Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - ROCKFORD OIL CORP | exhibit23-1.htm |
S-1/A - ROCKFORD OIL S-1/A3 - ROCKFORD OIL CORP | rockford-s1a3.htm |
Rockford Oil Corp.
Reserve Report
As of December 31, 2012
Properties in Barton, Butler, and Stafford County, Kansas
By:
James E Melland, PE, PG Melland Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 841
McPherson, Kansas 67460
April 1, 2013, 2012
Executive Summary
This report states the reserves for Rockford Oil Corp.'s (ROC) oil and gas properties in Barton, Butler, and Stafford County, Kansas (Table 1). The Anderson Lease is in Barton County and consists of 160 acres, two (2) producing wells and one (1) salt water disposal well (SWD). The Asmussen lease is in Butler County and consists of80 acres, one (1) producing well, one (1) operated SWD, and one (1) non- operated SWD. The Sanders lease is in Stafford County and consists of 160 acres and, two (2) producing wells and one (1) SWD well.
The reserves were estimated using decline curve analysis. For each lease, an initial production rate (IP) and annual decline rate were established to generate the production forecast curve, which was then entered into an economic spreadsheet to determine economic reserves. Using historical production data, the annual decline rate for the Anderson was estimated to be 2.5%, the Asmussen was estimated to be
10.0%, and the Sanders was estimated to be 6%.
The production forecast data was entered into a 25 year 10% discounted cashflow (10% DCF) to
determine the economic reserves. The cashflow is based on a net revenue interest (NRI) of 0.1275 for the
Anderson lease, 0.16 for the Asmussen lease, and 0.28000140 for the Sanders lease. An oil price of
w as used based on the 12 month prior NCRA average Kansas Common price posting. The expenses used are estimated standard expenses, which represent the cost to operate a properly designed and functioning oil well in Kansas. The production with positive cash flow equals the reserves.
1 |
The reserves for each lease are summarized in the Table 1 below.
Reserve Summary Table
Country | Lease | Oil Reserves, PDP BO | GAS Reserves, PDP MCF | |
Barton | Anderson | 3,840 | 0 | |
Butler | Asmussen | 900 | 0 | |
Stafford | Sanders | 1,000 | ||
Totals | 5,740 |
Abbreviations and Definitions
BO | Barrels Oil |
BOPY | Barrels Oil per Year |
D&A | Drilled and Abandoned (dry hole) |
DCF | Discounted Cash Flow |
IP | Initial Production Rate |
J&A | Junked and Abandoned (plugged due to hole problems while drilling) |
KGS | Kansas Geological Survey |
LKC | Lansing - Kansas City formations |
MCF | Thousand cubic feet |
P&A | Produced and Abandoned or Plugged and Abandoned |
PDP | Proven Developed Producing reserves |
PDNP | Proven Developed Non-Producing reserves |
PUD | Proven UnDeveloped reserves |
ROC | Rockford Oil, Corp. |
Disclosures
This report was prepared in accordance with the definitions and regulations contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and conforms to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932.
i) Purpose
This report was prepared for Rockford Oil, Corp. (ROC) to be included as an exhibit in a filing to be made with the SEC.
2 |
ii) Effective & Completion Date
The effective date of the report is December 31, 2012. The report was completed on April 1, 2013.
iii) Proportion and Geographic Area of Reserves
This report cover three (3) of the three (3) leases owned by ROC, which is approximately 100% of ROC's reserves. The reserves are located in Barton, Butler, and Stafford Counties, Kansas.
iv) Assumptions, Data, Methods, Prodedures, and Percentage of Reserves
During the preparation of this report, 100% of ROC's reserves were reviewed. Reserves were estimated using decline curve analysis, which is an industry standard method of estimating reserves. The procedure is as follows. Historical production data was downloaded from the Kansas Geological Survey (KGS) website and recent production data was obtained from the operator. The author of this report has downloaded historical production data from the KGS website for hundreds, if not thousands, of leases and has usually found the data to be accurate. The annual production rate was plotted against time to establish a decline curve for each lease. From the decline curve, an overall historical decline rate, a forecasted decline rate, and a forecasted initial production rate (IP) were established. Current production and operating information was also used to establish the forecasted decline rate and the IP. It is assumed that
the forecasted decline rate remains constant. The forecasted production data, oil prices, and expected
operating expenses were entered into a 25 year discounted cash flow economics spreadsheet. The forecasted production with positive cash flow equaled the reserve amount.
v) Primary Economic Assumptions
An oil price of$85.02/BO was used based on the NCRA average Kansas Common price posting and was held constant throughout the life of the reserves. It is assumed that oil prices will stay in the $85.02/BO range throughout the life of the reserves. The expenses used are estimated standard expenses, which represent the cost to operate a properly designed and functioning oil well in Kansas. Both oil price and operating expenses were held constant throughout the life of the reserves. The Ad Valorem taxes were roughly estimated. It was assumed that the operator has multiple properties and that some expenses are spread out amongst all properties and the total amount of the particular expense is not included for a single property, i.e. insurance.
vi) Effects of Regulation
There are no foreseeable regulations that would affect the ability to produce the reserves listed in this report.
vii) Inherent Uncertainties of Reserve Estimates
There are three (3) main methods of estimating oil and gas reserves; 1) decline curve analysis, 2) material balance, and 3) volumetric calculations. If possible, it is best to use more than one method to reduce the uncertainty in the reserve estimates. For the typical Kansas oil reservoir, decline curve analysis is the only method to use. Fortunately, there are numerous oil leases in Kansas and they have similar decline curves, therefore, the uncertainty is limited. The main uncertainty for Kansas leases is the fact that production rates are close to the economic limit and one major unexpected lease expense can cut the reserve life of a lease short.
viii) Methods and Procedures Considered
This reserve report was prepared using all the necessary procedures and methods, mainly decline curve analysis.
3 |
ix) Summary of Conclusions
The proved developed producing reserves for the Anderson Lease in Barton County, Kansas are 3,840 BO (net). The proved developed producing reserves for the Asmussen Lease in Butler County, Kansas are
900 BO (net). The proved developed producing reserves for the Sanders Lease in Stafford County, Kansas are 1000 BO.
Pricing
An oil price of $85 .021BO was used to determine the economical reserves for each lease. The price is the
12 month average of the NCRA monthly average price posting for Kansas Common oil and does not include any price adjustments. This method varies slightly from FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, which uses the first day of the month price. NCRA pays the monthly average price for oil, not the delivery date price. The difference in the reserve calculation is negligible.
Date 4/1/2013
James E. Melland, PE, PG
/s/ James E. Melland, PE, PG
Reserve Report
Company: Rockford Oil Corp.
Field: Chase-Silica, Barton County, Kansas
Lease: Anderson 160 Acres NW/4 28-20S-12W
Producing Zone: Arbuckle
Well #4 |
Spot NWSWNW |
API# 15-009-07395-0001 |
Type-Status OIL |
Prime Mover Electric | |
#7 | NESENW | 15-009-12231 | OIL | Electric | |
#8 | SWSENW | 15-009-05244-0001 | SWD | ||
#9 | E2 SENW | 15-009-25773 | OIL | Electric | |
#1 |
SWNWNW |
Oil |
15-009-00299 |
OIL-P&A |
|
#2 | SENWNW | Oil | 15-009-07394 | OIL-P&A | |
#3 | NENWNW | 15-009-05638 | D&A | ||
#5 | NESWNW | 15-009-05795 | D&A | ||
#6 | SESENW | 15-009-75883 | OIL-P&A |
4 |
The Anderson lease has been producing from the Arbuckle formation since 1956. As of yearend 2012, it has produced 357,020 BO from six (6) wells. Currently, there are three (3) active producers, the #4, #7, and #9, and a salt water disposal well, the #8. The #9 well was recently drilled and put on production and the #4 well was reworked, together increasing oil production from approximately 2.5 BOPD to
10+BOPD.
Historic annual production data was used to establish an annual decline rate of2.5%. Monthly production data was used to estimate the annual production for 2013 of 1600 BO, which was used as the IP for the production curve.
Rockford owns 0.15 WI and 0.1275 NRI.
Oil
PDP: | 3,840 BO (net) |
PDNP: | 0 BO |
PUD: | Unknown |
Reserve Report
Company: Rockford Oil Corp.
Field: Asmussen, Butler County, Kansas'
Lease: Asmussen 80 Acres W/2 SE/4 16-29S-4E
Producing Zone: Arbuckle
Well |
Spot |
API# |
Type-Status |
Prime Mover | |
#16-1 | E2NWNWSE | 15-015-23749-0001 | SWD | ||
#16-2 | S2NWNWSE | 15-015-23777 | OIL | Electric | |
#5 | NWSWSE | 15-015-21205 | SWD | ||
#1 |
NWNWSE |
15-015-70292 |
OIL-P&A |
||
#1 | NWNWSE | 15-015-00285 | OIL? (Now | 16-1?) | |
#2 | SWNWSE | 15-015-78230 | Oil-P&A | ||
#3 | NENWSE | 15-015-78231 | OIL-P&A | ||
#4 | SWSE | 15-015-78232 | SWD-P&A | ||
#6 | NWNWSE | 15-015-23136 | OTHER |
There was a conflict in the data sources as to which well was the #4 SWD and the #5 SWD.
5 |
The Asmussen lease has been producing from the Arbuckle formation since 1965. The production data reported on the KGS website was listed under two leases, the Amussen (1956 - 1989) and the Asmussen
16-1 (2008 - 2012). The total production as of yearend 2012 is 242,604 BO. There is one active producer, #16-2. The produced water is disposed of in the #16-1 SWD and the non-operated #5 SWD.
The Asmussen lease was reactivated in 2008 and showed flush production through 2009. Historical production data was used to establish an annual decline rate of 10%. The production for 2012 was 822
BO, which was used to calculate the IP of744 BOPY for the forecast production curve.
Rockford owns 0.20 WI and 0.160 NRI.
PDP: | 900 BO (net) |
PDNP: | 0 BO |
PUD: | Unknown |
Reserve Report
Company: Rockford Oil Corp.
Field: Seevers Northwest, Stafford County, Kansas
Lease Sanders 160 acres NW/4 1-25S-14W
Well | Typ | Status | Producing Zone | Prime Mover | |
3 | SE NW NW | 15-185-13136-0002 | SWD-Active | ||
5 | NE NE NW | 15-185-19025-0001 | OIL-Active | Electric | |
6 | SE NE NW | 15-185-19026-0001 | OIL-Active | Electric | |
1 |
NENWNW |
15-185-00477-0001 |
EOR-P&A |
||
2 | NWNENW | 15-185-19002-0001 | OIL-P&A | ||
4 | NWSWNW | 15-185-19003-0001 | OIL-P&A | ||
7 | NWSENW | 15-185-20922 | D&A | ||
J.E. | I | SESENW | 15-185-00894 | D&A |
6 |
The Sanders lease has been producing from the Mississippian since 1965. As of yearend 2012, it has produced 441,282 BO from six (6) wells. Early in the life of the lease, wells 1 through 6 were oil producers. Wells 1 and 3 were converted to injection wells, either for enhanced oil recovery or disposal. Wells 2 and 4 were plugged and abandoned. Wells 5 and 6 are active producers, and well 3 is a salt water disposal well.
Historic production data was used to establish an annual decline rate of 6.0%. Recent production data was used to estimate the forecast IP rate of 500 BOPY.
Rockford owns 0.35 WI and 0.28000140 NRI.
PDP: | 1,000 BO (net) |
PDNP: | 0 BO |
PUD: | Unknown, possible change of re-entering old well or drilling a new well. |
Reserve Table | ||
Reserve Category | Reserves | |
Oil (bbls) | Natural Gas (mcf) | |
PROVED | ||
Developed: | ||
Barton County - Anderson Lease | 3,840 | 0 |
Butler County - Asmussen Lease | 900 | 0 |
Stafford County, Sanders Lease | 1,000 | 0 |
Undeveloped: | ||
Barton County - Anderson Lease | 0 | 0 |
Butler County - Asmussen Lease |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL PROVED | 4395 | 0 |
PROBABLE | ||
Developed | 0 | 0 |
Undeveloped | 0 | 0 |
POSSIBLE | ||
Developed | 0 | 0 |
Undeveloped | 0 | 0 |
There is no gas production from either lease.
7 |