Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: May 16, 2013 – 112,344,695 shares of common stock ($0.001 par value) outstanding.

2

LYFE Communications, Inc.

Index to Report

3

Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

4

LYFE Communications, Inc.

 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Recently Enacted Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting standards in order to determine their effects, if any, on its consolidated results of operation, financial position or cash flows. Based on that review, the Company believes that none of these pronouncements will have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.

3.  Going Concern and Liquidity

The Company has an accumulated deficit through March 31, 2013 of $16,539,190, and has had negative cash flows from operating activities. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  

In 2012 sources of funding did not materialize as committed and as a result the Company received insufficient funding to execute its business plan. The Company accrued significant liabilities for which the Company does not have liquidity or committed funding to meet its current obligations.  If new sources of financing are insufficient or unavailable, we will modify our growth and operating plans to the extent of available funding, if any.  If we cease or stop operations, our shares could become valueless. Historically, we have funded operating, administrative and development costs through the sale of equity capital and short term related party and other shareholder loans. If our plans and/or assumptions change or prove inaccurate, and we are unable to obtain further financing, or such financing and other capital resources, in addition to projected cash flow, if any, prove to be insufficient to fund operations, our continued viability could be at risk. To the extent that any such financing involves the sale of our equity, our current stockholders could be substantially diluted. There is no assurance that we will be successful in achieving any or all of these objectives in 2013.

4.  Debt Issuance Costs

During the three months ending March 31, 2013 the Company paid fees for Notes Payable entered into during the period.  The Company amortizes debt issuance costs on a straight-line basis over the life of the Notes.  As of March 31, 2013 the Company had the following activity in their debt issuance cost account:

9

5. Equity-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2010, the Company’s board of directors approved a stock plan.  The stock plan known as the 2010 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) reserves up to 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized common stock for issuance to officers, directors, employees and consultants under the terms of the Plan.  The Plan permits the board of directors to issue stock options and restricted stock.  The stock options were valued based on the Black Scholes option pricing model.

A summary of option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is presented below:

The year-end intrinsic values are based on a March 28, 2013 closing price of $0.09 per share.

8.  Related Party Transactions

On May 28, 2010 the Company entered into a short-term note payable of $175,000 with a former officer of the Company.  The note has a 60 day maturity and 9% interest rate. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has accrued $48,032 and $43,124 in interest on the note payable, respectively.  The Company recorded $4,908 and $4,503 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of May 20, 2013 the note has not been repaid and is in default.

On February 16, 2011 an officer of the Company loaned the Company $100,000 bearing an interest rate of 12%.  The note matured on February 16, 2012.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has accrued $27,373 and $23,663 interest on the note payable, respectively. The Company recorded $3,708 and $3,312 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of May 20, 2013 the note has not been repaid and is in default.

On February 28, 2012 an officer of the Company loaned the Company $15,000 bearing an interest rate of 12%.  The note matured on August 28, 2012.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has accrued $2,008 and $1,513 in interest on the note payable, respectively.  As of March 31, 2013 a payment of $9,000 has been made on the note with a remaining balance of $9,521 including principal and interest.

On December 31, 2012 an officer of the Company loaned the Company $15,000 and entered into a convertible promissory note with an interest rate of 12%.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 10% discount to the previous three day trading average price per share and has a maturity date of May 31, 2013.  As of March 31, 2013

11

and December 31, 2012 the Company recorded a debt discount of $3,559 and $8,898 related to the conversion feature of the note, along with a derivative liability at inception (see Note 12: Derivative Liability), respectively.  Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discounts is calculated on a straight-line basis over the five month life of the note.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 amortization was recorded in the amount of $5,339 and $0.  Also as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the company has accrued $450 and $0 in interest expense, respectively.  As of May 20, 2013 the note has not been repaid.

9.  Notes Payable

On July 1, 2010 the Company entered into a short-term note payable of $40,000 with Smith Consulting Services (SCS) and affiliates.  On April 30, 2012 the Company converted $20,000 of the note principal and $9,850 of payables to that party as well as $4,551 in interest payable in stock totaling 300,000 shares.  On June 21, 2012 the Company converted $5,000 as well as $1,000 in interest payable in stock totaling 66,667 shares.  The remaining balance of the note is $15,000.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has accrued $3,967 and $3,372, respectively.  As of May 2013 the remaining balance on the note has not been repaid.

On October 1, 2010, the Company signed a $50,000 convertible promissory note with a third party. The note bears interest at 18% per annum and was due on November 5, 2010.  The note has conversion rights that allow the holder of the note at any time to convert all or any part of the remaining principal balance into the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.70 per share.  As of March 13, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has accrued $25,550 and $22,297 in interest, respectively.  The Company recorded $3,253 and $2,757 in interest expense for the three months ending March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of May 2013 the Company is currently in default as no payments have been made on the note and the note has not been converted.

On March 25, 2011 the Company entered into a short-term note payable of $7,500 with Smith Consulting Services (SCS) and affiliates.  The note is due on demand with an 18% interest rate. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company accrued $4,484 and $4,031 in interest, respectively. The Company recorded $453 and $384 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of May 2013 no payments have been made on this note and the note is in default.

On May 31, 2011, a shareholder loaned the Company $5,000 on a short-term convertible note payable.  The note was due on February 10, 2012 and has an 8% interest rate.  The note provides for the conversion of principal plus interest into the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 50% of the market price on date of conversion.  Consequently, the liability has been recorded at $10,000 on the balance sheet.  The difference between the face value and fair value of the note has been recognized as interest expense.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued interest of $766 and $653, respectively.  The Company recorded $113 and $105 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of May 2013 no payments have been made on this note and the note is in default.

On August 10, 2011, the Company signed a $65,000 convertible promissory note with a third party. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and was due on February 10, 2012.  The note has conversion rights that allow the holder of the note at any time to convert all or any part of the remaining principal balance into the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.02.  The Company calculated the value of the beneficial conversion feature (BCF) using the intrinsic method as stipulated in ASC 470. The value

12

of the BCF of the note has been calculated at $5,000.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has accrued $8,836 and $7,389 in interest, respectively. The Company recorded $1,447 and $1,340 in interest expense for the three months ending March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of May 2013 no payments have been made on this note and the note is in default.

On October 16, 2012, the Company signed a $53,000 convertible promissory note with a third party. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on July 18, 2013.  The holder of the note has the right, after the first one hundred eighty days of the note (March 18, 2013), to convert the note and accrued interest into common stock at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest five trading prices for the Common Stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of Conversion Notice.  The Company has the right to prepay the note and accrued interest during the first one hundred eighty days following the date of the note. During that time the amount of any prepayment during the first sixty days is 130% of the outstanding amounts owed while the amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent thirty days to 135%, 140%, 145%, and 150% of the outstanding amounts owed.  The Company recorded debt issuance costs for this note of $3,000, a debt discount of $53,000 related to the conversion feature of the note, and a derivative liability at inception.  Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discounts is calculated on a straight-line basis over the nine month life of the note.  As of March 31, 2013 the total amortization was recorded in the amount of $32,361 resulting in a debt discount of $20,684.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company recorded accrued interest of $1,972 and $894, respectively.

On November 29, 2012, the Company signed a $37,500 convertible promissory note with a third party. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on September 3, 2013.  The holder of the note has the right, after the first one hundred eighty days of the note (March 18, 2013), to convert the note and accrued interest into common stock at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest five trading prices for the Common Stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of Conversion Notice.  The Company has the right to prepay the note and accrued interest during the first one hundred eighty days following the date of the note. During that time the amount of any prepayment during the first sixty days is 130% of the outstanding amounts owed while the amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent thirty days to 135%, 140%, 145%, and 150% of the outstanding amounts owed.  The Company recorded debt issuance costs for this note of $2,500, a debt discount of $36,545 related to the conversion feature of the note, and a derivative liability at inception.  Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discounts is calculated on a straight-line basis over the nine month life of the note.  As of March 31, 2013 the  total amortization was recorded in the amount of $16,389 resulting in a debt discount of $20,156 at March 31, 2013.  As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company recorded accrued interest of $1,027 and $271, respectively.

On February 5, 2013, the Company signed a $47,500 convertible promissory note with a third party. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on November 5, 2013.  The holder of the note has the right, after the first one hundred eighty days of the note (May 17, 2013), to convert the note and accrued interest into common stock at a price per share equal to 58% (representing a discount rate of 42%) of the average of the lowest five trading prices for the Common Stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of Conversion Notice.  The Company has the right to prepay the note and accrued interest during the first one hundred eighty days following the date of the note. During that time the amount of any prepayment during the first sixty days is 130% of the outstanding amounts owed while the amount of the prepayment increases every subsequent thirty days

13

to 135%, 140%, 145%, and 150% of the outstanding amounts owed.  The Company recorded debt issuance costs for this note of $2,500, a debt discount of $47,500 related to the conversion feature of the note, and a derivative liability at inception.  Interest expense for the amortization of the debt discounts is calculated on a straight-line basis over the nine month life of the note.  As of March 31, 2013 the total amortization was recorded in the amount of $9,194 resulting in a debt discount of $38,306 at.  As of March 31, 2013 the Company recorded accrued interest of $562.

10.  Derivative Liability

During the three months ending March 31, 2013 the Company had the following activity in their derivative liability account:

 (1) At inception the Company recorded a derivative liability for the conversion feature of their $53,000 convertible note of $57,089, a debt discount of $53,000, and a loss on derivative liability of $4,089.  At March 31, 2013 the Company measured the fair value of the derivative for the conversion feature at $60,913 and recorded a gain on derivative liability of $14,501.  The fair values of the derivative liabilities were calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:

(2) At inception the Company recorded a derivative liability for the conversion feature of their $37,500 convertible note and a debt discount of $36,545.  At March 31, 2013 the Company measured the fair value of the derivative for the conversion feature at $48,099 and recorded a gain on derivative liability of $3,704 for the three months ending March 31, 2013.  The fair values of the derivative liabilities were calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:

14

(3) At inception, on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a derivative liability for the conversion feature of their $15,000 related party convertible note and a debt discount of $8,898.  At March 31, 2013, the Company measured the fair value of the derivative for the conversion feature at $6,346 and recorded a gain on derivative liability of $2,552 for the three months ending March 31, 2013.  The fair value of the derivative liability was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:

(4) At inception, on February 5, 2013, the Company recorded a derivative liability for the conversion feature of their $47,500 convertible note and a debt discount of $47,500.  At March 31, 2013, the Company measured the fair value of the derivative for the conversion feature at $63,326 and recorded a loss on derivative liability of $6,381 for the three months ending March 31, 2013. The fair value of the derivative liability was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:

11.  Subsequent Events

On April 23, 2013, the holder of a $53,000 convertible promissory note elected to convert $15,000 in principal in exchange for 433,526 shares of common stock.

On April 29, 2013, the Company issued 83,333 common shares in exchange for $5,000 in commissions payable to a third party contractor.

15

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-looking Statements

Statements made in this Quarterly Report which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements with respect to the goals, plan objectives, intentions, expectations, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and our business, including, without limitation, (i) our ability to raise capital, and (ii) statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expects,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “targets” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors (many of which are beyond our control) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, including the following, general economic or industry conditions, nationally and/or in the communities in which we may conduct business, changes in the interest rate environment, international gold prices, legislation or regulatory requirements, conditions of the securities markets, our ability to raise capital, changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines, financial or political instability, acts of war or terrorism, other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technical factors affecting our current or potential business and related matters.

Accordingly, results actually achieved may differ materially from expected results in these statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.  We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

Overview

LYFE Communications, Inc. is developing a technology base for next generation entertainment and communications. Through the wholly owned subsidiary Connected Lyfe, Inc., its primary customer acquisition, operations and services division, LYFE Communications is truly integrating television, ultra high-speed Internet and enhanced voice services for delivery via Internet using IP (Internet Protocol).

The Company’s technology innovations take traditional digital television delivery and convert it to an adaptive IP-based service. The result is dramatically lower cost of operation, new interactive capabilities and delivery to any device, in any location, at any time.

LYFE Communications provides high-speed data and voice services to consumers in six cities and will deploy next generation television services, with voice and data access, into each of these markets, offering the most innovative and compelling media and communications services to residential customers.  Beyond these markets, LYFE Communications will deploy its innovative platform through acquisitions, partnerships, and technology licensing to major existing service providers.

Our technologies are the foundation for many exciting, customer-valued IP services for a rapidly growing market segment that lives “always on and connected,” accessing all the people, information and entertainment in their lives, on their terms – any time, any place, on any device.

LYFE Communications expects to significantly increase their subscriber base in 2013.  The Company is currently under contract to provide its Data and Telephony services to 28 MDU properties spanning 6 cities in 2 states.  These properties present a total market opportunity of over 12,000 units.  These contracts can be characterized in one of two ways: bulk, or subscription.  A “bulk” contract allows LYFE to provide services to each and every tenant at the complex.  We currently have 3 bulk contracts with a

16

total customer base of 600. The remaining 25 contracts are “subscription”, meaning we have either an exclusive or non-exclusive marketing contract and/or Right of Entry (ROE) at the property.  Our average penetration rate at the subscription properties is 10%, which represents a tremendous growth opportunity for the Company.  Further, all of these contracts provide the Company with the opportunity to extend more services in the future.  The Company is currently negotiating with some of the countries largest REIT’s and property management groups to provide services to the properties they own and manage.    

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited Financial Statements and accompanying notes.  Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.  The Company believes there have been no significant changes during the period ended September 30, 2012, to the items disclosed as significant accounting policies in management's Notes to the Financial Statements in the Company's Form 10-K, filed on April 16, 2012, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Nevertheless, the Company’s financial statements contained in this report have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the footnotes to the financial statements and elsewhere in this report, the Company has not established any significant source of revenue to sustain operations, has had negative cash flows from operations and has not received sufficient capital to sustain operations. These factors raise substantial doubt that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has accounted for stock-based compensation under the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718-10-55.  This statement requires us to record an expense associated with the fair value of stock-based compensation.  We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate stock based compensation at the date of grant.  Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility.  Market approach analysis for pricing stock with infrequent trades and transactions require highly subjective assumptions, including restriction discount and blockage discounts.  Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LYFE Communications, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Connected Lyfe Inc.  All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, (SAB 104). The criteria to meet this guideline are: (i) persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, (ii) the sales terms are fixed and determinable, (iii) title and risk of loss have transferred, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company derives its revenue primarily from the sale of Video, Data and Voice over Internet Protocol services and

17

recognizes revenues in the period the related services are provided and the amount of revenue is determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). These tiers include:

Level one - Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level two - Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

Level three - Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

All cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities are carried at fair value.  Additionally, we measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis.  Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows at March 31, 2013.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are reflected at estimated net realizable value, do not bear interest and do not generally require collateral. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts equal to the estimated collection losses based on historical experience coupled with a review of the current status of existing receivables.  Customer accounts are reviewed and written off as they are determined to be uncollectible.

Results of Operations

Revenue - During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded $51,532 and $166,306, respectively.  The decline in revenue was both a result of the transition in the subscriber base on the properties acquired in June 2011 which initially has resulted in a decline of customers, as well as the sale of the UTOPIA customer base in October of 2012.

Direct Costs - Direct costs are comprised of programming costs, monthly recurring Internet broadband connections and VOIP costs.  During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 direct costs were $50,704 and $119,460, respectively.  The decrease in direct costs were a

18

result of the sale of the UTOPIA customer base in October of 2012, as well as a decrease in the subscriber base on the properties acquired in June 2011.

Selling, General and Administrative – Selling, General and Administrative costs increased by $320,426 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The increase is a result of a growth in contractor and employee head count, due to an increase in operating costs related to the upgrade of services to the properties acquired in June 2011.

Net Loss – The Company had a net loss of $666,627 and $265,970 during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The Company has ramped up operations and increased services to the properties acquired in June 2011.  As a result, expenditures and operating costs have increased and the company expects a growth in revenue to occur in the second quarter of 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to meet potential cash requirements. We have historically met our capital requirements through the issuance of stock and by borrowings.

Since inception, we have financed our cash flow requirements through issuance of common stock and notes payable. As we expand our activities, we may, and most likely will, continue to experience net negative cash flows from operations, pending additional revenues. Additionally, we anticipate obtaining additional financing to fund operations through common stock offerings to the extent available or to obtain additional financing to the extent necessary to augment our working capital. In the future we need to generate sufficient revenues from product and software sales in order to eliminate or reduce the need to sell additional stock or obtain additional loans.  There can be no assurance we will be successful in raising the necessary funds to execute our business plan.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the current assets increased by $151,451 when compared to December 31, 2012 due to an increase in cash.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the current liabilities increased by $254,912 when compared to December 31, 2012.  The increase was due to the increase in notes payable used to fund operations as well as an increase in accrued interest and liabilities partially offset by a decrease in accounts and taxes payable.  The Company used financing provided by the sale of common shares and short term borrowing to pay down some of the outstanding payables and tax liabilities.

We anticipate that we are likely to incur operating losses during the next twelve months. The Company’s lack of operating history makes predictions of future operating results difficult to ascertain.  Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in early operations, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving markets. Such risks include, but are not limited to, an evolving and unpredictable business model and the management of growth. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To address these risks, we must, among other things, increase our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so can have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

19

If new sources of financing are insufficient or unavailable, we will modify our growth and operating plans to the extent of available funding, if any. Any decision to modify our business plans would harm our ability to pursue our growth plans. If we cease or stop operations, our shares could become valueless. Historically, we have funded operating, administrative and development costs through the sale of equity capital and short term related party and other shareholder loans. If our plans and/or assumptions change or prove inaccurate, and we are unable to obtain further financing, or such financing and other capital resources, in addition to projected cash flow, if any, prove to be insufficient to fund operations, our continued viability could be at risk. To the extent that any such financing involves the sale of our equity, our current stockholders could be substantially diluted. There is no assurance that we will be successful in achieving any or all of these objectives in 2013 and 2014.

Management is currently seeking sources of equity and debt financing from current and potential investors.  The Company has signed agreements with AT&T to upgrade services to all the existing Ygnition properties acquired in the June 2011 acquisition.  The Company considers the upgrades to potentially increase revenue by offering improved services.  The potential for increased revenue does not include a large capital investment.  The Company will improve services without increasing but reducing the direct costs of providing services to each of the properties.  There can however be no assurance that improving services will lead to increased revenue.  To address the risks involved, the Company has to increase the customer base at each of the properties.  Additionally, the Company has to receive more funding to provide sales and marketing, and increase the revenues in the properties.   

Going Concern

The Company has accumulated losses since inception and has not yet been able to generate profits from operations. Operating capital has been raised through the sale of common stock or through loans from stockholders.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  

Management plans are to further develop new and innovative products and services that target the telecommunications industry.  If management is unsuccessful in these efforts, discontinuance of operations is possible.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief financial and executive officers evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.  In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and

20

that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.  The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on that evaluation, our chief accounting and chief executive officers concluded that, as of March 31, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were, subject to the limitations noted above, not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules, regulations and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of March 31, 20132, the Company did not have the capital and staffing resources to maintain the operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.  Since the evaluation, management has been attempting to secure capital and resources to improve the operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.  

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during period ended March 31, 2013.

21

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Vendors

On June 15, 2011 the Company received a default judgment from the State of Michigan Judicial Court in conjunction with the default on lease payments to a landlord in conjunction with a lease agreement.  The judgment was for $191,160, which was recorded as a liability.  The Company entered into a settlement with the landlord for $75,000 on November 15, 2011.  As of March 31, 2013 the Company owes $5,000 to satisfy the liability.

Siegfried and Jensen

On September 26, 2012, the Company received a “Summons & Complaint” from Ned P. Siegfried and Mitchell R. Jensen in conjunction with an outstanding $50,000 “Convertible Promissory Note.” Under the complaint Siegfried and Jensen are asking for $68,000, interest to date and attorney fees. The $50,000 Convertible Promissory Note was signed on October 1, 2010 and had a conversion price of $.70.  Throughout the duration of the note, the Company has tried several times to reach out to Siegfried & Jensen to settle this debt.  The Company has even offered reduced conversion prices, none of which were satisfactory to Siegfried & Jensen.  On October 23, 2012, the Company filed an “Answer to Complaint”, in the Third Judicial District Court in the State of Utah.  As of April 2013, the complaint is in legal proceedings.

UTOPIA

On March 2, 2011, the Company received from UTOPIA a notice of termination in conjunction with the agreement between Connected Lyfe and UTOPIA entitled Non-Exclusive Network Access and Use Agreement.  According to the notice, Connected Lyfe had until May 2, 2011 to transition its customers to another service provider on the UTOPIA network or cure the breach by working out an arrangement with UTOPIA that is acceptable.  The notice of termination is due to non-payment of network access fees.

On March 3, 2011, the Company received a “notice of exercise of video system reversionary rights” from UTOPIA. Currently, there is a dispute between UTOPIA and Connected Lyfe as to who has not performed under the existing contract.  As stated in the notice, UTOPIA had been working with Connected Lyfe on a resolution.  

On September 28, 2012, the Company received a “notice of transfer of customers” from UTOPIA to transfer the existing customer base to another provider on their network.  

On October 2, 2012, the Company received a “Summons & Complaint” from UTOPIA in conjunction with their claim that the Company failed to comply with both the “Network Access Agreement” and the “Video Systems Agreement”.  Under the complaint UTOPIA is asking for $495,000 in relief from Connected Lyfe Inc.

On October 10, 2012, the Company signed an agreement with Veracity Networks to transfer those customers remaining on the UTOPIA network.  

On November 2, 2012, the Company filed its official answer and subsequent counter complaint to the Utopia allegations.  The Company alleges in its answer and counter claim to the court that

22

Utopia failed to deliver the Video Head End as per the “Video Systems Agreement” which was executed on June 21, 2010, and seeks reimbursement of $375,000.  Further, the Company alleges in its answer and counter claim that Utopia has consistently overbilled for services, and prevented the Company from managing its customer accounts on the Utopia network, resulting in $240,000 of damages.  Further, the Company is also claiming the full value of its customers that were transferred as a result of Utopias actions in October 2012. The Company is seeking $1,900,000 in damages. Finally, the company is claiming substantial additional consequential and punitive damages. These actions came after years of failed negotiations between the Company and Utopia.  The Company decided it was in the best interest of its shareholders to take decisive action in a court of law against Utopia in order to recover any losses that Utopia has caused the company to incur and believes that they will be successful in this pursuit.  As of March 31, 2013, the Company has a $350,000 deposit recorded on the balance sheet in other assets as well as a $446,212 recorded in accounts payable related to this matter.  

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

For a discussion of the Company’s risk factors, please refer to Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, filed on April 14, 2013. There have been no material changes in the Company’s assessment of its risk factors during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The Company issued 8,333,332 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for $363,500 of cash, 1,375,000 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for services valued at $106,500, and 235,417 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for $14,125 in accounts payable during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None; not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None, not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.                         Identification of Exhibit

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized

LYFE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

24