UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

S	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

 

OR

 

£	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                           to                          

 

Commission file number 0-20394

 

	‘mktg, inc.’
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

  

Delaware		06-1340408
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

 

75 Ninth Avenue
New York, New York		10011
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 366-3400

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes S                             No £

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

  Yes S                             No £

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer £		Accelerated filer £
Non-accelerated filer £ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company S

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes £                            No S

 

As of October 31, 2012, 8,885,468 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, were outstanding.

 

 

INDEX

 

‘mktg, inc.’

 

				Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
			Balance Sheets – September 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and March 31, 2012	3
			Statements of Operations (Unaudited) – Three and Six Months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011	4
			Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) – Three and Six Months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011	5
			Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) –Six Months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011	6
		Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		19
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures		26
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6.		Exhibits		26
SIGNATURES				27

  

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

‘mktg, inc.’

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and March 31, 2012

 

		September 30, 2012				March 31, 2012
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	6,714,031			$	6,660,695
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $298,000 at September 30, 2012 and $317,0000 at March 31, 2012			14,222,200				11,286,403
Unbilled contracts in progress			1,368,233				1,991,951
Deferred contract costs			190,135				533,200
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			166,490				296,443
Deferred tax asset			830,696				805,696
Total current assets			23,491,785				21,574,388
Property and equipment, net			1,648,536				1,709,109
Restricted cash			500,000				500,000
Deferred tax asset			2,744,874				3,345,874
Goodwill			10,052,232				10,052,232
Intangible assets - net			441,262				602,103
Other assets			466,825				449,511
Total assets		$	39,345,514			$	38,233,217
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	1,239,903			$	1,637,619
Accrued compensation			1,031,367				1,739,734
Accrued job costs			1,675,159				533,523
Other accrued liabilities			2,541,742				3,108,798
Income taxes payable			30,818				891
Deferred revenue			12,007,001				12,470,463
Total current liabilities			18,525,990				19,491,028
Deferred rent			1,104,884				1,245,371
Warrant derivative liability			3,813,830				3,005,319
Deferred tax liability			2,715,544				2,368,544
Total liabilities			26,160,248				26,110,262
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable Series D Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, $3,539,573 redemption and liquidation value, par value $1.00: 2,500,000 shares designated, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012			2,845,669				2,569,347
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A convertible preferred stock, par value $.001; authorized 650,000 shares; none issued and outstanding			—				—
Class B convertible preferred stock, par value $.001; authorized 700,000 shares; none issued and outstanding			—				—
Preferred stock, undesignated; authorized 3,650,000 shares; none issued and outstanding			—				—
Common stock, par value $.001; authorized 25,000,000 shares; 8,952,315 shares issued and 8,885,468 outstanding at September 30, 2012 and 8,820,815 shares issued and 8,765,827 outstanding at March 31, 2012			8,952				8,821
Additional paid-in capital			14,972,336				14,746,738
Accumulated deficit			(4,607,340	)			(5,160,841	)
Cumulative translation adjustment			18,962				—
Treasury stock at cost, 66,847 shares at September 30, 2012 and 54,988 shares at March 31, 2012			(53,313	)			(41,110	)
Total stockholders’ equity			10,339,597				9,553,608
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	39,345,514			$	38,233,217

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

‘mktg, inc.’

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Six Months Ended September 30,
		2012				2011				2012				2011
Sales		$	32,998,359			$	28,407,439			$	68,434,886			$	59,736,124
Operating expenses:
Reimbursable program costs and expenses			5,748,872				5,353,501				12,025,445				12,500,948
Outside production and other program expenses			16,636,429				13,910,445				34,755,719				28,763,281
Compensation expense			7,587,441				6,465,344				15,318,370				13,053,231
General and administrative expenses			1,862,813				1,586,403				3,658,534				3,252,689
Total operating expenses			31,835,555				27,315,693				65,758,068				57,570,149
Operating income			1,162,804				1,091,746				2,676,818				2,165,975
Interest income (expense), net			260				(97,457	)			516				(193,772	)
Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives			(196,809	)			272,282				(808,511	)			430,267
Income before provision for income taxes			966,255				1,266,571				1,868,823				2,402,470
Provision for income taxes			393,000				45,000				1,039,000				90,000
Net income		$	573,255			$	1,221,571			$	829,823			$	2,312,470
Basic earnings per share		$	.07			$	.15			$	.10			$	.28
Diluted earnings per share		$	.04			$	.08			$	.05			$	.15
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic			8,325,891				8,150,595				8,240,528				8,115,364
Diluted			16,210,304				15,955,742				16,100,638				15,904,650

 

  

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

‘mktg, inc.’

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Six Months Ended September 30,
		2012				2011				2012				2011
Net income		$	573,255			$	1,221,571			$	829,823			$	2,312,470
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation gains			18,689				—				11,377				—
Comprehensive income		$	591,944			$	1,221,571			$	841,200			$	2,312,470

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

‘mktg, inc.’

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)

 

		2012					2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	829,823				$	2,312,470
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			483,906					477,570
Deferred rent amortization			(140,487	)				(122,004	)
Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives			808,511					(430,267	)
Share based compensation expense			225,729					216,945
Deferred income taxes			923,000					—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(2,935,797	)				(8,758,271	)
Unbilled contracts in progress			623,718					441,702
Deferred contract costs			343,065					100,674
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			129,953					(42,396	)
Other assets			(17,314	)				(26,371	)
Accounts payable			(397,716	)				(113,085	)
Accrued compensation			(708,367	)				(1,025,550	)
Accrued job costs			1,141,636					(541,307	)
Other accrued liabilities			(567,056	)				75,370
Income taxes payable			29,927					(174,000	)
Deferred revenue			(463,462	)				3,801,790
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			309,069					(3,806,730	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Restricted cash			—					500,000
Purchases of property and equipment			(262,492	)				(144,628	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities			(262,492	)				355,372
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchase of treasury stock			(12,203	)				(12,320	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(12,203	)				(12,320	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			18,962					—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			53,336					(3,463,678	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			6,660,695					7,977,068
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	6,714,031				$	4,513,390
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid during the period		$	—				$	202,433
Income taxes paid during the period		$	86,074				$	303,956

  

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 

 

‘mktg, inc.’

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

(1)	Basis of Presentation
	The following unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of ‘mktg, inc.’ (the “Company”) for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to GAAP for interim financial information and SEC rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
	In the opinion of management, such condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.

 

(2)	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	(a)	Principles of Consolidation
		The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Inmark Services LLC, Optimum Group LLC, U.S. Concepts LLC, Digital Intelligence Group LLC, mktg retail LLC and Mktg, inc. UK Ltd. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
	(b)	Use of Estimates
		The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of the contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of stock options and equity transactions, and revenue recognition. Management bases its estimates on certain assumptions, which it believes are reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	(c)	Goodwill
		Goodwill consists of the cost in excess of the fair value of the acquired net assets of the Company’s subsidiaries. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests which require the Company to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless it determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The Company assesses the potential impairment of goodwill annually and on an interim basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Upon completion of such annual review, if impairment is found to have occurred, a corresponding charge will be recorded. The Company has determined that it has one reporting unit, and that a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test was not necessary. There were no events or changes in circumstances during the six months ended September 30, 2012 that indicated to management that the carrying value of goodwill and the intangible asset may not be recoverable.

 

 

	(d)	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
		The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, derivative financial instruments, and the Company’s Redeemable Series D Convertible Participating Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”) issued December 15, 2009. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities generally approximate their respective carrying values due to their current nature. Derivative liabilities, as discussed below, are required to be carried at fair value. The following table reflects the comparison of the carrying value and the fair value of the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2012:

 

		Carrying Values				Fair Values
Series D Preferred Stock (See Notes 3 and 5)		$	2,845,669			$	7,209,876

 

	The fair value of the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock has been determined based upon the forward cash flow of the contracts, discounted at credit-risk adjusted market rates.
	Derivative financial instruments – Derivative financial instruments, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 Derivatives and Hedging, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying features (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.
	The Company generally does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company issued other financial instruments with features that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. As required by ASC 815, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities at fair value in the Company’s financial statements. See Notes 5 and 6 for additional information.
	Redeemable preferred stock – Redeemable preferred stock (such as the Series D Preferred Stock, and any other redeemable financial instrument the Company may issue) is initially evaluated for possible classification as a liability under ASC 480 Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. Redeemable preferred stock classified as a liability is recorded and carried at fair value. Redeemable preferred stock that does not, in its entirety, require liability classification, is evaluated for embedded features that may require bifurcation and separate classification as derivative liabilities under ASC 815. In all instances, the classification of the redeemable preferred stock host contract that does not require liability classification is evaluated for equity classification or mezzanine classification based upon the nature of the redemption features. Generally, any feature that could require cash redemption for matters not within the Company’s control, irrespective of probability of the event occurring, requires classification outside of stockholders’ equity. See Note 5 for further disclosures about the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock, which constitutes redeemable preferred stock.
	Fair value measurements - Fair value measurement requirements are embodied in certain accounting standards applied in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. Significant fair value measurements resulted from the application of the fair value measurement guidance included in ASC 815 to the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock, and Warrants issued in December 2009 as described in Note 6, and ASC 718 Stock Compensation to the Company’s share based payment arrangements.
	ASC 815 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. ASC 815 further permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. At this time, the Company does not intend to reflect any of its current financial instruments at fair value (except that the Company is required to carry derivative financial instruments at fair value). However, the Company will consider the appropriateness of recognizing financial instruments at fair value on a case by case basis as they arise in future periods.

  

	(e)	Revenue Recognition
		The Company’s revenues are generated from projects subject to contracts requiring the Company to provide its services within specified time periods generally ranging up to twelve months. As a result, on any given date, the Company has projects in process at various stages of completion. Depending on the nature of the contract, revenue is recognized as follows: (i) on time and material service contracts, revenue is recognized as services are rendered; (ii) on fixed price retainer contracts, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract; and (iii) on certain fixed price contracts, revenue is recognized as certain key performance criteria are achieved. Incremental direct costs associated with the fulfillment of certain specific contracts are accrued or deferred and recognized proportionately to the related revenue. Provisions for anticipated losses on uncompleted projects are made in the period in which such losses are determined.

 

 

 

		The FASB released guidance on “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” and “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for “Out-of-Pocket” Expenses Incurred.” Indicators identified by the Company for gross revenue reporting included: the Company is the primary obligor in customer arrangements, the Company has discretion in supplier selection, and the Company has credit risk. Accordingly, the Company records its client reimbursements, including out-of-pocket expenses, as revenue on a gross basis.
	(f)	Income Taxes
		The provision for income taxes includes federal, state and local income taxes that are currently payable. Deferred income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
	(g)	Net Income Per Share
		Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding restricted shares subject to forfeiture. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the same basis, including if dilutive, common share equivalents, which include outstanding options, warrants, preferred stock, and restricted stock. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, stock options, and warrants to purchase approximately 70,000 and 187,500 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The weighted average number of shares outstanding consists of:

  

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Six Months Ended September 30,
		2012				2011				2012				2011
Basic			8,325,891				8,150,595				8,240,528				8,115,364
Dilutive effect of:
Restricted stock			111,282				32,794				87,265				16,989
Warrants			2,453,982				2,453,204				2,453,696				2,453,148
Series D preferred stock			5,319,149				5,319,149				5,319,149				5,319,149
Diluted			16,210,304				15,955,742				16,100,638				15,904,650

  

	(h)	Recent Accounting Standards Affecting the Company
		Fair Value Measurements
		In May 2011, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively and are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results, financial position or cash flows.
		Comprehensive Income
		In June 2011, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Under the amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, in this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results, financial position or cash flows.

 

 

		It should be noted that the effective date of the provisions relating to the presentation of reclassifications between other comprehensive income and net income has been deferred by ASU 2011-12.
		Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
		In December 2011, the FASB has issued FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. Upon adoption an entity is required to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Management currently believes that the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results, financial position, or cash flows.
		Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
		In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” Similar to ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 250) - Testing Goodwill for Impairment”, ASU 2012-02 addresses the growing cost and complexity of performing an analysis to evaluate indefinite-lived intangible assets (other than goodwill) for impairment. This ASU introduces qualitative factors which would simplify the analysis if facts and circumstances make it more-likely-than-not that impairment would not exist. Rather than requiring a purely quantitative impairment test, the ASU provides entities with the option to first examine qualitative factors to make this determination. Factors to be considered would include, but are not limited to:

 

	·	Increases in interest rates, salaries, or other operating expenses, which would have a negative impact on future earnings or cash flows;
	·	Recent financial performance and cash flow trends;
	·	Aspects of the legal and regulatory environment which are expected to impact future cash flows, such as the Dodd-Frank Act;
	·	Management turnover;
	·	Economic and industry conditions.

 

	Entities are required by the guidance to consider both positive and negative impacts of such factors before determining whether it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than 50% probability) that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. It should be noted that the qualitative portion of the analysis is optional for all issuers.
	This ASU is effective for impairment tests performed during fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, and may be early adopted if the entity’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal or interim period have not yet been issued. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results, financial position or cash flows.

  

 

(3)	Union Capital Financing

		Overview:
		On December 15, 2009, the Company consummated a $5.0 million financing led by an investment vehicle organized by Union Capital Corporation (“UCC”). In the financing, the Company issued $2.5 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes (the “Secured Notes’) which were repaid in full in November 2011, $2.5 million in aggregate stated value of Series D Preferred Stock initially convertible into 5,319,149 shares of Common Stock, and Warrants to purchase 2,456,272 shares of Common Stock (“Warrants”). As a condition to its participation in the financing, UCC required that certain of our directors, officers and employees (“Management Buyers”) collectively purchase $735,000 of the financial instruments on the same terms and conditions as the lead investor. Aggregate amounts above are inclusive of Management Buyers amounts.
		The shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued in the financing have a stated value of $1.00 per share, and are convertible into Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.47. The conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock is subject to weighted-average anti-dilution provisions. Generally, this means that if the Company sells non-exempt securities below the conversion price, the holders’ conversion price will be adjusted downwards. Holders of the Series D Preferred Stock are not entitled to special dividends but will be entitled to be paid upon a liquidation, redemption or change of control, the stated value of such shares plus the greater of (a) a 14% accreting liquidation preference, compounding annually, and (b) 3% of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock outstanding on a fully-diluted basis (excluding the shares issued upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock) for the 20 days preceding the event. A consolidation or merger, a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, and a sale of 50% or more of Common Stock would be treated as a change of control for this purpose.
		After December 15, 2015, holders of the Series D Preferred Stock can require the Company to redeem the Series D Preferred Stock for cash at its stated value plus any accretion thereon (“Put Derivative”). In addition, the Company may be required to redeem the Series D Preferred Stock for cash earlier upon the occurrence of a “Triggering Event.” Triggering Events include (i) a failure to timely deliver shares of Common Stock upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock, (ii) failure to pay amounts due to the holders (after notice and a cure period), (iii) a bankruptcy event with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (iv) default under other indebtedness in excess of certain amounts, and (v) a breach of representations, warranties or covenants in the documents entered into in connection with the financing. Upon a Triggering Event or failure to redeem the Series D Preferred Stock, the accretion rate on the Series D Preferred Stock will increase to 16.5% per annum. The Company may also be required to pay penalties upon a failure to timely deliver shares of Common Stock upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock.
		The Series D Preferred Stock votes together with the Common Stock on an as-converted basis, and the vote of a majority of the shares of the Series D Preferred Stock is required to approve, among other things, (i) any issuance of capital stock senior to or pari passu with the Series D Preferred Stock; (ii) any increase in the number of authorized shares of Series D Preferred Stock; (iii) any dividends or payments on equity securities; (iv) any amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws or other governing documents that would result in an adverse change to the rights, preferences, or privileges of the Series D Preferred Stock; (v) any material deviation from the annual budget approved by the Board of Directors; and (vi) entering into any material contract not contemplated by the annual budget approved by the Board of Directors.
		So long as at least 25% of the shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued at closing are outstanding, the holders of the Series D Preferred Stock as a class will have the right to designate two members of the Company’s Board of Directors, and so long as at least 15% but less than 25% of the shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued at the closing are outstanding, the holders of the Series D Preferred Stock will have the right to designate one member of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the holders of Series D Preferred Stock have the right to designate two non-voting observers to our Board of Directors.
		The Warrants to purchase 2,456,272 shares of Common Stock issued in the financing have an exercise price of $0.001 per share, subject to adjustment solely for recapitalizations. The Warrants may also be exercised on a cashless basis under a formula that explicitly limits the number of issuable common shares. The exercise period for the Warrants ends December 15, 2015.
		At the request of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and exercise of the Warrants, if ever, the Company will be required to file a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of such shares of Common Stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

 

		Upon closing of the financing, UCC became entitled to a closing fee of $325,000, half of which was paid upon the closing and the balance of which was paid in six monthly installments following the closing. The Company also reimbursed UCC for its fees and expenses in the amount of $250,000. Additionally, the Company entered into a management consulting agreement with Union Capital under which Union Capital provides the Company with management advisory services and the Company currently pays Union Capital a fee of $62,500 per year. The management consulting agreement will terminate when the holders of the Series D Preferred Stock no longer have the right to nominate any directors and Union Capital no longer owns at least 20% of the Common Stock purchased by it at closing (assuming conversion of Series Preferred D Stock and exercise of Warrants held by it).
		Accounting for the December 2009 Financing:
		Current accounting standards require analysis of each of the financial instruments issued in the December 2009 financing for purposes of classification and measurement in our financial statements.
		The Series D Preferred Stock is a hybrid financial instrument. Due to the redemption feature and the associated participation feature that behaves similarly to a coupon on indebtedness, the Company determined that the embedded conversion feature and other features that have risks associated with debt require bifurcation and classification in liabilities as a compound embedded derivative financial instrument. The conversion feature, along with certain other features that have risks of equity, required bifurcation and classification in their compound form in liabilities as a derivative financial instrument. Derivative financial instruments are required to be measured at fair value both at inception and an ongoing basis. As more fully discussed below, the Company has used the Monte Carlo simulation technique to value the compound embedded derivative, because that model affords the flexibility to incorporate all of the assumptions that market participants would likely consider in determining the value for purposes of trading the hybrid contract. Further, due to the redemption feature, the Company is required to carry the host Series D Preferred Stock outside of stockholders’ equity and the discount resulting from the initial allocation requires accretion through charges to retained earnings, using the effective method, over the period from issuance to the redemption date.
		The Company evaluated the terms and conditions of the Secured Notes under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The terms of the Notes that qualified as a derivative instrument were (i) a written put option which allows the holders of the Notes to accelerate interest and principal (effectively forcing an early redemption of the Notes) in the event of certain events of default, including a change of control of the Company, and (ii) the holders’ right to increase the interest rate on the Notes by 4% per year in the event of a suspension from trading of the Company’s Common Stock or an event of default. Pursuant to ASC 815-15-25-40, put options that can accelerate repayment of principal meet the requisite criteria of a derivative financial instrument. In addition, as addressed in ASC 815-15-25-41, for a contingently exercisable put to be considered clearly and closely related to the relevant instrument and not constitute a separate derivative financial instrument, it can be indexed only to interest or credit risk. In this instance, the put instruments embedded in the Notes were indexed to events that were not related to interest or credit risk, namely, a change of control of the Company, and suspension of trading of the Company’s Common Stock. Accordingly, these features were not considered clearly and closely related to the Note, and bifurcation was necessary.
		The Company determined that the Warrants should be classified as stockholders’ equity. The principal concepts underlying accounting for warrants provide a series of conditions, related to the potential for net cash settlement, which must be met in order to achieve equity classification. Our conclusion is that the Warrants are indexed to the Company’s common stock and meet all of the conditions for equity classification. The Company measured the fair value of the Warrants on the inception date to provide a basis for allocating the net proceeds to the various financial instruments issued in the December 2009 financing. As more fully discussed below, the Company used the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation technique, because that method embodies, in its view, all of the assumptions that market participants would consider in determining the fair value of the Warrants for purposes of a sale or exchange. The allocated value of the Warrants was recorded to Additional Paid-in Capital.
		The financial instruments sold to the Management Buyers, were recognized as compensation expense in the amount by which the fair value of the share-linked financial instruments (i.e. Series D Preferred Stock and Warrants) exceeded the proceeds that the Company received. The financial instruments subject to allocation were the Secured Notes, Series D Preferred Stock, Compound Embedded Derivatives (“CED”) and the Warrants. Other than the compensatory amounts, current accounting concepts generally provide that the allocation is, first, to those instruments that are required to be recorded at fair value; that is, the CED; and the remainder based upon relative fair values.

 

 

The following table provides the components of the allocation and the related fair values of the subject financial instruments:

  

						Allocation
		Fair Values				UCC				Management Buyers				Total
Proceeds:
Gross proceeds						$	4,265,000			$	735,000			$	5,000,000
Closing costs							(325,000	)			—				(325,000	)
Reimbursement of investor costs							(250,000	)							(250,000	)
Net proceeds						$	3,690,000			$	735,000			$	4,425,000
Allocation:
Series D Preferred Stock		$	2,670,578			$	1,127,574			$	233,098			$	1,360,672
Secured Notes		$	2,536,015				1,070,519				363,293				1,433,812
Compound Embedded Derivatives (CED):
Series D Preferred Stock		$	1,116,595				949,106				167,489				1,116,595
Secured Notes		$	28,049				23,842				4,207				28,049
Warrants		$	1,225,680				518,959				183,852				702,811
Compensation Expense							—				(216,939	)			(216,939	)
						$	3,690,000			$	735,000			$	4,425,000

 

	Closing costs of $325,000 were paid directly to the lead investor. As required by current accounting standards, financing costs paid directly to an investor or creditor are reflected in the allocation as original issue discount to the financial instruments.
	Fair Value Considerations:
	The Company has adopted the authoritative guidance on “Fair Value Measurements.” The guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not adjusted for transaction costs. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical asset or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3) as described below:

  

	Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible by the Company.
	Level 2 Inputs – Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
	Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability including significant assumptions of the Company and other market participants.

 

	The Company’s Secured Notes, Warrant derivative liability, Put option derivative and Series D Preferred Stock are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using unobservable inputs including significant assumptions of the Company and other market participants. In November, 2011, in conjunction with the Company obtaining a bank credit facility (see Note 4), the Company repaid in full the remaining $2 million of principal then outstanding under the Secured Notes.
	There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, or transfers in and out of Level 3 during the six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

 

The following tables present the Company’s instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.

 

		Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2012
		Total				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Instruments:
Warrants		$	3,005,319			$	—			$	—			$	3,005,319
Series D Preferred Stock			2,569,347				—				—				2,569,347
Total Instruments		$	5,574,666			$	—			$	—			$	5,574,666

  

		Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2012
		Total				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Instruments:
Warrants		$	3,813,830			$	—			$	—			$	3,813,830
Series D Preferred Stock			2,845,669				—				—				2,845,669
Total Instruments		$	6,659,499			$	—			$	—			$	6,659,499

 

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 Instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

		Total				Secured Notes				Warrants				Put Derivative				Series D Preferred Stock
Balances at, June 30, 2011		$	7,314,575			$	2,500,000			$	2,680,150			$	4,280			$	2,130,145
Fair value adjustments			(272,282	)			—				(270,576	)			(1,706	)			—
Discount amortization			—				—				—				—				—
Accretion			169,863				—				—				—				169,863
Balances at, September 30, 2011		$	7,212,156			$	2,500,000			$	2,409,574			$	2,574			$	2,300,008
Balances at, June 30, 2012		$	6,323,840			$	—			$	3,617,021			$	—			$	2,706,819
Fair value adjustments			196,809				—				196,809				—				—
Discount amortization			—				—				—				—				—
Accretion			138,850				—				—				—				138,850
Balances at, September 30, 2012		$	6,659,499			$	—			$	3,813,830			$	—			$	2,845,669

 

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 Instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

  

		Total				Secured Notes				Warrants				Put Derivative				Series D Preferred Stock
Balances at, March 31, 2011		$	7,345,500			$	2,500,000			$	2,837,143			$	5,272			$	2,003,085
Fair value adjustments			(430,267	)			—				(427,569	)			(2,698	)			—
Discount amortization			—				—				—				—				—
Accretion			296,923				—				—				—				296,923
Balances at, September 30, 2011		$	7,212,156			$	2,500,000			$	2,409,574			$	2,574			$	2,300,008
Balances at, March 31, 2012		$	5,574,666			$	—			$	3,005,319			$	—			$	2,569,347
Fair value adjustments			808,511				—				808,511				—				—
Discount amortization			—				—				—				—				—
Accretion			276,322				—				—				—				276,322
Balances at, September 30, 2012		$	6,659,499			$	—			$	3,813,830			$	—			$	2,845,669

 

The fair value adjustments recorded for Warrants and Put Derivative are reported separately in the Statement of Operations, and accretion on Series D Preferred Stock is recorded to the accumulated deficit.

 

 

(4)	Bank Credit Facility
	On November 23, 2011, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with TD Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), pursuant to which it was provided with a $4.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of Company’s assets, including $500,000 of cash collateral that was deposited in a blocked account maintained with the Bank, and have been guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries.
	Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, among other things:

 

	·	All outstanding loans will become due on November 23, 2012, provided that following the Company’s request, the Bank may in its sole discretion agree to one year extensions of the maturity date;
	·	Interest accrues on outstanding loans at a per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) 4.0%, and (ii) the Bank’s prime rate as from time to time in effect plus one percent;
	·	Aggregate loans outstanding at any time are limited to a borrowing base equal to 80% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable, as determined by the Bank, provided that the advance rate is limited to 50% with respect to accounts receivable from customers of the Company whose receivables constitute more than 50% of the Company’s receivables in the aggregate; and
	·	The Company is required to comply with a number of affirmative, negative and financial covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict the Company’s ability to pay dividends, provide that the Company’s debt service coverage ratio (as determined pursuant to the Loan Agreement) cannot be less than 1.25 to 1.0 as of the end of any fiscal year, and require that the Company have immediately available cash at all times, including borrowings under the Credit Facility, of at least $3 million. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at September 30, 2012.

 

	If the Company does not comply with the financial and other covenants and requirements of the Loan Agreement, the Bank may, subject to various cure rights, require the immediate payment of all amounts outstanding under the Loan Agreement.
	Upon the closing of the Credit Facility, the Company paid a $30,000 commitment fee to the Bank plus its legal costs and expenses.
	At September 30, 2012, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility and availability of $4,000,000.
	In connection with the Loan Agreement, the holders of the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock entered into a Standstill Agreement with the Bank under which such stockholders have agreed not to exercise any rights they may have to cause the Company to redeem their shares of Series D Preferred Stock prior to December 15, 2015 (or such earlier date as the Credit Facility is terminated), other than upon a change of control or liquidation event of the Company.

 

(5)	Redeemable Preferred Stock
	Redeemable preferred stock consists of the following as of September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012:

  

		September 30, 2012				March 31, 2012
Series D Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.001, stated value $1.00, 2,500,000 shares designated, 2,500,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012; redemption and liquidation value $3,539,573 at September 30, 2012		$	2,845,669			$	2,569,347

 

The Series D Preferred Stock is subject to accretion to its redemption value, through charges to equity, over the period from issuance to the contractual redemption date, discussed in the Financing Overview, above, using the effective interest method. The redemption value is determined based upon the stated redemption amount of $1.00 per share, plus an accretion amount, more fully discussed above. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, accretion amounted to $138,850 and $276,332, respectively, and for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, accretion amounted to $169,863 and $296,923, respectively.

  

 

(6)	Derivative Financial Instruments
	The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of CEDs that were bifurcated from our Series D Preferred Stock and Secured Notes. The Preferred CED comprises the embedded conversion option and certain other equity-indexed features that were not clearly and closely related to the Series D Preferred Stock in terms of risks. The Senior Note CED comprises certain put features that were not clearly and closely related to the Secured Notes in terms of risks. Derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value. The following table reflects the components of the CEDs and changes in fair value, using the techniques and assumptions described in Note 3:

 

				Warrant Derivative				Put Derivative				Total
	Balances at April 1, 2012			$	3,005,319			$	—			$	3,005,319
	Fair value adjustments				808,511				—				808,511
	Balances at September 30, 2012			$	3,813,830			$	—			$	3,813,830
	Balances at April 1, 2011				$   2, 837,143			$	5,272			$	2,842,415
	Fair value adjustments				(427,569	)			(2,698	)			(430,267	)
	Balances at September 30, 2011			$	2,409,574			$	2,574			$	2,412,148

 

Fair value adjustments are recorded in other income in the accompanying financial statements. As a result, the Company’s earnings are and will be affected by changes in the assumptions underlying the valuation of the derivative financial instruments. The principal assumptions that have, in the Company’s view, the most significant effects are the Company’s trading market prices, volatilities and risk-adjusted market credit rates.

  

(7)	Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
	(i) Stock Options
	On July 1, 2002, the Company established the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”) providing for the grant of options or other awards, including stock grants, to employees, officers or directors of, consultants to, the Company or its subsidiaries to acquire up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of Common Stock. In September 2005, the 2002 Plan was amended so as to increase the number of shares of Common Stock available under the plan to 1,250,000. In September 2008, the 2002 Plan was amended to increase the number of shares of Common Stock available under the plan to 1,650,000. Options granted under the 2002 Plan may either be intended to qualify as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or may be non-qualified options. Grants under the 2002 Plan are awarded by a committee of the Board of Directors, and are exercisable over periods not exceeding ten years from date of grant. The option price for incentive stock options granted under the 2002 Plan must be at least 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant, while the price for non-qualified options granted is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. At September 30, 2012, there were options to purchase 70,000 shares of Common Stock, expiring from April 2013 through September 2017, issued under the 2002 Plan that remained outstanding. The 2002 Plan terminated on June 30, 2012.
	On March 25, 2010, the stockholders of the Company approved the ‘mktg, inc.’ 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”), under which 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock have been set aside and reserved for issuance. The 2010 Plan provides for the granting to our employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of stock options (non-statutory and incentive), restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and other performance stock awards. The 2010 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The exercise price per share of a stock option, which is determined by the Compensation Committee, may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. For non-qualified options the term of the option is determined by the Compensation Committee. For incentive stock options the term of the option is not more than ten years. However, if the optionee owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of the Company, the term of the incentive stock option will be no longer than five years. The 2010 Plan automatically terminates on February 22, 2020, unless it is terminated earlier by a vote of the Company’s stockholders or the Board of Directors; provided, however, that any such action does not affect the rights of any participants of the 2010 Plan. In addition, the 2010 Plan may be amended by the stockholders of the Company or the Board of Directors, subject to stockholder approval if required by applicable law or listing requirements. At September 30, 2012, there were options to purchase 2,599,865 shares of Common Stock, expiring May 2020, issued under the 2010 Plan that remained outstanding. Any option under the 2010 Plan that is not exercised by an option holder prior to its expiration may be available for re-issuance by the Company. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had options or other awards for 15,135 shares of Common Stock available for grant under the 2010 Plan.

 

 

	The maximum contractual life for any of the options is ten years. The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to estimate the value of stock options granted under FASB guidance. Because option-pricing models require the use of subjective assumptions, changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of options.
	A summary of option activity under all plans as of September 30, 2012, and changes during the six month period then ended is presented below:

 

		Weighted average exercise price				Number of options				Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)				Aggregate intrinsic value
Balance at March 31, 2012		$	0.60				2,814,302				8.06			$	1,238,293
Granted			—				—
Exercised			—				—
Forfeited		$	0.43				(144,437	)
Balance at September 30, 2012 (vested and expected to vest)		$	0.48				2,669,865				7.56			$	1,815,508
Exercisable at September 30, 2012		$	2.45				70,000				4.50			$	0

 

	Total unrecognized compensation cost related to vested and expected to vest options at September 30, 2012 amounted to $264,980 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.67 years. Total compensation cost for all outstanding option awards amounted to $39,747 and $82,612 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and $44,424 and $88,848 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
	(ii) Warrants
	At September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 there were warrants outstanding to purchase 2,456,272 shares of common stock at a price of $.001 per share, which were issued in the December 2009 financing and expire December 15, 2015. The aggregate intrinsic value of the warrants outstanding at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 were $2,846,819 and $2,257,314, respectively.
	(iii) Restricted Stock
	During the six months ended September 30, 2012, the Company awarded 160,000 shares of Common Stock initially subject to forfeiture (“restricted stock”) pursuant to the authorization of the Company’s Board of Directors and certain Restricted Stock Agreements under the Company’s 2010 Plan.
	As of September 30, 2012 the Company had awarded 1,185,571 shares (net of forfeited shares) of restricted stock under the Company’s 2002 Plan, 385,000 shares (net of forfeited shares) of restricted stock under the Company’s 2010 Plan, and 189,767 shares (net of forfeited shares) of restricted stock that were issued outside of the Company’s 2002 and 2010 Plans. Grant date fair value is determined by the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The aggregate value of these shares at their respective grant dates amount to approximately $2,634,569 and are recognized ratably as compensation expense over the vesting periods. The shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to such agreements vest in various tranches over one to five years from the date of grant.
	The shares awarded to employees under the restricted stock agreements vest on the applicable vesting dates only to the extent the recipient of the shares is then an employee of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, and each recipient will forfeit all of the shares that have not vested on the date his or her employment is terminated.

 

 

A summary of all non-vested stock activity as of September 30, 2012, and changes during the six month period then ended is presented below:

  

				Weighted average grant date fair value				Number of shares				Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)				Aggregate intrinsic value
	Unvested at March 31, 2012			$	1.62				581,855				2.06			$	535,307
	Awarded			$	0.90				160,000
	Vested			$	2.57				(109,943	)
	Forfeited			$	1.02				(28,500	)
	Unvested at September 30, 2012			$	1.32				603,412				1.97			$	699,958

 

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards at September 30, 2012 amounted to $479,547 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.97 years. Total compensation cost for the stock awards amounted to $73,350 and $143,117 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, and $70,439 and $128,097 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.

 

(8)	Concentrations
	The Company had sales to one customer that approximated $20,205,000 or 61% and $41,842,000 or 61% of total sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Accounts receivable due from this customer approximated $9,629,000 at September 30, 2012. In addition, the Company’s second largest customer accounted for approximately $5,288,000 or 16% and $11,180,000 or 16% of total sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Accounts receivable due from this customer approximated $2,370,000 at September 30, 2012. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 the Company had sales to one customer that approximated $18,635,000 or 66% and $38,416,000 or 64% of total sales, respectively. Accounts receivable due from this customer approximated $11,184,000 at September 30, 2011. In addition, the Company’s second largest customer accounted for approximately $3,591,000 or 13% and $6,750,000 or 11% of total sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Accounts receivable due from this customer approximated $2,526,000 at September 30, 2011.

 

(9)	Income Taxes
	For the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded provisions for federal, state and local income taxes of $393,000 and $1,039,000, respectively. Except for alternative minimum taxes, the Company did not record a provision or benefit for federal, state and local income taxes for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 because any such provision or benefit would have been fully offset by a change in the valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. The Company reversed the full valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 because, in light of operating income generated in fiscal years 2012 and 2011 and other factors, the Company believed it was more likely than not that it would be able to utilize the net deferred tax assets to reduce its tax expense in future periods.

  

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on beliefs of the Company’s management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company’s management. When used in this report, the words “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “predict,” “may,” “should,” “will,” the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events based on currently available information and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in those forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 under “Risk Factors,” including but not limited to “Recent Losses,” “Concentration of Customers,” “Recent Economic Changes,” “Dependence on Key Personnel,” “Series D Preferred Stock Liquidation Preference; Redemption,”“ Control by Union Capital Corporation and Holders of Series D Preferred Stock,” “Anti-Dilution Provisions of The Series D Preferred Stock Could Result In Dilution of Stockholders,” “Unpredictable Revenue Patterns,” “Competition,” “Lender’s Security Interest,” and “Risks Associated with Acquisitions,” in addition to other information set forth herein and elsewhere in our other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date hereof. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

Overview

 

‘mktg, inc.’, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries Inmark Services LLC, Optimum Group LLC, U.S. Concepts LLC, Digital Intelligence Group LLC, mktg retail LLC and Mktg, inc. UK Ltd., is a full-service marketing agency. We develop, manage and execute sales promotion programs at both national and local levels, utilizing both online and offline media channels. Our programs help our clients effectively promote their goods and services directly to retailers and consumers and are intended to assist them in achieving maximum impact and return on their marketing investment. Our activities reinforce brand awareness, provide incentives to retailers to order and display our clients’ products, and motivate consumers to purchase those products, and are designed to meet the needs of our clients by focusing on communities of consumers who want to engage brands as part of their lifestyles.

 

Our services include experiential and face to face marketing, event marketing, interactive marketing, ethnic marketing, and all elements of consumer and trade promotion, and are marketed directly to our clients by our sales force operating out of offices located in New York, New York; Cincinnati, Ohio; Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles, California, San Francisco, California and London, England.

 

‘mktg, inc.’ was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware in March 1992 and is the successor to a sales promotion business originally founded in 1972. ‘mktg, inc.’ began to engage in the promotion business following a merger consummated on September 29, 1995 that resulted in Inmark becoming its wholly-owned subsidiary.

 

Our corporate headquarters are located at 75 Ninth Avenue, New York, New York 10011, and our telephone number is 212-366-3400. Our Web site is www.mktg.com. Copies of all reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available on our Web site.

 

Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

Our recent ability to increase operating income and cash flows continued in the second quarter of Fiscal 2013. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 we generated $1,163,000 in operating income, an increase of $71,000 compared to the $1,092,000 earned during the three months ended September 30, 2011. This improvement was the result of a $1,470,000 increase in Operating Revenue partially offset by a $1,122,000 increase in compensation expense and a $277,000 increase in general and administrative expenses. Modified EBITDA rose to $1,522,000 from $1,444,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the six months ended September 30, 2012 we generated $2,677,000 in operating income, a $511,000 increase over the $2,166,000 earned during the six months ended September 30, 2011. This improvement was the result of a $3,182,000 increase in Operating Revenue partially offset by a $2,265,000 increase in compensation expense and a $406,000 increase in general and administrative expenses. In addition, Modified EBITDA increased to $3,387,000 from $2,861,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011

 

 

Our net income reflects a non-cash (charge) or benefit for the fair value adjustment to the derivative financial instruments reflected on our balance sheet in connection with our December 2009 financing. These adjustments are primarily attributable to changes in the price of our Common Stock during the period, which under generally accepted accounting principles require us to adjust the carrying values of the Warrant derivative liability and other derivative liabilities on our balance sheets and record a (charge) or benefit under “Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives” on our statements of operations. In addition, these adjustments are treated as non-deductible or includable permanent difference items for income tax reporting purposes. A more detailed explanation of the accounting treatment for these derivative financial instruments is provided in Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Report.

 

The following table presents the reported operating results for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Six Months Ended September 30,
		2012				2011				2012				2011
Operations Data:
Sales		$	32,998,000			$	28,407,000			$	68,435,000			$	59,736,000
Reimbursable program costs and expenses			5,749,000				5,354,000				12,025,000				12,501,000
Outside production and other program expenses			16,636,000				13,910,000				34,756,000				28,763,000
Operating revenue			10,613,000				9,143,000				21,654,000				18,472,000
Compensation expense			7,587,000				6,465,000				15,318,000				13,053,000
General and administrative expenses			1,863,000				1,586,000				3,659,000				3,253,000
Operating income			1,163,000				1,092,000				2,677,000				2,166,000
Interest income (expense), net			—				(97,000	)			1,000				(194,000	)
Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives			(197,000	)			272,000				(809,000	)			430,000
Income before provision for income taxes			966,000				1,267,000				1,869,000				2,402,000
Provision for income taxes			393,000				45,000				1,039,000				90,000
Net income		$	573,000			$	1,222,000			$	830,000			$	2,312,000
Per Share Data:
Basic earnings per share		$	0.07			$	0.15			$	0.10			$	0.28
Diluted earnings per share		$	0.04			$	0.08			$	0.05			$	0.15
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic			8,325,891				8,150,595				8,240,528				8,115,364
Diluted			16,210,304				15,955,742				16,100,638				15,904,650

  

 

Operating Revenue and Modified EBITDA

 

We believe Operating Revenue and Modified EBITDA are key performance indicators. We define Operating Revenue as our sales less reimbursable program costs and expenses, and outside production and other program expenses. Operating Revenue is the net amount derived from sales to customers that we believe is available to fund our compensation, general and administrative expenses, and capital expenditures. We define Modified EBITDA as income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization plus other non-cash expenses. Modified EBITDA is a supplemental measure to evaluate operational performance. Operating Revenue and Modified EBITDA are Non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide additional information to investors in order to provide them with an alternative method for assessing our financial condition and operating results. These measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP, and may be different from or inconsistent with Non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

  

The following table presents operating data expressed as a percentage of Operating Revenue for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Six Months Ended September 30,
		2012				2011				2012				2011
Statement of Operations Data:
Operating revenue			100.0	%			100.0	%			100.0	%			100.0	%
Compensation expense			71.4	%			70.7	%			70.7	%			70.7	%
General and administrative expense			17.6	%			17.3	%			16.9	%			17.6	%
Operating income			11.0	%			12.0	%			12.4	%			11.7	%
Interest income (expense), net			0.0	%			(1.1	%)			0.0	%			(1.1	%)
Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives			(1.9	%)			3.0	%			(3.8	%)			2.3	%
Income before provision for income taxes			9.1	%			13.9	%			8.6	%			12.9	%
Provision for income taxes			3.7	%			0.5	%			4.8	%			0.5	%
Net income			5.4	%			13.4	%			3.8	%			12.4	%

  

Sales. Sales consist of fees for services, commissions, reimbursable program costs and expenses and other production and program expenses. We purchase a variety of items and services on behalf of our clients for which we are reimbursed pursuant to our client contracts. The amount of reimbursable program costs and expenses, and outside production and other program expenses which are included in revenues will vary from period to period, based on the type and scope of the service being provided. Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $4,591,000 to $32,998,000, compared to $28,407,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This increase in sales is attributable to a $3,223,000 increase in experiential marketing revenues, a $1,569,000 increase in revenue from our largest customer, Diageo North America, Inc. (“Diageo”) which includes a $395,000 increase in reimbursable program cost revenue, partially offset by a $201,000 decrease in trade marketing revenues. Sales for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased $8,699,000 to $68,435,000, compared to $59,736,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. This increase in sales is attributable to a $5,535,000 increase in experiential marketing revenues, a $3,426,000 increase in revenue from Diageo which includes a $476,000 reduction in reimbursable program cost revenue, partially offset by a $262,000 decrease in trade marketing revenues.

 

Reimbursable Program Costs and Expenses. Reimbursable program costs and expenses are primarily direct labor, travel and product costs generally associated with events we execute for Diageo. Reimbursable program costs and expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $395,000 to $5,749,000, compared to $5,354,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Reimbursable program costs and expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $476,000 to $12,025,000, compared to $12,501,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. These variances are primarily due to the fluctuations in the number of events executed during the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2012 versus the same periods in Fiscal 2012.

 

Outside Production and Other Program Expenses. Outside production and other program expenses consist of the costs of purchased materials, media, services, certain direct labor charged to programs and other expenditures incurred in connection with and directly related to sales but which are not classified as reimbursable program costs and expenses. Outside production and other program expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $2,726,000 to $16,636,000, compared to $13,910,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This increase in outside production and other program expenses is primarily due to an increase in the number of Diageo events executed plus an increase in the cost of experiential marketing programs, partially offset by reductions in the cost of trade marketing programs. Outside production and other program expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased $5,993,000 to $34,756,000, compared to $28,763,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. This increase in outside production and other program expenses is primarily due to an increase in the number of Diageo events executed plus an increase in the cost of experiential marketing programs, partially offset by reductions in the cost of trade marketing programs.

 

 

Operating Revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, Operating Revenue increased $1,470,000 or 16% to $10,613,000, compared to $9,143,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the six months ended September 30, 2011, Operating Revenue increased $3,182,000 or 17% to $21,654,000, compared to $18,472,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. These increases in Operating Revenue for the three and six month periods are primarily due to an increase in Diageo and experiential marketing revenue, partially offset by a decrease in trade marketing revenue. Operating Revenue as a percentage of Sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 was 32%, compared to 32% and 31% for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011. A reconciliation of Sales to Operating Revenues for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is set forth below.

  

		Three Months Ended September 30,																Six Months Ended September 30,
Sales		2012				%				2011				%				2012				%				2011				%
Sales – U.S. GAAP		$	32,998,000				100			$	28,407,000				100			$	68,435,000				100			$	59,736,000				100
Reimbursable program costs and outside production expenses			22,385,000				68				19,264,000				68				46,781,000				68				41,264,000				69
Operating Revenue – Non-GAAP		$	10,613,000				32			$	9,143,000				32			$	21,654,000				32			$	18,472,000				31

 

 

Compensation Expense. Compensation expense, exclusive of reimbursable program costs and expenses and other program expenses, consists of the salaries, payroll taxes and benefit costs related to indirect labor, overhead personnel and certain direct labor otherwise not charged to programs. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, compensation expense increased $1,122,000 to $7,587,000, compared to $6,465,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This 17% increase in compensation expense is primarily the result of a $736,000 increase in salary expense and a $66,000 increase in payroll taxes and benefits due to staff increases, plus a $287,000 increase in bonus expense. For the six months ended September 30, 2012, compensation expense increased $2,265,000 to $15,318,000, compared to $13,053,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. This 17% increase in compensation expense is primarily the result of a $1,681,000 increase in salary expense and a $156,000 increase in payroll taxes and benefits due to staff increases, plus a $328,000 increase in bonus expense.

 

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist of office and equipment rent, depreciation and amortization, professional fees, other overhead expenses and charges for doubtful accounts. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses increased $277,000 to $1,863,000, compared to $1,586,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This 17% increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily the result of a $71,000 increase in rent and occupancy expense, a $68,000 increase in new business costs, a $64,000 increase in office expense, and a $30,000 increase in insurance expense. For the six months ended September 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses increased $406,000 to $3,659,000, compared to $3,253,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. This 12% increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily the result of a $148,000 increase in rent and occupancy expense, a $116,000 increase in new business costs, a $60,000 increase in office expense, and a $60,000 increase in insurance expense.

 

Modified EBITDA. As described above, we believe that Modified EBITDA is an additional key performance indicator. We use it to measure and evaluate operational performance. The Company’s Modified EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $78,000 or 5% to $1,522,000 compared to $1,444,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the six months ended September 30, 2012 the Company’s modified EBITDA increased by $526,000 or 18% to $3,387,000 compared to $2,861,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. A reconciliation of operating income to Modified EBITDA for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, is set forth below:

 

 

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2012				2011				2012				2011
Operating income – US GAAP		$	1,163,000			$	1,092,000			$	2,677,000			$	2,166,000
Depreciation and amortization			246,000				237,000				484,000				478,000
Share based compensation expense			113,000				115,000				226,000				217,000
Modified EBITDA – Non-GAAP		$	1,522,000			$	1,444,000			$	3,387,000			$	2,861,000

  

Interest income (expense), net. We had nominal net interest income for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net interest expense of ($97,000) and ($194,000) for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Interest expense for the periods ended September 30, 2011 consisted primarily of interest incurred on the Secured Notes, which were repaid in full in November 2011.

 

Fair Value Adjustments to Compound Embedded Derivatives. Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, were ($197,000) and ($809,000), respectively. Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, were $272,000 and $430,000, respectively. These amounts consist entirely of a non-cash fair value adjustment to the derivative financial instruments generated from the December 2009 financing. This adjustment is primarily attributable to the fluctuation in the price of our Common Stock during the relevant periods, which under generally accepted accounting principles required us to adjust the carrying values of the Warrant derivative liability and other derivative liabilities on our balance sheets and record the amount of such adjustments under “Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives” on our statements of operations. In general, an increase in the price of our Common Stock in a particular period will result in an increase in the carrying values of these derivative liabilities on our balance sheets at the end of such period and require us to record the amount of such increase as a charge under “Fair value adjustments to compound embedded derivatives” on our statements of operations for such period, and a decrease in the price of our Common Stock in a particular period will have the opposite effect. A more detailed explanation of the accounting treatment for these derivative financial instruments is provided in Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Report.

 

Income before Provision for Income Taxes. The Company’s income before provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2012, was $966,000 compared to 1,267,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the six months ended September 30, 2012, the Company’s income before provision for income taxes was $1,869,000 compared to $2,402,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011.

 

Provision for Income Taxes. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a provision for federal, state and local income taxes of $393,000 and $1,039,000, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012 were 41% and 56%, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended September 30, 2012 was significantly greater than the federal statutory rate of 34% primarily due to state and local taxes, net of federal benefit, and non-deductible expenses for income tax reporting purposes that include the $1,039,000 fair value adjustment charge to compound embedded derivatives described above. Except for alternative minimum taxes, we did not record a provision for federal, state and local income taxes for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 because any such provision would have been fully offset by a change in our September 30, 2011 valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. We reversed this allowance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 because, in the light of operating income generated in the fiscal years 2012 and 2011 and other factors, we believed it was more likely than not that we would be able to utilize the net deferred tax asset to reduce our tax expense in future periods.

 

Net Income. As a result of the items discussed above, net income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $573,000 compared to $1,222,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the six months ended September 30, 2012, the Company’s net income was $830,000 compared to $2,312,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011. Fully diluted earnings per share amounted to $.04 and $.05 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $.08 and $.15 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, working capital increased by $2,883,000 from $2,083,000 to $4,966,000, primarily as a result of the operating income we generated during the period.

 

At September 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6,714,000, borrowing availability under the Credit Facility of $4,000,000, working capital of $4,966,000, and stockholders’ equity of $10,340,000. In comparison, at March 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6,661,000, borrowing availability under the Credit Facility of $3,726,000, working capital of $2,083,000, and stockholders’ equity of $9,554,000. The $53,000 increase in cash and cash equivalents during the six months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily due to $309,000 of cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by $262,000 in property and equipment purchases.

 

Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended September 30, 2012 was $309,000, primarily attributable to net income of $830,000 plus $2,300,000 in net non-cash charges that include a deferred income tax provision, fair value adjustments to compound derivatives, depreciation and amortization expense, and share based compensation expense, partially offset by $2,821,000 of cash used by the changes in operating assets and liabilities as the result of an increase in accounts receivables and other assets, and a decrease in accounts payable, accrued compensation, other accrued liabilities and deferred revenue, offset by an decrease in unbilled contracts in progress, deferred contract costs, and prepaid expenses and other current assets, and an increase in accrued job costs and income taxes payable account balances.

 

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2012 was $262,000, consisting entirely of property and equipment purchases.

 

Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2012 consisted of $12,000 in repurchases of our Common Stock from employees to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock.

 

On November 23, 2011, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with TD Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), pursuant to which we were provided with a $4.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our assets, including $500,000 of cash collateral that was deposited in a blocked account maintained with the Bank, and have been guaranteed by our subsidiaries.

 

Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, among other things:

 

	·	All outstanding loans will become due on November 23, 2012, provided that following our request, the Bank may in its sole discretion agree to one year extensions of the maturity date;
	·	Interest accrues on outstanding loans at a per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) 4.0%, and (ii) the Bank’s prime rate as from time to time in effect plus one percent;
	·	Aggregate loans outstanding at any time are limited to a borrowing base equal to 80% of our eligible accounts receivable, as determined by the Bank, provided that the advance rate is limited to 50% with respect to accounts receivable from our customers whose receivables constitute more than 50% of our receivables in the aggregate; and
	·	We are required to comply with a number of affirmative, negative and financial covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict our ability to pay dividends, provide that our debt service coverage ratio (as determined pursuant to the Loan Agreement) cannot be less than 1.25 to 1.0 as of the end of any fiscal year, and require that we have immediately available cash at all times, including borrowings under the Credit Facility, of at least $3 million. We were in compliance with these covenants at September 30, 2012.

 

If we do not comply with the financial and other covenants and requirements of the Loan Agreement, the Bank may, subject to various cure rights, require the immediate payment of all amounts outstanding under the Loan Agreement.

 

In connection with the Loan Agreement, the holders of our Series D Preferred Stock entered into a Standstill Agreement with the Bank under which such stockholders have agreed not to exercise any rights they may have to cause us to redeem their shares of Series D Preferred Stock prior to December 15, 2015 (or such earlier date as the Credit Facility is terminated), other than upon a change of control or liquidation event of the Company.

 

We believe that cash currently on hand together with cash expected to be generated from operations and borrowing availability under the Credit Facility, will be sufficient to fund our cash and near-cash requirements both through September 30, 2013 and on a long-term basis. We had no loans outstanding under the Credit Facility at September 30, 2012.

  

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Certain of the estimates and assumptions required to be made relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain to future events. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions used were the most appropriate, actual results may vary from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

 

Please refer to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies relating to revenue recognition, goodwill (expanded below) and other intangible assets and accounting for income taxes. During the six months ended September 30, 2012, there were no material changes to these policies.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

Our goodwill consists of the cost in excess of the fair market value of the acquired net assets of our subsidiary companies, Inmark, Optimum, U.S. Concepts and Digital Intelligence as well as our mktgpartners business. These companies and businesses have been integrated into a structure which does not provide the basis for separate reporting units. Consequently, we are a single reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing purposes. We also have intangible assets consisting of a customer relationship acquired from mktgpartners, and an Internet domain name and related intellectual property rights. At September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, our balance sheet reflected goodwill and intangible assets as set forth below:

 

		September 30, 2012				March 31, 2012
Amortizable:
Customer relationship		$	241,262			$	402,103
Non-Amortizable:
Goodwill		$	10,052,232			$	10,052,232
Internet domain name			200,000				200,000
		$	10,252,232			$	10,252,232
Total		$	10,493,494			$	10,654,335

 

Goodwill and the internet domain name are deemed to have indefinite lives and are subject to annual impairment tests. Goodwill impairment tests require that we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. We are not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless we determine, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. We assess the potential impairment of goodwill annually and on an interim basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Upon completion of such review, if impairment is found to have occurred, a corresponding charge will be recorded. The value assigned to the customer relationship is being amortized over a five year period.

 

As of March 31, 2012, we assessed qualitative factors which included an analysis of macroeconomic conditions, financial performance, and industry and market considerations, and concluded that it was not necessary to perform a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test and that the goodwill of the Company was not impaired as of March 31, 2012. Goodwill and the intangible asset will continue to be tested annually at the end of each fiscal year to determine whether they have been impaired. Upon completion of each annual review, there can be no assurance that a material charge will not be recorded. Impairment testing is required more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment or decline in value may have occurred. There were no events or changes in circumstances during the six months ended September 30, 2012 that indicated that the carrying value of goodwill and the intangible asset may not be recoverable. Management has also determined that there was no impairment of the amortizable intangible asset.

 

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2012. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.

 

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

	31.1	Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
	31.2	Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
	32.1	Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act.
	32.2	Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act.
	101.INS§	XBRL Instance Document
	101.SCH§	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	101.CAL§	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
	101.LAB§	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
	101.PRE§	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
	101.DEF§	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

‘mktg, inc.’

  

Dated: November 13, 2012		By: /s/ Charles W. Horsey
		Charles W. Horsey, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

  

Dated: November 13, 2012		By: /s/ Paul Trager
		Paul Trager, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)