Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO - TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.terq32012exhibit311.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO - TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.terq32012exhibit321.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO - TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.terq32012exhibit312.htm
EX-10.1 - AMENDMENT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.terq32012exhibit101.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO - TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.terq32012exhibit322.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.Financial_Report.xls


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2012

or
o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             .

Commission file number 1-13794
TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
13-3818402
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
1000 Boardwalk at Virginia Avenue
 
 
Atlantic City, New Jersey
 
08401
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (609) 449-5534
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer
o
Accelerated Filer
o
Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o
Smaller Reporting Company
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes  x    No  o

As of October 18, 2012, there were 10,767,858 shares of common stock of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. outstanding.




PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 
 
September 30, 2012
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
 
(unaudited)
 
 
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
53,605

 
 
$
63,895

Accounts receivable, net
 
14,142

 
 
15,104

Accounts receivable, other
 
2,455

 
 
3,138

Property taxes receivable
 
19,482

 
 
4,979

Inventories
 
1,408

 
 
1,978

Deferred income taxes
 
556

 
 
556

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
5,375

 
 
4,886

Total current assets
 
97,023

 
 
94,536

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net property and equipment
 
389,709

 
 
402,980

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted cash
 
5,138

 
 
11,347

Intangible assets
 
8,700

 
 
8,700

Property taxes receivable
 
33,551

 
 
4,737

Casino Reinvestment Development Authority investments, net
 
37,891

 
 
40,178

Other assets
 
16,650

 
 
16,332

Total other assets
 
101,930

 
 
81,294

Total assets
 
$
588,662

 
 
$
578,810

 
 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Current maturities of long-term debt
 
$
3,622

 
 
$
3,967

Accounts payable
 
27,625

 
 
27,205

Accrued payroll and related expenses
 
13,292

 
 
14,302

Income taxes payable
 

 
 
1,500

Self-insurance reserves
 
14,888

 
 
14,039

Other current liabilities
 
19,631

 
 
19,399

Total current liabilities
 
79,058

 
 
80,412

 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
 
294,858

 
 
299,676

Deferred income taxes
 
556

 
 
556

Other long-term liabilities
 
10,464

 
 
5,401

 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders' equity:
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock:
 
 
 
 
 
$.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
 

 
 

Common stock:
 
 
 
 
 
$.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, 10,767,858 and 10,714,286 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
 
11

 
 
11

Additional paid-in capital
 
225,219

 
 
225,169

Accumulated deficit
 
(21,504
)
 
 
(32,415
)
Total stockholders' equity
 
203,726

 
 
192,765

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
588,662

 
 
$
578,810

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

2



TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 
Three Months
 
Nine Months
 
Ended
 
Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming
$
118,716

 
$
128,277

 
$
323,453

 
$
381,389

Rooms
23,790

 
22,889

 
59,991

 
58,437

Food and beverage
18,088

 
17,016

 
48,145

 
47,815

Other
5,459

 
5,691

 
14,898

 
18,178

 
166,053

 
173,873

 
446,487

 
505,819

Less promotional allowances
(46,928
)
 
(41,766
)
 
(127,088
)
 
(131,545
)
Net revenues
119,125

 
132,107

 
319,399

 
374,274

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Costs and expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaming
47,917

 
54,354

 
139,850

 
167,110

Rooms
4,867

 
5,116

 
12,420

 
12,906

Food and beverage
8,984

 
9,113

 
24,138

 
25,766

General and administrative
28,182

 
30,429

 
84,301

 
91,243

Property taxes
12,865

 
12,723

 
38,702

 
35,469

Corporate and other
1,647

 
2,557

 
5,293

 
7,286

Corporate—related party
98

 
98

 
293

 
293

Depreciation and amortization
5,245

 
5,838

 
15,684

 
22,525

Income from settlement of property tax appeals, net of related fees

 

 
(30,874
)
 

Income related to utility agreements

 

 
(3,532
)
 

Asset impairment charge

 

 
1,100

 

 
109,805

 
120,228

 
287,375

 
362,598

Income from operations
9,320

 
11,879

 
32,024

 
11,676

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-operating income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
840

 
241

 
1,297

 
1,040

Interest expense
(9,328
)
 
(10,241
)
 
(27,689
)
 
(32,291
)
Income related to deed amendment

 

 

 
5,465

 
(8,488
)
 
(10,000
)
 
(26,392
)
 
(25,786
)
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations
832

 
1,879

 
5,632

 
(14,110
)
Income taxes

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations
832

 
1,879

 
5,632

 
(14,110
)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trump Marina
(513
)
 
(114
)
 
5,279

 
(6,661
)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
(513
)
 
(114
)
 
5,279

 
(6,661
)
Net income (loss)
$
319

 
1,765

 
$
10,911

 
$
(20,771
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per share—basic and diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.08

 
$
0.17

 
$
0.52

 
$
(1.31
)
Discontinued operations
(0.05
)
 
(0.01
)
 
0.48

 
(0.62
)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
$
0.03

 
$
0.16

 
$
1.00

 
$
(1.93
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic
10,890,002

 
10,767,858

 
10,875,338

 
10,767,858

Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted
10,897,938

 
10,875,002

 
10,908,274

 
10,767,858



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

3



TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
 

 
 
 
Shares
 
Preferred
Stock
 
Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total
Stockholders' Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2011

 
$

 
10,714,286

 
$
11

 
$
225,169

 
$
(32,415
)
 
$
192,765

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 
53,572

 

 
50

 

 
50

Net income

 

 

 

 

 
10,911

 
10,911

Balance, September 30, 2012

 
$

 
10,767,858

 
$
11

 
$
225,219

 
$
(21,504
)
 
$
203,726


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements



4



TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands) 
 
Nine Months
 
Ended
 
September 30,
 
2012
 
2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
10,911

 
$
(20,771
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows used in operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
15,684

 
22,525

Asset impairment charge
1,100

 

Income related to property tax settlement, net of related fees
(39,204
)
 

Provisions for losses on receivables
1,001

 
4,393

Valuation allowance—CRDA investments
3,632

 
1,190

Accretion of interest income related to property tax settlements
(694
)
 
(336
)
Stock-based compensation expense
50

 
85

Gain on sale of assets
(66
)
 
(248
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Increase in receivables
(261
)
 
(4,551
)
Decrease in inventories
570

 
794

Decrease in property taxes receivable
5,000

 
3,641

(Increase) decrease in other current assets
(489
)
 
4,347

Increase in restricted cash

 
(5,465
)
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(110
)
 
3,476

Decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities
(2,128
)
 
(21,825
)
Increase in accrued interest payable
192

 
2,231

Decrease in other long-term liabilities
(1,650
)
 
(701
)
Net cash flows used in continuing operating activities
(6,462
)
 
(11,215
)
Net cash flows provided by discontinued operating activities
148

 
60

Net cash flows used in operating activities
(6,314
)
 
(11,155
)
 
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment
(5,396
)
 
(9,831
)
Purchases of CRDA investments
(3,941
)
 
(4,686
)
Proceeds from CRDA investments

 
1,882

Proceeds from sales of fixed assets
1,949

 
4,003

Decrease in restricted cash
4,109

 
6,236

Net cash flows used in continuing investing activities
(3,279
)
 
(2,396
)
Net cash flows provided by discontinued investing activities
2,366

 
30,884

Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
(913
)
 
28,488

 
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Repayments of term loans
(4,699
)
 
(46,349
)
Decrease in restricted cash
2,100

 
15,750

Repayments of other long-term debt
(464
)
 
(466
)
Net cash flows used in continuing financing activities
(3,063
)
 
(31,065
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(10,290
)
 
(13,732
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
63,895

 
85,585

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
53,605

 
$
71,853

 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
$
27,390

 
$
30,060

Cash paid for income taxes
$
1,500

 
$



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

5



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

(1) General
Organization
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include those of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (“TER”), a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries. Except where otherwise noted, the words “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, as well as “Company,” refer to TER and all of its subsidiaries. Through our subsidiary, Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. (“TER Holdings”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, we own and operate the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (“Trump Taj Mahal”) and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino (“Trump Plaza”), each in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Until May 24, 2011, we also owned and operated the Trump Marina Hotel Casino (“Trump Marina”) in Atlantic City, New Jersey. See Note 3 for additional information regarding this discontinued operation.

Chapter 11 Case

On February 17, 2009 (the “Petition Date”), TER and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey in Camden, New Jersey (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking relief under the provisions of chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). These chapter 11 cases were jointly administered under the caption In re: TCI 2 Holdings, LLC, et al Debtors, Chapter 11 Case Nos.: 09-13654 through 09-13656 and 09-13658 through 09-13664 (JHW) (the “Chapter 11 Case”).

On May 7, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the “Confirmation Order”) confirming the Supplemental Modified Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code Proposed by the Debtors and the Ad Hoc Committee of Holders of 8.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2015 (the “Ad Hoc Committee”), as filed with the Bankruptcy Court, in final form, on May 7, 2010 (the “Plan of Reorganization”).

On July 16, 2010 (the “Consummation Date”), the Plan of Reorganization became effective and the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization were consummated.

On January 10, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court issued its final decree and order closing the Chapter 11 Case.

Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) no later than 30 days after the Consummation Date, and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be declared effective by 60 days after the Consummation Date, a registration statement to register for resale the new common stock of the Company issued pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and held by members of the Ad Hoc Committee and/or their affiliates (the “Backstop Parties”) and other eligible holders of new common stock who elected to become parties thereto. The Registration Rights Agreement has been amended to defer our obligation to register the shares of common stock held by the Backstop Parties and such other holders until January 15, 2013, subject to an earlier request from the Backstop Parties holding a majority of the common stock held by the Backstop Parties.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, have been made. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC and all of our other filings, including Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC after such date and through the date of this report, which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or our website at www.trumpcasinos.com.

6

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our controlled subsidiaries and partnerships. We have eliminated all intercompany balances and transactions. In accordance with Topic 280 – “Segment Reporting” of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), we view each of our casino properties as operating segments and aggregate all such operating segments into one reportable segment, as we believe that they are economically similar, offer similar types of products and services, cater to the same types of customers and are similarly regulated.
In preparing the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Company’s management, events that have occurred after September 30, 2012.

Assets Held for Sale

Long-lived assets are considered held for sale when certain criteria are met, including whether management (having the authority to approve the action) has committed to a plan to sell the asset, whether the asset is available for sale in its present condition and whether a sale of the asset is probable within one year of the reporting date. Long-lived assets that are classified as held for sale are reported at the lower of the assets’ carrying amount or fair value less costs related to the assets’ disposition and are no longer depreciated.

Although the Company is currently evaluating certain strategic alternatives with respect to certain of its long-lived assets, including a potential sale of Trump Plaza, the accompanying financial statements do not present such long-lived assets as assets held for sale as all of the criteria required under ASC 360 - “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”) were not met as of the reporting date.

(3) Trump Marina Discontinued Operations

On May 24, 2011, the Company and its subsidiary, Trump Marina Associates, LLC, completed the sale of Trump Marina (the “Property”) to Golden Nugget Atlantic City, LLC (“Golden Nugget”), an affiliate of Landry's, Inc. (“Landry's”), pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of February 11, 2011 (as amended, the “Asset Purchase Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, at the closing, Golden Nugget acquired substantially all of the assets of, and assumed certain liabilities related to, the business conducted at the Property.

The following table provides a summary of Trump Marina's discontinued operations presented in our consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented:
 
 
Three Months
 
Nine Months
 
 
Ended
 
Ended
 
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Gaming revenues
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
48,242

Net revenues
 

 

 

 
45,074

Depreciation and amortization
 

 

 

 
481

(Loss) income from discontinued operations
 
(513
)
 
(114
)
 
5,279

 
(6,661
)

Income from discontinued operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 includes $8,330 of income, net of related fees, related to the settlement with the City of Atlantic City with respect to its challenges to the real estate tax assessments for the tax years 2008 through 2012 (see Note 8) and $2,301 of non-cash expense recognized in connection with the donation of $7,005 of previous CRDA deposits made by Trump Marina. On July 30, 2012, the Company received $2,366 from the CRDA representing the cash-back donation credit.

During July 2012, the Company entered into a General Release with Golden Nugget and Landry's Inc. settling certain claims under the Asset Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the General Release, the Company agreed to pay Landry's $227 and the Company and Landry's each released, discharged and forgave any and all claims, counterclaims, cross claims and defenses against the other party with respect to post-closing prorations owed under the Asset Purchase Agreement, including the final working capital adjustment. No other claims of the parties under the Asset Purchase Agreement or otherwise were released.


7

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


(4) Sale of Off-Site Warehouse and the Steel Pier

Off-Site Warehouse

On May 8, 2012, Trump Taj Mahal Associates completed the sale of its off-site warehouse (the “EHT Property”) located in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey to Schoffer Enterprises, LLC pursuant to the terms of an Agreement of Sale dated as of February 6, 2012. The net cash proceeds of the transaction of $1,949 are required to be used in a manner permitted under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

In accordance with ASC 360, during the first quarter of 2012, the Company recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge of $1,100 to record the EHT Property at its fair value less costs to sell. Such amount is reflected in Asset impairment charge in the consolidated statement of operations for nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Steel Pier

In August 2011, the Company sold the Steel Pier, an Atlantic City landmark of approximately 425,000 square feet located across the Boardwalk from Trump Taj Mahal, to an entity affiliated with the Steel Pier's long-time tenant for a sale price of $4,250. The tenant operated the amusement park on the Steel Pier under a lease which would have continued in effect until December 31, 2016. The net cash proceeds of this sale of $3,500, were used to make a mandatory principal payment under the Company's secured credit facility with Beal Bank, as agent and Icahn Partners, as lenders.

In September 2011, the Company sold the “skybridge” which extends over the Boardwalk connecting Trump Taj Mahal to the Steel Pier to the same entity that purchased the Steel Pier. The net cash proceeds of this sale of $250, were also used to make a mandatory principal payment under the Company's secured credit facility with Beal Bank, as agent and Icahn Partners, as lenders.

(5) Debt
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our debt consisted of the following: 
 
September 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
Senior Secured Credit Facility:
 
 
 
Term Loans - maturing December 31, 2015, interest and principal payments due quarterly at 12.0%
$
292,854

 
$
297,553

Other:
 
 
 
Capitalized lease obligations, payments due at various dates through 2028, secured by slot and other equipment, interest at 8.5% to 12.0%
5,626

 
6,090

Total long-term debt
298,480

 
303,643

Less: current maturities
(3,622
)
 
(3,967
)
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
$
294,858

 
$
299,676


Amended and Restated Credit Agreement - On July 16, 2010 (the “Consummation Date”), TER Holdings, TER and certain subsidiaries of TER (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), each as reorganized pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) with Beal Bank, SSB (“Beal Bank”) as original collateral agent and administrative agent, and Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund II LP and Icahn Partners Master Fund III LP (collectively, “Icahn Partners”), as initial lenders. In connection with a settlement of certain disputes between the Company and Icahn Partners, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was subsequently amended, retroactive to the Consummation Date, to reduce the total principal amount outstanding as of the Consummation Date to $346,500 and to provide that interest would be payable on all principal outstanding. In April 2012, Beal Bank was replaced as collateral agent and administrative agent by Icahn Agency Services, LLC.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement requires quarterly principal amortization payments in the amount of $866. All indebtedness outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement matures on December 31, 2015. Until such

8

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


maturity date, TER Holdings is required to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Term Loans at a rate per annum equal to 12%, payable quarterly in arrears.

TER Holdings may elect, at its option, to prepay Term Loans outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Any such optional prepayment after January 1, 2012 would be made at par. TER Holdings may be required to make mandatory prepayments of the Term Loans in connection with asset dispositions, debt and equity issuances and extraordinary receipts. During March 2012, in addition to its scheduled quarterly principal amortization payment, TER Holdings made a $2,100 mandatory prepayment of the Term Loans utilizing proceeds from certain extraordinary receipts during 2011. During 2011, in addition its scheduled quarterly principal amortization payments, TER Holdings made $43,750 of mandatory prepayments utilizing proceeds from certain extraordinary receipts during 2010 and net cash proceeds from the sale of Trump Marina and the Steel Pier and skybridge at Trump Taj Mahal.

Beginning on March 31, 2011, and on each subsequent anniversary of such date that occurs prior to the maturity date, TER Holdings is required to offer to the lenders to prepay portions of the Term Loans equal to 50% of the Free Cash Flow (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) for the calendar year then most recently ended. The Company did not generate any Free Cash Flow during the calendar years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Amounts outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

Under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants impose restrictions with respect to, among other things, (i) incurring liens, (ii) incurring debt, (iii) mergers or consolidations, (iv) sales or other dispositions of assets, (v) investments, (vi) dividends or distributions on, or repurchases of, equity interests, (vii) prepaying or repurchasing debt and (viii) certain capital expenditures. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains customary event of default and remedy provisions, including a provision stating that an event of default includes any termination or expiration of the Second Amended and Restated Trademark License Agreement entered into on the Consummation Date (the “Trademark License Agreement”) or the issuance of an injunction or similar order against the Company under the Trademark License Agreement. As of September 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.


9

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


(6) Earnings Per Share
The computations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented are as follows:
 
 
Three Months
 
Nine Months
 
Ended
 
Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
832

 
$
1,879

 
$
5,632

 
$
(14,110
)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
(513
)
 
(114
)
 
5,279

 
(6,661
)
Net income (loss)
$
319

 
$
1,765

 
$
10,911

 
$
(20,771
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
10,890,002

 
10,767,858

 
10,875,338

 
10,767,858

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock and restricted stock units
7,936

 
107,144

 
32,936

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted
10,897,938

 
10,875,002

 
10,908,274

 
10,767,858

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic net income (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
0.08

 
$
0.17

 
$
0.52

 
$
(1.31
)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
(0.05
)
 
(0.01
)
 
0.48

 
(0.62
)
Basic net income (loss) per share
$
0.03

 
$
0.16

 
$
1.00

 
$
(1.93
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
0.08

 
$
0.17

 
$
0.52

 
$
(1.31
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
(0.05
)
 
(0.01
)
 
0.48

 
(0.62
)
Diluted net income (loss) per share
$
0.03

 
$
0.16

 
$
1.00

 
$
(1.93
)

Potentially dilutive common shares excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share due to anti-dilution for the periods presented above are as follows:
 
Three Months
 
Nine Months
 
Ended
 
Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Potentially dilutive common shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock awards

 
160,716

 

 
267,860

Warrants
535,714

 
535,714

 
535,714

 
535,714

Total
535,714

 
696,430

 
535,714

 
803,574


On April 1, 2012, a total of 50,000 restricted stock units were awarded to five employees with a weighted-average contractual life of two years.

On the Consummation Date pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, warrants were issued to Donald J. Trump to purchase up to 535,714 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $123.74 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions set forth therein.


10

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


(7) Income Taxes
We did not record a tax provision during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
At September 30, 2012, we had unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $2,372, including interest. Our unrecognized tax benefits would not impact our effective tax rate, if recognized.
We recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties as a component of income tax expense. We did not recognize any interest associated with uncertain tax positions during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized interest associated with uncertain tax positions of $774 and $2,247, respectively.
 
Federal and State Income Tax Audits
Tax years 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by the federal and state tax authorities.

From 2002 through 2006, state income taxes for our New Jersey operations were computed under the alternative minimum assessment method. During December 2011, we entered into a Stipulation and Consent Order (the “Stipulation”) with the State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury and Division of Taxation (the “Division”, and together with the Company, the “Parties”), settling certain claims for unpaid taxes that were asserted by the Division in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings commenced by the Company in 2004 and the Chapter 11 Case. The Stipulation was approved by order of the Bankruptcy Court and became final and non-appealable on December 19, 2011 (the “Effective Date”).

Under the terms of the Stipulation, the Parties agreed to resolve any and all claims of the Division against the Company relating to New Jersey Corporation Business Tax for periods prior to the 2009 bankruptcy (including the Division's claim for unpaid taxes relating to the years 2002 through 2006 under the alternative minimum assessment method (“AMA”) of determining tax liability). On the Effective Date, pursuant to the Stipulation, the claim asserted by the Division in the Company's 2009 bankruptcy proceedings was reduced to $5,000 (the “Settlement Payment”) and was deemed to be an allowed priority tax claim, as defined in the Plan of Reorganization, in the amount of $5,000.

Pursuant to the Stipulation, in December 2011, the Company paid the first installment of the Settlement Payment, totaling $3,500, to the Division. The second and final installment payment of $1,500 was paid by the Company to the Division on April 30, 2012.
Chapter 11 Case Implications

Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, on the Consummation Date, the Company realized cancellation of indebtedness income, and as a result, was required to reduce certain tax attributes such as net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) and the tax basis of its assets. Effective January 1, 2011, the Company fully reduced its federal NOLs and credit carryforwards generated prior to 2011 as a result of the realized cancellation of indebtedness income pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The reduction of tax attributes and the application of Section 382 of the Code, as a result of the ownership change occurring on the Consummation Date, could result in increased future tax liabilities for the Company. The Company is also reviewing the technical merits of a potential tax reporting position as a result of the Plan of Reorganization and related transactions that may result in a substantial additional step-up in the tax basis of the Company's assets. The additional tax basis step-up in the Company's assets resulting from this tax reporting position, if any, would be subject to the application of Section 382 of the Code as a result of the ownership change which occurred on the Consummation Date. Any increased deferred tax assets, if any, from this tax reporting position would be offset by a full valuation allowance for financial statement purposes.

Utilization of certain federal NOLs available to TER after the Consummation Date is limited pursuant to Section 382 of the Code. As of December 31, 2011, we have federal NOLs of approximately $267,400 available to offset future taxable income, of which approximately $195,163 are limited pursuant to Section 382 of the Code to approximately $12,900 annually until expiration. The federal NOLs expire after 2031.

Under the New Jersey Casino Control Act (the “Act”), Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Plaza and Trump Marina are required to file New Jersey corporation business tax returns. As of December 31, 2011, Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Plaza and Trump Marina had NOLs of approximately $333,300, $329,500 and $335,900, respectively, for New Jersey state income tax purposes. The New Jersey state NOLs expire through 2031.

11

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


Tax Distributions

TER Holdings’ partnership agreement requires distributions to its partners sufficient in amount to cover all federal, state and local income taxes incident to their ownership of TER Holdings, including special allocations of income, gains, losses, deductions and credits. TER Holdings did not make any distributions for taxes during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

(8) City of Atlantic City Real Property Tax Appeals

During June 2012, the Company settled with the City of Atlantic City (the “City”) with respect to its challenges to the real estate tax assessments for its casino properties for the tax years 2008 through 2012. Under the settlement terms, the City agreed to provide the Company with a credit for previously paid real estate taxes in the total amount of $54,000, to be applied against future real estate tax payments related to Trump Taj Mahal as follows: $15,000 in 2013; $9,000 per year in each of 2014, 2015 and 2016; and $12,000 in 2017. The settlement agreement provides that the City has the option to issue a cash refund to the Company at any time for the unused portion of the credit. As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to pay real estate taxes for 2012 based upon the City's 2012 assessments. In addition, the City confirmed its intention to assess Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort at $1.0 billion for tax year 2013 (a 40% reduction from the 2012 assessment) and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino at $250.0 million for tax year 2013 (a 66% reduction from the 2012 assessment), and the Company agreed not to challenge such 2013 assessments. The settlement terms were set forth in a Settlement Agreement entered into as of June 13, 2012 among the Company's subsidiaries Trump Taj Mahal Associates, LLC, Trump Plaza Associates, LLC and Trump Marina Associates, LLC (along with Golden Nugget Atlantic City, LLC, which purchased the former Trump Marina Hotel Casino from the Company during 2011) and the City.

The present value of the settlement, net of estimated legal fees and other expenses, was recorded as a reduction to operating costs and expenses and was estimated to be approximately $39,204, of which $30,874 relates to the Company's continuing operations and $8,330 relates to its discontinued operation. The Company is currently disputing the computation of certain fees incurred related to the appeals.

Property taxes reflected on the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 include the effect of an 11.1% increase in the City's 2012 property tax rate, which is retroactive to January 1, 2012.

On October 17, 2012, the City and the Company entered into an Amendment to Settlement Agreement whereby the City agreed that, if a planned offering by the City of its tax appeal refunding bonds is successfully consummated, the City will, as permitted by the settlement agreement, pay to the Company, from the proceeds of the offering, the amount of $50,500 in cash within five days of the City's receipt of the proceeds, in lieu of the five-year credit provided for in the settlement agreement. The Company has agreed to accept such payment in full satisfaction of amounts due under the settlement agreement. Although the City has agreed to diligently and in good faith seek to consummate this bond offering, and has advised the Company that the offering is expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2012, completion of the offering is subject to conditions beyond the control of the City and there can be no assurance as to the timing of the offering or whether it will actually be consummated. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company will receive this cash refund from the City.

(9) Income Related to Utility Agreements

On February 27, 2012, the Company entered into various agreements with one of its utility providers. In consideration for entering into the agreements, the Company received $3,000 in cash and will receive rate reduction credits totaling approximately $1,960 which are to be applied against future invoices for services provided in equal monthly increments of $35 through October 2016. The Company recognized $4,415 of income, net of related expenses, during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 in connection with entering into these agreements, of which $3,532 related to its continuing operations and $883 related to its discontinued operations.


12

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


(10) Evacuation and Closure of Facilities

In connection with a mandate from the State of New Jersey to evacuate southern New Jersey's barrier islands due to anticipated severe weather and flooding, Atlantic City's casinos closed on August 26, 2011 and reopened on August 29, 2011. Trump Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza sustained only minor physical damage. The Company believes that its operations were negatively affected before, during and after the shutdown.
(11) Income Related to Deed Amendment

Pursuant to an Agreement (the “2011 Trump Plaza/Boardwalk Agreement”) entered into on March 14, 2011 between Trump Plaza Associates and Boardwalk Florida Enterprises, LLC (“Boardwalk”), the owner of certain real property in Atlantic City that was acquired from Trump Plaza Associates in 2005, Trump Plaza Associates and Boardwalk agreed that the deed provision restricting the development of gaming activities on such real property would be discharged and released and replaced with new contractual restrictions set forth in the 2011 Trump Plaza/Boardwalk Agreement. In connection with its execution of the 2011 Trump Plaza/Boardwalk Agreement and the related deed modification, the Company received $5,465 on March 14, 2011. Such amount is reflected in non-operating income in the statement of operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

(12) Insurance Proceeds

On July 16, 2010, Trump Plaza was temporarily closed due to a leak in a water main managed by the utility company that provides Trump Plaza with the necessary cold water for its air conditioning. Trump Plaza reopened the majority of its operations on July 18, 2010 after temporary cooling systems were put in place to remediate the problem. Trump Plaza became fully operational on July 22, 2010. The Company filed a business interruption claim with its insurance carrier and received insurance proceeds totaling $2,085, of which $1,551 was received during 2011 and recognized as other revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

(13) Commitments and Contingencies

Casino Reinvestment Development Authority Obligations – As required by the provisions of the Act, a casino licensee must pay an investment alternative tax of 2.5% of its gross casino revenues as defined in the Act. However, pursuant to contracts with the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority (the “CRDA”), Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Plaza and Trump Marina (through the date of its sale) (collectively, the “Trump Entities”) each pay 1.25% of their gross casino revenues to the CRDA (the “CRDA Payment”) to fund qualified investments as defined in the Act and such CRDA Payment entitles each such casino property to an investment tax credit in an amount equal to twice the amount of the CRDA Payment against the 2.5% investment alternative tax. Qualified investments may include the purchase of bonds issued by the CRDA at a below market rate of interest, direct investment in projects or donation of funds to projects as determined by the CRDA. According to the Act, funds on deposit with the CRDA are invested by the CRDA and the resulting interest income is shared two-thirds to the casino and one-third to the CRDA. Further, the Act requires that CRDA bonds be issued at statutory rates established at two-thirds of the average rate of the Bond Buyer Weekly 25 Revenue Bond Index for bonds available for purchase during the last 26 weeks preceding the date the CRDA issues its bond. The Company records charges to expense equal to one-third of its obligation to reflect the lower return on investment at the date the obligation arises. Pursuant to the contracts with the CRDA, each of the casino properties is required to make quarterly deposits with the CRDA to satisfy its investment obligations. We recognized expense related to our continuing operations of $564 and $3,632 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $374 and $1,190 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, to give effect to the below market interest rates associated with CRDA deposits and bonds.

NJSEA Subsidy Agreement – In August 2008, the casinos located in Atlantic City (“Casinos”) entered into a Purse Enhancement Agreement (the “2008 Subsidy Agreement”) with the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority (the “NJSEA”) and the CRDA in the interest of further deferring or preventing the proliferation of competitive gaming at New Jersey racing tracks through December 31, 2011. In addition to the continued prohibition of casino gaming in New Jersey outside of Atlantic City, legislation was enacted to provide for the deduction of certain promotional gaming credits from the calculation of the tax on casino gross revenue.

Under the terms of the 2008 Subsidy Agreement, the Casinos were required to make scheduled payments to the NJSEA totaling $90,000 to be used for certain authorized purposes (the “Authorized Uses”) as defined by the 2008 Subsidy Agreement. For each year, each casino's share of the scheduled payments equated to a percentage representing its gross gaming revenue for

13

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


the prior calendar year compared to the gross gaming revenues for that period for all Casinos. Each casino, solely and individually, was responsible for its respective share of the scheduled amounts due.
In the event that any casino failed to make its payment as required, the remaining Casinos had the right, but not the obligation, to cure a payment delinquency. We expensed our share of the $90,000, estimated to be approximately $18,700 based on our actual market share of gross gaming revenue, on a straight-line basis over the term of the 2008 Subsidy Agreement. We recorded expense within our continuing operations related to the 2008 Subsidy Agreement of $1,570 and $4,127 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
Atlantic City Tourism District – In February 2011, as part of the State of New Jersey's plan to revitalize Atlantic City's casino and tourism industries, a law was enacted requiring the creation of a tourism district (the “Tourism District”) to be administered and managed by the CRDA. The Tourism District includes each of the Atlantic City casino properties, along with certain other tourism related areas of Atlantic City. The law requires, among other things, the creation of a public-private partnership between the CRDA and a private entity that represents existing and future casino licensees. The private entity, known as The Atlantic City Alliance (the “ACA”), was established in the form of a not-for-profit corporation, of which Trump Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza are members. The public-private partnership established between the ACA and the CRDA is for an initial term of five years. Its general purpose is to revitalize and market the Tourism District. The law requires that a $5,000 contribution be made to this effort by all casinos prior to 2012, followed by an annual amount of $30,000 to be contributed by the casinos commencing January 1, 2012 for a term of five years. Each casino's portion of the annual contributions will equate to the percentage representing its gross gaming revenue for the prior calendar quarter compared to the aggregate gross gaming revenues for that period for all casinos. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized $1,025 and $3,074, respectively, of expense related to our portion of the $30,000 contribution to be made during 2012. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $203 and $608, respectively, of expense related to our portion of the $5,000 contribution made prior to 2012.
Boardwalk Revitalization Project During 2004, the Boardwalk Revitalization Fund was established by the CRDA to fund eligible boardwalk revitalization projects. The Boardwalk Revitalization Fund may be funded by a portion of the proceeds of the issuance and sale of certain Parking Fee Revenue Bonds and Atlantic City Fund Investment Alternative Tax Obligations.
During November 2011, the CRDA approved Trump Taj Mahal's application for the restoration of its building façade and other elements along its Boardwalk level, its three connecting grand staircases and its open-air second level promenade for its entire frontage along the Atlantic City Boardwalk (the “Boardwalk Façade Project”) and approved a fund reservation in the amount of $6,859 from such funds to be appropriated from Trump Taj Mahal's and Trump Plaza's remaining designated share of the Boardwalk Revitalization Fund.
A Project Grant Agreement dated as of March 30, 2012 was entered into by and between the CRDA and Trump Taj Mahal Associates, LLC and Trump Plaza Associates, LLC (the “Project Grant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Project Grant Agreement, the amount available from the Boardwalk Revitalization Fund to fund the Boardwalk Façade Project shall not exceed $6,859 and excess amounts necessary to complete the Project, if any, shall be borne by Trump Taj Mahal. Construction on the Project commenced in early 2012 and is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2012.

(14) Legal Proceedings
We and certain of our employees are involved from time to time in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. While any proceeding or litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management believes that the final outcomes of these other matters are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. In general, we have agreed to indemnify certain of our key executives and directors against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses (including reasonable costs, disbursements and counsel fees) and liabilities (including amounts paid or incurred in satisfaction of settlements, judgments, fines and penalties) incurred by them in any legal proceedings absent a showing of such persons’ gross negligence or malfeasance.
Chapter 11 Case – On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions in the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code. These chapter 11 cases were jointly administered under the caption In re: TCI 2 Holdings, LLC, et al Debtors, Chapter 11 Case Nos.: 09-13654 through 09-13656 and 09-13658 through 09-13664 (JHW) (the “Chapter 11 Case”).

On May 7, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Confirmation Order confirming the Supplemental Modified Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code Proposed by the Debtors and the Ad Hoc

14

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


Committee of Holders of 8.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2015, as filed with the Bankruptcy Court, in final form, on May 7, 2010.

On July 16, 2010, the Plan of Reorganization became effective and the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization were consummated.

On January 10, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court issued its final decree and order closing the Chapter 11 Case.

Notwithstanding the entry of the final decree and order closing the Chapter 11 Case, the Bankruptcy Court has retained jurisdiction to determine the allowance of the claims filed against the Company. An interim distribution is in the process of being made to holders of certain allowed Class 5 and Class 7 Claims as defined in the Plan of Reorganization during 2012. A number of disputed claims have yet to be resolved. If and when these claims are allowed, the claimants will receive distributions pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization.

Former Shareholders State Court Litigation On or about April 4, 2011, certain former shareholders of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the “Former Shareholders”) filed a complaint against TCI 2 Holdings, LLC, TER Development Co., LLC, and TER Management Co., LLC in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. ATL-L-2618-11 (the “Former Shareholders State Court Litigation”). In the Former Shareholders State Court Litigation, the Former Shareholders alleged that they were entitled to a judgment in an amount in excess of $3,500 (plus pre- and post-judgment interest from May 20, 2005) on account of distributions that they were entitled to be paid under the Second Amended Joint Plan Of Reorganization of THCR/LP Corporation et al. Dated As of March 30, 2005 (the “2005 Plan of Reorganization”). The parties have executed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice as to all claims which has been submitted to the Court.

Estate of Martin Caballero Lawsuit – On May 18, 2012, a lawsuit was filed by the estate and certain family members of Martin Caballero against the Company and certain of its affiliates in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County, Law Division (Docket No L-2553-12). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, negligence by the Company and certain of its affiliates in connection with the May 21, 2010 kidnapping of Mr. Caballero by two assailants on the grounds of the Taj Mahal’s parking garage, and Mr. Caballero’s subsequent murder. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages with respect to such claim. The Company intends to vigorously defend such case and has contacted its liability insurance carrier regarding any losses incurred in connection with this lawsuit. This matter is currently in the early stages of litigation.

(15) Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820 – “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). The levels of the hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

Balances Measured at Fair Value
 
September 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Balance
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Balance
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
CRDA investments, net
$
37,891

 

 
$
37,891

 

 
$
40,178

 
$

 
$
40,178

 
$


The fair value measurements relating to our CRDA bonds and deposits were determined using inputs within Level 2 of ASC 820’s hierarchy. CRDA assets are discussed in Note 13.


15

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


Balances Disclosed at Fair Value

The carrying amounts of financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The carrying amounts of CRDA investments approximate their fair value as a result of allowances established to give effect to below-market interest rates.
The estimated fair values of other financial instruments are as follows:
 
 
September 30, 2012
 
Amount Outstanding
 
Carrying Value
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
$
292,854

 
$
292,854

 
$
292,854

 
Level 2

 
December 31, 2011
 
Amount Outstanding
 
Carrying Value
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
$
297,553

 
$
297,553

 
$
297,553

 
Level 2

The carrying amount of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement approximates its fair value. The Company’s other long-term debt was not significant at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

16



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains statements that we believe are, or may be considered to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Report regarding the prospects of our industry or our prospects, plans, financial position or business strategy, may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “foresee,” “project,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plans,” “forecasts,” “continue” or “could” or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar terms. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements may be included in various filings that we make with the SEC, or press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of one of our authorized executive officers. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these expectations will prove to be correct and there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Report will be realized. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained herein, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to any forward-looking statements. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures we make in our reports to the SEC. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this Report.
For a more complete description of the risks that may affect our business, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Overview

We own and operate the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino, each in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Until May 24, 2011, we also owned and operated the Trump Marina Hotel Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

On May 24, 2011, we and our subsidiary, Trump Marina Associates, LLC, completed the sale of the Trump Marina (the “Property”) to Golden Nugget Atlantic City, LLC (“Golden Nugget”), an affiliate of Landry's Restaurants, Inc., pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of February 11, 2011, as amended (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, at the closing, Golden Nugget acquired substantially all of the assets of, and assumed certain liabilities related to, the business conducted at the Property.

On May 8, 2012, Trump Taj Mahal Associates completed the sale of its off-site warehouse (the “EHT Property”) located in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey to Schoffer Enterprises, LLC pursuant to the terms of the Agreement of Sale dated as of February 6, 2012. The net cash proceeds of the transaction of $1.9 million are required to be used in a manner permitted under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In accordance with ASC 360, the Company recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge of $1.1 million to record the EHT Property at its fair value less costs to sell. Such amount is reflected in Asset impairment charge in the consolidated statement of operations.

The Company is currently evaluating certain strategic alternatives with respect to certain of its long-lived assets, including a potential sale of Trump Plaza.

During June 2012, the Company settled with the City of Atlantic City (the “City”) with respect to its challenges to the real estate tax assessments for its casino properties for the tax years 2008 through 2012. Under the settlement terms, the City agreed to provide the Company with a credit for previously paid real estate taxes in the total amount of $54.0 million, to be applied against future real estate tax payments related to Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort as follows: $15.0 million in 2013; $9.0 million per year in each of 2014, 2015 and 2016; and $12.0 million in 2017. The settlement agreement provides that the City has the option to issue a cash refund to the Company at any time for the unused portion of the credit. As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to pay real estate taxes for 2012 based upon the City's 2012 assessments. In addition, the City confirmed its intention to assess Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort at $1.0 billion for tax year 2013 (a 40% reduction from the 2012 assessment) and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino at $250.0 million for tax year 2013 (a 66% reduction from the 2012 assessment), and the Company agreed not to challenge such 2013 assessments. The settlement terms were set forth in a Settlement Agreement entered into as of June 13, 2012 among the Company's subsidiaries Trump Taj Mahal Associates, LLC, Trump Plaza Associates, LLC and Trump Marina Associates, LLC (along with Golden Nugget Atlantic City, LLC, which purchased the former Trump Marina Hotel Casino from the Company during 2011) and the City.

17




The present value of the settlement, net of estimated legal fees and other expenses, was recorded as a reduction to operating costs and expenses and was estimated to be approximately $39.2 million, of which $30.9 million relates to the Company's continuing operations and $8.3 million relates to its discontinued operation. The Company is currently disputing the computation of certain fees incurred related to the appeals.

Property taxes reflected on the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 include the effect of an 11.1% increase in the City's 2012 property tax rate, which is retroactive to January 1, 2012.

On October 17, 2012, the City and the Company entered into an Amendment to Settlement Agreement whereby the City agreed that, if a planned offering by the City of its tax appeal refunding bonds is successfully consummated, the City will, as permitted by the settlement agreement, pay to the Company, from the proceeds of the offering, the amount of $50.5 million in cash within five days of the City's receipt of the proceeds, in lieu of the five-year credit provided for in the settlement agreement. The Company has agreed to accept such payment in full satisfaction of amounts due under the settlement agreement. Although the City has agreed to diligently and in good faith seek to consummate this bond offering, and has advised the Company that the offering is expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2012, completion of the offering is subject to conditions beyond the control of the City and there can be no assurance as to the timing of the offering or whether it will actually be consummated. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company will receive this cash refund from the City.

Chapter 11 Case
On February 17, 2009 (the “Petition Date”), TER and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey in Camden, New Jersey (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking relief under the provisions of chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). These chapter 11 cases were jointly administered under the caption In re: TCI 2 Holdings, LLC, et al Debtors, Chapter 11 Case Nos.: 09-13654 through 09-13656 and 09-13658 through 09-13664 (JHW) (the “Chapter 11 Case”).

On May 7, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the “Confirmation Order”) confirming the Supplemental Modified Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code Proposed by the Debtors and the Ad Hoc Committee of Holders of 8.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2015, as filed with the Bankruptcy Court, in final form, on May 7, 2010 (the “Plan of Reorganization”).

On July 16, 2010 (the “Consummation Date”), the Plan of Reorganization became effective and the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization were consummated.

On January 10, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court issued its final decree and order closing the Chapter 11 Case.

Notwithstanding the entry of the final decree and order closing the Chapter 11 Case, the Bankruptcy Court has retained jurisdiction to determine the allowance of the claims filed against the Company. An interim distribution is in the process of being made to holders of certain allowed Class 5 and Class 7 Claims as defined in the Plan of Reorganization during 2012. A number of disputed claims have yet to be resolved. If and when these claims are allowed, the claimants will receive distributions pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization.

Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) no later than 30 days after the Consummation Date, and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be declared effective by 60 days after the Consummation Date, a registration statement to register for resale the new common stock of the Company issued pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and held by members of the Ad Hoc Committee and/or their affiliates (the “Backstop Parties”) and other eligible holders of new common stock who elected to become parties thereto. The Registration Rights Agreement has been amended to defer our obligation to register the shares of common stock held by the Backstop Parties and such other holders until January 15, 2013, subject to an earlier request from the Backstop Parties holding a majority of the common stock held by the Backstop Parties.

18



Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General. Cash flows from the operating activities of our casino properties constitute our primary source of liquidity. Currently, our liquidity and cash flow is affected by a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including worsening economic conditions, the tightened credit markets, the downturn in the Atlantic City gaming market, regulatory issues, competition (both from casinos in Atlantic City and other gaming venues in our region) and other general business conditions. Although we anticipate significant cash flow savings during 2013 as a result of our recent property tax settlement with the City, the continuing effects of competition, including the opening of Revel in Atlantic City in spring 2012 and the recent property tax rate increase by the City, continue to have a negative impact on our cash flows. We cannot be assured that we will possess sufficient income and liquidity to continue to fund our operations and our required or planned capital expenditures. If our operating results do not improve, we may not have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet our cash obligations during the fourth quarter and going forward, including with respect to quarterly interest and amortization payments under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, and we may not be able to continue to satisfy the liquidity requirements of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (“DGE”) to continue to operate our business. We continue to explore various strategic alternatives, including obtaining additional sources of funding, in the event our operating results and liquidity do not improve. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in pursuing these alternatives or that we will have or be able to obtain sufficient funding to meet our obligations. We are currently financing our operations using our cash on hand.
We have been operating and are continuing to operate in an extremely challenging and competitive business environment. Cash flows used in our continuing operating activities were $6.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $11.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The lower cash flows used in continuing operations was principally due to a decrease in cash expenditures related to professional fees and expenses associated with our reorganization and the receipt of $3.0 million in connection with entering into various utility agreements with one of our utility providers.
Cash flows used in continuing investing activities were $3.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $2.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Continuing investing activities during 2012 included capital expenditures of $5.4 million, $3.9 million related to Casino Reinvestment Development Authority (“CRDA”) investment obligations, $1.9 million of proceeds received in connection with the sale of our off-site warehouse, which are restricted in use under the terms of our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and a $4.1 million decrease in restricted cash. Continuing investing activities during 2011 included capital expenditures of $9.8 million, $4.7 million related to CRDA investment obligations, $1.9 million in proceeds from certain CRDA investments, $4.0 million of proceeds received in connection with the sale of the Steel Pier and skybridge at Trump Taj Mahal and a $6.2 million decrease in restricted cash.
Our cash flows used in continuing financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included (i) the repayment of $4.7 million of outstanding borrowings under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was comprised of a $2.1 million mandatory prepayment funded from restricted cash representing a portion of proceeds from certain extraordinary receipts during 2011 and quarterly amortization payments of $2.6 million and (ii) the repayment of capital lease obligations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our cash flows used in continuing financing activities included (i) the repayment of $46.3 million of outstanding borrowings under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was comprised of: quarterly amortization payments of $2.6 million; $12.0 million in mandatory prepayments which were funded from restricted cash representing a portion of proceeds from certain extraordinary receipts during 2010; $28.0 million of net cash proceeds from the sale of Trump Marina and $3.8 million of net cash proceeds from the sale of the Steel Pier, (ii) a $15.8 million decrease in restricted cash and (iii) the repayment of capital lease obligations.

At September 30, 2012, we had $53.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and an additional $5.1 million of cash which was restricted in use under the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. There was $292.9 million in principal outstanding under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2012.
Our ability to meet our operating and debt service obligations depends on a number of factors, including our existing cash on hand and cash flows generated by our operating subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that other sources of funds will be available to us, or if available, at terms favorable to us.
TER has minimal operations, except for its ownership of TER Holdings and its subsidiaries. TER depends on the receipt of sufficient funds from its subsidiaries to meet its financial obligations. The ability of our subsidiaries to make payments to TER Holdings may also be restricted by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission (“CCC”) and the DGE.

19



Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interest, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us.

Analysis of Results of Operations

Our primary business activities are conducted by Trump Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza. In addition, we owned and operated Trump Marina through the consummation of its sale on May 24, 2011. Our 2012 operating results continue to be affected by various factors, including the effects of competition in our market and adjoining states and a weakening economy.

Competition. The first phase of Resorts World Casino at Aqueduct Racetrack in Queens, New York opened on October 28, 2011 with approximately 2,300 video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) and 205 electronic table games. The second phase of the casino opened in December 2011 and featured an additional 2,200 VLTs and 275 electronic table games.
 
During March 2012, the Atlantic Club Casino Hotel, formerly the Atlantic City Hilton, re-branded itself as a value-based casino offering free parking to all of its customers, additional lower denomination slot machines and lower minimum bet table games.

Valley Forge Casino Resort, Pennsylvania's eleventh casino and fourth Philadelphia-area casino, opened on March 31, 2012 featuring approximately 600 slot machines and 50 table games, with the option to add 15 tables for monthly poker tournaments.

Revel Entertainment Group (“Revel”) partially opened its casino resort located next to Showboat Casino Hotel in Atlantic City on April 2, 2012 with limited amenities. Revel officially opened on May 25, 2012 and continues to add new amenities.

During late April 2012, the Golden Nugget in Atlantic City unveiled the $150 million in renovations made to the property since May 2011, including a remodeled casino floor, refurbished rooms, and new restaurants, retail outlets and spa.

Maryland Live! Casino, located in Hanover, Maryland, opened on June 6, 2012. The casino opened with 3,176 slot machines and electronic table games and added an additional 1,574 games during the third quarter of 2012. Maryland Live! now features 4,750 slot machines and electronic table games. Maryland continues to consider legislation which would allow table games in all of its casinos, as well as an additional casino in Prince George's County.

During July 2012, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board announced that it would keep a second casino license that was designated for Philadelphia in the city. The second casino is not expected to be operating until 2014 at the earliest.

In addition, efforts to legalize casino gambling in New Jersey outside of Atlantic City continue. The Governor of New Jersey continues to express his commitment to revitalizing Atlantic City and has opposed allowing casino gambling outside of Atlantic City.

The following analyses of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with and give consideration to the following:
Gross Gaming Revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, gross gaming revenues in the Atlantic City market (as reported to the DGE) decreased 1.7% due to a 7.4% decrease in table game revenues partially offset by a 0.7% increase in slot revenues compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. Excluding Trump Marina, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, we experienced a 7.8% decrease in overall gross gaming revenues, comprised of a 5.4% decrease in slot revenues and a 13.5% decrease in table game revenues compared to the prior-year period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, gross gaming revenues in the Atlantic City market (as reported to the DGE) decreased 4.8% due to a 2.5% decrease in slot revenues and a 10.0% decrease in table game revenues compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Excluding Trump Marina, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we experienced a 14.6% decrease in overall gross gaming revenues, comprised of a 7.8% decrease in slot revenues and a 28.5% decrease in table game revenues compared to the prior-year period.
Atlantic City's gaming revenues continue to decline, even since the opening of Revel, Atlantic City's newest casino resort, earlier this year. In addition, the opening of Revel has negatively affected our operations.

20



Settlement of Property Tax Appeals. During June 2012, the Company settled with the City with respect to its challenges to the real estate tax assessments for its casino properties for the tax years 2008 through 2012. Under the settlement terms, the City agreed to provide the Company with a credit for previously paid real estate taxes in the total amount of $54.0 million, to be applied against future real estate tax payments related to Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort as follows: $15.0 million in 2013; $9.0 million per year in each of 2014, 2015 and 2016; and $12.0 million in 2017. The City has the option to issue a cash refund to the Company at any time for the unused portion of the credit. As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to pay real estate taxes for 2012 based upon the City's 2012 assessments.

The present value of the settlement, net of estimated legal fees and other expenses, was recorded as a reduction to operating costs and expenses and was estimated to be approximately $39.2 million, of which $30.9 million relates to the Company's continuing operations and $8.3 million relates to its discontinued operation.

Income Related to Utility Agreements. On February 27, 2012, the Company entered into various agreements with one of its utility providers. In consideration for entering into the agreements, the Company received $3.0 million in cash and will receive rate reduction credits totaling approximately $2.0 million which are to be applied against future invoices for services provided in equal monthly increments through October 2016. The Company recognized within its continuing operations $3.5 million of income, net of related expenses, during the first quarter of 2012 (of which $2.6 million related to Trump Taj Mahal and $0.9 million related to Trump Plaza) in connection with entering into these agreements.

Evacuation and Closure of Atlantic City Casinos. In connection with a mandate from the State of New Jersey to evacuate southern New Jersey's barrier islands due to anticipated severe weather and flooding, Atlantic City's casinos closed on August 26, 2011 and reopened on August 29, 2011. Trump Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza sustained only minor physical damage. The Company believes that its operations were negatively affected before, during and after the shutdown.

Trump Plaza Insurance Claim Proceeds. On July 16, 2010, Trump Plaza was temporarily closed due to a leak in a water main managed by the utility company that provides Trump Plaza with the necessary cold water for its air conditioning. We filed a business interruption claim with our insurance carrier and received insurance proceeds totaling $2.1 million, of which $1.6 million was received during 2011. Trump Plaza recognized the $1.6 million of insurance proceeds received during 2011 within net revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

21



The following table includes selected data of our casino properties and should be read with the following discussion of our results of operations.
 
 
Three Months
 
Nine Months
 
Ended
 
Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Gaming revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trump Taj Mahal
$
88.5

 
$
92.1

 
$
239.1

 
$
271.6

Trump Plaza
30.2

 
36.2

 
84.4

 
109.8

Total
$
118.7

 
$
128.3

 
$
323.5

 
$
381.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trump Taj Mahal
$
86.9

 
$
93.3

 
$
234.1

 
$
265.1

Trump Plaza
32.2

 
38.8

 
85.3

 
109.2

Total
$
119.1

 
$
132.1

 
$
319.4

 
$
374.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trump Taj Mahal
$
10.6

 
$
13.3

 
$
28.3

 
$
24.9

Trump Plaza
0.5

 
1.3

 
9.3

 
(5.5
)
Corporate and other
(1.8
)
 
(2.7
)
 
(5.6
)
 
(7.7
)
Total
$
9.3

 
$
11.9

 
$
32.0

 
$
11.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income related to property tax settlement, net of fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trump Taj Mahal
$

 
$

 
$
16.8

 
$

Trump Plaza

 

 
14.1

 

Total
$

 
$

 
$
30.9

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trump Taj Mahal
$
4.3

 
$
4.5

 
$
12.9

 
$
15.8

Trump Plaza
0.9

 
1.3

 
2.8

 
6.6

Corporate and other

 

 

 
0.1

Total
$
5.2

 
$
5.8

 
$
15.7

 
$
22.5

Comparison of Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Trump Taj Mahal – Gaming revenues decreased $3.6 million due to a $2.0 million decrease in slots revenue and a $1.6 million decrease in table games revenue. The decrease in slot revenue was principally due to a 5.9% decrease in slot handle. The decrease in table games revenue was due to a 22.7% decrease in amounts wagered on table games partially offset by a significant increase in table hold percentage and a $0.4 million decrease in poker revenue. Net revenues decreased $6.4 million principally due to the lower gaming revenues and an increase in promotional allowances.

Income from operations was $10.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $13.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011. Income from operations decreased $2.7 million as the decrease in net revenues was partially offset by a $3.7 million decrease in operating expenses. Total operating expenses decreased principally due to: a $2.2 million decrease in payroll and related costs due to reductions in workforce implemented during 2011; a $1.2 million decrease in expense related to the 2008 New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority (“NJSEA”) Subsidy Agreement; a $0.7 million decrease in provisions for doubtful accounts; a $0.4 million decrease in utility costs; and a $0.4 million decrease in gaming taxes. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in costs associated with the Atlantic City Alliance and a $0.4 million increase in the cost of food and beverage sales.
Trump Plaza – Gaming revenues decreased $6.0 million due to a $3.6 million decrease in table games revenue and a $2.4 million decrease in slot revenue. The decrease in table games revenue was due to a 44.9% decrease in amounts wagered

22



partially offset by an increase in table game hold percentage. Slot revenue decreased principally due to a 10.8% decrease in slot handle. Net revenues decreased $6.6 million due to the lower gaming revenues and an increase in gaming promotional offers partially offset by an increase in cash rooms, food and beverage revenues.
Income from operations was $0.5 million million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 as the lower net revenues were offset by a $5.8 million decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to a $2.1 million decrease in payroll and related costs due to the reductions in workforce implemented during 2011; a $0.8 million decrease in general and administrative expenses; a $0.7 million decrease in insurance costs; a $0.7 million decrease in promotional costs; a $0.7 million decrease provisions for doubtful accounts; a $0.4 million decrease in depreciation expense; a $0.4 million decrease in gaming taxes and fees, principally due to the lower gaming revenues; and a $0.4 million decrease in expense related to the 2008 NJSEA Subsidy Agreement. The decreases were partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in costs associated with the Atlantic City Alliance.
Corporate and Other – Corporate and other expenses decreased $0.9 million principally due to lower professional fees and expenses and lower property tax and insurance costs due to the sale of the former corporate office building.
Interest Income – Interest income was $0.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011, principally due to the accretion of interest income related to the settlement of property tax appeals with the City, partially offset by lower average invested cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Interest Expense – Interest expense was $9.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $10.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011. The lower interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2012 reflects lower outstanding borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement due to mandatory debt repayments from proceeds of extraordinary transactions and quarterly amortization payments.
Comparison of Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Trump Taj Mahal – Gaming revenues decreased $32.5 million due to a $22.9 million decrease in table games revenue and a $9.6 million decrease in slot revenue. The decrease in table games revenue was principally due to a 21.0% decrease in amounts wagered on table games and a $2.9 million decrease in poker revenue. The decrease in slot revenue was principally due to a 7.8% decrease in slot handle. Net revenues decreased $31.0 million due to the lower gaming revenues and a decrease in cash food and beverage and other sales, partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in gaming promotional allowances.

Excluding income related to the property tax settlement and utility agreements and the non-cash asset impairment charge, income from operations was $10.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to income from operations of $24.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Income from operations decreased $14.9 million as the decrease in net revenues was offset by a $16.1 million decrease in operating expenses. Total operating expenses decreased principally due to: a $7.5 million decrease in payroll and related costs due to reductions in workforce implemented during 2011, partially offset by increased group medical costs; a $3.3 million decrease in gaming taxes and regulatory fees; a $2.9 million decrease in depreciation expense; a $2.9 million decrease in expense related to the 2008 NJSEA Subsidy Agreement; a $2.4 million decrease in utility costs; a $2.3 million decrease in provisions for doubtful accounts; and a $1.2 million decrease in general and administrative expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in property taxes, principally due to an 11.1% rate increase by the City, a $2.2 million increase in costs associated with the Atlantic City Alliance, a $1.1 million increase in insurance costs and a $0.9 million increase in promotional expenses.
Trump Plaza – Net revenues decreased $23.9 million principally due to lower net gaming revenues and the $1.6 million recognized during 2011 in connection with the business interruption claim. Net gaming revenues decreased $21.8 million due to a $13.1 million decrease in table games revenue and a $12.4 million decrease in slot revenue, partially offset by a $3.7 million decrease in gaming promotional allowances. The decrease in table games revenue was due to a 52.5% decrease in amounts wagered partially offset by an increase in hold percentage. Slot revenue decreased principally due to a 16.6% decrease in slot handle.
Loss from operations before income related to the property tax settlement and utility agreements was $5.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to a loss from operations of $5.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as the lower net revenues were offset by a $23.7 million decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to an $10.4 million decrease in payroll and related costs due to the reductions in workforce implemented during 2011; a $3.8 million decrease in depreciation expense; a $2.5 million decrease in gaming taxes and fees, principally due to the lower gaming revenues; a $2.3 million decrease in general and administrative expenses; a $2.0 million decrease in promotional costs; a $1.2 million decrease in expense related to the 2008 NJSEA Subsidy Agreement; a $1.1 million decrease in provisions for doubtful accounts; a $1.0 million decrease in utility costs; a $0.7 million decrease in

23



marketing and entertainment costs; and a $0.5 million decrease in insurance costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in property taxes due to the rate increase by the City and a $0.9 million increase in costs associated with the Atlantic City Alliance.
Corporate and Other – Corporate and other expenses decreased $2.1 million principally due to lower professional fees and expenses and lower property tax and insurance costs due to the sale of the former corporate office building.
Interest Income – Interest income was $1.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to the accretion of interest income related to the settlement of property tax appeals with the City, partially offset by lower average invested cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Interest Expense – Interest expense was $27.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $32.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The lower interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 reflects lower outstanding borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement due to mandatory debt repayments from proceeds from extraordinary transactions and quarterly amortization payments.

Critical Accounting Estimates
General – Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require our management to make estimates and assumptions about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Of our accounting estimates, we believe the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.
Property and Equipment – Our operations are capital intensive and we make capital investments at each of our properties in the form of maintenance capital and, from time to time, expansion and product enhancement capital. At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $389.7 million of net property and equipment recorded on our balance sheet. We depreciate our assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The estimates of the useful lives are based on the nature of the assets as well as our current operating strategy. Future events, such as property expansions, new competition and new regulations, could result in a change in the manner in which we use certain assets requiring a change in the estimated useful lives of such assets. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property and equipment, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. If these estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional impairment charges for these assets.
Intangible Assets – We had $8.7 million of intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet at September 30, 2012. We regularly evaluate our businesses for potential impairment indicators. Additionally, we perform impairment testing related to our indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on, among other things, pending sales of assets, the regulatory and competitive status, operational performance of each of our businesses, and financial market valuations of conditions surrounding our business entities and the gaming industry. Future events, such as the failure to meet or exceed our operating plans, increased competition, the enactment of increased gaming or tax rates, or changes in market valuations could significantly impact our judgments and any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
TrumpONE Liability – Our unified player’s program, TrumpONE, allows customers to accumulate certain point-based rewards based on the volume of their gaming activity. TrumpONE customers may earn “comp dollars” redeemable for complimentary food, beverage and retail items and “slot dollars” which are redeemable for slot machine credits. Comp dollars and slot dollars accumulate over time and may be redeemed at the customer’s discretion under the terms of the program. Comp dollars and slot dollars are forfeited if a customer does not redeem earned rewards over a specified period of time. As a result of the ability of the customer to accumulate comp dollars and slot dollars, we accrue the associated expense, after giving effect to estimated forfeitures, as they are earned. At September 30, 2012, $1.6 million was accrued related to comp dollars and $0.7 million was accrued related to slot dollars earned under this program. Our accruals could be significantly affected if estimated forfeitures vary from historical levels or changes occur in the cost of providing complimentary food, beverage and retail items under the TrumpONE program. Management reviews our accruals for adequacy at the end of each reporting period.
Insurance Accruals – Our insurance policies for employee health, workers’ compensation and general patron liabilities have significant deductible levels on an individual claim basis. We accrue a liability for known workers’ compensation and general patron liabilities based upon a review of individual claims. Additionally, we accrue an amount for incurred but not reported claims based on our historical experience and other factors. Our employee health insurance benefit accrual is based on our historical claims experience rate including an estimated lag factor. These accruals involve complex estimates and could be significantly affected should current claims vary from historical levels. Management reviews our insurance accruals for adequacy at the end of each reporting period.

24



Income Taxes – We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in several states. We account for income taxes, including our current and deferred tax provisions in accordance with ASC Topic 740 – “Income Taxes.” The calculation of our income tax provision is complex and requires the use of estimates. Management reviews our provision for income taxes at the end of each reporting period. Additionally, our income tax returns are subject to examination by various taxing authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and our income tax liabilities. Inherent in our determination of any necessary reserves are assumptions based on past experiences and judgments about potential actions by taxing authorities. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We believe we have adequately provided for any reasonable and foreseeable outcome related to uncertain tax matters. When actual results of tax examinations differ from our estimates, we adjust the income tax provision in the period in which the examination issues are settled.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, including interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity rates.
The following table provides information about our debt obligations existing as of September 30, 2012. The following table presents principal cash flows and interest rates by expected maturity date of such debt obligations, except capitalized lease obligations. 
(Dollars in millions)
Remainder of
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Fixed rate debt maturities
$
0.9

 
$
3.5

 
$
3.5

 
$
285.0

 
$

 
$

 
$
292.9

Interest rate
12.0
%
 
12.0
%
 
12.0
%
 
12.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
The interest rate on our outstanding long-term debt is fixed at 12% per annum; therefore our risk related to fluctuations in interest rates is limited.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter covered by this Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

25



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Reference is made to the information contained in Note 14 of our unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10−K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Annual Report”). The risks described in our 2011 Annual Report, as updated by our quarterly reports on Form 10−Q, are not the only risks we face. In addition, you are referred to the above Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in particular the section captioned “Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources” for disclosure with respect to developments since we filed our 2011 Annual Report.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.


26



ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

10.1
Amendment to Settlement Agreement entered into as of October 17, 2012 between and among Trump Marina Associates, LLC, Trump Plaza Associates, LLC, Trump Taj Mahal Associates, LLC and the City of Atlantic City
 
 
31.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
 
31.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
 
32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
32.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
101.INS
XBRL.Instance
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase


27



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each of the registrants has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT RESORTS, INC.
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
Date:
October 18, 2012
By:
/s/ DAVID R. HUGHES
 
 
 
David R. Hughes
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer of
Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.


28



EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.
Exhibit
 
 
10.1
Amendment to Settlement Agreement entered into as of October 17, 2012 between and among Trump Marina Associates, LLC, Trump Plaza Associates, LLC, Trump Taj Mahal Associates, LLC, and the City of Atlantic City
 
 
31.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
 
31.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
 
32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
32.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
101.INS
XBRL.Instance
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase



29