Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| 8-K - 8-K - EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES INC | d549621d8k.htm |
EXHIBIT 99.1
FILED
| UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT |
JUN 03 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS |
| MHC FINANCING LIMITED |
No. 07-15982 | |
| PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited |
||
| partnership; GRAPELAND VISTAS |
D.C. No. CV-04-03325-VRW | |
| INC., a California corporation, |
||
| Plaintiffs - Appellants, |
ORDER | |
| v. |
||
| CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, a municipal corporation; CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California corporation,
Defendants - Appellees. |
||
| MHC FINANCING LIMITED |
No. 09-16447 | |
| PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited |
||
| partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., |
D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW | |
| an Illinois corporation,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,
Defendant - Appellant,
And
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS |
| ASSOCIATION,
|
||
| Defendant-intervenor. |
| MHC FINANCING LIMITED |
No. 09-16451 | |
| PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited |
||
| partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., |
D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW | |
| an Illinois corporation,
|
||
| Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,
Defendant - Appellant,
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee. |
| MHC FINANCING LIMITED |
No. 09-16612 | |
| PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited |
||
| partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., |
D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW | |
| an Illinois corporation, |
||
| Plaintiffs - Appellees, |
||
| v. |
||
| CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, |
||
2
| Defendant,
And
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - intervenor - Appellant. |
| MHC FINANCING LIMITED |
No. 09-16613 | |
| PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited |
||
| partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC., |
D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW | |
| an Illinois corporation,
|
||
| Plaintiffs - Appellees Cross- Appellants,
v.
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,
Defendant - Appellant Cross- Appellee,
CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - intervenor - Appellant Cross-Appellee. |
Before: FARRIS, THOMAS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
3
Plaintiffs-Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehearing the matter. Plaintiffs-Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Defendant-Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
Defendants-Appellants’ emergency motion for stay of injunction or immediate issuance of mandate is DE NIED as moot.
4