Exhibit 99.1

Filed pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933

and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filing Person: Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Subject Company: Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Commission File Number: 001-32162

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Supplemental Unaudited Information

As of June 30, 2013

As used in this supplemental package, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” include Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated (“CPA®:16 – Global”), its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors, unless otherwise indicated. “GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S.”).

Important Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This supplemental package includes certain supplemental metrics that are not defined by GAAP (“non-GAAP”), including funds from operations (“FFO”), modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), adjusted revenue, and pro rata amounts. A description of these non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided in this supplemental package.

Forward-Looking Statements

This supplemental package contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal securities laws. It is important to note that our actual results could be materially different from those projected in such forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in relying on forward-looking statements as they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may materially affect our future results, performance, achievements or transactions. Information on factors which could impact actual results and forward-looking statements contained herein is included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. We do not undertake to revise or update any forward-looking statements.

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to CPA®:16 – Global Stockholders

to Modified Funds From Operations (MFFO) (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 2

MFFO per share calculation:

__________

(a)         Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using various methodologies. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), management believes that MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, provides insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and debt investments, and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance.

(b)         In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment, as well as the costs associated with a liquidity event, such as merger expenses. Such information would be comparable only for non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition and merger costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses and merger expenses include payments to our advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses and merger expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income and income from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses and merger expenses will have negative effects on returns to stockholders, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property.

(c)          Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed at least annually for impairment, and certain intangibles are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges relating to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.

(d)         Management believes that adjusting for fair value adjustments for derivatives provides useful information because such fair value adjustments are based on market fluctuations and may not be directly related or attributable to our operations.

(e)          Management believes that adjusting for mark-to-market adjustments is appropriate because they are items that may not be reflective of on-going operations and reflect unrealized impacts on value based only on then current market conditions, although they may be based upon current operational issues related to an individual property or industry or general market conditions. The need to reflect mark-to-market adjustments is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly and/or annual basis in accordance with GAAP.

Non-GAAP Financial Disclosure – FFO and MFFO

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, NAREIT has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a real estate investment trust, or REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to nor a substitute for net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

We define FFO consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, impairment charges on real estate and depreciation and amortization; and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly-owned investments. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly-owned investments are calculated to reflect FFO.

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or is requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 3

the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate-related depreciation and amortization as well as impairment charges of real estate-related assets, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. In particular, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO described above, investors are cautioned that, due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges. However, FFO and MFFO, as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating the operating performance of the company. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) were put into effect in 2009. These other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, such as acquisition fees, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. Management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. In addition, non-listed REITs typically have a limited life with targeted exit strategies after acquisition activity ceases. In the prospectus for our follow-on offering dated April 28, 2006 (the “Prospectus”), we stated our intention to begin considering liquidity events (i.e., listing of our common stock on a national exchange, a merger or sale of our assets, or another similar transaction) for investors generally commencing eight years following the investment of substantially all of the proceeds from our initial public offering, which occurred in December 2005, and on July 25, 2013 we entered into an agreement to merge with and into a subsidiary of WPC. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association (“IPA”), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance now that our offering has been completed and essentially all of our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance since our offering and essentially all of our acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of a company’s operating performance after a company’s offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on a company’s operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

We define MFFO consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; nonrecurring impairments of real

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 4

estate-related investments (i.e., infrequent or unusual, not reasonably likely to recur in the ordinary course of business); mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives, or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and jointly-owned investments, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. While we are responsible for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, we retain an outside consultant to review all our hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of our operations, we believe it is appropriate to exclude such infrequent gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of on-going operations.

In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition-related expenses, amortization of above- and below-market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by a company. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as infrequent items or items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, and which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for assessing operating performance.

Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. For example, acquisition costs were generally funded from the proceeds of our offering and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or income from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance.

Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO accordingly.

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 5

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Adjusted Revenue (Unaudited)

(in thousands)

__________

(a)         Adjusted revenue is a non-GAAP measure. See Terms and Definitions section on page 11 for a description of our non-GAAP measures.

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 6

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Portfolio Diversification as of June 30, 2013 (Unaudited)

Top Ten Tenants by Rent (Pro Rata Basis)

(in thousands, except percentages)

__________

(a)         Pro rata annualized contractual minimum base rent represents a non-GAAP measure. See Terms and Definitions section on page 11 for a description of our non-GAAP measures.

(b)         Excludes operating properties (e.g., hotels).

(c)          Rent amounts are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

(d)         Percentage of the portfolio’s total pro rata square footage that was subject to lease.

Portfolio

At June 30, 2013, our portfolio was comprised of our full or partial ownership interests in 488 properties, substantially all of which were triple-net leased to 141 tenants, and totaled approximately 46 million square feet, with an occupancy rate of approximately 97.9%. In addition, our portfolio contained our ownership interests in two hotel properties, which had an aggregate carrying value of $68.1 million at June 30, 2013.

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 7

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Portfolio Diversification as of June 30, 2013 (Unaudited)

by Geography and Property Type (Pro Rata Basis)

(in thousands, except percentages)

__________

(a)           Pro rata annualized contractual minimum base rent represents a non-GAAP measure. See Terms and Definitions section on page 11 for a description of our non-GAAP measures.

(b)          Excludes operating properties (e.g., hotels).

(c)           Includes rent from tenants in Malaysia and Thailand.

(d)          Includes rent from tenants in Canada, Hungary, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, and Sweden.

(e)           Includes rent from tenants with the following property types: hospitality (2.1%), education (1.7%), theater (1.6%), residential (1.4%), sports (1.0%), and land (0.02%).

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 8

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Portfolio Diversification as of June 30, 2013 (Unaudited)

by Tenant Industry (Pro Rata Basis)

(in thousands, except percentages)

__________

(a)         Based on the Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. classification system and information provided by the tenant.

(b)         Pro rata annualized contractual minimum base rent represents a non-GAAP measure. See Terms and Definitions section on page 11 for a description of our non-GAAP measures.

(c)          Excludes operating properties (e.g., hotels).

(d)         Includes rent from tenants in the following industries: consumer services (0.8%), forest products and paper (0.5%), consumer and durable goods (0.3%), and utilities (0.3%).

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 9

Corporate Property Associates 16 – Global Incorporated

Investment Activity (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(in thousands, except square footage)

Acquisitions

Dispositions

Receivership Activity

__________

(a)         Includes capitalized transaction costs.

(b)         Disposition price reflects applicable foreign exchange rate.

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 10

Terms and Definitions

Non-GAAP Financial Disclosures

Adjusted Revenue

Adjusted revenue is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents revenues on a GAAP basis adjusted for our pro rata share of revenues from equity investments as well as the pro rata share of revenues due to noncontrolling interests. We believe that adjusted revenue is useful to investors and analysts as a supplemental measure of revenues from our core operations, and we use it to evaluate the stability of our underlying revenue streams. Adjusted revenue should not be considered as an alternative to revenues computed on a GAAP basis as a measure of our profitability. Adjusted revenue may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Pro Rata Amounts

This supplemental package contains certain measures prepared under the pro rata consolidation method, which is not in accordance with GAAP. We refer to these non-GAAP measures as pro rata measures. We believe that these pro rata measures are useful to investors as they provide supplemental information on the nature and performance of our investments that is not easily discernible in the equivalent GAAP measures. Consistent with industry practice and as a means of procuring opportunities and sharing risk, we have a number of investments, usually with our affiliates, in which our economic ownership is less than 100%. Under the full consolidation method required under GAAP, we report 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of those investments that are deemed to be under our control or for which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, even if our ownership is less than 100%. Also, under GAAP, for all other jointly-owned investments, we report our net investment and our net income or loss from that investment. Under the pro rata consolidation method, we generally present our proportionate share, based on our economic ownership of these jointly-owned investments, of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of those investments, as we use this information to evaluate our financial performance without including any ownership of the other investors. Our non-GAAP measures are not intended to be performance measures that should be regarded as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, our GAAP measures.

CPA®:16 – Global 6/30/2013 Supplemental 8-K — 11