Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. - FORM 10-Q/A

Attached files

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. Reports

Also read

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex321.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex311.htm
EX-10.69 - EXHIBIT 10.69 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex1069.htm
EX-10.72 - EXHIBIT 10.72 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex1072.htm
EX-10.71 - EXHIBIT 10.71 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex1071.htm
EX-10.70 - EXHIBIT 10.70 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex1070.htm
EX-10.68 - EXHIBIT 10.68 - Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	d456798dex1068.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 1 on

FORM 10-Q/A

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

¨	Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-32375

Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

20-1164345

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1886 Metro Center Drive

Suite 410

Reston, Virginia 20190

(703) 883-1700

(Address zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x

As of November 14, 2012, 18,533,045 shares of the Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 2,733,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01, of the Registrant were outstanding.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

INDEX


		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:		1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) – September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) – Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011		2

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011		3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011		4

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		5

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		23

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		28

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		28

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		30

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS		30

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USES OF PROCEEDS		30

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		30

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		30

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION		30

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS		30

SIGNATURES			32

EXPLANATORY NOTE

We are filing this amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, originally filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 14, 2012 (the “Original Form 10-Q”), for the sole purpose of correcting Exhibit 32.1 to our Original Form 10-Q, which, due to a typographical error, referred to an incorrect reporting period. No other changes have been made to the Original Form 10-Q. This amendment speaks as of the filing date of the Original Form 10-Q, does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date and does not otherwise modify or update in any way disclosures made in the Original Form 10-Q.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,442		$	5,639
Restricted cash		3,200			3,082
Trade receivables		1,298			2,228
Real estate held for development and sale		17,643			21,212
Operating real estate, net		—			12,095
Property, plant and equipment, net		185			105
Other assets		2,324			2,018


TOTAL ASSETS	$	29,092		$	46,379


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	3,656		$	3,987
Notes payable – secured by real estate held for development and sale, net of discount		9,761			10,541
Notes payable – secured by operating real estate, net		—			9,957
Notes payable – due to affiliates, unsecured		5,022			5,008
Notes payable – unsecured		3,650			4,309
Income taxes payable		5			33


TOTAL LIABILITIES		22,094			33,835


Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)		—			—
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value, 77,266,500 shares authorized, 18,533,045 and 17,944,503 issued and outstanding, respectively		185			179
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value, 2,733,500 shares authorized, issued and outstanding		27			27
Additional paid-in capital		169,542			168,620
Treasury stock, at cost (391,400 shares Class A common stock)		(2,439	)		(2,439	)
Accumulated deficit		(160,344	)		(156,684	)


TOTAL COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. EQUITY		6,971			9,703
Non-controlling interest		27			2,841


TOTAL EQUITY		6,998			12,544


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	29,092		$	46,379

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues
Revenue – homebuilding	$	2,527		$	2,864		$	9,479		$	9,003
Revenue – other		956			2,444			2,183			6,794


Total revenue		3,483			5,308			11,662			15,797
Expenses
Cost of sales – homebuilding		2,093			2,551			8,149			8,010
Cost of sales – other		1,144			2,487			2,951			6,327
Impairments and write-offs		2,358			—			2,358			—
Selling, general and administrative		2,183			1,633			6,165			4,951
Interest, real estate taxes and indirect costs related to inactive projects		190			893			1,982			1,677


Operating loss		(4,485	)		(2,256	)		(9,943	)		(5,168	)
Gain on legal settlement, net		—			9,434			—			9,434
Other (expense) income, net		(45	)		(201	)		(8	)		362


(Loss) income before income tax benefit		(4,530	)		6,977			(9,951	)		4,628
Income tax benefit (expense)		364			(82	)		2,478			(82	)


Net (loss) income from continuing operations		(4,166	)		6,895			(7,473	)		4,546
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued operations		(6	)		(234	)		(112	)		(336	)
Gain on sale of the real estate from discontinued operations		—			—			6,466			—
Income tax expense from discontinued operations		(364	)		—			(2,478	)		—


Net (loss) income from discontinued operations		(370	)		(234	)		3,876			(336	)
Net (loss) income		(4,536	)		6,661			(3,597	)		4,210
Less: Net loss from continuing operations attributable to non-controlling interest		(40	)		—			(40	)		—
Less: Net income from discontinued operations attributable to non-controlling interest		—			120			103			370


Net (loss) income attributable to Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	$	(4,496	)	$	6,541		$	(3,660	)	$	3,840


Basic (loss) income per share:
Continuing operations	$	(.20	)	$	.35		$	(.36	)	$	.23
Discontinued operations		(.02	)		(.02	)		.18			(.03	)

Net (loss) income per share	$	(.22	)	$	0.33		$	(.18	)	$	.20


Diluted (loss) income per share:
Continuing operations	$	(.20	)	$	.34		$	(.36	)	$	.23
Discontinued operations		(.02	)		(.01	)		.18			(.04	)

Net (loss) income per share	$	(.22	)	$	.33		$	(.18	)	$	.19


Basic weighted average shares outstanding		20,653			19,774			20,433			19,614
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		20,653			20,125			20,433			20,008
Net (loss) income attributable to Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.:
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(4,126	)	$	6,895		$	(7,433	)	$	4,546
(Loss) income from discontinued operations		(370	)		(354	)		3,773			(706	)


Net (loss) income	$	(4,496	)	$	6,541		$	(3,660	)	$	3,840

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Class A				Class B				Additional paid-in capital		Treasury stock			Retained earnings (deficit)			Non- controlling interest			Total
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance at December 31, 2010		17,120	$	171		2,733	$	27	$	166,700	$	(2,439	)	$	(157,791	)	$	—		$	6,668

Stock compensation and issuances		596		6		—		—		661		—			—			—			667
Warrants		—		—		—		—		945		—			—			—			945
Non-controlling interest		—		—		—		—		—		—			—			2,350			2,350
Net income		—		—		—		—		—		—			3,840			370			4,210


Balance at September 30, 2011		17,716	$	177		2,733	$	27	$	168,306	$	(2,439	)	$	(153,951	)	$	2,720		$	14,840


Balance at December 31, 2011		17,945	$	179		2,733	$	27	$	168,620	$	(2,439	)	$	(156,684	)	$	2,841		$	12,544
Stock compensation and issuances		588		6		—		—		922		—			—			—			928
Non-controlling interest		—		—		—		—		—		—			—			(2,877	)		(2,877	)
Net (loss) income		—		—		—		—		—		—			(3,660	)		63			(3,597	)


Balance at September 30, 2012		18,533	$	185		2,733	$	27	$	169,542	$	(2,439	)	$	(160,344	)	$	27		$	6,998

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(3,597	)	$	4,210
Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Amortization of loan discount and deferred financing fees		1,234			580
Depreciation expense		107			76
Provision for bad debt		—			3
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of notes payable		73			(219	)
Gain on trade payable settlements		—			(152	)
Gain on sale of operating real estate, net		(6,466	)		—
Impairments and write-offs		2,358			—
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		1			—
Amortization of stock compensation		928			667
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(118	)		(41	)
Trade receivables		930			—
Real estate held for development and sale		1,154			7,425
Other assets		(340	)		(1,402	)
Accrued interest		(596	)		365
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(777	)		(127	)
Income taxes payable		(28	)		81


Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(5,137	)		11,466


Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in Cascades Apartments – operating real estate, net		—			(9,281	)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(106	)		(53	)
Proceeds from sale of Cascades Apartments – operating real estate, net		18,882			—


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		18,776			(9,334	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable		13,662			33,520
Payments on notes payable		(25,283	)		(31,792	)
Loan financing costs		(338	)		(1,142	)
Proceeds from SunBridge warrant issuance		—			945
Distribution to non-controlling interest holders		(2,944	)		—
Contribution from non-controlling interest holders		67			2,350


Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(14,836	)		3,881


Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,197	)		6,013
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		5,639			475

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	4,442		$	6,488


Supplemental disclosure for non-cash activity:
Interest paid, net of interest capitalized	$	1,308		$	1,003
Reduction in proceeds from sale of Cascades Apartments and increase in other assets related to amounts placed in escrow upon settlement of Cascades Apartments sale	$	418		$	—
Reduction in notes payable in connection with troubled debt restructuring	$	—		$	(73	)
Increase in class A common stock par value in connection with issuance of stock compensation	$	—		$	6
Increase in additional paid in capital in connection with issuance of stock compensation	$	—		$	661
Increase in additional paid in capital in connection with SunBridge warrant	$	—		$	995
Reduction in accounts payable and restricted cash due to Cascades Private Placement closing	$	—		$	2,100

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are presented in thousands, except per share data)

1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Comstock” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Such financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement have been included in the accompanying financial statements. For further information and a discussion of our significant accounting policies other than as discussed below, refer to our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. is a multi-faceted real estate development and services company focused on the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The Company has substantial experience with building a diverse range of products including single-family homes, townhouses, mid-rise condominiums, high-rise multi-family condominiums, apartments and mixed-use (residential and commercial) developments. Since our founding in 1985, and as of September 30, 2012, we have built and delivered more than 5,500 homes generating total revenue in excess of $1.4 billion. References in this Form 10-Q to “Comstock,” “Company”, “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. together in each case with our subsidiaries and any predecessor entities unless the context suggests otherwise.

Comstock Companies, Inc. was incorporated on May 24, 2004 as a Delaware corporation. On June 30, 2004, the Company changed its name to Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc. On December 17, 2004, the Company completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of its Class A common stock. On June 22, 2012, the Company changed its name to Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. which better reflects the Company’s multi-faceted strategy and capabilities.

The Company’s Class A common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “CHCI” and has no public trading history prior to December 17, 2004. The Company continues to be in compliance with all NASDAQ continued listing requirements.

Certain amounts have been reclassified in prior periods to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications are due to the treatment of the sale of the Company’s apartment project as discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented. Refer to Notes 12 and 13 for further information.

2. REAL ESTATE HELD FOR DEVELOPMENT AND SALE

Real estate held for development and sale includes land, land development costs, interest and other construction costs. Real estate held for development and use is stated at cost, or when circumstances or events indicate that the real estate is impaired, at estimated fair value. Real estate held for sale is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Land, land development and indirect land development costs are accumulated by specific project and allocated to various units within that project using specific identification and allocation based upon the relative sales value, unit or area methods. Direct construction costs are assigned to units based on specific identification. Construction costs primarily include direct construction costs and capitalized field overhead. Other costs are comprised of fees, capitalized interest and real estate taxes. Selling costs are expensed as incurred.

If the project is considered held for sale, it is valued at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Currently the Company’s Eclipse and Penderbrook projects meet these criteria. Because the project sales are expected to extend over a period of time, the Company calculates fair value utilizing a discounted cash flow model as discussed below. For assets held for development and use, estimated fair value is based on comparable sales of real estate in the normal course of business under existing and anticipated market conditions. Currently, all other projects are considered held for development and use. The evaluation takes into consideration the current status of the property, various restrictions, carrying costs, costs of disposition and any other circumstances which may affect fair value including management’s plans for the property. A write-down to estimated fair value is recorded when the net carrying value of the property exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows. These evaluations are made on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net book value may not be recoverable.

The Company has classified its Eclipse and Penderbrook projects as held for sale as discussed above and accordingly, written the projects down to fair value less costs to sell as determined by discounted cash flow models. Discounted cash flow models are dependent upon several subjective factors, including estimated average sales prices, estimated sales pace, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. The estimates of sales prices, sales pace, and discount rates used by the Company are based on the best information available at the time the estimates are made.

In the quarter ended September 30, 2012, management evaluated its strategic alternatives with respect to its real estate projects classified as held for sale with the objective of creating additional near term liquidity. As a result, a decision was made to market the Potomac Yard project in a bulk sale transaction, rather than by selling directly to prospective home buyers, significantly accelerating absorption. The impairment charge of $2,358 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively, reflects the write down to estimated fair value less costs to sell under the revised disposition strategy, however, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in the sale of the Potomac Yard project in a bulk sale and in the absence thereof, the Company will continue selling to prospective home buyers. The Company has recorded an impairment charge of $2,358 during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, to properly record its for sale projects at fair market value less costs to sell, consistent with the provisions of ASC 360. There were no impairment charges recorded during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011.

Real estate held for development and sale consists of the following:


	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Land and land development costs	$	7,148	$	4,693
Cost of construction (including capitalized interest and real estate taxes)		10,495		16,519


	$	17,643	$	21,212

3. OPERATING REAL ESTATE, NET

In February 2011, the Company began construction on a 103 unit apartment rental project located in the Cascades master planned community in Loudoun County, Virginia (the “Cascades Apartments”). Accordingly, upon the initiation of construction, the value of the existing land upon which the project was constructed (approximately $2.5 million) was reclassified from real estate held for development and sale to operating real estate, net. The total construction costs capitalized in addition to the land and land development costs were approximately $9.8 million. The apartment project consisted of two buildings, the first of which was placed into service in July 2011 and the second of which was placed in service in September 2011. As further discussed in Note 13, the Cascades Apartments were sold on March 7, 2012 and accordingly, the results of operations are included in ‘Net loss on discontinued operations’ in 2012 and 2011.

Depreciation was calculated on buildings and improvements at the Cascades Apartments using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives, which ranged from seven to thirty years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment were depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives, which range from three years (primarily computer-related equipment) to seven years. Depreciation of $82 was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and depreciation of $61 was recorded for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011. No depreciation charges were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

4. GENERAL CONTRACTING

The Company undertakes short-term general contracting projects within its real estate services segment. These contracts are typically no more than 12 months in length. Revenue and earnings on these general contracting contracts are recognized under the percentage of completion method using the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs. There are estimates used in determining profits and total costs inherent in the percentage of completion method and actual results could differ from the estimates used by the Company. The revenues and costs associated with these projects are included in ‘Revenue – other’ and ‘Cost of sales – other,’ respectively, in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Total revenue and gross profit recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $883 and $178 respectively. Total revenue and gross profit recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $2,148 and $122, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 total revenue and gross profit recognized was $1,835 and $304, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 total revenue and gross profit recognized was $5,722 and $486, respectively. Included in trade receivables and accounts payable were approximately $1,240 and $1,228, respectively, related to ongoing general contracting projects at September 30, 2012. Trade receivables and accounts payable were approximately $1,646 and $1,397 respectively, related to ongoing general contracting projects at December 31, 2011.

5. WARRANTY RESERVES

Warranty reserves for units settled are established to cover potential costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims expected to arise during the typical one-year warranty period provided by the Company or within the two-year statutorily mandated structural warranty period for condominiums. Since the Company typically subcontracts its homebuilding work, subcontractors are required to provide the Company with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work. Claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of the subcontractors and product manufacturers. The warranty reserve is established at the time of closing, and is calculated based upon historical warranty cost experience and updated based upon actual and potential claims. This reserve is an estimate and actual warranty costs could vary from these estimates. Variables used in the calculation of the reserve, as well as the adequacy of the reserve based on the number of homes still under warranty, are reviewed on a periodic basis. Warranty claims are directly charged to the reserve as they arise. The following table is a summary of warranty reserve activity which is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	988		$	1,048		$	1,009		$	1,110
Additions		18			67			45			91
Releases and/or charges incurred		(26	)		(39	)		(74	)		(125	)


Balance at end of period	$	980		$	1,076		$	980		$	1,076

6. CAPITALIZED INTEREST AND REAL ESTATE TAXES

Interest and real estate taxes incurred relating to the development of lots and parcels are capitalized to real estate held for development and sale during the active development period, which generally commences when development activities begin and ends when the properties are substantially complete or the property becomes inactive. A project becomes inactive when development and construction activities have been suspended indefinitely. Interest is capitalized based on the interest rate applicable to specific borrowings or the weighted average of the rates applicable to other borrowings during the period. Interest and real estate taxes capitalized to real estate held for development and sale are expensed as a component of cost of sales as related units are sold. The following table is a summary of interest incurred and capitalized and interest expensed for units settled:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Total interest incurred and capitalized	$	124	$	94	$	176	$	215


Interest expensed as a component of cost of sales	$	474	$	483	$	1,719	$	1,509

When a project becomes inactive, its interest, real estate taxes and indirect production overhead costs are no longer capitalized but rather expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Following is a breakdown of the interest, real estate taxes and indirect costs related to inactive projects reported in real estate held for development and sale:


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011			2012			2011
Total interest incurred and expensed for inactive projects	$	107	$	906		$	1,850		$	1,434
Total real estate taxes incurred and expensed for inactive projects		38		106			133			293
Total production overhead incurred and expensed for inactive projects		45		56			153			160

		190		1,068			2,136			1,887
Amounts reclassified to discontinued operations		—		(175	)		(154	)		(210	)


	$	190	$	893		$	1,982		$	1,677

7. (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

The weighted average shares and share equivalents used to calculate basic and diluted (loss) income per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, are presented on the consolidated statement of operations. Stock options and warrants for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation using the treasury stock method and average market prices during the period, unless the stock option and warrants would be anti-dilutive. As a result of net losses from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, approximately 104 restricted stock awards, 209 stock options and 539 warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, approximately 130 and 221 of stock options and warrants, respectively, were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The computation of basic and diluted shares outstanding is as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Computation of weighted-average basic shares outstanding:
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		20,653		19,774		20,433		19,614


Computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding:
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		20,653		19,774		20,433		19,614
Dilutive effect of stock options		—		130		—		152
Dilutive effect of warrants		—		221		—		242

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding		20,653		20,125		20,433		20,008

Comprehensive income

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, comprehensive income equaled net income; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income is not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

8. SEGMENT DISCLOSURES

We operate our business through segments: Homebuilding, Apartment Buildings and Real Estate Services. We are currently exclusively focused on the Washington, D.C. market.

For our Homebuilding operations, we develop properties with the intent that they be sold either as fee-simple properties or condominiums to individual unit buyers, or as investment properties sold to private or institutional investors. Our for-sale products are designed to attract first-time, early move-up, and secondary move-up buyers. We focus on products that we are able to offer for sale in the middle price points within the markets where we operate, avoiding the very low-end and high-end products.

For our Apartment Buildings segment we focus on projects ranging from approximately 75 to 200 units in locations that are supply constrained with demonstrated demand for stabilized assets. We seek opportunities in the multi-family rental market where our experience and core capabilities can be leveraged. We will either position the assets for sale when completed or operate the asset within our own portfolio. Operating the asset for our own account affords us the flexibility of converting the units to condominiums in the future.

Our Real Estate Services segment pursues projects in all aspects of real estate management including strategic planning, land development, entitlement, property management, sales and marketing, workout and turnaround strategies, financing and general construction. We are able to provide a wide range of construction management and general contracting services to other property owners.

The following disclosure includes the Company’s reportable segments of Homebuilding, Apartment Buildings and Real Estate Services. Each of these segments operates within the Company’s single Washington, D.C. reportable geographic segment. The information for 2011 has been reclassified to conform to current year business segment presentation and to reclassify the operating results of the Cascades Apartments as discontinued operations as discussed in Note 12.


	(in thousands)
	Homebuilding			Apartment Buildings			Real Estate Services		Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
Net revenue	$	2,600		$	—		$	883	$	3,483
Gross profit		(2,290	)		—			178		(2,112	)
Operating (loss) profit from continuing operations		(4,644	)		—			114		(4,530	)
Operating (loss) profit from discontinued operations		—			(6	)		—		(6	)
Net (loss) income		(4,644	)		(6	)		114		(4,536	)
Total assets		26,759			421			1,912		29,092
Depreciation and amortization		337			—			—		337
Interest expense		107			—			—		107
Capital expenditures		106			—			—		106

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Net revenue	$	3,160		$	—		$	2,148	$	5,308
Gross profit		212			—			122		334
Operating (loss) profit from continuing operations		6,880			—			97		6,977
Operating (loss) profit from discontinued operations		—			(234	)		—		(234	)
Net (loss) income		6,798			(234	)		97		6,661
Total assets		35,146			12,491			1,359		48,996
Depreciation and amortization		585			61			—		646
Interest expense		773			133			—		906
Capital expenditures		53			3,227			—		3,280


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Net revenue	$	9,827		$	—		$	1,835	$	11,662
Gross profit		(2,100	)		—			304		(1,796	)
Operating (loss) profit from continuing operations		(10,177	)		—			226		(9,951	)
Operating (loss) profit from discontinued operations		—			6,354			—		6,354
Net (loss) income		(10,177	)		6,354			226		(3,597	)
Total assets		26,759			421			1,912		29,092
Depreciation and amortization		953			—			—		953
Interest expense		1,685			—			—		1,685
Capital expenditures		106			—			—		106

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Net revenue	$	10,075		$	—		$	5,722	$	15,797
Gross profit		974			—			486		1,460
Operating (loss) profit from continuing operations		4,291			—			337		4,628
Operating (loss) profit from discontinued operations		—			(336	)		—		(336	)
Net (loss) income		4,209			(336	)		337		4,210
Total assets		35,146			12,491			1,359		48,996
Depreciation and amortization		595			61			—		656
Interest expense		1,301			133			—		1,434
Capital expenditures		53			9,281			—		9,334

The Company allocates selling, general and administrative expenses to the individual segments based upon specifically allocable costs and, in the absence of direct allocations, based upon its estimate of time allocable to the segment or based upon overall pro rata revenue generation.

The table below reconciles the segment information to the corresponding amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Segment operating (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(4,530	)	$	6,977		$	(9,951	)	$	4,628
Income tax benefit (expense)		364			(82	)		2,478			(82	)


Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(4,166	)	$	6,895		$	(7,473	)	$	4,546


Segment operating income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(6	)	$	(234	)	$	6,354		$	(336	)
Income tax expense		(364	)		—			(2,478	)		—


Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(370	)	$	(234	)	$	3,876		$	(336	)

9. INCOME TAX

The effective tax rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 0%, respectively. This results in zero tax expenses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company recorded valuation allowances for certain tax attributes and other deferred tax assets. At this time, sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the future realization of these deferred tax assets through future taxable income. If, in the future, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax benefits will be realized, the valuation allowances will be reversed. With a full valuation allowance, any change in the deferred tax asset or liability is fully offset by a corresponding change in the valuation allowance.

The Company currently has approximately $106 million in federal and state NOLs, which based on current statutory tax rates, has a potential fair value of approximately $42 million in tax savings. If unused, these NOLs will begin expiring in 2028. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”) rules, if a change of ownership is triggered, the Company’s NOL assets and possibly certain other deferred tax assets may be impaired. We estimate that as of September 30, 2012, the cumulative shift in ownership of the Company’s stock would not cause an impairment of our NOL asset. However, if an ownership change were to occur, the Section 382 limitation would not be expected to materially impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations as of September 30, 2012, because of the Company’s full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets.

The Company’s ability to use its NOLs (and in certain circumstances, future built-in losses and depreciation deductions) can be negatively affected if there is an “ownership change” as defined under Section 382. In general, an ownership change occurs whenever there is a shift in ownership by more than 50 percentage points by one or more 5% shareholders over a specified time period (generally three years). Given Section 382’s broad definition, an ownership change could be the unintended consequence of otherwise normal market trading in the Company’s stock that is outside of the Company’s control. In an effort to preserve the availability of these NOLs, Comstock adopted a Section 382 stockholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”). The Rights Plan was adopted to reduce the likelihood of such an unintended “ownership change” and thus assist in preserving the value of these tax benefits. Similar plans have been adopted by a number of companies holding similar significant tax assets over the past several years. This plan was submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders on June 17, 2011 and the plan was approved at that meeting.

The Company has not recorded any accruals for tax uncertainties as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We file U.S. and state income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2009 through 2011 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal and most state tax authorities.

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

Currently, we are not subject to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, however, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. Although we cannot accurately predict the amount of our liability, if any, that could arise with respect to legal actions pending against us, we do not expect that any such liability will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results and cash flows. We believe that we have obtained adequate insurance coverage, rights to indemnification, or where appropriate, have established reserves in connection with these legal proceedings.

Letters of credit and performance bonds

The Company has commitments as a result of contracts entered into with certain third parties, primarily local governmental authorities, to meet certain performance criteria as outlined in such contracts. The Company is required to issue letters of credit and performance bonds to these third parties as a way of ensuring that such commitments entered into are met by the Company. The letters of credit and performance bonds issued in favor of the Company and/or its subsidiaries mature on a revolving basis, and if called into default, would be deemed material if assessed against the Company and/or its subsidiaries for the full amounts claimed. In some circumstances we have negotiated with our lenders in connection with foreclosure agreements for the lender to assume certain liabilities with respect to the letters of credit and performance bonds. We cannot accurately predict the amount of any liability that could be imposed upon the Company with respect to maturing or defaulted letters of credit or performance bonds and it is anticipated that any such liability would likely have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results or cash flows. At September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had issued $0 and $528 in letters of credit, respectively, and $1,710 and $2,133 in performance and payment bonds, respectively, to these third parties. No amounts have been drawn against these letters of credit or performance bonds.

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into a three-year lease for approximately 7,620 square feet of office space for its corporate headquarters at 1886 Metro Center Drive, Reston, Virginia from Comstock Asset Management, L.C., an affiliate wholly-owned by our Chief Executive Officer. On September 19, 2012, the Company amended the lease for an additional 2,436 square feet of office space, or a total 10,056 square feet, for its corporate headquarters, with an effective date of July 1, 2012. Concurrent with the amendment, the Company agreed to extend the lease for five-years from the effective date and future minimum annual lease payments are as follows:


2013	$	301
2014		310
2015		320
2016		329
2017		167


Total	$	1,427

For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, total payments made under this lease agreement were $74 and $54, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, total payments made under this lease agreement were $183 and $159, respectively. As of September 30, 2012, the Company recorded a straight–line rent payable of $5, which is included in ‘Accounts payable and accrued liabilities’.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring a portion of the base salary payments to our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer. These deferrals ended on May 1, 2011 and the deferred balance of $842 was paid during the third quarter of 2011.

On February 11, 2011, Comstock Contracting, L.C., a subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Owner-Contractor Agreement with CRS Construction Services, L.C., an entity wholly-owned by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to perform paving and certain site improvement work to property in Reston, Virginia which is owned by Fairfax County, Virginia. The contract sum was for approximately $1.0 million and the work was completed in April 2011.

Comstock Contracting, L.C., a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Subcontract Agreement with Davis Construction, LLC to perform site work and land development for a project known as Loudoun Station in Loudoun County, Virginia. Comstock Partners, L.C., an entity wholly-owned by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is the owner of the Loudoun Station project. The total contract value is estimated to be approximately $5 million and the project was completed in October 2012. The revenue associated with this project is included in ‘Revenue – other’ in the consolidated statement of operations. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $0.7 million and $1.5 million of revenue, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $1.1 million and $3.3 million of revenue, respectively. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company was owed $1.0 million and $1.0 million under this contract, respectively, which is included in ‘Trade receivables’ in the consolidated financial statements.

On January 31, 2011, Comstock Cascades II, L.C., a subsidiary of the Company (“Cascades II”) entered into a private placement for the sale of membership interests in Cascades II whereby Cascades II raised working capital in the amount of $2.35 million (the “Private Placement”) related to the planned construction of the Cascades Apartments. Proceeds of the Private Placement were utilized (i) to provide sufficient capital needed to secure project financing for the Cascades Apartments, (ii) to retire a portion of the existing indebtedness, and (iii) to reimburse the Company for prior expenditures incurred on behalf of the project. Participants in the Private Placement included unrelated third party investors along with several members of the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company. In March 2012, upon completion of the sale of the Cascades Apartments, the Company repaid the participants in the Private Placement $3.0 million, including the preferred returns, in full.

Pursuant to a Credit Enhancement Agreement by and between Comstock and the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company (each, a “Guarantor”), the Guarantors agreed to provide credit enhancement and the personal guarantee of loans with Cardinal Bank and Eagle Bank in exchange for payment by the Company of a credit enhancement fee. As a result of this credit enhancement the Guarantors on an aggregate basis were entitled to a credit enhancement fee calculated at a rate of four percent (4%) per annum based on an agreed upon formula more fully discussed in Note 14. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company made guarantee payments under this agreement of approximately $107. No payments were made for the three month period ended September 30, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company made guarantee payments under this agreement of approximately $130 and $213. The financing with SunBridge Capital Management, LLC, as discussed fully in Note 14, eliminated the need for personal guarantees on the applicable projects and accordingly this agreement was terminated on July 12, 2011 with respect to the fees paid on the Eagle Bank loan. On March 7, 2012, the Cardinal Bank loan was repaid and, accordingly, the agreement was terminated with respect to the fees paid on the Cardinal Bank loan and the accrued fees were paid in full.

12. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

As described in Note 13 below, on March 7, 2012, the Company’s subsidiary sold the Cascades Apartments. As the Cascades Apartments represented a component of the Company’s business, the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified for all periods presented to appropriately reflect the discontinued operations of the Cascades Apartments and the continuing operations of the Company. Revenues, costs and expenses directly associated with the Cascades Apartments have been reclassified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Corporate expenses, such as general corporate overhead, have not been allocated to discontinued operations. The guidance in ASC 740-20-45-7 requires that the income recorded in discontinued operations be considered when determining the amount of benefit allocable to continuing operations in circumstances when continuing operations result in a net loss position for the period presented. Accordingly, the Company has allocated a tax benefit of $364 to continuing operations and a tax expense of $364 to discontinued operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2012. The Company has allocated a tax benefit of $2,478 to continuing operations and a tax expense of $2,478 to discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Summarized financial information for the Cascades Apartments, is set forth below:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenue	$	—		$	86		$	171		$	86
Cost of sales		5			98			128			158
Selling, general and administrative		—			48			10			48
Interest, real estate taxes and indirect costs related to inactive projects		—			174			154			210
Other (income) expenses, net		1			—			(7	)		6


Loss from discontinued operations before gain on sale of real estate and income tax expense		(6	)		(234	)		(112	)		(336	)

Net gain on sale of real estate		—			—			6,466			—

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations before income tax expense		(6	)		(234	)		6,354			(336	)
Income tax expense		(364	)		—			(2,478	)		—


Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	$	(370	)	$	(234	)	$	3,876		$	(336	)

Discontinued operations have not been segregated in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Therefore, amounts for certain captions will not agree with the respective data in the consolidated statement of operations.

13. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY

GAAP requires a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to be consolidated by the company which is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method. Comstock’s variable interests in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets and/or (3) loans provided and or guaranteed to a

VIE. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining if Comstock is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.

Consolidated Real Estate Held for Development and Sale

Included within the Company’s real estate held for development and sale at September 30, 2012 are three historically consolidated entities that are VIEs and for which the Company is the primary beneficiary; Penderbrook, Potomac Yard and Yorkshire. These entities have been established to own and operate real estate property and were deemed VIEs primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entities to finance their activities without additional financial support. The Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as a result of its majority voting and complete operational control of the entities.

On August 23, 2012, the Company formed New Hampshire Ave. Ventures, LLC, a joint venture of its subsidiary Comstock Ventures XVI, L.C. and 6000 New Hampshire Avenue, LLC, for the purpose of acquiring, developing and constructing a 110 unit project (the “NHA Project”) in Washington, D.C. The Company evaluated the joint venture and determined that it was a VIE concluding that the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. The Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of the VIE as a result of its shared voting interests, complete operational control of the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses, or receive benefits, from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.

On September 27, 2012, the Company formed Comstock Eastgate, L.C., a joint venture of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. and BridgeCom Development I, LLC, for the purpose of acquiring, developing and constructing 66 condominium units (the “Eastgate Project”) in Loudoun County. The Company evaluated the joint venture and determined that it was a VIE concluding that the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. The Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of the VIE as a result of its shared voting interests, complete operational control of the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses, or receive benefits, from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, total assets of these VIEs were approximately $18.1 million and $21.1 million, respectively, and total liabilities were approximately $10.9 million and $10.5 million, respectively. The classification of these assets is primarily within real estate held for development and sale and the classification of liabilities are primarily within notes payable – secured by real estate held for development and sale in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Consolidated Operating Real Estate, Net

On January 31, 2011, Comstock Cascades II, L.C., a subsidiary of the Company (“Cascades II”) entered into a private placement for the sale of membership interests in Cascades II whereby Cascades II raised working capital in the amount of $2.35 million (the “Private Placement”) related to the planned construction of a 103 unit apartment project located in the Cascades master planned community in Loudoun County, Virginia (the “Cascades Apartments”). Proceeds of the Private Placement were utilized (i) to provide sufficient capital needed to secure project financing for the Cascades Apartments, (ii) to retire a portion of the existing indebtedness, and (iii) to reimburse the Company for prior expenditures incurred on behalf of the project. Participants in the Private Placement included unrelated third party investors along with several members of the Company’s Board of Directors, as well as the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company.

On February 11, 2011, Comstock closed its loan agreement with Cardinal Bank (see Note 14) which provided the necessary construction financing for the development of the Cascades Apartments and concurrent with that closing, the Company utilized the proceeds of the Private Placement offering as described above. The Company fully guaranteed the loan and accordingly, Comstock concluded that Cascades II was a VIE. As part of the Cascades II operating agreement, the Company had majority voting and complete operational control of the subsidiary. The Company concluded that it was the primary beneficiary of the VIE and therefore the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Cascades II were consolidated in the accompanying financial statements.

The investors in the Private Placement (the “Priority Members”) were entitled to a cumulative, compounded, preferred return, subject to the performance of Cascades II, of 20% per annum, compounded annually on their capital account balances. Comstock had the right to repurchase the interest of the Priority Members provided that i) all of the Priority Members interests were acquired, ii) the purchase was made in cash and iii) the purchase price shall equal the Priority Members capital account plus an amount necessary to cause the preferred return to equal a cumulative cash on cash return equal to 20% per annum. The equity contribution related to the Private Placement is reflected as a Non-Controlling Interest as a component of consolidated shareholders’ equity. The Company’s investment was subordinate to the Priority Members investment and gains from the operating activity and distributions of cash flow (if any) of Cascades II would allocate to the Priority Members (in advance of Comstock) up to their capital account plus the required preferred return of 20% as outlined above. For the three month period ended September 30, 2011, the priority returns were approximately $120.There were no priority returns for the three month period ended September 30, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the priority returns were approximately $103 and $370, respectively. The priority returns are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations as net income from discontinued operations attributable to non-controlling interests to properly account for the preferred return due the Priority Members upon liquidation of their interest in Cascades II.

On March 7, 2012, the Company completed the sale of the Cascades Apartments (the “Project”) to an affiliate of CAPREIT Acquisition Corporation (“Purchaser”), a Maryland corporation, pursuant to a Contract of Sale Agreement, as amended, dated October 31, 2011. The Project was sold for $19.35 million. In connection with the closing of the transaction, Cascades II placed in escrow $300 (the “Warranty Escrow”) to secure performance of certain post-closing warranty work and $650 (the “Claims Escrow”) to secure Cascades II’s indemnification and other obligations set forth in the Agreement. The Warranty Escrow will be released to Cascades upon completion of the post-closing warranty work and the Claims Escrow will be released to Cascades in three equal installments at six, eight and twelve months from the date of settlement provided that no claims have been made against Cascades by the Purchaser. On September 6, 2012, the Purchaser released the $300 Warranty escrow, net of $2 in settlement costs, and one-third of the Claims Escrow, $217, net of $35 of post-closing warranty claims. As detailed in Note 12, the historical operations of Cascades Apartments are included within discontinued operations.

Concurrent with the execution of the sale transaction, Cascades II settled the secured financing of $10.1 million with Cardinal Bank, including all principal and interest due at the time of settlement, and retired the non-controlling equity investment, including all preferred returns due. The Company realized a loss on the extinguishment of the secured financing with Cardinal Bank of $0.3 million, including the prepayment penalty fees of $0.2 million. At settlement, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $4.7 million from the transaction after repayment of the existing loan from Cardinal Bank secured by the Project and the retirement of the non-controlling equity investment related to the Project.

Concurrent with the settlement of the secured financing, retirement of non-controlling equity investment holders and the release of the Company’s corporate guaranty, the Company determined a reconsideration event under ASC 810 had occurred and concluded the entity no longer met the definition of a VIE as defined by the standard. The Company further noted that the Company has retained the controlling financial interest in Cascades II and has continued to consolidate the subsidiary.

Land purchase options

The Company typically acquires land for development at market prices under fixed price purchase agreements. The purchase agreements require deposits that may be forfeited if the Company fails to perform under the agreements. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts. The Company may, at its option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of its intent not to acquire the land under contract. The Company’s sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is typically limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidated damages provision contained within the purchase agreement. As a result, none of the creditors of any of the entities with which the Company enters into forward fixed price purchase agreements have recourse to the general credit of the Company.

The Company does not share in an allocation of either the profit earned or loss incurred by any of these entities with which the Company has fixed price purchase agreements. The Company has concluded that whenever it options land or lots from an entity and pays a significant non-refundable deposit as described above, a variable interest entity is created under the provisions of ASC 810-10, Consolidation. This is because the Company has been deemed to have provided subordinated financial support, which creates a variable interest which limits the equity holder’s returns and may absorb some or all of an entity’s expected theoretical losses if they occur. The Company, therefore, examines the entities with which it has fixed price purchase agreements for possible consolidation by the Company under the provision of ASC 810-10. The Company does not have any contractual or ownership interests in the entities with which it contracts to buy the land. The Company concluded that it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs, including the power to site plan and engineer the developments, finance the parcels under option contract, and develop the raw parcels under option contract into finished lots. The third party retains these rights under the fixed purchase price agreements until title is transferred to the Company upon settlement of the transaction, or a portion of the transactions as defined. Therefore, the Company has not consolidated these VIEs in the consolidated balance sheet.

14. CREDIT FACILITIES

The Company generally finances its development and construction activities on a single or multiple project basis so it is not uncommon for each project or collection of projects the Company develops and builds to have a separate credit facility. Accordingly, the Company typically has had numerous credit facilities and lenders. As described in more detail below, our outstanding debt by lender was as follows:


Bank	Balance as of September 30, 2012		Balance as of December 31, 2011		Recourse
Eagle Bank	$	6,398	$	—		Secured
SunBridge		—		10,178		Secured
Cardinal Bank		—		9,957		Secured
Bank of America		3,225		3,751		Unsecured
Rosalie K. Stahl Trust		3,000		—		Secured
Cornerstone		400		400		Unsecured
Branch Banking & Trust		263		263		Secured

Wachovia		—		133		Unsecured
Seller – Emerald Farm		100		100		Secured
Fifth Third		25		25		Unsecured


		13,411		24,807
Due to affiliates – Stonehenge Funding		5,022		5,008		Unsecured


Total	$	18,433	$	29,815

The material loan agreements are discussed below.

Eagle Bank

On May 29, 2012, the Company, through its Comstock Potomac Yard, L.C. and Comstock Penderbrook, L.C. subsidiaries, entered into a loan agreement with Eagle Bank pursuant to which the Company secured a $9.96 million loan with a twenty-seven months term (the “Eagle Bank Loan”) to refinance the Company’s Eclipse condominium project and Penderbrook Square condominium project. Proceeds from the Eagle Bank Loan were primarily utilized (i) to pay off existing indebtedness of approximately $7.97 million, (ii) set up an interest reserve escrow pursuant to the term of agreement in the amount $0.5 million, (iii) pay approximately $0.1 million in settlement charges and closing costs, and (iv) for general corporate purpose. The interest reserve escrow is held in the name of the bank and if the borrower defaults under the loan agreement, the bank has sole discretion to apply the funds or portion of the funds to pay off the indebtedness. Commencing thirty days after closing, the Company is required to make monthly payments of interest only on outstanding principal balance, principal curtailment payments upon settlements at the two subsidiaries and a minimum principal curtailment payment of $4.98 million no later than 12 months following the closing of the Eagle Bank Loan. There is no prepayment penalty associated with the Eagle Bank Loan. The balance outstanding at September 30, 2012 was $5.7 million.

On August 23, 2012, the Company, through New Hampshire Ave. Ventures, LLC, a consolidated joint venture of its subsidiary Comstock Ventures XVI, L.C. and 6000 New Hampshire Avenue, LLC, entered into a three-year loan agreement and related documents with Eagle Bank securing a $6.0 million revolving development loan and a $4.0 million revolving construction loan (collectively, the “Eagle NHA Revolver”) to finance the Company’s one hundred and ten unit The Hampshires project located in Washington, D.C. Proceeds from the Eagle NHA Revolver will primarily be utilized to (i) pay for expenses associated with the Eagle NHA Revolver;

(ii) reimburse the Company for development costs previously expended and (iii) to pay for the future development and construction related expenses. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Eagle NHA Revolver provides for an initial floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 3% with an interest rate floor of 5.75%. The New Hampshire Ave. Ventures, LLC is required to make monthly interest payments on the Eagle NHA Revolver to the extent not offset by a $400 interest reserve initially set aside for the benefit of the Borrower and is required to make a minimum principal curtailment under the development portion of the Eagle NHA Revolver of $3.22 million by December 31, 2013 and additional curtailments on a quarterly basis thereafter. There is no prepayment penalty associated with the Eagle NHA Revolver, which is secured by a first deed of trust and is fully guaranteed by the Company. The balance outstanding at September 30, 2012 was $0.7 million.

SunBridge

On July 12, 2011, the Company, through its Comstock Potomac Yard, L.C. subsidiary, entered into a loan agreement with BCL Eclipse, LLC, an affiliate of SunBridge Capital Management, LLC (“SunBridge”), pursuant to which the Company secured a $13.8 million loan with a three year term (the “SunBridge Eclipse Loan”) to refinance the Company’s Eclipse condominium project. Proceeds from the SunBridge Eclipse Loan were primarily utilized to (i) pay off existing indebtedness of approximately $9.0 million, (ii) pay approximately $0.8 million for expenses associated with the SunBridge Eclipse Loan (which were classified in Other assets in the accompanying balance sheet), and (iii) for general corporate purposes. The SunBridge Eclipse Loan provided for a 1% origination fee and an interest rate of 12.5%. There was no prepayment penalty associated with the SunBridge Eclipse Loan, which was secured by a first deed of trust on the Eclipse property. The loan was subject to minimum sales and release requirements.

On July 12, 2011, SunBridge also issued a binding commitment letter to the Company, through its Comstock Penderbrook, L.C. subsidiary, for a cash out refinance of the Company’s Penderbrook Square condominium projected in an amount of up to $7.0 million with a three-year term (the “SunBridge Penderbrook Loan”). This commitment was drawn upon on October 5, 2011 and the loan was funded for approximately $5.4 million. Proceeds from this loan were primarily utilized to (i) pay off existing indebtedness of approximately $3.9 million, (ii) pay for expenses associated with the loan of approximately $0.7 million, and (iii) for general corporate purposes.

As a condition of the loan agreement, the Company also entered into a cross-collateralization agreement whereby the Penderbrook project and the Eclipse project each secured payment and performance of the covenants and agreements of the October 5, 2011 SunBridge Penderbrook Loan and the loan funded on July 12, 2011 with respect to the Eclipse project as described above. The SunBridge Penderbrook Loan provided for a 1% origination fee and an interest rate of 12.5%. There was no prepayment penalty associated with the SunBridge Penderbrook Loan, which was secured by a first deed of trust on the property. The loan was subject to minimum sales and release requirements.

On October 5, 2011, the Company and a subsidiary of the Company, Comstock Emerald Farm, L.C., as guarantors, also entered into a guaranty agreement for the benefit of SunBridge. Pursuant to the guaranty agreement, (i) the guarantors jointly and severally guaranteed the payment of principal and interest and any other amounts due under the SunBridge Penderbrook Loan Agreement, (ii) the Company pledged its equity interest in Comstock Penderbrook, L.C., and (iii) each guarantor granted SunBridge a security interest in all of its unencumbered assets, all as additional security for the SunBridge Penderbrook Loan.

On May 29, 2012, the Company repaid the SunBridge loans in full. All cash paid to satisfy the extinguishment of the SunBridge Loans is classified as a financing activity in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Cardinal Bank

On February 11, 2011, the Company, through Cascades II entered into a loan agreement with Cardinal Bank pursuant to which the Company obtained an $11.0 million multi-family construction loan and mortgage with a five-year term (the “Cardinal Bank Loan”). Proceeds from the Cardinal Bank Loan (i) funded the construction of the Company’s Cascades apartment project and (ii) retired existing indebtedness of the Company owed to M&T Bank having a maturity date of February 14, 2011 and which was secured by a first deed of trust on the real property upon which the Cascades project was constructed. The Cardinal Bank Loan, secured by a new first deed of trust on the property, had an initial interest rate of Prime plus two percent (2%), with an interest rate floor of 6.5%. The Cardinal Bank Loan was amortized in accordance with a 5.5%, 25-year schedule, with amortization to begin 18 months after the loan closing and had a 2% prepayment penalty if paid within the first or second year and a 1% prepayment penalty if retired in the third or fourth year. The Company had fully guaranteed the Cardinal Bank Loan. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Operating Officer of the Company also provided a limited guaranty in connection with the Cardinal Bank Loan of up to $6.8 million, subject to further reduction upon the satisfaction of certain enumerated conditions set forth in the loan agreement (see Note 11). On March 7, 2012, the Company sold the Cascades Apartments and the Cardinal Bank Loan was repaid in full. A prepayment penalty of $0.2 million was incurred in connection with the early repayment and are included in Discontinued operations – gain on sale of real estate in the consolidated statement of operations. All cash paid to satisfy the extinguishment of the Cardinal Bank Loan is classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows.

On September 27, 2012, the Company, through Comstock Eastgate, L.C. (“Eastgate”), a consolidated joint venture of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. and BridgeCom Development I, LLC, entered into a loan agreement with Cardinal Bank to which the Company secured a $2.5 million revolving construction loan (the “Cardinal Bank Revolver”) to finance the Company’s sixty-six unit The Eastgate project located in Loudoun County, VA. The loan maturity is twelve months with an automatic extension of twelve months subject to the Company meeting sales conditions, which include that the Company (i) must have entered into binding contracts for the sale of eighteen units and (ii) settled twelve units, each by the one year anniversary of the loan. The proceeds of Cardinal Bank Revolver will be primarily utilized to pay expenses associated with the loan and future construction expenses of the project. The Cardinal Bank Revolver provides for a variable interest rate of Prime plus 0.5% with an interest rate floor of 4.75%. Commencing thirty days after loan close, the Company is required to make monthly payments of interest only and upon the closing of the sale of a unit, make principal curtailment payments of 100% of unit costs borrowed. There is no prepayment penalty associated with the Cardinal Bank Revolver. There have been no draws on the Cardinal Bank Revolver as of September 30, 2012.

Bank of America

At September 30, 2012, the Company had $3.2 million outstanding to Bank of America under a 10-year unsecured note. On February 25, 2010 the Company entered into a Seventh Loan Modification Agreement with Bank of America regarding the modification of the terms of this loan. In connection therewith the Company agreed to pay an extension fee of $100 and Bank of America agreed to delay until January 2011 the commencement of repayments of all previously unpaid interest accruing since the date of the Company’s previously reported modification of the line of credit in November 2008. On February 1, 2011, the Company entered into the Eighth Loan Modification Agreement with Bank of America. The modification required payments of past interest and modification fees of approximately $175 on February 1, 2011, which were paid in accordance with the agreement. The maturity date remains December 28, 2018. Comstock is required to make monthly interest payments beginning on February 28, 2011 through loan maturity. Commencing January 28, 2012 and continuing on each and every month through November 28, 2018, Comstock is also required to make monthly principal payments of approximately $37.

Rosalie K. Stahl Trust

On August 23, 2012, the Company, through New Hampshire Ave. Ventures, LLC, a consolidated joint venture of its subsidiary Comstock Ventures XVI, L.C. and 6000 New Hampshire Avenue, LLC also entered into a $3.0 million mezzanine loan (the “NHA Mezzanine Loan”) in connection with the The Hampshires project with the Rosalie K. Stahl Trust. Proceeds from the NHA Mezzanine Loan, which has a three-year maturity date, were utilized to acquire the land for development of the project. The NHA Mezzanine Loan provides for an interest rate of 13.5% per annum, interest to be paid current on a monthly basis, with the full principal balance being due at maturity. The NHA Mezzanine Loan is secured by a second deed of trust which is fully subordinate to the Eagle NHA Revolver and is non-recourse to the Company. There is no prepayment penalty associated with the NHA Mezzanine Loan.

Stonehenge

On December 23, 2009, Stonehenge Funding, LC (“Stonehenge”), an entity wholly-owned by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, completed the purchase of a senior unsecured note (the “JP Morgan Debt”) from JP Morgan Ventures (“JPMV”) in the then outstanding amount of approximately $9.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The purchase of the JP Morgan Debt resulted in the transfer to Stonehenge of a warrant previously issued to JPMV for the purchase of 1.5 million shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock with a strike price of $0.07 per share (the “JP Morgan Warrant”). The Company’s Chief Operating Officer subsequently purchased a participation interest in the JP Morgan Debt and the JP Morgan Warrant from Stonehenge. On February 12, 2010 the Company entered into a modification agreement to modify the terms of the Company’s senior unsecured note with Stonehenge (the “Modification Agreement”). Under the terms of the Modification Agreement, Stonehenge agreed to forgive $4.5 million of the principal balance due from the Company under the JP Morgan Debt, reducing the principal balance by 50% to $4.5 million. Stonehenge also agreed to forgive an additional amount due from the Company of approximately $875, representing all past due interest, late fees and penalties accruing through December 31, 2009 under the JP Morgan Debt. Stonehenge further agreed to reduce the interest rate, effective January 1, 2010, by 50% to 300 basis points above the one year LIBOR on a floating basis. In addition, to ensure the Company’s ability to comply with certain restrictions placed upon the Company by KeyBank and Guggenheim in connection with previously announced loan modifications enhancing cash flow to the Company, Stonehenge agreed to allow all future interest payments due from the Company under the JP Morgan Debt to accrue until at least 90 days after KeyBank and Guggenheim have been fully repaid. In connection therewith, Stonehenge may, on a quarterly basis, elect to accept stock of the Company (or warrants for the purchase thereof) with a cumulative value equal to the value of the scheduled interest payment in lieu of accruing a future quarterly interest payment. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no elections were made and no warrants were issued under the agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2010, warrants were issued with a fair value of $46, to settle interest payments. The KeyBank debt was fully repaid on February 2, 2011. The Guggenheim debt was fully repaid upon funding of the SunBridge Penderbrook Loan on October 5, 2011.

Further, the Modification Agreement provided for the elimination or forbearance upon the enforcement of all financial covenants contained in the JP Morgan Debt and all previously reported covenant violations by the Company. The maturity date of the Stonehenge debt remained unchanged at March 14, 2013. Stonehenge, as a condition of the new financing arrangement with SunBridge, agreed to subordinate its loan and delay principal and interest payments until the SunBridge loans on both Eclipse and Penderbrook are fully repaid. Concurrent with the repayment of the Sunbridge loans on May 29, 2012, the subordination agreement expired.

On July 24, 2012, the Company and Stonehenge entered into an agreement extending the maturity of the debt to July 20, 2013.

Wachovia

On August 17, 2009, the Company entered into a foreclosure agreement (“Agreement”) with Wachovia Bank with respect to approximately $17.8 million of secured debt, accrued interest and fees. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to cooperate with Wachovia with respect to its foreclosure on certain of the Company’s real estate assets. In return, Wachovia agreed to release the Company from their obligations and guarantees relating to the $17.8 million of indebtedness contemporaneous with the execution by the Company of a non-interest bearing, unsecured deficiency note payable to Wachovia in the amount of approximately $1.8 million. The deficiency note was reduced by the principal payments related to certain homes sold by the Company. As of December 31, 2011, the deficiency note balance was $132. On September 27, 2012, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of the deficiency note in full.

Cornerstone

On September 21, 2009 the Company entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release with Cornerstone Bank (“Cornerstone”) with respect to approximately $5.1 million debt secured by its Gates of Luberon project in Atlanta, Georgia. Under the terms of the agreement, Cornerstone released the Company, and its subsidiary Mathis Partners, LLC, from their respective obligations and guarantees relating to $5.1 million of debt owed by the Company to Cornerstone in exchange for a non-interest bearing unsecured subordinate note in the amount of $0.4 million with a three year term. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of the deficiency note was $400. The Company was in compliance with all terms of the agreement as of September 30, 2012. As disclosed in Note 17, on October 15, 2012, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of the deficiency note in full.

The Company’s borrowings mature as follows:


2012	$	425
2013		6,540
2014		4,275
2015		3,968
2016 and thereafter		3,225


Total	$	18,433

15. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

There are three measurement input levels for determining fair value: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values based on their short maturities. The carrying amount of floating rate debt approximates fair value based upon observable market rates (Level 2 inputs).

The fair value of fixed rate debt is based on observable market rates (Level 2 inputs). The following table summarizes the fair value of fixed rate debt and the corresponding carrying value of fixed rate debt as of:


	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Carrying amount	$	18,433	$	30,378
Fair value	$	15,670	$	26,927

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instruments. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

The Company may also value its real estate held for development and sale at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Such fair value measurements use significant unobservable inputs and are classified as Level 3. See Note 2 for a further discussion of the valuation techniques and the inputs used.

16. RESTRICTED STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER STOCK PLANS

The Company accounts for its share-based awards pursuant to ASC 718, Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements over the vesting period based on their fair values at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is calculated under the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized the vesting of previously issued restricted stock awards with a fair value of $295 and $323 respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued 706 and 1,471 restricted stock awards with a fair value of $1,157 and $1,725, respectively. Restricted stock awards issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 vest over four years.

For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized $34 for previously issued stock options. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 100 stock options with a fair value of $108. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued 140 and 100 stock options with a fair value of $176 and $108 respectively. Stock options issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 vest over four years.

For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, total stock-based compensation cost was $329 and $311, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, total stock-based compensation cost was $928 and $660, respectively, and was charged to selling, general and administration expenses.

As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, the weighted-average remaining contractual term of unexercised stock options was 7.5 years and 7.8 years, respectively. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, there was $1,436 and $1,199 respectively, unrecognized compensation cost related to stock issuances granted.

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 1, 2012, the Company, through Comstock Eastgate, L.C., a consolidated joint venture of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. and BridgeCom Development I, LLC, received equity contributions from BridgeCom Development I, LLC of $945. The proceeds from the contributions are to be utilized to acquire, develop and construct the Company’s 66-unit The Eastgate project located in Loudoun County, VA.

On October 15, 2012, the Company repaid in full the $400 outstanding balance of the deficiency note with Cornerstone Bank. The Company was in compliance with all terms of the agreement with Cornerstone Bank as of September 30, 2012.

On November 9, 2012, The Company repaid in full the $25 outstanding balance of the deficiency note with Fifth Third Bank. The Company was in compliance with all terms of the agreement with Fifth Third Bank as of September 30, 2012.

COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Cautionary Notes Regarding Forward-looking Statements” for more information. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly under the headings “Cautionary Notes Regarding Forward-looking Statements.”

Overview

We are a multi-faceted real estate development and services company. We have substantial experience with building a diverse range of products including apartments, single-family homes, townhouses, mid-rise condominiums, high-rise multi-family condominiums and mixed-use (residential and commercial) developments. We operate our business through three segments: Homebuilding, Apartment Buildings and Real Estate Services as further discussed in Note 8 of our consolidated financial statements. We are currently focused exclusively on the Washington, D.C. market, which is the eighth largest metropolitan statistical area in the United States.

Homebuilding

Our expertise in developing traditional and non-traditional housing products enables us to focus on a wide range of opportunities within our core market. For our homebuilding operations, we develop properties with the intent that they be sold either as fee-simple properties or condominiums to individual unit buyers or as investment properties sold to private or institutional investors. Our for-sale products are designed to attract first-time, early move-up, and secondary move-up buyers. We focus on products that we are able to offer for sale in the middle price points within the markets where we operate, avoiding the very low-end and high-end products. We believe our middle market strategy positions our products such that they are affordable to a significant segment of potential home buyers in our market.

Apartment Buildings

Comstock’s focus on the apartment sector is on developing projects ranging from approximately 75 to 200 units in locations that are supply constrained with demonstrated demand for stabilized assets. We seek opportunities in the multi-family rental market where our experience and core capabilities can be leveraged. We will either position the asset for sale when completed or operate the asset within our own portfolio. Operating the asset for our own account affords us the flexibility of converting the units to condominiums in the future. When developing rental communities, we design our products to be affordable for tenants that fit one of two groups: (i) young first-time renters, or (ii) renters by choice.

Real Estate Services

Our management team has significant experience in all aspects of real estate management including strategic planning, land development, entitlement, property management, sales and marketing, workout and turnaround strategies, financing and general construction. We are able to provide a wide range of construction management, general contracting and other real estate related services to other property owners. This business line not only allows us to generate fee income from our highly qualified personnel but also serves as a potential catalyst for joint venture and acquisition opportunities.

We believe that our significant experience over the past 25 years, combined with our ability to navigate through two major housing downturns (early 1990s and late 2000s) have provided us the experience necessary to capitalize on attractive opportunities in our core market of Washington, D.C. and to rebuild shareholder value. We believe that our focus on the Washington, D.C. market, which has historically been characterized by economic conditions less volatile than many other major homebuilding markets, will provide an opportunity to generate attractive returns on investment and for growth.

Recent Developments

New Hampshire Ave. Ventures LLC

On August 23, 2012, the Company formed New Hampshire Ave. Ventures, LLC, a consolidated joint venture of its subsidiary Comstock Ventures XVI, L.C. and 6000 New Hampshire Avenue, LLC, to acquire, develop and construct 110 residential units, consisting of 37 single-family homes and 73 townhomes, in Washington, D.C. (the “NHA Project”). The Company, through New Hampshire Ave. Ventures, LLC, entered into a $3.0 million mezzanine loan (the “NHA Mezzanine Loan”) in connection with the NHA Project with the Rosalie K. Stahl Trust, utilized to acquire the fully entitled land. Concurrent with the formation of the joint venture, the Company entered into a three-year loan agreement with Eagle Bank pursuant to which the Company secured a $6.0 million revolving development loan and a $4.0 million revolving construction loan (collectively, the “Eagle NHA Revolver”) to finance the development and construction of the NHA Project. Refer to Note 14 within the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the terms of these financing arrangements.

Comstock Eastgate, L.C.

On September 27, 2012, the Company formed Comstock Eastgate, L.C., a consolidated joint venture of Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. and BridgeCom Development I, LLC , to acquire, develop and construct 66 residential condominium units in Loudoun County, VA (the “Eastgate Project”). Concurrent with the formation of the joint venture, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Cardinal Bank to which the Company secured a $2.5 million revolving construction loan to finance the construction of the units. Refer to Note 14 within the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the terms of the financing arrangement.

Results of Operations

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to three and nine months ended September 30, 2011

Orders, cancellations and backlog

Gross new order revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $3.0 million to $7.0 million on 16 units as compared to $4.0 million on 13 units for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Gross new order revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $3.6 million to $14.8 million on 50 units as compared to $11.2 million on 38 units for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Net new order revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $2.1 million to $6.1 million on 13 units as compared to $4.0 million on 13 units for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Net new order revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $3.1 million to $14.0 million on 47 units as compared to $10.8 million on 36 units for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Average gross new order revenue per unit for three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $134 to $438, as compared to $304 for the three months

ended September 30, 2011. Average gross new order revenue per unit for nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $3 to $297, as compared to $294 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase is related directly to the unit mix of units settled. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, gross new orders totaled 37 units at Penderbrook, 10 units at Eclipse and 3 units at New Hampshire Ave., as compared to 25 units at Penderbrook and 13 units at Eclipse for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

We have two Washington, D.C. condominium projects where we have units available for sale or for rent: Penderbrook Square in Fairfax, VA and the Eclipse at Potomac Yard in Arlington, VA. Therefore, we were only able to generate orders and backlog at the two condominium projects in the first nine months of 2012. Because our unit sales for these projects are generated from completed inventory we do not need to construct units after a sales contract is executed with a unit purchaser. As a result we are able to quickly execute on a sales contract and deliver the unit to the purchaser. Typically, unit deliveries are made within thirty days of contract execution. As a result, we do not tend to generate significant order backlog for these projects.

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company has commenced development of the New Hampshire Ave. project in Washington, D.C. and the Eastgate project in Loudoun County, VA. The Company has completed development and construction of two single-family model homes at the New Hampshire Ave. project and has begun generating orders and backlog. The Company anticipates settlements at the New Hampshire Ave. project to commence in the first quarter of 2013. The Company anticipates completion of the first six units, including two models, at the Eastgate project in the fourth quarter of 2012.

At September 30, 2012, the Company had 9 units in backlog across the four projects to generate $5.1 million in revenues.

Revenue – homebuilding

The number of homes delivered for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased to 12 as compared to 10 homes for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The number of homes delivered for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased to 41 as compared to 30 homes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Average revenue per home delivered decreased by approximately $75 to $211 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $286 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Average revenue per home delivered decreased by approximately $69 to $231 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $300 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in settlements and decrease in average sales price is largely a function of the available product mix at condominium projects. As of September 30, 2012, there are 22 units remaining in our Eclipse project and 3 units remaining in our Penderbrook project. This compares to 33 units and 47 units, respectively, for Eclipse and Penderbrook for the period ended September 30, 2011.

Revenue from homebuilding decreased by $0.4 million to $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Revenue from homebuilding increased by $0.5 million to $9.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase was as a result of the increase in the number of homes settled, offset by the unit mix of units sold. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, 11 units were settled at Penderbrook and 1 unit at Eclipse, as compared to 6 units at Penderbrook and 4 units at Eclipse for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, 36 units were settled at Penderbrook and 5 units at Eclipse, as compared to 19 units at Penderbrook and 11 units at Eclipse for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Revenue – other

Revenue-other decreased approximately $1.4 million to $1.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Revenue-other decreased approximately $4.6 million to $2.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. These decreases are directly attributable to the completion of several general contracting projects in the latter quarters of 2011 and through 2012, as well as from the reduction in rental operations at the Penderbrook and Eclipse developments due to absorption of the units. The Company has two ongoing general contracting projects and continues to pursue opportunities within the Real Estate Services segment.

Cost of sales – homebuilding

Cost of sales – homebuilding for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $0.5 million, to $2.1 million as compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Cost of sales – homebuilding for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $0.1 million, to $8.1 million as compared to $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The unit mix of homes settled during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012 accounted for the decrease and increase, respectively, in the aggregate cost of sales figures. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, gross margins increased to 17% on units settled as compared to 11% for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, gross margins increased to 14% on units settled as compared to 11% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in margins is attributable to an increase in traffic and absorption at the two condominium projects resulting in a slight increase in pricing across those units.

Cost of sales – other

Cost of sales – other decreased approximately $1.4 million to $1.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $2.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011. Cost of sales – other decreased approximately $3.3 million to $3.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $6.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Included in cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2012, costs and gross profits totaled $439 and $398, respectively, related to rental operations at Penderbrook and Eclipse. Included in cost of sales – other for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, costs and gross profits (losses) totaled $1,376 and $1,062, respectively, related to rental operations at Penderbrook and Eclipse. As a result of the continued absorption of the condominium units at Penderbrook and Eclipse, the number of units has been reduced to 3 and 22, respectively, as of September 30, 2012. For the same period in 2011, rental units remaining for Penderbrook and Eclipse were 49 and 33, respectively. Consequently, rental revenues have declined and the impact of fixed costs on gross profit has been more significant. The Company expects this trend to continue as the final units within the two remaining condominium projects are absorbed. Additionally, an increase in repairs and maintenance costs of $359, net of decreases related to home owners’ association fees and other costs has contributed to the increase in costs and gross profit decline.

Included in cost of sales – other for the three months ended September 30, 2012, were costs and gross profits (losses) that totaled $705 and $178, respectively, related to our aforementioned general contracting projects. Included in cost of sales – other for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, were costs and gross profits (losses) that totaled $1,531 and $304, respectively, related to our aforementioned general contracting projects. These decreases in three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are directly related to the decrease in the number of ongoing general contracting projects. Consequently, the decline in revenues generated within the Real Estate Services segment and the impact relative to the fixed costs on gross profit has been more significant. The Company has two ongoing projects and continues to pursue opportunities to expand the Real Estate Services segment.

Impairments and write-offs

Impairments and write-offs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $2,358, as compared to zero for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the basis for the impairments realized.

Selling, general and administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.5 million to $2.2 million, as compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1.2 million to $6.2 million, as compared to $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in expenses over the three month period is attributable to increases in legal expenses of $142, consulting expenses of $66, feasibility expenses of $59, marketing of $76 and stock compensation of $41. The increase in expenses over the nine month period is attributable to increases in compensation, benefits and payroll taxes of $431, consulting expenses of $302 and stock compensation of $157. The increase in expenses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, is primarily attributable to labor and costs related to the Company’s pursuit of new business opportunities.

Interest, real estate taxes and indirect costs related to inactive projects

Interest and real estate taxes incurred relating to the development of lots and parcels are capitalized to real estate held for development and sale during the active development period, which generally commences when development and construction activities begin and ends when the properties are substantially complete or the property becomes inactive which means that development and construction activities have been suspended indefinitely. Interest is capitalized based on the interest rate applicable to specific borrowings or the weighted average of the rates applicable to other borrowings during the period. Interest and real estate taxes capitalized to real estate held for development and sale are expensed as a component of cost of sales as related units are sold.

When a project becomes inactive, its interest, real estate taxes and indirect overhead costs are no longer capitalized but rather expensed in the period in which they are incurred. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, several of our projects were determined to be inactive for accounting purposes. Refer to Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the breakdown of the interest, real estate taxes and indirect costs related to inactive projects reported on the consolidated statement of operations related to the inactivation of certain real estate projects held for development and sale.

Discontinued operations

As described in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, on March 7, 2012, the Company’s subsidiary sold the Cascades Apartments for $19.35 million. Because the sale of the Cascades Apartments represents a component of the Company, generally accepted accounting principles require the results of operations associated with the Cascades Apartments to be included in Discontinued Operations. Accordingly, the net gain from the sale of the project of $6.5 million is reflected within Discontinued Operations in the accompanying financial statements. Although the sale of the Cascades project is presented in the accompanying financial statements under Discontinued Operations, developing apartments for the purpose of selling is a component of the Company’s ongoing strategy and operating activities. The Company continues to pursue such projects within its Apartment Buildings segment and anticipates that sales of similar operating projects will be reflected in this manner.

Income taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” (“ASC 740”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 0%, respectively.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company recorded valuation allowances for certain tax attributes and other deferred tax assets. At this time, sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the future realization of these deferred tax assets through future taxable income or carry back opportunities. If, in the future, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax benefits will be realized, the valuation allowances will be reversed. With a full valuation allowance, any change in the deferred tax asset or liability is fully offset by a corresponding change in the valuation allowance. This results in a zero deferred tax benefit or expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

We file U.S. and state income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2009 through 2011 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal and most state tax authorities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We require capital to operate, to post deposits on new deals, to purchase and develop land, to construct homes, to fund related carrying costs and overhead and to fund various advertising and marketing programs to generate sales. These expenditures include payroll, community engineering, entitlement, architecture, advertising, utilities and interest as well as the construction costs of our homes. Our sources of capital include, and will continue to include, funds derived from various secured and unsecured borrowings to finance construction and development on acquired land, cash flow from operations, which includes the sale and delivery of constructed homes, rental apartment projects, finished and raw building lots and the sale of equity and debt securities.

The Company is involved in ongoing discussions with lenders and potential equity investors in an effort to provide additional growth capital to fund various new business opportunities. We are anticipating that through a combination of current available cash on hand, the additional cash from settlement proceeds, and the cash generated from settlements at our new communities currently under development that the Company will have sufficient financial resources to sustain our operations through the next 12 months, though no assurances can be made that we will be successful in our ongoing capital raising efforts.

Credit Facilities

We have outstanding borrowings with various financial institutions and other lenders that have been used to finance the acquisition, development and construction of real estate property. The Company has generally financed its development and construction activities on a single or multiple project basis so it is not uncommon for each project or collection of projects the Company develops and builds to have a separate credit facility. Accordingly, the Company typically has had numerous credit facilities and lenders. Refer to Note 14 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of our credit facilities and maturities and/or curtailment obligations of all of our borrowings.

Cash Flow

Net cash used in operating activities was $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This represents a decline from the net cash provided by operating activities of $11.5 million for the nine months ended 2011. However, the 2012 cash flows do not reflect the net cash flows from the sale of the Cascades Apartments of approximately $4.7 million. Although the construction, development and sale of this and potentially future projects are an ongoing component of the Company’s operations, the sale of the project is required to be presented as Discontinued Operations. Accordingly, the net cash flows are presented within the investing and financing section of the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows. Additionally, for 2012, other significant outflows relate to a $0.6 million reduction in accrued interest payable for debt service payments made to lenders and a $0.8 million reduction in payables related to payments made to vendors and compensation paid to employees, reflective of the improved cash position of the Company.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $18.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily attributable to the sale of the Cascades Apartments. Net cash used in investing activities was $9.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily attributable to the development activities of the Cascades Apartments.

Net cash used in financing activities was $14.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily attributable to the extinguishment of debt and retirement of the non-controlling interests, including preferred returns, in full related to the Cascades Apartments and curtailments paid to lenders upon settlement of units at the Penderbrook and Eclipse properties. Net cash provided by financing activities was $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily attributable to the refinancing of the notes payable related to the Eclipse project and the Private Placement for the Cascades Apartments.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with those disclosed in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Cautionary Notes Regarding Forward-looking Statements

This report includes forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “intend,” “expect,” “will,” “should,” “seeks” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally to the real estate industry, while other factors apply directly to us. Any number of important factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation: general economic and market conditions, including interest rate levels; our ability to service our substantial debt; inherent risks in investment in real estate; our ability to compete in the markets in which we operate; regulatory actions; fluctuations in operating results; our anticipated growth strategies; shortages and increased costs of labor or building materials; the availability and cost of land in desirable areas; natural disasters; our ability to raise debt and equity capital and grow our operations on a profitable basis; and our continuing relationships with affiliates. Additional information concerning these and other important risk and uncertainties can be found under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Our actual results could differ materially from these projected or suggested by the forward-looking statements.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2012. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control

No change has occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our last fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There have been no material changes to the legal proceedings discussed under “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

We previously disclosed risk factors under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There have been no material changes to these risk factors.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


10.68*		Loan Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2011, by and among Comstock Penderbrook, L.C. and BCL Penderbrook, LLC

10.69*		Contract of Sale Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2011, by and among Comstock Cascades II, L.C and CAPREIT Acquisition Corporation.

10.70*		Loan Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2012, by and between Eagle Bank and Comstock Potomac Yard, L.C and Comstock Penderbrook, L.C.

10.71*		Loan Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2012, by and between Eagle Bank and New Hampshire Ave. Venture, LLC.

10.72*		Loan Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2012, by and between Cardinal Bank and Comstock Eastgate, L.C.

10.73		Loan Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2012, by and between Rosalie K. Stahl Trust and New Hampshire Ave. Venture, LLC.

31.1*		Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1**		Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder’s Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. ***

*	Filed herewith.

**	Furnished herewith.

***

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	COMSTOCK HOLDING COMPANIES, INC.

Date: December 21, 2012	By:	/ S / CHRISTOPHER CLEMENTE
		Christopher Clemente
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: December 21, 2012	By:	/ S / JOSEPH M. SQUERI
		Joseph M. Squeri
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Large Accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company