Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32 - AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES INCex32.txt
EX-31 - AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES INCex31-1.txt
EX-31 - AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES INCex31-2.txt

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                  For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
                                       or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

        For the transition period from _______________ to ______________

                        Commission file number: 000-22855

                        AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
           (Name of Small Business Issuer as specific in its Charter)

           Nevada                                                95-4780218
(State or Other Jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 Incorporation or Organization)                              Identification No.)

7745 Alabama Ave, # 9, Canoga Park, California                     91304
  (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                       (Zip Code)

         Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (818) 899-4686

        Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

           Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                          Common Stock, $.001 par value
                                (Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the  registrant is a well-known  seasoned  issuer,  as
defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate  by  check  mark if the  registrant  is not  required  to file  reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted  electronically  and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every  Interactive  Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of
this chapter)  during the  preceding 12 months (or for such shorter  period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained herein, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer [ ]                       Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer  [ ]                        Smaller reporting company  [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

As of January 3, 2013, the number of shares of common stock outstanding was
68,090,590.

As of January 3, 2013, the aggregate market value of our common stock held by
non-affiliates was approximately $114,777 (based upon 24,951,469 shares at
$0.0046 per share).

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The following documents are incorporated herein by reference: Form 10K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 filed on January 13, 2011; Form 10Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 filed on February 22, 2011; Form 10Q
for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2011 filed on May 16, 2011; Form 10Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 filed on August 15, 2011 and as
amended and filed on August 28, 2011; Form 10K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011 filed on December 29, 2011; Form 10Q for the quarterly period
ended December 31, 2011 filed on February 8, 2012; Form 10Q for the quarterly
period ended March 30, 2012 filed on May 7, 2012; Form 10Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2012 filed on August 8, 2012.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ITEM 1 DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.......................................... 3 ITEM 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.......................................... 6 ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................................ 6 ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.......................................... 7 ITEM 5 MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS......... 7 ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.......................................... 8 ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS........................................ 9 ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS............................................. 13 ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE......................................... 13 ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.......................................... 14 ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION................................................ 14 ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT................ 14 ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION........................................... 16 ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.................................. 20 ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS................... 21 ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES........................... 22 ITEM 15 EXHIBITS ........................................................ 23 SIGNATURES................................................................. 24 2
PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS American Soil Technologies, Inc., formerly Soil Wash Technologies, Inc., was incorporated in California on September 22, 1993 as a soil remediation business. In May 2002, we discontinued the soil remediation business. BUSINESS OF ISSUER We develop, manufacture on an outsourced basis and market advanced products that decrease the need for water and improves the soil in the "Green Industry" consisting of agriculture, turf and horticulture. Our products enhance growing environments and reduce the environmental damage caused by common growing practices. We manufacture on an outsourced basis three primary products: Agriblend(R), a patented soil amendment developed for agriculture; Soil Medic, a patented slow release liquid fertilizer; developed for homes, parks, golf courses and other turf related applications; and The Agro Tower, developed for vertical farming. We market our products primarily in the United States. We are continually attempting to add sales representatives and distributors in both the agriculture and turf industries. On July 7, 2006, we acquired Smart World Organics, Inc. ("Smart World") as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Smart World is a "C" corporation formerly located in Hudson, Florida. Smart World developed organic and sustainable products through a unique research approach both in the field and with Universities and agricultural schools in Florida. The products were sold directly to the end user and through distributors in the United States Smart World provided next-generation organic and sustainable fertilizers to commercial and residential customers worldwide. Smart World also provided advanced, custom-formulated products built to suit unusual growing conditions and environments. The product line included homogenized fertilizers, non-toxic insect controls, plant protectants, seed, soil and silage inoculants. We issued 2,300,000 shares of common stock to the shareholders of Smart World in exchange for 100% of the shares of common stock of Smart World and assumed approximately $400,000 in notes and trade payables. On December 20, 2006, we entered into an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement with Ray Nielsen whereby we purchased from Mr. Nielsen any and all intellectual property of Mr. Nielsen, including all formulas developed by Mr. Nielsen over the past 30 years, including but not limited to all formulas and intellectual property used in the business of Smart World, including all graphics and logos; all domain names and URL's; any proprietary software and its source code; all existing content and HTML files; all branding and trademarks; all trade names; all services marks; all copywritten material; all patents; and 3
all products and proceeds of the foregoing, in any form whatsoever and wheresoever located (collectively the "Intellectual Property"), in exchange for a convertible debenture in the amount of $1,500,000, bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum (the "Convertible Debenture"). The Convertible Debenture was convertible at the option of Mr. Nielsen at any time prior to the maturity date into shares of our common stock. The Debenture is deemed no longer convertible due to the expiration of the conversion rights. The Convertible Debenture is secured by the Intellectual Property. The principal of the Debenture and any unpaid accrued interest thereon was due and payable on January 19, 2008. We were to make quarterly interest payments until the maturity date. A dispute has arisen between Mr. Nielsen and us regarding the Convertible Debenture and the uniqueness and value of the Intellectual Property. See "Legal Proceedings." Due to losses incurred, in 2008, management terminated Smart World employees, consolidated Smart World operations with those of American Soil, and continues to seek sales of certain of its products. However, sales of Smart World related product have been minimal. COMPETITION To the best knowledge of our management, there is no direct competition for our Agriblend(R) product, however, earlier polymer based technology was very expensive and the remembrance of its cost has a negative effect on marketing Agriblend(R). Accordingly, educating the end user regarding the benefits of using Agriblend(R) and gaining general acceptance of the new "micro grain" technology are obstacles to marketing the product. The slow release fertilizer, "Soil Medic" does not seem to have competition at this time however, the patent which relates to the technology is expiring in Fiscal 2014. There is some competition for the organic products that we distribute that stem from Smart World. 4
SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF RAW MATERIAL AND PRINCIPAL SUPPLIERS Our products are proprietary blends that include cross-linked micro grain polymer in the blend. Cross-linked polymer is manufactured by several chemical companies that include Stockhausen; BASF; Ciba Specialties; and Floerger. All other components of our products are readily available commercially throughout the world. Agriblend(R) products are custom blended in accordance with our specifications at a blending facility located near Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Our warehouse facilities are located in Phoenix, Arizona and Canoga Park, California. Nutrimoist(R) is blended by us through contract blenders and is a combination of different formulations, which include our polymer products. Two licensees under our patent manufacture our liquid slow release fertilizer. Custom blending of Soil Medic, as needed, is performed by us through independent blenders. The Agro Tower is manufactured for us by Make-It Manufacturing in Paso Robles, California. DEPENDENCE ON MAJOR CUSTOMERS We are dependent on three customers for a substantial portion of our sales. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY We have six patents on the M-216 Polymer Injector machine designed to install our Nutrimoist(R) product into mature turf. On March 21, 2006, we acquired the U.S. patent on a slow release liquid fertilizer through our acquisition of Advanced Fertilizer Technologies, Inc. We have exclusive worldwide manufacturing/marketing rights to patented super absorbent cross-linked polymer application technology. The underlying patents include United States Patent number 5,649,495 and 5,868,087, commonly known and described as "Agricultural Retention Mixture and Application Technique." We have exclusive worldwide marketing rights to the patent pending linear polymer product known as the Sircle Saver Sack(TM). We own registered trademarks on the names, Agriblend(R), Nutrimoist(R), Hydroganic(R) and Prosper(R). We have worldwide marketing rights to a patented product known as the Agro Tower. We own the right to numerous formulas used to manufacture organic and sustainable soil amendments, fertilizers and insecticides. GOVERNMENT APPROVAL Agriblend(R) and our other polymers are subject to regulatory standards developed by the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") that are applicable to 5
maximum monomer concentrations in polymers. Polymer products cannot exceed monomer concentrations of 200 mg/kg. All of the polymers we use are well below the maximum monomer standard. Many of our products are organically approved through the National Organic Program ("NOP") and registered under EPA section 25B. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS We have not spent material amounts for research and development during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. COST AND EFFECTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS We provide Material Safety Data Sheets on all components of our product line and comply with labeling requirement for our products. In addition, we comply with EPA regulations applicable to monomer content in its polymer additives (no greater than five-hundredths percent (0.05%)). We believe that our operations currently comply in all material respects with applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances regarding the discharge of materials into the environment. We do not believe that such compliance will have a material impact on our capital expenditures, future earnings and competitive position. No material capital expenditures for environmental control equipment presently are planned. EMPLOYEES As of the date hereof, we have three full-time employees. We hire independent contractors on an "as needed" basis only. We have no collective bargaining agreements with our employees. We believe that our employee relationships are satisfactory. ITEM 1A NON APPLICABLE ITEM 1B NON APPLICABLE ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY On April 1, 2004, we entered into a Sublease Agreement to sublet 923.50 square feet located at a facility in Pacoima, California from a related party, which required monthly rental payments of approximately $554. The Sublease Agreement expired on December 31, 2008 and we continued to rent the facilities through December 2010. In January 2011, we moved offices to a location in Canoga Park and sublease the space from a related party. The new lease is month to month and does not require lease payments as our presence in the facility is nominal. We also rent storage space in Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona for approximately $200 per month. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On or about September 21, 2007, Stockhausen, Inc. ("Stockhausen") filed a Complaint in the United States District Court, for the Middle District of North 6
Carolina, against us seeking damages. The parties entered into a settlement agreement on June 2, 2010. Under the settlement agreement, we agreed to pay Stockhausen $250,000 on or before June 23, 2010 as a compromise to Stockhausen's claims that currently total $603,921. We further agreed that we would consent to the entry of a Judgment against us in favor of Stockhausen in the amount of $603,921 if we failed to make complete and timely payment as agreed. The company was unable to make the agreed upon payment, and on July 8, 2010, Stockhausen entered a judgment for the above stated amount against the company. On or about October 4, 2007, Raymond J. Nielsen and Cheryl K. Nielsen (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court in the Sixth Judicial District of Pasco County, Florida, against us and Smart World (collectively "Defendants") seeking damages, declaratory, and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to pay interest when due on the Convertible Debenture from Defendants to Plaintiffs, and, thus, the entire amount of the Convertible Debenture is accelerated and Plaintiffs are seeking a judgment in the amount of $1,500,000 plus interest. On December 29, 2009, the matter was settled for $400,000 and the Company had 60 days in which to remit the amount or a judgment in the entire amount claimed will be entered against us. The Company was not able to meet the terms of the settlement and have been actively communicating with the Plaintiffs to extend the terms of the settlement. To the best knowledge of our management, there are no other legal proceedings pending against us. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES None. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITES MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY Our common stock is currently quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the Symbol "SOYL." Set forth below is the trading history of our common stock without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions: High Low ---- --- 2011 First Quarter ......................... 0.07 0.01 Second Quarter ........................ 0.02 0.01 Third Quarter ......................... 0.02 0.01 Fourth Quarter ........................ 0.02 0.01 7
2012 First Quarter ......................... 0.02 0.005 Second Quarter ........................ 0.01 0.005 Third Quarter ......................... 0.03 0.005 Fourth Quarter ........................ 0.02 0.005 On December 27, 2012, the closing stock price was $0.0045 The above quotations are inter-dealer quotations from market makers of our common stock. At certain times the actual closing or opening quotations may not represent actual trades that took place. HOLDERS As of December, 2012, there were 283 shareholders holding certificated securities and approximately 545 shareholders currently listed in the Depository Trust Company as holding shares in brokerage accounts. Our transfer agent is Standard Registrar & Transfer Company 1528 South 1840 East, Draper, Utah 84020. DIVIDENDS We have paid no dividends on our common stock since inception and do not anticipate or contemplate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES None ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our selected financial information: Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 September 30, 2011 ------------------ ------------------ STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenue $ 70,842 $ 139,025 Loss From Operations (538,447) (609,266) Net Loss (643,819) (721,369) Net Loss Per Share $ (0.01) $ (0.01) 8
BALANCE SHEET DATA: Current Assets $ 10,612 $ 37,584 Property and Equipment, net 219 760 Intangible Assets, net 51,809 93,256 Total Assets 10,831 131,600 Total Current Liabilities (7,456,092) (6,881,234) Accumulated Deficit (28,675,193) (28,031,374) Stockholders' Deficit $ (7,445,263) $ (6,749,634) ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Report. The following information contains certain forward-looking statements of our management. Forward-looking statements are statements that estimate the happening of future events and are not based on historical fact. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may," "could," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "plan," "predict," "probable," "possible," "should," "continue," or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms. The forward-looking statements specified in the following information have been compiled by our management on the basis of assumptions made by management and considered by management to be reasonable. Our future operating results, however, are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty is to be inferred from those forward-looking statements. OVERVIEW We develop, manufacture and market advanced technology that decreases the need for water and improves the soil in the "Green Industry" consisting of agriculture, turf and horticulture. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 COMPARED TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 REVENUES Revenues for the fiscal year-ended September 30, 2012 were $70,842 compared to $139,025 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of 49%. This decrease in revenue is directly related to our inability to properly market and sell our products due to a lack of operating capital. 9
COST OF SALES Cost of goods sold decreased to $25,797 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from $56,728 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in the cost of sales directly relates to the reduction in revenue producting activity not related to royalty revenue. Our gross margins were 64% and 59% for the years ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively. The increase in our gross margins was caused by a higher percentage of royalty revenue compared to the traditional sale of goods. OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses decreased approximately 16% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 compared to operating expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. This decrease in operating expenses is a result of many factors, which include the below items. General and administrative expenses decreased approximately 13% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 due to a reduction in general operational expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased approximately 30% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 compared the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 as we eliminated substantially all marketing efforts. Research and development costs have been eliminated as there is no additional need for research and development on our existing products. In fiscal 2012, the amortization expense of intangible assets decreased by 17% compared to fiscal 2011. Impairment of intangible assets was zero during fiscal 2012 compared to $19,000 in fiscal 2011. INTEREST EXPENSE Interest expense decreased 9% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 from the period ended September 30, 2011. This decrease resulted from reduced finance charges this audited period. NET LOSS For the reasons detailed above, we experienced reduced losses in the year ended September 30, 2012 compared to the year ended September 30, 2011. Given the gross margins of our turf products as well as a renewed interest in consumer organic products for the retail market, future operating results may improve. 10
SEASONALITY Our efforts in the United States have focused on the southern states and therefore generally experience year round growing cycles, with the sale of the agricultural products preceding the growing cycle of various crops. International sales have not been significant during recent years. If the Company is able to expand into the residential and commercial segments nationally, we will experience some seasonal declines in sales during the fall and winter quarters in less temperate climates. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Cash and cash equivalents totaled $3,846 and $4,356 at September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively. Net cash used by operations was $45,510 for the year ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $162 for the year ended September 30, 2011. We have historically relied upon one of our officers and significant shareholders to provide cash to meet short term operating cash requirements. During the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company borrowed an additional $45,000 from this officer and shareholder which makes up the total amounts received from financing activities. The officer's previous note was amended with a new principal balance of $834,842. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, the officer loaned an additional $38,000. As of September 30, 2012 we had a working capital deficit of $7,445,480 (current assets less current liabilities) compared to a working capital deficit of $6,843,650 as of September 30, 2011. The increase in the working capital deficit has been caused by an increase in our current liabilities, mostly related to accrued and unpaid wages. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we have incurred an accumulated deficit of $28,675,193 and a working capital deficit of $7,445,480 as of September 30, 2012. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on obtaining additional capital and financing and operating at a profitable level. We intend to seek additional capital either through debt or equity offerings and to increase sales volume and operating margins to achieve profitability. Our working capital and other capital requirements during the next fiscal year and thereafter will vary based on the sales revenue generated by our internal workforce and the ability of our distribution and sales network to grow. We will consider both the public and private sale of securities and debt instruments for expansion of our operations if such expansion would benefit our overall growth and income objectives. Should sales growth not materialize, we may look to these public and private sources of financing. There can be no assurance, however, that we can obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms, if at all. Under such conditions, failure to obtain such capital likely would, at a minimum, negatively impact our ability to timely meet our business objectives. 11
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions. The methods, estimates, and judgment we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. The SEC has defined "critical accounting policies" as those accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based upon this definition, our most critical estimates are: long-lived assets. Our most critical accounting policies applicable to the periods presented are noted below. For additional information see Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in the notes to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available, and actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. REVENUE RECOGNITION We generate our revenues from the sale of products and services and recognize revenue when the following fundamental criteria are met: * persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; * the products and services have been delivered; * selling prices are fixed and determinable and not subject to refund or adjustment; and * collection of amounts due is reasonably assured. Delivery occurs when goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, in accordance with the terms specified in the arrangement with the customer. Revenue recognition is deferred in all instances where the earnings process is incomplete. We provide for sales returns and allowances in the same period as the related revenues are recognized. We base these estimates on our historical experience or the specific identification of an event necessitating a reserve. To the extent actual sales returns differ from our estimates, our future results of operations may be affected. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine that these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected. 12
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's current credit worthiness, as determined by our review of their current credit information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. While our credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the allowance established, we may not continue to experience the same credit loss rates as we have in the past. Our accounts receivable are concentrated in a relatively few number of customers. Therefore, a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one customer could make it more difficult for us to collect our accounts receivable and require us to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, which could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. LONG-LIVED ASSETS The Company reviews its fixed assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted operating cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL RISKS Not Applicable ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The financial statements required to be filed pursuant to this Item 8 begin on page F-1 of this report. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES As required by SEC Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, our Chief Executive and Principal Accounting Officer carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing evaluation, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2012 and that they do allow for information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive and Principal Accounting Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. 13
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company in accordance with, and as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the (i) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, (ii) reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (iii) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our internal controls framework is based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits us to provide only management's report in this annual report. ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Not Applicable ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, AND CONTROL PERSONS Our directors and executive officers are as follows: Name Age Position ---- --- -------- Carl P. Ranno 72 Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer Neil C. Kitchen 64 Director, Vice President Diana Visco 54 Secretary Scott Baker 54 Director 14
MR. CARL P. RANNO, DIRECTOR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, received a degree in Economics from Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio and his Juris Doctor from the University of Detroit School of Law. Mr. Ranno became a Director in September 2001 and Chief Executive Officer and President in May 2002. For the five years prior to becoming the President/CEO of the Company, he had acted as an advisor in strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions and as a securities attorney to numerous public companies. He has served as president and CEO of public and private companies. He is also a member of the board of directors of Central Utilities Production Company. MR. NEIL C. KITCHEN, DIRECTOR, VICE PRESIDENT, has over 20 years experience in business management in the environmental sector including management of companies involved in general engineering, toxicology, and environmental cleanup. Prior to joining us in 1994, he was Vice President of a publicly-held environmental cleanup company. He holds a B.S. in Business Management from San Diego State University and a class "A" General Engineering license with Hazardous Material Certification from the State of California. MS. DIANA VISCO, SECRETARY, Diana Visco, Secretary, has worked with us since January 1999. Prior to that, she worked for 21 years with the Americana Leadership College, Inc., traveling to all of its offices and conferences across the USA and Caribbean in addition to Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Europe. Ms Visco spent several years as a traveling administrator and as International Administrator handling all aspects of finance, administration as well as marketing and promotion in addition to being assistant to the President of that company. She is the daughter of Mr. Louie Visco, a former director who passed away on January 3, 2008 MR. SCOTT BAKER, DIRECTOR, has practiced law in Arizona for the past 19 years. He graduated from the University of Arizona with a B.S. in business in 1978 and obtained his J.D. from the University of Arizona in 1981. As a general practitioner, he has appeared before the U.S. District Tax Court and the U.S. District Court. Directors serve until the next annual meeting or until their successors are qualified and elected. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and certain officers, as well as persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, ("Reporting Persons") to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based solely upon a review of the copies of such forms, we believe that all Reporting Persons have complied on a timely basis with all filing requirements applicable to them, except that Louie Visco filed one late report on Form 4 disclosing his conversion of debt to equity. 15
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Set forth below is a summary of compensation for our principal executive officer and our two most highly compensated officers other than our principal executive officer (collectively, the "named executive officers") for our last two fiscal years. There have been no annuity, pension or retirement benefits ever paid to our officers, directors or employees. With the exception of reimbursement of expenses incurred by our named executive officers during the scope of their employment and unless expressly stated otherwise in a footnote below, none of the named executive officers received other compensation, perquisites and/or personal benefits in excess of $10,000. Name and Non-Equity Principal Stock Option Incentive Plan All Other Position Year Salary ($)(1) Bonus($) Awards($) Awards($) Compensation($) Compensation($) Total($) -------- ---- ------------- -------- --------- --------- --------------- --------------- -------- Carl P. Ranno, 2012 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 CEO, President, CFO 2011 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 (Principal Executive Officer) Neil C. Kitchen, 2012 $134,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,500 Vice President 2011 $134,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,500 Diana Visco 2012 $ 85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 85,000 Secretary 2011 $ 85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 85,000 ---------- (1) All salaries for 2012 and 2011 were accrued in the Company's consolidated balance sheet, but not paid. No salaries and wages have been paid to the above named officers during the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011, or through the date of this report. GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS We did not grant any plan-based awards during this fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END There are no outstanding equity awards as of September 30, 2012 16
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS We have an employment agreement Carl P. Ranno as our Chief Executive Officer and President. The Agreement is for a term of five years, commencing on May 23, 2008 and expiring on May 22, 2013 with automatic one-year extensions unless either the Company or Mr. Ranno provides written notice of their intention not to renew the Agreement at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then current term. The Agreement provides that, in addition to receiving paid vacation in accordance with the Company's policies as well as other customary benefits and provisions, Mr. Ranno shall receive an annual base salary of $200,000. If, at any time during the term of the Agreement, Mr. Ranno is terminated "without cause," he will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the aggregate compensation payable to Mr. Ranno during the remaining term of the Agreement. The compensation is being accrued. On May 23, 2008 the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Neil C. Kitchen to act as the Company's Vice President and Chief Technical Officer (the "Agreement"). The Agreement is for a term of five years, commencing on May 23, 2008 and expiring on May 22, 2013 with automatic one-year extensions unless either the Company or Mr. Kitchen provides written notice of their intention not to renew the Agreement at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then current term. The Agreement provides that, in addition to receiving paid vacation in accordance with the Company's policies as well as other customary benefits and provisions, Mr. Kitchen shall receive an annual base salary of $134,500. If, at any time during the term of the Agreement, Mr. Kitchen is terminated "without cause," he will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the aggregate compensation payable to Mr. Kitchen during the remaining term of the Agreement. The compensation is being accrued. On May 23, 2008, and effective the same date, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Diana Visco to act as the Company's Secretary and Administrative Assistant to the President (the "Agreement").The Agreement is for a term of five years, commencing on May 23, 2008 and expiring on May 22, 2013 with automatic one-year extensions unless either the Company or Ms. Visco provides written notice of their intention not to renew the Agreement at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then current term. The Agreement provides that, in addition to receiving paid vacation in accordance with the Company's policies as well as other customary benefits and provisions, Ms. Visco shall receive an annual base salary of $85,000. If, at any time during the term of the Agreement, Ms. Visco is terminated "without cause," she will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the aggregate compensation payable to Ms. Visco during the remaining term of the Agreement. The compensation is being accrued. 2002 STOCK OPTION PLAN Our shareholders adopted a Stock Option Plan on November 8, 2002 (the "2002 Plan"). Under the 2002 Plan, 2,000,000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance as Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options. Under the 2002 Plan, options may be granted to our key employees, officers, directors or consultants. The purchase price of the common stock subject to each Incentive Stock Option shall not be less than the fair market value (as determined in the 2002 Plan), or in the case of the grant of an 17
Incentive Stock Option to a principal stockholder, not less that 110% of fair market value of such common stock at the time such option is granted. The purchase price of the common stock subject to each Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be determined at the time such option is granted, but in no case less than 100% of the fair market value of such shares of common stock at the time such option is granted. The 2002 Plan shall terminate ten years from the date of its adoption by our shareholders, and no option shall be granted after termination of the 2002 Plan. Subject to certain restrictions, the 2002 Plan may at any time be terminated and from time to time be modified or amended by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our capital stock present, or represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with the applicable laws of the State of Nevada. As of September 30, 2012, 1,310,000 options were issued pursuant to the 2002 Plan. As of September 30, 2012 450,000 remained outstanding, all of which expired without exercise on November 1, 2012. 2005 STOCK OPTION/STOCK ISSUANCE PLAN GENERAL On January 31, 2005, our Board of Directors adopted our 2005 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the "2005 Plan") and directed that it be presented to the stockholders for their approval and adoption. The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock to our directors, officers, employees and consultants in the form of stock options and shares of common stock. Our Board of Directors will initially administer the 2005 Plan, except that the Board may, at its discretion, establish a committee comprised of two or more members of the Board or two or more other persons to administer the 2005 Plan (the "Plan Administrator"). The 2005 Plan has two separate components: the option grant program and the stock issuance program. To date, 498,240 shares of common stock have been issued pursuant to the stock issuance component of the 2005 Plan, As of September 30, 2011, 1,526,000 options were issued and outstanding. During the year ended September 30, 2012 all of these options expired. There are no options that remain outstanding from the 2005 Plan. OPTION GRANT PROGRAM Incentive stock options (those stock options that qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("the "Code")) may be granted to any individual who is, at the time of the grant, our employee. Non-qualified stock options (those options that do not qualify under Section 422 of the Code) may be granted to employees and other people, including our directors and officers. 18
Grants under the option grant program may be structured as installment options which become exercisable for vested shares over the optionee's period of service or as immediately exercisable options for unvested shares which will be subject to repurchase by us, at the option exercise price paid per share, upon the optionee's termination of service prior to vesting in those shares. All option grants must have an exercise price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date. Each option is to have a maximum term of ten years, subject to earlier termination in the event the optionee leaves our service. The optionee will have up to a three month period following termination of service (for reasons other than death or disability) in which to exercise the option. This period will be extended to 12 months if the optionee's service terminates by reason of disability, and in the event of the optionee's death, the personal representative of the optionee's estate (or the person inheriting the option) will have up to a 12 month period following the optionee's death in which to exercise the option. To exercise the option, the optionee must execute a stock purchase agreement and pay the exercise price for the purchased shares. Payment is to be made in cash; however, the Plan Administrator may also permit the optionee to deliver a full-recourse interest-bearing promissory note for the purchased shares payable in one or more installments. Provided that our shares remain publicly traded, the exercise price may be paid in shares of common stock or, alternatively, through the optionee's participation in a same-day sale program. Under such program, the option shares are sold immediately following the exercise of the option, and a portion of the sale proceeds is applied to the payment of the exercise price and all applicable withholding taxes. In the event we are acquired by merger or asset sale, the option shares will immediately vest, and the option may be exercised for any or all of those vested shares prior to the effective date of such acquisition. However, such accelerated vesting will not occur if our repurchase rights with respect to the unvested option shares are assigned to the acquiring entity. The Plan Administrator will have the discretion to structure one or more option grants under the Plan so that the shares subject to those options will immediately vest in the event the optionee's service is involuntarily terminated within 18 months following an acquisition in which our repurchase rights are so assigned, and the optionee would then have a one-year period to exercise the accelerated options for fully-vested shares. It is anticipated that this special vesting acceleration provision would be made available only on a limited case-by-case basis. The stock purchase agreement will provide us with the right to repurchase, at the original exercise price paid per share, any unvested shares held by the optionee at the time of his or her termination of service. The applicable vesting schedule will be set forth in the Notice of Grant. Full and immediate vesting of all the option shares will occur upon an acquisition by merger or asset sale, unless the repurchase right applicable to those shares is assigned to the successor company. One or more repurchase rights outstanding under the Plan may be structured so that those rights will subsequently lapse (and the option shares will immediately vest) upon an involuntary termination of the optionee's service within 18 months following the effective date of an acquisition in which the repurchase rights are assigned to the successor company. 19
STOCK ISSUANCE PROGRAM Shares of common stock may be issued to employees and other people, including our directors and officers. The stock issuance program allows eligible persons to purchase shares of common stock at fair market value or at a discount of up to 15% of fair market value. The shares may be fully vested when issued or may vest over time as the recipient provides services or as specified performance objectives are attained. In addition, shares of common stock may be issued as bonus awards in recognition of services rendered, without any cash outlay required of the recipient. The stock issuance component is structured as a stock purchase transaction, with the purchase price for the shares to be paid in cash or by promissory note at the time of issuance of the shares. The same repurchase rights summarized above for the "Stock Purchase Agreement" under the option grant program will apply to the purchased shares, namely, our right to repurchase, at the original purchase price, any unvested shares held by the participant at the time of his or her termination of service. It is anticipated that any issued shares will vest either immediately or in a series of installments over the participant's period of service. Full and immediate vesting of all the shares will occur upon an acquisition by merger or asset sale, unless the repurchase right applicable to those shares is assigned to the successor company. The assigned repurchase rights may be structured so that they will subsequently lapse (and the shares will immediately vest) upon an involuntary termination of the participant's service within 18 months following the effective date of the acquisition. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS Our Directors do not receive any cash compensation, but are entitled to reimbursement of their reasonable expenses incurred in attending directors' meetings. We do not have any audit, nominating, compensation or other committee of our Board of Directors. Scott Baker is our only independent director. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth certain information regarding our shares of outstanding common stock beneficially owned as of the date hereof by (i) each of our directors and executive officers, (ii) all directors and executive officers as a group, and (iii) each other person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock based upon 68,090,590 issued shares of common stock. 20
Name and Address Amount and Nature of Percent of Beneficial Owners (1) Beneficial Ownership Ownership (2) ------------------------ -------------------- ------------- Carl P. Ranno, CEO, President, CFO, Director 2,452,900 3.6% Neil C. Kitchen, Vice President, Director 2,401,455 3.5% Diana Visco, Secretary 3,131,328 4.6% Scott Baker, Director 1,354,818 2.0% All executive officers and directors as a group (4 persons) 9,340,501 13.7% FLD Corporation 17,907,003 26.3% ---------- * Less than 1%. 1. C/o our address, 7745 Alabama Ave, #9, Canoga Park, CA 91304, unless otherwise noted. 2. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of the person holding such options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of any other person. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The Visco Family are the owners and directors of FLD Corporation, and own 17,907,003 shares of our common stock. Note payable to Diana Visco for $834,842, bearing interest at the prime rate of 3.25% at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively with interest payable monthly. The note is unsecured and is due in January 2013. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, Ms. Visco loaned the Company an additional $38,000, increasing the note to $872,842. The terms of the amended note stayed the same while extending the due date to October 2013. On April 1, 2004, we entered into a Sublease Agreement to sublet 923.50 square feet located at a facility in Pacoima, California from a related party, which required monthly rental payments of approximately $554. The Sublease Agreement expired on December 31, 2008 and we continued to rent the facilities through December 2010. In January 2011, we moved offices to a location in Canoga Park and sublease the space from a related party, The Benz Group. The new lease is month to month and does not require lease payments as our presence in the facility is nominal. We also rent storage space in Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona for approximately $200 per month. 21
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES DBBMCKENNON dbbmckennon, a registered public accounting firm, was our independent auditor and examined our financial statements to September 30, 2012 and performed the services listed below. AUDIT FEES dbbmckennon fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements included in this Form 10-K and for the reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $37,000 and $37,000, respectively. AUDIT RELATED FEES dbbmckennon was not paid additional fees during that period for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. TAX FEES Tax filings have not been completed for the 2012 or 2011 fiscal year, thus no fees were paid. ALL OTHER FEES None AUDIT COMMITTEE We do not have an audit committee. 22
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS 3.1 Articles of Incorporation of New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation, dated January 9, 1997 (1) 3.2 Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation, dated May 29, 1997 (1) 3.3 Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., dated January 4, 2000 (2) 3.4 Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of American Soil Technologies, Inc., dated August 4, 2003 (3) 3.4 Bylaws of New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., dated May 29, 1997 (1) 3.5 Amended and Restated Bylaws of New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., dated July 20, 1998 (4) 3.6 Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated November 30, 2006 4.1 Convertible Debenture - Lump Sum Contribution (Form) (5) 4.2 Convertible Debenture - Incremental (Form) (5) 10.1 License Agreement between Ron Salestrom, American Soil Technologies, Inc., and Polymers Plus, L.L.C., dated January 4, 2000 (2) 10.2 Sublease Agreement with The Customized Box Company, dated April 1, 2004 (6) 10.8 Employment Contract with Donette Lamson, dated January 18, 2006 (7) 10.12 Acquisition Agreement for Smart World Organics, dated July 7, 2006 (8) 10.14 Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement with Ray Nielsen, dated December 20, 2006 (9) 10.15 Security Agreement with Ray Nielsen, dated December 22, 2006 (9) 10.16 Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions for Silver Terrace Nurseries, dated November 27, 2007 (12) 10.17 Employment Contract with Carl Ranno, dated May 23, 2008 (13) 10.18 Employment Contract with Neil Kitchen, dated May 23, 2008 (13) 10.19 Employment Contract with Diana Visco, dated May 23, 2008 (13) 10.21 Subsidiaries: Smart World Organics Inc. a Florida corporation 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ---------- 1. Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed on July 2, 1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-30583). 2. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, filed on September 27, 2000 (File No. 000-22855). 3. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed on April 3, 2006. 4. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998, filed on September 16, 1998. 5. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2000, filed on May 15, 2000. 6. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, filed on May 5, 2004. 7. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, filed on May 17, 2006. 8. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, filed on August 14, 2006. 9. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed on April 18, 2007. 10. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed on April 18, 2007. 11. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed on April 18, 2007. 12. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-KSB for the transition period ended September 30, 2007, filed on February 15, 2008. 13. Incorporated by reference from our Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2008, filed on January 13, 2009 23
SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized. AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DATED: January 7, 2013 By: /s/ Carl P. Ranno --------------------------------------------- Carl P. Ranno Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) 24
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Stockholders American Soil Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Soil Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary (collectively the "Company") as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012 and 2011. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of American Soil Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company has generated minimal operating revenues, incurred losses from operations, and used significant cash in operating activities. Its viability is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and successful operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with respect to these matters are also discussed in Note 1. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ dbbmckennon Newport Beach, California January 7, 2013 F-1
American Soil Technologies, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2012 September 30, 2011 ------------------ ------------------ Assets: Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,846 $ 4,356 Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $35,088 and $38,538 at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively 387 25,922 Inventory 5,144 6,286 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,235 1,020 ------------ ------------ Total current assets 10,612 37,584 Property and equipment, net 219 760 Intangible assets 51,808 93,256 ------------ ------------ Total assets $ 62,639 $ 131,600 ============ ============ Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit: Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 1,678,065 $ 1,697,987 Accrued liabilities 2,708,576 2,158,796 Notes payable 1,919,585 1,919,585 Notes payable to related parties 1,149,866 1,104,866 ------------ ------------ Total current liabilities 7,456,092 6,881,234 Total liabilities 7,456,092 6,881,234 ------------ ------------ Stockholders' deficit: Series A preferred stock, $0.50 stated value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 2,763,699 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively 1,381,849 1,381,849 Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 68,090,590 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively 68,091 68,091 Additional paid-in capital 19,831,800 19,831,800 Accumulated deficit (28,675,193) (28,031,374) ------------ ------------ Total stockholders' deficit (7,393,453) (6,749,634) ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 62,639 $ 131,600 ============ ============ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-2
American Soil Technologies, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations Year Ended Year Ended September 30, 2012 September 30, 2011 ------------------ ------------------ Revenue $ 70,842 $ 139,025 Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of intangible assets) 25,797 56,728 ------------ ------------ Gross profit 45,045 82,297 ------------ ------------ Operating expenses: General and administrative 541,569 621,988 Sales and marketing 476 684 Amortization of intangible assets 41,447 49,891 Impairment of intangible assets -- 19,000 ------------ ------------ Total operating expenses 583,492 691,563 ------------ ------------ Loss from operations (538,447) (609,266) Other (income) expense Interest expense 104,572 114,968 Gain on sale/disposal of equipment -- (3,665) ------------ ------------ Loss before income taxes (643,019) (720,569) Provision for income taxes 800 800 ------------ ------------ Net loss $ (643,819) $ (721,369) ============ ============ Net loss per share basic and diluted $ (0.01) $ (0.01) ============ ============ Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted 68,090,590 68,090,590 ============ ============ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-3
American Soil Technologies, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit Series A Preferred Common Stock -------------------------- ------------------------ Shares Amount Shares Amount ------ ------ ------ ------ Balance at September 30, 2010 2,763,699 1,381,849 68,090,590 68,091 Stock compensation expense -- -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance at September 30, 2011 2,763,699 1,381,849 68,090,590 68,091 Net loss -- -- -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance at September 30, 2012 2,763,699 $ 1,381,849 68,090,590 $ 68,091 ============ ============ ============ ============ Additional Paid-in Accumulated Capital Deficit Total ------- ------- ----- Balance at September 30, 2010 19,796,056 (27,310,005) (6,064,009) Stock compensation expense 35,744 -- 35,744 Net loss -- (721,369) (721,369) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance at September 30, 2011 19,831,800 (28,031,374) (6,749,634) Net loss -- (643,819) (643,819) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance at September 30, 2012 $ 19,831,800 $(28,675,193) $ (7,393,453) ============ ============ ============ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-4
American Soil Technologies, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Year Ended Year Ended September 30, 2012 September 30, 2011 ------------------ ------------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(643,819) $(721,369) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash: Gain on sale/disposal of equipment -- (3,665) Impairment of intangible equipment -- 19,000 Depreciation and amortization 41,988 57,146 Stock-based compensation -- 35,744 Bad debt expense 2,820 -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 22,715 (19,912) Inventory 1,142 15,000 Prepaid expenses and other assets (216) 13,521 Accounts payable (19,920) 72,229 Accrued expenses 549,780 532,144 --------- --------- Net cash used in operating activities (45,510) (162) --------- --------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of assets -- 3,000 --------- --------- Net cash provided by investing activities -- 3,000 --------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from related party notes 45,000 3,000 Payments on capital lease obligations -- (3,527) --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 45,000 (527) --------- --------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (510) 2,311 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 4,356 2,045 --------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 3,846 $ 4,356 ========= ========= Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for interest $ 7,852 $ 19,850 ========= ========= Cash paid during the year for income taxes $ -- $ -- ========= ========= See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-5
American Soil Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION ORGANIZATION American Soil Technologies, Inc. (the "Company" or "American Soil"), formerly Soil Wash Technologies, Inc., was incorporated in the state of California on September 22, 1993. On November 24, 1999, the Company entered into an exchange agreement for the reverse acquisition of New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., a publicly traded Nevada corporation incorporated on January 9, 1997 ("New Directions"), wherein New Directions would acquire the assets of the Company and change its name to American Soil Technologies, Inc. This exchange agreement was effective as of the close of business on December 31, 1999. The Company is primarily engaged in the marketing and selling of polymer and other soil amendments to the agricultural turf and horticulture industries. The Company's products are used to decrease water usage, increase nutrient retention in soil, enhance seed germination and sprout emergence, clarify ponds and increase the effectiveness of chemical fertilizers and biological additives. In 2006, the Company acquired the patent to a slow release fertilizer. The Company also has exclusive license rights to the use of patented polymer application techniques, as well as numerous patents on a unique machine designed to inject polymer and other liquid products into existing turf and some crops. The Company expanded to provide next-generation and sustainable fertilizers through the acquisition of Smart World Organics, Inc. ("Smart World") on December 20, 2006. Simultaneously, the Company entered into an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement with the founder of Smart World, Ray Nielsen ("Nielsen") that included certain formulas originally believed to be proprietary and intellectual properties used in the business of Smart World. The formulas acquired from Nielsen were later deemed not to be proprietary and subsequently deemed to have little or no value (see Note 5). Smart World sold homogenized fertilizers, non-toxic insect controls, plant protectants, seed, soil and silage inoculants, and also provided advanced, custom-formulated products built to suit unusual growing conditions and environments. Due to losses incurred in 2008, management terminated Smart World employees, consolidated Smart Worlds operation with those of American Soil, and continues to seek sales of certain of its products. Additionally, the Company has several debt obligations related to Smart World that are past the contractual maturity date or are due and payable due to non payment of interest. Operations of Smart World have been limited subsequent to fiscal 2008 due to insufficient working capital GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT'S PLANS The Company has sustained significant losses and has an accumulated deficit of $28,675,193 and negative working capital of $7,445,480 as of September 30, 2012. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon obtaining additional capital and financing, and generating positive cash flows from operations. The Company intends to seek additional capital either through debt or equity offerings and is attempting to increase sales volume and operating margins to achieve profitability. Due to the current economic environment and the Company's current financial condition, management cannot be assured there will be adequate capital available when needed and on acceptable terms. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If the Company is unable to raise capital of sustain profitable operations, the Company may have to curtail or discontinue operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Soil Technologies, Inc, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Smart World Organics, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. F-6
USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company's significant estimates made in connection with the preparation of the accompanying financial statements include the carrying value of the intangible assets. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents includes all short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less. ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE The Company utilizes the allowance method to provide a reserve for uncollectible accounts. The Company determines any required allowance by considering a number of factors including length of time trade accounts receivable are past due and the Company's previous loss history. The Company records a reserve account for accounts receivable when they become uncollectible. Payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations and continually monitors its collection of amounts due from its customers. The Company adjusts credit limits and payment terms granted to its customers based upon payment history and the customer's current creditworthiness. The Company does not require collateral from its customers to secure amounts due from them. Reserves for uncollectible amounts are provided based on past experience and a specific analysis of the accounts which management believes is sufficient. INVENTORY Inventory consists primarily of purchased polymer soil amendments. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to 15 years. Betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the lives of the assets are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to assets disposed or retired are removed from the accounts, and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized in the respective period. LONG-LIVED ASSETS The Company reviews its fixed assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted operating cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. ACCOUNTING FOR CONVERTIBLE DEBT Convertible debt is accounted for under the guidelines established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") No. 470 Topic 20, "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and ASC No. 740, "Income Tax". The Company records a beneficial conversion feature ("BCF") related to the issuance of convertible debt that have conversion features at fixed or adjustable rates that are in-the-money when issued and records the fair value of F-7
warrants issued with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion features, both of which are credited to paid-in-capital. The Company calculates the fair value of warrants issued with the convertible instruments using the Black-Scholes valuation method. Under these guidelines, the Company allocates the value of the proceeds received from a convertible debt transaction between the conversion feature and any other detachable instruments (such as warrants) on a relative fair value basis. The allocated fair value is recorded as a debt discount or premium and is amortized over the expected term of the convertible debt to interest expense. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Intellectual property includes the exclusive licenses to the patented polymer application techniques and certain acquired intellectual property which are being amortized using the straight-line method over the respective estimated useful lives. ADVERTISING The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was $476 and $684, for year ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. REVENUE RECOGNITION In accordance with ASC No. 605, "Revenue Recognition", revenue is recognized when products are shipped to a customer and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed based on the terms of the sale. Royalty revenues are recognized monthly based on customer usage as defined by individual agreements. SHIPPING AND HANDLING COST Shipping and handling fees charged to customers are included in revenue in accordance with ASC No. 605, "Revenue Recognition". The shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company are included in cost of sales. INCOME TAXES The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 "Income Taxes" ("ASC 740") which requires the Company to provide a net deferred tax asset/liability equal to the expected future tax benefit/expense of temporary reporting differences between book and tax accounting methods and any available operating loss or tax credit carry forwards. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change. ASC 740 also prescribes, among other things, a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a company's income tax return. The Company utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Step one or recognition, requires a company to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. Step two or measurement, is based on the largest amount of benefit, which is more likely than not to be realized on settlement with the taxing authority. F-8
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS On October 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC 820 ("ASC 820") Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The Company did not record an adjustment to retained earnings as a result of the adoption of the guidance for fair value measurements, and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company's assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, prepaids and other current assets, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and notes payable. Fair values for these items were assumed to approximate carrying values because of their short term nature or because they are payable on demand. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no material level 1,2, or 3 assets or liabilities. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK Accounts receivable from individual customers representing 10% or more of the net accounts receivable balance consists of the following as of September 30: 2012 2011 ---- ---- Percent of accounts receivable -- 83% Number of customers -- 3 Sales from individual customers representing 10% or more of sales consist of the following customers for the years ended September 30: 2012 2011 ---- ---- Percent of sales 95% 82% Number of customers 3 4 As a result of the Company's concentration of its customer base, the loss or cancellation of business from, or significant changes in scheduled deliveries of product sold to the above customers or a change in their financial position could materially and adversely affect the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. F-9
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company accounts for equity based compensation under the provisions of ASC No. 718, "Compensation, Stock Compensation" ("ASC 718"). ASC 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of equity-based compensation in net income. The fair value of the Company's stock option awards are estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and elections including expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. The fair value of equity-based awards is amortized over the vesting period of the award. NET LOSS PER SHARE Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution to basic EPS that could occur upon conversion or exercise of securities, options or other such items to common shares using the treasury stock method, based upon the weighted average fair value of our common shares during the period. For each period presented, basic and diluted loss per share amounts are identical as the effect of potential common shares is antidilutive. The following is a summary of outstanding securities which have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect would have been antidilutive for the following periods: 2012 2011 ---------- ---------- Series A convertible preferred stock 2,763,699 2,763,699 ---------- ---------- 2,763,699 2,763,699 ========== ========== LEGAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH LOSS CONTINGENCIES The Company expenses legal costs in connection with loss contingencies as incurred. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS The FASB issues Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs") to amend the authoritative literature in ASC. There have been a number of ASUs to date that amend the original text of ASC. The Company believes those issued to date either (1) provide supplemental guidance, (ii) are technical corrections, (iii) are not applicable to the Company or (iv) are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company. 3. INVENTORY Inventory consists of the following at September 30: 2012 2011 -------- -------- Raw materials $ -- $ -- Finished goods 5,144 6,286 -------- -------- $ 5,144 $ 6,286 ======== ======== F-10
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET Property and equipment consisted of the following at September 30: Estimated useful life (in years) 2012 2011 ---------- --------- --------- Machinery 10 $ 543,793 $ 543,793 Office furnishings, fixtures and equipment 3-5 25,068 25,068 --------- --------- 568,861 568,861 Less accumulated depreciation (568,642) (568,101) --------- --------- $ 219 $ 760 ========= ========= Depreciation expense for the year ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $541 and $7,255, respectively. Management assessed property and equipment for impairment due to the decreased revenue streams from operations and specifically the lack of revenues being generated. Because the net remaining property and equipment value is insignificant as of September 30, 2012 and will be fully depreciated in fiscal 2013 Management does not believe impairment is necessary as of September 30, 2012. 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL The following table summarizes the components of intangible assets as of September 30: Soil Medic patent ------- Balance at September 30, 2010 $ 162,147 Additions -- Amortization (49,891) Impairment (19,000) --------- Balance at September 30, 2011 $ 93,256 Additions -- Amortization (41,447) Impairment -- --------- Balance at September 30, 2012 $ 51,809 ========= Weighted average remaining life at: September 30, 2012 1.2 September 30, 2011 2.2 As of September 30, 2011, Management evaluated the value of the remaining intangible asset. It was determined that the associated expected cash flow of future revenues required an impairment charge of $19,000. Per Management's evaluation, no impairment was necessary as of September 30, 2012 based on future expected cash flows. Amortization expense was $41,447 and $49,891 for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization expense is expected to be $41,447 and $10,362 for fiscal 2013 and 2014, respetively. F-11
6. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES Accounts payable consisted of the following at September 30: 2012 2011 ---------- ---------- Accounts payable $ 712,845 $ 716,086 Accounts payable - related party 361,299 377,980 Accrued litigation 603,921 603,921 ---------- ---------- $1,678,065 $1,697,987 ========== ========== Accrued expenses consisted of the following at September 30: 2012 2011 ---------- ---------- Interest $ 415,861 $ 370,335 Interest to related parties 252,086 200,892 Compensation and related 2,040,629 1,587,569 ---------- ---------- $2,708,576 $2,158,796 ========== ========== 7. NOTES PAYABLE Notes payable consists of the following at September 30: 2012 2011 ----------- ----------- Debenture payable to a related party. Original balance 25,000 25,000 of $25,000 bearing interest at 8% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal was convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $0.50 per share prior to maturity. The principal was due February 1, 2008. Debenture payable to a related party bearing interest at 25,000 25,000 8% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal was convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $0.50 per share prior to maturity. The principal was due February 1, 2008. Note payable to a related party, original balance of 88,000 88,000 $85,000 bearing interest at prime rate payable monthly. Note is unsecured and was due August 31, 2011. Note payable to Diana Visco bearing interest at 834,842 789,842 prime rate with interest payable monthly. The note is unsecured and is due in May 2013. Debenture payable to a related party. Original balance 177,024 177,024 of $250,000 bearing interest at a rate of 10% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments of $3,000 are due through 2014. The note is in default for non-payment. Principal was convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $3.00 per share prior to initial maturity in 2002. The note is unsecured. Dbenture payable to Ray Nielsen bearing interest at a 1,500,000 1,500,000 rate of 8% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal balance was convertible at the proceeding day's rate for one share of common stock prior to maturity. The note is secured by the intellectual property acquired from the note holder. The principal was due on January 19, 2008. F-12
Debenture payable to an unrelated party bearing interest 30,000 30,000 at a rate of 8% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal balance was convertible into common stock at a rate of $0.25 per share prior to maturity. The note is unsecured. The principal was due on October 1, 2008. Debenture payable to an unrelated party bearing interest 30,000 30,000 at a rate of 8% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal was convertible into common stock at a rate of $0.10 per share prior to maturity. The note is unsecured and was due on October 1, 2008. Debenture payable to an unrelated party bearing interest 30,000 30,000 at a rate of 8% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal was convertible into common stock at a rate of $0.10 per share prior to maturity. Note is unsecured and was due October 1, 2008. Notes payable to various individuals with interest 254,585 254,585 rates ranging from 6% to 20%. The notes are currently in default. Debenture to an unrelated party bearing interest at a 75,000 75,000 rate of 10% per annum with interest payable quarterly. The principal was convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $0.19 per share prior to maturity. Note is unsecured and was due on July 18, 2009. ----------- ----------- 3,069,451 3,024,451 Less: debt discounts -- -- ----------- ----------- 3,069,451 3,024,451 Current portion (3,069,451) (3,024,451) ----------- ----------- Long-term portion $ -- $ -- =========== =========== The prime rate as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 3.25%, respectively. All notes are currently in default and are no longer convertible. F-13
8. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following for the years ended September 30: 2012 2011 -------- -------- Federal $ -- $ -- State (800) (800) -------- -------- Provision for income taxes $ (800) $ (800) ======== ======== The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before provision for income taxes. The differences between the federal statutory tax rate of 34% and the effective tax rates are primarily due to state income tax provisions, net operating loss ("NOL") carry forwards, deferred tax valuation allowance and permanent differences as follows for the years ended September 30: 2012 2011 -------- -------- Statutory rate (34%) (34%) Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from the following: State income taxes, net of federal benefit 5% 5% Change in valuation allowance 29% 29% ------ ------ --% --% ====== ====== Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at September 30: 2012 2011 -------- -------- Deferred tax assets (liabilities): Current: Reserves and accruals $ 1,320,647 $ 1,104,915 Non-current: Intangible assets 597,000 597,000 Net operating losses 5,779,734 7,326,145 Other 60,031 62,547 Valuation allowance (7,757,412) (9,090,607) ----------- ----------- $ -- $ -- =========== =========== At September 30, 2012 and 2011, the valuation allowance was increased (decreased) by a total of $(1,333,195) and $168,431 respectively. At September 30, 2012, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $22,049,098 that expire from 2012 through 2031 and state net operating carryforwards of $2,861,945 expiring from 2012 through 2016. These net operating losses may be suspended or limited due to changes in State and Federal legislation, as well as a possible change in ownership as defined under Section 382 of the IRC. In addition certain of these NOL's are not valid until the 2008-2011 tax returns are filed as noted below. The Company has not filed its United States Federal and State tax returns for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008. Management intends to comply with the requirements to file the tax returns upon raising capital. Failure to file the tax returns could result in penalties assessed against the Company. The Company has identified the United States Federal tax returns as its "major" tax jurisdiction. The United States Federal return years 2008 through 2011 are still subject to tax examination by the United States Internal Revenue Service, when filed; however, we do not currently have any ongoing tax F-14
examinations. The Company is subject to examination by the California Franchise Tax Board for the years ended 2008 through 2011 and currently does not have any ongoing tax examinations. 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES OPERATING LEASES During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company moved its headquarters and now shares office space with an entity owned by a related party, The Benz Group. The Company does not pay rent to the related party as the resources and space occupied the Company is minimal and the fair value of the rent is immaterial to the financial statements taken as a whole. LITIGATION On or about September 21, 2007, Stockhausen, Inc. ("Stockhausen") filed a Complaint in the United States District Court, for the Middle District of North Carolina, against us seeking damages. The parties entered into a settlement agreement on June 2, 2010. Under the settlement agreement, we agreed to pay Stockhausen $250,000 on or before June 23, 2010 as a compromise to Stockhausen's claims that currently total $603,921. We further agreed that we would consent to the entry of a Judgment against us in favor of Stockhausen in the amount of $603,921 if we failed to make complete and timely payment as agreed. The Company was unable to make the agreed upon payment and on July 8, 2010, Stockhausen entered a judgment for the above stated amount against the Company. The Company has accrued $603,921 related to the litigation as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, which is included in accounts payable in the accompanying balance sheets. On or about October 4, 2007, Raymond J. Nielsen and Cheryl K. Nielsen (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court in the Sixth Judicial District of Pasco County, Florida, against us and Smart World (collectively "Defendants") seeking damages, declaratory, and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to pay interest when due on the Convertible Debenture from Defendants to Plaintiffs and, thus, the entire amount of the Convertible Debenture is accelerated and Plaintiffs are seeking a judgment in the amount of $1,500,000 plus interest. On December 29, 2009, the matter was settled for $400,000 and the Company had 60 days in which to remit the amount or a judgment in the entire amount claimed would be entered against us. The Company was not able to meet the terms of the settlement and have been actively communicating with the Plaintiffs to extend the terms of the settlement. 11. PREFERRED STOCK The Company has 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized of which 2,763,699 shares of $0.50 stated value Series A convertible preferred stock ("Series A Preferred") are issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and 2011. The Series A Preferred have the following characteristics: DIVIDENDS Each holder is entitled to receive preferential quarterly dividends equal to the prime interest rate as quoted in the Wall Street Journal when and if declared by the Board of Directors, out of any assets that are legally available. If the Board of Directors declares that such dividends may only be payable in shares of common stock for any quarter, holders of Series A preferred stock have the option of accepting the dividend paid in shares of common stock of the Company, or letting the dividend accrue for a cash payment. No dividends have been declared, accrued or paid during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. CONVERSION Each holder has the option to convert each share of Series A Preferred into common stock at a rate of one share of common stock for each share of preferred stock tendered. F-15
VOTING The holders have no voting rights. LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE Each holder is entitled to be paid the stated value of their holdings out of the assets of the Company, prior and in preference to any payment or distribution out of the assets of the Company to the holders of common stock or any other class or series of capital stock. 12. COMMON STOCK STOCK OPTIONS In November 2002, the Company enacted a stock option plan (the "2002 Plan") to provide additional incentives to selected employees, directors and consultants. Two million shares were authorized for grant. The purchase price of the common stock subject to each Incentive Stock Option was not to be less than the fair market value or in the case of a grant of an incentive stock option to a principal shareholder, not less than 110% of the fair market value of such common stock at the time each option was granted. The 2002 Plan terminates in November 2012. The options are fully-vested when granted and are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant and are subject to cancellation upon termination of employment. The Company has granted options to purchase 1,010,000 shares and 300,000 shares with exercise prices of $0.50 and $0.25, respectively. The market price at the date of grant was $0.12. At September 30, 2012 and 2011, 450,000 stock options were available for grant. On January 6, 2005, the Company enacted the 2005 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the "2005 Plan"). The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock to our directors, officers, employees and consultants in the form of stock options and shares of common stock. The 2005 Plan has two separate components: the option grant program and the stock issuance program. Grants under the option grant program may be structured as installment options which become exercisable for vested shares over the optionee's period of service or as immediately exercisable options for unvested shares which will be subject to repurchase by the Company, at the option exercise price paid per share, upon the optionee's termination of service prior to vesting in those shares. All option grants must have an exercise price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date. The stock issuance program allows eligible persons to purchase shares of common stock at fair market value or at a discount of up to 15% of fair market value. The shares may be fully vested when issued or may vest over time as the recipient provides services or as specified performance objectives are attained. In addition, shares of common stock may be issued as bonus awards in recognition of services rendered, without any cash outlay required of the recipient. Upon stock option exercise, the Company issues new shares of common stock. The following table summarizes stock option activity under the above stock option plans: Remaining Number of Weighted-Average Contractual Term Shares Exercise Price (in years) ------ -------------- ---------- Outstanding at September 30, 2010 1,976,000 $0.20 2.0 Granted -- Exercised -- Cancelled -- ----------- Outstanding at September 30, 2011 1,976,000 $0.20 1.0 Granted -- Exercised -- Cancelled 1,526,000 $0.11 0.0 ----------- Outstanding at September 30, 2012 450,000 $0.50 0.1 =========== F-16
The fair value of stock options awarded were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The expected option term was estimated based upon the contractual term of the underlying stock option. The expected volatility of the Company's stock price was based upon the historical daily changes in the price of the Company's common stock. The risk-free interest rate was based upon the current yield on U.S. Treasury securities having a term similar to the expected option term. Dividend yield is estimated at zero because the Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. There were no options issued during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 that required valuation. Outstanding Exercisable ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Average Weighted Weighted Average Average Remaining Average Remaining Number of Exercise Contractual Life Number of Exercise Contractual Life Exercise Prices shares Price (in years) shares Price (in years) --------------- ------ ----- ---------- ------ ----- ---------- $0.50 450,000 $0.50 0.1 450,000 $0.50 1.1 At September 30, 2012, all stock options are vested, and there is no remaining unrecognized compensation expense. The intrinsic value of options is zero as all options had an exercise price above the closing price of the stock at September 30, 2012. Stock based compensation expense was $0 and $35,744 for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During the year ended September 30, 2012, Ms. Visco loaned the Company an additional $45,000. The Company entered into a new note for $834,842 with Ms. Visco which superseded all previous notes. The principal is due on May 1, 2013. Interest is payable monthly based on the current Prime Rate of 3.25%. See Note 14 for additional loan subsequent to September 30, 2012. Interest expense incurred in connection with outstanding loans and notes payable to Ms. Visco or entities partially controlled was $26,563 and $25,670 for the year ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Subsequent to year end, Ms. Visco loaned the Company an additional $38,000. The previous note was amended to increase the principal due to $872,842. The terms of the note remained the same while extending the due date to October 2013. The note is in default for non-payment of interest. F-1