Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INCex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INCex32-1.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INCFinancial_Report.xls


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 

 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended May 31, 2013
 
OR
   
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period From                           to                          

Commission File Number: 000-29990
 
SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia
 
90010141
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
2535 N. Carleton Avenue
Grand Island, Nebraska
 
 
68803
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
  
(308) 381-1355
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  x      No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  o      No   x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
     
Large accelerated filer  ¨
 
Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer       ¨
 
Smaller reporting company   x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes  ¨      No  x
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
Class
 
Outstanding at August 21, 2013
Common Stock
 
102,768,448 shares
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sense Technologies Inc. Form 10-Q
 
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
     
ITEM 1.
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
     
ITEM 2.
11
ITEM 3.
13
ITEM 4.
13
     
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
14
     
ITEM 1.
14
ITEM 1A.
14
ITEM 2.
14
ITEM 3.
14
ITEM 4.
14
ITEM 5.
14
ITEM 6.
14
     
15
 

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)
( Unaudited )
 
 
 


 
Page 1

 
SENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
As of May 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)

 
May 31,
 
February 28,
 
 
2013
 
2013
 
 
(Unaudited)
     
         
ASSETS
 
Current
       
Cash
  $ 35,867     $ 69,022  
Accounts Receivable
    35,071       52,710  
Prepaids
    11,850       19,466  
Total Current Assets
    82,788       141,198  
Deposit
    800       800  
Equipment – Net of accumulated depreciation of $127,875 and $125,516 at May 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013, respectively
    14,832       17,191  
Intangible assets
    51       51  
Total Assets
  $ 98,471     $ 159,240  
                 
LIABILITIES
 
Current
 
Accounts payable
  $ 407,428     $ 283,159  
Accounts payable-related party
    35,884       35,884  
Accrued expenses
    1,001,730       969,656  
Accrued expenses-related party
    70,811       70,811  
Royalty payable – related party
    480,000       480,000  
Notes payable, current portion
    520,286       533,934  
Notes payable, current portion – default
    263,000       263,000  
Notes payable-related party - default
    439,590       439,590  
Advances payable – related entity
    128,020       121,020  
Dividends payable
    337,404       329,507  
Convertible promissory notes payable - default
    584,447       584,447  
Deferred Revenue
    157,500       157,500  
Total Current Liabilities
    4,426,100       4,268,508  
                 
Notes payable, long-term
    26,720       36,666  
Total Liabilities
    4,452,820       4,305,174  
                 
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
 
   
Class A preferred shares, without par value, redeemable at $1 per  share 20,000,000 shares authorized, 315,914 shares  issued at May 31, 2013 (February 28, 2013: 315,914)
    315,914       315,914  
Common stock, without par value 150,000,000 shares authorized, 102,768,448 shares issued at May 31, 2013 (February 28, 2013: 102,768,448)
    14,868,018       14,868,018  
Common stock payable
    154,889       154,889  
Deficit
    (19,693,170 )     (19,484,755 )
Total Stockholders’ Deficiency
    (4,354,349 )     (4,145,934 )
    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency
  $ 98,471     $ 159,240  
 
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
Page 2


SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
STATEMENTS OF LOSSES
For the three months ended May 31, 2013 and 2012
(Stated in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
For the three months ended
 
   
May 31,
   
May 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
                 
Sales
 
$
152,224
   
$
65,680
 
                 
Direct Costs
   
249,114
     
38,402
 
                 
Gross Profit (Loss)
   
(96,890
)
   
27,278
 
                 
Operating Expenses
               
Consulting fees
   
10,500
     
11,000
 
Contract labor
   
3,000
     
3,000
 
Depreciation
   
2,359
     
2,533
 
Filing fees
   
1,866
     
650
 
Insurance
   
7,616
     
6,998
 
Bank charges
   
455
     
722
 
Legal and accounting
   
8,836
     
7,095
 
Office and miscellaneous
   
5,146
     
3,268
 
Rent
   
4,338
     
3,564
 
Shareholder information and printing
   
-
     
26
 
Telephone and utilities
   
176
     
72
 
Transfer agent fees
   
390
     
-
 
Travel and automotive
   
12,892
     
22
 
     
57,574
     
38,950
 
Net operating loss
   
(154,464
)
   
(11,672
)
                 
Other Income and (Expenses)
               
Interest Expense
   
(46,053
)
   
(44,091
)
                 
 Net loss
   
(200,517
)
   
(55,763)
 
                 
Preferred dividends, paid or accrued
   
7,898
     
7,898
 
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(208,415
)
 
$
(63,661
)
                 
 Basic and diluted loss per share
 
$
(0.00
)
 
$
(0.01
)
                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
   
102,768,448
     
100,945,622
 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
Page 3


SENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended May 31, 2013 and 2012
(Stated in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
2013
   
2012
 
Operating Activities
           
Net loss for the period
 
$
(200,517
)
 
$
(55,763
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
Operating activities:
               
Depreciation
   
2,359
     
2,533
 
Changes in non-cash working capital balances related to operations:
               
Accounts Receivable
   
17,639
     
(35,014
)
Inventory
   
-
     
(8,179
)
Prepaids
   
7,616
     
1,767
 
Accounts payable
   
124,269
     
242
 
Accrued expenses
   
32,074
     
40,596
 
Advances payable
   
7,000
     
19,840
 
Net cash used in operating activities
   
(9,560
)
   
(33,978
)
Financing Activities
               
Borrowing on notes payable
   
-
     
6,671
 
Repayment on notes payable
   
(20,519
)
   
(5,865
)
Repayment on bank indebtedness
   
(3,076
)
   
(2,828
)
Proceeds from common stock issued for cash
   
-
     
36,000
 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
   
(23,595
)
   
33,978
 
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash during the period
   
(33,155
)
   
-
 
                 
Cash, beginning of period
   
69,022
     
-
 
                 
Cash, end of period
 
$
35,867
   
$
-
 
                 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
               
                 
Cash Paid for Interest
 
$
15,190
   
$
1,238
 
Accrual of Preferred Stock Dividend
 
$
7,898
   
$
7,898
 
Stock Issued from Common Stock Payable
 
$
-
   
$
22,500
 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
Page 4

 
SENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
As of the period ended May 31, 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)

   
Common Stock
   
Preferred Stock
   
Common
             
   
Issued
         
Issued
         
Stock
   
Accumulated
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Payable
   
Deficit
   
Total
 
                                           
Balance, February 29, 2012
   
100,818,448
   
$
14,783,215
     
315,914
   
$
315,914
   
$
141,389
   
$
(18,884,341
)
 
$
(3,643,823
)
Common stock issued for cash
   
1,200,000
     
326,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
326,000
 
Common stock issued for subscription
   
750,000
     
22,500
     
-
     
-
     
(22,500
)
   
-
     
-
 
Options issued to Directors
   
-
     
26,303
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
26,303
 
Common shares subscribed
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
36,000
     
-
     
36,000
 
Dividends
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(31,591
)
   
(31,591
)
Net income (loss) for the period
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(568,823
)
   
(568,823
)
Balance, February 28, 2013
   
102,768,448
     
14,868,018
     
315,914
     
315,914
     
154,889
     
(19,484,755
)
   
(4,145,934
)
Dividends
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(7,898
)
   
(7,898
)
Net income (loss) for the period
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(200,517
)
   
(200,517
)
Balance, May 31, 2013 (unaudited)
   
102,768,448
   
$
14,868,018
     
315,914
   
$
315,914
   
$
154,889
   
$
(19,693,170
)
 
$
(4,354,349
)
 
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
Page 5


SENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCUNTING

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its obligations and commitments in the normal course of operations. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

While the information presented in the accompanying three months to May 31, 2013 financial statements is unaudited, it includes all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. It is suggested that these interim unaudited financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2013.

Reclassification
 
Certain amounts reported in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to the current period presentation.

Recently Adopted and Recently Enacted Accounting Pronouncements
 
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
 
-  
Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
-  
Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
 
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
 
Page 6

 
In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.
 
NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN
 
At May 31, 2013, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, had an accumulated deficit of $19,693,170 (February 28, 2013 - $19,484,755) since its inception and incurred a net loss of $200,517 (2012 - $ 55,763) for the three months ended May 31, 2013 and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management has no formal plan in place to address this concern but considers obtaining additional funds by equity financing and/or from related party. Management expects the Company’s cash requirement over the twelve-month period ended February 28, 2014 to be $300,000. While the Company is expending its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds for operations.
 
 
Page 7


NOTE 3 – ACCRUED EXPENSES/ACCRUED EXPENSES – RELATED PARTY
 
Other liabilities and accrued expenses consisted of the following:
 
  
 
May 31,
   
February 28,
 
   
2013
   
2013
 
Accounts payable
 
$
407,428
   
$
283,159
 
Accounts payable – related party
   
35,884
     
35,884
 
Deferred Revenue
   
157,500
     
157,500
 
Accrued royalties payable – Guardian Alert
   
480,000
     
480,000
 
                 
Detail of Accrued Expenses:
               
Accrued interest payable
   
772,346
     
741,483
 
Accrued non-resident withholding taxes, including accrued interest
   
163,304
     
163,304
 
Credit card
   
4,585
     
5,397
 
Commissions Payable
   
16,391
     
13,285
 
Accrued taxes payable
   
45,104
     
46,187
 
  Total accrued expenses
 
$
1,001,730
   
$
969,656
 
                 
Detail of Accrued Expense – Related party:
               
Accrued payroll – related party
   
53,694
     
53,694
 
Other accrued liabilities – related party
   
17,117
     
17,117
 
  Total accrued expenses – related party
 
$
70,811
   
$
70,811
 

The Company is in arrears with respect to thirteen notes payable totaling $1,287,037.

NOTE 4 – COMMON STOCK

 Options
 
Stock-based Compensation Plan
 
The Company has adopted a Stock Option Plan (‘the plan”) in which the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a determination to whom options should be granted and at what price and their terms of vesting.

The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted. For employees, the compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period which approximates the vesting period. Compensation expense for stock options granted to non-employees is amortized over the contract services period or, if none exists, from the date of grant until the options vest. Compensation associated with unvested options granted to non-employees is re-measured on each balance sheet date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The expected volatility of options granted has been determined using the historical stock price. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise, forfeiture and employee termination within the valuation model. For non-employees, the expected term of the options approximates the full term of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected term of the stock options. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. Based on the best estimate, management applied the estimated forfeiture rate of Nil in determining the expense recorded in the accompanying Statement of Loss.
 
 
Page 8

 
The Company has granted directors common share purchase options. These options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant.

   
May 31, 2013
 
   
Options
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding and exercisable at beginning of the year
   
3,000,000
   
$
0.04
 
Issued during the year
   
-
     
-
 
Outstanding and exercisable, May 31, 2013
   
3,000,000
   
$
0.04
 
 
   
February 28, 2013
 
 
    
 
Options
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding and exercisable at beginning of the year
   
3,000,000
   
$
0.04
 
Expired during the year
   
(1,000,000
)
   
(0.05
)
Issued during the year
   
1,000,000
     
0.03
 
Outstanding and exercisable, February 28, 2013
   
3,000,000
   
$
0.04
 

At May 31, 2013, the following director common share purchase options were outstanding entitling the holders thereof the right to purchase one common share for each share purchase option held:
 
     
Exercise
 
  
Number
   
Price
 
Expiry Date
         
  
 
3,000,000
   
$
0.03
 
December 31, 2014

Warrants

As of May 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013, the Company had no outstanding warrants.

NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company incurred the following items with directors and companies with common directors and shareholders:

  
 
May 31,
 
  
 
2013
   
2012
 
Interest expense
 
$
12,363
   
$
12,381
 

As of May 31, 2013, included in accounts payable is $33,495 (February 28, 2013: $33,495) owing to an accounting firm in which a director of the Company is a partner and $2,389 (February 28, 2013: $2,389) to a shareholder with respect to unpaid fees and interest on promissory notes, $480,000 (February 28, 2013: $480,000) owing to shareholders of the Company in respect of royalties payable with no interest accruing, and $53,694 (February 28, 2013: $53,694) owing to the former president of the Company in respect of unpaid wages.

As of May 31, 2013, included in advances payable is $128,020 (February 28, 2013: $121,020) owed to a company controlled by a director.
 
 
Page 9


As of May 31, 2013, promissory notes payable of $439,590 (February 28, 2013: $439,590 is due to a profit-sharing and retirement plan administered by a director of the Company.  Terms are:

Date Due:
 
Amount
 
December, 2012
 
$
216,372
 
December, 2012   
   
168,218
 
April, 2012    
   
15,000
 
August, 2012
   
12,500
 
November, 2013
   
27,500
 
Total
 
$
439,590
 
 
All bear interest at 12% per annum.

NOTE 6 – CONCENTRATIONS AND CONTINGENCIES

Concentrations

Approximately 98% of the Company’s revenues are obtained from three (3) customers and one of these customers represents a significant portion of the accounts receivable. The Company is exposed to significant sales and accounts receivable concentration. Sales to these customers are not made pursuant to a long term agreement. Customers are under no obligation to continue to purchase from the Company.

For the three months ended May 31, 2013, one (3) customer accounted for approximately 98% of revenue. For the three months ended May 31, 2012, there was one (1) customer that accounted for 87% of sales revenue.
 
Contingencies

During the normal course of business we may from time to time be involved in litigation or other possible loss contingencies. As of May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012 management is not aware of any possible contingencies that would warrant disclosure pursuant to SFAS 5.

Commitments

Our future minimum royalty payments on the ScopeOut® agreement consist of the following:

A 5% royalty with a $.75 per unit maximum “minimum royalty” to retain exclusivity with the following volumes:
 
 
End of calendar year containing the second anniversary:
30,000 units
 
End of calendar year containing the third anniversary:
60,000 units
 
 NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
Management has evaluated subsequent events through August 21, 2013, the date of which the financial statements were available to be issued.
 
As of July 3, 2013, the Company borrowed $25,000 on a one year note, paying interest monthly.
 
 
Page 10


Management’s Discussion And Analysis
Sense Technologies Inc. Form 10-Q
 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the period ended May 31, 2013 and our Financial Statements and notes thereto for the period ended May 31, 2012.

1.           Overview of Operations
 
Sense holds a non-exclusive license to manufacture, distribute, market and sublicense world-wide, a patented technology which is used to produce the Guardian Alert® backing awareness system for motor vehicles utilizing microwave radar technology.  The Company assembles the product in Charlotte, NC.  The company also holds a non-exclusive license to manufacture, distribute, market and sublicense world-wide, the ScopeOut® product, a patented system of specially-designed mirrors which are placed at specific points on vehicles to offer drivers a more complete view of the blind spots toward the rear of the vehicle.  This product is manufactured in China through an outsourced vendor.

2.           Results of Operations

For the three month period ended May 31, 2013 as compared to the three month period ended May 31, 2012.

   
For the three months ended
 
   
May 31, 2013
   
May 31, 2012
 
Sales
           
Sales Guardian Alert
   
152,224
     
65,680
 
Sales Scope Out
   
-
     
-
 
     
152,224
     
65,680
 

Sales for the quarter ended May 31, 2013 increased by 132% from $65,680 to $152,224 due to increased demand for Guardian Alert and a shift of our focus from Scope Out to Guardian Alert sales. Revenue is recognized by management only upon receipt of an actual purchase order from a customer, and the related invoicing to the company or, in the absence of a purchase order (i.e., verbal order), the actual invoicing to the customer, when the products are shipped and collection is reasonably assured.

We continued to market both products.  While it is the company objective to grow sales, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in this manner and sustain comparable sales in future periods.

   
For the Three months ended May 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Direct Cost
           
Scope Out Direct Costs
           
Cost of sales
   
-
     
-
 
Manufacturing expenses
   
-
     
-
 
Research and development
   
-
     
-
 
Commissions
   
-
         
Royalties - related party
   
15,000
     
15,000
 
Total Scope Out Direct Costs
   
15,000
     
15,000
 
                 
Guardian Alert Direct Costs
               
Cost of sales
   
-
     
-
 
Manufacturing expenses
   
196,424
     
6,761
 
Research and development
   
7,500
     
3,000
 
Commissions
   
30,190
     
9,700
 
Royalties
   
-
     
3,941
 
Total Guardian Alert Direct Costs
   
234,114
     
23,402
 
Total Direct Costs
   
249,114
     
38,402
 

Direct costs typically include the cost of raw materials necessary to make our products.  It also includes the cost of shipping the products from manufacturing location to our warehouse.  Direct costs also include costs in respect of obsolete inventory.
 
 
Page 11


Direct costs related to Scope Out® were $15,000 and $15,000 for the three month periods ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Direct costs related to Guardian Alert were $234,114 and $23,402 for the three month period ending May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This change represents an increase of 900%. Commission expenses were $30,190 and $9,700 for the three month period ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Commission expense increased 211% due to an increase in commissioned sales.  Manufacturing expenses were $196,424 and $6,761 for the three month period ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Manufacturing expenses in Direct Costs for the Guardian Alert® for the three months ended in 2013 and 2012 represents assembly costs for the sales achieved for the same period.

Selling, General, and Administrative
 
   
   
For the three months ended
 
   
May 31, 2013
   
May 31, 2012
 
Consulting fees
   
10,500
     
11,000
 
Contract labor
   
3,000
     
3,000
 
Depreciation
   
2,359
     
2,533
 
Filing fees
   
1,866
     
650
 
Insurance
   
7,616
     
6,998
 
Bank charges
   
455
     
722
 
Legal and accounting
   
8,836
     
7,095
 
Office and miscellaneous
   
5,146
     
3,268
 
Rent
   
4,338
     
3,564
 
Shareholder information and printing
   
-
     
26
 
Telephone and utilities
   
176
     
72
 
Transfer agent fees
   
390
     
-
 
Travel and automotive
   
12,892
     
22
 
Interest expense
   
46,053
     
44,089
 
Total
   
103,627
     
83,041
 

Sense Technologies, Inc. had selling, general and administrative expenses of $103,627 for the three month period ended May 31, 2013 compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $83,041 for the three month period ended May 31, 2012, an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of 25% from the prior period. 

Consulting fees decreased from $11,000 for the three month period ended May 31, 2012 to $10,500 for the three month period ended May 31, 2013. The decrease was a result of consulting related to Guardian Alert product sales.

The Company determined that prior expenses for marketing and advertising costs related to the sales plan for ScopeOut® were not producing results. Management believed it was in the best interest of the company to discontinue these costs. The Company is concentrating on Guardian Alert® sales based on market interest, and in doing so as cost-efficiently as possible, the Company has replaced those costs with a “little-to-no cost” effort of asking existing fleet-customers to refer the Guardian Alert® products to other fleets.  Additionally, the company is paying more in commissions, as previously stated, because of the efforts to incentivize the sales of the Guardian Alert® to fleets.

Legal and accounting fees increased from $7,095 in the three month period ended May 31, 2012 to $8,836 for the three month period ended May 31, 2013.

Following summarizes the overall operations results for the three month period ended May 31:
 
               
Increase
   
%  Increase
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
( Decrease)
   
(decrease)
 
                         
Sales
   
152,224
     
65,680
     
86,544
     
131.76
 
Direct Costs
   
249,114
     
38,402
     
210,712
     
548.70
 
General and Administrative expenses
   
103,627
     
83,041
     
20,586
     
24.79
 
Net Loss
   
(200,517
)
   
(55,763
)
   
(144,754
)
   
(259.58
)
Basic and Diluted Loss per share
   
(.00
)
   
(.01
)
               

We had a loss from operations of $200,517 for three month period ended May 31, 2013, compared to a loss from operations of $55,763 for the three month period ended May 31, 2012, an increase in loss from operations of $144,754 from the prior year.
 
 
Page 12


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash position at May 31, 2013 was $35,867 as compared to $69,022 at February 28, 2013. This decrease was due to our use of cash in operating and investing activities and cash provided by financing activities as described below.

We have a working capital deficit of 4,348,349 and 4,145,934 as of May 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013, respectively. If we are unable to raise adequate working capital for fiscal 2014, we will be restricted in the implementation of our business plan.  If this were to happen, the value of our securities would diminish and we may be forced to change our business plan for fiscal 2014, which would result in the value of our securities declining in value and/or becoming worthless.  If we raise an adequate amount of working capital to implement our business plan, we anticipate incurring significant expenses relating to paying down our notes payable and royalties that are in arrears. Additionally we will incur net losses until a sufficient client base can be established, of which there can be no assurance.

Net cash used in operating activities
 
Net cash used in operating activities was $15,560 in 2013, compared to $33,978 in 2012. The decrease in cash used in 2013 was largely due to the increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
 
Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash used by financing activities was $17,595 in 2013 compared to net cash provided of $33,978 in 2012.

In 2013, we received $6,000 through subscriptions to our common shares.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its chief executive officer (who is also acting in the capacity as the principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer has concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses, the Company performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure its consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the Company believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

The Company’s internal conclusion related to its disclosure and procedural controls is due to the number and magnitude or changes to its draft 10Q recommended by the Company’s independent auditor.

The Company plans to continue working with competent outside professionals to help it with quarterly reporting and if its business plan is successful additional improvements in the Company’s accounting department will be made.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In addition, the Company with the participation of its chief executive officers have determined that no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during or subsequent to the quarter ended May 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is (as that term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Page 13

 
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
 
None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.
 
There were no material changes in our risk factors from our Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended May 31, 2013.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
 
None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
 
Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.
 
Sense Technologies has entered an agreement with a global company to market the Guardian Alert® under a registered trade name.
 
Item 6. Exhibits.
 
31.1
32.1
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 
Page 14

 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
SENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
     
     
August 22, 2013
/s/ BRUCE E. SCHREINER
 
 
Bruce E. Schreiner
 
 
Chief Executive Officer, President, Director, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
 
 
 

 
Page 15