Bonanza Goldfield Corp. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - Bonanza Goldfield Corp.	bonz_ex311.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - Bonanza Goldfield Corp.	bonz_ex312.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIIFICATION - Bonanza Goldfield Corp.	bonz_ex321.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - Bonanza Goldfield Corp.	bonz_ex322.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Bonanza Goldfield Corp.	Financial_Report.xls

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

____________________

FORM 10-Q

____________________

(Mark One)

þ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act

For the transition period from N/A through N/A

____________________

Commission File No. 000-53612

____________________

Bonanza Goldfields Corp.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	26-2723015
State of Incorporation	IRS Employer Identification No.

736 East Braeburn Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85022

(Address of principal executive offices)

(928) 251-4044

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non–accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer large accelerated filer” and “Smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non–Accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding November 3, 2013
Common stock, $0.0001 par value		411,982,943

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FILING

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Balance Sheets	4
	Statements of Operations	5
	Statement of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	22
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	22

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	24
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	29
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	29
Item 5.	Other information	29
Item 6.	Exhibits	30

CERTIFICATIONS

Exhibit 31 – Management certification

Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Interim Financial Statements and Notes to Interim Financial Statements

General

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's latest Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements that would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year as reported in the Form 10-K have been omitted.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORPORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	September 30,			June 30,
	2013			2013
ASSETS:
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	24,448		$	8,557
Interest receivable		-			43,770
Total current assets		24,448			52,327

Property and equipment, net		-			123,938
Deposit		-			300
Investment in Gunner Gold LLC		39,603			-
Mining claims		250,000			560,568
TOTAL ASSETS	$	314,051		$	737,133

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	134,682		$	199,181
Accrued interest		84,147			71,218
Lease obligation, current portion		-			205,720
Disputed payable		263,950			263,950
Common stock payable		432,500			432,500
Deferred liabilities		60,000			60,000
Convertible note payable		-			323,926
Notes payable		594,699			594,699
Total current liabilites		1,569,978			2,151,194

Long-term lease obligation		-			54,848
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,569,978			2,206,042

CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS

COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO RESCISSION		985,100			985,100

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:

Series A Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 325,982,943 and 290,485,137 issued and outstanding, respectively		32,598			29,048
Additional paid-in capital		5,585,225			5,547,988
Deficit accumulated during exploration stage		(7,858,850	)		(8,031,045	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(2,241,027	)		(2,454,009	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	314,051		$	737,133

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORPORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Period from March 6, 2008
	September 30,						(inception) through
	2013			2012			September 30, 2013

REVENUE	$	-		$	-		$	619

OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative		78,545			439,841			3,363,907
Exploration expense		6,818			20,684			463,205
Impairment of mining claims		-			-			714,700
Impairment of other assets		-			-			32,122
Total operating expenses		85,363			460,525			4,573,934

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES:
Other income		(2,500	)					(2,500	)
Interest expense		158,059			23,942			3,516,868
Loss on settlement of litigation		-			-			29,500
Loss on settlement of accounts payable		-			-			33,014
Loss on debt conversion		-			-			121,770
Gain on settlement of note payable to Tonaquint		(106,999	)		-			(106,999	)
Gain on sale of assets to Gunner Gold LLC		(306,118	)		-			(306,118	)
Total other (income) expenses		(257,558	)		23,942			3,285,535

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	172,195		$	(484,467	)	$	(7,858,850	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.00	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		393,799,953			320,980,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORPORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)



							For the Period
	For the Three Months Ended						from March 6, 2008
	September 30,						(inception) through
	2013			2012			September 30, 2013

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	172,195		$	(484,467	)	$	(7,858,850	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		6,818			2,213			31,095
Stock-based compensation		-			359,261			1,869,602
Impairment of mining claims		-			-			714,700
Impairment of other assets		-			-			32,122
Amortization of debt discount		125,259			-			2,744,881
Common stock issued for interest expense		-			-			610,583
Loss on settlement of litigation		-			-			29,500
Loss on settlement of accounts payable		-			-			33,014
Loss on debt conversion		-			-			121,770
Gain on settlement of note payable to Tonaquint		(106,999	)					(106,999	)
Gain on the sale of assets to Gunner Gold LLC		(306,118	)		-			(306,118	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable		(14,167	)		-			(57,937	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			20,200			7,700
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(20,032	)		20,728			197,246
Disputed payable		-			-			293,450
Deferred liabilities		-			-			60,000
Net cash used in operating activities		(143,044	)		(82,065	)		(1,584,241	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment in mining equipment		-			-			(140,138	)
Investment in mining property		-			-			(199,000	)
Deposit		300			-			-
Proceeds from sale of assets to Gunner Gold LLC		433,635			-			433,635
Net cash provided by investing activities		433,935			-			94,497

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable		-			-			355,800
Repayments of notes payable and convertible notes payable		(275,000	)		-			(333,000	)
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		-			-			437,389
Proceeds from the sale of common stock		-			140,000			1,054,003
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(275,000	)		140,000			1,514,192

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		15,891			57,935			24,448
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		8,557			85,623			-
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	24,448		$	143,558		$	24,448

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Interest paid	$	2,500		$	1,875		$	670,470
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS:

Notes issued to acquire mining claims	$	-		$	-		$	357,000
Debt Discount	$	-		$	-		$	2,507,342
Common stock issued for note modification	$	-		$	-		$	48,387
Common stock issued to acquire mining claims	$	-		$	-		$	458,700
Common stock issued for fixed assets	$	-		$	-		$	43,872
Common stock issued for conversion of debt	$	40,787		$	-		$	386,346
Common stock to be issued for settlement of litigation	$	-		$	-		$	29,500
Common stock to be issued for note extension	$	-		$	-		$	15,500

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Bonanza Goldfields Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 6, 2008. The Company’s fiscal year ends on June 30. The Company’s areas of exploration are in geopolitically stable North American areas. The Company has acquired 3 sets of mineral properties in the state of Arizona. The mineral properties are contiguous, therefore the three sets are considered as one project. The first is federal mining claims on land managed by the Bureau of Land Management totaling 435 acres. The second property is 130.76 acres of patented land the Company leased for an initial term of two years with an option to buy from Judgetown LLC. The lease agreement with Judgetown LLC was effective on October 15, 2012 and ended on September 20, 2013. The third property is referred to as the Hull land and is approximately 20 acres of patented land.

The recoverability of amounts from the properties or claims will be dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of the Company's interest in the underlying properties and/or claims, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to satisfy the expenditure requirements under the property and/or claim agreements and to complete the development of the properties and/or claims, and upon future profitable production or proceeds for the sale thereof.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has a working deficit and has not generated significant revenues since inception. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $7,858,850. Further, the Company has inadequate working capital to maintain or develop its operations, and is dependent upon funds from private investors and the support of certain stockholders. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. In this regard, management is planning to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and additional sales of its common stock. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital.

The Company's ability to meet its obligations and continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional financing, achievement of profitable operations and/or the discovery, exploration, development and sale of mining reserves. The Company cannot reasonably be expected to earn revenue in the exploration stage of operations. Although the Company plans to pursue additional financing, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to secure financing when needed or to obtain such financing on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales and expenses recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Exploration Stage Company

The Company's financial statements are prepared pursuant to SEC guidance and Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915, Development Stage Entities, as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that will eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence.

Cost method investment

The Company accounts for equity investment in private companies using the cost method accounting when the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. Cost method investment is adjusted only for other-than-temporary declines in fair value, certain distributions and additional investments. In September 2013, the Company acquired a 1% ownership interest in Gunner Gold LLC, a private company incorporated in Delaware. The investment is accounted for using the cost method.

Mineral property rights

All direct costs related to the acquisition of mineral property rights are capitalized. Exploration costs are charged to operations in the period incurred until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves, at which time subsequent exploration costs and the costs incurred to develop a property are capitalized. The Company reviews the carrying values of its mineral property rights whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may exceed their estimated net recoverable amounts. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying value of those assets is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. As of September 30, 2013, management has determined that there was no impairment loss required for the three months then ended.

At such time as commercial production may commence, depletion of each mining property will be provided on a unit-of-production basis using estimated proven and probable recoverable reserves as the depletion base. In cases where there are no proven or probable reserves, depletion will be provided on the straight-line basis over the expected economic life of the mine.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Management has determined that there is no impairment loss required for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company had no operating properties at September 30, 2013, but the Company’s mineral properties will be subject to standards for mine reclamation that are established by various governmental agencies. For these non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value. Such costs are based on management's current estimate of amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and regulations.

It is reasonably possible that due to uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of possible environmental contamination, application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities, and changes in remediation technology, the ultimate cost of remediation and reclamation could change in the future. The Company continually reviews its accrued liabilities for such remediation and reclamation costs as evidence becomes available indicating that its remediation and reclamation liability has changed.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and depreciated over the lives of the assets on a units-of-production basis. Reclamation costs are accreted over the life of the related assets and are adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate on the underlying obligation. There were no asset retirement obligations as of September 30, 2013 as there are presently no underlying obligations.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets using principally the straight-line method. When items are retired or otherwise disposed of, income is charged or credited for the difference between net book value and proceeds realized thereon. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and replacements and betterments are capitalized.

The range of estimated useful lives used to calculated depreciation for principal items of property and equipment are as follow:

Asset Category		Depreciation/ Amortization Period
Support Equipment		5 Years

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided, to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company follows a two-step approach to ultimately recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company's tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments. At September 30, 2013, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

Share-Based Compensation

The measurement of the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument is based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted.

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share was computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net loss per share for the Company is the same as basic net loss per share, as during the period where a net loss is reported, the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be antidilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation. Options and warrants will have a dilutive effect only when the average stock price during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants (they are in the money).

At September 30, 2013 and 2012, common stock equivalents consisted of warrants to purchase 5,500,000 and 25,500,000 shares of common stock, respectively, which have been antidilutive.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced sale or liquidation.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accrued interest and related party payable, approximate fair value due to their most maturities.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued effective pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – SALE OF ASSETS TO GUNNER GOLD, LLC

On September 20, 2013, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement with Gunner Gold, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company exchanged the following assets for 3,300,000 units of Gunner Gold, LLC common shares and $433,635 cash: 1) mining equipment and materials with net book value of $117,117; 2) right to conduct mining operations on the Company’s BLM properties for 7 years with the option to acquire the mineral rights for 700,000 additional units of Gunner Gold, LLC’s stock; 3) right to conduct mining operations on the Company’s Hull Lode Mining Claim with a monthly payment of $2,500; 4) the Company’s Judgetown Mining Claim related to a lease agreement with Judgetown, LLC dated September 30, 2012 (See Note 4). The Company will receive 5% of the net proceeds, after the payment of all maintenance costs, earned by Gunner Gold, LLC from the mining operation on BLM properties. Gunner Gold, LLC also assumed $260,568 of the lease obligation pursuant to the lease agreement. $275,000 of the $433,635 proceeds was paid directly to Tonaquint, Inc. to satisfy the Company’s entire obligation to Tonaquint Inc. under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement entered on October 1, 2012. The 3,300,000 units of Gunner Gold, LLC was valued at $39,600 on the acquisition date and is accounted for using the cost method of accounting because the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Gunner Gold, LLC. The Company recognized a gain on sale of assets of $306,118 as a result of the transaction. The gain represents the excess of the sum of the fair value of the Company’s investment in Gunner Gold LLC and $433,635 cash over the sum of the carrying value of the assets sold.

At September 30, 2013, the Company had a receivable of $57,500 from Gunner Gold, LLC related to this transaction.

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013:

	September 30, 2013		June 30, 2013
Support equipment	$	-	$	148,215
Less: accumulated depreciation		-		(24,277)
Net property and equipment		-		123,938

Depreciation expense was $6,818 and $2,213 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

NOTE 5 – MINING CLAIMS

The following is a detail of mining claims at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013:

	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Midas Placer Mining Claim (fully impaired)	$	565,700		$	565,700
Tarantula (Hull Lode) Mining Claim		250,000			250,000
Osiris Gold Joint Venture (fully impaired)		50,000			50,000
Judgetown Mining Claim		-			310,568
Total mining and equipment activity		865,700			1,176,268
Accumulated impairment of mining claims		(615,700	)		(615,700	)
Total Mining Claims	$	250,000		$	560,568

During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company learned that the title of Midas Placer Claim which the Company purchased from Global Minerals, Inc., was never transferred to the Company. The Company did not record any adjustment during the year ended June 30, 2013 as the Midas Placer Mining Claim was fully impaired during fiscal year 2011.

On September 30, 2012, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Judgetown LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company located in Arizona to lease 130.76 acres land in the county of Yavapai, Arizona. The lease is exclusive to the Company and its successors and assigns all of Judgetown LLC’s interest in and to all mining rights and minerals beneath the surface of, within, or that may be produced from the land. The lease is for a period of two years unless terminated pursuant to the lease. The lease obligation, as amended on February 9, 2013, is $200,000 for the first year and $120,000 for the second year. An option to purchase the land was also granted for a price of $1,190,000 less lease payments before January 15, 2015. At June 30, 2013, $310,568 of the discounted value of the lease payments was recorded as the Judgetown Mining Claim as a component of Mining Claims assets. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had recorded a lease obligation payable related to this agreement of $260,568. The Judgetown lease rights were sold on September 20, 2013. See Note 3.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE

The Company had the following notes payable outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013:

	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Gold Exploration LLC (a)
Dated - June 1, 2008	$	52,699		$	52,699

Venture Capital International (b)
Dated – March 30, 2009		12,000			12,000

Venture Capital International (c)
Dated - May 7, 2009		17,000			17,000

Advantage Systems Enterprises Limited (d)
Dated – July 3, 2009		17,000			17,000

Advantage Systems Enterprises Limited (e)
Dated – August 7, 2009		10,000			10,000

Venture Capital International (f)
Dated – October 15, 2009		10,000			10,000

Venture Capital International (g)
Dated – October 27,2009		7,000			7,000

Advantage Systems Enterprises Limited (h)
Dated – November 9, 2009		25,000			25,000

Venture Capital International (i)
Dated – November 23, 2009		5,000			5,000

Strategic Relations Consulting, Inc. (j)
Dated – March 31, 2010		15,000			15,000

Summit Technology Corporation, Inc. (k)
Dated November 22, 2010		2,000			2,000

Gold Exploration LLC (l)
Dated July 29, 2010		97,000			97,000

Freedom Boat, LLC (m)
Dated February 7, 2012		250,000			250,000

Dr. Linh B. Nguyen (n)
Dated May 23, 2012		25,000			25,000

Mr. Charles Chapman (o)
Dated December 27, 2012		50,000			50,000

Tonaquint, Inc. (p)
Dated October 1, 2012		-			449,185
Total notes and convertible note payable		594,699			1,043,884
Less debt discount		-			(125,259	)
Less current portion of long-term debt		(594,699	)		(918,625	)
Long term debt	$	-		$	-

(a) The Company entered into a purchase agreement to purchase mining claims with Gold Exploration LLC in the amount of $99,000 on June 1, 2008. The Company paid $15,000 in cash and issued a note for $84,000 with an interest rate of 12% for the remaining balance. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, $7,000 should be paid each 90 days until the full principal balance plus accrued interest is paid off. As of September 30 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Gold Exploration LLC for this note is $73,264 and $71,670, respectively. This agreement required that Gold Exploration LLC perfect the transfer and send the documents to the Company. The transfer was never made and a review of the BLM lists of claims disclosed that Gold Exploration LLC never owned the claims that they attempted to sell to the Company. On August 27, 2013, the Company has demanded the cancellation of the note agreement and remittance of $15,000. Gold Exploration LLC has not yet responded to the Company’s request.

(b) On March 30, 2009, the Company issued a $12,000 demand promissory note to Venture Capital International, Inc. The note is due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Venture Capital International, Inc. related to this note is $14,683 and $14,532, respectively. Venture Capital has not demanded the repayment of the note.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(c) On May 7, 2009, the Company issued a $17,000 demand promissory note to Venture Capital International, Inc. The note is not secured, due on demand and has an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Venture Capital International, Inc. related to this note is $20,712 and $20,498,respectively. Venture Capital has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(d) On July 3, 2009, the Company issued a $17,000 demand promissory note to Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited related to this note is $20,614 and $20,400, respectively. Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(e) On August 7, 2009, the Company issued a $10,000 demand promissory note to Advantage Systems Enterprises Limited. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited, Inc. related to this note is $12,074 and $11,948, respectively. Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(f) On October 15, 2009, the Company issued a $10,000 demand promissory note to Venture Capital International. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Venture Capital International related to this note is $ $11,979 and $11,853, respectively. Venture Capital has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(g) On October 27, 2009, the Company issued a $7,000 demand promissory note to Venture Capital. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Venture Capital International related to this note is $8,374 and $8,286, respectively. Venture Capital has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(h) On November 9, 2009, the Company issued a $25,000 demand promissory note to Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited related to this note is $29,887 and $29,572, respectively. Advantage Systems Enterprise Limited has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(i) On November 23, 2009, the Company issued a $5,000 demand promissory note to Venture Capital International. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Venture Capital International related to this note is $5,963 and $5,900, respectively. Venture Capital International has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(j) On March 31, 2010, the Company issued a $15,000 demand promissory note to Strategic Relations consulting, Inc. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 principal and interest payable to Strategic Relations Consulting, Inc. related to this note is $17,628 and $17,439, respectively. Subsequent to September 30, 2013, Strategic Relations Consulting, Inc. has agreed to convert the note to 15,000 units of Gunner Gold’s stock that the Company acquired on September 20, 2013.

(k) On November 22, 2010, the Company issued a $7,000 demand promissory note to Summit Technologies Corporation, Inc. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Strategic Relations Consulting, Inc. related to this note is $2,436 and $2,411, respectively. Summit Technologies Corporation, Inc. has not demanded the repayment of the note.

(l) On July 29, 2010, the Company issued 8,300,000 common shares to Gold Exploration LLC, valued at $83,000 (or $0.01 per share) based upon the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date the agreement was executed, to partially repay $10,000 of principal on the promissory note held by Gold Exploration LLC initially issued to Global Mineral Resources Corporation. This payment of common stock reduced the outstanding balance of the note held by Gold Exploration LLC to $97,000. The Company recognized a loss on debt conversion of $73,000. During fiscal year 2012, the note holder called the balance of the note and demanded payment although the agreement states the note is not due until 2015. The note holder indicated that the note was in default because the Company failed to maintain the Midas Placer Mining Claim, collateral which secured the note. Pursuant to the note agreement, the note should accrue interest at 12% when due or declared due. The note is classified as a current liability on the balance sheets. As of September 30 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Gold Exploration LLC related to this note is $123,214 and $120,280, respectively. This agreement required that Gold Exploration LLC perfect the transfer and send the documents to the Company. The transfer was never made and a review of the BLM lists of claims disclosed that Gold Exploration LLC never owned the claims that they attempted to sell to the Company. On June 2, 2011, Gold Exploration LLC requested to lift the Section 144 restrictive legends without a proper legal opinion and the legends were removed at the direction of David Janney, the Company’s former CEO. On August 27, 2013, the Company demanded the cancellation of the promissory note and the return of the 8,300,000 common shares. Gold Exploration LLC has not yet responded to the Company’s demand.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(m) On February 7, 2011, the Company issued a $250,000 promissory note with an interest rate of 12% per annum to Freedom Boat LLC (“Freedom Boat”). Payment of $2,500 is due monthly from July 5, 2011 through December 5, 2011 with a final payment of interest and principal of $260,000 due on February 7, 2012. Freedom Boat also has a right to royalties under certain conditions. The note is secured by the Hull Lode claim, the West Acre Hull tract, property held by David Janney, former officer, and 10,000,000 of the Company’s common shares currently held in escrow. Proceed from the note was used to purchase Tarantula Mining Claim from Judgetown, LLC. As of September 30 and June 30, 2013, the remaining principal owed was $250,000. This note is presently in default but the Company is negotiating with the holder for an amendment of this note. On September 24, 2013 the Company entered into an agreement with Gunner Gold LLC in which Gunner agreed to pay $2,500 per month to lease the Hull Lode claim for 24 months. The $2,500 received from Gunner Gold LLC will be used to pay the monthly interest payment on the above note.

(n) On April 6, 2011, the Company entered into a demand promissory note with Linh B. Nguyen in the amount of $25,000. The note is not secured, due on demand with an interest rate of 5%. As of September 30 and June 30, 2013, principal and interest payable to Linh B. Nguyen related to this note is $27,942 and $27,627, respectively. Dr. Nguyen has demanded the repayment of this note during the year ended June 30, 2013. The note is currently in default.

(o) On December 27, 2011, the Company issued a $50,000 unsecured promissory note to Mr. Charles Chapman. The note was due on February 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 12%. Pursuant to the note agreement, Mr. Chapman has the right to receive 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of interest payment. On December 28, 2011, the Company issued 500,000 shares valued at $4,000 in lieu of the interest. On March 19, 2012, the note agreement was amended to extend the due date to May 15, 2012. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company agreed to issue an additional 500,000 common shares valued at $15,500 which was recorded as debt discount and fully amortized during fiscal year 2012. On May 16, 2012, the Company entered into a second amendment to extend the loan to November 15, 2012. Pursuant to the second amendment, the Company will issue 100,000 shares of its common stock per month for a period of six months in lieu of interest. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued the 500,000 common shares related to the March 19, 2012 amendment and an additional 100,000 common shares for one month interest which was valued at 1,950. On October 9, 2013, the $50,000 note and any unpaid interest were settled with 55,000 units of Gunner Gold, LLC stock that the Company acquired on September 20, 2013.

(p) On October 1, 2012, the Company entered into a Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Tonaquint, Inc., a Utah corporation ("Tonaquint"), whereby the Company issued (i) a Secured Convertible Promissory Note of the Company in the principal amount of $1,660,000 with a conversion price of $0.05 per share and an annual interest rate of 8% and (ii) a warrant to purchase 158,953,080 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrant has an exercise price of $0.075 per share and can be exercised at any time within five years after October 1, 2012. Tonaquint has the right to convert, subject to restrictions described in the promissory note, all or a portion of the outstanding amount of the promissory note that is eligible for conversion into shares of the Company’s common stock.

Buyer Mortgage Note 1 was due on the earlier of (1) 60 days following March 31, 2015, and (2) upon the Company’s filing of a registration statement pursuant to the Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement. Buyer Mortgage Note 2 was due on the earlier of (1) 60 days following March 31, 2015, and (2) if Tonaquint has been required to repay Buyer Mortgage Note 1, 5 trading date after the initial registration statement is declared effective. Buyer Mortgage Note 3 was due on the earlier of (1) 60 days following March 31, 2015, and (2) if (i) the shares issued to Tonaquint to repay the Secured Convertible Promissory Note are freely saleable or covered by an effective registration statement (ii) Tonaquint has been required to repay Buyer Mortgage Note 2 and (ii) the Company has produced 200 ounces of gold with an average production of at least 1 gram per ton of processed material within 60 days after Tonaquint was required to pay Buyer Mortgage Note 2; (iii) outstanding balance of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note payable to Tonaquint is less or equal to $1.3 million. The $750,000 promissory note receivable from Tonaquint was due on the earlier of (1) 60 days following March 31, 2015, and (2) if (i) the shares issued to Tonaquint to repay the Secured Convertible Promissory Note are freely saleable or covered by an effective registration statement (ii) Tonaquint has been required to repay Buyer Mortgage Note 3 and (ii) the Company has produced 200 ounces of gold with an average production of at least 1 gram per ton of processed material, within 60 days after Tonaquint was required to pay Buyer Mortgage Note 3; (iii) outstanding balance of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note payable to Tonaquint is less or equal to $900,000.

The promissory note was due on April 1, 2015 and the interest was payable monthly. The total amount to be funded is $1,500,000, representing the principal amount of $1,660,000 less an original issuance discount of $150,000 and the payment of $10,000 to cover Tonaquint’s fees. The shares of common stock underlying the Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant were to be registered by a registration statement pursuant to the terms and conditions of a registration rights agreement. The registration statement has been withdrawn with Tonaquint’s consent.

Tonaquint initially funded the Company $150,000 in cash and issued three Buyer Mortgage Notes, in the principal amount of $50,000, $150,000, and $400,000 and a promissory note in the amount of $750,000 to the Company pursuant to the agreement. The Buyer Mortgage Notes are secured by certain real property owned by Tonaquint located in Cook County, Illinois. The Buyer Mortgage Notes and the $750,000 promissory note carry interest of 5% per annum.

Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company reserved 75,000,000 shares of common stock. The Company has agreed not to enter into any equity line of credit or financing arrangement or other transaction that involves issuing securities that are convertible into common stock (including without limitation selling convertible debt, warrants or convertible preferred stock), or otherwise issue common stock (a) with conversion, exercise or similar mechanics or reset provisions that vary according to the market price of the common stock without a floor at or higher than $0.01 or (b)at a fixed price which is lower than $0.01, without the prior written consent of Tonaquint. The Company agrees not to declare or make any dividend or other distributions of its assets.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company’s default status on the Freedom Boat note existed prior to and during negotiations on the transaction with Tonaquint.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company has received net proceeds of $307,514 from Tonaquint. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, warrants to purchase 22,106,057 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued. The Company determined the estimated fair value of the warrants was $1,146,845. $1,146,845 of the proceeds were allocated to the warrants. The promissory note included a beneficial conversion feature of $363,155. The total discount of $1,660,000, including the original issuance discount of $150,000, was amortized over the life of the promissory note commencing upon the receipt of the funding.

Beginning on March 30, 2013, and each month thereafter, the Company was to pay to Tonaquint principal payments of $69,167 plus the sum of any accrued and unpaid interest due on such date by converting such amount at a conversion price equals to the lower of the (i) conversion price in effect ($0.05 per share if no anti-dilution adjustment) (ii) 65% of the arithmetic average of the three lowest volume-weighted average prices of the stock price during the 20 consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the date of the payment date; provided, however, the Company may, at its option as described in the agreement, pay all or any part of such installment amount by redeeming such installment amount in cash or by any combination of a Company conversion and a Company redemption.

At June 30, 2013, the Company offset the notes receivable from Tonaquint of $1,202,486 with notes payable to Tonaquint of $1,651,671 as permitted under the agreement and had interest receivable from Tonaquint of $43,770. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded interest income of $14,167 which was offset with interest expense of $31,537 related to the agreement with Tonaquint.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued Tonaquint 35,497,806 common shares to repay interest of $22,439 and principal of $18,348.

On September 20, 2013, the entire Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Tonaquint, Inc were settled with a cash payment of $275,000. The Company recorded a $106,999 gain on settlement of note payable related to this settlement.

NOTE 7 - EQUITY

Preferred Stock

On June 14, 2011, the Company authorized 20,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at $0.0001 par value. The Preferred Stock contains certain rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions and other characteristics. Specifically, the Preferred Stock has 100 votes per share, whereas, each share of Common Stock has 1 vote. Preferred Stock holders may vote with holders of the Company’s Common Stock on all matters which common stockholders may vote. On June 14, 2011, the Company issued 3,000,000 preferred shares valued at $300 to its former CEO/CFO. In August 2011, the former CEO/CFO returned those shares as a result of his resignation from the Company. The preferred shares were then cancelled.

Common Stock

NOTE 8 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Effective June 18, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the 2008 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (the "2008 Plan"). The Plan reserves 1,000,000 shares of common stock for grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, warrants and restricted stock awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants performing services for the Company. Options and warrants granted under the Plan have an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant and become exercisable based on a vesting schedule determined at the date of grant. The options expire 2 years from the date of grant whereas warrants generally expire 5 years from the date of grant. Restricted stock awards granted under the Plan are subject to a vesting period determined at the date of grant.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

On June 6, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company amended the 2008 Plan to increase the reserved grant shares from 1,000,000 common shares to 25,000,000 common shares. On August 17, 2012 the Board of Directors of the Company amended the 2008 Plan to increase the authorized shares to be granted from 25,000,000 to 35,000,000.

The cost of all employee stock options, as well as other equity-based compensation arrangements, is reflected in the financial statements over the vesting period based on the estimated fair value of the awards.

There was no warrant activity during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Details of warrants outstanding are presented below:

	Shares Available for Grant		Number of Shares Granted		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
June 30, 2013		29,500,000		5,500,000	$	0.01		1.41		-
September 30, 2013		29,500,000		5,500,000	$	0.01		1.16		-

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company believes that through a fraudulent scheme by former management, 86,000,000 shares of our common stock were improperly issued. The Company is in the process of seeking a legal remedy to this issue however, if the Company is not successful in its efforts to cancel the shares, the stock value could be improperly diminished because of the dilution created by this fraudulent scheme to the detriment of the shareholders. The Company will bring an action in the appropriate court against the original recipients of the shares and the former CEO and to request an order to cancel the shares. Securities issued in violation of section 5 are subject to rescission under section 12(a) (l) of the Act. Sections 12(a) (1) of the Securities Act and Section 5 allow purchasers to sue sellers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. As long as the purchaser can prove a direct link between the purchaser and the seller and the purchaser may obtain rescission with interest or damages if the investor sold his securities for less than he purchased them. The Company did not receive any consideration for the improper sale of the shares and will pursue all legal remedies available to correct this issue including but not limited to bringing an action in federal court to cancel the shares and for damages sustained by the Company. However, if the Company is not successful the stock value could be improperly diminished because of the dilution created by this fraudulent scheme.

The Company believes that the former CEO in concert with associates and acting outside his authority defrauded the Company. The legitimate purchasers of the shares could have an action against the seller who knew the shares were not registered or exempt from registration.

The Company was not a party to this fraudulent scheme and therefore believes rescission is not available to the Company. The damage sustained by the Company could be at least $985,100, which is the amount that the Company would have realized if the shares had been sold pursuant to a registration statement or as restricted shares to legitimate buyers at the time of this incident. The Company has classified $985,100 as common stocks subject to rescission.

On October 1, 2012, Mr. Cao entered into an employment agreement with the Company. Pursuant to the employment agreement, the Company will compensate Mr. Cao $4,000 monthly. In February 2013, Mr. Cao agreed to temporarily terminate the agreement since the Company is not active in mining operations.

On May 10, 2012, the Company entered into a two-year employment contract with Mr. Scott Geisler, Chief Executive Officer at that time. The agreement allows the immediate accrual of unpaid salary from August 29, 2011 at $100,000 per year. The Company also issued stock options to purchase a total of 17,000,000 common shares. Options for 8,500,000 common shares at an exercise price of $0.01 per share vested immediately. Additional options to purchase 8,500,000 common shares at an exercise price of $0.01 per share vested in August 2012. The 17,000,000 options are valued at $507,862. These options have a term of 5 years and can be exercised on a cashless basis. On June 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement with Mr. Geisler. That Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement superseded the employment agreement dated May 10, 2012. Pursuant to the Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement, Mr. Geisler would receive 7,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and $75,000 in the next 25 months commencing July 15, 2012. On June 1, 2012, Mr. Geisler resigned as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

On October 30, 2012, management learned that former President and CEO, Mr. Scott Geisler, filed suit against the Company on September 20, 2012, in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial District in the State of Florida. The Company has not yet been served with the summons and complaint or filed an answer. Mr. Geisler asserts that the Company is in default with respect to payments under a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement entered into upon his resignation as an officer and director of the Company and effective June 8, 2012. Mr. Geisler claims monetary damages "in excess of $15,000," attorneys' fees, court costs and seeks the issuance of 7,500,000 shares of common stock that is provided for under the Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement. We have engaged legal counsel to represent the Company in this dispute and counsel has identified defenses to the claims and setoffs. The case has been dismissed due to the Plaintiffs failure to prosecute the case against the Company.

BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Currently, the Company is carrying the amount of $263,950 as disputed payables until resolved, which include other disputed payables.

The Company entered into a purchase agreement to purchase mining claims from Gold Exploration LLC in the amount of $99,000 on June 1, 2008. The agreement requires the Company to make royalty payments equal to 2% of the Net Smelter Returns (“NSR”) per year. The Company had no NSR for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and no royalties have been paid. The agreement does not have any commitment dates of when production is to begin. This agreement is in a legal dispute as the Company believes that Gold Exploration LLC never owned the mining claims that should have been transferred to the Company.

On February 7, 2011, the Company entered into a $250,000 promissory note agreement with Freedom Boat which bears interest rate at 12%. The agreement includes a royalty payment which includes 5% in royalty of its gross profits from gold extraction from the Hull Lode Placer Claim and 5% royalty payment from Hull Placer Mine when and if production occurs. There is currently no production.

On February 7, 2011, David Janney, former officer, entered an agreement with Amazon Holding LLC to pay a finder’s fee for raising $250,000 in the acquisition of mining property. On January 19, 2012, Amazon Holding LLC demanded the Company make the payment. The dispute is still pending but the Company believes that it is not likely that Amazon Holding LLC will prevail if a suit is filed against the Company related to this agreement.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 9, 2013, the Company transferred 55,000 units of Gunner Gold LLC to Charles Chapman for the settlement of principal and accrued interest payable to him under the note agreement dated December 27, 2012.

Subsequent to September 30, 2013, Strategic Relations Consulting, Inc. has agreed to convert the note to 15,000 units of Gunner Gold’s stock that the Company acquired on September 20, 2013.

* * * * * * * * * * *

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, “Company,” “our company,” “us,” and “our” refer to Bonanza Goldfields Corporation, unless the context requires otherwise.

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains various “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company that involve risks and uncertainties. Certain statements included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements related to anticipated cash flow sources and uses, and words including but not limited to “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “expects”, “future” and similar statements or expressions, identify forward looking statements. Any forward-looking statements herein are subject to certain

risks and uncertainties in the Company’s business, including but not limited to, reliance on key customers and competition in its markets, market demand, product performance, technological developments, maintenance of relationships with key suppliers, difficulties of hiring or retaining key personnel and any changes in current accounting rules, all of which may be beyond the control of the Company. The Company adopted at management’s discretion, the most conservative recognition of revenue based on the most astringent guidelines of the SEC in terms of recognition of revenue. Management will elect additional changes to revenue recognition to comply with the most conservative SEC recognition on a forward going accrual basis as the model is replicated with other similar markets (i.e. SBDC). The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth therein. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those identified in the section titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013, as well as other factors that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but that may exist in the future. In addition, the foregoing factors may affect generally our business, results of operations and financial position. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are an exploration stage company and that there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exist on any of our properties and that further exploration will be required. Our exploration target is to find exploitable minerals on our properties and to raise adequate funding to begin processing our land. Our success depends on achieving that target and becoming cash flow positive once production begins. There is the likelihood of our mineral claims containing little or no economic mineralization or reserves of gold and other minerals. There is the possibility that our claims do not contain any reserves and funds that we spend on exploration will be lost. Even if we complete our current exploration program and are successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will be required to expend substantial funds to bring our claims to production. We are unable to assure you we will be able to raise the additional funds necessary to implement any future exploration or extraction program even if mineralization is found.

It is our objective in fiscal year 2014 to identify mineral prospect properties of merit, conduct preliminary exploration work, and if results are positive, to process mineral resources through a market where we believe capital is transitioning to the safety of gold. Our management contends that this business model is timely in a world of financial and currency instability with escalating mineral demand.

However, as the landscape for gold changed in April of 2013, raising adequate capital became much more difficult to secure at a reasonable rate. To ensure the viability of the Company, management entered into an asset purchase agreement with Gunner Gold LLC, which closed in September 2013. The asset purchase agreement allows the Company to retain critical assets such as our mining claim to the land of Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the patented Hull Lode claim. It also grants a royalty to the Company on revenues produced on the BLM land while giving the Company 3.3 million units of Gunner Gold, LLC.

A National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report was prepared August 30, 2011 on mineral rights now owned or leased by Gunner Gold. This is a report that is the standard used in the industry to estimate the amount of minerals located on the subject property. The report places an estimate of its inferred mineral resources at 5.88 million ounces of gold and with current gold spot prices of roughly $1,275 per ounce it could have a perceived gross value of approximately $7.5 billion.

Our areas of exploration are in geopolitically stable North American areas.

We have acquired 3 sets of mineral properties in the state of Arizona. The first is federal mining claims on BLM land totaling 435 acres. The second was 130.76 acres of patented land we leased for an initial term of two years with an option to buy from Judgetown LLC. This lease option to the Judgetown LLC patented property has been sold to Gunner Gold, LLC in September 2013. This relieved the Company of a large and growing debt to Judgetown LLC. The lease agreement with Judgetown was effective on October 15, 2012 and was sold in September 2013. The third property is referred to as the Hull land and is approximately 20 acres of patented land which we have purchased with funds borrowed from Freedom Boat and remains in Bonanza’s possession but is being leased to Gunner Gold LLC for 2 years commencing in September 2013. The Company also sold its Yukon 25 plant to Gunner Gold, LLC.

Bonanza Goldfields Corp also retired certain debt with proceeds from the asset purchase agreement. This investment into Gunner Gold, LLC and the reduction of debt will allow us to redefine a corporate strategy in light of the underperformance of the gold mining industry in 2013. Management believes that the current structure allows investors to benefit from a rebound in gold but in the event that the gold price remains at current levels the Company now has the flexibility to examine entering other businesses.

Historical Background:

The Judgetown lease, with an effective date of October 15, 2012, was executed on or before September 30, 2012 between our Company and Judgetown LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company located in Arizona. The leased premises consist of 130.76 acres in the county of Yavapai, Arizona in the Date Creek Mountain range. The lease is exclusive to the Company and our successors and assigns all of Judgetown LLC’s interest in and to all mining rights and minerals beneath the surface of, within, or that may be produced from the premises. The lease granted the following to us for a period of two years unless terminated pursuant to the lease; Mining and Access Rights, Cross Mining, Commingling, Deposit of Waste Materials, Treatment and Water Rights. The lease obligation, as amended, is $320,000 for the period commencing on January 15, 2013. An option to purchase the land was also granted for a price of $1,500,000 less lease payments. The lease with an option to purchase was amended on February 1, 2013 to reflect a new owner and to amend the payment schedule and amount.

As of November 14, 2013, our leased lands consist of 38 lode claims covering about 455 acres of patented, private property claims and BLM claims in the Date Creek Mountains, Arizona consisting of both alluvial and mineralized quartz deposits, as well as the presence of certain rare earth elements. A Preliminary Geological Survey as well as subsequent testing and assays of the leased claims were prepared by Auric Resources International, Inc. of Wickenburg, Arizona. Shareholders can access the report and test results at our website: www.bonanzagoldfields.com (such website and its contents are not to be incorporated by reference to this report).

Highlights from the report include:

●	The large land package with widespread areas of anomalous gold values;

●

Although some preliminary testing has been done on portions of the property, the majority of the land package has virgin placer gravels and large quartz veins that have never been explored or tested. The geologic setting of the property is favorable for the concentration of placer gold in the local gravels that occur in drainage channels and elevated benches and for lode gold that occurs within the early Proterozoic granitic rocks as auriferous quartz fissure veins with locally abundant sulfides and iron oxides.

●	Auriferous quartz and quartz-sulfide veins occur on the leased claims. These veins ranged up to several feet in width and have strike lengths ranging from hundreds to thousands of feet.

●

Prior to commencing the survey, extensive samplings were analyzed locally at multiple depths demonstrating the potential for high grade gold findings throughout the property. Modern access for heavy equipment is already in place through Bonanza’s privately constructed roads, and rail is localized. Unique features appear ubiquitous throughout the immediate area, including greenstone dike extensions, placer gravel deposits, and vestiges of numerous pre-historic waterfalls. Additionally, lode gold possibilities exist due to the extensions of schist and mineralized quartz veins in the immediate area of the Congress Mine. Bonanza management believes the alluvial deposits originate from two ancient rivers that flowed in opposing directions during separate geological periods.

●	Our most recent gold assays occurred during the month of July 2012 and were surface level rock chip assays on the Company's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) claims located near the Piedmont Mine area.

●	The assays were completed based on the geological teams' recommendation to study the Piedmont Mine. Bonanza's geological team staked out and acquired the Piedmont in December 2011 as part of the planned leased claims expansion. The assays were completed at a third party globally recognized assayer.

●	Table 1: Surface area rock chip samples on our BLM land claims in the Piedmont Mine area

TARANTULA	Au (Fire)	Au (Fire 2)	Au (Fire 2)
Control #	ppb	Grams/per ton	Ounces/per ton
681	>3000	20.2	0.65
682	>3000	45.5	1.46
683	52	n/a	n/a
684	47	n/a	n/a
685	13	n/a	n/a

*Assays reported in grams and ounces per ton

**Conversion based on 31.1 grams = 1 troy ounce of gold

Rare Earth Metal Tests:

●

The Company also tested for the most prevalent and critical rare earth metals (REM) in the Arizona geographic region, which are Cerium, Lanthanum, Scandium, Yttrium. The tests proved positive for all four rare earth elements. The Company is now planning future tests for the other 13 critical rare earth elements and for estimates of concentration. The plan is to test for the remaining 13 metals in Canadian testing facilities where more advanced analysis can be performed.

●	Major Rare Earth Metals Uses (listed by metal):

●	Cerium is used in auto catalysts, petroleum refining, and in metal alloys.

●	Lanthanum is used in hybrid engines and metal alloys.

●	Scandium is used in sports equipment, the firearms industry and dental applications.

●	Yttrium is used in red color, fluorescent lamps, ceramics, and as an agent in metal alloys with applications to superconductors and medical devices.

We expanded our geological footprint with the acquisition of the Piedmont Mine, gold and silver mine in operation until 1940. The Piedmont Mine has been deemed by the Bonanza geological team a strategic addition to leased claims. The acquisition expands the geological footprint to 38 lode mining claims covering about 600 acres of contiguous property.

There are gold-bearing quartz fissure veins that closely follow “greenstone” (andesite or diabase) dikes that occur along east-west and northwest-southeast trending structures in early Proterozoic granitic rocks. The veins range from a few inches to several feet in width, with up to several hundred feet and unknown depth. The mineralogy of the veins consists of auriferous quartz with silver and varying amounts of sulfides, primarily pyrite with smaller amounts of galena, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite, and locally molybdenite. Hematite is locally prevalent as masses and relic structures formed from oxidation of the pyrite. The highest grade gold is generally associated with the highest concentrations of pyrite.

We have not completed a Canadian NI 43-101 report or an American equivalent and do not know what our proven reserves are, but we are in the process of doing an internal resource estimate based on the placer material run to date and the assays we have completed and are in the process of completing on our load material. This will include our rock chip analysis that can be used to estimate load material and is being conducted by our internal geologist and we are using an accredited external assayer in Prescott, Arizona named Copper State Labs.

Although some preliminary testing has been done on portions of the property, the majority of the land package has virgin placer gravels and large quartz veins that have never been explored or tested. Additional exploration (mapping, sampling, bulk-sampling geophysics, drilling, etc.) must be conducted in order to determine the areal extent, volumes, grades, and values of auriferous quartz veins and gravels within the expanded claim block. The large land package with widespread areas of anomalous gold values; proximity to the Congress Mine; large iron oxide rich quartz veins which exhibit mineralogic and structural similarities to the Congress, Niagra, Queen of the Hills, Golden Wave and other mineralized, economic vein systems in the area; and the presence of placer gold in widespread gravels indicates that the Tarantula Property may host a large, potentially economic gold deposit and undoubtedly represents an excellent exploration target with potential for both placer and lode gold production from auriferous placers and veins.

There was some surface disturbance before Bonanza Goldfields acquired the property. There are a few existing adits and test pits, and a network of roads built by the previous owner who was selling boulders to housing developments. There is no known contamination of the area. The mining activity appears to be limited to small adits and test pits. Remediation of the site will be an ongoing process. Excavations will first be filled with the oversize material which has been separated by grizzly from the bank run feed materials from each excavation. Finally, the upper 6” - 12” of soil, which has been stored during initial site preparation, will be placed on top of the oversize materials in order to enhance revegetation of the area. Care will be taken to prevent erosion on slopes, and where necessary runoff will be diverted by water bars and terracing. All improved access roads will be graded to natural contour and water bars will be utilized to prevent erosion. Since some of the area of operations is near a natural drainage, efforts will be taken to ensure the natural flow is restored upon completion of the operation.

A breakdown of the exploration timetable and budget, including estimated amounts that will be required for each exploration activity, such as geophysics, geochemistry, surface sampling, drilling, etc. for each prospect are as follows:

The timetable will depend on the availability of financing. The exploration plan would begin with a surface sampling program estimated to take 3 weeks and to cost approximately $35,000 to complete. Multi-element analyses will be performed on each sample and the geochemical analyses along with the local geology and the visible outcrops of mineralized quartz would be used to determine the best drill targets. The analyses and interpretation of the data will take an estimated 6 weeks to complete at a cost of $25,000. Assuming a cost of $50 per foot of core drilling, 8 drill targets, and an average depth of 500 feet, the drilling program will cost approximately $200,000.

Our first phase is to set up the plant and then run placer material and test the results (including rock chip samples) to obtain an internal resource estimate on our patented properties. Also, we plan to obtain all necessary licenses to operate on the BLM land. Our second phase would be to move as much placer volume through our plant as possible if the placer levels are economical and to expand that plant to have significantly more operating volume. Third, we plan to secure financing for a load operation to add to our placer capacity. If placer material is not economical and load tests to be more economical then we plan to move to load given financing is available.

On September 20, 2013, we entered into an Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement with Gunner Gold, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, Gunner Gold, LLC has agreed to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities from us for a purchase price of 3,300,000 units of Gunner Gold, LLC stock. We also granted Gunner Gold, LLC the right to conduct mining operations on our BLM properties with the option to acquire the mineral rights for 700,000 additional units of Gunner Gold, LLC’s stock. The Company will receive 5% of the net proceeds, after the payment of all maintenance costs, earned by Gunner Gold from the mining operation on BLM properties.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Three months Ended September 30, 2012

We are an exploration stage company acquiring mineral properties or claims located in the State of Arizona, USA. The recoverability of amounts from the properties or claims will be dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of our interest in the underlying properties and/or claims, our ability to obtain necessary financing to satisfy the expenditure requirements under the property and/or claim agreements and to complete the development of the properties and/or claims, and upon future profitable production or proceeds for the sale thereof.

For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we generated no revenue. Our future revenue plan is uncertain and is dependent on our ability to effectively mine our products, generate sales, and obtain contract mining opportunities. There are no assurances of the ability of our Company to begin to mine our claim. The cost of mining is intensive so it is critical for us to raise appropriate capital to implement our business plan. We had net income of $172,195 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and a net loss of $484,467 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and our losses since inception amount to $7,858,850.

Our operating expenses for exploration activities for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $6,818 and $20,684, respectively. The costs associated with exploration activities included trenching, testing, hauling, and labor costs associated with the exploration of our gold mines claims.

Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $78,545 and $439,841, respectively. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease of compensation to an officer and a consultant. The Company is not active in its mining operation and has temporarily terminated its employment agreement with certain officer and consultant.

Our interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $158,059 and $23,942, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to the full amortization of debt discount related to a note issued to Tonaquint, Inc. as a result of the settlement in September 2013.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company settled the entire Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Tonaquint, Inc with cash payment of $275,000 and recorded $106,999 gain on settlement of note payable to Tonaquint.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company exchanged its Judgetown claim and certain other assets for a noncontrolling interest in Gunner Gold LLC’s and $433,635 cash and recorded $306,118 gain on sale of assets to Gunner Gold LLC.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash used in operating activities for three months ended September 30, 2013 was $143,044 compared to $82,065 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in cash used in operations was primarily attributable to the increase of cash payments made to the professionals.

Cash provided by investing activities was $433,935 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase is mainly due to the cash received from sale of assets to Gunner Gold LLC.

Our cash used in financing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $275,000 compared to $140,000 cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2012. We settled the entire Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Tonaquint, Inc with cash payment of $275,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2012 included the proceeds from the sale of common stock.

We are in default on our note to Freedom Boat, LLC for $250,000 which is secured by 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company. We have preliminarily agreed with Freedom Boat to pay monthly interest for another 2 years from September 30, 2013 with the balance due at the end of the 24-month term. On September 24, 2013 the Company entered into an agreement with Gunner Gold LLC in which Gunner agreed to pay $2,500 for 24 months to lease the Company’s Hull Lode claim. The $2,500 monthly payment will be used to repay the interest of note payable to Freedom Boat.

We are in need of approximately $65,000 per month in order to meet our operating expenses. We are currently in discussion with Tonaquint for additional funding.

On October 1, 2012, we entered into a Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Tonaquint, Inc., a Utah corporation ("Tonaquint"), whereby the Company issued (i) a Secured Convertible Promissory Note of the Company in the principal amount of $1,660,000 and (ii) a warrant to purchase 158,953,080 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrant has an exercise price of $0.075 per share and can be exercised at any time within five years after October 1, 2012. Tonaquint has the right to convert, subject to restrictions described in the promissory note, all or a portion of the outstanding amount of the promissory note that is eligible for conversion into shares of our common stock. The conversion price of the promissory note is $0.05 per share.

The Secured Convertible Promissory Note was due on April 1, 2015 and the interest rate of 8% payable monthly. In the event the Company elects to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance, the Company shall pay Tonaquint 135% of the amount the Company elects to prepay. The total amount to be funded is $1,500,000, representing the principal amount of $1,660,000 less an original issuance discount of $150,000 and the payment of $10,000 to cover Tonaquint’s fees. The shares of common stock underlying the Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant were to be registered by a registration statement pursuant to the terms and conditions of a registration rights agreement. The registration statement has been withdrawn with Tonaquint’s consent. Tonaquint initially funded the Company $150,000 in cash and issued three Buyer Mortgage Notes, in the principal amount of $50,000, $150,000, and $400,000 and a promissory note in the amount of $750,000 to the Company pursuant to the agreement. The Buyer Mortgage Notes are secured by certain real property owned by Tonaquint located in Cook County, Illinois.

Pursuant to the purchase agreement, we reserved 75,000,000 shares of common stock. We agreed not to enter into any equity line of credit or financing arrangement or other transaction that involves issuing securities that are convertible into common stock (including without limitation selling convertible debt, warrants or convertible preferred stock), or otherwise issue common stock (a) with conversion, exercise or similar mechanics or reset provisions that vary according to the market price of the common stock without a floor at or higher than $0.01 or (b) at a fixed price which is lower than $0.01, without the prior written consent of Tonaquint. We agreed not to declare or make any dividend or other distributions of our assets.

As of September 30, 2013, we have received principal of $307,514 pursuant to the Secured Convertible Promissory Note. A National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report was prepared August 30, 2011 on mineral rights now owned or leased by Gunner Gold. This is a report that is the standard used in the industry to estimate the amount of minerals located on the subject property. The report places an estimate of its inferred mineral resources at 5.88 million ounces of gold and with current gold spot prices of approximately $1,275 per ounce it could have a perceived gross value of approximately $7.5 billion.

On September 20, 2013, the entire Secured Convertible Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with Tonaquint, Inc was settled with cash payment of $275,000.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect the liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.

Additional Information

Bonanza files reports and other materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents may be inspected and copied at the Securities and Exchange Commission, Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also get copies of documents that the Company files with the Commission through the Commission’s Internet site at www.sec.gov.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities. Most of our activity is the development and mining of our mining claim.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance that the controls and procedures would meet their objectives. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective for the three months ended September 30, 2013 mainly due to lack of segregation of duties.

In the interim period, to mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of external legal and accounting professionals. As we grow, we expect to create a new finance and accounting position that will allow for proper segregation of duties consistent with control objectives, and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function. As our financing staff grows we will prepare and implement appropriate written policies and checklists which set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the duties within the internal control framework. These current control deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances that would result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, we have determined that these control deficiencies as described above together constitute a material weakness.

(b) Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our chief executive officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has identified control deficiencies regarding the lack of segregation of duties and the need for a stronger internal control environment. Our management believes that these material weaknesses are due to the small size of our accounting staff. The small size of our accounting staff may prevent adequate controls in the future, such as segregation of duties, due to the high cost of such remediation relative the benefit expected to be derived thereby.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our company’s or our company’s subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect except the following matters.

On October 30, 2012 we learned that former President and CEO, Scott Geisler, filed suit against the Company on September 20, 2012, in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial District in the State of Florida. The Company has not yet been served with the summons and complaint or filed an answer. Mr. Geisler asserts that the Company is in default with respect to payments under a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement entered into upon his resignation as an officer and director of the Company and effective June 8, 2012. Mr. Geisler claims monetary damages "in excess of $15,000," attorneys' fees, court costs and seeks the issuance of 7,500,000 shares of common stock that is provided for under the Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement. We have engaged legal counsel to represent the Company in this dispute and counsel has identified defenses to the claims and setoffs. The case has been dismissed due to the lack of prosecution by the Plaintiffs against the Company.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). If any of the events anticipated by the risks described below occur, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock, causing you to lose all or part of your investment.

Management lacks technical training and experience with exploring for, starting, and/or operating a mine; and that with no direct training or experience in these areas, management may not be fully aware of many of the specific requirements related to working within this industry. We do however, employ a geochemist who is very familiar with exploration and a subcontractor who has experience operating placer plants. This sub-contractor is an Engineer by training and he and his team operate the equipment on the site, which includes bulldozers, front end loaders, a Finley that screens material, and the maintenance of the plant. The sub-contractor has built two placer plants prior to being hired by Bonanza. Additionally, he has 25 years of construction and heavy equipment experience. Our staff retained an expert consultant for the first half of 2012 named Madan Singh to advise the Company on how to effectively begin a placer operation.

There Is Substantial Doubt Exists About Our Ability To Continue As A Going Concern

The Company has a working deficit and has not generated significant revenues since inception. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $7,858,850. Further, the Company has inadequate working capital to maintain or develop its operations, and is dependent upon funds from private investors and the support of certain stockholders. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to obtain sufficient financing in the near term or achieve profitability, then we would, in all likelihood, experience severe liquidity problems and may have to curtail our operations. If we curtail our operations, we may be placed into bankruptcy or undergo liquidation, the result of which will adversely affect the value of our common shares.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our internal controls over financial disclosure and procedures were not effective.

If the weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures are not remedied based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO the Company may not be able to accurately disclose its financial condition.

Because the probability of an individual prospect ever having reserves economically recoverable is extremely remote, any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost.

The probability of an individual prospect ever having economically recoverable reserves is extremely remote. As such, any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost. Management beleives our properties do contain reserves. If we are not able to find any reserve in our properties, the Company and its business operations could be adversely impacted and there would be a material adverse impact on our Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

We lack an operating history and have losses which we expect to continue into the future. As a result, we may have to suspend or cease activities.

We were incorporated on March 6, 2008 and we have not started our proposed business activities or realized any significant revenues. We have no operating history upon which an evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. Our net loss was $7,858,850 from inception to September 30, 2013. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon:

●	our ability to locate a profitable mineral property
●	our ability to generate revenues
●	our ability to reduce exploration costs.

Based upon current plans, we expect to incur operating losses in future periods. This will happen because there are expenses associated with the research and exploration of our mineral properties. As a result, we may not generate revenues in the future. Failure to generate revenues will cause us to suspend or cease activities.

Because we will have to spend additional funds to determine if we have economically recoverable reserves, if we can't raise sufficient funds, we will have to cease operations.

Even if we complete our current exploration program and it is successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit, a reserve. If we do not have a commercially viable mineral reserve, it would have a material adverse impact on our Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

As we undertake exploration of our claims and interests, we will be subject to compliance of government regulation that may increase the anticipated time and cost of our exploration program.

There are several governmental regulations that materially restrict the exploration of minerals. We will be subject to the mining laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions where our claims are located, and these laws and regulations may change over time. In order to comply with these regulations, we may be required to obtain work permits, post bonds and perform remediation work for any physical disturbance to land. While our planned budget for exploration programs includes a contingency for regulatory compliance, there is a risk that new regulations could increase our costs of doing business and prevent us from carrying out our exploration program, or that the budgeted amounts are inadequate.

Because of the inherent dangers involved in mineral exploration, there is a risk that we may incur liability or damages, which could hurt our financial position and possibly result in the failure of our business.

The search for valuable minerals involves numerous hazards. As a result, we may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure. The payment of such liabilities may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

We may not have access to all of the supplies and materials we need to begin exploration which could cause us to delay or suspend activities.

Competition and unforeseen limited sources of supplies in the industry could result in occasional spot shortages of supplies, such as dynamite, and certain equipment such as bulldozers and excavators that we might need to conduct exploration. We have not attempted to locate or negotiate with any suppliers of products, equipment or materials. If we cannot find the products and equipment we need, we will have to suspend our exploration plans until we do find the products and equipment we need.

Due to external market factors in the mining business, we may not be able to market any minerals that may be found.

The mining industry, in general, is intensely competitive. Even if commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, we can provide no assurance to investors that a ready market will exist for the sale of these minerals. Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered. These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of markets and processing equipment, and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, mineral importing and exporting and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but any combination of these factors may result in our not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

Our performance may be subject to fluctuations in market prices of gold and other minerals.

The profitability of a mineral exploration project could be significantly affected by changes in the market price of the relevant minerals. The price of gold, while recently reaching record highs in the last 24 months, has been volatile over the past few months. Demand for gold can also be influenced by economic conditions, attractiveness as an investment vehicle and the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and local investment currencies. A number of other factors affect the market prices for other minerals. The aggregate effect of the factors affecting the prices of various minerals is impossible to predict with accuracy. Fluctuations in mineral prices may adversely affect the value of any mineral discoveries made on the properties with which we are involved, which may in turn affect the market price and liquidity of our common shares and our ability to pursue and implement our business plan.

Our operations are subject to strict environmental regulations, which result in added costs of operations and operational delays.

Our operations are subject to environmental regulations, which could result in additional costs and operational delays. All phases of our operations are subject to environmental regulation. Environmental legislation is evolving in some countries and jurisdictions in a manner that may require stricter standards, and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringer environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. There is no assurance that any future changes in environmental regulation will not negatively affect our projects.

We have no insurance for environmental problems.

Insurance against environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production, has not been available generally in the mining industry. We have no insurance coverage for most environmental risks. In the event of a problem, the payment of environmental liabilities and costs would reduce the funds available to us for future operations. If we are unable to fund fully the cost of remedying an environmental problem, we might be required to enter into an interim compliance measure pending completion of the required remedy.

Climate change and related regulatory responses may impact our business.

Climate change as a result of emissions of greenhouse gases is a significant topic of discussion and may generate government regulatory responses in the near future. It is impracticable to predict with any certainty the impact of climate change on our business or the regulatory responses to it, although we recognize that they could be significant. However, it is too soon for us to predict with any certainty the ultimate impact, either directionally or quantitatively, of climate change and related regulatory responses.

The current financial environment may have impacts on our business and financial condition that we cannot predict.

The continued instability in the global financial system and related limitation on availability of credit may continue to have an impact on our business and our financial condition, and we may continue to face challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not improve. Our ability to access the capital markets has been restricted as a result of the economic downturn and related financial market conditions and may be restricted in the future when we would like, or need, to raise capital. The difficult financial environment may also limit the number of prospects for potential joint venture, asset monetization or other capital raising transactions that we may pursue in the future or reduce the values we are able to realize in those transactions, making these transactions uneconomic or difficult to consummate.

Nevada Law And Our Articles Of Incorporation Protect Our Directors From Certain Types Of Lawsuits, Which Could Make It Difficult For Us To Recover Damages From Them In The Event Of A Lawsuit.

Nevada law provides that our directors will not be liable to our Company or to our stockholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as directors. Our Articles of Incorporation require us to indemnify our directors and officers against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. The exculpation provisions may have the effect of preventing stockholders from recovering damages against our directors caused by their negligence, poor judgment or other circumstances. The indemnification provisions may require our company to use our assets to defend our directors and officers against claims, including claims arising out of their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances.

Because We Are Quoted On The OTCQB Instead Of An Exchange Or National Quotation System, Our Investors May Have Difficulty Selling Their Stock Or Experience Negative Volatility On The Market Price Of Our Stock.

Our common stock is traded on the OTCQB. The OTCQB is often highly illiquid, in part because it does not have a national quotation system by which potential investors can follow the market price of shares except through information received and generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that make markets in particular stocks. There is a greater chance of volatility for securities that trade on the OTCQB as compared to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including the lack of readily available price quotations, the absence of consistent administrative supervision of bid and ask quotations, lower trading volume, and market conditions. Investors in our common stock may experience high fluctuations in the market price and volume of the trading market for our securities. These fluctuations, when they occur, may have a negative effect on the market price for our securities. Accordingly, our stockholders may not be able to realize a fair price from their shares when they determine to sell them or may have to hold them for a substantial period of time until the market for our common stock improves.

As a public company we are subject to complex legal and accounting requirements that will require us to incur significant expenses and will expose us to risk of non-compliance.

As a public company, we are subject to numerous legal and accounting requirements that do not apply to private companies. The cost of compliance with many of these requirements is material, not only in absolute terms but, more importantly, in relation to the overall scope of the operations of a small company. Our relative inexperience with these requirements may increase the cost of compliance and may also increase the risk that we will fail to comply. Failure to comply with these requirements can have numerous adverse consequences including, but not limited to, our inability to file required periodic reports on a timely basis, loss of market confidence, delisting of our securities and/or governmental or private actions against us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all of these requirements or that the cost of such compliance will not prove to be a substantial competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis our privately held and larger public competitors.

The application of the “penny stock” rules could adversely affect the market price of our common shares and increase your transaction costs to sell those shares. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rule 3a51-1 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, rule 15g-9 require:

●	that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and
●	the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

●	obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
●	make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

●	sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
●	that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

●	Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

The market price for our common shares is particularly volatile given our status as a relatively unknown company with a small and thinly traded public float, limited operating history and lack of profits which could lead to wide fluctuations in our share price. The price at which you purchase our common shares may not be indicative of the price that will prevail in the trading market. You may be unable to sell your common shares at or above your purchase price, which may result in substantial losses to you.

The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date, and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the volatility of our share price.

Volatility in our common share price may subject us to securities litigation, thereby diverting our resources that may have a material effect on our profitability and results of operations.

As discussed in the preceding risk factors, the market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure will result in additional expenses and pose challenges for our management team.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated there under, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S. public markets. Our management team will need to devote significant time and financial resources to comply with both existing and evolving standards for public companies, which will lead to increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities.

We will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations that affect public companies, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects.

As a public company and particularly after we cease to be an "emerging growth company," we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we have not incurred to date, including increased costs associated with public company reporting and corporate governance requirements. These requirements include compliance with Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC. The increased costs associated with operating as a public company will decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business. Additionally, if these requirements divert our management's attention from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects. However, for as long as we remain an "emerging growth company" as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies" including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an "emerging growth company." If the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30, we would cease to be an "emerging growth company" as of the following June 30, or if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three-year period, we would cease to be an "emerging growth company" immediately.

The Company believes that through a fraudulent scheme by former management, 86,000,000 shares of our common stock were improperly issued.

The Company is in the process of seeking a legal remedy to this issue however, if the Company is not successful in its efforts to cancel the shares, the stock value could be improperly diminished because of the dilution created by this fraudulent scheme to the detriment of the shareholders. The Company will bring an action in the appropriate court against the original recipients of the shares and the former CEO and to request an order to cancel the shares. Securities issued in violation of section 5 are subject to rescission under section 12(a) (l) of the Act. Sections 12(a) (1) of the Securities Act and Section 5 allow purchasers to sue sellers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. As long as the purchaser can prove a direct link between the purchaser and the seller and the purchaser may obtain rescission with interest or damages if the investor sold his securities for less than he purchased them. The Company did not receive any consideration for the improper sale of the shares and is attempting to contact the recipients of the subject shares and will pursue all legal remedies available to correct this issue including but not limited to bringing an action in federal court to cancel the shares and for damages sustained by the Company. However, if the Company is not successful the stock value could be improperly diminished because of the dilution created by this fraudulent scheme.

The former CEO in concert with associates and acting outside his authority defrauded the Company. The legitimate purchasers of the shares will have an action against the seller who knew the shares were not registered or exempt from registration.

The Company was not a party to this fraudulent scheme and it therefore feels rescission is not available to it, however it may still be available to the innocent purchasers of the shares of stock. The damage sustained by the Company could be at least $985,100, which is the amount that the Company would have realized if the shares had been sold pursuant to a registration statement or as restricted shares to legitimate buyers at the time of this incident. If the non-participating owners are unable to recover their losses from the former CEO and those working in concert with him, they will lose their initial investment and any possible appreciation of their investment.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIES

On July 25, 2013 and August 30, 2013, the Company issued 12,695,369 and 22,802,437 common shares, respectively, to repay accrued interest and principal totaling $40,787 related to the note payable to Tonaquint. The offer and sale of such shares of our common stock were effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended September 30, 2013.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

There is no information with respect to which information is not otherwise called for by this form.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

3.1	Articles of Incorporation(1)
3.2	Bylaws (4)
4.1	$1,660,000 Secured Convertible Note dated October 1, 2012 (3)
4.2	Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated October 1, 2012 (3)
10.1	Agreement with Gold Explorations, LLC and Bonanza Goldfields, Corp., dated July 1, 2009.(2)
10.2	Peter Cao Chief Operating Officer employment agreement (3)
10.3	Scott Geisler Chief Executive Officer employment agreement (3)
	Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated October 1, 2012 (3)
10.5	Form of Promissory Note (3)
10.6	Form of Mortgage, dated October 1, 2012 (3)
10.7	Escrow Agreement dated October 1, 2012 (3)
10.8	Form of Buyer Mortgage Note 1 dated October 1, 2012. (3)
10.9	Form of Buyer Mortgage Note 2 dated October 1, 2012.(3)
10.10	Form of Buyer Mortgage Note 3 dated October 1, 2012. (3)
10.11	Registration rights Agreement, dated October 1, 2012 (3)
10.12	Security Agreement dated October 1, 2012 (3)
10.13	Judgetown Lease Agreement dated September 14, 2012 and Amended Agreement dated February 1, 2013 (4)
10.14	David Janney Mutual Release Dated February 19, 2013 (4)
10.15	Scott Geisler Settlement and Mutual Release Date June 14, 2012 (4)
10.16	Choice Capital Agreement dated September 13, 2012 (4)
10.17	David Janney Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(4)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (4)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(4)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(4)

___________

(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s filing on Form S1/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2008.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibits on the Company’s filing on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012 for the period ended September 30, 2011.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibits on the Company’s filing on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2012.

(4)	Filed herein.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant Date: November 14, 2013		Bonanza Goldfields Corp. By: /s/ Michael Stojsavljevich
		Michael Stojsavljevich
		Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Registrant Date: November 14, 2013		Bonanza Goldfields Corp. By: /s/ Michael Stojsavljevich
		Michael Stojsavljevich
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer,)

Bonanza Goldfield Corp. - FORM 10-Q - November 14, 2013

Attached files

Bonanza Goldfield Corp. Reports