Attached files

file filename
EX-10.17 - AMENDMENT NO 3 TO HAGEN SAVILLE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-1017amendmentno3saville.htm
EX-10.5 - BFP POTOMAC TOWERS LEASE - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-105leasemcgcapitalbfppo.htm
EX-10.20 - KENNEDY SEVERANCE AGREEMENT - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-1020kennedyseveranceagr.htm
EX-21 - SUBSIDIARIES - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-21123113subsidiaries.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-321123113.htm
EX-10.19 - AMENDMENT NO 1 TO REICHERT SEVERANCE AGREEMENT - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-1019amendmentno1reichert.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-311123113.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-231123113.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-322123113.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) - MCG CAPITAL CORPex-312123113.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
___________________
Commission file number 0-33377
MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
54-1889518
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1001 19th Street North, 10th Floor, Arlington, VA
 
22209
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(703) 247-7500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
 
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x   No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer    o
Accelerated filer    x
Non-accelerated filer    o
Smaller reporting company    o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2013, was $356,905,163, based on $5.21 per share, the last reported sale price of the shares of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. For purposes of this computation, shares held by certain stockholders and by directors and executive officers of the Registrant have been excluded. Such exclusion of shares held by such persons is not intended, nor shall it be deemed, to be an admission that such persons are affiliates of the Registrant. There were 70,510,441 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2014.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as indicated herein.




TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES




PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General
We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to lower middle-market companies throughout the United States. Generally, our portfolio companies use our capital investment to finance acquisitions, recapitalizations, buyouts, organic growth, working capital and other general corporate purposes.
We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a BDC we must meet various regulatory tests, which include investing at least 70% of our total assets in private or thinly traded public U.S.-based companies and limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings (excluding SBIC debt) of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt generally may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets).
In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to continue to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes and obtain favorable RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain requirements, including certain minimum distribution requirements. If we satisfy these requirements, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders as distributions, allowing us to substantially reduce or eliminate our corporate-level tax liability. From time to time, our wholly owned subsidiaries may execute transactions that trigger corporate-level tax liabilities. In such cases, we recognize a tax provision in the period when it becomes more likely than not that the taxable event will occur.
Corporate Structure
We make a portion of our investments in qualifying small businesses through Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital, our wholly owned subsidiary licensed by the United States Small Business Administration, or the SBA, to operate as a Small Business Investment Company, or SBIC, under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, or the SBIC Act. As an SBIC, Solutions Capital is subject to a variety of regulations concerning, among other things, the size and nature of the companies in which it may invest and the structure of those investments.
We also make investments through other wholly owned subsidiaries, all of which are structured as Delaware corporations and limited liability companies, to hold the assets of one or more of our portfolio companies. Some of these subsidiaries in turn have wholly owned subsidiaries, all of which are Delaware corporations that hold the assets of certain of our portfolio companies.
Company Background
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1998. On March 18, 1998, we changed our name from MCG, Inc. to MCG Credit Corporation and, on June 14, 2001, to MCG Capital Corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 1001 19th Street North, 10th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209 and our telephone number is (703) 247-7500.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “Company,” “MCG,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to MCG Capital Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (including its affiliated securitization trust) unless the context otherwise requires.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and, accordingly, file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information can be read and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at the Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Our Internet address is www.mcgcapital.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge on our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

1



Our logo, trademarks and service marks are the property of MCG. Other trademarks or service marks appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective holders.
Significant Developments in 2013
Originations and Advances — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we made $37.1 million and $128.1 million, respectively, in originations and advances to new and existing portfolio companies.
Loan Monetizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we received $37.0 million and $199.4 million, respectively, in loan payoffs and amortization payments.
Equity Monetizations and Realizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we received $2.6 million and $10.7 million, respectively, in proceeds from the sale of equity investments, principally the sale of securities in each of Miles Media Group, LLC, NDSSI Holdings, LLC and Jenzabar, Inc.
Loans on Non-Accrual — As of December 31, 2013, loans on non-accrual were $21.4 million at cost (6.1% of the total loan portfolio), and $4.5 million at fair value (1.3% of the total loan portfolio). On December 15, 2013, Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc., or Color Star, filed for voluntary relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. In the quarter ended December 31, 2013, we realized a $13.5 million loss on our subordinated loan to Color Star.
Operating Costs — For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2013, our total operating costs, excluding interest expense, were $11.5 million, or 2.2% of total assets of $514.0 million. During this same period, we incurred severance costs of $0.8 million, offset by the reversal of $0.3 million of amortization expense associated with the forfeiture of restricted stock that we included in total operating costs.
Reduced Leverage — For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2013, we reduced our outstanding borrowings under our MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust, by $72.9 million, reducing our borrowings under our 2006-1 Trust from $98.1 million to $25.2 million as of December 31, 2013. On January 21, 2014, we repaid and terminated our 2006-1 Trust.
Open-Market Purchases of Our Stock — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased 512,100 and 1,016,739 shares of our common stock at weighted average purchase prices of $4.73 and $4.62, respectively. We acquired these shares from sellers in open market transactions. We retire these shares upon settlement, thereby reducing the number of shares issued and outstanding.
Second SBIC License — On November 8, 2013, we withdrew our application for a second license from the SBA to operate an additional subsidiary as an SBIC. We elected to withdraw our application for a second license until such time as the SBA has an opportunity to further evaluate organizational results in connection with our restructuring efforts and our position in relation to other specialty finance companies. The SBA indicated that we may petition the SBA for permission to re-file our application at a future date. The withdrawal of the license application for the second SBIC license does not impact Solutions Capital, its existing license or operations.
Outlook
In 2013, we successfully improved our operating efficiency by reducing operating costs, excluding interest expense, as a percentage of total assets from 3.6% in 2011 to 2.2%, which we believe places us in the top quartile of all BDCs. In 2014, we anticipate that our fixed-cost cash operating expenses, excluding interest and variable incentive compensation, to be approximately $10 million.  In addition, we anticipate incurring non-recurring general and administrative expenses of $1.0-2.0 million primarily related to Color Star litigation and recruitment expenses.  
During 2014, we plan to reorganize our Asset Management department to more effectively address the markets we serve and to better leverage the vertical market industry expertise we possess in healthcare, software, information services, for-profit education and consumer products, among others. We expect that the majority of our new business will continue to come from private equity sponsors operating in the lower middle-market with loan proceeds used in connection with M&A, business expansion and recapitalization transactions. We will also continue to provide unitranche, second lien and subordinated debt solutions and, to a small degree, equity co-investment.
We believe that current market conditions in our primary lending markets are consistent with the peak of a credit cycle. The current supply of debt capital exceeds the demand by issuers in our markets, resulting in lower pricing and weaker

2



contractual protections. A noteworthy development is that, in our view, many issuers in the lower middle-market can currently obtain financing on pricing and terms comparable to larger companies. As a result of these market conditions, we intend to redeploy our excess liquidity in a cautious and deliberate manner and we expect to generate, net operating income, or NOI of 25-30 cents per share for 2014. Based on our assumptions of normalized expenses and 100 basis points of yield compression, fully-deployed we expect to generate 11% yield on $470 million of total investments and to generate annual NOI of approximately 40-45 cents per share before leverage, or approximately 10-12 cents per share on a quarterly basis. Fully-deployed, we estimate that a 100 basis point change in yield on our portfolio has an approximately 7 cent per share impact on NOI.
During the two year period ending December 31, 2013, we monetized $622 million of our investment portfolio, $155 million more than our forecast resulting in lower overall earning assets and associated revenue and earnings for that period. We expect repayments of approximately $100-125 million in 2014; however, depending upon market conditions, it is possible that monetization levels could run meaningfully higher. Depending on the market, during 2014 and 2015, we expect to originate and advance approximately $100-150 million annually in new investments, which would result in full deployment of our balance sheet in the next six to eight quarters at the earliest.
On January 21, 2014, we repaid the remaining indebtedness associated with our 2006-1 Trust, thus eliminating all funded indebtedness associated with our BDC asset coverage test. Given our equity capital base of $334 million we believe that we have substantial leverage capacity available to support asset acquisition above our cash balances and provide associated incremental earnings power to the extent leverage is available.
On February 28, 2014, our board of directors approved an increase in our current stock repurchase program from $25 million to $35 million and we expect to repurchase stock at share price levels that we believe are accretive to our stockholders.
Also on February 28, 2014, our board of directors declared a 12.5 cent per share distribution to stockholders of record on March 14, 2014 and payable on March 28, 2014. We expect that our board of directors will declare distributions on a quarterly basis at a level approximating our quarterly NOI. Due to the continuing high velocity of our loan portfolio and challenging market conditions generally, subject to review and approval by our board of directors, we anticipate lowering our quarterly distributions to 7 cents per share at least for the remainder of 2014.
MCG’s Investment Portfolio
As of December 31, 2013, the majority of our investment portfolio is loans to lower middle-market companies that generate annual revenue of less than $50 million and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, in the range of $3-$15 million. Generally, our portfolio companies use our capital investments to finance acquisitions, recapitalizations and buyouts, as well as for organic growth and working capital. We identify and source new portfolio companies through multiple channels, including private equity sponsors, investment bankers, brokers, fund-less sponsors, institutional syndication partners, owner operators, and other club lenders that facilitate peer-to-peer loans. We generally invest in some combination of senior debt, second-lien debt, secured and unsecured subordinated debt and equity.

3



As of December 31, 2013, we had debt and equity investments in 34 portfolio companies with a combined fair value of $368.9 million. As shown in the following chart, over 90% of the fair value of our portfolio as of December 31, 2013 was invested in senior and subordinated debt, while the remainder was invested in preferred and common equity securities. Our diversified investment portfolio spans 15 industries. We have concentrations in excess of 10% of the fair value of our total portfolio in the following four industries: Healthcare (23.0%), Business Services (17.4%), Education (15.7%) and Manufacturing (14.0%). Approximately 98% of our portfolio at fair value is concentrated in ten industries. Since we target investments in industries in which we have expertise and, given the size of our investment base, we anticipate that our portfolio will remain concentrated in fewer than ten industries. See Portfolio Composition and Investment Activity in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional detail about our investment portfolio, including a detailed listing of the industries represented in our investment portfolio.
Most of the loans in our portfolio were originated directly with our portfolio companies; however, we have also participated in loan syndications or other transactions, which are often referred to as "passive participations" which make up less than 5% of our portfolio at value as of December 31, 2013.
Our debt instruments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 15.5%, a portion of which may be deferred. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 73.3% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 26.7% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 60.2% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had LIBOR floors between 1.0% and 3.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.50% and 6.0%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percent of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.
From time to time, we make equity investments in companies in which we have also made debt investments. Our equity investments include preferred stock, common stock and warrants and, in many cases, board observation rights. We may invest across the capital structure of our portfolio companies using a combination of debt and equity investments to meet our portfolio companies’ needs and achieve favorable risk-adjusted returns.

4



The following table summarizes the fair value and revenue contributions of our ten largest investments. As of December 31, 2013, these ten investments comprised 54.3% of the fair value of our portfolio and contributed 42.1% of our total revenues during 2013. We originated approximately 12% of the fair value of our top ten largest portfolio investments in the fourth quarter of 2013.
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31, 2013
Year ended December 31, 2013
Company
Industry
Fair Value
% of
Portfolio
Revenues
% of Total
Revenues
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
Healthcare
$
31,656

8.6
%
$
4,474

8.9
%
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC(1)
Insurance
23,619

6.4

3,129

6.2

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.
Publishing
21,483

5.8

2,624

5.2

C7 Data Centers, Inc.
Business Services
20,574

5.6

1,466

2.9

Education Management, Inc.
Education
19,791

5.4

2,562

5.1

TCFI CP LLC
Manufacturing
19,667

5.3

372

0.7

Miles Media Group, LLC
Business Services
18,913

5.1

2,380

4.7

IDOC, LLC
Healthcare
16,427

4.4

1,510

3.0

SC Academy Holdings, Inc.
Education
14,577

4.0

1,982

3.9

Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc.
Restaurants
13,691

3.7

761

1.5

Total—ten largest investments
 
200,398

54.3
%
21,260

42.1
%
Other portfolio companies
 
168,475

45.7
%
29,225

57.9
%
Total investment portfolio
 
$
368,873

100.0
%
$
50,485

100.0
%
___________________________________________
(1)
In February 2014, we exited our investment in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC
As of December 31, 2013, our control companies comprised 11.9% of the fair value of our portfolio and contributed 10.3% of our total revenues during 2013.
Competition
We compete with many types of investors for the portfolio companies in which we invest, including public and private funds (including other BDCs and SBICs), commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds or hedge funds. Some of our existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some may also have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, allowing them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than we can.
The competitive pressures we face require our management team to develop and maintain strong relationships with intermediaries, private equity funds, financial institutions, investment bankers, commercial bankers, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants, consultants and other individuals within our network in order to keep apprised of potential investment opportunities.
Winning attractive investment opportunities requires that we offer terms and conditions on a par with or better than our peers. While we do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, we may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure. We may be precluded from taking advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time as a result of an inability to meet market terms.
Life Cycle of Debt and Equity Originations
The key aspects of our portfolio origination, servicing and monitoring process are set forth below. Generally, we intend to keep the amount of our investment in any one company at or below $15 million, which we may accomplish by selling a portion of our initial investment to another investor post-close. We generally make loans with four- to six-year stated maturities. We believe the market-average hold period of a loan is approximately three years, although that figure has recently declined. Our equity investments generally do not have maturity dates.
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE AND STRATEGIES
Our investment objective is to achieve attractive returns by generating current income and capital gains on our investments. We seek to increase our earnings and NAV by investing primarily in debt securities of lower middle-market companies. On a more limited basis, we make equity investments, which we anticipate limiting to approximately

5



10% of the fair value of our investments. We intend to earn interest, dividends and fees on our investments and we may report unrealized appreciation and depreciation as the fair value of our investments periodically increases or decreases. We realize capital gains or losses when the investment is eventually monetized.
The cost basis of our investments include unamortized original issue discount, premiums and fees, as well as paid-in-kind interest and dividends that are generally due at maturity or upon our exit from the investment.
When we originate debt and equity investments, we strive to achieve favorable risk-adjusted rates of return in the form of current income and capital gains, while maintaining credit and investment quality in our portfolio. Before making investments, we apply well established credit processes to assess investment risk and we structure and price our investments accordingly. We have developed proprietary analytics, data and knowledge to support our business activities. We designed our investment process to achieve the following strategic objectives:
generate favorable risk-adjusted rates of return by delivering capital and strategic insight to increase our portfolio companies’ enterprise value;
maintain sound credit and investment discipline and pricing practices, regardless of market conditions, to avoid adverse investment selection; and
manage risk by utilizing an integrated team approach to business development, underwriting and investment servicing.
We maintain a flexible approach to funding that permits us to adjust price, maturity and other transaction terms to accommodate the needs of our portfolio companies.
ORGANIZATION OF MCG’S INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS
Our organization includes experienced professionals with the ability to originate, underwrite, finance, syndicate, monitor and exit investments that generate attractive returns. The following bullets describe the key functional teams that are responsible for our investment processes:
Asset ManagementOur Asset Management department is responsible for identifying and performing a financial and risk analysis of potential investment opportunities. This department also underwrites and manages our investment portfolio, and leads any work-out or restructuring that may occur from time to time. After an investment is approved and funded, individual deal teams, comprised generally of a Managing Director or Vice President, an analyst and an in-house attorney, have continuing ongoing responsibility for monitoring the performance of our investments.
Credit Committee—Prospective investments are presented to MCG's credit committee for review and approval prior to issuing a term sheet. Final approval by the credit committee generally occurs after the deal team has substantially completed the underwriting process. The credit committee includes our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Head of Asset Management and General Counsel. Our board of directors has delegated authority to the credit committee to (i) originate, underwrite and fund any non-control, non-distressed investment of $15 million or less provided that the equity component does not exceed $3 million, (ii) originate any distressed investment of $5 million or less and (iii) increase any existing investment previously approved by the Company's investment and valuation committee up to a certain over-line or established amount. As a matter of practice, our board of directors is invited to participate at every credit committee meeting and in the review and approval of all investments, irrespective of investment size.
Investment and Valuation Committee of the Board of DirectorsThe investment and valuation committee reviews and approves all investments over $15 million and has the discretion to review and approve other investments. Subsequent to the review and funding of an investment, the investment and valuation committee makes recommendations that are used by our board of directors for its quarterly determination of the fair value of our investment portfolio.
The following sections provide additional information on how we conduct the investment process. In addition to the teams described above, we also have a group of professionals that provide accounting, finance, human resources, investor relations, legal, and other services that support our investment professionals and other corporate, compliance and governance functions.

6



BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
MCG and its predecessors have been active investors in lower middle-market companies since 1990. We believe our experience in lower middle-market investing is a meaningful competitive advantage that we use to operate our business. Our senior investment professionals and members of our credit committee have, on-average, each made over $500 million of investments throughout their careers, principally in lower middle-market companies and in industries that we target, such as healthcare, business services, education, technology, software, information services and consumer directed businesses.
Our deal teams identify and source new investments through multiple channels, including private equity sponsors, investment bankers, brokers, fund-less sponsors, institutional syndication partners, other club lenders and owner-operators. The deal teams also market to prospective portfolio companies identified through past relationships with executives, information gathered through proprietary and public research and relationships with investment bankers, accountants, lawyers and other professionals.
Once we identify a prospective portfolio company, we review its financial reports, business plan, corporate activities and other relevant information gathered from third-party databases, industry reports and publications. We focus on a company’s fundamental performance against industry conditions and operational benchmarks, and evaluate acceptable risks and returns. We work with our current and prospective portfolio companies to understand their business, as well as the costs and benefits of their corporate development initiatives, opportunities and competition. Our detailed analysis allows us to support our portfolio companies’ corporate development decisions, even in some cases where short-term financial ratios or other metrics may decline temporarily.
RISK ANALYSIS
After identifying a prospective investment, we review the company’s operating history, executive leadership team, opportunities and the market for the company's products and services during the life of our investment, as well as the potential risks and threats to the business or the markets in which it competes. As early as possible in the process, we generally conduct on-site meetings with key executives to learn more about the investment directly from the company's leadership team and tour the company's key facilities or operating locations.
To assess the validity and stability of the company's historical and projected financial performance we often, either ourselves or through a third-party firm, perform a review of quality of earnings. For select transactions, we may engage or rely on the research of industry specific due diligence firms that provide market research or insights that we judge as prudent or helpful in in the underwriting process.
Based on our experience, we also look at the company's capitalization, proposed sources and uses of proceeds, structural considerations of various securities in the capital structure, leverage, expected cash generation, affirmative and negative covenants, methods for repayment or exit from the investment and other important considerations specific to the investment.
In particular, we analyze certain key risks in light of our underwriting criteria, including financial characteristics and portfolio-specific risk that might arise from the new investment, including, but not limited to, the following:
Industry Risks—maturity, cyclicality and seasonality associated with the industries in which we invest, as well as the proportion of our portfolio that is invested in specific industries and individual portfolio companies;
Competitive Risksstrengths and weaknesses of the prospective portfolio company relative to their competitors’ pricing, product quality, customer loyalty, substitution and switching costs, brand positioning and capitalization. We also assess the defensibility of a prospect’s market position and its opportunity for increasing market share;
Management Riskstrack records, industry experience, turnover in leadership, concentration of knowledge, the prospective portfolio company’s business plan and management incentives;
Regulatory Risks—industry specific regulation and regulation reform (e.g., healthcare reform, increased regulatory oversight, government reimbursement of for-profit schools, etc.), and economic or macro issues that may affect an investment (e.g., cost of utilities or access to power at historical rates in certain regions, access to nuclear materials for medical imaging, etc.), as well as regulations that may change the incentives of partners or investors in the investment (e.g., tax reform that may impact private equity funds or hedge funds, regulations of commercial banks, and potential reforms of BDCs or SBIC regulations);
Customer Concentration and Market Riskssustainability, stability and opportunities for the growth of the prospective portfolio company's customer base, including the number and size of its customers, attrition rates and dependence on one or a limited number of customers; and

7



Technology Risksimpact of technological advances in the industries and portfolio companies in which we may invest.
In addition, we evaluate industry-specific comparisons, such as cash flow margins, product and cash flow diversification, revenue growth rates, cost structure and other operating benchmarks that are derived from historical and projected financial statements. Qualitative attributes we evaluate may include management skill and depth, industry risk, substitution risk, sensitivity to economic cycles, cyclicality, geographic diversification, facilities infrastructure, administration requirements and product quality and ranking.
We have developed a series of valuation techniques to assist us in determining the risk of a potential investment and quantifying its underlying value. Analyses of comparative public and private market transactions and other data form the basis of our enterprise valuations, along with current and projected market conditions. We also look to comparable public companies to benchmark the value of the proposed investment using public market data. Using these methods provides multiple views of the value of the enterprise allowing us to calculate certain metrics used in both risk assessment and product pricing, such as loan-to-value ratios for our debt investments.
UNDERWRITING AND RISK MANAGEMENT
We initiate our underwriting process in tandem with the business development process, focusing on investment risk analysis. We perform standard due diligence on a prospective portfolio company’s financial performance, as well as customized analyses of its operations, systems, accounting policies, human resources and competitive, legal and regulatory environments.
In addition to gaining an in-depth understanding of a prospective portfolio company, our research and due diligence process evaluates industry-wide operational, strategic and valuation issues. We also examine emerging trends and competitive threats to the portfolio company, as well as the industry in which it operates. Portfolio companies may later draw on our valuable knowledge and insight obtained through our research to refine their strategic plans, identify acquisition opportunities and set appropriate financial and operational goals.
When presenting a prospective investment to our credit committee for approval, the deal team delivers a detailed investment memorandum. Should the dollar amount of the proposed investment exceed certain pre-defined thresholds, or include a significant investment in equity, the investment memorandum is also submitted to the investment and valuation committee of our board of directors for review and approval. The investment memorandum generally consists of the following:
a transaction overview, including a description of the business and the investment opportunity;
transaction rationale, underwriting considerations and an assessment of risks and mitigants;
historical financial analyses, projections and scenario modeling;
a service or product overview, customer and industry analyses, operational and regulatory analyses;
an assessment of the company's enterprise valuation relative to comparable public and private companies;
a description of the capital structure and the investment risk and return characteristics; and
a review of insights or reports obtained from third-party experts or due diligence firms.
INVESTMENT STRUCTURE
We evaluate our portfolio companies’ needs to develop investment structures that meet their capital requirements and business plans while protecting our own capital, with an expectation toward generating risk-adjusted returns through current income on our loans and capital gains on our equity investments. We structure our debt investments to mitigate risk by requiring appropriate financial and collateral coverage thresholds. To create the most effective and responsive deal structures, we consider payment priority, collateral or asset value, and financial support from guarantors and other credit enhancements. Since our investments typically include cash-flow loans, rather than asset-backed loans, we factor the enterprise value of the prospective portfolio company’s assets into our credit decisions. For loans classified as senior secured, second-lien and subordinated secured, we receive a security interest in all or a portion of the portfolio companies’ tangible and intangible assets, entitling us to a preferred position relative to both unsecured creditors and more junior lenders on the proceeds of those assets in the event of liquidation. In addition, our loan documents generally include affirmative covenants that require our portfolio companies to provide periodic financial information, notification of material events and compliance with laws, as well as restrictive covenants that prevent the portfolio company from taking a range of significant actions, such as incurring additional indebtedness or making acquisitions. Financial covenants require the portfolio companies to maintain or achieve specified financial ratios, such as cash flow leverage, interest charge coverage, total charge coverage, and, in certain cases, meet specific operational benchmarks.

8



Our business strategy dictates that we generally invest in some combination of the following securities:
Senior Secured Debt—We provide cash flow based senior secured debt in the form of revolving credit facilities as well as amortizing term loans, bullet maturity term loans and uni-tranche loans that blend characteristics of both senior and subordinated financing. Senior secured debt ranks senior in priority of payment to other debt and equity, and benefits from a first priority security interest in the assets of the borrower that serve as collateral for the loan(s). As such, virtually all other creditors rank junior to senior secured debt in the event of insolvency. Some of our borrowers grant a first lien on working capital collateral (i.e., receivables) to asset-based lenders that is outside of our collateral pool. Assuming we have a first lien on all other collateral, in such cases we would still classify our security as senior secured. Due to its lower risk profile and often more restrictive covenants as compared to other debt, senior secured debt generally earns a lower return.
Second-Lien Debt—We, on occasion, provide second-lien term loans on a sole-source or participant basis where assets or enterprise-value based borrowing capacity is not readily available within typical senior debt leverage constraints. Second-lien debt ranks senior in priority of payment to subordinated debt, unsecured debt, select junior securities, and equity. While second lien debt benefits from a collateral interest in the assets of the borrower, its liens are subordinated to those of senior secured debt in a liquidation. As such, senior secured creditors rank ahead of second lien creditors in the event of insolvency with respect to pursuing remedies against the collateral of a portfolio company, and receiving the proceeds thereof. Due to its higher risk profile and often less restrictive covenants as compared to senior debt, second-lien debt generally earns a higher return than senior debt. We classify second-lien term loans as "Subordinated Secured" debt in our consolidated financial statements.
Secured and Unsecured Subordinated Debt—We invest in secured and unsecured subordinated debt, which may be structured with a combination of current interest, deferred interest and equity-linked components. Payment of all subordinated debt, whether secured or unsecured, ranks behind payment of senior secured and second-lien debt. While the security interest of subordinated secured debt ranks behind that of the senior secured and second-lien debt, subordinated unsecured debt enjoys no security interest in the borrower's assets. In the event of insolvency, senior secured and second-lien creditors will be paid in full before the subordinated secured and subordinated unsecured creditors. Due to its higher risk profile and often less restrictive covenants as compared to other types of loans, subordinated debt generally earns a higher return than other debt.
Equity—We may from time-to-time invest in minority equity positions with private equity partners or on our own. In addition, we may receive warrants to purchase preferred or common stock of a portfolio company that are related to our debt investments in such portfolio company. Preferred stock ranks senior to common stock, and often carries the right to receive a preferential return upon the sale of the company.
To protect our investments and maximize our returns, we negotiate carefully the structure of each debt and equity security in our investment portfolio, and may require board observation rights as part of our initial investment to keep abreast of company matters. Our loan and equity documentation generally includes terms governing interest rate, amortization, prepayment premiums, financial covenants, operating covenants, ownership and corporate governance parameters, dilution parameters, liquidation preferences, voting rights, and put or call rights. In some cases, our loan agreements also allow for interest rate increases and decreases to the extent the portfolio company's financial or operational performance varies materially from the portfolio company's business plan.
In addition to capital, we also offer managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. Typically, this assistance involves strategic advice, evaluation of business plans, financial modeling assistance and industry research and expertise. Providing assistance to our portfolio companies enables us to maximize our value proposition for our portfolio companies, which, in turn, helps maximize our investment returns.
INVESTMENT APPROVAL PROCESS
Our investment approval process begins with an initial screening of a business plan or financing solicitation by either a Managing Director or a Vice President, referred to as a deal sponsor, to assess eligibility, sector, risk profile, investment fit and expected returns. There is a weekly meeting at which all prospective investments are discussed. The Asset Management department prepares a pipeline report consisting of an internal summary of the opportunity, company materials and an investment structuring worksheet for review by the credit committee. Simultaneously, a non-binding indication of interest may also be executed in support of a private equity firm issuing a bid for the transaction. Deals are judged by, among other things, a prospect's revenue run rate, continuity of solid cash flow, percentage of recurring revenue, gross profit margin, bad debt as a percentage of revenue, customer renewal rate, the prospect's marketing niche, level of competition, customer base quality and concentration and strength of the management team.

9



The credit committee determines whether the investment should be pursued, giving consideration to the risk return profile, industry concentrations and general economic outlook for the sector in which the business operates. In these meetings the credit committee also offers the deal sponsor insight into key issues that must be resolved before a potential investment is funded. If the credit committee agrees to move forward with an investment, the terms are documented initially by a signed term sheet or letter of intent, as applicable, consistent with the pipeline report and committee clearance, and the deal proceeds to the documentation stage. The term sheet establishes the terms and conditions under which we propose to enter into a credit or investment relationship.
Generally, our underwriting process begins after the Asset Management team receives a signed term sheet or letter of intent. The assigned deal team is responsible for oversight and completion of comprehensive due diligence, and is expected to investigate and report on all critical aspects of the proposed investment. Our due diligence often includes review of financial statements, discussion with key members of management, review of material contracts, background checks, reviews of customer and vendor relationships, confirmation of historical results and assumptions underlying forecasted results. When necessary or advisable based on industry or the history of the prospect itself, third party diligence is conducted. The underwriting process includes legal and business due diligence and typically an on-site visit with the prospect company, including its management team and any other key employees.
Once the underwriting process is complete, the deal sponsor presents a credit approval memorandum, including detailed findings of the foregoing underwriting process, to the credit committee and, if required, the investment and valuation committee. If approved, the deal proceeds to final documentation and closure. All of our investments are approved by our credit committee. In addition, investments of over $15 million must also be approved by the investment and valuation committee of our board of directors.
INVESTMENT FUNDING
We fund our investments using cash from our balance sheet and some of the loans in turn are used as collateral in our secured debt facility. In 2013, our secured debt facilities included certain restrictions on the types of investments that could be used as collateral. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources-Borrowings section of our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information. As a BDC, we are also subject to certain restrictions on incurring debt. For example, we are not permitted to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities (which include all of our borrowings, excluding those made by our SBIC, and any preferred stock we have then issued) of at least 200%.
INVESTMENT MONITORING AND RESTRUCTURING
We monitor the status and financial performance of each company in our portfolio in order to evaluate overall portfolio quality and to facilitate quarterly valuations, which are approved by our board of directors. We are proactive in advising and communicating with companies that are underperforming and, in many instances, have added stricter covenant protection and rights over time. During the process of monitoring a loan in default, if required or necessary to protect our security interest, we will send a notice of non-compliance outlining the specific defaults that have occurred and preserving our contractual rights and remedies, followed by a review of the collateral, if any.
When our attempts to collect past due principal and/or interest on a loan are unsuccessful, we analyze the appropriate course of action. In some cases, we may consider restructuring the investment to better reflect the current financial performance of the portfolio company. We may need to extend liquidity to companies from time to time as part of a restructuring. Such a restructuring may, among other things, involve deferring principal and interest payments, adjusting interest rates or warrant positions, imposing additional fees, amending financial or operating covenants or converting debt to equity. In connection with a restructuring, we generally receive compensation from the portfolio company. When a restructuring is not an appropriate course of additional action, we generally pursue remedies available to us to minimize potential losses, including initiating foreclosure, liquidation proceedings or selling the loan.
When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the portfolio company to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing paid-in-kind interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.

10



INVESTMENT POLICIES
Our investment policies provide that we will not:
act as an underwriter of securities of other issuers, except to the extent that we may be deemed an “underwriter” of securities (i) purchased by us that must be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, before they may be offered or sold to the public, or (ii) in connection with offerings of securities by our portfolio companies;
sell securities short in an uncovered position;
write or buy uncovered put or call options, except to the extent of options, warrants or conversion privileges in connection with our loans or other investments, and rights to require the issuers of such investments or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances;
engage in the purchase or sale of commodities or commodity contracts, including futures contracts, except for the purpose of hedging in the ordinary course of business or where necessary in working out distressed loan or investment situations; or
acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of, or invest more than 5% of our total assets in any securities issued by, any other investment company, except if we acquire them as part of a merger, consolidation or acquisition of assets or if they result from a sale of a portfolio company, or otherwise as permitted under the 1940 Act.
All of the above policies and the investment and lending guidelines set by our board of directors or any committees, including our investment objective to achieve current income and capital gains, are not “fundamental” as defined under the 1940 Act. Therefore, our board may change them without notice to, or approval by, our stockholders. However, any change may require the consent of our lenders.
Other than the restrictions pertaining to the issuance of senior securities under the 1940 Act, the percentage restrictions on investments generally apply on the effective date of the transaction. A subsequent change in a percentage resulting from market fluctuations or any cause other than an action by us will not require us to dispose of portfolio securities or to take other action to satisfy the percentage restriction.
We intend to conduct our business so as to retain our status as a BDC. As such, we may not acquire any assets, other than non-investment assets necessary and appropriate to our operations as a BDC, if after giving effect to such acquisition the value of our “qualifying assets” is less than 70% of the value of our total assets.
Investment Adviser
We have no investment adviser and are internally managed by our executive officers under the supervision of the board of directors. Our investment decisions are made by our officers, directors and senior investment professionals who serve on our credit and investment and valuation committees. None of our executive officers or other employees has the unilateral authority to approve any investment.
Regulation
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
As a BDC, we are regulated under the 1940 Act. The BDC structure provides stockholders the ability to retain the liquidity of a publicly traded stock, while sharing in the possible benefits, if any, of investing in primarily privately owned companies.
In part, the 1940 Act requires us to be organized in the United States for the purpose of investing in, or lending to, primarily private companies and making managerial assistance available to them. As a BDC we may use capital provided by public stockholders and from other sources to invest in long-term, private investments in businesses.
We may not, however, change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC unless authorized by vote of a majority of our outstanding voting securities. The 1940 Act defines a majority of the outstanding voting securities as the lesser of:
i.
67% or more of such company’s shares present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding shares of such company are present or represented by proxy; or
ii.
more than 50% of the outstanding shares of such company.
We currently do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.

11



Qualifying Assets
A BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) below. Thus, under the 1940 Act, we may not acquire any asset other than those of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:
1.
Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions):
a.
is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer that:
i.
is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;
ii.
is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by us) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
iii.
does not have any class of securities listed on a national securities exchange;
b.
is a company that meets the requirements of (a)(i) and (ii) above, but is not an eligible portfolio company because it has issued a class of securities on a national securities exchange, if:
i.
at the time of the purchase, we own at least 50% of the (x) greatest number of equity securities of such issuer and securities convertible into or exchangeable for such securities; and (y) the greatest amount of debt securities of such issuer, held by us at any point in time during the period when such issuer was an eligible portfolio company; and
ii.
we are one of the 20 largest holders of record of such issuer’s outstanding voting securities; or
c.
is a company that meets the requirements of (a)(i) and (ii) above, but is not an eligible portfolio company because it has issued a class of securities on a national securities exchange, if the aggregate market value of such company’s outstanding voting and non-voting common equity is less than $250.0 million.
2.
Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we control.
3.
Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.
4.
Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
5.
Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.
6.
Cash, cash items, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a BDC beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company. For the foreseeable future, we do not expect to add new control positions to our portfolio.
Significant Managerial Assistance
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test discussed above, we must either control the issuer of the securities or offer to make available significant managerial assistance; except that, where we act together to purchase such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, to offer to provide and, if accepted, provide significant guidance and counsel

12



concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company through monitoring of its operations, selective participation in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising its officers and directors or other organizational or financial guidance.
Warrants and Options
Under the 1940 Act, we are subject to restrictions on the amount of warrants, options, restricted stock or rights to purchase shares of capital stock that we may have outstanding at any time. In particular, the amount of capital stock that would result from the conversion or exercise of all outstanding warrants, options or rights to purchase capital stock cannot exceed 25% of our total outstanding shares of capital stock. This amount is reduced to 20% of our total outstanding shares of capital stock if the amount of warrants, options or rights issued pursuant to an executive compensation plan would exceed 15% of our total outstanding shares of capital stock. We have received exemptive relief from the SEC permitting us to issue restricted stock to our employees and directors subject to the above conditions, among others.
Indebtedness and Senior Securities
We will be permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, we may not be permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on our outstanding common shares, or purchase any such shares, unless, at the time of such declaration or purchase, we have asset coverage of at least 200% after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution, or purchase price. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes.
Capital Structure
As a BDC, we generally cannot issue and sell our common stock at a price below the current NAV per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current NAV of our common stock in a rights offering to our stockholders if: 1) our board of directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders; 2) our stockholders approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less than the current NAV; and 3) the price at which our common stock is to be issued and sold is not less than a price that, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any sales load).
We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.
We do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any registered investment company (as defined in the 1940 Act), invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one such investment company or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of such investment companies in the aggregate.
1940 Act Code of Ethics
We have adopted and will maintain a code of ethics that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain personal securities transactions by our officers and directors. Personnel subject to the code may invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the code’s requirements. Our Amended and Restated Code of Ethics, or 1940 Act Code of Ethics, will generally not permit investments by our employees in securities that may be purchased or held by us. We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from conducting certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC.
A copy of our 1940 Act Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.mcgcapital.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Form 10-K. In addition, you may read and copy the 1940 Act Code of Ethics at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090. In addition, the 1940 Act Code of Ethics attached as an exhibit to our registration statement and is available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. You may also obtain copies of the 1940 Act Code

13



of Ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
PRIVACY PRINCIPLES
We are committed to maintaining the privacy of our stockholders and safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information we collect, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share information with select other parties.
Generally, we do not receive any non-public personal information relating to our stockholders, although certain non-public personal information of our stockholders may become available to us. We do not disclose any non-public personal information about our stockholders or former stockholders, except as permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service stockholder accounts (for example, to a transfer agent).
We restrict access to non-public personal information about our stockholders to our employees with a legitimate business need for the information. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the security of the non-public personal information of our stockholders.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interest of our stockholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by us. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there are compelling long-term reasons to do so.
Our proxy voting decisions are discussed with the committee that is responsible for monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision-making process disclose to our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision-making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
EXEMPTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
We have received an exemptive order from the SEC to permit us to issue restricted shares of our common stock as part of the compensation packages for certain of our employees and directors. We believe that the particular characteristics of our business, the dependence we have on key personnel to conduct our business effectively and the highly competitive environment in which we operate require the use of equity-based compensation for our personnel in the form of restricted stock. The issuance of restricted shares of our common stock requires the approval of our stockholders. In June 2006, our stockholders approved our Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or the 2006 Plan, and our Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan.
Awards under the 2006 Plan must comply with all aspects of the SEC's order, including the following:
no one person may be granted awards totaling more than 25% of the shares available;
in any fiscal year, no person may be granted awards in excess of 500,000 shares of our common stock; and
the total number of shares that may be outstanding as restricted shares under all of our compensation plans may not exceed 10% of the total number of our shares of common stock authorized and outstanding at any time.
In October 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC, which effectively allows us to exclude debt issued by Solutions Capital from the calculation of our consolidated BDC asset coverage ratio.
We requested the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engaged in a stock repurchase program and did not rescind awards of restricted stock previously awarded in compliance with the terms and conditions of the exemptive order of the SEC so long as we agreed not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. On September 27, 2013, the no-action letter was issued by the SEC.

14



OTHER
We will be examined periodically by the SEC for compliance with the Exchange Act and the 1940 Act.
As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, we must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of our directors must be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. We must provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we cannot protect any director or officer against any liability to our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.
We are required to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, and to review these policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. Mr. Tod K. Reichert, our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, is responsible for administering these policies and procedures.
Recently, legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, which may revise certain regulations applicable to BDCs. The legislation provides for (i) increasing the amount of funds BDCs borrow by reducing asset to debt limitations from 2:1 to 3:2, (ii) permitting BDCs to file registration statements with the SEC that incorporate information by reference, (iii) utilizing other streamlined registration processes afforded to operating companies, and (iv) allowing BDCs to own investment adviser subsidiaries. There are no assurances as to when the legislation will be enacted by Congress, if at all,or, if enacted, what final form the legislation would take.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND THE NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REGULATIONS
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on publicly held companies and their insiders. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with it and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
The NASDAQ Global Select Market has also adopted various corporate governance requirements as part of its listing standards. We believe we are in compliance with such corporate governance listing standards.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS
In December 2004, we formed Solutions Capital and Solutions Capital G.P., LLC. In September 2007, Solutions Capital received final approval to be licensed as an SBIC. Solutions Capital has borrowed funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional deposits of regulatory capital. As of January 2012, we had borrowed $150.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program, which is the maximum amount of outstanding leverage available to single-license SBIC. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest-only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and a ten-year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity, but may be prepaid at any time without penalty.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, Solutions Capital is subject to regulatory requirements including making investments in SBA eligible businesses, investing at least 25% of regulatory capital in eligible “smaller” businesses, placing certain limitations on the financing terms of investments, prohibiting investing in certain industries, required capitalization thresholds, and is subject to periodic audits and examinations among other regulations. If Solutions Capital fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit Solutions Capital from making new investments. In addition, the SBA can revoke or suspend a license for willful or repeated violation of, or willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the SBIC Act or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. These actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because Solutions Capital is our wholly owned subsidiary.
Eligible Small and Smaller Businesses
Under current SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include those that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18 million and average annual net income not exceeding $6 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote 25% of its investment activity to “smaller” concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6 million and average annual net income not exceeding $2 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number

15



of employees or gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses and invest in the equity securities of such businesses. Once an SBIC has invested in a company, it may generally continue to make follow-on investments in the company, regardless of the size of the business, up and until the time a business offers its securities in a public market. Through Solutions Capital, we plan to continue to provide long-term loans to, and non-control equity investments in, qualifying small businesses.
Financing Limitations
SBA regulations also include restrictions on a “change of control” of an SBIC where a transfer would result in any person or group owning 10% or more of a class of capital stock (or its equivalent in the case of a partnership) of a licensed SBIC and require that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations. In addition, our SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its ability to make distributions to us if it does not have sufficient earnings and capital, in accordance with SBA regulations. The SBA places certain limits on the financing terms of investments by SBICs, including limiting the interest rate on debt securities and loans provided to portfolio companies of the SBIC. The SBA also limits fees, prepayment terms and certain other economic arrangements that are common in lending environments.
SBA Leverage or Debentures
SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse to us, have a ten-year maturity and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed at the time of issuance at a market-based spread over ten-year U.S. Treasury Notes. Obtaining leverage, or borrowings, through SBA guaranteed debentures is subject to required capitalization thresholds. Current SBA regulations limit the amount that Solutions Capital may borrow to a maximum of $150 million, which is up to twice its regulatory capital.
Our SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that our SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon our SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies. Periodically, SBA staff audits Solutions Capital to verify its compliance with SBA regulations.
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to our SBIC subsidiary’s assets over our stockholders in the event we liquidate our SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by our SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
Effective as of January 1, 2002, we elected to be treated as a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay corporate taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders as dividends, which allows us to reduce or eliminate our corporate-level tax liability. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as defined below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses, collectively referred to as the 90% Distribution Requirement.
TAXATION AS A REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANY
If we:
continue to qualify as a RIC, and
distribute each year to stockholders at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which is defined in the Internal Revenue Code generally as ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses,
we will be entitled to deduct and, therefore, will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on, the portion of our income we distribute or are deemed to distribute to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate on any income not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders. We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax, or 4% excise tax, to the extent we do not make specified levels of distributions (actually or on a deemed basis) in a timely manner. We are subject as a RIC to the 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute (on either an actual or deemed basis): 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year; 98.2% of our capital gain net income for each calendar year; and any income realized, but not distributed, in prior calendar years.

16



To qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:
1.
continue to qualify as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;
2.
derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities, loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities and (2) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership;” and
3.
diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:
a.
at least 50% of the value of our assets consist of cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and
b.
no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of (i) one issuer, (ii) two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” known as the Diversification Tests.
We may be required to recognize taxable income even when we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount, we must include in taxable income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We also may have to include in taxable income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest and deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a cash distribution to our stockholders in the amount of that non-cash income in order to satisfy the 90% Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any cash representing such income.
If we fail to satisfy the 90% Distribution Requirement or fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we would be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any distributions made in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013 would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations, may be eligible for the 15% or 20% maximum tax rate (depending on income thresholds) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
In addition, we will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC Distribution Requirement. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the SBIC Act, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver. If our SBIC subsidiary is unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may cause us to fail to qualify as a RIC, which would result in us becoming subject to corporate-level federal income tax.
EMPLOYEES
We believe our success will depend greatly on our ability to identify, attract and retain capable employees. As of December 31, 2013, we employed 15 full-time employees and two part-time employees, including investment, portfolio and operations professionals, in-house counsel and administrative staff. Substantially all of these employees are located in our corporate headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit and we believe our relations with our employees are good.

17



ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS. 
Investing in our common stock may be speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks described below and all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the schedules and exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Investing in lower middle-market companies is inherently risky. Our financial results may be affected adversely if one or more of our portfolio investments defaults on its loans or fails to perform.
Our portfolio consists primarily of debt and equity investments in privately owned lower middle-market companies. Investing in lower middle-market companies involves a number of significant risks. Typically, the debt in which we invest may be rated below investment grade by one or more rating agency. Compared to larger publicly traded companies with greater financial, technical and marketing resources, lower middle-market companies typically have fewer resources and may experience wider variations in their operating results, making them more vulnerable to economic downturns. Lower middle-market companies experience limited access to capital and the cost of capital is usually higher than for their larger competitors. Many lower middle-market companies are unable to obtain financing from public capital markets or from traditional credit sources, such as commercial banks, often because they are perceived to pose a higher default risk. The success of lower middle-market companies often depends heavily on the managerial talents and efforts of an individual or a small group of persons. Therefore, the loss of any key employee could harm both its financial condition and its ability to compete effectively. Further, some lower middle-market companies conduct business in regulated industries. Changes in the regulatory environment impacting lower middle-market companies could result in significant expenditures and impair cash flow by making it difficult for them to conduct business in a cost effective manner, and have more dire effects, including bankruptcy. Even minor events may adversely affect the value of a loan's collateral and a company's ability to repay its obligations, which in turn may adversely affect the return on, or the recovery of, our investment in these businesses.
When evaluating a potential investment, we must rely on our employees' diligence to obtain information necessary to make well informed investment decisions. If we fail to uncover material information about our portfolio companies, either prior to or after our investment, we may lose money. A portfolio company's failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults under our loan documents and trigger cross-defaults under other agreements. Should other lenders choose to accelerate their loans and/or foreclose on the company's secured assets, it could jeopardize our portfolio company's ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may also incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company.
Very few of our portfolio investments are publicly traded and, as a result, their value is uncertain. If our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments is higher than that which we ultimately realize upon disposition, our NAV could be affected adversely.
Typically, there is no public market for the securities of the privately held companies in which we have invested, and in which we generally expect to continue to invest. In accordance with the 1940 Act and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we carry substantially all of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors.
Whenever possible, our board of directors values our securities at market value; however, since very few of our investments are traded publicly the board considers various factors to assist it in determining fair value during the valuation process. For example, depending on the nature of the investment, the board may examine public and private mergers and acquisitions transactions, comparisons to publicly traded comparable companies, third-party assessments of valuation, discounted cash flow analyses, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's earnings and its ability to make payments, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market-based pricing, bond-yield analysis and other relevant factors. We also obtain financial and other information from portfolio companies, which may include unaudited, projected or pro forma financial information. Our board of directors also engages independent valuation firms to assist in determining the fair value of our investments. Because valuations, particularly those of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and are often based on estimates. Our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a readily available market for these investments existed and from the amounts we may

18



realize on any disposition of such investments. If our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments are materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposition of such investments, our NAV could be affected adversely.
The general volatility of the financial markets and the economy could impair our portfolio companies' financial positions and operating results, which, in turn, could harm our operating results.
The future of the United States economy is unclear. Unemployment continues to be elevated and expectations for other economic fundamentals remain uncertain. If U.S. economic performance declines in the future, the financial results of our lower middle-market portfolio companies could experience deterioration or limited growth. If prolonged, unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions could render our portfolio companies unable to service debt or engage in a liquidity event, such as a sale, merger, recapitalization or initial public offering.
Adverse economic conditions have decreased the value of some of our loans and equity investments. The lingering effects of uncertain economic conditions could increase the number of non-performing assets and decrease the value of one or more of our portfolio companies during such periods. Should this happen, we may experience further loss of value in our portfolio and decreases in our revenues, net income and net assets. Adverse economic conditions also may impair the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities, and the success of our business model necessitates that we develop and maintain strong referral relationships. Failure to do so, or to offer desirable investment terms, may preclude us from winning new business and adversely affect our financial conditions and results of operations.
We compete with many types of investors for the portfolio companies in which we invest, including public and private funds (including other BDCs and SBICs), commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds or hedge funds. As a result of these entrants, competition for investment opportunities has intensified in recent years and may intensify further in the future. Some of our existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some may also have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments that may lead to additional market share and a competitive advantage over us. Unlike many of our competitors, we are also subject to regulatory restrictions and valuation requirements the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC.
The myriad competitive pressures we face require our management team to develop and maintain strong relationships with intermediaries, financial institutions, investment bankers, commercial bankers, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants, consultants and other individuals within our network in order to keep apprised of potential investment opportunities. If our management team fails to maintain its existing relationships or develop new ones with important sources of investment opportunities, we may fail to remain competitive for new business and our investment portfolio may languish as a result. Regardless of the strength of relationships, no one is obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.
While we do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, we may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure. If we do match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure to win business, we may then experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. We may be precluded from taking advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time as a result of an inability to meet market terms, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and successfully make investments that are consistent with our investment objective. Failure to compete effectively for, and establish strong relationships that could lead to, new business would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our portfolio is concentrated in certain industries, which increases our risk of significant loss if any one of these companies fails to service our debt because of industry downturns.
From time to time, we target specific industries in which to invest on a recurring basis, which may result in significant concentrations in our portfolio. As a consequence, the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of such investments or a substantial write-down of any one investment. Beyond regulatory and income tax diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for industry concentration. In addition, while we generally decline to make investments in a particular industry or group of industries that would exceed 15.0% of our total assets at the time of closing, it is possible that as the values of our

19



portfolio companies change, one industry or a group of industries may come to exceed such level. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which we have invested a significant portion of our total investments could have a materially adverse effect on us. As of December 31, 2013, 23.0%, 17.4%, 15.7% and 14.0% of our total investments at fair value were invested in healthcare, business services, education and manufacturing industries, respectively. Therefore, we are susceptible to the economic circumstances in these industries, and a downturn in any one of these industries could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in healthcare laws and other regulations applicable to some of our portfolio companies' businesses may constrain their ability to offer their products and services.
Changes in healthcare or other laws and regulations applicable to the businesses of some of our portfolio companies may increase their compliance and other costs of doing business, require significant systems enhancements, or render their products or services less profitable or obsolete, any of which could have a material adverse effect on their results of operations. There has also been an increased political and regulatory focus on healthcare laws in recent years, and new legislation could have a material effect on the business and operations of some of our portfolio companies.
Our wholly owned subsidiary is licensed by the SBA and is subject to SBA regulations. If our SBIC subsidiary fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could limit or prohibit its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or revoke or suspend our license.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital, is licensed to operate as an SBIC and is regulated by the SBA. The SBIC license allows Solutions Capital to obtain leverage, or borrowings, by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to receipt of a capital commitment from the SBA and other customary procedures. The SBA regulations require, among other things, an annual periodic examination of a licensed SBIC by an SBA examiner to determine the SBIC's compliance with the relevant SBA regulations, and the performance of a financial audit by an independent auditor.
The SBA regulations permit licensed SBICs to make long term loans to small businesses and invest in the equity securities of such businesses. Under current SBA regulations, a licensed SBIC may provide capital to small businesses having a tangible net worth not exceeding $18.0 million and an average net income after federal income taxes not exceeding $6.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, a licensed SBIC must devote 25% of its investment activity to entities having a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and an average annual net income after federal income taxes not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. If a proposed portfolio company does not meet the foregoing requirements, the SBA regulations also provide alternative criteria for eligibility which depend on the industry in which the prospective portfolio company is engaged as well as other factors such as the number of employees and gross sales. The SBA also restricts the financing terms of investments by SBICs in portfolio companies, and prohibits funds from being deployed in support of certain purposes or industries. Compliance with SBA requirements may cause our SBIC subsidiary to forego attractive investment opportunities that are not permitted under SBA regulations.
A single-license SBIC subsidiary may currently borrow up to a maximum of $150.0 million when it has at least $75.0 million in private capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of January 2012, we had funded $75.0 million to Solutions Capital, and Solutions Capital has borrowed the maximum $150.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures.
The SBA prohibits, without prior SBA approval, a change of control of an SBIC or transfers that would result in any person (or a group of persons acting in concert) owning 10% or more of a class of capital stock of a licensed SBIC. If our SBIC subsidiary fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit it from making new investments. In addition, the SBA can revoke or suspend a license for willful or repeated violation of, or willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the SBIC Act or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. These actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because our SBIC subsidiary is our wholly owned subsidiary and we rely on the ability to make investments through it.
We must effectively manage and deploy capital to ensure our financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to do so, we could experience a decline in our business prospects and the loss of key employees, all of which could negatively affect our operating results.
Equity capital is, and may continue to be, difficult to raise because we generally are not able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below NAV per share without stockholder approval. In addition, available debt capital may be costly and/or carry less favorable terms and conditions. Therefore, our ability to maximize our portfolio's total return depends on the ability to successfully manage and deploy capital effectively. Our debt investments generate capital

20



from current income, and our equity and equity-related investments generally provide capital appreciation, enhancing our overall operating results. Our ability to identify and evaluate, and ultimately to finance and invest in, companies that will produce the desired financial gains rests squarely in the hands of our investment team. Accomplishing our investment objectives on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment team's handling of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services and our access to investments offering acceptable terms. In addition to monitoring the performance of our existing investments, members of our investment team are also called upon, from time to time, to provide managerial assistance to some of our portfolio companies. These demands on their time may distract them or slow the rate of investment capital.
Our results of our operations will depend on many factors, including the availability of opportunities for investment, and economic conditions. Furthermore, if we cannot successfully operate our business or implement our investment policies and strategies it could negatively impact our ability to pay dividends. The prolonged inability to effectively deploy capital could negatively impact our business prospects, cause the departure of key employees and have an adverse impact on our operating results.
Our ability to raise additional capital is limited by the market price of our common stock and by regulations governing our operations as a BDC.
Although shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a market price that is less than the NAV attributable to those shares, this characteristic has no correlation with the risk of decline to our own NAV. It is not possible to predict whether our common stock will trade at, above, or below NAV. In the recent past, the stocks of BDCs as an industry, including shares of our common stock, have traded below NAV as a result of concerns over liquidity, leverage restrictions and distribution requirements. When our common stock trades below its NAV per share, the 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current NAV unless our stockholders approve such a sale and our board of directors makes certain determinations.
We have issued debt securities and may in the future incur additional debt, issue preferred stock, and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as senior securities”. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, as a BDC we are permitted to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our BDC asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines we may be unable to satisfy this test, precluding us from issuing senior securities and paying dividends. We may also be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.
Failure to maintain our qualification as a BDC would significantly reduce our operating flexibility.
If we were to continuously fail to qualify as a BDC, we might become subject to regulation as a registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would significantly decrease our operating flexibility. In addition, failure to comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us. For additional information on the qualification requirements of a BDC, see the disclosure under the caption Item 1. Business-Regulation.
If we fail to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our BDC status.
As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Our failure to meet the 70% threshold could cause us to lose our status as a BDC, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the 70% requirement may preclude us from investing in potentially attractive investments, as well as prevent us from making additional investments in our existing portfolio companies, thus diluting our position, to the extent they do not meet the standard for qualifying assets under the 1940 Act. Finally, we may need to sell certain of our investments to comply with the 1940 Act, which could cause us to realize significantly less than the current value of such investments.
If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on our income and our income available for distribution would be reduced significantly or eliminated.
We have elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes as a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a RIC under the Internal Revenue Code, we must meet certain source-of-income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements and maintain our status as a BDC, including:
Sources of Income. We must obtain at least 90% of our income each year from dividends, interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar sources.

21



Asset Diversification. At the end of each taxable year, at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other acceptable securities. No more than 25% of the value of our assets may be invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, (i) of one issuer, or (ii) of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or of certain qualified publicly traded partnerships.
Income Distribution. We must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, on an annual basis. Because we are subject to an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940 Act, and may also be subject to certain financial covenants under any debt financings we may incur, we could, under certain circumstances, be restricted from making the distributions necessary to satisfy the IRS requirement. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the SBIC Act and SBA regulations governing SBICs from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC.
Failure to meet the foregoing requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and, therefore, will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason we would become subject to corporate-level income tax, substantially reducing our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on our stockholders and us.
Our wholly-owned SBIC subsidiary may be unable to make distributions to us that will enable us to maintain RIC status, which could result in the imposition of an entity-level tax.
In order for us to continue to qualify for RIC tax treatment and to minimize corporate-level taxes, we will be required to distribute substantially all of our net ordinary income and net capital gain income, including income from certain of our subsidiaries, which includes the income from our SBIC subsidiary. We will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the SBIC Act, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver. If our SBIC subsidiary is unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may result in loss of RIC tax treatment and a consequent imposition of an entity-level tax on us.
Our future success depends on our investment team. If we lose one or more of these or other key employees, our operating results may suffer from our inability to make future investments.
We depend on the members of our investment team for the identification, review, final selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our investments. Their significant investment expertise and relationships are vital to the implementation of our business plan and we have no guarantee that they or any other employees will remain with the company. If we lose the services of one or more of these individuals, our operating results could suffer if we are unable to make future investments as we expect.
If we fail to service our existing debt arrangements adequately, or to establish new credit facilities on favorable terms, our business could be harmed materially.
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. In November 2012, we entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver is subject to certain collateral requirements and financial covenants, including maintaining a ratio of all unencumbered assets to outstanding amounts under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver of at least four-to-one, as well as a ratio of unencumbered cash and senior portfolio loans to outstanding amounts under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver of at least three-to-one.
SBA Debentures. In addition, Solutions Capital has issued SBA debentures that require our SBIC to generate sufficient cash flow to make required interest payments. Further, Solutions Capital must maintain a minimum capitalization that if impaired could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Our borrowings under our SBA debentures are collateralized by the assets of Solutions Capital.
Our continued compliance with each of these borrowings depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Material net asset devaluation in connection with additional borrowings could result in an inability to comply

22



with our obligation to restrict the level of indebtedness that we are able to incur in relation to the value of our assets or to maintain a minimum level of stockholders' equity.
Furthermore, we cannot be certain that we will be able to establish new borrowing facilities to provide working and investment capital, including for new originations. If we are unable to establish new facilities of a reasonable size, our liquidity will be reduced significantly. Even if we are able to consummate new borrowing facilities, we may not be able to do so on favorable terms.
We may be unable to obtain debt capital on favorable terms or at all, in which case we would not be able to use leverage to increase the return on our investments.
If we are unable to obtain debt capital, then our equity investors will not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage to the extent that our investment strategy is successful and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or fundings to our portfolio companies.
Prepayments of our debt investments by our portfolio companies could adversely impact our results of operations and reduce our return on equity.
We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts. Any future investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our portfolio companies elect to prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally, prepayments could negatively impact our return on equity, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.
In situations where we hold junior priority liens, our ability to control decisions with respect to our portfolio companies may be limited by lenders holding superior liens. In a default scenario, the value of collateral may be insufficient to repay us after the senior priority lenders are paid in full.
We make certain loans to portfolio companies that are secured by a junior priority security interest in the same collateral pledged to secure debt owed to lenders with liens senior to ours. Often the senior lender has procured covenants from the portfolio company prohibiting the incurrence of additional secured debt without the senior lender's consent. As a condition of permitting the portfolio company to incur junior secured indebtedness, the senior lender will require that we as junior lender enter into an intercreditor agreement that, among other things, will establish the senior lender's right to control the disposition of any collateral in the event of an insolvency proceeding or other default situation. In addition, intercreditor agreements generally will expressly subordinate junior liens to senior liens as well as the repayment of junior debt to senior debt.
Because of the control we may cede to senior lenders under intercreditor agreements, we may be unable to control the manner or timing of collateral disposition. In addition, the value of collateral securing our debt investment will ultimately depend on market and economic conditions at the time of disposal, the availability of buyers and other factors. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by our liens. There is also a risk that such collateral securing our investments will be difficult to sell in a timely manner or to appraise. If the proceeds of the collateral are insufficient to repay our loans, then we will have an unsecured claim to the extent of the deficiency against any of the company's remaining assets, which claim will likely be shared with many other unsecured creditors.
As a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we may have little direct influence over the entity. The stockholders and management of the portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
We make both debt and minority equity investments. Should a portfolio company make business decisions with which we disagree, or the stockholders and management of that company take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests, the value of our portfolio holdings could decrease and have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
If we need to sell any of our investments, we may not be able to do so at a favorable price and, as a result, we may suffer losses.
Our investments usually are subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there is usually no established trading market. The illiquidity of most of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price. As a result, we may suffer losses. In addition, if we were forced to liquidate some or all

23



of the investments in our portfolio on an expedited basis, the proceeds of such liquidation could be significantly less than the current fair value of such investments. We may be required to liquidate some or all of our portfolio to meet our debt service obligations or to maintain our qualification as a BDC and as a RIC to the extent we fail to satisfy the applicable regulatory criteria.
The disposition of our investments may result in contingent liabilities.
Most of our investments involve private securities. In connection with the disposition of an investment in private securities, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment with respect to certain potential liabilities or to the extent that any of our representations turn out to be inaccurate. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied through our return of certain distributions previously made to us.
Portfolio company litigation could result in additional costs, the diversion of management time and resources and have an adverse impact on the fair value of our investment.
In the course of providing significant managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies, we may serve as directors on the boards of such companies. In addition, in the course of making portfolio company investments, we may elect to take an equity position in any given company. To the extent that litigation arises out of our investments, we may be named as a defendant, which could result in additional costs and the diversion of management time and resources. In addition, litigation involving a portfolio company may be costly and affect the operations of the business, which could in turn have an adverse impact on the fair value of our investment.
There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
If one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court could elect to subordinate all or a portion of our claims to those of other creditors regardless of the seniority of our original investment. In such instances, the court may deem our actions to be more like that of an equityholder than a debt holder. Were that to occur, the claims we carried as senior in right of payment on our books might instead be recharacterized by the court as junior, and therefore come much lower in the priority of payments. To the extent that there are insufficient funds remaining to pay us once other debtholders are paid in full, we may lose all or a portion of our investment.
The actions we take with respect to a portfolio company's business, including providing managerial assistance, or the exercise of control over a portfolio company could also give rise to lender liability claims. Should our actions be viewed as more akin to those of an equityholder than a debtholder because of our involvement in the operations of the portfolio company, a presumption could arise that we have a fiduciary duty to the portfolio company. A third party could then sue us, for example, in an attempt to make us liable for any negative performance by such portfolio company.
We may choose to waive or defer enforcement of covenants in the debt securities held in our portfolio, which may cause us to lose all or part of our investment in these companies.
We structure the debt investments in our portfolio companies to include business and financial covenants placing affirmative and negative obligations on the operation of the company’s business and its financial condition. However, from time to time we may elect to waive breaches of these covenants, including our right to payment, or waive or defer enforcement of remedies, such as acceleration of obligations or foreclosure on collateral, depending upon the financial condition and prospects of the particular portfolio company. These actions may reduce the likelihood of our receiving the full amount of future payments of interest or principal and be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of the underlying collateral as many of these companies may have limited financial resources, may be unable to meet future obligations and may go bankrupt. This could negatively impact our ability to pay dividends, could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition and cause the loss of all or part of your investment.
Any unrealized losses we experience on our investment portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution and could impair our ability to service our borrowings, if any.
As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized depreciation in our investment portfolio could be an

24



indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected investments. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods and could materially adversely affect our ability to service our outstanding borrowings, if any.
Our stock price has been, and continues to be, volatile and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
The stock market in general, and the market prices for securities of financial services companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. If current levels of market volatility continue or worsen, we may continue to experience an adverse effect, possibly material, on our ability to access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The market price and the liquidity of the market for our shares may from time to time be affected by a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, the following:
our quarterly results of operations;
our origination activity, including the pace of, and competition for, new investment opportunities;
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
investors' general perception of our company, the economy and general market conditions;
actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or changes in the expectations of securities analysts;
the financial performance of the specific industries in which we invest on a recurring basis, including without limitation, our investments in the healthcare, business services and education industries;
significant transactions or capital commitments by us or our competitors;
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of BDCs or other financial services companies;
volatility resulting from trading in derivative securities related to our common stock including puts, calls or short trading positions;
potential future sales of debt securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our common stock or the conversion of such securities;
changes in laws or regulatory policies or tax guidelines with respect to BDCs or RICs;
loss of RIC status;
the inability to secure additional debt or equity capital;
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by us or our competitors;
litigation or regulatory actions affecting us or our portfolio companies; and
departures of key personnel.
If any of these factors causes an adverse effect on our business, our results of operations or our financial condition, the price of our common stock could fall and investors may not be able to sell their common stock at or above their respective purchase prices.
You may not receive future distributions.
In the event that the asset coverage ratio applicable to us as a BDC falls below 200%, we will be unable to make distributions until the ratio again meets or exceeds the threshold. If we do not distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including the possible loss of our status as a RIC for the applicable period. From December 2001 through December 31, 2013, we declared distributions totaling $13.89 per common share. Due to the market dislocation, we suspended our distributions from the third quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2010. We reinstated our distribution on April 29, 2010, and have continued to declare a quarterly dividend since that time; however, there can be no assurance that distributions will continue in the future.
We will make future decisions with respect to the actual level of distributions after taking into account the minimum statutorily required level of distributions, gains and losses recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, our liquidity, cash earnings and our BDC asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision. Regulatory constraints, our inability to achieve operating results or a decline in the performance of our business could restrict our ability to

25



make any future distributions. In addition, we may not be able to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time.
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before, or without, receiving cash representing such income.
In accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations, we include in taxable income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash from our portfolio companies, such as contractual PIK interest, interest on loans that are on non-accrual status and original issue discount. PIK interest represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Loans that are on non-accrual status reflect an inability of a portfolio company to make payments to us when due. Original issue discount may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the issuance of a debt instrument or in other circumstances. We are required to include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Other situations may also arise where we are required to include amounts in taxable income for which we have not yet received payment in cash.
We must distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to maintain the tax benefits we enjoy as a RIC. This obligation applies whether or not that income was actually received in cash. Since we may recognize income before, or without, receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the requirement. To raise funds to make the required distributions, we may have to raise additional debt or equity capital at unattractive rates or on unfavorable conditions. We might also need to sell some of our investments at unfavorable prices, or repurpose the cash we had reserved for new investment originations. If we cannot obtain cash from these or other sources, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and, thus, be subject to corporate-level income tax.
Any change in the regulation of our business could have a significant adverse effect on the profitability of our operations and our cost of doing business.
Changes in the laws, regulations or interpretations of the laws and regulations that govern BDCs, RICs, SBICs or non-depository commercial lenders could have a significant adverse effect on our operations and our cost of doing business. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations and also to judicial and administrative decisions that affect our operations. If these laws, regulations or decisions change, or if we expand our business into jurisdictions that have adopted requirements that are more stringent than those in which we currently conduct business, we may have to incur significant expenses in order to comply or we may have to restrict our operations.
We may in the future decide to issue preferred stock, which would magnify the risks of investing in us, as well as the potential for loss.
Because preferred stock is another form of borrowing and the dividends on any preferred stock we might issue would be cumulative, preferred stock has the same risks to our common stockholders as debt. We are obligated to pay the cumulative dividends and any liquidation preference attached to such preferred stock before we make any payments to our common stockholders. While the value of preferred stock is unaffected by our expenses or losses, preferred stockholders do not participate in any income or appreciation in excess of their stated preference. Holders of any preferred stock we might issue would have the right to elect members of the board of directors as well as class voting rights on certain matters, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open-end status. Accordingly, preferred stockholders could veto changes to the detriment of the company and its common stockholders. We currently have no plans to issue preferred stock.
Investments in equity securities involve a substantial degree of risk.
We have purchased, and may purchase in the future, common stock and other equity securities, including warrants, in various portfolio companies. Although equity securities historically have generated higher average total returns than debt securities over the long term, equity securities may experience more volatility in those returns than debt securities. The equity securities we acquire may fail to appreciate, decline in value or lose all value, and our ability to recover our investment will depend on our portfolio company's success. Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant risks, including the risk of further dilution in the event the portfolio company issues additional securities. Investments in preferred securities involve special risks, such as the risk of deferred distributions, illiquidity and limited voting rights.

26



Fluctuations in interest rates could affect our income adversely.
Because we sometimes borrow to make investments, our net income depends, in part, on the difference between the interest rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate at which we invest these funds. Because a significant portion of our assets and liabilities may be priced using various short-term rate indices, including one-month to six-month LIBOR, commercial paper rates and the prime rate, the timing of changes in market interest rates or in the relationship between interest rate indices could affect the interest rates earned on our interest-earning assets differently than the interest rates we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. As a result, significant changes in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our net income.
A significant portion of our variable rate loans have interest rate floors based on the LIBOR or prime rate. These floors minimize our exposure to significant decreases in interest rates. A significant increase in market interest rates could harm our ability to attract new portfolio companies and originate new loans and investments. In addition, our non-performing assets could increase and the value of our portfolio decrease because our floating-rate loan portfolio companies may be unable to meet higher payment obligations.
Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of our portfolio of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.
Concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association, or BBA, in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivatives positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks have entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing.
Actions by the BBA, regulators or law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities, including our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.
Our business is subject to increasingly complex corporate governance, public disclosure and accounting requirements that could adversely affect our business and financial results.
We are subject to changing rules and regulations of federal and state government as well as the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market have issued a significant number of new and increasingly complex requirements and regulations over the course of the last several years and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to laws enacted by Congress. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation-related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act, and the SEC has adopted additional rules and regulations that may impact us. Our efforts to comply with these requirements have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, an increase in expenses and a diversion of management’s time from other business activities.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
The Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage a third party from making a proposal to acquire us. We have also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of our board or our company, including provisions in our certificate of incorporation dividing our board of directors into three classes with the term of one class expiring at each annual meeting of stockholders. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price of our common stock.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS. 
None.

27



ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES. 
Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries own any facilities or real estate.  However, during 2013 we leased 13,134 square feet of office space for our corporate headquarters located at 1001 19th Street North, Arlington, VA 22209. Our lease expires in November 2014. In February 2014, we entered into a new lease for our current corporate headquarters which will expire in December 2015 and may be extended until December 2016.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. 
From time to time, we are a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies. While we cannot predict the outcome of these legal proceedings with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES. 
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “MCGC.” The following table sets forth the high and low last sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:
 
Years ended December 31,
 
2013
2012
Quarter Ended
High
Low
High
Low
March 31
$
5.00

$
4.47

$
5.01

$
3.89

June 30
$
5.32

$
4.57

$
4.58

$
4.07

September 30
$
5.49

$
4.89

$
5.28

$
4.33

December 31
$
5.32

$
4.40

$
4.89

$
4.09

Holders
On February 21, 2014 we had approximately 119 holders of record and approximately 19,946 beneficial holders of our common stock.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Purchases of Equity Securities
STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million, which was increased on February 28 2014, to $35.0 million. We have provided our stockholders with notice of our intention to repurchase shares of our common stock in accordance with 1940 Act requirements. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase shares in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares, and all repurchases are made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases. We retire immediately all such shares of common stock that we purchase in connection with the stock repurchase program.

28



NET ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK
For certain employees, we may be deemed to have purchased through the net issuance of shares, a portion of the shares of restricted stock previously issued under the 2006 Plan for which the forfeiture provisions have lapsed to satisfy the applicable employee’s income tax withholding obligations. We retire immediately all such shares of common stock that we purchase in connection with such net issuance to employees.
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
As part of our dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders, we may direct the plan administrator to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market to satisfy dividend reinvestment requests related to dividends that we pay on outstanding shares of our common stock.
The following table summarizes the shares of common stock that we have purchased during the three months ended December 31, 2013:
Period/Purpose
Total number
of shares
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
November 1 – 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Stock repurchase program(a)
512,100

$
4.73

 
512,100

$
22,578,748

Dividend reinvestment requirements(b)
1,430

$
4.82

(c) 
n/a

n/a

Total November 1 – 30, 2013
513,530

$
4.73

 
512,100

$
22,578,748

December 1 – 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock vesting(d)
3,540

$
4.40

(e) 
n/a

n/a

Total December 1 – 31, 2013
3,540

$
4.40

 
n/a

n/a

Total
517,070

$
4.73

 
512,100

$
22,578,748

    
(a) 
On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million, which was increased on February 28, 2014, to $35.0 million.
(b) 
Represents stock purchased on the open market to satisfy dividend reinvestment requests.
(c) 
Represents the weighted-average purchase price per share, including commissions, for shares purchased pursuant to the terms of our dividend reinvestment plan.
(d) 
Represents shares repurchased from our employees in connection with the net issuance of shares to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock.
(e) 
Based on the weighted-average closing share prices of our common stock on the dates that the forfeiture restrictions lapsed.

Distribution Policy
We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient distributions to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income which amounts would be considered a return of capital. As a RIC, we are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or on deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the BDC asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act and due to restrictions in our credit facilities as well as SBIC restrictions. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of favorable RIC tax treatment. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level. We may make distributions to our stockholders of certain net capital gains.

29



The following table summarizes our distributions declared since January 1, 2012:
Date Declared
Record Date
Payable Date
Dividends per Share
February 28, 2014
March 14, 2014
March 28, 2014
$
0.125

October 25, 2013
November 8, 2013
November 22, 2013
$
0.125

July 26, 2013
August 9, 2013
August 30, 2013
$
0.125

April 26, 2013
May 10, 2013
May 31, 2013
$
0.125

March 1, 2013
March 15, 2013
March 29, 2013
$
0.125

October 26, 2012
November 16, 2012
November 30, 2012
$
0.125

July 27, 2012
August 17, 2012
August 31, 2012
$
0.140

April 27, 2012
June 13, 2012
July 13, 2012
$
0.140

February 24, 2012
April 13, 2012
May 15, 2012
$
0.170

We will make future decisions with respect to the actual level of distributions after taking into account the minimum statutorily required level of distributions, gains and losses recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, our liquidity, cash earnings and our BDC asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision. For additional information about our distributions, see the Liquidity and Capital Resources and Distributions sections of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Stock Performance Graph
The following comparative stock performance graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends, if any) from investing $100 on December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2013, in each of: i) our common stock; ii) the Russell 2000 Index; and iii) the NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (capitalization weighted).
The information included under the heading Stock Performance Graph in Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is “furnished” and not “filed,” and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or subject to Regulation 14A, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act.

30



ITEM 6.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated financial data set forth in the following table with respect to our statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are derived from our audited financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are derived from our audited financial statements, which are not included herein. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. See the notes below and to the consolidated financial statements for an explanation of the method used to determine the number of shares used in computing NOI and net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted. The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto found at Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(in thousands, except per share and other period-end data)
Years ended December 31,
 
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Income statement data
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
50,485

$
60,993

$
85,696

$
89,569

$
99,834

Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
29,896

18,806

37,658

40,565

38,188

Net investment loss
(28,594
)
(13,299
)
(129,873
)
(54,819
)
(94,353
)
Net income (loss)
1,176

4,998

(93,115
)
(13,072
)
(51,059
)
Per common share data
 
 
 
 
 
Net operating income before net investment gain (loss), (loss) gain on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision per weighted-average common share—basic and diluted
$
0.42

$
0.25

$
0.49

$
0.54

$
0.51

Income (loss) per weighted-average common share—basic and diluted
$
0.02

$
0.07

$
(1.22
)
$
(0.17
)
$
(0.68
)
Cash dividends declared per common share
$
0.50

$
0.58

$
0.66

$
0.37

$

Selected period-end balances
 
 
 
 
 
Investment portfolio balance
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value
$
368,873

$
477,724

$
741,166

$
1,009,705

$
986,346

Cost
566,438

668,787

1,017,218

1,245,673

1,154,924

Total assets
513,993

630,776

890,538

1,145,277

1,191,149

Borrowings
175,172

248,053

430,219

546,882

557,848

Total stockholders’ equity
333,954

371,728

434,952

578,016

615,683

Net asset value per common share outstanding(a)
$
4.74

$
5.18

$
5.65

$
7.54

$
8.06

Other period-end data
 
 
 
 
 
Average size of investment
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value
$
10,849

$
10,857

$
12,353

$
14,221

$
16,718

Cost
$
16,660

$
15,200

$
16,954

$
17,545

$
19,575

Number of portfolio companies
34

44

60

71

59

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted
71,232

74,859

76,259

75,422

74,692

Shares outstanding at end of year
70,510

71,721

76,997

76,662

76,394

    
(a)
Based on common shares outstanding at period-end.

31



ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and Other Data, and our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, projections, intentions, goals, strategies, plans, prospects and the beliefs and assumptions of our management including, without limitation: our expectations regarding our results of operations, including revenues, net operating income, net investment losses and general and administrative expenses and the factors that may affect such results; our belief that improved operating efficiency through reduced operating costs, places MCG in the top quartile of all BDCs; anticipated levels of fixed cash operating expenses and non-recurring general and administrative expenses during 2014; efforts to reorganize our Asset Management department to redeploy excess liquidity and to address the markets MCG serves and to better leverage the vertical market industry expertise MCG possesses; expectations regarding sources of new business opportunities; expected net operating income levels for 2014 and on a fully-deployed basis (including related yield and expense assumptions), when there can be no guarantee that either will be achieved; estimates regarding yield compressions and the impact on net operating income; expectations regarding the level and timing of monetizations during 2014; expectations with regard to origination pacing and anticipated aggregate investment levels, including timing to full deployment of our balance sheet; the belief that we have substantial leverage capacity available to support asset acquisitions above our cash balances and provide associated incremental earnings power; intentions to repurchase shares of common stock under our stock repurchase program through available liquidity or otherwise and whether such repurchases will be accretive to our stockholders; expected dividend distribution levels during 2014, which are subject to, among other things, approval of our board of directors, and which may never be declared or distributed; expected levels of industry concentration in our portfolio; our intentions to limit equity investments to approximately 10% of the fair value of our investments; our decisions to make dividend distributions after taking into account our distribution requirements as a RIC, together with an assessment of our current and forecasted gains and losses recognized or to be recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, liquidity, cash earnings and our asset coverage ratio; the sufficiency of liquidity to meet 2014 operating requirements, as well as new origination opportunities and potential dividend distributions; our expectations regarding the full use of, and our belief that our operations, monetizations, revolving credit facility and unrestricted cash will provide sufficient liquidity to fund, as necessary, requests to draw on unused portions of commitments that obligate us to extend credit in the form of loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments; our use of independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses; our expectations regarding the outcome of legal proceedings incidental to our business; market conditions generally and specifically regarding the leveraged loan market; the state of the economy and other factors. Forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “could increase the likelihood,” “hope,” “target,” “project,” “goals,” “potential,” “predict,” “might,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is planned,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “will enable,” “would be expected,” “look forward,” “may provide,” “would” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of those terms. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated or implied by forward-looking statements. Such factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those risk factors discussed in Item IA of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be incorrect. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to lower middle-market companies throughout the United States. Generally, our portfolio companies use our capital investment to finance acquisitions, recapitalizations, buyouts, organic growth, working capital and other general corporate purposes.
We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a BDC we must meet various regulatory tests, which include investing at least 70% of our total assets in private or thinly traded public U.S.-based companies and limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings (excluding Small Business Investment Company, or SBIC, debt) of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt generally may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets).
In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to continue to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax

32



purposes and obtain favorable RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain requirements, including certain minimum distribution requirements. If we satisfy these requirements, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders as distributions, allowing us to substantially reduce or eliminate our corporate-level tax liability. From time to time, our wholly owned subsidiaries may execute transactions that trigger corporate-level tax liabilities. In such cases, we recognize a tax provision in the period when it becomes more likely than not that the taxable event will occur.
Significant Developments in 2013
Originations and Advances — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we made $37.1 million and $128.1 million, respectively, in originations and advances to new and existing portfolio companies.
Loan Monetizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we received $37.0 million and $199.4 million, respectively, in loan payoffs and amortization payments.
Equity Monetizations and Realizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we received $2.6 million and $10.7 million, respectively, in proceeds from the sale of equity investments, principally the sale of securities in each of Miles Media Group, LLC, NDSSI Holdings, LLC and Jenzabar, Inc.
Loans on Non-Accrual — As of December 31, 2013, loans on non-accrual were $21.4 million at cost (6.1% of the total loan portfolio), and $4.5 million at fair value (1.3% of the total loan portfolio). On December 15, 2013, Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc., or Color Star, filed for voluntary relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. In the quarter ended December 31, 2013, we realized a $13.5 million loss on our subordinated loan to Color Star.
Operating Costs — For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2013, our total operating costs, excluding interest expense, were $11.5 million, or 2.2% of total assets of $514.0 million. During this same period, we incurred severance costs of $0.8 million, offset by the reversal of $0.3 million of amortization expense associated with the forfeiture of restricted stock that we included in total operating costs.
Reduced Leverage — For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2013, we reduced our outstanding borrowings under our MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust, by $72.9 million, reducing our borrowings under our 2006-1 Trust from $98.1 million to $25.2 million as of December 31, 2013. On January 21, 2014, we repaid and terminated our 2006-1 Trust.
Open-Market Purchases of Our Stock — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased 512,100 and 1,016,739 shares of our common stock at weighted average purchase prices of $4.73 and $4.62, respectively. We acquired these shares from sellers in open market transactions. We retire these shares upon settlement, thereby reducing the number of shares issued and outstanding.
Second SBIC License — On November 8, 2013, we withdrew our application for a second license from the SBA to operate an additional subsidiary as an SBIC. We elected to withdraw our application for a second license until such time as the SBA has an opportunity to further evaluate organizational results in connection with our restructuring efforts and our position in relation to other specialty finance companies. The SBA indicated that we may petition the SBA for permission to re-file our application at a future date. The withdrawal of the license application for the second SBIC license does not impact Solutions Capital, its existing license or operations.
Outlook
In 2013, we successfully improved our operating efficiency by reducing operating costs, excluding interest expense, as a percentage of total assets from 3.6% in 2011 to 2.2%, which we believe places us in the top quartile of all BDCs. In 2014, we anticipate that our fixed-cost cash operating expenses, excluding interest and variable incentive compensation, to be approximately $10 million.  In addition, we anticipate incurring non-recurring general and administrative expenses of $1.0-2.0 million primarily related to Color Star litigation and recruitment expenses.  
During 2014, we plan to reorganize our Asset Management department to more effectively address the markets we serve and to better leverage the vertical market industry expertise we possess in healthcare, software, information services, for-profit education and consumer products, among others. We expect that the majority of our new business will continue to come from private equity sponsors operating in the lower middle-market with loan proceeds used in

33



connection with M&A, business expansion and recapitalization transactions. We will also continue to provide unitranche, second lien and subordinated debt solutions and, to a small degree, equity co-investment.
We believe that current market conditions in our primary lending markets are consistent with the peak of a credit cycle. The current supply of debt capital exceeds the demand by issuers in our markets, resulting in lower pricing and weaker contractual protections. A noteworthy development is that, in our view, many issuers in the lower middle-market can currently obtain financing on pricing and terms comparable to larger companies. As a result of these market conditions, we intend to redeploy our excess liquidity in a cautious and deliberate manner and we expect to generate, net operating income, or NOI of 25-30 cents per share for 2014. Based on our assumptions of normalized expenses and 100 basis points of yield compression, fully-deployed we expect to generate 11% yield on $470 million of total investments and to generate annual NOI of approximately 40-45 cents per share before leverage, or approximately 10-12 cents per share on a quarterly basis. Fully-deployed, we estimate that a 100 basis point change in yield on our portfolio has an approximately 7 cent per share impact on NOI.
During the two year period ending December 31, 2013, we monetized $622 million of our investment portfolio, $155 million more than our forecast resulting in lower overall earning assets and associated revenue and earnings for that period. We expect repayments of approximately $100-125 million in 2014; however, depending upon market conditions, it is possible that monetization levels could run meaningfully higher. Depending on the market, during 2014 and 2015, we expect to originate and advance approximately $100-150 million annually in new investments, which would result in full deployment of our balance sheet in the next six to eight quarters at the earliest.
On January 21, 2014, we repaid the remaining indebtedness associated with our 2006-1 Trust, thus eliminating all funded indebtedness associated with our BDC asset coverage test. Given our equity capital base of $334 million we believe that we have substantial leverage capacity available to support asset acquisition above our cash balances and provide associated incremental earnings power to the extent leverage is available.
On February 28, 2014, our board of directors approved an increase in our current stock repurchase program from $25 million to $35 million and we expect to repurchase stock at share price levels that we believe are accretive to our stockholders.
Also on February 28, 2014, our board of directors declared a 12.5 cent per share distribution to stockholders of record on March 14, 2014 and payable on March 28, 2014. We expect that our board of directors will declare distributions on a quarterly basis at a level approximating our quarterly NOI. Due to the continuing high velocity of our loan portfolio and challenging market conditions generally, subject to review and approval by our board of directors, we anticipate lowering our quarterly distributions to 7 cents per share at least for the remainder of 2014.
Access to Capital and Liquidity
At December 31, 2013, we had $91.6 million of cash and cash equivalents available for general corporate purposes, as well as $32.5 million of cash in restricted accounts related to our SBIC that we could use to fund new investments in the SBIC and $1.4 million of restricted cash held in escrow. In addition, we had $13.9 million of cash in securitization accounts, that may only be used to make interest and principal payments on our securitized borrowings or distributions to the Company in accordance with the indenture agreement.
As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retain all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date. On January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full for an aggregate redemption price of $40.3 million, of which $14.9 million was paid to us in respect of the Class D Notes we held, and the other obligations of the 2006-1 Trust were satisfied and the assets of the 2006-1 Trust were transferred to MCG, the parent.
At December 31, 2013, $150.0 million of SBA borrowings were outstanding, the maximum available under our current SBIC license.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
As of December 31, 2013, the fair value of our investment portfolio was $368.9 million, which represents a $108.9 million, or 22.8%, decrease from the $477.7 million fair value as of December 31, 2012. The following sections describe the composition of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2013 and key changes in our portfolio during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.

34



Portfolio Composition
The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio at fair value:
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Investments at
Fair Value
Percent of
Total Portfolio
Investments at
Fair Value
Percent of
Total Portfolio
Debt investments
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
185,524

50.3
%
$
291,760

61.1
%
Subordinated debt
 
 
 
 
Secured
108,338

29.4

114,983

24.1

Unsecured
42,452

11.5

26,274

5.4

Total debt investments
336,314

91.2

433,017

90.6

Equity investments
 
 
 
 
Preferred equity
28,390

7.7

41,558

8.7

Common/common equivalents equity
4,169

1.1

3,149

0.7

Total equity investments
32,559

8.8

44,707

9.4

Total investments
$
368,873

100.0
%
$
477,724

100.0
%
Our debt investments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 15.5%, a portion of which may be in the form of payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 73.3% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 26.7% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 60.2% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.0% and 3.0% on a LIBOR based index or prime floors between 2.5% and 6.0%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percentage of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.
The following table summarizes our investment portfolio by industry at fair value:
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Investments
at Fair Value
Percent of
Total Portfolio
Investments at
Fair Value
Percent of
Total Portfolio
Healthcare
$
84,922

23.0
%
$
106,119

22.2
%
Business services
64,108

17.4

64,947

13.6

Education
57,905

15.7

59,783

12.5

Manufacturing
51,735

14.0

28,728

6.0

Publishing
25,312

6.9

30,646

6.4

Insurance
23,620

6.4

26,529

5.6

Restaurants
23,010

6.2

9,301

1.9

Information services
12,552

3.4

12,646

2.7

Broadcasting
12,252

3.3

25,372

5.3

Home furnishings
4,730

1.3

7,806

1.6

Consumer products
4,657

1.3

4,338

0.9

Agriculture


21,781

4.6

Auto parts


6,434

1.3

Cable


5,061

1.1

Electronics


33,361

7.0

Logistics


27,237

5.7

Other(a)
4,070

1.1

7,635

1.6

Total
$
368,873

100.0
%
$
477,724

100.0
%
______________________
(a)    No individual industry within this category exceeds 1%.
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2013, our ten largest portfolio companies represented approximately 54.3% of the total fair value of our investments. These ten companies accounted for 42.1% of our total revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013. We originated approximately 12% of the fair value of our top ten largest portfolio investments in the fourth quarter of 2013.

35



During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we had concentrations in certain industries, including the healthcare, business services, education and manufacturing industries. The following table summarizes our fair value and revenue concentrations in each of those industries:
 
Investments at fair value
Revenue for the year ended
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Amount
% of Total Portfolio
Amount
% of Total Portfolio
Amount
% of Total Revenue
Amount
% of Total Revenue
Industry
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Healthcare
$
84,922

23.0
%
$
106,119

22.2
%
$
12,650

25.1
%
$
9,160

15.0
%
Business services
64,108

17.4

64,947

13.6

8,265

16.4

7,247

11.9

Education
57,905

15.7

59,783

12.5

6,690

13.2

5,286

8.7

Manufacturing
51,735

14.0

28,728

6.0

5,823

11.5

5,876

9.6

Total
$
258,670

70.1
%
$
259,577

54.3
%
$
33,428

66.2
%
$
27,569

45.2
%
Changes in Investment Portfolio
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we made $128.1 million of originations and advances compared to $162.0 million of originations and advances during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The following table summarizes our total portfolio investment activity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
Year ended
(in thousands)
December 31
 
2013
2012
Beginning investment portfolio
$
477,724

$
741,166

Originations and advances
128,089

161,957

Gross payments, reductions and sales of securities
(210,124
)
(412,195
)
Net realized loss(a)
(21,686
)
(98,181
)
Unrealized depreciation
(14,443
)
(15,261
)
Reversals of unrealized depreciation
7,940

100,250

Origination fees and amortization of unearned income
1,373

(12
)
Ending investment portfolio
$
368,873

$
477,724

___________________________
(a) 
Net realized loss for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 excludes $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of net realized loss related to other assets.

36



Originations and Advances
The following table shows our originations and advances during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 by security type:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2013
2012
(dollars in thousands)
Amount
% of Total
Amount
% of Total
Debt investments
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
73,683

57.5
%
$
78,792

48.6
%
Subordinated debt
 
 
 
 
Secured
15,011

11.7

47,240

29.2

Unsecured
36,541

28.5

26,870

16.6

Total debt investments
125,235

97.7

152,902

94.4

Equity investments
 
 
 
 
Preferred equity
2,884

2.3

8,994

5.6

Common/common equivalents equity
(30
)

61


Total equity investments
2,854

2.3

9,055

5.6

Total originations and advances
$
128,089

100.0
%
$
161,957

100.0
%
The following table shows our significant originations and advances:
(in thousands)
Year ended
 
December 31, 2013
Company
Originations
Draws/
Advances
PIK Advances/ Dividends
Total
Debt
 
 
 
 
TCFI CP LLC
$
14,500

$
8,500

$
84

$
23,084

Intrafusion Holdings, Inc.
21,500



21,500

Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc.
14,000



14,000

Huron Inc.
13,000


457

13,457

Community Investors, Inc.
12,300



12,300

Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC
10,000


35

10,035

Dorsey School of Business Holdings, Inc.
10,000



10,000

C7 Data Centers, Inc.

8,000


8,000

Miles Media Group, LLC

3,450


3,450

Education Management, Inc.

1,380

1,043

2,423

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.


1,521

1,521

SC Academy Holdings, Inc.


1,141

1,141

Other (< $1 million)

1,500

2,824

4,324

Total debt
95,300

22,830

7,105

125,235

Equity
 
 
 
 
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC


1,719

1,719

Other (< $1 million)
300


835

1,135

Total Equity
300


2,554

2,854

Total originations and advances
$
95,600

$
22,830

$
9,659

$
128,089


37



Repayments, Sales and Other Reductions of Investment Portfolio
The following table shows our gross payments, reductions and sales of securities during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 by security type:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2013
2012
(dollars in thousands)
Amount
% of Total
Amount
% of Total
Debt investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
159,065

75.7
%
$
283,463

68.7
%
Subordinated debt
 
 
 
 
Secured
20,243

9.6

51,507

12.5

Unsecured
20,144

9.6

12,189

3.0

Total debt investments
199,452

94.9

347,159

84.2

Equity investments
 
 
 
 
Preferred equity
7,669

3.7

44,439

10.8

Common/common equivalents equity
3,003

1.4

20,597

5.0

Total equity investments
10,672

5.1

65,036

15.8

Total gross payments, reductions and sales of securities
$
210,124

100.0
%
$
412,195

100.0
%
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, our gross payments, reductions and sales of securities by transaction type included:  
 
Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2013
2012
Principal repayments, reductions and loan sales
$
164,292

$
307,044

Sale of equity investments
9,803

56,562

Scheduled principal amortization
31,779

31,119

Collection of accrued paid-in-kind interest and dividends
4,250

17,470

Total gross payments, reductions and sales of securities
$
210,124

$
412,195


38



As shown in the following table, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we monetized all, or part of, 19 portfolio investments with proceeds totaling $175.0 million:
 
Year ended
 
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Principal Repayments and Proceeds from Loan Sales
Sale or Settlement of Equity Investments
PIK Interest and Dividend Prepayments
Total
Monetizations
 
 
 
 
NDSSI Holdings, LLC
$
29,356

$
3,217

$
831

$
33,404

Capstone Logistics, LLC
27,347



27,347

Chase Industries, Inc.
16,800



16,800

SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.
13,462



13,462

Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc.
8,234

2,300

509

11,043

Intrafusion Holdings, Inc.
10,000



10,000

Sagamore Hill Broadcasting, LLC
8,900



8,900

The Gavilon Group, LLC
8,000



8,000

Oceans Acquisition, Inc.
7,500



7,500

Virtual Radiologic Corp.
7,225



7,225

Constructions Trailer Specialists, Inc.
6,442


33

6,475

Barbri, Inc.
6,099



6,099

Gans Communications, L.P.
5,015



5,015

Other < 5 Million
9,912

3,852


13,764

Total monetizations
164,292

9,369

1,373

175,034

Other scheduled payments
31,779

434

2,877

35,090

Total gross payments, sales and other reductions of investment portfolio
$
196,071

$
9,803

$
4,250

$
210,124

The proceeds from these monetizations correlated closely with the most recently reported fair value of the associated investments.
ASSET QUALITY
Asset quality is generally a function of portfolio company performance and economic conditions, as well as our underwriting and ongoing management of our investment portfolio. In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, we use the following investment rating system to characterize and monitor our expected level of returns on each investment in our portfolio:
Investment
Rating
Summary Description
1
Capital gain expected or realized
2
Full return of principal and interest or dividend expected with customer performing in accordance with plan
3
Full return of principal and interest or dividend expected, but customer requires closer monitoring
4
Some loss of interest or dividend expected, but still expect an overall positive internal rate of return on the investment
5
Loss of interest or dividend and some loss of principal investment expected, which would result in an overall negative internal rate of return on the investment

39



The following table shows the distribution of our investments on our 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Investment
Rating
Investments at
Fair Value
% of Total
Portfolio
Investments at
Fair Value
% of Total 
Portfolio
1(a)
$
104,657

28.4
%
$
146,589

30.7
%
2
137,586

37.3

209,016

43.7

3
94,102

25.5

96,932

20.3

4
25,976

7.0

22,789

4.8

5
6,552

1.8

2,398

0.5

Total
$
368,873

100.0
%
$
477,724

100.0
%
_________________________
(a) 
As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Investment Rating “1” included $83.4 million and $81.9 million, respectively, of loans to companies in which we also hold equity securities.
When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the customer to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest have been brought current through payment or a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.
The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of loans more than 90 days past due and loans on non-accrual status:
 
COST BASIS
FAIR VALUE BASIS
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Investments
at Cost
% of Loan
Portfolio
Investments
at Cost
% of Loan
Portfolio
Investments
at Fair Value
% of Loan
Portfolio
Investments
at Fair Value
% of Loan
Portfolio
Loans greater than 90 days past due
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On non-accrual status
$
3,897

1.11
%
$
3,897

0.86
%
$

%
$

%
Total loans greater than 90 days past due
$
3,897

1.11
%
$
3,897

0.86
%
$

%
$

%
Loans on non-accrual status
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0 to 90 days past due
$
17,531

4.98
%
$
12,880

2.85
%
$
4,493

1.34
%
$
607

0.14
%
Greater than 90 days past due
3,897

1.11

3,897

0.86





Total loans on non-accrual status
$
21,428

6.09
%
$
16,777

3.71
%
$
4,493

1.34
%
$
607

0.14
%

40



The following table summarizes the changes in the cost and fair value of the loans on non-accrual status from December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2013:
 
Year ended
 
December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Cost
Fair Value
Non-accrual loan balance as of December 31, 2012
$
16,777

$
607

Additional loans on non-accrual status
 
 
Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc. - Agriculture
13,522

13,195

Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. (Senior) - Home furnishings
7,204

4,493

Total additional loans on non-accrual status
20,726

17,688

Payments received on loans on non-accrual status
(621
)
(621
)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on non-accrual loans


Reversal of previously recognized unrealized loss on non-accrual loans(a)

2,273

Realized loss on non-accrual loans(a)
(15,454
)
(15,454
)
Total change in non-accrual loans
4,651

3,886

Non-accrual loan balance as of December 31, 2013
$
21,428

$
4,493

_________________________
(a) 
Represents the reversal of previously recognized unrealized loss and recognition of realized loss on the non-accrual loans attributed to Color Star and Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. and reversal of previously recognized unrealized gain and recognition of realized gain on the non-accrual loan attributed to CWP/RMK Acquisition Corp.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
The following table summarizes the components of our net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
Years ended
 
 
December 31,
Variance
(dollars in thousands)
2013
2012
$
Percentage
Revenue
 
 
 
 
Interest and dividend income
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
43,106

$
50,775

$
(7,669
)
(15.1
)%
Dividend income
2,554

3,688

(1,134
)
(30.7
)
Loan fees
3,165

3,236

(71
)
(2.2
)
Total interest and dividend income
48,825

57,699

(8,874
)
(15.4
)
Advisory fees and other income
1,660

3,294

(1,634
)
(49.6
)
Total revenue
50,485

60,993

(10,508
)
(17.2
)
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
9,087

15,103

(6,016
)
(39.8
)
Employee compensation
 
 
 
 
Salaries and benefits
4,928

10,956

(6,028
)
(55.0
)
Amortization of employee restricted stock
1,179

2,076

(897
)
(43.2
)
Total employee compensation
6,107

13,032

(6,925
)
(53.1
)
General and administrative expense
5,381

13,983

(8,602
)
(61.5
)
Restructuring expense
14

69

(55
)
(79.7
)
Total operating expense
20,589

42,187

(21,598
)
(51.2
)
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
29,896

18,806

11,090

59.0

Net investment loss before income tax provision
(28,594
)
(13,299
)
(15,295
)
115.0

Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision

(174
)
174

(100.0
)
Income tax provision
126

335

(209
)
(62.4
)
Net income
$
1,176

$
4,998

$
(3,822
)
(76.5
)
NM=Not Meaningful
 
 
 
 

41




TOTAL REVENUE
Total revenue includes interest and dividend income, loan fees, advisory fees and other income. The following sections describe the reasons for the variances in each major component of our revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.
INTEREST INCOME
The level of interest income that we earn depends upon the level of interest-bearing investments outstanding during the period, as well as the weighted-average yield on these investments. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value was 12.2% compared to 11.3% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The weighted-average yield varies each period because of changes in the composition of our portfolio of debt investments, changes in stated interest rates, accelerations of unearned fees on paid-off/restructured loans and the balance of loans on non-accrual status for which we are not accruing interest.
The following table shows the various components of the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
Year ended
 
December 31
 
2013
2012
Average 90-day LIBOR
0.3
 %
0.4
 %
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio
11.9

10.9

Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans
0.3

0.4

Impact of non-accrual loans
(0.3
)
(0.4
)
Total yield on average loan portfolio
12.2
 %
11.3
 %
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, interest income was $43.1 million, compared to $50.8 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, which represented a $7.7 million, or 15.1%, decrease. This decrease reflected (i) a $11.5 million decrease resulting from a 21.0% decrease in our average loan balance, (ii) a $1.8 million decrease due to interest rate floors, (iii) a $0.8 million decrease related to the decrease in LIBOR and (iv) a $0.7 million decrease resulting from loans that were on non-accrual status during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 but that had been accruing interest during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. These decreases were partially offset by a $7.1 million increase in interest income resulting from a 1.3% increase in our net spread to LIBOR.
PIK Income
Interest income includes certain amounts that we have not received in cash, such as PIK interest. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is added to the principal balance of the loan and compounded if not paid on a current basis. Borrowers may in some instances be required to prepay PIK because of certain contractual provisions or they may choose to prepay; however, more typically, PIK is paid at the end of the loan term. The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, at cost:
 
Year ended
 
December 31
(in thousands)
2013
2012
Beginning PIK loan balance
$
9,043

$
15,653

PIK interest earned during the period
6,480

5,253

Interest receivable converted to PIK
605


Payments received from PIK loans
(3,381
)
(8,996
)
PIK converted from (to) other securities

3,143

Realized loss
(615
)
(6,010
)
Ending PIK loan balance
$
12,132

$
9,043

As of December 31, 2013, all of our PIK loans were accruing interest and, as of December 31, 2012, we were not accruing interest on $0.4 million of the ending PIK loan balance, at cost. During the twelve months ended December 31,

42



2013, the payments received on PIK loans, included $1.0 million collected in conjunction with the partial repayment of our investment in Education Management, Inc., as well as $0.8 million and $0.5 million collected in conjunction with the repayments in full of our investments in NDSSI Holdings, LLC and Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc., respectively. The payments received from PIK loans during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, included $2.9 million from Jet Plastica Investors, LLC, $1.8 million from GSDM Holdings Corp. and $1.3 million from Coastal Sunbelt Holding, Inc.
DIVIDEND INCOME
We accrete dividends on equity investments with stated dividend rates as they are earned, to the extent that we believe the dividends will be paid ultimately and the associated portfolio company has sufficient value to support the accretion. We recognize dividends on our other equity investments when we receive the dividend payment. Our dividend income varies from period to period because of changes in the size and composition of our equity investments, the yield from the investments in our equity portfolio and the ability of the portfolio companies to declare and pay dividends. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recognized dividend income of $2.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively. In addition, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we received payments on accrued dividends of $0.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the balance of accrued dividends was $10.9 million.
ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER INCOME
Advisory fees and other income primarily include fees related to prepayment, advisory and management services, equity structuring, syndication, bank interest and other income. Generally, advisory fees and other income relate to specific transactions or services and, therefore, may vary from period to period depending on the level and types of services provided. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we earned $1.7 million of advisory fees and other income, which represented a $1.6 million, or 49.6%, decrease from the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. This decrease resulted from a decrease in prepayment premiums of $1.6 million during 2013.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenses include interest, employee compensation and general and administrative expenses. The reasons for these variances are discussed in more detail below.
INTEREST EXPENSE
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred $9.1 million of interest expense, which represented a $6.0 million, or 39.8%, decrease from the same period in 2012. Our average cost to borrow decreased from 4.60% during the year ended December 31, 2012 to 4.46% during the year ended December 31, 2013, principally due to a decrease in the amortization of deferred financing costs (from $5.6 million to $1.2 million), offset by the repayment of securitized debt in our 2006-1 Trust, which carried interest rates ranging from L+0.33% to L+2.25%.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, our averaging borrowings declined to approximately $201 million from an average of approximately $324 million for the same period in 2012, which accounted for a $4.9 million reduction in our interest expense. In addition, interest expense decreased by $4.4 million related to decreased amortization of debt issuance costs and $0.5 million due to a decrease in the average LIBOR rate from 0.43% to 0.27%. These decreases were offset by $3.8 million attributable to the spread to LIBOR increasing from approximately 2.46% to 3.63%.
We recognized $1.2 million in deferred financing costs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, down $4.4 million from 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to $2.9 million in deferred financing fees related to our SunTrust Warehouse financing facility which terminated in 2012.
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Employee compensation expense includes base salaries and benefits, variable annual incentive compensation and amortization of employee stock awards. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, our employee compensation expense was $6.1 million, which represented a $6.9 million, or 53.1%, decrease from the same period in 2012. Our salaries and benefits decreased by $6.0 million, or 55.0%, due to a $3.9 million decrease in incentive

43



compensation and a $2.2 million decrease in salaries and benefits primarily resulting from our operational realignment. As of December 31, 2013, we had 17 employees compared to 21 employees as of December 31, 2012.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we recognized $1.2 million of compensation expense related to employee restricted stock awards, a decrease of $0.9 million from the same period in 2012. The decrease in amortization of restricted stock awards resulted from a decrease of $0.3 million due to forfeitures of restricted stock awards, a decrease of $0.3 million due to accelerated amortization of awards related to employees whose employment was terminated, and a decrease of $0.3 million due to the expiration of the requisite service period for stock awards net of the amortization of new awards.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, general and administrative expense was $5.4 million, which represented an $8.6 million, or 61.5%, decrease compared to the same period in 2012. General and administrative expense for 2012 included $4.8 million in transition costs, including $3.3 million in severance related expenses and $1.5 million in costs to move our corporate headquarters and improve our information technology systems. In addition, the decrease in general and administrative expense reflected (i) a $2.2 million decrease due to reduced occupancy and other costs for our new corporate office space, (ii) a $0.6 million decrease due to reduced directors and officers insurance costs, (iii) a $0.4 million decrease in board of directors fees, (iv) a $0.4 million decrease in legal fees related to portfolio litigation, (v) a $0.3 million decrease in data processing costs related to our loan servicing system, (vi) a $0.3 million decrease in professional consulting services for corporate and investment related services, (vii) a $0.1 million decrease in professional consulting services for information technology related matters, and (viii) a $0.1 million decrease in telecommunications costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.8 million increase in severance costs related to employee terminations in the third quarter of 2013.
NET INVESTMENT (LOSS) GAIN BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred $28.6 million of net investment losses before income tax provision, compared to $13.3 million during the same period in 2012. These amounts represent the total of net realized gains and losses, net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation, and reversals of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation. We reverse unrealized (appreciation) depreciation at the time that we realize the gain or loss. The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013:
 
 
Year ended December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Industry
Type
Realized
Gain/(Loss)
Unrealized (Depreciation)/
Appreciation
Reversal of
Unrealized
Depreciation/
(Appreciation)
Net
(Loss)/
Gain
Portfolio Company
Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc.
Agriculture
Non-Affiliate
$
(13,522
)
$
(327
)
$
327

$
(13,522
)
Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Healthcare
Non-Affiliate
(6,298
)
(3,341
)
4,841

(4,798
)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
Healthcare
Control

(4,655
)

(4,655
)
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC
Insurance
Non-Affiliate

(3,870
)

(3,870
)
Education Management, Inc.
Education
Affiliate

(3,627
)

(3,627
)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.
Home Furnishings
Non-Affiliate
(3,424
)
(2,381
)
3,249

(2,556
)
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC
Healthcare
Non-Affiliate

(1,144
)

(1,144
)
Miles Media Group, LLC
Business Services
Affiliate
2,877

1,192

(1,170
)
2,899

C7 Data Centers, Inc.
Business Services
Affiliate

1,114


1,114

Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))
 
 
(1,523
)
2,395

693

1,565

Total
 
 
$
(21,890
)
$
(14,644
)
$
7,940

$
(28,594
)
In December 2013, Color Star filed a voluntary pre-packaged chapter 11 plan to sell substantially all of Color Star's assets, which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and became effective in January 2014. The proceeds from the sale were less than the claims senior to our subordinate debt investment, resulting in a realized loss of $13.5 million.

44



We received $7.2 million from the sale of our debt investment in Virtual Radiologic Corporation, which resulted in a $6.3 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $4.8 million.
We recorded $4.7 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC due to an increased cost basis related to preferred dividends and to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.
During 2013, we recorded $3.9 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC, to reflect proceeds from the January 2014 sale of our preferred and common stock investment.
We recorded $3.6 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Education Management, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company and the exchange, in the fourth quarter of 2013, of $5.0 million of principal of our senior debt investment for a new class of preferred stock of Education Management, Inc.
During 2013, we wrote off our preferred and common equity investments in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. resulting in a realized loss of $3.4 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $3.2 million. In addition, we recorded $2.4 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.
We recorded $1.1 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.
We received $3.0 million for the sale of our equity investment in Miles Media Group, LLC, which resulted in a $2.9 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million.
We recorded $1.1 million of unrealized appreciation on our investment in C7 Data Centers, Inc. to reflect improvement in the company's performance and the value indicated by the recent sale of new preferred stock of C7 Data Centers, Inc. to third parties.
The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from a change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.
The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for 2012:
 
 
Year ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands)
Industry
Type
Realized
Gain/(Loss)
Unrealized (Depreciation)/
Appreciation
Reversal of
Unrealized
Depreciation/
(Appreciation)
Net
(Loss)/
Gain
Portfolio Company
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.
Communications
Control
$

$
(9,789
)
$

$
(9,789
)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.
Home Furnishings
Affiliate

(6,046
)

(6,046
)
Orbitel Holdings, LLC
Cable
Control
(2,171
)
(1,966
)
805

(3,332
)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
Healthcare
Control

(1,734
)

(1,734
)
Education Management, Inc.
Education
Non-Affiliate

(1,387
)

(1,387
)
GSDM Holdings, LLC
Healthcare
Non-Affiliate
1,463

(849
)
(1,976
)
(1,362
)
Stratford School Holdings, Inc.
Education
Affiliate
16,370

(99
)
(13,056
)
3,215

NPS Holding Group, LLC
Business Services
Control
(12,930
)
2,414

12,715

2,199

Jet Plastica Investors, LLC
Plastic Products
Control
(90,802
)
1,385

91,288

1,871

Intran Media, LLC
Other Media
Control
(12,785
)

12,945

160

PremierGarage Holdings, LLC
Home Furnishings
Control
(5,371
)

5,371


Philadelphia Media Network, Inc.
Newspaper
Non-Affiliate
(5,027
)
(1
)
5,064

36

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.
Publishing
Non-Affiliate
(3,000
)
(1,366
)
4,821

455

Jenzabar, Inc.
Technology
Non-Affiliate
16,370


(16,436
)
(66
)
Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))
 
 
(698
)
4,182

(1,003
)
2,481

Total
 
 
$
(98,581
)
$
(15,256
)
$
100,538

$
(13,299
)
In August 2012, Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc., or Broadview, filed a voluntary pre-packaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and became effective in

45



November 2012. As of December 31, 2012, our fair value estimate of our investment in Broadview reflects our reduced ownership resulting from this restructuring and the performance of the company.
In April 2012, Jet Plastica Investors, LLC liquidated substantially all of its assets.  Including the proceeds from the liquidation, we received $11.0 million in payments on our senior debt resulting in a $90.8 million realized loss and a $91.3 million reversal of unrealized depreciation in the second quarter of 2012.
In the second quarter of 2012, we received $34.0 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in Stratford School Holdings, Inc., which resulted in a $16.4 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $13.1 million.
We received $35.2 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in Orbitel Holdings, LLC, which resulted in a $2.2 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $0.8 million.
We received $34.7 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in GSDM Holdings, LLC, which resulted in a $1.5 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $2.0 million.
We received $12.1 million in proceeds from the sale of all the assets of NPS Holding Group, LLC for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investments, which resulted in a $12.9 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $12.7 million.
We received $0.4 million in proceeds from the sale of all the assets of Intran Media, LLC which resulted in a realized loss on our equity investments of $12.7 million and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $12.9 million.
We restructured our subordinated debt investment in Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. and canceled a portion of our outstanding subordinated loan balance, resulting in a $3.0 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $4.8 million.
We received $44,000 in the sale of our equity investment in Philadelphia Media Network, Inc. and wrote off our equity investment in PremierGarage Holdings, LLC, resulting in realized losses and reversals of previously unrealized depreciation on those investments.
In February 2012, we accepted $23.7 million for our senior preferred stock and warrant position in Jenzabar, Inc., which resulted in a $16.4 million reversal of previously unrealized appreciation and the realization of a $16.4 million gain.
We recorded $6.0 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.
The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from a change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.
INCOME TAX PROVISION
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred a $0.1 million income tax provision compared to a $0.3 million income tax provision during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The income tax provision for both periods was primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.

46



SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA
The following tables summarize key unaudited financial information for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2013. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future quarter.
 
2013 Quarters
2012 Quarters
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Fourth
Third
Second
First
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
11,179

$
13,170

$
12,890

$
13,246

$
13,421

$
12,069

$
17,944

$
17,559

Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
6,333

7,964

7,556

8,043

5,113

4,056

5,595

4,042

Net investment gain (loss) before income tax provision
(24,757
)
(4,616
)
1,012

(233
)
1,305

228

(12,339
)
(2,493
)
Net income (loss)
(18,439
)
3,289

8,574

7,752

6,412

4,266

(7,037
)
1,357

PER COMMON SHARE DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net operating income before net investment gain (loss), loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision per common share—basic and diluted
$
0.09

$
0.11

$
0.11

$
0.11

$
0.07

$
0.06

$
0.07

$
0.05

Income (Loss) earnings per weighted-average common share—basic and diluted
$
(0.26
)
$
0.05

$
0.12

$
0.11

$
0.09

$
0.06

$
(0.09
)
$
0.02

Cash dividends declared per common share
$
0.125

$
0.125

$
0.125

$
0.125

$
0.125

$
0.14

$
0.14

$
0.17

SELECTED PERIOD-END BALANCES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment portfolio balances
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value
$
368,873

$
395,532

$
456,027

$
409,022

$
477,724

$
444,793

$
453,471

$
666,140

Cost
566,438

589,270

645,048

596,287

668,787

662,035

676,352

961,058

Total assets
513,993

546,018

580,311

606,993

630,776

638,427

752,314

844,224

Borrowings
175,172

179,173

204,927

233,015

248,053

249,053

339,778

402,783

Total stockholders’ equity
333,954

363,501

368,709

368,672

371,728

378,740

389,926

418,485

Net asset value per common share outstanding(a)
$
4.74

$
5.10

$
5.18

$
5.18

$
5.18

$
5.20

$
5.26

$
5.45

OTHER PERIOD-END DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average size of investment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value
$
10,849

$
10,987

$
11,123

$
10,226

$
10,857

$
9,884

$
9,648

$
11,895

Cost
16,660

16,369

15,733

14,907

15,200

14,712

14,390

17,162

Number of portfolio companies
34

36

41

40

44

45

47

56

Number of employees
17

17

21

20

21

24

27

33

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING—BASIC AND DILUTED
69,924

71,218

71,217

71,507

72,594

73,431

75,142

77,050

NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING AT PERIOD-END
70,510

71,212

71,222

71,212

71,721

72,788

74,062

76,762

    
(a) Based on common shares outstanding at period-end.

47



The following tables summarize key unaudited information about our investment portfolio for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2013. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future quarter.
 
2013 Quarters
2012 Quarters
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Fourth
Third
Second
First
PORTFOLIO COMPANY DATA (FAIR VALUE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Portfolio by type
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
185,524

$
218,937

$
261,904

$
214,907

$
291,760

$
324,228

$
328,094

$
458,928

Subordinated debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
108,338

114,173

113,019

111,801

114,983

79,191

88,503

112,070

Unsecured
42,452

22,771

39,245

39,085

26,274



12,353

Total debt investments
336,314

355,881

414,168

365,793

433,017

403,419

416,597

583,351

Equity investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred equity
28,390

37,284

39,384

39,264

41,558

39,524

34,991

77,901

Common equity/equivalents
4,169

2,367

2,475

3,965

3,149

1,850

1,883

4,888

Total equity investments
32,559

39,651

41,859

43,229

44,707

41,374

36,874

82,789

Total portfolio
$
368,873

$
395,532

$
456,027

$
409,022

$
477,724

$
444,793

$
453,471

$
666,140

Percentage of total portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
50.3
 %
55.4
%
57.4
%
52.5
%
61.1
 %
72.9
%
72.4
%
68.9
%
Subordinated debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
29.4

28.8

24.8

27.3

24.1

17.8

19.5

16.8

Unsecured
11.5

5.8

8.6

9.6

5.4



1.9

Total debt investments
91.2

90.0

90.8

89.4

90.6

90.7

91.9

87.6

Equity investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred equity
7.7

9.4

8.6

9.6

8.7

8.9

7.7

11.7

Common equity/equivalents
1.1

0.6

0.6

1.0

0.7

0.4

0.4

0.7

Total equity investments
8.8

10.0

9.2

10.6

9.4

9.3

8.1

12.4

Total portfolio
100.0
 %
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
 %
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
YIELD ON AVERAGE LOAN PORTFOLIO AT FAIR VALUE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average 90-Day LIBOR
0.2
 %
0.3
%
0.3
%
0.3
%
0.3
 %
0.4
%
0.5
%
0.5
%
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio
12.1

12.0

12.1

11.7

11.3

10.9

10.7

10.6

Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans
0.5

0.6

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.3

0.6

0.2

Impact of non-accrual loans
(0.7
)
(0.5
)


(0.3
)
(0.5
)
(0.3
)
(0.4
)
Total yield on average loan portfolio
12.1
 %
12.4
%
12.5
%
12.1
%
11.8
 %
11.1
%
11.5
%
10.9
%
COMPOSITION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO BY INTEREST TYPE (FAIR VALUE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Percentage of loans with fixed interest rates
26.7
 %
27.2
%
27.2
%
30.6
%
23.7
 %
10.6
%
13.1
%
12.7
%
Percentage of loans with floating interest rates
73.3
 %
72.8
%
72.8
%
69.4
%
76.3
 %
89.4
%
86.9
%
87.3
%
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DEBT INVESTMENTS (FAIR VALUE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans on non-accrual status
1.3
 %
3.7
%
0.1
%
0.2
%
0.1
 %
4.0
%
3.0
%
4.0
%
Loans greater than 90 days past due
 %
%
%
%
 %
3.1
%
2.8
%
1.8
%
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DEBT INVESTMENTS (COST)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans on non-accrual status
6.1
 %
7.4
%
3.4
%
3.9
%
3.7
 %
7.2
%
5.8
%
12.8
%
Loans greater than 90 days past due
1.1
 %
1.0
%
0.9
%
1.0
%
0.9
 %
4.2
%
3.2
%
2.2
%


48



COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
The following table summarizes the components of our net income (loss) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
 
Years ended
 
 
December 31,
Variance
(dollars in thousands)
2012
2011
$
Percentage
Revenue
 
 
 
 
Interest and dividend income
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
50,775

$
71,133

$
(20,358
)
(28.6
)%
Dividend income
3,688

7,344

(3,656
)
(49.8
)
Loan fees
3,236

3,731

(495
)
(13.3
)
Total interest and dividend income
57,699

82,208

(24,509
)
(29.8
)
Advisory fees and other income
3,294

3,488

(194
)
(5.6
)
Total revenue
60,993

85,696

(24,703
)
(28.8
)
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
15,103

15,634

(531
)
(3.4
)
Employee compensation
 
 
 
 
Salaries and benefits
10,956

11,998

(1,042
)
(8.7
)
Amortization of employee restricted stock
2,076

2,081

(5
)
(0.2
)
Total employee compensation
13,032

14,079

(1,047
)
(7.4
)
General and administrative expense
13,983

14,036

(53
)
(0.4
)
Restructuring expense
69

4,289

(4,220
)
(98.4
)
Total operating expense
42,187

48,038

(5,851
)
(12.2
)
Net operating income before net investment gain (loss), loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
18,806

37,658

(18,852
)
(50.1
)
Net investment loss before income tax provision
(13,299
)
(129,873
)
116,574

(89.8
)
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision
(174
)
(863
)
689

(79.8
)
Income tax provision
335

37

298

NM

Net income (loss)
$
4,998

$
(93,115
)
$
98,113

NM

NM=Not Meaningful
TOTAL REVENUE
Total revenue includes interest and dividend income, loan fees, advisory fees and other income. The following sections describe the reasons for the variances in each major component of our revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 from the twelve months ended December 31, 2011.
INTEREST INCOME
The level of interest income that we earn depends upon the level of interest-bearing investments outstanding during the period, as well as the weighted-average yield on these investments. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value was 11.3% compared to 10.7% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The weighted-average yield varies each period because of changes in the composition of our portfolio of debt investments, changes in stated interest rates, accelerations of unearned fees on paid-off/restructured loans and the balance of loans on non-accrual status for which we are not accruing interest.

49



The following table shows the various components of the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
 
Year ended
 
December 31
 
2012
2011
Average 90-day LIBOR
0.4
 %
0.3
 %
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio
10.9

10.7

Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans
0.4

0.3

Impact of non-accrual loans
(0.4
)
(0.6
)
Total yield on average loan portfolio
11.3
 %
10.7
 %
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, interest income was $50.8 million, compared to $71.1 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, which represented a $20.4 million, or 28.6%, decrease. This decrease reflected (i) a $23.4 million decrease resulting from a 31.6% decrease in our average loan balance, (ii) a $1.3 million decrease resulting from loans that were on non-accrual status during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 but that had been accruing interest during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 and (iii) a $0.4 million decrease due to interest rate floors. These decreases were partially offset by a $4.1 million increase in interest income resulting from a 0.4% increase in our net spread to LIBOR and a $0.7 million increase in interest income related to the increase in LIBOR.
PIK Income
Interest income includes certain amounts that we have not received in cash, such as PIK interest. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is added to the principal balance of the loan and compounded if not paid on a current basis. Borrowers may in some instances be required to prepay PIK because of certain contractual provisions or they may choose to prepay; however, more typically, PIK is paid at the end of the loan term. The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, at cost:
 
Year ended
 
December 31
(in thousands)
2012
2011
Beginning PIK loan balance
$
15,653

$
30,923

PIK interest earned during the period
5,253

7,794

Interest receivable converted to PIK

590

Payments received from PIK loans
(8,996
)
(21,600
)
PIK converted from (to) other securities
3,143

(877
)
Realized loss
(6,010
)
(1,177
)
Ending PIK loan balance
$
9,043

$
15,653

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we were not accruing interest on $0.4 million and $8.9 million, respectively, of the ending PIK loan balance, at cost. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, the payments received on PIK loans, included $2.9 million from Jet Plastica Investors, LLC, $1.8 million from GSDM Holdings Corp. and $1.3 million from Coastal Sunbelt Holding, Inc. The payments received from PIK loans during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, included $8.2 million and $4.7 million of PIK collected in conjunction with the respective sales of our investments in Restaurant Technologies, Inc. and Avenue Broadband LLC, as well as $1.7 million collected in conjunction with the partial repayment of our investment in Sagamore Hill Broadcasting, LLC.
DIVIDEND INCOME
We accrete dividends on equity investments with stated dividend rates as they are earned, to the extent that we believe the dividends will be paid ultimately and the associated portfolio company has sufficient value to support the accretion. We recognize dividends on our other equity investments when we receive the dividend payment. Our dividend income varies from period to period because of changes in the size and composition of our equity investments, the yield from the investments in our equity portfolio and the ability of the portfolio companies to declare and pay dividends. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recognized dividend income of $3.7 million and $7.3 million, respectively. In addition, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we received payments on accrued dividends of $8.5 million and $13.5 million, respectively. Broadview restructured during 2012, which resulted

50



in our controlling interest in the company, held through our ownership in the company's preferred stock, converting to a minority common stock investment.  As a result, our $159.6 million cost basis in our preferred stock investment, including $65.9 million of accrued dividends, converted into the cost basis of the newly issued common stock.  As of December 31, 2012, the balance of accrued dividends was $9.4 million.
ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER INCOME
Advisory fees and other income primarily include fees related to prepayment, advisory and management services, equity structuring, syndication, bank interest and other income. Generally, advisory fees and other income relate to specific transactions or services and, therefore, may vary from period to period depending on the level and types of services provided. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, we earned $3.3 million of advisory fees and other income, which represented a $0.2 million, or 5.6%, decrease from the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. This decrease included a decrease of $2.3 million in advisory fees due to our lower investment activity in 2012 compared to 2011, offset by an increase in prepayment premiums of $2.1 million related to eight investment repayments in 2012.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenses include interest, employee compensation and general and administrative expenses. The reasons for these variances are discussed in more detail below.
INTEREST EXPENSE
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, we incurred $15.1 million of interest expense, which represented a $0.5 million, or 3.4%, decrease from the same period in 2011. During these respective periods, our average cost to borrow increased from 3.1% to 4.6%, principally due to the repayment of securitized debt of our 2006-1 Trust (which carried interest rates ranging from L+0.33% to L+2.25%), additional borrowings under the SBIC debenture program (which carries a weighted average fixed rate of 4.33%) and an increase in the amortization of deferred financing costs (from $3.0 million to $5.6 million).
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, our averaging borrowings declined to approximately $324 million from an average of approximately $501 million for the same period in 2011, which accounted for a $5.2 million reduction in our interest expense. This decrease in interest expense was offset by an increase of $2.6 million related to increased amortization of debt issuance costs, $1.6 million attributable to the spread to LIBOR increasing from approximately 2.1% to 2.5%, and $0.5 million due to an increase in the average LIBOR rate from 0.3% to 0.4%.
We recognized $5.6 million in deferred financing costs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, up $2.6 million from the same period in 2011. The increase in 2012 is attributable to $2.3 million in accelerated deferred financing fees related to the termination of our SunTrust Warehouse financing facility and $0.3 million of accelerated deferred financing fees related to prepayments of collateral in our 2006-1 Trust.
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Employee compensation expense includes base salaries and benefits, variable annual incentive compensation and amortization of employee stock awards. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, our employee compensation expense was $13.0 million, which represented a $1.0 million, or 7.4%, decrease from the same period in 2011. Our salaries and benefits decreased by $1.0 million, or 8.7%, due to a $3.8 million decrease in salaries and benefits primarily resulting from reductions in our workforce that occurred as part of our corporate restructuring and operational realignment that began in August 2011. As of December 31, 2012, we had 21 employees compared to 63 employees as of June 30, 2011. The decrease in salaries and benefits was offset by an increase in incentive compensation of $2.8 million primarily resulting from incentive and inducement bonuses for 2012.
During each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $2.1 million of compensation expense related to employee restricted stock awards. The amortization of restricted stock awards during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 included accelerated amortization of $0.3 million of awards to employees whose employment was terminated in during 2012.

51



GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, general and administrative expense was $14.0 million, which represented a $0.1 million, or 0.4%, decrease compared to the same period in 2011. General and administrative expense for 2012 included $4.8 million in transition costs, including $3.3 million in severance related expenses and $1.5 million in costs to move our corporate headquarters and improve our information technology systems.
NET INVESTMENT (LOSS) GAIN BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, we incurred $13.3 million of net investment losses before income tax provision, compared to $129.9 million during the same period in 2011. These amounts represent the total of net realized gains and losses, net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation, and reversals of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation. We reverse unrealized (appreciation) depreciation at the time that we realize the gain or loss. The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012:
 
 
Year ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands)
Industry
Type
Realized
Gain/(Loss)
Unrealized (Depreciation)/
Appreciation
Reversal of
Unrealized
Depreciation/
(Appreciation)
Net
(Loss)/
Gain
Portfolio Company
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.
Communications
Control
$

$
(9,789
)
$

$
(9,789
)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.
Home Furnishings
Affiliate

(6,046
)

(6,046
)
Orbitel Holdings, LLC
Cable
Control
(2,171
)
(1,966
)
805

(3,332
)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
Healthcare
Control

(1,734
)

(1,734
)
Education Management, Inc.
Education
Non-Affiliate

(1,387
)

(1,387
)
GSDM Holdings, LLC
Healthcare
Non-Affiliate
1,463

(849
)
(1,976
)
(1,362
)
Stratford School Holdings, Inc.
Education
Affiliate
16,370

(99
)
(13,056
)
3,215

NPS Holding Group, LLC
Business Services
Control
(12,930
)
2,414

12,715

2,199

Jet Plastica Investors, LLC
Plastic Products
Control
(90,802
)
1,385

91,288

1,871

Intran Media, LLC
Other Media
Control
(12,785
)

12,945

160

PremierGarage Holdings, LLC
Home Furnishings
Control
(5,371
)

5,371


Philadelphia Media Network, Inc.
Newspaper
Non-Affiliate
(5,027
)
(1
)
5,064

36

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.
Publishing
Non-Affiliate
(3,000
)
(1,366
)
4,821

455

Jenzabar, Inc.
Technology
Non-Affiliate
16,370


(16,436
)
(66
)
Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))
 
 
(698
)
4,182

(1,003
)
2,481

Total
 
 
$
(98,581
)
$
(15,256
)
$
100,538

$
(13,299
)
In August 2012, Broadview filed a voluntary pre-packaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and became effective in November 2012. As of December 31, 2012, our fair value estimate of our investment in Broadview reflects our reduced ownership resulting from this restructuring and the performance of the company.
In April 2012, Jet Plastica Investors, LLC liquidated substantially all of its assets.  Including the proceeds from the liquidation, we received $11.0 million in payments on our senior debt resulting in a $90.8 million realized loss and a $91.3 million reversal of unrealized depreciation in the second quarter of 2012.
In the second quarter of 2012, we received $34.0 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in Stratford School Holdings, Inc., which resulted in a $16.4 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $13.1 million.
We received $35.2 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in Orbitel Holdings, LLC, which resulted in a $2.2 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $0.8 million.
We received $34.7 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in GSDM Holdings, LLC, which resulted in a $1.5 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $2.0 million.

52



We received $12.1 million in proceeds from the sale of all the assets of NPS Holding Group, LLC for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investments, which resulted in a $12.9 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $12.7 million.
We received $0.4 million in proceeds from the sale of all the assets of Intran Media, LLC which resulted in a realized loss on our equity investments of $12.7 million and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $12.9 million.
We restructured our subordinated debt investment in Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. and canceled a portion of our outstanding subordinated loan balance, resulting in a $3.0 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $4.8 million.
We received $44,000 in the sale of our equity investment in Philadelphia Media Network, Inc. and wrote off our equity investment in PremierGarage Holdings, LLC, resulting in realized losses and reversals of previously unrealized depreciation on those investments.
In February 2012, we accepted $23.7 million for our senior preferred stock and warrant position in Jenzabar, Inc., which resulted in a $16.4 million reversal of previously unrealized appreciation and the realization of a $16.4 million gain.
We recorded $6.0 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.
The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from a change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.
The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for 2011:
 
 
Year ended December 31, 2011
(in thousands)
Industry
Type
Realized
(Loss)/Gain
Unrealized
(Depreciation)/
Appreciation
Reversal of
Unrealized
Depreciation/
(Appreciation)
Net
(Loss)/
Gain
Portfolio Company
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.
Communications
Control
$

$
(92,093
)
$

$
(92,093
)
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC
Plastic Products
Control

(28,774
)

(28,774
)
Jenzabar, Inc.
Technology
Non-Affiliate

(11,049
)

(11,049
)
Intran Media, LLC
Other Media
Control
(7,946
)
(6,088
)
6,972

(7,062
)
PremierGarage Holdings, LLC
Home Furnishings
Control
(9,256
)
(5,379
)
8,461

(6,174
)
VOX Communications Group Holdings, LLC
Broadcasting
Non-Affiliate
(7,688
)

5,645

(2,043
)
Superior Industries Investors, Inc.
Sporting Goods
Control
1,010


(2,788
)
(1,778
)
Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc.
Business Services
Affiliate

(1,358
)

(1,358
)
Provo Craft & Novelty, Inc.
Leisure Activities
Non-Affiliate
(1,152
)
(1,160
)
1,151

(1,161
)
Avenue Broadband LLC
Cable
Control
11,977

(325
)
(11,895
)
(243
)
Total Sleep Holdings, Inc.
Healthcare
Control
(38,081
)

38,054

(27
)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
Healthcare
Control

7,104


7,104

NPS Holding Group, LLC
Business Services
Control

3,857


3,857

GSDM Holdings, Corp.
Healthcare
Non-Affiliate

2,452


2,452

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.
Publishing
Non-Affiliate

2,035


2,035

Orbitel Holdings, LLC
Cable
Control

1,784


1,784

Stratford School Holdings, Inc.
Education
Affiliate

1,714


1,714

Restaurant Technologies, Inc.
Food Services
Non-Affiliate
1,750

1,429

(1,842
)
1,337

Coastal Sunbelt Real Estate, Inc.
Real Estate Investments
Non-Affiliate
171

2,693

(1,914
)
950

Active Brands International, Inc.
Consumer Products
Non-Affiliate
(39,706
)

39,829

123

GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC
Broadcasting
Control
(1,000
)
99

1,000

99

Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))
 
 
(598
)
465

567

434

Total
 
 
$
(90,519
)
$
(122,594
)
$
83,240

$
(129,873
)

53



A summary of the reasons for significant changes in realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for 2011 is set forth below.
During 2011, we recorded a $92.1 million decrease in the fair value of our investment in Broadview primarily to reflect, among other factors, continuing challenges in the bond market, a downgrade of Broadview's corporate credit rating, delays by Broadview in refinancing its debt, as well as the near-term maturities of Broadview's debt facilities.
We recorded $28.8 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Jet Plastica Investors, LLC, to reflect a decrease in that company’s operating performance. In addition, we recorded unrealized depreciation on our investment in Jet Plastica to reflect an incremental investment that we made in this portfolio company during 2011, that we subsequently wrote down to zero.
In February 2012, we accepted $23.7 million for our senior preferred stock and warrant position in Jenzabar, which resulted in an $11.0 million unrealized depreciation during 2011 of our investment.
We wrote off our remaining subordinated debt and equity investment in Total Sleep Holdings, Inc. resulting in the reversal of $38.1 million of previously unrealized depreciation and the realization of a $38.1 million loss.
We received payments of $2.1 million on the sale of Active Brands International, Inc.'s senior debt and wrote off our subordinated debt and equity investment in that portfolio company, which resulted in the reversal of $39.8 million of previously unrealized depreciation and the realization of a $39.7 million loss.
The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from a change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.
LOSS ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
We incurred a $0.2 million premium when we repurchased the remaining $8.7 million of our private placement notes during 2012. During 2011, we incurred a $0.9 million premium when we repurchased $17.4 million of our private placement notes.
INCOME TAX PROVISION
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, we incurred a $0.3 million income tax provision compared to a $37,000 income tax provision during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The income tax provision for both periods was primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our financial liquidity principally comes from our cash on hand and the spread we earn on our investments, principally loans, over our cost to borrow, operate our business and gains and losses on our investments. We may also use our available liquidity to pay dividends to our stockholders and to repurchase our common stock in the open market under our stock repurchase program. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we declared 50.0 cents per share in dividends and paid $35.4 million in total dividends. We also repurchased 1,016,739 shares of our common stock for $4.7 million at a weighted average price of $4.62 per share.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we earned 12.2% on our average loan portfolio at fair value of $377.8 million and our weighted average cost to borrow was 4.5% on average borrowings of $200.9 million. Including dividend income and fee income, we earned $29.9 million of net operating income and $1.2 million of net income.
At December 31, 2013, we had $91.6 million in cash and cash equivalents available for general corporate purposes, $32.5 million of cash in restricted accounts related to our SBIC that we could use to fund new investments in the SBIC and $1.4 million of restricted cash held in escrow. In addition, we had $13.9 million in securitization accounts that may only be used to make interest and principal payments on our securitized borrowings or distributions to MCG in accordance with the indenture agreement. We also have full access to a $20 million unsecured revolving credit facility that we can use for general corporate purposes.

54



In January 2014, we used $40.3 million of cash, including the $13.9 million of securitized cash as of December 31, 2013, to repay in full the outstanding borrowings of our 2006-1 Trust. We received $14.9 million for for the 2006-1 Trust Class D notes that we held resulting in a net repayment of $25.4 million.
Although there can be no assurance, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our operating requirements for the remainder of 2014, as well as liquidity for new origination opportunities and potential dividend distributions.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CASH, SECURITIZATION ACCOUNTS, AND CASH, RESTRICTED
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect three categories of cash: cash and cash equivalents; cash, securitization accounts; and cash, restricted. Each of these categories is described more fully below:
Cash and cash equivalents represents unrestricted cash, including checking accounts, interest bearing deposits collateralized by marketable debt securities and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had $91.6 million and $73.6 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents included $56.7 million that was held in interest-bearing accounts.
Cash, securitization accounts includes principal and interest payments received on securitized loans, which, are held in designated bank accounts until quarterly disbursements are made from the securitization trust. We are generally required to use a portion of these amounts to pay interest expense, reduce borrowings or pay other amounts in accordance with the related securitization agreement. Cash in securitization accounts has a negative impact on our earnings since the interest we pay on borrowings typically exceeds the rate of return that we are able to earn on temporary cash investments. Our objective is to maintain sufficient cash-on-hand and availability under our debt facilities to cover current funding requirements. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had $13.9 million and $17.0 million, respectively, in cash, securitization accounts.
Cash, restricted includes cash held for regulatory purposes and cash held in escrow. The largest component of restricted cash is cash held by Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital, a wholly owned subsidiary licensed as an SBIC under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, or the SBIC Act, which generally is restricted to the origination of new loans by Solutions Capital. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had $33.9 million and $54.8 million respectively, of restricted cash.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, our operating activities provided $115.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, and our financing activities used $97.4 million of cash and cash equivalents.

55



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—BORROWINGS
As of December 31, 2013, we reported $175.2 million of borrowings on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. The following table summarizes our borrowing facilities, the facility amounts and the amounts outstanding.
 
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Maturity Date
Total
Facility/
Program
Amount
Outstanding
Total
Facility/
Program
Amount
Outstanding
SBIC
 
 
 
 
 
2008-10B
September 2018
$
2,600

$
2,600

$
2,600

$
2,600

2009-10A
March 2019
12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

2009-10B
September 2019
13,000

13,000

13,000

13,000

2010-10B
September 2020
27,500

27,500

27,500

27,500

2011-10A
March 2021
53,500

53,500

53,500

53,500

2012-10A
March 2022
41,400

41,400

41,400

41,400

MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1(a)
 




 
 
Series 2006-1 Class B Notes
April 2018(b)


37,151

37,151

Series 2006-1 Class C Notes(c)
April 2018(b)


45,000

32,000

Series 2006-1 Class D Notes(d)
April 2018(b)
40,016

25,172

45,945

28,902

Bank of America Unsecured Revolver
 




 
 
Unsecured Revolving Note
November 2014
20,000


20,000


Total borrowings
 
$
210,016

$
175,172

$
298,096

$
248,053

__________
(a)    In April 2013, the Class B Notes were repaid in full, in October 2013, the Class C Notes were repaid in full, and in January 2014 the Class D Notes were repaid in full.
(b)    Borrowings under the MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1 facility are listed based on the contractual maturity date.  In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining Class D Notes on the next quarterly payment date, which was January 21, 2014.
(c)    Amount outstanding excludes $5.0 million of notes that we repurchased in December 2008 for $1.6 million and $8.0 million of notes that we repurchased in April 2010 for $4.4 million. As part of the consolidation process, we eliminated the notes that MCG, the parent company, purchased.
(d)    Amount outstanding excludes $10.1 million of notes that we repurchased in December 2008 for $2.4 million and $7.5 million of notes that we repurchased in January 2009 for $2.1 million. As part of the consolidation process, we eliminated the notes that MCG, the parent company, purchased.
As of December 31, 2013, our asset coverage ratio was 1,418%. This ratio does not include our SBIC debt which the SEC has permitted us to exclude from the asset coverage ratio requirements pursuant to an exemptive order.
Our access to current and future liquidity from our borrowing facilities depends on several factors, including, but not limited to: the credit quality of our investment portfolio, including those investments used to collateralize borrowing facilities; the magnitude of our investments in individual companies and the industries in which they operate; our compliance with specific covenants in each borrowing agreement; and the specific provisions of our borrowing facilities.
As our borrowing facilities mature, it is important that we have sufficient liquidity available to repay our borrowing obligations. We may obtain the liquidity for repayment of our borrowing facilities from a number of sources, including cash on-hand, the maturity or monetization of our investment portfolio, other borrowing facilities and equity issuances, and from other borrowing arrangements.
We have funded our current secured borrowing debt facility through a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose, wholly owned subsidiary. Therefore, as of December 31, 2013, this subsidiary’s assets may not be available to our creditors. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent.
SBIC DEBENTURES
In December 2004, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital. Solutions Capital has a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under the SBIC Act. The license permits Solutions Capital to borrow up to $150.0 million from the SBA, which is the maximum amount of outstanding leverage available to single-license SBIC companies.

56



To realize the full $150.0 million borrowing for which we have received approval under the SBIC program, we have funded a total of $75.0 million to Solutions Capital. As of each of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Solutions Capital had borrowed $150.0 million. We are permitted to use these funds to provide debt and equity capital to qualifying small businesses. However, we may not use these borrowings to provide additional financing to certain companies that are currently in our portfolio without SBA approval. In addition, we may not use these funds for MCG’s, the parent company’s, working capital.
SBICs are subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements to maintain certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. An SBIC license does not assure an SBIC maintenance of SBA-guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon continued compliance with SBA regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have superior claim to Solutions Capital’s assets over our stockholders in the event we liquidate Solutions Capital or the SBA exercises its remedies upon an event of default under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by Solutions Capital.
The following table sets forth the maturity of Solutions Capital debentures, as well as the maturity of the investments and the current balance of restricted cash in Solutions Capital as of December 31, 2013.
 
Maturities
(in thousands)
Total
Less than
1 year
1-3 years
4-5 years
After 5
years
Borrowings
$
150,000

$

$

$
2,600

$
147,400

Collateral
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of debt investments
204,106

1,860

36,368

146,211

19,667

Fair value of equity investments(a)
2,846




2,846

Cash, restricted account
32,493

32,493




Total collateral
$
239,445

$
34,353

$
36,368

$
146,211

$
22,513

____________________ 
(a)    Equity investments do not have a stated maturity date.
MCG COMMERCIAL LOAN TRUST 2006-1
As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retained all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent.
BANK OF AMERICA UNSECURED REVOLVER
In November 2012, we obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. Advances under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver will bear interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and will expire in November 2014.  As of December 31, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding on the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.
The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver is subject to certain collateral requirements and financial covenants. Included among them are requirements that we maintain a ratio of all unencumbered assets to outstanding amounts under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver of at least four-to-one, as well as a ratio of unencumbered cash and senior portfolio loans to outstanding amounts under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver of at least three-to-one. The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver requires that we maintain a zero balance for a period of at least five consecutive days during the six-month period immediately preceding June 30th and December 31st of each year. The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver may be prepaid at any time.

57



WEIGHTED-AVERAGE BORROWINGS AND COST OF FUNDS
The following table shows our weighted-average borrowings, the weighted-average interest rate on all of our borrowings, including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and commitment fees, the average LIBOR, and the average spread to LIBOR for 2013 and 2012:
 
Year ended
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Weighted-average borrowings
$
200,918

$
324,128

Average LIBOR
0.27
%
0.43
%
Average spread to LIBOR, excluding amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
3.63

2.46

Impact of amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
0.56

1.70

Total cost of funds
4.46
%
4.59
%

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—COMMON STOCK
We are a closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current net asset value of such stock, except in limited circumstances, including approval by our stockholders of such a sale and certain determinations by our board of directors.
On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million. On February 28, 2014, our board of directors increased the stock repurchase program to $35.0 million. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares, and all repurchases will be made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases. Under both programs, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased 1,016,739 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $4.62 per share, which was a 10.2% discount from our quarterly net asset value per share.
We requested and received the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engage in a stock repurchase program and agree not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. Although, as of December 31, 2013, there were 1,425,006 shares of our common stock available for issuance under our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Plan, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, an aggregate of 178,853 and 107,924 shares of restricted stock, respectively, could be issued under our 2006 Plan and our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Non-Employee Plan, before reaching the 10% threshold set forth in the SEC's order. The increase in shares that could be issued under the restricted stock plans from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 is attributable to the forfeiture of share awards for which the requisite service period had not been satisfied.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our customers. These instruments include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. We attempt to limit our credit risk by conducting extensive due diligence and obtaining collateral where appropriate.

58



Commitments to extend credit include the unused portions of commitments that obligate us to extend credit in the form of loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments. Commitments to extend credit would also include loan proceeds we are obligated to advance, such as loan draws, rotating or revolving credit arrangements, or similar transactions. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
We do not report the unused portions of these commitments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2013, we had $18.1 million of outstanding unused loan commitments. We believe that our operations, monetizations, revolving credit facility and unrestricted cash will provide sufficient liquidity to fund, as necessary, requests to draw on these unfunded commitments. We estimate that the fair value of these commitments was $0.1 million based on the fees that we currently charge to enter into similar arrangements, taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties. From time to time, we provide guarantees or standby letters of credit on behalf of our portfolio companies. As of December 31, 2013, we had no outstanding guarantees or standby letters of credit.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table shows our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013:
(in thousands)
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations(a)
Total
Less than
1 year
1-3 years
4-5 years
After 5
years
Borrowings
 
 
 
 
 
Term securitizations(b)
$
25,172

$
25,172

$

$

$

SBIC
150,000



2,600

147,400

Total borrowings
175,172

25,172


2,600

147,400

Interest payments on borrowings(c)
47,152

6,687

13,006

13,006

14,453

Operating leases(d)
943

368

575



Severance obligations(e)
341

341




Total contractual obligations
$
223,608

$
32,568

$
13,581

$
15,606

$
161,853

 
(a) 
Excludes the unused commitments to extend credit to our customers of $18.1 million as discussed above.
(b) 
Borrowings under the MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1 facility were repaid in full in January 2014. 
(c) 
Interest payments are based on contractual maturity and the current outstanding principal balance of our borrowings and assume no changes in interest rate benchmarks.
(d) 
Includes lease payments due under a new lease we entered into in February 2014 for our corporate headquarters.
(e) 
Represents remaining severance payments and employer taxes that we are obligated to pay stemming from the resignation of our former chief financial officer.
DISTRIBUTIONS
We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income, which amount would be considered a return of capital. As a RIC, we are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the BDC asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act and due to restrictions in our credit facilities and SBA regulations. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of favorable RIC tax treatment. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions, or distributions at a particular level. We may make distributions to our stockholders of certain net capital gains. Since December 2001, we have declared distributions of $13.89 per share.

59



The following table summarizes the distributions that we declared since January 1, 2012:
Date Declared
Record Date
Payable Date
Dividends per Share
February 28, 2014
March 14, 2014
March 28, 2014
$
0.125

October 25, 2013
November 8, 2013
November 22, 2013
$
0.125

July 26, 2013
August 9, 2013
August 30, 2013
$
0.125

April 26, 2013
May 10, 2013
May 31, 2013
$
0.125

March 1, 2013
March 15, 2013
March 29, 2013
$
0.125

October 26, 2012
November 16, 2012
November 30, 2012
$
0.125

July 27, 2012
August 17, 2012
August 31, 2012
$
0.140

April 27, 2012
June 13, 2012
July 13, 2012
$
0.140

February 24, 2012
April 13, 2012
May 15, 2012
$
0.170

As of the end of each fiscal year, we determine the tax attributes of our distributions, including return of capital, based upon our taxable income and distributions paid for the full year, which we report to each stockholder on a Form 1099. Based on the tax attributes of the distributions that we declared for 2013, 75.0% of our distributions were from ordinary income and 25.0% of our distributions were a return of capital. We will make future decisions with respect to the actual level of distributions after taking into account the minimum statutorily required level of distributions, gains and losses recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, our liquidity, cash earnings and our BDC asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision.
Each year, we mail statements on Form 1099-DIV to our stockholders that identify whether we made distributions from ordinary income, net capital gains on the sale of securities, which are each taxable distributions, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus, which is a nontaxable distribution. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders for tax purposes. All or a portion of the distributions that we paid to stockholders during fiscal years 2013, 2012, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 represented a return of capital. During the fiscal year 2009, we did not declare or pay any dividends to stockholders. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we declared and paid distributions from ordinary income that were sufficient to meet our distribution requirements as a RIC. We will monitor 2014 taxable income in order to ensure compliance with the distribution requirements as a RIC. We determine the tax attributes of our distributions as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid during the full year.
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, or the Modernization Act, was enacted, which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of regulated investment companies. The changes are generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. One of the more prominent changes addresses capital loss carryforwards. Under the Modernization Act, each RIC will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those subsequent taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under previous regulation. For the tax years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we have total net capital losses of $120.8 million which have no expiration and will be carried forward indefinitely to offset future net capital gains. Capital loss carryforwards from tax years 2009 of $54.2 million and 2010 of $5.2 million will expire December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018, respectively, unless utilized to offset future net capital gains prior to those expiration dates to the extent permitted by federal tax law.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The following are some of the more critical judgment areas that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations.

60



INCOME RECOGNITION
We follow the policies described below to recognize income on our Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Interest IncomeWe accrue interest income if we expect that ultimately we will be able to collect it. Generally, when a loan becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise believe the customer is unable to service its debt and other obligations, we will as a general matter place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we remain contractually entitled to this interest. We may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. We generally accrue PIK interest when collection is expected and cease accruing PIK if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or we expect the customer is unable to pay all principal and interest due.
Dividend IncomeWe accrue dividend income on equity investments with stated income, generally preferred equity, if we expect to collect the dividends. We record dividend income on common equity investments, and gains from realized distributions, when the dividend has been declared and is required to be paid.
Loan Origination Fees—We capitalize loan origination fees, then amortize these fees into interest income over the term of the loan using the effective interest rate method or on a straight-line basis when the loan has a revolving credit feature. In certain loan arrangements, we receive warrants or other equity interests from the borrower as additional origination fees. Typically, borrowers granting these interests are not traded publicly. We record the financial instruments received at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. In certain cases, when we record a warrant or other equity instrument that results in a loan discount, we accrete the discount into income over the term of the loan.
Advisory Fees and Other Income—We charge our portfolio companies fees for services that we provide, including advisory and management services, prepayments, research, structuring, and other fees. We generally recognize these fees when earned. We recognize prepayment fees upon receipt. Finally, certain of the bank accounts in which we maintain cash balances pay interest, which we recognize when the interest is earned.
VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
We account for our investments at fair value in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This fair value definition focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.
ASC 820 establishes the following three-level hierarchy, based upon the transparency of inputs to the fair value measurement of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:
ASC 820
Fair Value Hierarchy
Inputs to Fair Value Methodology
Level 1
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market information
Level 3
Pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption is unobservable or when the estimation of fair value requires significant management judgment
We categorize a financial instrument in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to its fair value measurement. In the event that transfers between these levels were to occur in the future, we would

61



recognize those transfers as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period.
DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUE IN GOOD FAITH
As a BDC, we invest primarily in illiquid securities, including debt and equity securities of private companies. To protect our investments and maximize our returns, we negotiate the structure of each equity security and the majority of the debt securities in our investment portfolio. Our contracts with our portfolio companies generally include many terms governing interest rate, repayment terms, prepayment premiums, financial covenants, operating covenants, ownership and corporate governance rights, dilution parameters, liquidation preferences, voting rights, and put or call rights. In some cases, our loan agreements also allow for increases in the spread to the base index rate, if the portfolio company’s financial or operational performance deteriorates or shows negative variances from its business plan and, in some cases, allow for decreases in the spread if financial or operational performance improves or exceeds the portfolio company’s plan. Generally, our investments are subject to some restrictions on resale and have no established trading market. Because of the type of investments that we make and the nature of our business, our valuation processes require analyses of numerous market, industry and company-specific factors, including: the performance of the underlying investment; the financial condition of the portfolio company; changing market events; market prices, when available; estimates of market interest rates that would otherwise be made available to our portfolio companies; and other factors relevant to the individual security.
There is no single approach for determining fair value in good faith. Unlike banks, we are not permitted to provide a general reserve for anticipated loan losses. As a result, for portfolio investments that do not have an active market, we must apply business judgment to the specific facts and circumstances associated with each security to determine fair value.
Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. When such market prices are not available, we use several valuation methodologies to estimate the fair value of our investment portfolio, which generally results in a range of fair values from which we derive a single estimate of fair value. To determine a portfolio company’s fair value, we analyze its historical and projected financial results, as well as key market value factors. In determining a security's fair value, we assume we would exchange it in an orderly transaction at the measurement date. We use the following methods to determine the fair value of investments in our portfolio that are not traded actively:
Majority-Owned Control Investments—Majority-owned control investments comprised 11.9% of our investment portfolio at fair value. Market quotations are not readily available for these investments; therefore, we use a combination of market and income approaches to determine their fair value. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues or, in limited cases, book value. Generally, we apply multiples that we observe for other comparable companies to relevant financial data for the portfolio company in question. Also, in a limited number of cases, we use income approaches to determine the fair value of these securities, based on our projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company will likely generate, as well as industry derived capital costs. Our valuation approaches for majority-owned investments estimate the value upon a hypothetical sale or exit and then allocates such value to the investment's securities in order of their relative liquidation preference. In addition, we assume that any outstanding debt or other securities that are senior to our securities are required to be repaid at par. These valuation approaches also consider the value of our ability to control the portfolio company’s capital structure and the timing of a potential exit.
Non-Control Investments—Non-control investments comprised 88.1% of our investment portfolio at fair value. Quoted prices were not available for 96.4% of our non-control investments at fair value. For our non-control equity investments, we use the same market and income approaches used to value our control investments. For non-control debt investments for which no quoted prices are available, we estimate fair value using a market-yield approach based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, based on our estimate of current market rates. We may adjust discounted cash flow calculations to reflect other market conditions or the perceived credit risk of the borrower. In the event the fair value of a non-control debt investment, as determined by the same market or income approach used to value our control investments, is below our cost, we estimate the fair value using the market or income approach.
Thinly-Traded and Over-the-Counter Securities—Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. However, we may apply a discount to the market value of restricted or thinly-traded public

62



securities to reflect the impact that these restrictions have on the value of these securities. We review factors, including the trading volume, total securities outstanding and our percentage ownership of securities to determine whether the trading levels are active (Level 1) or inactive (Level 2). As of December 31, 2013, these securities represented 3.2% of our investment portfolio at fair value. We utilize independent pricing services to arrive at certain of our fair value estimates. The majority of our level 2 investments are senior debt investments that are secured and collateralized. To corroborate “bid/ask” quotes from independent pricing services we perform a market-yield approach to validate prices obtained or obtain other evidence.
Our valuation analyses incorporate the impact that key events could have on the securities’ values, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, purchase transactions, public offerings, letters of intent and subsequent debt or equity sales. Our valuation analyses also include key external data, such as market changes and industry valuation benchmarks. We also engage independent valuation firms to provide additional data points for our quarterly valuation analyses. Our general practice is to obtain an independent valuation or review of valuation at least once per year for each portfolio investment that had a fair value in excess of $5.0 million, unless the fair value has otherwise been derived through a sale of some or all of our investment in the portfolio company or is a new investment made within the last twelve months. In total, as of December 31, 2013, we either obtained a valuation or review from an independent firm, considered new investments made or used market quotes in the preceding twelve month period to calculate 99.0% of the fair value of our investment portfolio.
The majority of the valuations performed by the independent valuation firms utilize proprietary models and inputs. We have used, and intend to continue to use, independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses.
Our board of directors sets our valuation policies and procedures and determines the fair value of our investments. The investment and valuation committee of our board of directors meets at least quarterly with our executive management to review management’s recommendations of fair value of our investments. Our board of directors considers our valuations, as well as the independent valuations and reviews, in its determination of the fair value of our investments.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such fair value estimates may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses that we ultimately realize on these investments to differ from the valuations currently assigned.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Our investment portfolio is not composed of homogeneous debt and equity securities that can be valued with a small number of inputs. Instead, the majority of our investment portfolio is composed of complex debt and equity securities with distinct contract terms and conditions. As such, our valuation of each investment in our portfolio is unique and complex, often factoring in numerous different inputs, including the historical and forecasted financial and operational performance of the portfolio company, projected cash flows, market multiples, comparable market transactions, the priority of our securities compared with those of other investors, credit risk, interest rates, independent valuations and reviews and other inputs too numerous to list quantitatively herein.

63



The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurements of our level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of December 31, 2013.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Techniques
Unobservable
Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
 
Minimum
Maximum
Senior debt
$
177,040

Discounted Cash Flow
Market Interest Rate
6.8
%
12.8
%
8.9
%



Market Comparable Companies
Revenue Multiple
0.2x

0.2x

0.2x




Market Comparable Companies
EBITDA multiple (a)
7.5x

7.5x

7.5x

Subordinated debt
150,790

Discounted Cash Flow
Market Interest Rate
7.8
%
14.3
%
12.9
%



Market Comparable Companies
Revenue Multiple
0.2x

0.2x

0.2x




Market Comparable Companies
EBITDA multiple (a)
7.5x

7.5x

7.5x

Preferred and common equity
29,260

Market Comparable Companies
EBITDA multiple (a)
4.4x

10.0x

7.6x



Market Comparable Companies
Revenue multiple
0.7x

0.7x

0.7x





Discount for minority interest
%
25.0
%
3.1
%



Residual Assets
Discount Rate
25.0
%
25.0
%
25.0
%
 
$
357,090

 
 
 
 
 
________________
(a) 
EBITDA may include proforma adjustments and/or other addbacks based on specific circumstances related to each investment.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
In accordance with ASC Topic 718—Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, we recognize compensation cost related to share-based awards for which forfeiture provisions are expected to lapse over the requisite service period. Share-based awards are entitled to receive dividends which are not forfeitable in the event the share-based awards forfeiture provisions are not achieved. If actual forfeitures differ from our expectations, dividends previously paid on the forfeited shares are reclassified between retained earnings and compensation expense.
INCOME TAXES
We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income, which amounts would be considered a return of capital. We are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or on deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.
We have certain wholly owned taxable subsidiaries, each of which holds one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments. The purpose of these taxable subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as LLCs or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the taxable subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us for the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by taxable subsidiaries is taxed to the taxable subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the taxable subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the taxable subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-08, Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure

64



Requirements, or ASU 2013-08. This update changes the approach to the assessment of whether a company is an investment company, clarifies the characteristics of an investment company, provides comprehensive guidance for the investment company assessment and contains certain disclosure requirements. ASU 2013-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is prohibited. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. In the event of financial downturns affecting the banking system and financial markets, the financial position and results of operations of certain of the middle-market companies in our portfolio could be affected adversely, which ultimately could lead to difficulty in their meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults.
Interest rate sensitivity refers to the change in earnings that may result from changes in the level of interest rates. Our net interest income is affected by changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR, prime rates and commercial paper rates. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 73.3% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, bore interest at a spread to either the LIBOR or the prime rate, and 26.7% at a fixed interest rate. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 60.2% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.0% and 3.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.50% and 6.0%. The three-month weighted-average LIBOR interest rate was 0.24% as of December 31, 2013. Thus, the LIBOR floors in these loan investments lessen the impact of such historically low LIBOR rates.
We regularly measure exposure to interest rate risk. We assess interest rate risk and we manage our interest rate exposure on an ongoing basis by comparing our interest rate-sensitive assets to our interest rate-sensitive liabilities. Based on this review, we determine whether or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates.
The following table shows a comparison of the interest rate base for our interest-bearing cash, outstanding commercial loans, at cost, and our outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(in thousands)
Interest Bearing Cash and Commercial Loans
Borrowings
Interest Bearing Cash and Commercial Loans
Borrowings
Money market rate
$
56,685

$

$
43,291

$

Prime rate


13,603


LIBOR
 
 
 
 
30-day
57,725


18,635


60-day




90-day
194,133

25,172

294,774

98,053

180-day


9,301


Commercial paper




Fixed rate
100,009

150,000

115,091

150,000

Total
$
408,552

$
175,172

$
494,695

$
248,053

Based on our December 31, 2013 balance sheet, the following table shows the impact to net income of hypothetical base rate increases in interest rates, assuming no changes in our investment and borrowing structure. The impact to net income of hypothetical base rate decreases in interest rates is not shown in the following table because as of December 31, 2013, the quarterly average LIBOR was 0.24% and a 100-basis point decrease could not occur:
(dollars in thousands) 
 
Basis Point Change
Interest
Income
Interest
Expense
Net Income (Loss)
100
$
1,076

$
252

$
824

200
3,240

503

2,737

300
6,162

755

5,407



65



ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2013
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2012
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

66



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
MCG Capital Corporation
We have audited MCG Capital Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). MCG Capital Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, MCG Capital Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of MCG Capital Corporation (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated March 5, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 5, 2014

67




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
MCG Capital Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MCG Capital Corporation (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MCG Capital Corporation at December 31, 2013 and 2012, the consolidated results of its operations, changes in its net assets, and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), MCG Capital Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated March 5, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 5, 2014

68



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
December 31,
2013
December 31,
2012



Assets


Cash and cash equivalents
$
91,598

$
73,588

Cash, securitization accounts
13,906

16,980

Cash, restricted
33,895

54,838

Investments at fair value




Non-affiliate investments (cost of $444,217 and $534,389, respectively)
268,173

365,639

Affiliate investments (cost of $59,470 and $69,500, respectively)
56,792

62,079

Control investments (cost of $62,751 and $64,898, respectively)
43,908

50,006

Total investments (cost of $566,438 and $668,787, respectively)
368,873

477,724

Interest receivable
2,087

2,700

Other assets
3,634

4,946

Total assets
$
513,993

$
630,776

Liabilities




Borrowings (maturing within one year of $25,172 and $15,038, respectively)
$
175,172

$
248,053

Interest payable
2,345

2,496

Other liabilities
2,522

8,499

Total liabilities
180,039

259,048

Stockholders’ equity




Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized 1 share, none issued and outstanding


Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized 200,000 shares on December 31, 2013 and 2012, 70,510 issued and outstanding on December 31, 2013 and 71,721 issued and outstanding on December 31, 2012
705

717

Paid-in capital
980,930

984,468

Distributions in excess of earnings
(449,915
)
(422,395
)
Net unrealized depreciation on investments
(197,766
)
(191,062
)
Total stockholders’ equity
333,954

371,728

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
513,993

$
630,776

Net asset value per common share at end of period
$
4.74

$
5.18



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
69



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations

Year ended
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
December 31

2013
2012
2011
Revenue



Interest and dividend income



Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)
$
37,307

$
45,004

$
64,116

Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned)
6,345

6,761

7,024

Control investments (more than 25% owned)
5,173

5,934

11,068

Total interest and dividend income
48,825

57,699

82,208

Advisory fees and other income






Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)
1,622

1,858

2,458

Control investments (more than 25% owned)
38

1,436

1,030

Total advisory fees and other income
1,660

3,294

3,488

Total revenue
50,485

60,993

85,696

Operating expense






Interest expense
9,087

15,103

15,634

Employee compensation






Salaries and benefits
4,928

10,956

11,998

Amortization of employee restricted stock awards
1,179

2,076

2,081

Total employee compensation
6,107

13,032

14,079

General and administrative expense
5,381

13,983

14,036

Restructuring expense
14

69

4,289

Total operating expense
20,589

42,187

48,038

Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
29,896

18,806

37,658

Net realized (loss) gain on investments






Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)
(20,460
)
8,907

(46,887
)
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned)
(1,485
)
16,370

(703
)
Control investments (more than 25% owned)
55

(123,858
)
(42,929
)
Total net realized (loss) gain on investments
(21,890
)
(98,581
)
(90,519
)
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments






Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)
(7,294
)
(168,409
)
38,328

Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned)
4,743

(18,598
)
1,598

Control investments (more than 25% owned)
(3,951
)
271,996

(80,010
)
Derivative and other fair value adjustments
(202
)
293

730

Total net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments
(6,704
)
85,282

(39,354
)
Net investment loss before income tax provision
(28,594
)
(13,299
)
(129,873
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision

(174
)
(863
)
Income tax provision
126

335

37

Net income (loss)
$
1,176

$
4,998

$
(93,115
)
Income (loss) per basic and diluted common share
$
0.02

$
0.07

$
(1.22
)
Cash distributions declared per common share
$
0.50

$
0.575

$
0.66

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted
71,232

74,859

76,259


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
70



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year ended December 31,
 
2013
2012
2011
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
 
 
 
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
$
29,896

$
18,806

$
37,658

Net realized loss on investments
(21,890
)
(98,581
)
(90,519
)
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments
(6,704
)
85,282

(39,354
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision

(174
)
(863
)
Income tax provision
(126
)
(335
)
(37
)
Net income (loss)
1,176

4,998

(93,115
)
Distributions to stockholders
 
 
 
Distributions declared
(35,400
)
(42,889
)
(50,877
)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions
(35,400
)
(42,889
)
(50,877
)
Capital share transactions
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock
(4,693
)
(27,172
)

Amortization of restricted stock awards
 
 
 
Employee awards accounted for as employee compensation
1,179

2,076

2,081

Employee awards accounted for as restructuring expense


432

Non-employee director awards accounted for as general and administrative expense
60

120

64

Common stock withheld to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of restricted stock
(96
)
(357
)
(1,638
)
Net forfeitures of restricted common stock


(11
)
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions
(3,550
)
(25,333
)
928

Total decrease in net assets
(37,774
)
(63,224
)
(143,064
)
Net assets
 
 
 
Beginning of period
371,728

434,952

578,016

End of period
$
333,954

$
371,728

$
434,952

Net asset value per common share at end of period
$
4.74

$
5.18

$
5.65

Common shares outstanding at end of period
70,510

71,721

76,997


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
71



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
Year ended
 
December 31
(in thousands)
2013
2012
2011
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
1,176

$
4,998

$
(93,115
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
 
 
 
Investments in portfolio companies
(119,803
)
(153,005
)
(255,852
)
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales
205,874

394,725

375,138

Decrease (increase) in interest receivable, accrued payment-in-kind interest and dividends
(5,146
)
9,842

20,052

Amortization of restricted stock awards
 
 
 
Employee
1,179

2,076

2,513

Non-employee director
60

120

64

Decrease in cash—securitization accounts from interest collections
2,486

4,415

2,961

Increase in restricted cash—escrow accounts
5,842

(485
)
(1,799
)
Depreciation and amortization
1,225

6,532

4,125

Decrease in other assets
83

958

207

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
(6,179
)
(894
)
3,246

Realized loss on investments
21,890

98,581

90,519

Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on investments
6,704

(85,282
)
39,354

Loss on extinguishment of debt

174

863

Net cash provided by operating activities
115,391

282,755

188,276

Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock
(4,693
)
(27,172
)

Payments on borrowings
(72,881
)
(203,740
)
(142,526
)
Proceeds from borrowings

21,400

25,000

Decrease (increase) in cash in restricted and securitization accounts
 


 
Securitization accounts for repayment of principal on debt
587

18,911

(1,022
)
Restricted cash
15,102

(19,389
)
(3,782
)
Payment of financing costs

(1,402
)
(2,184
)
Distributions paid
(35,400
)
(55,981
)
(48,520
)
Common stock withheld to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of restricted stock
(96
)
(357
)
(1,638
)
Net forfeitures of restricted common stock


(11
)
Net cash used in by financing activities
(97,381
)
(267,730
)
(174,683
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
18,010

15,025

13,593

Cash and cash equivalents
 
 


Beginning balance
73,588

58,563

44,970

Ending balance
$
91,598

$
73,588

$
58,563

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
 
 
 
Interest paid
$
8,071

$
9,727

$
12,206

Income taxes paid
138

277

349

Paid-in-kind interest collected
3,381

8,996

21,600

Dividend income collected
869

8,474

13.5


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
72



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate(8)
 
 
Fair
Value
Portfolio Company
Industry
Investment
Current
PIK
Total
Principal
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Control Investments(4):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC(2)
Broadcasting
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
4.3
%

4.3
%
$
13,329

$
10,963

$
12,252

 
Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(6)
2.5
%

2.5
%
11,593

6,975


 
 
Class B Voting Units (8.0%, 86,700 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
9,071


Jet Plastica
Investors, LLC
(2)(9)
Plastic Products
Senior Debt A (Due 3/15)(1)(6)
2.4
%
7.5
%
9.9
%
5,326

3,897


RadioPharmacy
Investors, LLC
(2)
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
7.5
%

7.5
%
7,640

7,640

7,640

 
Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
12.0
%
3.0
%
15.0
%
10,845

10,841

10,841

 
 
Preferred LLC Interest (19.7%, 70,000 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
13,364

13,175

Total control investments (represents 11.9% of total investments at fair value)
 
 
 
 
62,751

43,908

Affiliate Investments(3):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
C7 Data Centers, Inc.
Business Services
Senior Debt (Due 9/17)(1)
9.5
%

9.5
%
17,350

17,092

17,092

Series B Preferred Stock (7,142,857 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,000

3,482

Education Management, Inc.(11)
Education
Senior Debt (Due 12/15)(1)
3.0
%
8.7
%
11.7
%
19,723

19,617

19,617

 
Series C Preferred Stock (9.0%, 16,910 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
5,000

174

IDOC, LLC
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 8/17)(1)
9.8
%

9.8
%
15,000

14,762

14,762

 
 
Limited Partner Interests(1)(2)(5)
 
 
 
 
999

1,665

Total affiliate investments (represents 15.4% of total investments at fair value)
 
 
 
 
59,470

56,792

Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5% owned):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accurate Group Holdings, Inc.(2)
Business Services
Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)(1)
12.5
%

12.5
%
10,000

9,827

9,827

Series A Preferred Stock (974,805 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,000

1,731

Advanced Sleep
Concepts, Inc.
(2)
Home Furnishings
Senior Debt (Due 1/14 to 8/14)(1)(6)
10.3
%

10.3
%
7,409

7,204

4,493

Subordinated Debt (Due 1/14)(6)
%
10.0
%
10.0
%
3,771

3,352


Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.(12)
Communications
Common Stock (132,779 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
159,579

761

 
Series A-1 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5)
 
 
 
 


 
 
Series A-2 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5)
 
 
 
 


Community Investors, Inc.
Business Services
Senior Debt (Due 5/18)(1)
9.8
%

9.8
%
12,300

12,079

12,079

Preferred Stock (10.0%, 297,436 shares)(1)
 
 
 
 
317

317

 
 
Common Stock (2,564 shares)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
3

124

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.
Publishing
Subordinated Debt (Due 3/15)(1)
5.0
%
7.3
%
12.3
%
21,521

21,483

21,483

Dorsey School of Business Holdings, Inc.
Education
Senior Debt (Due 6/18)(1)
9.5
%

9.5
%
10,000

9,867

9,867

G&L Investment Holdings, LLC(2)(13)
Insurance
Subordinated Debt (Due 5/14)(1)
11.2
%
4.3
%
15.5
%
19,484

19,423

19,423

 
Series A Preferred Shares (14.0%,
5,000,000 shares)
(5)
 
 
 
 
8,191

4,196

 
 
Class C Shares (621,907 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
529


Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd.(10)
Diversified Financial Services
Income Notes (Due 4/19)
 
 
 
 
2,491

3,298

Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC
Manufacturing
Subordinated Debt (Due 9/18)(1)
10.0
%
4.0
%
14.0
%
9,379

9,221

9,221

Huron Inc.
Manufacturing
Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)(1)
10.0
%
4.0
%
14.0
%
13,187

12,958

12,958

Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC
Manufacturing
Subordinated Debt (Due 6/19)
9.7
%
2.0
%
11.7
%
10,035

9,888

9,888

Intrafusion Holding Corp.
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 6/18)(1)
11.9
%

11.9
%
11,500

11,290

11,290

Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc.
Home Furnishings
Class B-1 Common Stock (2,000 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,185

237

Mailsouth, Inc.
Publishing
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
6.8
%

6.8
%
3,921

3,888

3,830


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
73



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest Rate(8)
 
 
Fair
Value
Portfolio Company
Industry
Investment
Current
PIK
Total
Principal
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Maverick Healthcare
Equity, LLC
Healthcare
Preferred Units (10.0%, 1,250,000 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,021

1,474

 
Class A Common Units (1,250,000 units)(5)
 
 
 
 


Midwest Technical Institute, Inc.
Education
Senior Debt (Due 10/17)(1)
9.5
%

9.5
%
13,813

13,575

13,670

Miles Media Group, LLC(2)
Business Services
Senior Debt (Due 6/16)(1)
12.5
%

12.5
%
19,063

18,913

18,913

Oceans Acquisition, Inc.
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 12/17)(1)
10.8
%

10.8
%
12,710

12,460

12,460

Rita’s Water Ice Franchise Company, LLC
Restaurants
Senior Debt (Due 11/16)(1)
14.0
%

14.0
%
9,375

9,320

9,320

SC Academy Holdings, Inc.
Education
Subordinated Debt (Due 7/16)(1)
%
14.0
%
14.0
%
14,641

14,577

14,577

South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.
Healthcare
Subordinated Debt (Due 10/17)(1)
12.0
%
2.5
%
14.5
%
11,761

11,581

11,614

Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC
Information Services
Class E Series I Units (636 units)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
4,120

563

Class E Series II Units (276 units)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
1,788

67

TCFI CP LLC
Manufacturing
Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 4/19)(1)
10.0
%
3.0
%
13.0
%
20,010

19,667

19,667

Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc.
Restaurants
Senior Debt (Due 12/18)(1)
9.5
%

9.5
%
14,000

13,691

13,691

The e-Media Club I, LLC
Investment Fund
LLC Interest (74 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
88

11

Visant Corporation
Consumer Products
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
5.3
%

5.3
%
4,711

4,711

4,657

West World Media, LLC
Information Services
Senior Debt (Due 9/15)(1)
11.0
%
3.0
%
14.0
%
11,467

11,105

11,182

Class A Membership Units (25,000 units)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
1

362

 
 
Warrant to purchase Class A Membership Units (expire 9/15)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
324

379

Xpressdocs Holdings, Inc.
Business Services
Series A Preferred Stock (161,870 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
500

543

Total non-affiliate investments (represents 72.7% of total investments at fair value)
 
 
 
 
444,217

268,173

Total Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
566,438

$
368,873



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
74



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
Interest Rate(8)
 
 
Fair
Value
Portfolio Company
Industry
Investment
Current
PIK
Total
Principal
Cost
Control Investments(4):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC(2)
Broadcasting
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
4.3
%

4.3
%
$
17,570

$
15,150

$
15,736

 
Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(6)
2.5
%

2.5
%
11,303

6,976


 
 
Class B Voting Units (8.0%, 86,700 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
9,071


Jet Plastica
Investors, LLC
(2)(9)
Plastic Products
Senior Debt A (Due 3/15)(1)(6)
2.3
%
7.0
%
9.3
%
4,963

3,897


RadioPharmacy
Investors, LLC
(2)
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
7.5
%

7.5
%
7,640

7,640

7,640

 
Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
12.0
%
3.0
%
15.0
%
10,521

10,518

10,518

 
 
Preferred LLC Interest (19.7%, 70,000 units)
 
 
 
 
11,646

16,112

Total control investments (represents 10.5% of total investments at fair value)
64,898

50,006

Affiliate Investments(3):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advanced Sleep
Concepts, Inc.
(2)
Home Furnishings
Senior Debt (Due 1/14)(1)
12.9
%

12.9
%
$
7,559

$
7,539

$
7,199

Subordinated Debt (Due 1/14)(1)(6)
12.0
%
4.0
%
16.0
%
5,873

5,385

10

 
 
Series A Preferred Stock (20.0%, 49 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
344


 
 
Series B Preferred Stock (1,000 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 


 
 
Common Stock (423 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
524


 
 
Warrants to purchase Common Stock
(expire 10/16)
(5)
 
 
 
 
348


C7 Data Centers, Inc.
Business Services
Senior Debt (Due 9/17)(1)
9.5
%

9.5
%
10,000

9,659

9,659

Series B Preferred Units (10.0%, 7,142,857 units)
 
 
 
 
2,053

2,421

Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc.
Business Services

Subordinated Debt (Due 3/16)(1)
12.0
%
2.0
%
14.0
%
8,575

8,059

7,870

Series A Preferred Stock (10.0%, 2,313 shares)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,387

2,203

Series B Preferred Stock (10.0%, 358 shares)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
307

341

 
 
Common Stock (8,519 shares)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
538


IDOC, LLC
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 8/17)(1)
9.8
%

9.8
%
15,000

14,707

14,707

 
 
Limited Partner Interests (8.0%)(1)(2)
 
 
 
 
1,032

1,073

Miles Media Group, LLC(2)
Business Services
Senior Debt (Due 6/16)(1)
12.5
%

12.5
%
16,738

16,495

16,495

Warrants to purchase Class A Units (expire 3/21)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
123

101

Total affiliate investments (represents 13.0% of total investments at fair value)
 
 
 
 
69,500

62,079


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
75



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
Interest Rate(8)
 
 
Fair
Value
Portfolio Company
Industry
Investment
Current
PIK
Total
Principal
Cost
Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5% owned):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accurate Group Holdings, Inc.(2)
Business Services
Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 6/18)(1)
12.5
%

12.5
%
$
10,000

$
9,802

$
9,802

Series A Preferred Stock (974,805 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,000

2,000

BarBri, Inc.
Publishing
Senior Debt (Due 6/17)(1)
6.0
%

6.0
%
6,099

6,046

6,110

Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.
Communications
Common Stock (132,779 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
159,579

1,087

 
Series A-1 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5)
 
 
 
 


 
 
Series A-2 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5)
 
 
 
 


Capstone Logistics, LLC
Logistics
Senior Debt (Due 9/16)(1)
10.5
%

10.5
%
27,347

27,237

27,237

Chase Industries, Inc.
Manufacturing
Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 5/18)(1)
11.5
%

11.5
%
16,800

16,472

16,472

Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc.
Agriculture
Subordinated Debt (Due 11/16)(1)
12.0
%
3.0
%
15.0
%
13,553

13,292

13,292

Construction Trailer Specialists, Inc.(2)
Auto Parts
Senior Debt (Due 6/13)(1)
8.6
%
6.3
%
14.9
%
6,445

6,434

6,434

Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.
Publishing
Subordinated Debt (Due 3/15)(1)(7)
5.0
%
7.3
%
12.3
%
20,000

19,942

19,942

CWP/RMK Acquisition Corp.(2)
Home Furnishings
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(6)
6.8
%

6.8
%
600

519

597

Education Management, Inc.
Education
Senior Debt (Due 6/15)(1)
9.3
%

9.3
%
26,654

26,459

25,260

Gans Communications,
L.P.(2)
Cable
Senior Debt (Due 10/17)(1)
5.0
%

5.0
%
5,015

4,996

5,061

G&L Investment Holdings, LLC(2)
Insurance
Subordinated Debt (Due 5/14)(1)
10.7
%
4.3
%
15.0
%
18,667

18,462

18,462

 
Series A Preferred Shares (14.0%,
5,000,000 shares)
(5)
 
 
 
 
8,191

8,067

 
 
Class C Shares (621,907 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
529


Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd.(10)
Diversified Financial Services
Income Notes (Due 4/19)
 
 
 
 
2,989

2,847

Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC
Manufacturing
Senior Debt (Due 12/17)(1)
8.5
%

8.5
%
3,500

3,427

3,427

 
Subordinated Debt (Due 6/18)(1)
10.0
%
4.0
%
14.0
%
9,008

8,829

8,829

Jenzabar, Inc.
Technology
Subordinated Preferred Stock (109,800 shares)
 
 
 
 
1,098

988

Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc.
Home Furnishings
Class B-1 Common Stock (2,000 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,185


Mailsouth, Inc.
Publishing
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
6.8
%

6.8
%
4,640

4,590

4,594

Maverick Healthcare
Equity, LLC
Healthcare
Preferred Units (10.0%, 1,250,000 units)
 
 
 
 
1,925

2,078

 
Class A Common Units (1,250,000 units)(5)
 
 
 
 

444

Midwest Technical Institute, Inc.
Education
Senior Debt (Due 10/17)(1)
9.5
%

9.5
%
17,063

16,682

16,682

NDSSI Holdings,
LLC(2)
Electronics
Senior Debt (Due 12/12)(1)
12.8
%
1.0
%
13.8
%
30,175

30,174

30,174

 
Series D Preferred Units (30.0%, 2,000,000 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
2,000

3,000

 
 
Series A Preferred Units (516,691 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
718


 
 
Series B Convertible Preferred Units
(165,003 units)
(5)
 
 
 
 
142

187

 
 
Class A Common Units (1,000,000 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
333


Oceans Acquisition, Inc.
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 12/17)(1)
10.8
%

10.8
%
23,710

23,237

23,237


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
76



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
Interest Rate(8)
Principal
Cost
Fair
Value
Portfolio Company
Industry
Investment
Current
PIK
Total
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.(10)
Personal Transportation
Senior Debt (Due 7/14)(1)
3.2
%

3.2
%
$
2,808

$
2,728

$
2,702

Rita’s Water Ice Franchise Company, LLC
Restaurants
Senior Debt (Due 11/16)(1)
14.0
%

14.0
%
9,375

9,301

9,301

Sagamore Hill Broadcasting, LLC(2)
Broadcasting
Senior Debt (Due 8/14)(1)
10.5
%

10.5
%
9,700

9,636

9,636

SC Academy Holdings, Inc.
Education
Subordinated Debt (Due 7/16)(1)
12.0
%

12.0
%
18,000

17,841

17,841

Softlayer Technologies, Inc.
Business Services
Senior Debt (Due 11/16)(1)
7.3
%

7.3
%
13,720

13,606

13,814

South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.
Healthcare
Subordinated Debt (Due 10/17)(1)
12.0
%
2.5
%
14.5
%
18,333

17,984

18,219

Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC
Information Services
Class E Series I Units (636 units)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
4,120

439

Class E Series II Units (276 units)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
1,788

13

Sunshine Media
Group, Inc.
(2)
Publishing
Warrants to purchase Common Stock
(expire 1/21)
(5)
 
 
 
 


The e-Media Club I, LLC
Investment Fund
LLC Interest (74 units)(5)
 
 
 
 
88

11

The Gavilon Group, LLC
Agriculture
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
6.0
%

6.0
%
8,500

8,409

8,489

Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Healthcare
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
7.8
%

7.8
%
13,740

13,591

12,091

Visant Corporation
Consumer Products
Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1)
5.3
%

5.3
%
4,760

4,772

4,338

VS&A-PBI Holding LLC
Publishing
LLC Interest(5)
 
 
 
 
500


West World Media, LLC
Information Services
Senior Debt (Due 9/15)(1)
11.0
%
3.0
%
14.0
%
11,462

10,911

11,140

Class A Membership Units (25,000 units)(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
1

335

 
 
Warrant to purchase Class A Membership Units
(expire 9/15)
(1)(5)
 
 
 
 
324

719

Xpressdocs Holdings, Inc.
Business Services
Series A Preferred Stock (161,870 shares)(5)
 
 
 
 
500

241

Total non-affiliate investments (represents 76.5% of total investments at fair value)
 
 
 
 
534,389

365,639

Total Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
668,787

$
477,724



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
77



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments

(1) 
Some or all of this security is held by our SBIC subsidiary or one of our other financing subsidiaries and may have been pledged as collateral in connection therewith. See Note 6—Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) 
Includes securities issued by one or more of the portfolio company’s affiliates.
(3) 
Affiliate investments represent companies in which we own at least 5%, but not more than 25% of the portfolio company’s voting securities.
(4) 
Control investments represent companies in which we own more than 25% of the portfolio company’s voting securities.
(5) 
Equity security is non-income producing at period-end.
(6) 
Loan or debt security is on non-accrual status.
(7) 
We did not recognize paid-in-kind, or PIK, interest or accretion income because the fair value of our investment was below its cost basis. However, we continue to accrue interest that is receivable in cash from the portfolio company.
(8) 
Interest rates represent the weighted-average annual stated interest rate on debt securities, presented by nature of indebtedness for a single issuer. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is generally added to the principal balance of the debt security and compounded if contractually required and not paid on a current basis. PIK may be prepaid by either contract or the portfolio company's choice, but generally is paid at the end of the loan term. Rates on preferred stock and preferred LLC interests, where applicable, represent the contractual rate.
(9) 
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, Jet Plastica Investors, LLC liquidated substantially all of its assets.  Including the proceeds from the liquidation, we have received $11.0 million of payments on our senior debt.
(10) 
Investment is not a qualifying asset under section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets.
(11) 
In December 2013, we exchanged $5.0 million of our senior debt to Education Management, Inc. for $5.0 million of a new class of preferred stock of Education Management, Inc.  With the completion of this transaction, Education Management, Inc. became an affiliate.
(12) 
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.’s financial statements are currently publicly available and may be accessed on-line using either the Company’s website (www.broadviewnet.com) or using the EDGAR System available on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov)
(13) 
In February 2014, our subordinated debt investment in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC was re-paid in full and our equity investments were sold for total proceeds of $4.2 million.




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
78



MCG Capital Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These Financial Statements present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of MCG Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “MCG” refer to MCG Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to middle-market companies throughout the United States. We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. Our organization includes the following categories of subsidiaries:
Wholly Owned Special-Purpose Financing Subsidiary—This subsidiary is a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose entity to which we transfer certain loans. The financing subsidiary, in turn, transfers the loans to a Delaware statutory trust. For accounting purposes, the transfers of the loans to the Delaware statutory trust is structured as an on-balance sheet securitization.
Small Business Investment Subsidiaries—We own Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital, a wholly owned subsidiary licensed by the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, which operates as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, or SBIC Act. In connection with the formation of Solutions Capital I, L.P., MCG also established another wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital G.P., LLC, to act as the general partner of Solutions Capital I, L.P., while MCG is the sole limited partner.
Taxable SubsidiariesWe currently qualify as a regulated investment company, or RIC, for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, are not required to pay corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. We have certain wholly owned taxable subsidiaries, or Taxable Subsidiaries, each of which holds one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedules of Investments. The purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs, or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us, and be included in the calculation of the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by Taxable Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The accompanying financial statements reflect the consolidated accounts of MCG and the following subsidiaries: Solutions Capital; Solutions Capital G.P., LLC; and MCG’s special-purpose financing subsidiary, MCG Finance VII, LLC.
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
These consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We believe we have made all necessary adjustments so that the financial statements are presented fairly and that all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. We eliminated all significant intercompany balances. In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we do not consolidate portfolio company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest. Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Further, in connection with the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements, we have evaluated subsequent events that occurred after the balance sheet date as of December 31, 2013 through the date these financial statements were issued.
Preparing financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported on our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although we believe the estimates and assumptions

79



used in preparing these Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes are reasonable, actual results could differ materially.
NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Significant Accounting Policies
INCOME RECOGNITION
We follow the policies described below to recognize income on our Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Interest IncomeWe accrue interest income if we expect that ultimately we will be able to collect it. Generally, when a loan becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise believe the customer is unable to service its debt and other obligations, we will place the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest is current through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we remain contractually entitled to this interest. We may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. Paid-in-kind interest, or PIK, represents contractually deferred interest that typically is added to the loan balance. Generally, PIK interest is due at the end of the loan term. We generally accrue PIK interest when collection is expected and cease accruing PIK if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or we expect the customer is unable to pay all principal and interest due.
Dividend IncomeWe accrue dividend income on equity investments with stated income, generally preferred equity, if we expect to collect the dividends. We record dividend income on common equity investments, and gains from realized distributions, when the dividend has been declared and is required to be paid.
Loan Origination Fees—We capitalize loan origination fees, then amortize these fees into interest income over the term of the loan using the effective interest rate method or on a straight-line basis when the loan has a revolving credit feature. In certain loan arrangements, we receive warrants or other equity interests from the borrower as additional origination fees. Typically, borrowers granting these interests are not traded publicly. We record the financial instruments received at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. In certain cases, when we record a warrant or other equity instrument that results in a loan discount, we accrete the discount into income over the term of the loan.
Advisory Fees and Other Income—We charge our portfolio companies fees for services that we provide, including advisory and management services, prepayments, research, structuring, and other fees. We generally recognize these fees when earned. We recognize prepayment fees upon receipt. Finally, certain of the bank accounts in which we maintain cash balances pay interest, which we recognize when the interest is earned.
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
In accordance with the 1940 Act, we classify portfolio investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Schedules of Investments into the following categories:
Control InvestmentsInvestments in which we control more than 25% of the voting securities or have greater than 50% representation on the board of directors;
Affiliate Investments—Investments in which we own between 5% and 25% of the voting securities and have less than 50% representation on the board of directors; and
Non-Affiliate Investments—Investments in which we own less than 5% of the voting securities.
We carry our investments at fair value in accordance with the 1940 Act and Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. We base the fair value of portfolio investments on market prices when market quotations are readily available. As required by the 1940 Act, the fair value of all other investments is determined in good faith by our board of directors. Typically, there are no readily available market values for the majority of investments in our portfolio. As a result, the fair value of our entire investment portfolio was determined in good faith by our board of directors. We determine fair values using various valuation models that estimate the underlying value of the associated entity, taking into consideration our ownership share, as well as any discounts for transfer restrictions or other terms that impact the value. No single standard exists for determining fair value in good faith. Therefore, our board of directors applies business judgment to specific facts and circumstances about each investment in our portfolio pursuant to our valuation policy and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

80



ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820’s definition of fair value focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs within a measurement of fair value.
Each quarter, we record the difference between the carrying value of our investments and the fair values determined by the board of directors as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Upon the ultimate disposition of an asset in our portfolio, we reverse any previously recorded unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and realize a gain (loss) on investment that reflects the difference between the carrying cost of the investment and the net proceeds from the sale, including proceeds held in escrow that we record as restricted cash on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 4—Fair Value Measurement for additional information about the methodologies that the board of directors uses to determine the fair value of our investments, as well as our application of ASC 820.
CASH
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect the following categories of cash:
Cash and cash equivalents—Represents unrestricted cash, including checking accounts, interest bearing deposits collateralized by marketable debt securities and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less;
Cash, securitization accounts—Represents principal and interest held in designated bank accounts that we received on securitized loans or other reserved amounts associated with our securitization facility. We must use the funds deposited in these accounts to pay interest, reduce borrowings or pay other specified obligations in accordance with associated securitization agreements. Interest collections in excess of the interest payments and other specified obligations are distributed back to us; and
Cash, restricted—Includes cash held in escrow that we received as part of an asset sale, cash held for regulatory purposes and cash that we have received that is earmarked for transfer into our cash, securitization accounts.
BORROWING FACILITIES
As described more fully in Note 6—Borrowings, we have borrowed funds from various sources including debentures guaranteed by the SBA and an unsecured credit facility. In addition, we have a bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose entity that issued debt collateralized by pools of loans that we have transfered to the entity. We have recorded our obligation to repay all our borrowings at cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We account for loans transferred to our bankruptcy remote, special-purpose entity for use in securitization transactions in accordance with ASC Topic 860—Transfers and Servicing, or ASC 860.
Debt issuance costs include fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with our borrowings. We amortize these costs ratably over the contractual term of the borrowing facility using the effective interest method and include this amortization in interest expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. For facilities with a revolving credit feature, we amortize these costs on a straight-line basis.
From time-to-time, we may repurchase certain debt instruments issued by our bankruptcy-remote special-purpose entities from third parties at a negotiated price that may be different than the principal amount of the debt. In accordance with ASC 470—Debt, we treat these repurchases as if the debt were extinguished and report the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt as a gain or loss on extinguishment of debt on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
In accordance with ASC Topic 718—Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, we recognize compensation cost related to share-based awards for which forfeiture provisions are expected to lapse over the requisite service period.
INCOME TAXES
We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income which would be considered

81



a return of capital. We are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or on deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.
We have certain wholly owned Taxable Subsidiaries, each of which holds one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments. The purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as LLCs or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us for the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by Taxable Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statement of Operations. For additional information about our Taxable Subsidiaries and the determination of our income taxes, see Note 11—Income Taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-08, Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements, or ASU 2013-08. This update changes the approach to the assessment of whether a company is an investment company, clarifies the characteristics of an investment company, provides comprehensive guidance for the investment company assessment and contains certain disclosure requirements. ASU 2013-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is prohibited. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value:
 
COST BASIS
FAIR VALUE BASIS
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Investments
at Cost
% of Total
Portfolio
Investments
at Cost
% of Total
Portfolio
Investments
at Fair Value
% of Total
Portfolio
Investments
at Fair Value
% of Total
Portfolio
Debt Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
190,783

33.7
%
$
297,842

44.6
%
$
185,524

50.3
%
$
291,760

61.1
%
Subordinated debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
118,632

20.9

127,288

19.0

108,338

29.4

114,983

24.1

Unsecured
42,452

7.5

26,274

3.9

42,452

11.5

26,274

5.4

Total debt investments
351,867

62.1

451,404

67.5

336,314

91.2

433,017

90.6

Equity investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred
44,956

8.0

46,403

6.9

28,390

7.7

41,558

8.7

Common/common equivalents
169,615

29.9

170,980

25.6

4,169

1.1

3,149

0.7

Total equity investments
214,571

37.9

217,383

32.5

32,559

8.8

44,707

9.4

Total investments
$
566,438

100.0
%
$
668,787

100.0
%
$
368,873

100.0
%
$
477,724

100.0
%

Our debt instruments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 15.5%, a portion of which may be in the form of PIK. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 73.3% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 26.7% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 60.2% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.0% and 3.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.50% and 6.0%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percent of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.

82



When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the customer to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place the loan on non-accrual status and generally will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.
The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of loans more than 90 days past due and loans on non-accrual status:
 
COST BASIS
FAIR VALUE BASIS
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Investments
at Cost
% of Loan
Portfolio
Investments
at Cost
% of Loan
Portfolio
Investments
at Fair Value
% of Loan
Portfolio
Investments
at Fair Value
% of Loan
Portfolio
Loans greater than 90 days past due
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On non-accrual status
$
3,897

1.11
%
$
3,897

0.86
%
$

%
$

%
Total loans greater than 90 days past due
$
3,897

1.11
%
$
3,897

0.86
%
$

%
$

%
Loans on non-accrual status
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0 to 90 days past due
$
17,531

4.98
%
$
12,880

2.85
%
$
4,493

1.34
%
$
607

0.14
%
Greater than 90 days past due
3,897

1.11

3,897

0.86





Total loans on non-accrual status
$
21,428

6.09
%
$
16,777

3.71
%
$
4,493

1.34
%
$
607

0.14
%
The following table summarizes our investment portfolio by industry at fair value:
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Investments
at Fair Value
Percent of
Total Portfolio
Investments at
Fair Value
Percent of
Total Portfolio
Healthcare
$
84,922

23.0
%
$
106,119

22.2
%
Business services
64,108

17.4

64,947

13.6

Education
57,905

15.7

59,783

12.5

Manufacturing
51,735

14.0

28,728

6.0

Publishing
25,312

6.9

30,646

6.4

Insurance
23,620

6.4

26,529

5.6

Restaurants
23,010

6.2

9,301

1.9

Information services
12,552

3.4

12,646

2.7

Broadcasting
12,252

3.3

25,372

5.3

Home furnishings
4,730

1.3

7,806

1.6

Consumer products
4,657

1.3

4,338

0.9

Agriculture


21,781

4.6

Auto parts


6,434

1.3

Cable


5,061

1.1

Electronics


33,361

7.0

Logistics


27,237

5.7

Other(a)
4,070

1.1

7,635

1.6

Total
$
368,873

100.0
%
$
477,724

100.0
%
______________________
(a)    No individual industry within this category exceeds 1%.
 
 
 
 

NOTE 4—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
We account for our investments in portfolio companies under ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This fair value definition focuses on exit price in

83



the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.
Fair Value Hierarchy
ASC 820 establishes the following three-level hierarchy, based upon the transparency of inputs to the fair value measurement of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:
ASC 820
Fair Value Hierarchy
Inputs to Fair Value Methodology
Level 1
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market information
Level 3
Pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption is unobservable or when the estimation of fair value requires significant management judgment
We categorize a financial instrument in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to its fair value measurement. In the event that transfers between these levels were to occur in the future, we would recognize those transfers as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the assets that we report at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets by fair value hierarchy:
 
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Internal Models with Significant
Total Fair Value
Reported in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Observable Market Parameters  
(Level 2)
Unobservable
Market Parameters
 
(Level 3)
Non-affiliate investments
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
8,487

$
105,674

$
114,161

Subordinated secured debt

97,497

97,497

Unsecured subordinated debt

42,452

42,452

Preferred equity
3,298

8,261

11,559

Common/common equivalents

2,504

2,504

Total non-affiliate investments
11,785

256,388

268,173

Affiliate investments
 
 
 
Senior secured debt

51,471

51,471

Preferred equity

3,656

3,656

Common/common equivalents

1,665

1,665

Total affiliate investments

56,792

56,792

Control investments
 
 
 
Senior secured debt

19,892

19,892

Subordinated secured debt

10,841

10,841

Preferred equity

13,175

13,175

Total control investments

43,908

43,908

Total assets at fair value
$
11,785

$
357,088

$
368,873

As of December 31, 2013, we had no investments that had quoted market prices in active markets, which we would categorize as Level 1 investments under ASC 820. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value and are Level 1 assets. Interest receivable is carried at cost which approximates fair value.
Valuation Methodologies and Procedures
As required by the 1940 Act, we classify our investments by level of control. Control investments include both majority-owned control investments and non-majority owned control investments. A majority-owned control investment

84



represents a security in which we own more than 50% of the voting interest of the portfolio company and generally control its board of directors. A non-majority owned control investment represents a security in which we own 25% to 50% of the portfolio company’s voting equity. As of December 31, 2013, our portfolio contained no non-majority control investments. Non-control investments represent both affiliate and non-affiliate securities for which we do not have a controlling interest. Affiliate investments represent securities in which we own 5% to 25% of the portfolio company’s equity. Non-affiliate investments represent securities in which we own less than 5% of the portfolio company’s equity.
Majority-Owned Control Investments—Majority-owned control investments comprise 11.9% of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2013. Market quotations are not readily available for these investments; therefore, we use a combination of market and income approaches to determine their fair value. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues or, in limited cases, book value. Generally, we apply multiples that we observe for other comparable companies to relevant financial data for the portfolio company in question. Also, in a limited number of cases, we use income approaches to determine fair value, based on our projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company will likely generate, as well as industry derived capital costs. Our valuation approaches for majority-owned investments estimate the value upon a hypothetical sale or exit and then allocates such value to the investment's securities in order of their relative liquidation preference. In addition, we assume that any outstanding debt or other securities that are senior to our securities are required to be repaid at par. These valuation approaches consider the value of our ability to control the portfolio company’s capital structure and the timing of a potential exit.
Non-Control Investments—Non-control investments comprise 88.1% of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2013. Quoted prices are not available for 96.4% of our non-control investments as of December 31, 2013. For our non-control equity investments, we use the same market and income approaches used to value our control investments. For non-control debt investments for which no quoted prices are available, we estimate fair value using a market-yield approach based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, based on our estimate of current market rates. We may adjust discounted cash flow calculations to reflect other market conditions or the perceived credit risk of the borrower. In the event the fair value of a non-control debt investment, as determined by the same market or income approach used to value our control investments, is below our cost, we estimate the fair value using the market or income approach.
Thinly-Traded and Over-the-Counter Securities—Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. However, we may apply a discount to the market value of restricted or thinly-traded public securities to reflect the impact that these restrictions have on the value of these securities. We review factors, including the trading volume, total securities outstanding and our percentage ownership of securities to determine whether the trading levels are active (Level 1) or inactive (Level 2). As of December 31, 2013, these securities represented 3.2% of our investment portfolio. We utilize independent pricing services to arrive at certain of our fair value estimates. The majority of our level 2 investments are senior debt investments that are secured and collateralized. To corroborate “bid/ask” quotes from independent pricing services we perform a market-yield approach to validate prices obtained or obtain other evidence.
Our valuation analyses incorporate the impact that key events could have on the securities’ values, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, purchase transactions, public offerings, letters of intent and subsequent debt or equity sales. Our valuation analyses also include key external data, such as market changes and industry valuation benchmarks. We also engage independent valuation firms to provide additional data points for our quarterly valuation analyses. Our general practice is to obtain an independent valuation or review of valuation at least once per year for each portfolio investment that had a fair value in excess of $5.0 million, unless the fair value has otherwise been derived through a sale of some or all of our investment in the portfolio company or is a new investment made within the last twelve months. In total, as of December 31, 2013, we either obtained a valuation or review from an independent firm, considered new investments made or used market quotes in the preceding twelve-month period to calculate 99.0% of our investment portfolio, calculated on a fair value basis.
The majority of the valuations performed by the independent valuation firms utilize proprietary models and inputs. We have used, and intend to continue to use, independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses.
Our board of directors sets our valuation policies and procedures and determines the fair value of our investments. The investment and valuation committee of our board of directors meets at least quarterly with our executive

85



management to review management’s recommendations of fair value of our investments. Our board of directors considers our valuations, as well as the independent valuations and reviews, in its determination of the fair value of our investments.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed, and such differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to differ from the valuations currently assigned.
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
We classify securities in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. Our fair value approach for Level 3 securities primarily uses unobservable inputs, but may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include fair value changes due, in part, to observable factors. Additionally, we transfer investments in and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 securities as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period. During each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no transfers in or out of Level 1, 2 or 3.

86



The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
(in thousands)
Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Non-affiliate
Investments
Affiliate
Investments
Control
Investments
Total
Fair value December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
163,125

$
48,060

$
23,376

$
234,561

Subordinated secured debt
96,585

7,880

10,518

114,983

Unsecured subordinated debt
26,274



26,274

Preferred equity
16,561

6,038

16,112

38,711

Common/common equivalents equity
3,048

101


3,149

Total fair value December 31, 2012
305,593

62,079

50,006

417,678

Realized/unrealized gain (loss)
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
(2,064
)
921

702

(441
)
Subordinated secured debt
(13,735
)
190


(13,545
)
Preferred equity
(4,635
)
(3,540
)
(4,667
)
(12,842
)
Common/common equivalents equity
(544
)
3,107


2,563

Total realized/unrealized gain (loss)
(20,978
)
678

(3,965
)
(24,265
)
Issuances
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
53,910

10,708

55

64,673

Subordinated secured debt
31,057

683

323

32,063

Unsecured subordinated debt
36,322



36,322

Preferred equity
413

3,458

1,718

5,589

Common/common equivalents equity
3

1,457


1,460

Total issuances
121,705

16,306

2,096

140,107

Settlements
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
(92,067
)
(8,218
)
(4,241
)
(104,526
)
Subordinated secured debt
(16,410
)
(8,753
)

(25,163
)
Unsecured subordinated debt
(17,144
)


(17,144
)
Preferred equity
20


12

32

Total settlements
(125,601
)
(16,971
)
(4,229
)
(146,801
)
Sales
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
(17,230
)


(17,230
)
Unsecured subordinated debt
(3,000
)


(3,000
)
Preferred equity
(4,098
)
(2,300
)

(6,398
)
Common/common equivalents equity
(3
)
(3,000
)

(3,003
)
Total sales
(24,331
)
(5,300
)

(29,631
)
Fair value as of December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
105,674

51,471

19,892

177,037

Subordinated secured debt
97,497


10,841

108,338

Unsecured subordinated debt
42,452



42,452

Preferred equity
8,261

3,656

13,175

25,092

Common/common equivalents equity
2,504

1,665


4,169

Total fair value as of December 31, 2013
$
256,388

$
56,792

$
43,908

$
357,088

There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.

87



The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
(in thousands)
Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Non-affiliate
Investments
Affiliate
Investments
Control
Investments
Total
Fair value December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
280,371

$
40,572

$
62,615

$
383,558

Subordinated secured debt
100,967

12,967

10,355

124,289

Unsecured subordinated debt
12,203



12,203

Preferred equity
28,978

12,453

46,293

87,724

Common/common equivalents equity
18,645

3,610


22,255

Total fair value December 31, 2011
441,164

69,602

119,263

630,029

Realized/unrealized gain (loss)
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
(41
)
(204
)
4,034

3,789

Subordinated secured debt
266

(5,140
)

(4,874
)
Unsecured subordinated debt
(194
)

8

(186
)
Preferred equity
(885
)
2,980

(14,526
)
(12,431
)
Common/common equivalents equity
94

138


232

Total realized/unrealized gain (loss)
(760
)
(2,226
)
(10,484
)
(13,470
)
Issuances
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
50,597

28,502

109

79,208

Subordinated secured debt
46,349

402

323

47,074

Unsecured subordinated debt
26,446



26,446

Preferred equity
2,462

3,438

1,919

7,819

Common/common equivalents equity

61


61

Total issuances
125,854

32,403

2,351

160,608

Settlements
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
(167,802
)
(20,810
)
(43,382
)
(231,994
)
Subordinated secured debt
(50,997
)
(349
)
(160
)
(51,506
)
Unsecured subordinated debt
(12,181
)

(8
)
(12,189
)
Preferred equity
(12,103
)

(1,711
)
(13,814
)
Common/common equivalents equity
(15,647
)


(15,647
)
Total settlements
(258,730
)
(21,159
)
(45,261
)
(325,150
)
Sales
 
 
 
 
Preferred equity
(1,891
)
(12,833
)
(15,863
)
(30,587
)
Common/common equivalents equity
(44
)
(3,708
)

(3,752
)
Total sales
(1,935
)
(16,541
)
(15,863
)
(34,339
)
Fair value as of December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
163,125

48,060

23,376

234,561

Subordinated secured debt
96,585

7,880

10,518

114,983

Unsecured subordinated debt
26,274



26,274

Preferred equity
16,561

6,038

16,112

38,711

Common/common equivalents equity
3,048

101


3,149

Total fair value as of December 31, 2012
$
305,593

$
62,079

$
50,006

$
417,678

There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.

88



Unrealized (Depreciation) Appreciation of Level 3 Investments
The following table summarizes the unrealized (depreciation) appreciation that we recognized on those investments for which we determined fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
Year ended December 31, 2013
Year ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands)
Non-affiliate
Investments
Affiliate
Investments
Control
Investments
Total
Non-affiliate
Investments
Affiliate
Investments
Control
Investments
Total
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior secured debt
$
(2,235
)
$
928

$
703

$
(604
)
$
539

$
(204
)
$
4,160

$
4,495

Subordinated secured debt
1,820

190


2,010

(1,249
)
(5,140
)

(6,389
)
Unsecured subordinated debt




81



81

Preferred equity
(4,412
)
(3,146
)
(4,655
)
(12,213
)
(44
)
372

(13,380
)
(13,052
)
Common/common equivalents equity
1,158

770


1,928

70

(568
)

(498
)
Total change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on Level 3 investments
$
(3,669
)
$
(1,258
)
$
(3,952
)
$
(8,879
)
$
(603
)
$
(5,540
)
$
(9,220
)
$
(15,363
)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Our investment portfolio is not composed of homogeneous debt and equity securities that can be valued with a small number of inputs. Instead, the majority of our investment portfolio is composed of complex debt and equity securities with distinct contract terms and conditions. As such, our valuation of each investment in our portfolio is unique and complex, often factoring in numerous different inputs, including the historical and forecasted financial and operational performance of the portfolio company, projected cash flows, market multiples, comparable market transactions, the priority of our securities compared with those of other investors, credit risk, interest rates, independent valuations and reviews and other inputs too numerous to list quantitatively herein.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurements of our level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of December 31, 2013.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
($ in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Techniques
Unobservable
Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
 
Minimum
Maximum
Senior debt
$
177,040

Discounted Cash Flow
Market Interest Rate
6.8
%
12.8
%
8.9
%



Market Comparable Companies
Revenue Multiple
0.2x

0.2x

0.2x




Market Comparable Companies
EBITDA multiple (a)
7.5x

7.5x

7.5x

Subordinated debt
150,790

Discounted Cash Flow
Market Interest Rate
7.8
%
14.3
%
12.9
%



Market Comparable Companies
Revenue Multiple
0.2x

0.2x

0.2x




Market Comparable Companies
EBITDA multiple (a)
7.5x

7.5x

7.5x

Preferred and common equity
29,260

Market Comparable Companies
EBITDA multiple (a)
4.4x

10.0x

7.6x



Market Comparable Companies
Revenue multiple
0.7x

0.7x

0.7x





Discount for minority interest
%
25.0
%
3.1
%



Residual Assets
Discount Rate
25.0
%
25.0
%
25.0
%
 
$
357,090

 
 
 
 
 
________________
(a) 
EBITDA may include proforma adjustments and/or other addbacks based on specific circumstances related to each investment.
(b)
Revenue may include a discount based on specific circumstances related to each investment.


89



NOTE 5—CONCENTRATIONS OF INVESTMENT RISK
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we had concentrations in certain industries, including the healthcare, business services, education and manufacturing industries. The following table summarizes our fair value and revenue concentrations in each of those industries:
 
Investments at fair value
Revenue for the year ended
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Amount
% of Total Portfolio
Amount
% of Total Portfolio
Amount
% of Total Revenue
Amount
% of Total Revenue
Industry
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Healthcare
$
84,922

23.0
%
$
106,119

22.2
%
$
12,650

25.1
%
$
9,160

15.0
%
Business services
64,108

17.4

64,947

13.6

8,265

16.4

7,247

11.9

Education
57,905

15.7

59,783

12.5

6,690

13.2

5,286

8.7

Manufacturing
51,735

14.0

28,728

6.0

5,823

11.5

5,876

9.6

Total
$
258,670

70.1
%
$
259,577

54.3
%
$
33,428

66.2
%
$
27,569

45.2
%

NOTE 6—BORROWINGS
As of December 31, 2013, we reported $175.2 million of borrowings on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. The following table summarizes our borrowing facilities, the facility amounts and amounts outstanding.
 
 
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Maturity Date
Total
Facility/
Program
Amount
Outstanding
Total
Facility/
Program
Amount
Outstanding
SBIC
 
 
 
 
 
2008-10B
September 2018
$
2,600

$
2,600

$
2,600

$
2,600

2009-10A
March 2019
12,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

2009-10B
September 2019
13,000

13,000

13,000

13,000

2010-10B
September 2020
27,500

27,500

27,500

27,500

2011-10A
March 2021
53,500

53,500

53,500

53,500

2012-10A
March 2022
41,400

41,400

41,400

41,400

MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1(a)
 




 
 
Series 2006-1 Class B Notes
April 2018(b)


37,151

37,151

Series 2006-1 Class C Notes(c)
April 2018(b)


45,000

32,000

Series 2006-1 Class D Notes(d)
April 2018(b)
40,016

25,172

45,945

28,902

Bank of America Unsecured Revolver
 




 
 
Unsecured Revolving Note
November 2014
20,000


20,000


Total borrowings
 
$
210,016

$
175,172

$
298,096

$
248,053

__________
(a)    In April 2013, the Class B Notes were repaid in full, in October 2013, the Class C Notes were repaid in full, and in January 2014 the Class D Notes were repaid in full. See Note 17—Subsequent Events.
(b)    Borrowings under the MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1 facility are listed based on the contractual maturity date.  In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining Class D Notes on the next quarterly payment date, which was January 21, 2014.
(c)    Amount outstanding excludes $5.0 million of notes that we repurchased in December 2008 for $1.6 million and $8.0 million of notes that we repurchased in April 2010 for $4.4 million. As part of the consolidation process, we eliminated the notes that MCG, the parent company, purchased.
(d)    Amount outstanding excludes $10.1 million of notes that we repurchased in December 2008 for $2.4 million and $7.5 million of notes that we repurchased in January 2009 for $2.1 million. As part of the consolidation process, we eliminated the notes that MCG, the parent company, purchased.
We estimate that the fair value of these borrowings as of December 31, 2013 was approximately $177.0 million, based on current interest rates and repayments. This fair value is estimated from a market-yield approach for $151.8 million (level 3) of our SBIC borrowings and the repayment of our $25.2 million (level 3) 2006-1 Trust notes in January 2014. See Note 17—Subsequent Events. Interest payable is carried at cost which approximates fair value.

90



As a BDC, we are not permitted to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities, including preferred stock, unless immediately after such borrowing our asset coverage ratio for total borrowings (excluding borrowings by our SBIC facility) of at least 200%. In addition, we may not be permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on our outstanding common shares, or purchase any such shares, unless, at the time of such declaration or purchase, we have an asset coverage ratio of at least 200% after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price. If we are unable to meet this asset coverage requirement, we may not be able to incur additional debt. As of December 31, 2013, our ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities was 1,418%.
Each of our borrowing facilities has certain financial covenants and non-financial covenants. We were in compliance with the covenants as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.
We have funded our current secured borrowing debt facility through a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose, wholly owned subsidiary. Therefore, this subsidiary’s assets may not be available to our creditors. As of December 31, 2013, we continued to service those portfolio investments that we use as collateral in our secured borrowing facility.
The following table summarizes repayments of our borrowings based on the final legal maturity or the contractual principal collections of the outstanding loans that comprise the collateral, where applicable. Actual repayments could differ significantly due to future prepayments by our borrowers, modifications of our borrowers’ existing loan agreements, and monetizations.
(in thousands)
December 31, 2013
2014(a)
$
25,172

2015

2016

2017

2018
2,600

Thereafter
147,400

Total
$
175,172

     
(a) 
In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining Class D Notes of our 2006-1 Trust on the next quarterly payment date, which was January 21, 2014.
SBIC Debentures
In December 2004, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary Solutions Capital. Solutions Capital has a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under the SBIC Act. The license permits Solutions Capital to borrow up to $150.0 million from the SBA, which is the maximum amount of outstanding leverage available to single-license SBIC companies.
To realize the full $150.0 million in borrowings for which we have received approval under the SBIC program, we have funded a total of $75.0 million to Solutions Capital. As of each of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Solutions Capital had borrowed $150.0 million. We are permitted to use these funds to provide debt and equity capital to qualifying small businesses. However, we may not use these borrowings to provide additional financing to certain companies that are currently in our portfolio without SBA approval. In addition, we may not use these funds to provide working capital to MCG, Solutions Capital's parent company.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had $207.0 million and $187.9 million, respectively, of investments in our SBIC and we had $32.5 million and $48.3 million, respectively, of restricted cash to be used for additional investments in our SBIC.

91



Once drawn, the SBIC debentures bear an interim interest rate of LIBOR plus 30 basis points. The rate then becomes fixed at the time of SBA pooling, which occurs twice each year, and is set to the then-current 10-year treasury rate plus a spread and an annual SBA charge. As of each of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the SBIC had borrowings outstanding as summarized in the following table:
(dollars in thousands)
Amount Outstanding
Rate
Tranche
 
 
 
2008-10B
$
2,600

6.44
%
Fixed
2009-10A
12,000

5.34
%
Fixed
2009-10B
13,000

4.95
%
Fixed
2010-10B
27,500

3.93
%
Fixed
2011-10A
53,500

4.80
%
Fixed
2012-10A
41,400

3.38
%
Fixed
Total
$
150,000

4.33
%
 
In October 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC which allows us to exclude debt issued by Solutions Capital from the calculation of our consolidated BDC asset coverage ratio.
MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1
In April 2006, we completed a $500.0 million debt securitization through the MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust, a wholly owned subsidiary. The 2006-1 Trust issued six classes of notes with interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 0.33% to LIBOR plus 2.25%. The reinvestment period ended on July 20, 2011 and all subsequent principal collections or monetization proceeds that we received from collateral used to securitize this 2006-1 Trust were applied to the outstanding balance of that facility. As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retained all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent. See Note 17—Subsequent Events.
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver
In November 2012, we obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver will expire in November 2014. In August 2013, we executed an amendment to the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver that requires that we maintain a zero balance for a period of at least five consecutive days during the six-month period immediately preceding June 30th and December 31st of each year, the testing of which was previously required quarterly. In the event we borrow under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver, we agreed to increase the interest rate on such advances from LIBOR plus 3.5% to LIBOR plus 4.0%.  As of December 31, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding on the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.
The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver is subject to certain collateral requirements and financial covenants. Included among them are requirements that we maintain a ratio of all unencumbered assets to outstanding amounts under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver of at least four-to-one, as well as a ratio of unencumbered cash and senior portfolio loans to outstanding amounts under the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver of at least three-to-one. The Bank of America Unsecured Revolver may be prepaid at any time.
NOTE 7—CAPITAL STOCK
We have one class of common stock and one class of preferred stock authorized. Our board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in one or more series, establish the number of shares to be included in each such series and establish the designations, voting powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, subject to the 1940 Act.

92



Stock Repurchase Program
On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million. On February 28, 2014, our board of directors increased the stock repurchase program to $35.0 million. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares, and all repurchases will be made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases. Under both programs, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased 1,016,739 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $4.62 per share, which was a 10.2% discount from our quarterly net asset value per share.
We requested and received the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engage in a stock repurchase program and agree not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. Although, as of December 31, 2013, there were 1,425,006 shares of our common stock available for issuance under our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Plan, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, an aggregate of 178,853 and 107,924 shares of restricted stock, respectively, could be issued under our 2006 Plan and our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Non-Employee Plan, before reaching the 10% threshold set forth in the SEC's order. The increase in shares that could be issued under the restricted stock plans from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 is attributable to the forfeiture of share awards for which the requisite service period had not been satisfied.
Distributions
The following table summarizes our distributions per share declared since January 1, 2011:
Date Declared
Record Date
Payment Date
Amount
February 28, 2014
March 14, 2014
March 28, 2014
$
0.125

October 25, 2013
November 8, 2013
November 22, 2013
$
0.125

July 26, 2013
August 9, 2013
August 30, 2013
$
0.125

April 26, 2013
May 10, 2013
May 31, 2013
$
0.125

March 1, 2013
March 15, 2013
March 29, 2013
$
0.125

October 26, 2012
November 16, 2012
November 30, 2012
$
0.125

July 27, 2012
August 17, 2012
August 31, 2012
$
0.140

April 27, 2012
June 13, 2012
July 13, 2012
$
0.140

February 24, 2012
April 13, 2012
May 15, 2012
$
0.170

October 31, 2011
December 15, 2011
January 13, 2012
$
0.170

August 1, 2011
September 14, 2011
October 14, 2011
$
0.170

May 5, 2011
June 15, 2011
July 15, 2011
$
0.170

March 1, 2011
March 15, 2011
April 15, 2011
$
0.150

NOTE 8—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
All full-time employees, and those part-time employees who work at least 1,000 hours per year, are eligible to participate in a contributory employee savings plan that we sponsor under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, or 401(k) Plan. We match a portion of the contribution made by employees to the 401(k) Plan, based upon a percentage of defined compensation. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $68,000, $152,000 and $345,000, respectively, in expenses related to the 401(k) Plan.

93



NOTE 9—SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
EMPLOYEE SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan
From time to time, we award shares of restricted common stock to employees under our 2006 Plan which our stockholders initially approved in June 2006. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan increasing the number of shares we may award from 3,500,000 to 6,050,000 shares. Shares of restricted common stock awarded under the 2006 Plan may be subject to the employees' meeting service or performance conditions specified at the time of award. The award date is the date on which the shares are awarded by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors, while the fair value of the respective stock award is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the award date. We amortize restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period and report this expense as amortization of employee restricted stock awards on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, no shares of restricted stock were issued under the 2006 Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock under the 2006 Plan with a weighted-average fair value per share of common stock at the award date of $4.43.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recognized $1.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards. As of December 31, 2013, all the restricted share awards for which forfeiture provisions had not lapsed carried non-forfeitable dividend rights to the holder of the restricted shares. As of December 31, 2013, we had $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted common stock awarded to employees. We expect to recognize these costs over the remaining weighted-average requisite service period of 2.1 years.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
During June 2006, our stockholders initially approved the 2006 Non-Employee Plan, which was subsequently amended and restated. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Non-Employee Plan that increased the number of shares we may award to non-employee members of our board of directors from 100,000 to 150,000 shares. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we awarded 15,000 and 22,500 shares, respectively, of restricted common stock to non-employee directors. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recognized $60,000 and $120,000, respectively, of compensation costs related to share-based awards to non-employee directors. We include this compensation cost in general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2013, we had less than $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted common stock awarded to non-employee directors, which we expect to recognize over the remaining weighted-average requisite service period of 1.9 years.

94



SUMMARY OF EMPLOYEE AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes our restricted stock award activity since December 31, 2010:
 
Shares
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value per Share
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2010
932,200

$3.92
Awarded
752,250

$6.15
Forfeiture provision satisfied
(1,112,050
)
$4.16
Forfeited
(141,890
)
$6.86
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2011
430,510

$6.14
Awarded
1,022,500

$4.43
Forfeiture provision satisfied
(275,265
)
$5.25
Forfeited
(35,725
)
$6.87
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2012
1,142,020

$4.69
Awarded
15,000

$5.01
Forfeiture provision satisfied
(71,730
)
$6.58
Forfeited
(189,550
)
$4.63
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2013
895,740

$4.55
NOTE 10CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
On August 1, 2011, our board of directors approved a plan to reduce our workforce by 42%, including 22 current employees and 5 resignations. Affected employees received severance pay, continuation of benefits and, for employees who had been awarded restricted stock, additional lapsing of restrictions associated with restricted stock awards. We have accounted for these costs in accordance with ASC 420-10-Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $14,000, $69,000 and $4.3 million, respectively, of restructuring expenses related to severance obligations, which we reported as a separate line item on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We included liabilities associated with our restructuring in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes changes in the balance of our restructuring liabilities from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013:
(in thousands)
Severance
Benefits(a)
Other
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2010
$
178

$
85

$
263

Additions
3,747

36

3,783

Accretion
56

1

57

Cash payments
(1,509
)
(68
)
(1,577
)
Balance as of December 31, 2011
$
2,472

$
54

$
2,526

Additions



Accretion
66


66

Cash payments
(1,890
)
(33
)
(1,923
)
Balance as of December 31, 2012
$
648

$
21

$
669

Additions

(11
)
(11
)
Accretion
14


14

Cash payments
(662
)
(10
)
(672
)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
$

$

$

NOTE 11—INCOME TAXES
As a RIC, we are taxed under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, our income generally is not taxable to the extent we distribute it to stockholders and we meet certain qualification tests as outlined in the Internal Revenue Code. However, income from certain investments owned by our wholly owned subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. During 2013 and 2012, we declared and paid distributions from ordinary income

95



that were sufficient to meet our distribution requirements as a RIC. On a continuing basis, we monitor distribution requirements in order to comply with Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code.
We use the asset and liability method to account for our Taxable Subsidiaries' income taxes. Using this method, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. In addition, we recognize deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carryforwards that we may use to offset future tax obligations. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect to recover or settle those temporary differences. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recorded income tax provisions of $0.1 million, $0.3 million, and $37,000, respectively, which were primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.
From December 2001 through December 31, 2013, we declared distributions per share of $13.89. We determine the tax attributes of our distributions as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid during the full year. Each year, we mail statements on Form 1099-DIV to our stockholders that identify whether we made distributions from ordinary income, net capital gains on the sale of securities, which are each taxable distributions, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus, which is a nontaxable distribution. A portion of our distributions may represent a return of capital to our stockholders, to the extent that the total distributions paid in a given year exceed current and accumulated taxable earnings and profits. All or a portion of the distributions that we paid to stockholders during fiscal years 2013, 2012, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 represented a return of capital.
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, or the Modernization Act, was enacted, which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of regulated investment companies. The changes are generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. One of the more prominent changes addresses capital loss carryforwards. Under the Modernization Act, each RIC will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those subsequent taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under previous regulation. For the tax years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we have total net capital losses of $120.8 million which have no expiration and will be carried forward indefinitely to offset future net capital gains. Capital loss carryforwards from tax years 2009 of $54.2 million and 2010 of $5.2 million will expire December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018, respectively, unless utilized to offset future net capital gains prior to those expiration dates to the extent permitted by federal tax law.

96



For income tax purposes, we report distributions paid to stockholders as ordinary income, return of capital, capital gains or a combination thereof. For the tax year ended December 31, 2013, 75.0% of our distributions were from ordinary income and 25.0% of our distributions were a return of capital. For the tax year ended December 31, 2012, 100% of our distributions were a return of capital. For the tax year ended December 31, 2011, 37% of our distributions were from ordinary income and 63% of our distributions were a return of capital. Distributions per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were taxable as follows:
 
Years ended December 31,
 
2013
2012
2011
 
$/Share
% of Total
$/Share
% of Total
$/Share
% of Total
Dividends declared during the year
$
0.500

 
$
0.575

 
$
0.660

 
Dividends declared in 2011 but paid in 2012

 
0.170

 
(0.170
)
 
Dividends declared in 2010 but paid in 2011

 

 
0.140

 
Dividends paid in calendar year
0.500

 
0.745

 
0.630

 
Dividends declared in 2010, paid in 2011, but treated as taxable in 2010 as required by the Internal Revenue Code

 

 
(0.030
)
 
Dividends paid for tax purposes
$
0.500

 
$
0.745

 
$
0.600

 
Dividends declared on tax Form 1099-DIV(unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ordinary income(a)
$
0.375

75.0
%
$

%
$
0.220

37.0
%
Return of capital(b)
0.125

25.0

0.745

100.0

0.380

63.0

Total reported on tax Form 1099-DIV
$
0.500

100.0
%
$
0.745

100.0
%
$
0.600

100.0
%
__________________
(a)
Ordinary income was reported on Form 1099-DIV as either qualified or non-qualified.
(b)
Return of capital refers to those amounts reported as nontaxable distributions on Form 1099-DIV.
On a tax basis, distributions allocable to 2013 were composed of $26.0 million of ordinary income and $9.0 million of return of capital, distributions allocable to 2012 were composed of $55.2 million of return of capital and distributions in 2011 were composed of $16.3 million of ordinary income and $29.0 million return of capital. The following table summarizes changes in our cumulative distributions in excess of earnings for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
(in thousands)
December 31,
 
2013
2012
Beginning Balance
$
251,165

$
195,310

Current year return of capital
9,029

55,211

Current year tax permanent differences
282

644

Tax distributions in excess of earnings
$
260,476

$
251,165

Taxable income differs from net income recognized in accordance with GAAP because of temporary and permanent differences in income and expense recognition.
Taxable income generally excludes unrealized gains and losses from appreciation or depreciation of our investments, which are included in GAAP net income. Further, amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes may differ from amounts included in taxable income due to the accrued dividends on preferred stock, which increases the book basis but not the tax basis of our investments, and non-accrual interest on loans, which increases tax basis but not book basis.

97



The following table summarizes the cost, as well as the unrealized appreciation and depreciation for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
December 31,
(in thousands)
2013
2012
Total investments at fair value (GAAP)
$
368,873

$
477,724

Gross unrealized appreciation
 
 
Unrealized appreciation of fair value of portfolio investments (GAAP)
(5,231
)
(7,752
)
Book to tax differences
(76,810
)
(75,261
)
Gross unrealized appreciation (GAAP)
(82,041
)
(83,013
)
Gross unrealized depreciation
 
 
Unrealized depreciation of fair value of portfolio investments (GAAP)
202,596

198,814

Book to tax differences


Gross unrealized depreciation (GAAP)
202,596

198,814

Net unrealized depreciation (GAAP)
120,555

115,801

Plus: Unrealized depreciation of fair value of other assets and liabilities (GAAP)
201

1

Cost for federal income tax purposes
$
489,629

$
593,526

The following table reconciles GAAP net income (loss) to taxable (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31,
2013
2012
Net income (loss)
$
1,176

$
4,998

Difference between book and tax losses on investments
(1,894
)
27,681

Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments not taxable until realized
6,704

(85,282
)
Capital losses in excess of capital gains
23,985

70,513

Timing difference related to deductibility of long-term incentive compensation
(2,120
)
1,456

Taxable interest income on non-accrual loans(a)
63

(17,586
)
Dividend income accrued for GAAP purposes that is not yet taxable
(2,554
)
(3,688
)
Distributions from taxable subsidiaries
3,104

1,532

Federal tax provision
125

277

Other, net
(2,557
)
(3,030
)
Taxable (loss) income before deductions for distributions
$
26,032

$
(3,129
)
___________________________
(a)
Results for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 reflect the reversal of interest we previously recognized on non-accrual loans of portfolio investments that we monetized. In accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, we are required to recognize as taxable interest income all interest that is owed to us by portfolio companies, including interest on those debt investments that are on non-accrual status for GAAP reporting purposes.
As of December 31, 2013, based on our analysis of our tax position, we concluded that we did not have any uncertain tax positions that met the recognition or measurement criteria of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes.

98



NOTE 12—EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
 
Years ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2013
2012
2011
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
1,176

$
4,998

$
(93,115
)
Less: Dividends declared—common and restricted shares
(35,400
)
(42,889
)
(50,877
)
Undistributed earnings
(34,224
)
(37,891
)
(143,992
)
Percentage allocated to common shares(a)
98.4
%
98.6
%
100.0
%
Undistributed earnings—common shares
(33,676
)
(37,361
)
(143,992
)
Add: Dividends declared—common shares
34,834

42,289

50,877

Numerator for common shares outstanding excluding participating shares
1,158

4,928

(93,115
)
Numerator for participating unvested shares only
18

70


Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share—total
$
1,176

$
4,998

$
(93,115
)
Denominator for basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
 
 
 
Common shares outstanding
70,122

73,793

76,259

Participating unvested shares(b)
1,110

1,066


Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding—total(b)
71,232

74,859

76,259

Earnings (loss) per share—basic and diluted
 
 
 
Excluding participating unvested shares
$
0.02

$
0.07

$
(1.22
)
Including participating unvested shares
$
0.02

$
0.07

$
(1.22
)
_______________________________
 
 
 
(a)        Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares:
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
70,122

73,793

76,259

Weighted-average restricted shares
1,110

1,066


Total basic and diluted(b) weighted-average common shares
71,232

74,859

76,259

Percentage allocated to common shares
98.4
%
98.6
%
100.0
%
(b) 
For the year ended December 31, 2011, we excluded 735 weighted-average shares of restricted common stock from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the inclusion of these shares would have had an anti-dilutive impact on the calculation of loss per share.
Holders of unvested shares of our issued and outstanding restricted common stock are eligible to receive non-forfeitable dividends. As such, these unvested shares are participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Pursuant to the two-class method, we report basic and diluted earnings per share both inclusive and exclusive of the participating securities.
NOTE 13—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business, including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
During the normal course of business, we are party to certain financial instruments, including loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments. We conduct extensive due diligence and, when appropriate, obtain collateral to limit our credit risk. Generally, these commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, which may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. We expect many of these commitments will not be fully used before they expire; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

99



We do not report the unused portions of these commitments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had $18.1 million and $23.0 million, respectively, of outstanding unused loan commitments. We estimate that as of each of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of these commitments was $0.1 million based on the fees that we currently charge to enter into similar arrangements, taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no outstanding guarantees or standby letters of credit.
LEASE OBLIGATIONS
We lease our headquarters and certain other facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating and capital leases which expire in 2014. The lease on our former headquarters in Arlington, Virginia expired in February 2013. In August 2012, we entered into a lease agreement for new office space in Arlington, Virginia. The new lease term is from October 2012 to November 2014 with a base rent of $0.4 million per year. The base rent will not increase during the term of the lease. In November 2012, we ceased using our old headquarters and recognized the remaining amounts due under that lease in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2013, our obligations for the remaining terms of these leases was $0.4 million, which will be payable during the next twelve months. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, our rent expense totaled $0.3 million, $2.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In February 2014, we entered into a new lease for our corporate headquarters. See Note 17—Subsequent Events.
NOTE 14—SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
We have determined that for the year ended December 31, 2013, RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC, or RadioPharmacy, and GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC, or GMC, are unconsolidated portfolio companies that meet the conditions of a significant subsidiary and therefore, we are presenting summarized financial information of RadioPharmacy and GMC as of the most recent periods for which data is available. Both RadioPharmacy and GMC are private companies, which have prepared financial statements in accordance with GAAP but not in accordance with Regulation S-X. In addition, the financial information of RadioPharmacy or GMC has not been audited.
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
RadioPharmacy is a nuclear compounding pharmacy for regional hospitals and imaging centers. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized $4.5 million of total revenue from our investment in RadioPharmacy. The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet information for RadioPharmacy as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in thousands)
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
 
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Assets:
 
 
Total current assets
$
6,126

$
5,868

Total non-current assets
19,270

18,783

Total assets
$
25,396

$
24,651

 
 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
 
 
Current liabilities
$
3,349

$
2,907

Long-term liabilities
19,645

19,679

Preferred stock
1

1

Other stockholders' equity
2,401

2,064

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
25,396

$
24,651


100



The following table sets forth summarized income statement information for RadioPharmacy for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2013
2012
 
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Sales
$
26,098

$
28,252

Gross margin
$
15,316

$
15,220

Net income (loss)
$
337

$
(426
)
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC
GMC owns certain Hawaii local television station licenses. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized $0.7 million of total revenue from our investment in GMC. The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet information for GMC as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(in thousands)
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
 
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Assets:
 
 
Total current assets
$
1,460

$
1,375

Total non-current assets
34,360

38,834

Total assets
$
35,820

$
40,209

 
 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
 
 
Current liabilities
$
1,192

$
1,214

Long-term liabilities
25,302

29,224

Member's equity
9,326

9,771

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
35,820

$
40,209

The following table sets forth summarized income statement information for GMC for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2013
2012
 
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Sales
$
3,987

$
4,468

Gross margin
$
(87
)
$
(351
)
Net income (loss)
$
(445
)
$
(674
)


101



NOTE 15—FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Following schedule summarizes financial highlights for the five years ended December 31, 2013:
 
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
PER SHARE DATA
 
 
 
 
 
Net asset value at beginning of year(a)
$
5.18

$
5.65

$
7.54

$
8.06

$
8.66

Net (loss) income(b)
 
 
 
 
 
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
0.42

0.25

0.49

0.54

0.51

Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments
(0.09
)
1.14

(0.51
)
(0.88
)
1.31

Net realized (loss) gain on investments
(0.31
)
(1.32
)
(1.19
)
0.15

(2.57
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision


(0.01
)
0.04

0.07

Income tax provision



(0.02
)

Net income (loss)
0.02

0.07

(1.22
)
(0.17
)
(0.68
)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from distributions
(0.50
)
(0.58
)
(0.66
)
(0.37
)

Net (decrease) increase in net assets relating to stock-based transactions
 
 
 
 
 
Forfeiture (issuance) of shares of restricted common stock(c)
0.01

(0.07
)
(0.04
)
(0.04
)

Repurchase of common stock

0.06




Net increase in stockholders’ equity from restricted stock amortization
0.02

0.03

0.03

0.06

0.11

Net (decrease) increase in stockholders’ equity from other stock transactions(b)
0.01

0.02



(0.03
)
Net (decrease) increase in net assets relating to share issuances
0.04

0.04

(0.01
)
0.02

0.08

Net asset value at end of year(a)
$
4.74

$
5.18

$
5.65

$
7.54

$
8.06

MARKET PRICE PER SHARE AT END OF YEAR
$
4.40

$
4.60

$
3.99

$
6.97

$
4.32

TOTAL RETURN(d)
6.52
%
33.96
%
(33.72
)%
66.67
 %
508.45
 %
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average (diluted)
71,232

74,859

76,259

75,422

74,692

End of year
70,510

71,721

76,997

76,662

76,394

NET ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Average
$
364,188

$
397,741

$
534,240

$
611,084

$
620,243

End of year
$
333,954

$
371,728

$
434,952

$
578,016

$
615,683

RATIO
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses to average net assets
5.65
%
10.61
%
8.99
 %
8.02
 %
9.94
 %
Net operating income to average net assets
8.21
%
4.73
%
7.05
 %
6.64
 %
6.16
 %
General and administrative expense to average net assets
1.48
%
3.52
%
2.63
 %
1.88
 %
2.52
 %
Return on average equity
0.32
%
1.26
%
(17.43
)%
(2.14
)%
(8.23
)%
_____________________________
(a)
Based on total number shares outstanding.
(b)
Based on weighted-average number shares outstanding.
(c)
Represents the effects of shares issued during the period and the lapsing of forfeiture provisions on restricted stock on earnings per share.
(d)
Total return = [(ending market price per share – beginning market price per share + dividends paid per share) / beginning market price].

102



NOTE 16—SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables summarize key unaudited financial information for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2013. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future quarter.
 
2013 Quarters
2012 Quarters
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Fourth
Third
Second
First
Fourth
Third
Second
First
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
11,179

$
13,170

$
12,890

$
13,246

$
13,421

$
12,069

$
17,944

$
17,559

Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision
6,333

7,964

7,556

8,043

5,113

4,056

5,595

4,042

Net income (loss)
$
(18,439
)
$
3,289

$
8,574

$
7,752

$
6,412

$
4,266

$
(7,037
)
$
1,357

Income (loss) per basic and diluted common share
$
(0.26
)
$
0.05

$
0.12

$
0.11

$
0.09

$
0.06

$
(0.09
)
$
0.02

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted
69,924

71,218

71,217

71,507

72,594

73,431

75,142

77,050

NOTE 17—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
REPAYMENT OF 2006-1 TRUST DEBT
In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes of our 2006-1 Trust on the next quarterly payment date. On January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full for an aggregate redemption price of $40.3 million of which $14.9 million was paid to us in respect of the Class D Notes we held, the other obligations of the Trust were satisfied and the assets of the 2006-1 Trust were transferred to MCG, the parent.
NEW LEASE FOR OFFICE SPACE
On February 28, 2014, we entered into a new lease for our headquarters office space. The lease will commence on December 1, 2014 and will run through December 31, 2015 with a one year renewal option.

103



ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. 
1.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013. The term “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
2.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
(a) MANAGEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, including the supervision and participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” published in 1992.
Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report with regard to our internal control over financial reporting.

104



(b) ATTESTATION REPORT OF THE REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding our internal control over financial reporting appears on page 67.
(c) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act), occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
Lease for Office Space
On February 28, 2014, we entered into a lease, or the Lease, with BFP Potomac Tower Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or the Landlord. Under the terms of the Lease, we have agreed to lease approximately 13,684 square feet of office space at 1001 19th Street North, Arlington, VA, which includes approximately 13,134 square feet of office space that we are currently subleasing pursuant to a sublease dated as of August 15, 2012 between FBR & CO and MCG, or the Sublease.
The Lease will commence on December 1, 2014 following the expiration of the Sublease on November 30, 2014. The Lease will run through December 31, 2015 although we have the option to renew the Lease for one additional one-year term provided that we provide notice of such extension no later than December 31, 2014. Lease payments of $684,200 per annum, payable in monthly installments of $57,016.67, or the Base Rent, are due during the term of the Lease and, if the renewal option is exercised, during the renewal term. However, we shall receive a rent credit in the amount of $166,050 for the initial term and, if applicable, for the renewal term, with such credit to reduce the monthly installments of rent (i) for the first two months of the initial term and, if applicable, the renewal term to $0 and (ii) for the third month of the initial term and, if applicable, the renewal term, to $5,000. Base Rent will not increase during the initial or renewal term of the Lease, and we are not required to pay any taxes or operating expenses other than electricity.
The foregoing description of the Lease is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Lease, which is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.5, and is incorporated by reference herein.
Appointment of Certain Officers
Effective March 6, 2014, Keith Kennedy, our Executive Vice President, Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, assumed the position of President. B. Hagen Saville will remain our Chief Executive Officer.
Prior to joining us in February 2012, Mr. Kennedy, age 44, served as an Executive-in-Residence at Arlington Capital Partners from May 2011 to February 2012. From October 2009 until he joined Arlington Capital, Mr. Kennedy pursued principal investing and, during this period, worked exclusively with Jay I. Kislak and J.I. Kislak, Inc. (March to September 2010) to pursue the acquisition of various private companies. From October 2002 to September 2009, Mr. Kennedy worked at GE Capital where he was a Managing Director and invested in over 40 healthcare transactions. Prior to GE, Mr. Kennedy served as a Manager, Transaction Services, at Ernst & Young LLP. Early in his career, Mr. Kennedy served as an Officer in the U.S. Air Force. Mr. Kennedy received his M.B.A. from The College of William & Mary and Bachelor of Science with High Distinction from Indiana University. Mr. Kennedy is a Chartered Financial Analyst and Certified Public Accountant.
In connection with the commencement of his tenure as President, we executed a Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement, or the Agreement, with Mr. Kennedy.
Term. Under the Agreement, Mr. Kennedy is an “at will” employee upon the terms set forth in the Agreement, for the period commencing from the date of execution and ending on the date on which such employment is terminated.
Salary, Bonus and Benefits. Mr. Kennedy will receive an annual base salary of $450,000, and will be eligible to receive an annual bonus determined by our board of directors or compensation committee, with a target bonus equal to 100% of his base salary. Mr. Kennedy shall be entitled to participate in all benefit plans and programs that we establish and make available to our employees to the extent that he is eligible under (and subject to the provisions of) the plan documents governing those programs.
Payments Upon Termination or Upon a Change of Control. If Mr. Kennedy’s employment is terminated by us for cause or by Mr. Kennedy other than for good reason (each as defined in the Agreement), he will receive all amounts of compensation accrued under the Agreement but unpaid as of the termination date, including base salary, bonuses or incentive compensation for the previous fiscal year, vacation pay, reimbursable expenses and any previously deferred

105



compensation. In addition, Mr. Kennedy will forfeit any shares of restricted common stock as to which the forfeiture restrictions have not lapsed.
If Mr. Kennedy’s employment is terminated (i) by us other than for cause, death or disability or (ii) by Mr. Kennedy for good reason, then Mr. Kennedy will receive all of his accrued compensation, severance pay equal to 1.5 times his base salary and 1.5 times his target annual bonus, full and immediate lapsing of forfeiture restrictions with respect to all of his shares of restricted common stock, and continued health coverage for Mr. Kennedy and any eligible dependents for a maximum of 18 months from his date of termination.
If Mr. Kennedy’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, Mr. Kennedy will receive his accrued compensation, an amount equal to the annual bonus Mr. Kennedy would have been entitled to receive for the fiscal year in which his termination of employment occurs, pro-rated and calculated at target, and full and immediate lapsing of forfeiture restrictions with respect to all of his shares of restricted common stock.
Non-Solicitation and Proprietary Information. During the term of his employment with us and for eighteen months thereafter, Mr. Kennedy has agreed not to recruit or hire any of our employees, and solicit our clients and certain prospective clients. The Agreement requires that Mr. Kennedy protect our confidential information both during and after the term of his employment with us.
There is no arrangement or understanding between Mr. Kennedy and any other person pursuant to which he was appointed as President, nor is there any family relationship between Mr. Kennedy and any of our directors or other executive officers. There are no transactions since the beginning of our last fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which Mr. Kennedy had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest.
The foregoing description of the Agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.20, and is incorporated by reference herein.
Effective March 6, 2014, Beverly Jane Alley, our Controller, will assume the position of Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. In connection with the commencement of her tenure as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Ms. Alley’s annual base salary was increased from $200,000 to $250,000.
Prior to joining us on November 29, 2004, Ms. Alley, age 51, served as Manager of Corporate Accounting and Cost Accounting for Measurement Specialties, Inc. from February 2001 until November 2004. Prior to Measurement Specialties, from April 1999 to February 2001 Ms. Alley was the Manager of Accounting for Lucas Control Systems. Ms. Alley received her B.B.A. from the University of Oklahoma and an M.B.A. from Troy State University. Ms. Alley is a Certified Public Accountant.
Ms. Alley is eligible for participation in the MCG Capital Corporation 2011 Severance Pay Plan, as amended, or the 2011 Severance Pay Plan, which is applicable to all MCG employees who are not entitled to receive severance benefits under another agreement or letter in excess of any wages accrued as of any termination of employment.
The 2011 Severance Pay Plan provides MCG employees with certain benefits under defined events of termination of employment. Specifically, the plan provides that in the event that we terminate an eligible employee’s employment without cause or the employee resigns for good reason, the employee will be eligible for three, six or nine months of continuing separation pay, healthcare continuation benefits and lapsing of forfeiture provisions with respect to shares of restricted stock (based on years of service with MCG).
Under the 2011 Severance Pay Plan, if the employment of Ms. Alley is terminated by us other than for cause, or if Ms. Alley terminates her employment with us for good reason, Ms. Alley would be eligible for nine months of continuing separation pay, healthcare continuation benefits and lapsing of forfeiture provisions with respect to shares of restricted stock.
There is no arrangement or understanding between Ms. Alley and any other person pursuant to which she was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, nor is there any family relationship between Ms. Alley and any of our directors or other executive officers. There are no transactions since the beginning of our last fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which Ms. Alley had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest.


106



PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. 
The information relating to our directors, nominees for election as directors, executive officers and audit committee under the headings Election of Directors, Corporate Governance—Our Executive Officers, Corporate Governance—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and Corporate Governance—Board Committees in our definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We make available our code of business conduct and ethics free of charge through our website which is located at www.mcgcapital.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of business conduct and ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ Global Select Market by filing such amendment or waiver with the Securities and Exchange Commission and by posting it on our website.
We made no material change to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors, as described in our 2013 proxy statement.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. 
The discussion under the headings Executive Compensation, Compensation of Directors, Compensation Committee Report, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation, and Narrative Disclosure of Our Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to Risk Management in our definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. 
The discussion under the heading Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in our definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE. 
The discussion under the headings Certain Relationships and Related Transactions; Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions and Corporate Governance—Board Determination of Independence in our definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. 
The discussion under the heading Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Auditors’ Fees and—Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures in our definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.

107



PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
 
Page
1

The following financial statements are filed herewith:
 
 
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2013
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2012
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2

The following financial statement schedules are filed herewith:
 
 
Schedule 12-14 Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
3

Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

108



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
MCG Capital Corporation
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of MCG Capital Corporation (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and have issued our report thereon dated March 5, 2014 (included elsewhere in this Form 10-K). Our audits also included the Schedule 12-14 listed in Item 15 of this Form 10-K. The Schedule 12-14 is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, the Schedule 12-14 referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
March 5, 2014

109



Schedule 12-14
MCG Capital Corporation
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES
(in thousands)
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2013
As of
December 31,
2012
Fair Value
 
 
As of
December 31,
2013
Fair Value
Portfolio Company
Investment(a)
Amount of 
Interest or Dividends
Credited to 
Income(e)
Gross
Additions(b)
Gross
Reductions(c)
Control Investments
 
 
 
 
 
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC
Senior Debt
699

15,736

704

(4,188
)
12,252

Subordinated Debt(d)





Class B Voting Units





Jet Plastica Investors, LLC
Senior Debt(d)





RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC
Senior Debt
818

7,640



7,640

Subordinated Debt
1,937

10,518

323


10,841

Preferred LLC Interest
1,719

16,112

1,719

(4,656
)
13,175

Total Control Investments
5,173

50,006

2,746

(8,844
)
43,908

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Affiliate Investments
 
 
 
 
 
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.(f)
Senior Debt

7,199


(7,199
)

 
Subordinated Debt(d)

10


(10
)

 
Series A Preferred Stock





 
Series B Preferred Stock






 
Common Stock






 
Warrants to purchase Common Stock






C7 Data Centers, Inc.
Senior Debt
1,520

9,659

8,000

(567
)
17,092

 
Series B Preferred Units
(53
)
2,421

1,264

(203
)
3,482

Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc.
Subordinated Debt
1,685

7,870

357

(8,227
)

 
Series A Preferred Stock


2,203


(2,203
)

 
Series B Preferred Stock


341


(341
)

 
Common Stock






Education Management, Inc.(g)
Senior Debt
577


19,599

18

19,617

 
Series C Preferred Debt


5,000

(4,826
)
174

IDOC, LLC
Senior Debt
1,543

14,707


55

14,762

 
Limited Partner Interests


1,073

592


1,665

Miles Media Group, LLC(h)
Senior Debt
1,106

16,495


(16,495
)

 
Warrants to purchase Class A Units
(33
)
101

2,899

(3,000
)

Total Affiliate Investments
$
6,345

$
62,079

$
37,711

$
(42,998
)
$
56,792

This schedule should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, including our Consolidated Schedule of Investments and Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)
Common stock, warrants, options and, in some cases, preferred stock generally are non-income producing and restricted. The principal amount of the debt and the number of shares of common stock and preferred stock are shown in the Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2013.
(b)
Gross additions include increases in investments resulting from new portfolio company investments, paid-in-kind interest or dividends, amortization of discounts and fees, and exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross additions also include net increases in unrealized appreciation or net decreases in unrealized depreciation.
(c)
Gross reductions include decreases in investments resulting from principal collections related to investment repayments or sales and the exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized appreciation.
(d)
All or part of this debt is on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2013, and, therefore, is considered non-income producing.
(e)
Represents the total amount of interest or dividends credited to income for the portion of the year an investment was a control investment (more than 25% owned) or an affiliate investment (5% to 25% owned), respectively. All dividend income is non-cash unless otherwise noted.

110



(f)
During 2013 our preferred and common stock investments in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. were canceled and written off. As of December 31, 2013 the portfolio company is classified as a non-affiliate. The transfers of our senior and subordinate debt investments from affiliate to non-affiliate are included in gross reductions.
(g)
In December 2013, we exchanged $5.0 million of our senior debt to Education Management, Inc. for $5.0 million of a new class of preferred stock of Education Management, Inc.  With the completion of this transaction, Education Management, Inc. became an affiliate. The transfers of our investments from non-affiliate to affiliate are included in gross additions.
(h)
During 2013 our warrant investment in Miles Media Group, LLC was sold. As of December 31, 2013 the portfolio company is classified as a non-affiliate. The transfer of our senior debt investment from affiliate to non-affiliate is included in gross reductions.
**
Information related to the amount of equity in the net profit and loss for the period for the investments listed has not been included in this schedule. This information is not considered to be meaningful due to the complex capital structures of the portfolio companies, with different classes of equity securities outstanding with different preferences in liquidation. These investments are neither consolidated nor accounted for under the equity method of accounting.


111



Exhibits
The following table lists exhibits filed as part of this report, according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K. All exhibits listed in the following table are incorporated by reference except for those exhibits denoted in the last column. Please note that the agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-K are included to provide information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement that have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
Exhibit
No.
Description
Form and SEC
File No.
Filing Date
with SEC
Exhibit No.
Filed with
this 10-K
 
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
 
 
 
 
3.1

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MCG Capital Corporation
8-K
(0-33377)
May 31, 2005
3.1
 
3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of MCG Capital Corporation
8-K
(0-33377)
April 11, 2012
3.1
 
 
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders
 
 
 
 
4.1

Specimen Common Stock Certificate
N-2
(333-64596)
November 1, 2001
99.d.1
 
4.2

Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and among MCG Capital Corporation and certain stockholders
10-K
(0-33377)
April 1, 2002
10.1
 
 
Material Contracts—Purchase, Financing and Credit Agreements
 
 
 
 
10.1

Amended and Restated Custody Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated December 11, 2008
10-K
(0-33377)
March 9, 2009
10.2
 
10.2

Financing Agreement dated November 21, 2012 between MCG Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A
8-K
(0-33377)
November 26, 2012
10.1
 
10.3

First Amendment to Financing Agreement dated as of August 8, 2013 between MCG Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.
8-K
(0-33377)
August 8, 2013
10.1
 
 
Material Contracts—Leases
 
 
 
 
10.4

Sublease dated as of August 15, 2012 by and between MCG Capital Corporation and FBR & CO.
8-K
(0-33377)
August 16, 2012
10.1
 
10.5

Deed of Lease by and between BFP Potomac Tower Co. LLC, as landlord, and MCG Capital Corporation, as tenant, dated as of February 28, 2014
 
 
 
*
 
Material Contracts—Management Contracts and Compensation Plans
 
 
 
 
10.6#

MCG Capital Corporation 401(k) Plan
10-K
(0-33377)
March 5, 2013
10.12
 
10.7#

MCG Capital Corporation Dividend Reinvestment Plan
N-2
(333-64596)
November 1, 2001
99.e
 
10.8#

MCG Capital Corporation Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan
8-K(0-33377)
8-K/A(0-33377)
June 1, 2010
June 2, 2010
10.2
10.2
 
10.9#

MCG Capital Corporation Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan
8-K(0-33377)
8-K/A(0-33377)
June 1, 2010
June 2, 2010
10.1
10.1
 
10.10#

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Members of the Board of Directors (pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan)
10-Q
(0-33377)
August 5, 2010
10.4
 
10.11#

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees (pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan)
10-Q
(0-33377)
August 5, 2010
10.3
 
10.12#

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for MCG Executive Employee (pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan).
8-K
(0-33377)
March 15, 2012
10.3
 
10.13#

Restricted Stock Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville, dated November 21, 2006
10-K
(0-33377)
March 9, 2009
10.37
 
10.14#

Employment Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville, dated as of September 18, 2006
8-K
(0-33377)
September 19, 2006
10.2
 
10.15#

Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville, dated as of December 31, 2008
10-K
(0-33377)
March 9, 2009
10.43
 

112



 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
Exhibit
No.
Description
Form and SEC
File No.
Filing Date
with SEC
Exhibit No.
Filed with
this 10-K
10.16#

Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville, dated as of November 1, 2012
10-K
(0-33377)
March 5, 2013
10.22
 
10.17#

Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville, dated as of March 5, 2014
 
 
 
*
10.18#

Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Tod K. Reichert, dated August 2, 2011
10-Q
(0-33377)
August 4, 2011
10.6
 
10.19#

Amendment No. 1 to Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Tod K. Reichert, dated as of March 5, 2014
 
 
 
*
10.20#

Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Keith Kennedy, dated as of March 5, 2014
 
 
 
*
10.21#

MCG Capital Corporation 2011 Severance Pay Plan, dated August 3, 2011
10-Q
(0-33377)
August 4, 2011
10.4
 
10.22#

Amendment No. 1 to MCG Capital Corporation 2011 Severance Pay Plan.
8-K
(0-33377)
March 15, 2012
10.1
 
10.23#

Amendment No. 2 to MCG Capital Corporation Severance Pay Plan
10-Q
(0-33377)
July 31, 2012
10.1
 
10.24#

MCG Capital Corporation 2013 Annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan
8-K
(0-33377)
March 19, 2013
10.1
 
 
Code of Ethics
 
 
 
 
14.1

Amended and Restated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, effective as of March 15, 2012
8-K
(0-33377)
March 15, 2012
14.1
 
 
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 
 
 
 
21

Subsidiaries of MCG Capital Corporation and Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization
 
 
 
*
 
Consents of Experts
 
 
 
 
23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm
 
 
 
*
 
Certifications
 
 
 
 
31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
*
31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
*
32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
*
Filed herewith.
Furnished herewith.
#
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit herein pursuant to Item 15(a) of Form 10-K.


113



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 5, 2014.
 
 
MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION
 
 
By:
/S/ B. Hagen Saville
 
B. Hagen Saville
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
 
 
Signature
Title
Date
 
 
 
/s/ B. HAGEN SAVILLE
President and Chief Executive Officer,
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 5, 2014
B. Hagen Saville
/s/ KEITH KENNEDY
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
March 5, 2014
Keith Kennedy
/s/ RICHARD W. NEU
Chairman of the Board and Director
February 28, 2014
Richard W. Neu
/s/ KIM D. KELLY
Director
February 28, 2014
Kim D. Kelly
/s/ KENNETH J. O’KEEFE
Director
February 28, 2014
Kenneth J. O’Keefe
/s/ GAVIN SAITOWITZ
Director
February 28, 2014
Gavin Saitowitz

114