TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC	extim3263012.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC	extim31263012.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC	exhtim31163012.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from _____ to _____.

Commission file number 0-23333

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington	91-1863696
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

624 Simpson Avenue, Hoquiam, Washington	98550
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(360) 533-4747

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes _X_ No __

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ___

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated filer __

Smaller reporting company _X_

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ___ No _X_

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

CLASS	SHARES OUTSTANDING AT July 31, 2012
Common stock, $.01 par value	7,045,036

INDEX

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	4-5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	7

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	8-9

	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	10-32

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33-44

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	45

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	45

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	45

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	45

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	45

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	45

Item 5.	Other Information	46

Item 6.	Exhibits	46

SIGNATURES		47
Certifications
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	June 30,			September 30,
	2012			2011
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from financial institutions	$	12,489		$	11,455
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		80,499			100,610
Total cash and cash equivalents		92,988			112,065

Certificates of deposit (“CDs”) held for investment (at cost which approximates fair value)		22,781			18,659
Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and other investments - held to maturity, at amortized cost (estimated fair value $3,651 and $4,229)		3,503			4,145
MBS and other investments - available for sale		5,113			6,717
Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) stock		5,705			5,705

Loans receivable		544,708			535,926
Loans held for sale		4,064			4,044
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(11,603	)		(11,946	)
Net loans receivable		537,169			528,024

Premises and equipment, net		17,723			17,390
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) and other repossessed assets, net		9,997			10,811
Accrued interest receivable		2,161			2,411
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)		16,374			15,917
Goodwill		5,650			5,650
Core deposit intangible (“CDI”)		286			397
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), net		2,150			2,108
Prepaid Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance assessment		1,415			2,103
Other assets		6,121			6,122
Total assets	$	729,136		$	738,224

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Deposits: Non-interest-bearing demand	$	70,004		$	64,494
Deposits: Interest-bearing		520,362			528,184
Total deposits		590,366			592,678

FHLB advances		45,000			55,000
Repurchase agreements		826			729
Other liabilities and accrued expenses		3,669			3,612
Total liabilities		639,861			652,019

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 16,641 shares, Series A, issued and outstanding; $1,000 per share liquidation value		16,168			15,989
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 7,045,036 shares issued and outstanding		10,500			10,457
Unearned shares - Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)		(1,785	)		(1,983	)
Retained earnings		64,905			62,270
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(513	)		(528	)
Total shareholders’ equity		89,275			86,205
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	729,136		$	738,224

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,		Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Interest and dividend income

Loans receivable	$7,842	$8,192	$23,254	$24,966
MBS and other investments	89	141	323	486
Dividends from mutual funds	6	8	26	23
Interest-bearing deposits in banks	82	90	252	260
Total interest and dividend income	8,019	8,431	23,855	25,735

Interest expense

Deposits	925	1,463	3,128	4,805
FHLB advances	466	556	1,525	1,835
Total interest expense	1,391	2,019	4,653	6,640

Net interest income	6,628	6,412	19,202	19,095

Provision for loan losses	900	3,400	2,600	5,000

Net interest income after provision for loan
losses	5,728	3,012	16,602	14,095

Non-interest income

Other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”)
on MBS and other investments	(60)	(70)	(182)	(224)
Adjustment for portion recorded as transferred from other
comprehensive income (loss) before taxes	23	(95)	(8)	(112)
Net OTTI on MBS and other investments	(37)	(165)	(190)	(336)

Realized losses on MBS and other investments	--	--	--	(2)
Gain on sales of MBS and other investments	2	--	22	79
Service charges on deposits	955	993	2,815	2,875
ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees	564	515	1,621	1,384
BOLI net earnings	146	121	457	361
Gain on sales of loans, net	567	247	1,722	1,214
Escrow fees	30	16	79	55
Valuation recovery (allowance) on MSRs	(82)	(137)	144	703
Fee income from non-deposit investment sales	20	25	58	73
Other	176	146	550	414
Total non-interest income, net	2,341	1,761	7,278	6,820

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,		Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Non-interest expense

Salaries and employee benefits	$ 3,006	$ 3,150	$ 8,989	$ 9,393
Premises and equipment	647	640	1,979	1,967
Advertising	173	235	553	604
OREO and other repossessed assets, net	363	496	1,299	930
ATM expenses	206	203	598	583
Postage and courier	124	139	381	400
Amortization of CDI	37	42	111	125
State and local taxes	159	155	460	475
Professional fees	217	190	628	567
FDIC insurance	237	248	703	919
Other insurance	51	56	161	299
Loan administration and foreclosure	82	345	615	711
Data processing and telecommunications	303	285	918	847
Deposit operations	177	202	593	447
Other	315	396	903	1,069
Total non-interest expense	6,097	6,782	18,891	19,336

Income (loss) before federal and state income
taxes	1,972	(2,009)	4,989	1,579

Provision (benefit) for federal and state income
taxes	624	(729)	1,551	417

Net income (loss)	1,348	(1,280)	3,438	1,162

Preferred stock dividends	(208)	(208)	(624)	(624)
Preferred stock discount accretion	(61)	(57)	(179)	(168)

Net income (loss) to common shareholders	$ 1,079	$ (1,545)	$ 2,635	$ 370

Net income (loss) per common share
Basic	$ 0.16	$ (0.23)	$ 0.39	$ 0.05
Diluted	$ 0.16	$ (0.23)	$ 0.39	$ 0.05

Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic	6,780,516	6,745,250	6,780,516	6,745,250
Diluted	6,780,516	6,745,250	6,780,516	6,745,487

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,		Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$ 1,348	$ (1,280)	$ 3,438	$ 1,162
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on securities
available for sale, net of tax	39	50	(17)	2
Change in OTTI on securities held to maturity, net of tax:
Additions	--	(9)	(27)	(65)
Additional amount recognized related to credit loss for which OTTI was previously
recognized	5	5	1	15
Amount reclassified to credit loss for
previously recorded market loss	10	67	21	124
Accretion of OTTI securities held to maturity,
net of tax	11	8	37	27

Total comprehensive income (loss)	$ 1,413	$ (1,159)	$ 3,453	$ 1,265

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended September 30, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Number of Shares		Amount		Unearned		Accumulated Other Compre-
	Preferred Stock	Common Stock	Preferred Stock	Common Stock	Shares ESOP	Retained Earnings	hensive Loss	Total

Balance, September 30, 2010	16,641	7,045,036	$15,764	$10,377	$(2,247)	$62,238	$(724)	$85,408

Net income	--	--	--	--	--	1,089	--	1,089
Accretion of preferred stock discount	--	--	225	--	--	(225)	--	--
5% preferred stock dividend	--	--	--	--	--	(832)	--	(832)
Earned ESOP shares	--	--	--	(61)	264	--	--	203
MRDP (1) compensation expense	--	--	--	134	--	--	--	134
Stock option compensation expense	--	--	--	7	--	--	--	7
Unrealized holding gain on securities available for sale, net of tax	--	--	--	--	--	--	14	14
Change in OTTI on securities held to maturity, net of tax	--	--	--	--	--	--	139	139
Accretion of OTTI on securities held to maturity, net of tax	--	--	--	--	--	--	43	43

Balance, September 30, 2011	16,641	7,045,036	15,989	10,457	(1,983)	62,270	(528)	86,205

Net income	--	--	--	--	--	3,438	--	3,438
Accretion of preferred stock discount	--	--	179	--	--	(179)	--	--
5% preferred stock dividend	--	--	--	--	--	(624)	--	(624)
Earned ESOP shares	--	--	--	(53)	198	--	--	145
MRDP compensation expense	--	--	--	85	--	--	--	85
Stock option compensation expense	--	--	--	11	--	--	--	11
Unrealized holding loss on securities available for sale, net of tax	--	--	--	--	--	--	(17)	(17)
Change in OTTI on securities held to maturity, net of tax	--	--	--	--	--	--	(5)	(5)
Accretion of OTTI on securities held to maturity, net of tax				--	--	--	37	37

Balance, June 30, 2012	16,641	7,045,036	$16,168	$10,500	$(1,785)	$64,905	$(513)	$89,275

__________________________

(1) 1998 Management Recognition and Development Plan (“MRDP”).

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012	2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$ 3,438	$ 1,162
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	2,600	5,000
Depreciation	684	743
Deferred federal income taxes	366	(412)
Amortization of CDI	111	125
Earned ESOP shares	198	198
MRDP compensation expense	85	129
Stock option compensation expense	11	5
Loss (gain) on sales of OREO and other repossessed assets, net	290	(527)
Provision for OREO losses	609	973
Loss on disposition of premises and equipment	--	3
BOLI net earnings	(457)	(361)
Gain on sales of loans, net	(1,722)	(1,214)
Decrease in deferred loan origination fees	(181)	(241)
Net OTTI on MBS and other investments	190	336
Gain on sales of MBS and other investments	(22)	(79)
Realized losses on held to maturity securities	--	2
Valuation recovery on MSRs	(144)	(703)
Loans originated for sale	(67,112)	(44,266)
Proceeds from sales of loans	68,814	47,684
Increase (decrease) in other assets, net	622	(15)
Increase in other liabilities and accrued expenses, net	433	177
Net cash provided by operating activities	8,813	8,719

Cash flows from investing activities
Net increase in CDs held for investment	(4,122)	(40)
Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of MBS and other investments available for sale	829	1,248
Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of MBS and other investments held to maturity	574	697
Proceeds from sales of MBS and other investments	743	2,272
Increase in loans receivable, net	(12,676)	(3,476)
Additions to premises and equipment	(1,017)	(344)
Proceeds from sales of OREO and other repossessed assets	1,047	2,883
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(14,622)	3,240

Cash flows from financing activities
(Decrease) increase in deposits, net	(2,312)	10,629
Repayment of FHLB advances	(10,000)	(20,000)
Increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements	97	(24)
ESOP tax effect	(53)	(47)
Dividends paid	(1,000)	- -
Net cash used in financing activities	(13,268)	(9,442)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

For the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012	2011

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$ (19,077)	$ 2,517
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period	112,065	111,786
End of period	$ 92,988	$ 114,303

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Income taxes paid	$ 1,463	$ 2,097
Interest paid	4,770	6,786

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities
Loans transferred to OREO and other repossessed assets	$ 4,906	$ 4,344
Loans originated to facilitate the sale of OREO	3,744	1,538

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. However, all adjustments which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 (“2011 Form 10-K”). The unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2012.

(b) Principles of Consolidation: The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberland Bank (“Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberland Service Corp. All significant inter-company balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

(c) Operating Segment: The Company has one reportable operating segment which is defined as community banking in western Washington under the operating name, “Timberland Bank.”

(d) The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(e) Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the June 30, 2012 presentation with no change to net income or total shareholders’ equity previously reported.

(2) REGULATORY MATTERS

In December 2009, the FDIC and the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks (“Division”) determined that the Bank required supervisory attention and, on December 29, 2009, entered into an agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding with the Bank (“Bank MOU”). Under the Bank MOU, the Bank must, among other things, maintain Tier 1 Capital of not less than 10.0% of the Bank’s adjusted total assets and maintain capital ratios above the “well capitalized” thresholds as defined under FDIC Rules and Regulations; obtain the prior consent from the FDIC and the Division prior to the Bank declaring a dividend to its holding company; and not engage in any transactions that would materially change the Bank’s balance sheet composition including growth in total assets of five percent or more or significant changes in funding sources without the prior non-objection of the FDIC.

In addition, on February 1, 2010, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRB”) determined that the Company required additional supervisory attention and entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Company (“Company MOU”). Under the Company MOU, the Company must, among other things, obtain prior written approval or non-objection from the FRB to declare or pay any dividends, or make any other capital distributions; issue any trust preferred securities; or purchase or redeem any of its stock. The FRB has denied the Company’s requests to pay certain quarterly cash dividends on its Series A Preferred Stock issued under the U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) since May 2010. For additional information on the CPP, see Note 3 below entitled “U.S Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program.”

(3) U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT’S CAPITAL PURCHASE PROGRAM

On December 23, 2008, the Company received $16.64 million from the U.S. Treasury Department (“Treasury”) as a part of the Treasury’s CPP, which was established as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”). The Company sold 16,641 shares of senior preferred stock with a related warrant to purchase 370,899 shares of the Company’s common

stock at a price of $6.73 per share at any time through December 23, 2018. The preferred stock pays a 5.0% dividend for the first five years, after which the rate increases to 9.0% if the preferred shares are not redeemed by the Company.

Preferred stock is initially recorded at the amount of proceeds received. Any discount from the liquidation value is accreted to the expected call date and charged to retained earnings. This accretion is recorded using the level-yield method. Preferred dividends paid (or accrued) and any accretion is deducted from (or added to) net income (loss) for computing net income (loss) to common shareholders and net income (loss) per share computations.

Under the Company MOU, the Company must, among other things, obtain prior written approval or non-objection from the FRB to declare or pay any dividends. The FRB has denied the Company’s requests to pay certain dividends on its Series A Preferred Stock issued under the CPP since May 2010. The Company did, however, receive approval from the FRB during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 to pay $1.00 million in dividends and interest accrued on missed dividend payments to the Treasury. As a result of not receiving permission from the FRB to pay all dividends, the Company had not made five quarterly dividend payments (four full payments and one partial payment) totaling $900,000 at June 30, 2012. There can be no assurances that the FRB will approve such payments or dividends in the future. The Company has applied to the FRB for permission to pay the remaining accrued dividends, interest on the accrued dividends and to pay the dividend due on August 15, 2012. The Company may not declare or pay dividends on its common stock or, with certain exceptions, repurchase common stock without first having paid all cumulative preferred dividends that are due. If dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock have not been paid for at least six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two members to the Company’s Board of Directors.

(4) MBS AND OTHER INVESTMENTS

MBS and other investments have been classified according to management’s intent and are as follows as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
June 30, 2012
Held to Maturity
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	1,577	$	40	$	(5	)	$	1,612
Private label residential		1,899		212		(102	)		2,009
U.S. agency securities		27		3		--			30
Total	$	3,503	$	255	$	(107	)	$	3,651

Available for Sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	2,995	$	145	$	--		$	3,140
Private label residential		1,050		56		(138	)		968
Mutual funds		1,000		5		--			1,005
Total	$	5,045	$	206	$	(138	)	$	5,113

September 30, 2011
Held to Maturity
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	1,831	$	45	$	(4	)	$	1,872
Private label residential		2,287		311		(271	)		2,327
U.S. agency securities		27		3		--			30
Total	$	4,145	$	359	$	(275	)	$	4,229

Available for Sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	4,395	$	188	$	--		$	4,583
Private label residential		1,227		59		(152	)		1,134
Mutual funds		1,000		--		--			1,000
Total	$	6,622	$	247	$	(152	)	$	6,717

The estimated fair value of temporarily impaired securities, the amount of unrealized losses and the length of time these unrealized losses existed as of June 30, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Held to Maturity MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	- -	$	- -		$	266	$	(5	)	$	266	$	(5	)
Private label residential		92		(7	)		787		(95	)		879		(102	)
Total	$	92	$	(7	)	$	1,053	$	(100	)	$	1,145	$	(107	)

Available for Sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	- -	$	- -		$	- -	$	- -		$	- -	$	- -
Private label residential		- -		- -			660		(138	)		660		(138	)
Mutual funds		- -		- -			- -		- -			- -		- -
Total	$	- -	$	- -		$	660	$	(138	)	$	660	$	(138	)

During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded net OTTI charges through earnings on residential MBS of $37,000 and $165,000, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded net OTTI charges through earnings on residential MBS of $190,000 and $336,000, respectively. The Company provides for the bifurcation of OTTI into (i) amounts related to credit losses which are recognized through earnings, and (ii) amounts related to all other factors which are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

To determine the component of the gross OTTI related to credit losses, the Company compared the amortized cost basis of each OTTI security to the present value of its revised expected cash flows, discounted using its pre-impairment yield. The revised expected cash flow estimates for individual securities are based primarily on an analysis of default rates and prepayment speeds included in third-party analytic reports. Significant judgment by management is required in this analysis that includes, but is not limited to, assumptions regarding the collectability of principal and interest, net of related expenses, on the underlying loans. The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs utilized to measure management’s estimate of the credit loss component on OTTI securities as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011:

	Range						Weighted
	Minimum			Maximum			Average
At June 30, 2012
Constant prepayment rate		6.00	%		15.00	%		8.80	%
Collateral default rate		0.85	%		25.67	%		9.20	%
Loss severity rate		24.74	%		69.60	%		50.10	%

At September 30, 2011
Constant prepayment rate		6.00	%		15.00	%		10.71	%
Collateral default rate		0.43	%		24.23	%		8.03	%
Loss severity rate		11.93	%		64.54	%		39.22	%

The following tables present the OTTI for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012		Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Held To Maturity	Available For Sale	Held To Maturity	Available For Sale
Total OTTI	$ 60	$ - -	$ 41	$ 29
Portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss (before income taxes) (1)	23	- -	(95)	- -
Net OTTI recognized in earnings (2)	$ 37	$ - -	$ 136	$ 29

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012		Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Held To Maturity	Available For Sale	Held To Maturity	Available For Sale
Total OTTI	$ 139	$ 43	$ 194	$ 30
Portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss (before income taxes) (1)	(8)	- -	(112)	- -
Net OTTI recognized in earnings (2)	$ 147	$ 43	$ 306	$ 30

________________________

(1)	Represents OTTI related to all other factors.

(2)	Represents OTTI related to credit losses.

The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component of held to maturity and available for sale debt securities that have been written down for OTTI with the credit loss component recognized in earnings and the remaining impairment loss related to all other factors recognized in other comprehensive income for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Beginning balance of credit loss	$	3,361		$	4,725
Additions:
Credit losses for which OTTI was not previously recognized		81			53
Additional increases to the amount related to credit loss for which OTTI was previously recognized		109			283
Subtractions:
Realized losses previously recorded as credit losses		(661	)		(1,390	)
Ending balance of credit loss	$	2,890		$	3,671

There was a gross realized gain on sales of securities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 of $2,000 and $22,000, respectively. There were no gross realized gains on sales of securities for the three months ended June 30, 2011. There was a gross realized gain on sale of securities for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 of $79,000. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded a $242,000 realized loss (as a result of the securities being deemed worthless) on 19 held to maturity residential MBS and one available for sale residential MBS, of which the entire amount had been recognized previously as a credit loss. During the nine months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded a $661,000 realized loss on 24 held to maturity residential MBS and one available for sale residential MBS, of which the entire amount had been recognized previously as a credit loss. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the

Company recorded a $509,000 realized loss (as a result of the securities being deemed worthless) on 22 held to maturity residential MBS and one available for sale residential MBS, of which the entire amount had been recognized previously as a credit loss. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded a $1.392 million realized loss on 23 held to maturity residential MBS and one available for sale residential MBS, of which $1.390 million had been recognized previously as a credit loss.

The amortized cost of residential MBS and agency securities pledged as collateral for public fund deposits, federal treasury tax and loan deposits, FHLB collateral, retail repurchase agreements and other non-profit organization deposits totaled $5.95 million and $7.77 million at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively.

The contractual maturities of debt securities at June 30, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from scheduled maturities as a result of the prepayment of principal or call provisions.

	Held to Maturity				Available for Sale
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Due within one year	$	15	$	16	$	--	$	--
Due after one year to five years		9		9		72		76
Due after five to ten years		30		32		--		- -
Due after ten years		3,449		3,594		3,973		4,032
Total	$	3,503	$	3,651	$	4,045	$	4,108

(5) GOODWILL

During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company engaged a third party firm to perform the annual test for goodwill impairment. The test concluded that recorded goodwill was not impaired. No assurances can be given, however, that the Company will not record an impairment loss on goodwill in the future.

(6) LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Loans receivable and loans held for sale consisted of the following at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2012						September 30, 2011
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family (1)	$	109,624			19.5	%	$	114,680			20.5	%
Multi-family		38,146			6.8			30,982			5.5
Commercial		258,545			45.9			246,037			43.9
Construction and land development		48,639			8.7			52,484			9.4
Land		41,273			7.3			49,236			8.8
Total mortgage loans		496,227			88.2			493,419			88.1

Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		34,080			6.1			36,008			6.4
Other		6,413			1.1			8,240			1.5
Total consumer loans		40,493			7.2			44,248			7.9

Commercial business loans		26,052			4.6			22,510			4.0

Total loans receivable		562,772			100.0	%		560,177			100.0	%

Less:
Undisbursed portion of construction loans in process		(12,239	)					(18,265	)
Deferred loan origination fees		(1,761	)					(1,942	)
Allowance for loan losses		(11,603	)					(11,946	)

Total loans receivable, net	$	537,169					$	528,024

_________________________

(1) Includes loans held for sale.

Construction and Land Development Loan Portfolio Composition

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s construction and land development loan portfolio at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2012					September 30, 2011
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Custom and owner/builder	$	27,643		56.8	%	$	26,205		49.9	%
Speculative one- to four-family		2,122		4.4			1,919		3.7
Commercial real estate		17,920		36.8			12,863		24.5
Multi-family (including condominiums)		345		0.7			9,322		17.8
Land development		609		1.3			2,175		4.1
Total construction and land development loans	$	48,639		100.0	%	$	52,484		100.0	%

Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables set forth information for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 regarding activity in the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Beginning Allowance		Provision /(Credit)			Charge- offs		Recoveries		Ending Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	931	$	(10	)	$	92	$	3	$	832
Multi-family		1,288		(116	)		3		3		1,172
Commercial		3,737		1,104			288		--		4,553
Construction – custom and owner / builder		267		160			--		--		427
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		171		(64	)		--		--		107
Construction – commercial		861		139			622		--		378
Construction – multi-family		504		(480	)		24		--		--
Construction – land development		95		(86	)		9		--		--
Land		2,737		406			526		1		2,618
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		431		91			14		14		522
Other		353		15			4		--		364
Commercial business loans		889		(259	)		--		--		630
Total	$	12,264	$	900		$	1,582	$	21	$	11,603

	For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Beginning Allowance		Provision /(Credit)			Charge- offs		Recoveries		Ending Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	760	$	279		$	211	$	4	$	832
Multi-family		1,076		96			3		3		1,172
Commercial		4,035		1,314			796		--		4,553
Construction – custom and owner / builder		222		205			--		--		427
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		169		(63	)		--		1		107
Construction – commercial		794		206			622		--		378
Construction – multi-family		354		(780	)		24		450		--
Construction – land development		79		160			239		--		--
Land		2,795		801			1,058		80		2,618
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		460		166			118		14		522
Other		415		(27	)		24		--		364
Commercial business loans		787		243			401		1		630
Total	$	11,946	$	2,600		$	3,496	$	553	$	11,603

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Beginning Allowance		Provision /(Credit)			Charge- offs		Recoveries		Ending Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	738	$	250		$	172	$	1	$	817
Multi-family		1,016		88			--		11		1,115
Commercial		4,179		(343	)		--		4		3,840
Construction – custom and owner / builder		346		(92	)		--		--		254
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		260		(63	)		--		--		197
Construction – commercial		179		2,282			1,444		--		1,017
Construction – multi-family		263		(125	)		--		--		138
Construction – land development		28		667			667		--		28
Land		3,254		790			1,147		6		2,903
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		505		(52	)		--		--		453
Other		436		(8	)		--		--		428
Commercial business loans		594		6			--		--		600
Total	$	11,798	$	3,400		$	3,430	$	22	$	11,790

	For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Beginning Allowance		Provision /(Credit)			Charge- offs		Recoveries		Ending Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	530	$	543		$	405	$	149	$	817
Multi-family		393		692			--		30		1,115
Commercial		3,173		609			47		105		3,840
Construction – custom and owner / builder		481		(227	)		--		--		254
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		414		(177	)		40		--		197
Construction – commercial		245		2,216			1,444		--		1,017
Construction – multi-family		245		(107	)		--		--		138
Construction – land development		240		938			1,150		--		28
Land		3,709		709			1,560		45		2,903
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		922		(362	)		114		7		453
Other		451		5			30		2		428
Commercial business loans		461		161			22		--		600
Total	$	11,264	$	5,000		$	4,812	$	338	$	11,790

The following table presents information on the loans evaluated individually for impairment and collectively evaluated for impairment in the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Allowance for Loan Losses						Recorded Investment in Loans
	Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		Total		Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		Total

June 30, 2012
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$	261	$	571	$	832	$	4,032	$	105,592	$	109,624
Multi-family		784		388		1,172		6,899		31,247		38,146
Commercial		679		3,874		4,553		21,218		237,327		258,545
Construction – custom and owner / builder		19		408		427		312		18,566		18,878
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		24		83		107		700		770		1,470
Construction – commercial		--		378		378		--		15,098		15,098
Construction – multi-family		--		--		--		345		--		345
Construction – land development		--		--		--		609		--		609
Land		818		1,800		2,618		9,511		31,762		41,273
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		105		417		522		1,078		33,002		34,080
Other		--		364		364		9		6,404		6,413
Commercial business loans		--		630		630		30		26,022		26,052
Total	$	2,690	$	8,913	$	11,603	$	44,743	$	505,790	$	550,533
September 30, 2011
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$	45	$	715	$	760	$	3,701	$	110,979	$	114,680
Multi-family		632		444		1,076		5,482		25,500		30,982
Commercial		255		3,780		4,035		19,322		226,715		246,037
Construction – custom and owner / builder		11		211		222		320		16,777		17,097
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		37		132		169		700		906		1,606
Construction – commercial		738		56		794		5,435		2,479		7,914
Construction – multi-family		--		354		354		632		4,867		5,499
Construction – land development		--		79		79		1,882		221		2,103
Land		560		2,235		2,795		9,997		39,239		49,236
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		10		450		460		1,014		34,994		36,008
Other		1		414		415		1		8,239		8,240
Commercial business loans		--		787		787		44		22,466		22,510
Total	$	2,289	$	9,657	$	11,946	$	48,530	$	493,382	$	541,912

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company uses credit risk grades which reflect the Company’s assessment of a loan’s risk or loss potential. The Company categorizes loans into risk grade categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors such as the estimated fair value of the collateral. The Company uses the following definitions for credit risk ratings as part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of its loan portfolio:

Pass: Pass loans are defined as those loans that meet acceptable quality underwriting standards.

Watch: Watch loans are defined as those loans that still exhibit marginal acceptable quality, but have some concerns that justify greater attention. If these concerns are not corrected, a potential for further adverse categorization exists. These concerns could relate to a specific condition peculiar to the borrower, its industry segment or the general economic environment.

Special Mention: Special mention loans are defined as those loans deemed by management to have some potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the payment prospects of the loan. Assets in this category do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant a substandard classification.

Substandard: Substandard loans are defined as those loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or of the collateral pledged. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment of the debt. If the weakness or weaknesses are not corrected, there is the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained.

Loss: Loans in this classification are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be realized in the future.

The following table lists the loan credit risk grades utilized by the Company that serve as credit quality indicators. Each of the credit risk loan grades include high and low factors associated with their classification that are utilized to calculate the aggregate ranges of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

June 30, 2012	Loan Grades
	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$	98,081	$	4,025	$	3,746	$	3,772	$	109,624
Multi-family		26,310		89		10,114		1,633		38,146
Commercial		228,330		1,472		7,530		21,213		258,545
Construction – custom and owner / builder		16,135		--		2,431		312		18,878
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		227		242		700		301		1,470
Construction – commercial		15,098		--		--		--		15,098
Construction – multi-family		--		--		--		345		345
Construction – land development		--		--		--		609		609
Land		23,714		5,738		2,281		9,540		41,273
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		30,702		884		1,200		1,294		34,080
Other		6,359		45		--		9		6,413
Commercial business loans		22,550		2,630		117		755		26,052
Total	$	467,506	$	15,125	$	28,119	$	39,783	$	550,533

September 30, 2011

Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$	100,159	$	6,131	$	2,450	$	5,940	$	114,680
Multi-family		19,279		199		10,380		1,124		30,982
Commercial		212,898		1,042		6,320		25,777		246,037
Construction – custom and owner / builder		16,522		255		--		320		17,097
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		323		--		700		583		1,606
Construction – commercial		2,479		--		--		5,435		7,914
Construction – multi-family		4,115		--		752		632		5,499
Construction – land development		83		--		--		2,020		2,103
Land		26,825		6,604		5,084		10,723		49,236
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		32,389		901		1,513		1,205		36,008
Other		8,179		50		--		11		8,240
Commercial business loans		19,060		20		220		3,210		22,510
Total	$	442,311	$	15,202	$	27,419	$	56,980	$	541,912

The following tables present an age analysis of past due status of loans by category at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	30–59 Days Past Due	60-89 Days Past Due	Non- Accrual	Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing	Total Past Due	Current	Total Loans
June 30, 2012
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$ 963	$355	$ 2,123	$ --	$ 3,441	$106,183	$109,624
Multi-family	--	--	1,449	--	1,449	36,697	38,146
Commercial	6,626	412	9,099	6	16,143	242,402	258,545
Construction – custom and owner / builder	--	--	313	--	313	18,565	18,878
Construction – speculative one- to four- family	302	--	--	--	302	1,168	1,470
Construction – commercial	--	--	--	--	--	15,098	15,098
Construction – multi-family	--	--	345	--	345	--	345
Construction – land development	--	--	609	--	609	--	609
Land	531	31	9,265	229	10,056	31,217	41,273
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage	333	82	776	710	1,901	32,179	34,080
Other	--	--	9	--	9	6,404	6,413
Commercial business loans	60	16	30	--	106	25,946	26,052
Total	$ 8,815	$ 896	$ 24,018	$ 945	$ 34,674	$515,859	$550,533

September 30, 2011
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$ --	$ 1,822	$ 2,150	$ --	$ 3,972	$110,708	$114,680
Multi-family	--	--	--	1,449	1,449	29,533	30,982
Commercial	--	12,723	6,571	--	19,294	226,743	246,037
Construction – custom and owner / builder	--	--	320	--	320	16,777	17,097
Construction – speculative one- to four- family	--	--	--	--	--	1,606	1,606
Construction – commercial	--	--	688	--	688	7,226	7,914
Construction – multi-family	--	752	632	--	1,384	4,115	5,499
Construction – land development	--	--	1,882	--	1,882	221	2,103
Land	1,100	2,558	8,935	29	12,622	36,614	49,236
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage	643	441	366	--	1,450	34,558	36,008
Other	9	7	1	--	17	8,223	8,240
Commercial business loans	--	14	44	276	334	22,176	22,510
Total	$ 1,752	$ 18,317	$ 21,589	$ 1,754	$ 43,412	$498,500	$541,912

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the original or modified terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated cost to sell if the loan is considered collateral dependent. Impaired loans that are not considered to be collateral dependent are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows.

The categories of non-accrual loans and impaired loans overlap, although they are not coextensive. The Company considers all circumstances regarding the loan and borrower on an individual basis when determining whether an impaired loan should be placed on non-accrual status, such as the financial strength of the borrower, the estimated collateral value, reasons for the delay, payment record, the amount past due and the number of days past due.

The following table is a summary of information related to impaired loans as of June 30, 2012 and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

	Recorded Investment	Unpaid Principal Balance (Loan Balance Plus Charge Off)	Related Allowance	QTD Average Recorded Investment (1)	YTD Average Recorded Investment (2)	QTD Interest Income Recognized (1)	YTD Interest Income Recognized (2)	QTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (1)	YTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (2)
With no related allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$ 1,081	$ 1,162	$ --	$ 1,660	$ 1,978	$ 14	$ 20	$ 14	$ 16
Multi-family	--	982	--	--	--	--	1	--	1
Commercial	13,960	14,510	--	14,510	16,235	149	519	95	343
Construction – custom and owner / builder	209	209	--	209	263	--	--	--	--
Construction – speculative one- to four-family	--	--	--	- -	--	--	--	--	--
Construction - commercial	--	2,066	--	--	--	--	14	--	14
Construction – multi-family	345	810	--	173	652	--	--	--	--
Construction – land development	609	3,571	--	689	1,446	4	12	4	12
Land	6,930	9,392	--	5,996	6,303	11	27	7	15
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage	435	547	--	443	559	--	--	--	--
Other	8	8	--	8	3	--	--	--	--
Commercial business loans	30	445	--	37	41	--	2	--	2
Subtotal	23,607	33,702	--	23,725	27,480	178	595	120	403
With an allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	2,951	2,951	261	2,574	1,959	27	56	21	43
Multi-family	6,899	6,899	784	6,904	6,339	63	209	35	144
Commercial	7,258	7,978	679	5,294	3,672	--	24	--	3
Construction – custom and owner / builder	103	103	19	104	108	--	--	--	--
Construction – speculative one- to four-family	700	700	24	700	860	8	24	6	18
Construction – commercial	--	--	--	2,694	4,338	48	159	31	110
Construction – multi-family	--	--	--	185	74	--	--	--	--
Land	2,581	2,768	818	3,899	3,659	9	28	9	28
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage	643	643	105	643	524	5	27	4	20
Other	1	1	--	1	1	--	--	--	--
Commercial business loans	--	--	--	--	55	--	--	--	--
Subtotal	21,136	22,043	2,690	22,998	21,589	160	527	106	366
Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	4,032	4,113	261	4,234	3,937	41	76	35	59
Multi-family	6,899	7,881	784	6,904	6,339	63	210	35	145
Commercial	21,218	22,488	679	19,804	19,907	149	543	95	346
Construction – custom and owner / builder	312	312	19	313	371	--	--	--	--
Construction – speculative one- to four-family	700	700	24	700	860	8	24	6	18
Construction – commercial	--	2,066	--	2,694	4,338	48	173	31	124
Construction – multi-family	345	810	--	358	726	--	- -	--	--
Construction – land development	609	3,571	--	689	1,446	4	12	4	12
Land	9,511	12,160	818	9,895	9,962	20	55	16	43
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage	1,078	1,190	105	1,086	1,083	5	27	4	20
Other	9	9	--	9	4	--	--	--	--
Commercial business loans	30	445	--	37	96	--	2	--	2
Total	$ 44,743	$ 55,745	$ 2,690	$ 46,723	$ 49,069	$ 338	$ 1,122	$ 226	$ 769

(1)	For the three months ended June 30, 2012

(2)	For the nine months ended June 30, 2012

Following is a summary of information related to impaired loans as of and for the year ended September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance (Loan Balance Plus Charge Off)		Related Allowance		YTD Average Recorded Investment (1)		YTD Interest Income Recognized (1)		YTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (1)
With no related allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$	2,092	$	2,387	$	--	$	2,908	$	30	$	22
Multi-family		--		982		--		681		--		--
Commercial		18,137		19,279		--		14,623		1,060		573
Construction – custom and owner / builder		209		209		--		303		7		1
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		--		--		--		502		7		7
Construction – multi-family		632		1,135		--		1,287		4		4
Construction – land development		1,882		7,179		--		2,920		5		--
Land		8,198		11,533		--		7,883		69		42
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		669		719		--		430		26		16
Other		--		--		--		13		--		--
Commercial business loans		44		65		--		44		2		2
Subtotal		31,863		43,488		--		31,594		1,210		667

With an allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family		1,609		1,609		45		768		47		38
Multi-family		5,482		5,482		632		4,798		298		222
Commercial		1,185		1,185		255		1,409		50		118
Construction – custom and owner / builder		111		111		11		45		2		2
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		700		700		37		1,042		50		37
Construction – commercial		5,435		6,879		738		3,537		273		123
Construction – multi-family		--		--		--		65		--		--
Land		1,799		1,821		560		2,946		114		83
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		345		345		10		425		10		9
Other		1		1		1		1		--		--
Subtotal		16,667		18,133		2,289		15,036		844		632

Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family		3,701		3,996		45		3,676		77		60
Multi-family		5,482		6,464		632		5,479		298		222
Commercial		19,322		20,464		255		16,032		1,110		691
Construction – custom and owner / builder		320		320		11		348		9		3
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		700		700		37		1,544		57		44
Construction – commercial		5,435		6,879		738		3,537		273		123
Construction – multi-family		632		1,135		--		1,352		4		4
Construction – land development		1,882		7,179		--		2,920		5		--
Land		9,997		13,354		560		10,829		183		125
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		1,014		1,064		10		855		36		25
Other		1		1		1		14		--		--
Commercial business loans		44		65		--		44		2		2
Total	$	48,530	$	61,621	$	2,289	$	46,630	$	2,054	$	1,299

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(1)	For the year ended September 30, 2011

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s non-performing assets at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,			September 30,
	2012			2011
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family	$	2,123		$	2,150
Multi-family		1,449			--
Commercial		9,099			6,571
Construction – custom and owner / builder		313			320
Construction – speculative one- to four-family		--			--
Construction – commercial		--			688
Construction – multi-family		345			632
Construction – land development		609			1,882
Land		9,265			8,935
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		776			367
Other		9			--
Commercial business		30			44
Total loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis		24,018			21,589

Accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more		945			1,754

Total of non-accrual and 90 days past due loans		24,963			23,343

Non-accrual investment securities		2,484			2,796

OREO and other repossessed assets		9,997			10,811
Total non-performing assets (1)	$	37,444		$	36,950

Troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status (2)	$	14,579		$	18,166

Non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans as a percentage of loans receivable		4.55	%		4.32	%

Non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans as a percentage of total assets		3.42	%		3.16	%

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		5.14	%		5.01	%

Loans receivable (3)	$	548,772		$	539,970

Total assets	$	729,136		$	738,224

(1) Does not include troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status.

(2) Does not include troubled debt restructured loans totaling $9.32 million and $7.38 million reported as non-accrual loans at June 30, 2012 and September

30, 2011, respectively.

(3) Includes loans held for sale and before the allowance for loan losses.

Troubled debt restructured loans are loans for which the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial condition, has granted a significant concession to the borrower that it would otherwise not consider. The loan terms which have been modified or restructured due to a borrower’s financial difficulty, include but are not limited to: a reduction in the stated interest rate; an extension of the maturity at an interest rate below current market; a reduction in the face amount of the debt; a reduction in the accrued interest; or re-aging, extensions, deferrals and renewals. Troubled debt restructured loans are considered impaired loans and are individually evaluated for impairment. Troubled debt restructured loans can be classified as either accrual or non-accrual. The Company had $23.90 million in troubled debt restructured loans included in impaired loans at June 30, 2012 and had no commitments to lend additional funds on these loans. At June 30, 2012, $9.32 million of the $23.90 million in troubled debt restructured loans were on non-accrual status and included in non-performing loans. The Company had $25.54 million in troubled debt restructured loans included in impaired loans at September 30, 2011 and had $144,000 in commitments to lend additional funds on these loans. At September 30, 2011, $7.38 million of the $25.54 million in troubled debt restructured loans were on non-accrual status and included in non-performing loans.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s troubled debt restructurings by portfolio segment that occurred during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012	Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		End of Period Balance
One-to four-family		1	$	373	$	373	$	373
Land		1		249		249		238
Total		2	$	622	$	622	$	611

Year Ended September 30, 2011
	Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		End of Period Balance
One-to four-family		4	$	1,543	$	1,543	$	1,543
Commercial		2		3,394		3,717		3,145
Construction – commercial		2		6,800		5,451		5,435
Land		2		535		535		526
Home equity		2		303		303		303
Total		12	$	12,575	$	11,549	$	10,952

There was one commercial real estate troubled debt restructured loan with a balance of $919,000 and one land troubled debt restructured loan with a balance of $147,000 that were modified during the year ended September 30, 2011 and subsequently defaulted. There were no troubled debt restructured loans that were recorded in the twelve months prior to June 30, 2012 that have subsequently defaulted.

(7) NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without considering any dilutive items. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares and common stock equivalents for items that are dilutive, net of shares assumed to be repurchased using the treasury stock method at the average share price for the Company’s common stock during the period. Dilutive net loss per common share is the same as basic net loss per common share due to the anti-dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. Common stock equivalents arise from the assumed conversion of outstanding stock options and the outstanding warrant to purchase common stock. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance for stock compensation, shares owned by the Bank’s ESOP that have not been allocated are not considered to be outstanding for the purpose of computing basic and diluted net income per common share. At June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were 264,520 and 299,786 shares, respectively, that had not been allocated under the Bank’s ESOP.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Basic net income (loss) per common share computation
Numerator – net income (loss)	$	1,348		$	(1,280	)	$	3,438		$	1,162
Preferred stock dividends		(208	)		(208	)		(624	)		(624	)
Preferred stock discount accretion		(61	)		(57	)		(179	)		(168	)
Net income (loss) to common shareholders	$	1,079		$	(1,545	)	$	2,635		$	370

Denominator – weighted average common shares outstanding		6,780,516			6,745,250			6,780,516			6,745,250

Basic net income (loss) per common share	$	0.16		$	(0.23	)	$	0.39		$	0.05

Diluted net income (loss) per common share computation
Numerator – net income (loss)	$	1,348		$	(1,280	)	$	3,438		$	1,162
Preferred stock dividend		(208	)		(208	)		(624	)		(624	)
Preferred stock discount accretion		(61	)		(57	)		(179	)		(168	)
Net income (loss) to common shareholders	$	1,079		$	(1,545	)	$	2,635		$	370

Denominator – weighted average common shares outstanding		6,780,516			6,745,250			6,780,516			6,745,250
Effect of dilutive stock options (1)(2)		--			--			--			237
Effect of dilutive stock warrant (3)		--			--			--			--
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents		6,780,516			6,745,250			6,780,516			6,745,487

Diluted net income (loss) per common share	$	0.16		$	(0.23	)	$	0.39		$	0.05

____________________________________________

(1) For the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2012, options to purchase 110,726 and 133,652 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock, and, therefore, their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011, options to purchase 140,545 and 168,186 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock, and, therefore, their effect would have been anti-dilutive

(2) For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the dilutive effect of dilutive stock options was computed to be 710 shares. However, the dilutive effect of these stock options has been excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2011 because the Company reported a net loss for the period, and, therefore, their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

(3) For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, a warrant to purchase 370,899 shares of common stock was outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share because the warrant’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock, and, therefore, its effect would have been anti-dilutive.

(8) STOCK PLANS AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Option Plans

Under the Company’s stock option plans (the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2003 Stock Option Plan), the Company was able to grant options for up to a combined total of 1,622,500 shares of common stock to employees, officers and directors. Shares issued may be purchased in the open market or may be issued from authorized and unissued shares. The exercise price of each option equals the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Generally, options vest in 20% annual installments on each of the five anniversaries from the date of the grant. At June 30, 2012, options for 219,938 shares are available for future grant under the 2003 Stock Option Plan and no shares are available for future grant under the 1999 Stock Option Plan.

Activity under the plans for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012					Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding, beginning of period		137,726		$	9.25		194,864		$	8.71
Granted		33,500			4.01		--			--
Forfeited		(6,200	)		6.06		(57,138	)		7.42
Options outstanding, end of period		165,026		$	8.30		137,726		$	9.25

Options exercisable, end of period		119,326		$	9.89		117,326		$	10.06

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at June 30, 2012 was $45,000.

At June 30, 2012, there were 45,700 unvested options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $68,000, all of which the Company assumes will vest. The aggregate intrinsic value of unvested options at June 30, 2012 was $40,000. There were 5,000 options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $6,000 that vested during the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

At June 30, 2011, there were 20,400 unvested options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $26,000, all of which the Company assumes will vest. There were 5,200 options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $7,000 that vested during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate of a similar term as the stock option at the particular grant date. The expected life is based on historical data, vesting terms and estimated exercise dates. The expected dividend yield is based on the most recent quarterly dividend on an annualized basis in effect at the time the options were granted. The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. There were 33,500 options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 with an aggregate grant date fair value of $52,000. There were no options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was used in estimating the fair value of option grants. The weighted average assumptions used for options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 were:

Expected Volatility		44%
Expected term (in years)		5
Expected dividend yield		--%

Risk free interest rate		0.89%
Grant date fair value per share		$1.56

Stock Grant Plan

The Company adopted the Management Recognition and Development Plan (“MRDP”) in 1998 for the benefit of employees, officers and directors of the Company. The objective of the MRDP is to retain and attract personnel of experience and ability in key positions by providing them with a proprietary interest in the Company.

The MRDP allowed for the issuance to participants of up to 529,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Awards under the MRDP are made in the form of shares of common stock that are subject to restrictions on the transfer of ownership and are subject to a five-year vesting period. Compensation expense is the amount of the fair value of the common stock at the date of the grant to the plan participants and is recognized over a five-year vesting period, with 20% vesting on each of the five anniversaries from the date of the grant.

There were no MRDP shares granted to officers or directors during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

At June 30, 2012, there were a total of 11,561 unvested MRDP shares with an aggregated grant date fair value of $104,000. There were 10,831 MRDP shares that vested during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 with an aggregated grant date fair value of $130,000. There were 100 MRDP shares forfeited during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 with a grant date fair value of $1,000. At June 30, 2012, there were no shares available for future awards under the MRDP.

At June 30, 2011, there were a total of 24,892 unvested MRDP shares with an aggregated grant date fair value of $273,000. There were 11,033 MRDP shares that vested during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 with an aggregated grant date fair value of $132,000. There were 500 MRDP shares forfeited during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 with a grant date fair value of $5,000. At June 30, 2011, there were no shares available for future awards under the MRDP.

Expenses for Stock Compensation Plans

Compensation expenses for all stock-based plans were as follows:

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012				2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Stock Options		Stock Grants		Stock Options		Stock Grants
Compensation expense recognized in income	$	11	$	85	$	5	$	129
Related tax benefit recognized		4		29		2		44

As of June 30, 2012, the compensation expense yet to be recognized for stock-based awards that have been awarded but not vested for the years ending September 30 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Stock Options		Stock Grants		Total Awards
Remainder of 2012	$	5	$	20	$	25
2013		17		38		55
2014		17		2		19
2015		11		--		11
2016		10		--		10
2017		2		--		2
Total	$	62	$	60	$	122

(9) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

GAAP requires disclosure of estimated fair values for financial instruments. Such estimates are subjective in nature, and significant judgment is required regarding the risk characteristics of various financial instruments at a discrete point in time. Therefore, such estimates could vary significantly if assumptions regarding uncertain factors were to change. In addition, as the Company normally intends to hold the majority of its financial instruments until maturity, it does not

expect to realize many of the estimated amounts disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for certain items which are not defined as financial instruments but which may have significant value. The Company does not believe that it would be practicable to estimate a representational fair value for these types of items as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011. Because GAAP excludes certain items from fair value disclosure requirements, any aggregation of the fair value amounts presented would not represent the underlying value of the Company.

Accounting guidance regarding fair value measurements defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP. Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The following definitions describe the levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting

entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as

quoted prices in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or

can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the

assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information

available in the circumstances.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value on a recurring basis:

MBS and Other Investments Available for Sale

The estimated fair value of MBS and other investments are based upon the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the security. Such assumptions include quoted market prices (Level 1), market prices of similar securities or observable inputs (Level 2).

The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

	Estimated Fair Value
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Available for Sale Securities
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	- -	$	3,140	$	- -	$	3,140
Private label residential		- -		968		- -		968
Mutual funds		1,005		--		- -		1,005
Total	$	1,005	$	4,108	$	- -	$	5,113

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Estimated Fair Value
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Available for Sale Securities
MBS:
U.S. government agencies	$	- -	$	4,583	$	- -	$	4,583
Private label residential		- -		1,134		- -		1,134
Mutual funds		1,000		- -		- -		1,000
Total	$	1,000	$	5,717	$	- -	$	6,717

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year ended September 30, 2011.

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

The Company uses the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

Impaired Loans: A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The specific reserve for collateral dependent impaired loans was based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell. The estimated fair value of collateral was determined based primarily on appraisals. In some cases, adjustments were made to the appraised values due to various factors including age of the appraisal, age of comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.

MBS and Other Investments Held to Maturity: The estimated fair value of MBS and other investments are based upon the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the security. Such assumptions include quoted market prices (Level 1), market prices of similar securities or observable inputs (Level 2) and unobservable inputs such as dealer quotes, discounted cash flows or similar techniques (Level 3).

OREO and Other Repossessed Assets, net: The Company’s OREO and other repossessed assets are initially recorded at estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. This amount becomes the property’s new basis. Estimated fair value was generally determined by management based on a number of factors, including third-party appraisals of estimated fair value in an orderly sale. Estimated costs to sell were based on standard market factors. The valuation of OREO and other repossessed items is subject to significant external and internal judgment.

MSRs: The fair value of the MSRs was determined using a third-party model, which incorporates the expected life of the loans, estimated cost to service the loans, servicing fees received and other factors. The estimated fair value is calculated by stratifying the mortgage servicing rights based on the predominant risk characteristics that include the underlying loan’s interest rate, cash flows of the loan, origination date and term.

The following table summarizes the balances of assets measured at estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2012, and the total losses resulting from these estimated fair value adjustments for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

	Estimated Fair Value
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Impaired loans:
Mortgage Loans;
One-to four-family	$	- -	$	- -	$	2,951	$	233
Multi-family		- -		- -		6,899		- -
Commercial		- -		- -		7,258		669
Construction – custom and owner / builder		- -		- -		103		- -
Construction – speculative one-to four-family		- -		- -		700		40
Land		- -		- -		2,581		413
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		- -		- -		643		114
Other		- -		- -		1		- -
Total impaired loans (1)		- -		- -		21,136		1,469


MBS – held to maturity (2):
Private label residential		- -		193		- -		147
OREO and other repossessed items (3)		- -		- -		9,997		1,136
MSRs (4)		- -		- -		2,150		- -
Total	$	- -	$	193	$	33,283	$	2,752

_______________________

(1)	The loss represents charge offs on collateral dependent loans for estimated fair value adjustment based on the estimated fair value of the collateral.

(2)	The loss represents OTTI credit-related charges on held-to-maturity MBS.

(3)	The loss represents management periodic reviews of the recorded value to determine whether the property continues to be recorded at the lower of its recorded book value or estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell.

(4)	The amount of impairment recognized is the amount, if any, by which the amortized cost of the rights exceeds its estimated fair value. Impairment, if deemed temporary, is recognized through a valuation allowance to the extent that estimated fair value is less than the recorded amount.

The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2011 and the total losses resulting from these estimated fair value adjustments for the year ended September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Estimated Fair Value
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Losses
Impaired loans:
Mortgage Loans;
One-to four-family	$	- -	$	- -	$	1,609	$	543
Multi-family		- -		- -		5,482		- -
Commercial		- -		- -		1,185		47
Construction – custom and owner / builder		- -		- -		111		48
Construction – speculative one-to four-family		- -		- -		700		103
Construction – commercial		- -		- -		5,435		1,444
Land		- -		- -		1,799		1,704
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage		- -		- -		345		150
Other		- -		- -		1		30
Total impaired loans		- -		- -		16,667		4,069

MBS – held to maturity (2):
Private label residential		- -		211		- -		421
OREO and other repossessed items (3)		- -		- -		10,811		1,305
MSRs (4)		- -		- -		2,108		- -
Total	$	- -	$	211	$	29,586	$	5,795

_______________________

(1)	The loss represents charge offs on collateral dependent loans for estimated fair value adjustment based on the estimated fair value of the collateral.

(2)	The loss represents OTTI credit-related charges on held-to-maturity MBS.

(3)	The loss represents management periodic reviews of the recorded value to determine whether the property continues to be recorded at the lower of its recorded book value or estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell.

(4)	The amount of impairment recognized is the amount, if any, by which the amortized cost of the rights exceed their estimated fair value. Impairment, if deemed temporary, is recognized through a valuation allowance to the extent that estimated fair value is less than the recorded amount.

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the date indicated (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2012
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input(s)	Range


Impaired loans	$	21,136	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs	NA

Other real estate owned	$	9,997	Market approach	Lower of appraised value or listing price less selling costs	NA

MSRs	$	2,150	Discounted cashflows	Discount rate Prepayment Speeds	10.08% - 12.50% 279 to 559

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change, and that change may either be favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to appropriately manage interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed interest rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising interest rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling interest rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed interest rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising interest rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling interest rate environment. Management monitors interest rates and maturities of assets and liabilities, and attempts to manage interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimate fair value of its other financial instruments:

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The estimated fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or re-price frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have an estimated fair value equal to the recorded value.

CDs Held for Investment: The estimated fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or re-price frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have an estimated fair value equal to the recorded value.

FHLB Stock: FHLB stock is not publicly traded and it is not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

Loans Receivable, Net: At June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, because of illiquid market for loan sales, loans were priced using comparable market statistics. The loan portfolio was segregated into various categories and a weighted average valuation discount that approximated similar loan sales was applied to each category.

Loans Held for Sale: The estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices obtained from the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

Accrued Interest: The recorded amount of accrued interest approximates the estimated fair value.

Deposits: The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity date is included at the amount payable on demand. The estimated fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is computed by discounting future cash flows using the rates currently offered by the Bank for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

FHLB Advances: The estimated fair value of FHLB advances is computed by discounting the future cash flows of the borrowings at a rate which approximates the current offering rate of the borrowings with a comparable remaining life.

Repurchase Agreements: The recorded value of repurchase agreements approximates the estimated fair value due to the short-term nature of the borrowings.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: Since the majority of the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments consist of variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined that they do not have a distinguishable estimated fair value

The estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Recorded Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial Assets

Cash and cash equivalents	$	92,988	$	92,988	$	92,988	$	- -	$	- -
CDs held for investment		22,781		22,781		22,781		- -		- -
MBS and other investments		8,616		8,764		1,035		7,729		- -
FHLB stock		5,705		N/A		N/A		- -		- -
Loans receivable, net		533,105		491,809		- -		- -		491,809
Loans held for sale		4,064		4,194		4,194		- -		- -
Accrued interest receivable		2,161		2,161		2,161		- -		- -

Financial Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	70,004	$	70,004	$	70,004	$	- -	$	- -
Interest-bearing		520,362		522,501		311,888		- -		210,613
Total deposits		590,366		592,505		381,892		- -		210,613
FHLB advances		45,000		50,624		- -		50,624		- -
Repurchase agreements		826		826		826		- -		- -
Accrued interest payable		429		467		467		- -		- -

	September 30, 2011
	Recorded Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	112,065	$	112,065
CDs held for investment		18,659		18,659
MBS and other investments		10,862		10,946
FHLB stock		5,705		N/A
Loans receivable, net		523,980		490,322
Loans held for sale		4,044		4,185
Accrued interest receivable		2,411		2,411

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	592,678	$	595,331
FHLB advances – long term		55,000		61,009
Repurchase agreements		729		729
Accrued interest payable		545		545

(10) RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance regarding testing goodwill for impairment. The new guidance allows an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance that defers the effective date of the requirement to present separate line items on the income statement for reclassification adjustments of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net income. The deferral is temporary until FASB reconsiders the operational concerns and needs of financial

statement users. The FASB has not yet announced a timetable for its reconsideration. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following analysis discusses the material changes in the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012. This analysis as well as other sections of this report contains certain “forward-looking statements.”

Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning our future operations. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future economic performance and projections of financial items. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets which may lead to increased losses and non-performing assets in our loan portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses, and require us to materially increase our loan loss reserves; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market; results of examinations of us by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and our bank subsidiary by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks or other regulatory authorities, including our compliance with the memoranda of understandings (“MOU”) and the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, institute a formal or informal enforcement action against us or our bank subsidiary which could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits or impose additional requirements and restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; our compliance with regulatory enforcement actions; the requirements and restrictions that have been imposed upon the Company and the Bank under the MOUs with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (in the case of the Company) and the FDIC and the Washington DFI (in the case of the Bank) and the possibility that the Company and the Bank will be unable to fully comply with their respective MOUs, which could result in the imposition of additional requirements or restrictions; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules and any changes in the rules applicable to institutions participating in the TARP Capital Purchase Program; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing regulations; our ability to attract and retain deposits; further increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our consolidated balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; the failure or security breach of computer systems on which we depend; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our business strategies; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; our ability to pay dividends on our common and preferred stock; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations; pricing, products and services; and other risks detailed in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our 2011 Form 10-K.

Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this Form 10-Q and in the other public statements we make are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this report or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These risks could cause our actual results for 2012 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of us, and could negatively affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as well as its stock price performance.

Overview

Timberland Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for Timberland Bank. The Bank opened for business in 1915 and serves consumers and businesses across Grays Harbor, Thurston, Pierce, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties, Washington with a full range of lending and deposit services through its 22 branches (including its main office in Hoquiam). At June 30, 2012, the Company had total assets of $729.14 million and total shareholders’ equity of $89.28 million. The Company’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report relates primarily to the Bank’s operations.

The profitability of the Company’s operations depends primarily on its net interest income after provision for loan losses. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that the Company earns on interest-earning assets, comprised of primarily loans and investments, and interest expense, the amount the Company pays on its interest-bearing liabilities, which are primarily deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets, interest earned on those assets, the volume and mix of interest bearing liabilities and interest paid on those interest bearing liabilities. Management strives to match the re-pricing characteristics of the interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities to protect net interest income from changes in market interest rates and changes in the shape of the yield curve.

The provision for loan losses is dependent on changes in the loan portfolio and management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan portfolio as well as prevailing economic and market conditions. The provision for loan losses reflects the amount that the Company believes is adequate to cover potential credit losses in its loan portfolio.

Net income is also affected by non-interest income and non-interest expenses. For the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2012, non-interest income consisted primarily of service charges on deposit accounts, gain on sale of loans, ATM transaction fees, an increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance and other operating income. Non-interest income is increased by valuation recoveries on MSRs and reduced by valuation allowances on MSRs. Non-interest income is reduced by net OTTI losses on MBS and other investments. Non-interest expenses consisted primarily of salaries and employee benefits, premises and equipment, advertising, ATM expenses, OREO expenses, postage and courier expenses, professional fees, deposit insurance premiums, other insurance premiums, state and local taxes, loan administration and foreclosure expenses, deposit operation expenses and data processing expenses and telecommunication expenses. Non-interest income and non-interest expenses are affected by the growth of our operations and growth in the number of loan and deposit accounts.

Results of operations may be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

The Bank is a community-oriented bank which has traditionally offered a variety of savings products to its retail customers while concentrating its lending activities on real estate mortgage loans. Lending activities have been focused primarily on the origination of loans secured by real estate, including residential construction loans, one- to four-family residential loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans and land loans. The Bank originates adjustable-rate

residential mortgage loans that do not qualify for sale in the secondary market. The Bank also originates commercial business loans.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company has identified several accounting policies that as a result of judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” That discussion highlights estimates the Company makes that involve uncertainty or potential for substantial change. There have not been any material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the disclosure contained in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011

The Company’s total assets decreased by $9.09 million, or 1.2%, to $729.14 million at June 30, 2012 from $738.22 million at September 30, 2011. The decrease in total assets was primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents, which were used to increase CDs held for investment, fund new loans and repay FHLB advances.

Net loans receivable increased by $9.15 million, or 1.7%, to $537.17 million at June 30, 2012 from $528.02 million at September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in commercial real estate loan balances, multi-family loan balances, commercial real estate construction loan balances, commercial business loan balances and custom and owner/builder construction loan balances. These increases were partially offset by decreases in multi-family construction loan balances, land loan balances, one-to four-family loan balances, consumer loan balances and land development loan balances.

Total deposits decreased by $2.31 million, or 0.4%, to $590.37 million at June 30, 2012 from $592.68 million at September 30, 2011, primarily as a result of decreases in certificates of deposit account balances and N.O.W. checking account balances. These decreases were partially offset by increases in money market account balances, non-interest bearing account balances and savings account balances.

Shareholders’ equity increased by $3.07 million, or 3.6%, to $89.28 million at June 30, 2012 from $86.21 million at September 30, 2011. The increase in shareholders’ equity was primarily a result of net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

A more detailed explanation of the changes in significant balance sheet categories follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents and CDs Held for Investment: Cash and cash equivalents and CDs held for investment decreased by $14.96 million or 11.4%, to $115.77 million at June 30, 2012 from $130.72 million at September 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a $19.08 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents, which was partially offset by a $4.12 million increase in CDs held for investment.

MBS (Mortgage-backed Securities) and Other Investments: MBS and other investments decreased by $2.25 million, or 20.7%, to $8.62 million at June 30, 2012 from $10.86 million at September 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily a result of scheduled amortization and prepayments on MBS, the sale of a $722,000 U.S. government agency MBS and OTTI charges recorded on private label residential MBS. For additional information on MBS and other investments, see Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 1, Financial Statements.”

Loans: Net loans receivable increased by $9.15 million, or 1.7%, to $537.17 million at June 30, 2012 from $528.02 million at September 30, 2011. The increase in the portfolio was primarily a result of a $12.51 million increase in commercial real estate loan balances, a $7.16 million increase in multi-family loan balances, a $5.06 million increase in commercial real estate construction loan balances, a $3.54 million increase in commercial business loan balances and a $1.44 million increase in custom and owner/builder construction loan balances. These increases to net loans receivable were partially offset by an $8.98 million decrease in multi-family construction loan balances, a $7.96 million decrease in land loan balances, a $5.06 million decrease in one-to four-family loan balances, a $3.76 million decrease in consumer

loan balances and a $1.57 million decrease in land development loan balances. Also impacting the net loans receivable was a $6.03 million decrease in the undisbursed portion of construction loans in process.

Loan originations increased to $165.61 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $123.20 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in loan originations was primarily due to increased demand for commercial real estate loans and increased refinance activity for single family home loans. The Company continued to sell longer-term fixed rate loans for asset liability management purposes and to generate non-interest income. The Company sold fixed rate one- to four-family mortgage loans totaling $68.03 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $46.43 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

For additional information, see Note 6 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 1, Financial Statements.”

Premises and Equipment: Premises and equipment increased by $330,000, or 1.9%, to $17.72 million at June 30, 2012 from $17.39 million at September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the remodeling of a vacant branch office building into office space for administrative personnel.

OREO (Other Real Estate Owned): OREO and other repossessed assets decreased by $814,000, or 7.5%, to $10.00 million at June 30, 2012 from $10.81 million at September 30, 2011, primarily due to the sale of OREO properties. During the nine months ended June 30, 2012, 32 OREO properties and other repossessed assets totaling $4.91 million were sold.

Goodwill and CDI: The recorded value of goodwill of $5.65 million at June 30, 2012 was unchanged from September 30, 2011. The amortized value of the CDI decreased $111,000, or 28.0%, to $286,000 at June 30, 2012 from $397,000 at September 30, 2011. The decrease was attributable to scheduled amortization of the CDI.

Prepaid FDIC Insurance Assessment: The prepaid FDIC insurance assessment decreased $688,000, or 32.7%, to $1.42 million at June 30, 2012 from $2.10 million at September 30, 2011 as a portion of the prepaid amount was expensed.

Deposits: Deposits decreased by $2.31 million, or 0.4%, to $590.37 million at June 30, 2012 from $592.68 million at September 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily a result of a $19.75 million decrease in certificates of deposit account balances to $208.47 million and a $5.48 million decrease in N.O.W. checking account balances to $149.82 million at June 30, 2012. These decreases were partially offset by a $12.83 million increase in money market account balances to $73.86 million, a $5.51 million increase in non-interest bearing account balances to $70.00 million and a $4.57 million increase in savings account balances to $88.21 million at June 30, 2012. The Company had no brokered deposits at June 30, 2012 or September 30, 2011.

FHLB Advances: The Company has short- and long-term borrowing lines with the FHLB of Seattle with total credit available on the lines equal to 30% of the Bank’s total assets, limited by available collateral. Borrowings are considered short-term when the original maturity is less than one year. At June 30, 2012 FHLB advances and other borrowings consisted of long-term FHLB advances with scheduled maturities at various dates in 2017 and bear interest at rates ranging from 3.69% to 4.34%. A portion of these advances may be called by the FHLB at a date earlier than the scheduled maturity date. The weighted average interest rate on FHLB borrowings at June 30, 2012 was 4.10%. FHLB advances decreased by $10.00 million, or 18.2%, to $45.00 million at June 30, 2012 from $55.00 million at September 30, 2011, as the Bank used a portion of its liquid assets to repay maturing FHLB advances.

Shareholders’ Equity: Total shareholders’ equity increased by $3.07 million, or 3.6%, to $89.28 million at June 30, 2012 from $86.21 million at September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to net income of $3.44 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

The FRB has denied the Company’s requests to pay all quarterly cash dividends on its outstanding Series A Preferred Stock held by the Treasury. The Company did, however, receive approval from the FRB during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 to pay $1.00 million in dividends and interest accrued on missed dividend payments. Cash dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are cumulative and accrue and compound on each subsequent date. Accordingly, during the

deferral period, the Company will continue to accrue, and reflect in the consolidated financial statements, the deferred dividends on the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock. As a result of not receiving permission from the FRB to pay all dividends, the Company had not made five quarterly dividend payments (four full payments and one partial payment) as of June 30, 2012. At June 30, 2012, the Company has accrued preferred stock dividends in arrears of $900,000. The Company applied to the FRB for permission to pay the remaining accrued dividends, the interest accrued on the unpaid dividends and the dividend payment due on August 15, 2012. The Company is currently waiting for a response from the FRB.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

The Company reported net income of $1.35 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss of $(1.28) million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Net income to common shareholders after adjusting for the preferred stock dividend and the preferred stock discount accretion was $1.08 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss of $(1.55 million) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase in earnings for the quarter was primarily a result of a decreased provision for loan losses, decreased non-interest expense, increased non-interest income and increased net interest income. Net income per diluted common share was $0.16 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss per diluted common share of $(0.23) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

The Company reported net income of $3.44 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net income of $1.16 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. Net income to common shareholders after adjusting for the preferred stock dividends and the preferred stock discount accretion was $2.64 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net income of $370,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily a result of a decreased provision for loan losses, decreased non-interest expense, increased non-interest income and increased net interest income. Net income per diluted common share was $0.39 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net income per diluted common share of $0.05 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

A more detailed explanation of the income statement categories is presented below.

Net Income: Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 increased by $2.63 million to $1.35 million from a net loss of $(1.28 million) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Net income to common shareholders after adjusting for preferred stock dividend of $208,000 and preferred stock discount accretion of $61,000 was $1.08 million, or $0.16 per diluted common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, compared to a loss of $(1.55 million), or $(0.23) per diluted common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

The increase in net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was primarily the result of a $2.50 million decrease in provision for loan losses, a $685,000 decrease in non-interest expense, a $580,000 increase in non-interest income and a $216,000 increase in net interest income. These increases to net income were partially offset by a $1.35 million increase in the provision for federal and state income taxes.

Net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 increased by $2.28 million, or 195.9%, to $3.44 million from the net income of $1.16 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. Net income to common shareholders after adjusting for preferred stock dividends of $624,000 and preferred stock discount accretion of $179,000 was $2.64 million, or $0.39 per diluted common share for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $370,000, or $0.05 per diluted common share for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

The increase in net income for nine months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily the result of a $2.40 million decrease in provision for loan losses, a $458,000 increase in non-interest income, a $445,000 decrease in non-interest expense and a $107,000 increase in net interest income. The increases to net income were partially offset by a $1.13 million increase in the provision for federal and state income taxes.

Net Interest Income: Net interest income increased by $216,000, or 3.4%, to $6.63 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $6.41 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase in net interest income was primarily attributable to an increase of 0.20% in the net interest margin, which was partially offset by a decrease of $12.81 million in average total interest-bearing assets.

Total interest and dividend income decreased by $412,000 or 4.9%, to $8.02 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $8.43 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as the yield on interest bearing assets decreased to 4.79% from 4.94% for the same period last year. The decrease in the weighted average yield on interest bearing assets was primarily a result of decreased market rates for loans. Total interest expense decreased by $628,000, or 31.1%, to $1.39 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $2.02 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased to 0.98% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from 1.37% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in funding costs was primarily a result of a decrease in overall market rates and a change in the composition of the funding base as the percentage of certificates of deposit account balances and FHLB advances decreased. The net interest margin increased to 3.96% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from 3.76% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Net interest income increased by $107,000, or 0.6%, to $19.20 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $19.10 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in net interest income was primarily attributable to an increase of 0.02% in the net interest margin and an increase of $277,000 in average total interest-bearing assets.

Total interest and dividend income decreased by $1.88 million or 7.3%, to $23.86 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $25.74 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as the yield on interest bearing assets for the same respective periods decreased to 4.73% from 5.10%. The decrease in the weighted average yield on interest bearing assets was primarily a result of decreased market rates for loans. Total interest expense decreased by $1.99 million, or 29.9%, to $4.65 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $6.64 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased to 1.08% for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from 1.52% for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in funding costs was primarily a result of a decrease in overall market rates and a change in the composition of the funding base as the percentage of certificates of deposit account balances and FHLB advances decreased. The net interest margin increased to 3.80% for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from 3.78% for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Cost

The following tables sets forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and average yields and costs. Such yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. (Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012							2011
	Average		Interest and		Yield/			Average		Interest and		Yield/
	Balance		Dividends		Cost			Balance		Dividends		Cost

Interest-bearing assets: (1)
Loans receivable (2)	$	548,450	$	7,842		5.72	%	$	537,858	$	8,192		6.09	%
MBS and other investments (2)		7,824		89		4.55			11,256		141		5.01
FHLB stock and equity securities		6,706		6		0.36			6,676		8		0.48
Interest-bearing deposits		106,735		82		0.31			126,739		90		0.28
Total interest-bearing assets		669,715		8,019		4.79			682,529		8,431		4.94
Non-interest-bearing assets		63,528							60,678
Total assets	$	733,243						$	743,207

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts	$	88,696		54		0.24		$	76,411		107		0.56
Money market accounts		71,122		81		0.46			57,984		94		0.65
N.O.W. accounts		151,578		150		0.40			158,905		340		0.86
Certificates of deposit		212,854		640		1.21			242,573		922		1.52
Short-term borrowings		818		-		0.05			509		-		0.05
Long-term borrowings (3)		45,000		466		4.15			55,000		556		4.05
Total interest-bearing liabilities		570,068		1,391		0.98			591,382		2,019		1.37
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		74,640							64,028
Total liabilities		644,708							655,410
Shareholders' equity		88,535							87,797
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity	$	733,243						$	743,207


Net interest income			$	6,628						$	6,412

Interest rate spread						3.81	%						3.57	%
Net interest margin (4)						3.96	%						3.76	%
Ratio of average interest-bearing assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						117.48	%						115 .41	%

(1)	Interest yield on loans and MBS is calculated assuming a 30/360 basis; interest yield on all other categories is based on daily interest basis.

(2)	Average balances include loans and MBS on non-accrual status.

(3)	Includes FHLB advances with original maturities of one year or greater.

(4)	Net interest income divided by total average interest bearing assets, annualized.

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012							2011
	Average		Interest and		Yield/			Average		Interest and		Yield/
	Balance		Dividends		Cost			Balance		Dividends		Cost

Interest-bearing assets: (1)
Loans receivable (2)	$	542,378	$	23,254		5.72	%	$	537,782	$	24,966		6.19	%
MBS and other investments (2)		8,825		323		4.88			12,056		486		5.37
FHLB stock and equity securities		6,704		26		0.52			6,677		23		0.46
Interest-bearing deposits		115,142		252		0.29			116,257		260		0.30
Total interest-bearing assets		673,049		23,855		4.73			672,772		25,735		5.10
Non-interest-bearing assets		61,089							59,269
Total assets	$	734,138						$	732,041

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts	$	86,664		214		0.33		$	71,723		355		0.66
Money market accounts		67,655		263		0.52			57,919		342		0.79
N.O.W. accounts		153,829		516		0.45			157,397		1,140		0.97
Certificates of deposit		218,535		2,135		1.30			242,697		2,968		1.64
Short-term borrowings		671		-		0.05			514		-		0.05
Long-term borrowings (3)		48,467		1,525		4.19			55,000		1,835		4.46
Total interest-bearing liabilities		575,821		4,653		1.08			585,250		6,640		1.52
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		70,769							60,105
Total liabilities		646,590							645,355
Shareholders' equity		87,548							86,686
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity	$	734,138						$	732,041


Net interest income			$	19,202						$	19,095

Interest rate spread						3.65	%						3.58	%
Net interest margin (4)						3.80	%						3.78	%
Ratio of average interest-bearing assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						116.89	%						114.95	%

(1)	Interest yield on loans and MBS is calculated assuming a 30/360 basis; interest yield on all other categories is based on daily interest basis.

(2)	Average balances include loans and MBS on non-accrual status.

(3)	Includes FHLB advances with original maturities of one year or greater.

(4)	Net interest income divided by total average interest bearing assets, annualized.

Rate Volume Analysis

The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on the net interest income of the Company. Information is provided with respect to the (i) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), and (ii) effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), and (iii) the net change (sum of the prior columns). Changes in rate/volume have been allocated to rate and volume variances based on the absolute values of each. (In thousands)

	Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011 increase (decrease) due to									Nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to nine months ended June 30, 2011 increase (decrease) due to
	Rate			Volume			Net Change			Rate			Volume			Net Change
Interest-bearing assets:
Loans receivable (1)	$	(509	)	$	159		$	(350	)	$	(1,668	)	$	(44	)	$	(1,712	)
MBS and other
investments		(12	)		(40	)		(52	)		(42	)		(121	)		(163	)
FHLB stock and equity
securities		(2	)		--			(2	)		3			--			3
Interest-bearing deposits		7			(15	)		(8	)		(6	)		(2	)		(8	)
Total net (decrease) increase in
income on interest-earning assets		(516	)		104			(412	)		(1,713	)		(167	)		(1,880	)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts		(69	)		16			(53	)		(134	)		(7	)		(141	)
N.O.W accounts		(175	)		(15	)		(190	)		(599	)		(25	)		(624	)
Money market accounts		(31	)		18			(13	)		(79	)		-			(79	)
CD accounts		(178	)		(104	)		(282	)		(557	)		(276	)		(833	)
Short-term borrowings		--			--			--			--			--			--
Long-term borrowings		13			(103	)		(90	)		(100	)		(210	)		(310	)

Total net decrease in expense
on interest-bearing
liabilities		(440	)		(188	)		(628	)		(1,469	)		(518	)		(1,987	)

Net increase (decrease)
in net interest income	$	(76	)	$	292		$	216		$	(244	)	$	351		$	107

(1) Excludes interest on non-accrual loans. Includes loans originated for sale.

Provision for Loan Losses: The provision for loan losses decreased $2.50 million, or 73.5%, to $900,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $3.40 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 were $1.56 million compared to $3.41 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

The provision for loan losses decreased $2.40 million, or 48.0% to $2.60 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $5.00 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. Net charge-offs for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 were $2.94 million compared to $4.47 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.

The decrease in the provision for loan losses during the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to decreased net charge-offs and a change in the composition of the loan portfolio as the level of higher risk loan categories

(construction and land development loans and land loans) decreased $28.34 million to $89.91 million at June 30, 2012 from $118.26 million at June 30, 2011.

The Company has established a comprehensive methodology for determining the provision for loan losses. On a quarterly basis the Company performs an analysis that considers pertinent factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The factors include changes in the amount and composition of the loan portfolio, historic loss experience for various loan segments, changes in economic conditions, delinquency rates, a detailed analysis of impaired loans, and other factors to determine an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses. Based on its comprehensive analysis, management believes the allowance for loan losses of $11.60 million at June 30, 2012 (2.11% of loans receivable and loans held for sale and 46.5% of non-performing loans) was adequate to provide for probable losses based on an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio at that date. Impaired loans are subjected to an impairment analysis to determine an appropriate reserve amount to be held against each loan. The aggregate principal impairment reserve amount determined at June 30, 2012 was $2.69 million. The allowance for loan losses was $11.79 million (2.21% of loans receivable and loans held for sale and 44.6% of non-performing loans) at June 30, 2011.

While management believes the estimates and assumptions used in its determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional reserves based upon their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses would adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. For additional information, see Note 6 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 1, Financial Statements.”

Non-interest Income: Total non-interest income increased $580,000, or 32.9%, to $2.34 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $1.76 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily a result of a $320,000 increase in gain on sale of loans, a $128,000 decrease in net OTTI on MBS and other investments, a $55,000 reduction in the valuation allowance on MSRs and a $49,000 increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees. The increase in gain on sale of loans was primarily a result of an increased volume of fixed rate one-to four-family loans sold during quarter ended June 30, 2012.

Total non-interest income increased $458,000, or 6.7%, to $7.28 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $6.82 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily a result of a $508,000 increase in gain on sale of loans, a $237,000 increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees, a $146,000 decrease in net OTTI on MBS and other investments and a $96,000 increase in BOLI net earnings. These increases to non-interest income were partially offset by a $559,000 decrease in the valuation recovery on MSRs. The increase in gain on sale of loans was primarily a result of an increased volume of fixed rate one-to four-family loans sold during the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

The valuation recovery on MSRs was based on a third party valuation of the MSR asset. The Company recorded a valuation recovery on MSRs of $144,000 during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a recovery of $703,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2012, the MSR asset had a remaining valuation allowance of $340,000 that is available for future recovery.

Non-interest Expense: Total non-interest expense decreased by $685,000, or 10.1%, to $6.10 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $6.78 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily the result of a $263,000 decrease in loan administration and foreclosure expense, a $144,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense, a $133,000 decrease in OREO and other repossessed assets expense and a $62,000 decrease in advertising expense.

Total non-interest expense decreased by $445,000, or 2.3%, to $18.89 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $19.34 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily the result of a $404,000

decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense, a $216,000 decrease in FDIC insurance expense, a $138,000 decrease in other insurance expense, a $96,000 decrease in loan administration and foreclosure expense and a $51,000 decrease in advertising expense. These decreases to non-interest expense were partially offset by a $369,000 increase in OREO and other repossessed assets expense and a $146,000 increase in deposit operations expense. The OREO expense was lower in the comparable period one year ago primarily due to gains on sale of OREO properties which offset other OREO related expenses incurred.

Provision (Benefit) for Federal and State Income Taxes: The provision for federal and state income taxes increased $1.35 million to $624,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from a benefit for income taxes of $(729,000) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, primarily as a result of increased income before taxes. The Company’s effective tax (benefit) rate was 31.64% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and (36.29)% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The change in the effective tax rate between periods was primarily due to the loss before taxes during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and the non-taxable BOLI earnings. BOLI earnings reduce the effective tax rate in periods with income before taxes and increase the effective tax benefit rate in periods with a loss before taxes.

The provision for federal and state income taxes increased $1.13 million, or 271.9%, to $1.55 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 from $417,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, primarily the result of income before taxes. The Company’s effective tax rate was 31.09% for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 26.41% for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in the effective tax rate between periods was primarily due to a lower percentage of non-taxable income during the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

Liquidity

The Company’s primary sources of funds are customer deposits, proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans and MBS, proceeds from the sale of loans, proceeds from maturing securities and maturing CDs held for investment, FHLB advances, and other borrowings. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

Liquidity management is both a short and long-term responsibility of the Bank’s management. The Bank adjusts its investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (i) expected loan demand, (ii) projected loan sales, (iii) expected deposit flows, and (iv) yields available on interest-bearing deposits. Excess liquidity is invested generally in interest-bearing overnight deposits and other short-term investments

The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and short-term investments to meet short-term liquidity needs. At June 30, 2012, the Bank’s regulatory liquidity ratio (net cash, and short-term and marketable assets, as a percentage of net deposits and short-term liabilities) was 20.14%.

The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $19.08 million, or 17.0% to $92.99 million at June 30, 2012 from $112.07 million at September 30, 2011. If the Bank requires funds that exceed its ability to generate them internally, it has additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB and the FRB. At June 30, 2012 the Bank maintained an uncommitted credit facility with the FHLB that provided for immediately available advances up to an aggregate amount equal to 30% of total assets, limited by available collateral, under which $45.00 million was outstanding and $147.29 million was available for additional borrowings.. The Bank also maintains a short-term borrowing line with the FRB with available total credit based on eligible collateral. At June 30, 2012, the Bank had $59.12 million available for borrowings with the FRB and there was no outstanding balance on this borrowing line.

The Bank’s primary investing activity is the origination of one- to four-family mortgage loans, commercial mortgage loans, construction loans, consumer loans, and commercial business loans. At June 30, 2012, the Bank had loan commitments totaling $45.49 million and undisbursed construction loans in process totaling $12.24 million. The Bank anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet current loan commitments. CDs that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from June 30, 2012 totaled $134.66 million. Historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its non-brokered CDs as they mature. At June 30, 2012, the Bank had no brokered deposits.

Capital Resources

Federally-insured state-chartered banks are required to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under current FDIC regulations, insured state-chartered banks generally must maintain (i) a ratio of Tier 1 leverage capital to total assets of at least 4.0%, (ii) a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets of at least 4.0% and (iii) a ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of at least 8.0%. The Bank is currently required to maintain a “well capitalized” status and a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 10.0% under terms of the Bank MOU. At June 30, 2012, the Bank was in compliance with all applicable capital requirements.

The following table compares the Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts at June 30, 2012 to its minimum regulatory capital requirements at that date (dollars in thousands):

	Actual					Regulatory Minimum To Be “Adequately Capitalized”					To Be “Well Capitalized” Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 leverage capital:
Consolidated	$	84,378		11.59	%	$	29,113		4.00	%		N/A		N/A	%
Timberland Bank (1)		78,587		10.85			72,414		10.00		$	72,414		10.00

Tier 1 risk adjusted capital:
Consolidated		84,378		15.58			21,657		4.00			N/A		N/A
Timberland Bank (1)		78,587		14.55			32,415		6.00			32,415		6.00

Total risk–based capital
Consolidated		91,207		16.85			43,314		8.00			N/A		N/A
Timberland Bank (1)		85,402		15.81			54,025		10.00			54,025		10.00

______________________________

(1)

Reflects the higher Tier 1 leverage capital ratio that the Bank is required to comply with under terms of the Bank MOU with the FDIC and the Division. Also reflects that the Bank is required to maintain Tier 1 risk adjusted capital ratio and Total risk-based capital ratio at or above the “well capitalized” thresholds under the terms of the Bank MOU.

Key Financial Ratios and Data

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
PERFORMANCE RATIOS:
Return (loss) on average assets (1)		0.74	%		(0.69	)%		0.62	%		0.21	%
Return (loss) on average equity (1)		6.09	%		(5.83	)%		5.24	%		1.79	%
Net interest margin (1)		3.96	%		3.76	%		3.80	%		3.78	%
Efficiency ratio		67.98	%		82.98	%		71.34	%		74.61	%

	At June 30,		At September 30,		At June 30,
	2012		2011		2011
BOOK VALUES:
Book value per common share	$	10.38	$	9.97	$	9.99
Tangible book value per common share (2)	$	9.53	$	9.11	$	9.13

______________________

(1) Annualized

(2) Calculation subtracts goodwill and core deposit intangible from the equity component.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There were no material changes in information concerning market risk from the information provided in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company’s senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2012 the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b)

Changes in Internal Controls: There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The Company continued, however, to implement suggestions from its internal auditor and independent auditors to strengthen existing controls. The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; as over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Neither the Company nor the Bank is a party to any material legal proceedings at this time. From time to time,

the Bank is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s

2011 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

See discussion in Item 2 of Part 1 with respect to cumulative preferred stock dividends in arrears, which discussion is incorporated here by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None to be reported.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)	Exhibits
	3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
	3.2	Certificate of Designation relating to the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock Series A (2)
	3.3	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (3)
	4.1	Warrant to purchase shares of Company’s common stock dated December 23, 2008 (2)
	4.2	Letter Agreement (including Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms attached as Exhibit A) dated December 23, 2008 between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury (2)
	10.1	Employee Severance Compensation Plan, as revised (4)
	10.2	Employee Stock Ownership Plan (4)
	10.3	1999 Stock Option Plan (5)
	10.4	Management Recognition and Development Plan (5)
	10.5	2003 Stock Option Plan (6)
	10.6	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (7)
	10.7	Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (7)
	10.8	Form of Management Recognition and Development Award Agreement (7)
	10.9	Form of Compensation Modification Agreements (2)
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
	32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
	101	The following materials from Timberland Bancorp Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted on Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) (a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss); (d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity; (e) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (f) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (8)

_________________

	(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333- 35817).
	(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2008.
	(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 29, 2010.
	(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1997; and to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2007, and to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 18, 2007.
	(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 1999 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement dated December 15, 1998.
	(6)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 2004 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement dated December 24, 2003.
	(7)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.
	(8)	Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Timberland Bancorp, Inc.

Date: August 9, 2012	By: /s/Michael R. Sand
	Michael R. Sand
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: August 9, 2012	By: /s/Dean J. Brydon
	Dean J. Brydon
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101	The following materials from Timberland Bancorp Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted on Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) (a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss); (d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity; (e) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (f) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC Reports