Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - PREMIERWEST BANCORP | f8kprwt042412ea1stqcov.htm |
EXHIBIT 99.1
PREMIERWEST BANCORP
ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
MEDFORD, OREGON—April 24, 2012: PremierWest Bancorp (NASDAQ:PRWT) announced results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2012, as follows:
• Net loss applicable to common shareholders of $4.8 million, after $3.5 million in loan loss provision, net OREO and foreclosed asset expenses of $2.4 million, gains on sale of securities of $2.2 million and one-time costs of $829,000 associated with the branch consolidation initiative announced during the quarter. This compares to a net loss applicable to common shareholders of $4.1 million in the fourth quarter 2011, after $3.0 million in loan loss provision, net OREO and foreclosed asset expenses of $1.4 million and gains on sale of securities of $116,000;
• Net interest margin of 4.10%, an increase of 15 basis points from 3.95% in fourth quarter 2011;
• Average rate paid on total deposits and borrowings of 0.62%, a 4 basis point decline from 0.66% in the fourth quarter in 2011;
• Net loan charge-offs of $5.9 million compared to net loan charge-offs of $7.3 million in fourth quarter 2011.
Management continued to execute strategies that have resulted in further strengthening of the Company, including:
• Reducing adversely classified loans by 12%, or $19.8 million, during the quarter, to $140.0 million, from $159.8 million at December 31, 2011;
• Reducing non-performing assets by 8%, or $7.8 million, during the quarter to $91.3 million, from $99.1 million at December 31, 2011;
• Completing a master settlement agreement with its largest non-performing loan relationship totaling $28.7 million, resulting in receipt of deeds in lieu of foreclosure and dismissal of lawsuits which was effective the first quarter;
• Announcing the consolidation of nine branches into existing nearby offices by the end of April 2012 and sale of two branches by the end of June 2012 to reduce expenses and improve efficiency. These branches represent less than 10% of total bank wide deposits; however this action is projected to result in expense savings of approximately $1.9 million annually beginning in the second quarter of 2012;
• Maintaining stability of the Bank’s total risk-based and leverage capital ratios of 13.23% and 8.78%, respectively, as compared to 13.03% and 8.72% at December 31, 2011;
• Increasing average non-interest bearing demand deposits to 27% of total average deposits, as compared to 26% in fourth quarter 2011.
Subsequent to the close of the quarter, Management announced additional expense control initiatives including a restructuring of staff and processes that are projected to result in annualized savings of approximately $2.5 million. As a result of these changes, some staff positions will be eliminated and other currently vacant positions will not be filled in order to create a more efficient organization. These operational changes are expected to be completed during the second quarter.
James M. Ford, PremierWest’s President & Chief Executive Officer, remarked, “The Company continued to make meaningful progress in reducing problem assets during this current quarter. Our net loss was up slightly from fourth quarter in 2011, primarily due to increased credit resolution costs, which have enabled us to reduce non-performing assets to our lowest levels since December 31, 2008. A significant portion of this improvement was reached in the settlement with our largest non-performing borrowing relationship earlier in the first quarter.
“In addition, we incurred one-time costs associated with the branch consolidations announced in January 2012. This, along with the expense control initiatives announced earlier this month, demonstrates our commitment to implement changes in the operation of the Bank that position us for the future. We are focused on creating a more cost-effective organization to successfully operate in the challenging business climate ahead without sacrificing service.
“Despite continued international and domestic economic uncertainty, our net interest margin improved during this past quarter. We continue to increase non-interest bearing deposits as a source of funding and reduce our reliance on higher-cost certificates of deposits,” commented Ford. “Loan demand continues to be soft as a result of the sluggish economy. As a result, the investment portfolio is providing earnings until loan demand improves. The investment portfolio consists of high quality federal government agency and municipal securities.”
Finally, Ford stated, “During this quarter of hard fought progress, our capital levels have improved. Along with our continued efforts to reduce problem assets, we will be completing our initiatives to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of PremierWest. I appreciate the steadfast dedication of our employees for the notable progress we have made. We could not achieve this progress without the support of the shareholders.”
OPERATING RESULTS
Net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 declined from fourth quarter 2011 and the first quarter in the prior year. This is primarily due to a decline in average interest earning assets during these periods as part of the Company’s deleveraging strategy. Correspondingly, average interest bearing liabilities decreased during these same periods. Changes in the balance sheet mix also contributed to declines in net interest income during these periods. Loan balances have declined through payoffs and charge-offs. Investment securities have grown as a proportion of the balance sheet with loan demand continuing to be weak due to the economic slowdown. As such, investment securities, which typically generate a lower yield than loans, comprise a higher percentage of the Bank’s earning assets.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011 financial table presentations to conform to current year presentations. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net loss per share.
INCOME STATEMENT OVERVIEW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Loss per Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income | $ | 13,118 | $ | 13,710 | $ | (592 | ) | -4 | % | $ | 15,032 | $ | (1,914 | ) | -13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 1,744 | 1,969 | (225 | ) | -11 | % | 2,831 | (1,087 | ) | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 11,374 | 11,741 | (367 | ) | -3 | % | 12,201 | (827 | ) | -7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss provision | 3,500 | 3,000 | 500 | 17 | % | 6,300 | (2,800 | ) | -44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 4,483 | 2,377 | 2,106 | 89 | % | 3,101 | 1,382 | 45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 16,536 | 14,476 | 2,060 | 14 | % | 15,740 | 796 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES | (4,179 | ) | (3,358 | ) | (821 | ) | 24 | % | (6,738 | ) | 2,559 | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES | 10 | 26 | (16 | ) | -62 | % | 16 | (6 | ) | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
NET LOSS | (4,189 | ) | (3,384 | ) | (805 | ) | 24 | % | (6,754 | ) | 2,565 | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS AND DISCOUNT ACCRETION | 629 | 682 | (53 | ) | -8 | % | 656 | (27 | ) | -4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS | $ | (4,818 | ) | $ | (4,066 | ) | $ | (752 | ) | 18 | % | $ | (7,410 | ) | $ | 2,592 | -35 | % | ||||||||||||||
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BASIC (1) | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | 17 | % | $ | (0.74 | ) | $ | 0.26 | -35 | % | ||||||||||||||
DILUTED (1) | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | 17 | % | $ | (0.74 | ) | $ | 0.26 | -35 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding - basic (1) | 10,034,741 | 10,035,241 | (500 | ) | 0 | % | 10,034,847 | (106 | ) | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding - diluted (1) | 10,034,741 | 10,035,241 | (500 | ) | 0 | % | 10,034,847 | (106 | ) | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) As of March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, 109,039 common shares related to the potential exercise of the warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The following table provides the reconciliation of net loss applicable to common shareholders to pre-tax, pre-credit operating income (non-GAAP) for the periods presented:
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Operating Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For The Three Months Ended | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss applicable to common shareholders | $ | (4,818 | ) | $ | (4,066 | ) | $ | (752 | ) | 18 | % | $ | (7,410 | ) | $ | 2,592 | -35 | % | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 3,500 | 3,000 | 500 | 17 | % | 6,300 | (2,800 | ) | -44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cost of operations of other real estate owned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreclosed assets | 2,424 | 1,380 | 1,044 | 76 | % | 2,124 | 300 | 14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 10 | 26 | (16 | ) | -62 | % | 16 | (6 | ) | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion | 629 | 682 | (53 | ) | -8 | % | 656 | (27 | ) | -4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax, pre-credit cost operating income | $ | 1,745 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 723 | 71 | % | $ | 1,686 | $ | 59 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Equivalent Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For The Three Months Ended | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 11,374 | $ | 11,741 | $ | (367 | ) | -3 | % | $ | 12,201 | $ | (827 | ) | -7 | % | ||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment for municipal loan interest | 42 | 43 | (1 | ) | -2 | % | 45 | (3 | ) | -7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment for municipal bond interest | 9 | 7 | 2 | 29 | % | 30 | (21 | ) | -70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income | 11,425 | 11,791 | (366 | ) | -3 | % | 12,276 | (851 | ) | -7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 3,500 | 3,000 | 500 | 17 | % | 6,300 | (2,800 | ) | -44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 4,483 | 2,377 | 2,106 | 89 | % | 3,101 | 1,382 | 45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 16,536 | 14,476 | 2,060 | 14 | % | 15,740 | 796 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 10 | 26 | (16 | ) | -62 | % | 16 | (6 | ) | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net loss | (4,138 | ) | (3,334 | ) | (804 | ) | 24 | % | (6,679 | ) | 2,541 | -38 | % | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion | 629 | 682 | (53 | ) | -8 | % | 656 | (27 | ) | -4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net loss applicable to common shareholders | $ | (4,767 | ) | $ | (4,016 | ) | $ | (751 | ) | 19 | % | $ | (7,335 | ) | $ | 2,568 | -35 | % | ||||||||||
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. Management believes that presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information frequently used by shareholders in the evaluation of a company. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
Noninterest Income
Non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 was up compared to the fourth quarter of 2011. Service charge income on deposit accounts declined due to a reduction in the amount of non-sufficient check items from the fourth quarter in 2011. In addition, gains on sales of securities increased as compared to the fourth quarter of 2011, which were used to offset increased OREO and related third-party expenses and one-time costs associated with a branch consolidation initiative announced during the first quarter. Investment brokerage fee income grew in the first quarter of 2012 versus the fourth quarter of 2011 on increased sales volume in part due to recent gains in the equity markets attracting more investor activity.
In November 2010 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") issued mandates on overdraft payment programs applicable to its supervised institutions, including the Bank. These restrictions were effective July 1, 2011. The Bank began implementing changes to its overdraft payment program in the second quarter of 2011 to comply with the FDIC's mandates. The Company believes these mandates have continued to adversely affect non-interest income.
Noninterest income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | $ | 865 | $ | 898 | $ | (33 | ) | -4 | % | $ | 955 | $ | (90 | ) | -9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other commissions and fees | 649 | 684 | (35 | ) | -5 | % | 645 | 4 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of securities, available for sale | 2,168 | 116 | 2,052 | 1769 | % | 349 | 1,819 | 521 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment brokerage and annuity fees | 438 | 360 | 78 | 22 | % | 500 | (62 | ) | -12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking fees | 115 | 143 | (28 | ) | -20 | % | 125 | (10 | ) | -8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income | 9 | 13 | (4 | ) | -31 | % | 324 | (315 | ) | -97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in value of BOLI | 124 | 125 | (1 | ) | -1 | % | 122 | 2 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest income | 115 | 38 | 77 | 203 | % | 81 | 34 | 42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest income | $ | 4,483 | $ | 2,377 | $ | 2,106 | 89 | % | $ | 3,101 | $ | 1,382 | 45 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense
Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 grew compared to fourth quarter 2011. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased primarily due to increases in payroll taxes normally experienced at the beginning of a calendar year, annual salary increases granted during the quarter and a $195,000 accrual for earned, but unused vacation benefits incurred during the quarter. In addition, a one-time expense of $719,000 for retirement of assets and $110,000 for severance costs was charged in the first quarter associated with the branch consolidation initiative. Also, total costs associated with OREO and related third-party loan expenses increased. This was due to higher losses on sale of OREO than experienced in the previous quarter. This was partially offset by a decline in legal expenses as compared to the previous quarter which contained costs associated with the master settlement agreement with the Company’s largest non-performing loan relationship.
Noninterest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ | 6,810 | $ | 6,302 | $ | 508 | 8 | % | $ | 7,026 | $ | (216 | ) | -3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net cost of OREO and foreclosed assets | 2,424 | 1,380 | 1,044 | 76 | % | 2,124 | 300 | 14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net occupancy and equipment | 1,812 | 1,690 | 122 | 7 | % | 2,104 | (292 | ) | -14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FDIC and state assessments | 671 | 727 | (56 | ) | -8 | % | 1,123 | (452 | ) | -40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Professional fees | 408 | 807 | (399 | ) | -49 | % | 876 | (468 | ) | -53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Communications | 468 | 509 | (41 | ) | -8 | % | 475 | (7 | ) | -1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising | 198 | 135 | 63 | 47 | % | 245 | (47 | ) | -19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Third-party loan costs | 255 | 343 | (88 | ) | -26 | % | 296 | (41 | ) | -14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Professional liability insurance | 213 | 540 | (327 | ) | -61 | % | 226 | (13 | ) | -6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Problem loan expense | 1,288 | 200 | 1,088 | 544 | % | 88 | 1,200 | 1364 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director fees | 109 | 105 | 4 | 4 | % | 101 | 8 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Internet costs | 143 | 237 | (94 | ) | -40 | % | 112 | 31 | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ATM debit card costs | 140 | 190 | (50 | ) | -26 | % | 119 | 21 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Business development | 70 | 85 | (15 | ) | -18 | % | 84 | (14 | ) | -17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | 116 | 116 | — | 0 | % | 151 | (35 | ) | -23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplies | 136 | 149 | (13 | ) | -9 | % | 149 | (13 | ) | -9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest expense | 1,275 | 961 | 314 | 33 | % | 441 | 834 | 189 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense | $ | 16,536 | $ | 14,476 | $ | 2,060 | 14 | % | $ | 15,740 | $ | 796 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Income Taxes
The Company recorded an income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011. The provision was made for minimum state income taxes owed.
As of March 31, 2012, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance of $39.1 million against its deferred tax asset. If the Company returns to sustained profitability, all or a portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be reversed. A reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would decrease the Company’s income tax expense and increase net income. Currently, the only tax expense the Company is recognizing relates to Oregon minimum tax.
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET OVERVIEW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | % | March 31, | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ Change | Change | 2011 | $ Change | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 102,180 | $ | 71,349 | $ | 30,831 | 43 | % | $ | 142,025 | $ | (39,845 | ) | -28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing certificates of deposit | 1,500 | 1,500 | — | 0 | % | 1,500 | — | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities | 289,589 | 319,415 | (29,826 | ) | -9 | % | 233,326 | 56,263 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross loans, net of deferred fees | 743,259 | 797,416 | (54,157 | ) | -7 | % | 921,018 | (177,759 | ) | -19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (20,324 | ) | (22,683 | ) | 2,359 | -10 | % | (33,366 | ) | 13,042 | -39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans | 722,935 | 774,733 | (51,798 | ) | -7 | % | 887,652 | (164,717 | ) | -19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 110,720 | 99,050 | 11,670 | 12 | % | 108,223 | 2,497 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,226,924 | $ | 1,266,047 | $ | (39,123 | ) | -3 | % | $ | 1,372,726 | $ | (145,802 | ) | -11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders' equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | 1,083,033 | 1,127,749 | (44,716 | ) | -4 | % | 1,233,881 | (150,848 | ) | -12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | 35,861 | 35,169 | 692 | 2 | % | 32,842 | 3,019 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 27,596 | 18,764 | 8,832 | 47 | % | 17,461 | 10,135 | 58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 80,434 | 84,365 | (3,931 | ) | -5 | % | 88,542 | (8,108 | ) | -9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 1,226,924 | $ | 1,266,047 | $ | (39,123 | ) | -3 | % | $ | 1,372,726 | $ | (145,802 | ) | -11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investment Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | % of Total | December 31, 2011 | % of Total | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | % of Total | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 38,399 | 10 | % | $ | 40,179 | 10 | % | $ | (1,780 | ) | -4 | % | $ | 24,811 | 7 | % | $ | 13,588 | 55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal fund sold | 3,005 | 1 | % | 4,030 | 1 | % | (1,025 | ) | -25 | % | 3,215 | 1 | % | (210 | ) | -7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | 60,776 | 15 | % | 27,140 | 7 | % | 33,636 | 124 | % | 113,999 | 30 | % | (53,223 | ) | -47 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash equivalents | 102,180 | 26 | % | 71,349 | 18 | % | 30,831 | 43 | % | 142,025 | 38 | % | (39,845 | ) | -28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing certificates of deposit | 1,500 | 0 | % | 1,500 | 0 | % | — | 0 | % | 1,500 | 0 | % | — | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 126,488 | 32 | % | 134,416 | 34 | % | (7,928 | ) | -6 | % | 115,672 | 30 | % | 10,816 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 80,936 | 20 | % | 71,773 | 18 | % | 9,163 | 13 | % | 6,773 | 2 | % | 74,163 | 1095 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Governement and agency securities | 11,219 | 3 | % | 41,093 | 11 | % | (29,874 | ) | -73 | % | 79,587 | 21 | % | (68,368 | ) | -86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | 65,745 | 17 | % | 66,878 | 17 | % | (1,133 | ) | -2 | % | 25,873 | 7 | % | 39,872 | 154 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities - Other Community Reinvestment Act | 2,000 | 1 | % | 2,000 | 1 | % | — | 0 | % | 2,000 | 1 | % | — | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted equity securities | 3,201 | 1 | % | 3,255 | 1 | % | (54 | ) | -2 | % | 3,421 | 1 | % | (220 | ) | -6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 289,589 | 74 | % | 319,415 | 82 | % | (29,826 | ) | -9 | % | 233,326 | 62 | % | 56,263 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments | $ | 393,269 | 100 | % | $ | 392,264 | 100 | % | $ | 1,005 | 0 | % | $ | 376,851 | 100 | % | $ | 16,418 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as a % of total assets | 32 | % | 31 | % | 27 | % |
Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||
Balance beginning of period | $ | 319,415 | $ | 303,927 | $ | 15,488 | $ | 218,290 | $ | 101,125 | ||||||||||
Principal purchases | 26,967 | 37,591 | (10,624 | ) | 68,308 | (41,341 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales | (49,015 | ) | (2,777 | ) | (46,238 | ) | (39,823 | ) | (9,192 | ) | ||||||||||
Principal paydowns, maturities, and calls | (9,473 | ) | (17,656 | ) | 8,183 | (12,033 | ) | 2,560 | ||||||||||||
Gains on sales of securities | 2,168 | 116 | 2,052 | 349 | 1,819 | |||||||||||||||
Losses on sales of securities | — | (1 | ) | 1 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (loss) before tax | 746 | (136 | ) | 882 | (1,188 | ) | 1,934 | |||||||||||||
Amortization and accretion of discounts and premiums | (1,219 | ) | (1,649 | ) | 430 | (577 | ) | (642 | ) | |||||||||||
Total investment portfolio | $ | 289,589 | $ | 319,415 | $ | (29,826 | ) | $ | 233,326 | $ | 56,263 | |||||||||
nm=not meaningful |
Liquidity | March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Primary liquidity | 32.05 | % | 29.75 | % | 22.40 | % | ||||||||
Fed funds sold and interest-bearing deposits/total assets | 5.32 | % | 2.58 | % | 8.65 | % | ||||||||
Net non-core funding dependency | -4.10 | % | 0.12 | % | -6.46 | % | ||||||||
Gross loans to deposits | 68.66 | % | 70.74 | % | 74.79 | % | ||||||||
The Company’s liquidity position remains strong as evidenced by its current level of combined cash equivalents and investment securities. In an effort to support its net interest income and margin, the Company reduced its cash equivalents balances while increasing its investment securities portfolio since March 31, 2011. Cash equivalents increased temporarily as of March 31, 2012, due to the sale of investment securities during the quarter. These funds have since been redeployed into higher yielding investment securities. Over the past year, the Company increased its government guaranteed collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, and municipal securities portfolios. The purchases were primarily of 10 and 15-year fully amortizing U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, for which we expect to have limited extension risk. Municipal securities rated AA or better with maturities generally ranging from 5 to 15 years were also purchased during this period. The expected duration of the investment portfolio was 3.9 years at March 31, 2012, compared to 3.3 years a year earlier and 4.4 years at December 31, 2011.
LOANS
Loans by category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands)
March 31, 2012 | % of Gross Loans | December 31, 2011 | % of Gross Loans | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | % of Gross Loans | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, Land Dev & Other Land | $ | 57,763 | 8 | % | $ | 81,241 | 10 | % | $ | (23,478 | ) | -29 | % | $ | 114,579 | 12 | % | $ | (56,816 | ) | -50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial & Industrial | 122,023 | 17 | % | 124,422 | 16 | % | (2,399 | ) | -2 | % | 145,907 | 16 | % | (23,884 | ) | -16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate Loans | 433,942 | 58 | % | 449,347 | 56 | % | (15,405 | ) | -3 | % | 511,499 | 55 | % | (77,557 | ) | -15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured Multifamily Residential | 22,532 | 3 | % | 21,792 | 3 | % | 740 | 3 | % | 23,156 | 3 | % | (624 | ) | -3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial Loans Secured by RE | 45,674 | 6 | % | 47,912 | 6 | % | (2,238 | ) | -5 | % | 55,518 | 6 | % | (9,844 | ) | -18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans to Individuals, Family & Personal Expense | 9,325 | 1 | % | 9,784 | 1 | % | (459 | ) | -5 | % | 12,240 | 1 | % | (2,915 | ) | -24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer/Finance | 36,077 | 5 | % | 35,522 | 5 | % | 555 | 2 | % | 36,244 | 4 | % | (167 | ) | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Loans | 16,090 | 2 | % | 27,594 | 3 | % | (11,504 | ) | -42 | % | 23,359 | 3 | % | (7,269 | ) | -31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Overdrafts | 234 | 0 | % | 264 | 0 | % | (30 | ) | -11 | % | 309 | 0 | % | (75 | ) | -24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross loans | 743,660 | 797,878 | (54,218 | ) | -7 | % | 922,811 | (179,151 | ) | -19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: allowance for loan losses | (20,324 | ) | -3 | % | (22,683 | ) | -3 | % | 2,359 | -10 | % | (33,366 | ) | -4 | % | 13,042 | -39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: deferred fees and restructured loan concessions | (401 | ) | 0 | % | (462 | ) | 0 | % | 61 | -13 | % | (1,793 | ) | 0 | % | 1,392 | -78 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net | $ | 722,935 | $ | 774,733 | $ | (51,798 | ) | -7 | % | $ | 887,652 | $ | (164,717 | ) | -19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Bank’s total loan portfolio declined from December 31, 2011, reflecting the continued challenges in the local and national economy. As a result, commercial, real estate construction, and commercial & industrial loan balances declined from year end. Loan totals have also declined because the Company exited a number of higher risk rated loan relationships over the past year which contributed to the contraction in the commercial real estate and construction, land development & other land loan categories over the same period. This included a reduction of approximately $15 million in loan balances associated with settlement of the largest non-performing lending relationship, as previously noted.
Interest and fees earned on our loan portfolio are our primary source of revenue. Our ability to achieve loan growth will be dependent on many factors, including the effects of competition, economic conditions in our markets, retention of key personnel and valued customers, and our ability to close loans in the pipeline.
The Company manages new commercial, including agricultural, loan origination volume using concentration limits that establish maximum exposure levels by designated industry segment, real estate product types, geography, and single borrower limits. We expect the commercial loan portfolio to be an important contributor to growth in future revenues as we continue to seek to limit our exposure to construction and development and commercial real estate.
DEPOSITS
(Dollars in Thousands) | March 31, 2012 | Percent of Total | December 31, 2011 | Percent of Total | $ Change | March 31, 2011 | Percent of Total | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand and money market | $ | 316,235 | 29 | % | $ | 326,994 | 29 | % | $ | (10,759 | ) | $ | 373,965 | 30 | % | $ | (57,730 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Savings | 90,035 | 8 | % | 87,483 | 8 | % | 2,552 | 85,276 | 7 | % | 4,759 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 396,830 | 37 | % | 431,753 | 38 | % | (34,923 | ) | 522,078 | 43 | % | (125,248 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 803,100 | 74 | % | 846,230 | 75 | % | (43,130 | ) | 981,319 | 80 | % | (178,219 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand | 279,933 | 26 | % | 281,519 | 25 | % | (1,586 | ) | 252,562 | 20 | % | 27,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | $ | 1,083,033 | 100 | % | $ | 1,127,749 | 100 | % | $ | (44,716 | ) | $ | 1,233,881 | 100 | % | $ | (150,848 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total deposits declined from December 31, 2011, a trend that has continued from recent quarters. This decrease was mainly due to the decision to continue to reduce higher cost time deposit balances. Time deposits declined as a percentage of the Company’s total deposits in the most recent quarter versus the previous quarter and the same quarter last year. The combination of the Company’s efforts to reduce higher-cost time deposits and recent deposit pricing strategies to lower interest rates in concert with market conditions has reduced the average rate paid on total deposits in first quarter 2012 from the previous quarter and the same quarter in 2011.
Total brokered deposits were $241,000 at March 31, 2012 unchanged from December 31, 2011. Brokered deposits are currently not being replaced as they mature.
CAPITAL
PremierWest Bank has met the quantitative thresholds to be considered “Well-Capitalized” under published regulatory standards for total risk-based capital and Tier 1 risk-based capital at March 31, 2012. Capital ratios at the Bank have improved as compared to the previous quarter and the same quarter in 2011, primarily due to the Company’s deleveraging strategy and shift in the balance sheet mix to less risk-weighted assets, such as investment securities. However, we continue to be subject to the terms of the Consent Order with the FDIC and have not yet reached the 10.00 percent leverage ratio required by the Consent Order. As such, we are not considered “Well-Capitalized” for all regulatory ratios.
Bancorp: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | Minimum to be | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | “Adequately Capitalized” | |||||||||||||||||
greater than or equal to | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio | 12.52% | 12.45% | 12.20% | 8.00% | ||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 10.69% | 10.80% | 10.84% | 4.00% | ||||||||||||||||
Leverage ratio | 7.84% | 8.01% | 8.28% | 4.00% | ||||||||||||||||
Bank: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory | Regulatory | |||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | Minimum to be | Minimum to be | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | “Adequately Capitalized” | “Well-Capitalized” | ||||||||||||||||
greater than or equal to | greater than or equal to | |||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio | 13.23% | 13.03% | 12.51% | 8.00% | 10.00% | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | 11.96% | 11.77% | 11.24% | 4.00% | 6.00% | |||||||||||||||
Leverage ratio | 8.78% | 8.72% | 8.59% | 4.00% | 5.00% |
The total risk based capital ratios of Bancorp include $30.9 million of junior subordinated debentures, of which $24.8 million qualified as Tier 1 capital at March 31, 2012, under guidance issued by the Federal Reserve. As provided in the Dodd-Frank Act, which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, Bancorp expects to continue to rely on these junior subordinated debentures as part of its regulatory capital. However, at this point, Bancorp does not expect to issue additional junior subordinated debentures as any future issued junior subordinated debentures would not qualify as Tier 1 total capital under Dodd-Frank.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW | ||||||||||||||||||||
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | Change | March 31, 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
Selective quarterly performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets, annualized | -1.56 | % | -1.25 | % | (0.31 | ) | -2.15 | % | 0.59 | |||||||||||
Return on average equity, annualized | -43.03 | % | -34.12 | % | (8.91 | ) | -52.87 | % | 9.84 | |||||||||||
Efficiency ratio (1) | 104.28 | % | 102.54 | % | 1.74 | 102.86 | % | 1.42 | ||||||||||||
Share and per share information | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding - basic | 10,034,741 | 10,035,241 | (500 | ) | 10,034,847 | (106 | ) | |||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding - diluted | 10,034,741 | 10,035,241 | (500 | ) | 10,034,847 | (106 | ) | |||||||||||||
Basic loss per common share | (0.48 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.74 | ) | 0.26 | |||||||||||
Diluted loss per common share | (0.48 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.74 | ) | 0.26 | |||||||||||
Book value per common share (2) | 3.98 | 4.38 | (0.40 | ) | 4.83 | (0.85 | ) | |||||||||||||
Tangible book value per common share (3) | 3.79 | 4.18 | (0.39 | ) | 4.60 | (0.81 | ) |
(1) Non-interest expense divided by net interest income plus non-interest income.
(2) Book value is calculated as the total common equity (less preferred stock and the discount on preferred stock) divided by the period ending number of common shares outstanding.
(3) Tangible book value is calculated as the total common equity (less preferred stock and the discount on preferred stock) less core deposit intangibles divided by the period ending number of common shares outstanding.
NET INTEREST MARGIN | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Annualized, tax-equivalent basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | Change | March 31, 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
Selective quarterly performance ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
Yield on average gross loans (1) | 5.89 | % | 5.90 | % | (0.01 | ) | 5.77 | % | 0.12 | |||||||||||
Yield on average investment securities (1)(2) | 2.22 | % | 1.64 | % | 0.58 | 1.73 | % | 0.49 | ||||||||||||
Cost of average interest bearing deposits | 0.79 | % | 0.85 | % | (0.06 | ) | 1.08 | % | (0.29 | ) | ||||||||||
Cost of average borrowings | 1.95 | % | 1.72 | % | 0.23 | 2.13 | % | (0.18 | ) | |||||||||||
Cost of average total deposits and borrowings | 0.62 | % | 0.66 | % | (0.04 | ) | 0.89 | % | (0.27 | ) | ||||||||||
Cost of average interest-bearing liabilities | 0.84 | % | 0.88 | % | (0.04 | ) | 1.12 | % | (0.28 | ) | ||||||||||
Yield on average interest-earning assets | 4.73 | % | 4.61 | % | 0.12 | 4.71 | % | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Cost of average interest-bearing liabilities | 0.84 | % | 0.88 | % | (0.04 | ) | 1.12 | % | (0.28 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest spread | 3.89 | % | 3.73 | % | 0.16 | 3.59 | % | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin (1) | 4.10 | % | 3.95 | % | 0.15 | 3.83 | % | 0.27 |
(1) Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 40% rate.
(2) Includes interest-bearing cash equivalents.
Net Interest Margin
Net interest margin for first quarter 2012 increased as compared to fourth quarter 2011, predominantly due to a lower cost of interest bearing deposits. In addition, a one-time premium amortization adjustment to more properly reflect the expected life of a type of securities resulted in a 26 basis point decline in the yield on investment securities and an 8 basis point decline in net interest margin during the fourth quarter 2011. The spread between the yield earned on loans and rates paid on interest bearing deposits improved year-over-year despite the decline in higher yielding loan balances, primarily due to a decline in costs of interest-bearing liabilities. The improvement in yields on investment securities also contributed to the increase in net interest margin between the periods due to the Company’s reduction in lower yielding cash-equivalent investments and increase in relatively higher-yielding federal government guaranteed and municipal securities. This plan to restructure earning assets began in first quarter 2011 and completed by fourth quarter 2011. Net interest margin for first quarter 2012 increased as compared to first quarter 2011 for similar reasons noted above. Also, during this period loan yields improved with the decline in the amount of loans on non-accrual.
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Interest Income or Expense | Average Yields or Rates | Average Balance | Interest Income or Expense | Average Yields or Rates | Average Balance | Interest Income or Expense | Average Yields or Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in 000's) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning balances due from banks | $ | 38,722 | $ | 22 | 0.23 | % | $ | 51,828 | $ | 40 | 0.31 | % | $ | 119,507 | $ | 76 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold | 3,033 | 2 | 0.27 | % | 3,179 | 2 | 0.25 | % | 3,201 | 2 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments - taxable | 309,081 | 1,884 | 2.45 | % | 300,546 | 1,419 | 1.87 | % | 211,906 | 1,291 | 2.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments - nontaxable | 1,068 | 23 | 8.66 | % | 2,502 | 17 | 2.70 | % | 4,313 | 75 | 7.05 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross loans (1) | 766,868 | 11,222 | 5.89 | % | 825,724 | 12,271 | 5.90 | % | 960,326 | 13,656 | 5.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgages held for sale | 686 | 16 | 9.38 | % | 1,004 | 11 | 4.35 | % | 722 | 7 | 3.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets | 1,119,458 | 13,169 | 4.73 | % | 1,184,783 | 13,760 | 4.61 | % | 1,299,975 | 15,107 | 4.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (21,868 | ) | (26,564 | ) | (34,910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 145,106 | 135,012 | 132,690 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,242,696 | $ | 1,293,231 | $ | 1,397,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | 392,416 | 103 | 0.11 | % | 405,229 | 114 | 0.11 | % | 463,998 | 367 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 412,135 | 1,469 | 1.43 | % | 444,791 | 1,702 | 1.52 | % | 533,634 | 2,297 | 1.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 4,548 | 4 | 0.35 | % | 4,312 | 3 | 0.28 | % | 838 | 1 | 0.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 30,928 | 168 | 2.18 | % | 30,928 | 150 | 1.92 | % | 30,928 | 166 | 2.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities | 840,027 | 1,744 | 0.84 | % | 885,260 | 1,969 | 0.88 | % | 1,029,398 | 2,831 | 1.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits | 298,234 | 301,485 | 253,926 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 18,942 | 18,910 | 17,595 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 85,493 | 87,576 | 96,836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 1,242,696 | $ | 1,293,231 | $ | 1,397,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (3) | $ | 11,425 | $ | 11,791 | $ | 12,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread | 3.89 | % | 3.73 | % | 3.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average yield on earning assets (2) (3) | 4.73 | % | 4.61 | % | 4.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense to earning assets | 0.63 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income to earning assets (2) (3) | 4.10 | % | 3.95 | % | 3.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measure: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 11,374 | $ | 11,741 | $ | 12,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment for municipal loan interest | 42 | 43 | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment for municipal bond interest | 9 | 7 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income | $ | 11,425 | $ | 11,791 | $ | 12,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP financial mesures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. Management believes that presentation of this non-GAAP measure provides useful information frequently used by shareholders in the evaluation of a company.
Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitue for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
(1) Non-performing loans of approximately $55.9 million at 3/31/12, $76.2 million at 12/31/2011, $109.8 million for 3/31/2011 are included in the average loan balances.
(2) Loan interest income includes loan fee income of $25,000, $126,000, and $73,000 for the three months ended 3/31/2012, 12/31/2011, and 3/31/2011, respectively.
(3) Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis at a 40% effective rate. The amount of such adjustment was an increase to recorded pre-tax income of $51,000, $50,000, and $75,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively.
ASSET QUALITY
At March 31, 2012, the Company experienced a continued decrease in adversely classified loans, largely due to a decline in non-performing loans. Non-performing loans have continued to decline primarily in the construction and land development loan category, as a result of improvements in credit quality ratings and transfers to OREO, pay offs, and charge-offs of impaired loans. Of those loans currently designated as non-performing, approximately $20.6 million, or 37.1%, are current as to payment of principal and interest.
The Company monitors delinquencies, defined as loans on accruing status 30-89 days past due, as an indicator of future non-performing assets. Total 30-89 days delinquencies remain below 1.00%, mirroring the improvement in overall credit quality noted previously. Delinquencies in this current quarter continue to be below this target. While the local and national economy continues to languish, more borrowers are demonstrating the ability to adjust to current economic conditions.
At March 31, 2012, total non-performing assets were down compared to December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011. Non-performing assets and non-performing loans also declined during this period in terms of percentage of total assets and loans, respectively. The amount of additions to non-performing loans remained relatively unchanged in the current quarter as compared to the previous quarter. Approximately $4.1 million was attributed to one land developer borrowing relationship, in which the guarantor ceased to continue to provide financial support to the project. The Company experienced an increase in loan balances transferred to OREO during the quarter, as a result of entering into a master settlement agreement with its largest non-performing loan relationship.
Adversely classified loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated substandard or worse | $ | 84,124 | $ | 83,583 | $ | 541 | 1 | % | $ | 139,546 | $ | (55,422 | ) | -40 | % | |||||||||||||
Impaired | 55,880 | 76,241 | (20,361 | ) | -27 | % | 109,844 | (53,964 | ) | -49 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total adversely classified loans* | $ | 140,004 | $ | 159,824 | $ | (19,820 | ) | -12 | % | $ | 249,390 | $ | (109,386 | ) | -44 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross loans | $ | 743,660 | $ | 797,878 | $ | (54,218 | ) | -7 | % | $ | 922,811 | $ | (179,151 | ) | -19 | % | ||||||||||||
Adversely classified loans to gross loans | 18.83 | % | 20.03 | % | -1.20 | % | 27.03 | % | -8.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 20,324 | $ | 22,683 | $ | (2,359 | ) | -10 | % | $ | 33,366 | $ | (13,042 | ) | -39 | % |
* Adversely classified loans are defined as loans having a well-defined weakness or weaknesses related to the borrower's financial capacity or to pledged collateral that may jeopardize the repayment of the debt. They are characterized by the possibility that the Bank may sustain some loss if the deficiencies giving rise to the substandard classification are not corrected. Note that any loans internally rated worse than substandard are included in the impaired loan totals.
30-89 Days Past Due by type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 | % of Category | December 31, 2011 | % of Category | $ Change | March 31, 2011 | % of Category | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, Land Dev & Other Land | $ | — | 0 | % | $ | — | 0 | % | $ | — | $ | 3,783 | 53 | % | $ | (3,783 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial & Industrial | — | 0 | % | 128 | 4 | % | (128 | ) | 961 | 14 | % | (961 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate Loans | 1,040 | 34 | % | 626 | 22 | % | 414 | 1,167 | 16 | % | (127 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Secured Multifamily Residential | — | 0 | % | 242 | 8 | % | (242 | ) | 200 | 3 | % | (200 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial Loans Secured by RE | 657 | 21 | % | 533 | 18 | % | 124 | 100 | 1 | % | 557 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans to Individuals, Family & Personal Expense | 16 | 1 | % | 108 | 4 | % | (92 | ) | 255 | 4 | % | (239 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer/Finance | 1,337 | 44 | % | 1,279 | 44 | % | 58 | 661 | 9 | % | 676 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Loans | — | 0 | % | — | 0 | % | — | — | 0 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans 30-89 days past due, not in nonaccrual status | $ | 3,050 | $ | 2,916 | $ | 134 | $ | 7,127 | $ | (4,077 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquent loans to total loans, not in nonaccrual status | 0.44 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-performing Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||
Balance beginning of period | $ | 76,241 | $ | 78,210 | $ | (1,969 | ) | 129,616 | $ | (53,375 | ) | |||||||||
Transfers from performing loans | 13,835 | 12,466 | 1,369 | 2,723 | 11,112 | |||||||||||||||
Loans returned to performing status | — | (478 | ) | 478 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Transfers to OREO | (19,245 | ) | (2,740 | ) | (16,505 | ) | (4,251 | ) | (14,994 | ) | ||||||||||
Principal reduction from payment | (8,631 | ) | (3,235 | ) | (5,396 | ) | (5,694 | ) | (2,937 | ) | ||||||||||
Principal reduction from charge-off | (6,320 | ) | (7,982 | ) | 1,662 | (12,550 | ) | 6,230 | ||||||||||||
— | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans | $ | 55,880 | $ | 76,241 | $ | (20,361 | ) | $ | 109,844 | $ | (53,964 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage of non-performing loans to total gross loans | 7.51 | % | 9.56 | % | 11.90 | % | ||||||||||||||
nm = not meaningful | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-performing assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans on nonaccrual status | $ | 55,356 | $ | 76,097 | $ | (20,741 | ) | -27 | % | $ | 109,753 | $ | (54,397 | ) | -50 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans past due greater than 90 days but | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
not on nonaccrual status | 524 | 144 | 380 | 264 | % | 91 | 433 | 476 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans | 55,880 | 76,241 | (20,361 | ) | -27 | % | 109,844 | (53,964 | ) | -49 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreclosed assets | 35,434 | 22,829 | 12,605 | 55 | % | 29,757 | 5,677 | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 91,314 | $ | 99,070 | $ | (7,756 | ) | -8 | % | $ | 139,601 | $ | (48,287 | ) | -35 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of non-performing assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
to total assets | 7.44 | % | 7.83 | % | 10.17 | % |
The Company’s OREO property disposition activities continued at a steady pace in the first quarter of 2012, while the level of additional real estate properties taken into the OREO portfolio increased from prior periods, primarily due to the resolution at the beginning of the quarter of the largest non-performing lending relationship in the Company. During the first quarter 2012, the Company disposed of 22 OREO properties with a book value of $4.9 million while acquiring 25 properties with a book value of $19.2 million and recorded OREO valuation adjustments similar to prior quarters. The combination of these actions resulted in an increase in total OREO in the quarter. At March 31, 2012, the OREO portfolio consisted of 83 properties. The largest balances in the OREO portfolio at the end of the quarter were attributable to income-producing properties followed by homes and residential site development projects, all of which are located within our footprint.
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned, beginning of period | $ | 22,829 | $ | 28,127 | $ | (5,298 | ) | -19 | % | $ | 32,009 | $ | (9,180 | ) | -29 | % | ||||||||||||
Transfers from outstanding loans | 19,245 | 2,740 | 16,505 | 602 | % | 4,251 | 14,994 | 353 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Improvements and other additions | — | — | — | nm | 10 | (10 | ) | -100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales | (4,278 | ) | (6,959 | ) | 2,681 | -39 | % | (5,093 | ) | 815 | -16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sales | (663 | ) | 518 | (1,181 | ) | -228 | % | 656 | (1,319 | ) | -201 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges | (1,699 | ) | (1,597 | ) | (102 | ) | 6 | % | (2,076 | ) | 377 | -18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total other real estate owned | $ | 35,434 | $ | 22,829 | 12,605 | 55 | % | $ | 29,757 | 5,677 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
nm = not meaningful |
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets by type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | March 31, 2012 | # of Properties | December 31, 2011 | # of Properties | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | # of Properties | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, Land Dev & Other Land | $ | 15,838 | 43 | $ | 9,772 | 45 | $ | 6,066 | 62 | % | $ | 14,449 | 49 | $ | 1,389 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farmland | 4,045 | 5 | 1,817 | 3 | 2,228 | 123 | % | 1,364 | 2 | 2,681 | 197 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 Family Residential Properties | 2,518 | 11 | 3,019 | 11 | (501 | ) | -17 | % | 4,373 | 23 | (1,855 | ) | -42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily (5 or more) Residential | — | — | 140 | 1 | (140 | ) | -100 | % | 299 | 1 | (299 | ) | nm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonfarm Nonresidential Properties | 13,033 | 24 | 8,081 | 19 | 4,952 | 61 | % | 9,272 | 18 | 3,761 | 41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total OREO by type | $ | 35,434 | 83 | $ | 22,829 | 79 | 12,605 | 55 | % | $ | 29,757 | 93 | 5,677 | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nm = not meaningful |
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Company’s allowance for loan losses continues to decline in concert with the reduction in adversely classified loans, loan delinquencies and other relevant credit metrics. With the reduction in net charge-offs and change in the loan portfolio composition over the past several years, loss factors used in Management’s estimates to establish reserve levels have declined commensurately. During the current period, $3.5 million was provided to the allowance for loan losses up from the amount in the fourth quarter of 2011 and down from the first quarter of 2011.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2012, total net loan charge-offs were down compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2011, and the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Approximately $3.6 million was attributed to one land developer borrowing relationship, in which the guarantor ceased to continue to provide financial support to the project. As such, the net charge-offs in the current period were concentrated in the construction and land development and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan categories. The ratio of net loan charge-offs to average gross loans (annualized) for the current quarter was down compared to the previous quarter and the same quarter one year ago.
The overall risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio continues to improve, as stated above. However, the trend of future provision for loan losses will depend primarily on economic conditions, level of adversely-classified assets, and changes in collateral values.
Allowance for Loan Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | March 31, 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross loans outstanding at end of period | $ | 743,660 | $ | 797,878 | $ | (54,218 | ) | -7 | % | $ | 922,811 | $ | (179,151 | ) | -19 | % | ||||||||||||
Average loans outstanding, gross | $ | 766,868 | $ | 825,724 | (58,856 | ) | -7 | % | $ | 960,326 | (193,458 | ) | -20 | % | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period | $ | 22,683 | $ | 26,975 | (4,292 | ) | -16 | % | $ | 35,582 | (12,899 | ) | -36 | % | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | (353 | ) | (1,093 | ) | 740 | -68 | % | (1,052 | ) | 699 | -66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | (5,181 | ) | (5,434 | ) | 253 | -5 | % | (11,211 | ) | 6,030 | -54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer | (493 | ) | (500 | ) | 7 | -1 | % | (265 | ) | (228 | ) | 86 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other | (293 | ) | (955 | ) | 662 | -69 | % | (22 | ) | (271 | ) | 1232 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total charge-offs | (6,320 | ) | (7,982 | ) | 1,662 | -21 | % | (12,550 | ) | 6,230 | -50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 88 | 102 | (14 | ) | -14 | % | 3,365 | (3,277 | ) | -97 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | 147 | 451 | (304 | ) | -67 | % | 574 | (427 | ) | -74 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 193 | 62 | 131 | 211 | % | 84 | 109 | 130 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Other | 33 | 75 | (42 | ) | -56 | % | 11 | 22 | 200 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Total recoveries | 461 | 690 | (229 | ) | -33 | % | 4,034 | (3,573 | ) | -89 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs | (5,859 | ) | (7,292 | ) | 1,433 | -20 | % | (8,516 | ) | 2,657 | -31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Provision charged to income | 3,500 | 3,000 | 500 | 17 | % | 6,300 | (2,800 | ) | -44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, end of period | $ | 20,324 | $ | 22,683 | (2,359 | ) | -10 | % | $ | 33,366 | (13,042 | ) | -39 | % | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of net loans charged-off to average gross loans outstanding, annualized | 3.07 | % | 3.50 | % | (0.43 | ) | 3.60 | % | (0.53 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to gross loans outstanding | 2.73 | % | 2.84 | % | (0.11 | ) | 3.62 | % | (0.89 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of adversely classified loans | 14.52 | % | 14.19 | % | 0.33 | 13.38 | % | 1.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans | 36.37 | % | 29.75 | % | 6.62 | 30.38 | % | 5.99 |
ABOUT PREMIERWEST BANCORP
PremierWest Bancorp (NASDAQ: PRWT) is a bank holding company headquartered in Medford, Oregon, and operates primarily through its subsidiary, PremierWest Bank. PremierWest Bank offers expanded banking-related services through two subsidiaries, Premier Finance Company and PremierWest Investment Services, Inc.
PremierWest Bank was created following the merger of the Bank of Southern Oregon and Douglas National Bank in May 2000. In April 2001, PremierWest Bancorp acquired Timberline Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberline Community Bank, with eight branch offices located in Siskiyou County in northern California. In January 2004, PremierWest acquired Mid Valley Bank with five branch offices located in the northern California counties of Shasta, Tehama and Butte. In January 2008, PremierWest acquired Stockmans Financial Group, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Stockmans Bank, with five full service banking offices in the Sacramento, California area. During the last several years, PremierWest expanded into Klamath Falls and the Central Oregon communities of Bend and Redmond, and into Nevada, Yolo and Butte counties in California.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “Safe-Harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which management believes are a benefit to shareholders. These statements are necessarily subject to risk and uncertainty and actual results could differ materially due to certain risk factors, including those set forth from time to time in PremierWest’s filings with the SEC, and risks that we are unable to increase capital levels as planned or effectively implement asset reduction and credit quality improvement strategies, unable to comply with regulatory agreements and the risk that market conditions deteriorate. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and we undertake no obligation to update any such statements. We make forward-looking statements in this press release about branch consolidations and cost savings initiatives and the expected savings related thereto, future profitability of the Company, deferred tax assets, net interest margin, regulatory compliance, loan demand, interest rate changes, loan upgrades, loan migration, the prospects for earnings growth, deposit and loan growth, capital levels, the effective management of our credit quality, the collectability of identified non-performing loans, real estate market conditions and the adequacy of our Allowance for Loan Losses.