Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such partnership interests as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be determined.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART I

Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") was organized in August 1984, as a California limited partnership under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the California Corporations Code.  Fox Partners IV (the “General Partner”), a California general partnership, is the general partner of the Partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners IV are Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a California corporation, and Fox Realty Investors ("FRI"), a California general partnership.  The managing general partner of FRI is NPI Equity Investments II, Inc., a Florida Corporation ("NPI Equity"). The Managing General Partner and NPI Equity are subsidiaries of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("Aimco"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2016, unless terminated prior to such date. The principal business of the Partnership is to hold for investment and ultimately sell income-producing multi-family residential properties.

Beginning in September 1984 through June 1986, the Partnership offered $120,000,000 in limited partnership units and sold units having an initial cost of $82,848,000. The net proceeds of this offering were used to acquire eleven income-producing real estate properties. The Partnership's original property portfolio was geographically diversified with properties acquired in eight states. The Partnership's acquisition activities were completed in September 1986 and since then the principal activity of the Partnership has been managing its portfolio.  The Partnership continues to own and operate one residential property. One property was acquired by the lender through foreclosure in 1992, one property was sold in each of 1995, 2001 and 2005, three properties were sold in 2006, two properties were sold in 2008 and one property was sold in 2009. As a result, the Partnership currently holds one investment property.  Since its initial offering, the Partnership has not received, nor are the limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions.

The Partnership has no full-time employees. The Managing General Partner is vested with full authority as to the general management and supervision of the business and affairs of the Partnership.  The non-managing general partners and the limited partners have no right to participate in the management or conduct of such business and affairs. An affiliate of the Managing General Partner provides day-to-day management services for the Partnership's investment property.

A further description of the Partnership's business is included in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-K.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 2.     Property

The following table sets forth the Partnership's investment in property:

(1)   Property is held by a limited partnership in which the Partnership owns a 100% interest.

Set forth below for the Partnership's property is the gross carrying value, accumulated depreciation, depreciable life, method of depreciation and Federal tax basis at December 31, 2012.

See "Note A – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for a description of the Partnership's capitalization and depreciation policies.

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the mortgage loans encumbering the Partnership's property.

(1)   See “Note C – Mortgage Notes Payable” to the consolidated financial statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for information with respect to the Partnership's ability to prepay these loans and other specific details about the loans.

(2)   Fixed rate mortgages.

Schedule of Rental Rates and Occupancy

Average annual rental rates and occupancy for 2012 and 2011 for the property were as follows:

The real estate industry is highly competitive. The Partnership’s property is subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. The Managing General Partner believes that the property is adequately insured. The property is an apartment complex which leases units for terms of one year or less. No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space. The property is in good physical condition, subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical for an asset of this type and age.

Real Estate Taxes and Rate

Real estate taxes and rate in 2012 for the property were as follows:

Capital Improvements

Capital improvements will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership’s distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.     Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Security Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Partnership, a publicly-held limited partnership, offered and sold 82,848 limited partnership units (the "Units") aggregating $82,848,000. The Partnership currently has 2,439 holders of record owning an aggregate of 82,686 Units at December 31, 2012. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner owned 54,702.50 Units or 66.16% at December 31, 2012. No public trading market has developed for the Units, and it is not anticipated that such a market will develop in the future.

In 2009, the Partnership recorded a distribution payable representing the estimated Illinois withholding taxes to be paid by the Partnership on behalf of certain limited partners in connection with the sale of Autumn Run Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Partnership paid approximately $222,000 of such nonresident withholding taxes. The remaining distribution payable of approximately $229,000 at December 31, 2010 was paid to certain limited partners during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, the timing of debt maturities, property sale and/or refinancings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital expenditures, to permit distributions to its partners during 2013 or subsequent periods. See “Item 2. Property – Capital Improvements” for information relating to anticipated capital expenditures at the property.

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, Aimco and its affiliates owned 54,702.50 Units in the Partnership representing 66.16% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2012. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by Aimco or its affiliates. It is possible that Aimco or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of Aimco, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, which include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 66.16% of the outstanding Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. With respect to 17,341.50 Units, such affiliates are required to vote such Units: (i) against any increase in compensation payable to the Managing General Partner or to affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by it or its affiliates, in proportion to the votes cast by third party unitholders. Except for the foregoing, no other limitations are imposed on such affiliates' ability to influence voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to both the General Partner and Aimco as the sole stockholder of the Managing General Partner.

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7.     Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Managing General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions; accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership’s financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership recognized a net loss of approximately $248,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to a net loss of approximately $389,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in net loss is due to an increase in total revenues and a decrease in total expenses, partially offset by a decrease in casualty gains.

Total revenues increased due to an increase in rental income, partially offset by a decrease in other income. Rental income increased due to an increase in the average rental rate and a decrease in bad debt expense, partially offset by a decrease in occupancy at Wood Creek Apartments. The decrease in other income is primarily due to decreases in resident utility reimbursements, cleaning and damage fees and application fees, partially offset by an increase in parking income at Wood Creek Apartments.

Total expenses decreased due to decreases in operating and general and administrative expenses, partially offset by increases in depreciation and property tax expenses. Interest expense remained relatively constant for the comparable periods. Operating expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in salaries and related benefits, call center costs and costs incurred in 2011 associated with the Partnership’s successful appeal of the assessed value of the property. Depreciation expense increased due to property improvements and replacements placed into service during the past twelve months at Wood Creek Apartments. Property tax expense increased primarily due to an increase in the tax rate, partially offset by a decrease in the assessed value of Wood Creek Apartments.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a decrease in the management reimbursements to an affiliate of the Managing General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included in general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

In October 2010, Wood Creek Apartments suffered damages of approximately $24,000 as a result of wind and hail damage. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $22,000, as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $23,000, partially offset by the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $1,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2012, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $205,000, compared to approximately $37,000 at December 31, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents increased approximately $168,000 due to approximately $961,000 of cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by approximately $527,000 and $266,000 of cash used in investing and financing activities, respectively. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements, partially offset by insurance proceeds received. Cash used in financing activities consisted of principal payments made on the mortgages encumbering the Partnership’s investment property, partially offset by advances received from AIMCO Properties, L.P.

AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, has made available to the Partnership a credit line of up to $150,000 per property owned by the Partnership. Advances under the credit line are unsecured and accrue interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum (5.25% at December 31, 2012). During the year ended December 31, 2012, AIMCO Properties, L.P., advanced the Partnership approximately $50,000 to fund operating expenses at Wood Creek Apartments and Partnership expenses. During the year ended December 30, 2011, AIMCO Properties, L.P., exceeded the $150,000 limit and advanced the Partnership approximately $170,000 to fund operating expenses and real estate taxes at Wood Creek Apartments. Interest expense on the outstanding advance balances amounted to approximately $7,000 and $2,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership repaid advances and associated accrued interest of approximately $81,000. There were no repayments of advances and associated accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2012. Total advances and accrued interest of approximately $148,000 and $91,000 were unpaid at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2013. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The Partnership's assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering the Partnership's investment property of approximately $18,548,000 is amortized over 30 years with balloon payments of approximately $17,239,000 due in 2016. The Managing General Partner will attempt to refinance such indebtedness and/or sell the property prior to such maturity date. If the property cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing such property through foreclosure.

In 2009, the Partnership recorded a distribution payable representing the estimated Illinois withholding taxes to be paid by the Partnership on behalf of certain limited partners in connection with the sale of Autumn Run Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Partnership paid approximately $222,000 of such nonresident withholding taxes. The remaining distribution payable of approximately $229,000 at December 31, 2010 was paid to certain limited partners during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, the timing of debt maturities, property sale and/or refinancings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital improvements, to permit distributions to its partners during 2013 or subsequent periods.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

A summary of the Partnership’s significant accounting policies is included in "Note A – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in the consolidated financial statements in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data". The Managing General Partner believes that the consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership to provide readers of the consolidated financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Partnership’s operating results and financial condition.  The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnership’s accounting policies in many areas. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.  

Investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment property.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing; and changes in interest rates and the availability of financing. Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an impairment of the Partnership’s asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTH FUND XXII, LP

LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2012 and 2011

Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Deficit - Years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Partners

Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

March 13, 2013

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") is a Delaware Limited Partnership organized in August 1984 to acquire and operate residential apartment complexes. The Partnership's general partner is Fox Partners IV (the “General Partner”), a California general partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners IV are Fox Capital Management Corporation (the "Managing General Partner" or "FCMC"), a California corporation, and Fox Realty Investors ("FRI"), a California general partnership. The Managing General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("Aimco"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2016 unless terminated prior to such date. The Partnership commenced operations on September 25, 1984. The Partnership currently operates one apartment property in Arizona.

Subsequent Events

The Partnership’s management evaluated subsequent events through the time this Annual Report on Form 10-K was filed.

Principles of Consolidation

The Partnership's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wood Creek CPGF 22, L.P. The Partnership owns a 100% interest in this partnership.  The Partnership has the ability to control the major operating and financial policies of this partnership. All interpartnership transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Abandoned Units

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the number of limited partnership units (the “Units”) decreased by 22 and 140 units, respectively, due to limited partners abandoning their Units.  In abandoning Units, a limited partner relinquishes all right, title and interest in the Partnership as of the date of the abandonment.

Net Loss Per Limited Partnership Unit

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership had outstanding 82,686 and 82,708 Units, respectively. Net loss per limited partnership unit is computed by dividing net loss allocated to the limited partners by the number of Units outstanding at the beginning of the fiscal year. Per unit information has been computed based on 82,708 and 82,848 Units outstanding for 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Allocation of Profits, Gains, Losses and Distributions

Profits, gains, losses and distributions of the Partnership are allocated between general and limited partners in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.

Profits and losses, not including gains from property dispositions, are allocated as follows: a) first, 10% to the general partner, and b) remainder allocated 2% to the general partner and 98% to the limited partners.

Any gain from property dispositions shall be allocated as follows: a) first, to the general partner in an amount equal to distributions to the general partner from proceeds of property dispositions or refinancings; b) until the general partner no longer has a deficit balance in its capital account, 12% to the general partner and 88% to the limited partners, and c) remainder to the limited partners.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership is required to classify these fair value measurements into one of three categories, based on the nature of the inputs used in the fair value measurement.  Level 1 of the hierarchy includes fair value measurements based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities the Partnership can access at the measurement date.  Level 2 includes fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 includes fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs.  The classification of fair value measurements is subjective and generally accepted accounting principles requires the Partnership to disclose more detailed information regarding those fair value measurements classified within the lower levels of the hierarchy. The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments (except for mortgage notes payable) approximates their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its mortgage notes payable by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term, mortgage notes payable. The Partnership has classified this fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2012, the fair value of the Partnership's mortgage notes payable at the Partnership's incremental borrowing rate was approximately $20,226,000.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand and in banks. At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits. Cash balances included approximately $205,000 and $29,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in cash concentration accounts.

Depreciation

Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the apartment property and related personal property. For Federal income tax purposes, the accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation of (1) real property over 27.5 years and (2) personal property additions over 5 years.

Deferred Costs

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, loan costs of approximately $203,000, less accumulated amortization of approximately $124,000 and $102,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are included in other assets. The loan costs are amortized over the terms of the related loan agreements. Amortization expense was approximately $22,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and is included in interest expense. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $22,000 for each of the years 2013 through 2015 and approximately $13,000 for 2016.

Leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with successful leasing efforts are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related leases.  Amortization of these costs is included in operating expenses.

Tenant Security Deposits

The Partnership requires security deposits from lessees for the duration of the lease and such deposits are included in receivables and deposits. Deposits are refunded when the tenant vacates, provided the tenant has not damaged the space and is current on rental payments.

Leases

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Investment Property

Investment property consists of one apartment complex and is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital additions activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements and replacements of existing property components. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital additions activities at the property level.  The Partnership capitalizes interest, property taxes and insurance during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress.The Partnership did not capitalize any costs related to interest, property taxes, or insurance during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Capitalized costs are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. The Partnership charges to expense as incurred costs that do not relate to capital additions activities, including ordinary repairs, maintenance and resident turnover costs.

Segment Reporting

ASC Topic 280-10, “Segment Reporting”, established standards for the way public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. ASC Topic 280-10 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in ASC Topic 280-10, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.

Advertising

The Partnership expenses the costs of advertising as incurred. Advertising costs of approximately $73,000 and $69,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are included in operating expenses.

Note B – Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership’s property as compensation for providing property management services.  The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $180,000 and $175,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $92,000 and $84,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property.  The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $41,000 and $21,000, respectively. At December 31, 2011, approximately $15,000 of these reimbursements were unpaid and were included in due to affiliates. There were no such amounts unpaid at December 31, 2012.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, for managing the affairs of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management incentive allocation equal to 10% of the Partnership's adjusted cash from operations as distributed.  No incentive was paid during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011 as no cash from operations was distributed.

AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, has made available to the Partnership a credit line of up to $150,000 per property owned by the Partnership. Advances under the credit line are unsecured and accrue interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum (5.25% at December 31, 2012). During the year ended December 31, 2012, AIMCO Properties, L.P., advanced the Partnership approximately $50,000 to fund operating expenses at Wood Creek Apartments and Partnership expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2011, AIMCO Properties, L.P., exceeded the $150,000 limit and advanced the Partnership approximately $170,000 to fund operating expenses and real estate taxes at Wood Creek Apartments. Interest expense on the outstanding advance balances amounted to approximately $7,000 and $2,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership repaid advances and associated accrued interest of approximately $81,000. There were no repayments of advances and associated accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2012. Total advances and accrued interest of approximately $148,000 and $91,000 were unpaid at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner.  During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $44,000 and $36,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, Aimco and its affiliates owned 54,702.50 Units in the Partnership representing 66.16% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2012. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by Aimco or its affiliates. It is possible that Aimco or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of Aimco, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, which include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 66.16% of the outstanding Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. With respect to 17,341.50 Units, such affiliates are required to vote such Units: (i) against any increase in compensation payable to the Managing General Partner or to affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by it or its affiliates, in proportion to the votes cast by third party unitholders. Except for the foregoing, no other limitations are imposed on such affiliates' ability to influence voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to both the General Partner and Aimco as the sole stockholder of the Managing General Partner.

Note C - Mortgage Notes Payable

The principal terms of mortgage notes payable are as follows:

(1)   Fixed rate mortgages.

The mortgage notes payable are non-recourse and are secured by a pledge of the Partnership's rental property and by a pledge of revenues from the rental property. The mortgage notes payable include prepayment penalties if repaid prior to maturity. Further, the property may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.

Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):

Note D – Investment Property and Accumulated Depreciation

Reconciliation of "Investment Property and Accumulated Depreciation":

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership retired and wrote off personal property no longer being used that had a cost basis of approximately $310,000 and $3,147,000, respectively, and accumulated depreciation of approximately $310,000 and $3,147,000, respectively, which are included in the table above.

The aggregate cost of the investment property for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2012 and 2011 is approximately $21,301,000 and $20,812,000, respectively. The accumulated depreciation for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2012 and 2011 is approximately $17,540,000 and $16,981,000, respectively.

Note E - Income Taxes

The Partnership is classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes.  Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is made in the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership. Taxable income or loss of the Partnership is reported in the income tax returns of its partners.

The following is a reconciliation of reported net loss and Federal taxable income (loss) (in thousands, except per unit data):

The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership's reported amounts and Federal tax basis of net liabilities:

Note F – Casualty Events

In November 2011, Wood Creek Apartments suffered fire damage to one of its apartment units. Total damages were approximately $12,000, including approximately $4,000 of clean-up costs. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Partnership incurred approximately $4,000 of clean-up costs which are included in operating expenses. In April 2012, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $12,000, of which approximately $4,000 related to clean-up costs are included in operating expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $7,000, as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $8,000, partially offset by the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $1,000.

In October 2010, Wood Creek Apartments suffered damages of approximately $24,000 as a result of wind and hail damage. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $22,000, as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $23,000, partially offset by the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $1,000.

Note G - Contingencies

The Partnership is unaware of any pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

(a)   Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officers of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, and effected by the Partnership’s management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

·        pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets;

·        provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Partnership’s management; and

·        provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Based on their assessment, the Partnership’s management concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

(b)   Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There has been no change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information

None.

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP (the “Partnership” or the “Registrant”) has no directors or officers. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners IV, a California general partnership. The managing general partner of Fox Partners IV is Fox Capital Management Corporation, (“FCMC” or the “Managing General Partner”).

The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by, the present directors and officers of the Managing General Partner are set forth below. There are no family relationships between or among any officers or directors.

Steven D. Cordes was appointed as a Director of the Managing General Partner effective March 2, 2009.  Mr. Cordes has been a Senior Vice President of the Managing General Partner and Aimco since May 2007.  Mr. Cordes joined Aimco in 2001 as a Vice President of Capital Markets with responsibility for Aimco’s joint ventures and equity capital markets activity.  Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Cordes was a manager in the financial consulting practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers.  Effective March 2009, Mr. Cordes was appointed to serve as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership.  Mr. Cordes brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of asset management as well as finance and accounting.

John Bezzant was appointed as a Director of the Managing General Partner effective December 16, 2009.  Mr. Bezzant was appointed Executive Vice President of the Managing General Partner and Aimco in January 2011 and prior to that time was a Senior Vice President of the Managing General Partner and Aimco since joining Aimco in June 2006.  Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Bezzant spent over 20 years with Prologis, Inc. and Catellus Development Corporation in a variety of executive positions, including those with responsibility for transactions, fund management, asset management, leasing and operations.  Mr. Bezzant brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of real estate finance, property operations, sales and development.

Ernest M. Freedman was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner and Aimco in November 2009.   Mr. Freedman joined Aimco in 2007 as Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis and has served as Senior Vice President of Finance since February 2009, responsible for financial planning, tax, accounting and related areas.  Prior to joining Aimco, from 2004 to 2007, Mr. Freedman served as chief financial officer of HEI Hotels and Resorts.

Paul Beldin joined Aimco in May 2008 and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Aimco and the Managing General Partner since that time.  Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Beldin served as controller and then as chief financial officer of America First Apartment Investors, Inc., a publicly traded multifamily real estate investment trust, from May 2005 to September 2007 when the company was acquired by Sentinel Real Estate Corporation.  Prior to joining America First Apartment Investors, Inc., Mr. Beldin was a senior manager at Deloitte and Touche LLP, where he was employed from August 1996 to May 2005, including two years as an audit manager in SEC services at Deloitte’s national office.

Stephen B. Waters was appointed Senior Director of Partnership Accounting of Aimco and the Managing General Partner in June 2009.  Mr. Waters has responsibility for partnership accounting with Aimco and serves as the equivalent of the principal financial officer of the Partnership.  Mr. Waters joined Aimco as a Director of Real Estate Accounting in September 1999 and was appointed Vice President of the Managing General Partner and Aimco in April 2004.  Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Waters was a senior manager at Ernst & Young LLP.

The Registrant is not aware of the involvement in any legal proceedings with respect to the directors and executive officers listed in this Item 10.

One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.

The board of directors of the Managing General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the Managing General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".

The directors and officers of the Managing General Partner with authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of Aimco. Aimco has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on Aimco's website (www.Aimco.com). Aimco's website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

Neither the directors nor any of the officers of the Managing General Partner received any remuneration from the Registrant during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Except as noted below, no person or entity was known by the Registrant to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Limited Partnership Units (the “Units”) of the Registrant as of December 31, 2012.

AIMCO IPLP, L.P., IPLP Acquisition I, LLC and Market Ventures, LLC are indirectly ultimately owned by Aimco. Their business addresses are 80 International Drive, Greenville, South Carolina 29615.

AIMCO Properties, L.P. is indirectly ultimately controlled by Aimco. Its business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80222.

No director or officer of the Managing General Partner owns any Units.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership’s property as compensation for providing property management services.  The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $180,000 and $175,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $92,000 and $84,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property.  The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $41,000 and $21,000, respectively. At December 31, 2011, approximately $15,000 of these reimbursements were unpaid and were included in due to affiliates. There were no such amounts unpaid at December 31, 2012.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, for managing the affairs of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management incentive allocation equal to 10% of the Partnership's adjusted cash from operations as distributed.  No incentive was paid during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011 as no cash from operations was distributed.

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner.  During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $44,000 and $36,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, Aimco and its affiliates owned 54,702.50 Units in the Partnership representing 66.16% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2012. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by Aimco or its affiliates. It is possible that Aimco or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of Aimco, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, which include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 66.16% of the outstanding Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. With respect to 17,341.50 Units, such affiliates are required to vote such Units: (i) against any increase in compensation payable to the Managing General Partner or to affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by it or its affiliates, in proportion to the votes cast by third party unitholders. Except for the foregoing, no other limitations are imposed on such affiliates' ability to influence voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to both the General Partner and Aimco as the sole stockholder of the Managing General Partner.

Neither of the Managing General Partner’s directors is independent under the independence standards established for New York Stock Exchange listed companies as both directors are employed by the parent of the Managing General Partner.

The Managing General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership for 2013.  The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2012 and 2011 are described below.

Audit Fees.  Fees for audit services totaled approximately $43,000 and $39,000 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of the Partnership’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Tax Fees.  Fees for tax services totaled approximately $6,000 and $8,000 for 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

     31.1        Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     31.2        Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1        Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101         XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of operations, (iii) consolidated statements of changes in partners’ deficit, (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (v) notes to consolidated financial statements. (1)

(1)         As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.