UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to ____

Commission File No. 333-16135

LIBERTY GOLD CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 700, Phoenix, AZ 85016

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

602-553-1190

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

___________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes [X]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):   Yes [   ]    No [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.   Yes [   ]    No [   ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of September 23, 2013 there were 88,416,287 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

LIBERTY GOLD CORP.

(An Exploration State Company)

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Liberty Gold Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.  These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.  Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements.  The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include, among other things: the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing and that there will be little demand for the Company’s services and products, and other factors over which we have little or no control; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-Q, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM   1.  CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Liberty Gold Corp.

(An Exploration State Company)

June 30, 2013 and 2012

Index to the Condensed Financial Statements

Contents                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Page(s)

F-1

F-2

F-3

F-4

F-5

F-6

Liberty Gold Corp.

(An Exploration State Company)

June 30, 2013 and 2012

Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Financial Statements

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

IBOS, Inc.

IBOS, Inc. (“IBOS”) was incorporated as a Subchapter S corporation on April 11, 2006 under the laws of the State of California.  It was converted into a C corporation, incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 5, 2009, in a transaction in which the newly-formed corporation issued an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of common stock to the former stockholders of the S corporation for all of the issued and outstanding shares of IBOS.  All shares were held by and all shares of common stock were issued to IBOS’s stockholders and President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  No cash consideration was paid.  No value was given to the shares issued by the newly formed corporation.  Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $.0001 par value and additional paid-in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($900).

IBOS applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)), by reclassifying all of IBOS’s undistributed earnings and losses to additional paid-in capital as of March 5, 2009.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared as if IBOS had its corporate capital structure as of the first date of the first period presented.

IBOS provided web-based comprehensive selection of electronic medical claims processing and collection solutions to the healthcare provider industry prior to April 5, 2011.  IBOS had minimal operations between April 1, 2011 and April 4, 2011.

Change in Control and Scope of Business

On April 5, 2011, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) by and among IBOS’s three officers and directors Deepak Danavar, Ravi Sharma, and James Villalobos, the Company and Lynn Harrison (“LH”) was executed and a closing was held under the SPA.  Pursuant to the SPA (i) LH purchased an aggregate of 8,280,000 shares of common stock of the Company (87% of the outstanding shares) from Messrs. Danavar, Sharma and Villalobos for an aggregate purchase price of $370,000.00; (ii) the Company disposed of its California subsidiary by transferring its shares to Messrs. Danavar, Sharma and Villalobos;  (iii) LH was elected the sole director of the Company; (iv) LH was elected President and CEO of the Company and Frank J. Hariton was elected secretary of the Company; and (v) Messrs Danavar, Sharma and Villalobos each resigned as officers and directors of the Company. Additionally as part of the change in control the former shareholders agreed to forgive debts outstanding to them totaling $30,544 which have been recorded as contributed capital.  As part of the Stock Purchase transaction the Company transferred to a newly-formed company controlled by IBOS’s three officers and directors Deepak Danavar, Ravi Sharma, and James Villalobos, the Company’s three former officers and directors (the “Buyers”), certain operating assets associated with the operations of IBOS’s electronic medical claims processing and collection solutions, subject to related liabilities (the “Business”).  Pursuant to the terms of SPA, the assumption by the Buyer of all liabilities and debts of IBOS which relate to or arise out of the operations of the Business and the indemnification by the Buyer of all losses, liabilities, claims, damages, costs and expenses that may be suffered by IBOS at any time which arise out of the operations of the Business.  Loss from disposal of the discontinued operations amounted to $8,067.

Upon acquisition of certain gold mine properties on April 5, 2011 IBOS decided to engage in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties.

Surrender of Common Shares from Principal Stockholder upon Change in Control

On April 21, 2011, Lynn Harrison, President, CEO and principal shareholder of the Company, surrendered 351,900,000 shares of common stock owned by her, thus reducing her ownership from 414,000,000 shares to 62,100,000 shares and reducing the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares from 476,000,000 shares to 124,100,000 shares.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the surrender of those common shares.

F-7

Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation

On April 26, 2011, IBOS filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, and (i) changed its name to Liberty Gold Corp. (“Liberty Gold” or the “Company”) upon the acquisition of certain gold mine properties; (ii) increased its total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue from One Hundred and Five Million (105,000,000) shares, inclusive of Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share, to Two Hundred Fifty Five Million (255,000,000) shares, inclusive of Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and Two Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share; and (iii) affected a 50-for-1 (1:50) forward stock split (the “Stock Split”).

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the Stock Split.

The Company elected March 31 as its fiscal year ending date.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2013 and notes thereto and other pertinent information contained in our Form 10-K the Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The results of operations for the three month period ended June 30 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2014.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.  These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Exploration State Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by ASC 915, Development Stage Entities.  The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company's development stage activities.

An exploration-state company is an issuer that is engaged in the search for mineral deposits (reserves) and is neither in the development nor production stage.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were $3, and $3,091 at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 respectively.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company follows ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses

F-8

the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, to report accounting for contingencies.  Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.  There were no commitments or contingencies at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013.

Financial Instruments

The Company’s balance sheet includes certain financial instruments. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Long-lived Assets

The Company follows ASC 360 for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include mineral properties, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or

F-9

changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes.  The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized mineral properties and mining equipment. Management takes into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous mine operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. A provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property when it is determined that a project or property will be abandoned or its carrying value has been impaired..

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Mineral Properties

The Company follows ASC 930, Extractive Activities for its mineral properties. for its mineral properties.  Mineral properties and related mineral rights acquisition costs are capitalized pending determination of whether the drilling has found proved reserves.  If a mineral ore body is discovered, capitalized costs will be amortized on a unit-of-production basis following the commencement of production.  Otherwise, capitalized acquisition costs are expensed when it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value.  General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases, including rights of access to lands for geophysical work and salaries, equipment, and supplies for geologists and geophysical crews are expensed as incurred.  When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable reserves, further exploration costs and development costs as well as interest costs relating to exploration and development projects that require greater than six (6) months to be readied for their intended use incurred after such determination will be capitalized.  The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of final feasibility studies which indicate whether a property is economically feasible.  Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be transferred to the appropriate asset categories and amortized on a unit-of-production basis.  Capitalized costs, net of salvage values, relating to a deposit which is abandoned or considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future will be written off.  The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate.  A gain or loss will be recognized for all other sales of proved properties and will be classified in other operating revenues.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.

The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of mineral properties is calculated on a property-by-property basis using the unit-of-production method.  Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.  Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all general exploration costs, if any, are being expended.

Related Parties

The Company follows ASC 850, Related Party Disclosures, for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.  Related party transactions for the periods ending June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 totaled $28,356 and were comprised of advances payable.

Share-based Expense

ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions in which employee services are acquired.  Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options, and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights.  Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).  

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees.  Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable:  (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued.  The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.  

F-10

Share-based expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $0.

Deferred Income Taxes and Valuation Allowance

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740 Income Taxes.  Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs.  A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.  No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized at June 30, 2013 or March 31, 2013.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic loss per share is computed in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered antidilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation.

At June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had potentially dilutive common shares in the form of warrants.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements are presented in United States dollars.  In accordance with ASC 830“Foreign Currency Translation”, foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date.  Non-monetary items, including equity, are translated at the historical rate of exchange.  Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange during the year.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company.

We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the exploration state at June 30, 2013 of $1,397,514, a net loss of $59,807, net cash used in operating activities, of $70,751, and a $ 659,825 working capital deficiency. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

While the Company is attempting to commence explorations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence explorations and generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.

F-11

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Website

Website and accumulated amortization are as follows:

Amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over seven years.  Amortization for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 was $0 as the website is still in the application and infrastructure development stage. Amortization expense for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $0 and $0, respectively.

Note 5 – Mineral Properties

The carrying amount of each mineral property and the respective mineral property payable balances are presented below as of June 30, 2013:

There were no exploration costs capitalized or expended during the period ended June 30, 2013 for any of the mineral properties.  

Note 6 – Related Party Transactions

Advances from Stockholders and Former Stockholders

From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

F-12

Note 7 – Stockholders’ (Deficit)

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is One Hundred and Five Million (105,000,000) shares of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share.

On April 28, 2011, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, and increased its total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue to Two Hundred Fifty Five Million (255,000,000) shares inclusive of Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and Two Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share.

Common Stock

On April 21, 2011, Lynn Harrison, President, CEO and principal shareholder of the Company, surrendered 351,900,000 shares of common stock owned by her, thus reducing her ownership from 414,000,000 shares to 62,100,000 shares and reducing the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares from 476,000,000 shares to 124,100,000 shares. This transaction was given retroactive effect to the opening numbers at March 31, 2010.

On June 28, 2011, the Company issued to an individual 75,000 Units (each unit being comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and a warrant exercisable over a three year period for 75,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share).  The Units were sold at $.80 per Unit for an aggregate of $60,000.

For the period from July 28, 2011 through September 9, 2011, the Company issued to a foreign institutional investor a total of 712,500 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance.  The Units were sold at $.80 per Unit for an aggregate of $570,000.

On August 10, 2011, Lynn Harrison, President, CEO and principal shareholder of the Company, surrendered 40,000,000 shares of common stock.

On June 18, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to repurchase 250,000 of its shares from an unaffiliated party for

$0.40 per share for a total of $100,000. These shares were subsequently retired.

On June 26, 2012, under the Termination Agreement of the Alaska mineral property purchase agreement, the Contra Party is returning to the Registrant the 1,500,000 shares that were issued to it and the Registrant is relieved from all further obligations under the PPA

During the period ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 275,000 shares of common stock for services valued at $107,125.

Stock Payable

During the three months ended June 2013, the company recorded $ 68,700 in common stock payable for future issuance of 152,667 common shares for $68,700 in cash.”  As of March 31, 2013, the Company recorded $21,300 in common stock payable for future issuance of 47.333 common shares for $21,300 in cash.  As of this filing, the shares have not been issued. The share stock payable relates to and is in accordance with our equity financing agreement with American Gold Holdings, Ltd. (“AGH”).

Equity Financing Agreement

On October 11, 2011, the Company executed a Share Issuance Agreement with American Gold Holdings, Ltd. (“AGH”) that allows the Company to issue its equity in Units with each unit comprised of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock.  The issue price of the Unit will be the greater of $0.45 or 90% of the volume weighted average of the closing price of common stock, for the five (5) banking days immediately preceding the date of the notice, as quoted on OTC markets, or other source of stock quotes as agreed to by both parties. The exercise price of the Warrants will be 130% of the price of the Unit and the term of the Warrants will be three (3) years from the date of issuance.

F-13

The Share Issuance Agreement commits AGH to make advances to the Company up to $ 15,000,000 in tranches of no more than $1,000,000 each and in multiples of $25,000 until October 11, 2013 (the completion date) or to be extended for an additional term of up to twelve (12) months at the option of the Company or AGH upon written notice on or before the completion date.

On October 28, 2011 and November 12, 2011, the Company issued Advance Notice to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000 and $200,000, respectively. The Company issued 222,222 and 444,444 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On December 15, 2011, the Company issued Advance Notice to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 101,010 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.99 per Unit for the advance.

On February 7, 2012 and February 8, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $25,000 and $225,000, respectively. The Company issued 55,556 and 500,000 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On March 21, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $50,000. The Company issued 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On April 23, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On May 18, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $75,000. The Company issued 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On June 5, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On June 11, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at

$0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On June 25, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $50,000. The Company issued 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On August 1, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $75,000. The Company issued 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On September 26, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to AGH for $50,000 which has been included in Stock Subscriptions Receivable. The Company issued 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

F-14

On November 14 and 15, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to AGH for $75,000 and $25,000, respectively, which has been included in Stock Subscriptions Receivable. The Company issued a total of 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

Warrants Issued in Connection with Sale of Common Shares

Description of Warrants

(i) Warrants Issued in June 28, 2011

In connection with the sale of 75,000 shares of its common stock at $0.80 per share or $60,000 in gross proceeds to one investor on June 28, 2011, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share earned and exercisable upon issuance expiring three (3) year from the date of issuance.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $60,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $48,000 and $12,000, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(ii) Warrants Issued for the period from July 28, 2011 through September 9, 2011

For the period from July 28, 2011 through September 9, 2011, in connection with the sale of 712,500 shares of its common stock at $0.80 per share or $570,000 in gross proceeds to the investors, the Company issued warrants to purchase 712,500 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share earned and exercisable upon issuance expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

F-15

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $570,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $475,000 and $95,000, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(iii) Warrants Issued for the period from October 28, 2011 through November 12, 2011

For the period from October 28, 2011 through November 12, 2011, the Company sold 666,666 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $300,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $241,071 and $58,929, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(iv) Warrants Issued on December 15, 2011

On December 15, 2011, the Company sold 101,010 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.99 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $82,500 and $17,500, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

F-16

(v) Warrants Issued on February 7 and February 8, 2012

On December 15, 2011, the Company sold 555,556 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $250,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $208,334 and $ 41,666 , respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(vi) Warrants Issued on March 21, 2012

On March 21, 2011, the Company sold 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $50,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $41,667 and $8,333, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(vii) Warrants Issued on April 23, 2012

On April 23, 2012, the Company sold 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three

F-17

(3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $63,698 and $36,302, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(viii) Warrants Issued on May 18, 2012

On May 18, 2012, the Company sold 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $75,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $46,920 and $28,080, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(viiii) Warrants Issued on June 5, 2012

On June 5, 2012, the Company sold 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

F-18

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $65,804 and $34,196, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(x) Warrants Issued on June 11, 2012

On June 11, 2012, the Company sold 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $65,530 and $35,470, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(xi) Warrants Issued on June 25, 2012

On June 25, 2012, the Company sold 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

F-19

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $50,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $31,884 and $18,116, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(xii) Warrants Issued on August 1, 2012

On August 1, 2012, the Company sold 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $75,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $57,811 and $17,189, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(xiii) Warrants Issued on September 26, 2012

On September 26, 2012, the Company sold 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

F-20

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $50,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $33,832 and $16,168, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(xvi) Warrants Issued on November 14, 2012

On November 14, 2012, the Company sold 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $75,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $54,178 and $20,822, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(xv) Warrants Issued on November 15, 2012

On November 15, 2012, the Company sold 55,555 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

F-21

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility.  The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business.  The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $25,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $18,989 and $6,011, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions

Exercise of Warrants

For the period ended June 30, 2013, none of the warrants have been exercised.

Summary of Warrant Activities

The table below summarizes the Company’s non-derivative warrant activities through June 30, 2013:

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of June 30, 2013:

F-22