UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

  X .QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2013

OR

      .TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to ____

Commission File No. 000-53286

CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	71-1050559
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

1000 W. Bonanza Rd.

Las Vegas, Nevada 89106

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(702) 382-3385

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X . No      .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes      . No  X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (check one):

Large accelerated filer	.	Accelerated filer	.
Non-accelerated filer	. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes      . No  X .

---

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes      . No      .

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of December 31, 2013, there were 73,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

2

---

CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

INDEX

Index				Page
Part I.	Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements		5
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013(unaudited) and March 31, 2013.		5
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from July 27, 2001 (inception) through December 31, 2013 (unaudited).		6
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from July 27, 2001 (inception) through December 31, 2013 (unaudited).		8
		Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited).		9
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		21
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		22
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.		23
Part II.	Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.		23
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors.		23
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		23
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		23
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.		23
	Item 5.	Other Information.		23
	Item 6.	Exhibits.		24
Signatures				24

3

---

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.  These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.  Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements.  The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results.

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-Q, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

All references in this Form 10-Q to the  “Company”, “Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc.”, “Centaurus Diamond Technologies,” “we”, “us,” or “our” are to Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc.

4

---

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM   1.  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

					December 31,  2013			March 31, 2013
					(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash				$	6,001		$	22,832
	Prepayments and other current assets					-			2,500
		Total Current Assets				6,001			25,332
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
	Property and equipment					8,000			8,000
	Accumulated depreciation					(2,400)			(1,200)
		Property and equipment, net				5,600			6,800
PATENT
	Patent					6,982			6,982
	Accumulated amortization					(1,044)			(783)
		Patent, net				5,938			6,199
			Total Assets		$	17,539		$	38,331
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Accrued expenses and other current liabilities				$	375		$	-
	Advances from stockholders					36,312			3,486
		Total Current Liabilities				36,687			3,486
			Total Liabilities			36,687			3,486
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
	Common stock par value $0.001: 450,000,000 shares authorized;
		73,000,000 shares issued and outstanding				73,000			73,000
	Additional paid-in capital					429,033			429,033
	Deficit accumulated during the development stage					(521,181)			(467,188)
		Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)				(19,148)			34,845
			Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		$	17,539		$	38,331
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

5

---

CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

				For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2013			For the Three Months Ended December 31,  2013			For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012			For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012			For the Period from July 27, 2001 (inception) through December 31, 2013
				(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenue earned during the development stage				$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Operating Expenses
	Consulting fees				12,850			6,550			-			-			73,663
	Professional fees				13,220			3,945			125,234			27,863			145,029
	Rent - related party				6,117			1,117			17,500			10,000			31,117
	Research and development				384			256			93,060			62,000			120,817
	Salary and wages - officers				-			-			54,613			17,113			67,498
	General and administrative expenses				21,422			6,361			94,186			43,246			83,057
		Total operating expenses			53,993			18,229			384,593			160,222			521,181
Loss before Income Tax Provision					(53,993)			(18,229)			(384,593)	-		(160,222)			(521,181)
Income Tax Provision					-			-			-			-			-
Net Loss				$	(53,993)		$	(18,229)		$	(384,593)		$	(160,222)		$	(521,181)
Net Loss per Common Share - Basic and Diluted				$	(0.00)		$	(0.00)		$	(0.01)		$	(0.00)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
	- basic and diluted				73,000,000			73,000,000			66,004,000			73,000,000

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

6

---

Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

For the Period from July 27, 2001 (Inception) through December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

				Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value					Additional Paid-in Capital			Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage			Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
				Number of Shares		Amount
Balance, July 27, 2001 (inception)				-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Common shares issued for cash upon formation				43,850,000			43,850			(40,850)			-			3,000
	Net loss for the period from July 27, 2001  (inception) through March 31, 2010			-			-			-			(1,520)			(1,520)
Balance, March 31, 2010				43,850,000			43,850			(40,850)			(1,520)			1,480
	Net loss			-			-			-			(778)			(778)
Balance, March 31, 2011				43,850,000			43,850			(40,850)			(2,298)			702
	Net loss			-			-			-			(380)			(380)
Balance, March 31, 2012				43,850,000			43,850			(40,850)			(2,678)			322
Reverse acqusition adjustment				27,950,000			27,950			(183,519)			-			(155,569)
Forgiveness of debt from former stockholders				-			-			54,602			-			54,602
Issuance of equity units for cash at $0.50 per unit on June 5, 2012				1,200,000			1,200			598,800			-			600,000
	Net loss												(464,510)			(464,510)
Balance, March 31, 2013				73,000,000			73,000			429,033			(467,188)			34,845
	Net loss			-			-			-			(53,993)			(53,993)
Balance, December 31, 2013				73,000,000		$	73,000		$	429,033		$	(521,181)		$	(19,148)
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

7

---

CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

				For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2013			For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012			For the Period from July 27, 2001 (inception) through December 31, 2013
				(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss				$	(53,993)		$	(384,593)		$	(521,181)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
		Depreciation expense			1,200			800			2,400
		Amortization expense			261			261			1,044
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Prepayments and other current assets			2,500			(6,750)			-
		Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			375			-			375
Net cash used in operating activities					(49,657)			(390,282)			(517,362)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
		Cash used in acquisition			-			(100,967)			(100,967)
		Purchases of property and equipment			-			(8,000)			(8,000)
		Patent application costs			-			-			(6,982)
Net cash used in investing activities					-			(108,967)			(115,949)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
		Amounts from (repayment to) stockholders			32,826			-			36,312
		Proceeds from sale of equity units			-			600,000			600,000
		Capital contribution			-			-			3,000
Net cash provided by financing activities					32,826			600,000			639,312
Net change in cash					(16,831)			100,751			6,001
Cash at beginning of the period					22,832			-			-
Cash at end of the period				$	6,001	-	$	100,751		$	6,001
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
		Interest paid		$	-		$	-		$	-
		Income tax paid		$	-		$	-		$	-
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

8

---

Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

December 31, 2013 and 2012

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc. (Formerly Sweetwater Resources, Inc.)

Sweetwater Resources, Inc. ("Sweetwater") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on July 24, 2007.

On July 9, 2012, Sweetwater amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name to Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc. (“Centaurus” or the “Company”).

Innovative Sales

Innovative Sales (“Innovative”) was incorporated on July 27, 2001 under the laws of the State of Nevada.  Innovative engages in the business of research and development of industrial grade cultured diamonds that are chemically, optically and physically the same as their natural counterparts.

Acquisition of Innovative Sales Treated as a Reverse Acquisition

On June 5, 2012 (the "Closing Date"), the Company closed an asset acquisition pursuant to the terms of the Asset Acquisition Agreement (the "Acquisition Agreement") by and between the Company and Innovative, whereby the Company acquired all of the assets of Innovative consisting of a cultured diamond technology patent and related intellectual property (the "Assets") in exchange for:  (a) 43,850,000 shares (the "Consideration Shares") of Centaurus's restricted common stock (the "Acquisition") (these shares were issued on June 7, 2012), (b) Centaurus's assumption of certain debt of Innovative in an amount not to exceed $100,000, (c) the satisfaction of all of Centaurus's debts and liabilities as of the Closing Date, and (d) Centaurus's simultaneous close on a private placement (the "Private Placement") of Centaurus's common stock and warrants to purchase shares of Centaurus's common stock for gross proceeds of at least $500,000, plus the amount necessary to pay any of Centaurus's remaining pre-closing debts, including, but not limited to, all legal and accounting costs associated with the preparation and filing of Centaurus's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.  The shares issued represented approximately 60.1% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Centaurus immediately after the consummation of the Acquisition Agreement.

As a result of the controlling financial interest of the former stockholder of Innovative, for financial statement reporting purposes, the merger between the Company and Innovative has been treated as a reverse acquisition with Innovative deemed the accounting acquirer and the Company deemed the accounting acquiree under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with section 805-10-55 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The reverse acquisition is deemed a capital transaction and the net assets of Innovative (the accounting acquirer) are carried forward to the Company (the legal acquirer and the reporting entity) at their carrying value before the acquisition.  The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of Innovative which are recorded at their historical cost.  The equity of the Company is the historical equity of Innovative retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares issued by the Company in the transaction.

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application.  Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

9

---

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for the interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented.  Unaudited consolidated interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the information filed as part of the Company’s Form 10-K, which was filed on July 15, 2013.

Fiscal Year End

The Company elected March 31st as its fiscal year ending date.

Development Stage Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification.  The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and still qualifies as a development stage company.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

10

---

Principles of Consolidation

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation.  The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.

The Company's consolidated subsidiary and/or entity is as follows:

Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation (date of acquisition, if applicable)		Attributable interest
Innovative Sales		The State of Nevada		July 27, 2001		100%

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company as of reporting period end dates and for the reporting periods then ended.

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.   These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

11

---

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepayments and other current assets, and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of the instrument.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, and patent, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes.  The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost.  Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.  Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of five (5) to seven (7) years.  Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Patent

The Company follows the guidelines as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for patent.  For acquired patents the Company records the costs to acquire patents as patent and amortizes the patent acquisition cost over its remaining legal life, or estimated useful life, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter. For internal developed patents, all costs incurred to the point when a patent application is to be filed are expended as incurred as research and development expense; patent application costs, generally legal costs, thereafter incurred are capitalized, which are to be amortized once the patents are granted or expended if the patent application is rejected. The Company amortizes the internal developed patents over the shorter of the expected useful lives or the legal lives of the patents, which are generally 17 to 20 years for domestic patents and 5 to 20 years for foreign patents from the date when the patents are granted. The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expended as incurred. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

12

---

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include:  a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company will derive its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of products upon commencing operations.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice, product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the trucking company or third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

13

---

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

·

Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

·

Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

·

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

·

Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.

14

---

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Income Tax Provision

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.

Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL.  Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.”  In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.  In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years.  The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.

15

---

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

The following table shows the number of potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:

		Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
		For Reporting Period Ended December 31, 2013		For Reporting Period Ended December 31, 2012
Warrant Shares
Warrants issued on June 5, 2012 to an institutional investor in connection with the Company’s June 5, 2012 equity financing with an exercise price of $0.75 per share expiring June 5, 2014		1,200,000		1,200,000
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares		1,200,000		1,200,000

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.

16

---

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date."  This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage at December 31, 2013, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to commence operations, further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations, further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

17

---

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

Depreciation Expense

The Company acquired property and equipment on June 27, 2012 and started to depreciate as of July 1, 2012. Depreciation expense was $1,200 and $800 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 5 – Patent

The Company started its U.S. patent application process on June 20, 2006 and obtained a U.S. patent (U.S. Patent No.: 007854823B2) on December 21, 2010.  Patent application costs of $6,982, primarily legal costs, incurred during the patent application process were capitalized and are being amortized over the expected useful life of 20 years as of January 1, 2011.

Amortization Expense

Amortization expense was $261 each for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 6 – Related Party Transactions

Related Parties

Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:

Related Parties		Relationship
Alvin Snaper		Chairman, CEO and majority stockholder of the Company

Advances from Chairman, CEO and Majority Stockholder

From time to time, Alvin Snaper advances funds to the Company for working capital purposes. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Operating Lease from Chairman and CEO

On June 5, 2012 the Company leased office spaces for its corporate office at 1000 W. Bonanza, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 Alvin Snaper, at $2,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, effective upon signing.

On June 5, 2013 the Company scaled back its operations due to lack of working capitals and terminated its month-to-month office lease effective June 3, 2013.

Note 7 – Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Company is authorized to issue is four hundred fifty million (450,000,000) shares with a par value of $0.001, all of which are designated as Common Stock.

Common Stock

Immediately prior to the consummation of the Acquisition Agreement on June 5, 2012, the Company had 113,525,000 common shares issued and outstanding.

Upon consummation of the Acquisition Agreement on June 5, 2012, the then majority stockholders of the Company surrendered 85,575,000 shares of the Company's common stock which was cancelled upon receipt and the Company issued 43,850,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Acquisition Agreement.

18

---

Sale of Common Stock or Equity Units

On June 5, 2012 the Company issued (i) 1,200,000 shares of its common stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 1,200,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share expiring two (2) years from the date of issuance. The units were sold at $0.50 per unit consisting one common share and the warrant to purchase one common share for an aggregate of $600,000, $475,200 and $124,800 of which were allocated as the relative fair value of the common stock and warrants, respectively.

Additional Paid-in Capital

Upon consummation of the Acquisition Agreement on June 5, 2012, the then majority stockholders of the Company assumed the accounts payable of $20,935.50, forgave their advances of $35,614.50, net of cash of $1,948 pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Acquisition Agreement, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Warrants

June 5, 2012 Issuances

On June 5, 2012, the Company issued (i) warrants to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an institutional investor with an exercise price of $0.75 per share expiring two (2) years from the date of issuance in connection with the sale of common shares.

The Company estimated the relative fair value of the warrants on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

				June 5, 2012
Expected life (year)				2
Expected volatility (*)				69.96%
Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends				0.00%
Risk-free rate(s)				0.68%

*

As a thinly traded stock it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price.  The Company selected all of the three (3) comparable public companies listed on NYSE MKT and NASDAQ Capital Market within the synthetic or cultured diamond manufacturing industry which the Company engages in to calculate the expected volatility.  The Company calculated those three (3) comparable companies’ historical volatility over the expected life of the options or warrants and averaged them as its expected volatility.

The aggregate relative fair value of the warrants issued in March 2012 using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model was $124,800 at the date of issuance.

19

---

Summary of the Company’s Warrants Activities

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrants activities:

		Number of Warrant Shares		Exercise Price Range Per Share			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Fair Value at Date of Issuance			Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance, March 31, 2012		-		$	-		$	-		$	124,800		$	-
Granted		1,200,000			0.75			0.75			-			-
Canceled		-			-			-			-			-
Exercised		-			-			-			-			-
Expired		-			-			-			124,800			-
Balance, March 31, 2013		1,200,000			0.75			0.75			-			-
Granted		-			-			-			-			-
Canceled		-			-			-			-			-
Exercised		-			-			-			-			-
Expired		-			-			-			124,800			-
Balance, December 31, 2013		1,200,000		$	0.75		$	0.75		$	124,800		$	-
Earned and exercisable, December 31, 2013		1,200,000		$	0.75		$	0.75		$	-		$	-
Unvested, December 31, 2013		-		$	-		$	-		$			$	-

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants at December 31, 2013:

Note 8 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported.  The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

20

---

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 24, 2007 and has a fiscal year end of March 31.  We are a development stage Company.  Implementing our planned business operation is dependent on our ability to raise approximately $3,000,000.

Going Concern

To date the Company has little operations and no revenues, and consequently has incurred recurring losses from operations.  No revenues are anticipated until we complete the implement our initial business plan, as described in this Form 10-Q.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on raising capital to fund our business plan and ultimately to attain profitable operations.  Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Our activities have been financed primarily from the proceeds of share subscriptions. We have raised a total of $600,000 from private offerings of our common stock, and have borrowed an additional $36,312 from a related-party stockholder.

The Company plans to raise additional funds through debt or equity offerings.  There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise any capital through this or any other offerings.  

PLAN OF OPERATION

To date we have not generated any revenue. The operations of Innovative have historically been funded by its founder and sole shareholder, Alvin A. Snaper, through advances from Mr. Snaper.  From time to time, Mr. Snaper has advanced funds to Innovative for working capital purposes.

Our current cash requirements are moderate and will be used for development, and we anticipate generating losses.  In order to execute on our business strategy, we will require additional working capital, commensurate with the operational needs of our planned marketing, development and production efforts.  We believe that our cash on hand and working capital will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next eight (8) months and we have no short term plans to raise additional funds.  We are currently focused on developing a prototype process for our technology.  As we proceed to commercialize our product, we may seek additional debt or equity financing to assist with manufacturing and distribution. There is no guarantee we will be successful in raising capital or obtaining loans in the future, or upon terms that are favorable or satisfactory to us, and any failure could have a material adverse effect on our business objectives and operations.

Since inception, Innovative has had on-going operations, including creating a strategic plan, identifying significant employees and management, drafting and filing a patent, negotiating terms with manufacturers and designers and developing a marketing plan.

Our current and future operations are and will be focused on researching and developing our technology for the manufacture of industrial grade cultured diamonds that are chemically, optically and physically the same as their natural counterparts, the integration of the intellectual property we have acquired through the Acquisition, and the continued evaluation of potential strategic acquisitions and/or partnerships.

Our first year after Closing will be dedicated to research and development, with the goal being the creation of a commercially viable production process derived from our proprietary technology.

We intend to lease the equipment and space necessary for us to conduct the next stage of research and development into our technologies.  We have begun negotiations with the owners of the required equipment and facilities but do not, at present, have any such lease agreements in place.  We anticipate that the cost of leasing the equipment and space necessary for our research and development efforts to cost approximately $130,000 over the next twelve months.

Provided our research and development activities are successful, we will thereafter seek to develop the equipment, protocols and systems for ongoing batch production of industrial cultured diamonds on a volume basis. Upon completion of the development phase, we anticipate we will need to relocate because we believe we will need approximately 10,000 square feet to house our employees and production machines.

   

21

---

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013 (unaudited) and 2012, and for the period from July 27, 2001 (inception) through March 31, 2013.

We have generated no revenues since inception and have incurred $521,181 in expenses from inception through December 31, 2013. 

For the three months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred $18,229 in operating expenses, comprised of $6,550 in consulting fees, $3,945 in professional fees, $1,117 in rent paid to a related party, $256 in research and development and $6,361 in general and administrative expenses.  By comparison, for the three months ended December 31, 2012, we incurred $160,222 in operating expenses, comprised of $27,863 in professional fees, $10,000 in rent, $62,000 in research and development, 17,113 in salary and wages paid to officers, and $43,246 in general and administrative expenses.

For the nine months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred $53,993 in operating expenses, comprised of $12,850 in consulting fees, $13,220 in professional fees, $6,117 in rent paid to a related party, $384 in research and development and $21,422 in general and administrative expenses.  By comparison, for the nine months ended December 31, 2012, we incurred $384,593 in operating expenses, comprised of $125,234 in professional fees, $17,500 of rent paid to a related party, $93,060 in research and development, $54,613 in salary and wages, and $94,186 in general and administrative expenses.  

Our net loss since inception (July 27, 2001) through December 31, 2013 was $521,181.

GOING CONCERN

Although we have recognized some nominal amount of revenues since inception, we are still devoting substantially all of our efforts on establishing the business and, therefore, still qualifies as a development stage company. From inception to December 31, 2013, the Company had accumulated losses of $521,181.  Our independent public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the accompanying financial statements regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent public accounting firm.  Our financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability or classification of asset-carrying amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2013, we had a cash balance of $6,001. Our expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $60,000, unless we raise $3,000,000 to fund our 12-month plan of operation.

We must raise approximately $3,000,000, to complete our plan of operation for the next 12 months.  Additionally, we anticipate spending an additional $60,000 on general and administration expenses and complying with reporting obligations, and general administrative costs.   Additional funding will likely come from equity financing from the sale of our common stock, if we are able to sell such stock. If we are successful in completing an equity financing, existing stockholders will experience dilution of their interest in our Company. We do not have any financing arranged and we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund our plan of operation. In the absence of such financing, our business will fail.

There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our business and our business will fail.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect our liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 3.

22

---

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer are responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.  Disclosure controls and procedures means that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, including any consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of December 31, 2013.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is not currently subject to any legal proceedings.  From time to time, the Company may become subject to litigation or proceedings in connection with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant.  There are no such pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 1A.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

None.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

23

---

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS.

(a)

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation SK

*

XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

(1)

Filed and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-151339), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 2008.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	(Name of Registrant)
Date:  March 5, 2014	By:	/s/ Alvin Snaper
		Name: Alvin Snaper
		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

24

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

*

XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

(1)

Filed and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-151339), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 2008.

25