Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INCd582023dex311.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INCd582023dex312.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INCd582023dex321.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INCd582023dex322.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

Commission file number 33-42125

 

 

CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specifies in its charter)

 

 

 

State of Alaska   92-0014224

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

5601 Electron Drive, Anchorage, AK   99518
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(907) 563-7494

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   x    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. NONE

 

 

 


Table of Contents

CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

     2   

Part I. Financial Information

  

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements (unaudited)

     2   
 

Balance Sheets - as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

     3   
 

Statements of Operations - Three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012

     5   
 

Statements of Cash Flows - Six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012

     6   
 

Notes to Financial Statements

     7   

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     18   

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     33   

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

     34   

Part II. Other Information

  

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

     34   

Item 1A.    

 

Risk Factors

     34   

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     35   

Item 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     35   

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

     35   

Item 5.

 

Other Information

     35   

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

     35   
 

Signatures

     36   
 

Exhibits

     37   

 

1


Table of Contents

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this report that do not relate to historical facts, including statements relating to future plans, events or performance, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results, events or performance may differ materially. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date of this report and the accuracy of which is subject to inherent uncertainty. It is suggested these statements are read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed as part of our annual report on Form 10-K. Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (Chugach) undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may occur after the date of this report or the effect of those events or circumstances on any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report, except as required by law.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited financial statements and notes to the unaudited financial statements of Chugach as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, follow.

 

2


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

 

Assets

   June 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  

Utility plant:

    

Electric plant in service

   $ 1,147,897,032      $ 891,781,509   

Construction work in progress

     21,652,726        263,459,794   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total utility plant

     1,169,549,758        1,155,241,303   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (511,374,420     (493,894,390
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net utility plant

     658,175,338        661,346,913   

Other property and investments, at cost:

    

Nonutility property

     84,735        84,735   

Investments in associated organizations

     10,128,199        10,552,683   

Special funds

     441,200        570,027   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other property and investments

     10,654,134        11,207,445   

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

     4,407,200        14,047,469   

Special deposits

     153,233        153,233   

Restricted cash equivalents

     9,732,876        1,953,085   

Marketable securities

     10,111,977        10,158,016   

Accounts receivable, net

     37,347,078        46,650,901   

Materials and supplies

     34,487,595        32,867,971   

Fuel Stock

     9,870,348        9,466,767   

Prepayments

     3,991,385        2,156,862   

Other current assets

     33,504        252,146   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     110,135,196        117,706,450   

Deferred charges, net

     25,998,167        27,712,243   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 804,962,835      $ 817,973,051   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

3


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Balance Sheets (continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Liabilities, Equities and Margins

   June 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  

Equities and margins:

     

Memberships

   $ 1,578,608       $ 1,559,344   

Patronage capital

     157,297,706         153,832,674   

Other

     11,353,899         11,372,355   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total equities and margins

     170,230,213         166,764,373   

Long-term obligations, excluding current installments:

     

Bonds payable

     469,499,999         491,916,666   

National Bank for Cooperatives note payable

     27,414,275         29,680,420   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total long-term obligations

     496,914,274         521,597,086   

Current liabilities:

     

Current installments of long-term obligations

     24,682,812         24,493,022   

Commercial paper

     34,000,000         11,500,000   

Accounts payable

     10,253,195         16,488,323   

Consumer deposits

     4,534,437         4,279,901   

Fuel cost over-recovery

     5,290,509         13,710,049   

Accrued interest

     6,512,682         6,807,207   

Salaries, wages and benefits

     8,661,466         8,369,203   

Fuel

     20,011,353         20,868,078   

Other current liabilities

     5,029,850         4,559,981   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     118,976,304         111,075,764   

Deferred compensation

     441,200         570,027   

Deferred liabilities

     2,204,215         1,769,172   

Patronage capital payable

     6,858,367         6,858,367   

Deferred proceeds on sale of asset

     9,338,262         9,338,262   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities, equities and margins

   $ 804,962,835       $ 817,973,051   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

 

     Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
     2013     2012     2013     2012  

Operating revenues

   $ 74,776,425      $ 58,631,729      $ 152,524,942      $ 129,812,502   

Operating expenses:

        

Fuel

     36,037,367        26,874,320        70,249,319        59,439,351   

Production

     5,353,464        4,170,903        10,060,684        8,456,737   

Purchased power

     5,428,871        4,738,685        12,905,983        11,210,321   

Transmission

     1,833,720        1,189,705        3,458,901        2,812,841   

Distribution

     3,372,184        3,338,257        6,310,563        7,058,250   

Consumer accounts

     1,634,902        1,503,462        3,188,039        2,893,093   

Administrative, general and other

     5,993,334        5,764,020        11,702,739        11,596,660   

Depreciation and amortization

     10,422,646        8,145,799        20,044,278        16,276,958   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     70,076,488        55,725,151        137,920,506        119,744,211   

Interest expense:

        

Long-term debt and other

     6,133,720        5,999,478        12,427,412        11,863,466   

Charged to construction

     (75,474     (2,456,802     (1,077,540     (4,448,444
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

     6,058,246        3,542,676        11,349,872        7,415,022   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net operating margins

     (1,358,309     (636,098     3,254,564        2,653,269   

Nonoperating margins:

        

Interest income

     171,607        80,734        343,860        153,637   

Allowance for funds used during construction

     34,272        69,375        78,341        129,580   

Capital credits, patronage dividends and other

     (224,114     (26,147     (211,733     (25,554
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonoperating margins

     (18,235     123,962        210,468        257,663   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assignable margins

   $ (1,376,544   $ (512,136   $ 3,465,032      $ 2,910,932   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

 

     Six months ended June 30,  
     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Assignable margins

   $ 3,465,032      $ 2,910,932   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile assignable margins to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation

     20,044,278        16,276,958   

Amortization and depreciation cleared to operating expenses

     3,031,314        2,477,552   

Allowance for funds used during construction

     (78,341     (129,580

Write off of inventory, deferred charges and projects

     255,217        232,805   

Other

     211,738        25,941   

(Increase) decrease in assets:

    

Accounts receivable, net

     9,303,823        10,169,807   

Fuel cost under-recovery

     0        908,491   

Materials and supplies

     (1,860,842     (272,051

Fuel Stock

     (403,581     0   

Prepayments

     (1,834,523     (1,559,191

Other assets

     (7,561,149     140,965   

Deferred charges

     (283,807     (1,559,924

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

     662,585        (663,061

Consumer deposits

     254,536        (1,605,723

Fuel cost over-recovery

     (8,419,540     10,231,870   

Accrued interest

     (294,525     1,903,670   

Salaries, wages and benefits

     292,263        569,173   

Fuel

     (856,725     (5,620,645

Other current liabilities

     1,159,578        1,328,562   

Deferred liabilities

     17,240        (75,918
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     17,104,571        35,690,633   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Investment in associated organizations

     424,484        663,697   

Investment in marketable securities

     (165,699     0   

Proceeds from restricted cash equivalents

     0        120,000,000   

Extension and replacement of plant

     (25,419,602     (58,410,521
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

     (25,160,817     62,253,176   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Payments for debt issue costs

     0        (1,834,818

Proceeds from short-term obligations

     28,500,000        13,000,000   

Proceeds from long-term obligations

     0        250,000,000   

Repayments of short-term obligations

     (6,000,000     (188,000,000

Repayments of long-term obligations

     (24,493,022     (133,158,332

Memberships and donations received

     808        32,948   

Retirement of patronage capital and estate payments

     0        (48,079

Net receipts (refunds) on consumer advances for construction

     408,191        425,921   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (1,584,023     (59,582,360
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

     (9,640,269     38,361,449   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   $ 14,047,469      $ 17,118,118   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 4,407,200      $ 55,479,567   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

    

Retirement of plant

   $ 3,429,797      $ 1,562,041   

Extension and replacement of plant included in accounts payable

   $ 2,412,127      $ 5,538,634   

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information - interest expense paid, net of amounts capitalized

   $ 10,641,478      $ 4,347,671   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

1. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements include the accounts of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (Chugach) and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. They should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed as part of our annual report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for an entire year or any other period.

 

2. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Chugach is the largest electric utility in Alaska. Chugach is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity to directly serve retail customers in the Anchorage and upper Kenai Peninsula areas. Through an interconnected regional electrical system, Chugach’s power flows throughout Alaska’s Railbelt, a 400-mile-long area stretching from the coastline of the southern Kenai Peninsula to the interior of the state, including Alaska’s largest cities, Anchorage and Fairbanks.

Chugach also supplies much of the power requirements of three wholesale customers, Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. (MEA), Homer Electric Association, Inc. (HEA) and the City of Seward (Seward). We sell available generation in excess of our own needs to produce electric energy for sale to Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc. (GVEA). In addition, on a periodic basis, we provide electricity to Anchorage Municipal Light & Power (ML&P). Chugach’s retail and wholesale members are the consumers of the electricity sold.

Chugach was organized as an Alaska electric cooperative in 1948 and operates on a not-for-profit basis and, accordingly, seeks only to generate revenues sufficient to pay operating and maintenance costs, the cost of purchased power, capital expenditures, depreciation, and principal and interest on all indebtedness and to provide for reserves. Chugach is subject to the regulatory authority of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA).

 

7


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Approximately 70 percent of our employees are members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Chugach has three Collective Bargaining Unit Agreements (CBA) with the IBEW. We also have an agreement with the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees (HERE). Chugach successfully reached agreement with all three IBEW bargaining units renewing the CBA’s through June 30, 2017. After employee ratification, two of the IBEW CBA’s were accepted by the Board of Directors (Board) on March 27, 2013. A third IBEW CBA was ratified by employees and accepted by the Board on April 24, 2013. The three CBA extensions provide for wage increases in all years and include health and welfare premium cost sharing provisions. The agreement with the HERE remains in full force and effect while the union conducts the ratification process.

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Management Estimates

In preparing the financial statements, the management of Chugach is required to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts, workers compensation, deferred charges and credits, unbilled revenue and the estimated useful life of utility plant. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

b. Regulation

The accounting records of Chugach conform to the Uniform System of Accounts as prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Chugach meets the criteria, and accordingly, follows the accounting and reporting requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 980, “Topic 980 – Regulated Operations” (FASB ASC 980). FASB ASC 980 provides for the recognition of assets and liabilities as allowed by regulators for costs or credits that are reflected in current rates or are considered probable of being included in future rates. Our regulated rates are established to recover all of our specific costs of providing electric service. In each rate filing, rates are set at levels to recover all of our specific allowable costs and those rates are then collected from our retail and wholesale customers. The regulatory assets or liabilities are then reduced as the cost or credit is reflected in earnings and our rates.

c. Income Taxes

Chugach is exempt from federal income taxes under the provisions of Section 501(c)(12) of the Internal Revenue Code and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was in compliance with that provision. In addition, Chugach collects sales tax and is assessed gross receipts and excise taxes which are presented on a net basis in accordance with FASB ASC 605-45-50, “Topic 605 – Revenue Recognition – Subtopic 45 – Principal Agent Considerations – Section 50 – Disclosure.”

 

8


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Chugach applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. FASB ASC 740, “Topic 740 – Income Taxes,” only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. Chugach’s management reviewed Chugach’s tax positions and determined there were no outstanding, or retroactive tax positions, that were not highly certain of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities.

d. Accounts Receivable

Included in accounts receivable are invoiced amounts to ML&P for their proportionate share of current Southcentral Power Project (SPP) costs, which amounted to $1.5 and $3.0 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. In addition, accounts receivable includes invoiced amounts to the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) for reimbursable expenditures related to grants, which amounted to $1.3 million and $4.0 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

e. Fuel Stock

Fuel Stock is the weighted average cost of fuel injected into the Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska (CINGSA), which began service in the second quarter of 2012. Limited withdrawals of gas began in the third quarter of 2012. Chugach’s fuel balance in storage amounted to $9.9 million and $9.5 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively.

f. Marketable Securities

In September of 2012, Chugach implemented a bond and equity investment portfolio. The investments are classified as marketable securities, reported at fair value with gains and losses included in earnings. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the carrying amount and fair value was $10.1 million.

g. Restricted cash

Restricted cash equivalents include funds on deposit for future workers compensation claims and the funds generated from the interim and refundable rates implemented on February 6, 2013, associated with the 2012 General Rate Case. Funds for deposit for future workers compensation claims amounted to $2.2 million and $2.0 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively, and funds generated from the 2012 General Rate Case interim and refundable rates amounted to $7.5 million at June 30, 2013.

 

9


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

4. REGULATORY MATTERS

2012 General Rate Case

In anticipation of commercial operation of SPP, on December 21, 2012, Chugach submitted a general rate case with the RCA to increase system base rate revenues by $30.0 million, or approximately 26 percent on total base rate revenues of $115.0 million. Chugach requested that the proposed rates become effective on an interim and refundable basis beginning in February of 2013. In addition to the base rate increases, the filing requests approval to update and expand Chugach’s operating tariff to include both firm and non-firm transmission wheeling service and attendant ancillary services in support of third-party transactions on the Chugach system. The expansion of the tariff was made, in part, to accommodate wheeling services in anticipation of the expiration of the HEA and MEA wholesale customer contracts in 2014. Because of efficiency improvements associated with the commercial operation of SPP, Chugach also submitted a request in a separate filing to the RCA to adjust its fuel rates effective at the same time as the requested base rate increases contained in the general rate case filing. This allows the interim base rate increases to be synchronized with expected reductions in fuel costs reflected in Chugach’s fuel rates.

On February 1, 2013, Chugach submitted a supplemental filing to the RCA removing the impacts associated with a one-year amortization of distribution storm-related costs from its retail revenue requirement. On February 6, 2013, the RCA opened Docket U-13-007 and issued Order No. 1 approving Chugach’s supplemental filing for rates effective February 6, 2013 on an interim and refundable basis. In addition, the RCA also approved Chugach’s request to assess transmission wheeling charges on economy energy transactions that originate from the Chugach system.

In total, when factoring both base rate increases and reductions in fuel costs, the net increase to Chugach retail end-users is approximately 6 percent, while the net increase to retail end-users of Chugach’s wholesale customers is approximately 4 percent to 7 percent. As is standard practice in general rate case proceedings, the RCA order required Chugach, at its option, to either place the interim and refundable amounts received into an escrow account or pay the statutory annualized interest rate of 10.5 percent on any future refunds required in the docket. Chugach elected to place the interim and refundable amounts into escrow. At June 30, 2013, the interim and refundable amount subject to refund was $7.5 million and is treated as a reduction in cash provided by operating activities on the Statements of Cash Flows.

Natural Gas Contract Submittal

On July 12, 2013, Chugach submitted a new gas purchase agreement with Hilcorp Alaska, LLC (Hilcorp) to the RCA. The new agreement will supply gas from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2018. The total amount of gas under the contract is estimated to be 17.7 billion cubic feet (Bcf). The new agreement is designed to fill the balance of Chugach’s unmet needs in 2015 and 2016, up to 100% of unmet needs in 2017 and up to 100% of its total needs in the first quarter of 2018. Approval of the contract by the RCA is condition precedent for the effectiveness of the contract and will ensure, in advance, that costs incurred under the contract can be recovered from Chugach’s customers.

 

10


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Fire Island Wind Project

On October 10, 2011, the RCA issued an order approving Chugach’s request for assurance of cost recovery associated with a new power purchase agreement (PPA) between Chugach and Fire Island Wind, LLC (FIW), a special purpose entity wholly-owned by Cook Inlet Region, Inc.

Associated with the approval of the PPA, Chugach submitted project status reports on March 31, 2012, June 29, 2012, October 31, 2012 and January 16, 2013. On May 22, 2013, the RCA issued an order requiring Chugach to submit a status report by January 31, 2014 regarding FIW integration and a cost reimbursement agreement related to possible impacts to an interconnected utility as a result of the project.

 

5. DEBT

Lines of Credit

Chugach maintains a $50.0 million line of credit with National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (NRUCFC). Chugach did not utilize this line of credit in the first six months of 2013, and therefore had no outstanding balance at June 30, 2013. In addition, Chugach did not utilize this line of credit during 2012 and had no outstanding balance at December 31, 2012. The borrowing rate is calculated using the total rate per annum and may be fixed by NRUCFC. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the borrowing rate was 2.90%.

The NRUCFC Revolving Line Of Credit Agreement requires that Chugach, for each 12-month period, for a period of at least five consecutive days, pay down the entire outstanding principal balance. The NRUCFC line of credit expires October 12, 2017. This line of credit is immediately available for unconditional borrowing.

Commercial Paper

On November 17, 2010, Chugach entered into a $300.0 million Unsecured Credit Agreement, which is used to back Chugach’s Commercial Paper program. Effective May 4, 2012, Chugach reduced the commitment amount to $100.0 million and on June 29, 2012, amended and extended the Credit Agreement to update the pricing and extend the term. The new pricing includes an all-in drawn spread of one month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 107.5 basis points, along with a 17.5 basis points facility fee (based on an A-/A3 unsecured debt rating). The Amended Unsecured Credit Agreement now expires on November 17, 2016. The participating banks include NRUCFC, KeyBank National Association, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Montreal, CoBank, ACB and Chang Hwa Commercial Bank, Ltd., Los Angeles Branch. Commercial paper can be repriced between one day and two hundred seventy days. Chugach is expected to continue to issue commercial paper in 2013, as needed. Chugach had $34.0 million and $11.5 million of commercial paper outstanding at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

11


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

The following table provides information regarding 2013 and 2012 average commercial paper balances outstanding for the quarter ended June 30 (dollars in millions), as well as corresponding weighted average interest rates:

 

2013   2012
Average Balance   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
  Average Balance   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
$38.0   0.25%   $2.3   0.36%

Chugach has a term loan facility with CoBank. Loans made under this facility are evidenced by the 2011 CoBank Note, which is governed by the Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated January 19, 2011 and secured by the Second Amended and Restated Indenture. At June 30, 2013, Chugach had $29.7 million outstanding with CoBank.

 

6. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

ASC Update 2013-04 “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force”

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASC Update 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASC Update 2013-04)). ASC Update 2013-04 provides guidance on the measurement and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total obligation is fixed at the reporting date. This update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. Chugach will begin application of ASC Update 2013-04 on January 1, 2014. Adoption is not expected to have any incremental effect on results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

ASC Update 2013-02 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASC Update 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (ASC Update 2013-02). ASC Update 2013-02 expands the disclosure requirements for amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Chugach began application of ASC Update 2013-02 on January 1, 2013. Chugach does not have any items included in other comprehensive income. Therefore, assignable margins and comprehensive income are the same amount and the adoption did not have any effect on results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

 

12


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

ASC Update 2013-01 “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities)”

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASC Update 2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (ASC Update 2013-01). ASC Update 2013-01 clarifies the scope of Update 2011-11 to apply to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. Chugach began application of ASC Update 2013-01 on January 1, 2013. Adoption did not have any incremental effect on results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

ASC Update 2012-04 “Technical Amendments and Improvements”

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASC Update 2012-04, “Technical Amendments and Improvements” (ASC Update 2012-04). ASC Update 2012-04 amends a wide range of Topics in the FASB Codification, however the main provisions were to correct source literature guidance, provide clarity by updating and correcting wording and references, relocating guidance to a more appropriate location within the Codification, and conform terminology and clarify guidance to fully reflect the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements of Topic 820. This update is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2012. Chugach began application of ASC Update 2012-04 on January 1, 2013. Adoption did not have any incremental effect on results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

 

7. FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with ASC 820, “Topic 820 – Fair Value Measurement,” Chugach groups its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

 

13


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect Chugach’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

The table below presents the balance of Chugach’s overnight repurchase agreement, money market and marketable securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012.

 

     Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

June 30, 2013

           

Repurchase agreement

   $ 100       $ 0       $ 100       $ 0   

Marketable securities

   $ 10,111,977       $ 10,111,977       $ 0       $ 0   

December 31, 2012

           

Repurchase agreement

   $ 100       $ 0       $ 100       $ 0   

Money market

   $ 2,829,397       $ 2,829,397       $ 0       $ 0   

Marketable securities

   $ 10,158,016       $ 10,158,016       $ 0       $ 0   

Chugach had no Level 3 assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value estimates are dependent upon subjective assumptions and involve significant uncertainties resulting in variability in estimates with changes in assumptions. The fair value of long-term debt has been determined using discounted future cash flows at borrowing rates currently available to Chugach. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, and other short-term monetary assets and liabilities approximate carrying value due to their short-term nature.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values (in thousands) of the long-term obligations included in the financial statements at June 30, 2013, are as follows:

 

     Carrying Value      Fair Value  

Long-term obligations (including current installments)

   $ 521,597       $ 520,841   

Level 1 measurement was used to determine the fair value of the 2011 and 2012 Series A Bonds. Level 2 measurements were used to determine all other long-term obligations.

 

14


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

8. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

The Clean Air Act and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations under the Clean Air Act establish ambient air quality standards and limit the emission of many air pollutants. New Clean Air Act regulations impacting electric utilities may result from future events or new regulatory programs. On October 30, 2009, the EPA published new federal regulations requiring the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gases from all sectors of the economy. Chugach is subject to these regulations, which have not had and are not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. While we cannot predict whether any additional new regulation would occur or its limitation, it is possible that new laws or regulations could increase our capital and operating costs. We have obtained or applied for all Clean Air Act permits currently required for the operation of our generating facilities.

Chugach is subject to numerous other environmental statutes including the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and to the regulations implementing these statutes. We do not believe that compliance with these statutes and regulations to date has had a material impact on our financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. However, new laws or regulations, implementation of final regulations or changes in or new interpretations of these laws or regulations could result in significant additional capital or operating expenses.

 

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Concentrations

Approximately 70 percent of our employees are members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Chugach has three Collective Bargaining Unit Agreements (CBA) with the IBEW. We also have an agreement with the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees (HERE). Chugach successfully reached agreement with all three IBEW bargaining units renewing the CBA’s through June 30, 2017. After employee ratification, two of the IBEW CBA’s were accepted by the Board of Directors (Board) on March 27, 2013. A third IBEW CBA was ratified by employees and accepted by the Board on April 24, 2013. The three CBA extensions provide for wage increases in all years and include health and welfare premium cost sharing provisions. The agreement with the HERE remains in full force and effect while the union conducts the ratification process.

 

15


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Generation Commitments

Chugach and ML&P have jointly constructed and now own, as tenants in common, a new natural gas-fired power plant near Chugach’s Anchorage headquarters. SPP began commercial operation on February 1, 2013, furnishing up to 200 megawatts (MW) provided by four generating units. Chugach owns and will take approximately 70 percent of the new plant’s output and ML&P owns and will take the remaining output. Chugach proportionately accounted for its ownership in SPP and related inventory.

Chugach has substantially satisfied its commitments pursuant to its contracts associated with SPP.

Fuel Supply Contracts

Chugach has fuel supply contracts with various producers at market terms. A gas supply contract between Chugach and ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and ConocoPhillips, Inc. (collectively “COP”), provided gas beginning in 2010 and will terminate December 31, 2016. The total amount of gas under the contract is currently estimated to be 60 billion cubic feet (BCF). A Marathon Alaska Production, LLC (MAP) contract provided gas beginning April 1, 2011 and will terminate December 31, 2014. Both MAP contract extension options have been exercised. The total amount of gas under the contract with MAP is currently estimated at 40 BCF. These contracts fill 100 percent of Chugach’s needs through December 2014, approximately 70 percent of Chugach’s needs through December 2015 and approximately 40 percent in 2016. Hilcorp purchased Marathon Alaska Production assets effective February 1, 2013. All of the production is expected to come from Cook Inlet, Alaska.

On July 12, 2013, Chugach submitted a new gas purchase agreement with Hilcorp to the RCA. The new agreement will supply gas from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2018. The total amount of gas under the contract is estimated to be 17.7 Bcf. The new agreement is designed to fill the balance of Chugach’s unmet needs in 2015 and 2016, up to 100% of Chugach’s unmet needs in 2017 and up to 100% of its total needs in the first quarter of 2018. Approval of the contract by the RCA is condition precedent for the effectiveness of the contract and will ensure, in advance, that costs incurred under the contract can be recovered from Chugach’s customers.

Economy Energy Sales

On October 5, 2012, Chugach and GVEA finalized arrangements for Chugach to provide economy energy to GVEA through March of 2015. Sales will be made under the terms and conditions of Chugach’s economy energy sales tariff. The price to GVEA will include the cost of fuel, variable operations and maintenance expense and a margin. Chugach entered into a gas supply arrangement with Hilcorp for GVEA economy energy sales, which was approved by the RCA on March 1, 2013.

 

16


Table of Contents

Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013 and 2012

 

Legal Proceedings

Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. v. Chugach Electric Association, Inc., Superior Court Case No. 3PA-13-1006 Civil

On May 14, 2013, MEA served Chugach with a Summons and Complaint in the above referenced case. Chugach filed its Answer to the Complaint on June 21, 2013. With its Complaint, MEA fundamentally asks that Chugach be required to repatriate MEA’s capital credits on the same basis as it promised, in a 2007 settlement, that it would repatriate HEA capital credits.

The margins Chugach earns each year are allocated to the customers who contribute them and are booked as capital credits to those customers’ accounts. Capital credits are eventually repatriated to customers at the discretion of Chugach’s Board of Directors typically many years after the margins are earned. With this litigation, MEA seeks to accelerate the return to it of its capital credits.

Chugach believes the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend against them. Management is uncertain of the outcome of the proceeding before the Superior Court. The ultimate resolution of this matter is not currently determinable. In the opinion of management, an adverse outcome is not likely to have a material adverse effect on Chugach’s results of operations or financial condition, however, an adverse outcome could impact Chugach’s equity ratio, which is subject to debt covenant compliance, in addition to our ability to borrow additional debt or refinance existing debt.

Chugach has certain litigation matters and pending claims that arise in the ordinary course of Chugach’s business. In the opinion of management, no individual matter or matters in the aggregate is or are likely to have a material adverse effect on Chugach’s results of operations, or financial condition. The matter disclosed above could impact Chugach as previously discussed.

 

17


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Reference is made to the information contained under the caption “CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” at the beginning of this report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Current Year Quarter versus Prior Year Quarter

Operating revenues, which include sales of electric energy to retail, wholesale and economy energy customers and other miscellaneous revenues, increased $16.1 million, or 27.5%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012. This increase was due primarily to an increase in rates to both retail and wholesale customers as a result of Chugach’s 2012 Test Year Rate Case filed with the RCA in December of 2012, higher kilowatt hour (kWh) sales, specifically economy energy sales, and higher economy fuel and purchased power expense recovered through the fuel and purchased power adjustment process.

Overall, retail revenue increased in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012. Base retail revenue increased due primarily to an increase in rates charged to retail customers as discussed above and higher retail kWh sales. The overall increase was also due to an increase in fuel and purchased power expense recovered through the fuel and purchased power adjustment process, which was somewhat offset by the effect of economy energy and wheeling transactions in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Overall, wholesale revenue increased in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012. Base wholesale revenue increased due primarily to higher wholesale kWh sales and an increase in rates charged to wholesale customers as discussed above. An increase in fuel and purchased power expense recovered through the fuel and purchased power adjustment process was more than offset by the effect of economy energy and wheeling transactions in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012. Wheeling transactions include the transfer of electric power over Chugach’s transmission system.

Economy energy revenue increased in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 due to increased sales to GVEA as a result of a new agreement between Chugach and GVEA. The new agreement provides economy energy sales to GVEA through March of 2015.

 

18


Table of Contents

Based on the results of fixed and variable cost recovery established in Chugach’s last rate case, wholesale sales to HEA, MEA and Seward contributed approximately $8.7 million to Chugach’s fixed costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, and $6.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

The following table shows the base rate sales revenue and fuel and purchased power revenue by customer class that is included in revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

    Base Rate Sales Revenue     Fuel and Purchased Power Revenue     Total Revenue  
    2013     2012     % Variance     2013     2012     % Variance     2013     2012     % Variance  
Retail                  

Residential

  $ 11.8      $ 9.9        19.2   $ 6.9      $ 7.0        (1.4 %)    $ 18.7      $ 16.9        10.7

Small Commercial

  $ 1.9      $ 1.7        11.8   $ 1.7      $ 1.5        13.3   $ 3.6      $ 3.2        12.5

Large Commercial

  $ 8.1      $ 6.6        22.7   $ 7.0      $ 6.8        2.9   $ 15.1      $ 13.4        12.7

Lighting

  $ 0.4      $ 0.4        0.0   $ 0.0      $ 0.0        0.0   $ 0.4      $ 0.4        (0.0 %) 

Total Retail

  $ 22.2      $ 18.6        19.4   $ 15.6      $ 15.3        2.0   $ 37.8      $ 33.9        11.5
Wholesale                  

HEA

  $ 3.7      $ 3.1        19.4   $ 5.5      $ 5.8        (5.2 %)    $ 9.2      $ 8.9        3.4

MEA

  $ 6.6      $ 4.5        46.7   $ 9.3      $ 9.2        1.1   $ 15.9      $ 13.7        16.1

SES

  $ 0.4      $ 0.3        33.3   $ 0.8      $ 0.9        (11.1 %)    $ 1.2      $ 1.2        0.0

Total Wholesale

  $ 10.7      $ 7.9        35.4   $ 15.6      $ 15.9        (1.9 %)    $ 26.3      $ 23.8        10.5

Economy Sales

  $ 0.6      $ 0.0        100.0   $ 9.0      $ 0.1        8,900.0   $ 9.6      $ 0.1        9,500.0

Miscellaneous

  $ 0.5      $ 0.4        25.0   $ 0.6      $ 0.4        50.0   $ 1.1      $ 0.8        37.5

Total Revenue

  $ 34.0      $ 26.9       26.4   $ 40.8     $ 31.7       28.7   $ 74.8     $ 58.6       27.6

The following table summarizes kWh sales for the quarters ended June 30:

 

Customer

   2013
kWh
     2012
kWh
 

Retail

     267,335,923         263,449,977   

Wholesale

     294,303,894         288,959,237   

Economy Energy

     83,975,000         1,396,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     645,614,817         553,805,214   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Base rates charged to retail and wholesale customers in the second quarter of 2013 include demand and energy base rate changes effective February 6, 2013, as a result of Chugach’s 2012 Test Year Rate Case filed with the RCA in December of 2012. Effectively, base rates increased 21% to retail and 24%, 38% and 33% to the wholesale customer classes of HEA, MEA and Seward, respectively, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Total operating expenses increased $14.4 million, or 25.8%, in the second quarter of 2013 over the same quarter in 2012, due to higher expenses in several operating expense categories.

 

19


Table of Contents

Fuel expense increased $9.2 million, or 34.1%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012. The increase was due to an increase in the average effective delivered price, caused in part by higher fuel storage costs, and in million cubic feet (MMcf) used as a result of higher kWh sales, largely associated with economy sales to GVEA. In the second quarter of 2013, Chugach used 5,863,534 MMcf of fuel at an average effective delivered price of $5.92 per MMcf. In the second quarter of 2012, Chugach used 5,366,139 MMcF of fuel at an average effective delivered price of $4.89 per MMcf. The amount of fuel used in our operations for the first quarter of 2013 did not include MMcf from one supplier of natural gas, primarily associated with economy energy sales, along with other adjustments, which totaled 1,594,540 MMcf, resulting in 7,392,279 MMcf used by Chugach during that period. As a result, our average effective delivered price has been recalculated as $4.93 per MMcf instead of $6.50 per MMcf for the first quarter of 2013. Therefore, an increase in MMcf used as a result of higher economy energy sales to GVEA and higher fuel storage costs was somewhat offset by a decrease in MMcf used for firm kWh sales caused in part by the efficiency of SPP, in the first quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Production expense increased $1.2 million, or 28.4%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012, due primarily to operating and maintenance expense at SPP which was somewhat offset by a decrease in operating and maintenance expense at the Beluga Power Plant.

Purchased power expense, which includes the cost of 384,026 MMcf of fuel associated with purchases from the Nikiski Cogeneration plant (Nikiski), increased $0.7 million, or 14.6%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012. The increase was due primarily to an increase in the average effective price, caused in part by the unavailability of Nikiski due to maintenance. In the second quarter of 2013, Chugach purchased 114,040 megawatt hours (MWh) of energy at an average effective price of 4.22 cents per kWh. In the second quarter of 2012, Chugach purchased 119,864 MWh of energy at an average effective price of 3.60 cents per kWh, which included the cost of 703,212 MMcf of fuel associated with purchases from Nikiski.

Transmission expense increased $0.6 million, or 54.1%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012, due primarily to more substation and overhead line maintenance in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Distribution expense did not materially change in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Consumer accounts did not materially change in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Administrative, general and other expense did not materially change in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.3 million, or 28.0%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012, due primarily to depreciation associated with SPP.

 

20


Table of Contents

Interest on long-term and other debt did not materially change in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012.

Interest charged to construction decreased $2.4 million, or 96.9%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012 due primarily to a decrease in the average Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) balance due primarily to the commercial operation of SPP in February of 2013.

Non-operating margins decreased $0.1 million, or 114.7%, in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter in 2012 due primarily to an unrealized loss on marketable securities and a decrease in Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) caused by a lower average CWIP balance that is equity financed, which was somewhat offset by an increase in the interest income on marketable securities.

Current Year to Date versus Prior Year to Date

Operating revenues, which include sales of electric energy to retail, wholesale and economy energy customers and other miscellaneous revenues, increased $22.7 million, or 17.5%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This increase was due primarily to an increase in rates to both retail and wholesale customers as a result of Chugach’s 2012 Test Year Rate Case filed with the RCA in December of 2012, higher economy energy sales and higher fuel and purchased power expense recovered through the fuel and purchased power adjustment process, which was somewhat offset by lower firm kWh sales.

Overall, retail and wholesale revenue increased in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. Base retail and wholesale revenue increased due to an increase in rates charged to all customers as discussed above. An increase in fuel and purchased power expense recovered through the fuel and purchased power adjustment process was more than offset by the effect of economy energy and wheeling transactions and lower retail and wholesale kWh sales caused by warmer weather in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Economy energy revenue increased in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 due to increased sales to GVEA as a result of a new agreement between Chugach and GVEA. The new agreement provides economy energy sales to GVEA through March of 2015.

Based on the results of fixed and variable cost recovery established in Chugach’s last rate case, wholesale sales to HEA, MEA and Seward contributed approximately $18.5 million to Chugach’s fixed costs for the six months ended June 30, 2013, and $13.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

21


Table of Contents

The following table shows the base rate sales revenue and fuel and purchased power revenue by customer class that is included in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Base Rate Sales Revenue     Fuel and Purchased Power Revenue     Total Revenue  
     2013      2012      % Variance     2013      2012      % Variance     2013      2012      % Variance  
Retail                         

Residential

   $ 25.4       $ 22.7         11.9   $ 14.7       $ 15.7         (6.4 %)    $ 40.1       $ 38.4         4.4

Small Commercial

   $ 4.3       $ 3.8         13.2   $ 3.4       $ 3.4         0.0   $ 7.7       $ 7.2         6.9

Large Commercial

   $ 16.1       $ 13.6         18.4   $ 13.5       $ 14.0         (3.6 %)    $ 29.6       $ 27.6         7.2

Lighting

   $ 0.7       $ 0.7         0.0   $ 0.1       $ 0.1         0.0   $ 0.8       $ 0.8         0.0

Total Retail

   $ 46.5       $ 40.8         14.0   $ 31.7       $ 33.2         (4.5 %)    $ 78.2       $ 74.0         5.7
Wholesale                         

HEA

   $ 7.3       $ 6.3         15.9   $ 11.2       $ 12.5         (10.4 %)    $ 18.5       $ 18.8         (1.6 %) 

MEA

   $ 13.9       $ 10.8         28.7   $ 19.0       $ 20.7         (8.2 %)    $ 32.9       $ 31.5         4.4

SES

   $ 0.8       $ 0.7         14.3   $ 1.6       $ 1.8         (11.1 %)    $ 2.4       $ 2.5         (4.0 %) 

Total Wholesale

   $ 22.0       $ 17.8         23.6   $ 31.8       $ 35.0         (9.1 %)    $ 53.8       $ 52.8         1.9

Economy Sales

   $ 1.4       $ 0.1         1,300.0   $ 17.1       $ 1.4         1,121.4   $ 18.5       $ 1.5         1,133.3

Miscellaneous

   $ 1.0       $ 0.8         25.0   $ 1.0       $ 0.7         42.9   $ 2.0       $ 1.5         33.3

Total Revenue

   $ 70.9       $ 59.5        19.2   $ 81.6      $ 70.3        16.1   $ 152.5      $ 129.8        17.5

The following table summarizes kWh sales for the six months ended June 30:

 

Customer

   2013
kWh
     2012
kWh
 

Retail

     579,595,050         589,076,909   

Wholesale

     639,754,830         651,469,083   

Economy Energy

     175,942,000         18,648,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1,395,291,880         1,259,193,992   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Base rates charged to retail and wholesale customers in the first six months of 2013 include base rate changes as a result of the simplified rate filing (SRF) utilizing the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, for rates effective November 12, 2012, and demand and energy base rate changes effective February 6, 2013, as a result of Chugach’s 2012 Test Year Rate Case filed with the RCA in December of 2012. Effectively, base rates increased 17% to retail and 14%, 20% and 21% to HEA, MEA and Seward, respectively, in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Total operating expenses increased $18.2 million, or 15.2%, in the first half of 2013 over the same period in 2012, due to higher expenses in several operating expense categories except distribution expense.

Fuel expense increased $10.8 million, or 18.2%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was due to an increase in the average effective delivered price, caused in part by higher fuel storage costs, and in MMcf used as a result of higher economy

 

22


Table of Contents

sales. In the first half of 2013, Chugach used 12,205,367 MMcf of fuel at an average effective delivered price of $5.52 per MMcf. In the first half of 2012, Chugach used 11,609,081 MMcf of fuel at an average effective delivered price of $5.06 per MMcf.

Production expense increased $1.6 million, or 19.0%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, due primarily to operating and maintenance expense at SPP which was largely offset by a decrease in operating and maintenance expense at the Beluga Power Plant.

Purchased power expense, which included the cost of 1,151,891 MMcf of fuel associated with purchases from Nikiski, increased $1.7 million, or 15.1%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, due primarily to an increase in the average effective price, caused in part by the unavailability of Nikiski due to maintenance. In the first half of 2013, Chugach purchased 254,739 MWh of energy at an average effective price of 4.57 cents per kWh. In the first half of 2012, Chugach purchased 253,753 MWh of energy at an average effective price of 4.09 cents per kWh, which included the cost of 1,768,379 MMcf of fuel associated with purchases from Nikiski.

Transmission expense increased $0.6 million, or 23.0%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, due primarily to more substation maintenance in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Distribution expense decreased $0.7 million, or 10.6%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, due primarily to lower costs associated with storm related line maintenance and right-of-way line clearing.

Consumer accounts did not materially change in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Administrative, general and other expense did not materially change in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.8 million, or 23.2%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, due primarily to depreciation associated with SPP.

Interest on long-term and other debt did not materially change in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The full interest associated with the 2012 bonds expensed in the first half of 2013 was somewhat offset by a decrease in interest due to principal payments on the 2011 and 2012 bonds.

 

23


Table of Contents

Interest charged to construction decreased $3.4 million, or 75.8%, in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 due primarily to a decrease in the average CWIP balance caused by the commercial operation of SPP in February of 2013.

Non-operating margins decreased $0.1 million, or 18.3%, in the first half of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. A decrease in AFUDC cause by a lower average CWIP balance that is equity financed and an unrealized loss on marketable securities was somewhat offset by an increase in interest income on marketable securities.

Financial Condition

Assets

Total assets decreased $13.0 million, or 1.6%, from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013. Net utility plant decreased $3.2 million, or 0.5%, caused by depreciation expense in excess of extension and replacement of plant. Investments in associated organizations decreased $0.4 million, or 4.0%, caused by a CoBank equity retirement in March of 2013. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $9.6 million, or 68.6%, due primarily to the use of the excess funds received from the 2012 financing after retiring the balance of commercial paper outstanding and a decrease in the over-recovery of fuel costs. Accounts receivable decreased $9.3 million, or 19.9%, due primarily to lower kWh sales, lower amounts outstanding to AEA and a decrease in amounts outstanding from ML&P for current SPP costs and deferred charges decreased $1.7 million, or 6.2%, caused primarily by the amortization which exceeded expenditures associated with fuel related studies. Those decreases were somewhat offset by an increase in restricted cash equivalents, material and supplies, fuel stock and prepayments. Restricted cash equivalents increased $7.8 million, or 398.3%, due to the cash collected from the interim and refundable rates implemented in February of 2013 and materials and supplies increased $1.6 million, or 4.9%, due to an increase in materials associated with SPP and distribution projects. Fuel stock increased $0.4 million, or 4.3%, due to additional fuel storage and prepayments increased $1.8 million, or 85.1%, caused primarily by the annual renewal of insurance and the prepayment of health and welfare premiums for 2013.

Liabilities and Equity

Total liabilities, equities and margins decreased $13.0 million, or 1.6%, from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013. Long term obligations decreased $24.7 million, or 4.7%, caused by the principal payments on the 2011 and 2012 bonds and accounts payable decreased $6.2 million, or 37.8%, due primarily to the timing of cash payments. Fuel cost over-recovery decreased $8.4 million, or 61.4%, due to the partial payment of the prior quarter’s over-recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and fuel payable decreased $0.9 million, or 4.1% due to the timing of fuel payments. These decreases were somewhat offset by an increase in total equities and margins, commercial paper and other and deferred liabilities. Total equities and margins increased $3.5 million, or 2.1%, due to the margins generated in the first half of 2013. Commercial paper increased $22.5 million, or 195.7%, due primarily to the timing of the principal payments associated with the 2011 and 2012 bonds and the restrictions associated with cash collected from the interim and refundable rates implemented in February of 2013. Other liabilities increased

 

24


Table of Contents

$0.5 million, or 10.3%, caused by an increase in the municipal underground ordinance payable, which was somewhat offset by the annual payment of gross receipts tax. Deferred liabilities increased $0.4 million, or 24.6%, due to an increase in customer advances for construction.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Summary

We ended the first six months of 2013 with $4.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, down from $14.0 million at December 31, 2012. We did not utilize the $50.0 million line of credit that we maintain with NRUCFC in the first six months of 2013, therefore, this line of credit had no outstanding balance and our available borrowing capacity under this line was $50.0 million at June 30, 2013. We issued commercial paper in the first six months of 2013 and had $34.0 million of commercial paper outstanding at June 30, 2013, thus our available borrowing capacity under our Commercial Paper Program at June 30, 2013, was $66.0 million.

Cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased and an overnight repurchase agreement and concentration account with First National Bank Alaska (FNBA).

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

 

     2013     2012  

Total cash provided by (used in):

    

Operating activities

   $ 17,104,571      $ 35,690,633   

Investing activities

     (25,160,817     62,253,176   

Financing activities

     (1,584,023     (59,582,360
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   $ (9,640,269   $ 38,361,449   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities was $17.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $35.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Assignable margins increased to $3.5 million in the first half of 2013, compared with $2.9 million in the first half of 2012. The increase in assignable margins was adjusted by the change in depreciation, which was due primarily to depreciation associated with SPP and additionally adjusted by the change in the amortization of deferred charges. The assignable margins increase was further expanded by changes in operating assets and liabilities. The changes in operating assets and liabilities were due primarily to changes in fuel cost under and over-recovery, materials and supplies, fuel stock, other assets, deferred charges, accounts payable, consumer

 

25


Table of Contents

deposits, accrued interest and fuel. The change in fuel cost under and over-recovery was due to the over-collection of fuel and purchased power costs recovered through the fuel and purchased power surcharge process, while the change in materials and supplies was due primarily to the change in inventory needed and used during the construction seasons. The change in fuel stock was due to the addition of fuel storage and the change in other assets was due primarily to the increase in restricted cash equivalents caused by the cash collected from the interim and refundable rates implemented in February of 2013. The change in deferred charges was due primarily to a change in financing related expenditures and the change in accounts payable was due to the change in cash payments, primarily associated with SPP. The change in consumer deposits was due to the change in customer prepaid accounts and the change in accrued interest was due primarily to the timing of the initial interest payments on the 2012 bonds. The change in fuel was due primarily to the timing of payments and the difference in price and quantity of fuel used in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was $25.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $62.3 million provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The change in cash used in investing activities was due primarily to the release of restricted funds associated with the 2011 financing to repay the 2002 Series A Bonds on February 1, 2012, and a decrease in expenditures associated with SPP. Capital construction through June 30, 2013, was $25.4 million and is estimated at $52.6 million for the full year. Once funding from other sources is collected, the total cash requirement is estimated at $24.2 million for 2013. Capital improvement expenditures are expected to increase during the third quarter as the construction season continues.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities was $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $59.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The change in cash used in financing activities was due primarily to changes related to our financing activity in 2012. The change in payments for debt issue costs was due to the issuance of the 2012 bonds in 2012 and the increase in short-term obligations was due primarily to the timing of the principal payments associated with the 2011 and 2012 bonds and the restrictions associated with cash collected from the interim and refundable rates implemented in February of 2013. The change in proceeds from long-term obligations and repayments of short-term obligations was due primarily to the issuance of the 2012 bonds to repay the commercial paper balance used to finance SPP. The change in repayments of long-term obligations was due to the payment of the 2002 Series A bonds in February of 2012 and the additional principal payments associated with the 2012 bonds.

 

26


Table of Contents

Sources of Liquidity

Chugach satisfies its operational and capital cash requirements through internally generated funds, a $50.0 million line of credit from NRUCFC and a $100.0 million Commercial Paper Program. At June 30, 2013, there was no outstanding balance on our NRUCFC line of credit and $34.0 million of outstanding commercial paper. Thus, at June 30, 2013, our available borrowing capacity under our line of credit with NRUCFC was $50.0 million and our available commercial paper capacity was $66.0 million.

Our commercial paper can be repriced between one day and two hundred seventy days. The average commercial paper balance for the six months ended June 30, 2013, was $23.8 million with a corresponding weighted average interest rate of 0.25%. The maximum amount of outstanding commercial paper for the six months ended June 30, 2013, was $40.0 million. The following table provides information regarding monthly average commercial paper balances outstanding (dollars in millions), as well as corresponding weighted average interest rates:

 

Month

   Average
Balance
     Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 

January 2013

   $ 5.9         0.27

February 2013

   $ 0.1         0.25

March 2013

   $ 23.2         0.29

April 2013

   $ 40.0         0.26

May 2013

   $ 39.7         0.24

June 2013

   $ 34.3         0.24

Chugach has a term loan facility with CoBank. Loans made under this facility are evidenced by the 2011 CoBank Note, which is governed by the Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated January 19, 2011 and secured by the Second Amended and Restated Indenture.

At June 30, 2013, Chugach had the following note outstanding with this facility:

 

     Principal
Balance
     Interest Rate at
June 30, 2013
  Maturity
Date
     Principal
Payment Dates

2011 CoBank Note

   $ 29,680,420       2.54%     2022       2014 - 2022

Under the Second Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust, additional obligations may be sold by Chugach upon the basis of bondable additions and the retirement or defeasance of or principal payments on previously outstanding obligations. Chugach’s ability to sell additional debt obligations will be dependent on the market’s perception of Chugach’s financial condition and Chugach’s continuing compliance with financial covenants contained in its debt agreements.

Chugach management continues to expect that cash flows from operations and external funding sources, including additional commercial paper borrowings, will be sufficient to cover operational, financing and capital funding requirements in 2013 and thereafter.

 

27


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

As of June 30, 2013, there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies as disclosed in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These policies include electric utility regulation and unbilled revenue.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Information required by this Item is contained in Note 6 to the “Notes to Financial Statements” within Part I of this Form 10-Q.

OUTLOOK

Integrating a new, highly efficient power generation facility into our existing operations and rate structure, managing and securing additional natural gas contracts and securing replacement revenue sources for wholesale customer loads that will be leaving in January and December of 2014, all while controlling operating expenses to minimize future adverse customer rate impacts, are some of the major challenges Chugach has faced and will continue to face in the near and intermediate term. These issues, along with energy issues and plans at the state level, are expected to shape how Chugach proceeds into the future.

Chugach and ML&P have jointly constructed and now own the Southcentral Power Project. On February 1, 2013, SPP began commercial operation, furnishing up to 200 MW provided by four generating units. Chugach owns and will take approximately 70 percent of the plant’s output and ML&P owns and will take the remaining 30 percent. Chugach’s financing for the project was primarily completed in January of 2012 with the issuance of the 2012 Series A Bonds. In 2010, the RCA concluded that Chugach may include in future rates $197.0 million in costs attributable to three principal contracts to build SPP when the plant becomes used and useful. A request to establish and approve SPP depreciation rates was approved by the RCA in August of 2012. On December 21, 2012, Chugach submitted a general rate case with the RCA to recover the additional costs associated with the project, among other things. Chugach also requested SPP fixed costs be synchronized with expected reductions in fuel costs. The RCA approved interim and refundable rates effective February 6, 2013.

We continue to actively manage our fuel supply needs. Incorporating the new gas purchase agreement with Hilcorp, we currently have contracts in place which are intended to fill up to 100 percent of our needs through March 2018. The State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR) completed a preliminary engineering and geological evaluation of the remaining Cook Inlet gas reserves in December of 2009. The DNR study identified 863 BCF of proven, developed, producing reserves, additional probable reserves of 279 Bcf and an additional increment of 353 Bcf in high-confidence pay intervals. Combined, these 1.5 trillion cubic feet of gas reserves are similar to the 1.4 trillion cubic feet of gas reserves identified in a 2004 study undertaken by the Department of Energy. Given current demand and deliverability, DNR estimates a minimum 10-year supply of gas exists in currently producing leases. DNR does note that economic considerations will play a major role in whether producers continue undertaking additional drilling and development activities to meet demand. An updated June 2011 DNR report titled “Cook Inlet Natural Gas Production Cost Study” further quantified the economic considerations and came to two key conclusions:

 

  1) Based on currently available information, the assumptions made in this study, and absent any exploration success, the Cook Inlet basin is capable given sufficient continued investments of supplying the regional natural gas needs until 2018-2020 at a price below that of currently contemplated alternatives. However, failure to make appropriate investments in lockstep with demand requirements will necessitate alternative sources of natural gas to be made available sooner. Therefore, transition to alternative sources of natural gas may begin to occur before the 2018-2020 time-frame as part of a comprehensive supply and risk management plan.

 

28


Table of Contents
  2) Natural gas storage will play an increasingly important role in optimizing and managing deliverability and economics of the natural gas supply for south-central Alaska. Just-in-time production reduces the amount of time between investment and return, and improves the economics of supplying natural gas. If gas purchases can be made in summer in advance of peak winter needs, storage allows these dynamics to be managed effectively by allowing production in summer to exceed the demand and storing the excess production until it is needed in winter.

Chugach has been working closely with the State of Alaska and producers to develop a comprehensive Cook Inlet management plan that will meet this goal. Chugach continues to explore its options for future fuel supply needs by working with developers on commercial terms for future gas supply and the state of Alaska on energy policies to promote gas development in Cook Inlet and other in-state gas options such as a Spur Line off a larger line from the North Slope or a Bullet Line to Southcentral Alaska.

The 2010 Alaska Legislature passed legislation that provides incentives to natural gas producers to enhance Cook Inlet oil and gas production. There are several independent producers currently taking advantage of those incentives. Other producers have recently drilled conventional wells. Although it is too early to tell if the incentives will pay off, independent producers do seem to be taking steps to enter the market. 2011 Cook Inlet petroleum lease sales were up and several gas producers new to Cook Inlet have plans to drill in 2013. Last year, the State of Alaska took in approximately $6.9 million in bids at its area-wide Cook Inlet oil and gas lease sale, reportedly the third-highest dollar volume for a Cook Inlet sale since area-wide sales began in 1999. The three major bidders were all large current leaseholders and much of the bidding appeared to be filling in around existing leasehold positions. Hilcorp purchased Chevron’s subsidiary Union Oil Company of California January 1, 2012, and purchased Marathon Alaska Production assets effective February 1, 2013. Both Hilcorp and ConocoPhillips have recently entered into gas contracts with a majority of the gas users in Cook Inlet for the delivery of gas through the first quarter of 2018. Chugach is encouraged with this recent development but continues to explore other alternatives to diversify our portfolio.

 

29


Table of Contents

Chugach, as part of a group of utilities in Southcentral Alaska, continues to evaluate its long-term needs and is focusing on design and permitting of an Liquefied National Gas (LNG) import facility that could potentially be in service by 2018. In addition to following exploration and production activity in the Cook Inlet area, Chugach is also closely monitoring potential pipeline options from the North Slope.

CINGSA began service April 1, 2012. The facility had an initial storage capacity of 11 Bcf. Injections into the facility began in 2012 so that local utilities, including Chugach, will have gas available to meet deliverability requirements during peak periods. Chugach’s share of the initial capacity was 2.4 BCF and is now 2.3 BCF. Chugach was entitled to withdraw gas at a rate of up to 35.0 MMcf per day in 2012 and is entitled to the same limits in 2013. The RCA approved inception rates and a tariff for the CINGSA facility on January 31, 2011 and a Firm Storage Service (FSS) Agreement between the seller and Chugach in July of 2011.

Notification was made by MEA in 2004 and by HEA in 2007 that neither organization intends to be on the Chugach system under the current contractual arrangements post 2014. This would result in a loss of approximately 49 percent of Chugach’s power sales load and approximately 39 percent of the utility’s annual sales revenue.

HEA’s solely-owned power generation and transmission entity, Alaska Electric and Energy Cooperative, Inc. (AEEC), plans to complete its Nikiski generation conversion project in 2013. AEEC currently owns a 40 MW natural gas-fired generation plant that is dispatched as part of Chugach’s overall system. The conversion project entails adding a steam turbine and increasing the output of the plant to approximately 77 MW. HEA intends to purchase all of the output from this unit upon expiration of the Chugach contract in 2013. HEA is also installing a 48 MW combustion turbine which will be used as a backup power source. Chugach and HEA finalized an agreement to accommodate HEA’s commissioning efforts at Nikiski effective July 1, 2013.

Effective December 31, 2011, Chugach sold the Bernice Lake Power Plant and associated transmission substation facilities to AEEC and HEA. Associated with the sale, Chugach also entered into a purchased power agreement that gives Chugach the right to purchase the capacity and related energy from the Bernice Lake Power Plant from the closing date of the sale of the facility through December 31, 2013. The agreement allowed Chugach to sell the Bernice Lake Power Plant and simultaneously ensures system retail and wholesale deliverability requirements continue to be met through December 31, 2013. All capacity purchased power costs will be recovered through our fuel and purchased power process.

After open discussions and proposals regarding power sales possibilities beyond 2014, in February 2012, Chugach received a response from MEA which indicated it is following the path its membership most favored and is moving forward with plans to build its own generation plant. On March 12, 2012, MEA issued a press release announcing an award for power house engineering and engine/generating equipment for their new power plant at Eklutna, Alaska, which is expected to provide 171 MW of base load generation for MEA beginning in 2015.

 

30


Table of Contents

Chugach has been preparing for the loss of two of its wholesale customers for some time and has taken steps to reduce costs in order to mitigate the rate impact to our remaining customers. Our 10-year financial forecast results indicate Chugach can sustain operations and meet financial covenants when these two customers leave the system.

Chugach is also pursuing replacement sources of revenue through potential new power sales agreements and transmission wheeling and ancillary services tariff revisions. On October 5, 2012, Chugach and GVEA finalized arrangements for Chugach to provide economy energy to GVEA until March of 2015. Chugach has also entered into a gas supply arrangement for GVEA economy energy sales, which was approved by the RCA on March 1, 2013.

Included in its 2012 general rate case filing with the RCA on December 21, 2012, Chugach requested approval to update and expand its operating tariff to include both firm and non-firm transmission wheeling service and attendant ancillary services in support of third-party transactions on the Chugach system. The expansion of the tariff was made, in part, to accommodate wheeling services in anticipation of the expiration of the HEA and MEA wholesale customer contracts in 2014. We believe that cost reduction and containment, successful implementation of new power sales agreements and revised tariffs will mitigate anticipated rate increases in the 2014 and 2015 timeframe. However, we cannot assure that we will be able to replace sources of revenue or that any replacement of revenue sources, revised tariffs or our cost reduction and containment measures will fully counteract any anticipated rate increases in this timeframe.

A State of Alaska Energy Policy approved by the legislature in 2010 included legislative intent that the state achieve a 15 percent increase in energy efficiency on a per capita basis between 2010 and 2020, receive 50 percent of its electric generation from renewable and alternative energy sources by 2025, work to ensure a reliable in-state gas supply for residents of the state, and that the state power project fund serve as the main source of state assistance for energy projects, remain a leader in petroleum and natural gas production and become a leader in renewable and alternative energy development. The main project moving Alaska toward its renewable energy goals is the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project. The project is to be located on the Susitna River, approximately halfway between Anchorage and Fairbanks. The project capacity is expected to be 600 MW and would provide about half the electric energy needed in the Railbelt. The 2012 fiscal year State of Alaska capital budget contained $65.7 million for the AEA to conduct planning, design and permitting for this project and on December 29, 2011, AEA filed an application with FERC to begin the licensing process. The 2014 capital budget included $95.0 million for AEA to continue moving the project forward. On July 16, 2012, AEA submitted the proposed studies required to meet federal licensing requirements as part of the review process to meet environmental and safety standards. An updated study plan was submitted in December 2012. AEA held public meetings and comments were accepted by FERC during its 45-day review period. In February of 2013 FERC approved forty-four study plans and approved the remaining studies shortly after. Chugach will work with AEA and other parties on this effort.

 

31


Table of Contents

The 2013 fiscal year State of Alaska capital budget contained $7.4 million in appropriations for Chugach projects that will help contain the cost of power for ratepayers while improving reliability and increasing the amount of renewable energy on the system. Funding for these projects will flow through either the AEA or the Municipality of Anchorage.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Compliance with Environmental Standards

Chugach’s operations are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, which seek to limit air, water and other pollution and regulate hazardous or toxic waste disposal. While we monitor these laws and regulations to ensure compliance, they frequently change and often become more restrictive. When this occurs, our costs of compliance generally increase.

We include costs associated with environmental compliance in both our operating and capital budgets. We accrue for costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when those costs are probable and reasonably estimable. We do not anticipate that environmental related expenditures will have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We cannot, however, predict the nature, extent or cost of new laws or regulations relating to environmental matters.

The Clean Air Act and EPA regulations under the Clean Air Act establish ambient air quality standards and limit the emission of many air pollutants. New Clean Air Act regulations impacting electric utilities may result from future events or new regulatory programs. On October 30, 2009, the EPA published new federal regulations requiring the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gases from all sectors of the economy. Chugach is subject to these regulations, which have not had and are not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. While we cannot predict whether any additional new regulation would occur or its limitation, it is possible that new laws or regulations could increase our capital and operating costs. We have obtained or applied for all Clean Air Act permits currently required for the operation of our generating facilities.

 

32


Table of Contents

Chugach is subject to numerous other environmental statutes including the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and to the regulations implementing these statutes. We do not believe that compliance with these statutes and regulations to date has had a material impact on our financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. However, new laws or regulations, implementation of final regulations or changes in or new interpretations of these laws or regulations could result in significant additional capital or operating expenses.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Chugach is exposed to a variety of risks, including changes in interest rates and changes in commodity prices due to repricing mechanisms inherent in gas supply contracts. In the normal course of our business, we manage our exposure to these risks as described below. We do not engage in trading market risk-sensitive instruments for speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

At June 30, 2013, our short- and long- term debt was comprised of our 2011 and 2012 Series A Bonds, our CoBank bond and outstanding commercial paper.

The interest rates of our 2011 Series A Bonds due 2031 and 2041 are fixed at 4.20 and 4.75 percent, per annum, respectively. The interest rates of our 2012 Series A Bonds due 2032 and 2042 are fixed at 4.01, 4.41 and 4.78 percent, per annum, respectively. At June 30, 2013, we had $253.7 million of 2011 and $238.2 million of 2012 Series A Bonds outstanding. The fair value at June 30, 2013, was $491.2 million.

Chugach is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates associated with our other credit facilities. Our credit facilities’ interest rates may be reset due to fluctuations in a market-based index, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or the base rate or prime rate of our lenders. At June 30, 2013, we had $34.0 million of commercial paper outstanding and $29.7 million outstanding on our CoBank bond. A 100 basis-point rise in interest rates would increase our interest expense by approximately $0.8 million, and a 100 basis point decline in interest rates would decrease our interest expenses by approximately $0.4 million, based on $63.7 million of variable rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2013.

Commodity Price Risk

Chugach’s gas contracts provide for adjustments to gas prices based on fluctuations of certain commodity prices and indices. Because fuel and purchased power costs are passed directly to our wholesale and retail customers through a fuel and purchased power recovery process, fluctuations in the price paid for gas pursuant to gas supply contracts does not normally impact margins.

 

33


Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO each concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), ensures that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In addition, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the second quarter of 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information required by this Item is contained in Note 9 to the “Notes to Financial Statements” within Part I of this Form 10-Q.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Fire Island Wind Project

All construction and commissioning activity necessary for the Fire Island Wind Project to commence regular operation, in accordance with the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) between Chugach and Fire Island Wind, LLC (FIW) dated June 21, 2011, and the Interconnection & Integration Agreement (I&I Agreement) dated September 13, 2011, has been completed. As of December 31, 2012, the “Commercial Operation Date” was deemed to have occurred under both the PPA and the I&I Agreement.

All matters that remain outstanding under the PPA, the I&I Agreement and the Build Transfer Agreement (BTA) dated November 16, 2011, have been resolved through the development of a “Submarine Transmission Line Repair Agreement” and other related documents finalized on March 28, 2013.

For information regarding additional risk factors, please refer to Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Except as noted above, these risk factors have not materially changed as of June 30, 2013.

 

34


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

XBRL Instance Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

35


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
  By:  

/s/ Bradley W. Evans

    Bradley W. Evans
    Chief Executive Officer
  By:  

/s/ Sherri L. McKay-Highers

    Sherri L. McKay-Highers
    Chief Financial Officer
  Date:  

August 12, 2013

 

36


Table of Contents

EXHIBITS

Listed below are the exhibits, which are filed as part of this Report:

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  31.1    Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  31.2    Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32.1    Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32.2    Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*    XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

37