Attached files

file filename
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - Relypsa Incd692360dex231.htm
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2014

Registration No. 333-                

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

Relypsa, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   2834   26-0893742

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

700 Saginaw Drive

Redwood City, CA 94063

(650) 421-9500

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

John A. Orwin

President and Chief Executive Officer

Relypsa, Inc.

700 Saginaw Drive

Redwood City, CA 94063

(650) 421-9500

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

Alan C. Mendelson, Esq.

Mark V. Roeder, Esq.

Latham & Watkins LLP

140 Scott Drive

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 328-4600

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600

 

Ronald A. Krasnow, Esq.

General Counsel, Senior Vice President

Relypsa, Inc.

700 Saginaw Drive

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 421-9500

Facsimile: (650) 421-9700

 

Patrick O’Brien, Esq.

Ropes & Gray LLP

Prudential Tower

800 Boylston Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02199

Telephone: (617) 951-7000

Facsimile: (617) 951-7050

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.  ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

Title of securities to be registered  

Proposed
maximum
aggregate

offering price (1)(2)

 

Amount of

registration fee

Common stock, $0.001 par value per share

  $115,000,000   $14,812

 

 

(1) Includes $15,000,000 of shares of common stock that may be purchased by the underwriters pursuant to an option to purchase additional shares.
(2) Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on the basis of the maximum aggregate offering price.

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 19, 2014

$100,000,000

 

 

 

LOGO

Common Stock

 

 

We are offering shares of our common stock with an aggregate public offering price of approximately $100,000,000 in this offering. Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RLYP.” On March 14, 2014, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $43.62 per share.

We are an emerging growth company under the federal securities laws and are subject to reduced public company reporting requirements.

 

 

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk factors” beginning on page 9.

 

     Per share      Total  

Public offering price

   $                $            

Underwriting discounts and commissions

   $         $     

Proceeds, before expenses, to us

   $         $     

We intend to grant the underwriters the right to purchase up to approximately $15,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock from us, at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters can exercise this right at any time within 30 days after the date of this prospectus.

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York on         , 2014.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

 

Morgan Stanley   BofA Merrill Lynch
Cowen and Company

, 2014


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

 

     Page  

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

     1   

RISK FACTORS

     9   

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     48   

MARKET, INDUSTRY AND OTHER DATA

     50   

USE OF PROCEEDS

     51   

PRICE RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK

     52   

CAPITALIZATION

     53   

DILUTION

     54   

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

     56   

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

     60   

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

     66   

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS

     69   

UNDERWRITING

     74   

LEGAL MATTERS

     82   

EXPERTS

     82   

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

     82   

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

     83   

 

 

Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We and the underwriters are offering to sell shares of common stock and seeking offers to buy shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common stock.

Relypsa and our logo are some of our trademarks used in this prospectus. This prospectus also includes trademarks, tradenames, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and tradenames referred to in this prospectus appear without the ™ symbol, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and tradenames.

When we refer to patiromer in this document we are referring to our product candidate, RLY5016 for oral suspension.

 

i


Table of Contents

Prospectus Summary

This summary provides a general overview of selected information and does not contain all of the information you should consider before buying our common stock. Therefore, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the information incorporated by reference, before deciding to invest in our common stock. Investors should carefully consider the information set forth under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9. In this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or “Relypsa,” refer to Relypsa, Inc.

Our Company

We are a pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of non-absorbed polymeric drugs to treat disorders in the areas of renal, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. We have completed our two-part pivotal Phase 3 trial of our lead product candidate, patiromer, for the treatment of hyperkalemia, a life-threatening condition defined as abnormally elevated levels of potassium in the blood. The design of this pivotal Phase 3 trial was agreed to under a special protocol assessment, or SPA, with the United States, or U.S., Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. Each part of this trial met both its primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, with the results being both statistically significant and clinically meaningful. We expect to submit a New Drug Application, or NDA, with the FDA in the third quarter of 2014. Patiromer is a non-absorbed, optimized potassium binding polymer administered as a convenient oral suspension powder. In our clinical program, we have observed that daily administration of patiromer lowered, and maintained control of, serum potassium levels into the normal range in hyperkalemic subjects and was well tolerated. We have global royalty-free commercialization rights to patiromer, which has intellectual property protection in the U.S. until at least 2030. If approved by the FDA, we plan to commercialize patiromer for the treatment of hyperkalemia in the U.S. with an approximately 100 person specialty sales force targeting nephrologists and cardiologists.

Overview of Hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia, which can present chronically or acutely, can lead to severe medical complications, including life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death. Hyperkalemia is typically defined as a level of serum potassium, or potassium in the blood, greater than 5.0 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L). Patients with serum potassium greater than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L, which we define as moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia, were found in an independent study to have a 10-fold increase in their mortality rate within 24 hours. Causes and risk factors for hyperkalemia include reduced renal function, diabetes, extensive soft tissue injury, age, high dietary potassium intake and the use of medications such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, or RAAS, inhibitors.

Hyperkalemia occurs most frequently in patients with chronic kidney disease, or CKD, where the ability of the patient’s kidney to excrete potassium has been compromised. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of RAAS inhibitors to preserve kidney function and delay the progression of renal failure to end stage renal disease, or ESRD; however, RAAS inhibitors have the well-recognized side effect of causing or worsening hyperkalemia, thereby limiting their use. In addition to CKD patients, hyperkalemia is also observed in heart failure, or HF, patients, for whom RAAS inhibitors have demonstrated a decrease in all-cause mortality.

 

 

1


Table of Contents

Unmet Need in Hyperkalemia

In the U.S., current treatment options for the chronic management of hyperkalemia are limited. These options include dietary potassium restriction, potassium-wasting diuretics or sodium polystyrene sulfonate, or SPS (e.g., Kayexalate®). SPS, first marketed in 1958, is currently the only drug on the market in the U.S. that is indicated for the treatment of hyperkalemia; however, it has a poor tolerability profile. SPS’ product labeling includes warnings of serious and potentially fatal gastrointestinal, or GI, side effects, and therefore, we believe that its use as a daily treatment option over the long term is limited.

The discontinuation or reduction in the dose of RAAS inhibitors is a common intervention for patients taking RAAS inhibitors who show abnormally elevated serum potassium levels. RAAS inhibitors are a first-line treatment for hypertension and to delay CKD progression under widely accepted treatment guidelines and are recommended in the majority of patients with CKD and/or HF. However, due to their side effect of causing or worsening hyperkalemia, physicians have indicated that they are caught in a dilemma of choosing to treat their HF and CKD patients with RAAS inhibitors, thereby running the risk of inducing a life-threatening hyperkalemic state or avoiding these drugs and depriving patients of the morbidity and mortality benefits that RAAS inhibitors confer. To manage this dilemma, both HF and CKD guidelines, as well as the drug labels, advise dose reductions or discontinuation of the RAAS inhibitors if a patient develops hyperkalemia.

Our Solution—Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia

We have designed patiromer to efficiently bind and remove potassium from the body, thereby treating hyperkalemia. Top line data from the first part, Part A, of our pivotal Phase 3 trial showed a statistically significant mean serum potassium reduction of 1.01 mEq/L, which was also clinically meaningful with 76% of subjects having their serum potassium in the normal range at week 4. In addition, top line data from the second part of the trial, Part B, showed that, after controlling serum potassium in Part A, the estimated median increase from Part B baseline in serum potassium was 0.72 and zero in subjects randomized to placebo and in subjects that remained on patiromer, respectively, with the difference between the groups being statistically significant. Further, the difference was clinically meaningful with hyperkalemia recurring at any time during Part B in significantly more subjects randomized to placebo than in subjects who continued to receive patiromer. The positive results from both parts of the pivotal study indicate that patiromer is an effective treatment for hyperkalemia and that chronic dosing with patiromer reduces the recurrence of hyperkalemia. These positive Phase 3 results are supported by top line results from our 52-week Phase 2b trial, which also demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in serum potassium at 4 weeks, with 86% to 90% of subjects having their serum potassium in the target range at 52 weeks, demonstrating the ability of patiromer to control serum potassium over the long term. We believe that patiromer, if approved, will be the first drug approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia with a tolerability profile that enables chronic daily administration.

Patient Populations of Interest

We believe a significant commercial opportunity exists for patiromer, and we plan to initially market patiromer in the U.S. to a subset of the approximately 7,000 nephrologists, as well as cardiologists

 

 

2


Table of Contents

associated with a targeted group of major HF centers, who treat patients in one or more of the following categories:

 

   

Patients with existing moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia.    We believe the prevalence of moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia is between 20 to 40% in stage 3 and 4 CKD patients and HF patients. Therefore, we estimate that there are approximately 2.4 million CKD and HF patients in the U.S. with moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia being treated by a nephrologist or cardiologist. Many of these patients are being treated with RAAS inhibitors due to their benefits for CKD and HF patients. Based on our market research, approximately 80% of physicians surveyed indicated that they are likely to intervene with some form of treatment for hyperkalemia by the time a patient’s serum potassium level reaches 5.5 mEq/L. Accordingly, we view these patients as a readily identifiable initial patient population likely to be prescribed patiromer.

 

   

Patients with existing mild hyperkalemia.    While physicians surveyed indicated that they are most likely to intervene with a treatment for hyperkalemia when a patient has a serum potassium level of greater than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L, approximately 40% of these physicians indicated that they would likely intervene with a treatment for hyperkalemia at a serum potassium level of less than 5.5 mEq/L, which we define as mild hyperkalemia. We believe that a safe, effective and well-tolerated daily use chronic therapy such as patiromer would be useful for patients in this category, in particular for those patients who have a history of recurrent episodes of hyperkalemia.

 

   

Patients not currently taking a RAAS inhibitor or who have had their RAAS inhibitor dose reduced to address their hyperkalemia.    There are approximately 13.9 million stage 3 or 4 CKD patients and 3.7 million non-CKD HF patients in the U.S. We believe that 60 to 70% of these patients are treated by a nephrologist or cardiologist, and that the majority of these patients currently are not receiving RAAS inhibitors, or are receiving sub-optimal RAAS inhibitor dosing, in part because they have developed hyperkalemia from these treatments. Our market research indicates that for about 90% of nephrologists, hyperkalemia is the top concern with RAAS inhibitor therapy, and that about 90% of specialist physicians would use a drug with patiromer’s clinical profile for the treatment of hyperkalemia in this type of patient. We believe that, with the introduction of a safe, effective and well-tolerated daily use chronic treatment option for hyperkalemia, physicians may increase their RAAS inhibitor usage in patients who have hyperkalemia by either maintaining their RAAS inhibitor therapy, increasing the doses of their RAAS inhibitor where indicated or by reinitiating RAAS inhibitor medications.

Clinical Development

We have conducted a robust clinical development program in which daily administration of patiromer has been observed by us to lower, and maintain control of, serum potassium levels in hyperkalemic subjects with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. Our clinical development program consists of our completed two-part pivotal Phase 3 trial, four completed Phase 2 trials, two completed Phase 1 trials and one ongoing Phase 1 onset-of-action trial. In our Phase 3 and Phase 2b trials, we observed that patiromer, when administered in pre-dialysis CKD subjects on RAAS inhibitors:

 

   

Provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in serum potassium levels, meeting the primary efficacy endpoints in each trial;

 

 

3


Table of Contents
   

Reduced serum potassium levels into the normal range in the substantial majority of subjects;

 

   

Significantly reduced the recurrence of hyperkalemia in subjects after serum potassium levels were controlled compared to subjects taking placebo; and

 

   

Maintained average serum potassium within the normal range for up to 1 year, demonstrating the ability of patiromer to control serum potassium over the long-term.

The completed pivotal Phase 3 trial was conducted under an SPA and consisted of two parts: an open-label treatment part (Part A) and a placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal part (Part B). As part of the SPA, each part of the trial was intended to serve as one of two pivotal trials required for NDA submission. Part A, which met both the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, with the results being both statistically significant and clinically meaningful, was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of patiromer in the treatment of hyperkalemia. Part B, which also met both the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, was designed to provide additional evidence that chronic administration with patiromer maintains control of serum potassium levels and that once patiromer treatment is withdrawn, hyperkalemia recurs.

Our Strategy

Our strategy is to develop and commercialize a product portfolio of novel therapeutics to treat disorders in the areas of renal, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The key elements of our strategy are to:

 

   

Obtain FDA approval to market our lead product candidate, patiromer, for the treatment of hyperkalemia.

 

   

Commercialize patiromer in the U.S. with a specialty sales force of approximately 100 sales representatives focused on a subset of the approximately 7,000 nephrologists, as well as cardiologists associated with a targeted group of major HF centers, treating our patient populations of interest.

 

   

Leverage our commercial and research infrastructure to create a pipeline over time using our proprietary polymer drug discovery technology and/or by selectively pursuing commercially synergistic in-licensing or acquisition of additional compounds.

Management Team

Members of our management team have played central roles at prior companies, including Affymax, Inc., KAI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Fibrogen, Inc. and Saltigo GmbH, in discovering, developing and commercializing therapeutics, several in the renal field, including Omontys, KAI-4169 and Kiklin®.

 

 

4


Table of Contents

Risks to Our Business

Our business is subject to numerous risks, as more fully described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” immediately following this prospectus summary. These risks include, among others:

 

   

We have a limited operating history, have incurred significant losses and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

 

   

We will require substantial additional financing.

 

   

We are substantially dependent on the success of our lead product candidate, patiromer.

 

   

We may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for the commercialization of patiromer.

 

   

Even if patiromer obtains regulatory approval, it may never achieve market acceptance or commercial success.

 

   

If our intellectual property related to patiromer or any future product candidates is not adequate, we may not be able to compete effectively.

Corporate Information

We were founded in August 2007 as a Delaware corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 700 Saginaw Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063, and our telephone number is (650) 421-9500. Our web site address is www.relypsa.com.

The information on, or that can be accessed through, our web site is not part of this prospectus. We have included our web site address as an inactive textual reference only.

 

 

5


Table of Contents

The Offering

 

Issuer

Relypsa, Inc.

 

Common stock we are offering

Approximately $100,000,000 of shares of our common stock

 

Common stock to be outstanding after the offering

32,006,894 shares

 

Underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares

Approximately $15,000,000 of shares of our common stock

 

Use of proceeds

We currently expect to use the substantial majority of the net proceeds from this offering to fund the ongoing development and preparation for potential commercialization of patiromer, including the preparation and submission of our NDA for patiromer, to support our activities during the FDA’s review and approval process and pre-commercialization marketing activities for patiromer, and any remaining proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, including research and development. See “Use of Proceeds” on page 51 for a more complete description of the intended use of proceeds from this offering.

 

Risk factors

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9 and other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors that you should consider carefully before deciding to invest in our common stock.

 

Symbol on The NASDAQ Global Select Market

“RLYP”

The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on 29,714,368 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2013, and excludes the following:

 

   

3,544,810 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2013 having a weighted-average exercise price of $5.63 per share;

 

   

64,021 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2013 having a weighted-average exercise price of $9.51 per share;

 

   

1,232,978 shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to future awards under our 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as well as any automatic increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan; and

 

   

255,317 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as well as any automatic increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan.

Unless otherwise indicated, the number of shares of our common stock described above assumes no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares.

 

 

6


Table of Contents

Summary Financial Data

The following tables set forth a summary of our historical financial data as of, and for the period ended on, the dates indicated. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the period from October 29, 2007 (date of inception) through December 31, 2013, as well as the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013, are derived from our audited financial statements incorporated by reference in this prospectus from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. You should read this data together with our audited financial statements and related notes, as well as the information under the captions “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.

 

     Year Ended December 31,     Period From
October 29, 2007
(Inception)
Through
December 31,
2013
 
     2011     2012     2013    
                       (unaudited)  
     (in thousands, except share and per share data)  

Statement of Operations Data:

        

Operating expenses:

        

Research and development

   $ 20,363      $ 36,052      $ 58,971      $ 168,124   

General and administrative

     5,164        7,285        11,940        35,813   

Acquired in-process research and development

                          6,823   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     25,527        43,337        70,911        210,760   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from operations

     (25,527     (43,337     (70,911     (210,760

Interest and other income (expense), net

     123        (382     (1,481     (463

Interest expense

     (419     (6     (1,453     (4,933
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

     (25,823     (43,725     (73,845     (216,156
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred stock extinguishment

                          9,711   

Deemed dividend to preferred stockholders

            (18,716     (7,336     (26,052
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders

   $ (25,823   $ (62,441   $ (81,181   $ (232,497
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per share information:

        

Net loss attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted

   $ (104.33   $ (205.45   $ (22.42  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Weighted-average common shares used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted(1)

     247,507        303,927        3,620,235     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

(1) The net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted, does not give effect to the issuance of shares from the proposed public offering nor do they give effect to potential dilutive securities where the impact would be anti-dilutive. See Note 2 to our audited financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein.

 

 

7


Table of Contents

The table below presents our balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013:

 

   

on an actual basis; and

 

   

on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the sale of 2,292,526 shares of common stock in this offering based on the last reported sale price of our common stock, or $43.62 per share, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

     As of December 31, 2013  
     Actual     As Adjusted  
    

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

Balance Sheet Data:

    

Cash, cash equivalents and short term investments

   $ 94,759      $ 188,059   

Working capital

     78,828        172,128   

Total assets

     106,031        199,331   

Debt

     13,670        13,670   

Deficit accumulated during development stage

     (225,840     (225,840

Total stockholders’ equity

     74,850        168,150   

 

 

8


Table of Contents

Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves significant risks, some of which are described below. You should carefully consider these risks, as well as the other information in this prospectus, including the information incorporated by reference, before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business.

Risks Related to Our Limited Operating History, Financial Condition and Capital Requirements

We have a limited operating history, have incurred significant losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. We have only one product candidate in clinical trials and no commercial sales, which, together with our limited operating history, makes it difficult to assess our future viability.

We are a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company with a limited operating history. Pharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. To date, we have focused principally on developing our lead product candidate, patiromer, which is our only product in clinical development. We are not profitable and have incurred losses in each year since our inception in August 2007. We have only a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects. In addition, we have limited experience and have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully overcome many of the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry. We have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. We continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. Our net loss for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $73.8 million, $43.7 million and $25.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $225.8 million. We expect to continue to incur losses for at least the next few years, and we anticipate these losses will increase as we continue our development of, seek regulatory approval for, and begin to commercialize, patiromer. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Our prior losses, combined with expected future losses, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital.

We will require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals, and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed on acceptable terms, or at all, could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development, other operations or commercialization efforts.

Since our inception, most of our resources have been dedicated to the nonclinical and clinical development of our lead product candidate, patiromer. As of December 31, 2013, we had working capital of $78.8 million and capital resources consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $94.8 million. We believe that we will continue to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable future as we continue development, seek regulatory approval, and prepare for the commercialization of patiromer and develop any other product candidates we may choose to pursue. These expenditures will include costs associated with research and development, sales and marketing, conducting nonclinical studies and clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, and manufacturing and supply. In addition, other

 

9


Table of Contents

unanticipated costs may arise. Because the outcome of any clinical trial and/or regulatory approval process is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully complete the development, regulatory approval process and commercialization of patiromer and any future product candidates. As of December 31, 2013, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, plus access to the $7.5 million tranche pursuant to our term loan, will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months. However, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or private equity, debt financings or other sources, such as strategic collaborations. Such financing may result in dilution to stockholders, imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations, or other restrictions that may affect our business. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans.

Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

 

   

the time and cost necessary to obtain regulatory approvals for patiromer and the costs of post-marketing studies that could be required by regulatory authorities;

 

   

the costs of obtaining commercial supplies of patiromer;

 

   

our ability to successfully commercialize patiromer;

 

   

the manufacturing, selling and marketing costs associated with patiromer, including the cost and timing of expanding our sales and marketing capabilities;

 

   

the amount of sales and other revenues from patiromer, including the sales price and the availability of adequate third-party reimbursement;

 

   

the cash requirements of any future acquisitions or discovery of product candidates;

 

   

the progress, timing, scope and costs of our nonclinical studies and clinical trials, including the ability to enroll patients in a timely manner for potential future clinical trials;

 

   

the draw down, if any, of the $7.5 million tranche pursuant to our term loan;

 

   

the time and cost necessary to respond to technological and market developments; and

 

   

the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights.

Additional funds may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate:

 

   

clinical trials or other development activities for patiromer or any future product candidate;

 

   

our research and development activities; or

 

   

our establishment of sales and marketing capabilities or other activities that may be necessary to commercialize patiromer or any future product candidate.

 

10


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Business

We are substantially dependent on the success of our lead product candidate, patiromer.

To date, we have invested substantially all of our efforts and financial resources in the research and development of patiromer, which is currently our lead product candidate and only product candidate in clinical trials. In particular, we have completed two Phase 1 and four Phase 2 trials and our pivotal Phase 3 trial, for which we reported positive primary and secondary efficacy endpoint results for the first part in September 2013 and positive primary and secondary efficacy endpoint results for the second part in October 2013.

Our near-term prospects, including our ability to finance our operations and generate revenue, will depend heavily on the successful development and commercialization of patiromer. The clinical and commercial success of patiromer will depend on a number of factors, including the following:

 

   

the timely completion of our ongoing Phase 1 onset-of-action trial, which will depend substantially upon the satisfactory performance of third-party contractors;

 

   

the timely submission and filing of our NDA for patiromer, including completion of our testing and analysis of clinical and non-clinical data;

 

   

our ability to demonstrate patiromer’s safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA;

 

   

whether we are required by the FDA to conduct additional clinical trials prior to any approval to market patiromer;

 

   

the prevalence and severity of adverse side effects of patiromer;

 

   

the timely receipt of necessary marketing approvals from the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities;

 

   

our ability to successfully commercialize patiromer, if approved for marketing and sale by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, whether alone or in collaboration with others;

 

   

the ability of our third-party manufacturers to manufacture quantities of patiromer using commercially sufficient processes and at a scale sufficient to meet anticipated demand and enable us to reduce our cost of manufacturing;

 

   

our success in educating physicians and patients about the benefits, administration and use of patiromer;

 

   

achieving and maintaining compliance with all regulatory requirements applicable to patiromer;

 

   

acceptance of patiromer as safe and effective by patients and the medical community;

 

   

the availability, perceived advantages, relative cost, relative safety and relative efficacy of alternative and competing treatments;

 

   

our ability to obtain and sustain an adequate level of reimbursement for patiromer by third-party payors;

 

   

the effectiveness of our own or any future strategic collaborators’ marketing, sales and distribution strategy and operations;

 

   

the ability of our third-party manufacturers to manufacture supplies of patiromer or any future product candidates and to develop, validate and maintain a commercially viable manufacturing process that is compliant with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP;

 

11


Table of Contents
   

our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights in and to patiromer;

 

   

our ability to avoid third-party patent interference or patent infringement claims; and

 

   

a continued acceptable safety profile of patiromer following any approval.

Many of these factors are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will ever be able to generate revenue through the sale of patiromer. If we are not successful in commercializing patiromer, or are significantly delayed in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

We may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for patiromer under applicable regulatory requirements.

To gain approval to market a drug product, we must provide the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities with clinical data that adequately demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the product for the intended indication applied for in the NDA or other respective regulatory filing. Drug development is a long, expensive and uncertain process, and delay or failure can occur at any stage of any of our clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry, including biotechnology companies, have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials even after promising results in earlier nonclinical or clinical studies. These setbacks have been caused by, among other things, nonclinical findings made while clinical studies were underway and safety or efficacy observations made in clinical studies, including previously unreported adverse events. Success in nonclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and the results of clinical trials by other parties may not be indicative of the results in trials we may conduct.

Our business currently depends entirely on the successful development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our lead product candidate, patiromer. Based on the results of our Phase 2b and pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials, we plan to prepare and file an NDA with the FDA seeking marketing approval for the use of patiromer for the treatment of hyperkalemia. We believe that these results warrant this filing. However, the clinical data have only become available recently and additional information will arise from our continuing analysis of the data and such additional data or analyses may be less favorable than the information we have currently or than what we anticipate. Moreover, we are currently completing data analysis from our clinical trials and conducting additional non-clinical drug-drug interaction studies, both of which we will need, and plan, to complete prior to submitting our NDA; however, we may be unable to complete all such analyses and studies within our planned timeline.

Furthermore, patiromer may not receive marketing approval despite having achieved its specified endpoints in clinical trials. Although the design of our pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial was agreed to under an SPA with the FDA, the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in evaluating the results of this trial and our earlier trials. For example, notwithstanding our view to the contrary, the FDA may determine that the efficacy data and/or safety data from our Phase 2b and pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials do not support approval of an NDA for patiromer. Clinical data often is susceptible to varying interpretations and many companies that have believed that their products performed satisfactorily in clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain FDA approval for their products. The FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our trial design and our interpretation of data from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. Upon the FDA’s review of the data in our NDA, it may request that we conduct additional analyses and, if it believes that such data are not satisfactory, could advise us that patiromer is not approvable with the filed data package. In addition,

 

12


Table of Contents

the FDA’s initial review of the NDA could find deficiencies in the submission and the FDA could refuse the NDA for filing until we resolve the identified deficiencies.

Based on these factors, we may not submit our NDA for patiromer within our anticipated time frame and, even after we make the submission, the FDA may not accept the filing, may request additional information from us, including data from additional clinical and/or non-clinical trials, and, ultimately, may not grant marketing approval for patiromer.

The denial or delay of regulatory approval for patiromer would delay commercialization of patiromer and adversely impact our ability to generate revenue, our business and our results of operations.

If we are not successful in commercializing patiromer, or are significantly delayed in doing so, our business will be materially harmed and we may need to curtail or cease operations. We currently have no drug products approved for sale, and we may never obtain regulatory approval to commercialize patiromer. The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, sale, marketing and distribution of drug products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the U.S. and other countries, and such regulations differ from country to country. We are not permitted to market patiromer in the U.S. until we receive approval of an NDA from the FDA.

The FDA or any foreign regulatory bodies can delay, limit or deny approval to market patiromer for many reasons, including:

 

   

our inability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory body that patiromer is safe and effective for the requested indication;

 

   

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s disagreement with the interpretation of data from nonclinical studies or clinical trials;

 

   

our inability to demonstrate that the clinical and other benefits of patiromer outweigh any safety or other perceived risks;

 

   

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s requirement for additional nonclinical or clinical studies;

 

   

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s non-approval of the formulation, labeling and/or the specifications of patiromer;

 

   

the FDA’s or the applicable foreign regulatory agency’s failure to approve the manufacturing processes or third-party manufacturers with which we contract; or

 

   

the potential for approval policies or regulations of the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agencies to significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

Of the large number of drugs in development, only a small percentage successfully complete the FDA or other regulatory approval processes and are commercialized.

Even if we eventually complete clinical testing and receive approval of an NDA or foreign marketing authorization for patiromer, the FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly additional clinical trials which may be required after approval. The FDA or the applicable foreign regulatory agency may also approve patiromer for a more limited indication and/or a narrower patient population than we originally request, and the FDA, or applicable

 

13


Table of Contents

foreign regulatory agency, may not approve the labeling that we believe is necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of patiromer. Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approval would delay or prevent commercialization of patiromer and would materially adversely impact our business and prospects.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results.

Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Furthermore, we rely on contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and, while we have agreements governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of nonclinical and clinical studies of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. For example, the positive results generated to date in clinical studies for patiromer do not ensure that our Phase 3 clinical trials will demonstrate similar results. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier studies, and we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. Even if our clinical trials are completed, the results may not be sufficient to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

Although we have completed patient enrollment in our Phase 1 onset-of-action trial for patiromer, we may experience delays in obtaining and analyzing data from this trial, and we do not know whether future clinical trials, if any, will begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll an adequate number of patients on time or be completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials can be delayed or aborted for a variety of reasons, including delay or failure to:

 

   

obtain regulatory approval to commence a trial, if applicable;

 

   

reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

 

   

obtain institutional review board, or IRB, approval at each site;

 

   

recruit suitable patients to participate in a trial;

 

   

have patients complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;

 

   

ensure that clinical sites observe trial protocol or continue to participate in a trial;

 

   

address any patient safety concerns that arise during the course of a trial;

 

   

address any conflicts with new or existing laws or regulations;

 

   

initiate or add a sufficient number of clinical trial sites; or

 

   

manufacture sufficient quantities of product candidate for use in clinical trials.

Patient enrollment is a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials and is affected by many factors, including the size and nature of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, competing clinical trials and clinicians’

 

14


Table of Contents

and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs or treatments that may be approved for the indications we are investigating.

We could also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by an independent Safety Review Board, or SRB, for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may suspend or terminate a clinical trial due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.

Further, conducting clinical trials in foreign countries, as we have historically done, presents additional risks that may delay completion of our clinical trials. These risks include the failure of physicians or enrolled patients in foreign countries to adhere to clinical protocol as a result of differences in healthcare services or cultural customs, managing additional administrative burdens associated with foreign regulatory schemes, as well as political and economic risks relevant to such foreign countries. In addition, the FDA may determine that our clinical trial results obtained in foreign subjects do not represent the safety and efficacy of patiromer when administered in US patients and are thus not supportive of an NDA approval in the US.

If we experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates may be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

We rely on third parties to conduct some of our nonclinical studies and all of our clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize patiromer or any future product candidates.

We do not have the ability to independently conduct clinical trials and, in some cases, nonclinical studies. We rely on medical institutions, clinical investigators, contract laboratories, collaborative partners and other third parties, such as CROs, to conduct clinical trials on our drug candidates. The third parties with whom we contract for execution of our clinical trials play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. However, these third parties are not our employees, and except for contractual duties and obligations, we have limited ability to control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. Although we rely on these third parties to conduct some of our nonclinical studies and all of our clinical trials, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our nonclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with its investigational plan and protocol. Moreover, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with regulations and standards, including some regulations commonly

 

15


Table of Contents

referred to as good clinical practices, or cGCPs, for conducting, monitoring, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to ensure that the data and results are scientifically credible and accurate, and that the trial subjects are adequately informed of the potential risks of participating in clinical trials.

In addition, the execution of nonclinical studies and clinical trials, and the subsequent compilation and analysis of the data produced, requires coordination among various parties. In order for these functions to be carried out effectively and efficiently, it is imperative that these parties communicate and coordinate with one another. Moreover, these third parties may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. These third parties may terminate their agreements with us upon as little as 30 days’ prior written notice. Some of these agreements may also be terminated by such third parties under certain other circumstances, including our insolvency. If the third parties conducting our clinical trials do not perform their contractual duties or obligations, experience work stoppages, do not meet expected deadlines, terminate their agreements with us or need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical trial protocols or GCPs, or for any other reason, we may need to enter into new arrangements with alternative third parties, which could be difficult, costly or impossible, and our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated or may need to be repeated. If any of the foregoing were to occur, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize the product candidate being tested in such trials.

We rely completely on third-party suppliers to manufacture our clinical drug supply of patiromer, and we intend to rely on third parties to produce commercial supply of patiromer and nonclinical, clinical and commercial supplies of any future product candidate.

We do not currently have, nor do we plan to acquire, the infrastructure or internal capability to produce our commercial supply of patiromer and we lack the internal resources and the capability to manufacture any product candidates on a nonclinical, clinical or commercial scale. The FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory agencies must, pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit our NDA or relevant foreign regulatory submission, approve our contract manufactures to manufacture the active pharmaceutical ingredient and final drug product for patiromer, or any future product candidates.

We do not directly control the manufacturing of, and are completely dependent on, our contract manufacturers for compliance with the cGMP for manufacture of both active drug substances and finished drug products. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no direct control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. Furthermore, all of our contract manufacturers are engaged with other companies to supply and/or manufacture materials or products for such companies, which exposes our manufacturers to regulatory risks for the production of such materials and products. As a result, failure to meet the regulatory requirements for the production of those materials and products may generally affect the regulatory clearance of our contract manufacturers’ facility. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory agency does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws its approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would negatively impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved.

 

16


Table of Contents

We and our third-party suppliers continue to refine and improve the manufacturing process, certain aspects of which are complex and unique, and we may encounter difficulties with new or existing processes, particularly as we seek to significantly increase our capacity to commercialize patiromer. For example, we have analyzed the impurities identified in the most recently manufactured registration batches of patiromer and we believe the levels of impurities, including the levels of genotoxic and special toxicological concern impurities, are below the suggested guidance recommendations; however, toxicological assessments might change based on our future findings. Our reliance on contract manufacturers also exposes us to the possibility that they, or third parties with access to their facilities, will have access to and may appropriate our trade secrets or other proprietary information.

Our current drug substance and finished drug product are acquired from our single-source suppliers. The loss of these suppliers, or their failure to supply us with the drug substance or the finished drug product, would materially and adversely affect our business.

We currently operate under a multi-year Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Lanxess Corporation, or Lanxess, as our drug substance supplier; however, we do not currently have an alternative supplier of drug substance under contract or whom we plan to submit as a supplier with our NDA for patiromer. Although we have obtained drug substance for clinical trial uses under an arrangement with an alternate supplier, we do not have a commercial supply agreement in place with such alternate supplier. We currently have an arrangement with Patheon Inc., or Patheon, under which we issue purchase orders for the supply of finished drug product; however, we do not have an alternative supplier of finished drug product. Although we have entered into a long-term commercial supply arrangement with Lanxess, we may be unable do so with Patheon or alternative suppliers and manufacturers or do so on commercially reasonable terms, which would have a material adverse impact upon our business.

In addition, we currently rely on our contract manufacturers to purchase from third-party suppliers the materials necessary to produce patiromer, including all of the starting/raw materials and excipient, such as methyl-2-fluoro-acrylate monomer, or MFA. We do not have direct control over the acquisition of those materials by our contract manufacturers. Moreover, outside of our single-source suppliers, we currently do not have any agreements for the commercial production of those materials.

We are dependent on the approval of additional drug substance and drug product suppliers to ensure sufficient supply to meet our anticipated market demand and to reduce the manufacturing cost of patiromer. Our inability to obtain approval for additional suppliers and/or the inability of our suppliers to achieve larger scale production, would materially and adversely affect our business.

Polymeric-based drugs like patiromer generally require large quantities of drug substance, as compared to small molecule drugs. Thus, we will require larger scale and/or multiple suppliers of drug substance and drug product in order to produce sufficient quantities of patiromer to meet our anticipated market demand. Our current supplier of drug substance, Lanxess, does not currently have the capacity to manufacture patiromer in the quantities that we believe will be sufficient to meet anticipated market demand. Our business plan assumes that we are able to develop a supply chain with multiple suppliers and significantly decrease our cost of goods within the first several years of commercialization of patiromer, enabling us to achieve gross margins similar to those achieved by other companies that produce non-absorbed polymeric drugs. If we are unable to reduce the manufacturing cost of patiromer, our operating results will suffer and our ability to achieve profitability will be significantly jeopardized.

 

17


Table of Contents

Because we plan to submit our NDA with single source suppliers for drug substance and drug product, we will need to obtain approval from the FDA for these additional suppliers, including approval for the testing necessary to prove equivalence of drug substance and product produced by the additional suppliers. Further, we are dependent on our drug substance and product suppliers to be able to fully scale up the production of patiromer as well as validate certain process improvements in order to reach the quantities we anticipate needing.

We are also dependent upon the appropriate sourcing of starting/raw material, including large quantities, measured in metric tons, of MFA. While we believe there are multiple alternative suppliers of MFA, we will need our drug substance suppliers to qualify these alternate MFA suppliers to prevent a possible disruption of the manufacture of the starting materials necessary to produce patiromer. If our drug substance manufacturer is unable to source, or we are unable to purchase, MFA on acceptable terms, of sufficient quality, and in adequate quantities, if at all, the ability of patiromer to reach its market potential, or any future product candidates to be launched would be delayed or there would be a shortage in supply, which would impair our ability to generate revenues from the sale of patiromer or any future product candidates.

If there is a disruption to our contract manufacturers’ or suppliers’ relevant operations, we will have no other means of producing patiromer until they restore the affected facilities or we or they procure alternative manufacturing facilities. Additionally, any damage to or destruction of our contract manufacturers’ or suppliers’ facilities or equipment may significantly impair our ability to manufacture patiromer on a timely basis.

If we fail to establish an effective distribution process utilizing cold chain logistics for patiromer, our business may be adversely affected.

We do not currently have the infrastructure necessary for distributing pharmaceutical products to patients. We intend to contract with a third-party logistics company to warehouse these products and distribute them, and we will require that patiromer be maintained at a controlled temperature for some of the distribution chain. This distribution network will require significant coordination with our sales and marketing and finance teams. Failure to secure contracts with a logistics company could negatively impact the distribution of patiromer, and failure to coordinate financial systems could negatively impact our ability to accurately report product revenue. If we are unable to effectively establish and manage the distribution process, the commercial launch and sales of patiromer will be delayed or severely compromised and our results of operations may be harmed.

In addition, the use of cold chain logistics for patiromer involves certain risks, including, but not limited to, risks that distributors or pharmacies will:

 

   

not provide us with accurate or timely information regarding their inventories, the number of patients who are using patiromer, or any complaints regarding it;

 

   

not effectively sell or support patiromer with sufficient cold storage;

 

   

reduce their efforts or discontinue to sell or support patiromer;

 

   

not devote the resources necessary to sell patiromer in the volumes and within the time frames that we expect;

 

   

be unable to satisfy financial obligations to us or others; or

 

   

cease operations.

 

18


Table of Contents

Patiromer has a limited room temperature shelf life, and if we do not effectively maintain our cold chain supply logistics, then we may experience an unusual number of product returns or out of date product. Any such failure may result in decreased product sales and lower product revenue, which would harm our business.

Even if patiromer or any future product candidates obtain regulatory approval, they may never achieve market acceptance or commercial success, which will depend, in part, upon the degree of acceptance among physicians, patients, patient advocacy groups, health care payors and the medical community.

Even if we obtain FDA or other regulatory approvals, patiromer or any future product candidates may not achieve market acceptance among physicians and patients, and may not be commercially successful. Patiromer may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, patient advocacy groups, health care payors and the medical community. Market acceptance of patiromer or any future product candidates for which we receive approval depends on a number of factors, including:

 

   

the efficacy of the product as demonstrated in clinical trials;

 

   

the prevalence and severity of any side effects and overall safety profile of the product;

 

   

the clinical indications for which the product is approved;

 

   

advantages over existing therapies, such as, in the case of patiromer, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (e.g., Kayexalate®);

 

   

acceptance by physicians, major operators of clinics and patients of the product as a safe and effective chronic daily treatment;

 

   

relative convenience and ease of administration of our products;

 

   

the potential and perceived advantages of our product candidates over current treatment options or alternative treatments, including future alternative treatments;

 

   

the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments and willingness to pay for our products, if approved, on the part of physicians and patients;

 

   

relative convenience and ease of administration;

 

   

the availability of products and their ability to meet market demand, including a reliable supply for long-term daily treatment;

 

   

the strength of our marketing and distribution organizations;

 

   

the quality of our relationships with patient advocacy groups; and

 

   

sufficient third-party coverage or reimbursement.

Any failure by our product candidates that obtain regulatory approval to achieve market acceptance or commercial success would adversely affect our results of operations.

Patiromer, if approved, may face significant competition and our failure to effectively compete may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration.

The pharmaceutical market is highly competitive and dynamic, and is characterized by rapid and substantial technological development and product innovations. We are seeking regulatory approval of

 

19


Table of Contents

patiromer for the treatment of hyperkalemia. While current options for the chronic management of hyperkalemia are limited, we expect to compete against well-known treatment options, including sodium polystyrene sulfonate (e.g., Kayexalate®). In addition, ZS Pharma is developing a zirconium silicate particle to treat hyperkalemia, which recently completed a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial. In order to compete successfully in this market, we will have to demonstrate that the treatment of hyperkalemia with patiromer is a worthwhile treatment and is a superior alternative to existing or new therapies for hyperkalemia.

We face significant competition from many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are also researching and selling products designed to address these markets. Many of our competitors have materially greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, research and drug development resources than we do. Large pharmaceutical companies in particular have extensive expertise in nonclinical and clinical testing and in obtaining regulatory approvals for drugs. In addition, academic institutions, government agencies, and other public and private organizations conducting research may seek patent protection with respect to potentially competitive products or technologies. These organizations may also establish exclusive collaborative or licensing relationships with our competitors.

Failure to effectively compete against established treatment options for hyperkalemia or in the future with new products currently in development would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently have no sales organization. If we are unable to establish sales capabilities on our own or through third parties, we may not be able to market and sell patiromer, if approved, or any future product candidates or generate product revenue.

We currently do not have a sales organization. In order to commercialize patiromer in the U.S., we must build our marketing, sales, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in doing so. If patiromer receives regulatory approval, we expect to establish a specialty sales organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize our product candidates, which will be expensive and time consuming. We have no prior experience in the marketing, sale and distribution of pharmaceutical products and there are significant risks involved in building and managing a sales organization, including our ability to hire, retain, and incentivize qualified individuals, generate sufficient sales leads, provide adequate training to sales and marketing personnel, and effectively manage a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the commercialization of these products. Further, given our lack of prior experience in marketing, selling and distributing pharmaceutical products, our initial estimate of 100 specialty sales representatives may be materially less than the actual number of sales representatives required to effectively commercialize patiromer. As such, we may be required to hire substantially more sales representatives to adequately support the commercialization of patiromer. We may choose to collaborate with third parties that have direct sales forces and established distribution systems, either to augment our own sales force and distribution systems or in lieu of our own sales force and distribution systems. If we are unable to enter into such arrangements on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize patiromer. If we are not successful in commercializing patiromer or any future product candidates, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future product revenue will suffer and we would incur significant additional losses.

 

20


Table of Contents

If we fail to obtain and sustain an adequate level of reimbursement for our products by third-party payors, sales would be adversely affected.

We expect patients who have hyperkalemia to need treatment throughout their lifetimes but anticipate that most patients will not be capable of paying for this treatment themselves. There will be no commercially viable market for patiromer without reimbursement from third-party payors. Additionally, even if there is a commercially viable market, if the level of reimbursement is below our expectations, our revenue and gross margins will be adversely affected.

Obtaining hospital formulary approval can be an expensive and time-consuming process. We cannot be certain if and when we will obtain formulary approval to allow us to sell patiromer or any future products into our target markets. Even if we do obtain formulary approval, third-party payors, such as government or private health care insurers, carefully review and increasingly question the coverage of, and challenge the prices charged for, drugs. Reimbursement rates from private health insurance companies vary depending on the company, the insurance plan and other factors. A current trend in the U.S. health care industry is toward cost containment. Large public and private payors, managed care organizations, group purchasing organizations and similar organizations are exerting increasing influence on decisions regarding the use of, and reimbursement levels for, particular treatments. Such third-party payors, including Medicare, are questioning the coverage of, and challenging the prices charged for medical products and services, and many third-party payors limit coverage of, or reimbursement for, newly approved health care products.

Cost-control initiatives could decrease the price we might establish for products, which could result in product revenues being lower than anticipated. If the prices for our products decrease or if governmental and other third-party payors do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels, our revenue and prospects for profitability will suffer. Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by country and by region, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country basis.

Our clinical drug development program may not uncover all possible adverse events that patients who take patiromer may experience. The number of subjects exposed to patiromer treatment and the average exposure time in the clinical development program may be inadequate to detect rare adverse events, or chance findings, that may only be detected once patiromer is administered to more patients and for greater periods of time.

Clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population. However, with a limited number of subjects and limited duration of exposure, we cannot be fully assured that rare and severe side effects of patiromer may only be uncovered with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to the drug. Further, we have not designed our clinical trials to determine the effect and safety consequences on total body potassium levels of lowering serum potassium over a multi-year period or to measure the safety of immediate reductions in serum potassium.

Although we have monitored the subjects in our studies for certain safety concerns and we have not seen evidence of significant safety concerns in our clinical trials, patients treated with patiromer, if approved, may experience adverse reactions. For example, we have seen some reductions in blood pressure in some of our clinical trials, which can lead to hypotension, and some reductions in serum magnesium in some patients in our clinical trials, which can lead to weakness, muscle cramps, cardiac arrhythmia, increased irritability of the nervous system with tremors and jerking, confusion or seizures.

 

21


Table of Contents

Although we have not seen any evidence of these reductions causing a safety concern in our clinical programs, it is possible that the FDA may ask for additional data regarding such matters. Further, a degradant of patiromer is calcium fluoride, which may lead to increased levels of fluoride in patients who take patiromer. Although none of the symptoms associated with acute fluoride toxicity have been reported in patiromer clinical studies, patients may experience this side effect. If safety problems occur or are identified after patiromer reaches the market, the FDA may require that we amend the labeling of patiromer, recall patiromer, or even withdraw approval for patiromer.

If product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of patiromer or any future product candidates.

We face an inherent risk of product liability as a result of the clinical testing of our product candidates and will face an even greater risk if we commercialize any products. For example, we may be sued if any product we develop allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability, and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

 

   

decreased demand for patiromer or any future product candidates;

 

   

injury to our reputation;

 

   

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

 

   

costs to defend the related litigation;

 

   

a diversion of management’s time and our resources;

 

   

substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients;

 

   

regulatory investigations, product recalls or withdrawals, or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions;

 

   

loss of revenue; and

 

   

the inability to commercialize patiromer or any future product candidates.

Our inability to obtain and maintain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost and scope of coverage to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of patiromer or any future products we develop. We currently carry product liability insurance covering use in our clinical trials in the amount of $5.0 million for each occurrence and $5.0 million in the aggregate. Although we maintain such insurance, any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our insurance policies also have various exclusions and deductibles, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. We will have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or that are not covered by our insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts. Moreover, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts

 

22


Table of Contents

to protect us against losses. If and when we obtain approval for marketing patiromer, we intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of patiromer. However, we may be unable to obtain this liability insurance on commercially reasonable terms.

We will need to significantly increase the size of our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing growth.

As of December 31, 2013, we had 73 full-time employees. We will need to continue to expand our managerial, operational, finance and other resources in order to manage our operations, regulatory filings, manufacturing and supply activities, marketing and commercialization activities, and clinical trials, and commercialize patiromer or any future product candidates. Our management, personnel, systems and facilities currently in place may not be adequate to support this future growth. Our need to effectively execute our growth strategy requires that we:

 

   

expand our general and administrative and sales and marketing organizations;

 

   

identify, recruit, retain, incentivize and integrate additional employees;

 

   

manage our internal development efforts effectively while carrying out our contractual obligations to third parties; and

 

   

continue to improve our operational, legal, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures.

If we fail to attract and keep senior management, we may be unable to successfully develop patiromer or any future product candidates, conduct our clinical trials and commercialize patiromer or any future product candidates.

Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified personnel. In particular, we are highly dependent upon our experienced senior management. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our product pipeline, completion of our planned clinical trials or the commercialization of patiromer or any future product candidates. Although we have entered into employment agreements with our senior management team, these agreements do not provide for a fixed term of service.

Although we have not historically experienced unique difficulties attracting and retaining qualified employees, we could experience such problems in the future. In addition, competition for qualified personnel in the biotechnology and pharmaceuticals field is intense due to the limited number of individuals who possess the skills and experience required by our industry. We will need to hire additional personnel as we expand our clinical development and commercial activities. We may not be able to attract and retain quality personnel on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, to the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or that they have divulged proprietary or other confidential information, or that their former employers own their research output.

 

23


Table of Contents

Our loan and security agreements contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business.

Our loan and security agreements contain various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions without our lenders’ prior consent. These covenants limit our ability to, among other things:

 

   

sell, transfer, lease or dispose of our assets;

 

   

create, incur or assume additional indebtedness;

 

   

encumber or permit liens on certain of our assets;

 

   

make restricted payments, including paying dividends on, repurchasing or making distributions with respect to our common stock;

 

   

make specified investments (including loans and advances);

 

   

consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and

 

   

enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

The covenants in our loan and security agreements may limit our ability to take certain actions and, in the event that we breach one or more covenants, our lenders may choose to declare an event of default and require that we immediately repay all amounts outstanding, plus penalties and interest, terminate their commitments to extend further credit and foreclose on the collateral granted to them to secure such indebtedness. Such repayment could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We will incur significant costs as a result of operating as a new public company, and our management will devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives. We may fail to comply with the rules that apply to public companies, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which could result in sanctions or other penalties that would harm our business.

We will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a new public company, including costs resulting from public company reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and regulations regarding corporate governance practices. The listing requirements of The NASDAQ Global Select Market require that we satisfy certain corporate governance requirements relating to director independence, distributing annual and interim reports, stockholder meetings, approvals and voting, soliciting proxies, conflicts of interest and a code of conduct. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements. Moreover, the reporting requirements, rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time consuming and costly. Any changes we make to comply with these obligations may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely basis, or at all. These reporting requirements, rules and regulations, coupled with the increase in potential litigation exposure associated with being a public company, could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or board committees or to serve as executive officers, or to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ insurance, on acceptable terms.

 

24


Table of Contents

In addition, we expect that we will need to implement an enterprise resource planning, or ERP, system for our company. An ERP system is intended to combine and streamline the management of our financial, accounting, human resources, sales and marketing and other functions, enabling us to manage operations and track performance more effectively. However, an ERP system would likely require us to complete many processes and procedures for the effective use of the system or to run our business using the system, which may result in substantial costs. Additionally, during the conversion process, we may be limited in our ability to convert any business that we acquire to the ERP. Any disruptions or difficulties in implementing or using an ERP system could adversely affect our controls and harm our business, including our ability to forecast or make sales and collect our receivables. Moreover, such disruption or difficulties could result in unanticipated costs and diversion of management attention.

We are subject to Section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, and the related rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, which generally require our management and independent registered public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Beginning with the year ended December 31, 2014, Section 404 requires an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. However, for so long as we remain an emerging growth company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or JOBS Act, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404. Once we are no longer an emerging growth company or, if prior to such date, we opt to no longer take advantage of the applicable exemption, we will be required to include an opinion from our independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our IPO (December 31, 2018), (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than an aggregate of $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

We have only evaluated, as of December 31, 2013, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) of the Exchange Act. To date, we have not conducted any other review of our internal control for the purpose of providing the reports required by Section 404 and the related SEC rules. During the course of our review and testing, we may identify deficiencies and be unable to remediate them before we must provide the required reports. Furthermore, if we have a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, we may not detect errors on a timely basis and our financial statements may be materially misstated. We or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, which could harm our operating results, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and cause the trading price of our stock to fall. In addition, as a public company we are required to file accurate and timely quarterly and annual reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act. Any failure to report our financial results on an accurate and timely basis could result in sanctions, lawsuits, delisting of our shares from The NASDAQ Global Select Market or other adverse consequences that would materially harm our business.

 

25


Table of Contents

If we are not successful in discovering, developing, acquiring or commercializing additional product candidates, our ability to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.

Although a substantial amount of our effort will focus on the continued clinical testing, potential approval and commercialization of patiromer, a key element of our strategy is to discover, develop and commercialize a portfolio of products utilizing proprietary discovery and development technology. We are seeking to do so through our internal research programs and/or by selectively pursuing commercially synergistic in-licensing or acquisition of additional compounds. All of our other potential product candidates remain in the discovery stage. Research programs to identify product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, whether or not any product candidates are ultimately identified. Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for many reasons, including the following:

 

   

the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential product candidates;

 

   

competitors may develop alternatives that render our product candidates obsolete or less attractive;

 

   

product candidates we develop may nevertheless be covered by third parties’ patents or other exclusive rights;

 

   

the market for a product candidate may change during our program so that such a product may become unreasonable to continue to develop;

 

   

a product candidate may on further study be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate it is unlikely to be effective or otherwise does not meet applicable regulatory criteria;

 

   

a product candidate may not be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all; and

 

   

a product candidate may not be accepted as safe and effective by patients, the medical community or third-party payors, if applicable.

If we fail to develop and successfully commercialize other product candidates, our business and future prospects may be harmed and our business will be more vulnerable to any problems that we encounter in developing and commercializing patiromer.

Any collaboration arrangements that we may enter into in the future may not be successful, which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize patiromer and potential future product candidates.

We may seek collaboration arrangements with pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies for the development or commercialization of patiromer and potential future product candidates. We may enter into these arrangements on a selective basis depending on the merits of retaining commercialization rights for ourselves as compared to entering into selective collaboration arrangements with leading pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies for our product candidates, both in the U.S. and internationally. We will face, to the extent that we decide to enter into collaboration agreements, significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Moreover, collaboration arrangements are

 

26


Table of Contents

complex and time consuming to negotiate, document and implement. We may not be successful in our efforts to establish and implement collaborations or other alternative arrangements should we so chose to enter into such arrangements. The terms of any collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.

Any future collaborations that we enter into may not be successful. The success of our collaboration arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and activities of our collaborators. Collaborators generally have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations.

Disagreements between parties to a collaboration arrangement regarding clinical development and commercialization matters can lead to delays in the development process or commercializing the applicable product candidate and, in some cases, termination of the collaboration arrangement. These disagreements can be difficult to resolve if neither of the parties has final decision-making authority.

Collaborations with pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies and other third parties often are terminated or allowed to expire by the other party. Any such termination or expiration would adversely affect us financially and could harm our business reputation.

If we engage in acquisitions, we will incur a variety of costs and we may never realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions.

Although we currently have no intent to do so, we may attempt to acquire businesses, technologies, services, products or product candidates that we believe are a strategic fit with our business. If we do undertake any acquisitions, the process of integrating an acquired business, technology, service, products or product candidates into our business may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, including diversion of resources and management’s attention from our core business. In addition, we may fail to retain key executives and employees of the companies we acquire, which may reduce the value of the acquisition or give rise to additional integration costs. Future acquisitions could result in additional issuances of equity securities that would dilute the ownership of existing stockholders. Future acquisitions could also result in the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or the amortization of expenses related to other intangible assets, any of which could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition.

If we seek and obtain approval to commercialize patiromer outside of the U.S., a variety of risks associated with international operations could materially adversely affect our business.

If patiromer is approved for commercialization outside the U.S., we may enter into agreements with third parties to market patiromer outside the U.S. We expect that we will be subject to additional risks related to entering into these international business relationships, including:

 

   

different regulatory requirements for drug approvals in foreign countries;

 

   

differing U.S. and foreign drug import and export rules;

 

   

reduced protection for intellectual property rights in foreign countries;

 

   

unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements;

 

   

different reimbursement systems, and different competitive drugs indicated to treat hyperkalemia;

 

27


Table of Contents
   

economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;

 

   

compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;

 

   

foreign taxes, including withholding of payroll taxes;

 

   

foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country;

 

   

workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the U.S.;

 

   

production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad;

 

   

potential liability resulting from development work conducted by these distributors; and

 

   

business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters.

Our business involves the use of hazardous materials and we and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers must comply with environmental laws and regulations, which can be expensive and restrict how we do business.

Our research and development activities and our third-party manufacturers’ and suppliers’ activities involve the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials, including the components of our product and product candidates and other hazardous compounds. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are subject to laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. In some cases, these hazardous materials and various wastes resulting from their use are stored at our and our manufacturers’ facilities pending their use and disposal. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination, which could cause an interruption of our commercialization efforts, research and development efforts and business operations, environmental damage resulting in costly clean-up and liabilities under applicable laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and specified waste products. Although we believe that the safety procedures utilized by our third-party manufacturers for handling and disposing of these materials generally comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot guarantee that this is the case or eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In such an event, we may be held liable for any resulting damages and such liability could exceed our resources and state or federal or other applicable authorities may curtail our use of certain materials and/or interrupt our business operations. Furthermore, environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent. We cannot predict the impact of such changes and cannot be certain of our future compliance. We do not currently carry biological or hazardous waste insurance coverage.

Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. The recent global financial crisis caused extreme volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets. A severe or prolonged economic downturn, such as the recent global financial crisis, could result in a variety of risks to our business, including reduced ability

 

28


Table of Contents

to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy could also strain our suppliers, possibly resulting in supply disruption. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

We or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by earthquakes or other natural disasters and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.

Our corporate headquarters and other facilities are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, which in the past has experienced severe earthquakes. We do not carry earthquake insurance. Earthquakes or other natural disasters could severely disrupt our operations, and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as our enterprise financial systems or manufacturing resource planning and enterprise quality systems, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place currently are limited and are unlikely to prove adequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which, particularly when taken together with our lack of earthquake insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Furthermore, integral parties in our supply chain are operating from single sites, increasing their vulnerability to natural disasters or other sudden, unforeseen and severe adverse events. If such an event were to affect our supply chain, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

The regulatory approval process is highly uncertain and we may not obtain regulatory approval for the commercialization of patiromer or any future product candidates.

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, selling, import, export, marketing and distribution of drug products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the U.S. and other countries, which regulations differ from country to country. Neither we nor any future collaboration partner is permitted to market patiromer or any future product candidate in the U.S. until we receive approval of an NDA from the FDA. We have not submitted an application or obtained marketing approval for patiromer anywhere in the world. Obtaining regulatory approval of an NDA can be a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process. In addition, failure to comply with FDA and other applicable U.S. and foreign regulatory requirements may subject us to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions or other actions, including:

 

   

warning letters;

 

   

civil and criminal penalties;

 

   

injunctions;

 

   

withdrawal of regulatory approval of products;

 

29


Table of Contents
   

product seizure or detention;

 

   

product recalls;

 

   

total or partial suspension of production; and

 

   

refusal to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs.

Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a drug candidate in the U.S. or abroad, we or our collaborators must demonstrate with substantial evidence from well-controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction of the FDA or other foreign regulatory agencies, that such drug candidates are safe and effective for their intended uses. The number of nonclinical studies and clinical trials that will be required for FDA approval varies depending on the drug candidate, the disease or condition that the drug candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to any particular drug candidate. Results from nonclinical studies and clinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the nonclinical or clinical data for our drug candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. Administering drug candidates to humans may produce undesirable side effects, which could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and result in the FDA or other regulatory authorities denying approval of a drug candidate for any or all targeted indications.

Regulatory approval of an NDA or NDA supplement is not guaranteed, and the approval process is expensive and may take several years. The FDA also has substantial discretion in the approval process and we may encounter matters with the FDA that requires us to expend additional time and resources and delay or prevent the approval of our product candidates. For example, the FDA may require us to conduct additional studies or trials for patiromer either prior to or post-approval, such as additional drug-drug interaction studies or safety or efficacy studies or trials, or it may object to elements of our clinical development program such as the number of subjects in our current clinical trials from the U.S. Further, there have been subject deaths in our clinical programs. While the incidence of subject deaths are not unexpected in view of the morbidity and mortality for the patient populations in our trials and have been determined by the study investigators and by us as unrelated to patiromer, the FDA may require us to perform additional studies or otherwise delay regulatory approval of patiromer. Despite the time and expense exerted, failure can occur at any stage. The FDA can delay, limit or deny approval of a drug candidate for many reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

   

a drug candidate may not be deemed safe or effective;

 

   

FDA officials may not find the data from nonclinical studies and clinical trials sufficient;

 

   

the FDA might not approve our third party manufacturers’ processes or facilities; or

 

   

the FDA may change its approval policies or adopt new regulations.

If patiromer or any future product candidate fails to demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical trials or does not gain regulatory approval, our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely harmed. Additionally, if the FDA requires that we conduct additional clinical studies, places limitations on patiromer in our label, delays approval to market patiromer or limits the use of patiromer, our business and results of operations may be harmed.

 

30


Table of Contents

Although we have entered into a Special Protocol Assessment agreement with the FDA relating to our pivotal Phase 3 trial of patiromer, this agreement does not guarantee any particular outcome with respect to regulatory review of the pivotal trial or with respect to regulatory approval of patiromer.

The protocol for our pivotal Phase 3 trial of patiromer was reviewed and agreed upon by the FDA under a Special Protocol Assessment, or SPA, which allows for FDA evaluation of whether a clinical trial protocol could form the primary basis of an efficacy claim in support of an NDA. The SPA is an agreement that a Phase 3 trial’s design, clinical endpoints, patient population and statistical analyses are sufficient to support the efficacy claim. Agreement on an SPA is not a guarantee of approval, and there is no assurance that the design of, or data collected from, the trial will be adequate to obtain the requisite regulatory approval. The SPA is not binding on the FDA if public health concerns unrecognized at the time the SPA was entered into become evident or other new scientific concerns regarding product safety or efficacy arise. In addition, upon written agreement of both parties, the SPA may be changed. The FDA retains significant latitude and discretion in interpreting the terms of an SPA and any resulting trial data in determining whether a drug is safe and effective and whether it will be approved. As a result, we do not know how the FDA will interpret the parties’ respective commitments under the SPA, how it will interpret the data and results from the pivotal Phase 3 trial, whether the FDA will require that we conduct or complete one or more additional clinical trials to support potential approval, including the completion of our ongoing Phase 1 onset-of-action trial for patiromer, or whether patiromer will receive any regulatory approvals.

Even if we receive regulatory approval for patiromer or any future product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, any product candidates, if approved, could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal, and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our products.

Even if a drug is FDA-approved, regulatory authorities may still impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-marketing studies. Furthermore, any new legislation addressing drug safety issues could result in delays or increased costs to assure compliance. If patiromer is approved it will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market information, including both federal and state requirements in the U.S. In addition, manufacturers and manufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive FDA requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP. As such, we and our contract manufacturers are subject to continual review and periodic inspections to assess compliance with cGMP. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continue to expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production, and quality control. We will also be required to report certain adverse reactions and production problems, if any, to the FDA, and to comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for our products. Promotional communications with respect to prescription drugs are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the information in the product’s approved label. As such, we may not promote our products for indications or uses for which they do not have FDA approval.

 

31


Table of Contents

If a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, or disagrees with the promotion, marketing, or labeling of a product, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product or us, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency or enforcement authority may:

 

   

issue warning letters;

 

   

impose civil or criminal penalties;

 

   

suspend regulatory approval;

 

   

suspend any of our ongoing clinical trials;

 

   

refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us;

 

   

impose restrictions on our operations, including closing our contract manufacturers’ facilities; or

 

   

seize or detain products or require a product recall.

Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response, and could generate negative publicity. Any failure to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability to commercialize and generate revenues from patiromer. If regulatory sanctions are applied or if regulatory approval is withdrawn, the value of our company and our operating results will be adversely affected. Additionally, if we are unable to generate revenues from the sale of patiromer our potential for achieving profitability will be diminished and the capital necessary to fund our operations will be increased.

Currently we plan to seek regulatory approval to market patiromer solely for the treatment of hyperkalemia and, unless we seek regulatory approval for additional indications, we will be prohibited from marketing patiromer for any other indication.

We intend to seek approval to market patiromer for the treatment of hyperkalemia. We do not have plans to seek approval of patiromer for any other indication at this time. Even if we obtain regulatory approval to market patiromer with an indication statement for the treatment of hyperkalemia, we will likely be prohibited from marketing patiromer using any promotional claims relating to maintaining more patients on, or enabling the increased or optimized usage of, RAAS inhibitors. The exploratory endpoints analyzing the modification of RAAS inhibitor medication due to recurrent hyperkalemia in the pivotal Phase 3 trial will not be sufficient to support FDA approval of a RAAS inhibitor enabling indication. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about prescription products. While patiromer has been studied in the setting of hyperkalemia associated with the use of RAAS inhibitors, patiromer may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in its approved labeling. Under applicable regulations, the ability of a company to make marketing statements about the effectiveness of its drug outside of the statements made in the label, referred to as “off-label” marketing, is prohibited. If we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability.

 

32


Table of Contents

If we fail to comply or are found to have failed to comply with FDA and other regulations related to the promotion of patiromer for unapproved uses, we could be subject to criminal penalties, substantial fines or other sanctions and damage awards.

The regulations relating to the promotion of products for unapproved uses are complex and subject to substantial interpretation by the FDA and other government agencies. If we receive marketing approval for patiromer, physicians may nevertheless prescribe it to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label. We intend to implement compliance and training programs designed to ensure that our sales and marketing practices comply with applicable regulations. Notwithstanding these programs, the FDA or other government agencies may allege or find that our practices constitute prohibited promotion of patiromer for unapproved uses. We also cannot be sure that our employees will comply with company policies and applicable regulations regarding the promotion of products for unapproved uses. Over the past several years, a significant number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have been the target of inquiries and investigations by various federal and state regulatory, investigative, prosecutorial and administrative entities in connection with the promotion of products for unapproved uses and other sales practices, including the Department of Justice and various U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission and various state Attorneys General offices. These investigations have alleged violations of various federal and state laws and regulations, including claims asserting antitrust violations, violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the False Claims Act, the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, anti-kickback laws, and other alleged violations in connection with the promotion of products for unapproved uses, pricing and Medicare and/or Medicaid reimbursement. Many of these investigations originate as “qui tam” actions under the False Claims Act. Under the False Claims Act, any individual can bring a claim on behalf of the government alleging that a person or entity has presented a false claim, or caused a false claim to be submitted, to the government for payment. The person bringing a qui tam suit is entitled to a share of any recovery or settlement. Qui tam suits, also commonly referred to as “whistleblower suits,” are often brought by current or former employees. In a qui tam suit, the government must decide whether to intervene and prosecute the case. If it declines, the individual may pursue the case alone.

If the FDA or any other governmental agency initiates an enforcement action against us or if we are the subject of a qui tam suit and it is determined that we violated prohibitions relating to the promotion of products for unapproved uses, we could be subject to substantial civil or criminal fines or damage awards and other sanctions such as consent decrees and corporate integrity agreements pursuant to which our activities would be subject to ongoing scrutiny and monitoring to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Any such fines, awards or other sanctions would have an adverse effect on our revenue, business, financial prospects and reputation.

If approved, patiromer or any future products may cause or contribute to adverse medical events that we are required to report to regulatory agencies and if we fail to do so we could be subject to sanctions that would materially harm our business.

Some participants in our clinical studies have reported adverse effects after being treated with patiromer. If we are successful in commercializing patiromer or any other products, FDA and foreign regulatory agency regulations require that we report certain information about adverse medical events if those products may have caused or contributed to those adverse events. The timing of our obligation to report would be triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event. We may fail to report adverse events we become aware of within the prescribed timeframe.

 

33


Table of Contents

We may also fail to appreciate that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the use of our products. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA or a foreign regulatory agency could take action, including criminal prosecution, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, seizure of our products or delay in approval or clearance of future products.

If third-party manufacturers fail to comply with manufacturing regulations, our financial results and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Before they can begin commercial manufacture of patiromer, contract manufacturers must obtain regulatory approval of their manufacturing facilities, processes and quality systems. In addition, pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities are continuously subject to inspection by the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities, before and after product approval. Due to the complexity of the processes used to manufacture pharmaceutical products and product candidates, any potential third-party manufacturer may be unable to continue to pass or initially pass federal, state or international regulatory inspections in a cost-effective manner.

If a third-party manufacturer with whom we contract is unable to comply with manufacturing regulations, patiromer may not be approved, or we may be subject to fines, unanticipated compliance expenses, recall or seizure of our products, total or partial suspension of production and/or enforcement actions, including injunctions, and criminal or civil prosecution. These possible sanctions would adversely affect our financial results and financial condition.

We are currently only seeking regulatory approval to market patiromer in the U.S., and if we want to expand the geographies in which we may market patiromer, we will need to obtain additional regulatory approvals.

We currently plan to seek regulatory approval for patiromer in the U.S. for the treatment of hyperkalemia. In the future, we may attempt to develop and seek regulatory approval to promote and commercialize patiromer outside of the U.S. In order to obtain such approvals, we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials or studies to support our applications, which would be time consuming and expensive, and may produce results that do not result in regulatory approvals. Further, we will have to expend substantial time and resources in order to establish the commercial infrastructure or pursue a collaboration arrangement that would be necessary to promote and commercialize patiromer outside of the U.S. If we do not obtain regulatory approvals for patiromer in foreign jurisdictions, our ability to expand our business outside the U.S. will be severely limited.

Our failure to obtain regulatory approvals in foreign jurisdictions for patiromer would prevent us from marketing our products internationally.

In order to market any product in the European Economic Area, or EEA (which is composed of the 28 Member States of the European Union plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein), and many other foreign jurisdictions, separate regulatory approvals are required. In the EEA, medicinal products can only be commercialized after obtaining a Marketing Authorization, or MA. Before granting the MA, the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or the competent authorities of the Member States of the EEA make an assessment of the risk-benefit balance of the product on the basis of scientific criteria concerning its quality, safety and efficacy.

 

34


Table of Contents

The approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional clinical testing, and the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. Clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries, and approval by one or more foreign regulatory authorities does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. However, a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals or to do so on a timely basis, and even if we do file we may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.

We may be subject to healthcare laws, regulation and enforcement; our failure to comply with these laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial conditions.

Although we do not currently have any products on the market, once we begin commercializing our products, we may be subject to additional healthcare statutory and regulatory requirements and enforcement by the federal government and the states and foreign governments in which we conduct our business. The laws that may affect our ability to operate as a commercial organization include:

 

   

the federal healthcare programs’ Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

 

   

federal false claims laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent;

 

   

federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;

 

   

the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which governs the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information;

 

   

state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers; and

 

   

U.S. and European reporting requirements detailing interactions with and payments to healthcare providers.

If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, the exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs and imprisonment, any of which could adversely affect our ability to market our products and adversely impact our financial results. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of

 

35


Table of Contents

interpretations. Further, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal health care fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the PPACA provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statutes. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business.

The PPACA also imposes new reporting and disclosure requirements on drug manufacturers for any “transfer of value” made or distributed to prescribers and other healthcare providers. In addition, drug manufacturers will also be required to report and disclose any investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members during the preceding calendar year. Failure to submit required information may result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of $150,000 per year (and up to an aggregate of $1 million per year for “knowing failures”), for all payments, transfers of value or ownership or investment interests not reported in an annual submission. Manufacturers were required to begin data collection on August 1, 2013 and report such data to the government by March 31, 2014 and by the 90th calendar day of each year thereafter.

In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians for marketing. Some states mandate implementation of compliance programs and/or the tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation, and other remuneration to physicians. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with multiple jurisdictions with different compliance and/or reporting requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.

Legislative or regulatory healthcare reforms in the U.S. may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory clearance or approval of patiromer or any future product candidates and to produce, market and distribute our products after clearance or approval is obtained.

From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the regulatory clearance or approval, manufacture, and marketing of regulated products or the reimbursement thereof. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. Any new regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of patiromer or any future product candidates. We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations, statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated, enacted or adopted may have on our business in the future. Such changes could, among other things, require:

 

   

additional clinical trials to be conducted prior to obtaining approval;

 

   

changes to manufacturing methods;

 

   

recall, replacement, or discontinuance of one or more of our products; and

 

   

additional record keeping.

Each of these would likely entail substantial time and cost and could materially harm our business and our financial results. In addition, delays in receipt of or failure to receive regulatory clearances or

 

36


Table of Contents

approvals for any future products would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

We may become subject to claims alleging infringement of third parties’ patents or proprietary rights and/or claims seeking to invalidate our patents, which would be costly, time consuming and, if successfully asserted against us, delay or prevent the development and commercialization of patiromer or any future product candidates.

There have been many lawsuits and other proceedings asserting patents and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. We cannot be certain that patiromer or any future product candidates will not infringe existing or future third-party patents. Because patent applications can take many years to issue and may be confidential for 18 months or more after filing, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware and which may later result in issued patents that we may infringe by commercializing patiromer or future product candidates. Moreover, we may face claims from non-practicing entities that have no relevant product revenue and against whom our own patent portfolio may thus have no deterrent effect. In addition, patiromer has a complex structure that makes it difficult to conduct a thorough search and review of all potentially relevant third-party patents. We may be unaware of one or more issued patents that would be infringed by the manufacture, sale or use of patiromer.

We may be subject to third-party claims in the future against us or our collaborators that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successful against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorney’s fees if we are found to be willfully infringing a third party’s patents. We may be required to indemnify future collaborators against such claims. If a patent infringement suit were brought against us or our collaborators, we or they could be forced to stop or delay research, development, manufacturing or sales of the product or product candidate that is the subject of the suit. As a result of patent infringement claims, or in order to avoid potential claims, we or our collaborators may choose to seek, or be required to seek, a license from the third party and would most likely be required to pay license fees or royalties or both. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we or our collaborators were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which would give our competitors access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a product, or forced to redesign it, or to cease some aspect of our business operations if, as a result of actual or threatened patent infringement claims, we or our collaborators are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, such litigation can be expensive and time consuming to litigate and would divert management’s attention from our core business. Any of these events could harm our business significantly.

In addition to infringement claims against us, if third parties prepare and file patent applications in the U.S. that also claim technology similar or identical to ours, we may have to participate in interference or derivation proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, to determine which party is entitled to a patent on the disputed invention. We may also become involved in similar opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office or similar offices in other jurisdictions regarding our intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology. Since patent applications are confidential for a period of time after filing, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our product candidates.

 

37


Table of Contents

If our intellectual property related to patiromer or any future product candidates is not adequate, we may not be able to compete effectively in our market.

We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to patiromer and our development programs. Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential or proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market.

The strength of patents in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical field involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. The patent applications that we own or license may fail to result in issued patents in the U.S. or in foreign countries. Even if patents do successfully issue, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. For example, patents granted by the European Patent Office may be opposed by any person within nine months from the publication of the grant. Similar proceedings are available in other jurisdictions, and in some jurisdictions third parties can raise questions of validity with a patent office even before a patent has granted. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property or prevent others from designing around our claims. For example, a third party may develop a competitive product that provides therapeutic benefits similar to patiromer but has a sufficiently different composition to fall outside the scope of our patent protection. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to patiromer or any future product candidates is successfully challenged, then our ability to commercialize patiromer or any future product candidates could be negatively affected, and we may face unexpected competition that could have a material adverse impact on our business. Further, if we encounter delays in our clinical trials, the period of time during which we could market patiromer or any future product candidates under patent protection would be reduced.

Even where laws provide protection, costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and the outcome of such litigation would be uncertain. If we or one of our future collaborators were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering patiromer or one of our future products, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to validity, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability against our intellectual property related to patiromer, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on patiromer. Such a loss of patent protection would have a material adverse impact on our business. Moreover, our competitors could counterclaim that we infringe their intellectual property, and some of our competitors have substantially greater intellectual property portfolios than we do.

 

38


Table of Contents

We also rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that may not be patentable, processes for which patents may be difficult to obtain and/or enforce and any other elements of our product development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. Although we require all of our employees to assign their inventions to us, and endeavor to execute confidentiality agreements with all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology, we cannot be certain that we have executed such agreements with all parties who may have helped to develop our intellectual property or who had access to our proprietary information, nor can we be certain that our agreements will not be breached. We cannot guarantee that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. Further, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the U.S. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property both in the U.S. and abroad. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we fail to comply with our obligations under our IP License and Assignment Agreement, we could lose license rights that are important to our business.

We are a party to an IP License and Assignment Agreement with Ilypsa, Inc., or Ilypsa, which is a subsidiary of Amgen Inc., pursuant to which we license key intellectual property relating to our drug discovery and development technology. Although our obligations under the license are limited, the license agreement does impose certain diligence, notice and other obligations not currently applicable to us. If we fail to comply with these obligations, Ilypsa (Amgen) may have the right to terminate the license, other than in respect of patiromer.

Changes in U.S. patent law could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products.

As is the case with other biopharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biopharmaceutical industry involve both technological and legal complexity. Therefore, obtaining and enforcing biopharmaceutical patents is costly, time consuming and inherently uncertain. In addition, the U.S. has recently enacted and is currently implementing wide-ranging patent reform legislation. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.

 

39


Table of Contents

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

The USPTO and various foreign patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions to maintain patent applications and issued patents. Noncompliance with these requirements can result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case.

We have not yet registered trademarks for a commercial trade name for patiromer in the U.S. or elsewhere and failure to secure such registrations could adversely affect our business.

We have not yet registered trademarks for a commercial trade name for patiromer in the U.S. or elsewhere. During trademark registration proceedings, our trademark application may be rejected. Although we are given an opportunity to respond to those rejections, we may be unable to overcome such rejections. In addition, in the USPTO and in comparable agencies in many foreign jurisdictions, third parties can oppose pending trademark applications and seek to cancel registered trademarks. Opposition or cancellation proceedings may be filed against our trademarks, and our trademarks may not survive such proceedings. Moreover, any name we propose to use with our product candidates in the U.S. must be approved by the FDA, regardless of whether we have registered it, or applied to register it, as a trademark. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product names, including an evaluation of potential for confusion with other product names. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed proprietary product names, we may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable substitute name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA.

We may not be able to enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of some countries, particularly developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, especially those relating to life sciences. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or the misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Furthermore, while we intend to protect our intellectual property rights in our expected significant markets, we cannot ensure that we will be able to initiate or maintain similar efforts in all jurisdictions in which we may wish to market patiromer or any future products. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate. In addition, changes in the law and legal decisions by courts in the U.S. and foreign countries may affect our ability to obtain and enforce adequate intellectual property protection for our technology.

 

40


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Common Stock and This Offering

Our stock price is volatile and our stockholders may not be able to resell shares of our common stock at or above the price they paid.

The trading price of our common stock is highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include those discussed in this “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus and others such as:

 

   

announcements of regulatory approval or a complete response letter to patiromer, or specific label indications or patient populations for its use, or changes or delays in the regulatory review process;

 

   

announcements of therapeutic innovations or new products by us or our competitors;

 

   

adverse actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our clinical trials, manufacturing supply chain or sales and marketing activities;

 

   

changes or developments in laws or regulations applicable to patiromer;

 

   

future capital raising transactions;

 

   

any adverse changes to our relationship with any manufacturers or suppliers;

 

   

the success of our testing and clinical trials;

 

   

the success of our efforts to acquire or license or discover additional product candidates;

 

   

any intellectual property infringement actions in which we may become involved;

 

   

announcements concerning our competitors or the pharmaceutical industry in general;

 

   

achievement of expected product sales and profitability;

 

   

manufacture, supply or distribution shortages;

 

   

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

 

   

changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;

 

   

trading volume of our common stock;

 

   

sales of our common stock by us, our executive officers and directors or our stockholders in the future;

 

   

general economic and market conditions and overall fluctuations in the U.S. equity markets; and

 

   

the loss of any of our key scientific or management personnel.

In addition, the stock markets in general, and the markets for pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that may have been unrelated to the operating performance of the issuer. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price or liquidity of our common stock. In the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against the issuer. If any of our stockholders were to bring such a lawsuit against us, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit and the attention of our management would be diverted from the operation

 

41


Table of Contents

of our business, which could seriously harm our financial position. Any adverse determination in litigation could also subject us to significant liabilities.

An active public market for our common stock may not be sustained.

We completed our IPO in November 2013. Prior to that offering, there had been no public market for shares of our common stock, and an active public market for our shares may not be sustained. The lack of an active market may impair our stockholdersability to sell their shares at the time they wish to sell them or at a price they consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other businesses, applications or technologies using our shares as consideration.

We are an “emerging growth company” and as a result of the reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common stock may be less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of the initial public offering of our common stock (December 31, 2018), (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th and we have been a public company for at least one year, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

Purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of their investment.

The public offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock before giving effect to this offering. Accordingly, if you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur immediate substantial dilution of approximately $38.37 per share, based on the last reported sale price of our common stock, or $43.62 per share, and our as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2013. In addition, following this offering, purchasers in this offering will have contributed approximately 26.3% of the total gross consideration paid by stockholders to us to purchase shares of our common stock, through December 31, 2013, but will own only approximately 7.2% of the shares of common stock outstanding immediately after this offering. Furthermore, if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares, or outstanding options and warrants are exercised, you could experience further dilution.

 

42


Table of Contents

If we sell shares of our common stock in future financings, stockholders may experience immediate dilution and, as a result, our stock price may decline.

We may from time to time issue additional shares of common stock at a discount from the current trading price of our common stock. As a result, our stockholders would experience immediate dilution upon the purchase of any shares of our common stock sold at such discount. In addition, as opportunities present themselves, we may enter into financing or similar arrangements in the future, including the issuance of debt securities, preferred stock or common stock. If we issue common stock or securities convertible into common stock, our common stockholders would experience additional dilution and, as a result, our stock price may decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall.

If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market after the lock-up and other legal restrictions on resale lapse in connection with this offering and our IPO, the trading price of our common stock could decline. Based upon the number of shares outstanding as of March 1, 2014, upon the closing of this offering, we will have outstanding a total of approximately 32.0 million shares of common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. Of these shares, the shares of our common stock sold in our initial public offering are currently freely tradable, and the shares to be sold in this offering, plus any shares sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, will be freely tradable, without restriction, in the public market immediately following this offering. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, however, may, in their sole discretion, permit our officers, directors and stockholders who are subject to these lock-up agreements to sell shares prior to the expiration of the lock-up agreements.

The lock-up agreements pertaining to our initial public offering will expire on May 13, 2014, following which at least approximately 23.6 million shares of common stock will be eligible for sale in the public market, subject to any additional restrictions, including a lock-up in connection with this offering. The lock-up agreements pertaining to this offering will expire 90 days from the date of this prospectus, following which approximately 16.9 million shares of common stock will be eligible for sale in the public market, all of which shares are held by current directors, executive officers and other affiliates and may be subject to Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

In addition, as of March 1, 2014, approximately 5.1 million shares of common stock that are either subject to outstanding options, reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans or subject to outstanding warrants are eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various vesting schedules, the lock-up agreements and Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the Securities Act. If these additional shares of common stock are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

After this offering, the holders of approximately 21.6 million shares of our common stock, or approximately 73% of our total outstanding common stock as of March 1, 2014, will be entitled to rights with respect to the registration of their shares under the Securities Act, subject to vesting schedules and to the lock-up agreements described above. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except for shares purchased by affiliates. Any sales of securities by these stockholders could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.

 

43


Table of Contents

Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of March 1, 2014, our executive officers, directors, holders of 5% or more of our capital stock and their respective affiliates beneficially owned approximately 71.1% of our outstanding voting stock. These stockholders will have the ability to influence us through this ownership position. These stockholders may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, these stockholders may be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that certain stockholders may believe are in their best interest.

We have broad discretion to determine how to use the funds raised in this offering, and may use them in ways that may not enhance our operating results or the price of our common stock.

Our management will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering, and we could spend the proceeds in ways our stockholders may not agree with or that do not yield a favorable return, if at all. We currently intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from this offering to fund the ongoing development and preparation for potential commercialization of patiromer, including the preparation and submission of our NDA for patiromer, to support our activities during the FDA’s review and approval process and pre-commercialization marketing activities for patiromer, and any remaining proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, including research and development. However, our use of these proceeds may differ substantially from our current plans. If we do not invest or apply these proceeds in ways that improve our operating results, we may fail to achieve expected financial results, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable and may lead to entrenchment of management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could significantly reduce the value of our shares to a potential acquirer or delay or prevent changes in control or changes in our management without the consent of our board of directors. The provisions in our charter documents include the following:

 

   

a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;

 

   

no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;

 

   

the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

 

   

the required approval of at least 662/3% of the shares entitled to vote to remove a director for cause, and the prohibition on removal of directors without cause;

 

   

the ability of our board of directors to authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquiror;

 

44


Table of Contents
   

the ability of our board of directors to alter our bylaws without obtaining stockholder approval;

 

   

the required approval of at least 662/3% of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws or repeal the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation regarding the election and removal of directors;

 

   

a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

 

   

the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors; and

 

   

advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquiror’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

In addition, these provisions would apply even if we were to receive an offer that some stockholders may consider beneficial.

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions contained in Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under Section 203, a corporation may not, in general, engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other exceptions, the board of directors has approved the transaction. For a description of our capital stock, see the section titled “Description of Capital Stock.”

In addition, certain provisions in our IP License and Assignment Agreement may discourage certain takeover or acquisition attempts, including that in the event we undergo a change of control, we shall pay to Ilypsa (Amgen) an increasing amount of the purchase price, less certain expenses, of such transaction, ranging from approximately 6.7% to 10% of such amount, up to a cap of $30.0 million.

Claims for indemnification by our directors and officers may reduce our available funds to satisfy successful third-party claims against us and may reduce the amount of money available to us.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated bylaws and our indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our directors and officers provide that:

 

   

We will indemnify our directors and officers for serving us in those capacities or for serving other business enterprises at our request, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that a corporation may indemnify such person if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the registrant and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful.

 

45


Table of Contents
   

We may, in our discretion, indemnify employees and agents in those circumstances where indemnification is permitted by applicable law.

 

   

We are required to advance expenses, as incurred, to our directors and officers in connection with defending a proceeding, except that such directors or officers shall undertake to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification.

 

   

We will not be obligated pursuant to our amended and restated bylaws to indemnify a person with respect to proceedings initiated by that person against us or our other indemnitees, except with respect to proceedings authorized by our board of directors or brought to enforce a right to indemnification.

 

   

The rights conferred in our amended and restated bylaws are not exclusive, and we are authorized to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors, officers, employees and agents and to obtain insurance to indemnify such persons.

 

   

We may not retroactively amend our amended and restated bylaw provisions to reduce our indemnification obligations to directors, officers, employees and agents.

We may be required to pay severance benefits to our executive officers and certain other employees who are terminated in connection with a change in control, which could harm our financial condition or results.

Each of our executive officers and certain other employees are parties to severance arrangements in their employment agreements that contain change in control and severance provisions providing for aggregate cash payments of up to approximately $4.0 million for severance and other benefits and acceleration of vesting of stock options with a value of approximately $47.7 million (based on the last reported sale price of our common stock on March 1, 2014) in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control of us. The accelerated vesting of options could result in dilution to our existing stockholders and harm the market price of our common stock. The payment of these severance benefits could harm our financial condition and results. In addition, these potential severance payments may discourage or prevent third parties from seeking a business combination with us.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock, and, consequently, our stockholders’ ability to achieve a return on their investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Additionally, the terms of our loan and security agreements restrict our ability to pay dividends. Therefore, our stockholders are not likely to receive any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Since we do not intend to pay dividends, our stockholdersability to receive a return on their investment will depend on any future appreciation in the market value of our common stock. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate or even maintain the price at which our holders have purchased it.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards may be limited.

As of December 31, 2013, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $163.2 million and $158.8 million for both U.S. federal and California income tax purposes, respectively, which begin

 

46


Table of Contents

to expire in 2027 for U.S. federal income tax purposes and 2017 for California income tax purposes. If a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, the corporation may be subject to annual limits on its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards. An ownership change is, as a general matter, triggered by sales or acquisitions of the corporation’s stock in excess of 50 percentage points on a cumulative basis during a three-year period by persons owning 5% or more of the corporation’s total equity value. We have performed an initial analysis under Section 382 of the Code and believe that we have in the past experienced ownership changes that will result in a limitation on our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards. As a result of this analysis, we have removed the deferred tax assets for net operating losses of $28.6 million generated through December 31, 2013 from our deferred tax asset schedule and have recorded a corresponding decrease to our valuation allowance. Our net operating loss carryforwards may also be subject to further limitations in the future as a result of additional ownership changes, including if we experience an ownership change as a result of this offering.

 

47


Table of Contents

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements concerning our business, operations and financial performance and condition, as well as our plans, objectives and expectations for our business operations and financial performance and condition. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “due,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “plan,” “predict,” “potential,” “positioned,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and other similar expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and future trends, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

 

   

our expectations regarding the timing of submitting a New Drug Application for patiromer to the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the clinical trials to be included in our NDA for patiromer;

 

   

the potential market opportunities for commercializing patiromer;

 

   

our expectations regarding the potential market size and the size of the patient populations for patiromer, if approved for commercial use;

 

   

our expectations regarding the timing of reporting results from our Phase 1 onset-of-action trial for patiromer, including the value of the information we expect to receive from the Phase 1 onset-of-action trial relating to the timing of when patiromer starts lowering serum potassium levels;

 

   

our expectations regarding the meaning and utility of our exploratory endpoints from our pivotal trial;

 

   

estimates of our expenses, future revenue, capital requirements, sufficiency of capital resources and our needs for additional financing;

 

   

our expectations regarding the number of nephrologists and cardiologists that we plan to target;

 

   

the likelihood of regulatory approvals for patiromer;

 

   

our ability to develop, acquire and advance product candidates into, and successfully complete, clinical trials and nonclinical testing;

 

   

the implementation of our business model, strategic plans for our business and technology;

 

   

our expectations regarding our future costs of goods;

 

   

the initiation, timing, progress and results of future preclinical studies and clinical trials, and our research and development programs;

 

   

the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering patiromer and our drug discovery platform technology;

 

   

our ability to maintain and establish collaborations or obtain additional funding;

 

   

our expectations regarding the time during which we will be an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012;

 

48


Table of Contents
   

our financial performance;

 

   

our use of proceeds from this offering; and

 

   

developments and projections relating to our competitors and our industry.

These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about our business and the industry in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance or development and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that are in some cases beyond our control. As a result, any or all of our forward-looking statements in this prospectus may turn out to be inaccurate. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. Potential investors are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. You should, however, review the factors and risks we describe in the reports we will file from time to time with the SEC after the date of this prospectus. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 

49


Table of Contents

Market, Industry and Other Data

This prospectus, including the information incorporated by reference, contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business, and the markets for patiromer, including data regarding the estimated patient population in those markets, their projected growth rates, the perceptions and preferences of patients and physicians regarding certain therapies for the treatment of hyperkalemia, prescriber and patient data, as well as data regarding market research, estimates and forecasts prepared by our management. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. In some cases, we do not expressly refer to the sources from which this data is derived. In that regard, when we refer to one or more sources of this type of data in any paragraph, you should assume that other data of this type appearing in the same paragraph is derived from the same sources, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.

 

50


Table of Contents

Use of Proceeds

We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of $100.0 million of common stock in this offering will be approximately $93.3 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, we estimate that net proceeds will be approximately $107.4 million after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

We currently expect to use the substantial majority of the net proceeds from this offering to fund the ongoing development and preparation for potential commercialization of patiromer, including the preparation and submission of our NDA for patiromer, to support our activities during the FDA’s review and approval process and pre-commercialization marketing activities for patiromer, and any remaining proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, including research and development.

Based on our planned use of our net proceeds from this offering, we currently estimate that such funds will be sufficient to fund our operations through FDA approval of patiromer. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use these available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. It is possible that we will not achieve the progress that we expect because the actual costs and timing of drug development, including obtaining regulatory approvals, are difficult to predict and are subject to substantial risks and delays. We do not expect that the net proceeds from this offering will be sufficient to fund substantial development of other product candidates or to fund additional clinical trials for patiromer such as trials to support outside U.S. regulatory approvals, if needed, or life cycle management initiatives.

Due to the uncertainties inherent in the clinical development and regulatory approval process, it is difficult to estimate with certainty the exact amounts of the net proceeds from this offering that may be used for the above purposes. As such, our management will retain discretion over the use of the net proceeds from this offering. The amounts and timing of our expenditures will depend upon numerous factors, including: the draw down, if any, of the $7.5 million tranche pursuant to our term loan; the timing of our NDA submission to the FDA and the timing of the FDA’s response to our NDA; and unforeseen delays or problems in the development of our manufacturing and supply chain.

Pending the use of the proceeds from this offering, we intend to invest the net proceeds in interest-bearing, investment-grade securities, certificates of deposit or government securities.

 

51


Table of Contents

Price Range of Common Stock

Our common stock has been publicly traded on The NASDAQ Select Global Market under the symbol “RLYP” since our initial public offering on November 15, 2013. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth on a per share basis, for the periods indicated, the low and high sale prices of our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

 

2013    High      Low  

Fourth Quarter (from November 15, 2013)

   $ 30.45       $ 11.55   
2014    High      Low  

First Quarter (through March 14, 2014)

   $ 44.70       $ 22.11   

 

52


Table of Contents

Capitalization

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2013:

 

   

on an actual basis; and

 

   

on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the issuance and sale by us of approximately $100.0 million of our common stock in this offering based on the last reported sale price of our common stock, or $43.62 per share, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

You should read this information together with our audited financial statements and related notes incorporated by reference in this prospectus. For more details on how you can obtain our Commission reports and other information, you should read the section of the prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 

     As of December 31, 2013  
     Actual     Pro Forma  
    

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Debt

   $ 13,670      $ 13,670   

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 5,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, actual and as adjusted

              

Common stock, $0.001 par value per share; 300,000 shares authorized, 29,710 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 300,000 shares authorized, 32,003 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted

     30        32   

Additional paid-in capital

     300,660        393,958   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

              

Deficit accumulated during the development stage

     (225,840     (225,840
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     74,850        168,150   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capitalization

   $ 88,520      $ 181,820   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The outstanding share information in the table above excludes the following:

 

   

3,544,810 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2013 having a weighted-average exercise price of $5.63 per share;

 

   

64,021 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2013 having a weighted-average exercise price of $9.51 per share;

 

   

1,232,978 shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to future awards under our 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as well as any automatic increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan; and

 

   

255,317 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as well as any automatic increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan.

 

53


Table of Contents

Dilution

If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your interest will be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of our common stock in this offering and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering. As of December 31, 2013, we had a historical net tangible book value of $74.8 million, or $2.52 per share of common stock. Our net tangible book value represents total tangible assets less total liabilities and convertible preferred stock, all divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31, 2013.

After giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock in this offering based on the last reported sale price of our common stock, or $43.62 per share, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, our as adjusted net tangible book value at December 31, 2013 would have been approximately $168.1 million, or $5.25 per share. This represents an immediate increase in as adjusted net tangible book value of $2.73 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $38.37 per share to new investors. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

 

Assumed public offering price per share

      $ 43.62   

Historical net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2013

   $ 2.52      

Increase in as adjusted net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors

     2.73      
  

 

 

    

As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering

        5.25   
     

 

 

 

Dilution per share to new investors participating in this offering

        38.37   
     

 

 

 

If the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase additional shares, as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering would increase to approximately $5.63 per share, and there would be an immediate dilution of approximately $37.99 per share to new investors.

To the extent that outstanding options with an exercise price per share that is less than the as adjusted net tangible book value per share, before giving effect to the issuance and sale of shares in this offering, are exercised, new investors will experience further dilution. If all of our outstanding options described above were exercised, our net tangible book value as of December 31, 2013, before giving effect to the issuance and sale of shares in this offering, would have been approximately $83.5 million, or approximately $2.62 per share, and our as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2013 after this offering would have been approximately $176.8 million, or approximately $5.18 per share, causing dilution to new investors of approximately $38.44 per share.

In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2013, and excludes the following:

 

   

3,544,810 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2013 having a weighted-average exercise price of $5.63 per share;

 

54


Table of Contents
   

64,021 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2013 having a weighted-average exercise price of $9.51 per share;

 

   

1,232,978 shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to future awards under our 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as well as any automatic increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan; and

 

   

255,317 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as well as any automatic increases in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan.

 

55


Table of Contents

Principal Stockholders

The following table sets forth information relating to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 1, 2014, by:

 

   

each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;

 

   

each of our directors;

 

   

each of our named executive officers; and

 

   

all directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each entity, person, director or executive officer is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares over which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power as well as any shares that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 1, 2014 through the exercise of any stock option, warrants or other rights. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by that person.

The percentage of shares beneficially owned is computed on the basis of 29,714,718 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2014. Shares of our common stock that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 1, 2014 are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such rights, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person, except with respect to the percentage ownership of all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address for each beneficial owner listed is c/o Relypsa, Inc., at 700 Saginaw Drive, Redwood City, California 94063.

 

56


Table of Contents
     Beneficial Ownership Prior to this Offering     Beneficial Ownership
After this Offering
 

Name and
Address of Beneficial

Owner

  Number of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
    Number of
Shares
Exercisable
Within 60 Days
    Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
    Percentage
of Beneficial
Ownership
    Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
    Percentage
of
Beneficial
Ownership
 

5% and Greater Stockholders

           

OrbiMed Private Investments IV, LP(1)

    9,941,551               9,941,551        33.5     9,941,551        31.1

Entities affiliated with 5AM Ventures(2)

    4,845,402               4,845,402        16.3     4,845,402        15.1

Entities affiliated with Delphi Ventures(3)

    2,407,918               2,407,918        8.1     2,407,918        7.5

New Leaf Ventures I, L.P.(4)

    2,114,890               2,114,890        7.1     2,114,890        6.6

Entities affiliated with Sprout Capital(5)

    1,785,972               1,785,972        6.0     1,785,972        5.6

Named Executive Officers and Directors

           

John A. Orwin(6)

    15,000        831,432        846,432        2.8     846,432        2.6

Gerrit Klaerner(7)

    58,139        523,879        582,018        1.9     582,018        1.8

Lance Berman, M.D., M.S.(8)

           198,597        198,597        *        198,597        *   

Claire Lockey(9)

           197,453        197,453        *        197,453        *   

John P. Butler(10)

                         *               *   

Paul J. Hastings(11)

           37,755        37,755        *        37,755        *   

Ronald M. Hunt(12)

    2,114,890        10,140        2,125,030        7.1     2,125,030        6.6

David W. J. McGirr(13)

           65,372        65,372        *        65,372        *   

Scott M. Rocklage, Ph.D.(14)

    4,845,402        10,140        4,855,542        16.3     4,855,542        15.2

Thomas J. Schuetz, M.D., Ph.D.(15)

           45,021        45,021        *        45,021        *   

Jonathan T. Silverstein, J.D.(16)

           10,140        10,140        *        10,140        *   

Klaus Veitinger, M.D.(17)

           176,998        176,998        *        176,998        *   

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)(18)

    6,995,641        2,167,229        9,162,870        28.7     9,162,870        26.8

 

* Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the total outstanding shares of common stock.
(1) As reported on Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on December 2, 2013 by OrbiMed Advisors LLC (“Advisors”), OrbiMed Capital GP IV LLC (“GP IV”) and Samuel D. Isaly (“Isaly”). GP IV is the sole general partner of OrbiMed Private Investments IV, LP (“OPI IV”) and as such may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own the shares held by OPI IV. Advisors pursuant to its authority as the sole managing member of GP IV may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own the shares held by OPI IV. Isaly is the managing member of and owner of a controlling interest in Advisors. Accordingly, Advisors and Isaly may be deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares held by OPI IV. Each of GP IV, Advisors and Isaly disclaim beneficial ownership with respect to such shares, except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein, if any. The address of Advisors, GP IV, Isaly, and OPI IV is 601 Lexington Avenue, 54th Floor, New York, NY 10022.
(2)

As reported on Forms 4 filed with the SEC on November 20, 2013 by 5AM Partners II, LLC (“Partners II”), 5AM Ventures II LP (“Ventures II”), 5AM Co-Investors II LP (“Co-Investors II”), 5AM Partners III, LLC (“Partners III”), 5AM Ventures III, L.P. (“Ventures III”) and 5AM Co-Investors III, L.P. (“Co-Investors III”). Partners II is the general partner of Ventures II and Co-Investors II. Partners III is the general partner of Ventures III and Co-Investors III. John D. Diekman, Ph.D., Andrew J. Schwab and Scott M. Rocklage, Ph.D., are the managing members of Partners II and Partners III and may be deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares directly owned by Ventures II, Co-Investors II, Ventures III and

 

57


Table of Contents
 

Co-Investors III. Dr. Diekman, Mr. Schwab and Dr. Rocklage disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares, except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein, if any. The address for the entities affiliated with 5AM Ventures is 2200 Sand Hill Road, Suite 110, Menlo Park, CA 94025.

(3) As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 28, 2014 by Delphi Ventures VII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“DV VII”), Delphi BioInvestments VII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“DBI VII”), Delphi Management Partners VII, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“DMP VII”) and the general partner of DV VII and DBI VII, and James J. Bochnowski (“Bochnowski”), David L. Douglass (“Douglass”), Douglas A. Roeder (“Roeder”) and Deepika R. Pakianathan, Ph.D. (“Pakianathan”), the managing members of DMP VII. DMP VII is the general partner of DV VII and DBI VII and may be deemed to have sole power to vote and sole power to dispose of shares of the issuer directly owned by DV VII and DBI VII. Bochnowski, Douglass, Roeder and Pakianathan are the managing members of DMP VII and may be deemed to have shared power to vote and shared power to dispose of the shares of the issuer directly owned by DV VII and DBI VII. DMP VII and each of Bochnowski, Douglass, Roeder and Pakianathan may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over the reported securities. The address for the entities affiliated with Delphi Ventures is 3000 Sand Hill Road, #1-135, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
(4) As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by New Leaf Ventures I, L.P. (“NLV I”), New Leaf Venture Management I, L.P. (“NLV Venture Management”) and New Leaf Venture Management I, L.L.C. (“NLV Management”) and Philippe O. Chambon (“Chambon”), James Niedel (“Niedel”), Vijay Lathi (“Lathi”), Ronald Hunt (“Hunt”), Jeani Delagardelle (“Delagardelle”) and Liam Ratcliffe (“Ratcliffe” and together with Chambon, Niedel, Lathi, Hunt and Delagardelle the “Managing Directors”). NLV I directly owns the shares of common stock (the “NLV I Shares”). As the sole general partner of NLV I, NLV Venture Management may be deemed to own beneficially the NLV I Shares. As the sole general partner of NLV Venture Management, NLV Management may be deemed to own beneficially the NLV I Shares. As the individual managers of NLV Management, each of the Managing Directors also may be deemed to own beneficially the NLV I Shares. The Managing Directors share voting and investment power over shares directly owned by NLV-I. The address of the principal business office of NLV I, NLV Venture Management, NLV Management, Chambon, Niedel, Hunt and Ratcliffe is New Leaf Venture Partners, Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square, Suite 3502, New York, NY 10036. The address of the principal business office of Lathi and Delagardelle is New Leaf Venture Partners, 1200 Park Place, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94043.
(5) Consists of shares directly owned by Sprout Capital IX, L.P. (“Sprout IX”) and Sprout Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. (“SEF”). New Leaf Venture Partners, L.L.C. (“NLV”) has entered into a sub-management agreement with DLJ Capital Corporation (“DLJCC”) whereby NLV and its principals, including Ronald M. Hunt, provide DLJCC with investment management services on the various investments owned by various Sprout Group venture capital funds, including Sprout IX and SEF. DLJCC is the Managing General Partner of Sprout IX and the General Partner of SEF. NLV is not an affiliate of DLJCC, Sprout IX, SEF or the Sprout Group. The investment committee of the Sprout Group consists of Nicole Arnaboldi, Philippe O. Chambon, Robert Finzi and Janet Hickey. Such individuals share voting and investment power over the shares owned by Sprout IX and SEF and disclaim beneficial ownership over such shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The address of DLJCC, Sprout IX, SEF and the Sprout Group is One Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010.
(6) Consists of (a) 831,432 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, all of which were subject to repurchase at such date and (b) 15,000 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Orwin.
(7) Consists of (a) 58,139 shares of common stock and (b) 523,879 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 198,477 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.
(8) Consists of 198,597 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 121,243 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.
(9) Consists of 197,453 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 88,342 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.

 

58


Table of Contents
(10) Mr. Butler holds options to purchase an aggregate of 24,632 shares of common stock, none of which were exercisable as of March 1, 2014.
(11) Consists of 37,755 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 26,824 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.
(12) Consists of (i) 10,140 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of a stock option within 60 days of March 1, 2014, all of which were subject to repurchase at such date, and (ii) securities directly owned by New Leaf Ventures I, L.P. as set forth in footnote 4. Mr. Hunt disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by New Leaf Ventures I, L.P. except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(13) Consists of (i) 55,232 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of a stock option within 60 days of March 1, 2014 by the David W.J. McGirr Family Trust, of which 35,671 shares were subject to repurchase at such date and (ii) 10,140 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of a stock option within 60 days of March 1, 2014 by Mr. McGirr, all of which were subject to repurchase at such date. Mr. McGirr has shared voting and investment power over the 55,232 shares beneficially owned by the McGirr Family Trust.
(14) Consists of (i) 10,140 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of a stock option within 60 days of March 1, 2014, all of which were subject to repurchase at such date, and (ii) securities beneficially owned by entities affiliated with 5AM Ventures as set forth in footnote 2. Dr. Rocklage disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares listed in footnote 2, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(15) Consists of 45,021 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 17,763 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.
(16) Consists of 10,140 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of a stock option within 60 days of March 1, 2014, all of which were subject to repurchase at such date.
(17) Consists of 176,998 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 40,747 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.
(18) Includes 6,995,641 outstanding shares, and 2,167,229 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options within 60 days of March 1, 2014, of which 1,574,289 shares were subject to repurchase at such date.

 

59


Table of Contents

Description of Capital Stock

The following summary describes our capital stock and the material provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, the investor rights agreement to which we and certain of our stockholders are parties and of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Because the following is only a summary, it does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. For a complete description, you should refer to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and amended and restated investor rights agreement, copies of which are incorporated by reference as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is part.

General

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes 300,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of December 31, 2013, there were outstanding:

 

   

29,714,368 shares of our common stock;

 

   

64,021 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants; and

 

   

3,544,810 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options.

As of March 1, 2014, there were approximately 70 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held by nominees in street name.

Common Stock

Voting Rights

Each holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors. Our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Accordingly, holders of a majority of the voting shares are able to elect all of the directors. In addition, the affirmative vote of holders of 66 2/3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding voting stock will be required to take certain actions, including amending certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, such as the provisions relating to amending our amended and restated bylaws, the classified board and director liability.

Dividends

Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any then outstanding preferred stock, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of legally available funds. The terms of our credit facility currently prohibit us from paying cash dividends on our common stock.

Liquidation

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock will be entitled to share ratably in the net assets legally available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of

 

60


Table of Contents

all of our debts and other liabilities and the satisfaction of any liquidation preference granted to the holders of any then outstanding shares of preferred stock.

Rights and Preferences

Holders of our common stock have no preemptive, conversion, subscription or other rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our common stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of our common stock are subject to and may be adversely affected by the rights of the holders of shares of any series of our preferred stock that we may designate in the future.

Fully Paid and Nonassessable.

All of our outstanding shares of common stock are, and the shares of common stock to be issued in this offering will be, fully paid and nonassessable.

Preferred Stock

Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. These rights, preferences and privileges could include dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting, or the designation of, such series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of common stock. The issuance of our preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock and the likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon our liquidation. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company or other corporate action. No shares of preferred stock are outstanding, and we have no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Registration Rights

Under our amended and restated investor rights agreement, the holders of approximately 21.6 million shares of common stock, including shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, or their transferees, have the right to require us to register their shares under the Securities Act so that those shares may be publicly resold, or to include their shares in any registration statement we file, in each case as described below.

Demand Registration Rights

Based on the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013, the holders of approximately 21.6 million shares of our common stock, including shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, or their transferees, are entitled to certain demand registration rights. Beginning on May 13, 2014, the 180th day following the effectiveness of the registration statement filed in connection with our initial public offering in November 2013, the holders of at least 55% of these shares can, on not more than two occasions, request that we register all or a portion of their shares. Such request for registration must cover a number of shares with an anticipated aggregate offering price of at least $10.0 million. Additionally, we will not be required to effect a demand registration during the 180 days following the effectiveness of such registration statement, provided that we have complied with certain notice requirements to the holders of these shares.

 

61


Table of Contents

Piggyback Registration Rights

Based on the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013, in the event that we determine to register any of our securities under the Securities Act (subject to certain exceptions), either for our own account or for the account of other security holders, the holders of approximately 21.6 million shares of our common stock, including shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, or their transferees, are entitled to certain “piggyback” registration rights allowing the holders to include their shares in such registration, subject to certain marketing and other limitations. As a result, whenever we propose to file a registration statement under the Securities Act, other than with respect to a registration related to employee benefit plans, the offer and sale of debt securities, or corporate reorganizations or certain other transactions, the holders of these shares are entitled to notice of the registration and have the right, subject to limitations that the underwriters may impose on the number of shares included in the registration, to include their shares in the registration. In an underwritten offering, the managing underwriter, if any, has the right, subject to specified conditions, to limit the number of shares such holders may include.

Form S-3 Registration Rights

Based on the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013, the holders of approximately 21.6 million shares of our common stock, including shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, or their transferees, are entitled to certain Form S-3 registration rights. Beginning on May 13, 2014, the 180th day following the effectiveness of the registration statement filed in connection with our initial public offering in November 2013, the holders of these shares can make a written request that we register their shares on Form S-3 if we are eligible to file a registration statement on Form S-3 and if the aggregate price to the public of the shares offered is at least $2.0 million. These stockholders may make an unlimited number of requests for registration on Form S-3. However, we will not be required to effect a registration on Form S-3 if, within 30 days of a written request to exercise such rights, we give notice to such holders of its intention to make a public offering within 90 days, provided that we have complied with certain notice requirements to the holders of these shares.

Expenses of Registration

We will pay the registration expenses of the holders of the shares registered pursuant to the demand, piggyback and Form S-3 registration rights described above.

Expiration of Registration Rights

The demand, piggyback and Form S-3 registration rights described above will expire, with respect to any particular stockholder, upon the earlier of three years after the consummation of our initial public offering in November 2013 or when that stockholder can sell all of its shares under Rule 144 of the Securities Act during any 90 day period.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Amended and Restated Bylaws and Delaware Law

Some provisions of Delaware law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws could make the following transactions more difficult: acquisition of us by means of a tender offer; acquisition of us by means of a proxy contest or otherwise; or removal of our incumbent officers and directors. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to

 

62


Table of Contents

accomplish or could deter transactions that stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interest or in our best interests, including transactions that might result in a premium over the market price for our shares.

These provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits persons deemed “interested stockholders” from engaging in a “business combination” with a publicly-held Delaware corporation for three years following the date these persons become interested stockholders unless the business combination is, or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder was, approved in a prescribed manner or another prescribed exception applies. Generally, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder status did own, 15% or more of a corporation’s voting stock. Generally, a “business combination” includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. The existence of this provision may have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by the board of directors, such as discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a premium over the market price of our common stock.

Undesignated Preferred Stock

The ability to authorize undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change control of us. These and other provisions may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of our company.

Special Stockholder Meetings

Our amended and restated bylaws provide that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by our chairman of the board of directors, Chief Executive Officer or President, or by a resolution adopted by a majority of our board of directors.

Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder Nominations and Proposals

Our amended and restated bylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors.

Elimination of Stockholder Action by Written Consent

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation eliminates the right of stockholders to act by written consent without a meeting.

 

63


Table of Contents

Classified Board; Election and Removal of Directors; Filling Vacancies

Our board of directors is divided into three classes. The directors in each class will serve for a three-year term, one class being elected each year by our stockholders, with staggered three-year terms. Only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Because our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights, our stockholders holding a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding will be able to elect all of our directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for the removal of any of our directors only for cause and requires at least a 662/3% stockholder vote. Furthermore, any vacancy on our board of directors, however occurring, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the size of our board, may only be filled by a resolution of the board of directors unless the board of directors determines that such vacancies shall be filled by the stockholders. This system of electing and removing directors and filling vacancies may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, because it generally makes it more difficult for stockholders to replace a majority of the directors.

Choice of Forum

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Although our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain the choice of forum provision described above, it is possible that a court could find that such a provision is inapplicable for a particular claim or action or that such provision is unenforceable.

Amendment of Charter Provisions

The amendment of any of the above provisions, except for the provision making it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock, would require approval by holders of at least 662/3% of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock.

The provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our Common Stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

Limitations of Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our

 

64


Table of Contents

directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

 

   

any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;

 

   

any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

 

   

unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or

 

   

any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we may, and our amended and restated bylaws provide that we are required to, indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we may advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under Delaware law. We have entered and expect to continue to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees as determined by our board of directors. With specified exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including, among other things, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and our stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage.

The NASDAQ Global Select Market Listing

Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RLYP.”

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. The transfer agent and registrar’s address is 620 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219.

 

65


Table of Contents

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

Future sales of our common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, in the public market after this offering, or the perception that those sales may occur, could cause the prevailing market price for our common stock to fall or impair our ability to raise equity capital in the future. As described below, only a limited number of shares of our common stock will be available for sale in the public market for a period of several months after consummation of this offering due to contractual and legal restrictions on resale described below. Future sales of our common stock in the public market either before (to the extent permitted) or after restrictions lapse, or the perception that those sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock at such time and our ability to raise equity capital at a time and price we deem appropriate.

Sale of Restricted Shares

Based on the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and the last reported sale price of our common stock, or $43.62 per share, upon the closing of this offering and assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock, as well as no exercise of any of our other outstanding options or warrants, we will have outstanding an aggregate of approximately 29,714,368 shares of common stock. Of these shares, all of the shares of common stock sold in our initial public offering (other than any shares purchased by our then-existing investors, including the limited partners of such investors and one of our executive officers) and to be sold in this offering, and any shares sold upon exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, will be freely tradable in the public market without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless the shares are held by any of our “affiliates” as such term is defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act. All remaining shares of common stock held by existing stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of this offering will be “restricted securities” as such term is defined in Rule 144. These restricted securities were issued and sold by us, or will be issued and sold by us, in private transactions and are eligible for public sale only if registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, including the exemptions provided by Rule 144 or Rule 701, which rules are summarized below.

Lock-Up Agreements

In connection with this offering, we and our directors and executive officers, as well as certain of our stockholders, have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, with the underwriters not to dispose of or hedge any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock during the period from the date of the lock-up agreement continuing through the date 90 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are required to be aggregated) who is not deemed to have been one of our “affiliates” for purposes of Rule 144 at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than one of our “affiliates,” is entitled to sell those shares in the public market (subject to the

 

66


Table of Contents

lock-up agreement referred to above, if applicable) without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitations or notice provisions of Rule 144, but subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than “affiliates,” then such person is entitled to sell such shares in the public market without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144 (subject to the lock-up agreement referred to above, if applicable). In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, once we have been subject to the public company reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for at least 90 days, our “affiliates,” as defined in Rule 144, who have beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least six months are entitled to sell in the public market, upon expiration of any applicable lock-up agreements and within any three-month period, a number of those shares of our common stock that does not exceed the greater of:

 

   

1% of the number of common shares then outstanding, which will equal approximately 297,144 shares of common stock immediately after this offering (calculated as of December 31, 2013 on the basis of the assumptions described above); or

 

   

the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale. Such sales under Rule 144 by our “affiliates” or persons selling shares on behalf of our “affiliates” are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. Notwithstanding the availability of Rule 144, the holders of substantially all of our restricted securities have entered into lock-up agreements as referenced above and their restricted securities will become eligible for sale (subject to the above limitations under Rule 144) upon the expiration of the restrictions set forth in those agreements.

Rule 701

In general, under Rule 701 as currently in effect, any of our employees, directors, officers, consultants or advisors who acquired common stock from us in connection with a written compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement in compliance with Rule 701 under the Securities Act before the effective date of a registration statement under the Securities Act is entitled to rely on Rule 701 to resell such shares in reliance on Rule 144. An affiliate of the issuer can resell shares in reliance on Rule 144 without having to comply with the holding period requirements of Rule 144, and a non-affiliate of the issuer can resell shares in reliance on Rule 144 without having to comply with the holding period requirements of Rule 144 and without regard to the volume of such sales or the availability of public information about the issuer.

The SEC has indicated that Rule 701 will apply to typical stock options granted by an issuer before it becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, along with the shares acquired upon exercise of such options, including exercises after an issuer becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. In 2013 we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act to register shares in connection with our initial public offering and a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register all of the shares of our common stock subject to outstanding options and other awards issuable pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.

 

67


Table of Contents

Registration Rights

Based on the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013, the holders of approximately 21.6 million shares of our common stock, including shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, or their transferees, are, subject to any lock-up agreements they have entered into, entitled to certain rights with respect to the registration of the offer and sale of those shares under the Securities Act. For a description of these registration rights, please see the section titled “Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights.” If the offer and sale of these shares are registered, they will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act.

Stock Plans

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of common stock that we may initially issue upon exercise of outstanding options reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and our 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as well as any shares we may reserve for issuance pursuant to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Accordingly, shares registered under such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market following its effective date, subject to Rule 144 volume limitations and the lock-up agreements described above, if applicable.

 

68


Table of Contents

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders

The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below) of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock issued pursuant to this offering but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax effects. The effects of other U.S. federal tax laws, such as estate and gift tax laws, and any applicable state, local or non-U.S. tax laws are not discussed. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions, and published rulings and administrative pronouncements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), in each case in effect as of the date of this Registration Statement. These authorities may change or be subject to differing interpretations. Any such change or differing interpretation may be applied retroactively in a manner that could adversely affect a Non-U.S. Holder. We have not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS regarding the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position to that discussed below regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock.

This discussion is limited to Non-U.S. Holders that hold our common stock as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to a Non-U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including the impact of the tax on net investment income imposed by Section 1411 of the Code. In addition, it does not address consequences relevant to Non-U.S. Holders subject to particular rules, including, without limitation:

 

   

U.S. expatriates and former citizens or long-term residents of the United States;

 

   

persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;

 

   

persons holding our common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or other risk reduction strategy or as part of a conversion transaction or other integrated investment;

 

   

banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions;

 

   

brokers, dealers or traders in securities;

 

   

“controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment companies” and corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax;

 

   

partnerships or other entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and investors therein);

 

   

tax-exempt organizations or governmental organizations;

 

   

persons deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive sale provisions of the Code;

 

   

persons who hold or receive our common stock pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation; and

 

   

tax-qualified retirement plans.

If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will depend on the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. Accordingly, partnerships holding our common stock and the partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to them.

 

69


Table of Contents

THIS DISCUSSION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED AS TAX ADVICE. INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON STOCK ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX TREATY.

Definition of a Non-U.S. Holder

For purposes of this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of our common stock that is neither a “U.S. person” nor an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A U.S. person is any person that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is or is treated as any of the following:

 

   

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

 

   

a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

   

an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

 

   

a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and the control of one or more “United States persons” (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) or (2) has a valid election in effect to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Distributions

As described in the section entitled “Description of Capital Stock—Common Stock—Dividends,” the terms of our credit facility currently prohibit us from paying cash dividends on our common stock. However, if we do make distributions of cash or property on our common stock, such distributions will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Amounts not treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes will constitute a return of capital and first be applied against and reduce a Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its common stock, but not below zero. Any excess will be treated as capital gain and will be treated as described below under “—Sale or Other Taxable Disposition.”

Subject to the discussion below on effectively connected income, dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder of our common stock will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the gross amount of the dividends (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty, provided the Non-U.S. Holder furnishes a valid IRS Form W-8BEN certifying qualification for the lower treaty rate). A Non-U.S. Holder that does not timely furnish the applicable withholding agent with the required certification, but that qualifies for a reduced treaty rate, may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under any applicable income tax treaty.

 

70


Table of Contents

If dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, the Non-U.S. Holder maintains a permanent establishment in the United States to which such dividends are attributable), the Non-U.S. Holder will be exempt from the U.S. federal withholding tax described above. To claim the exemption, the Non-U.S. Holder must furnish to the applicable withholding agent a valid IRS Form W-8ECI, certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States.

Any such effectively connected dividends will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at the regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. A Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation also may be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty) on such effectively connected dividends, as adjusted for certain items. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding any applicable tax treaties that may provide for different rules.

Sale or Other Taxable Disposition

A Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock unless:

 

   

the gain is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, the Non-U.S. Holder maintains a permanent establishment in the United States to which such gain is attributable);

 

   

the Non-U.S. Holder is a nonresident alien individual present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of the disposition and certain other requirements are met; or

 

   

our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest (“USRPI”) by reason of our status as a U.S. real property holding corporation (“USRPHC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Gain described in the first bullet point above will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at the regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. A Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation also may be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty) on such effectively connected gain, as adjusted for certain items.

Gain described in the second bullet point above will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate specified by an applicable income tax treaty), which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses of the Non-U.S. Holder (even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States), provided the Non-U.S. Holder has timely filed U.S. federal income tax returns with respect to such losses.

With respect to the third bullet point above, we believe we currently are not, and do not anticipate becoming, a USRPHC. Because the determination of whether we are a USRPHC depends, however, on the fair market value of our USRPIs relative to the fair market value of our non-U.S. real property interests and our other business assets, there can be no assurance we currently are not a USRPHC or will not become one in the future. Even if we are or were to become a USRPHC, gain arising from the

 

71


Table of Contents

sale or other taxable disposition by a Non-U.S. Holder of our common stock will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax if our common stock is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations, on an established securities market, and such Non-U.S. Holder owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less of our common stock throughout the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or other taxable disposition or the Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period.

Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding any applicable tax treaties that may provide for different rules.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Payments of dividends on our common stock will not be subject to backup withholding, provided the holder either certifies its non-U.S. status, such as by furnishing a valid IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8ECI, or otherwise establishes an exemption. However, information returns are required to be filed with the IRS in connection with any dividends on our common stock paid to the Non-U.S. Holder, regardless of whether any tax was actually withheld. Proceeds of the sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock within the United States or conducted through certain U.S.-related brokers generally will not be subject to backup withholding or information reporting, if the applicable withholding agent receives the certification described above, or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Proceeds of a disposition of our common stock conducted through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker generally will not be subject to backup withholding or information reporting.

Copies of information returns that are filed with the IRS may also be made available under the provisions of an applicable treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in which the Non-U.S. Holder resides or is established.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Additional Withholding Tax on Payments Made to Foreign Accounts

Withholding taxes may be imposed under Sections 1471 to 1474 of the Code (such Sections commonly referred to as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or “FATCA”) on certain types of payments made to non-U.S. financial institutions and certain other non-U.S. entities. Specifically, a 30% withholding tax may be imposed on dividends paid on, or gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, our common stock paid to a “foreign financial institution” or a “non-financial foreign entity” (each as defined in the Code), unless (1) the foreign financial institution undertakes certain diligence and reporting obligations, (2) the non-financial foreign entity either certifies it does not have any “substantial United States owners” (as defined in the Code) or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial United States owner, or (3) the foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules. If the payee is a foreign financial institution and is subject to the diligence and reporting requirements in (1) above, it must enter into an agreement with the U.S. Department of the Treasury requiring, among other things, that it undertake to identify accounts held by certain “specified United States persons” or “United States-owned foreign entities” (each as defined in the Code), annually report certain information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on certain payments to non-compliant foreign financial institutions and certain other account holders. Foreign financial institutions located in jurisdictions that have an intergovernmental agreement with the United States governing FATCA may be subject to different rules.

 

72


Table of Contents

Under the applicable Treasury Regulations and IRS guidance, withholding under FATCA generally will apply to payments of dividends on our common stock made on or after July 1, 2014, and to payments of gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of such stock on or after January 1, 2017.

Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of withholding under FATCA to their investment in our common stock.

 

73


Table of Contents

Underwriting

Under the terms and subject to the conditions in an underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Cowen and Company, LLC are acting as representatives, have severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to them the number of shares indicated below:

 

Name

   Number of Shares

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC

  

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

                      Incorporated

  

Cowen and Company, LLC

  
  

 

Total:

  

The underwriters and the representatives are collectively referred to as the “underwriters” and the “representatives,” respectively. The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject to their acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to the approval of certain legal matters by their counsel and to certain other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus if any such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares covered by the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares described below.

The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of common stock directly to the public at the offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to certain dealers at a price that represents a concession not in excess of $            . After the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time to time be varied by the representatives.

The underwriters have an option to buy up to approximately $15.0 million of additional shares of common stock from us and have 30 days from the date of this prospectus to exercise such option. To the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase about the same percentage of the additional shares of common stock as the number listed next to the underwriter’s name in the preceding table bears to the total number of shares of common stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.

The following table shows the per share and total public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and proceeds before expenses to us. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock.

 

     Per
Share
     Total  
      No Exercise      Full
Exercise
 

Public offering price

   $                      $                          $                  

Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by:

        

Us

   $         $         $     

Proceeds, before expenses, to us

   $         $         $     

 

74


Table of Contents

The estimated offering expenses payable by us, exclusive of the underwriting discounts and commissions, are approximately $0.7 million. We have agreed to reimburse the underwriters for expense relating to clearance of this offering with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority up to $25,000.

The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed 5% of the total number of shares of common stock offered by them.

Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “RLYP.”

We and all directors and officers, as well as certain of our stockholders, have agreed that, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, during the period ending 90 days after the date of this prospectus (the “restricted period”):

 

   

offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of common stock;

 

   

file any registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the offering of any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or

 

   

enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the common stock

whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise. In addition, we and each such person agrees that, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we or such other person will not, during the restricted period, make any demand for, or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of any shares of common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock.

The restrictions described in the immediately preceding paragraph to do not apply to:

 

   

the sale of the shares to the underwriters;

 

   

the issuance of shares of common stock upon the exercise of an option or warrant or the conversion of a security outstanding on the date hereof of which the underwriters have been advised in writing;

 

   

transfers or dispositions of shares of common stock (or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock):

 

   

as a bona fide gift;

 

   

to any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of the party subject to the lock-up restrictions or the immediate family of such person;

 

   

to any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, investment fund or other entity controlled or managed, or under common control or management by the party subject to the lock-up restrictions or the immediate family of such person;

 

75


Table of Contents
   

by will, other testamentary document or intestate succession to the legal representative, heir, beneficiary or a member of the immediate family of the party subject to the lock-up restrictions; and

 

   

as distributions to partners, members or stockholders of the party subject to the lock-up restrictions,

 

   

provided that in the case of any transfer or distribution pursuant to the above five subclauses, (i) each donee or distributee shall sign and deliver a lock-up letter substantially in the form executed by the party subject to the lock-up restrictions and (ii) no filing under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, reporting a reduction in beneficial ownership of shares of common stock, shall be required or shall be voluntarily made during the restricted period (other than a filing on Form 5);

 

   

the establishment of a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act for the transfer of shares of common stock, provided that (i) such plan does not provide for the transfer of common stock during the restricted period and (ii) to the extent a public announcement or filing under the Exchange Act, if any, is required of or voluntarily made by or on behalf of the party subject to the lock-up restrictions or the Company regarding the establishment of such plan, such announcement or filing shall include a statement to the effect that no transfer of common stock may be made under such plan during the restricted period;

 

   

the exercise of options to purchase shares of common stock granted under any stock incentive plan or stock purchase plan of the Company, provided that the underlying shares shall continue to be subject to the restrictions on transfer set forth in this agreement and provided further that no filing under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act shall be required or shall be voluntarily made during the restricted period (other than a filing on Form 5);

 

   

the exercise (whether for cash, cashless, or net exercise) of warrants to purchase shares of common stock (or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock), provided that the underlying shares shall continue to be subject to the lock-up restrictions and provided further that no filing under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act shall be required or shall be voluntarily made during the restricted period (other than a filing on Form 5);

 

   

the transfer of shares of common stock (or any security convertible into common stock) to the Company or sold in connection with a vesting event of the Company’s securities or upon the exercise of options to purchase the Company’s securities, on a “cashless” or “net exercise” basis or to cover tax withholding obligations of the party subject to the lock-up restrictions in connection with such vesting or exercise provided that no filing under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act shall be required or shall be voluntarily made during the restricted period (other than a filing on Form 5);

 

   

the transfer or disposition of the shares of common stock (or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock) held by the party subject to the lock-up restrictions that occurs by operation of law, such as pursuant to a qualified domestic order or in connection with a divorce settlement provided that each transferee shall sign and deliver a lock-up letter substantially in the form executed by the party subject to the lock-up restrictions;

 

76


Table of Contents
   

during the 90 days after the date of this prospectus, the transfer of shares of common stock (or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock) pursuant to a bona fide third party tender offer, merger, consolidation or other similar transaction made to all holders of the common stock involving a change of control of the Company, provided that in the event that the tender offer, merger, consolidation or other such transaction is not completed, the common stock owned by the party subject to the lock-up restrictions shall remain subject to such restrictions; or

 

   

transactions by any person other than us relating to shares of common stock or other securities acquired in open market transactions after the completion of the offering of the shares, provided that no filing under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is required or voluntarily made in connection with subsequent sales of the common stock or other securities acquired in such open market transactions (other than a filing on Form 5).

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, in their sole discretion, may release the common stock and other securities subject to the lock-up agreements described above in whole or in part at any time with or without notice.

In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the underwriters under the option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters can close out a covered short sale by exercising the option to purchase additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out a covered short sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the open market price of shares compared to the price available under the option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters may also sell shares in excess of the option to purchase additional shares, creating a naked short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering. As an additional means of facilitating this offering, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open market to stabilize the price of the common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market price of the common stock above independent market levels or prevent or retard a decline in the market price of the common stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities and may end any of these activities at any time.

We and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares of common stock to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the representatives to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.

The underwriters and their respective affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial

 

77


Table of Contents

advisory, investment management, investment research, principal investment, hedging, financing and brokerage activities. Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates may in the future perform various financial advisory and investment banking services for us, for which they will receive customary fees and expenses.

In addition, in the ordinary course of their various business activities, the underwriters and their respective affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold long and short positions in such securities and instruments. Such investment and securities activities may involve our securities and instruments. The underwriters and their respective affiliates may also make investment recommendations or publish or express independent research views in respect of such securities or instruments and may at any time hold, or recommend to clients that they acquire, long or short positions in such securities and instruments.

Pricing of the Offering

The public offering price will be determined by negotiations between us and the representatives. Among the factors considered in determining the initial public offering price were our future prospects and those of our industry in general, our results from operations and certain other financial and operating information in recent periods, and the price-earnings ratios, price-sales ratios, market prices of securities, and certain financial and operating information of companies engaged in activities similar to ours.

Selling Restrictions

European Economic Area

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a “Relevant Member State”) an offer to the public of any shares of our common stock may not be made in that Relevant Member State, except that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any shares of our common stock may be made at any time under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they have been implemented in that Relevant Member State:

 

(a) to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive;

 

(b) to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, 150, natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), as permitted under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives for any such offer; or

 

(c) in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of shares of our common stock shall result in a requirement for the publication by us or any underwriter of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer to the public” in relation to any shares of our common stock in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and any shares of our common stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase any shares of our common stock, as the same

 

78


Table of Contents

may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in the Relevant Member State, and the expression “2010 PD Amending Directive” means Directive 2010/73/EU.

United Kingdom

Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:

 

(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of the shares of our common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to us; and

 

(b) it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the shares of our common stock in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Switzerland

The shares of common stock may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the shares or the offering may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the offering, the Company, or the shares have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of shares will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (“FINMA”), and the offer of shares has not been and will not be authorized under the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”). The investor protection afforded to acquirers of interests in collective investment schemes under the CISA does not extend to acquirers of shares.

Notice to Prospective Investors in the Dubai International Financial Centre

This prospectus relates to an Exempt Offer in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority (“DFSA”). This prospectus is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for the prospectus. The shares to which this prospectus relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on the shares. If

 

79


Table of Contents

you do not understand the contents of this prospectus you should consult an authorized financial advisor.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Australia

No placement document, prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document has been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”), in relation to the offering. This prospectus does not constitute a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the Corporations Act 2001 (the “Corporations Act”), and does not purport to include the information required for a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the Corporations Act.

Any offer in Australia of the shares may only be made to persons (the “Exempt Investors”) who are “sophisticated investors” (within the meaning of section 708(8) of the Corporations Act), “professional investors” (within the meaning of section 708(11) of the Corporations Act) or otherwise pursuant to one or more exemptions contained in section 708 of the Corporations Act so that it is lawful to offer the shares without disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act.

The shares applied for by Exempt Investors in Australia must not be offered for sale in Australia in the period of 12 months after the date of allotment under the offering, except in circumstances where disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act would not be required pursuant to an exemption under section 708 of the Corporations Act or otherwise or where the offer is pursuant to a disclosure document which complies with Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act. Any person acquiring shares must observe such Australian on-sale restrictions.

This prospectus contains general information only and does not take account of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. It does not contain any securities recommendations or financial product advice. Before making an investment decision, investors need to consider whether the information in this prospectus is appropriate to their needs, objectives and circumstances, and, if necessary, seek expert advice on those matters.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Hong Kong

The shares of common stock have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means of any document, other than (a) to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong and any rules made under that Ordinance; or (b) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” as defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of Hong Kong or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance. No advertisement, invitation or document relating to the shares of common stock has been or may be issued or has been or may be in the possession of any person for the purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public of Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to shares of common stock which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance and any rules made under that Ordinance.

 

80


Table of Contents

Notice to Prospective Investors in Japan

The shares of common stock have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948, as amended) and, accordingly, will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or for the benefit of any Japanese Person or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to any Japanese Person, except in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines promulgated by relevant Japanese governmental or regulatory authorities in effect at the relevant time. For the purposes of this paragraph, “Japanese Person” shall mean any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Singapore

This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the shares of common stock may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares of common stock be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”), (ii) to a relevant person pursuant to Section 275(1), or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275, of the SFA, or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.

Where the shares of common stock are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:

 

  (a) a corporation (which is not an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA)) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or

 

  (b) a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an accredited investor,

securities (as defined in Section 239(1) of the SFA) of that corporation or the beneficiaries’ rights and interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferred within six months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares of common stock pursuant to an offer made under Section 275 of the SFA except:

 

  (a) to an institutional investor or to a relevant person defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA, or to any person arising from an offer referred to in Section 275(1A) or Section 276(4)(i)(B) of the SFA;

 

  (b) where no consideration is or will be given for the transfer;

 

  (c) where the transfer is by operation of law;

 

  (d) as specified in Section 276(7) of the SFA; or

 

  (e) as specified in Regulation 32 of the Securities and Futures (Offers of Investments) (Shares and Debentures) Regulations 2005 of Singapore.

 

81


Table of Contents

Legal Matters

The validity of the issuance of our common stock offered in this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park, California. Ropes  & Gray LLP is acting as counsel for the underwriters in connection with this offering.

Experts

Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 which are incorporated by reference in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement. Our financial statements are incorporated by reference in reliance on Ernst & Young  LLP’s report, given on their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

Where You Can Find More Information

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. Whenever a reference is made in this prospectus to any of our contracts, agreements or other documents, the reference may not be complete and you should refer to the exhibits that are a part of the registration statement or the exhibits to the reports or other documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus for a copy of such contract, agreement or other document. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any other document that is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. For further information with respect to Relypsa, Inc. and the common stock offered hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. A copy of the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith may be inspected without charge at the public reference room maintained by the SEC, located at 100 F Street N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from such offices upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address is www.sec.gov.

We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. We maintain a website at www.relypsa.com. You may access our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC free of charge at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on our website, and you should not consider the contents of our website in making an investment decision with respect to our common stock.

 

82


Table of Contents

Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference

The following documents filed by us with the SEC are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. You should carefully read and consider all of these documents before making an investment decision:

 

   

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 19, 2014;

 

   

Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2014; and

 

   

The description of our common stock contained in our registration statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on November 7, 2013, including any amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating such description.

Nothing in this prospectus shall be deemed to incorporate information deemed furnished but not filed with the SEC. Any statement contained in a document that is incorporated by reference will be modified or superseded for all purposes to the extent that a statement contained in this prospectus modifies or is contrary to that previous statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed a part of this prospectus except as so modified or superseded.

We will provide to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom a prospectus is delivered, a copy of any or all of the reports or documents that have been incorporated by reference into this prospectus but not delivered with this prospectus. We will provide these reports upon written or oral request at no cost to the requester. Please direct your request, either in writing or by telephone, to the Corporate Secretary, 700 Saginaw Drive, Redwood City, California 94063, telephone number (650) 421-9500. In addition, copies of the documents incorporated herein by reference may be accessed at our website at www.relypsa.com.

 

83


Table of Contents

$100,000,000

 

LOGO

Common Stock

Prospectus

 

Morgan Stanley   BofA Merrill Lynch
Cowen and Company

                , 2014


Table of Contents

PART II

Information Not Required in Prospectus

 

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than the underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by the registrant in connection with the sale of Common Stock being registered. All amounts are estimates except for the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, registration fee, and the FINRA filing fee.

 

Item

   Amount to
be paid
 

SEC registration fee

   $ 14,812   

FINRA filing fee

     17,750   

The NASDAQ Global Select Market supplemental listing fee

     30,000   

Printing and engraving expenses

     165,000   

Legal fees and expenses

     250,000   

Accounting fees and expenses

     130,000   

Blue Sky, qualification fees and expenses

     20,000   

Transfer agent fees and expenses

     10,000   

Miscellaneous expenses

     62,438   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 700,000   
  

 

 

 

 

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

As permitted by Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, we have adopted provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws that limit or eliminate the personal liability of our directors for a breach of their fiduciary duty of care as a director. The duty of care generally requires that, when acting on behalf of the corporation, directors exercise an informed business judgment based on all material information reasonably available to them. Consequently, a director will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for:

 

   

any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;

 

   

any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

 

   

any act related to unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions or payment of dividends; or

 

   

any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

These limitations of liability do not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes us to indemnify our officers, directors and other agents to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.

As permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated bylaws provide that:

 

   

we may indemnify our directors, officers, and employees to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to limited exceptions;

 

II-1


Table of Contents
   

we may advance expenses to our directors, officers and employees in connection with a legal proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to limited exceptions; and

 

   

the rights provided in our amended and restated bylaws are not exclusive.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 hereto, and our amended and restated bylaws, filed as Exhibit 3.2 hereto, provide for the indemnification provisions described above and elsewhere herein. We have entered into separate indemnification agreements with our directors and officers which may be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law. These indemnification agreements generally require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers and directors against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct. These indemnification agreements also generally require us to advance any expenses incurred by the directors or officers as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. In addition, we have purchased a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures our directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment in some circumstances. These indemnification provisions and the indemnification agreements may be sufficiently broad to permit indemnification of our officers and directors for liabilities, including reimbursement of expenses incurred, arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

The form of Underwriting Agreement, to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 hereto, provides for indemnification by the underwriters of us and our officers who sign this Registration Statement and directors for specified liabilities, including matters arising under the Securities Act.

 

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

The following list sets forth information as to all securities we have sold since January 1, 2011, which were not registered under the Securities Act.

 

1. In July 2011, we issued an aggregate of 3,810,637 shares of our Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $9.1848 for aggregate gross consideration of $35.0 million to 12 accredited investors.

 

2. In July 2012, September 2012 and November 2012, we issued an aggregate of 7,076,901 shares of our Series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $9.1848 to 15 accredited investors. In connection with such issuances, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,076,643 shares of our Series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $0.17. The aggregate gross consideration received for these issuances was $65.0 million. In November 2013, we issued an aggregate of 2,046,176 shares of common stock to eight accredited investors in connection with the cash and net exercise of the warrants. The aggregate cash consideration received for these issuances was approximately $22,000.

 

3. In January 2013, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 54,437 shares of our Series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $9.1848 to Oxford Finance LLC and Silicon Valley Bank, or the Venture Lenders, in connection with that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated January 31, 2013 with the Venture Lenders, whereby the Venture Lenders committed to lend us up to $20.0 million pursuant to the terms therein.

 

II-2


Table of Contents
4. In May 2013, we issued a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 6,968 shares of our Series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $9.1848 to Silicon Valley Bank in connection with that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated May 2, 2013 with Silicon Valley Bank, whereby Silicon Valley Bank committed to lend us up to $1.6 million pursuant to the terms therein.

 

5. In October 2013, we issued an aggregate of 1,633,126 shares of our Series C-2 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $9.1848 to 15 accredited investors. In connection with such issuances, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 479,221 shares of our Series C-2 Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share of $0.17. The aggregate gross consideration received for these issuances was $15.0 million. We issued an aggregate of 472,187 shares of common stock to eight accredited investors in connection with the cash and net exercise of the warrants. The aggregate cash consideration received for these issuances was approximately $5,000.

 

6. In October 2013, we issued an aggregate of 22,088 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant to warrants exercised by two accredited investors at a price per share of $13.502. The aggregate gross consideration received for these issuances was $0.3 million.

 

7. In November 2013, we issued an aggregate of 22,625 shares of common stock to nine accredited investors in connection with the cash and net exercise of warrants to purchase our common stock at a price per share of $9.1848. The aggregate cash consideration received for these issuances was $0.1 million.

 

8. In December 2013, we issued 9,800 shares of common stock pursuant to the net exercise of a warrant to purchase 26,162 shares of common stock to one accredited investor at an effective price per share of $17.20. We did not receive any cash proceeds from such cashless net exercise.

 

9. Prior to filing our registration statement on Form S-8 in November 2013, we granted stock options and stock awards to employees, directors and consultants under our Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, covering an aggregate of 3,320,623 shares of common stock, at a weighted-average average exercise price of $5.51 per share. Of these, options covering an aggregate of 201,655 shares were cancelled without being exercised.

 

10. Prior to filing our registration statement on Form S-8 in November 2013, we sold an aggregate of 81,125 shares of common stock to employees, directors and consultants for cash consideration in the aggregate amount of $0.3 million upon the exercise of stock options and stock awards.

We claimed exemption from registration under the Securities Act for the sale and issuance of securities in the transactions described in paragraphs (1)-(8) by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions not involving any public offering. All of the purchasers of unregistered securities for which we relied on Section 4(a)(2) and/or Regulation D represented that they were accredited investors as defined under the Securities Act. We claimed such exemption on the basis that (a) the purchasers in each case represented that they intended to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to the distribution thereof and that they either received adequate information about the registrant or had access, through employment or other relationships, to such information and (b) appropriate legends were affixed to the stock certificates issued in such transactions.

 

II-3


Table of Contents

We claimed exemption from registration under the Securities Act for the sales and issuances of securities in the transactions described in paragraphs (9)-(10) above under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act in that such sales and issuances did not involve a public offering or under Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act, in that they were offered and sold either pursuant to written compensatory plans or pursuant to a written contract relating to compensation, as provided by Rule 701.

 

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

 

(a) Exhibits. See the Exhibit Index attached to this registration statement, which is incorporated by reference herein.

 

(b) Financial Statement Schedules. Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements incorporated by reference or notes thereto.

 

Item 17. Undertakings.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

1. For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.

 

2. For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

 

II-4


Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Redwood City, California, on March 18, 2014.

 

RELYPSA, INC.
By:  

/s/ John A. Orwin

John A. Orwin
President and Chief Executive Officer

Power of Attorney

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints John A. Orwin and Kristine M. Ball, and each of them acting individually, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Registration Statement, including post-effective amendments or any abbreviated registration statement and any amendments thereto filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) increasing the number of securities for which registration is sought, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of each to act alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully for all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ John A. Orwin

John A. Orwin

   Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
  March 18, 2014

/s/ Kristine M. Ball

Kristine M. Ball

   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  March 18, 2014

/s/ John P. Butler

John P. Butler

   Director   March 18, 2014

/s/ Paul J. Hastings

Paul J. Hastings

   Director   March 18, 2014

 

II-5


Table of Contents

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ Ronald M. Hunt

Ronald M. Hunt

   Director   March 18, 2014

/s/ David W.J. McGirr

David W.J. McGirr

   Director   March 18, 2014

/s/ Scott M. Rocklage

Scott M. Rocklage, Ph.D.

   Director   March 18, 2014

/s/ Thomas J. Schuetz

Thomas J. Schuetz, M.D., Ph.D.

   Director   March 18, 2014

/s/ Jonathan T. Silverstein

Jonathan T. Silverstein, Esq.

   Director   March 18, 2014

/s/ Klaus Veitinger

Klaus Veitinger, M.D., Ph.D.

   Director   March 18, 2014

 

II-6


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

        Incorporated by Reference    

Exhibit
Number

 

Exhibit Description

  Form  

Date

 

Number

 

Provided

Herewith

  1.1*   Form of Underwriting Agreement.        
  1.2   Form of Underwriting Agreement.   S-1/A   10/17/2013   1.1  
  3.1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.   8-K   10/20/2013   3.1  
  3.2   Amended and Restated Bylaws.   8-K   10/20/2013   3.2  
  4.1   Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 through 3.2.        
  4.2   Form of Common Stock Certificate.   S-1/A   10/17/2013   4.2  
  4.3   Warrant issued to Silicon Valley Bank.   S-1   9/27/2013   4.4  
  4.4   Form of warrant in connection with venture debt financing.   S-1   9/27/2013   4.7  
  4.5   Warrant issued to Silicon Valley Bank (equipment loan).   S-1   9/27/2013   4.8  
  5.1*   Opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP.        
10.1†   Amended and Restated Intellectual Property License and Assignment Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Ilypsa, Inc.   S-1/A   10/17/2013   10.1  
10.2(a)   Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of July 26, 2012, by and among Relypsa, Inc. and the investors listed therein.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.2  
10.2(b)   Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated October 30, 2013, by and among Relypsa, Inc. and the signatories thereto.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.2(b)  
10.3(a)   Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2013, by and among Oxford Finance LLC, Silicon Valley Bank, Relypsa, Inc. and Relypsa 106, LLC.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.3(a)  
10.3(b)   First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2013, by and among Oxford Finance LLC, Oxford Finance Funding I, LLC, Silicon Valley Bank, Relypsa, Inc. and Relypsa 106, LLC.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.3(b)  
10.3(c)   Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2013, by and among Oxford Finance LLC, Oxford Finance Funding I, LLC, Silicon Valley Bank and Relypsa, Inc.   8-K   12/23/2013   10.3(c)  


Table of Contents
        Incorporated by Reference    

Exhibit
Number

 

Exhibit Description

  Form  

Date

 

Number

 

Provided

Herewith

10.4(a)   Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2013, by and among Silicon Valley Bank, Relypsa Inc. and Relypsa 106, LLC.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.4(a)  
10.4(b)   First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2013 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, Relypsa, Inc. and Relypsa 106, LLC.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.4(b)  
10.5(a)†   Master Agreement for Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing Services, effective January 17, 2011, by and between Patheon Inc. and Relypsa, Inc.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.5(a)  
10.5(b)†   First Amendment to Master Agreement for Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing Services, dated February 25, 2011, by and between Patheon Inc. and Relypsa, Inc.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.5(b)  
10.6†   Manufacturing and Supply Agreement effective as of November 27, 2012 by and between LANXESS Corporation and Relypsa, Inc.   10-K   03/19/2014   10.6  
10.7   Lease, dated September 7, 2012, by and between HCP LS Redwood City, LLC and Relypsa, Inc.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.7  
10.8(a)#   Relypsa, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.8(a)  
10.8(b)#   Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.8(b)  
10.8(c)#   Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.8(c)  
10.9(a)#   Relypsa, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.   10-K   03/19/2014   10.9(a)  
10.9(b)#   Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement under the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.9(b)  
10.9(c)#   Form of Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.9(c)  
10.9(d)#   Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.9(d)  


Table of Contents
        Incorporated by Reference    

Exhibit
Number

 

Exhibit Description

  Form  

Date

 

Number

 

Provided

Herewith

10.10#   Relypsa, Inc. 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.   10-K   03/19/2014   10.10  
10.11#   Non-Employee Director Compensation Program.   10-K   3/19/2014   10.11  
10.12#   Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.12  
10.13#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Jerry Buysse, effective as of September 24, 2013.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.13  
10.14(a)#   Letter Agreement Regarding Transition Employment Terms (Employment Agreement), by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Gerrit Klaerner, dated October 25, 2012.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.14(a)  
10.14(b)#   Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Gerrit Klaerner, dated March 11, 2013.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.14(b)  
10.14(c)#   Separation and Consulting Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Gerrit Klaerner, dated May 9, 2013.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.14(c)  
10.15#   Offer Letter, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and John Orwin, dated April 26, 2013.   S-1   9/27/2013   10.15  
10.16#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Kristine Ball, effective as of September 24, 2013.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.16  
10.17#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Lance Berman, effective as of September 24, 2013.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.17  
10.18#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Wilhelm Stahl, effective as of September 24, 2013.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.18  
10.19#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Claire Lockey, effective as of September 24, 2013.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.19  
10.20#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Ronald A. Krasnow, effective as of September 24, 2013.   S-1/A   11/1/2013   10.20  
10.21#   Employment Agreement, by and between Relypsa, Inc. and Mary Corbett, effective as of December 16, 2013.   10-K   03/19/2014   10.21  


Table of Contents
        Incorporated by Reference    

Exhibit
Number

 

Exhibit Description

  Form  

Date

 

Number

 

Provided

Herewith

23.1   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.         X
23.2*   Consent of Latham & Watkins LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).        
24.1   Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto).         X

 

* To be filed by amendment.
Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and this exhibit has been filed separately with the SEC.
# Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.