Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Crexendo, Inc. | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - Crexendo, Inc. | exe_ex322.htm |
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - Crexendo, Inc. | exe_ex311.htm |
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - Crexendo, Inc. | exe_ex321.htm |
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - Crexendo, Inc. | exe_ex312.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
———————
FORM 10-Q
———————
(Mark One)
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission file number 001-32277
———————
Crexendo, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
———————
Delaware
|
87-0591719
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
incorporation or organization)
|
||
1615 South 52nd Street, Tempe, AZ
|
85281
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(602) 714-8500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one).
Large accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Smaller reporting company
|
þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of August 1, 2012 was 10,669,201.
INDEX
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3 |
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 14 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 30 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 30 |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 31 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 31 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 31 |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 32 |
Signatures | 33 |
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
|
CREXENDO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
(In thousands, except par value and share data)
|
(unaudited)
|
June 30,
2012
|
December 31,
2011
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 8,443 | $ | 8,658 | ||||
Restricted cash
|
1,965 | 1,965 | ||||||
Trade receivables, net of allowance of doubtful accounts of $852
as of June 30, 2012 and $3,512 as of December 31, 2011 |
7,735 | 9,420 | ||||||
Inventories
|
204 | 232 | ||||||
Equipment financing receivables
|
9 | - | ||||||
Income taxes receivable
|
514 | 552 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
|
762 | 725 | ||||||
Total Current Assets
|
19,632 | 21,552 | ||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
500 | 500 | ||||||
Long-term trade receivables, net of allowance of doubtful accounts of $185
as of June 30, 2012 and $1,949 as of December 31, 2011 |
1,625 | 6,097 | ||||||
Long term equipment financing receivables
|
16 | - | ||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
3,718 | 4,055 | ||||||
Deferred income tax assets, net
|
272 | 279 | ||||||
Intangible assets
|
42 | 79 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
265 | 265 | ||||||
Other long-term assets
|
213 | 233 | ||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 26,283 | $ | 33,060 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Current Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 463 | $ | 1,153 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other
|
1,718 | 2,240 | ||||||
Dividend payable
|
- | 211 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liability
|
272 | 279 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, current portion
|
7,774 | 9,288 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities
|
10,227 | 13,171 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
1,637 | 6,123 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
250 | 419 | ||||||
Total Liabilities
|
12,114 | 19,713 | ||||||
Stockholders' Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share - authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share - authorized 100,000,000 shares; 10,669,201
|
||||||||
shares outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and 10,523,078 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2011
|
11 | 11 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
49,680 | 48,938 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(35,522 | ) | (35,602 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
14,169 | 13,347 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 26,283 | $ | 33,060 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CREXENDO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
(In thousands, except per share and share data)
|
(unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 4,914 | $ | 17,496 | $ | 10,169 | $ | 32,064 | ||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue
|
1,298 | 7,675 | 2,719 | 13,980 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
984 | 10,076 | 1,917 | 18,839 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
2,741 | 3,333 | 5,774 | 6,092 | ||||||||||||
Research and development
|
505 | 871 | 1,099 | 1,743 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
5,528 | 21,955 | 11,509 | 40,654 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations
|
(614 | ) | (4,459 | ) | (1,340 | ) | (8,590 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
524 | 1,316 | 1,266 | 2,469 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
- | (1 | ) | - | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net
|
(14 | ) | (39 | ) | 14 | (33 | ) | |||||||||
Total other income, net
|
510 | 1,276 | 1,280 | 2,434 | ||||||||||||
Loss before income tax provision
|
(104 | ) | (3,183 | ) | (60 | ) | (6,156 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
(13 | ) | (6,162 | ) | 140 | (5,040 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (117 | ) | $ | (9,345 | ) | $ | 80 | $ | (11,196 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (1.05 | ) | |||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (1.05 | ) | |||||
Dividends per common share:
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
10,634,104 | 10,642,384 | 10,582,372 | 10,640,489 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
10,634,104 | 10,642,384 | 10,614,888 | 10,640,489 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CREXENDO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
(unaudited)
|
Additional
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011
|
10,523,078 | $ | 11 | $ | 48,938 | $ | (35,602 | ) | $ | 13,347 | ||||||||||
Expense for stock options granted to employees
|
- | - | 455 | - | 455 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
146,123 | - | 498 | - | 498 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
- | - | (211 | ) | - | (211 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income
|
- | - | - | 80 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2012
|
10,669,201 | $ | 11 | $ | 49,680 | $ | (35,522 | ) | $ | 14,169 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CREXENDO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
(In thousands)
|
(unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 80 | $ | (11,196 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
|
||||||||
cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
759 | 704 | ||||||
Impariment of inventory and intangible assets
|
- | 1,075 | ||||||
Expense for stock options issued to employees
|
455 | 362 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision
|
- | 5,973 | ||||||
Change in uncertain tax positions
|
(167 | ) | - | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Trade receivables
|
6,157 | (3,223 | ) | |||||
Equipment financing receivables
|
(25 | ) | - | |||||
Inventories
|
28 | 345 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable
|
38 | 570 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
|
(37 | ) | 411 | |||||
Other long-term assets
|
20 | (8 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
|
(573 | ) | (1,624 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue
|
(6,000 | ) | 4,773 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
4 | (931 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
739 | (2,769 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
(1,024 | ) | (348 | ) | ||||
Investment in subsidiary
|
- | (56 | ) | |||||
Net cash used for investing activities
|
(1,024 | ) | (404 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
498 | 60 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock
|
- | (89 | ) | |||||
Payments made on contingent consideration
|
(6 | ) | - | |||||
Dividend payments
|
(422 | ) | (427 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
70 | (456 | ) | |||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(215 | ) | (3,629 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
8,658 | 14,207 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 8,443 | $ | 10,578 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | - | $ | 1 | ||||
Income taxes
|
(11 | ) | (569 | ) | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing information:
|
||||||||
Dividends declared
|
$ | - | $ | 213 | ||||
Purchase of property and equipment included in accounts payable
|
16 | 395 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CREXENDO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
(1) Description of Business
Crexendo, Inc. is incorporated in the state of Delaware. As used hereafter in this Form 10-Q, we refer to Crexendo, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as “we,” “us,” or “the Company.” We are a hosted services company that provides e-commerce software, website development, web hosting, search engine optimization, link building, hosted telecommunication services, and broadband internet for businesses and entrepreneurs. Our services are designed to make enterprise-class hosting services available to small and medium-sized businesses at affordable monthly rates. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations, financial position, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of the Company for the periods indicated.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation – These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Crexendo, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, consistent in all material respects with those applied in our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Because these financial statements address interim periods, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Such interim financial information is unaudited but reflects all adjustments that in the opinion of management are necessary for the fair presentation of the interim periods presented. The results of operations presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012 or for any future periods. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
In July of 2011, we announced the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel in our StoresOnline division. As a result, we have shifted our focus toward growing our Crexendo Web Services and Crexendo Network Services divisions. We currently plan to fund this growth through operating cash flows. If operating cash flows prove to be insufficient to fund future growth, we may need to raise additional capital through financing. There can be no assurances that such additional capital, if needed, would be available on acceptable terms or at all, which would adversely affect our Company’s ability to achieve our business objectives. Due to changes in our growth strategy and the rapidly evolving nature of our business and the markets we serve, we believe period-to-period comparisons of our operating results, including operating expenses as a percentage of revenue and cash flows, are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.
Use of Estimates- The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and operating expenses during the reporting period. Actual results will vary, and may vary materially, from these estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance – As of January 1, 2012, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-04 related to guidance associated with fair value measurements and disclosures. This ASU clarifies the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) intent on current guidance, modifies and changes certain guidance and principles, and expands disclosures concerning Level 3 fair value measurements in the fair value hierarchy (including quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy). In addition, this ASU requires disclosure of the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, but whose fair value is required to be disclosed. Adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
7
As of January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-05 related to guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This ASU requires an entity to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income (includes net income) either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity, but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. Adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
As of January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-08 related to the testing of goodwill for impairment. The objective of this ASU is to simplify goodwill impairment testing by adding a qualitative review step to assess whether the required quantitative impairment analysis that exists today is necessary. The ASU permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. The ASU was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012. Adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) – ASU 2011-05 guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income requires an entity to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income (includes net income) either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company does not have any components of other comprehensive income (loss) other than net income (loss). Net income (loss) has been presented in the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.
Significant Customers – No customer accounted for 10% or more of our total net revenue or total accounts receivable for the six months ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.
(3) Dividends
During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, our Board of Directors declared the following cash dividends:
Declaration Date |
Per Share
Dividend
|
Record Date | Total Amount | Payment Date | ||||||
(Fiscal year 2012)
|
||||||||||
March 14, 2012
|
$ | 0.02 |
March 28, 2012
|
$ | 211,000 |
April 4, 2012
|
||||
(Fiscal year 2011)
|
||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.02 |
July 11, 2011
|
$ | 213,000 |
July 18, 2011
|
||||
March 22, 2011
|
$ | 0.02 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 213,000 |
April 7, 2011
|
On July 6, 2012, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.02 per share on the company's common stock. The dividend was payable on July 24, 2012 to stockholders of record as of July 17, 2012.
8
(4) Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed giving effect to all dilutive common stock equivalents, consisting of common stock options and restricted shares held in escrow. Diluted net income per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2012 included 25,516 common share equivalents related to shares to be purchased under our Company’s employee stock option plan and 7,000 restricted shares held in escrow. Diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2012, the three months ended June 30, 2011, and the six months ended June 30, 2011 was the same as basic net loss per common share because the common share equivalents were anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (in thousands)
|
$ | (117 | ) | $ | (9,345 | ) | $ | 80 | $ | (11,196 | ) | |||||
Weighted-average share reconciliation:
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
10,641,104 | 10,656,384 | 10,589,372 | 10,654,489 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average restricted shares held in escrow
|
(7,000 | ) | (14,000 | ) | (7,000 | ) | (14,000 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding
|
10,634,104 | 10,642,384 | 10,582,372 | 10,640,489 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive employee stock options
|
- | - | 25,516 | - | ||||||||||||
Dilutive restricticed shares held in escrow
|
- | - | 7,000 | - | ||||||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding
|
10,634,104 | 10,642,384 | 10,614,888 | 10,640,489 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (1.05 | ) | |||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (1.05 | ) |
The following table includes the number of common stock equivalent shares that are not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share.
Three Months ended June 30,
|
Six Months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding stock options
|
1,284,442 | 800,304 | 1,436,479 | 680,954 | ||||||||||||
Restricted shares held in escrow
|
7,000 | 14,000 | - | 14,000 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
1,291,442 | 814,304 | 1,436,479 | 694,954 |
(5) Restricted Cash
We classified $1,965,000 as restricted cash as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, due to acquiring a letter of credit related to our telecommunications registration in Arizona, the compensating balance requirement for our merchant accounts, and purchasing card agreements.
9
(6) Trade Receivables, net
Our trade receivables balance primarily consists of Extended Payment Term Agreements (EPTAs) sold through our workshop seminars. Below is an analysis of the days outstanding of our trade receivables as shown on our balance sheet (in thousands):
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Non-EPTA trade receivables
|
$ | 170 | $ | 391 | ||||
Conforming EPTAs
|
8,833 | 15,674 | ||||||
Non-Conforming EPTAs:
|
||||||||
1 - 30 days
|
638 | 2,121 | ||||||
31 - 60 days
|
394 | 1,626 | ||||||
61 - 90 days
|
362 | 1,166 | ||||||
Gross trade receivables
|
10,397 | 20,978 | ||||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(1,037 | ) | (5,461 | ) | ||||
Trade receivables, net
|
$ | 9,360 | $ | 15,517 | ||||
Current trade receivables, net
|
$ | 7,735 | $ | 9,420 | ||||
Long-term trade receivables, net
|
1,625 | 6,097 | ||||||
Trade receivables, net
|
$ | 9,360 | $ | 15,517 |
(7) Equipment Financing Receivables
On April 1, 2012, we began renting our hosted telecommunication equipment (VoIP telephone devices) through leasing contracts that we classify as either operating leases or sale-type leases. The two primary accounting provisions which we use to classify transactions as sales-type or operating leases are: 1) lease term to determine if it is equal to or greater than 75% of the economic life of the equipment and 2) the present value of the minimum lease payments to determine if they are equal to or greater than 90% of the fair market value of the equipment at the inception of the lease. The economic life of most of our products is estimated to be three years, since this represents the most frequent contractual lease term for our products. There is no significant after-market for our used equipment. Residual values, if any, are established at lease inception using estimates of fair value at the end of the lease term. The vast majority of our leases that qualify as sales-type leases are non-cancelable and include cancellation penalties approximately equal to the full value of the lease receivables. Leases that do not meet the criteria for sales-type lease accounting are accounted for as operating leases.
Equipment finance receivables arising from the rental of our hosted equipment through sales-type leases, were as follows (in thousands):
June 30,
|
||||
2012
|
||||
Gross financing receivables
|
$ | 56 | ||
Unearned income
|
31 | |||
Financing receivables, net
|
25 | |||
Less: Billed portion of financing receivables, net
|
2 | |||
Less: Current portion of finance receivables not billed, net
|
7 | |||
Finance receivables due after one year
|
$ | 16 |
Equipment finance receivables are expected to recognize as revenue within the next thirty-six months.
10
(8) Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012, was 13% which resulted in an income tax provision of $13,000. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 233%, which resulted in a benefit for income taxes of $140,000. The benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to the statute of limitations expiring for a few uncertain tax positions.
Our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was 194% and 82%, respectively, which resulted in a provision for income taxes of $6,162,000 and $5,040,000, respectively.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we placed a full valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, we considered whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We considered the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, the suspension of the sale of product and services through the seminar sales channel for our StoresOnline division, the restructuring of the StoresOnline division, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, we determined it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would not be realized; accordingly, we recorded a full valuation allowance in the three months ended June 30, 2011. Subsequent to placing a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets, adjustments impacting our tax rate have been and are expected to continue to be insignificant.
(9) Fair Value Measurements
We have financial instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 for which the fair value is summarized below (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Description
|
Carrying Value
|
Estimated Fair
Value |
Carrying Value
|
Estimated Fair
Value |
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net | $ | 9,360 | $ | 9,192 | $ | 15,517 | $ | 15,178 | ||||||||
Certificate of deposit | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill | 265 | 265 | 265 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Intangible assets | 42 | 42 | 79 | 79 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (6 | ) |
The fair value of our financial assets and liabilities was determined based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly, including:
|
●
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
|
|
●
|
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets;
|
|
●
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
|
|
●
|
Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data.
|
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.
11
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Fair value measurement at reporting date
|
||||||||||||||||
Description
|
As of June
30, 2012
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
$ | 500 | $ | - | $ | 500 | $ | - | ||||||||
Description
|
As of December
31, 2011
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
$ | 500 | $ | - | $ | 500 | $ | - | ||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration
|
$ | (6 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (6 | ) |
Assets for which fair value is disclosed but not required to be recognized in the balance sheet on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
Fair value measurement at reporting date
|
||||||||||||||||
Description
|
As of June 30,
2012
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Trade Receivables, net
|
$ | 9,192 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 9,192 | ||||||||
Goodwill
|
265 | - | - | 265 | ||||||||||||
Intangible Assets
|
42 | - | - | 42 | ||||||||||||
Description
|
As of December 31, 2011
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Trade Receivables, net
|
$ | 15,178 | - | - | $ | 15,178 | ||||||||||
Goodwill
|
265 | - | - | 265 | ||||||||||||
Intangible Assets
|
79 | - | - | 79 |
The fair value measurement for the contingent consideration is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Company’s own assumptions in measuring fair value.
The progressions of the Company’s Level 3 instruments for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 are shown in the table below (in thousands):
Acquisition
Contingent Consideration
|
||||
Balances as of December 31, 2011
|
$ | 6 | ||
Purchases, sales and settlements, net
|
(6 | ) | ||
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
- | |||
Balances as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | - |
The carrying amount of certificate of deposits approximates fair value, as determined by certificates of deposits with similar terms and conditions. The trade receivables consist primarily of extended payment term agreements and the fair value is computed using a discounted cash flow model using estimated market rates.
Our disclosure of the estimated fair value of our financial instruments is made in accordance with generally accepted accounting guidance. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and valuation methodologies we consider to be appropriate. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data in order to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
12
(10) Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
From time to time we receive inquiries from federal, state, city and local government officials in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. These inquiries and investigations generally concern compliance with various city, county, state and/or federal regulations involving sales, representations made, customer service, refund policies, and marketing practices. We respond to these inquiries and have generally been successful in addressing the concerns of these persons and entities, without a formal complaint or charge being made, although there is often no formal closing of the inquiry or investigation. There can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these or other inquiries or investigations will not have a material adverse effect on our business or operations, or that a formal complaint will not be initiated. We also receive complaints and inquiries in the ordinary course of business from both customers and governmental and non-governmental bodies on behalf of customers, and in some cases these customer complaints have risen to the level of litigation. There can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. There have been no material changes to current legal events as outlined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had liabilities primarily related to StoresOnline legal proceedings of $220,000 and $381,000, respectively. Attorney’s fees associated with the various legal proceedings are expensed as incurred. We are also subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the resolution of these other cases will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, or results of operations.
(11) Segment Information
Management has chosen to organize the Company around differences in products and services. Crexendo Web Services generates revenue from managing e-commerce or lead generation offerings, websites, search engine optimization/management and online promotional needs for small, medium, and large businesses. Crexendo Network Services generates revenue from selling hosted telecommunication and broadband data services. We believe StoresOnline will continue to generate revenue by offering businesses a continuum of services and technology providing tools and training to establish a successful website on the Internet for entrepreneurs and small office/home office (SOHO) customers.
Information on reportable segments and reconciliation to condensed consolidated net (loss) income was as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||||||
StoresOnline
|
$ | 4,054 | $ | 16,928 | $ | 8,464 | $ | 31,017 | ||||||||
Crexendo Web Services
|
692 | 550 | 1,462 | 1,029 | ||||||||||||
Crexendo Network Services
|
168 | 18 | 243 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated revenue
|
4,914 | 17,496 | 10,169 | 32,064 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations:
|
||||||||||||||||
StoresOnline
|
3,110 | (1,175 | ) | 6,296 | (1,960 | ) | ||||||||||
Crexendo Web Services
|
(666 | ) | (599 | ) | (1,229 | ) | (1,269 | ) | ||||||||
Crexendo Network Services
|
(683 | ) | (489 | ) | (1,371 | ) | (975 | ) | ||||||||
Unallocated corporate items
|
(2,375 | ) | (2,196 | ) | (5,036 | ) | (4,386 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating loss
|
(614 | ) | (4,459 | ) | (1,340 | ) | (8,590 | ) | ||||||||
Other Income, net:
|
||||||||||||||||
StoresOnline
|
504 | 1,276 | 1,268 | 2,434 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated corporate items
|
6 | - | 12 | - | ||||||||||||
Total other income
|
510 | 1,276 | 1,280 | 2,434 | ||||||||||||
Loss before income tax provision
|
||||||||||||||||
StoresOnline
|
3,614 | 101 | 7,564 | 474 | ||||||||||||
Crexendo Web Services
|
(666 | ) | (599 | ) | (1,229 | ) | (1,269 | ) | ||||||||
Crexendo Network Services
|
(683 | ) | (489 | ) | (1,371 | ) | (975 | ) | ||||||||
Unallocated corporate items
|
(2,369 | ) | (2,196 | ) | (5,024 | ) | (4,386 | ) |
Loss before income tax provision
|
$ | (104 | ) | $ | (3,183 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (6,156 | ) |
13
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
This section and other parts of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” which are incorporated herein by reference. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”) filed with the SEC and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the 2011 Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.
OVERVIEW
We are a hosted services company that provides e-commerce software, website development, web hosting, search engine optimization, link building, hosted telecommunication services, and broadband internet for businesses and entrepreneurs. Our services are designed to make enterprise-class hosting services available to small and medium-sized businesses at affordable monthly rates. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations, financial position, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of the Company.
The Company has three operating segment, which consist of StoresOnline, Crexendo Web Services and Crexendo Network Services.
StoresOnline – We offer a continuum of services and technology providing tools and training for businesses to establish a successful web presence. Our Do-It-Yourself package includes our robust content management and website building solution, fully enabled e-commerce package, online marketing tools, and educational training modules.
We have historically derived a substantial portion of our revenue from cash collected on the sale of our content management and web building software licenses at workshop events held throughout the year, as well as principal collected on the sale of software licenses sold through extended payment term arrangements (“EPTAs”). As a result of the restructuring plan we initiated in July 2011, we will no longer generate revenue from cash collected on the sale of our content management and web building software licenses at workshop events. We believe we will, however, continue to generate revenue from principal collected on our EPTA contracts for the next year to eighteen months at a decreasing rate over that time period.
Crexendo Web Services – We generates revenue from managing e-commerce or lead generation offerings, websites, search engine optimization/management and online promotional needs primarily for small and medium-sized businesses.
We generate professional services revenue primarily from website design and development, search engine optimization services, link building, paid search management services and conversion rate optimization services. These services are typically billed on a fixed price basis or on a monthly recurring basis with an initial term of six to twelve months. We generate SaaS subscription fees on our website builder and website hosting fees. Revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the contract for all subscription and hosting services. Our hosting contracts are month to month.
Crexendo Network Services – Our hosted telecommunications services transmit calls using VoIP technology, which converts voice signals into digital data packets for transmission over the Internet. Each of our calling plans provides a number of basic features typically offered by traditional telephone service providers, plus a wide range of enhanced features that we believe offer an attractive value proposition to our customers. This platform enables a user via a single “identity” to access and utilize services and features regardless of how the user is connected to the Internet.
We generate subscription fees from our hosted telecommunications and broadband internet services. Our hosted telecommunication contracts typically have a 36 month term. We generate product revenue and financing revenue from the sale and lease of our hosted telecommunications equipment.
14
Economic Factors
The tight credit markets in place over the past several years have adversely affected our StoresOnline business as consumers and businesses continued to be limited in their ability to obtain alternate sources of financing. The tight credit markets contributed to our decision to suspend the sale of our products and services through the seminar sales channel. The high unemployment rate has had a negative impact on our StoresOnline customer base and has historically resulted in high default rates on our accounts receivable. While we have seen our collection rates stabilize and improve over the past several quarters, our default rate remains high. Since we recognize revenue when the cash is collected on our accounts receivable portfolio, an improvement in our collection rates will result in additional future revenue, while deterioration in our collection rate will decrease future revenue.
Opportunities
Technological and product innovation is the foundation of our long-term growth strategy, and we intend to increase our commitment to invest in product development, engineering excellence, and delivering high-quality products and services to customers. We have organized Crexendo Web Services and Crexendo Network Services around our primary business objectives which are to help entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized businesses increase the effectiveness and visibility of their online presence, as well as decreasing their infrastructure and communications costs.
We believe our long-term focus on investing in products and developing new and alternative sales channels is enabling us to build a foundation for growth by delivering innovative products, creating opportunities for potential channel partners, and improving customer satisfaction. Our focus continues to be to execute in key areas through ongoing innovation on our integrated content management software solution, responding effectively to customer and partner needs, and focusing internally on product excellence and accountability across our Company.
We have developed a University Program that allows universities to teach courses using our website building solution. This program will provide an opportunity to expand our website hosting service offering as the Company will provide hosting services for websites developed by students using our platform. We believe this program will allow us to grow our customer base.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on our revenue, operating income or loss and net income or loss, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in our accounting policies described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider them to be our critical accounting policies and estimates. We believe that there were no significant changes to those critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Our senior management has reviewed the development and selection of our critical accounting policies and estimates and their disclosure in this Form 10-Q with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
15
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Results of Consolidated Operations (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 4,914 | $ | 17,496 | $ | 10,169 | $ | 32,064 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
(104 | ) | (3,183 | ) | (60 | ) | (6,156 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
(13 | ) | (6,162 | ) | 140 | (5,040 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
(117 | ) | (9,345 | ) | 80 | (11,196 | ) | |||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (1.05 | ) |
Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Total revenue decreased 72% in the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the corresponding period of 2011, primarily due to the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales in June 2011, which caused a 100% decrease in seminar sales, a 75% decrease in commissions from third parties and other revenue, and approximately, a 40% decrease in principal collected on our StoresOnline EPTAs. StoresOnline revenue decreased 76% to $4,054,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $16,928,000 in the corresponding period in 2011. The decrease was offset by increases in revenue from Web Services and Network Services offerings. Crexendo Web Services revenue increased 26% to $692,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $550,000 in the corresponding period in 2011. Crexendo Network Services increased 833% to $168,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $18,000 in the corresponding period in 2011.
Loss Before Income Taxes
Loss before income tax was $104,000 and $3,183,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $12,582,000 compared to corresponding period of 2011. Total operating expenses decreased 75% to $5,528,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $21,955,000 in the corresponding period of 2011.
Income Tax Provision
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was 13% and 194%, respectively, which resulted in a provision for income taxes of $13,000 and a provision for income taxes of $6,162,000, respectively. The high tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily the result of placing a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets.
16
Six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to six months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Total net revenue decreased 68% in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with the corresponding period of 2011, primarily due to the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales in June 2011, which caused a 100% decrease in seminar sales, a 75% decrease in commissions from third parties and other revenue, and approximately, a 40% decrease in principal collected on our StoresOnline EPTAs. StoresOnline revenue decreased 73% to $8,464,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $31,017,000 in the corresponding period in 2011. The decrease was offset by increases in revenue from Web Services and Network Services offerings. Crexendo Web Services revenue increased 42% to $1,462,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $1,029,000 in the corresponding period in 2011. Crexendo Network Services increased 1,250% to $243,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $18,000 in the corresponding period in 2011.
Loss Before Income Taxes
Loss before income tax was $60,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with a loss of $6,156,000 in the corresponding period of 2011. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $21,895,000 compared to corresponding period of 2011. Total operating expenses decreased 72% to $11,509,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $40,654,000 in the corresponding period of 2011.
Income Tax Provision
Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was 233% and 82%, respectively, which resulted in income tax benefit of $140,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and a provision for income taxes of $5,040,000, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The income tax benefit in the current year is primarily due to the statute of limitations expiring for a few uncertain tax positions. The high tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily the result of placing a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we placed a full valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, we considered whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We considered the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, the suspension of the sale of product and services through the seminar sales channel for our StoresOnline division, the restructuring of the StoresOnline division, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, we determined it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would not be realized; accordingly, we recorded a full valuation allowance in the three months ended June 30, 2011. Subsequent to placing a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets, adjustments impacting our tax rate have been and are expected to continue to be insignificant.
17
Segment Operating Results
The information below is organized in accordance with our three reportable segments. Segment operating income (loss) is equal to segment net revenue less segment cost of revenue, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. Segment expenses do not include certain costs, such as corporate general and administrative expenses and share-based compensation expenses, which are not allocated to specific segments.
Operating Results of StoresOnline (in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
StoresOnline
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 4,054 | $ | 16,928 | $ | 8,464 | $ | 31,017 | ||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue
|
471 | 7,046 | 1,117 | 12,804 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
64 | 9,468 | 141 | 17,515 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
409 | 1,589 | 910 | 2,658 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
3,110 | (1,175 | ) | 6,296 | (1,960 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income
|
504 | 1,276 | 1,268 | 2,434 | ||||||||||||
Income before taxes
|
$ | 3,614 | $ | 101 | $ | 7,564 | $ | 474 |
Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Revenue from StoresOnline for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 76% to $4,054,000, from $16,928,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Following our decision to suspend our direct mail seminar sales in July 2011, revenue from our StoresOnline division has been generated primarily through principal amounts collected on historical sales of StoresOnline products and services sold through EPTAs. Fees for our StoresOnline products and services sold under EPTAs are recognized as revenue as cash payments are received from the customer and not at the time of sale.
18
Revenue related to cash collected under EPTA agreements decreased to $2,629,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $4,383,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our typical EPTA agreement has a term of two to three years. As such, while we no longer plan to offer EPTAs to our customers as a result of the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales, we will continue to recognize revenue from those EPTA contracts executed prior to July 2011 as cash is collected from those contracts. EPTAs were originally recognized in our balance sheet, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, through our deferred revenue balance. The remaining deferred revenue balance is expected to be recognized as revenue, however, at a decreasing rate over the next year to eighteen months. The following table summarizes the activity within deferred revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of March 31, 2011
|
$ | 25,617 | ||
Cash collected on Principal of EPTA Contracts
|
(4,383 | ) | ||
Deferred revenue added during period (net of writeoffs)
|
6,733 | |||
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of June 30, 2011
|
$ | 27,967 | ||
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of March 31, 2012
|
$ | 12,038 | ||
Cash collected on Principal of EPTA Contracts
|
(2,629 | ) | ||
Deferred revenue recognized during the period (net of writeoffs)
|
(181 | ) | ||
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | 9,228 |
Due to the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel in July 2011, we had no cash sales of StoresOnline Software licenses (“SOS licenses”) or other products at events during the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $9,241,000 of cash sales at events in the three months ended June 30, 2011. Hosting revenue decreased to $829,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $1,326,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in hosting revenue was primarily due to attrition in the StoresOnline customer base since July 2011, primarily as a result of the suspension of the direct mail seminar sales channel.
Commissions from third parties and other revenue decreased 70% to $596,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $1,978,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, due primarily to our decision to suspend our direct mail seminar sales channel. As a result of this decision, we no longer sent leads to these third parties, and as such, we do not expect this revenue source to be significant in the future.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of the cost to conduct internet training workshops, credit card fees, the cost of products sold, as well as customer support costs. Cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 93% to $471,000, from $7,046,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in cost of revenue was primarily due to suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel in July 2011, as such, we no longer incurred the costs to conduct the internet training workshops. The cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 primarily related to the cost to fulfill products sold through our inside sales group and customer services costs.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for sales and marketing activities associated with our inside sales group. Selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 99% to $64,000, from $9,468,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily related to the suspension of our direct mail sales seminars in July 2011, as such, we no longer incur the selling and marketing expenses associated with those seminars, which accounted for most of our selling and marketing expenses in 2011.
19
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for executive, administrative personnel, legal, rent, accounting and other professionals, finance company service fees, and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased to $409,000 from $1,589,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel, which resulted in decreases in head count and other general and administrative expenses.
Other Income
Other income primarily relates to interest earned on EPTAs, which generally carry an 18% simple interest rate. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, other income was $504,000 and $1,276,000, respectively.
Six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to six months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Revenue from StoresOnline for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 73% to $8,464,000, from $31,017,000 for the six months ended June, 2011.
Following our decision to suspend our direct mail seminar sales in July 2011, revenue from StoresOnline has been generated primarily through principal amounts collected on historical sales of StoresOnline products and services sold through EPTAs. Fees for our StoresOnline products and services sold under EPTAs are recognized as revenue as cash payments are received from the customer and not at the time of sale.
Revenue related to cash collected under EPTA agreements decreased to $5,749,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $8,588,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our typical EPTA agreement has a term of two to three years. As such, while we no longer plan to offer EPTAs to our customers as a result of the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales, we will continue to recognize revenue from those EPTA contracts entered into prior to July 2011 as cash is collected on those contracts. EPTAs are originally recognized in our balance sheet, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, through our deferred revenue balance. The remaining deferred revenue balance is expected to be recognized as revenue, however, at a decreasing rate over the next year to eighteen months.
The following table summarizes the activity within deferred revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 23,229 | ||
Cash collected on Principal of EPTA Contracts
|
(8,588 | ) | ||
Deferred revenue added during period (net of writeoffs)
|
13,326 | |||
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of June 30, 2011
|
$ | 27,967 | ||
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of December 31, 2011
|
$ | 15,196 | ||
Cash collected on Principal of EPTA Contracts
|
(5,749 | ) | ||
Deferred revenue recognized during the period (net of writeoffs)
|
(219 | ) | ||
StoresOnline deferred revenue as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | 9,228 |
Due to the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel in July 2011, we had no cash sales of StoresOnline Software licenses (“SOS licenses”) or other products at events during the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $16,213,000 of cash sales at events in the six months ended June 30, 2011. Hosting revenue decreased to $1,653,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $2,331,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in hosting revenue was primarily due to attrition in the StoresOnline customer base since June 2011, primarily as a result of the suspension of the direct mail seminar sales channel.
20
Commissions from third parties and other revenue decreased 73% to $1,062,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, from $3,886,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, due primarily to our decision to suspend our direct mail seminar sales channel. As a result of this decision, we no longer sent leads to these third parties, and as such, we do not expect this revenue source to be significant in the future.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of the cost to conduct internet training workshops, credit card fees, the cost of products sold, as well as customer support costs. Cost of revenue for the six months ended June, 2012 decreased 91% to $1,117,000, from $12,804,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in cost of revenue was primarily due to suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel in July 2011, as such, we no longer incurred the costs to conduct the internet training workshops. The cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily related to the cost to fulfill products sold through our inside sales group and customer services costs.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for sales and marketing activities, associated with our inside sales group. Selling and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 99% to $141,000, from $17,515,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily related to the suspension of our direct mail sales seminars in July 2011. As a result of this suspension, we no longer incur the selling and marketing expenses associated with those seminars, which accounted for most of our selling and marketing expenses in 2011.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for executive and administrative personnel, rent, legal, accounting and other professional fees, finance company service fees, and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased to $910,000 from $2,658,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the suspension of our direct mail seminar sales channel, which resulted in decreases in head count and other general and administrative expenses.
Other Income
Other income primarily relates to interest earned on EPTAs, which generally carry an annual 18% simple interest rate. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, other income was $1,268,000 and $2,434,000, respectively.
Operating Results of Crexendo Web Services (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Crexendo Web Services
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 692 | $ | 550 | $ | 1,462 | $ | 1,029 | ||||||||
Operating Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue
|
483 | 439 | 995 | 847 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
734 | 608 | 1,417 | 1,289 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
141 | 102 | 279 | 162 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss
|
$ | (666 | ) | $ | (599 | ) | $ | (1,229 | ) | $ | (1,269 | ) |
21
Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Crexendo Web Services revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $692,000, compared to $550,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in revenue was primarily due to our increased focus on this division following the reduction in operations in our StoresOnline division, as well as an increase in number of sales representatives. Revenue from Crexendo Web Services is generated primarily through on-page and off-page SEO services, search engine management services, conversion rate optimization services, and website design and development services. A substantial portion of Crexendo Web Services’ revenue is generated through three to twelve-month service contracts.
Below is a table which displays the Crexendo Web Services revenue backlog as of March 31, 2011 and 2012, and June 30, 2011 and 2012, which is expected to be recognized as revenue within the next twelve to eighteen months (in thousands):
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of March 31, 2011
|
$ | 972 | ||
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of June 30, 2011
|
$ | 1,196 | ||
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of March 31, 2012
|
$ | 1,212 | ||
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | 1,007 |
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of salaries related to fulfillment of our web services. Cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $483,000 compared to $439,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in cost of revenue for the current period is related to an increase in headcount as we continue to increase our fulfillment capacity as revenue increases.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, as well as advertising expenses. Selling and marketing expense was $734,000 and $608,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, primarily due to a $116,000 increase in our sales force expense.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses were $141,000 and $102,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to a $49,000 increase in the office space rent allocation for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011.
22
Six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to six months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Crexendo Web Services revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1,462,000, compared to $1,029,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in revenue was primarily due to our increased focus on this division following the reduced operations in our StoresOnline division, as well as an increase in number of sales representatives. Revenue from Crexendo Web Services is generated primarily through on-page and off-page SEO services, search engine management services, conversion rate optimization services, and website design and development services. A substantial portion of Crexendo Web Services’ revenue is generated through six to twelve-month service contracts.
Below is a table which displays the Crexendo Web Services revenue backlog as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and June 30, 2011 and 2012, which is expected to be recognized as revenue within the next twelve to eighteen months (in thousands):
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | 964 | ||
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of June 30, 2011
|
$ | 1,196 | ||
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of December 31, 2011
|
$ | 1,142 | ||
Crexendo Web Services backlog as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | 1,007 |
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of salaries related to fulfillment of our web services. Cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $995,000 compared to $847,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in cost of revenue for the current period is related to an increase in headcount as we continue to increase our fulfillment capacity as revenue increases.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, as well as advertising expenses. Selling and marketing expense was $1,417,000 and $1,289,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is primarily related to the increase in our direct sales representatives, which resulted in $237,000 increase in salaries and wages. This increase was off-set by a decrease in advertising spend of approximately $115,000, as we have shifted our focus from an advertising sale primarily through paid search advertising to less expensive vertical specific lead channels.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses were $279,000 and $162,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to a $100,000 increase in the office space rent allocation for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011.
23
Operating Results of our Crexendo Network Services Division (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Crexendo Network Services
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 168 | $ | 18 | $ | 243 | $ | 18 | ||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue
|
329 | 158 | 579 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
142 | - | 275 | 22 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
127 | 58 | 266 | 122 | ||||||||||||
Research and development
|
253 | 291 | 494 | 584 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss
|
$ | (683 | ) | $ | (489 | ) | $ | (1,371 | ) | $ | (975 | ) |
Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to Three months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Crexendo Network Services revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $168,000 compared to $18,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. We began selling our network services products through a limited launch during the first half of 2011 with no dedicated sales representatives. As of June 30, 2012 we had twenty-four direct sales representatives. A substantial portion of Crexendo Network Services’ revenue is generated through twenty-four to thirty-six month service contracts. As such, we believe growth in Crexendo Network Services will initially be seen through increases in our backlog.
Below is a table which displays the Crexendo Network Services revenue backlog as of March 31, 2011 and 2012, and June 30, 2011 and 2012, which we expect to recognize as revenue within the next twenty-four to thirty-six months (in thousands):
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of March 31, 2011
|
$ | - | ||
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of June 30, 2011
|
$ | - | ||
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of March 31, 2012
|
$ | 965 | ||
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | 1,292 |
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of product cost and customer support department salaries of our hosted communication services. Cost of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $329,000 compared to $158,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in cost of revenue from the three months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in customer support costs of $96,000 and an increase in bandwidth costs of $57,000.
24
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, as well as advertising expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $142,000 compared to no expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in selling and marketing expenses was primarily due to an $87,000 increase in the direct sales force expense combined with a $55,000 increase in advertising spend.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses for rent, professional fees, and administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses were $127,000 and $58,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 primarily consisted of additional salaries and benefits, increase in rental expense allocation and various professional services costs.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses which are attributable to the development of new hosted telecommunications products. Research and development expenses were $253,000 and $291,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in our engineering head count.
Six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to six months ended June 30, 2011
Revenue
Crexendo Network Services revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $243,000 compared to $18,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. We began selling our network services products through a limited launch during the first half of 2011 with no dedicated sales representatives, as such; we had no revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012 we had twenty-four direct sales representatives. A substantial portion of Crexendo Network Services’ revenue is generated through twenty-four to thirty-six month service contracts. As such, we believe growth in Crexendo Network Services will initially be seen through increases in our backlog.
Below is a table which displays the Crexendo Network Services revenue backlog as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and June 30, 2011 and 2012, which we expect to recognize as revenue within the next twenty-four to thirty-six months (in thousands):
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of December 31, 2010
|
$ | - | ||
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of June 30, 2011
|
$ | - | ||
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of December 31, 2011
|
$ | 155 | ||
Crexendo Network Services backlog as of June 30, 2012
|
$ | 1,292 |
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of product cost and customer support department salaries of our hosted telecommunication services. Cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $579,000 compared to $265,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in cost of revenue from the three months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily was primarily due to an increase in customer support costs of $180,000 and an increase in bandwidth costs of $86,000.
25
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, as well as advertising expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $275,000 compared to $22,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in selling and marketing expenses was primarily due to a $165,000 increase in the direct sales force expense combined with a $88,000 increase in advertising spend.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses for rent, professional fees, and administrative personnel. General and administrative expenses were $266,000 and $122,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily consisted of additional salaries and benefits, increase in rental expense allocation and various professional services costs.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses which are attributable to the development of new hosted telecommunication products. Research and development expenses were $494,000 and $584,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in our engineering head count.
Results of our Corporate and Other Unallocated Operations (in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Unallocated corporate items
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$ | 15 | $ | 32 | $ | 28 | $ | 64 | ||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
44 | - | 84 | 13 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
2,064 | 1,584 | 4,319 | 3,150 | ||||||||||||
Research and development
|
252 | 580 | 605 | 1,159 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss
|
(2,375 | ) | (2,196 | ) | (5,036 | ) | (4,386 | ) | ||||||||
Other Income
|
6 | - | 12 | - | ||||||||||||
Loss before taxes
|
$ | (2,369 | ) | $ | (2,196 | ) | $ | (5,024 | ) | $ | (4,386 | ) |
26
Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011
Unallocated corporate expenses, which are not allocated to specific segments of our operations, totaled $2,375,000 and $2,196,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Unallocated costs increased for the three months ended June 30, 2012 due primarily to an increase in unallocated costs for rent, option expense, insurance, accounting services and software license and maintenance expense. Following the suspension of the direct mail seminar sales channel, certain costs were reallocated back to corporate unallocated expenses.
Cost of Revenue
Unallocated corporate cost of revenue consists of share-based compensation expense of $15,000 and $32,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Selling and Marketing
Unallocated corporate selling and marketing expenses consist of share-based compensation which was $44,000 and no expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
General and Administrative
Unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses consist of payroll, share-based compensation, rent, professional fees, and administrative personnel expenses which are not allocated to specific segments. Unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses were $2,064,000 and $1,584,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Unallocated general and administrative expenses increased for the three months ended June 30, 2012 due primarily to an increase in unallocated costs for rent, option expense, insurance, accounting services and software license and maintenance expense. During the third quarter, we anticipate evacuating our office space in Orem, Utah and taking a non-cash charge, as a result we expect rent expense to decrease in future periods.
Research and Development
Unallocated corporate research and development expenses consist primarily of payroll and share-based compensation expenses, related to our engineering team, whose cost cannot be specifically allocated to any particular segment. Unallocated research and development expenses were $252,000 and $580,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to a reduction in headcount in our engineering department.
Six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to six months ended June 30, 2011
Unallocated corporate expenses, which are not allocated to specific segments of our operations, totaled $5,036,000 and $4,386,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Unallocated costs increased for the six months ended June 30, 2012 due primarily to an increase in unallocated costs for rent, option expense, insurance, accounting services and software license and maintenance expense. Following the suspension of the direct mail seminar sales channel, certain costs were reallocated back to corporate unallocated expenses.
Cost of Revenue
Unallocated corporate cost of revenue consists of share-based compensation expense of $28,000 and $64,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
27
Selling and Marketing
Unallocated corporate selling and marketing expenses consist of share-based compensation which was $84,000 and $13,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
General and Administrative
Unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses consist of payroll, share-based compensation, rent, professional fees, and administrative personnel expenses which are not allocated to specific segments. Unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses were $4,319,000 and $3,150,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase was due primarily to higher rental expense primarily due to the favorable lease impairment adjustment in 2011 as well as an increase in unallocated option expense, accounting services, insurance and software licenses and maintenance expenses. During the third quarter, we anticipate evacuating our office space in Orem, Utah and taking a non-cash charge, as a result we expect rent expense to decrease in future periods.
Research and Development
Unallocated corporate research and development expenses consist primarily of payroll and share-based compensation expenses, related to our engineering team, whose cost cannot be specifically allocated to any particular segment. Unallocated corporate research and development expenses were $605,000 and $1,159,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to a reduction in headcount in our engineering department.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working Capital
As of June 30, 2012, we had working capital of $9,405,000, compared to $8,381,000 as of December 31, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, we had working capital, excluding deferred revenue, of $17,179,000, compared to $17,669,000 as of December 31, 2011. Deferred revenue balances represent historical contract sales for which we cannot immediately recognize revenue. We currently anticipate that the costs and expenses we will incur as these deferred revenue amounts are recognized as revenue will be insignificant. Consequently, we do not consider deferred revenue to be a factor that impacts our liquidity or future cash requirements. The increase in working capital and working capital excluding deferred revenue is primarily attributable to the proceeds from exercise of stock options of $498,000 in the current quarter which was offset by the payment of $422,000 in dividends and a decrease of $1,212,000 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. We believe we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet our needs for at least the next twelve months.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
As of June 30, 2012, we had $8,443,000 of cash and cash equivalents held primarily in operating accounts, compared to $8,658,000 as of December 31, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we generated $739,000 in cash from operating activities and used $1,024,000 in cash for investing activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we generated cash from financing activities of $70,000, primarily due to the exercise of stock options which was offset by the payment of dividends to stockholders.
Trade Receivables
Current and long-term trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, totaled $9,360,000 as of June 30, 2012, compared to $15,517,000 as of December 31, 2011. Long-term trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, were $1,625,000 as of June 30, 2012 compared to $6,097,000 as of December 31, 2011. We offer our customers a contract with payment terms between 24 and 36 months, as one of several payment options. The payments that become due more than 12 months after the end of the fiscal period are classified as long-term trade receivables. The decrease in our accounts receivable balance at June 30, 2012 is primarily related to cash collections of EPTA agreements of $5,749,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012.
28
Accounts Payable
Accounts payable as of June 30, 2012 totaled $463,000, compared to $1,153,000 as of December 31, 2011. Our accounts payable as of June 30, 2012 were generally within our vendors’ terms of payment.
Capital
As of June 30, 2012, total stockholders’ equity was $14,169,000, up from $13,347,000 at December 31, 2011. The significant changes in stockholders’ equity during the first six months of fiscal year 2012 included an increase of additional paid-in capital of $455,000 for options granted, $498,000 in proceeds from stock option exercises, and a decrease of $211,000 for common stock dividends declared. In addition, we had net income of $80,000 for the six month period ending June 30, 2012.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2012, we are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Not Applicable
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition
With the exception of historical facts, the statements contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which reflect our current expectations and beliefs regarding our future results of operations, performance and achievements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based upon assumptions and beliefs that may or may not materialize. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:
|
●
|
our belief that our target market will increasingly look to Internet solutions providers who leverage industry and customer practices, increase predictability of success of their Internet initiatives and decrease implementation risks by providing low-cost, scalable solutions with minimal lead time;
|
|
●
|
our belief that we can compete successfully by relying on our infrastructure and marketing strategies as well as techniques, systems and procedures, and by adding additional products and services in the future;
|
|
●
|
our belief that we can continue our success by periodic review and revision of our methods of doing business and by continuing our expansion into domestic and international markets;
|
|
●
|
our belief that a key component of our success comes from a number of new, recently developed proprietary technologies and that these technologies and advances distinguish our services and products from our competitors and further help to substantially reduce our operating costs and expenses;
|
|
●
|
our contention that we do not offer our customers a “business opportunity” or a “franchise” as those terms are defined in applicable statutes of the states in which we operate;
|
29
|
●
|
our belief that there is a large, fragmented and under-served population of small businesses and entrepreneurs searching for professional services firms that offer business-to-consumer e-commerce solutions coupled with support and continuing education;
|
|
●
|
our expectation that our offering of products and services will evolve as some products are replaced by new and enhanced products intended to help our customers achieve success with their Internet-related businesses; and
|
|
●
|
our expectation that the costs and expenses we incur will be insignificant as deferred revenue amounts are recognized as product and other revenues when cash is collected.
|
We caution readers that our operating results are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those discussed or anticipated, including changes in economic conditions and internet technologies, interest rate fluctuations, and the factors set forth in the section entitled, “Risk Factors,” under Part I, Item 1A of the 2011 Form 10-K. We also advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this Report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, other than as required by law.
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Not required
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report, have concluded that, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
Information on certain legal proceedings that we believe may be material to our business is set forth in “Part I – Item 3. Legal Proceedings” to the 2011 Form 10-K. Other than the information regarding the legal proceedings set forth under “Legal Proceedings" in Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, there were no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in on the 2011 Form 10-K. The information regarding legal proceedings as set forth under "Legal Proceedings" in Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
There are many risk factors that may affect our business and the results of our operations, many of which are beyond our control. Information on certain risks that we believe are material to our business is set forth in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the 2011 Form 10-K.
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
We have a share purchase program that authorizes us to purchase outstanding shares of our common stock. The aggregate dollar amount originally authorized in September 2006 for purchase was $20,000,000 through September 2009. In September 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an additional $50,000,000 of our common stock through September 2012. We had no share purchases during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
31
ITEM 6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
Exhibits
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
||
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
||
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
||
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
||
101.INS* |
XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
|
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA DOCUMENT
|
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
|
|
101.DEF* |
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
|
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE DOCUMENT
|
|
101.PRE* | XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
*
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) documents are furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.
|
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
August 9, 2012
|
Crexendo, Inc.
|
||
By:
|
/s/ Steven G. Mihaylo
|
||
Steven G. Mihaylo
|
|||
Chief Executive Officer |
August 9, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Ronald Vincent
|
|
Ronald Vincent
|
|||
Chief Financial Officer |
33