Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - Apple REIT Ten, Inc.ex31-2.htm
EX-32.1 - Apple REIT Ten, Inc.ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - Apple REIT Ten, Inc.ex31-1.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Apple REIT Ten, Inc.Financial_Report.xls


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 


x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______

Commission File Number 000-54651

Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Virginia 27-3218228
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
   
 814 East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia
23219
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
                                                                                             
(804) 344-8121
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer   o
 
Accelerated filer   o
 
Non-accelerated filer   x
 
Smaller reporting company  o
       
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of registrant’s common shares outstanding as of May 1, 2013: 68,107,424
 
 
 

 
APPLE REIT TEN, INC.
FORM 10-Q
 
 
Page Number
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
   
 
Item 1.
 
       
   
3
       
   
4
       
   
5
       
   
6
       
 
Item 2.
15
       
 
Item 3.
26
       
 
Item 4.
26
       
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
   
 
Item 1.
27
       
 
Item 2.
28
       
 
Item 6.
30
       
31
 
This Form 10-Q includes references to certain trademarks or service marks. The Courtyard ® by Marriott, Fairfield Inn and Suites® by Marriott, TownePlace Suites® by Marriott, Marriott®, SpringHill Suites® by Marriott and Residence Inn® by Marriott trademarks are the property of Marriott International, Inc. or one of its affiliates. The Hampton Inn and Suites®, Homewood Suites® by Hilton, Hilton Garden Inn® and Home2 Suites® by Hilton trademarks are the property of Hilton Worldwide or one or more of its affiliates. For convenience, the applicable trademark or service mark symbol has been omitted but will be deemed to be included wherever the above referenced terms are used.
 
 
 

 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
APPLE REIT TEN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
 
   
March 31, 2013
   
December 31, 2012
 
   
(unaudited)
       
Assets            
Investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation of $26,291 and $21,804, respectively
  $ 560,405     $ 506,689  
Cash and cash equivalents
    109,942       146,530  
Restricted cash-furniture, fixtures and other escrows
    7,138       9,396  
Due from third party managers, net
    5,593       2,481  
Other assets, net
    3,017       2,689  
        Total Assets
  $ 686,095     $ 667,785  
                 
Liabilities
               
Notes payable
  $ 80,770     $ 81,186  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    5,821       7,074  
        Total Liabilities
    86,591       88,260  
                 
Shareholders' Equity
               
Preferred stock, authorized 30,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding
    0       0  
Series A preferred stock, no par value, authorized 400,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 68,111,893 and 64,983,511 shares, respectively
    0       0  
Series B convertible preferred stock, no par value, authorized 480,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 480,000 shares
    48       48  
Common stock, no par value, authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 68,111,893 and 64,983,511 shares, respectively
    666,904       636,191  
Distributions greater than net income
    (67,448 )     (56,714 )
        Total Shareholders' Equity
    599,504       579,525  
                 
        Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
  $ 686,095     $ 667,785  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
3

 
APPLE REIT TEN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues:
           
    Room revenue
  $ 27,637       22,537  
    Other revenue
    3,229       2,285  
Total revenue
    30,866       24,822  
                 
Expenses:
               
    Operating expense
    8,058       6,336  
    Hotel administrative expense
    2,628       2,073  
    Sales and marketing
    2,719       2,291  
    Utilities
    1,131       973  
    Repair and maintenance
    1,071       848  
    Franchise fees
    1,246       1,007  
    Management fees
    1,076       811  
    Property taxes, insurance and other
    2,145       1,937  
    General and administrative
    1,017       1,093  
    Acquisition related costs
    1,366       644  
    Depreciation expense
    4,487       3,685  
Total expenses
    26,944       21,698  
                 
    Operating income
    3,922       3,124  
                 
    Interest expense, net
    (956 )     (1,100 )
                 
Income before income taxes
    2,966       2,024  
                 
    Income tax expense
    (78 )     (50 )
                 
Net income
  $ 2,888     $ 1,974  
                 
Basic and diluted net income per common share
  $ 0.04     $ 0.04  
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
    66,289       45,593  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
4

 
APPLE REIT TEN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net income
  $ 2,888     $ 1,974  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    4,487       3,685  
Amortization of deferred financing costs, fair value adjustments and other non-cash expenses, net
    30       28  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Increase in due from third party managers, net
    (3,095 )     (3,504 )
Decrease (increase) in other assets, net
    292       (134 )
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (772 )     (144 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    3,830       1,905  
                 
Cash flows used in investing activities:
               
Cash paid for the acquisition of hotel properties
    (54,922 )     (13,917 )
Deposits and other disbursements for potential acquisitions
    (303 )     0  
Capital improvements
    (3,779 )     (2,579 )
Decrease (increase) in capital improvement reserves
    1,886       (214 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    (57,118 )     (16,710 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net proceeds related to issuance of Units
    31,941       55,737  
Redemptions of Units
    (1,225 )     0  
Distributions paid to common shareholders
    (13,622 )     (9,336 )
Payments of notes payable
    (394 )     (343 )
Deferred financing costs
    0       (132 )
Net cash provided by financing activities
    16,700       45,926  
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (36,588 )     31,121  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    146,530       7,079  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 109,942     $ 38,200  
                 
Non-cash transactions:
               
Notes payable assumed in acquisitions
  $ 0     $ 13,067  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
5

 
APPLE REIT TEN, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Apple REIT Ten, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company was formed to invest in hotels and other income-producing real estate in selected metropolitan areas in the United States. Initial capitalization occurred on August 13, 2010, when 10 Units, each Unit consisting of one common share and one Series A preferred share, were purchased by Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”) and 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares, were purchased by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company began operations on March 4, 2011, when it purchased its first hotel. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31. The Company has no foreign operations or assets and its operating structure includes only one reportable segment. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. As of March 31, 2013, the Company owned 34 hotels located in 15 states with an aggregate of 4,367 rooms.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2013 presentation with no effect on previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, and insurance, and reserves for furniture, fixtures, and equipment replacements of up to 5% of property revenue for certain hotels, as required by certain management or mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions.

Offering Costs

The Company is raising capital through an on-going best-efforts offering of Units by David Lerner Associates, Inc., the managing underwriter, which receives a selling commission and a marketing expense allowance based on proceeds of the Units sold. Additionally, the Company has incurred other offering costs including legal, accounting and reporting services. These offering costs are recorded by the Company as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had sold 69.7 million Units for gross proceeds of $762.0 million and proceeds net of offering costs of $683.1 million. Offering costs included $76.2 million in selling commissions and marketing expenses and $2.7 million in other offering costs. On January 4, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the offering until January 19, 2014. As a result, the offering will continue until all Units have been sold or until January 19, 2014, whichever occurs sooner.
 
 
6


Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated after giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding for the period. There were no potential common shares with a dilutive effect for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or 2012. As a result, basic and diluted outstanding shares were the same. Series B convertible preferred shares are not included in earnings per common share calculations until such time that such shares are eligible to be converted to common shares.

2.  Investment in Real Estate

The Company acquired three hotels during the first three months of 2013. The following table sets forth the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each hotel. All dollar amounts are in thousands.

City
 
State
 
Brand
 
Manager
 
Date Acquired
 
Rooms
   
Gross Purchase Price
 
Huntsville
 
AL
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
LBA
 
3/14/2013
    98     $ 11,466  
Huntsville
 
AL
 
Home2 Suites
 
LBA
 
3/14/2013
    77       9,009  
Fairfax
 
VA
 
Marriott
 
White
 
3/15/2013
    310       34,000  
    Total
                    485     $ 54,475  
 
The purchase price for these properties was funded by the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units. The Company also used proceeds from its on-going best-efforts offering to pay approximately $1.4 million in acquisition related costs, including $1.1 million, representing 2% of the gross purchase price for these hotels, as a brokerage commission to Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and approximately $0.3 million in other acquisition related costs, including title, legal and other related costs. These costs are included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

The Company leases all of its hotels to its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (or a subsidiary thereof) under master hotel lease agreements.

No goodwill was recorded in connection with any of the acquisitions.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company owned 34 hotels, located in 15 states, consisting of the following:
 
   
Total by
   
Number of
 
Brand
 
Brand
   
Rooms
 
Hilton Garden Inn
    9       1,443  
Hampton Inn & Suites
    6       724  
Homewood Suites
    4       416  
TownePlace Suites
    4       388  
Fairfield Inn & Suites
    3       310  
Home2 Suites
    3       304  
Courtyard
    2       266  
SpringHill Suites
    2       206  
Marriott
    1       310  
      34       4,367  
 
 
7


At March 31, 2013, the Company’s investment in real estate consisted of the following (in thousands):

Land
  $ 52,740  
Building and Improvements
    494,931  
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
    37,150  
Franchise fees
    1,875  
      586,696  
Less Accumulated Depreciation
    (26,291 )
Investment in real estate, net
  $ 560,405  
 
As of March 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding contracts for the potential purchase of four additional hotels for a total purchase price of $86.1 million. Of these four hotels, three are under construction and should be completed over the next 10 to 18 months from March 31, 2013. Closing on these three hotels is expected upon completion of construction. The one existing hotel is expected to close within the next three months. Although the Company is working towards acquiring these hotels, there are many conditions to closing that have not yet been satisfied and there can be no assurance that closings will occur under the outstanding purchase contracts. The following table summarizes the location, brand, number of rooms, refundable (if the seller does not meet its obligations under the contract) contract deposits paid, and gross purchase price for each of the contracts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.  

Location
 
Brand
 
Rooms
   
Deposits Paid
   
Gross Purchase Price
 
Operating (a)
                     
Houston, TX
 
Residence Inn
    120     $ 50     $ 18,000  
Under Construction (b)
                           
Fort Lauderdale, FL (d)
 
Residence Inn
    156       3       23,088  
Oklahoma City, OK
 
Hilton Garden Inn
    155    
(c)
   
(c)
 
Oklahoma City, OK
 
Homewood Suites
    100    
(c)
   
(c)
 
          531     $ 353     $ 86,088  
 
________
       
(a)  This hotel is currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from March 31, 2013.
(b)  The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise.  Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these hotels should close over the next 10 to 18 months from March 31, 2013.
(c)  The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and an initial deposit of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.
(d)  If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.
 
As there can be no assurance that all conditions to closing will be satisfied, the Company includes deposits paid for hotels under contract in other assets, net in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and in deposits and other disbursements for potential acquisitions in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. It is anticipated that the purchase price for the outstanding contracts will be funded from the proceeds of the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and cash on hand if a closing occurs.

On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase contract for the potential acquisition of an adjoining Courtyard and TownePlace Suites hotel complex under development in Grapevine, Texas. On March 18, 2013, this contract was terminated. The gross purchase price for the hotels totaled $41.7 million. In connection with the termination of this contract, the initial deposit of $50,000 was repaid to the Company.
 
 
8


3.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates the fair value of its debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit terms and credit characteristics, which are Level 3 inputs. Market rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. As of March 31, 2013, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was approximately $80.8 million and $84.6 million. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $81.2 million and $85.8 million. The carrying value of the Company’s other financial instruments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

4.  Related Parties
 
The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.

The Company has a contract with ASRG, to acquire and dispose of real estate assets for the Company. A fee of 2% of the gross purchase price or gross sale price in addition to certain reimbursable expenses is paid to ASRG for these services. As of March 31, 2013, payments to ASRG for fees under the terms of this contract have totaled approximately $11.5 million since inception. Of this amount, the Company incurred $1.1 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, which is included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A10A, pursuant to which A10A provides management services to the Company. A10A provides these management services through an affiliate called Apple Fund Management LLC (“AFM”), which is a subsidiary of Apple REIT Six, Inc. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses, is payable to A10A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

In addition to the fees payable to ASRG and A10A, the Company reimbursed A10A or ASRG or paid directly to AFM on behalf of A10A or ASRG approximately $0.4 million for each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. The expenses reimbursed are approximately $0.1 million for each period for costs reimbursed under the contract with ASRG and approximately $0.3 million for each period for costs reimbursed under the contract with A10A. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s proportionate share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM at the direction of A10A.

AFM is an affiliate of Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., ASRG and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc., (collectively the “Advisors” which are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight). As such, the Advisors provide management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and the Company (collectively the “Apple REIT Entities”). Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described more fully below allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Amounts reimbursed to AFM include both compensation for personnel and “overhead” (office rent, utilities, benefits, office supplies, etc.) used by the companies. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.
 
 
9


The Advisors and Apple REIT Entities allocate all of the costs of AFM among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors. The allocation of costs from AFM is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. As part of this arrangement, the day to day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities. To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.

On November 29, 2012, Apple REIT Six, Inc. entered into a merger agreement with a potential buyer that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or its Advisors (“the Merger”). If the closing conditions to the Merger are satisfied, it is anticipated that the Merger will close during the second quarter of 2013. To maintain the current cost sharing structure, on November 29, 2012, Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”) entered into an assignment and transfer agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the transfer of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s interest in AFM. The assignment and transfer is expected to occur immediately after the closing of the Merger. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the potential buyer for any liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A, if it occurs, will have no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A10A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. as described above, which will increase the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.

Also, on November 29, 2012, in connection with the Merger, Apple REIT Nine, Inc. entered into a transfer agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the potential acquisition of the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and the assignment of the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement which is expected to close immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. If the closing occurs, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease (i.e. office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc.) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. as described above.

ASRG and A10A are 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Another member of the Company’s Board of Directors is also on the Board of Directors of Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Eight, Inc.

On occasion, the Company uses, for acquisition, renovation and asset management purposes, a Learjet owned by Apple Air Holding, LLC, which is jointly owned by Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Total costs paid for the usage of the aircraft in the first three months of 2013 and 2012 were $115,000 and $55,000. On December 5, 2012, the Company entered into a membership interest purchase agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the potential acquisition of a 26% membership interest in Apple Air Holding, LLC for approximately $1.45 million that is expected to close immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. The membership interest, if a closing occurs, will include all rights and obligations of Apple REIT Six, Inc. under Apple Air Holding, LLC’s operating agreement. Also as part of the purchase, the Company agreed to indemnify the potential buyer of Apple REIT Six, Inc. for any liabilities related to the membership interest.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures and the review of certain transactions involving Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Although the Company believes it is currently not the focus of the SEC investigation, the Company’s officers are the same officers as the other Apple REIT Entities. The other Apple REIT Entities are engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning the issues noted and the roles of certain officers. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome or timing of this matter as it relates to the other Apple REIT Entities or any of its officers. The total costs for the legal matters discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $0.8 million in the first three months of 2013, of which approximately $0.1 million was allocated to the Company.
 
 
10


5.  Shareholders’ Equity

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company has issued 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in exchange for the payment by him of $0.10 per Series B convertible preferred share, or an aggregate of $48,000. The Series B convertible preferred shares are convertible into common shares pursuant to the formula and on the terms and conditions set forth below.

There are no dividends payable on the Series B convertible preferred shares. Holders of more than two-thirds of the Series B convertible preferred shares must approve any proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation that would adversely affect the Series B convertible preferred shares.

Upon the Company’s liquidation, the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is entitled to a priority liquidation payment before any distribution of liquidation proceeds to the holders of the common shares. However, the priority liquidation payment of the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is junior to the holders of the Series A preferred shares’ distribution rights. The holder of a Series B convertible preferred share is entitled to a liquidation payment of $11.00 per number of common shares each Series B convertible preferred share would be convertible into according to the formula described below. In the event that the liquidation of the Company’s assets results in proceeds that exceed the distribution rights of the Series A preferred shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, the remaining proceeds will be distributed between the common shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, on an as converted basis.

Each holder of outstanding Series B convertible preferred shares shall have the right to convert any of such shares into common shares of the Company upon and for 180 days following the occurrence of any of the following events:

(1) substantially all of the Company’s assets, stock or business is sold or transferred through exchange, merger, consolidation, lease, share exchange, sale or otherwise, other than a sale of assets in liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company;

(2) the termination or expiration without renewal of the advisory agreement with A10A, or if the Company ceases to use ASRG to provide property acquisition and disposition services; or

(3) the Company’s common shares are listed on any securities exchange or quotation system or in any established market.
 
Upon the occurrence of any conversion event, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into a number of common shares based upon the gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in the Company’s $2 billion offering according to the following table:
 
Gross Proceeds Raised from Sales of
Units through Date of Conversion
 
Number of Common Shares
through Conversion of
One Series B Convertible Preferred Share
$700 million
    8.49719  
$800 million
    9.70287  
$900 million
    10.90855  
$    1  billion
    12.11423  
$ 1.1  billion
    13.31991  
$ 1.2  billion
    14.52559  
$ 1.3  billion
    15.73128  
$ 1.4  billion
    16.93696  
$ 1.5  billion
    18.14264  
$ 1.6  billion
    19.34832  
$ 1.7  billion
    20.55400  
$ 1.8  billion
    21.75968  
$ 1.9  billion
    22.96537  
$    2  billion
    24.17104  
 
 
11


In the event that after raising gross proceeds of $2 billion, the Company raises additional gross proceeds in a subsequent public offering, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into an additional number of common shares based on the additional gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in a subsequent public offering according to the following formula: (X/100 million) x 1.20568, where X is the additional gross proceeds rounded down to the nearest $100 million.

No additional consideration is due upon the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares. The conversion into common shares of the Series B convertible preferred shares will result in dilution of the shareholders’ interests and the termination of the Series A preferred shares.

Expense related to the issuance of 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Mr. Knight will be recognized at such time when the number of common shares to be issued for conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares can be reasonably estimated and the event triggering the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares to common shares occurs. The expense will be measured as the difference between the fair value of the common stock for which the Series B convertible preferred shares can be converted and the amounts paid for the Series B convertible preferred shares. Although the fair market value cannot be determined at this time, expense if the maximum offering is achieved could range from $0 to in excess of $127 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value). Based on equity raised through March 31, 2013, if a triggering event had occurred, expense would have ranged from $0 to $44.9 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value) and approximately 4.1 million common shares would have been issued.

Unit Redemption Program

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since the inception of the program through March 31, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 1.6 million Units in the amount of $16.3 million, including 0.1 million Units in the amount of $1.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis due to the 3% limitation discussed above. Prior to October 2012, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first quarter of 2013:

Redemption Date
 
Requested Unit Redemptions
   
Units Redeemed
   
Redemption Requests Not Redeemed
 
                   
April 2012
    474,466       474,466       0  
July 2012
    961,236       961,236       0  
October 2012
    617,811       46,889       570,922  
January 2013
    938,026       114,200       823,826  

Distributions

The Company’s annual distribution rate as of March 31, 2013 was $0.825 per common share, payable monthly. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.20625 per common share for a total of $13.6 million and $9.3 million.
 
 
12


6.  Pro Forma Information

The following unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is presented as if the acquisitions of the Company’s hotels acquired after December 31, 2011 had occurred on the latter of January 1, 2012 or the opening date of the hotel (five of the Company’s hotels opened after January 1, 2012). The pro forma information does not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations would actually have been if such transactions, in fact, had occurred on these applicable dates, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. Amounts are in thousands, except per share data.

   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
             
Total revenues
  $ 33,232     $ 29,309  
Net income
    3,877       1,291  
Net income per share - basic and diluted
  $ 0.06     $ 0.03  
 
The pro forma information reflects adjustments for actual revenues and expenses of the eight hotels acquired during 2012 and 2013 for the respective period owned prior to acquisition by the Company. Net income has been adjusted as follows: (1) interest income and expense has been adjusted to reflect the reduction in cash and cash equivalents required to fund the acquisitions; (2) interest expense related to prior owner’s debt which was not assumed has been eliminated; (3) depreciation has been adjusted based on the Company’s basis in the hotels; and (4) transaction costs have been adjusted for the acquisition of existing businesses.

7.  Legal Proceedings

The term the “Apple REIT Companies” means the Company, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The consolidated complaint also asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

On April 18, 2012, the Company and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. The briefing period for the motions to dismiss was completed on July 13, 2012.

By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013. The Company believes that any claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Companies are without merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.
 
 
13


8.  Subsequent Events

In April 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $4.7 million, or $0.06875 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.

In April 2013, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 0.6 million Units in the amount of $6.5 million. The redemptions represented approximately 60% of the total redemption requests due to the 3% limitation under the Unit Redemption Program.

During April 2013, the Company closed on the issuance of approximately 0.6 million Units through its on-going best-efforts offering, representing gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $7.0 million and proceeds net of selling and marketing costs of approximately $6.3 million.

 
 
14


Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “goal,” “plan,” “should,” “will,” “predict,” “potential” and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the ability of the Company to implement its acquisition strategy and operating strategy; the Company’s ability to manage planned growth; changes in economic cycles; financing risks; the outcome of current and future litigation, regulatory proceedings or inquiries; changes in laws or regulations or interpretations of current laws and regulations that impact the Company’s business, assets or classification as a real estate investment trust; and competition within the hotel and real estate industry. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore there can be no assurance that such statements included in this quarterly report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved. In addition, the Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Readers should carefully review the Company’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward-looking statement that the Company makes speaks only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.

Overview

Apple REIT Ten, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company, which has a limited operating history, was formed to invest in hotels and other income-producing real estate in selected metropolitan areas in the United States. The Company was initially capitalized on August 13, 2010, with its first investor closing on January 27, 2011. The on-going best-efforts offering will continue until all Units are sold or January 19, 2014. As of March 31, 2013, the Company owned 34 hotels (three acquired during the first three months of 2013, five acquired during 2012 and 26 acquired during 2011). Accordingly, the results of operations include only results from the date of ownership of the properties.

Hotel Operations

Although hotel performance can be influenced by many factors including local competition, local and general economic conditions in the United States and the performance of individual managers assigned to each hotel, performance of the hotels as compared to other hotels within their respective local markets, in general, has met the Company’s expectations for the period owned. As the United States economy continues to improve, the hotel industry and the Company are experiencing improvements in both revenues and operating income for comparable hotels as compared to the prior year. Although there is no way to predict future general economic conditions, and there are several key factors that may continue to negatively affect the economic recovery in the United States and add to general market uncertainty, including but not limited to, the continued high levels of unemployment, the slow pace of the economic recovery in the United States and the uncertainty surrounding the fiscal policy of the United States, the Company and industry are forecasting a mid-single digit percentage increase in revenue for 2013 as compared to 2012 for comparable hotels.

In evaluating financial condition and operating performance, the most important indicators on which the Company focuses are revenue measurements, such as average occupancy, average daily rate (“ADR”), revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) and market yield which compares an individual hotel’s results to others in its local market, and expenses, such as hotel operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and other expenses as described below.
 
 
15


The following is a summary of the results from operations of the 34 hotels owned as of March 31, 2013 for their respective periods of ownership by the Company:

   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(in thousands, except statistical data)
 
2013
   
Percent of Revenue
   
2012
   
Percent of Revenue
 
                         
Total revenue
  $ 30,866       100 %   $ 24,822       100 %
Hotel operating expenses
    17,929       58 %     14,339       58 %
Property taxes, insurance and other expense
    2,145       7 %     1,937       8 %
General and administrative expense
    1,017       3 %     1,093       4 %
                                 
Acquisition related costs
    1,366               644          
Depreciation
    4,487               3,685          
Interest expense, net
    956               1,100          
Income tax expense
    78               50          
                                 
Number of hotels
    34               28          
Average Market Yield(1)
    131               130          
ADR
  $ 114             $ 112          
Occupancy
    67 %             64 %        
RevPAR
  $ 77             $ 72          
Total rooms sold(2)
    241,466               200,805          
Total rooms available(3)
    358,496               312,162          
 
(1)  Calculated from data provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.®  Excludes hotels under renovation or opened less than two years during the applicable periods.
(2)  Represents the number of room nights sold during the period.
(3)  Represents the number of rooms owned by the Company multiplied by the number of nights in the period.

Legal Proceedings

The term the “Apple REIT Companies” means the Company, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The consolidated complaint also asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.
 
 
16


On April 18, 2012, the Company and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. The briefing period for the motions to dismiss was completed on July 13, 2012.

By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013. The Company believes that any claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Companies are without merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

Hotels Owned

As noted above, the Company commenced operations in March 2011 upon the purchase of its first hotel property. The following table summarizes the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each of the 34 hotels the Company owned as of March 31, 2013. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
 
City
 
State
 
Brand
 
Manager
 
Date
Acquired
 
Rooms
   
Gross
Purchase
Price
 
Denver
 
CO
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
3/4/2011
    221     $ 58,500  
Winston-Salem
 
NC
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
McKibbon
 
3/15/2011
    94       11,000  
Charlotte
 
NC
 
Fairfield Inn & Suites
 
Newport
 
3/25/2011
    94       10,000  
Columbia
 
SC
 
TownePlace Suites
 
Newport
 
3/25/2011
    91       10,500  
Mobile
 
AL
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
McKibbon
 
6/2/2011
    101       13,000  
Gainesville
 
FL
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
McKibbon
 
6/2/2011
    104       12,500  
Pensacola
 
FL
 
TownePlace Suites
 
McKibbon
 
6/2/2011
    98       11,500  
Knoxville
 
TN
 
SpringHill Suites
 
McKibbon
 
6/2/2011
    103       14,500  
Richmond
 
VA
 
SpringHill Suites
 
McKibbon
 
6/2/2011
    103       11,000  
Cedar Rapids
 
IA
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
Schulte
 
6/8/2011
    103       13,000  
Cedar Rapids
 
IA
 
Homewood Suites
 
Schulte
 
6/8/2011
    95       13,000  
Hoffman Estates
 
IL
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Schulte
 
6/10/2011
    184       10,000  
Davenport
 
IA
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
Schulte
 
7/19/2011
    103       13,000  
Knoxville
 
TN
 
Homewood Suites
 
McKibbon
 
7/19/2011
    103       15,000  
Knoxville
 
TN
 
TownePlace Suites
 
McKibbon
 
8/9/2011
    98       9,000  
Mason
 
OH
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Schulte
 
9/1/2011
    110       14,825  
Omaha
 
NE
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
White
 
9/1/2011
    178       30,018  
Des Plaines
 
IL
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Raymond
 
9/20/2011
    251       38,000  
Merillville
 
IN
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Schulte
 
9/30/2011
    124       14,825  
Austin/Round Rock
 
TX
 
Homewood Suites
 
Vista
 
10/3/2011
    115       15,500  
Scottsdale
 
AZ
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
White
 
10/3/2011
    122       16,300  
South Bend
 
IN
 
Fairfield Inn & Suites
 
White
 
11/1/2011
    119       17,500  
Charleston
 
SC
 
Home2 Suites
 
LBA
 
11/10/2011
    122       13,908  
Oceanside
 
CA
 
Courtyard
 
Marriott
 
11/28/2011
    142       30,500  
Skokie
 
IL
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
Raymond
 
12/19/2011
    225       32,000  
Tallahassee
 
FL
 
Fairfield Inn & Suites
 
LBA
 
12/30/2011
    97       9,355  
Gainesville
 
FL
 
Homewood Suites
 
McKibbon
 
1/27/2012
    103       14,550  
Nashville
 
TN
 
TownePlace Suites
 
LBA
 
1/31/2012
    101       9,848  
Jacksonville
 
NC
 
Home2 Suites
 
LBA
 
5/4/2012
    105       12,000  
Boca Raton
 
FL
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
White
 
7/16/2012
    149       10,900  
Houston
 
TX
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
7/17/2012
    124       14,632  
Huntsville
 
AL
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
LBA
 
3/14/2013
    98       11,466  
Huntsville
 
AL
 
Home2 Suites
 
LBA
 
3/14/2013
    77       9,009  
Fairfax
 
VA
 
Marriott
 
White
 
3/15/2013
    310       34,000  
    Total
                    4,367     $ 574,636  
 
 
17

 
The purchase price for these properties, net of debt assumed was funded by the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units. The Company assumed approximately $82.5 million of debt secured by six of its hotel properties.

The Company also used the proceeds of its on-going best-efforts offering to pay approximately $11.5 million, representing 2% of the gross purchase price for these hotels, as a commission to Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company leases all of its hotels to its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (or a subsidiary thereof) under master hotel lease agreements. No goodwill was recorded in connection with any of the acquisitions.

Results of Operations

During the period from the Company’s initial capitalization on August 13, 2010 to March 3, 2011, the Company owned no properties, had no revenue, exclusive of interest income and was primarily engaged in capital formation activities. The Company began operations on March 4, 2011 when it purchased its first hotel. As of March 31, 2013, the Company owned 34 hotels (of which three were acquired during 2013) with 4,367 rooms as compared to 28 hotels, with a total of 3,504 rooms as of March 31, 2012. As a result, a comparison of 2013 operating results to prior year results is not meaningful.

Hotel performance is impacted by many factors including the economic conditions in the United States as well as each locality. Although hampered by government spending uncertainty, economic indicators in the United States have shown evidence of a sustainable recovery, which continues to overall positively impact the lodging industry. As a result, the Company’s revenue and operating income for comparable hotels has improved in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same period of 2012 and the Company expects continued improvement in revenue and operating income in 2013 as compared to 2012.

Revenues

The Company’s principal source of revenue is hotel revenue, consisting of room and other related revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had total revenue of approximately $30.9 million and $24.8 million. This revenue reflects hotel operations for the 34 hotels acquired through March 31, 2013 for their respective periods of ownership by the Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 67%, ADR of $114 and RevPAR of $77. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 64%, ADR of $112 and RevPAR of $72. ADR is calculated as room revenue divided by the number of rooms sold, and RevPAR is calculated as occupancy multiplied by ADR.

The Company’s hotels in general have shown results consistent with industry and brand averages for the period of ownership. Although certain markets have been negatively impacted by reduced government spending, with overall demand and room rate improvement, the Company and industry are forecasting a mid-single digit percentage increase in revenue for 2013 as compared to 2012 for comparable hotels. The Company’s hotels continue to be leaders in their respective markets. The Company’s average Market Yield for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was 131 and 130. The Market Yield is a measure of each hotel’s RevPAR compared to the average in the market, with 100 being the average (the index excludes hotels under renovation or open less than two years) and is provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.®, an independent company that tracks historical hotel performance in most markets throughout the world. The Company will continue to pursue market opportunities to improve revenue.

In addition, eight of the hotels owned as of March 31, 2013 have been opened within the past two years. Generally, newly constructed hotels require 12 to 24 months to establish themselves in their respective markets. Therefore, revenue is below market levels for this period of time.
 
 
18


Expenses

Hotel operating expenses relate to the 34 hotels acquired through March 31, 2013 for their respective periods owned and consist of direct room expenses, hotel administrative expense, sales and marketing expense, utilities expense, repair and maintenance expense, franchise fees and management fees. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, hotel operating expenses totaled approximately $17.9 million and $14.3 million, or 58% of total revenue. As noted above, eight of the hotels acquired by the Company opened within the past two years. As a result, although operating expenses will increase with a full year of ownership for all properties, it is anticipated that operating expenses as a percentage of revenue for the properties owned at March 31, 2013 will decline as new properties establish themselves within their respective markets. The benefit of newly opened hotels reducing expenses as a percentage of revenue as they become established was offset by a slight increase in labor benefit costs during the first three months of 2013 as compared to the first three months of 2012 for comparable hotels. These labor benefit costs are likely to continue to grow at increased rates until the associated government regulations surrounding healthcare are developed and implemented. Although operating expenses will increase as revenue increases, the Company will continue to work with its management companies to reduce costs as a percentage of revenue where possible while maintaining quality and service levels at each property.
 
Property taxes, insurance, and other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $2.1 million and $1.9 million, or 7% and 8% of total revenue. As discussed above, with the addition of eight newly opened hotels, taxes, insurance and other expenses as a percentage of revenue is anticipated to decline as the properties become established in their respective markets. However, for comparable hotels, taxes will likely increase if the economy continues to improve and localities reassess property values accordingly.

General and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $1.0 million and $1.1 million. The principal components of general and administrative expense are advisory fees and reimbursable expenses, legal fees, accounting fees and reporting expenses. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively in legal costs related to the legal matters discussed herein and continued costs related to responding to requests from the staff of the SEC. The SEC staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures and the review of certain transactions involving Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Although the Company believes it is currently not the focus of the SEC investigation, the Company’s officers are the same officers as the other Apple REIT Companies. The other Apple REIT Companies are engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning the issues noted and the roles of certain officers. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this investigation as to the other Apple REIT Companies or its officers, nor can it predict the timing associated with any such conclusion or resolution. As discussed below under Related Parties, the Company shares legal counsel with the other Apple REIT Companies. Total costs for these legal matters for all of the Apple REIT Companies were approximately $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Company anticipates it will continue to incur costs associated with these matters.
 
Acquisition related costs for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $1.4 million and $0.6 million. The Company has expensed as incurred all transaction costs associated with the acquisitions of existing businesses, including title, legal, accounting and other related costs, as well as the brokerage commission paid to ASRG. The increase is due to the acquisition of three hotels with a total purchase price of $54.5 million in the first three months of 2013 compared to two hotels with a total purchase price of $24.4 million in the first three months of 2012.

Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $4.5 million and $3.7 million. Depreciation expense represents expense of the Company’s 34 hotel buildings and related improvements, and associated personal property (furniture, fixtures and equipment), for their respective periods owned.

Interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $1.1 million for both periods and is net of approximately $167,000 and $106,000 of interest capitalized associated with renovation projects. Interest expense primarily arose from debt assumed with the acquisition of six of the Company’s hotels (one loan assumption in 2012 and five loan assumptions in 2011). For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized interest income of approximately $119,000 and $11,000. Interest income represents earnings on excess cash invested in short term money market instruments. The Company had $109.9 million in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2013 compared to $38.2 million at March 31, 2012.
 
 
19


 Related Parties

The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.

The Company has a contract with ASRG, to acquire and dispose of real estate assets for the Company. A fee of 2% of the gross purchase price or gross sale price in addition to certain reimbursable expenses is paid to ASRG for these services. As of March 31, 2013, payments to ASRG for fees under the terms of this contract have totaled approximately $11.5 million since inception. Of this amount, the Company incurred $1.1 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, which is included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A10A, pursuant to which A10A provides management services to the Company. A10A provides these management services through an affiliate called Apple Fund Management LLC (“AFM”), which is a subsidiary of Apple REIT Six, Inc. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses, is payable to A10A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

In addition to the fees payable to ASRG and A10A, the Company reimbursed A10A or ASRG or paid directly to AFM on behalf of A10A or ASRG approximately $0.4 million for each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. The expenses reimbursed are approximately $0.1 million for each period for costs reimbursed under the contract with ASRG and approximately $0.3 million for each period for costs reimbursed under the contract with A10A. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s proportionate share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM at the direction of A10A.

AFM is an affiliate of Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., ASRG and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc., (collectively the “Advisors” which are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight). As such, the Advisors provide management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and the Company (collectively the “Apple REIT Entities”). Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described more fully below allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Amounts reimbursed to AFM include both compensation for personnel and “overhead” (office rent, utilities, benefits, office supplies, etc.) used by the companies. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.

The Advisors and Apple REIT Entities allocate all of the costs of AFM among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors. The allocation of costs from AFM is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. As part of this arrangement, the day to day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities. To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.
 
 
20


On November 29, 2012, Apple REIT Six, Inc. entered into a merger agreement with a potential buyer that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or its Advisors (“the Merger”). If the closing conditions to the Merger are satisfied, it is anticipated that the Merger will close during the second quarter of 2013. To maintain the current cost sharing structure, on November 29, 2012, Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”) entered into an assignment and transfer agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the transfer of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s interest in AFM. The assignment and transfer is expected to occur immediately after the closing of the Merger. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the potential buyer for any liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A, if it occurs, will have no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A10A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. as described above, which will increase the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.

Also, on November 29, 2012, in connection with the Merger, Apple REIT Nine, Inc. entered into a transfer agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the potential acquisition of the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and the assignment of the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement which is expected to close immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. If the closing occurs, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease (i.e. office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc.) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple REIT Six, Inc. as described above.

ASRG and A10A are 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Another member of the Company’s Board of Directors is also on the Board of Directors of Apple REIT Seven, Inc. and Apple REIT Eight, Inc.

On occasion, the Company uses, for acquisition, renovation and asset management purposes, a Learjet owned by Apple Air Holding, LLC, which is jointly owned by Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Total costs paid for the usage of the aircraft in the first three months of 2013 and 2012 were $115,000 and $55,000. On December 5, 2012, the Company entered into a membership interest purchase agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the potential acquisition of a 26% membership interest in Apple Air Holding, LLC for approximately $1.45 million that is expected to close immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. The membership interest, if a closing occurs, will include all rights and obligations of Apple REIT Six, Inc. under Apple Air Holding, LLC’s operating agreement. Also as part of the purchase, the Company agreed to indemnify the potential buyer of Apple REIT Six, Inc. for any liabilities related to the membership interest.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The SEC staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures and the review of certain transactions involving Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Although the Company believes it is currently not the focus of the SEC investigation, the Company’s officers are the same officers as the other Apple REIT Entities. The other Apple REIT Entities are engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning the issues noted and the roles of certain officers. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome or timing of this matter as it relates to the other Apple REIT Entities or any of its officers. The total costs for the legal matters discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $0.8 million in the first three months of 2013, of which approximately $0.1 million was allocated to the Company.
 
 
21


Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
 
The Company has issued 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in exchange for the payment by him of $0.10 per Series B convertible preferred share, or an aggregate of $48,000. The Series B convertible preferred shares are convertible into common shares pursuant to the formula and on the terms and conditions set forth below.

There are no dividends payable on the Series B convertible preferred shares. Holders of more than two-thirds of the Series B convertible preferred shares must approve any proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation that would adversely affect the Series B convertible preferred shares.

Upon the Company’s liquidation, the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is entitled to a priority liquidation payment before any distribution of liquidation proceeds to the holders of the common shares. However, the priority liquidation payment of the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is junior to the holders of the Series A preferred shares’ distribution rights. The holder of a Series B convertible preferred share is entitled to a liquidation payment of $11.00 per number of common shares each Series B convertible preferred share would be convertible into according to the formula described below. In the event that the liquidation of the Company’s assets results in proceeds that exceed the distribution rights of the Series A preferred shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, the remaining proceeds will be distributed between the common shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, on an as converted basis.

Each holder of outstanding Series B convertible preferred shares shall have the right to convert any of such shares into common shares of the Company upon and for 180 days following the occurrence of any of the following events:

(1) substantially all of the Company’s assets, stock or business is sold or transferred through exchange, merger, consolidation, lease, share exchange, sale or otherwise, other than a sale of assets in liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company;

(2) the termination or expiration without renewal of the advisory agreement with A10A, or if the Company ceases to use ASRG to provide property acquisition and disposition services; or

(3) the Company’s common shares are listed on any securities exchange or quotation system or in any established market.
 
Upon the occurrence of any conversion event, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into a number of common shares based upon the gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in the Company’s $2 billion offering according to the following table:
 
Gross Proceeds Raised from Sales of
Units through Date of Conversion
 
Number of Common Shares
through Conversion of
One Series B Convertible Preferred Share
$700 million
    8.49719  
$800 million
    9.70287  
$900 million
    10.90855  
$    1  billion
    12.11423  
$ 1.1  billion
    13.31991  
$ 1.2  billion
    14.52559  
$ 1.3  billion
    15.73128  
$ 1.4  billion
    16.93696  
$ 1.5  billion
    18.14264  
$ 1.6  billion
    19.34832  
$ 1.7  billion
    20.55400  
$ 1.8  billion
    21.75968  
$ 1.9  billion
    22.96537  
$    2  billion
    24.17104  
 
 
22


In the event that after raising gross proceeds of $2 billion, the Company raises additional gross proceeds in a subsequent public offering, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into an additional number of common shares based on the additional gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in a subsequent public offering according to the following formula: (X/100 million) x 1.20568, where X is the additional gross proceeds rounded down to the nearest $100 million.

No additional consideration is due upon the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares. The conversion into common shares of the Series B convertible preferred shares will result in dilution of the shareholders’ interests and the termination of the Series A preferred shares.

Expense related to the issuance of 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Mr. Knight will be recognized at such time when the number of common shares to be issued for conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares can be reasonably estimated and the event triggering the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares to common shares occurs. The expense will be measured as the difference between the fair value of the common stock for which the Series B convertible preferred shares can be converted and the amounts paid for the Series B convertible preferred shares. Although the fair market value cannot be determined at this time, expense if the maximum offering is achieved could range from $0 to in excess of $127 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value). Based on equity raised through March 31, 2013, if a triggering event had occurred, expense would have ranged from $0 to $44.9 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value) and approximately 4.1 million common shares would have been issued.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Resources

The Company was initially capitalized on August 13, 2010, with its first investor closing on January 27, 2011. The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand, the proceeds of its on-going best-efforts offering and the cash flow generated from properties the Company has or will acquire and any short term investments. In addition, the Company may borrow funds, subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Company is raising capital through a best-efforts offering of Units (each Unit consists of one common share and one Series A preferred share) by David Lerner Associates, Inc., the managing dealer, which receives selling commissions and a marketing expense allowance based on proceeds of the Units sold. The minimum offering of 9,523,810 Units at $10.50 per Unit was sold as of January 27, 2011, with proceeds net of commissions and marketing expenses totaling $90 million. Subsequent to the minimum offering and through March 31, 2013, an additional 60.2 million Units, at $11 per Unit, were sold, with the Company receiving proceeds, net of commissions, marketing expenses and other offering costs of approximately $593.1 million. The Company is continuing its offering at $11.00 per Unit. On January 4, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the offering until January 19, 2014. As a result, the offering will continue until all Units have been sold or until January 19, 2014, whichever occurs sooner. As of March 31, 2013, 112,542,407 Units remained unsold.

Capital Uses

The Company anticipates that cash flow from operations, and cash on hand, will be adequate to meet its anticipated liquidity requirements, including debt service, capital improvements, required distributions to shareholders to maintain its REIT status and planned Unit redemptions. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering and cash on hand to purchase the hotels under contract if a closing occurs, however, it may use debt if necessary to complete the acquisitions.

To maintain its REIT status the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary income.  Distributions during the first three months of 2013 totaled approximately $13.6 million and were paid at a monthly rate of $0.06875 per common share. For the same period, the Company’s cash generated from operations was approximately $3.8 million. Due to the inherent delay between raising capital and investing that same capital in income producing real estate, the Company has had significant amounts of cash earning interest at short term money market rates. As a result, a portion of distributions paid through March 31, 2013 have been funded from proceeds from the on-going best-efforts offering of Units, and are expected to be treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes.
 
 
23


In February 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors established a policy for an annualized distribution rate of $0.825 per common share, payable in monthly distributions. The Company intends to continue paying distributions on a monthly basis, consistent with the annualized distribution rate established by its Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, may amend or establish a new annualized distribution rate and may change the timing of when distributions are paid. The Company’s objective in setting a distribution rate is to project a rate that will provide consistency over the life of the Company taking into account acquisitions and capital improvements, ramp up of new properties and varying economic cycles. To meet this objective, the Company may require the use of debt or offering proceeds in addition to cash from operations. Since a portion of distributions to date have been funded with proceeds from the offering of Units, the Company’s ability to maintain its current intended rate of distribution will be based on its ability to fully invest its offering proceeds and thereby increase its cash generated from operations. As there can be no assurance of the Company’s ability to acquire properties that provide income at this level, or that the properties already acquired will provide income at this level, there can be no assurance as to the classification or duration of distributions at the current rate. Proceeds of the offering which are distributed are not available for investment in properties.

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since the inception of the program through March 31, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 1.6 million Units in the amount of $16.3 million, including 0.1 million Units in the amount of $1.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis due to the 3% limitation discussed above. Prior to October 2012, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first quarter of 2013:

Redemption Date
 
Requested Unit Redemptions
   
Units Redeemed
   
Redemption Requests Not Redeemed
 
                   
April 2012
    474,466       474,466       0  
July 2012
    961,236       961,236       0  
October 2012
    617,811       46,889       570,922  
January 2013
    938,026       114,200       823,826  
 
The Company has on-going capital commitments to fund its capital improvements. The Company is required, under all of the hotel management agreements and certain loan agreements, to make available, for the repair, replacement, refurbishing of furniture, fixtures, and equipment, a percentage of gross revenues provided that such amount may be used for the Company’s capital expenditures with respect to the hotels. The Company expects that this amount will be adequate to fund required repair, replacement, and refurbishments and to maintain the Company’s hotels in a competitive condition. As of March 31, 2013, the Company held approximately $4.6 million in reserve for capital expenditures. During the first three months of 2013, the Company invested approximately $3.8 million in capital expenditures and anticipates spending an additional $7 to $10 million for the remainder of 2013 on properties owned at March 31, 2013. The Company does not currently have any existing or planned projects for development.
 
 
24


As of March 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding contracts for the potential purchase of four additional hotels for a total purchase price of $86.1 million. Of these four hotels, three are under construction and should be completed over the next 10 to 18 months from March 31, 2013. Closing on these three hotels is expected upon completion of construction. The existing hotel is expected to close within the next three months. Although the Company is working towards acquiring these hotels, there are many conditions to closing that have not yet been satisfied and there can be no assurance that closings will occur under the outstanding purchase contracts. The following table summarizes the location, brand, number of rooms, refundable (if the seller does not meet its obligations under the contract) contract deposits paid, and gross purchase price for each of the contracts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.  

Location
 
Brand
 
Rooms
   
Deposits Paid
   
Gross Purchase Price
 
Operating (a)
                     
Houston, TX
 
Residence Inn
    120     $ 50     $ 18,000  
Under Construction (b)
                           
Fort Lauderdale, FL (d)
 
Residence Inn
    156       3       23,088  
Oklahoma City, OK
 
Hilton Garden Inn
    155    
(c)
   
(c)
 
Oklahoma City, OK
 
Homewood Suites
    100    
(c)
   
(c)
 
          531     $ 353     $ 86,088  
 
________
       
(a)  This hotel is currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from March 31, 2013.
(b)  The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise.  Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these hotels should close over the next 10 to 18 months from March 31, 2013.
(c)  The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and an initial deposit of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.
(d)  If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.
 
It is anticipated that the purchase price for the outstanding contracts will be funded from the proceeds of the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and cash on hand if a closing occurs.

On December 5, 2012, and as a result of the Merger, the Company entered into a membership interest purchase agreement with Apple REIT Six, Inc. for the potential acquisition of a 26% membership interest in Apple Air Holding, LLC for approximately $1.45 million that is expected to close immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. The membership interest, if a closing occurs, will include all rights and obligations of Apple REIT Six, Inc. under Apple Air Holding, LLC’s operating agreement. Also as part of the purchase, the Company agreed to indemnify the potential buyer of Apple REIT Six, Inc. for any liabilities related to the membership interest. The remaining 74% membership interests are collectively owned by Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Since there can be no assurance at this time that the Merger will occur, there can be no assurance that a closing will occur under the membership interest purchase agreement.

Impact of Inflation

Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation. Competitive pressures may, however, limit the operators’ ability to raise room rates. Currently the Company is not experiencing any material impact from inflation.

Business Interruption

Being in the real estate industry, the Company is exposed to natural disasters on both a local and national scale. Although management believes there is adequate insurance to cover this exposure, there can be no assurance that such events will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
 
25


Seasonality

The hotel industry historically has been seasonal in nature. Seasonal variations in occupancy at the Company’s hotels may cause quarterly fluctuations in its revenues. Generally, occupancy rates and hotel revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. To the extent that cash flow from operations is insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenue, the Company expects to utilize cash on hand or, if necessary, any available other financing sources to make distributions.

Subsequent Events

In April 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $4.7 million, or $0.06875 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.

In April 2013, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 0.6 million Units in the amount of $6.5 million. The redemptions represented approximately 60% of the total redemption requests due to the 3% limitation under the Unit Redemption Program.

During April 2013, the Company closed on the issuance of approximately 0.6 million Units through its on-going best-efforts offering, representing gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $7.0 million and proceeds net of selling and marketing costs of approximately $6.3 million.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company does not engage in transactions in derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. As of March 31, 2013, the Company’s financial instruments were not exposed to significant market risk due to foreign currency exchange risk, commodity price risk or equity price risk. The Company will be exposed to changes in short term money market rates as it invests the proceeds from the sale of Units pending use in acquisitions and renovations. Based on the Company’s cash invested at March 31, 2013, of $109.9 million, every 100 basis points change in interest rates will impact the Company’s annual net income by approximately $1.1 million, all other factors remaining the same.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on this evaluation process, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2013. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
26

 
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
 
The term the “Apple REIT Companies” means the Company, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The consolidated complaint also asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

On April 18, 2012, the Company and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. The briefing period for the motions to dismiss was completed on July 13, 2012.

By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013. The Company believes that any claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Companies are without merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.
 
 
27


Item 2.  Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds

The Company has registered, effective January 19, 2011, 182,251,082 Units (each Unit consisting of one common share and one Series A preferred share). The managing underwriter is David Lerner and Associates, Inc. The following tables set forth information concerning the on-going best-efforts offering and the use of proceeds from the offering as of March 31, 2013.  All amounts are in thousands, except per Unit data:

Units Registered:
                 
                   
      9,524   Units  
       $10.50 per Unit
  $ 100,000  
      172,727   Units  
       $11 per Unit
    1,900,000  
Totals:
    182,251   Units       $ 2,000,000  
                       
Units Sold:
                     
                       
      9,524   Units  
       $10.50 per Unit
  $ 100,000  
      60,185   Units  
       $11 per Unit
    662,034  
Totals:
    69,709   Units         762,034  
                       
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution of Units
               
                       
1.  Underwriting discounts and commission
                  76,203  
2.  Expenses of underwriters
                  -  
3. Direct or indirect payments to directors or officers of the Company or their
       
associates, to ten percent shareholders, or to affiliates of the Company
    -  
4.  Fees and expenses of third parties
            2,706  
Total Expenses of Issuance and Distribution of Common Shares
    78,909  
Net Proceeds to the Company
          $ 683,125  
                       
1. Purchase of real estate (net of debt proceeds and repayment)
  $ 497,695  
2. Deposits and other costs associated with potential real estate acquisitions
    424  
3. Repayment of other indebtedness, including interest expense paid
    9,303  
4.  Investment and working capital
                  163,111  
5. Fees to the following (all affiliates of officers of the Company):
       
a. Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (excludes reimbursed expenses)
        1,099  
b. Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (excludes reimbursed expenses)
    11,493  
6.  Fees and expenses of third parties
            -  
7.  Other
                  -  
Total of Application of Net Proceeds to the Company
          $ 683,125  

Unit Redemption Program

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. As noted below, since October 2012, the total redemption requests have exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions due to the 3% limitation discussed above.
 
 
28


Since inception of the program through March 31, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 1.6 million Units in the amount of $16.3 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company redeemed approximately 0.1 million Units in the amount of $1.2 million. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis with approximately 8% of the amount requested redeemed in the fourth quarter of 2012 and 12% in the first quarter of 2013, leaving approximately 0.8 million Units requested but not redeemed as of the last scheduled redemption date in the first quarter of 2013 (January 2013). Prior to October 2012, the Company had redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The Company has a number of cash sources, including cash from operations and proceeds from its on-going best-efforts offering of Units from which it can make redemptions. See the Company’s complete consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 included in the Company’s interim financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for a further description of the sources and uses of the Company’s cash flows. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first quarter of 2013:

Redemption Date
 
Requested Unit Redemptions
   
Units Redeemed
   
Redemption Requests Not Redeemed
 
                   
April 2012
    474,466       474,466       0  
July 2012
    961,236       961,236       0  
October 2012
    617,811       46,889       570,922  
January 2013
    938,026       114,200       823,826  
 
The following is a summary of redemptions during the first quarter of 2013 (no redemptions occurred in February and March of 2013).
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
   
(a)
   
(b)
   
(c)
   
(d)
 
Period
 
Total Number of
Units Purchased
   
Average Price
Paid per Unit
   
Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
   
Maximum Number of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
 
January 2013
    114,200     $ 10.73       114,200         (1)

(1) The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any 12 month period is limited to up to three percent (3.0%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding from the beginning of the 12 month period, subject to the Company’s right to change the number of Units to be redeemed.
 
 
29

 
 
Exhibit Number
 
 
Description of Documents
     
3.1
 
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to amendment no. 4 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed January 7, 2011 and effective January 19, 2011)
 
3.2
 
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to amendment no. 3 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed December 20, 2010 and effective January 19, 2011)
 
31.1
 
 
31.2
 
 
32.1
 
     
101
 
The following materials from Apple REIT Ten, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail (FURNISHED HEREWITH)
 
 
30

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
       
Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
   
       
By:
/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT 
 
Date: May 7, 2013
 
Glade M. Knight,
   
 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
       
By:
/s/    BRYAN PEERY
 
Date: May 7, 2013
 
Bryan Peery,
   
 
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
   

 
31