Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS LPform8-kxheppresentationdec4.htm
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. Wells Fargo Energy Conference December 2012


 
Statements made during the course of this presentation that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and necessarily involve risks that may affect the business prospects and performance of Holly Energy Partners L.P. and/or HollyFrontier Corporation. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed during this presentation. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, actions of actual or potential competitive suppliers and transporters of refined petroleum products in Holly Energy Partners’ and HollyFrontier’s markets, the demand for and supply of crude oil and refined products, the spread between market prices for refined products and market prices for crude oil, the possibility of constraints on the transportation of refined products, the possibility of inefficiencies or shutdowns in refinery operations or pipelines, effects of governmental regulations and policies, the availability and cost of financing to Holly Energy Partners and HollyFrontier, the effectiveness of Holly Energy Partners’ and HollyFrontier’s capital investments, marketing and acquisition strategies, the possibility of terrorist attacks and the consequences of any such attacks, and general economic conditions. Additional information on risks and uncertainties that could affect the business prospects and performance of Holly Energy Partners and HollyFrontier are provided in the most recent reports of Holly Energy Partners and HollyFrontier filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements included in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements. Holly Energy Partners and HollyFrontier undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Safe Harbor Disclosure Statement 2


 
HEP Investment Highlights 3  Well positioned assets that serve high growth markets  Revenues are 100% fee based with no commodity ownership risk  Long-term contracts support cash flow stability  Successful execution of growth plan has resulted in consistent distribution increases  HEP benefits from strong sponsor relationship with HFC


 
Well Positioned HEP & HFC Assets… 4


 
…Serving Traditionally High Growth Markets 5 …Serving Traditionally High Growth Markets RI DC Loss 0-5% 5-15% 15-25% 25% + NH VT MA CT NJ DE MD PR Legend Area Served by HEP • Asset footprint in Southwest, Rockies and Mid-continent regions • States served by HEP assets are among the fastest growing • E&P activity continues to increase in these areas


 
Fee-based Revenues with No Commodity Risk 6  Fee-based revenues • Tariffs from pipeline movements • Storage and transfer fees for terminal activity • Loading fees for loading rack activity • Capacity lease commitments  With no commodity ownership risk • HEP shippers own hydrocarbon inventory • No inventory hedging program required


 
Long Term Contracts Support Cashflow Stability 7  Major refiner customers have entered into 15-year long term contracts  Contracts require minimum payment obligations for volume and/or revenue commitments  Earliest contract matures in 2018  Over 80% of revenues tied to long term contracts and minimum commitments Minimum Annual Commitment Term Counterparty ($mm) Expiration HFC $217.2 2019-2026 Alon USA $39.4 2018-2022 Total $256.6


 
Successful Execution of Growth Plan Over Time 8  Organic growth: Increase cashflow via base business volume growth and annual contractual PPI-related growth  HFC growth: Partner with HFC to grow current asset base with projects and joint acquisitions  Third party growth: Acquire third party assets and/or businesses


 
HEP Growth Chronology: IPO to Present 9 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 MLP IPO ( Jul 2004 ) Holly intermediate feedstock pipeline acquisition ( Jul 2005 ) 25 % JV with Plains for SLC pipeline ( Mar 2009 ) Holly Tulsa loading rack dropdown acquisition ( Tulsa West ) ( Aug 2009 ) Holly crude oil and tankage assets acquisition ( Mar 2008 ) Alon pipeline and terminal asset acquisition ( Feb 2005 ) Holly 16 " Intermediate pipeline facilities acquisition ( Jun 2009 ) Sinclair Tulsa ( Tulsa East) & Roadrunner / Beeson acquisitions ( Dec 2009 ) Sale of 70 % interest in Rio Grande to Enterprise ( Dec 2009 ) 2010 Purchase of additional Tulsa tanks and racks ; Lovington rack ( March 2010 ) 2011 HFC Dropdown of El Dorado & Cheyenne assets ( Nov 2011 ) Holly South line expansion project ( 2007 - 08 ) Holly Corporation and Frontier Oil Corporation complete merger (July 2011) 2012 HEP purchases 75% interest in UNEV from HFC (July 2012) Tulsa interconnect pipelines (Sep 2011)


 
HEP Statistics: Then and Now 10 IPO July 2004 Pipeline miles 1,000 2,900 Product terminals 9 13 Loading racks 2 15 Storage (mm bbls) 2.0 11.8 Annual EBITDA run-rate ($mm) $35.0 $200.0+ Quarterly distr ($/unit/qtr) $0.500 $0.925 Unit price ($/unit)* $22.25 $66.04 LP unit yield 9.0% 5.6% LP units outstanding (mm) 14.0 28.4 Market capitalization ($mm)* $311.5 $1,874.9 Current *As of 11/28/2012 HEP share price


 
HEP Growth: EBITDA* Since Inception 11 *Definition on page 21


 
HEP Growth: Distributable Cash Flow1 12 $41.4 $47.2 $51.0 $60.4 $72.2 $91.0 $100.3 $111.5 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Di str ibu table Cas h F lo w (mm’ s) 1 Definition on page 21 2 As of September 30, 2012 2


 
HEP Growth: Limited Partner Distributions 13 $2.22 $2.58 $2.78 $2.96 $3.12 $3.28 $3.44 $3.62 $2.00 $2.25 $2.50 $2.75 $3.00 $3.25 $3.50 $3.75 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 LTM 3Q12 Distribution has been increased every quarter since IPO—32 consecutive quarters Current distribution (Q3 2012) annual run rate: $3.701 1Nov. 2012 quarterly rate of $0.925/unit times 4 quarters equals $3.70


 
Strategic Relationship with HollyFrontier (“HFC”) 14  HEP’s assets are integral to HollyFrontier’s five refineries  Currently HFC owns 42% of the MLP through a limited partner interest and 2% through a general partner interest  As HFC grows, HEP is positioned to benefit by partnering with HFC to build and/or acquire supporting logistic assets  HEP generally has right of first refusal on all logistics assets HFC builds or acquires


 
HFC & HEP Assets: Current Footprint 15


 
HollyFrontier Business Highlights 16  Pure play competitive refiner  5 refineries with 440,000 bbls per day of refining capacity  High refining complexity – combined Nelson complexity of over 12.0.  Multiple sources of crude oil – all crude oil ‘WTI’ price-based  Attractive markets  Geographic: Rockies, Southwest and Mid-Continent Plains states  Advantaged crude supply: High growth Canadian, Bakken, Permian, Niobrara  Product mix: Balanced gasoline and diesel product slate plus high margin specialty lubricants  Strong Financial Performance  Historical industry leading return on invested capital among peers  Historical industry leading earnings per barrel among peers  Low debt among peers and history of conservative financial management


 
HollyFrontier Corporation: Strong Returns on Capital 17 Highest Return on Invested Capital among refining peer group (2007-2011 average)* *PSX and MPC are 3 and 4 year averages respectively based on historical ROCE data provided by the companies. See page 22 for supporting information & reconciliation to financials


 
HEP Investment Highlights 18  Well positioned assets that serve high growth markets  Revenues are 100% fee based with no commodity ownership risk  Long-term contracts support cash flow stability  Successful execution of growth plan has resulted in consistent distribution increases  HEP benefits from strong sponsor relationship with HFC


 
Contact Information: Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP) 2828 N. Harwood, Suite 1300 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 871-3555 For investor relations questions please contact: Neale Hickerson, Investor Relations neale.hickerson@hollyenergy.com Julia Heidenreich, Investor Relations julia.heidenreich@hollyenergy.com 19


 
Appendix 20


 
Definitions 21 BPD: Barrels per day DISTRIBUTABLE CASH FLOW: Distributable cash flow (DCF) is not a calculation based upon GAAP. However, the amounts included in the calculation are derived from amounts separately presented in our consolidated financial statements, with the exception of excess cash flows over earnings of SLC Pipeline, maintenance capital expenditures and distributable cash flow from discontinued operations. Distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income or operating income as an indication of our operating performance or as an alternative to operating cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Distributable cash flow is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Distributable cash flow is presented here because it is a widely accepted financial indicator used by investors to compare partnership performance. We believe that this measure provides investors an enhanced perspective of the operating performance of our assets and the cash our business is generating. Our historical distributable cash flow is reconciled to net income in footnote 5 to the table in "Item 6. Selected Financial Data" of HEP's 2011 10-K. EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization which is calculated as net income plus (i) interest expense net of interest income and (ii) depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation based upon U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). However, the amounts included in the EBITDA calculation are derived from amounts included in our consolidated financial statements. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or operating income, as an indication of our operating performance or as an alternative to operating cash flow as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. EBITDA is presented here because it is a widely used financial indicator used by investors and analysts to measure performance. EBITDA is also used by our management for internal analysis and as a basis for compliance with financial covenants. Our historical EBITDA is reconciled to net income in footnote 4 to the table in “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” of HEP’s 2011 10-K. STEADY STATE EBITDA: EBITDA as defined above calculated on the basis of our projection of normal pipeline and terminal volumes from our customers, applicable tariffs and fees, and normal expense levels, and assuming no material unplanned shutdowns or unavailable capacity.


 
Financial Metrics for HFC 22 HOLLYFRONTIER 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 5-Yr Ave ROIC Net Income $ 1,330.2 $ 141.6 $ (65.0) $ 347.0 $ 736.1 Total Debt EX HEP $ 1,036.8 $ 674.8 $ 725.8 $ 5.2 $ 150.0 Total Equity $ 7,098.1 $ 2,274.6 $ 2,151.6 $ 1,587.4 $ 1,474.3 ROIC 16% 5% -2% 22% 45% 17.2% Company 2011 ROIC 2010 ROIC 2009 ROIC 2008 ROIC 2007 ROIC 5 Yr. Ave ROIC PS 14.0% 7.0% 2.0% 7.7% MPC 19.0% 5.0% 4.0% 11.0% 9.8% VLO 8.7% 1.0% -9.0% -5.0% 21.0% 3.3% DK 15.5% -11.0% 0.0% 3.0% 11.0% 3.7% ALJ 2.9% -10.0% -8.0% 5.0% 11.0% 0.2% WNR 8.2% -1.0% -19.0% 3.0% 10.0% 0.2% HFC 16.4% 4.8% -2.3% 21.8% 45.3% 17.2% TSO 10.0% -1.0% -3.0% 6.0% 12.0% 4.8% * HFC debt excludes HEP debt: All amounts are based on publicly-available financial statements, which we have assumed to be accurate.