Attached files

file filename
EX-32.02 - CERTIFICATE - DEER VALLEY CORPd594610dex3202.htm
EX-31.01 - CERTIFICATE - DEER VALLEY CORPd594610dex3101.htm
EX-31.02 - CERTIFICATE - DEER VALLEY CORPd594610dex3102.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - DEER VALLEY CORPFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.01 - CERTIFICATE - DEER VALLEY CORPd594610dex3201.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 28, 2013

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 000-05388

 

 

DEER VALLEY CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Florida   20-5256635

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

3030 N Rocky Point Drive W, Suite 150, Tampa, FL   33607
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (813) 418-5250

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated Filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller reporting company   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

The Registrant had 15,434,447 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of October 31, 2013.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

         PAGE  
PART I   FINANCIAL INFORMATION   
Item 1  

Financial Statements

     F-1   
 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

  
 

As of September 28, 2013 (unaudited)

  
 

As of December 31, 2012

     F-2   
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

  
 

Three and Nine Months ended September 28, 2013 (unaudited)

  
 

Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2012 (unaudited)

     F-3   
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  
 

Nine Months ended September 28, 2013 (unaudited)

  
 

Nine Months ended September 30, 2012 (unaudited)

     F-4   
 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

     F-5– F-12   
Item 2  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

     1   
Item 4  

Controls and Procedures

     8   
PART II   OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1  

Legal Proceedings

     9   
Item 2  

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     9   
Item 3  

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     10   
Item 4  

Mine Safety Disclosures

     10   
Item 5  

Exhibits

     11   

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references in this filing to “we,” “us,” the “Company,” and “Deer Valley” are to Deer Valley Corporation, a Florida corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc., an Alabama corporation, Deer Valley Finance Corp., a Florida corporation, and Deer Valley Home Repair Services, Inc., a Florida corporation.


Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

Contents:

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 28, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012

  F-2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September  28, 2013 and September 30, 2012 (unaudited)

  F-3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Month Period Ended September  28, 2013 and September 30, 2012 (unaudited)

  F-4

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

  F-5 - F-12

 

 

 

F-1


Table of Contents

Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

     September 28,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 
     (unaudited)        
ASSETS     

Current Assets:

    

Cash

   $ 1,691,162      $ 2,434,227   

Accounts receivable, net

     2,041,516        1,058,858   

Inventory

     1,793,714        1,547,723   

Deferred tax asset

     564,187        629,090   

Inventory finance notes receivable

     2,776,743        3,537,638   

Construction loan notes receivable

     1,069,007        —     

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     176,249        122,280   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

     10,112,578        9,329,816   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fixed Assets:

    

Property, plant and equipment, net

     2,101,489        2,128,005   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Assets:

    

Inventory finance notes receivable, net

     2,685,259        4,407,293   

Deferred tax asset

     1,746,495        1,891,861   

Other assets

     18,256        20,578   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Other Assets:

     4,450,010        6,319,732   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 16,664,077      $ 17,777,553   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current Liabilities:

    

Current maturities on long term debt

   $ 125,600      $ 125,600   

Revolving credit loans

     3,221,799        4,750,000   

Accounts payable

     435,617        197,915   

Accrued expenses

     1,536,223        1,398,306   

Accrued warranties

     1,110,000        1,170,000   

Income tax payable

     —          57,732   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     6,429,239        7,699,553   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long Term Liabilities:

    

Long-term debt, net of current maturities

     847,800        942,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Long Term Liabilities

     847,800        942,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

     7,277,039        8,641,553   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)

    

Stockholders’ Equity:

    

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,786,184 and 17,786,184 shares issued and 15,434,513 and 15,657,661 shares outstanding, respectively.

     17,788        17,788   

Additional paid-in capital

     33,254,293        33,254,293   

Treasury Stock, at cost; 2,351,671 and 2,128,523 shares, respectively

     (1,275,572     (1,134,998

Accumulated deficit

     (22,609,471     (23,001,083
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Equity

     9,387,038        9,136,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   $ 16,664,077      $ 17,777,553   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

 

F-2


Table of Contents

Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

     For The Three Month Period Ended     For The Nine Month Period Ended  
     September 28,     September 30,     September 28,     September 30,  
     2013     2012     2013     2012  
     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

REVENUE

   $ 7,285,472      $ 6,439,126      $ 19,963,500      $ 19,401,335   

COST OF REVENUE

     5,886,887        5,097,314        16,295,573        15,923,789   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

GROSS PROFIT

     1,398,585        1,341,812        3,667,927        3,477,546   

OPERATING EXPENSES

        

Depreciation

     2,247        3,221        7,986        9,707   

Selling, general and administrative

     1,013,018        980,190        3,037,249        3,115,871   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

     1,015,265        983,411        3,045,235        3,125,578   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

     383,320        358,401        622,692        351,968   

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)

        

Derivative income

     —          16,821        —          33,286   

Interest income

     122        218        414        3,156   

Other income

     2,000        —          2,000        1,640   

Interest expense

     (10,685     (15,791     (32,710     (41,573
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL OTHER (EXPENSES)/INCOME

     (8,563     1,248        (30,296     (3,491
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

     374,757        359,649        592,396        348,477   

INCOME TAX (EXPENSE)

     (110,834     (136,843     (200,784     (136,727
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET INCOME

   $ 263,923      $ 222,806      $ 391,612      $ 211,750   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation of net income to income attributable to common stockholders:

        

Income from operations

   $ 263,923      $ 222,806      $ 391,612      $ 211,750   

Deemed distribution on redemption of preferred stock

     —          —          —          118,182   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income attributable to common stockholders an numerator for basic Income per common share

   $ 263,923      $ 222,806      $ 391,612      $ 329,932   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income Per Share (Basic)

   $ 0.02      $ 0.01      $ 0.03      $ 0.02   

Net Income Per Share (Fully Diluted)

   $ 0.02      $ 0.01      $ 0.03      $ 0.02   

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

     15,459,922        15,959,274        15,512,813        18,547,213   

Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding

     15,459,922        15,959,274        15,512,813        16,317,618   

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

 

F-3


Table of Contents

Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

     For The Nine Month Period Ended  
     September 28,     September 30,  
     2013     2012  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net income

   $ 391,612      $ 211,750   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used) in operating activities:

    

Depreciation

     157,209        158,607   

Derivative (income)

     —          (33,286

Gain on sale of equipment

     (2,000     (1,640

(Benefit)/Provision for credit losses

     (117,660     70,870   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

(Increase)/decrease in receivables

     (982,658     1,208,188   

(Increase)/decrease in inventories

     (245,991     (857,798

(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax asset

     210,269        215,944   

(Increase)/decrease in inventory finance receivable

     2,600,589        (774,906

(Increase)/decrease in construction loan receivable

     (1,069,007     —     

(Increase)/decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets

     (45,783     49,309   

Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable

     237,702        (22,577

Increase/(decrease) in income tax payable

     (63,596     (519,182

Increase/(decrease) in estimated services and warranties

     (60,000     (135,000

Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses

     137,916        100,695   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOW PROVIDED BY/(USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES

   $ 1,148,602      $ (329,026
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Purchases of equipment

     (130,693     (9,724

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

     2,000        4,095   

Sales of short-term investments

     —          2,900,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOW (USED) IN/PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

   $ (128,693   $ 2,894,371   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Repayment of long-term debt

     (94,200     (83,733

Proceeds from revolving credit loans

     11,396,287        8,750,000   

Repayments of revolving credit loans

     (12,924,487     (8,300,000

Purchases of common stock option

     —          (879,419

Purchases of treasury stock

     (140,574     (660,593

Purchases of preferred stock

     —          (1,756,818
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOW (USED) IN/FINANCING ACTIVITIES

   $ (1,762,974   $ (2,930,563
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET (DECREASE) IN CASH

   $ (743,065   $ (365,218

CASH, Beginning

     2,434,227        3,270,048   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH, Ending

   $ 1,691,162      $ 2,904,830   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

    

Cash paid during the period for:

    

Interest

   $ 155,255      $ 125,145   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Taxes

   $ 106,008      $ 568,723   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Conversion of Series A preferred stock for common stock-net

   $ —        $ 215   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

 

F-4


Table of Contents

Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 28, 2013

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013 and September 30, 2012 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

The unaudited financial information included in this report includes all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to reflect a fair statement of the results for the interim period. The operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results of the full fiscal year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Registrant’s December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation - The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc. (“DVH), Deer Valley Financial Corp (“DVFC”) and Deer Valley Home Repair Services, Inc. (“DVHRS”). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Accounting Estimates - The Company’s financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fiscal Year - The Company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year end. Each fiscal quarter consists of 13 weeks, with an occasional fourth quarter extending to 14 weeks, if necessary.

Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The Company maintains its cash balances in two different financial institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At September 28, 2013, $1,798,772 of our cash balances exceeded the current FDIC insurance limits.

Inventory Finance Notes Receivable - The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to qualified retail dealers and developers. Finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to 24 months. The Company periodically evaluates the collectability of our notes receivable and considers the need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our historical collection experience. We have established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $211,840 as of September 28, 2013 and $271,810 at September 30, 2012.

Construction Loan Notes Receivable - The Company provides bridge financing to an established mortgage originator to provide on a revolving basis, 80% of the funding for “construction-to-permanent loans” prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy and ultimate resale of the loan to either private or government controlled long term financing entities.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - Property and intangible assets are material to our consolidated financial statements. Further, these assets are subject to the potential negative effects arising from factors beyond the Company’s control including changing economic conditions. The Company evaluates its tangible and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during our fourth quarter or more frequently in the presence of circumstances or trends that may be indicators of impairment. The evaluation is a two step process. The first step is to compare our undiscounted cash flows, as projected over the remaining useful lives of the assets, to their respective carrying values. In the event that the carrying values are not recovered by future undiscounted cash flows, as a second step,

 

F-5


Table of Contents

the Company compares the carrying values to the related fair values and, if the fair value is lower, record an impairment adjustment. For purposes of fair value, the Company generally uses replacement costs for tangible fixed assets and discounted cash flows, using risk-adjusted discount rates, for intangible assets. These estimates are made by competent employees, using the best available information, under the direct supervision of our management. For tangible property, plant and equipment, there have been no changes in assumptions or methodologies in the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013 as compared to September 30, 2012. The Company did not have definite-lived intangible assets at September 28, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 420 “Exit on Disposal Cost Obligations”, the Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. The carrying value of long-lived assets is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such assets is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that the fair market values are primarily based on independent appraisals and preliminary or definitive contractual arrangements less costs to dispose.

Revenue Recognition - Revenue from manufactured homes sold to independent dealers generally is recorded when all of the following conditions have been met; (a) an order for the home has been received from the dealer, (b) an agreement with respect to payment terms (usually in the form of a written or verbal approval for payment has been received from the dealer’s flooring institution), and (c) the home has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the dealer and collectability is reasonably assured.

Cost of Sales - The Company’s factory-built housing segment includes the following types of expenses in cost of sales: purchase and receiving costs, freight in, direct labor, supply costs, warehousing, direct and indirect overhead costs, inspection, transfer, actual and accrued warranty, depreciation, and amortization costs. The Company’s financial services segment includes the following types of expenses in cost of sales: interest expense

Selling, General and Administrative - The Company includes the following types of expenses in selling, general and administrative expense: sales salaries, sales commissions, bad debt expense, advertising, administrative overhead, administrative salaries and bonuses and legal and professional fees.

Derivative Financial Instruments - We generally do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow risks or market-risks that may affect the fair values of our financial instruments. However, we have entered into certain financial instruments, such as the issuance of certain freestanding warrants, which do not meet the conditions for equity classification due to their “down-round” protection features. As required by ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value with changes in fair value, in our financial statements with changes in fair value reflected in our income (loss). See Note 9 Derivative Liabilities of the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure data.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share - The Company uses the guidance set forth under FASB topic ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. Basic income/(loss) per share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) and net income/(loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income/(loss) per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential shares had been issued and if the additional shares were dilutive. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of net loss per share if they would be anti-dilutive.

The Company’s dilutive common stock equivalent shares as of September 30, 2012 include any incremental shares associated with the Company’s outstanding warrants. As of September 28, 2013 the Company did not have any outstanding warrants. All warrants expired on August 11, 2013.

See the detailed list of Common Stock Equivalents below.

 

                 Common Stock Equivalents  
                 as of  

Securities

   Exercise
Price
    

Expiration Date

   September 28,
2013
     September 30,
2012
 

Warrants:

           

Class B Warrants

   $ 2.25       August 11, 2013      —           1,112,487   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

           —           1,112,487   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total common stock equivalents

           —           1,112,487   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-6


Table of Contents

Income Taxes - Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period when the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

NOTE 3 - INVENTORY

Inventory consisted of the following components:

 

     September 28,      December 31,  
     2013      2012  

Raw Materials

   $ 1,005,848       $ 884,884   

Work-in-Process

     228,196         229,259   

Finished Goods

     559,670         433,580   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Inventory

   $ 1,793,714       $ 1,547,723   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

NOTE 4 - INVENTORY FINANCE NOTES RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSS

The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to a limited number of qualified retail dealers and developers. Administrative services for inventory-secured financing are provided by Triad Financial Services, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida. Finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to 24 months. These notes are secured by the inventory collateral and other security depending on borrower circumstances.

Inventory finance notes receivable, net, consisted of the following:

 

     September 28,     December 31,  
     2013     2012  

Inventory finance notes receivable - current

   $ 2,776,743      $ 3,537,638   

Inventory finance notes receivable - long-term

     2,897,099        4,736,793   

Allowance for loan loss

     (211,840     (329,500
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Inventory finance notes receivable

   $ 5,462,002      $ 7,944,931   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

With respect to our inventory finance notes receivable, the risk of loss is spread over numerous borrowers. In addition to historical experience, borrower inventory levels and activity are monitored in conjunction with a third-party provider to estimate the potential for loss. The Company anticipates it will be able to resell any repossessed homes, thereby mitigating loss experience. If a default occurs and collateral is lost, the Company is exposed to loss of the full value of the note receivable. The Company recorded a (benefit)/provision for credit losses of $(117,660) and $70,870 for nine month period ending September 28, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. The following table represents changes in the estimated allowance for loan losses:

 

     September 28,     September 30,  
     2013     2012  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 329,500      $ 200,940   

(Benefit)/Provision for credit losses

     (117,660     70,870   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 211,840      $ 271,810   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-7


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 - ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

 

     September 28,      December 31,  

Category

   2013      2012  

Accrued dealer incentive program

   $ 241,471       $ 268,754   

Accrued third party billings

     468,779         477,832   

Accrued compensation

     408,730         239,225   

Accrued insurance

     76,273         90,943   

Accrued interest

     11,163         17,394   

Accrued repurchase commitment

     116,605         106,280   

Other

     213,202         197,878   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Accrued Expenses

   $ 1,536,223       $ 1,398,306   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

NOTE 6 - PRODUCT WARRANTIES

The Company provides the retail home buyer a one-year limited warranty covering defects in material or workmanship in home structure, plumbing and electrical systems. The Company estimated warranty costs are accrued at the time of the sale to the dealer following industry standards and historical warranty cost incurred. Periodic adjustments to the estimated warranty accrual are made as events occur which indicate changes are necessary. As of September 28, 2013, the Company has recorded an accrued liability of $1,110,000 for estimated warranty costs relating to homes sold, based upon management’s assessment of historical experience factors and current industry trends. Management reviews its warranty requirements at the close of each reporting period and adjusts the reserves accordingly.

The following tabular presentation reflects activity in warranty reserves during the periods presented:

 

     For The Three
Month Period
Ended
    For The Nine
Month Period
Ended
 
     September 28,     September 28,  
     2013     2013  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 1,080,000      $ 1,170,000   

Warranty charges

     353,303        967,070   

Warranty payments

     (323,303     (1,027,070
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 1,110,000      $ 1,110,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 7 - REVOLVING CREDIT LOANS

Effective September 10, 2013, Deer Valley renewed its $5,000,000 Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with Fifth Third Bank, used for display model financing for dealers of the products produced by DVH (the “Display Model LOC”). The Display Model LOC has a two year term and has a variable interest rate at 4.00% above LIBOR or 4.1824% at September 28, 2013. As of September 28, 2013, the Company had an outstanding balance of $650,000 under the revolving credit loan.

Effective September 10, 2013, Deer Valley renewed its $3,000,000 Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with Fifth Third Bank, used for short term working capital financing, letters of credit and as a bridge loan on financing the sale of retail units by DVH (the “Working Capital LOC”). The Working Capital LOC has a two year term and has a variable interest rate at 2.50% above LIBOR or 2.6824% at September 28, 2013. As of September 28, 2013, the Company had an outstanding balance of $1,550,000 under the revolving credit loan.

Effective April 12, 2013 Deer Valley entered into a Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with its primary bank, used for funding “construction-to-permanent loans” prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy and ultimate resale of the loan to either a private or government controlled long term financing entities. The $2,500,000 Facility has a two year term and has a variable interest rate at 4.0% above LIBOR. The loan is evidenced by a revolving credit note and secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and all other tangible and intangible personal property of Deer Valley. As of September 28, 2013, the Company had an outstanding balance of $1,021,799 under the revolving credit loan.

 

F-8


Table of Contents

The amount available under the revolving credit loans is equal to the lesser of $10,500,000 or an amount based on defined percentages of accounts receivable and inventories reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. At September 28, 2013, $6,855,088 was available under the revolving credit loans after deducting letters of credit of $65,000.

In addition to the revolving line of credit described in the preceding paragraph, DVH, during its normal course of business, is required to issue irrevocable standby letters of credit in the favor of independent third party beneficiaries to cover obligations under insurance policies. As of September 28, 2013, no amounts had been drawn on the above irrevocable letters of credit by the beneficiaries.

NOTE 8 - LONG_TERM DEBT

On May 26, 2006, DVH entered into a Loan Agreement with Fifth Third Bank (the “Lender”) providing for a loan of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) (the “Loan”) evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a first mortgage on DVH’s properties in Guin, Alabama and Sulligent, Alabama, including the structures and fixtures located thereon, as well as DVH’s interest in any lease thereof. The Loan had a term from May 26, 2006 through June 1, 2011 and has a variable interest rate at 2.25% above LIBOR. There is no prepayment penalty. Future advances are available under the Loan Agreement, subject to approval by the Lender. Also on May 26, 2006, the Company and DVH guaranteed the Loan. Should Deer Valley default, thereby triggering acceleration of the Loan, the Company would become liable for payment of the Loan. On June 1, 2011 Fifth Third Bank agreed to extend to maturity date on the loan until an amendment to the loan agreement could be finalized.

On July 8, 2011, DVH and the Lender entered into that certain Amendment to Loan Agreement effective June 1, 2011, pursuant to which, among matters, (a) DVH made a cash payment to reduce the outstanding principal balance of the Real Estate Loan to $1,256,000, (b) the term of the Real Estate Loan was extended to June 1, 2016, and (c) the variable interest rate was set at 400 basis points (4.00%) above the One-Month LIBOR-Index Rate. The Real Estate Loan is guaranteed by DVC and DVFC.

NOTE 9 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Under ASC 815, share-linked contracts which contain full ratchet anti-dilution provisions are not considered indexed to a company’s own stock for purposes of determining whether it meets the first part of the scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74. The application of this standard required us to (1) evaluate our instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. Based upon applying this approach to instruments within the scope of the consensus, we determined that certain of our warrants do not meet the definition of Indexed to a Company’s Own Stock provided in the Consensus. Accordingly, those Warrants are recorded as liabilities at their fair value. ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” requires that the fair value of these liabilities be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

As of December 31, 2012, derivative financial instruments recorded as liabilities consisted of Class B Warrants indexed to 1,112,487 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $2.25. The fair value of the Class B warrants as of December 31, 2012 was $0. The Company’s Class B Warrants expired on August 11, 2013.

The following tables summarize the effects on our income (loss) associated with changes in the fair values of our derivative financial instruments:

 

     Three months
ended
    

Three months

ended

 
     September 28,
2013
     September 30,
2012
 

Class A Warrants (Class A-1 & Class A-2)

   $ —         $ —     

Class B Warrants

     —           16,821   

Class BD-2 Warrants

     —           —     

Class BD-3 Warrants

     —           —     

Class BD-4 Warrants

     —           —     

Class BD-5 Warrants

     —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ —         $ 16,821   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

We estimate fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be consistent with the objective measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate technique, we consider, among other factors, the nature of the instrument, the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of settlement. We value our derivative warrants using a Binomial Lattice valuation model which provides for early exercise scenarios and incorporates the down-round anti-dilution protection possibilities that could arise in early exercise scenarios.

 

F-9


Table of Contents

Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques (such as Lattice models) are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair value, our (income) loss will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

 

     December 31, 2012  

Significant assumptions (or ranges):

  

Trading market values (1)

   $ 0.60   

Term (years) (3)

     .61   

Volatility (3)

     44.8

Risk-free rate (2)

     0.06

Fair value hierarchy:

 

(1) Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, or derived there from. Our trading market values and the volatilities that are calculated thereupon are level 1 inputs.
(2) Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable. We use the current published yields for zero-coupon US Treasury Securities, with terms nearest the remaining term of the warrants for our risk free rate.
(3) Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs. Inputs for which any parts are level 3 inputs are classified as level 3 in their entirety. The remaining term used equals the remaining contractual term as our best estimate of the expected term.

 

F-10


Table of Contents

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES

Income Taxes:

The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

     Nine months ended  
     September 28, 2013  

Current income tax (benefit)

   $ (9,485

Deferred income tax expense

     210,269   
  

 

 

 

Total income tax expense

   $ 200,784   
  

 

 

 

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate and the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

     Nine months ended  
     September 28, 2013  
           Impact on  
     Amount     Rate  

Income tax (benefit) at federal rate

   $ 201,415       34.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

State tax benefit, net of Federal effect

     25,035       4.23
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Permanent Differences:

    

Meals and entertainment

     15,765       2.66

Officer’s life insurance

     1,003       0.17
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total permanent differences

   $ 16,768       2.83
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

True Up to Tax Return - Deferred Assets

     (42,434 )     -7.16
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax (benefit)

   $ 200,784       33.90
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income taxes are as follows:

 

     September 28, 2013  

Current Deferred Tax Assets:

  

Warranty reserve

   $ 424,309   

Repurchase reserve

     44,573   

Loan loss reserve

     80,978   

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     5,734   

Inventory reserve

     4,770   

Accrued legal fees

     3,823   
  

 

 

 

Total Current Deferred Tax Asset

     564,187   
  

 

 

 

Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets:

  

Goodwill impairment

     1,781,829   
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets

     1,781,829   
  

 

 

 

Non-Current Deferred Tax Liability:

  

Accelerated depreciation

     (42,864

Sale of assets

     7,530   
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Liability

     (35,334
  

 

 

 

Total Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities) - Net

   $ 2,310,682   
  

 

 

 

NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation - The Company in the normal course of business is subject to claims and litigation. Management of the Company is of the opinion that, based on information available, such legal matters will not ultimately have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operation of the Company.

Reserve for Repurchase Commitments - DVH is contingently liable under the terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of DVH’s products. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer. The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over numerous retailers. The price DVH is obligated to pay generally declines over the period of the agreement (typically 18 to 24 months) and the risk of loss is further reduced by the sale value of repurchased homes. The maximum amount for which the

 

F-11


Table of Contents

Company is contingently liable under repurchase agreements is approximately $2,915,145 at September 28, 2013. As of September 28, 2013 the Company reserved $116,605 for future repurchase losses, based on prior experience and an evaluation of dealers’ financial conditions. DVH to date has not experienced significant losses under these agreements, and management does not expect any future losses to have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 12 - EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

Common Stock Dividends - There were no dividends paid during the nine month period ended September 28, 2013.

Treasury Stock - Pursuant to a common stock repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors, a total of 223,148 shares were purchased during the nine month period ended September 28, 2013 at a cost of $140,574 and recorded as treasury stock.

NOTE 13 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

Our business segments consist of factory-built housing and financial services. Our chief decision making officer considers income (loss) from operations as the basis to measure segment profitability. The following table summarizes net sales, income (loss) from operations, and identifiable assets by segment for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

 

     For The Three Months Ended     For The nine Months Ended  
     September 28,
2013
    September 30,
2012
    September 28,
2013
    September 30,
2012
 

Revenues from external customers

        

Factory-built housing

   $ 7,114,025      $ 6,279,416      $ 19,422,391      $ 18,973,951   

Financial services

     171,447        159,710        541,109        427,384   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 7,285,472      $ 6,439,126      $ 19,963,500      $ 19,401,335   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

        

Factory-built housing

   $ 362,244      $ 401,187      $ 709,588      $ 675,023   

Financial services

     130,231        71,265        358,900        155,464   

General corporate expenses

     (109,155     (114,051     (445,796     (478,519
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income (loss) from operations

   $ 383,320      $ 358,401      $ 622,692      $ 351,968   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Identifiable assets by segment

        

Factory-built housing

   $ 9,904,826      $ 10,064,217       

Financial Services

     6,675,761        7,460,462       

Other

     83,490        71,837       
  

 

 

   

 

 

     
   $ 16,664,077      $ 17,596,516       
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

F-12


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and projections about future events, are not guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below), and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Overview

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc. (“DVH”) and Deer Valley Home Repair Services, Inc. (“DVHRS”), designs and manufactures factory built homes which are marketed in 14 states through a network of independent dealers, builders, developers and government agencies located primarily in the southeastern and south central regions of the United States. Our financial subsidiary, Deer Valley Financial Corp (“DVFC”), provides dealer inventory-secured financing for our factory built homes and provides bridge financing to an established mortgage originator for the funding of construction-to-permanent loans for ultimate resale.

Our business segments consist of factory-built housing and financial services. Our financial services provide qualified independent retail dealers and developers with inventory-secured financing for homes the Company produces and provides bridge financing for construction-to-permanent loans for ultimate resale. The Company does not maintain separate operating segments for regions and does not separately report financial information by geographic sales area because they are similar products using similar production techniques and sold to the same class of customer. See Note 13 – Segment Information of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on our net sales, income from operations, and identifiable assets by segment for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

Industry and Company Outlook

The factory-built housing industry and the Company continue to operate at low production and shipment levels. According to data provided by the Manufactured Housing Institute (“MHI”), our industry shipped approximately 55,000 HUD code homes during the calendar year 2012, compared to approximately 52,000 homes shipped in 2011 and 50,000 homes shipped in both calendar years 2010 and 2009. From January to August 2013, industry HUD code shipments were approximately 39,750 units; an approximately 6 percent increase from the same period a year ago.

 

- 1 -


Table of Contents

While we are encouraged by the positive trends in shipments of HUD code homes, several challenges such as persistently high unemployment levels, ongoing economic weakness and uncertainty, the restrictive mortgage lending environment and the potential for more foreclosures continue to threaten a recovery in our industry. Until there is a more robust U.S. economic recovery, we expect shipments of HUD code homes to remain at historically low levels, with uneven improvement across markets.

Before an emergence from current low shipment levels can occur, increased availability of consumer financing for the retail purchase of factory-built is necessary. Although, the overall demand for new homes has continued to show signs of improvement, the current lending environment that favors site-built housing and more affluent homebuyers has resulted in an adverse impact for buyers of factory-built homes. Restrictive underwriting guidelines, inconsistent appraisal processes, higher interest rates compared to site-built homes, regulatory burdens, reduction in the number of institutions lending to factory-built home buyers and limited secondary market availability for factory-built home loans are significant restraints to industry growth.

The Company’s executives continue to focus on challenges faced by our industry and the general economy. (i) As part of the Company’s strategic plan, management seeks to identify niche market opportunities where our custom building capabilities provide us with a competitive advantage. The Company continues to focus on the production of custom built, energy efficient, “heavy built homes” and has intensified efforts in innovative exterior elevations to meet the needs of homeowners, dealers and developers (ii) Management has addressed the limited availability of “dealer inventory financing” with the establishment of its wholly owned subsidiary, DVFC. The subsidiary was created to provide inventory-secured loans to qualified retail dealers and developers. (iii) Management has addressed a need for consumer financing by teaming with an established mortgage originator to increase the availability of affordable loans for qualified retail buyers of factory-built homes. (iv) The Company continues to focus on operating activities to improve manufacturing efficiencies and maintaining a conservative cost structure. (v) The Company continually looks for new market opportunities and expanding our product offering by developing product designs and production methods.

Manufacturing Operations

We produce all of our factory-built homes at our plant in Guin, Alabama. Our plant is currently staffed for a single shift; 40 hour work week and producing on average 20 “floors” per week. During the quarter ended September 28, 2013, the Company’s average production rate was approximately 17 “floors” produced per week or 49% of our maximum capacity of a single shift, 40 hour work week. As of September 28, 2013, our backlog of orders stood at approximately $3,100,000 or approximately 22 days at our current production rate. We have one idle plant located in Sulligent, Alabama.

When evaluating the Company’s operating performance, the key performance indicators management examines are (1) the Company’s production rate, in “floors” produced per day, (2) the cost of sales, (3) the size of the Company’s sales backlog, and (4) the prevailing market conditions. For more information on these performance indicators, please see the attached financial statements and notes thereto and the section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K titled “Description of Business

Financial Operations

The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to a limited number of qualified retail dealers and developers. Products shipped to dealers under the Company’s inventory-secured financing program are recorded by the Company as sales and the dealers obligations to the Company are reflected as inventory finance notes receivable.

Finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to twenty-four months. These notes are secured by a first priority secured interest in the inventory collateral and other security depending on borrower circumstances. Dealers who sell products utilizing inventory-secured financing are required to make immediate payment for those products to the Company upon sale to the retail customer. For the three month period ending September 28, 2013, approximately 30% of sales of the Company’s products utilized the Company’s inventory-secured financing program compared to approximately 46% for the three month period ended September 30, 2012.

Although inventory-secured financing continues to be in short supply for the industry’s wholesale distribution chain, recently a national lender introduced finance programs subject to less financial involvement of

 

- 2 -


Table of Contents

the manufacturer. The increased flexibility has allowed the Company to begin to reduce its involvement in direct inventory-secured financing. However, until greater access to credit for inventory financing becomes available participation in inventory-secured financing is needed to maintain our distribution base.

On April 12, 2013, the Company entered into a new credit arrangement with its primary bank by entering into a new Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with its primary bank, which provides for a revolving line of credit in an amount not to exceed Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00) (the “Construction Facility”). The Construction Facility is evidenced by a revolving credit note and secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and all other tangible and intangible personal property of Deer Valley. The Loan matures on June 30, 2015 and has a variable interest rate of 4.00% above LIBOR. An event of default such as non-payment of amounts when due or a breach of a covenant may accelerate the maturity date of the facility. The facility provides for conditions to meet prior to each advance, including financial ratios.

Deer Valley’s financial subsidiary, DVFC is using proceeds from the Construction Facility to furnish up to total of $2.5 million dollars to CIS Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a CIS Home Loans (CIS), to provide on a revolving basis, 80% of the funding for “construction-to-permanent loans” prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy and ultimate resale of the loan to either private or government controlled long term financing entities.

Single-closing, construction-to-permanent mortgage is a common form of financing for new site-built homes. Often, however, it is not readily available to buyers of factory-built homes. This specific source of retail financing is important for the factory-built housing industry. Through this new arrangement with CIS, Deer Valley is able to assist its dealers and homebuyers with increased availability of this type of retail financing to the buyers of factory-built homes.

See Note 7 – Revolving Credit Loans of the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements for information on our $5,000,000 display model line of credit, $3,000,000 working capital line of credit, and the $2,500,000 Construction Facility.

Regulatory Developments

In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was passed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act is a sweeping piece of legislation, and the financial services industry is still assessing its implications. Congress detailed some significant changes, but the Dodd-Frank Act leaves many details to be determined by regulation and further study. The full impact will not be fully known for months or even years, as regulations that are intended to implement the Dodd-Frank Act are adopted by the appropriate agencies, and the text of the Dodd-Frank Act is analyzed by impacted stakeholders and possibly the courts. The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB to regulate consumer financial products and services. On January 10, 2013 the CFPB released certain mortgage finance rules required under the Dodd-Frank Act. These rules define standards for origination of “Qualified Mortgages,” establish specific requirements for lenders to prove borrowers’ ability to repay loans, and outline the conditions under which Qualified Mortgages will be subject to safe harbor limitations on liability to borrowers. Unless current efforts to modify the new rules are successful they will take effect in January 2014 and will apply to consumer credit transactions secured by a dwelling, which include chattel-only loans (manufactured home without land). The rules also establish interest rate and other cost parameters for determining which Qualified Mortgages fall under safe harbor protection. Among other issues, Qualified Mortgages with interest rates and other costs outside the limits will be “rebuttable” by borrowers and expose the lender and its assignees (including investors in loans, pools of loans, and instruments secured by loans or loan pools) to litigation and penalties. While many manufactured homes are currently financed with agency-conforming mortgages in which the ability to repay is verified and at interest rates and other costs that would be within the safe harbor limits, a significant amount of loans as currently written, especially chattel loans and non-conforming land-home loans, would fall outside the safe harbor. After the rules are in effect, lenders may become reluctant to write such loans, and investors reluctant to own or participate in owning such loans because of the uncertainty of potential litigation and other costs. If so, some prospective buyers of manufactured homes may be unable to secure financing necessary to complete purchases. In addition, compliance with the law may be costly from implementation of new processes, procedures, controls and infrastructure which may be required to comply with the regulations. Compliance may also create operational constraints and place limits on pricing. Failure to comply with these regulations, changes in these or other regulations, or the imposition of additional regulations, could affect our earnings, limit our access to capital and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, was passed into law. As enacted, the Health Reform Law reforms, among other things, certain aspects of health insurance. The Health Reform Law could increase our healthcare costs, adversely impacting the Company’s earnings.

 

- 3 -


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following discussion examines the results of the Company’s operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013. This discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements, included herewith. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment by our management. It is also imperative that one read our December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings on Form 8-K.

HISTORICAL RESULTS – THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2012.

Revenues. Overall gross revenue for the three month period ended September 28, 2013 was $7,285,472 compared to $6,439,126 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012, representing an increase of $846,346, or approximately 13.1%. Overall gross revenue for the nine month period ended September 28, 2013 was $19,963,500 compared to $19,401,335 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, representing an increase of $562,165, or approximately 2.9%. The increase in revenue is primarily from an increase in the average sales prices. Our average wholesale price per unit increased to approximately $78,000 from $68,000 for the nine month period ended September 28, 2013, compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2012. The increase in the average sales price is attributable to sales price adjustments from higher material costs and from a product mix of larger homes with greater amenities. Although we remain cautiously optimistic, several challenges such as persistently high unemployment levels, ongoing economic weakness and uncertainty, the restrictive mortgage lending environment and the threat of more foreclosures continue to hinder a robust recovery in the housing market.

Gross Profit. Gross profit for the three month period ended September 28, 2013 was $1,398,585 or 19.2% of total revenue compared to $1,341,812 or 20.8% of total revenue for the three month period ended September 30, 2012. Gross profit for the nine month period ended September 28, 2013 was $3,667,927 or 18.4% of total revenue compared to $3,477,546 or 17.9% of total revenue for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012. For the three month period gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased 1.6% compared to the prior year, the decrease is primarily attributable to an increase in warranty related costs of 1.05% and other direct and indirect overhead cost of .55%. For the nine month period gross profit as a percentage of sales increased .50% compared to the prior year, the increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in labor and related costs of 1.35%, which were offset in part by an increase in warranty related cost of .80%. The Company includes the following types of expenses in cost of sales: purchase and receiving costs, freight in, direct labor, supply costs, warehousing, direct and indirect overhead costs, inspection, transfer, actual and accrued warranty, depreciation, and amortization costs.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three month period ended September 28, 2013 were $1,013,018 compared to $980,190 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the nine month period ended September 28, 2013 were $3,037,249 compared to $3,115,871 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine month period, primarily relates to a decrease in sales and marketing expenses. The Company includes the following types of expenses in selling, general and administrative expense: sales salaries, sales commissions, bad debt expense, advertising, administrative overhead, administrative salaries and bonuses and legal and professional fees.

Net Income. The net income for the three month period ended September 28, 2013 was $263,923 compared to net income of $222,806 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012, representing an increase in net income of $41,117. The net income for the nine month period ended September 28, 2013 was $391,612 compared to net income of $211,750 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, representing an increase in net income of $179,862. The increase in net income for the three and nine month periods ended September 28, 2013 compared to the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, is primarily attributable to an increase in revenues.

 

- 4 -


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management believes that the Company currently has sufficient cash flow from operations, available bank borrowings, cash, and cash equivalents to meet its short-term working capital requirements. The Company had $1,691,162 in cash and cash equivalents as of September 28, 2013, compared to $2,434,227 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as of December 31, 2012. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents is primarily attributable to an increase in accounts receivable. The increase in accounts receivable is primarily driven by a smaller percentage of sales of our products utilizing the Company’s inventory secured finance program. Should our costs and expenses prove to greater than we currently anticipate or should we change our current business plan in a manner which will increase or accelerate our anticipated costs or capital demand, such as through the acquisition of new products, our working capital could be depleted at an accelerated rate.

As of September 28, 2013, the aggregate balance on our loan facilities was $3,221,799. In addition, we have a real estate loan from its primary bank that had a balance, as of September 28, 2013, of $973,400.

1 – Cash flow from operating activities:

For the nine month period ended September 28, 2013, operating activities provided net cash of $1,148,602 primarily as a result of the following:

 

  (a) a decrease in inventory finance notes receivable of $2,600,589 (a source of cash), primarily as a result of a national inventory lender returning to the market, and

 

  (b) a decrease in deferred tax asset of $210,269 ( a source of cash), and

 

  (c) an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of 375,618 (a source of cash), which were partially offset by,

 

  (d) an increase in accounts receivable of $982,658 (a use of cash), primarily as a result of a return to normal production levels subsequent to holiday shutdown period at December 31, 2012 and a smaller percentage of sales utilizing the Company’s inventory secured financing,

 

  (e) an increase in inventories of $245,991 (a use of cash), primarily as a result of a return to normal production levels subsequent to holiday shutdown period at December 31, 2012, and

 

  (f) an increase in construction loan receivables of $1,069,007 (a use of cash), as result of the initial funding of construction-to-permanent loans.

2 – Cash flow from investing activities:

The net cash used in investing activities for the nine month period ending September 28, 2013 was $128,693, which reflects capitalization of normal operating purchases of equipment.

3 – Cash flow from financing activities:

The net cash used in financing activities for the nine month period ending September 28, 2013 was $1,762,974, which is primarily attributable purchases of treasury stock at a cost of $140,574, scheduled principal payments of long-term debt of $94,200, and net repayments of revolving credit loans of $1,528,200.

The Company is contingently liable under the terms of the repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of our products. For more information on the repurchase agreements, including the Company’s contingent liability there under, please see “Reserve for Repurchase Commitments” below.

DVH, during its normal course of business, is required to provide irrevocable standby letters of credit to cover obligations under its workers compensation insurance policy in the amount of $65,000. As of September 28, 2013, no amounts had been drawn on the above irrevocable letters of credit by the beneficiaries.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments which affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. For a description of those estimates, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, contained in the explanatory notes to the Company’s financial statements for the

 

- 5 -


Table of Contents

quarter ended September 28, 2013, contained in this filing and the Company’s Form 10-K for December 31, 2012. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to reserves, deferred tax assets, valuation allowances, impairment of long-lived assets, fair value of equity instruments issued to consultants for services, and estimates of costs to complete contracts. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. However, we believe that our estimates, including those for the above-described items, are reasonable.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Management is aware that certain changes in accounting estimates employed in generating financial statements can have the effect of making the Company look more or less profitable than it actually is. Management believes the Company’s estimates are reasonable. A summary of the most critical accounting estimates employed by the Company in generating financial statements follows below.

Warranties

We provide our retail buyers with a one-year limited warranty covering defects in material or workmanship, including plumbing and electrical systems. We record a liability for estimated future warranty costs relating to homes sold, based upon our assessment of historical experience and industry trends. In making this estimate, we evaluate historical sales amounts, warranty costs related to homes sold and timing in which any work orders are completed. The Company has accrued a warranty liability reserve of $1,110,000 on its balance sheet as of September 28, 2013. Based on management’s assessment of historical experience and current trends in wholesale shipments and dealer inventories we decreased our warranty provision by $30,000 for the quarter ended September 28, 2013. Although we maintain reserves for such claims, there can be no assurance that warranty expense levels will remain at current levels or that the reserves that we have set aside will continue to be adequate. A large number of warranty claims which exceed our current warranty expense levels could have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations.

Volume Incentives Payable

We have relied upon volume incentive payments to our independent dealers who retail our products. These volume incentive payments are accounted for as a reduction to gross sales, and are estimated and accrued when sales of our factory-built homes are made to our independent dealers. Volume incentive reserves are recorded based upon the annualized purchases of our independent dealers who purchase a qualifying amount of home products from us. We accrue a liability to our dealers, based upon estimates derived from historical payout rates. We had a reserve for volume incentives payable of $241,471 as of September 28, 2013.

Reserve for Repurchase Commitments

Most of our independent dealers finance their purchases under a wholesale floor plan financing arrangement under which a financial institution provides the dealer with a loan for the purchase price of the home and maintains a security interest in the home as collateral. When entering into a floor plan arrangement, the financial institution routinely requires that we enter into a separate repurchase agreement with the lender, under which we are obligated, upon default by the independent dealer, to repurchase the factory-built home at our original invoice price less the cost of administrative and shipping expenses. Our potential loss under a repurchase obligation depends upon the estimated net resale value of the home, as compared to the repurchase price that we are obligated to pay. This amount generally declines on a predetermined schedule over a period that usually does not exceed 24 months.

The risk of loss that we face under these repurchase agreements is lessened by several factors, including the following:

 

  (i) the sales of our products are spread over a number of independent dealers,

 

  (ii) historically we have had only isolated instances where we have incurred a repurchase obligation, although there is no guarantee that such historical trends will continue,

 

  (iii) the price we are obligated to pay under such repurchase agreements declines based upon a predetermined amount over a period which usually does not exceed 24 months, and

 

  (iv) we have been able to resell homes repurchased from lenders at current market prices, although there is no guarantee that we will continue to be able to do so.

 

- 6 -


Table of Contents

The maximum amount for which the Company is contingently liable under such agreements amounted to approximately $2,915,145 as of September 28, 2013, as compared to $2,675,000 as of September 30, 2012. As of September 28, 2013 and September 30, 2012, we had reserves of $116,605 and $106,885, respectively, established for future repurchase commitments, based upon our prior experience and evaluation of our independent dealers’ financial conditions. Deer Valley to date has not experienced any significant losses under these agreements; consequently, management does not expect any future losses to have a material effect on our accompanying financial statements.

Allowance loan loss for Inventory Finance Notes Receivable

The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to qualified retail dealers and developers. Finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to 24 months. The Company periodically evaluates the collectability of our notes receivable and considers the need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our historical collection experience. The Company had a total inventory-secured financing receivable of $5,673,842 as of September 28, 2013. We have established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $211,840 as of September 28, 2013 and $271,810 at September 30, 2012.

The risk of loss that we face in connection with inventory-secured financing is lessened by several factors, including the following:

 

  (i) the financing for our products are spread over a number of independent dealers,

 

  (ii) historically we have had only isolated instances where we have had our dealers default on floor plan financing, although there is no guarantee that such historical trends will continue, and

 

  (iii) we anticipate that we would be able to resell homes repossessed from dealers at current market prices, although there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Although we maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, there can be no assurance that such allowance will remain at current levels or that such allowances will be adequate.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

As previously discussed, the factory-built housing industry has experienced an overall market decline. Addressing the constriction of the retail housing market, in 2008 the Company idled its Sulligent, Alabama plant and thereafter consolidated its production operations at the Company’s larger plant located in Guin, Alabama. In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 420 “Exit on Disposal Cost Obligations”, the Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. The carrying value of long-lived assets is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such assets is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that the fair market values are primarily based on independent appraisals and preliminary or definitive contractual arrangements less costs to dispose. Based on our estimates of the fair value of idled facility no impairment charges have been recorded.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue for our products sold to independent dealers are generally recorded when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) an order for the home has been received from the dealer, (ii) an agreement with respect to payment terms has been received, and (iii) the home has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the dealer and collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company provides limited inventory-secured financing for its independent dealers. Products shipped to dealers under the Company’s inventory-secured financing program are recorded by the Company as sales and the dealers’ obligations to the Company are reflected as inventory finance note receivables. Interest on inventory finance note receivables is recognized in the period that it is earned.

 

- 7 -


Table of Contents

Recent accounting pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements – We have reviewed accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effective dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB and other regulatory bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective dates. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the fiscal period ending September 28, 2013 covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon our evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended September 28, 2013, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations of the Effectiveness of Disclosure and Internal Controls

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure control system or internal control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any disclosure control system or internal control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.

 

- 8 -


Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Although the Company in the normal course of business is subject to claims and litigation, the Company is not a party to any material legal proceeding nor is the Company aware of any circumstance which may reasonably lead a third party to initiate legal proceeding against the Company.

As of the date of this filing, there are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings relating to our Company or properties to which we are a party, and except as set forth below, to our knowledge there are no material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers, or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which have a material interest adverse to us.

On September 17, 2013, Mr. Shadron Stastney resigned from the Company’s board of directors. On September 18, 2013, without admitting or denying the findings of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), Mr. Stastney consented to the entry of an administrative order (the “Order”) by the SEC instituting administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), and Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The order, entitled In the Matter of Shadron L. Stastney, resolved issues relating to a failure to disclose a material conflict of interest to the trustee of Vicis Capital Master Fund (the “Fund”) and the engagement in an undisclosed principal transaction with the Fund. In conjunction with the Order, Mr. Stastney agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 206(2) and 206(3) of the Advisers Act, to be barred from association with any investment adviser, broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, or transfer agent and prohibited from serving or acting as an employee, officer, director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser or depositor of, or principal underwriter for, a registered investment company or affiliated person of such investment adviser, depositor, or principal underwriter, with the right to apply for reentry after eighteen months (except that he may continue to remain associated with Vicis Capital, LLC as a managing member solely for the purpose of engaging in activities and taking actions that are reasonably necessary to wind down the Fund, subject to the oversight of an independent monitor paid for by Mr. Stastney), and pay disgorgement of $2,033,710.46, prejudgment interest of $501,385.06, and a civil monetary penalty of $375,000. To the Company’s knowledge, no other director, officer, or five percent owner of the Company has, during the last five years, been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to, federal or state securities laws or finding any violation with respect to such laws.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Treasury Stock – Pursuant to a common stock repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors, a total of 223,148 shares were purchased during the nine month period ended September 28, 2013 at a cost of $140,574 and recorded as treasury stock.

 

- 9 -


Table of Contents

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Period

   (a)
Total number
of
shares
purchased
     (b)
Average
price paid
per share
     (c)
Total number of
shares
purchased as
part of publicly
announced
plans or programs
     (d)
Maximum number (or
approximate dollar
value) of shares that
may yet be purchased
under  the plans or
programs
 

Month #1

 

Jan. 1 to Jan. 31, 2013

     81,545       $ .62         0         0   

Month #2

 

Feb. 1 to Feb. 28, 2013

     30,000       $ .65         0         0   

Month #3

 

Mar. 1 to Mar. 31, 2013

     20,003       $ .65         0         0   

Month #4

 

Apr. 1 to Apr. 30, 2013

     4,951       $ .65         0         0   

Month #5

 

May 1 May 31, 2013

     28,554       $ .62         0         0   

Month #6

 

June 1 to June 30, 2013

     11,170       $ .65         0         0   

Month #7

 

July 1 to July 31, 2013

     12,140       $ .64         0         0   

Month #8

 

August 1 to August 31, 2013

     22,512       $ .61         0         0   

Month #9

 

September 1 to September 30, 2013

     12,273       $ .64         0         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total (1)

     223,148       $ .63         0         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Total does not include 66 shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased by the Company between October 1, 2013 and October 31, 2013 at an average price of $.65 per share.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None

 

- 10 -


Table of Contents
Item 5. Exhibits

 

Exhibit
No.

  

Description

    3.01    Articles of Incorporation of Deer Valley Corporation. (1)
    3.02    Bylaws of Deer Valley Corporation. (1)
    4.01    Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. (1)
    4.02    Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. (1)
    4.03    Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. (1)
    4.04    Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. (1)
    4.05    Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. (2)
  10.1    Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement – $2,500,000 (3)
  10.2    Revolving Credit Note – $2,500,000 (3)
  31.01    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013. (4)
  31.02    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013. (4)
  32.01    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013. (4)
  32.02    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013. (4)
101.INS    XBRL Instance Document (4)
101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document (4)
101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (4)
101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (4)
101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (4)
101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (4)

 

(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB, filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 19, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference
(4) Filed herewith.

 

- 11 -


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

      Deer Valley Corporation
   

 

      (Registrant)
Dated: November 7, 2013     By:  

/s/ Charles G. Masters

    Charles G. Masters
    President & Chief Executive Officer