UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

þ  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 000-52775

OCEAN ELECTRIC INC.

(Name of Small Business Issuer in its charter)

775-321-8216

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was require to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   þ   Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o     Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o   No þ  

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of August 13, 2012 the registrant had 55,800,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (this “Amendment”) amends the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, which the Registrant previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2012 (the “Original Filing”).  The Registrant is amending its filing because the Registrant has restated its financial statements as at June 30, 2012 and for the three and six months then ended to reflect the acquisition cost of the off-shore wind energy technology to be valued at the transferor’s historical cost.  The effect of the restatement decreased total assets by $5,087,955 and decreased net loss for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 by $88,206 and $176,412, respectively. 

Except as set forth above, the Original Filing has not been amended, updated or otherwise modified.  Other events occurring after the filing of the Form 10-Q/A or other disclosures necessary to reflect subsequent events have been addressed in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission subsequent to the filing of this Form 10-Q/A.

OCEAN ELECTRIC INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

OCEAN ELECTRIC INC.

(formerly known as Gold Holding Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

June 30, 2012

OCEAN ELECTRIC INC.

(formerly known as Gold Holding Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

OCEAN ELECTRIC INC.

(formerly known as Gold Holding Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

OCEAN ELECTRIC INC.

(formerly known as Gold Holding Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash flows

(unaudited)

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

1.

Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business

Ocean Electric Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 10, 2006. On October 27, 2009, the Company changed its name from Royal Equine Alliance Corp. to Gold Holding Corp., and on January 23, 2012, changed its name from Gold Holding Corp. to Ocean Electric Inc. The Company is a development stage company that plans to focus on alternative energy sources. The Company is a development stage company as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915, “Development Stage Entities”.    

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company has working capital of $3,276,157 and an accumulated deficit of $3,668,614.  The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars.  The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

b)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.  The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources.  The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates.  To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

c)

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.  

d)

Interim Financial Statements

These interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown.  The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

e)

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share.  ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement.  Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method.  In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants.  Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

f)

Financial Instruments

Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value.  A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable, loan payable to related party and long-term debt.  Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.  We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

g)

Comprehensive Loss

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.

h)

Construction in Process

On April 16, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with a production company, whereby the production company will produce an advertorial video project at a cost of $395,152.  As at June 30, 2012, the Company incurred $197,576 on the project.

i)

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are comprised of patents and licenses relating to wave energy and wind energy technology.  The intangible assets are externally acquired and are amortized straight-line over a useful life of fifteen years with zero residual value.  

j)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, Property Plant and Equipment, the Company tests long-lived assets or asset groups for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.  Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisal in certain instances.  An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.

k)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

3.

Prepaid Expense

On April 27, 2012, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares with a fair value $6,000,000, to the director for serviced provided and to be provided from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012.  As at June 30, 2012, the Company had $3,000,000 in prepaid expenses.

4.

On October 3, 2011, the Company acquired all of the rights and patents to a wave energy technology developed by Hidroflot, S.A.  The purchase price is $1,400,000 for the technology, which is payable in thirty-three monthly installments, and has been recorded at the present value of $1,218,238, based on the present value of payments.

On December 13, 2011, the Company acquired all of the rights and patents to an off-shore wind energy technology developed by Green& Blue Sustainable Technologies.  The Company issued 25,000,000 common shares as full payment for the acquisition, with a market value of $5,750,000.

5.

Long-Term Debt

On June 26, 2012, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Zenith Equity Group providing for a loan of $450,000.  The loan will accrue simple interest of 3% on the outstanding principal amount and to be repaid in full due on or before June 27, 2015.  As at June 30, 2012, the loan amount is $450,000 (2011 - $nil) and accrued interest is $173.

As at June 30, 2012, the Company owed $924,840 (2011 - $1,122,862) of debt relating to the acquisition of the wave energy technology, as noted in Note 3.  The amount owing is payable in equal monthly installments as follows:

The repayment schedule for the note payable is accelerated to three equal monthly payments of the remaining outstanding amounts at such time where the Company generates $10,000,000 in direct revenues from the technology.  

5.

Long-Term Debt (continued)

The Company is required to make the following principal repayments on the long-term debt:

6.

Related Party Transactions

a)

As at June 30, 2012, the Company owed $15,796 (2011 - $15,796) to the former President of the Company.  The amounts were used to fund operations.  The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.  

b)

On October 3, 2011, the Company purchased the rights to a wave energy technology from Hidroflot, S.A., a company solely owned by the President of the Company, for $1,400,000 (see note 3).

c)

On December 13, 2011, the Company purchased the rights to an off-shore wind energy technology from Green & Blue Sustainable Technologies, a company solely owned by the President of the Company, for 25,000,000 common shares with a fair value of $5,750,000 (see note 3).

d)

On April 27, 2012, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares with a fair value of $6,000,000 to the director for serviced provided and to be provided from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012

7.

Share Capital

a)

On February 24, 2012, the Company increased the number of common shares authorized from 75,000,000 common shares to 250,000,000 common shares.

b)

On March 26, 2012, the Company issued 1,400,000 common shares for proceeds of $502,600.

c)

On April 27, 2012, the Company issued 20,000,000 common shares with a fair value of $6,000,000 to the President of the Company for management fees.

8.

Commitments

On April 16, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with a production company, whereby the production company will produce an advertorial video project at a cost of $395,152, to be paid according to the following schedule

·

50% ($197,576) upon signing of the agreement (paid);

·

25% ($98,788) prior to commencement of animation; and

·

25% ($98,788) on delivery of the final video project.

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Safe Harbor Statement

This report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements.  All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any projections of earnings, revenues, or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operation; any statements concerning proposed new products, services, or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; statements of belief; and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the following: competition, promotional costs, and risk of declining revenues.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors.  These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this filing, and we assume no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.  The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations based upon our financial statements which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  It should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.  The discussions of results, causes and trends should not be construed to imply any conclusion that these results or trends will necessarily continue into the future.

Overview

We were incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada on January 10, 2006.  We are a startup company and have realized minimal revenues of $4,000.  Our efforts, to date, have focused primarily on the development and implementation of our business plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $741,765 and a working capital surplus of $3,276,157.  As of June 30, 2012 our accumulated deficit was $3,464,168 .  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 our net loss was  $3,184,448 compared to a net income $21,281 during the same period in 2011.  This increase was due to an increase in management fees and amortization.

We used net cash of $61,812 in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to  receiving net cash of $13,810 in operating activities for the same period in 2011.  We used net cash of $197,576 in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $nil for the same period ending in 2011.  We received net cash of $703,920 from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $13,810 repayment in financing activities for the same period in 2011.  

These financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that we are a going concern, meaning we will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate when a company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future.  Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to attain profitable operations and generate funds there-from, and/or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations.  Management plans to raise equity financings over the next twelve months to finance operations.  There is no guarantee that we will be able to complete any of these objectives.  We have incurred losses from operations since inception and at June 30, 2012, have an accumulated deficit that creates substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Results of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 and from inception to June 30, 2012.

Limited Revenues

Since our inception on January 10, 2006 to June 30, 2012, we have earned limited revenue of $4,000.  As of June 30, 2012, we have an accumulated deficit of  $3,464,168 and we did not earn any revenues during the three months ending on June 30, 2012. At this time, our ability to generate any significant revenues continues to be uncertain.  Our financial statements contain an additional explanatory paragraph in Note 1, which identifies issues that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Net Income/Loss

We incurred a net loss of $1,597,465 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to a net income of $26,381 for the same period in 2011.  This increase in net loss was due to an increase in management fees and amortization.  From inception on January 10, 2006 to June 30, 2012, we have incurred a net loss of  $3,464,168.  Our basic and diluted net income (loss) per share was ($0.03) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and  $0.00 for the same period in 2011. 

Expenses

Our total operating expenses increased from $3,525 to  $1,572,496 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.  This increase in expenses is mostly due to higher management fees and amortization.  Since our inception on January 10, 2006 to June 30, 2012, we have incurred total operating expenses of $3,364,294.

Results of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

Limited Revenues

We did not earn any revenues during the six months ending on June 30, 2012, nor did we earn any revenues earned during the same period in 2011.  At this time, our ability to generate any significant revenues continues to be uncertain.

Net Income/Loss

We had a net loss of  $3,184,448 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to a net income of $21,281, for the same period in 2011.  This increase in net loss was mostly due to higher management fees and amortization. Our basic and diluted net income (loss) per share was ($0.08) for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and $0.00 for the same period in 2011.  

Expenses

Our total operating expenses increased from $8,625 to  $3,132,218 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.  This increase in expenses is mostly due to higher management fees and amortization.

Inflation

The amounts presented in the financial statements do not provide for the effect of inflation on our operations or financial position.  The net operating losses shown would be greater than reported if the effects of inflation were reflected either by charging operations with amounts that represent replacement costs or by using other inflation adjustments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2012, we had no off-balance sheet transactions that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.