Attached files

file filename
10-K - NAR 2012-B 10-K FOR FYE 03/31/13 - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustbodynar12b10k033113.htm
EX-3.2 - BYLAWS OF NARC II - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex3_2.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14(D) - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex31_1.htm
EX-33.2 - MANAGEMENT?S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB (CITIBANK, N.A.) - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex33_2.htm
EX-33.1 - REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES OF NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex33_1.htm
EX-35.1 - SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex35_1.htm
EX-34.1 - REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (ERNST & YOUNG LLP) - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex34_1.htm
EX-99.1 - ANNUAL SERVICER?S CERTIFICATE PROVIDED BY NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION TO HOLDERS OF NOTES AND CERTIFICATES - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex99_1.htm
EX-3.1 - AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF NARC II - Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trustnar12b10kex3_1.htm
Exhibit 34.2
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)
 



 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
The Board of Directors
Citibank, N.A.:
 
We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013.  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.
 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 
/s/ KPMG LLP
 
 
Chicago, Illinois
May 24, 2013