Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Portlogic Systems Inc.Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 - Portlogic Systems Inc.plq3ex31_1.htm
EX-21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT - Portlogic Systems Inc.plq3ex21_1.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 - Portlogic Systems Inc.plq3ex31_2.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS UNDER 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 - Portlogic Systems Inc.plq3ex32_1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


Form 10-Q


(Mark One)


[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended February 29, 2012


or


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from ____________ to ____________


Commission file number 333-151434


PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



NEVADA        

20-2000407

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)                

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


100 King St. W., Suite 5700 Toronto, Ontario, Canada

M5X 1K7

(Address of principal executive offices)                   

(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(647) 847-8350


Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.


Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  X Yes No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer 

Accelerated filer 

Non-accelerated filer   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company  X

- 1 -



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes No X


As of April 13, 2012, the registrant had 206,491,422 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding.



- 2 -





PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.


FORM 10-Q

For the nine months ended February 29, 2012


TABLE OF CONTENTS

                 PAGE NUMBER


PART I



Item 1.  

Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations.                    

21

Item 3.  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

26

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures.                                                                           

26



PART II


Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.                                                                                  

  27

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

27

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

29

Item 3.  

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.                                     

30

Item 4.  

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.                                      

30

Item 5.

Other Information.

30

Item 6.

Exhibits.

30



- 3 -




CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q may be "forward-looking statements". Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies, predictions, or any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or conditions. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, and projections about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by our management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and probably will, differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including those described above and those risks discussed from time to time in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the risks described under "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


In addition, such statements could be affected by risks and uncertainties related to our financial condition, factors that affect our industry, market and customer acceptance, competition, government regulations and requirements and pricing, as well as general industry and market conditions and growth rates, and general economic conditions. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, except as required by law.



- 4 -


PART I


Item 1.    

Financial Statements




SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


FEBRUARY 29, 2012 (UNAUDITED)



FORMING A PART OF QUARTERLY REPORT

PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)









Page #





Unaudited Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2011

6







Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months Ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, and the Period from June 22, 2004 (Inception) to February 29, 2012

7







Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) for the Period from June 22, 2004 (Inception) to February 29, 2012

8-9







Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended

10

February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, and the Period from June 22, 2004 (Inception) to February 29, 2012








Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

11-20


- 5 -



PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.




(A Development Stage Company)




UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2012 AND MAY 31, 2011




(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)




 



February 29, 2012

May 31, 2011



$

$

ASSETS



Current



Cash and cash equivalents

14,203

10,607

 Loan receivable, net of allowance for doubtful  

     accounts of $0 at February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2011

8,944

15,100

Prepaid expenses and deposits

6,255

6,255



29,402

31,962

Long-term




Equipment, net


1,304

2,737

Source code, net


-

-

TOTAL ASSETS

 

30,706

34,699





LIABILITIES



Current



Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

142,103

104,218

Notes payable

376,943

357,000

Shareholder loan

36,087

6,600

Convertible loan

7,000

7,000

 

 

562,133

474,818





Commitments

-

-




STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY



Capital stock



Preference stock; $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares



   authorized; 0 issued and outstanding at February 29, 2012

   and May 31, 2011

-

-

Common stock; $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares



   authorized; 68,830,474 issued and outstanding at

   February 29, 2012 and May 31, 2011**


68,830

68,830

Additional paid in capital

 318,870

318,870

Deficit accumulated during the development stage                           

(919,127)

(827,819)



(531,427)

(440,119)






TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

30,706

34,699





** Common stock figures do not reflect the 3:1 forward common stock split effective March 30, 2012.





The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.





- 6 -


PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.



(A Development Stage Company)



UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND NINE

MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2012 AND FEBRUARY 28, 2011, AND THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 22, 2004 (INCEPTION) TO FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)








June 22, 2004

For the Nine Months

For the Three Months


(inception) through

February 29, 2012

Ended February 29

and February 28

Ended February 29

and February 28

 


2012

2011

2012

2011


$

$

$

$

$

Gross Margin (Loss)






Revenue

96,646

1,492

3,041

-

1,258

Cost of goods sold

199,996

-

38,000

-

12,667

 

(103,350)

1,492

(34,959)

-

(11,409)







Leasing and consulting fees earned

23,000

-

-

-

-


(80,350)

1,492

(34,959)

-

(11,409)







Expenses






Selling and administrative

824,466

91,367

128,817

37,371

42,857

Depreciation

14,311

1,433

1,812

285

593

 

838,777

92,800

130,629

37,656

43,450













Net Loss for the period 

(919,127)

 (91,308)

(165,588)

 (37,656)

(54,859)







Net Loss per share for the period






Basic and fully diluted

 

 (0.0013)

(0.0024)

 (0.0005)

(0.0008)







Weighted average number of shares outstanding






Basic and fully diluted

 

*68,830,474

*68,830,474

*68,830,474

*68,830,474


* Reflects the 2:1 stock split effective January 20, 2010 on a retroactive basis but does not reflect the 3:1 forward common stock split effective March 30, 2012.


The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.


- 7 -



PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC. (A Development Stage Company)






UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 22, 2004 (INCEPTION) TO FEBRUARY 29, 2012





(Amounts Expressed in US Dollars)





Deficit




Common
Stock *

Common
Stock
Amount

Additional
Paid in
Capital

Accumulated
During
Development
Stage

Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficiency)




$

$

$

$

Balance as of June 22, 2004


 -

 -

 -

 -

 -  

Stock issued in January 2005 for cash @ 0.0005 (pre-stock split of 0.001) a share

 5,900,000

5,900

(2,950)  

-

2,950

Stock issued in February 2005 for cash @ 0.001 (pre-stock split of 0.002) a share

 200,000

200

 -

-

 200

Stock issued in May 2005 for cash @ 0.001 (pre-stock split of 0.002) a share

 3,000,000

 3,000

 -

-

 3,000

Net loss for the period


-

-

 (7,125)

 (7,125)

Balance as of May 31, 2005


 9,100,000

 9,100

 (2,950)

 (7,125)

 (975)

Stock issued in July 2005 for cash @ 0.001 (pre-stock split of 0.002) a share

 50,550,000

 50,550

 

-

 50,550

Stock issued in September 2005 for cash @ 0.001 (pre-stock split of 0.002) a share

 2,500,000

 2,500

 

-

 2,500

Stock issued in October 2005 for software @ 0.025 (pre-stock split of 0.05) a share

 4,480,000

 4,480

 107,520

-

 112,000

Stock issued in April 2006 for cash @ 0.025 (pre-stock split of 0.05) a share

 60,000

60

 1,440

-

 1,500

Stock issued in May 2006 for cash @ 0.025 (pre-stock split of 0.05) a share

 480,000

 480

 11,520

-

 12,000

Net loss for the year


 (11,954)

 (11,954)

Balance as of May 31, 2006


 67,170,000

 67,170

 117,530

 (19,079)

 165,621

Stock issued in June 2006 for cash @ 0.025 (pre-stock split of 0.05) a share

 60,000

 60

 1,440

-

 1,500

Stock issued in July 2006 for cash @ 0.025 (pre-stock split of 0.05) a share

 20,000

 20

 480

-

 500

Stock issued in December 2006 for cash @ 0.025 (pre-stock split of 0.05) a share

 60,000

 60

 1,440

-

 1,500

Stock issued in February 2007 for cash @ 0.075 (pre-stock split of 0.15) a share

 266,666

 266

 19,734

-

 20,000

Stock issued in May 2007 for cash @ 0.10 (pre-stock split of 0.20) a share

 200,000

 200

 19,800

-

 20,000

Stock issued in May 2007 for cash @ 0.15 (pre-stock split of 0.30) a share

996,666

 997

 148,503

-

 149,500

Net loss for the year


-

-

-

(39,305)

 (39,305)

Balance as of May 31, 2007


 68,773,332

 68,773

 308,927

 (58,384)

319,316

Stock issued in January 2008 for cash @ 0.175 (pre-stock split of 0.35) a share

 57,142

 57

9,943

-

10,000

Net loss for the year


-

-

-

(187,428)

 (187,428)



- 8 -



PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC. (A Development Stage Company)






UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 22, 2004 (INCEPTION) TO NOVEMBER 30, 2011 (cont’d)





(Amounts Expressed in US Dollars)



Deficit




Common
Stock *

Common
Stock
Amount

Additional
Paid in
Capital

Accumulated
During
Development
Stage

Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficiency)




$

$

$

$

Balance as of May 31, 2008


68,830,474

68,830

 318,870

 (245,812)

141,888

Net loss for the year





(157,555)

(157,555)

Balance as of May 31, 2009


68,830,474

68,830

 318,870

 (403,367)

(15,667)

Net loss for the year


-

-

-

(216,373)

 (216,373)

Balance as of May 31, 2010


68,830,474

68,830

 318,870

 (619,740)

(232,040)

Net loss for the year


-

-

-

(208,079)

(208,079)

Balance as of May 31, 2011


68,830,474

68,830

318,870

 (827,819)

(440,119)

Net loss for the period


-

-

-

(91,308)

 (91,308)

Balance as of February 29, 2012


68,830,474

68,830

 318,870

 (919,127)

(531,427)



* The figure in Common Stock reflects the 2:1 stock split effective January 20, 2010 on a retroactive basis but does not include the 3:1 forward common stock split effective March 30, 2012.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.


- 9 -


PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.





(A Development Stage Company)





UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2012 AND FEBRUARY 28, 2011,


AND THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 22, 2004 (INCEPTION) TO FEBRUARY 29, 2012


(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)





 


June 22, 2004 (inception) to

February 29,
2012

For the nine

months ended

February 29,
2012

For the nine

months ended

February 28,
2011



$

$

$

Cash Flows from Operating Activities





Net Loss


(919,127)

(91,308)

(165,588)

Adjustments made to reconcile net loss to net cash from

   operating activities




Depreciation of equipment


14,311

1,433

1,812 

Amortization of source code


152,000

-

38,000

Changes in operating assets and liabilities





Increase in accounts and other receivables


(8,944)

6,156

(1,600)

Increase in prepaid expenses and deposits


(6,255)

-

(122)

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

142,103

37,885

17,627

Cash flows used in operating activities


(625,912)

(45,834)

(109,871)






Cash Flows from Investing Activities





Purchase of equipment


(15,615)

-

(1,483)

Purchase of source code


(40,000)

-

-

Cash flows used in investing activities


(55,615)

-

(1,483)






Cash Flows from Financing Activities





Proceeds from issuance of notes payable


376,943

19,943

90,000

Proceeds from issuance of convertible loan


7,000

-

-

Proceeds from issuance of shareholder loan


36,087

29,487

-

Proceeds from issuance of common stock


275,700

-

-

Cash flows provided by financing activities


695,730

49,430

90,000

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


14,203

3,596

(21,354)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period


-

10,607

33,318

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period


14,203

14,203

11,964






Supplemental Cash Flow Information





Non-cash acquisition of source code upon issuance of common stock

112,000

-

-


 


 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

 






- 10 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 1.  ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


Portlogic Systems Inc. (“Portlogic”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 22, 2004. On June 5, 2008, Portlogic filed a Form S-1 Registration Statement under the United States Securities Act of 1933. It became effective June 24, 2008.


Portlogic is a Toronto, Canada based development stage company with enterprise mobile marketing applications solutions, kiosk hardware and software products which fall into five principal product families: m2Meet, m2Bank, m2Market, m2Ticket, and m2Kiosk. Prior to January 2010. Portlogic created and licensed online interactive community portal software systems and developed a series of web-based community portal products.


On September 16, 2009, Portlogic incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary, Sunlogic Energy Corporation in Panama City, Republic of Panama for the purpose of looking at solar and alternative green energy software and products. Initial operations include: capital formation; organization; website construction; target market identification; research costs; promotional materials costs; and marketing planning. Sunlogic Energy Corporation is still incorporated as a subsidiary but its operations are on hold.


The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include Portlogic and its subsidiary (herein after referred to collectively as the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.


The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for interim financial statements. Therefore, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011.


The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements present the balance sheet, statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows of the Company.  The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with GAAP.


NOTE 2.  GOING CONCERN


The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are presented on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and discharge of obligations in the normal course of business as they come due.  No adjustments have been made to assets or liabilities in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should the Company not be able to continue normal business operations.


The Company has incurred losses from inception and, during the nine month period ended February 29, 2012, the Company utilized $45,834 (February 28, 2011 - $109,871) of cash in operations. At February 29, 2012, the Company reported a deficit of $919,127 and continues to expend cash in amounts that exceed revenues. These conditions cast substantial doubt on the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern and meet its obligations as they come due. Management is considering various alternatives and is pursuing raising additional capital resources. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that these initiatives if undertaken will be successful.


The Company is in the development stage and is in the process of developing a series of web-based community portal products as well as a series of off-the-shelf template based websites. Sale of one of these products commenced during the 2008 fiscal year. The Company has recently shifted its focus to specializing in mobile applications solutions marketing. The Company’s continuance as a going concern is dependent on the commercialization of more of the Company’s products and the achievement of profitable operations as well as the success of the Company in raising additional long-term financing through debt or equity offerings. In the event that the Company is not successful in these efforts, the assets may not be realized or liabilities discharged at their carrying amounts, and differences from the carrying amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements could be material.



- 11 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 3.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


The interim consolidated financial information is unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position as of February 29, 2012 and the results of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows presented herein have been included in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the full year.


Accounting Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the period. Financial statement items subject to significant judgment include the expected life of equipment and source code, the net realizable value of accounts receivable, the completeness of expense accruals, as well as income taxes and loss contingencies. Actual results may differ from those estimates.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


Cash equivalents comprise highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As at February 29, 2012, cash equivalents amounted to $9,067 (May 31, 2011 - $7,575).


Equipment


Equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives (three years for computer hardware and mobile hardware and two years for computer software).


Asset Impairment


Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.  


Source Code


The Company has capitalized the costs of acquiring computer source code in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) in ASC 985-20, “Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed." At each reporting period end, the Company analyzes the realizability of its recorded software assets under the provisions of that statement. An impairment loss would be recognized when and to the extent that the carrying amount of the software exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Since the source code has started to generate positive cash flows and is still being used for development, no impairment loss has been recognized. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the asset's estimated useful life, three years. As of February 29, 2012, the source code has been fully amortized.


Advertising Costs


Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included as part of selling and administrative expenses. Advertising costs amounted to $424 for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 (February 28, 2011 - $6,419).





- 12 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 3.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)


Revenue Recognition


The Company recognizes revenue at the point of passage to the customer of title and risk of loss when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.


Service revenues are generally recognized at the time of performance.  Revenues billed in advance under contracts are deferred and recognized over the corresponding service periods.


Foreign Currency Translation


The Company maintains its accounting records in US dollars, which is its functional and reporting currency. At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense denominated in a foreign currency is translated into the functional currency by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency by using the exchange rate in effect at that date.  The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations. Foreign exchange gain amounted to $420 for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 (February 28, 2011 - loss of $2,505).


Income Taxes


The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.


Earnings (Loss) per Share


The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed conversion of the convertible loan into common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect.


Comprehensive Income


The Company has adopted ASC 220, "Comprehensive Income," which establishes standards for reporting and the display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners or distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, the standard requires that all items that are required to be recognized under the current accounting standards as a component of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income would be displayed in the statement of shareholders' equity and in the balance sheet as a component of shareholders' equity (deficiency). The Company had no other comprehensive income (loss) for the nine month periods ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011. As such, net loss is equivalent to total comprehensive loss.



- 13 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 3.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)


Financial Instruments and Risk Concentrations


The Company’s financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, loan receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, notes payable and convertible loan. Unless otherwise indicated, the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities approximate their recorded values due to their short-terms to maturity. The Company determines the fair value of its long-term financial instruments based on quoted market values or discounted cash flow analyses.


Financial instruments that may potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk comprise primarily cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents comprise deposits with major commercial banks and/or checking account balances. With respect to accounts receivable, the Company performs periodic credit evaluations of the financial condition of its customers and typically does not require collateral from them. Allowances are maintained for potential credit losses consistent with the credit risk of specific customers and other information. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or currency risks in respect of its financial instruments.


Leases


Leases entered into by the Company as a lessee are classified as capital or operating leases. Leases that transfer substantially the entire risks and benefits incidental to ownership are classified as capital leases. At the inception of a capital lease, an asset and an obligation are recorded at an amount equal to the lesser of the present value of the minimum lease payments and the asset’s fair market value at the beginning of each lease. Rental payments under operating leases are expensed as incurred.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements Issued but Not Yet Adopted


In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS” which is intended to create consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments include clarification on the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expanded disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This guidance is effective prospectively for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption by public entities prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this standard, but it is not expected to have a material impact on its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income” which requires comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive statements reporting net income and other comprehensive income. The amendment does not change what items are reported in other comprehensive income. Additionally, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” which indefinitely defers the requirement in ASU No. 2011-05 to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component in both the statement in which net income is presented and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. During the deferral period, the existing requirements in U.S. GAAP for the presentation of reclassification adjustments must continue to be followed. These standards are effective for interim and annual financial periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. As these standards impact presentation requirements only, the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.




- 14 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 3.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)


Recent Accounting Pronouncements Issued but Not Yet Adopted (cont’d)


In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing for Goodwill Impairment” which permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant effect on its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.


NOTE 4.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Beginning June 1, 2008, the Company partially applied accounting standard, “Fair Value Measurements,” codified as ASC 820. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard defines fair value as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value, in this context, should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk including our own credit risk.

In addition to defining fair value, the standard expands the disclosure requirements around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:


 

Level 1

Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable;

Level 3

Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates.


Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Assets/Liabilities

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level3

 

 

At Fair Value

Asset
















 

     Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

$5,136

 

 

$

9,067

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

14,203

 

     Loan receivable



-




-



$

8,944



$

8,944

 

Liability
















 

     Notes payable



-




-



$

376,943



$

376,943

 

     Shareholder loan



-




-



$

36,087



$

36,087

 

     Convertible loan



-




-



$

7,000



$

7,000

 






- 15 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 5.  EQUIPMENT


Equipment – February 29, 2012

 Cost

 Accumulated

Depreciation

 Net Book
Value


$

          $

     $

Mobile hardware

893

248

645

Computer hardware

9,266

8,607

659

Computer software

5,456

5,456

-

 

15,615

14,311

1,304


Equipment – May 31, 2011

 Cost

 Accumulated

Depreciation

 Net Book
Value


$

          $

     $

Mobile hardware

893

25

868

Computer hardware

9,266

8,009

1,257

Computer software

5,456

4,844

612 

 

15,615

12,878

2,737


Depreciation expense amounted to $1,433 for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 (February 28, 2011 - $1,812).


NOTE 6.  SOURCE CODE


Source Code – February 29, 2012

 Cost

 Accumulated

Amortization

 Net book
value


   $

     $

    $

Internet dating portal software

152,000

152,000

-


Source Code – May 31, 2011

 Cost

 Accumulated

Amortization

 Net book
value


   $

     $

    $

Internet dating portal software

152,000

152,000

-


On October 31, 2005, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Joyn Internet Communities Inc. ("Joyn") to acquire Internet dating software that Joyn had developed, including all rights to use and license the software.


In consideration, the Company issued 4,480,000 restricted common shares and paid $40,000, cash. The stock-based portion of the issuance, according to the terms of the agreement, was valued at $112,000, or $0.025 cents per share.   


The Company did not capitalize any additional source code software for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012, or for period from June 22, 2004 (inception) to February 29, 2012.


Amortization expense, included in cost of goods sold, amounted to $Nil for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 (February 28, 2011 - $38,000). Amortization commenced March 1, 2008, when it became apparent that the source code was being used to generate revenue, and ended on February 28, 2011.


As of February 29, 2012, the source code software has been fully amortized.



- 16 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 7.  ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES



February 29, 2012

May 31, 2011


        $

        $

Audit and review

12,200

16,206

Bookkeeping and accounting

107

107

Legal

-

5,975

Other

83,358

50,840

Credit cards

6,148

6,063

Interest payable

40,290

25,027




142,103

104,218



NOTE 8.  NOTES PAYABLE


On July 18, 2008, the Company issued a note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $100,000 over a term of one year. Interest is payable at the prime rate plus 2%. This has been extended under the same terms. Principal and interest are now due on July 18, 2012 unless demanded earlier. On July 18, 2008, the Company borrowed $25,000 against the total $100,000 available to be drawn down. On April 14, 2009, the Company borrowed $5,000 against the total $75,000 available to be drawn down. On June 10, 2009, the Company borrowed $50,000 against the total $70,000 available to be drawn down. The balance payable on this note payable is $80,000 as of February 29, 2012 (May 31, 2011 - $80,000).


On August 26, 2009, the Company issued an additional note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $300,000 over a term of one year. Interest is payable at the prime rate plus 2%. This has been extended under the same terms. Principal and interest are now due on August 26, 2012 unless demanded earlier. On August 26, 2009, the Company borrowed $100,000 against the total $300,000 available to be drawn down. On March 3, 2010, the Company borrowed $75,000 against the total $200,000 available to be drawn down. On August 24, 2010, the Company borrowed $30,000 against the total $125,000 available to be drawn down. On September 27, 2010, the Company borrowed $10,000 against the total $95,000 available to be drawn down. On November 1, 2010, the Company borrowed $10,000 against the total $85,000 available to be drawn down leaving $75,000 further funds available to be drawn down. On December 9, 2010, the Company borrowed $15,000 against the total $75,000 available to be drawn down leaving $60,000 further funds available to be drawn down. On December 15, 2010, the Company borrowed $10,000 against the total $60,000 available to be drawn down leaving $50,000 further funds available to be drawn down. On January 18, 2011, the Company borrowed $15,000 against the total $50,000 available to be drawn down leaving $35,000 further funds available to be drawn down. On March 9, 2011, the Company borrowed $12,000 against the total $35,000 available to be drawn down leaving $23,000 further funds available to be drawn down. On January 5, 2012, the Company borrowed $19,943 against the total $23,000 available to be drawn down leaving $3,057 further funds available to be drawn down The balance payable on this note payable is $296,943 as of February 29, 2012 (May 31, 2011 - $277,000).


Interest expense amounted to $16,314 for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 (February 28, 2011 - $11,376) and is included in selling and administrative expense. As at February 29, 2012, accrued interest of $40,290 (May 31, 2011 - $25,027) is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.




- 17 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 9.  CONVERTIBLE LOAN


A convertible debenture, issued March 11, 2005, was unsecured, matured March 11, 2012 and carried interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The instrument is convertible at the option of the holder into common shares of the Company at a rate of $0.05 per share, and may be redeemed at any time prior to maturity at the option of the holder, should certain conditions prevail. The holder of the debenture has signed agreements waiving interest accrued from March 11, 2005 through to March 10, 2013. This convertible debenture has not been repaid and is due on March 10, 2013.


NOTE 10.  STOCK TRANSACTIONS **


Transactions, other than employees’ stock issuance, are in accordance with paragraph 8 of SFAS 123 “Share Based Payment”. Thus issuances shall be accounted for on the fair value of the consideration received. Transactions with employees’ stock issuance are in accordance with paragraphs (16-44) of SFAS 123. These issuances shall be accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or whichever is more readily determinable.


In January 2005, the Company issued a total of 5,900,000* shares of common stock to nine individuals for cash in the amount of $0.0005 per share for a total of $2,950.


On February 7, 2005, the Company issued a total of 200,000* shares of common stock to one individual for cash in the amount of $0.001 per share for a total of $200.


On May 26, 2005, the Company issued a total of 3,000,000* shares of common stock to one individual for cash in the amount of $0.001 per share for a total of $3,000.


In July 2005, the Company issued a total of 50,550,000* shares of common stock to nine individuals for cash in the amount of $0.001 per share for a total of $50,550.


On September 14, 2005, the Company issued a total of 2,500,000* shares of common stock to one director for cash in the amount of $0.001 per share for a total of $2,500.


On October 31, 2005, the Company issued a total of 4,480,000* shares of common stock in the amount of $0.025 per share for a total of $112,000, which was the fair value of the stock on date of issuance, in consideration for the purchase of source code software. A further $40,000 in cash was also paid as consideration for this asset purchase agreement.


In April 2006, the Company issued a total of 60,000* shares of common stock to three individuals for cash in the amount of $0.025 per share for a total of $1,500.


In May 2006, the Company issued a total of 480,000* shares of common stock to five individuals for cash in the amount of $0.025 per share for a total of $12,000.


In June 2006, the Company issued a total of 60,000* shares of common stock to three individuals for cash in the amount of $0.025 per share for a total of $1,500.


On July 22, 2006, the Company issued a total of 20,000* shares of common stock to one individual for cash in the amount of $0.025 per share for a total of $500.


On December 22, 2006, the Company issued a total of 60,000* shares of common stock to one individual for cash in the amount of $0.025 per share for a total of $1,500.



- 18 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 10.  STOCK TRANSACTIONS ** (cont’d)


On February 22, 2007, the Company issued a total of 266,666* shares of common stock to one individual for cash in the amount of $0.075 per share for a total of $20,000.


In May 2007, the Company issued a total of 1,196,666* shares of common stock to three individuals for cash in the amount of $0.1416 per share for a total of $169,500.


On January 10, 2008, the Company issued a total of 57,142* shares of common stock to one individuals for cash in the amount of $0.175 per share for a total of $10,000.


As of February 29, 2012, the Company had 68,830,474* share of common stock issued and outstanding.



* After giving retroactive effect of 2:1 stock split effective January 20, 2010.


** These transactions do not include the 3:1 forward common stock split the Company effected on March 30, 2012.



NOTE 11.  STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY


The stockholders' deficiency section of the Company contains the following classes of capital stock as of February 29, 2012: **


Preferred stock: $0.001 par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized and 0 shares issued and outstanding.

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized and 68,830,474* shares issued and outstanding.


* After giving retroactive effect of 2:1 stock split effective January 20, 2010.

** These transactions do not include the 3:1 forward stock split the Company effected on March 30, 2012.

On March 30, 2012, the Company effected a common stock forward split 3:1. Each shareholder is to receive two additional shares for each share they hold on the Record Date. The number of authorized common shares shall be correspondingly increased. The number of authorized preferred stock stays the same.

Therefore the stockholders' deficiency section of the Company contains the following classes of capital stock as of April 13, 2012:


Preferred stock: $0.001 par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized and 0 shares issued and outstanding.

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 225,000,000 shares authorized and 206,491,422* shares issued and outstanding.


* Also after giving retroactive effect of 2:1 stock split effective January 20, 2010.




NOTE 12.  COMMITMENTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


a)

On June 25, 2008, the Company advanced $9,807 to UOMO Media Inc. (“UOMO”). One director of the Company is also a director of UOMO. This advance was paid back to the Company on February 19, 2010. In April and May 2010, the Company advanced a total amount of $13,500 as a temporary loan again. In June 2010, a further $1,600 was advanced totaling the temporary loan to $15,100. In August 2011, a payment of $1,624 was applied against this loan. On September 11, 2011, a payment of $490 was applied against this loan. In December 2011, payments of $4,042 were further applied against this loan. As at February 29, 2012, $8,944 remains receivable from UOMO (May 31, 2011 – $15,100).





- 19 -

PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 29, 2012

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)


NOTE 12.  COMMITMENTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (cont’d)



b)

On May 1, 2007, an independent contractor agreement was entered into under which compensation of $3,000 per month was to be paid to perform services as an officer to October 31, 2007. New agreements have been entered into with this contractor from November 1, 2007 to October 31, 2008 at $3,000 per month. The agreement has been continued on a month-to-month basis. The related service fee for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 amounted to $27,000 (February 28, 2011 - $27,000).


c)

On August 1, 2010, an independent contractor agreement was entered into under which compensation of $2,000 per month was to be paid to perform services as an officer for a period of one year. The agreement was not renewed after July 31, 2011. Therefore, the related service fee for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 amounted to $4,000 (February 28, 2011 - $14,000).


d)

On November 24, 2011, the Company entered into a contract to pay one of its directors 20,000 restricted common shares and $5,000 cash compensation to carry out services as the Company’s director for a term of one year or until removed as a director.


e)

On December 9, 2011, the Company entered into a contract to pay one of its directors 20,000 restricted common shares and $5,000 cash compensation to carry out services as the Company’s director for a term of one year or until removed as a director.



NOTE 13.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 30, 2012, the Company effected a common stock forward split 3:1. Each shareholder is to receive two additional shares for each share they hold on the Record Date. The number of authorized common shares shall be correspondingly increased. The number of authorized preferred stock stays the same.

On March 30, 2012, the Company entered into a sales partner agreement with JBBMobile Inc. The agreement provides that the Company will resell and distribute JBBMobile’s Field Cloud Application and Mobile CRM software systems and solutions for a term of one year. The agreement may automatically renew for periods of one year.






- 20 -


Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


INTRODUCTION


The following management discussion and analysis compares our results of operations for the nine months ended February 29, 2012 to the same period in 2011. This management discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this quarterly report for the nine months ended February 29, 2012.


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in this report and other reports we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by law.


OVERVIEW


We incorporated on June 22, 2004 as Portlogic Systems Inc. under the laws of the State of Nevada. On June 5, 2008, the Company filed a Form S-1 Registration Statement under the United States Securities Act of 1933. It became effective June 24, 2008. We have a financial year end of May 31.


We are currently in the development stage and began our business developing and licensing portal software products and related services. We developed a product that we licensed to our customers to enable them to operate their own online social networking portal without requiring any technical programming or website design skills.


Since January 2010, we have expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. Portlogic’s product offering now include enterprise software solutions which fall into five principal product families: m2Meet, m2Bank, m2Market, m2Ticket, and m2Kiosk.


Our 5 divisions are as follows:


1.

m2Meet: A community networking software solution. Currently being developed from our proprietary web based source code. Internet and mobile users with similar interests will use m2Meet to socially network and connect using location based technology such as GPS.

2.

m2Bank: (Mobile to Bank) is a financial transactions system that facilitates bill payments, money transfers, and account management.

3.

m2Market: Mobile marketing solutions including a bluetooth push technology that is used to deliver marketing materials to mobile phones.

4.

m2Ticket: Mobile ticketing sales engine which manages the sale and delivery of tickets through mobile phones for the transportation and entertainment industry.

5.

m2Kiosk: A line of standard and custom kiosks hardware and software which integrates with mobile phone applications in the marketing, financial, and ticketing industries.


Due to the cost of developing the technology to offer such products we have decided to offer many of our products by bundling technology from third party suppliers. Agreements can include but are not limited to licensing agreements, reseller agreements, partnership agreements, memoranda of understanding, and software development agreements.


On September 16, 2009, we incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary, Sunlogic Energy Corporation in Panama City, Republic of Panama for the purpose of looking at solar and alternative green energy software and products. Initial operations include: capital formation; organization; website construction; target market identification; research costs; promotional materials costs; and marketing planning. To date, our subsidiary has not had any operations.





- 21 -


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for interim financial statements. Therefore, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011.


The preparation of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the reported amounts of revenues and expenses, bad debt, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider the following accounting policies to be critical because the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change or because the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


Our cash equivalents comprise highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As at February 29, 2012, cash equivalents amounted to $9,067 (May 31, 2011 - $7,575).


SOURCE CODE

                                                          

We have capitalized the costs of acquiring computer source code in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) in ASC 985-20, “Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed." At each reporting period end, we analyze the realizability of our recorded software assets under the provisions of that statement. We recognize an impairment loss when and to the extent that the carrying amount of the software exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Since the source code has started to generate positive cash flows and is still being used for development, no impairment loss has been recognized. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the asset's estimated useful life, three years. As of February 29, 2012, the source code has been fully amortized.


REVENUE RECOGNITION


We recognize revenue at the point of passage to the customer of title and risk of loss when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.


We recognize service revenues at the time of performance.  Revenues billed in advance under contracts are deferred and recognized over the corresponding service periods.


FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION


We maintain our accounting records in US dollars, which is our functional and reporting currency. At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense denominated in a foreign currency is translated into the functional currency by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency by using the exchange rate in effect at that date.  The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations. Foreign exchange gain amounted to $420 for the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 (February 28, 2011 - loss of $2,505).



- 22 -


RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED


In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS” which is intended to create consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments include clarification on the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expanded disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This guidance is effective prospectively for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption by public entities prohibited. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this standard, but it is not expected to have a material impact on our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income” which requires comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive statements reporting net income and other comprehensive income. The amendment does not change what items are reported in other comprehensive income. Additionally, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” which indefinitely defers the requirement in ASU No. 2011-05 to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component in both the statement in which net income is presented and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. During the deferral period, the existing requirements in U.S. GAAP for the presentation of reclassification adjustments must continue to be followed. These standards are effective for interim and annual financial periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. As these standards impact presentation requirements only, the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.


In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing for Goodwill Impairment” which permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant effect on our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

COMPARISON OF RESULTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2012 AND FEBRUARY 28, 2011


REVENUE


For the nine months ended February 29, 2012, we recognized $1,492 in revenue from interest income on our short term deposits. For the nine months ended February 28, 2011, we recognized $3,020 in dating revenues derived from our proprietary source code. We have not yet begun to generate revenues from our mobile marketing offerings.


COST OF GOODS SOLD


Cost of goods sold of $38,000 for the nine months ended February 28, 2011, is made up entirely of amortization of our source code, which we include in cost of goods sold. The work completed to earn revenue in this nine month period was provided in-house using our source code. Amortization of our source code commenced March 1, 2008 when it became apparent that the source code was being used to generate revenue.


We incurred $Nil in cost of goods sold for the nine months ended February 29, 2012 as we did not earn any dating revenues in this period and our source code has been fully amortized.





- 23 -


EXPENSES


During the nine months ended February 29, 2012, we incurred total expenses of $92,800 comprised of selling and administrative expense of $91,367 and depreciation of $1,433; compared with total expenses of $130,629 comprised of selling and administrative expense of $128,817 and depreciation of $1,812 for the same period in 2011. Higher expenses for the prior nine month period ended February 28, 2011 were incurred all around with the largest expenses for both periods pertaining mostly to consulting and professional fees. The largest difference between the two periods resulted from consulting fees of $16,662 versus $4,000 due to seven months of officers’ fees versus two months in 2012. However, this was offset by $10,000 in directors’ fees which were not incurred in 2011. Legal fees was much higher in the nine month period ended February 28, 2011 in part due to a legal adjustment of $5,798 resulting from the May 31, 2010 year end. As well, reduced audit fees in the nine month period ended February 29, 2012 was due to a change of auditors. Higher advertising (February 28, 2011 - $6,419) versus $424 advertising expense was incurred in the current period. Much higher webhosting and system administration due to operations related to the dating website revenues were incurred in the nine month period ended February 28, 2011; as no dating revenues were realized in the current period, so the same expense was related mostly to maintenance. And finally expenses related to travel and meals of $10,213 were incurred in the prior period ended February 28, 2011. Very little travel incurred in the nine month period ended February 29, 2012.


NET INCOME/LOSS


During the nine months ended February 29, 2012, we incurred a net loss of $91,308 compared with a net loss of $165,588 for the nine months ended February 28, 2011. The decrease in net loss was due to slightly higher revenue in the nine months ended February 28, 2011 and much lower selling and administrative expenses all around in the same period. As well, as our revenues in this period were not earned from our dating software and our source code has been fully amortized, we did not incur any cost of goods sold which was the highest expense in the prior period ended February 28, 2011.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


We do not yet have an adequate source of reliable, long-term revenue to fund operations. The Company is in the development. We have no significant assets or financial resources. The amount of working capital that we will require depends on several factors, including without limitation, the extent and timing of sales of our products and related services, future costs of development, the timing and costs associated with the expansion of our customer support capabilities, and our operating results.


As of February 29, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $14,203. We had total current assets of $29,402.


In order to ensure we continue to generate cash revenues, during the next three months, we have expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. Our proprietary web based community software will be further developed for mobile use in our m2Meet division. However, our product offering now includes enterprise software solutions which fall into five principal product families: m2Meet, m2Bank, m2Market, m2Ticket, and m2Kiosk as follows:


1.

m2Meet: A community networking software solution. Currently being developed from our proprietary web based source code. Internet and mobile users with similar interests will use m2Meet to socially network and connect using location based technology such as GPS.

2.

m2Bank: (Mobile to Bank) is a financial transactions system that facilitates bill payments, money transfers, and account management.

3.

m2Market: Mobile marketing solutions including a bluetooth push technology that is used to deliver marketing materials to mobile phones.

4.

m2Ticket: Mobile ticketing sales engine which manages the sale and delivery of tickets through mobile phones for the transportation and entertainment industry.

5.

m2Kiosk: A line of standard and custom kiosks hardware and software which integrates with mobile phone applications in the marketing, financial, and ticketing industries.


Due to the cost of developing the technology to offer such products we have decided to offer many of our products by bundling technology from third party suppliers. Agreements can include but are not limited to licensing



- 24 -


agreements, reseller agreements, partnership agreements, memoranda of understanding, and software development agreements. We anticipate that we will require $350,000 in total, over the next three months, to fund the start up of each of these divisions. We anticipate launching each division, individually, as technology solutions providers are in place. We need to be assured that we have strong presentation support, an organized implementation strategy and ongoing technical support. As we sign more technology partners with proven large scale application experience, we will begin to hire project managers and begin marketing our solutions to targeted potential clients.


Any additional cash revenues that we generate from our operations will ease the burden on our cash and enable us to finance operations beyond the next six months. If we generate no cash revenues other than the $14,203 that we had available as of February 29, 2012, we will need to raise additional funds during the next three months. Potential sources of such working capital could include senior debt facilities, new lines of credit, bank financings or additional sales of our securities. If we raise funds through the sale of our securities, the common stock currently outstanding would be diluted. There is a risk that such additional financing may not be available, or may not be available on acceptable terms, and the inability to obtain additional financing or generate sufficient cash from operations could require us to reduce or eliminate expenditures for capital equipment, production, or marketing of our products, or otherwise curtail or discontinue our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


On August 26, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $300,000 over a term of one year which has been extended. Interest is payable at the prime rate plus 2%. Principal and interest are now due on August 26, 2012 unless demanded earlier.


As of February 29, 2012, the Company borrowed $296,943 against the total $300,000 available to be drawn down.


Prior to this, on July 18, 2008, the Company had issued a note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $100,000 over a term of one year which has been extended. As of February 29, 2012, the Company borrowed $80,000 against this loan.


A shareholder has also loaned the Company $36,087 as of February 29, 2012.


Our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a continuing operation basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.


As of February 29, 2012, our total assets were $30,706, our total liabilities were $562,133, and stockholders’ deficiency was $531,427.


SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 30, 2012, we effected a common stock forward split 3:1. Each shareholder is to receive two additional shares for each share they hold on the Record Date. The number of authorized common shares shall be correspondingly increased. The number of authorized preferred stock stays the same.

On March 30, 2012, we entered into a sales partner agreement with JBBMobile Inc. The agreement provides that the we will resell and distribute JBBMobile’s Field Cloud Application and Mobile CRM software systems and solutions for a term of one year. The agreement may automatically renew for periods of one year.


OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTION


We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.





- 25 -


Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item.


Item 4T.      Controls and Procedures.


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures can be relied upon to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting. Management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance that the control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We have assessed the effectiveness of those internal controls as of February 29, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework.


Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement

preparation and presentation.


A material weakness in internal controls is a deficiency in internal control, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects a company's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. In the course of making our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness consisted of inadequate staffing within the accounting operations of our Company. The small number of employees who are responsible for accounting functions prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews. Due to this material weakness, management could not conclude that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 29, 2012.

Our review also indicated the existence of certain high level procedures that might or might not serve to provide compensating control over these weaknesses. These procedures consisted of analytical review of key operating results by our senior management, including preparation and review of monthly operating results, comparison of such results to budgets and to historical amounts. In addition, the board of directors received monthly updates on



- 26 -


operations, and on a quarterly basis, reviews, investigates and discusses apparent inconsistencies and concerns with senior operating management.

Our review also revealed that although a number of controls appeared to exist, and were observed to have been in operation, documentary evidence that such controls were operating throughout the period was found to be lacking. Such evidence as signatures indicating that a certain procedure had been carried out and affixing responsibility were lacking in the internal control system.


This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this quarterly report.


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended February 29, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.


PART II


Item 1.

Legal Proceedings


We may be involved from time to time in ordinary litigation, negotiation and settlement matters that will not have a material effect on our operations or finances. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us or our officers and directors in their capacity as such that could have a material impact on our operations or finances.


ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

Risks Relating To Our Business


We intend to grow our Company by acquisition and have expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. If we are not successful, our business will be harmed.


Our business strategy includes the attainment of a portion of our growth through our ability to successfully execute our acquisition model. In order to pursue a growth by acquisition strategy successfully, we must identify suitable candidates for these transactions, complete these transactions, and manage post-closing issues such as integration of the acquired business into our corporate structure. Integration issues are complex, time-consuming, and expensive and, without proper planning and implementation, could significantly disrupt our business. Potential disruptions include diversion of management's attention, loss of key business and/or personnel from the acquired company, unanticipated events, and legal liabilities. If the business becomes impaired, there could be partial or full write-offs attributed to the acquisition.


If we cannot obtain additional financing, we may have to curtail operations and may ultimately cease to exist.


Our continued operations are contingent on our ability to raise additional capital and obtain financing and success in future operations. If we do not acquire sufficient additional funding or alternative sources of capital to meet our working capital, we may have to substantially curtail our operations and business plan. If we do not achieve sufficient revenues to meet our future obligations, we intend to seek sufficient financial resources by issuing shares of common stock, borrowing cash from a bank or one of our directors, or a combination of these activities. We may be unable to obtain additional financing using any of these methods. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. However, our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue our business.





- 27 -


We have a limited operating history and may never achieve or sustain profitable operations.


We have a short operating history and have not been profitable since our incorporation in June 2004. Since inception until February 29, 2012, we have derived ancillary revenues by providing website layout and web portal design services, as well as software licensing. Although some of our main web-based community portal products were still being developed, we realized some revenues, starting mostly in September 2007, for providing dating software websites. We have changed our business model to mobile solutions applications marketing. Even if we obtain future revenues sufficient to expand operations, increased operational or marketing expenses could adversely affect our liquidity. The limited extent of our assets and revenues, our early stage of development, and our limited operating history make us subject to the risks associated with start-up companies, including potentially negative cash flows. We have no significant assets or financial resources. Our lack of operating history makes it very difficult for you to make an investment decision. We may never become profitable. You may lose your entire investment.


We depend on our officers and directors to perform our business activities and our ability to recruit and retain the qualified individuals needed to operate and develop our business is unknown.


We rely on our officers and directors to perform many of our business activities. Currently, our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, Jueane Thiessen, personally performs most of our accounting and financial management functions, and liases with external contractors who provide additional programming and consulting services. Ms. Thiessen is also involved in carrying out our sales activities. Our present management structure, although adequate for the early stage of our operations, will likely have to be significantly augmented as our operations expand. Our future success will depend in part on the services of our key personnel and, additionally, on our ability to identify, hire and retain additional qualified personnel. There is intense competition for qualified management, marketing, accounting, and sales personnel in our new business line: marketing mobile application solutions. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain the personnel needed to operate and develop our business. Because we rely on our officers and directors to perform our sales, accounting, and financial management activities, failure to attract and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.


We have limited cash which we anticipate will be insufficient to fund our plan of operations for the three months ending May 31, 2012 and if we are unable to raise additional capital, our business may fail and stockholders may lose their entire investment.


We have limited capital reserves to finance expansion or to protect us from a downturn in business. We currently do not have sufficient cash to fund operations for the three months ending May 31, 2012. We will need to raise additional funds to fully fund our operations for the next three month period beginning March 1, 2012. Additional financing may come in the form of an offering of common shares, borrowing from a bank or one of our directors, or from revenues generated by new business. If additional shares are issued to raise capital, our existing stockholders will suffer a dilution of their stock ownership and the value of our outstanding shares may fall. If we borrow more money, we will have to pay interest and may also have to agree to restrictions that limit our operating flexibility. We have no commitments for additional financing and there can be no assurance that additional funds will be available when needed, or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If adequate funds are not available we may be required to change our planned business strategies. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing, we may not be able to successfully develop and market our products and services. As a result, we would need to curtail business operations which would have a material negative effect on operating results, the value of our outstanding stock is likely to fall, and our business may fail causing our stockholders to lose their entire investment.


One of our directors, Jueane Thiessen, also serves as our officer. This interrelationship may create conflicts of interest that might be detrimental to us.


There are various interrelationships between our officers and directors that may create conflicts of interest that might be detrimental to us. One of our directors, Jueane Thiessen, is our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and acting Chief Executive Officer. Our board of directors, which appoints our officers, currently consists of three persons, Ms. Thiessen, Mr. Donald Gilpin and Mr. Bruce Maschmeyer. Ms. Thiessen controls over thirty-three percent of the voting power of the board of directors. Because Ms. Thiessen is both a director and officer, there exists a potential future conflict of interest regarding the decision to remove our officers or appoint new officers.



- 28 -


Our directors and officers will deal with any such conflicts of interest, should they arise, in accordance with our Corporate Code of Ethics and applicable corporate law principles.


We may be subject to foreign currency fluctuation and such fluctuation may adversely affect our financial position and results.


We are currently located in Canada and pay most of our expenses in United States dollars. However, our target market is global. We may enter into contracts that require customers to pay us in currencies other than United States dollars. Therefore, our potential operations make us subject to foreign currency fluctuation. We do not make investments that offset the risk of adverse foreign currency fluctuations and we may suffer increased expenses and overall losses as a result.


We do not own patents on our products and, if other companies copy our products, our revenues may decline which may result in a decrease in our stock price.


We do not own patents on our products we have developed and we do not currently intend to file for patent protection on those products. Therefore, another company could recreate our products and could compete against us, which would adversely affect our revenues.


We do not carry any insurance and we may be subject to significant lawsuits which could substantially increase our expenses.


We do not carry any insurance. There are a number of occurrences that could adversely affect our financial condition. These include damage to our assets, financial records, or other property by fire or water, as well as any successful lawsuits against us involving recovery of damages arising out of our contractual, legal, or other duties. Should such an uninsured loss occur, our costs may substantially increase which would lower our overall profitability, if any.


Amendments to telecommunications regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business by increasing the cost of our operations or the costs that customers must incur to use our products and services.


We use telecommunications services to deliver our online software licensing and programming services to customers. In addition, our customers typically require telecommunications systems to use our products and services. The telecommunications industry is subject to regulatory control. Any amendments to current regulations in any jurisdiction where we operate or where our customers conduct business could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and prospects. If amendments to regulations increase the cost of using telecommunications services, our operating expenses may increase. Additionally, if regulatory amendments increase the cost that our customers must incur to use our services, we may experience difficulty attracting new customers or retaining existing customers.


Equipment loss or malfunctions and telecommunication service interruptions or delays may adversely affect our ability to provide our products and services.


Our business is highly dependent on our computer and telecommunications equipment and software systems for the operation and quality of our services. The temporary or permanent loss of all or a portion of these systems, including as a result of physical damage or operating malfunction, or significant replacement delays, could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any interruptions, delays or capacity problems experienced on the Internet or with telephone services could adversely affect our ability to provide our products and services.


Item 2.

      Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


N/A





- 29 -


Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities


None.


Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


During the third quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2012, no matter was submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.


Item 5.         Other Information


None.


Item 6.         Exhibits


The exhibits listed below are filed as part of or incorporated by reference in this report.


Exhibit

No.       Identification of Exhibit


3.1

Certificate of Change – Nevada Secretary of State, dated March 5, 2012 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed April 4, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).


10.1

Distributor Sales Agreement between Portlogic Systems Inc. and Clip Mobile Inc., dated June 10, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed June 15, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).


10.2

Agent Partner Production Distribution Agreement between Portlogic Systems Inc. and Clip Mobile Inc., dated June 10, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed June 15, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).


10.3

Director Service Agreement between Portlogic Systems Inc. and Donald Gilpin, dated November 24, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 28, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).


10.4

Director Service Agreement between Portlogic Systems Inc. and Bruce Maschmeyer dated December 6, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed December 9, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).


21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).


31.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).


31.2

Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).


32.1

Certification of Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).








- 30 -


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Portlogic Systems Inc.

(Registrant)



By

/s/ Jueane Thiessen

Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting

Officer, and Treasurer


Date

April 13, 2012




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated.


By

/s/ Jueane Thiessen

               

Jueane Thiessen

Director


Date

April 13, 2012




By

/s/ Donald Gilpin

               

Donald Gilpin

Director


Date

April 13, 2012




By

/s/ Bruce Maschmeyer

Bruce Maschmeyer

Director


Date

April 13, 2012




- 31 -