Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - RJD Green, Inc.rjdgreen10k13ex32.htm
EX-31 - EXHIBIT 31 - RJD Green, Inc.rjdgreen10k13ex31.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549


FORM 10-K


[X]  15, ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: August 31, 2013


 OR


[ ]  15, TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from     to


Commission file number: 000-27251


RJD Green, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant in its charter)


Nevada

 

27-1065441

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification)


4142 South Harvard Avenue, Suite D3, Tulsa Oklahoma 74135

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)


Registrant's Telephone number, including area code:  (918) 551-7883



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  Common Stock, $.001 par value


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [x]


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act

Yes [  ] No [x]




1



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.406 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [X] No [ ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that Dale the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the part 90 days.

Yes [x] No[  ]


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained hereof, and will not be contained, to will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [  ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  


Large accelerated filer   [  ]

 

Accelerated filer                     [  ]

Non-accelerated filer     [  ]

 

Smaller Reporting Company  [x]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [x]


State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The market value of the registrant’s voting $.001 par value common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $5,285.


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's only class of common stock, as of December 16, 2013 was 425,500,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock.


No documents are incorporated into the text by reference.




2




RJD Green, Inc.

Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2013

Table of Contents


 

 

Page

Part I

 

 

Item 1.  Business

 

4

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

6

Item 1B.  Unresolved staff comments

 

6

Item 2.  Properties

 

6

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

 

6

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

 

6

 

 

 

Part II

 

 

Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

7

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

 

7

Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

8

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

9

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

10

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

22

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

 

22

Item 9B.  Other Information

 

24

 

 

 

Part III

 

 

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

25

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

 

28

Item 12.  Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

29

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

30

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

30

 

 

 

Part IV

 

 

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

31

Signatures

 

33




3




PART I


ITEM 1.   BUSINESS


Overview


RJD Green, Inc., a Nevada company, is a development stage company incorporated in the State of Nevada in September 2009. We were formed to engage in the business of marketing and promoting green technologies, services, appliances, building materials and other green products suitable for residential buildings through our online website, (www.rjdgreen.com.). In April 2010, we commenced our planned principal operations, and therefore have no significant assets. As of August 31, 2013, we developed our business plan and secured a developer for the initial website design and have launched a preliminary site focused on green building materials and green technologies for the edification of builders, consumers, architects, and other residential building professionals. We intend to generate revenues from advertising. We need to build out our website in greater detail to focus on specific local markets. Additionally, we need to complete a database and search function on our site to highlight specific cities and states that have high concentrations of those consumers seeking green technology, appliances and building supplies for their homes.


Competition


We will compete against a variety of websites offering similar content. Barriers to entry on the Internet are relatively low; however, most other websites do not currently offer our proposed unique blend of product provider listings, green products and services and relevant content offerings. We anticipate facing significant competition in the future from new websites that offer the same emphasis on environmentally responsible building and services and existing websites that introduce competing services. We currently do not have a developed website nor are we generating any revenues, thus we do not effectively compete with those sites that may someday be our competition. We also lack financial resources that limit our ability to compete against other websites offering similar content.


Advertising Media


Our product and service listing services, when available, will compete against a number of websites that offer both information and product information featuring suppliers and sellers. We will also be competing with traditional media companies such as newspapers (print magazines specializing in environmentally responsible lifestyles.).




4



Products and Services


Our proposed green technology e-commerce service offerings will, upon completion, compete against a verity of Internet and offline green technology companies. There are a number of websites that offer green technology products and services, some of which have substantial green product listings and shopping information. We will also face competition indirectly from traditional offline stores that offer green products and services similar to those proposed to be on our website.


Content Offerings


Our content offerings will compete with both Internet and offline content providers. There are a number of websites that provide content related to environmentally responsible living. In addition, print content providers such as magazines, books and newspapers also provide similar content.


We believe that the principal competitive factors in attracting vendors, suppliers, and advertisers should include:


a large volume of website consumer traffic;

an awareness of brand and brand loyalty;

the demographics of environmentally responsible consumers; and

the cost effectiveness of advertising on a website, including the ability to target advertising to specific audiences.


We believe that the principal competitive factors in attracting consumers to our website are:


breadth and depth of green building product provider listings;

brand awareness and loyalty;

ease of use;

website functionality, responsiveness and information;

a positive browsing experience for the consumer; and

quality of content, other service offerings and customer service.


Employees


We are a development stage company and currently have no paid employees at this time. We plan to use consultants, attorneys, accountants, and contract services, as necessary and do not plan to engage any additional full-time employees in the near future. We believe the use of non-salaried personnel allows us to expend our capital resources as a variable cost as opposed to a fixed cost of operations. In other words, if we have insufficient revenues or cash available, we are in a better position to only utilize those services required to generate revenues as opposed to having salaried employees.




5



Our Officers and Directors are spending the time allocated to our business in handling the general business affairs of our company such as accounting issues, including review of materials presented to our auditors, working with our counsel in preparation of filing our S-1 registration statement, and developing our business plan and overseeing merger and acquisition exploratory efforts.


ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS


Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.



ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


Not applicable.



ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES


We currently maintain an office at 4142 South Harvard Avenue Tulsa OK. We have no monthly rent, nor do we accrue any expense for monthly rent. Ron Brewer, our Chief Operating Officer and Director, provides us a facility in which we conduct business on our behalf. We do not believe that we will need to obtain additional office space at any time in the foreseeable future, approximately 12 months, until our business plan is more fully implemented.


In the future we anticipate requiring additional office space and additional personnel; however, it is unknown at this time how much space or how many individuals will be required.


ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.


There is no litigation pending or threatened by or against RJD Green, Inc.


ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.


Not applicable




6



PART II


ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


    Item 5(a)


a)  Market Information.  Since inception, the registrant has had minimal trading on the OTC BB under the symbol RJDG.  There can be no assurance that a trading market will ever develop or, if such a market does develop, that it will continue.


b)  Holders.  At December 16, 2013, there were approximately 1,068 shareholders of the registrant.


c)  Dividends.  Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors.  No dividends on our common stock have ever been paid, and we do not anticipate that dividends will be paid on our common stock in the foreseeable future.


d)  Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.  No securities are authorized for issuance by the registrant under equity compensation plans.


e)  Performance graph.  Not applicable.


f)  Sale of unregistered securities.  


Not applicable


    Item 5(b)  Use of Proceeds.  Not applicable.


    Item 5(c)  Purchases of Equity Securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.  


During 2013 and 2012 we purchased no shares of our common stock.


ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.





7



ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Trends and Uncertainties


There are no other known trends, events or uncertainties that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material impact on our short term or long term liquidity.  Sources of liquidity will come from the sale of our products and services.  There are no material commitments for capital expenditure at this time.  There are no trends, events or uncertainties that have had or are reasonably expected to have a material impact on the net sales or revenues or income from continuing operations.  There are no significant elements of income or loss that do not arise from the registrant’s continuing operations.  There are no other known causes for any material changes from period to period in one or more line items of our financial statements.  


Results of Operations


For the year ended August 31, 2013, we received revenues of $1,115.  We paid $6,863 for professional services, $975 in organizational fees, $17,145 in legal and audit, $500 in filing fees, and $180 in bank fees.  As a result, we had net loss of $24,548 for the year ended August 31, 2013.


In comparison, for the year ended August 31, 2012, we did not receive any revenues.  We had professional services fees of $7,890, $900 in organizational fees, $147 in legal and audit, $114 in filing fees, and bank fees of $128.  As a result, we had net loss of $9,179 for the year ended August 31, 2012.


The 167% increase in net loss for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 compared to the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 were caused primarily by the increase in legal and audit services during this period.  These expenses were accrued as a result of the reporting requirements for a public company.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


For the period from September 10, 2009 (inception) through August 31, 2013, we did not pursue any investing activities.


For the year ended August 31, 2013, we received $5,000 from a related party borrowing.  As a result, we had net cash provided by financing activities of $5,000 for the year ended August 31, 2013.


For the year ended August 31, 2012, we received $10,467 from related party borrowing.  As a result, we had net cash provided by financing activities of $10,467 for the year ended August 31, 2012.




8



On January 20, 2013, the registrant commenced operations as a consultant and website raising awareness of green and efficient building materials and concepts. Currently, their website is live and operational. Furthermore, the registrant has generated revenues from its consulting services to contractors and builders. We currently only have cash assets of $50. Therefore, the cash currently available to us may not enable us to continue to market the site to the state in which it will optimally be able to generate material revenues. If we are to generate material revenues prior to needing any additional funding, we will immediately reinvest such revenues into further development our site and deployment of our business plan. We believe that the cash we have available will sustain us for approximately three (3) more months so long as we continuing operating in the manner that we are currently operating.


Plan of Operation.  


The registrant may experience problems, delays, expenses and difficulties, many of which are beyond the registrant’s control.  These include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates and competition.


Critical Accounting Policies


The following accounting policies are considered critical by our management.  These and other accounting policies require that estimates be made based on assumptions and judgment, which affect revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingencies in our financial statements.  These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  However, actual results may differ from these estimates under different and/or future circumstances.


Revenue Recognition


In general, we record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the student is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.  The following policies reflect specific criteria for the various revenue streams of the registrant:


Revenue is recognized at the time the product is delivered or the service is performed.


Recent Pronouncements


We do not believe any recently issued accounting standards will have a material impact on our financial statements.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable



9



ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


RJD Green, Inc.

Index to the Financial Statements


 

 

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

11

 

 

 

Balance Sheets at August 31, 2013 and 2012

 

12

 

 

 

Statements of Operations for the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012 and cumulative from September 10, 2009 (inception) to August 31, 2013

 

13

 

 

 

Statements of Change in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) from September 10, 2009 (inception) through August 31, 2013

 

14

 

 

 

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, and cumulative from September 10, 2009 (inception) to August 31, 2013

 

15

 

 

 

Notes to Financial Statements

 

16




10



[rjdgreen10k13v2001.jpg]CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors

RJD Green Inc. (a development stage company)

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of RJD Green Inc. (the "Company") as of August 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years then ended and for the period from September 10, 2009 (Inception) through August 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of August 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended and for the period from September 10, 2009 (Inception) through August 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and income since inception. These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2, which includes the raising of additional equity financing or merger with another entity. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ Anton & Chia LLP

 

Newport Beach, CA

 

December 16, 2013



11




RJD Green, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

 

 

 

August 31, 2013

 

August 31, 2012

Assets

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash

$

50

$

2,754

Total Assets

$

50

$

2,754

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit):

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Due to Related Party

$

-

$

20,980

Total Liabilities

 

-

 

20,980

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit):

 

 

 

 

Common Stock, 750,000,000 and 500,000,000 shares authorized (par value $.001) as of August 31,2013 and 2012, respectively; 425,500,000 and 75,500,000 shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (1)

 

4,255

 

755

Additional Paid in capital

 

59,844

 

20,520

Discount on Common Stock

 

(275)

 

(275)

Accumulated Deficit

 

(63,774)

 

(39,226)

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

50

 

(18,226)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity

$

50

$

2,754

 

 

 

 

 

(1)All common share amounts and per share amounts in these financial statements reflect the fifty-for-one and two-for-one stock splits of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, effective November 30, 2012 and March 21, 2013 respectively, including retroactive adjustment of common share amounts. See Note 4.

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements





12




RJD Green, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

 

 

 

For the Year Ended August 31, 2013

 

For the Year Ended August 31, 2012

 

Cumulative from September 10, 2009 (the date of inception) to August 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

$

1,115

$

-

$

1,115

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Organization Fees

 

975

 

900

 

4,482

Filing Fees

 

500

 

114

 

923

Legal and Audit

 

17,145

 

147

 

23,427

Professional Services

 

6,863

 

7,890

 

35,539

Bank Fees

 

180

 

128

 

518

Total Operating Expenses

 

25,663

 

9,179

 

64,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss before Income Taxes

 

(24,548)

 

(9,179)

 

(63,774)

Provision for Income Taxes

 

-

 

-

 

-

Net Loss

$

(24,548)

$

(9,179)

$

(63,774)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss per Share (basic and dilutive)

$

0.00

$

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares (basic and diluted)(2)

 

212,827,397

 

37,750,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2) All common share amounts and per share amounts in these financial statements reflect the fifty-for-one and two-for-one stock splits of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, effective November 30, 2012 and March 21, 2013, respectively, including retroactive adjustment of common share amounts. See Note 4.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




13



RJD Green Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

Common Stock

Additional Paid-in

Discount on Common

Deficit Accumulated During the Development

Total Stockholders' Equity

 

Shares

Amount

Capital

Stock

Stage

(Deficit)

Pre-Inception Balance

-

$     -

$               -

$             -

$                    -

$                   -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock Issued for Cash $0.0001 per share, Oct 2009 (3)

20,000,000

200

1,800

-

-

2,000

Common Stock issued to founder, April 2010 (3)

27,500,000

275

-

(275)

-

-

Common Stock Issued for Cash $0.0001 per share, May 2010 (3)

10,000,000

100

900

-

-

1,000

Common Stock Issued for Cash $0.001 per share, August 2010 (3)

13,000,000

130

12,870

-

-

13,000

Net Loss

-

-

-

-

(7,742)

(7,742)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of August 31, 2010

70,500,000

$705

$15,570

$(275)

$(7,742)

$8,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for Cash $0.001 per share, Sept. 2010 (3)

5,000,000

50

4,950

-

-

5,000

Let Loss

-

-

-

-

(22,305)

(22,305)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of August 31, 2011 (3)

75,500,000

$755

$20,520

$(275)

$(30,047)

$(9,047)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

-

-

-

-

(9,179)

(9,179)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of August 31, 2012 (3)

75,500,000

$755

$20,520

$(275)

$(39,226)

$(18,226)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of $25,980 of debt to 175,000,000 shares of restricted stock on March 18, 2013 (3)

350,000,000

3,500

22,480

-

-

25,980

Additional paid-in capital contributed May 3, 2013

-

-

13,325

-

-

13,325

Additional paid-in capital contributed August 15, 2013

-

-

3,519

-

-

3,519

Net loss for the twelve month period ended August 31, 2013

-

-

-

-

(24,548)

(24,548)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of August 31, 2013 (3)

425,500,000

$4,255

$59,844

$(275)

$(63,774)

$50


(3) Retroactively adjusted to reflect the 50-for-1 stock split effective November 30, 2012 and the 2-for-1 stock split effective March 21, 2013.  See Note 4.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



14



RJD GREEN INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

For the Twelve Months Ending August 31, 2013

 

For the Twelve Months Ending August 31, 2012

 

Cumulative since September 10, 2009 (inception) to August 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

$

 (24,548)

$

 (9,179)

$

 (63,774)

Shareholders’ contribution for organizational expenses

 

 16,844

 

  -

 

16,844

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operations

 

(7,704)

 

(9,179)

 

(46,930)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Common Stock

 

-

 

  -

 

21,000

Borrowing from a related party

 

5,000

 

 10,467

 

25,980

Net cash provided by  financing activities  

 

5,000

 

  10,467

 

 46,980

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease)in cash

 

  (2,704)

 

 1,288

 

 50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash at the Beginning of the Period:

 

2,754

 

 1,466

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash at the End of the Period

$

 50

$

 2,754

$

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH TRANSACTION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of debt to common shares

$

25,980

$

-

$

25,980


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements




15



RJD GREEN INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

Notes to the Financial Statements


NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


RJD Green Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 10, 2009 and has been inactive since inception. The Company intends to develop an Internet based e-commerce venture.


On May 21, 2013, the registrant entered into a definitive agreement with the shareholders of Silex Holdings, Inc. Pursuant to the agreement, the registrant will purchase all of the outstanding securities of Silex Holdings, Inc. in exchange for 375,390,000 common shares of the registrant. The registrant anticipates that the acquisition will be completed in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014. Silex Holdings, Inc. shall be a wholly owned subsidiary of the registrant. Completion date of the acquisition was at the request of Silex Holdings Inc. as they desired to complete their fiscal year December 31, 2013, and for RJD to complete its pending Form S-1 amended filing.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


BASIS OF PRESENTATION – DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

The Company has earned minimal revenue from operations since inception. Accordingly, the activities have been accounted for as those of a “Development Stage Enterprise” as set forth in ASC 915, “Development Stage Entities.” Among the disclosures required by ASC 915, are that the Company’s financial statements be identified as those of a development stage company, and that the statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company’s inception.


GOING CONCERN


The Company sustained operating losses an accumulated of $63,774 as of August 31, 2013. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations and/or obtain additional financing, as may be required.


USE OF ESTIMATE


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.




16



REVENUE RECOGNITION


The Company’s revenue recognition policy complies with the requirements of ASC 605. Revenue is recognized when i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, ii) delivery has occurred, iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, iv) collection is probable and v) obligations have been substantially performed pursuant to the terms of the arrangement.


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and on deposit at banking institutions as well as all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. The Company did not have cash equivalents as of August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.


FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS


The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10, (formerly SFAS No.157), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" for financial assets and liabilities. FASB ASC 820-10 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available.


Level 1:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2:  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities.


Level 3:  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.


RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS – Not Adopted


In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is



17



effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 will have on our financial statements.


IMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS


The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.


INCOME TAXES


Under ASC 740, "Income Taxes", deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.


LOSS PER COMMON SHARE


Basic loss per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the loss of the entity. As of August 31, 2013 and 2012, there are no outstanding dilutive securities.


NOTE 3 DUE TO RELATED PARTIES AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


The Company received funds from related parties from inception to August 31, 2013 of $25,980 and the amount due does not bear interest and is due on demand. These funds were retired March 18, 2013 by the conversion of debt payable for issuance of 175,000,000 shares (pre – split) of common stock. The issuance resulted in a change of control of the Company.


The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer of the corporation provides office space without charge to the Company.




18



NOTE 4 COMMON STOCK


The Company is currently issuing only one class of common stock, and this has been issued at two different prices since inception. The Company is authorized to issue 750,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.001.


In October 2009, the Company issued 20,000,000 common shares at $0.0001 per share for $2,000 in cash, resulting in additional paid-in capital of $1,800.


In April, 2010, the Company issued 27,500,000 common shares to the owner at a discount of $275 as founder’s shares.


In May 2010, the Company issued 10,000,000 common shares at $0.0001 per share for $1,000 in cash, resulting in additional paid-in capital of $900.


In August, 2010, the Company issued 13,000,000 common shares at $0.001 per share for $13,000 in cash, resulting in additional paid-in capital of $12,870.


In September 2010, the Company issued 5,000,000 common shares at $0.001 per share for $5,000 in cash, resulting in additional paid-in capital of $4,950.


On November 30, 2012, the Company effectuated a fifty to one forward stock split.


On March 18, 2013, the Company issued 350,000,000 common shares to Zahoor Ahmad, for the conversion of debt payable to a related party of $25,980. The issuance resulted in a change of control of the Company


As of March 21, 2013, the Company increased the authorized common shares from 500,000,000 to 750,000,000 common shares.  On March 31, 2013, the Company effectuated a 2 to 1 forward split increasing the outstanding shares of the Company to 425,500,000 common shares.


As of August 31, 2013, the Company had 425,500,000 common shares issued and outstanding. There were 350,000,000 common shares issued during the twelve months ended August 31, 2013.


All shares presented in these financial statements and accompanying footnotes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the increased number of shares resulting from the two forward stock splits effective on November 30, 2012 and March 21, 2013.




19



NOTE 5 INCOME TAXES


The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate and the benefit for income taxes were as follow:


 

August 31, 2013

August 31, 2012

Benefit computed at federal statutory rate

34.00%

34.00%

State tax, net of federal tax benefit

0.00%

0.00%

Valuation allowance

(34.00%)

(34.00%)

Effective income tax rate

0.00%

0.00%


Deferred tax assets resulting from the net operating losses are reduced by a valuation allowance, when, in the opinion of management, utilization is not reasonably assured. The following summarizes the deferred tax assets as of August 31, 2013 and August 31, 2012:


 

August 31, 2013

August 31, 2012

Deferred tax asset - NOL

$  33,727

$  9,179

Less valuation allowance

(33,727)

(9,179)

Net deferred tax asset

$          0

$         0


Due to a potential change in ownership under IRC 382, the amount of net operating loss that the Company may utilize in a future year may be limited under IRC Section 382.


The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and adjusts the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent the future realization of the deferred tax assets is not judged to be more likely than not.


The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income or loss, the carry-forward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.


At August 31, 2013, based on the weight of available evidence, including cumulative losses in recent years and expectations of future taxable income, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would not be realized.  Accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance equivalent to 100% of its cumulative deferred tax assets.




20



As a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740 the Company performed an analysis of its previous tax filings and determined that there were no positions taken that it considered materially uncertain. Therefore, there was no provision for uncertain tax positions for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 and for the year ended August 31, 2012. Future changes in uncertain tax positions are not expected to have an impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance.



21




ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None


ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Controls and Procedures.


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:


We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act that are designed to insure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or the persons performing similar functions, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, or the persons performing similar functions, our management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO, or the persons performing similar functions, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of August 31, 2013.


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is the process designed by and under the supervision of our CEO and CFO, or the persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies.




22



Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, or the persons performing similar functions, our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2013, and concluded that it is ineffective.


In connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2013, due to resource constraints, material weaknesses became evident to management regarding our inability to generate all the necessary disclosure for inclusion in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  A material weakness is a significant deficiency in one or more of the internal control components that alone or in the aggregate precludes our internal controls from reducing to an appropriately low level the risk that material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.


We are working with our auditors to ensure that we complete our financial reporting in a timely fashion.  Although we believe that this corrective step will enable management to conclude that the internal controls over our financial reporting are effective, we cannot assure you that these steps will be sufficient.  We may be required to expend additional resources to expend additional resource to identify, assess and correct any additional weaknesses in internal control.


This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the registrant’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the registrant to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


Evaluation of Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:


Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, or those persons performing similar functions, our management has evaluated changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2012.  Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO, or those persons performing similar functions, did not identify any change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Important Considerations:


The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and the



23



risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.


ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION


None




24




PART III


ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

 

Board of Directors.  


The members of our Board of Directors serve, without compensation, until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected.  The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.  Information as to the director and executive officer is as follows:


NAME

AGE

POSITIONS HELD

TERM OF OFFICE

Rex Washburn

64

Chief Executive Officer

June 2013 to present

Mike LaLond

63

Chief Financial Officer

June 2013 to present

Ron Brewer

63

Chief Operating Officer

June 2013 to present

Zahoor Ahmad

42

Director

April 2013 to present

Jerry Niblett

49

Director

June 2013 to present

Eric English

42

Director

June 2013 to present


Resumes:


Rex Washburn:

Rex Washburn, Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors member - Rex offers 23 years of senior management experience with 17 of those years as Chief Executive Officer of both publicly held and private companies.  Mr. Washburn is recognized as a corporate structural and ‘turnaround’ specialist, and has in-depth experience in international franchising and franchise development. Since 2005 Mr. Washburn has served as President and Principal of Franchise Systems Support LLC. Rex received a BBA in finance from Regis University in 1987 and studied for MS in Economics at the University of Edinburg from 1988 - 1990. Rex served in Special Operations for the US Army in military service from 1968 - 1972.


Mike La Lond:

Mike La Lond, Chief Financial Officer, has worked as both CFO and as a consultant.  From June 2007 through October 2008, Mr. La Lond was the Vice President and CFO of Lean Gourmet.  From January 2009 through June 2010, he worked as a consultant to the Southbridge Advisory Group.  From June 2010 through December 2010, he was the CFO of US Highland, a recreational powersports company.  Since January 2011, Mr. La Lond has been the president of La Lond Consulting.  Mr. La Lond Received a B.S. and a B.A. from Quincy College in 1970, an M.S. from Illinois State University in 1974, and a Ph.D. from Illinois State University in 1976.




25



Ron Brewer:

Since 2001, Ron Brewer, Chief Operating Officer and Board of Directors member, has been the Managing Director of the Southbridge Advisory Group, an Oklahoma based management services firm focused on merger and acquisition advisory, capital procurement, and management consulting services.  Mr. Brewer studied at the University of Arkansas and the University of Tulsa between 1969 and 1973.

 

Zahoor Ahmad:

Mr. Ahmad, age 42, has worked in the fields of personnel management, real estate sales, and small business management for the past 10 years.  From 2002 through 2010, he worked as a certified field trainer for Orkin, an extermination company.  Since 2010, he has worked as a Sales Representative with Remax Performance Realty Inc., a real estate brokerage.   Mr. Ahmad attended Garden College in Lahore Pakistan from 1986 through 1988.  He received a M.Sc. in Plant Pathology in 1993.  Mr. Ahmad does not have any family relationships with anyone within the registrant, nor any transactions with related persons.


Jerry Niblett:

Jerry Niblett, Board of Directors Member, has held leadership positions in several green energy companies.  Since 2007, he has been a regional manager of Sonoco Logistics Pipeline LP, where he monitors, analyzes, and oversees the operational activities for over 2,000 miles of active transmission and gathering pipelines.  Since 2009, he has been the president of Green Mountain Resources Corp., a small cap privately held energy company.  Since 2010, he has been a managing member of Green Mountain Resources LLC, a subsidiary of Green Mountain Resources Corp, where he is responsible for market strategy, technology development, corporate profitability and accountability to shareholders.  Since 2011, he has been a managing member of Rangeland Energy LLC, another small cap privately held energy company.  Mr. Niblett received a B.S. in Total Quality Management from Friends University in Wichita, KS in 1996.


Eric English:

Eric English, Board of Directors Member, has been a board member of Silex Holdings Inc. since June 2012.  Since February 2006 until March 2013, he served as president of Silex Interiors, an emerging growth company that imports semi-finished building materials at a low cost for delivery to end users.  Mr. English studied at Tulsa Community College in 1988 and 1989.


There are no material plans, contracts, or arrangements to which the officers or directors are a party or in which they participate that is entered into or material amendment in connection with the triggering event or any grant or award to them under any such plan, contract, or arrangement in connection with any such event.




26



Committees of the Board of Directors

We do not have standing audit, nominating or compensation committees, or committees performing similar functions. Our board of directors believes that it is not necessary to have standing audit, nominating or compensation committees at this time because the functions of such committees are adequately performed by our board of directors.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance


Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an officer, director, or greater-than-10% shareholder of the registrant must file a Form 4 reporting the acquisition or disposition of registrant's equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than the end of the second business day after the day the transaction occurred unless certain exceptions apply.  Transactions not reported on Form 4 must be reported on Form 5 within 45 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year.  Such persons must also file initial reports of ownership on Form 3 upon becoming an officer, director, or greater-than-10% shareholder.  To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of these reports furnished to it, the officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during 2013.


Code of Ethics Policy


We have not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions.


Corporate Governance


There have been no changes in any state law or other procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.  In addition to having no nominating committee for this purpose, we currently have no specific audit committee and no audit committee financial expert.  Based on the fact that our current business affairs are simple, any such committees are excessive and beyond the scope of our business and needs.


Indemnification


The registrant shall indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by, and in the manner permissible under the laws of the State of Nevada, any person made, or threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding, whether criminal, civil, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director or officer of the registrant, or served any other enterprise as director, officer or employee at the request of the registrant.  The board of directors, in its discretion, shall have the power on behalf of the



27



registrant to indemnify any person, other than a director or officer, made a party to any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that he/she is or was an employee of the registrant.  


Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.  In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceedings) is asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in connection with any securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issues.


INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS OR PERSONS CONTROLLING THE REGISTRANT FOR LIABILITIES ARISING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, IS HELD TO BE AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS THEREFORE UNENFORCEABLE.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The following table set forth certain information as to the compensation paid to our former sole executive officer and director, Robert Kepe, from inception (September 15, 2009) to May 31, 2012.


Summary Compensation Table


Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary ($)

Stock Awards ($)

Option Awards ($)

All Other Compensation ($)

Total ($)

Robert Kepe

2012

-

-

-

-

-

President, Secretary

2011

-

-

-

-

-

Treasurer

2010

-

-

-

27,500

27,500


Mr. Kepe has not received any monetary compensation or salary since the inception of the Company. Mr. Kepe has agreed to not receive any compensation or enter into any employment agreements until the Company begins operations. He has received 275,000 shares of restricted stock in exchange for his services in 2010.


Mr. Zahoor Ahmad was appointed an officer on April 5, 2013 and has not received any monetary compensation or salary since his appointment.




28



Mr. Rex Washburn, Mr. Mike LaLond, and Mr. Ron Brewer were appointed as officers in June 2013, and have not yet received any monetary compensation or salary since their appointment.


Directors’ Compensation

 

Directors are not entitled to receive compensation for services rendered to RJD Green, or for each meeting attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. There are no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate directors for services provided as a director.


ITEM 12.  SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS


The following tabulates holdings of shares of the registrant by each person who, subject to the above, holds of record or is known by management to own beneficially more than 5.0% of the common shares and, in addition, by all directors and officers of the registrant individually and as a group.  Each named beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite his name.


Shareholdings at December 16, 2013


Name of Beneficial Owner (1)

Number of Shares

Percentage Owned (2)

Rex Washburn

0

0.00%

Mike LaLond

0

0.00%

Ron Brewer

0

0.00%

Zahoor Ahmad

387,500,000

91.07%

Jerry Niblett

0

0.00%

Eric English

0

0.00%

All Directors, Officers, and Principal Stockholders as a Group

387,500,000

91.07%


1)

The address of each shareholder is care of RJD Green, Inc., 4142 South Harvard Avenue, Suite D3, Tulsa OK 74135 unless otherwise stated.

2)

Based on 425,500,000 shares outstanding as of December 16, 2013.





29



ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.


The registrant received funds from related parties from inception to August 31, 2013 of $25,980 and the amount due does not bear interest and is due on demand. These funds were retired March 18, 2013 by the conversion of debt payable for issuance of 175,000,000 shares (pre – split) of common stock. The issuance resulted in a change of control of the registrant.


The registrant neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer of the corporation provides office space without charge to the registrant.


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.


Audit Fees.  We paid aggregate fees and expenses of approximately $5,300 and $4,200, respectively, to Anton and Chia LLP during 2013 and 2012, respectively, for work completed for our annual audits and quarterly reviews of our financial statements.  


Tax Fees. We did not incur any aggregate tax fees and expenses from Anton and Chia LLP for the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.


All Other Fees. We did not incur any other fees from Anton and Chia LLP during 2013 and 2012.


The board of directors, acting as the Audit Committee considered whether, and determined that, the auditor's provision of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining the auditor's independence.  All of the services described above for the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012 were approved by the board of directors pursuant to its policies and procedures.




30



Part IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a)(1)  List of Financial statements included in Part II hereof


Balance Sheets, August 31, 2013 and 2012

Statements of Operations for the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, and cumulative from September 10, 2009 (inception) to August 31, 2013

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) from September 10, 2009 (inception) through August 31, 2013

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, and cumulative from September 10, 2009 (inception) to August 31, 2013

Notes to the Financial Statements


(a)(2) List of Financial Statement schedules included in Part IV hereof:  None.

(a)(3) Exhibits


The following exhibits are included herewith:


Exhibit No.

      Description

31

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS*

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


*XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.


Following are a list of exhibits which we previously filed in other reports which we filed with the SEC, including the Exhibit No., description of the exhibit and the identity of the Report where the exhibit was filed.



31




NO.

DESCRIPTION

FILED WITH

DATE FILED

1.1

Subscription Agreement

Form S-1

November 3, 2010

3.1

Articles of Incorporation and Amendment

Form S-1

November 3, 2010

3.2

By-Laws

Form S-1

November 3, 2010

10.1

Loan Agreement with Robert Kepe

Form S-1

November 3, 2010

10.1

Stock Purchase Agreement between RJD Green and Silex Holdings, Inc.

Form 8-K

May 22, 2013




32





SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


RJD Green, Inc.


/s/ Rex Washburn

By: Rex Washburn

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  December 16, 2013


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


SIGNATURE

TITLE

DATE

/s/Rex Washburn

Rex Washburn

Chief Executive Officer

December 16, 2013


/s/Mike LaLond

Mike LaLond

Chief Financial Officer, Controller

December 16, 2013


/s/Ron Brewer

Ron Brewer

Chief Operating Officer

December 16, 2013


/s/Zahoor Ahmad

Zahoor Ahmad

Director

December 16, 2013


/s/Jerry Niblett

Jerry Niblett

Director

December 16, 2013


/s/Eric English

Eric English

Director

December 16, 2013





33