HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. - FORM 10-Q/A

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. - FORM 10-Q/A - May 13, 2013

Attached files

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. Reports

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.	d518772dex321.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.	d518772dex312.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.	d518772dex322.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.	d518772dex311.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

AMENDMENT NO. 1

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012

¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from to

Commission File No. 1-10762

Harvest Natural Resources, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Delaware		77-0196707
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1177 Enclave Parkway, Suite 300
Houston, Texas		77077
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(281) 899-5700

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

At May 4, 2012, 37,365,047 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Restatement

Overview

Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. (“Harvest” or the “Company”) is filing this Amendment on Form 10-Q/A (“Form 10-Q/A”) to amend its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 10, 2012 (“Original Form 10-Q”). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), the Form 10-Q/A contains complete text of Items 1, 2 and 4 of Part 1, and Item 6 of Part II as amended as well as certain currently dated certifications.

The Form 10-Q/A is being filed to amend and restate the Company’s previously issued consolidated condensed financial statements due to errors in previously filed financial statements. In the course of our review, management determined (a) certain warrants issued in 2010 in connection with our $60 million term loan facility (the “Warrants”) were improperly valued at inception and improperly classified as equity instruments rather than liability instruments. As a result of the improper classification of the Warrants, (b) the debt discount and associated interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount was understated for all periods in which the associated debt was outstanding, and (c) the consolidated condensed statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for each reporting period was misstated by the omission of the changes in fair value of the Warrants as a liability instrument. Additionally, (d) certain exploration overhead was incorrectly capitalized to oil and gas properties, which under the successful efforts method of accounting should have been expensed, and (e) certain leasehold maintenance and other costs were improperly capitalized to oil and gas properties, which under the successful efforts method of accounting should have been expensed. Finally, (f) advances to equity affiliate were improperly classified as an operating activity rather than an investing activity and (g) certain costs were improperly classified as an investing activity rather than an operating activity on the consolidated condensed statement of cash flows. Such errors impacted the annual period ended December 31, 2011 and quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012.

As a result of the errors related to the Warrants described above, loss on extinguishment of debt was understated for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the quarters ended June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011.

An additional error was identified related to the improper expensing of costs associated with debt conversions that should have been recorded to equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

We have restated our segment footnote information to reflect the applicable errors stated above and eliminate intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable. Such errors impacted the annual period ended December 31, 2011 and quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012.

In assessing the severity of the errors, management determined that the errors were material to the consolidated condensed financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 and quarterly information for all quarters in 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. In addition to the errors described above, we made corrections for previously identified immaterial errors and errors affecting classification within the consolidated condensed statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) related to impairment of oil and gas properties and income taxes and the consolidated condensed balance sheets related to income taxes.

For information relating to the effect of the restatements, see the following items:

Part I:

Item 1 – Financial Statements

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

Part II:

Item 6 – Exhibits

Aside from the forgoing items, no other items are amended or modified in this Form 10-Q/A.

Other than the restatement, this Form 10-Q/A does not reflect events occurring after the date of the Original Form 10-Q or modify or update those disclosures as affected by subsequent events. Such events include, among others, the events described in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. This Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our other reports filed with the SEC subsequent to December 31, 2012 pursuant to the Exchange Act.

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		4
	Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		5
	Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		6
	Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements		7

Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		30

Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		46

Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		46

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		49

Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS		49

Item 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		50

Item 6.	EXHIBITS		50

Signatures			51

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	33,552		$	58,946
Restricted cash		1,200			1,200
Accounts and notes receivable, net:
Dividend receivable – equity affiliate		12,200			12,200
Joint interest and other		12,740			14,342
Note receivable		3,335			3,335
Advances to equity affiliate		2,384			2,388
Prepaid expenses and other		1,261			728

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		66,672			93,139
OTHER ASSETS		5,186			5,427
INVESTMENT IN EQUITY AFFILIATES		361,950			345,054
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method)		63,939			62,455
Other administrative property, net		1,027			1,128

TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET		64,966			63,583

TOTAL ASSETS	$	498,774		$	507,203


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable, trade and other	$	2,548		$	7,381
Accounts payable – carry obligation		3,596			3,596
Accrued expenses		8,177			15,247
Accrued interest		257			976
Other current liabilities		2,632			2,632
Income taxes payable		950			689
Current portion – long-term debt		15,551			—

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		33,711			30,521
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		949			908
WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITY		4,438			4,870
LONG-TERM DEBT		—			31,535
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 6)

EQUITY
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 a share; authorized 5,000 shares; outstanding, none		—			—
Common stock, par value $0.01 a share; authorized 80,000 shares at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011: 80,000 shares); issued 43,709 shares at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011: 40,625 shares)		437			406
Additional paid-in capital		245,794			227,800
Retained earnings		192,549			193,589
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,520 shares at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011: 6,475 shares)		(66,104	)		(66,104	)

TOTAL HARVEST STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		372,676			355,691
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST		87,000			83,678

TOTAL EQUITY		459,676			439,369

	$	498,774		$	507,203

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands, except per share data)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)
EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization	$	105		$	124
Exploration expense		1,935			1,299
Dry hole costs		5,546			—
General and administrative		5,842			6,675

		13,428			8,098


LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(13,428	)		(8,098	)

OTHER NON-OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
Investment earnings and other		69			145
Unrealized gain (loss) on warrant derivative		432			(2,516	)
Interest expense		(92	)		(3,553	)
Debt conversion expense		(2,422	)		—
Other non-operating expenses		(256	)		(431	)
Foreign currency transaction loss		(22	)		(11	)

		(2,291	)		(6,366	)


LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(15,719	)		(14,464	)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)		(1,220	)		459

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(14,499	)		(14,923	)

NET INCOME FROM EQUITY AFFILIATES		16,896			18,456

NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		2,397			3,533

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		(115	)		(3,266	)

NET INCOME		2,282			267

LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST		3,322			3,419

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HARVEST	$	(1,040	)	$	(3,152	)


NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HARVEST PER COMMON SHARE
(See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Earnings Per Share):
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.10	)

Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.10	)


COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(1,040	)	$	(3,152	)

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	2,282		$	267
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depletion, depreciation and amortization		105			934
Dry hole costs		5,546			—
Impairment of long-lived assets		—			1,440
Amortization of debt financing costs		183			270
Amortization of discount on debt		—			2,116
Debt conversion expense		1,939			—
Net income from equity affiliates		(16,896	)		(18,456	)
Non-cash compensation related charges		886			1,114
Unrealized (gain) loss on warrant derivative		(432	)		2,516
Other current liabilities		—			425
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable		1,602			(3,696	)
Prepaid expenses and other		(533	)		2,600
Other assets		(378	)		(34	)
Accounts payable		(4,833	)		2,119
Accrued expenses		(2,225	)		2,071
Accrued interest		(902	)		(1,158	)
Other long-term liabilities		41			434
Income taxes payable		261			182

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(13,354	)		(6,856	)


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions of property and equipment		(11,978	)		(8,414	)
Additions to asset held for sale		—			(15,633	)
Proceeds from sale of equity affiliate		—			1,273
Advances to equity affiliate		4			(146	)
Increase in restricted cash		—			(4,490	)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(11,974	)		(27,410	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock		—			416
Financing costs		(66	)		(189	)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(66	)		227


NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(25,394	)		(34,039	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		58,946			58,703

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	33,552		$	24,664

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization

Interim Reporting

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2012, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and do not include all disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“USGAAP”). Reference should be made to our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 which include certain definitions and a summary of significant accounting policies and should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year.

Organization

Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. (“Harvest”) is an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and disposition of oil and natural gas properties since 1989, when it was incorporated under Delaware law.

We have significant interests in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Venezuela”). Our Venezuelan interests are owned through HNR Finance, B.V. (“HNR Finance”). Our ownership of HNR Finance is through several corporations in all of which we have direct controlling interests. Through these corporations, we indirectly own 80 percent of HNR Finance and our partner, Oil & Gas Technology Consultants (Netherlands) Coöperatie U.A., a controlled affiliate of Venezolana de Inversiones y Construcciones Clerico, C.A. (“Vinccler”), indirectly owns the remaining 20 percent interest in HNR Finance. HNR Finance owns 40 percent of Petrodelta, S.A. (“Petrodelta”). As we indirectly own 80 percent of HNR Finance, we indirectly own a net 32 percent interest in Petrodelta, and Vinccler indirectly owns eight percent. Corporación Venezolana del Petroleo S.A. (“CVP”) owns the remaining 60 percent of Petrodelta. HNR Finance also has a direct controlling interest in Harvest Vinccler S.C.A. (“Harvest Vinccler”). Harvest Vinccler’s main business purposes are to assist us in the management of Petrodelta and in negotiations with Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (“PDVSA”). We do not have a business relationship with Vinccler outside of Venezuela.

In addition to our interests in Venezuela, we have exploration acreage mainly onshore in West Sulawesi in the Republic of Indonesia (“Indonesia”), offshore of the Republic of Gabon (“Gabon”), onshore in the Sultanate of Oman (“Oman”), and offshore of the People’s Republic of China (“China”). See Note 9 – Indonesia, Note 10 – Gabon, and Note 11 – Oman.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements

successful efforts method of accounting should have been expensed. Finally, (f) advances to equity affiliate were improperly classified as an operating activity rather than an investing activity and (g) certain costs were improperly classified as an investing activity rather than an operating activity on the consolidated condensed statement of cash flows. Such errors impacted annual period ended December 31, 2011 and quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012.

An additional error was identified related to the improper expensing of costs associated with debt conversions that should have been recorded to equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

We have restated our segment footnote information to reflect the applicable errors stated above and eliminate intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable. Such errors impacted annual period ended December 31, 2011 and quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012.

The following tables set forth the effect of the adjustments described above on the consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated condensed balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012									Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	As Previously Reported			Adjustment			As RESTATED			As Previously Reported			Adjustment			As RESTATED
	*(in thousands)*
Expenses
Depreciation and amortization	$	105		$	—		$	105		$	124		$	—		$	124
Exploration expense^(a)		1,443			492			1,935			1,189			110			1,299
Dry hole costs		5,546			—			5,546			—			—			—
General and administrative		5,842			—			5,842			6,675			—			6,675

Total expenses		12,936			492			13,428			7,988			110			8,098

Loss from operations		(12,936	)		(492	)		(13,428	)		(7,988	)		(110	)		(8,098	)
Other non-operating income (expense) Investment earnings and other		69			—			69			145			—			145
Unrealized gain (loss) on warrant derivatives^(b)		—			432			432			—			(2,516	)		(2,516	)
Interest expense^(c)		(394	)		302			(92	)		(2,212	)		(1,341	)		(3,553	)
Debt conversion expense		(2,422	)		—			(2,422	)		—			—			—
Other non-operating expense		(256	)		—			(256	)		(431	)		—			(431	)
Foreign currency transaction loss		(22	)		—			(22	)		(11	)		—			(11	)

		(3,025	)		734			(2,291	)		(2,509	)		(3,857	)		(6,366	)

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income taxes		(15,961	)		242			(15,719	)		(10,497	)		(3,967	)		(14,464	)
Income tax expense (benefit)^(d)		(1,220	)		—			(1,220	)		222			237			459

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		(14,741	)		242			(14,499	)		(10,719	)		(4,204	)		(14,923	)
Net Income from Equity Affiliate^(e)		16,758			138			16,896			18,494			(38	)		18,456

Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		2,017			380			2,397			7,775			(4,242	)		3,533
Loss from Discontinued Operations		(115	)		—			(115	)		(3,266	)		—			(3,266	)

Net Income		1,902			380			2,282			4,509			(4,242	)		267
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest^(e)		3,294			28			3,322			3,427			(8	)		3,419

Net Income (Loss) Attributable To Harvest	$	(1,392	)	$	352		$	(1,040	)	$	1,082		$	(4,234	)	$	(3,152	)


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Harvest Per Common Share:
Basic	$	(0.04	)	$	0.01		$	(0.03	)	$	0.03		$	(0.13	)	$	(0.10	)

Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	0.01		$	(0.03	)	$	0.02		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.10	)


Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,392	)	$	352		$	(1,040	)	$	1,082		$	(4,234	)	$	(3,152	)

(a)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(b)	Represents changes in fair value of Warrants for the period. Such Warrants were previously classified as equity and were, therefore, not marked to market at the end of each reporting period.

(c)

For 2012, relates to the improper expensing of accrued interest associated with debt conversions. For 2011, as a result of the change in fair value of the Warrants, the original discount allocated to the debt was understated; therefore, the additional amortization of the discount on debt, which is a component of interest expense, was understated for each period the debt was outstanding and income tax expense improperly classified as interest expense.

(d)	Relates to income tax expense improperly classified as interest expense.

(e)	Relates to a previously identified immaterial error.

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets


	March 31, 2012
	As Previously					As
	Reported		Adjustment			RESTATED
	*( in thousands)*

Deferred income tax^(a)	$	2,628	$	(2,628	)	$	—
Investment in equity affiliate^(b)		361,812		138			361,950
Oil and gas properties^(c)		67,784		(3,845	)		63,939
Total assets^(d)		505,109		(6,335	)		498,774
Accrued interest payable^(e)		653		(396	)		257
Other current liabilities^(f)		4,835		(2,203	)		2,632
Income taxes payable^(e)		979		(29	)		950
Warrant derivative liability^(g)		—		4,438			4,438
Total liabilities^(h)		37,288		1,810			39,098
Additional paid in capital⁽ⁱ⁾		254,625		(8,831	)		245,794
Retained earnings^(j)		191,891		658			192,549
Total Harvest shareholders’ equity^(k)		380,849		(8,173	)		372,676
Noncontrolling interest^(b)		86,972		28			87,000
Total equity		467,821		(8,145	)		459,676

(a)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

(b)	Represents a previously identified immaterial error.

(c)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(d)	Relates to (a) through (c) above.

(e)	Represents income taxes that were improperly classified as interest payable in 2011.

(f)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

(g)	Represents fair value of the Warrants at the reporting date.

(h)	Relates to (e) through (g) above.

(i)

Relates to (a) the reclassification of the Warrants from equity to warrant derivative liability of $11,122 thousand offset by an error recorded in 2011 for $2,730 thousand for the reversal of the original fair value of certain Warrants that did not qualify for equity classification and (b) deferred financing costs of $439 thousand that were erroneously expensed rather than capitalized to additional paid-in capital.

(j)

Relates to (a) net increase in expense in 2010, 2011, and the first three months of 2012 related to exploration expense of $3,015 thousand, (b) net increase in unrealized gain on warrant derivatives of $10,562 thousand for cumulative 2010, 2011 and the first three months of 2012, (c) net increase in interest expense of $2,619 thousand cumulative for 2010, 2011 and the first three months of 2012, (d) net increase in loss on extinguishment of debt of $3,450 thousand for 2011, (e) net increase in income from equity affiliate of $138 thousand less noncontrolling interest of $28 thousand due to a previously identified immaterial error, (f) net increase in income tax expense of $237 thousand for income taxes improperly classified as interest expense, offset by a reduction to retained earnings of $693 thousand prior to January 1, 2010 for adjustments to leasehold maintenance costs that were improperly capitalized rather than expensed prior to January 1, 2010.

(k)	Relates to reclassification of the Warrants as described in (i) above plus the impact of retained earnings described in (j) above.

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets


	December 31, 2011
	As Previously					As
	Reported		Adjustment			RESTATED
	*( in thousands)*

Deferred income taxes^(a)	$	2,628	$	(2,628	)	$	—
Oil and gas properties^(b)		65,671		(3,216	)		62,455
Total assets^(c)		513,047		(5,844	)		507,203
Accrued interest payable^(d)		1,372		(396	)		976
Other current liabilities^(e)		4,835		(2,203	)		2,632
Income taxes payable^(d)		718		(29	)		689
Warrant derivative liability^(f)		—		4,870			4,870
Total liabilities^(g)		65,592		2,242			67,834
Additional paid in capital^(h)		236,192		(8,392	)		227,800
Retained earnings⁽ⁱ⁾		193,283		306			193,589
Total Harvest shareholders’ equity^(j)		363,777		(8,086	)		355,691
Total equity		447,455		(8,086	)		439,369

(a)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

(b)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(c)	Relates to (a) and (b) above.

(d)	Represents other current liabilities that were improperly classified as interest payable and income taxes payable.

(e)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability and income taxes improperly classified as interest payable.

(f)

Relates to the reclassification of the Warrants out of additional paid in capital to warrant derivative liabilities. The fair value of the Warrants was not appropriately determined at inception because certain features of the Warrants were not originally considered in the fair value calculation. Thus, the correction of the error to record the Warrants as a liability does not agree to the correction of the error removing the Warrants from equity. Additionally, the Warrants were not properly marked to market at the end of each period. The warrant derivative liability was valued at $15,000 thousand at inception with subsequent reductions in fair value of $344 thousand in 2010 and $9,786 thousand in 2011.

(g)	Relates to (d) through (f) above.

(h)

Relates to the reversal of the amount recorded to equity at inception for the Warrants of $11,122 thousand and the reversal of the amount removed from additional paid in capital of $2,730 thousand when a portion of the Warrants were redeemed by the Company. In May 2011, additional paid in capital was debited for $2,730 thousand for the reversal of the original fair value of such warrants which was an error as they did not qualify for equity classification.

(i)

Relates to (a) net increase in expense in 2010 and 2011 related to exploration expense of $2,523 thousand (inclusive of the reclassification of exploration expense to impairment of oil and gas properties of $3,335 thousand), (b) net increase in unrealized gain on warrant derivatives of $10,130 thousand for cumulative 2010 and 2011, (c) net increase in interest expense of $2,921 thousand cumulative for 2010 and 2011, (d) net increase in loss on extinguishment of debt of $3,450 thousand for 2011, (e) net increase in income tax expense of $237 thousand for income taxes improperly classified as interest expense, offset by a reduction to retained earnings of $693 thousand prior to January 1, 2010 for adjustments to leasehold maintenance costs that were improperly capitalized rather than expensed prior to January 1, 2010.

(j)	Relates to reclassification of the Warrants as described in (h) above plus the impact of retained earnings described in (i) above.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows


	March 31, 2012									March 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustment			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustment			RESTATED
	*(in thousands)*
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities^(a)(b)	$	(12,343	)	$	(1,011	)	$	(13,354	)	$	(7,021	)	$	165		$	(6,856	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities^(a)(b)		(12,985	)		1,011			(11,974	)		(27,245	)		(165	)		(27,410	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(66	)		—			(66	)		227			—			227

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(25,394	)		—			(25,394	)		(34,039	)		—			(34,039	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		58,946			—			58,946			58,703			—			58,703

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	33,552		$	—		$	33,552		$	24,664		$	—		$	24,664

(a)

For 2012, relates to $629 thousand of lease maintenance costs, exploration overhead and $378 thousand of certain investment costs that were improperly classified as an investing activity rather than an operating activity. In addition, Advances to Equity Affiliates of $4 thousand were previously erroneously classified as an operating activity rather than an investing activity.

(b)

For 2011, relates to $53 thousand of lease maintenance costs and $(34) thousand of certain investment costs that were improperly classified as an investing activity rather than an operating activity. In addition, Advances to Equity Affiliates of $146 thousand were improperly classified as an operating activity rather than an investing activity.

In addition to the above, we have restated our segment footnote information to reflect the applicable errors stated above and eliminate intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable.


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012									Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED
Segment Income (Loss) Attributable to Harvest
Venezuela^(a)	$	12,715		$	241		$	12,956		$	13,214		$	74		$	13,288
Indonesia^(b)		(2,476	)		(380	)		(2,856	)		(1,418	)		—			(1,418	)
Gabon^(b)		(1,315	)		(110	)		(1,425	)		(342	)		(110	)		(452	)
Oman		(5,608	)		—			(5,608	)		(556	)		—			(556	)
United States^(c)		(4,593	)		601			(3,992	)		(6,550	)		(4,198	)		(10,748	)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,277	)		352			(925	)		4,348			(4,234	)		114
Discontinued operations (Antelope Project)		(115	)		—			(115	)		(3,266	)		—			(3,266	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Harvest	$	(1,392	)	$	352		$	(1,040	)	$	1,082		$	(4,234	)	$	(3,152	)

(a)	Represents a previously identified immaterial error.

(b)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(c)

For 2012, represents change in the fair value of the Warrants for the reporting period and improper expensing of debt conversion costs and lease maintenance costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense. For 2011, represents (a) change in fair value of the Warrants for the reporting period, (b) understatement of interest expense and debt discount which resulted from the improper classification of the Warrants, and (c) lease maintenance costs erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed to exploration expense.


	March 31, 2012									December 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED
Operating Segment Assets
Venezuela^(a)	$	365,497		$	138		$	365,635		$	348,802		$	—		$	348,802
Indonesia^(b)		14,388			(1,885	)		12,503			65,165			(50,572	)		14,593
Gabon^(b)		56,567			(1,668	)		54,899			119,273			(63,768	)		55,505
Oman^(b)		6,586			—			6,586			20,980			(13,828	)		7,152
United States^(c)		259,404			(2,920	)		256,484			137,531			122,325			259,856

		702,442			(6,335	)		696,107			691,751			(5,843	)		685,908
Intersegment eliminations		(197,333	)		—			(197,333	)		(178,704	)		(1	)		(178,705	)

Total Assets	$	505,109		$	(6,335	)	$	498,774		$	513,047		$	(5,844	)	$	507,203

(a)	Represents a previously identified immaterial error.

(b)	Relates to the elimination of intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable.

(c)	Relates to the elimination of intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable and a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of all wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany profits, transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-05), which is included in ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income” (“ASC 220”). This update requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. We adopted ASU 2011-05 effective January 1, 2012 and have elected to utilize the “single continuous statement” for presentation.

Reporting and Functional Currency

The United States Dollar (“U.S. Dollar”) is the reporting and functional currency for all of our controlled subsidiaries and Petrodelta. Amounts denominated in non-U.S. Dollar currencies are re-measured into U.S. Dollars, and all currency gains or losses are recorded in the consolidated condensed statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). We attempt to manage our operations in such a manner as to reduce our exposure to foreign exchange losses. However, there are many factors that affect foreign exchange rates and the resulting exchange gains and losses, many of which are beyond our influence.

See Note 7 – Venezuela for a discussion of currency exchange risk on Harvest Vinccler’s and Petrodelta’s businesses.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include money market funds and short term certificates of deposit with original maturity dates of less than three months.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash is classified as current or non-current based on the terms of the agreement. Restricted cash at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 represents cash held in a U.S. bank used as collateral for a standby letter of credit issued as a payment guarantee for electric wireline services to be provided during the drilling of the two exploratory wells on the Oman Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement Al Ghubar / Qarn Alam license (“Block 64 EPSA”) (see Note 11 – Oman).

Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and notes payable. Cash and cash equivalents are placed with commercial banks with high credit ratings. This diversified investment policy limits our exposure both to credit risk and to concentrations of credit risk.

Total long-term debt at March 31, 2012 consisted of $15.6 million of fixed-rate unsecured senior convertible notes maturing on March 1, 2013 unless earlier redeemed, purchased or converted. Total long-term debt at December 31, 2011 consisted of $31.5 million of fixed-rate unsecured senior convertible notes maturing on March 1, 2013 unless earlier redeemed, purchased or converted. See Note 4 – Long-Term Debt.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable bear interest and can have due dates that are less than one year or more than one year. Amounts outstanding under the notes bear interest at a rate based on the current prime rate and are recorded at face value. Interest is recognized over the life of the note. We may or may not require collateral for the notes.

Each note is analyzed to determine if it is impaired pursuant to Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) 2010-20. A note is impaired if it is probable that we will not collect all principal and interest contractually due. We do not accrue interest when a note is considered impaired. All cash receipts on impaired notes are applied to reduce the accrued interest on the note until the interest is made current and, thereafter, applied to reduce the principal amount of such notes.

At March 31, 2012, our note receivable relates to a prospect leasing cost financing arrangement. The note receivable plus accrued interest was approximately $3.3 million at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011: $3.3 million), and was secured by a portion of the production from the Bar F #1-20-3-2 in Utah. With the sale of our oil and gas assets in Utah’s Uinta Basin (the “Antelope Project”) effective March 1, 2011, the note receivable plus accrued interest will be settled upon finalization of certain terms of the Joint Exploration and Development Agreement (“JEDA”) which defined the participating parties’ obligations over the Antelope Project. See Note 3 – Dispositions and Note 5 – Commitments and Contingencies.

Other Assets

Other assets consist of investigative costs associated with new business development projects, deferred financing costs and a long-term receivable for value added tax (“VAT”) credits related to the Budong-Budong Production Sharing Contract (“Budong PSC”). Investigative costs are reclassified to oil and gas properties or expensed depending on management’s assessment of the likely outcome of the project. Deferred financing costs relate to specific financing and are amortized over the life of the financing to which the costs relate. See Note 4 – Long-Term Debt. The VAT receivable is reimbursed through the sale of hydrocarbons.

At March 31, 2012, other assets consisted of $0.5 million of investigative costs, $0.4 million of deferred financing costs and $3.6 million of long-term VAT receivable. At December 31, 2011, other assets consisted of $0.4 million of investigative costs, $1.0 million of deferred financing costs and $3.3 million of long-term VAT receivable. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, $0.2 million of investigative costs were reclassified to expense.

Other Assets at March 31, 2012 also includes a blocked payment of $0.7 million (December 31, 2011: $0.7 million) net to our 66.667 percent interest related to our drilling operations in Gabon in accordance with the U.S. sanctions against Libya as set forth in Executive Order 13566 of February 25, 2011, and administered by the United States Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). See Note 5 – Commitments and Contingencies.

Investment in Equity Affiliates

Investments in unconsolidated companies in which we have less than a 50 percent interest and have significant influence are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Investment in Equity Affiliates is increased by additional investments and earnings and decreased by dividends and losses. We review our Investment in Equity Affiliates for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of its carrying value.

There are many factors to consider when evaluating an equity investment for possible impairment. Currency devaluations, inflationary economies and cash flow analysis are some of the factors we consider in our evaluation for possible impairment. At March 31, 2012, there were no events that caused us to evaluate our investment in Petrodelta for impairment.

Property and Equipment

We use the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties. The major components of property and equipment are as follows:


	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)

Unproved property costs	$	60,814		$	59,626
Oilfield inventories		3,125			2,829
Other administrative property		3,180			3,176

		67,119			65,631
Accumulated depletion, impairment and depreciation		(2,153	)		(2,048	)

	$	64,966		$	63,583

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

Capitalized Interest

We capitalize interest costs for qualifying oil and gas properties. The capitalization period begins when expenditures are incurred on qualified properties, activities begin which are necessary to prepare the property for production and interest costs have been incurred. The capitalization period continues as long as these events occur. The average additions for the period are used in the interest capitalization calculation. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we capitalized interest costs of $0.7 million for qualifying oil and gas property additions (March 31, 2011: $0.9 million).

Derivative Financial Instruments

Under ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity”, certain of our financial instruments with anti-dilution protection features do not meet the conditions to obtain equity classification, as there are conditions which may require settlement by transferring assets, and are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, with changes in fair value reflected in our consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). See Note 14 – Warrant Derivative Liabilities for additional disclosures. In the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are required to repurchase the Warrants at the higher of (1) the fair market value of the warrant and (2) a valuation based on a computation of the option value of the Warrant using the Black-Scholes calculation method using the assumptions described in the Warrant Agreement. A fundamental change is defined as “the occurrence of one of the following events: a) a person or group becomes the direct or indirect owner of more than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding common stock, b) a merger event or similar transaction in which the majority owners before the transaction fail to own a majority of the voting power of the Company after the transaction, and c) approval of a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.”

Fair Value Measurements

We measure and disclose our fair values in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy assigns the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for

identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 2 measurements are inputs that are observable for assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly, other than quoted prices included within Level 1. We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable.

Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques (such the Monte Carlo model) are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair value, our (income) loss will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

Inherent in the Monte Carlo valuation model are assumptions related to expected stock price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. We estimate the volatility of our common stock based on historical volatility that matched the expected remaining life of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve as of the valuation dates for a maturity similar to the expected remaining life of the warrants. The expected life of the warrants is assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term. The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which we anticipate to remain at zero.

As part of our overall valuation process, management employs processes to evaluate and validate the methodologies, techniques and inputs, including review and approval of valuation judgments, methods, models, process controls, and results. These processes are designed to help ensure that the fair value measurements and disclosures are appropriate, consistently applied, and reliable.

The Monte Carlo model is used on the warrants to appropriately value the potential future exercise price adjustments triggered by the anti-dilution provisions. See Note 14 – Warrant Derivative Liability. This requires Level 3 inputs which are based on our estimates of the probability and timing of potential future financings and fundamental transactions. The assumptions we used are summarized in the following tables for warrants that were outstanding as of any of the balance sheet dates presented on our consolidated condensed balance sheets:


		March 31,			December 31,
		2012			2011
Significant assumptions (or ranges):
Stock price	Level 1 input	$	7.08		$	7.38
Term (years)			3.58			3.83
Volatility	Level 2 input		70	%		70	%
Risk-free rate	Level 1 input		0.66	%		0.55	%
Dividend yield	Level 2 input		0.0	%		0.0	%
Scenario probability debt/equity raise	Level 3 input		80% / 20	%		80% / 20	%

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. As required by ASC 820, a financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.


	March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities
Warrant derivative liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	4,438	$	4,438

Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	4,438	$	4,438


	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities
Warrant derivative liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	4,870	$	4,870

Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	4,870	$	4,870

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

We record the net change in the fair value of the derivative positions listed above in unrealized gain (loss) on warrant derivative liabilities in our consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). During the three months ended March 31, 2012, an unrealized gain of $0.4 million was recorded to reflect the change in fair value of the warrants (March 31, 2011: $2.5 million unrealized loss).

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their carrying value due to their short-term nature. The following table presents the estimated fair values of our fixed interest rate, long-term debt instrument (Level 2) as of March 31, 2012.


	March 31, 2012
	Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value
	(in thousands)

8.25% senior unsecured convertible notes (Level 2)	$	15,551	$	22,100

The fair value of our fixed interest debt instruments (Level 2) is based on the most recent market trades of the debt and weighted by the size of the trades.

Changes in Level 3 Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table provides a reconciliation of financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).


	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Financial liabilities:
Beginning balance	$	4,870		$	14,656
Unrealized change in fair value		(432	)		(9,786	)

Ending balance	$	4,438		$	4,870

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 liabilities.

Noncontrolling Interests

Changes in noncontrolling interest were as follows:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)

Balance at beginning of period	$	83,678	$	69,501
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		3,322		3,419

Balance at end of period	$	87,000	$	72,920

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands, except per share data)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)

Income (loss) from continuing operations^(a)	$	(925	)	$	114
Discontinued operations		(115	)		(3,266	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Harvest	$	(1,040	)	$	(3,152	)


Weighted average common shares outstanding		34,884			33,945
Effect of dilutive securities		—			2,122

Weighted average common shares, diluted		34,884			36,067


Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.03	)	$	—
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			(0.10	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.10	)


Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.03	)	$	—
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			(0.10	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.10	)

^(a)	Net of income attributable to noncontrolling interest.

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

The three months ended March 31, 2012 per share calculations above exclude 3.9 million options and 1.7 million warrants because they were anti-dilutive. The three months ended March 31, 2011 per share calculations above exclude 0.2 million options and 1.6 million warrants because they were anti-dilutive.

No stock options were exercised in the three months ended March 31, 2012. Stock options for 41,666 shares were exercised in the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulting in cash proceeds of $0.4 million.

transactions on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price or at negotiated rates. We are unable to access the ATM facility during blackout periods or when we are in possession of material information which has not been made public.

Liquidity

The oil and gas industry is a highly capital intensive and cyclical business with unique operating and financial risks. There are a number of variables and risks related to our exploration projects and our minority equity investment in Petrodelta that could significantly utilize our cash balances, affect our capital resources and liquidity. We also point out that the total capital required to develop the fields in Venezuela may exceed Petrodelta’s available cash and financing capabilities, and that there may be operational or contractual consequences due to this inability.

Our cash is being used to fund oil and gas exploration projects and to a lesser extent general and administrative costs. We require capital principally to fund the exploration and development of new oil and gas properties. As is common in the oil and gas industry, we have various contractual commitments pertaining to exploration, development and production activities. The remaining work commitment for the current exploration phase on the Budong PSC is for geological and geophysical work to be completed in the year 2012 at a minimum of $0.5 million ($0.3 million net to our 64.51 percent cost sharing interest). However, per the Budong PSC, excessive work done during any period can be offset against another period, so although there is a work commitment in the Budong PSC to perform the geological and geophysical work, we have exceeded this requirement. BPMIGAS has stated that we have satisfied all work commitments for the current exploration phase of the Budong PSC. We do not have any remaining work commitments for the current exploration phases of the Dussafu Marin Permit (“Dussafu PSC”) or Block 64 EPSA. However, as of May 28, 2012, the Dussafu PSC enters the third exploration phase. If the partners elect to enter the third exploration phase, there will be a $7.0 million ($4.7 million net to our 66.667 percent interest) work commitment over a two-year period.

Our primary ongoing source of cash is still dividends from Petrodelta. In November 2010, Petrodelta’s board of directors declared a dividend of $30.6 million, $12.2 million net to HNR Finance ($9.8 million net to our 32 percent interest). Due to Petrodelta’s liquidity constraints caused by PDVSA’s insufficient monetary and contractual support, as of May 4, 2012, this dividend has not been received, and the timing of the receipt of this dividend is uncertain. We expect Petrodelta to continue to declare and pay dividends in the future; however, we expect that in the near term Petrodelta will reinvest most of its earnings into the company in support of its drilling and appraisal activities. Therefore, there is uncertainty that Petrodelta will declare or pay additional dividends in 2012 or 2013.

Additionally, any dividend received from Petrodelta carries a liability to our non-controlling interest holder, Vinccler, for its 20 percent share. Dividends declared and paid by Petrodelta are paid to HNR Finance, our consolidated subsidiary. HNR Finance must declare a dividend in order for us and Vinccler to receive our respective shares of Petrodelta’s dividends. A dividend from HNR Finance is due upon demand. As of May 1, 2012, Vinccler’s share of the undistributed dividends is $9.0 million inclusive of the unpaid November 2010 dividend. See Note 12 – Related Party Transactions.

We incurred debt during 2010 which has imposed restrictions on us and increased our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions. Our semi-annual interest expense has increased significantly, and our senior convertible notes impose restrictions on us that limit our ability to obtain additional financing. Our ability to meet these covenants is primarily dependent on meeting customary affirmative covenant clauses. Our inability to satisfy the covenants contained in our senior convertible notes would constitute an event of default, if not waived. An uncured default could result in the senior convertible notes becoming immediately due and payable. If this were to occur, we may not be able to obtain waivers or secure alternative financing to satisfy our obligations, either of which would have a material adverse impact on our business. As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all of our long term debt covenants.

and funding from debt or equity financing combined with our ability to vary the timing of our capital expenditures will be sufficient to repay the outstanding debt at March 1, 2013. However, if the Petrodelta dividend payment is not received or our cash sources and requirements are different than expected, it could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

In order to increase our liquidity to levels sufficient to meet our commitments, we are currently pursuing a number of actions including our ability to delay discretionary capital spending to future periods, possible farm-out or sale of assets, or other monetization of assets as necessary to maintain the liquidity required to run our operations. We continue to pursue, as appropriate, additional actions designed to generate liquidity including seeking financing sources, accessing equity and debt markets, and cost reductions. However, there is no assurance that our plans will be successful. Although we believe that we will have adequate liquidity to meet our near term operating requirements and to remain compliant with the covenants under our long term debt arrangements, the factors described above create uncertainty. Our lack of cash flow and the unpredictability of cash dividends from Petrodelta could make it difficult to obtain financing, and accordingly, there is no assurance adequate financing can be raised. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any of these possible efforts will be successful or adequate, and if they are not, our financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

Note 3 – Dispositions

Discontinued Operations

On May 17, 2011, we closed the transaction to sell the Antelope Project. The sale had an effective date of March 1, 2011. We received cash proceeds of approximately $217.8 million which reflects increases to the purchase price for customary adjustments and deductions for transaction related costs. We do not have any continuing involvement with the Antelope Project. The related gain on the sale was reported in discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2011.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $0.1 million of expense related to settlement of royalty payments to the Mineral Management Services.

Revenue and net loss on the disposition of the Antelope Project are shown in the table below:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Revenues applicable to discontinued operations	$	—		$	4,120
Net loss from discontinued operations		(115	)		(3,266	)

Note 4 – Long-Term Debt

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:


	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Senior convertible notes, unsecured, with interest at 8.25% See description below	$	15,551	$	31,535
Less current portion		15,551		—

	$	—	$	31,535

On February 17, 2010, we closed an offering of $32.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 8.25 percent senior convertible notes. Under the terms of the notes, interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning September 1, 2010. The senior convertible notes mature on March 1, 2013, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or converted. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 175.2234 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of senior convertible notes, equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $5.71 per share of common stock. The notes are general unsecured obligations, ranking equally with all of our other unsecured senior indebtedness, if any, and

senior in right of payment to any of our subordinated indebtedness, if any. The notes are also redeemable in certain circumstances at our option and may be repurchased by us at the purchaser’s option in connection with occurrence of certain events.

On October 12, 2011, $0.5 million of the senior convertible notes were converted into 0.1 million shares of common stock at a conversion rate of $5.71 per share. On March 14, 2012, $16.0 million of the senior convertible notes were exchanged for 2.9 million shares of common stock at an effective exchange price of $5.56 per share. In addition, the exchanging holders were issued 0.2 million shares of common stock at $8.16 per share in exchange for foregoing a one-year interest make-whole of $1.3 million.

Financing costs associated with the senior convertible notes offering are being amortized over the remaining life of the notes and are recorded in other assets. The balance for financing costs was $0.4 million at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011: $1.0 million).

Note 5 – Commitments and Contingencies

In October 2007, we entered into a Joint Exploration and Development Agreement (“JEDA”) with a private third party with respect to the Antelope Project. On January 11, 2011, in connection with the sale of each party’s interests in the Antelope Project (see Note 3 – Dispositions), we entered into a letter agreement with the private third party wherein the private third party agreed to reimburse us for certain expenses related to the sale of the two parties’ interests in the Antelope Project. The private third party disputes our calculation of the amount owed to us pursuant to the January 11, 2011 letter agreement. On March 11, 2011, we entered into a letter agreement with the private third party regarding certain obligations between the parties related to the JEDA. The private third party disputes our calculation of the amount due pursuant to one of the items in the March 11, 2011 letter agreement. At March 31, 2012, we have a note receivable outstanding from the private third party of $3.3 million (see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Notes Receivable), an account receivable from the private third party of $2.7 million, and an account payable outstanding to the private third party of $3.6 million related to the purchase in July 2010 of an incremental 10 percent interest in the Antelope Project. In the event that the dispute is not resolved, the parties would arbitrate pursuant to the JEDA. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of this dispute with the private third party.

On May 31, 2011, the United Kingdom branch of our subsidiary, Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. (UK), initiated a wire transfer of approximately $1.1 million ($0.7 million net to our 66.667 percent interest) intending to pay Libya Oil Gabon S.A. (“LOGSA”) for fuel that LOGSA supplied to our subsidiary in the Netherlands, Harvest Dussafu, B.V., for the company’s drilling operations in Gabon. On June 1, 2011, our bank notified us that it had been required to block the payment in accordance with the U.S. sanctions against Libya as set forth in Executive Order 13566 of February 25, 2011, and administered by OFAC, because the payee, LOGSA, may be a blocked party under the sanctions. The bank further advised us that it could not release the funds to the payee or return the funds to us unless we obtain authorization from OFAC. On October 26, 2011, we filed an application with OFAC for return of the blocked funds to us. Unless that application is approved, the funds will remain in the blocked account, and we can give no assurance when, or if, OFAC will permit the funds to be released. As of May 4, 2012, our October 26, 2011 application for the return of the blocked funds remains pending with OFAC.

Robert C. Bonnet and Bobby Bonnet Land Services vs. Harvest (US) Holdings, Inc., Branta Exploration & Production, LLC, Ute Energy LLC, Cameron Cuch, Paula Black, Johnna Blackhair, and Elton Blackhair in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. This suit was served in April 2010 on Harvest and Elton Blackhair, a Harvest employee, alleging that the defendants, among other things, intentionally interfered with Plaintiffs’ employment agreement with the Ute Indian Tribe – Energy & Minerals Department and intentionally interfered with Plaintiffs’ prospective economic relationships. Plaintiffs seek actual damages, punitive damages, costs and attorney’s fees. We dispute Plaintiffs’ claims and plan to vigorously defend against them. We are unable to estimate the amount or range of any possible loss.

Uracoa Municipality Tax Assessments. Our Venezuelan subsidiary, Harvest Vinccler, has received nine assessments from a tax inspector for the Uracoa municipality in which part of the Uracoa, Tucupita and Bombal fields are located as follows:

•

Three claims were filed in July 2004 and allege a failure to withhold for technical service payments and a failure to pay taxes on the capital fee reimbursement and related interest paid by PDVSA under

the Operating Service Agreement (“OSA”). Harvest Vinccler has filed a motion with the Tax Court in Barcelona, Venezuela, to enjoin and dismiss one of the claims and has protested with the municipality the remaining claims.

•

Two claims were filed in July 2006 alleging the failure to pay taxes at a new rate set by the municipality. Harvest Vinccler has filed a protest with the Tax Court in Barcelona, Venezuela, on these claims.

•

Two claims were filed in August 2006 alleging a failure to pay taxes on estimated revenues for the second quarter of 2006 and a withholding error with respect to certain vendor payments. Harvest Vinccler has filed a protest with the Tax Court in Barcelona, Venezuela, on one claim and filed a protest with the municipality on the other claim.

•

Two claims were filed in March 2007 alleging a failure to pay taxes on estimated revenues for the third and fourth quarters of 2006. Harvest Vinccler has filed a protest with the municipality on these claims.

Harvest Vinccler disputes the Uracoa tax assessments and believes it has a substantial basis for its positions. Harvest Vinccler is unable to estimate the amount or range of any possible loss. As a result of the SENIAT’s, the Venezuelan income tax authority, interpretation of the tax code as it applies to operating service agreements, Harvest Vinccler has filed claims in the Tax Court in Caracas against the Uracoa Municipality for the refund of all municipal taxes paid since 1997.

Libertador Municipality Tax Assessments. Harvest Vinccler has received five assessments from a tax inspector for the Libertador municipality in which part of the Uracoa, Tucupita and Bombal fields are located as follows:

•

One claim was filed in April 2005 alleging the failure to pay taxes at a new rate set by the municipality. Harvest Vinccler has filed a protest with the Mayor’s Office and a motion with the Tax Court in Barcelona, Venezuela, to enjoin and dismiss the claim. On April 10, 2008, the Tax Court suspended the case pending a response from the Mayor’s Office to the protest. If the municipality’s response is to confirm the assessment, Harvest Vinccler will defer to the competent Tax Court to enjoin and dismiss the claim.

•

Two claims were filed in June 2007. One claim relates to the period 2003 through 2006 and seeks to impose a tax on interest paid by PDVSA under the OSA. The second claim alleges a failure to pay taxes on estimated revenues for the third and fourth quarters of 2006. Harvest Vinccler has filed a motion with the Tax Court in Barcelona, Venezuela, to enjoin and dismiss both claims.

•

Two claims were filed in July 2007 seeking to impose penalties on tax assessments filed and settled in 2004. Harvest Vinccler has filed a motion with the Tax Court in Barcelona, Venezuela, to enjoin and dismiss both claims.

Harvest Vinccler disputes the Libertador allegations set forth in the assessments and believes it has a substantial basis for its position. Harvest Vinccler is unable to estimate the amount or range of any possible loss. As a result of the SENIAT’s interpretation of the tax code as it applies to operating service agreements, Harvest Vinccler has filed claims in the Tax Court in Caracas against the Libertador Municipality for the refund of all municipal taxes paid since 2002.

On May 4, 2012, Harvest Vinccler learned that the Political Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice has issued a decision dismissing one of Harvest Vinccler’s claims against the Libertador Municipality. Harvest Vinccler continues to believe that it has sufficient arguments to maintain its position in accordance to the Venezuelan Constitution. Harvest Vinccler plans to present a request of Constitutional Revision to the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice once it is notified officially of the decision. Harvest Vinccler is unable to predict the impact of this decision on the remaining outstanding municipality claims and assessments.

We are a defendant in or otherwise involved in other litigation incidental to our business. In the opinion of management, there is no such litigation which will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Note 6 – Operating Segments

We regularly allocate resources to and assess the performance of our operations by segments that are organized by unique geographic and operating characteristics. The segments are organized in order to manage regional business, currency and tax related risks and opportunities. Operations included under the heading “United States” include corporate management, cash management, business development and financing activities performed in the United States and other countries, which do not meet the requirements for separate disclosure. All intersegment revenues, other income and equity earnings, expenses and receivables are eliminated in order to reconcile to consolidated totals. Corporate general and administrative and interest expenses are included in the United States and other segment and are not allocated to other operating segments.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)
Operating Segment Income (Loss) Attributable to Harvest
Venezuela	$	12,956		$	13,288
Indonesia		(2,856	)		(1,418	)
Gabon		(1,425	)		(452	)
Oman		(5,608	)		(556	)
United States		(3,992	)		(10,748	)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(925	)		114
Discontinued operations (Utah Operations)		(115	)		(3,266	)

Net income (loss)	$	(1,040	)	$	(3,152	)


	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)
Operating Segment Assets
Venezuela	$	365,635		$	348,802
Indonesia		12,503			14,593
Gabon		54,899			55,505
Oman		6,586			7,152
United States		256,484			259,856

		696,107			685,908
Intersegment eliminations		(197,333	)		(178,705	)

	$	498,774		$	507,203

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

Note 7 – Venezuela

Harvest Vinccler’s and Petrodelta’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar. They do not have currency exchange risk other than the official prevailing exchange rate that applies to their operating costs denominated in Venezuela Bolivars (“Bolivars”) (4.30 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar). However, during the three months ended March 31, 2012, Harvest Vinccler exchanged approximately $0.3 million (March 31, 2011: $0.3 million) through the Sistema de Transacciones con Títulos en Moneda Extranjera (“SITME”) and received an average exchange rate of 5.17 Bolivars (March 31, 2011: 5.18 Bolivars) per U.S. Dollar. Harvest Vinccler currently does not have any Bolivars pending government approval for settlement for U.S. Dollars at the official exchange rate or the SITME exchange rate. Petrodelta does not have, and has not had, any Bolivars pending government approval for settlement for U.S. Dollars at the official exchange rate or the SITME exchange rate.

accounts payable, accruals and other current liabilities. All monetary assets and liabilities incurred at the official Bolivar exchange rate are settled at the official Bolivar exchange rate. At March 31, 2012, the balances in Harvest Vinccler’s Bolivar denominated monetary assets and liabilities accounts that are exposed to exchange rate changes are 4.4 million Bolivars and 6.6 million Bolivars, respectively. At March 31, 2012, the balances in Petrodelta’s Bolivar denominated monetary assets and liabilities accounts that are exposed to exchange rate changes are 885.9 million Bolivars and 2,912.3 million Bolivars, respectively.

Note 8 – Investment in Equity Affiliates

Petrodelta, S.A.

As discussed in previous filings, PDVSA has failed to pay on a timely basis certain amounts owed to contractors that PDVSA has contracted to do work for Petrodelta. PDVSA purchases all of Petrodelta’s oil production. PDVSA and its affiliates have reported shortfalls in meeting their cash requirements for operations and planned capital expenditures, and PDVSA has fallen behind in certain of its payment obligations to its contractors, including contractors engaged by PDVSA to provide services to Petrodelta. In addition, PDVSA has fallen behind in certain of its payment obligations to Petrodelta, which payments Petrodelta would otherwise use to pay its contractors, including Harvest Vinccler. As a result, Petrodelta has experienced, and is continuing to experience, difficulty in retaining contractors who provide services for Petrodelta’s operations. We cannot provide any assurance as to whether or when PDVSA will become current on its payment obligations. Inability to retain contractors or to pay them on a timely basis is having an adverse effect on Petrodelta’s operations and on Petrodelta’s ability to carry out its business plan.

Harvest Vinccler has advanced certain costs on behalf of Petrodelta. These costs include consultants in engineering, drilling, operations, seismic interpretation, and employee salaries and related benefits for Harvest Vinccler employees seconded into Petrodelta. Currently, we have three employees seconded into Petrodelta. Costs advanced are invoiced on a monthly basis to Petrodelta. Harvest Vinccler is considered a contractor to Petrodelta, and as such, Harvest Vinccler is also experiencing the slow payment of invoices. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Harvest Vinccler advanced to Petrodelta $0.1 million for continuing operations costs, and Petrodelta repaid $0.1 million of the advance. Advances to equity affiliate remained constant at a balance of $2.4 million as of March 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we advanced Petrodelta $0.8 million for continuing operations costs, and Petrodelta repaid $0.1 million of the advances. Although payment is slow, payments continue to be received.

In April 2011, the Venezuelan government published in the Official Gazette the Law Creating a Special Contribution on Extraordinary Prices and Exorbitant Prices in the International Hydrocarbons Market (“Windfall Profits Tax”). Windfall Profits Tax is deductible for Venezuelan income tax purposes. Petrodelta recorded $84.7 million for Windfall Profits Tax during the three months ended March 31, 2012 (March 31, 2011: $27.1 million).

One section of the Windfall Profits Tax states that royalties paid to Venezuela are capped at $70 per barrel, but the cap on royalties has not been defined as being applicable to in-cash, in-kind, or both. In October 2011, Petrodelta received instructions from PDVSA that royalties, whether paid in-cash or in-kind, should be reported at $70 per barrel (royalty barrels x $70). The difference between the $70 royalty cap and the current oil price is to be reflected on the income statement as a reduction in oil sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the reduction to oil sales due to the $70 cap applied to all royalty barrels was $38.5 million ($12.3 million net to our 32 percent interest). The Windfall Profits Tax went into effect in April 2011; therefore, the $70 per barrel cap on royalty barrels does not affect oil sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Per our interpretation of the amended Windfall Profits Tax, the $70 cap on royalty barrels should only be applied to the 3.33 percent royalty which Petrodelta pays in cash. We have applied the $70 cap to only the 3.33 percent royalty paid in cash and the current oil sales price to the 30 percent royalty paid in-kind for the three months ended March 31, 2012. With assistance from Petrodelta, we have recalculated Petrodelta’s oil sales and royalties to apply the current oil price to its total barrels produced and to the 30 percent royalty paid in-kind and applied the $70 cap to the 3.33 percent royalty paid in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Net oil sales (oil sales less royalties) are slightly higher, $3.8 million ($1.2 million net to our 32 percent interest), under this method than the method advised by PDVSA and the method of applying the current oil price to total barrels produced and to total royalty barrels.

In November 2010, Petrodelta’s board of directors declared a dividend of $30.6 million, $12.2 million net to HNR Finance ($9.8 million net to our 32 percent interest). Petrodelta shareholder approval of the dividend was received on March 14, 2011. Due to Petrodelta’s liquidity constraints caused by PDVSA’s insufficient monetary and contractual support, as of May 4, 2012, this dividend has not been received, and the timing of the receipt of this dividend is uncertain.

The sale of oil and gas by Petrodelta to PDVSA is pursuant to a Contract for Sale and Purchase of Hydrocarbons with PDVSA Petroleo S.A. (“PPSA”) (the “Sales Contract”). Crude oil delivered from the Petrodelta fields to PPSA is priced using a market quotations formula that reflects the Merey 16 degrees API crude oil market prices, weighted for the different market destinations where crude is sold. Under the Sales Contract, the crude oil price is adjusted for variations in gravity and sulphur content, commercialization and transportation cost to reflect the actual quality of oil delivered by Petrodelta. This official price formula applied to the Merey 16 by the Ministry of the People’s Power for Energy and Petroleum (“MENPET”) is used for the sales of Petrodelta crude oil with quality close to 16 degrees API to represent actual quality delivered.

As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, production from the Petrodelta fields, except the El Salto field, flows through Petrodelta’s pipelines into PDVSA’s EPT-1 storage facility. Beginning October 2011, production from the El Salto field flows through PDVSA’s EPM-1 transfer point at PDVSA Morichal. API for the El Salto production varies around 10-12 degrees API compared to 16 degrees API for the other Petrodelta fields. Because of the difference in API, MENPET has applied different gravity and sulphur correction factors to the El Salto production that refers to a heavier crude oil market price formula. These factors and heavier crude market price formula are not included in the Sales Contract. PDVSA is not accepting Petrodelta’s invoicing of the El Salto production because the pricing formula for the heavier crude is not included in the Sales Contract. Until the Sales Contract can be amended to include the new weighting, quality adjustment factors and a market pricing formula that can better reflect this heavier quality of oil, it is most likely that PDVSA will continue to not accept invoices for the El Salto production. Currently, El Salto production of approximately 1.2 million barrels of oil (“MBls”) (0.4 MBls net to our 32 percent interest) valued at $119.2 million ($38.1 million net to our 32 percent interest) covering production months of October 2011 through March 2012 has not been invoiced.

The Organic Law on Sports, Physical Activity and Physical Education (“Sports Law”) was published in the Official Gazette on August 23, 2011 and is effective beginning January 1, 2012. The purpose of the Sports Law is to establish the public service nature of physical education and the promotion, organization and administration of sports and physical activity. Funding of the Sports Law is by contributions made by companies or other public or private organizations that perform economic activities for profit in Venezuela. The contribution is one percent of annual net or accounting profit and is not deductible for income tax purposes. Per the Sports Law, contributions are to be calculated on an after-tax basis. However, CVP has instructed Petrodelta to calculate the contribution on a before-tax basis contrary to the Sports Law. This method of calculation overstates the liability for the Sports Law contribution by $0.3 million ($0.1 million net to our 32 percent interest). We have adjusted for the over accrual of the Sports Law in the three months ended March 31, 2012 net income from equity affiliate. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

Petrodelta’s reporting and functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. HNR Finance owns a 40 percent interest in Petrodelta. Petrodelta’s financial information is prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) which we have adjusted to conform to USGAAP. All amounts through Net Income Equity Affiliate represent 100 percent of Petrodelta. Summary financial information for Petrodelta has been presented below at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:


	Three Months			Three Months
	Ended			Ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Revenues:
Oil sales	$	324,497		$	226,613
Gas sales		972			726
Royalty		(107,339	)		(77,315	)

		218,130			150,024
Expenses:
Operating expenses		21,581			14,282
Workovers		5,908			6,475
Depletion, depreciation and amortization		17,922			12,487
General and administrative		4,983			(930	)
Windfall profits tax		84,738			27,126

		135,132			59,440


Income from operations		82,998			90,584

Investment Earnings and Other		1			167
Interest expense		(1,913	)		(1,272	)


Income before Income Tax		81,086			89,479

Current income tax expense		42,070			53,343
Deferred income tax benefit		(13,490	)		(25,762	)

Net Income		52,506			61,898
Adjustment to reconcile to reported Net Income from Unconsolidated Equity Affiliate (RESTATED*):
Deferred income tax expense		12,041			17,871
Unrealized loss on fair value of VAT		—			95
Sports law over accrual		(345	)		—

Net Income Equity Affiliate		40,810			43,932
Equity interest in unconsolidated equity affiliate		40	%		40	%

Income before amortization of excess basis in equity affiliate		16,324			17,573
Amortization of excess basis in equity affiliate		(489	)		(421	)
Conform depletion expense to GAAP		1,061			(81	)

Net income from unconsolidated equity affiliate	$	16,896		$	17,071


	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)

Current assets	$	1,232,620	$	979,868
Property and equipment		414,990		409,941
Other assets		164,937		146,499
Current liabilities		1,034,435		808,955
Other liabilities		52,319		53,073
Net equity		725,793		674,280

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

Note 9 – Indonesia

Operational activities during the three months ended March 31, 2012 included rigging down operations of the drilling rig on the Karama-1 (“KD-1”) location and review of geological and geophysical data obtained from the drilling of the Lariang-1 (“LG-1”) and KD-1 wells. Drilling costs incurred through December 31, 2011 of $26.0 million were expensed to dry hole costs as of December 31, 2011. The remaining costs to plug and abandon the KD-1 and KD-1ST of $0.7 million have been expensed to dry hole costs as of March 31, 2012.

The remaining work commitment for the current exploration phase on the Budong PSC is for geological and geophysical work to be completed during 2012 at a minimum of $0.5 million ($0.3 million net to our 64.51 percent cost sharing interest). However, per the Budong PSC, excessive work done during any period can be offset against another period, so although there is a work commitment in the Budong PSC to perform the geological and geophysical work, we have exceeded this requirement. BPMIGAS has stated that we have satisfied all work commitments for the current exploration phase of the Budong PSC.

Based on the multiple oil and gas shows encountered in both the LG-1 and KD-1, we are working on an exploration program targeting the Pliocene and Miocene targets encountered in the previous two wells. The Budong PSC represents $5.3 million of unproved oil and gas properties on our March 31, 2012 balance sheet (RESTATED) (December 31, 2011: $5.3 million).

Note 10 – Gabon

The Dussafu PSC partners and the Republic of Gabon, represented by the Ministry of Mines, Energy, Petroleum and Hydraulic Resources (“Republic of Gabon”), entered into the second exploration phase of the Dussafu PSC with an effective date of May 28, 2007. At that time, it was agreed that the second three-year exploration phase be extended until May 27, 2011, at which time the partners can elect to enter a third exploration phase. In order to complete drilling activities of the first exploratory well, in March 2011, the DGH approved another one year extension to May 27, 2012 of the second exploration phase. We are currently negotiating to extend the second exploration phase for a period of four years with an effective date of May 28, 2012 in order to complete drilling activities of the second exploratory well.

We do not have any remaining work commitments for the current exploration phase of the Dussafu PSC, but as of May 28, 2012, the Dussafu PSC enters the third exploration phase. If the partners elect to enter the third exploration phase, there will be a $7.0 million ($4.7 million net to our 66.667 percent interest) work commitment over a two year period.

The Dussafu PSC represents $50.0 million of unproved oil and gas properties on our March 31, 2012 balance sheet (RESTATED) (December 31, 2011: $48.9 million).

Note 11 – Oman

In 2009, we signed an EPSA with Oman for the Block 64 EPSA. The Block 64 EPSA has a minimum work obligation to reprocess seismic and drill two exploration wells. The parties to the EPSA acknowledged that $22.0 million was indicative of the costs needed to complete the work program during the three-year initial period which expires in May 2013. As of February 29, 2012, we had expended more than $22.0 million and completed the minimum work obligations. We do not have any remaining work commitments for the current exploration phase of the Block 64 EPSA.

Operational activities during the three months ended March 31, 2012 include completion of the drilling of the Al Ghubar North-1 (“AGN-1”), the second exploratory wells on the Block 64 EPSA which spud December 21, 2011. On February 6, 2012, the AGN-1 was plugged and abandoned with gas shows in the Permian Khuff Formation. Drilling costs incurred through December 31, 2011 of $2.8 million were expensed to dry hole costs as of December 31, 2011. The remaining costs to plug and abandon the AGN-1 of $4.8 million have been expensed to dry hole costs as of March 31, 2012.

On October 21, 2011, a Standby Letter of Credit in the amount of $1.2 million was issued as a payment guarantee for electric wireline services to be provided during the drilling of the two exploratory wells on the Block 64 EPSA. Since drilling has been completed and all amounts owed have been paid, the vendor has agreed to cancel the Standby Letter of Credit prior to its expiration date. The Standby Letter of Credit was cancelled April 18, 2012.

The Block 64 EPSA represents $5.7 million of unproved oil and gas properties on our March 31, 2012 balance sheet (December 31, 2011: $5.3 million).

Note 12 – Related Party Transactions

Dividends declared and paid by Petrodelta are paid to HNR Finance. HNR Finance must declare a dividend in order for the partners, Harvest and Vinccler, to receive their respective shares of Petrodelta’s dividend. Petrodelta has declared two dividends, totaling $33.0 million, which have been received by HNR Finance and one dividend, totaling $12.2 million, which has not yet been received by HNR Finance. HNR Finance has not distributed these dividends to the partners. At March 31, 2012, Vinccler’s share of the undistributed dividends is $9.0 million.

Note 13 – Common Stock Warrants

In connection with a $60 million term loan facility issued in November 2010, we issued (1) 1.2 million warrants exercisable at any time on or after the closing date of the term loan facility for a period of five years from the closing date on a cashless exercise basis at $15 per share until July 28, 2011, the Bridge Date, at which time the exercise price per share would be repriced to equal the lower of $15 or 120 percent of the average closing bid price of Harvest’s common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Bridge Date (“Tranche A”); (2) 0.4 million warrants exercisable at any time on or after the closing date of the term loan facility for a period of five years from the closing date on a cashless exercise basis at $20 per share until the Bridge Date, at which time the exercise price per share would be repriced to equal the lower of $15 or 120 percent of the average closing bid price of Harvest’s common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Bridge Date (“Tranche B”); and (3) 4.4 million warrants exercisable at any time on or after the Bridge Date for a period of five years from the Bridge Date on a cashless exercise basis at the lower of $15 per share or 120 percent of the average closing price of Harvest’s common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Bridge Date (“Tranche C”) (“collectively “the Warrants”). Tranche C was redeemable by Harvest for $0.01 per share at any time prior to the Bridge Date in conjunction with the repayment of the loan prior to the Bridge Date.

On May 17, 2011, in connection with the payment of the term loan facility, we redeemed all of Tranche C at $0.01 per share. The cost to redeem Tranche C ($44,000) was expensed to loss on extinguishment of debt in the six months ended June 30, 2011.

On July 28, 2011, the Bridge Date, Tranche A and Tranche B were repriced to $14.78 per warrant which is the lower of $15 or 120 percent of the average closing bid price of Harvest’s common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Bridge Date.

The Warrants include anti-dilution provisions which adjust the number of warrants and the exercise price per warrant based on the issuance of additional shares. The induced conversions related to the $32 million senior convertible notes triggered the anti-dilution provision which resulted in the issuance of 72,830 additional warrants in the three months ended March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011: 2,007 additional warrants). In addition, the exercise price per share for all Warrants was repriced to $14.12 per warrant. The Warrants are classified as a liability on our consolidated condensed balance sheets and marked to market. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

In the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are required to repurchase the Warrants at the higher of (1) the fair market value of the warrant and (2) a valuation based on a computation of the option value of the Warrant using the Black-Scholes calculation method using the assumptions described in the Warrant Agreement. A fundamental change is defined as “the occurrence of one of the following events: a) a person or group becomes the direct or indirect owner of more than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding common stock, b) a merger event or similar transaction in which the majority owners before the transaction fail to own a majority of the voting power of the Company after the transaction, and c) approval of a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.”

The dates the warrants were issued, the expiration dates, the exercise prices and the number of warrants issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 were:


				Warrants
Date Issued	Expiration Date	Exercise Price		Issued		Outstanding
				(warrants in thousands)
November 2010	November 2015	$	14.12		1,600		1,600
October 2011	November 2015		14.12		2		2
March 2012	November 2015		14.12		73		73

					1,675		1,675

Note 14 – Warrant Derivative Liabilities

As of March 31, 2012, derivative financial instruments consisted of 1,674,837 warrants (December 31, 2011: 1,602,007 warrants) issued under the warrant agreements dated November 2010 in connection with a $60 million term loan. The fair value of the warrants as of March 31, 2012 was $2.65 per warrant (December 31, 2011: $3.04 per warrant).

These warrant agreements include provisions wherein we may be required to settle the warrant agreement by transferring assets. Consequently, these warrants must be treated as a derivative liability, bifurcated from the host instrument, and recorded at fair value at each reporting date. In the occurrence of a fundamental change, we are required to repurchase the Warrants at the higher of (1) the fair market value of the warrant and (2) a valuation based on a computation of the option value of the Warrant using the Black-Scholes calculation method using the assumptions described in the Warrant Agreement. A fundamental change is defined as “the occurrence of one of the following events: a) a person or group becomes the direct or indirect owner of more than 50% of the voting power of the outstanding common stock, b) a merger event or similar transaction in which the majority owners before the transaction fail to own a majority of the voting power of the Company after the transaction, and c) approval of a plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.”

All our warrant derivative contracts are recorded at fair value and are located in the balance sheet as warrant derivative liability. The following table summarizes the effect on our income (loss) associated with changes in the fair values of our derivative financial instruments:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Unrealized gain (loss) on warrant derivatives	$	432	$	(2,516	)

*	See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements.

Note 15 – Subsequent Event

We conducted our subsequent events review up through the date of the issuance of the original Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. (“Harvest” or the “Company”) cautions that any forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended [the “PSLRA”]) contained in this report or made by management of the Company involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various important factors. When used in this report, the words “budget”, “forecast”, “expect”, “believes”, “goals”, “projects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “should”, “could”, “assume” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In accordance with the provisions of the PSLRA, we caution you that important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include our concentration of operations in Venezuela, the political and economic risks associated with international operations (particularly those in Venezuela), the anticipated future development costs for undeveloped reserves, drilling risks, the risk that actual results may vary considerably from reserve estimates, the dependence upon the abilities and continued participation of certain of our key employees, the risks normally incident to the exploration, operation and development of oil and natural gas properties, risks incumbent to being a noncontrolling interest shareholder in a corporation, the permitting and the drilling of oil and natural gas wells, the availability of materials and supplies necessary to projects and operations, the price for oil and natural gas and related financial derivatives, changes in interest rates, the Company’s ability to acquire oil and natural gas properties that meet its objectives, availability and cost of drilling rigs and seismic crews, overall economic conditions, political stability, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, currency and exchange risks, currency controls, changes in existing or potential tariffs, duties or quotas, changes in taxes, changes in governmental policy, lack of liquidity, availability of sufficient financing, estimates of amounts and timing of sales of securities, changes in weather conditions, and ability to hire, retain and train management and personnel. A discussion of these factors is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which includes certain definitions and a summary of significant accounting policies and should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Executive Summary

Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. is a petroleum exploration and production company incorporated under Delaware law in 1989. Our focus is on acquiring exploration, development and producing properties in geological basins with proven active hydrocarbon systems. Our experienced technical, business development and operating personnel have identified low entry cost exploration opportunities in areas with large hydrocarbon resource potential. We operate from our Houston, Texas headquarters. We also have regional/technical offices in the United Kingdom and Singapore, and small field offices in Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia (“Indonesia”); Muscat, Sultanate of Oman (“Oman”); and Port Gentil, Republic of Gabon (“Gabon”) to support field operations in those areas.

We have acquired and developed significant interests in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Venezuela”). Our Venezuelan interests are owned through HNR Finance, B.V. (“HNR Finance”). Our ownership of HNR Finance is through several corporations in all of which we have direct controlling interests. Through these corporations, we indirectly own 80 percent of HNR Finance and our partner, Oil & Gas Technology Consultants (Netherlands) Coöperatie U.A., a controlled affiliate of Venezolana de Inversiones y Construcciones Clerico, C.A. (“Vinccler”), indirectly owns the remaining 20 percent interest of HNR Finance. HNR Finance owns 40 percent of Petrodelta, S.A. (“Petrodelta”). As we indirectly own 80 percent of HNR Finance, we indirectly own a net 32 percent interest in Petrodelta, and Vinccler indirectly owns eight percent. Corporación Venezolana del Petroleo S.A. (“CVP”) owns the remaining 60 percent of Petrodelta. HNR Finance has a direct controlling interest in Harvest Vinccler S.C.A. (“Harvest Vinccler”). Harvest Vinccler’s main business purposes are to assist us in the management of Petrodelta and in negotiations with Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (“PDVSA”). We do not have a business relationship with Vinccler outside of Venezuela.

Through the pursuit of technically-based strategies guided by conservative investment philosophies, we are building a portfolio of exploration prospects to complement the low-risk production, development and exploration prospects we hold in Venezuela. In addition to our interests in Venezuela, we hold exploration acreage mainly onshore West Sulawesi in Indonesia; offshore of Gabon; onshore in Oman; and offshore of the People’s Republic of China (“China”).

From time to time we learn of possible third party interests in acquiring ownership in certain assets within our property portfolio. We evaluate these potential opportunities taking into consideration our overall property mix,

our operational and liquidity requirements, our strategic focus and our commitment to long-term shareholder value. For example, we have received such expressions of interest in acquiring some of our international exploration assets, and we are currently evaluating these potential opportunities. There can be no assurances that our discussions will continue or that any transaction may ultimately result from our discussions.

On March 6, 2012, we announced that we had commenced exclusive negotiations with a third party for the possible sale of our 32 percent interest in Petrodelta. Negotiations are on-going, and there can be no assurance that such negotiations will be successful.

On March 9, 2012, we entered into exchange agreements with certain holders of our 8.25 percent senior convertible notes. These holders were issued 2.9 million shares of common stock at an effective exchange price of $5.56 per share in exchange for $16.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.25 percent senior convertible notes and associated interest. In addition, the holders were issued 0.2 million shares of common stock at $8.16 per share in exchange for foregoing a one-year interest make-whole of $1.3 million. The exchange closed on March 14, 2012. Approximately $15.6 million principal amount of the convertible notes remain outstanding.

On March 30, 2012, we announced that we had entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “Agreement”) with Knight Capital America, L.P. (“KCA”), a subsidiary of Knight Capital Group, Inc. relating to an “at-the-market” (“ATM”) offering of shares of our common stock having an aggregate sales price of up to $75.0 million. Under the terms of the Agreement, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock by means of transactions on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price or at negotiated rates. We are unable to access the ATM facility during blackout periods or when we are in possession of material information which has not been made public. We expect to use any proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including but not limited to, repayment of outstanding borrowings.

Operations

Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements

In connection with the preparation of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, we concluded that there were errors in previously filed financial statements. In the course of our review, management determined that (a) certain warrants issued in 2010 in connection with our $60 million term loan facility (the “Warrants”) were improperly valued at inception and improperly classified as equity instruments rather than liability instruments. As a result of the improper classification of the Warrants, (b) the debt discount and associated interest expense related to the amortization of the debt discount was understated for all periods in which the associated debt was outstanding, and (c) the consolidated condensed statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for each reporting period was misstated by the omission of the changes in fair value of the Warrants as a liability instrument. Additionally, (d) certain exploration overhead was incorrectly capitalized to oil and gas properties, which under the successful efforts method of accounting should have been expensed, and (e) certain leasehold maintenance and other costs were improperly capitalized to oil and gas properties, which under the successful efforts method of accounting should have been expensed. Finally, (f) advances to equity affiliate were improperly classified as an operating activity rather than an investing activity and (g) certain costs were improperly classified as an investing activity rather than an operating activity on the consolidated condensed statement of cash flows. Such errors impacted annual period ended December 31, 2011 and quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012.

An additional error was identified related to the improper expensing of costs associated with debt conversions that should have been recorded to equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

December 31, 2011 and quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012									Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustment			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustment			RESTATED
	*(in thousands)*
Expenses
Depreciation and amortization	$	105		$	—		$	105		$	124		$	—		$	124
Exploration expense^(a)		1,443			492			1,935			1,189			110			1,299
Dry hole costs		5,546			—			5,546			—			—			—
General and administrative		5,842			—			5,842			6,675			—			6,675

Total expenses		12,936			492			13,428			7,988			110			8,098

Loss from operations		(12,936	)		(492	)		(13,428	)		(7,988	)		(110	)		(8,098	)
Other non-operating income (expense) Investment earnings and other		69			—			69			145			—			145
Unrealized gain (loss) on warrant derivatives^(b)		—			432			432			—			(2,516	)		(2,516	)
Interest expense^(c)		(394	)		302			(92	)		(2,212	)		(1,341	)		(3,553	)
Debt conversion expense		(2,422	)		—			(2,422	)		—			—			—
Other non-operating expense		(256	)		—			(256	)		(431	)		—			(431	)
Foreign currency transaction loss		(22	)		—			(22	)		(11	)		—			(11	)

		(3,025	)		734			(2,291	)		(2,509	)		(3,857	)		(6,366	)

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income taxes		(15,961	)		242			(15,719	)		(10,497	)		(3,967	)		(14,464	)
Income tax expense (benefit)⁽^d)		(1,220	)		—			(1,220	)		222			237			459

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		(14,741	)		242			(14,499	)		(10,719	)		(4,204	)		(14,923	)
Net Income from Equity Affiliate^(e)		16,758			138			16,896			18,494			(38	)		18,456

Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		2,017			380			2,397			7,775			(4,242	)		3,533
Loss from Discontinued Operations		(115	)		—			(115	)		(3,266	)		—			(3,266	)

Net Income		1,902			380			2,282			4,509			(4,242	)		267
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest^(e)		3,294			28			3,322			3,427			(8	)		3,419

Net Income (Loss) Attributable To Harvest	$	(1,392	)	$	352		$	(1,040	)	$	1,082		$	(4,234	)	$	(3,152	)


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Harvest Per Common Share:
Basic	$	(0.04	)	$	0.01		$	(0.03	)	$	0.03		$	(0.13	)	$	(0.10	)

Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	0.01		$	(0.03	)	$	0.02		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.10	)


Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,392	)	$	352		$	(1,040	)	$	1,082		$	(4,234	)	$	(3,152	)

(a)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(b)	Represents changes in fair value of Warrants for the period. Such Warrants were previously classified as equity and were, therefore, not marked to market at the end of each reporting period.

(c)

(d)	Relates to income tax expense improperly classified as interest expense.

(e)	Relates to a previously identified immaterial error.

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets


	March 31, 2012
	As Previously					As
	Reported		Adjustment			RESTATED
	*( in thousands)*

Deferred income tax^(a)	$	2,628	$	(2,628	)	$	—
Investment in equity affiliate^(b)		361,812		138			361,950
Oil and gas properties^(c)		67,784		(3,845	)		63,939
Total assets^(d)		505,109		(6,335	)		498,774
Accrued interest payable^(e)		653		(396	)		257
Other current liabilities^(f)		4,835		(2,203	)		2,632
Income taxes payable^(e)		979		(29	)		950
Warrant derivative liability^(g)		—		4,438			4,438
Total liabilities^(h)		37,288		1,810			39,098
Additional paid in capital⁽ⁱ⁾		254,625		(8,831	)		245,794
Retained earnings^(j)		191,891		658			192,549
Total Harvest shareholders’ equity^(k)		380,849		(8,173	)		372,676
Noncontrolling interest^(b)		86,972		28			87,000
Total equity		467,821		(8,145	)		459,676

(a)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

(b)	Represents a previously identified immaterial error.

(c)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(d)	Relates to (a) through (c) above.

(e)	Represents income taxes that were improperly classified as interest payable in 2011.

(f)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

(g)	Represents fair value of the Warrants at the reporting date.

(h)	Relates to (e) through (g) above.

(i)

(j)

(k)	Relates to reclassification of the Warrants as described in (i) above plus the impact of retained earnings described in (j) above.

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets


	December 31, 2011
	As Previously					As
	Reported		Adjustment			RESTATED
	*( in thousands)*

Deferred income taxes^(a)	$	2,628	$	(2,628	)	$	—
Oil and gas properties^(b)		65,671		(3,216	)		62,455
Total assets^(c)		513,047		(5,844	)		507,203
Accrued interest payable^(d)		1,372		(396	)		976
Other current liabilities^(e)		4,835		(2,203	)		2,632
Income taxes payable^(d)		718		(29	)		689
Warrant derivative liability^(f)		—		4,870			4,870
Total liabilities^(g)		65,592		2,242			67,834
Additional paid in capital^(h)		236,192		(8,392	)		227,800
Retained earnings⁽ⁱ⁾		193,283		306			193,589
Total Harvest shareholders’ equity^(j)		363,777		(8,086	)		355,691
Total equity		447,455		(8,086	)		439,369

(a)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

(b)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(c)	Relates to (a) and (b) above.

(d)	Represents other current liabilities that were improperly classified as interest payable and income taxes payable.

(e)	Relates to a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability and other current liabilities that were improperly classified as interest payable and income taxes payable.

(f)

(g)	Relates to (d) through (f) above.

(h)

(i)

(j)	Relates to reclassification of the Warrants as described in (h) above plus the impact of retained earnings described in (i) above.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows


	March 31, 2012									March 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustment			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustment			RESTATED
	*(in thousands)*
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities^(a)(b)	$	(12,343	)	$	(1,011	)	$	(13,354	)	$	(7,021	)	$	165		$	(6,856	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities^(a)(b)		(12,985	)		1,011			(11,974	)		(27,245	)		(165	)		(27,410	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(66	)		—			(66	)		227			—			227

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(25,394	)		—			(25,394	)		(34,039	)		—			(34,039	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		58,946			—			58,946			58,703			—			58,703

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	33,552		$	—		$	33,552		$	24,664		$	—		$	24,664

(a)

(b)


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012									Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED
Segment Income (Loss) Attributable to Harvest
Venezuela^(a)	$	12,715		$	241		$	12,956		$	13,214		$	74		$	13,288
Indonesia^(b)		(2,476	)		(380	)		(2,856	)		(1,418	)		—			(1,418	)
Gabon^(b)		(1,315	)		(110	)		(1,425	)		(342	)		(110	)		(452	)
Oman		(5,608	)		—			(5,608	)		(556	)		—			(556	)
United States^(c)		(4,593	)		601			(3,992	)		(6,550	)		(4,198	)		(10,748	)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,277	)		352			(925	)		4,348			(4,234	)		114
Discontinued operations (Antelope Project)		(115	)		—			(115	)		(3,266	)		—			(3,266	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Harvest	$	(1,392	)	$	352		$	(1,040	)	$	1,082		$	(4,234	)	$	(3,152	)

(a)	Represents a previously identified immaterial error.

(b)	Relates to lease maintenance costs and exploration overhead costs that were erroneously capitalized as oil and gas properties rather than expensed as exploration expense.

(c)


	March 31, 2012									December 31, 2011
	As Previously						As			As Previously						As
	Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED			Reported			Adjustments			RESTATED
Operating Segment Assets
Venezuela^(a)	$	365,497		$	138		$	365,635		$	348,802		$	—		$	348,802
Indonesia^(b)		14,388			(1,885	)		12,503			65,165			(50,572	)		14,593
Gabon^(b)		56,567			(1,668	)		54,899			119,273			(63,768	)		55,505
Oman^(b)		6,586			—			6,586			20,980			(13,828	)		7,152
United States^(c)		259,404			(2,920	)		256,484			137,531			122,325			259,856

		702,442			(6,335	)		696,107			691,751			(5,843	)		685,908
Intersegment eliminations		(197,333	)		—			(197,333	)		(178,704	)		(1	)		(178,705	)

Total Assets	$	505,109		$	(6,335	)	$	498,774		$	513,047		$	(5,844	)	$	507,203

(a)	Represents a previously identified immaterial error.

(b)	Relates to the elimination of intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable.

(c)	Relates to the elimination of intrasegment receivables erroneously reported gross of related intrasegment payable and a deferred tax asset that was erroneously reported gross of the related liability.

Venezuela

The monetary assets that are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations are cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets. The monetary liabilities that are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations are accounts payable, accruals and other current liabilities. All monetary assets and liabilities incurred at the official Bolivar exchange rate are settled at the official Bolivar exchange rate. At March 31, 2012, the balances in Harvest Vinccler’s Bolivar denominated monetary assets and liabilities accounts that are exposed to exchange rate changes are 4.4 million Bolivars and 6.6 million Bolivars, respectively. At March 31, 2012, the balances in Petrodelta’s Bolivar denominated monetary assets and liabilities accounts that are exposed to exchange rate changes are 885.9 million Bolivars and 2,912.3 million Bolivars, respectively.

Petrodelta

Petrodelta’s shareholders intend that the company be self-funding and rely on internally-generated cash flow to fund operations. Petrodelta’s 2012 capital budget, which has still not been endorsed by Petrodelta’s board, is expected to be between $300 million and $400 million with a significant portion of that total related to infrastructure costs to support the further development of the Temblador and El Salto fields. Petrodelta is considering a third drilling rig arriving in the third quarter of this year. On May 1, 2012, Petrodelta was notified that it could be receiving two additional rigs during the third quarter of 2012.

Due to PDVSA’s liquidity constraints, PDVSA has not been providing the necessary monetary and contractual support required by Petrodelta. Continued underinvestment in the development plan may lead to continued under-performance. As discussed in previous filings, PDVSA has failed to pay on a timely basis certain amounts owed to contractors that PDVSA has contracted to do work for Petrodelta. PDVSA purchases all of Petrodelta’s oil production. PDVSA and its affiliates have reported shortfalls in meeting their cash requirements for operations and planned capital expenditures, and PDVSA has fallen behind in certain of its payment obligations to its contractors, including contractors engaged by PDVSA to provide services to Petrodelta. In addition, PDVSA has

fallen behind in certain of its payment obligations to Petrodelta, which payments Petrodelta would otherwise use to pay its contractors, including Harvest Vinccler. As a result, Petrodelta is continuing to experience difficulty in retaining contractors who provide services for Petrodelta’s operations. We cannot provide any assurance as to whether or when PDVSA will become current on its payment obligations. Inability to retain contractors or to pay them on a timely basis is having an adverse effect on Petrodelta’s operations and on Petrodelta’s ability to carry out its business plan.

The Organic Law on Sports, Physical Activity and Physical Education (“Sports Law”) was published in the Official Gazette on August 23, 2011 and is effective beginning January 1, 2012. The purpose of the Sports Law is to establish the public service nature of physical education and the promotion, organization and administration of sports and physical activity. Funding of the Sports Law is by contributions made by companies or other public or private organizations that perform economic activities for profit in Venezuela. The contribution is one percent of annual net or accounting profit and is not deductible for income tax purposes. Per the Sports Law, contributions are to be calculated on an after-tax basis. However, CVP has instructed Petrodelta to calculate the contribution on a before-tax basis contrary to the Sports Law. This method of calculation overstates the liability for the Sports Law contribution by $0.3 million ($0.1 million net to our 32 percent interest). We have adjusted for the over accrual of the Sports Law in the three months ended March 31, 2012 net income from equity affiliate. See Operations – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements above.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Petrodelta drilled and completed four development wells, delivered approximately 3.0 MBls of oil and 0.6 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”) of natural gas, averaging 33,944 barrels of oil equivalent (“BOE”) per day. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, Petrodelta drilled and completed three development wells and one successful appraisal well, delivered approximately 2.6 MBls of oil and 0.5 Bcf of natural gas, averaging 28,700 BOE per day.

Currently, Petrodelta is operating two drilling rigs and one workover rig and is continuing with infrastructure enhancement projects in the El Salto and Temblador fields. Plans are underway to build a pipeline connection between the Isleño field and the main production facility at Uracoa as Isleño production is currently being trucked to Uracoa.

Certain operating statistics for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 for the Petrodelta fields operated by Petrodelta are set forth below. This information is provided at 100 percent. This information may not be representative of future results.


	Three Months		Three Months
	Ended		Ended
	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011

Thousand barrels of oil sold		2,984		2,583
Million cubic feet of gas sold		630		470
Total thousand barrels of oil equivalent		3,089		2,661
Average price per barrel	$	108.75	$	87.73
Average price per thousand cubic feet	$	1.54	$	1.54
Cash operating costs ($millions)	$	21.6	$	14.3
Capital expenditures ($ millions)	$	26.1	$	34.4

Crude oil delivered from the Petrodelta fields to PDVSA Petroleo S.A. (“PPSA”) is priced with reference to Merey 16 published prices, weighted for different markets and adjusted for variations in gravity and sulphur content, commercialization costs and distortions that may occur given the reference price and prevailing market conditions. Merey 16 published prices are quoted and sold in U.S. Dollars. Natural gas delivered from the Petrodelta Fields to PPSA is priced at $1.54 per thousand cubic feet. PPSA is obligated to make payment to Petrodelta in U.S. Dollars in the case of payment for crude oil and natural gas liquids delivered. Natural gas deliveries are paid in Bolivars, but the pricing for natural gas is referenced to the U.S. Dollar.

Budong-Budong Project, Indonesia

The Budong PSC partners are planning to request a four year extension of the initial six-year term which expires on January 16, 2013. Prospects and leads are being matured for both the Lariang and Karama basins. An exploration well is being planned for 2013.

The remaining work commitment for the current exploration phase on the Budong-Budong Production Sharing Contract (“Budong PSC”) is for geological and geophysical work to be completed during 2012 at a minimum of $0.5 million ($0.3 million net to our 64.51 percent cost sharing interest). However, per the Budong PSC, excessive work done during any period can be offset against another period, so although there is a work commitment in the Budong PSC to perform the geological and geophysical work, we have exceeded this requirement. BPMIGAS has stated that that we have satisfied all work commitments for the current exploration phase of the Budong PSC.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we had cash capital expenditures of $5.8 million (RESTATED) for plugging and abandonment costs.

Dussafu Project – Gabon

Drilling operations on the Dussafu Marin Permit (“Dussafu PSC”) are currently suspended pending further exploration and development activities. The Dussafu Ruche Marin-A (“DRM-1”) information is being used to refine the 3-D seismic depth model and improve our understanding for predicting the Gamba structure under the salt to define potential resources in the nearby satellite structures for future drilling targets. Reservoir characterization and concept engineering studies have started with the aim of evaluating the potential for commerciality of the discovered oil.

Operational activities during the three months ended March 31, 2012 included processing of the 545 square kilometers of seismic which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011. The 3-D Pre-Stack Time Migration (“PSTM”) is expected to be completed by June 2012. Pre-Stack Depth processing and reprocessing of the 2005 Inboard 3-D seismic of approximately 1,300 square kilometers is expected to commence in June 2012. Well planning is in progress to drill an exploration well on the Tortue prospect to target stacked pre-salt Gamba and Dentale reservoirs as well as a secondary post-salt Madiela clastic reservoir.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we had cash capital expenditures of $1.0 million (RESTATED) for seismic processing.

Block 64 EPSA Project – Oman

All work commitments on the Al Ghubar/Qarn Alam License (“Block 64 EPSA”) have been completed and post well studies are being conducted. A one year extension for the Block 64 EPSA was granted until May 2013, at which time we must decide whether to commit to the Second Phase of the Block 64 EPSA. The Second Phase has a three year term.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $5.2 million for drilling and plugging and abandonment costs.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Our cash is being used to fund oil and gas exploration projects and to a lesser extent general and administrative costs. We require capital principally to fund the exploration and development of new oil and gas properties. As is common in the oil and gas industry, we have various contractual commitments pertaining to exploration, development and production activities. The remaining work commitment for the current exploration phase on the Budong PSC is for geological and geophysical work to be completed in the year 2012 at a minimum of $0.5 million ($0.3 million net to our 64.51 percent cost sharing interest). However, per the Budong PSC, excessive work done during any period can be offset against another period, so although there is a work commitment in the Budong PSC to perform the geological and geophysical work, we have exceeded this requirement. BPMIGAS has stated that that we have satisfied all work commitments for the current exploration phase of the Budong PSC. We do not have any remaining work commitments for the current exploration phases of the Dussafu Marin Permit (“Dussafu PSC”) or Block 64 EPSA. However, as of May 28, 2012, the Dussafu PSC enters the third exploration phase. If the partners elect to enter the third exploration phase, there will be a $7.0 million ($4.7 million net to our 66.667 percent interest) work commitment over a two-year period.

Additionally, any dividend received from Petrodelta carries a liability to our non-controlling interest holder, Vinccler, for its 20 percent share. Dividends declared and paid by Petrodelta are paid to HNR Finance, our consolidated subsidiary. HNR Finance must declare a dividend in order for us and Vinccler to receive our respective shares of Petrodelta’s dividends. A dividend from HNR Finance is due upon demand. As of May 4, 2012, Vinccler’s share of the undistributed dividends is $9.0 million inclusive of the unpaid November 2010 dividend. See Part I. Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Note 12 – Related Party Transactions.

At March 31, 2012, we had cash on hand of $33.6 million. We believe that this cash plus cash generated from Petrodelta dividends and funding from debt or equity financing combined with our ability to vary the timing of our capital expenditures is sufficient to fund our operations and capital commitments through at least March 31, 2013. Our senior convertible notes are due March 1, 2013. We expect some, if not all, debt holders will convert their debt into shares of our common stock on or before the March 1, 2013 due date. As of March 31, 2012, $16.0 million of the senior convertible notes had been converted into, or exchanged for, shares of our common stock. However, if the remaining debt is not converted or is only partially converted, we believe that Petrodelta dividends and funding from debt or equity financing combined with our ability to vary the timing of our capital expenditures will be sufficient to repay the outstanding debt at March 1, 2013. However, if the Petrodelta dividend payment is not received or our cash sources and requirements are different than expected, it could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Working Capital. The net funds raised and/or used in each of the operating, investing and financing activities are summarized in the following table and discussed in further detail below:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
	(RESTATED*)			(RESTATED*)

Net cash used in operating activities	$	(13,354	)	$	(6,856	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,974	)		(27,410	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(66	)		227

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(25,394	)	$	(34,039	)

*	See Operations – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements above.

At March 31, 2012, we had current assets of $66.7 million and current liabilities of $33.7 million, resulting in working capital of $33.0 million and a current ratio of 2.0:1. This compares with a working capital of $62.6 million and a current ratio of 3.1:1 at December 31, 2011. The decrease in working capital of $29.6 million was primarily due to reclassification of current portion of long-term debt and increases in capital expenditures.

Cash Flow used in Operating Activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, net cash used in operating activities was approximately $13.4 million and $6.9 million, respectively. The $6.5 million decrease was primarily due to decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses offset by decreases in accounts and notes receivable.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities. Our cash capital expenditures for property and equipment are summarized in the following table:


	March 31,
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
	(RESTATED*)		(RESTATED*)

Budong PSC	$	5.8	$	5.5
Dussafu PSC		1.0		2.1
Block 64 EPSA		5.2		—
Other projects		—		0.8

Total additions of property and equipment –continuing operations		12.0		8.4
Assets Held for Sale – Antelope Project⁽¹⁾		—		15.6

Total additions of property and equipment	$	12.0	$	24.0

⁽¹⁾	See Part I. Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Note 4 – Dispositions.

*	See Operations – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements above.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we:

•

Advanced $0.1 million to Petrodelta for continuing operations costs, and Petrodelta repaid $0.1 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we:

•

Received $1.3 million from the sale of our equity investment in Fusion;

•

Deposited $4.5 million as collateral for a standby letter of credit issued in support of the drilling unit to be used on the Gabon PSC; and

•

Advanced $0.3 million to Petrodelta for continuing operations costs, and Petrodelta repaid $0.1 million.

Petrodelta’s capital commitments will be determined by its business plan. Petrodelta’s capital commitments are expected to be funded by internally generated cash flow. Our budgeted capital expenditures of $25.5 million for 2012 for Indonesia, Gabon and Oman operations will be funded through our existing cash balances, accessing equity and debt markets, and cost reductions. In addition, we could delay the discretionary portion of our capital spending to future periods or sell assets as necessary to maintain the liquidity required to run our operations, as warranted.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 we:

•

Incurred $0.1 million in legal fees associated with financings.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we:

•

Incurred $0.2 million in legal fees associated with financings.

Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion of the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the financial condition as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 (RESTATED) Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 (RESTATED)

We reported net loss attributable to Harvest of $1.0 million, or $(0.03) diluted earnings per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared with a net loss attributable to Harvest of $3.2 million, or $(0.10) diluted earnings per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Total expenses and other non-operating (income) expense (in millions):


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,						Increase
	2012			2011			(Decrease)
	*(RESTATED)**			*(RESTATED)**
Depreciation and amortization	$	0.1		$	0.1		$	—
Exploration expense		1.9			1.3			0.6
Dry hole costs		5.5			—			5.5
General and administrative		5.8			6.7			(0.9	)
Investment earnings and other		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		—
Unrealized (gain) loss on warrant derivative		(0.4	)		2.5			(2.9	)
Interest expense		0.1			3.6			(3.5	)
Debt conversion expense		2.4			—			2.4
Other non-operating expenses		0.3			0.4			(0.1	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1.2	)		0.4			(1.6	)

*	See Operations – Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements above.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $1.1 million of exploration costs related to the processing and reprocessing of seismic data related to ongoing operations, $0.6 million related to lease maintenance, and $0.2 million related to other general business development activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we incurred $1.1 million of exploration costs related to the processing and reprocessing of seismic data related to ongoing operations. $0.1 million related to lease maintenance and $0.1 million related to other general business development activities.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we expensed to dry hole costs $0.7 million related to the drilling of the KD-1 well on the Budong PSC and $4.8 million related to the drilling of the AGN-1 on the Block 64 EPSA (see Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Operations, Budong-Budong Project, Indonesia and Block 64 EPSA Project – Oman).

The decrease in general and administrative costs in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 was primarily due to lower general office expense and overhead ($0.7 million), employee related costs ($0.7 million) and public relations ($0.1 million) offset by higher travel costs ($0.1 million) and contract services ($0.5 million). Employee related costs in the three months ended March 31, 2011 include $0.4 million of special consideration bonuses related to the sale of the Antelope Project.

Investment earnings and other in the three months ended March 31, 2012 was consistent with the three months ended March 31, 2011.

The increase in unrealized gain on warrant derivatives in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 was due to the change in fair value for our warrant derivative liabilities: $2.65 per warrant at March 31, 2012 and $2.86 weighted average price per warrant at March 31, 2011.

The decrease in interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 was due to the repayment in May 2011 of our $60 million term loan facility and interest capitalized to oil and gas properties of $0.7 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred debt conversion expense related to the issuance of 0.2 million shares of our common stock in exchange for certain holders of our senior convertible notes foregoing a one-year interest make-whole of $1.3 million. The debt conversion expense consists of bond conversion expenses ($0.6 million), interest expense make-whole provision satisfied by the issuance of 0.2 million common shares ($1.3 million) and legal and other professional fees ($0.5 million).

The decrease in other non-operating expense in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 was due to costs incurred related to our strategic alternative process and evaluation which resulted in the sale of our Antelope Project.

The decrease in income tax expense in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 is due to $1.5 million of projected U.S. income tax benefits associated with the carryback to the 2011 income tax year of net operating losses projected to be incurred in the 2012 income tax year. The U.S. income tax benefits are offset by income tax expense for our Netherlands affiliates.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, net income from unconsolidated equity affiliates reflects an increase in Petrodelta’s revenue from oil sales due to higher sales volumes and prices which was offset by the amended Windfall Profits Tax. The increase in operating expense and workovers in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 was due to increased oil production. The increase in Petrodelta’s effective tax rate (inclusive of the adjustments to reconcile to reported net income from unconsolidated equity affiliate) in the three months ended March 31, 2012 from the three months ended March 31, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in current tax on increased earnings.

We recorded a $1.3 million gain on the sale of our equity affiliate, Fusion, during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Discontinued Operations

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $0.1 million of expense related to settlement of royalty payments to the Mineral Management Services.

Revenue and net loss on the disposition of the Antelope Project are shown in the table below:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)

Revenues applicable to discontinued operations	$	—		$	4,120
Net loss from discontinued operations		(115	)		(3,266	)

Effects of Changing Prices, Foreign Exchange Rates and Inflation

Our results of operations and cash flow are affected by changing oil prices. Fluctuations in oil prices may affect our total planned development activities and capital expenditure program.

Our net foreign exchange losses attributable to our international operations were minimal for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. There are many factors affecting foreign exchange rates and resulting exchange gains and losses, most of which are beyond our control. It is not possible for us to predict the extent to which we may be affected by future changes in exchange rates and exchange controls.

Venezuela imposed currency exchange restrictions in February 2003, and adjusted the official exchange rate in February 2004, March 2005, January 2010 and again in January 2011. On January 4, 2011, the Venezuelan government published in the Official Gazette the Exchange Agreement which eliminated the 2.60 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar exchange rate with an effective date of January 1, 2011.

Harvest Vinccler and Petrodelta do not have currency exchange risk other than the official prevailing exchange rate that applies to their operating costs denominated in Bolivars (4.30 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar). However, during the three months ended March 31, 2012, Harvest Vinccler exchanged approximately $0.3 million

through SITME and received an average exchange rate of 5.17 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar. The monetary assets that are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations are cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets. The monetary liabilities that are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations are accounts payable, accruals and other current liabilities. All monetary assets and liabilities incurred at the official Bolivar exchange rate are settled at the official Bolivar exchange rate. Petrodelta does not have, and has not had, any U.S. Dollars pending government approval for settlement for Bolivars at the official exchange rate or the SITME exchange rate. Harvest Vinccler currently does not have any U.S. Dollars pending government approval for settlement for Bolivars at the official exchange rate or the SITME exchange rate.

See Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Operations, Venezuela for a more complete discussion of the exchange agreements and their effects on our Venezuelan operations.

Within the United States and other countries in which we conduct business, inflation has had a minimal effect on us, but it is potentially an important factor with respect to results of operations in Venezuela.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from adverse changes of the situation in Venezuela, our exploration program and adverse changes in oil prices, interest rates, foreign exchange and political risk, as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The information about market risk for the three months ended March 31, 2012 does not differ materially from that discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. In our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 filed on May 10, 2012, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2012. In connection with the restatement of the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as discussed in Part I. Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements, a reevaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) as of March 31, 2012. Based on that evaluation and in light of the material weaknesses described below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules and forms of the SEC, and is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Sufficient Complement of Accounting and Financial Reporting Resources

In certain areas, we did not maintain a sufficient complement of resources with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. This limited our ability, in certain areas, to ensure the necessary consistent communication, reinforcement, and application of accounting policies to make appropriate accounting and disclosure decisions. This material weakness contributed to the material weaknesses set forth below.

Accounting for Certain Transactions for Oil and Gas Properties

We did not maintain effective internal control over the accuracy, valuation and application of USGAAP related to capitalization, classification, and impairment of certain costs related to oil and gas properties. Specifically, effective controls were not designed or effectively operating to review the nature and classification of costs to be capitalized to oil and gas properties which impacts the accurate calculation of oil and gas property impairments. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of oil and gas properties, exploration expense, and related financial statement disclosures.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We did not maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, presentation and disclosure of our accounting for income taxes, including income tax expense and income tax assets and liabilities. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls to (1) document our analysis, considerations and evaluation of relevant facts related to our accounting judgments for income taxes, (2) account for uncertain tax positions, and (3) ensure appropriate recording and presentation of our net operating losses and associated valuation allowance and related footnote disclosures. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of income tax expense, deferred tax assets, our valuation allowance, and related financial statement disclosures.

Financial Reporting Process

We did not maintain effective internal control over certain of our financial close and reporting processes because of the following material weaknesses:

(a)

We did not maintain effective controls over segregation of duties related to certain system access rights and the recording and review of journal entries for validity, accuracy, and completeness for substantially all significant accounts. Specifically, certain individuals have incompatible access rights within key IT systems and certain accounting personnel have the ability to prepare and post journal entries without an independent review that is designed with sufficient rigor and precision to prevent or detect an error.

(b)

We did not maintain effective controls over the preparation and review of certain classification and disclosure matters impacting the financial statements and related notes. Specifically, controls are not designed and operating effectively to accumulate and review all information required to ensure complete, accurate, and proper presentation of the statement of cash flows and financial statement disclosures. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of cash provided by or used in investing and operating activities and related financial statement disclosures and the misstatement of segment information.

(c)

We did not maintain effective controls over significant and complex debt and equity transactions. Specifically, controls were not designed and operating effectively to ensure completeness and accuracy over the identification, evaluation, analysis and recording of significant and complex debt and equity transactions and the associated financial statement impact. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of additional paid-in capital, interest expense, unrealized gain (loss) on warrant derivatives, and related financial statement disclosures.

Additionally, each of the control deficiencies described above could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule that would not be prevented or detected. Certain of these material weaknesses resulted in errors which required the restatement of our unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Remediation Plan. In response to the identified material weaknesses, our management, with oversight from our Audit Committee will dedicate appropriate resources to remediate the material weaknesses described above. Until the remediation steps set forth below are fully implemented, the material weaknesses described above will continue to exist.

Management is taking the following actions to remediate the material weakness related to oil and gas unproved properties described above:

•

Formalize policies and procedures for the appropriate recording of oil and gas property transactions.

•

Train the accounting staff on the above policies and procedures.

•

Establish timely independent review and approval of oil and gas property transactions and schedules.

•

Redesign the controls for the evaluation, analysis, recording and review of oil and gas property transactions.

Management is taking the following actions to remediate the material weakness related to income tax accounting described above:

•

Formalize the policies and procedures for appropriate recording of income taxes.

•

Maintain and update memorandum to reflect the current status of income tax accounting positions and the relevant analysis, considerations and conclusions.

•

Redesign the controls for income taxes to ensure the level of precision and operating effectiveness required by management.

•

Redesign the controls for income taxes to ensure appropriate presentation and disclosure of the associated footnotes and financial statement schedule.

•

Supplement existing resources with additional personnel and additional training.

Management is taking the following actions to remediate the material weaknesses related to our Financial Reporting Process and complement of accounting and financial reporting resources:

•

Implement a sufficiently-designed control that is intended to ensure functions are appropriately segregated and that all journal entries are reviewed by an appropriate person.

•

Modify the system access of individuals with incompatible responsibilities and/or design compensating controls that operate at the appropriate level of precision to address the associated conflict.

•

Redesign the controls for the preparation, execution and review of the cash flow statement and financial statement disclosures.

•

Redesign certain entity-level monitoring controls and certain transaction level controls in order to achieve the level of precision and operating effectiveness required by management.

•

Redesign the controls over significant and complex debt and equity transactions to ensure appropriate identification, evaluation, analysis and recording of such transactions.

•

Supplement our accounting department with additional personnel and provide additional training to our personnel regarding the application of USGAAP.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Controls. Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect that Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

•

See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a description of other legal proceedings. There have been no material developments in other such legal proceedings since the filing of such Annual Report.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

We operate in many different jurisdictions and we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, which is broader in scope than the FCPA, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government and other officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our internal policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. Despite our training and compliance programs, we cannot be assured that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from acts of corruption committed by our employees or agents. Our continued expansion outside the U.S., including in developing countries, could increase the risk of such violations in the future. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 under Item 1A Risk Factors for a description of other risk factors. There have been no material developments in such risk factors since the filing of such Annual Report.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On March 14, 2012, we closed transactions contemplated by exchange agreements we entered into with certain holders of our 8.25 percent senior convertible notes pursuant to which such noteholders exchanged $16.0 million principal amount of the notes for 2.9 million shares of our common stock, resulting in an effective exchange price of $5.56 per share. In addition, in lieu of cash, we issued to the noteholders 0.2 million shares of common stock at $8.16 per share in exchange for foregoing a one year interest make-whole of $1.3 million. After giving effect to the exchange, approximately $15.6 million principal amount of the notes remain outstanding. The common stock was offered to accredited investors pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 6.

Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits


3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2010, File No. 1-10762.)

3.2		Restated Bylaws as of May 17, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2007, File No. 1-10762.)

4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2008, File No. 1-10762.)

4.2		Certificate of Designation, Rights and Preferences of the Series B Preferred Stock of Benton Oil and Gas Company, filed May 12, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2010, File No. 1-10762.)

4.3		Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2007, between Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to our Form 8-A filed on October 23, 2007, File No. 1-10762.)

4.4		Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2010, between Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2010, File No. 1-10762.)

31.1		Certification of the principal executive officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of the principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 executed by James A. Edmiston, President and Chief Executive Officer.

32.2		Certification accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 executed by Stephen C. Haynes, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.

Dated: May 13, 2013	By:	/s/ James A. Edmiston
		James A. Edmiston
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 13, 2013	By:	/s/ Stephen C. Haynes
		Stephen C. Haynes
		Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer
		and Treasurer

Exhibit Index


Exhibit Number		Description

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2010, File No. 1-10762).

3.2		Restated Bylaws as of May 17, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2007, File No. 1-10762.)

4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2008. File No. 1-10762.)

4.2		Certificate of Designation, Rights and Preferences of the Series B Preferred Stock of Benton Oil and Gas Company, filed May 12, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2010, File No. 1-10762.)

4.3		Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2007, between Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to our Form 8-A filed on October 23, 2007, File No. 1-10762.)

4.4		Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2010, between Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2010, File No. 1-10762.)

31.1		Certification of the principal executive officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of the principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 executed by James A. Edmiston, President and Chief Executive Officer.

32.2		Certification accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 executed by Stephen C. Haynes, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-Accelerated Filer

Smaller Reporting Company