BIRCH BRANCH INC - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - BIRCH BRANCH INC	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - BIRCH BRANCH INC	v307487_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - BIRCH BRANCH INC	v307487_ex32-2.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - BIRCH BRANCH INC	v307487_ex31-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - BIRCH BRANCH INC	v307487_ex32-1.htm

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File No.: 333-126654

BIRCH BRANCH, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Colorado	84-1124170
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)

c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd.

Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Cun Road Intersection,

Anyang County, Henan Province, China 455141

(Address of principal executive offices)

+86 372 323 7890

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0 par value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x

As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there was no active public trading market for our common stock.

As of March 28, 2012, the registrant has 32,047,222 shares of its common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
	PART I
ITEM 1.	Business.	4
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors.	14
ITEM 2.	Properties.	33
ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings.	34
ITEM 4.	(Removed and Reserved).	34

	PART II
ITEM 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	34
ITEM 6.	Selected Financial Data.	35
ITEM 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.	35
ITEM 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	47
ITEM 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	48
ITEM 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	48

	PART III
ITEM 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	49
ITEM 11.	Executive Compensation.	50
ITEM 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	52
ITEM 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.	54
ITEM 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.	54

	PART IV
ITEM 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.	55
SIGNATURES		57

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are projections of events, revenues, income, future economic performance or management’s plans and objectives for our future operations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the risks set out below, any of which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation:

the uncertainty of profitability based upon our history of losses;

risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms to continue as going concern;

risks related to our international operations and currency exchange fluctuations; and

other risks and uncertainties related to our business plan and business strategy.

This list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

References in this annual report to “we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company” refer to Birch Branch, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

References to China or the PRC refer to the People’s Republic of China.

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. All references to “common stock” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Company Overview

Operating through Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (“SC Coke”), a variable interest entity incorporated under the laws of People’s Republic China (“PRC”), Birch Branch, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “BRBH”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a vertically integrated coke producer with its facilities and operations are based solely in the PRC, principally in Henan Province. SC Coke, which operates and derives its revenue solely in the PRC, has a coke production plant with current capacity of approximately 1.7 million tons of coke annually, equity ownership in a coal mine and two coal washing plants (producing refined coal).

We control SC Coke and its operations through a series of contractual arrangements between Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (“Anyang WFOE”), our Chinese wholly-foreign owned enterprise subsidiary, and SC Coke and its shareholders. SC Coke owns 86% of Henan Shuncheng Group Longdu Trade Co., Ltd., a Chinese company (“Longdu”). Xinshun Wang, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, also owns 5% of Longdu.

Corporate History

We were incorporated in the State of Colorado on September 28, 1989. We were previously a residential real estate holding company. In September 2006, we sold our real estate assets to our then president. Effective December 6, 2006, our plan was to evaluate the structure and complete a merger with, or acquisition of, prospects consisting of private companies, partnerships or sole proprietorships.

On May 14, 2010, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with the principal shareholders of the Company, Shun Cheng Holdings HongKong Limited, a privately-held company organized under the laws of Hong Kong (“Shun Cheng HK”), and the shareholders of Shun Cheng HK (the “Share Exchange Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Shun Cheng HK from the Shun Cheng HK shareholders in exchange for the issuance by us to the Shun Cheng HK shareholders of an aggregate of 30,233,750 newly-issued shares of our common stock (the “Share Exchange”), which, upon completion of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement, will constitute approximately 95% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Upon consummation of the Share Exchange, Shun Cheng HK will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

On June 28, 2010, we entered into an Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Share Exchange Agreement dated May 14, 2010 to provide for certain changes to the Share Exchange Agreement regarding, among other things, our management after the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and the updating of certain information pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement. Unless the context requires otherwise, the Amendment to the Share Exchange Agreement and the Share Exchange Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Share Exchange Agreement.”

The transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement closed on June 28, 2010 (the “Closing Date”). On the Closing Date, simultaneously with the closing of the Share Exchange, we entered into a Cancellation Agreement with certain shareholders of BRBH (the “Cancellation Agreement”), pursuant to which 435,123 shares of our common stock held by such shareholders were cancelled (the “Share Cancellation”). In connection with the Share Exchange, on the Closing Date, Timothy Brasel resigned as our sole director and Xinshun Wang was appointed as Chairman of our Board of Directors. In addition, Feng Wang, Qifa Huang, David Chen and Dexin Li were appointed as members of the Board of Directors effective on July 13, 2010, 10 days after the date of the filing of a Schedule 14(f) with the SEC. Effective on the Closing Date, Timothy Brasel also resigned as our sole executive officer and Feng Wang and Dexin Li were appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, respectively.

On the Closing Date, in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement, we also changed our fiscal year end from June 30 to December 31 to conform to the fiscal year end of SC Coke.

On July 20, 2010, SC Coke entered into a loan agreement with Bank of China, Anyang Branch. The principal amount of the secured loan is approximately $2,937,461. The secured loan carries an interest rate of 5.841% per annum, is due on July 20, 2011, and is personally guaranteed by the SC Coke shareholders, one of whom is the Chairman of our Board of Directors, and a third party guarantor.

On July 28, 2010, SC Coke entered into a loan agreement with China Construction Bank, Anyang Branch. The principal amount of the loan is approximately $2,937,461. The loan carries an interest rate of the PRC prime rate, which was 5.310% per annum on July 28, 2010, and is due on July 28, 2011.

On August 4, 2010, we dismissed Cordovano and Honeck, LLP (“Cordovano”) as our independent registered public accounting firm and engaged Samuel H. Wong & Co., LLP (“SHW”) as our new independent registered public accounting firm. The dismissal of Cordovano is not the result of any disagreement between us and Cordovano on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure with respect to the Company.

On August 12, 2010, we appointed Feng Wang, a director of the Company and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as President of the Company.

On November 15, 2010, Feng Wang resigned as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Lei Wang was appointed as the new Chief Financial Officer, effective immediately.

On March 2, 2011, David Chen was dismissed by the Board as a director of the Company and Senshan Gong was appointed as a member of the Board.

Organization & Subsidiaries

Our relationships with SC Coke and its shareholders are governed by a series of contractual arrangements, described below, through which we exercise management rights over SC Coke. None of BRBH, Shun Cheng HK, nor Anyang WFOE owns any direct equity interest in SC Coke. On March 19, 2010, Anyang WFOE entered into the following contractual arrangements with SC Coke and its shareholders:

Entrusted Management Agreement. Pursuant to the entrusted management agreement between Anyang WFOE, on the one hand, and SC Coke and Xinshun Wang, Xinming Wang and Junsheng Cheng (collectively, the “SC Coke Shareholders”), on the other hand, (the “Entrusted Management Agreement”), SC Coke and the SC Coke Shareholders agreed to entrust the business operations of SC Coke and its management to Anyang WFOE until Anyang WFOE acquires all of the assets or equity of SC Coke (as more fully described under “Exclusive Option Agreement” below). Under the Entrusted Management Agreement, Anyang WFOE manages SC Coke’s operations and assets, and controls all of SC Coke’s cash flow and assets through entrusted or designated bank accounts. In turn, it is entitled to any of SC Coke’s net earnings as a management fee, and is obligated to pay all SC Coke’s debts to the extent SC Coke is not able to pay such debts. Such management fees payable by SC Coke shall accrue until such time as the parties shall mutually agree. The Entrusted Management Agreement will remain in effect until the acquisition of all assets or equity of SC Coke by Anyang WFOE is completed.

Shareholders’ Voting Proxy Agreement. Under the shareholders’ voting proxy agreement (the “Shareholders’ Voting Proxy Agreement”) between Anyang WFOE and the SC Coke Shareholders, the SC Coke Shareholders irrevocably and exclusively appointed the board of directors of Anyang WFOE as their proxy to vote on all matters that require SC Coke shareholder approval. The Shareholders’ Voting Proxy Agreement shall not be terminated prior to the completion of the acquisition of all assets or equity of SC Coke by Anyang WFOE.

Exclusive Option Agreement. Under the exclusive option agreement (the “Exclusive Option Agreement”) between Anyang WFOE, on the one hand, and SC Coke and the SC Coke Shareholders, on the other hand, the SC Coke Shareholders granted Anyang WFOE an irrevocable exclusive purchase option to purchase all or part of the shares or assets of SC Coke. The option is exercisable at any time on or after June 28, 2010, but only to the extent that such purchase does not violate any PRC law then in effect. The exercise price shall be the minimum price permitted under the PRC law then applicable, and such price, subject to applicable PRC law, shall be refunded to Anyang WFOE or SC Coke for no consideration or the minimum consideration permitted under the PRC law then applicable, whichever is more, in a manner decided by Anyang WFOE, at its reasonable discretion.

Shares Pledge Agreement. Under the shares pledge agreement between Anyang WFOE, on the one hand, and SC Coke and the SC Coke Shareholders, on the other hand, (the “Shares Pledge Agreement”), the SC Coke Shareholders pledged all of their equity interests in SC Coke, including the proceeds thereof, to guarantee all of Anyang WFOE’s rights and benefits under the Entrusted Management Agreement, the Exclusive Option Agreement and the Shareholders’ Voting Proxy Agreement. Prior to termination of the Shares Pledge Agreement, the pledged equity interests cannot be transferred without Anyang WFOE’s prior consent.

The Company’s organizational structure was developed to permit the infusion of foreign capital under the laws of the PRC and to maintain an efficient tax structure, as well as to foster internal organizational efficiencies. The Company’s organization structure, after taking into account the Share Exchange, is summarized in the figure below:

Market Summary

The Chinese coking industry is also a regionalized business where supply of raw materials and the demands for coke become uneconomical at long distances as transportation costs become prohibitive. SC Coke estimates that supply of raw materials and demand for coke to be delivered by truck transportation is uneconomical beyond 800 kilometers (approximately 500 miles); and access to and delivery by rail becomes a critical competitive factor. SC Coke is located in close proximity to the main coal mining provinces of Shanxi and Henan in China and has a private railway line, approximately 1.7 kilometers (approximately 1 mile) in length, which provides connection to the national railway network.

As the coke industry is highly dependent on the iron and steel industries, it is affected by many of the same factors that impact the iron and steel industries. Iron and steel are basic commodities that are required in many other industries, such as construction, infrastructure works, automotive and aerospace. The iron and steel industries are highly cyclical and have historically been very volatile. Similarly, the price and demand for coke has also experienced such cyclicality and volatility. SC Coke intends to focus on better recycling and use of its secondary products, in particular coke byproducts. The applications for coke byproducts are expected to be more diverse; therefore, demand factors for coke byproducts are likely to be different from the factors applicable to the iron and steel industries; for example, coal tar is used for the treatment of psoriasis and amsulfate is used as agricultural fertilizer.

Principal Products

Our principal products are “refined coal” (which is coal processed by coal washing) and coke (which results from the blending of various types of refined coal and subsequently heating such mixed refined coal at high temperatures in a brick oven to produce coke). The majority of refined coal is used by us in our coke manufacturing process. Metallurgical coke is primarily used in iron and steel manufacturing. Over the past three years, refined coal and coke have contributed an average of approximately more than 80% of our annual revenues. SC Coke also sells medium coal and coal slurry (which are byproducts produced from its refined coal process), tar, crude benzol and ammonium sulfate (“amsulfate”) (which are byproducts produced from its coke manufacturing process) and both sell and use coal gas to provide electricity for its internal operations (which is a byproduct produced from its coke manufacturing process). During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, SC Coke produced approximately 1,104,227 metric tons (“tons”) of coke, 673,765 tons of refined coal (inclusive of Longdu), 51,056 tons of tar, 13,673 tons of crude benzol, 11,949 tons of amsulfate and 450 million cubic meters of coal gas.

Description of Operations

Production Process

Our production process is described as follows:

SC Coke is based in the Henan Province in the central part of China. SC Coke’s operations are located in Tongye Town, Anyang County, Henan Province, PRC, which is 40 kilometers from Anyang City. SC Coke and Longdu purchase raw coal from numerous mines and suppliers deliver coal to SC Coke’s facilities in Tongye Town and Longdu’s facility in Matoujian Town, where the coal is processed, through a coal washing process, to obtain refined coal which is used by SC Coke to make coke or is sold to third parties. The production of refined coal also results in two byproducts - medium coal and coal slurry. The coke produced by SC Coke is either loaded onsite onto railcars on its private rail line and transported to customers through the connected national railway system or loaded onto trucks and transported to customers by highway. Byproducts of the coking process are either sold to customers or recycled for consumption by SC Coke. The tar gas emitted during the coking process results in four byproducts - tar, crude benzol, amsulfate, and coal gas. Coal gas is also consumed internally by SC Coke, providing an energy source for its ovens, and is utilized to produce electricity through onsite electric power generators to provide electricity for SC Coke’s operations. Excess coal gas remaining is then piped and sold to Angang Steel.

Coke Manufacturing

Metallurgical coke is primarily used in iron and steel manufacturing. China has a national standard for coke, based upon a variety of metrics including, ash and sulfur content, mechanical strength, volatility, moisture content and end-coke content. According to the national standard, metallurgical coke is classified into three grades – Grade I, Grade II and Grade III, with Grade I being the highest quality. SC Coke currently only produces Grade II metallurgical coke.

In 2011, SC Coke has completed the construction of a Coke Dry Quenching (“CDQ”) facility which allows SC Coke to reduce emissions, generate Certified Emission Reductions (“CER”) which can be sold, and potentially improves the coke quality, and so that it can possibly produce Grade I metallurgical coke. The CDQ facility expansion is discussed in additional detail under “Expansion Plans” below.

SC Coke’s current annual production capacity is approximately 1.3 million tons.

In SC Coke’s coke production process, five types of raw coal (with different levels of volatility) are currently purchased and blended by SC Coke in the following approximate proportions:

Type	Proportion
Coking coal		17 to 20%
One-third coke coal (high volatility)		20 to 35%
Low sulfur rich coal (medium to high volatility)		10%
High sulfur rich coal (medium to high volatility)		13%
Lean coal (low volatility)		20 to 25%

After the five types of raw coal have been unloaded at SC Coke’s plant, they are stored on site in an open air storage facility with wind prevention retention walls, and transported into batching towers by a mechanical conveyer where the raw coal is subsequently mixed into a refined coal blend. The blended refined coal is crushed and mixed before being sent, by mechanical conveyor, into delivery coke carts and tamped into the correct size and shape according to the specifications of SC Coke’s ovens. After tamping, the refined coal is mechanically delivered into the ovens where it is treated at a high temperature for a period of between 18 to 24 hours to produce coke. The coke is transported by receiving coke carts to a coke quenching tower located adjacent to the plant where water is currently used to quench the coke. After cooling, the coke is transported by mechanical conveyor to the distribution center near the private rail line owned by SC Coke, and thereafter it is transported by rail or road to customers.

SC Coke currently produces coke onsite from a series of five coke ovens with an annual capacity of up to approximately 1.3 million tons. SC Coke produces coke between the size of 25 to 40 millimeters which complies, and is consistent, with the Chinese national specifications for Grade II coke. Such coke must comply with the following national standards:

less than 13.5% ash;

less than 0.8% sulfur;

a specified mechanical strength;

a volatility less than 1.8%;

a moisture content less than 12.0%; and

an end-coke content less than 86.0%.

Tar gas is emitted during the coke production process. SC Coke processes the tar gas to produce byproducts which can be sold or recycled. This process consists of: (i) air cooling and condensation of the tar gas to extract tar, (ii) deaminating the residual gas (using sulfuric acid which produces a chemical reaction when mixed with ammonia) to produce amsulfate, (iii) “washing” the residual gas to produce crude benzol, and (iv) removing the sulfur from the residual gas to produce coal gas which can be recycled for use in connection with heat generation in the coke production process and to generate electricity for SC Coke’s self consumption. Excess coal gas is then piped and sold to Angang Steel. Based on the normal range of volatility in SC Coke’s refined coal blend, as currently constituted, 100 tons of coke will generally yield to SC Coke approximately the following amounts of coke byproducts: 4 to 4.5 tons of tar, 1 ton of crude benzol, 1.1 tons of amsulfate, and 400 to 420 cubic meters of coal gas.

SC Coke’s annual production volumes of coke for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, were approximately as follows:

	Annual
Fiscal	Production
Year	(Tons)

2007		514,820

2008		545,643

2009		722,175

2010		1,104,227

2011		1,286,861

Refined Coal

Raw coal contains impurities, such as shale, that require separation to obtain refined coal. Both water-based jig and dense medium separation washing processes are used to produce refined coal. The water-based jig process relies on the use and flow of water to separate coal from shale as they have different densities; it is a more conventional process that has the advantages of requiring simpler equipment and a faster process, which enables large scale production. We are permitted by the local government to utilize underground water at their sites. In contrast, the dense medium separation process is a newer technology that has the advantage of higher recovery rates and a smaller area required for operations. Dense medium separation utilizes the differences in the densities of coal and shale, which when processed, allows the coal, which is lighter, to be separated from the heavier shale.

Approximately 1.3 tons of raw coal yield 1 ton of refined coal. We use refined coal to produce Coke, and we sold unused refined coal, if any, to customers. In fiscal year 2011, SC Coke consumed approximately 1,692,919 tons of refined coal (from internal production and external purchase). In addition to refined coal, the coal-washing process produces two byproducts:

“Medium” coal, a PRC coal industry classification, is coal that does not have sufficient thermal value for coking, and is mixed with raw coal and coal slurry (described below), and sold for home and industrial heating purposes; and

Coal slurry, sometimes called coal slime, are the castoffs and debris from the coal washing process. Coal slurry can be used as a fuel with low thermal value, and is sold “as is” or mixed with “medium” coal.

SC Coke’s annual production volumes of refined coal for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011, were approximately as follows:

	Annual
Fiscal	Production
Year	(Tons)

2007		810,186

2008		555,316

2009		595,518

2010		673,765

2011		708,574

Coke Byproducts

Tar

Tar is an ingredient of asphalt, and is commonly used in the treatment of psoriasis, as an ingredient in certain disinfectants and for roofing and insulation applications.

SC Coke’s annual production volumes of tar for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, were approximately as follows:

	Annual Production
Fiscal Year	(Tons)

2007	10,024

2008		19,105

2009		42,103

2010		51,056

2011		55,724

Amsulfate

Amsulfate is used mainly as an agricultural fertilizer and can also be used in garment manufacturing, and in the leather and medical industries. SC Coke’s annual production volumes of amsulfate for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, were approximately as follows:

	Annual Production
Fiscal Year	(Tons)

2007	4,935

2008		6,536

2009		8,555

2010		11,949

2011		16,235

Crude Benzol

Crude benzol is a base material which, when further processed, can produce products such as benzene. Derivative products made from crude benzol are used in dyes, pesticides, spice production, solvents or bonds in paint making, paint spraying, shoemaking, and furniture manufacturing. SC Coke’s annual production volumes of crude benzol for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, were approximately as follows:

	Annual Production
Fiscal Year	(Tons)

2007	1,671

2008		1,557

2009		7,915

2010		13,673

2011		17,573

Coal Gas

SC Coke uses coal gas for internal use to generate heat for its ovens and to produce electricity. Any excess gas is piped and sold to Angang Steel. Prior to 2008, there were no external sales of coal gas and the excess coal gas was flared off to minimize discharge into the environment. In 2008, SC Coke purchased a 19% interest in Angang Steel and entered into a contract with Angang Steel to pipe and sell the excess coal gas produced by SC Coke to Angang Steel.

SC Coke’s annual production of coal gas for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, were approximately as follows:

	Annual Production
	(Million Cubic
Fiscal Year	Meters)

2007		214

2008		227

2009		300

2010		450

2011		460

Electricity Generation

Electricity that is generated by SC Coke is used to power SC Coke’s operations at its plant. SC Coke estimates that the replacement cost of this electricity, if it had to be purchased from the state-owned utility, would be in excess of $800,000 (based on usage and prices in 2009) per year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, SC Coke generated approximately 11, 638, 108 kilowatt-hours of useable electrical power for self consumption. In 2011, SC Coke consumed approximately $1,947,586 of electricity from the state electricity grid.

Expansion Plans

In December 2009, SC Coke started construction on the two additional 5.5 meter coke ovens. The total cost of such plant expansion is substantial and we expect to construct the facilities with the funds financed by debt and/or equity financings and internally generated cash flow. To date, SC Coke has not completed the construction. If additional financing is not obtained, SC Coke may need to reduce, defer or cancel its expansion plans.

In 2011, SC Coke has completed its construction of the CDQ facility. Previously, SC Coke utilized water quenching, and the water containing coke dust vaporizes and is released into the atmosphere. In the CDQ facility, red-hot coke will be cooled by gas circulating within an enclosed system, thereby preventing the release of airborne coke dust. The thermal energy of the red-hot coke, which is lost in the conventional system, will be collected and reused as steam to be used as heat and to generate electricity in the CDQ system. This technology uses less fossil fuel and results in lower carbon dioxide emissions. The CDQ project has received approval from the PRC government and has been designated a Clean Development Mechanism project by the Chinese government, which qualifies for CERs. The cost of constructing this facility approximately $30 million. Because the CDQ is an environmental conservation project, a portion of the total cost of the project is expected to be provided pursuant to grants by the Chinese government. , SC Coke has received grants in the amount of approximately $1.1 million for the CDQ facility construction. See discussion below under the heading “Clean Development Mechanism.”

An additional benefit of the CDQ facility is that it allows SC Coke to reduce emissions, generate Certified Emission Reductions which can be sold, and potentially improves the coke quality, and so that SC Coke can possibly produce Grade I metallurgical coke. However, there is no assurance that the CDQ facility will, by itself, enable SC Coke to produce Grade I metallurgical coke.

Product and Suppliers Quality Control

SC Coke adopts rigorous and frequent sampling and testing to ensure quality control over its products in the coke and coke byproduct manufacturing processes. SC Coke maintains an onsite testing laboratory to perform the testing.

Raw materials received from suppliers are subject to testing for suitability prior to their use by SC Coke. This pre-qualification process can take between two weeks to several months, depending on the type of raw material. Different raw materials are subject to different testing criteria. SC Coke also maintains a list of suppliers who are able to produce coal suitable for SC Coke’s needs if its regular suppliers are unable to meet its demands.

Samples of raw materials and products are numerically tagged, identified and stored for internal audit purposes to ensure that sample testing errors are minimized. Internal audits generally take place on a bi-weekly basis. Samples are typically kept for approximately one month at the laboratory before transfer to SC Coke’s warehouse for reuse in the coke or coke byproduct manufacturing processes.

In the coke production process, refined coal is sampled and tested before transfer into SC Coke’s stockpile. Samples at the stockpile are tested before blending. Once the blending and crushing is completed before tamping, the blended refined coal is tested every two hours. To the extent any issues are identified during the testing process, SC Coke refines the incorrect blend at separate batching towers. Coke at the distribution center is tested before transport to customers. This testing is usually performed every 4 hours.

Suppliers

SC Coke purchased raw coal and refined coal from unrelated external suppliers. In fiscal year of 2011, the top four suppliers of the company were: Yizhong Energy Group, ZaoZhuang Mining (Group) Co., Ltd., Xuzhou Yuantong Burning Co., Ltd., and Hebi Fuyuan Coke Co., Ltd. The first three suppliers each accounted for at least 10% of the company’s total purchases.

Generally, SC Coke’s suppliers contract for its main raw materials, on a monthly basis with monthly renewals. The prices and volumes fluctuate each month, and prices are based on then-prevailing market conditions. Purchases from most suppliers require 100% advance payments.

SC Coke believes that it has established stable cooperative relationships with its suppliers, but also expects it could, if necessary, readily find alternative sources of coal near its plant, as Henan Province is one of China’s main coal producing centers.

SC Coke’s other principal raw materials include water drawn from underground sources, for which SC Coke has the requisite permits, and electricity, approximately 80% of which SC Coke generates onsite from its own power stations and which is supplemented from the local state-owned utility as necessary. SC Coke also uses raw materials, such as sulfuric acid, in the manufacture of amsulfate. These materials are readily available and there is no shortage of other suppliers to choose from if there is any shortfall.

Customers

SC Coke sells all of its products within China. Its customers are concentrated in North China, East China, Central China and South China. SC Coke sells its coke to mostly national and provincial steel manufacturing companies and sells its refined coal to coke producers and others.

In fiscal year 2011, SC Coke’s top five major customers, aggregately, accounted for approximately 85.7% of its revenues, among which are Henan Fengbao Steel Co., Ltd., Changzhou zhongfa Iron Co., Ltd, Zhejiang Huatuo Engergy Co., Ltd, Shagang Group Anyang Yongxing Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. and Anyang xinpu Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

SC Coke’s largest coke customer was Henan Fengbao Steel Co. Ltd., which accounted for 22.58% of coke revenue sales in 2011. SC Coke’s top five coke customers accounted for approximately 65% of coke revenue sales in 2011.

Company sales personnel conduct routine visits to customers. SC Coke has long-standing relationships with these customers, and management believes that these relationships are stable.

Non-renewal or termination of SC Coke’s arrangements with these customers would have a materially adverse effect on SC Coke’s revenue. In the event that any one of its major customers does not renew or terminates its arrangement with SC Coke, there can be no assurance that SC Coke will be able to enter into another arrangement similar in scope. Additionally, there can be no assurance that SC Coke’s business will not remain largely dependent on a limited customer base accounting for a substantial portion of its revenue.

Transportation and Distribution

SC Coke owns and operates a private rail track approximately 1.7 kilometers in length that connects SC Coke’s plant to the Chinese national railway system at the Henan An-Li Railway Lizhen Railway Station. Refined coal and coke are loaded from SC Coke’s platform onto railcars to be transported to customers primarily in Central Eastern China, which includes the provinces of Hebei, Henan, Shandong, Hubei, Anhui, Guangdong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang. SC Coke also transports its products to customers by truck. In 2011, approximately 60% of SC Coke’s product sales were delivered to customers by railway network and 40% of products were delivered by road transportation.

Competition

The PRC coke manufacturing industry is highly competitive. The average sale prices for products are driven by a number of factors, including the particular composition and grade or quality of the coal or coke being sold, prevailing market prices for these products in the Chinese local, national and global marketplace, timing of sales, delivery terms, negotiations between SC Coke and its customers, and relationships with those customers.

SC Coke is primarily a coke producer and intends to continue to expand its coke production volumes and internal consumption of refined coal. Refined coal sales as part of SC Coke’s total revenue has been declining since 2007 and decreased to 0 in year 2011 when all the refined coal produced by SC Coke was used internally for its coke production. . As such, SC Coke’s main competitors are now, and likely to be for the foreseeable future, coke producers.

SC Coke competes in the coke market at the national, provincial and local levels. There are several large coke producers, such as Shanxi Coking Co., Ltd and Shenhua Group that provide and sell coke on a national level. However, the availability and cost of transportation to customers may often be a factor which limits these large producers from competing effectively in local markets. A key provincial competitor is Pingmei Group, part of the Pingdingshan Coal Group, a large state-owned company which produces coal, refined coal and coke. Pingdingshan Coal Group’s operations are located in Pingdingshan City, Henan Province, which is approximately 300 kilometers from SC Coke. Local competitors include Linzhou Xinda Coking Co. Ltd, Henan Province Xinlei Group Co. Ltd, Henan Province Liyuan Coking Co. Ltd and Henan Province Yulong Coking Co. Ltd. Competitive factors that influence coke sales include geographic location and available transportation to customers, product prices, long-standing client relationships, payment terms, reliability of delivery, quality and grade of coke, and quality of customer service. The principal competitive factor that influences SC Coke’s sale of its byproducts is price.

Government Regulation

The following is a summary of the principal governmental laws and regulations that are or may be applicable to SC Coke’s operations. The scope and enforcement of many of the laws and regulations in the PRC described below are uncertain.

Coal Business

According to the Coal Trading Supervision Regulation issued by the National Development and Reform Commission, any enterprise engaging in the business of the sale of coal, washed and selected coal products, and processing and sale of coal for civilian use is required to obtain a Coal Trading Qualification Certificate, which is valid for three years and may be renewable upon application 30 days before expiration. Currently, SC Coke holds a valid Coal Trading Qualification Certificate, which expires June 30, 2012. .

Under the Work Safety Law of the PRC, the Work Safety Permit Regulation and Work Safety Permit Implemental Regulation for Dangerous Chemical Products Manufacturer, an enterprise which manufactures flammable and/or explosive chemical products is required to obtain a Work Safety Permit before it starts producing such products. A Work Safety Permit is valid for three years and may be renewed after application and documentation and on-site examination as needed by the relevant authority. Currently, SC Coke has a valid Work Safety Permit for coke, tar, benzol and gas, which expires April 18, 2013.

According to the National Industrial Product Manufacture License Regulation of the PRC and its implementing rules, enterprises producing dangerous chemical products are required to obtain a National Industrial Product Manufacture License, which is valid for five years and renewable upon application to the provincial Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine six months before expiration. Currently, SC Coke has a valid National Industrial Product Manufacture License for organic dangerous chemicals, which expires August 27, 2013.

Under the Prevention and Control of Radioactive Pollution Law of the PRC and the Regulation for Safety and Protection of Radioisotopes and Radiation Apparatus, any enterprise engaging in the business of the sale, manufacture and use of radioisotopes and radiation apparatus is required to obtain a Radiation Safety License, which is valid for five years and may be renewed upon application within three months before expiration. Currently, SC Coke holds a valid Radiation Safety License, which expires June 27, 2013.

Environmental Impact Assessment

According to the Environment Protection Law of the PRC, the Environment Impact Assessment Law of the PRC and the Construction Project Environment Protection Regulations promulgated by the State Council on November 29, 1998, any enterprise which constructs a fixed asset investment project is required to submit an environmental impact assessment to an environmental protection administrative authority for approval. If such enterprise embarks on the construction without submission of the environmental impact assessment or approval by the applicable environmental protection administrative authority, they will be required to provide the environmental impact assessment and may be subject to a fine ranging from approximately $7,310 to $29,240. For each new construction and expansion of a fixed asset investment project, SC Coke is required to conduct an environmental impact assessment.

On May 10, 2010, the Environmental Protection Bureau of Anyang County (the “EPBAC”) issued an environmental protection administrative penalty notice to SC Coke for the construction of five coke ovens and related facilities without obtaining the approval of an environmental impact assessment and ordered SC Coke to stop construction and imposed a fine from approximately $7,310 to $29,240. SC Coke has been exempted from the administrative penalty.

Other than as described above, SC Coke has conducted environmental impact assessments for its current production projects, which have been approved by the relevant environmental protection administrative authorities.

Pollution Emission

According to the Tentative Plan of Pollution Emission License issued by the State Administration of Environment Protection (currently the Ministry of Environment Protection), on January 2, 2004, the local environmental protection government department may issue a pollution emission license for a period of two years. However, there is no formal legislation concerning the pollution emission license. In practice, enterprises will apply for a new pollution emission license to the local environment protection government department prior to the permit’s expiration. A pollution emission license is valid for two years and may be renewed after application and on-site examination as needed by the relevant authority. Currently, SC Coke has a pollution emission license issued by the Environmental Protection Bureau of Henan Province which expires on August 14, 2012.

On April 23, 2010, the EPBAC issued a pollutant over-limit rectification notice to SC Coke for coke oven gas and dust emissions and required SC Coke to rectify and control emissions within accepted limits. SC Coke rectified the condition and reported to EPBAC on May 13, 2010. SC Coke estimates that there will be no contingent liability resulting from such notice, although there can be no assurance that the EPBAC will not assess a penalty for the excess emissions.

Clean Development Mechanism (“CDM”)

To implement the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to which China is a signatory, the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Foreign Affairs promulgated the Clean Development Mechanism Projects Administration Regulation on October 12, 2005. According to such regulation, a CDM project is required to be approved by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Chinese government is entitled to collect 2% of the revenue from the sale of CERs by a Chinese entity. On April 9, 2009, the National Development and Reform Commission issued an approval to certify the CDQ project of SC Coke as a CDM project.

Dividend Distribution

The Company’s operations are conducted through SC Coke. It relies on dividends and other distributions from Anyang WFOE and SC Coke to provide it with its cash flow and allow it to pay dividends on the shares and meet its other obligations. The principal regulations governing distribution of dividends paid by wholly foreign-owned enterprises include:

	·	Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise Law (1986), as amended; and
	·	Implementation Rules on Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise Law (1990), as amended.

Under these regulations, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China are required to set aside at least 10% of their after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year to its general reserves until the accumulative amount of such reserves reach 50% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

Foreign Currency Exchange

On August 29, 2008, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) issued the Notice of the General Affairs Department of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Relevant Operating Issues concerning the Improvement of the Administration of Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign-funded Enterprises (“Circular 142”). Circular 142 requires that RMB converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital of a foreign-invested company may only be used for purposes within the business scope approved by the applicable governmental authority and may not be used for equity investments within the PRC unless specifically provided for otherwise. The use of such Renminbi capital may not be changed without SAFE’s approval and may not in any case be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not been used.

Regulation of Foreign Exchange in Certain Onshore and Offshore Transactions

In October 2005, SAFE issued the Notice on Issues Relating to the Administration of Foreign Exchange in Fund-raising and Return Investment Activities of Domestic Residents Conducted by Offshore Special Purpose Companies (“SAFE Notice 75”) which became effective as of November 1, 2005, and was further supplemented by two implementation notices issued by the SAFE on November 24, 2005 and May 29, 2007, respectively. Under SAFE Notice 75, prior registration with the local SAFE branch is required for PRC residents to establish or to control an offshore company for the purposes of financing that offshore company with assets or equity interests in an onshore enterprise located in the PRC. An amendment to registration or filing with the local SAFE branch by such PRC resident is also required for the injection of equity interests or assets of an onshore enterprise in the offshore company or overseas funds raised by such offshore company, or any other material change involving a change in the capital of the offshore company.

Under SAFE Notice 75, PRC residents are further required to repatriate into the PRC all of their dividends, profits or capital gains obtained from their shareholdings in the offshore entity within 180 days of their receipt of such dividends, profits or capital gains. The registration and filing procedures under SAFE Notice 75 are prerequisites for other approval and registration procedures necessary for capital inflow from the offshore entity, such as inbound investments or shareholders loans, or capital outflow to the offshore entity, such as the payment of profits or dividends, liquidating distributions, equity sale proceeds, or the return of funds upon a capital reduction. The failure to comply with such registration requirements may subject Anyang WFOE to restrictions including, but not limited to, the increase of the registered capital of Anyang WFOE, loans to Anyang WFOE, and dividend distributions abroad from Anyang WFOE.

Regulations of Overseas Investments and Listings

On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies, including the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the State Administration for Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) and SAFE, jointly adopted the Provisions on the Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (the “New M&A Rule”), which became effective on September 8, 2006. This regulation, among other things, includes provisions that purport to require that an offshore special purpose company (“SPV”) which is formed for purposes of listing of equity interests in PRC companies through the acquisition of PRC company equity with foreign equity as consideration and which is controlled directly or indirectly by PRC companies or individuals obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such SPV’s securities on a stock exchange outside of the PRC.

On September 21, 2006, the CSRC published procedures regarding its approval of listings by SPVs outside of the PRC. The CSRC approval procedures require the filing of a number of documents with the CSRC. It would generally take several months to complete the approval process. Based on our understanding of current PRC laws and as advised by our PRC counsel, SC Coke believes the structure of our restructuring, including the VIE Agreements and Call Option Agreements, is not subject to the New M&A Rule.

Employees

We currently have approximately 1625 employees, of which approximately 153 are professional technicians who possess national professional certification within their area of expertise, including such areas as high pressure coke oven operators, heavy equipment and crane operators and chemical, civil and electrical engineers. Of the total employees, 1215 are employed in our plant while 377 employees serve in administrative and executive services capacities. Our sales department currently has approximately 33employees, of which 12 are responsible for customer accounts and relationships.

In compliance with the Employment Contract Law of PRC, we have written contracts with all of our employees for a term of 3 to 5 years. The employment agreements include the positions, responsibilities and salaries of the respective employees, as well as the circumstances under which employment may be terminated, and in compliance with the Employment Contract Law of PRC.

Under the Employment Contract Law of PRC, upon the termination of an employment agreement by us without cause or expiration of an employment agreement without an offer to renew, we are obligated to pay the applicable employee compensation equal to one month’s salary for each year the employee has been employed by us, up to a maximum of twelve years (“Compensation”), except where (1) the employee has committed a crime or the employee’s actions or inactions have resulted in a material adverse effect on us; (2) the employee receives pension payments; (3) the employee dies or is declared dead or missing; or (4) we offer to renew the employment agreement with equal or higher consideration and the employee does not accept it. In these cases, we are not required to pay any Compensation and may terminate an employment agreement without prior notice. If the employee’s salary is greater than three times the average salary for the last year in Anyang City, the Compensation will be calculated by multiplying such average salary by three, and then multiplying the product obtained by the number of years the employee was employed by us, up to a maximum of twelve years.

We may terminate an employment agreement upon 30 days prior written notice or without prior notice upon an extra payment of one month salary and with Compensation payable to such employee, for any of the following reasons: (1) sickness or non-working injury and after medical treatment an employee is not able to do the original work or other assignments designated by us; (2) an employee is unable to perform his job and after training or position adjustment and is still unable to perform his job at a suitable level; and (3) the employment cannot be performed due to a fundamental change of circumstances and the employer and employee fail to reach an agreement to change the original employment contract.

If we terminate an employment agreement prior to its expiration for any reason other than as described above, the employee has the right to either enforce the agreement or to terminate the agreement and require us to pay an amount equal to twice the Compensation.

An employee may at any time terminate the employee’s employment agreement upon 30 days prior written notice.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent the Company from achieving its goals. The risks described below are not the only ones the Company will face. If any of these risks actually occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operation may be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline and investors in the Company’s common stock could lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Relating to SC Coke’s Business

SC Coke’s future operating results have been and may continue to be affected by fluctuations in raw material prices. SC Coke may not be able to pass on cost increases to customers.

SC Coke’s operating profits have been and may continue to be negatively affected by fluctuations in the price of raw materials which consist primarily of raw coal and refined coal. SC Coke is subject to short-term coal price volatility. SC Coke may, based on operations and prevailing market conditions, periodically purchase raw materials at higher prices. In the past, SC Coke has been unable to pass the cost increase of raw materials on to customers and may not be able to do so in the future. This has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect SC Coke’s gross margins, profitability and operations. SC Coke’s sales agreements with customers generally contain provisions that permit the parties to adjust the contract price of the coke that SC Coke produces upward or downward at specified times. For example, SC Coke may adjust these contract prices because of increases or decreases in the price of raw materials from SC Coke’s mining suppliers, general inflation or deflation, or changes in the cost of producing coke caused by such things as changes in taxes, fees, royalties or the laws regulating the mining, production, sale or use of raw coal and refined coal. However, SC Coke may not be able to pass on cost increases to customers. A general rise in coking coal prices also may adversely affect the price of, and demand for, coke and products made with coke such as iron and steel. This may in turn lead to a fall in demand for SC Coke’s products.

Factors beyond our control could impact the amount and pricing of coal supplied by third parties.

SC Coke purchases coal, including raw coking coal and refined coal, from third parties. Operational difficulties, changes in demand for contract mine operators from SC Coke’s competitors and other factors beyond SC Coke’s control could affect the availability, pricing and quality of coal suppliers, including raw coking coal, produced for it by independent contract mine operators. Disruptions in supply, increases in prices paid for raw coal and refined coal produced by or purchased from third parties, or the availability of more lucrative direct sales opportunities for SC Coke’s purchased coal sources could increase its costs or lower SC Coke’s volumes, either of which could negatively affect SC Coke’s profitability and operations. In addition, mine accidents, weather-related problems, strikes, lock-outs or other events experienced by SC Coke’s suppliers could impair SC Coke ability to supply coal to customers if it is not able to find substitute sources to obtain its coal.

The demand for SC Coke’s products are cyclical and is affected by industrial economic conditions. Downturns in the economy may reduce demand for SC Coke’s products and its revenues could decline.

Because SC Coke does not export its products out of China, its business and operating results are primarily dependent upon China’s domestic demand for metallurgical coke. However, because the domestic demand for metallurgical coke in China is impacted by the international demand for metallurgical coke, SC Coke is also susceptible to fluctuations in the international markets. The domestic and international metallurgical coke markets are cyclical and exhibit fluctuations in supply and demand from year to year and are subject to numerous factors beyond SC Coke’s control, including, but not limited to, economic conditions in China, global economic conditions and fluctuations in industries with high demand for metallurgical coke, such as the steel, iron and power industries. A significant decline in demand or excess supply for metallurgical coke may have a material adverse effect on SC Coke’s business and results of operations.

In addition, nearly all of SC Coke’s sales are concentrated in the North China, East China, Central China and South China. Accordingly, SC Coke is susceptible to fluctuations in business caused by adverse economic conditions in those regions. Difficult economic conditions in other geographic areas into which SC Coke may expand may also adversely affect its business, operations and finances.

If any of SC Coke’s sales agreements for its primary products of coke and refined coal terminates or expires, its revenues and operating profits could suffer.

A substantial portion of SC Coke’s primary product sales are made to customers under short term monthly sales agreements. It is common business practice in China that metallurgical coke and refined coal sale agreements are entered into for monthly terms, with monthly renewals. This practice makes it difficult for SC Coke to forecast long-term purchase and sale quantities and can negatively affect its ability to manage inventory. These agreements may be terminated or breached by a customer. We cannot provide any assurances that SC Coke will be able to renew any of these agreements on terms equally or more favorable to SC Coke. Non-renewal or termination of SC Coke’s agreements with any of, or a material breach by, these customers could have a material adverse effect on SC Coke’s revenue.

In the past, SC Coke has derived a significant portion of its sales from a few large customers. If SC Coke were to lose any such customers, its business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

SC Coke’s customer base for its primary products, which contribute a high percentage of revenues, has been highly concentrated. As of December 31, 2011, SC Coke’s top five customers for its primary products contributed approximately 85.69 % of its sales revenue, while its largest customer contributed approximately 22.58% of its sales revenue. SC Coke’s total number of customers is relatively concentrated and limited, and any adverse developments to any one of their business operations, or any material breach, termination or non-renewal of agreements by such customers, could have an adverse impact on SC Coke's business, operating results and financial condition.

Consolidation in the Chinese iron and steel industries may adversely affect SC Coke's business operations.

Many of SC Coke’s customers are iron and steel manufacturing companies. On March 20, 2009, the General Office of the State Council issued the Blueprint for the Adjustment and Revitalization of the Iron and Steel Industry which sets forth the PRC government’s objectives of, among other things, controlling the total national capacity of, and encouraging consolidation in, the steel industry from 2009 to 2011. As a result, the number of iron and steel manufacturers will likely decrease, with an emergence of larger iron and steel companies formed by strategic alliances and mergers and acquisitions. This consolidation may have the effect of reducing the number of customers available to purchase SC Coke’s products and may result in the loss of current customers who are acquired by other iron and steel manufacturing companies, which have their own suppliers. If any of the foregoing occurs, SC Coke's business, market position, growth prospects and operating results may be adversely affected.

PRC coal mining industry consolidation may adversely affect SC Coke's business operations.

In order to enhance coal mining safety, coal exploration efficiency and environmental protection, the PRC government has taken initiatives to consolidate the coal mining industry. This consolidation may have the effect of reducing the supply of coal available to SC Coke. In addition, if a supplier of SC Coke is acquired, the terms of any supply contracts may no longer be available as part of the consolidation. If any of the foregoing occurs, SC Coke's business, market position, growth prospects and operating results may be adversely affected.

Iron and steel consumption is highly cyclical, and worldwide overcapacity in the iron and steel industries and the availability of alternative products have resulted in intense competition.

Iron and steel consumption is highly cyclical and volatile and generally follows economic and industrial conditions both worldwide and in regional markets. The iron and steel industries have often been characterized by excess global supply, which has led to substantial price decreases during periods of economic weakness. Substitute materials are increasingly available for many iron and steel products, which further reduces demand for iron and steel. Any downturn in the iron and steel industries may have an adverse effect on SC Coke's business, market position, growth prospects and operating results.

Restrictions on financing in the real estate industry may affect SC Coke's business operations.

In order to address concerns regarding the real estate market, the PRC government has placed certain restrictions on the ability of purchasers to obtain financing for the acquisition of residential and commercial real estate. These restrictions, in turn, may negatively impact the demand for iron and steel. Many of SC Coke’s customers are national and provincial iron and steel manufacturing companies. If SC Coke’s iron and steel company customers reduce their purchases from SC Coke as a result of any such restrictions, SC Coke’s business and operations would be adversely affected.

There can be no assurance that any byproducts of the coking process SC Coke plans to sell will achieve significant market acceptance or will generate significant revenue.

SC Coke plans to increase its coke production capacity which will increase byproducts available for sale to third party customers. SC Coke can offer no assurances that customers will purchase such byproducts from it or will purchase the increased volume of such byproducts that it may offer for sale. SC Coke's inability or failure to position and/or price any byproducts competitively could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial position.

SC Coke is unable to shut down its coke production process if demand for its coke products decreases.

SC Coke produces coke using coke ovens which are made of brick. Since the bricks must be maintained at a relatively constant temperature, any prolonged significant reduction in the temperature could permanently damage the coke ovens. Accordingly, in the event demands for SC Coke’s products were to decrease, SC would be unable to stop production, even if such production is uneconomical.

A reduction in coke production would result in a lower volume of SC Coke’s byproducts available for sale.

SC Coke sells the byproducts of its coke production process to third parties. If SC Coke were to decrease production of coke, the amount of byproducts available for sale would be reduced. Any reduction in coke production will adversely impact SC Coke’s revenue which will be exacerbated by the consequential reduction in coke byproducts available for sale, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operations.

SC Coke relies on a limited number of third-party suppliers for its supply of coal and refined coke and the loss of any such supplier could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

SC Coke is dependent upon its relationships with a limited number of local third parties for its supply of coal. While SC Coke expects to increase the number of suppliers it uses as its business expands, if any of these suppliers, and in particular its largest supplier, terminate their supply relationship with SC Coke, it may be unable to procure sufficient amounts of coal to fulfill its needs. If SC Coke is unable to obtain adequate quantities of coal to meet the demand for its products, SC Coke's customers could seek to purchase products from other suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on SC Coke's revenues.

Disruption in the transportation of SC Coke's coking products or difficulties experienced with respect to the transportation of its coke ore refined coal could make its operations less competitive and result in the loss of customers.

Coke and refined coal producers and processors primarily depend upon rail and trucking to deliver coal to markets. While SC Coke's customers typically arrange and pay for transportation of coke and refined coal from its facilities to the point of use, any disruption of these transportation services because of natural disasters, weather-related problems, strikes, lock-outs or other events could temporarily impair SC Coke's ability to supply coke and refined coal to customers and thus could adversely affect its results of operations. If transportation for SC Coke's coke and refined coal becomes unavailable or uneconomic for its customers, its ability to sell coke and refined coal could suffer. Transportation costs can represent a significant portion of the total cost of coke and refined coal. Since SC Coke’s customers typically pay that cost, it is a critical factor in a distant customer’s purchasing decision. If transportation costs SC Coke charges its customers are not competitive, the customer may elect to purchase from another company.

SC Coke may not complete plant construction or expansion projects, or it may complete projects on materially different terms or on a different schedule than initially anticipated, and it may not be able to achieve the intended benefits of any such project, if completed.

SC Coke is currently in the process of expanding its plant and may undertake additional expansion projects in the future. SC Coke anticipates that it will be required to seek additional financing in the future to fund current and future plant construction and expansion projects and may not be able to secure such financing on favorable terms, if at all. If additional financing is not obtained, SC Coke may need to limit, defer, or cancel its expansion plans. In addition, projects may not be able to be completed on time as a result of natural disasters, weather conditions, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain regulatory approvals, delays in obtaining key materials, labor difficulties, difficulties with partners or potential partners, a decline in the credit strength of counterparties or vendors, or other factors beyond SC Coke’s control. Even if plant construction and expansion projects are completed, the total costs of the projects may be higher than anticipated and the performance of SC Coke's business following the completion of any projects may not meet expectations. Also, SC Coke may not be able to continue to meet the requirements for incentives granted by the PRC government or such programs could be modified or eliminated altogether. Further, SC Coke may not be able to timely and effectively integrate the projects into its operations and such integration may result in unforeseen operating difficulties or unanticipated costs. Any of these or other factors could adversely affect SC Coke's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the plant construction and expansion projects.

SC Coke may not be able to meet quality specifications required by its customers and as a result could incur economic penalties or the cancellation of agreements which would reduce its sales and profitability.

Most of SC Coke’s coke sales agreements contain provisions requiring it to deliver coke meeting quality thresholds for certain characteristics such as sulfur content, ash content, mechanical strength, volatility, moisture content and end-coke content. If SC Coke is not able to meet these specifications, because, for example, it is not able to source coal of the proper quality, it may incur penalties, including price adjustments, the rejection of deliveries or termination of the contracts.

SC Coke’s business is highly competitive and increased competition could reduce its sales, earnings and profitability.

The coal washing and coke businesses are highly competitive in China, and SC Coke faces substantial competition in connection with the marketing and sale of its products. Most of SC Coke’s competitors are well established, have greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources, have been in business for longer periods of time than it has, and have products that have gained wide customer acceptance in the marketplace. The greater financial resources of SC Coke’s competitors permit them to implement extensive marketing and promotional programs. SC Coke could fail to expand its market share, and could fail to maintain its current share. Increased competition could also result in overcapacity in the Chinese coke industry in general. Any overcapacity could reduce processed coke prices in the future and SC Coke’s profitability would be impaired.

SC Coke's success depends on attracting and retaining qualified personnel.

SC Coke is highly dependent on the knowledge of governmental issues of Xinshun Wang, its Chairman, and the operational expertise of its Chief Executive Officer, Feng Wang and Dexin Li, its Chief Operating Officer, and the loss of any of their services and support would have a material and adverse impact on SC Coke's operations. If one or more of SC Coke's key personnel are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, it may not be able to easily replace them, and it may incur additional expenses to recruit and train new personnel. The loss of SC Coke's key personnel could severely disrupt its business and its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, since the industries SC Coke invests in are characterized by high demand and intense competition for talent, it may need to offer higher compensation and other benefits in order to attract and retain key personnel in the future. There can be no assurances that SC Coke will be able to attract or retain the key personnel needed to achieve its business objectives. If SC Coke were to lose the services of its key senior managers, its ability to operate would be impaired. SC Coke does not have key-man life insurance on the lives of its executives.

SC Coke's future success will depend in large part on its continued ability to attract and retain other highly qualified management and operational personnel, as well as personnel with expertise in SC Coke's field and industry. SC Coke faces competition for personnel from other companies and organizations. If SC Coke's recruitment and retention efforts are unsuccessful, its business operations could suffer.

SC Coke does not have any registered patents and it may not be able to maintain the confidentiality of its processes.

SC Coke has no patents covering its coking and washing processes and it relies on the confidentiality of its coking and cleaning processes in producing a competitive product. The confidentiality of its know-how may not be maintained and it may lose any meaningful competitive advantage which might arise through its proprietary processes.

A prolonged downturn in global economic conditions may materially adversely affect SC Coke's business.

SC Coke's business and results of operations are affected by international, national and regional economic conditions. Financial markets in Asia, the United States and Europe have recently been experienced extreme disruption, including, among other things, extreme volatility in security prices, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, ratings downgrades of certain investments and declining values of others. These economic developments affect businesses such as SC Coke's and those of its customers in a number of ways that could result in unfavorable consequences to it. Current economic conditions or a deepening economic downturn in the PRC and elsewhere may cause SC Coke's current or potential customers to delay or reduce purchases which could, in turn, result in reductions in SC Coke's sales volumes or prices, materially and adversely affecting its results of operations and cash flows. Volatility and disruption of global financial markets could limit SC Coke's customers’ ability to obtain adequate financing to maintain their operations and proceed with capital spending initiatives, leading to a reduction in sales volume that could materially and adversely affect its results of operations and cash flow. In addition, a decline in SC Coke's customers’ ability to pay as a result of the economic downturn may lead to increased difficulties in SC Coke’s collection of its accounts receivable, higher levels of reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable, as well as higher operating costs as a percentage of revenues.

SC Coke may be required to repay obligations under guarantees it has executed in favor of other local entities.

From time to time, SC Coke provides guarantees of loans and other obligations for other, unrelated local enterprises. As of March 30, 2012 SC Coke had t thirteen guarantees of approximately $ 123 million in total principal outstanding with a one-year term.. SC Coke’s potential liability under such guarantees could include interest, default interest and the obligation to pay costs of collection in addition to principal amounts to which the guarantees relate. Since banks typically require security for loans, such as guarantees, mortgages or pledges, and these enterprises, including SC Coke, have mortgaged and pledged all of their available assets, in order to obtain additional bank loans, the local enterprises often agree to provide guarantees for one another. All the guarantees provided by SC Coke are joint liability guarantees, which provide that when the debtor defaults, the bank can request SC Coke to pay the total debt outstanding without first enforcing its rights against the debtor. Although SC Coke may look to the debtor for repayment of any such amounts paid to the bank on behalf of the debtor, SC Coke's evaluation of the potential liability may prove to be inaccurate and liabilities may exceed estimates. Changes in the economic environment could leave SC Coke exposed for obligations that SC Coke has guaranteed which could have a materially negative impact on the ongoing business of SC Coke.

SC Coke’s current debt and other obligations, including amounts it may be liable for under guarantees, may harm its financial condition and results of operations.

SC Coke’s total consolidated short- and long-term debt as of March 30, 2012 was $ 69.68 million. SC Coke’s level of indebtedness could result in the following:

it could affect SC Coke's ability to satisfy its outstanding obligations;

a substantial portion of SC Coke's cash flows from operations will have to be dedicated to interest and principal payments and may not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes;

it may impair SC Coke's ability to obtain additional financing in the future;

it may limit SC Coke's flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and industry and the markets in which it competes;

it may make SC Coke more vulnerable to downturns in its business, its industry or the economy in general; and

it may place SC Coke at a competitive disadvantage relative to its competitors with less indebtedness.

As of March 30, 2012, SC Coke had thirteen guarantees of approximately 123 million in total principal outstanding with a one-year term. .

SC Coke’s operations may not generate sufficient cash to enable it to service all of its obligations, including any obligations for which it may become liable pursuant to guarantees it has executed in favor of third parties. If SC Coke fails to make a payment on certain of its obligations, this could cause it to be in default on such obligations and the mortgages on its assets by SC Coke to secure such obligations may be enforced to repay the underlying outstanding indebtedness, which would adversely affect the production capabilities and operations of SC Coke.

SC Coke has historically been funded by Xinshun Wang, the sole director of SC Coke, through shareholder loans.

Historically, Xinshun Wang has loaned funds to SC Coke in order to allow it to implement its business plan and to fund the expansion of its operations, including its current plant expansion. These loans have traditionally been provided on a more favorable basis than SC Coke could have obtained by borrowing funds from a bank. We can offer no assurances that financing to SC Coke from Xinshun Wang or any unrelated parties, will be available in the future on favorable terms, or at all. The failure to obtain funding to implement SC Coke’s business plan and to expand its operations might adversely affect its business, and operating results.

SC Coke’s principal shareholders have control over SC Coke and may have conflicts of interest with SC Coke.

SC Coke is owned by three principal shareholders, including its sole director, Xinshun Wang, who owns a 60% interest in SC Coke. The shareholders of SC Coke may have, or may develop in the future, conflicts of interest with SC Coke.

If SC Coke fails to obtain additional financing it will be unable to execute its business plan.

As SC Coke continues to grow, it continues to require capital infusions. Under its current business strategy, SC Coke’s ability to grow will depend on the availability of additional funds, suitable acquisition targets or joint venture partners at an acceptable cost, meeting SC Coke's liability requirements, and working capital. SC Coke's ability to compete effectively, to reach agreements with acquisition targets on commercially reasonable terms, to secure critical financing and to attract professional technicians are critical to its success. SC Coke will need additional funds to finance its expansion plans and may need additional financing to make future acquisitions, continue improving its coal processing facilities, and to obtain regulatory approvals for its operations. Should such needs arise, SC Coke intends to seek additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing, strategic transactions and/or from other sources. However, there are no assurances that future funding will be available on favorable terms or at all. If additional funding is not obtained, SC Coke may need to reduce, defer or cancel development programs, planned initiatives or overhead expenditures, to the extent necessary. The failure to fund SC Coke’s capital requirements would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the benefits of an acquisition may take considerable time to develop and we cannot assure investors that any particular acquisition or joint venture will produce the intended benefits. Moreover, the identification and completion of these transactions may require SC Coke to expend significant management time and effort and other resources.

Terrorist attacks or military conflict could result in disruption of our business.

Terrorist attacks and threats, escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or acts of war may negatively affect SC Coke's business, financial condition and results of operations. SC Coke's business is affected by general economic conditions, fluctuations in consumer confidence and spending, and market liquidity, which can decline as a result of numerous factors outside of its control, such as terrorist attacks and acts of war. Future terrorist attacks, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts involving China or its allies, or military or trade disruptions affecting SC Coke’s customers may materially adversely affect SC Coke's operations. As a result, there could be delays or losses in transportation and deliveries of processed coal to its customers, decreased sales of coal and extensions of time for payment of accounts receivable from customers. Strategic targets such as energy-related assets may be at greater risk of terrorist attacks than other targets. In addition, disruption or significant increases in energy prices could result in government-imposed price controls. Any, or a combination, of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on SC Coke's business, financial condition and results of operations.

SC Coke’s industry is heavily regulated and it may not be able to comply with all such regulations and it may be required to incur substantial costs in complying with such regulations.

SC Coke is subject to extensive regulation by China’s National Development and Reform Commission and Ministry of Environmental Protection, and by other provincial, county and local authorities in jurisdictions in which its products are processed or sold, regarding the processing, storage, and distribution of its product. SC Coke's processing facilities are subject to periodic inspection by national, provincial, county and local authorities. SC Coke may not be able to comply with current laws and regulations, or any future laws and regulations. To the extent that new regulations are adopted, SC Coke will be required to adjust its activities in order to comply with such regulations. SC Coke may be required to incur substantial costs in order to comply. SC Coke's failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject it to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, which could have a material and adverse effect on SC Coke's business, operations and finances. Changes in applicable laws and regulations may also have a negative impact on its sales.

The government regulation of SC Coke’s coal processing and coke production operations imposes additional costs on SC Coke, and future regulations could increase those costs or limit its ability to crush, clean and process coking coal. China’s provincial, county and local authorities regulate matters such as employee health and safety, permitting and licensing requirements, air quality standards, water pollution, plant and wildlife protection and the discharge of materials into the environment. SC Coke may delay commencement, expansion or continuation of its coal processing operations. In addition, third parties and governmental agencies in some cases have the power under such laws and regulations to require remediation of environmental conditions and, in the case of governmental agencies, to impose fines and penalties. The possibility exists that new legislation and/or regulations and orders may be adopted that may materially and adversely affect its operations, its cost structure and/or its customers’ ability to produce coke or use coal. New legislation or administrative regulations (or judicial interpretations of existing laws and regulations), including proposals related to the protection of the environment that would further regulate and tax the coal industry, may also require SC Coke and its customers to change their operations significantly and/or incur increased costs. These factors and legislation, if enacted, could have a material adverse effect on SC Coke’s financial condition and results of operations.

SC Coke also believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with the numerous laws, regulations, rules, specifications and permits, approvals and registrations relating to human health and safety and the environment except where noncompliance would not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

In connection with the ownership and operation of SC Coke's properties (including locations to which it may have sent waste in the past) and the conduct of its business, it potentially may be liable for damages or cleanup, investigation or remediation costs. SC Coke's budgeted amount for environmental regulatory compliance may not be sufficient, and it may need to allocate additional funds for this purpose. If SC Coke fails to comply with current or future environmental laws and regulations, it may be required to pay penalties or fines or take corrective actions, any of which may have a material adverse effect on its business operations and financial condition.

No assurance can be given that all potential environmental liabilities have been identified or properly quantified or that any prior owner, operator, or tenant has not created an environmental condition unknown to SC Coke. Moreover, no assurance can be given that (i) future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability or (ii) the current environmental condition of SC Coke’s properties will not be affected by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the properties or by third parties unrelated to SC Coke.

It is possible that compliance with a new regulatory requirement could impose significant compliance costs on SC Coke's business. Such costs could have a material adverse effect on SC Coke's business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, China is a signatory to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which are intended to limit greenhouse gas emissions. On March 14, 2006, the PRC Government released the outline of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development, which sets goals to decrease the amount of energy consumed per unit of GDP by 20 percent and to reduce the emission of certain major pollutants by ten percent. In addition, recent discussions between the PRC government and U.S. government on clean energy initiatives, including the reduction of CO₂ level and the use low-carbon coal, which initiatives may be incorporated in the Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development, may have significant effects on SC Coke's business operations. If efforts to reduce energy consumption, to use low-carbon coal, and to control greenhouse gas emissions reducing coal consumption are adopted, SC Coke's revenue would decrease and its business would be adversely affected.

SC Coke's business will suffer if it cannot obtain, maintain or renew necessary permits or licenses.

All PRC enterprises in the coal industry are required to obtain from various PRC governmental authorities certain permits and licenses, including, without limitation, a business license, a Coal Trading Qualification Certificate, a Work Safety Permit for coke, tar, benzol and sulfoximine, a pollution emission license and a National Industrial Product Manufacture License.

These permits and licenses are subject to periodic renewal and/or reassessment by the relevant PRC government authorities, including permits which expire in less than one year, and the standards of compliance required in relation thereto may from time to time be subject to change. SC Coke intends to apply for renewal and/or reassessment of such permits and licenses when required by applicable laws, including renewal of its current Pollution Emission License to include its expanded plant prior to the start of production in its plant, and regulations and believes it can renew its permits in the ordinary course of its business, however, we cannot assure you that SC Coke can obtain, maintain or renew the permits and licenses or accomplish the reassessment of such permits and licenses in a timely manner. Any changes in compliance standards, or any new laws or regulations that may prohibit or render it more restrictive for us to conduct SC Coke's business or increase its compliance costs may adversely affect our operations or profitability. Any failure by SC Coke to obtain, maintain or renew the licenses, permits and approvals may have a material adverse effect on the operation of SC Coke's business. In addition, SC Coke may not be able to carry on business without such permits and licenses being renewed and/or reassessed.

SC Coke is also required to conduct an environmental impact assessment for the expansion project and file such assessment with the local government. SC Coke has finished the environmental impact assessment in year 2011, but we cannot assure you that SC Coke can make the filing and/or obtain the requisite approval for the environmental impact assessment in a timely manner. Any failure by SC Coke to make the filing and obtain the approval for environmental impact assessment for expansion may delay the construction of such expansion and subject SC Coke to a fine of approximately $7,310 to $29,240 if SC Coke commences construction of expansion without conducting environmental impact assessment, and as a result may have a material adverse effect on SC Coke's business expansion.

SC Coke may suffer losses resulting from industry-related accidents and lack of insurance.

SC Coke operates coal related facilities that may be affected by water, gas, fire or structural problems and earthquakes and other natural disasters. As a result, SC Coke, like other companies operating coke production facilities, have experienced accidents that have caused property damage and personal injuries. Although SC Coke continuously reviews its existing operational standards, including insurance coverage, and it has implemented safety measures and provided on-the-job training for our employees and workers, there can be no assurance that industry-related accidents, natural disasters and earthquakes will not occur in the future. Additionally, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from handling and disposing of SC Coke products cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of an accident, SC Coke could be held liable for resulting damages. The insurance industry in China is still in its development stage and Chinese insurance companies offer limited business insurance products. SC Coke currently has work-related injury insurance for its employees at its plant, but it does not currently maintain fire, casualty or other property insurance covering its properties, equipment or inventories. In addition, SC Coke does not maintain any business interruption insurance or any third party liability insurance to cover claims related to personal injury, property or environmental damage arising from accidents on its properties. Any uninsured losses and liabilities incurred by SC Coke could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

SC Coke needs to manage growth in operations to maximize its potential growth and achieve its expected revenues, and its failure to manage growth would cause a disruption of its operations resulting in the failure to generate revenue at levels it expects.

In order to maximize potential growth in SC Coke’s current and potential markets, it is expanding its production operations. This expansion will place a significant strain on SC Coke’s management and its operational, accounting and information systems. SC Coke anticipates that it will need to continue to improve its financial controls, operating procedures, and management information systems. SC Coke will also need to effectively recruit, train, motivate and manage its employees. SC Coke’s failure to manage its growth could disrupt its operations and ultimately prevent it from generating the revenues it expects to achieve.

If SC Coke’s land use rights are revoked, it would have no operational capabilities.

Under Chinese law land is owned by the state or rural collective economic organizations. The state issues to tenants the rights to use property. Use rights can be revoked and the tenants forced to vacate at any time when redevelopment of the land is in the public interest. The public interest rationale is interpreted quite broadly and the process of land appropriation may be less than transparent. SC Coke relies on these land use rights as the cornerstone of its operations, and the loss of such rights would have a material adverse effect on our company. According to PRC laws and regulations, any individual or organization which needs to use land for non-agricultural construction is required to apply for state owned land, except (i) to build a villager’s house; (ii) to build public facilities, or (iii) for a village/county-owned enterprise’s operation. However, if a village/county-owned enterprise is merged, acquired or reorganized by other enterprises, the collective land previously possessed by such village/county-owned enterprise can be used by the acquirer for non-agricultural construction. Since SC Coke is not a village/county-owned enterprise, the construction of part of its coking plant in Fujiagou Village and Dongjie Village and its office building in Xiacai Village using collective owned land through occupation agreements with village committees and individual villagers is not protected by relevant laws and regulations. If the villagers or villager committees breach the occupation agreements and do not allow SC Coke to use the land, SC Coke cannot force such villagers or villager committees to carry out the occupation agreements, but can only stop paying compensation as provided in the occupation agreements. The land on which the plant of SC Coke is located is collective owned land, which includes farmland and woodland. On December 31, 2008, the People’s Government of Anyang County issued an approval to permit our Company occupying and using part of the farmland and woodland in Shitang, Fujiagou and South Tongye Village. However, since SC Coke is using this agricultural land for non-agricultural uses it would need to apply for PRC state owned land or collective owned construction land. Since SC Coke is currently using such agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes, the PRC government has the right to confiscate the land and impose a significant fine.

Climate change poses both regulatory and physical risks that could adversely impact SC Coke’s business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

Climate change could have a potential economic impact on us and climate change mitigation programs and regulations could increase SC Coke's costs. Energy costs could be higher as a result of climate change regulations. SC Coke's costs could increase if utility companies pass on their costs, such as those associated with carbon taxes, emission cap and trade programs, or renewable portfolio standards. In addition, climate change may increase the frequency or intensity of natural disasters. We cannot assure you that climate change will not adversely impact SC Coke's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

SC Coke is past due in the payment of certain taxes.

As of December 31, 2011, SC Coke had no overdue enterprise income taxes. . As of the date of this current report, SC Coke has not been notified by a tax authority to pay any underpaid taxes nor, to the knowledge of SC Coke, has any tax authority commenced collection or enforcement measures.

If we do not implement necessary improvements to our internal control over financial reporting in an efficient and timely manner, or if we discover additional deficiencies and weaknesses in existing systems and controls, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement and investors may lose confidence in our ability to operate in compliance with existing internal control rules and regulations, which could result in a decline in our share price.

The PRC historically has been deficient in western style management and financial reporting concepts and practices, as well as in modern banking, and other control systems. We may have difficulty in hiring and retaining a sufficient number of qualified employees to work in the PRC and we may experience difficulty in establishing management, legal and financial controls, collecting financial data and preparing financial statements, books of account and corporate records and instituting business practices that meet western standards.

Our ability to manage our operations and growth requires us to maintain effective operations, compliance and management controls, as well as internal control over financial reporting. Our internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As a result of an evaluation of our internal control procedures we have identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, SC Coke has determined that it has a material weakness related to its ability to prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. SC Coke came to this conclusion based on the following significant deficiencies:

SC Coke holds a number of investments in other China-based companies. SC Coke failed to properly identify the entities that required consolidation and the proper accounting treatment for the other entities where it did not have significant ownership or significant control and influence.

SC Coke failed to perform appropriate inventory and sales cut-off during its year-end close procedures.

SC Coke failed to properly reconcile its cash accounts during its year-end close procedures.

SC Coke failed to identify significant GAAP disclosures during the preparation of its financial statements.

While SC Coke has begun to, or is intending to, take various measures to remediate the material weaknesses, and intends to continue to evaluate and strengthen its internal controls over financial reporting systems, these efforts require significant time and resources. If we are unable to establish adequate internal controls over financial reporting systems, we may encounter difficulties in the audit or review of our financial statements by our independent public accountants, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our ability to comply with the reporting obligations imposed upon us by the SEC.

It may be difficult to design and implement effective internal control over financial reporting for combined operations following the Share Exchange and perhaps other businesses which may be acquired in the future. In addition, differences in existing controls of acquired businesses may result in weaknesses that require remediation when internal controls over financial reporting are combined.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control, we may be unable to produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective at any time in the future, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to attest to the effectiveness of internal controls, is unable to deliver a report at all or can deliver only a qualified report, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement and investors may lose confidence in our ability to operate in compliance with existing internal control rules and regulations, which could in any such instance result in a decline in our share price.

Risks Relating to the Company and our Corporate Structure

Our corporate structure, in particular the VIE Agreements, are subject to significant risks, as set forth in the following risk factors.

We are primarily a holding company and depend on distributions from our subsidiaries to meet our financial obligations.

Our company has an offshore holding structure commonly used by Chinese enterprises seeking to be listed on a securities exchange outside the PRC. We are a corporation which owns Shun Cheng HK, Shun Cheng HK owns Anyang WFOE and Anyang WFOE has contractual arrangements pursuant to which it controls the operations of SC Coke. Our operations are conducted exclusively through SC Coke, in which we own no equity interest. The operations of SC Coke are our sole source of revenues. We have no operations independent of those of Anyang WFOE and SC Coke and its subsidiary. As a result, we are dependent upon the performance of SC Coke and its subsidiary and will be subject to the financial, business and other factors affecting such entities as well as general economic and financial conditions. As substantially all of our operations are conducted through SC Coke, we are dependent on the cash flow received by SC Coke to meet our obligations. The claims of our shareholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations, and trade payables, of our subsidiaries and SC Coke. In the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our subsidiaries and will be available to satisfy the claims of our shareholders only after all of Anyang WFOE’s liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.

The PRC government may determine that the VIE Agreements are not in compliance with applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations.

In the PRC it is widely understood that foreign invested enterprises are forbidden or restricted in their ability to engage in certain businesses or industries which are considered sensitive to the economy. While we intend to centralize our management and operation in the PRC without being restricted to conduct certain business activities which are important to our current or future business but are restricted or might be restricted in the future, we believe our VIE Agreements will be essential for our business operation. In order for Anyang WFOE to manage and operate our business through SC Coke in the PRC, the VIE Agreements were entered into under which almost all the business activities of SC Coke are managed and operated by Anyang WFOE and almost all economic benefits and risks arising from the business of SC Coke are transferred to Anyang WFOE.

There are risks involved with the operation of SC Coke under the VIE Agreements. If the VIE Agreements are considered to be in breach of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such breach, including:

discontinuing or restricting the operations of Anyang WFOE or SC Coke;

imposing conditions or requirements in respect of the VIE Agreements with which Anyang WFOE may not be able to comply;

requiring us to restructure the relevant ownership structure or operations;

taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could adversely affect our business; and

voiding the VIE Agreements.

Any of these actions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend upon the VIE Agreements in conducting our business in the PRC, which may not be as effective as direct ownership.

Following the Share Exchange, we will conduct our business in the PRC and generate the relevant revenues through the VIE Agreements. The VIE Agreements may not be as effective in providing us with control over SC Coke as direct ownership. The VIE Agreements are governed by PRC laws and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration pursuant to PRC laws. Accordingly, the VIE Agreements would be interpreted in accordance with PRC laws. If SC Coke or its shareholders fail to perform the obligations under the VIE Agreements, we may have to rely on legal remedies under PRC laws, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, and there is a risk that we may be unable to obtain these remedies. The legal environment in China is not as developed as in other jurisdictions. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce the VIE Agreements and therefore our rights under the VIE Agreements may not be fully protected under PRC laws.

The pricing arrangement under the VIE Agreements may be challenged by the PRC tax authorities.

We could face adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the VIE Agreements were not entered into based on arm’s length negotiations. If the PRC tax authorities determine that the VIE Agreements were not entered into on an arm’s length basis, they may adjust the income and expenses of SC Coke and/or Anyang WFOE for PRC tax purposes, which could result in higher tax liability.

We rely on the approval certificates and business license held by SC Coke and any deterioration of the relationship between Anyang WFOE and SC Coke could materially and adversely affect the overall business operation of our company.

Following the Share Exchange, and pursuant to the VIE Agreements, our business in China will be undertaken on the basis of the approvals, certificates and business license as well as other requisite licenses held by SC Coke. There can be no assurance that SC Coke will be able to renew its licenses or certificates when their terms expire with substantially similar terms as the ones they currently hold.

Further, our relationship with SC Coke is governed by the VIE Agreements, which are intended to provide us, through our indirect ownership of Anyang WFOE, with effective control over the business operations of SC Coke. However, the VIE Agreements may not be effective in providing direct control over the applications for and maintenance of the licenses required for SC Coke’s business operations. SC Coke could violate the VIE Agreements, go bankrupt, suffer from difficulties in its business or otherwise become unable to perform its obligations under the VIE Agreements and, as a result, our operations, reputation, business and stock price could be severely harmed.

If Anyang WFOE exercises the purchase options over SC Coke’s equity pursuant to the VIE Agreements, the payment of purchase price could materially and adversely affect the financial position of our company.

Under the VIE Agreements, Anyang WFOE holds an option to purchase all or a portion of the equity of SC Coke at a minimum price permitted under then-applicable PRC laws and regulations at the time of the exercise of the option, and such price, subject to applicable PRC law, shall be refunded to Anyang WFOE or SC Coke at no consideration in an appropriate manner decided by Anyang WFOE. In the case that applicable PRC laws and regulations require an appraisal of the equity interest or provide other restrictions on the purchase price, the purchase price shall be the lowest price permitted under the applicable PRC laws and regulations. As SC Coke is already a contractually controlled affiliate to our company, Anyang WFOE’s purchase of SC Coke’s equity would not bring immediate benefits to our company and the exercise of the option and payment of the purchase prices could adversely affect the financial position of our company.

Past company activities prior to the Share Exchange may lead to future liability for the Company.

Prior to the closing of the Share Exchange on June 28, 2010, we were engaged in a business that is unrelated to our current operations. Although certain of our shareholders prior to the Share Exchange have provided certain indemnifications against losses, subject to certain limitations, arising out of or based on breaches of representations and warranties made in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement, any liabilities relating to such prior business against which we are not completely indemnified may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to consolidate the financial results of our affiliated company or such consolidation could materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

For PRC regulatory reasons, much of our operations are/will be conducted through affiliated company which currently is considered for accounting purposes as an variable interest entity (“VIE”), and we are considered the primary beneficiary, enabling us to consolidate its financial results in our consolidated financial statements. In the event that in the future a company we hold as a VIE would no longer meet the definition of a VIE, or we are deemed not to be the primary beneficiary, we would not be able to consolidate line by line that entity's financial results in our consolidated financial statements for PRC purposes. Also, if in the future an affiliate company becomes a VIE and we become the primary beneficiary, we would be required to consolidate that entity's financial results in our consolidated financial statements for PRC purposes. If such entity's financial results were negative, this could have a corresponding negative impact on our operating results for PRC purposes. However, any material variations in the accounting principles, practices and methods used in preparing financial statements for PRC purposes from the principles, practices and methods generally accepted in the United States and in the SEC accounting regulations must be discussed, quantified and reconciled in financial statements for United States and SEC purposes.

Risks Relating to Doing Business in China

The PRC’s economic policies could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Substantially all of our assets are located in the PRC and all of our revenue is generated in domestic PRC markets. We anticipate that sales of our products in China will continue to represent all of our total sales in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects are subject, to a significant extent, to the economic, political and legal developments in the PRC. The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including: the amount of government involvement; the level of development; the growth rate; the control of foreign exchange; and the allocation of resources, including initiatives to consolidate the coal mining and iron and steel industries.

While the PRC’s economy has experienced significant growth in the past twenty years, such growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall economy of the PRC, but they may also have a negative affect on us. For example, our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected by the government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations. We cannot assure you that such growth will continue.

The economy of the PRC has been changing from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. In recent years, the PRC government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform and the reduction of state ownership of productive assets, and the establishment of corporate governance in business enterprises; however, a substantial portion of productive assets in the PRC are still owned by the government. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. It also exercises significant control over the PRC’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, the control of payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, the setting of monetary policy and the provision of preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Also, since early 2004, the PRC government has implemented certain measures to control the pace of economic growth, including certain price controls on raw coking coal.

Any adverse change in the economic conditions or government policies in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth and the level of energy investments and expenditures in China, which in turn could lead to a reduction in demand for our products and consequently have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

Our business is largely subject to the uncertain legal environment in China and your ability to sue and enforce judgments could be limited.

As the production of SC Coke’s products is carried out completely in the PRC, we are subject to and have to operate within the framework of the PRC legal system. Any changes in the laws or policies of the PRC or the implementation thereof, for example in areas such as foreign exchange controls, tariffs, trade barriers, taxes, export license requirements and environmental protection, may have a material impact on our operations and financial performance.

The Chinese legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike common law systems, it is a system in which precedents set in earlier legal cases are not generally followed. The overall effect of legislation enacted over the past 20 years has been to enhance the protections afforded to foreign invested enterprises in China. However, these laws, regulations and legal requirements are relatively recent and are evolving rapidly, and their interpretation and enforcement involve uncertainties. These uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to foreign shareholders, such as the right of foreign invested enterprises to hold licenses and permits such as requisite business licenses. Also, because our officers will likely be residing in the PRC at the time such a suit is initiated, achieving service of process against such persons would be extremely difficult. Furthermore, because the majority of our assets are located in the PRC, it would also be extremely difficult to access those assets to satisfy an award entered against us in a United States court. Moreover, we have been advised that the PRC does not have treaties with the United States providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts. Any, or all, of these factors may adversely affect the legal protections afforded to you.

Following the Effective Date of the Share Exchange, all of our directors and officers, will reside outside of the United States. In addition, Anyang WFOE and SC Coke are located in the PRC and all of its assets are located outside of the United States. China does not have a treaty with United States providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts. It may be difficult, if not impossible, to acquire jurisdiction over those persons if a lawsuit is initiated against us and/or our officers and directors by a shareholder or group of shareholders in the United States. It may therefore be difficult for investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights based on the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws against us in the courts of either the United States or the PRC and, even if civil judgments are obtained in courts of the United States, to enforce such judgments in the PRC courts. Further, it is unclear if extradition treaties now in effect between the United States and the PRC would permit effective enforcement against us or our officers and directors of criminal penalties, under the United States federal securities laws or otherwise.

We may have limited legal recourse under PRC laws if disputes arise under our contracts with third parties.

The PRC government has enacted some laws and regulations dealing with matters such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. However, their experience in implementing, interpreting and enforcing these laws and regulations is limited, and our ability to enforce commercial claims or to resolve commercial disputes is unpredictable. If our new business ventures are unsuccessful, or other adverse circumstances arise from these transactions, we face the risk that the parties to these ventures may seek ways to terminate the transactions, or, may hinder or prevent us from accessing important information regarding the financial and business operations of these acquired companies. The resolution of these matters may be subject to the exercise of considerable discretion by agencies of the PRC government, and forces unrelated to the legal merits of a particular matter or dispute may influence their determination. Any rights we may have to specific performance, or to seek an injunction under PRC laws, in either of these cases, are severely limited, and without a means of recourse by virtue of the Chinese legal system, we may be unable to prevent these situations from occurring. The occurrence of any such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although legislation in China over the past 30 years has significantly improved the protection afforded to various forms of foreign investment and contractual arrangements in China, these laws, regulations and legal requirements are relatively new and their interpretation and enforcement involve uncertainties, which could limit the legal protection available to us, and foreign investors, including you. The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital and could have a material adverse impact on our operations.

The PRC government exerts substantial influence over the manner in which we must conduct our business activities.

The PRC only recently has permitted provincial and local economic autonomy and private economic activities. The PRC government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the PRC economy through regulation and state ownership. Our ability to operate in the PRC may be harmed by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, environmental regulations, land use rights, property and other matters. We believe that SC Coke's operations are in material compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However, the central or local governments of the jurisdictions in which we operate may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with such regulations or interpretations.

Accordingly, government actions in the future including any decision not to continue to support recent economic reforms and to return to a more centrally planned economy or regional or local variations in the implementation of economic policies could have a significant effect on economic conditions in the PRC or particular regions thereof, and could require us to divest ourselves of any interest we then hold in Chinese properties or joint ventures.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident shareholders to personal liability, limit our ability to acquire PRC companies or to inject capital into our PRC subsidiary, limit our PRC subsidiary's ability to distribute profits to us or otherwise materially adversely affect us.

In October 2005, SAFE issued the Notice on Relevant Issues in the Foreign Exchange Control over Financing and Return Investment Through Special Purpose Companies by Residents Inside China, generally referred to as Circular 75, which required PRC residents to register with the competent local SAFE branch before establishing or acquiring control over an offshore special purpose company, or SPV; under Notice 75, a “special purpose company” refers to an offshore entity established or controlled, directly or indirectly, by PRC residents for the purpose of seeking offshore equity financing on the strength of the domestic assets or interests owned by such PRC residents in onshore companies. Internal implementing guidelines issued by SAFE, which became public in June 2007 (known as Notice 106), expanded the reach of Circular 75 by (1) purporting to cover the establishment or acquisition of control by PRC residents of offshore entities which merely acquire “control” over domestic companies or assets, even in the absence of legal ownership; (2) adding requirements relating to the source of the PRC resident's funds used to establish or acquire the offshore entity; (3) covering the use of existing offshore entities for offshore financings; (4) purporting to cover situations in which an offshore SPV establishes a new subsidiary in China or acquires an unrelated company or unrelated assets in China; and (5) making the domestic affiliate of the SPV responsible for the accuracy of certain documents which must be filed in connection with any such registration, notably, the business plan which describes the overseas financing and the use of proceeds. Amendments to registrations made under Circular 75 are required in connection with any increase or decrease of capital, transfer of shares, mergers and acquisitions, equity investment or creation of any security interest in any assets located in China to guarantee offshore obligations, and Notice 106 makes the offshore SPV jointly responsible for these filings. In the case of an SPV which was established, and which acquired a related domestic company or assets, before the implementation date of Circular 75, a retroactive SAFE registration was required to have been completed before March 31, 2006; this date was subsequently extended indefinitely by Notice 106, which also required that the registrant establish that all foreign exchange transactions undertaken by the SPV and its affiliates were in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Failure to comply with the requirements of Circular 75, as applied by SAFE in accordance with Notice 106, may result in fines and other penalties under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions. Any such failure could also result in the SPV's subsidiaries being impeded or prevented from distributing their profits and the proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the SPV, or from engaging in other transfers of funds into or out of China.

Based on our understanding of current PRC laws and as advised by our PRC counsel, we believe our current controlling shareholders are not PRC residents and are not subject to Circular 75 and Notice 106, and therefore are not required to register with the relevant branch of SAFE, however, we cannot provide any assurances that the relevant PRC authority will not have a different opinion. Moreover, because of uncertainty over how Circular 75 will be interpreted and implemented, and how or whether SAFE will apply it to us, we cannot predict how it will affect our business operations or future strategies. For example, our present and prospective PRC subsidiaries’ ability to conduct foreign exchange activities, such as the remittance of dividends and foreign currency-denominated borrowings, may be subject to compliance with Circular 75 and Notice 106 by our PRC resident beneficial holders.

In addition, PRC residents may not always be able to complete the necessary registration procedures required by Circular 75 and Notice 106. We also have little control over either our present or prospective direct or indirect shareholders or the outcome of such registration procedures. A failure by our current or prospective PRC resident beneficial holders or future PRC resident shareholders to comply with Circular 75 and Notice 106, if SAFE requires it, could subject these PRC resident beneficial holders to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our subsidiaries' ability to make distributions or pay dividends or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Ambiguities in the New M&A Rule implemented on September 8, 2006 relating to acquisitions of assets and equity interests of Chinese companies by foreign persons may present risks in our compliance status under the regulations.

On September 8, 2006, the MOFCOM, together with several other government agencies, promulgated the New M&A Rule to regulate the merger and acquisition of PRC equity and assets by foreign investors.

The transactions contemplated by the VIE Agreements are structured in a manner such that consummation of the transactions would not bring these transactions within the regulatory scope of the New M&A Rule. However, due to the ambiguities in the meaning of many provisions of the New M&A Rule, until there has been clarification either by pronouncements, regulations or practices, there is some uncertainty in the scope of the regulations. Moreover, the ambiguities may provide to the authorities wide latitude in the enforcement of the regulations and the transactions to which they may or may not apply. Therefore, it is possible that the future issuance of new regulations and pronouncements for the purposes of clarifying the application of New M&A Rule may require SC Coke to obtain approval from the appropriate authority for the transactions contemplated by the VIE Agreements, and failure to obtain such approval, if required, may cause the PRC government to take actions that adversely affect the VIE Agreements, including voiding the VIE Agreements, which as a result may have a material adverse effect on our control of and revenue from SC Coke.

The New M&A Rule, among other things, also includes provisions that purport to require that an SPV which is formed for purposes of listing of equity interests in PRC companies through the acquisition of PRC equity with foreign equity as consideration, and which is controlled directly or indirectly by PRC companies or individuals, obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such SPV’s securities on an overseas stock exchange (excluding the over the counter market).

Anyang WFOE was directly incorporated by Shun Cheng HK as a foreign investment enterprise under PRC law, and there was no acquisition of the equity of a “PRC domestic company” as defined under the New M&A Rules. In addition, the VIE arrangements between Anyang WFOE and SC Coke are not clearly defined and considered as transactions to which the New M&A Rule would apply and the OTCBB is not an overseas stock exchange as defined in New M&A Rule. Therefore, SC Coke did not seek prior CSRC approval.

In the future if we decide to be listed on a national or other securities exchange the CRSC may require that we obtain its approval for a future offering on such stock exchange. Such offering may be delayed until we obtain CSRC approval, which may take several months, if obtaining such approval is even practicable at all. The uncertainty of obtaining CSRC approval may have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain financing in the future.

We may face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to issue equity compensation to our directors and employees and other parties who are PRC citizens or residents under PRC law.

On April 6, 2007, SAFE issued the "Operating Procedures for Administration of Domestic Individuals Participating in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan or Stock Option Plan of An Overseas Listed Company, also known as "Circular 78" For any equity compensation plan which is so covered and is adopted by a non-PRC listed company after April 6, 2007, Circular 78 requires all participants who are PRC citizens to register with and obtain approvals from SAFE prior to their participation in the plan. In addition, Circular 78 also requires PRC citizens within three months after the issuance of Circular 78 to register with SAFE and make the necessary applications and filings if they participated in an overseas listed company's covered equity compensation plan prior to April 6, 2007. We may adopt an equity compensation plan after the closing of this offering and may make option grants to some of our directors and senior officers, most of whom are PRC citizens. Circular 78 may require PRC citizens who receive option grants to register with SAFE. We believe that the registration and approval requirements contemplated in Circular 78 will be burdensome and time-consuming. If it is determined that any of our equity compensation plans failure to comply with such provisions, this may subject us and recipients of such options to fines and legal sanctions and prevent us from being able to grant equity compensation to our PRC employees. In that case, our ability to compensate our employees and directors through equity compensation would be hindered and our business operations may be adversely affected.

The PRC economic cycle may negatively impact our operating results.

The rapid growth of the PRC economy before 2008 generally led to higher levels of inflation. The PRC economy has more recently experienced a slowing of its growth rate. A number of factors have contributed to this slow-down, including appreciation of the Renminbi, the currency of China, which has adversely affected China’s exports. In addition, the slow-down has been exacerbated by the recent global crisis in the financial services and credit markets, which has resulted in significant volatility and dislocation in the global capital markets. It is uncertain how long the global crisis in the financial services and credit markets will continue and the significance of the adverse impact it may have on the global economy in general, or the Chinese economy in particular. Slowing economic growth in China could result in slowing growth and demand for our services which could reduce our revenues. In the event of a recovery in the PRC, renewed high growth levels may again lead to inflation. Government attempts to control inflation may adversely affect the business climate and growth of private enterprise. In addition, our profitability may be adversely affected if prices for our products rise at a rate that is insufficient to compensate for the rise in inflation.

The fluctuation of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect the value of our common stock.

The value of the Renminbi against the United States Dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in the PRC’s political and economic conditions. Any significant revaluation of the RMB may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenues and financial condition.

Conversely, if we decide to convert our RMB into United States Dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our common stock or for other business purposes and the United States Dollar appreciates against the RMB, the United States Dollar equivalent of the RMB we convert would be reduced. Any significant devaluation of RMB may reduce our operation costs in United States Dollars, but may also reduce our earnings in United States Dollars. In addition, the depreciation of significant United States Dollar denominated assets could result in a charge to our income statement and a reduction in the value of these assets.

Since 1994, the PRC has set the value of the RMB to the United States Dollar. We do not believe that this policy has had a material effect on our business. There can be no assurance that RMB will not be subject to devaluation. We may not be able to hedge effectively against RMB devaluation, so there can be no assurance that future movements in the exchange rate of RMB and other currencies will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient foreign exchange to pay dividends or satisfy other foreign exchange requirements in the future.

At various times during recent years, the United States and the PRC have had disagreements over political and economic issues. Controversies may arise in the future between these two countries. Any political or trade controversies between the United States and the PRC could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to access United States capital markets.

Governmental control of currency conversion may affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive all of our revenues in RMB. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the ability of our PRC subsidiary and our affiliated entities to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to us. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from appropriate government authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign currencies.

Because our operations are located in China, information about our operations are not readily available from independent third-party sources.

Because SC Coke is based in China shareholders may have greater difficulty in obtaining information about SC Coke on a timely basis than would shareholders of an entirely U.S.-based company. SC Coke’s operations will continue to be conducted in China and shareholders may have difficulty in obtaining information about SC Coke from sources other than SC Coke itself. Information available from newspapers, trade journals, or local, regional or national regulatory agencies will not be readily available to shareholders. Shareholders will be dependent upon SC Coke’s management for reports of SC Coke’s progress, development, activities and operations.

Because our funds are held in banks which do not provide insurance, the failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could affect our ability to continue our business.

Banks and other financial institutions in the PRC do not provide insurance for funds held on deposit. As a result, in the event of a bank failure, we may not have access to funds on deposit. Depending upon the amount of money we maintain in a bank that fails, our inability to have access to our cash could impair our operations, and, if we are not able to access funds to pay our suppliers, employees and other creditors, we may be unable to continue our business.

We must comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

We are required to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits U.S. companies from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Foreign companies, including some of our competitors, are not subject to these prohibitions. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices occur from time-to-time in mainland China. If our competitors engage in these practices, they may receive preferential treatment from personnel of some companies, giving our competitors an advantage in securing business or from government officials who might give them priority in obtaining new licenses, which would put us at a disadvantage. Although we inform our personnel that such practices are illegal, we can not assure you that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties.

Due to various restrictions under PRC laws on the distribution of dividends by our PRC operating companies, we may not be able to pay dividends to our shareholders.

The Wholly-Foreign Owned Enterprise Law (1986), as amended and the Wholly-Foreign Owned Enterprise Law Implementing Rules (1990), as amended and the Company Law of the PRC (2006) contain the principal regulations governing dividend distributions by wholly foreign owned enterprises. Under these regulations, wholly foreign owned enterprises, such as Anyang WFOE, may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Additionally, Anyang WFOE is required to set aside 10% of its after tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds until the total amount of such reserve exceeds 50 percent of the registered capital of Anyang WFOE. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of liquidation and cannot be used for working capital purposes. Furthermore, if our PRC subsidiary and SC Coke incur debt on their own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other payments. If we or our subsidiaries and affiliated entities are unable to receive all of the revenues from our operations due to these contractual or dividend arrangements, we may be unable to pay dividends on our common stock.

Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law, we may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of China. Such classification will likely result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.

China passed a new Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the EIT Law, and its implementing rules, both of which became effective on January 1, 2008. Under the EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with “de facto management bodies” within China is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the EIT Law define de facto management as “substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties” of the enterprise.

We may be deemed to be a resident enterprise by Chinese tax authorities. If the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we may be subject to the enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. In our case, this would mean that income such as interest on financing proceeds and non-China source income would be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at a rate of 25%. Second, although under the EIT Law and its implementing rules dividends paid to us from our PRC subsidiary and affiliated entities would qualify as “tax-exempt income,” we cannot guarantee that such dividends will not be subject to a 10% withholding tax, as the PRC foreign exchange control authorities, which enforce the withholding tax, have not yet issued guidance with respect to the processing of outbound remittances to entities that are treated as resident enterprises for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Finally, it is possible that future guidance issued with respect to the new “resident enterprise” classification could result in a situation in which a 10% withholding tax is imposed on dividends we pay to our non-PRC shareholders and with respect to gains derived by our non-PRC shareholders from transferring our shares. We are actively monitoring the possibility of “resident enterprise” treatment for the 2010 tax year and are evaluating appropriate organizational changes to avoid this treatment, to the extent possible.

If we were treated as a “resident enterprise” by PRC tax authorities, we would be subject to taxation in both the United States and China, and our PRC tax may not be creditable against our United States tax.

Cultural, political and language differences.

There are material cultural, political and language differences between China and the United States, which make business negotiations and doing business more difficult in China than in the United States. Furthermore, continuing trade surpluses, a result of greater Chinese exports to the U.S. than U.S. exports to China, have become a sensitive political issue in the United States, and various members of Congress have threatened trade sanctions against China should the country continue a trade surplus with the United States. In addition, continuing strong economic growth in China with possible military buildup may result in American economic sanctions against China that could adversely affect the financial position and results of operations of the Company. There are additional challenges caused by distance, conflicting and changing laws and regulations, foreign laws, trading and investment policies and the burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations. These risks could in turn materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Risks Relating to the Market for our Common Stock

There is a substantial lack of liquidity of our common stock and volatility risks.

Our common stock is quoted in the OTCBB under the symbol “BRBH.” The liquidity of our common stock may be very limited and affected by our limited trading market. The OTCBB market is an inter-dealer market much less regulated than the major exchanges, and is subject to abuses, volatilities and shorting. There is currently no broadly followed and established trading market for our common stock. An established trading market may never develop or be maintained. Active trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders. Absence of an active trading market reduces the liquidity of the shares traded.

The trading volume of our common stock may be limited and sporadic. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. As a result of such trading activity, the quoted price for our common stock on the OTCBB may not necessarily be a reliable indicator of our fair market value. In addition, if our shares of common stock cease to be quoted, holders would find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotation as to the market value of, our common stock and as a result, the market value of our common stock likely would decline.

The market price for our stock may be volatile and subject to fluctuations in response to factors, including the following:

the increased concentration of the ownership of our shares by a limited number of affiliated shareholders following the Share Exchange may limit interest in our securities;

variations in quarterly operating results from the expectations of securities analysts or investors;

revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or reductions in security analysts’ coverage;

announcements of new products or services by us or our competitors;

reductions in the market share of our products;

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

general technological, market or economic trends;

investor perception of our industry or prospects;

insider selling or buying;

investors entering into short sale contracts;

regulatory developments affecting our industry; and

additions or departures of key personnel.

The market price for our common stock is particularly volatile given our status as a relatively small company with a small and thinly traded “float” that could lead to wide fluctuations in our share price. The market for our common stock is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common stock are sporadically and/or thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, BRBH is a speculative or “risky” investment due to our lack of revenues or profits to date and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our current and potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer.

Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common stock will be at any time, including as to whether our common stock will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common stock for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

Our common stock may never be listed on a major stock exchange.

We anticipate seeking the listing of our common stock on a national or other securities exchange at some time in the future, assuming that we can satisfy the initial listing standards for such. We currently do not satisfy the initial listing standards, and cannot ensure that we will be able to satisfy such listing standards or that our common stock will be accepted for listing on any such exchange. Should we fail to satisfy the initial listing standards of such exchanges, or our common stock is otherwise rejected for listing, the trading price of our common stock could suffer, the trading market for our common stock may be less liquid, and our common stock price may be subject to increased volatility.

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our ability to continue operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because a portion of our continued operations is expected to be financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our operations. Such reductions may force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including SC Coke’s ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our common stock price declines, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital in the future, we may not be able to have the resources to continue our normal operations.

Our corporate actions are substantially controlled by our principal shareholders and affiliated entities.

Our Chairman of the Board may become entitled to acquire equity ownership of shareholders of BRBH holding approximately 74.5% of our outstanding common stock. The Chairman could, directly or indirectly, exert substantial influence over matters such as electing directors, approving mergers or other business combination transactions and other matters requiring shareholder approval. In addition, because of the percentage of ownership and voting concentration in these principal shareholders, elections of our board of directors may generally be within the control of these shareholders and their affiliated entities. While all of our shareholders are entitled to vote on matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, the concentration of shares and voting control may at some point lie with these principal shareholders. As such, it would be difficult for shareholders to propose and have approved proposals not supported by management. There can be no assurances that matters voted upon by our officers and directors in their capacity as shareholders will be viewed favorably by all shareholders of the Company. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control of our Company. It could also deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our Company and it may affect the market price of our common stock.

Concentrated ownership of our common stock creates a risk of sudden changes in our common stock price.

The sale by any of our large shareholders of a significant portion of that shareholder’s holdings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Sales of our currently issued and outstanding stock may become freely tradable pursuant to Rule 144 and may dilute the market for your shares and have a depressive effect on the price of the shares of our common stock.

A substantial majority of the outstanding shares of common stock are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) (“Rule 144”). As restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions from registration under the Securities Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a non-affiliate who has held restricted securities for a period of at least six months (one year after filing Form 10 information with the SEC for shell companies such as BRBH and former shell companies) may sell their shares of common stock. Under Rule 144, affiliates who have held restricted securities for a period of at least six months (one year after filing Form 10 information with the SEC for shell companies such as BRBH and former shell companies) may, under certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of a company's outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks prior to the sale (the four calendar week rule does not apply to companies quoted on the OTCBB). A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Securities Act, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registrations of our shares of common stock, may have a depressive effect upon the price of our shares of common stock in any active market that may develop.

The securities issued in connection with the Share Exchange are restricted securities and may not be transferred in the absence of registration or the availability of a resale exemption.

The shares of common stock being issued in connection with the Share Exchange and the other transactions described herein are being issued in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder or Regulation S. Consequently, theses securities will be subject to restrictions on transfer under the Securities Act and may not be transferred in the absence of registration or the availability of a resale exemption. In particular, in the absence of registration, such securities cannot be resold to the public until certain requirements under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act have been satisfied, including certain holding period requirements. As a result, a purchaser who receives any such securities issued in connection with the Share Exchange may be unable to sell such securities at the time or at the price or upon such other terms and conditions as the purchaser desires, and the terms of such sale may be less favorable to the purchaser than might be obtainable in the absence of such limitations and restrictions.

If we issue additional shares in the future, it will result in the dilution of our existing shareholders.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock with no par value per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with no par value per share. Our board of directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares will result in a reduction of the book value and market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuance will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all current shareholders. Further, such issuance may result in a change of control of our Company.

We do not plan to declare or pay any dividends to our shareholders in the near future.

We have not declared any dividends in the past, and we do not intend to distribute dividends in the near future. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the board of directors and subject to PRC law, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors as the board of directors considers relevant. There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract management.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). These requirements are extensive. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight is required. This may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent fraud. As a result, our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price of our stock. Furthermore, we anticipate that we will incur considerable costs and use significant management time and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 and other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

If we are late in filing our quarterly or annual reports with the SEC, we may be de-listed from the OTCBB.

Under OTCBB rules relating to the timely filing of periodic reports with the SEC, any OTCBB issuer who fails to file a periodic report (Form 10-Qs or 10-Ks) by the due date of such report, three (3) times during any twenty-four (24) month period are de-listed from the OTCBB. Therefore, if we are late in filing a periodic report three times in any twenty-four (24) month period and are de-listed from the OTCBB, our securities may become worthless and we may be forced to curtail or abandon our business plan.

Public company compliance may make it more difficult to attract and retain officers and directors.

The various rules and regulations to which we are subject as a public company make certain activities more time consuming and costly and require the expenditure of significant resources for compliance-related matters. As a public company, we also expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance in the future and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.

Persons associated with securities offerings, including consultants, may be deemed to be broker dealers.

In the event that any of our securities are offered without engaging a registered broker-dealer, we may face claims for rescission and other remedies. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with the broker-dealer requirements, we could be subject to penalties, required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments, or repurchase such securities. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend our Company, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect reported results of operations.

A change in accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect its reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conducts business.

“Penny Stock” rules may make buying or selling our common stock difficult.

Trading in our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules require that any broker-dealer that recommends our common stock to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors, must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock, which could severely limit the market price and liquidity of our common stock.

We have the right to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, which may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our other securities and may deter hostile takeovers or delay changes in management control.

We may issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series, and with such rights, preferences and designations as our board of directors may determine from time to time. To date, our board of directors has not authorized any class or series of preferred stock. However, our board of directors, without further approval of our common shareholders, is authorized to fix the dividend rights and terms, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights, liquidation preferences and other rights and restrictions relating to any series of our preferred stock. Issuances of shares of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible financings, acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our other securities and may, under certain circumstances, have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delay changes in management control.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

SC Coke’s principal executive office, coking factory and coal washing factory are in Tongye Town, Anyang County, Henan Province. In addition, SC Coke has another office in the Xingshe Office Building, East of Wenfeng Avenue, Wenfeng District, Anyang City, Henan Province. SC Coke’s administrative headquarters is located 2.5 kilometers from the coking factory and is situated on a parcel of land of approximately 110,770 square meters, leased through a land occupation agreement with Xiacai Villagers Committee; the building occupies approximately 30,942 square meters.

SC Coke’s coking factory and coal washing factory are located in Tongye Town, Anyang County, Henan Province, approximately 40 kilometers from Anyang City. The coking factory is situated on a parcel of land of approximately 260,000 square meters and the factory is approximately 80,000 square meters. The People’s Government of Anyang County issued to SC Coke several land use right certificates for the site of the coking factory for 61,576.02 square meters in December of 2003. In addition, SC Coke also leases approximately 198,420 square meters of land on which the coking factory is located pursuant to several land occupation agreements it has entered into with various village committees and villagers. SC Coke’s coal washing facility is located approximately 4 kilometers from its coking factory on land leased pursuant to several land occupation agreements with villagers in Nanxilu Village. The coal washing facility is approximately 58,000 square meters.

The land occupation agreements entered by SC Coke with various village committees and villagers for the above land in Tongye Town generally have terms of more than 10 years with consideration of between RMB 1.5 to RMB 3 per square meter per year.

“Land use rights” are granted to an individual or entity after payment of a land use right fee is made to the applicable state or rural collective economic organization and individuals. Land use rights allow the holder of the right to use the land for a specified long-term period. SC Coke has a land use right, expiring in 2051, for a total of approximately 4,149.3 square meters located in the Xingshe Office Building and owns approximately 8,479 square meters of total floor space in the Xingshe Office Building.

The land on which the coke plant of SC Coke is located is collective owned land, which includes farmland and woodland. On December 31, 2008, the People’s Government of Anyang County issued an approval to permit SC Coke to occupy and use part of the farmland and woodland in Shitang, Fujiagou and South Tongye Village. However, since SC Coke is using this agricultural land for non-agricultural uses; it would need to apply to turn such collective owned agricultural land to PRC state owned land or collective owned construction land, which application is subject to approval of the provincial government of Henan Province. Since SC Coke is currently using such agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes, the PRC government has the right to confiscate the land and impose fines on SC Coke at RMB 10 to 20 per square meter for arable land occupied and no more than RMB 10 per square meter for land occupied other than arable land. In addition, SC Coke may be required to cease any new construction and remove any completed construction on such land. There can be no assurance that confiscation and/or the imposition of fines will not occur.

SC Coke has mortgaged its office in Xingshe office and a portion of its machinery and equipment to banks to secure loans it has obtained from the banks.

Longdu operates a coal-washing facility near Laohegou Village, Matoujian Town, Longan District, Anyang City, Henan Province, that is capable of producing up to 11,000 tons of refined coal annually.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

ITEM 4.

(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock is thinly traded on the OTCBB under the symbol BRBH. There can be no assurance that a liquid market for our securities will ever develop. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or blue sky laws of various states and foreign jurisdictions. Consequently, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and should be prepared to hold the common stock for an indefinite period of time.

Holders

As of March 28, 2012 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we had 369 shareholders of record holding 32,047,222 shares of our common stock.

Dividends

To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.

Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Stock Option Grants

To date, we have not granted any stock options.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc. is currently the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock. Its address is 3200 Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 430, Denver, CO 80209. Its phone number is (303) 282-4800.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We presently do not have any equity based or other long-term incentive programs. In the future, we may adopt and establish an equity-based or other long-term incentive plan if it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to do so.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. For this purpose any statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of which are not within our control. These factors include but are not limited to economic conditions generally and in the industries in which we may participate; competition within our chosen industry, including competition from much larger competitors; technological advances and failure to successfully develop business relationships.

Overview

SC Coke, which operates and derives its revenue solely in the PRC, is a vertically integrated coke producer, that has a coke production plant with current capacity of approximately 1.7 million tons of coke annually, equity ownership in a coal mine and two coal washing plants (producing refined coal). From our refined coal production process, byproducts such as medium coal and coal slurry are produced and sold. From coke production, SC Coke recycles and produces coke byproducts, including crude benzol, amsulfate, coal gas and tar. These coke byproducts are either marketed and sold, or recycled and consumed to provide electricity for its internal operations. For the purpose of this discussion, such refined coal and coke byproducts are referred to as “secondary products.”

The Chinese coking industry is also a regionalized business where supply of raw materials and the demand for coke become uneconomical at long distances as transportation costs become prohibitive. SC Coke estimates that supply of raw materials and demand for coke to be delivered by truck transportation is uneconomical beyond 800 kilometers (approximately 500 miles); and access to and delivery by rail becomes a critical competitive factor. SC Coke is located in close proximity to the main coal mining provinces of Shanxi and Henan in China and has a private railway line, approximately 1.7 kilometers (approximately 1 mile) in length, which provides connection to the national railway network.

The primary raw material for coke production is coal, principally coking coal. Raw coal is washed to produce refined coal which is the main raw material for SC Coke’s coke production. Coke prices are highly correlated to coal prices. SC Coke’s production process is as follows:

Because of our reliance on coal, SC Coke acquired an equity ownership interest in a coal mine. Although SC Coke has developed multiple sources of coal supplies and long term relationships with its coal suppliers, because of the PRC government policies of encouraging consolidation in the coal mining industry, SC Coke may continue to invest in coal mines, if, when and where opportunities are available and the terms of such investments are economically attractive.The PRC government recently adopted policies to encourage consolidation in the PRC coal mining industry whereby smaller and inefficient coal mines have been shut down. Similarly in the iron and steel industries, which are SC Coke’s main customers, companies have been merged and consolidated by the government. We believe that the coke manufacturing industry may face similar consolidation pressures in the future. Accordingly, SC Coke intends to continue its capacity expansion to maintain its competitive positioning.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Revenues. Total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2011 were $389,174,750, as compared to total revenues of $ 302,274,783 during the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $86,899,967 or approximately 28.7%. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the primary business of production and sale of coke has contributed 84 % of SC Coke’s total revenues. On the other hand, the sales of refined coal decreased to zero. The reason for the zero sales from the refined coal during this fiscal year is as the following: refined coal is a raw material for coke production, as coke production increased, our internal consumption of refined coal increased, which reduced the amount of SC Coke’s own refined coal available for external sales.

Primary Products

Our Revenues from the sales of coke during the year ended December 31, 2011 increased to $333,590,573, compared to $252,016,350 during the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $81,574,223 or approximately 32.36%. The increase in coke sales was primarily due to the increasing demands for coke from various steel mills in and near Henan Province where our main facilities and head quarter office locate.

SC Coke’s revenues from the sales of our primary products during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

	Revenues
	Coke			Refined Coal			Total
Revenues
Fiscal 2010	$	243,299,262		$	8,717,088		$	252,016,350
Fiscal 2011		333,590,573			0			333,590,573
Increase (decrease)	$	90,291,311		$	-8,717,088		$	81,574,223
% Increase (decrease)		37	%		-100	%		32.36	%
As Percentage of Total Revenues
Fiscal 2010		75.97	%		2.72	%		78.69	%
Fiscal 2011		85.7	%		0	%		85.7	%
Quantity Sold (metric tons)
Fiscal 2010		1,104,227			48,927			1,153,155
Fiscal 2011		1,286,861			0			1,286,861
Increase (decrease)		182,634			-48,927			133,706
% Increase (decrease)		16.5	%		-100	%		11.6	%
Average Price Per Ton
Fiscal 2010	$	220.33		$	178.16
Fiscal 2011		259.23			204.18
Increase (decrease)	$	38.9		$	26.02
% Increase (decrease)		17.66	%		14.6	%

Sales volume for coke benefited from the sale volume increase, while sales volume for refined coal decreased due to the decrease in the amount of refined coal available for external sales. Sales volume for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased over the comparable period in 2010 by 16.5% (from 1,104,227 tons to 1,286,861 tons); and over the same period, refined coal sales volume decreased by 100% (from 8,717,088 tons to 0 tons).

Product unit price for both coke and refined coal benefited from the global economic recovery. Compared with the same period of 2010, the average sales price for coke increased from $220.33 per ton to $259.23 per ton and the average sales price for refined coal increased from $178.16 per ton to $204 per ton for the year ended December 31, 2011. The percentage of coke sales in SC Coke’s total revenues increased slightly from 78.7% in year 2010 to 84% in year 2011.

Because of the increase in both product unit price and sales volume, revenues generated from coke sales increased from $252 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $333 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Secondary Products

SC Coke’s secondary product revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	Medium Coal			Crude Benzol			Amsulfate			Coal Gas			Tar			Coke Grain			Coke Powder			Others			Total
Revenues
Fiscal 2010	$	3,326,215		$	9,207,156		$	988,395		$	5,410,145		$	20,013,070		$	963,448		$	9,289,319		$	19,060,684		$	68,258,433
Fiscal 2011		0			14,489,710			2,179,696			4,972,393			24,540,194			1,780,648			7,621,536			0			55,584,177
Change	$	-3,326,215		$	5,282,554		$	1,191,301		$	-437,752		$	4,527,124		$	817,200		$	-1,667,783		$	-19,060,684		$	-12,674,256
% Change		-100	%		57	%		120	%		-8	%		22.6	%		84.8	%		-18	%		-100	%		-18.6	%
As% of Total Revenues
Fiscal 2010		1.04	%		2.87	%		0.31	%		1.69	%		6.25	%		0.30	%		2.90	%		5.95	%		21.31	%
Fiscal 2011		0	%		3.67	%		0.06	%		1.26	%		6.22	%		0.45	%		1.96	%		0	%		14.47	%

Despite the increase in coke production and sales, the total revenue of our secondary products decreased to $55.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 from $68.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of 18.6%. Revenue contribution from secondary products as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 21.31% in the year ended December 31, 2010 to 14.47 % in the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease in the percentage of revenues contributed by secondary products was primarily from the decrease in the sales of medium coal and others byproduct.

Of the secondary products, the largest contributor to revenue was tar sales. Tar sales increased by 22.6% from $20 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 to $24.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. Crude benzol sales also experienced a large increase, from $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold is comprised of raw material, labor and manufacturing costs. During the year of 2011, we contracted with unrelated local suppliers for the raw materials including the raw coals and refined coals. Cost of goods sold increased from $276 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, by 38.3%, to $382 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. The primary reasons for this increase were due to the increased raw material costs. Compared to fiscal year of 2010, the average price for the raw materials in the year of 2011 increased approximately by $ 45 per ton, or 25%. As a result, the gross profit decreased from $26 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 to $7 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. Due to an increase in the average cost of raw materials, gross profit margin decreased from 8.6% in the year ended December 31, 2010 to 1.84% in the year ended December 31, 2011.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased by 120% from $11.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 to $24.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. Operating expenses are comprised of sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased marginally from $4.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 to $8.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. Such increase in sales and marketing expenses caused the increase in our sales of primary product of coke in the year of 2011. General and administrative expenses increased from $6.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 to $16.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. Such increase was primarily attributable to added G&A expenses in 2011 due to: the inventory price adjustment (approximately $1.2 million), allowance for bad debt (approximately $2.6 million), and the company’s payment to the consultant (approximately $2.6 million) for its financial consulting services rendered.

Interest Income and Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $8.5 million and increased to $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Such increase was due to an increase in bank notes payable during the period. As of December 31, 2011, our outstanding bank notes payable increased to $186,890,191, compared to $120,118,576 as of December 31, 2010. Meanwhile, our interest income increased marginally by $1.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

Total Other Income (Expense). Due to an increase in interest expense as discussed above, our total other expense increased from $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Gain on Investment. Gain on investment for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $0.2 million compared to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 2010 was $2.6 million compared to a zero provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2011. . SC Coke and Longdu were subject to a corporate income tax rate of 25% during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2011.

Net Income. SC Coke recorded a net loss of ($32) million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to net income of $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributed to the combined effects of approximately$19 million decrease of gain on gross profit as a result of increased cost of our main raw material; and the $10 million increase of interest expense incurred as a result of the increased amount of bank notes payable during the fiscal year of 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $52 million compared with $157 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 . Net cash provided by customer deposits and notes receivable was $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared with net cash provided by customer deposits of approximately decrease $17.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, net cash provided by notes and accounts payable was $84 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared with net cash provided by $88 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $94.3 million compared to $100 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The primary reason for the increase was that the restricted cash increased by $12.5 million from $38.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $51.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.The construction in progress also increased by $6.2 million.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2011 was $34.2 million compared with net cash used in financing activities of $53.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. In the year ended December 31, 2011, SC Coke has no repaid loans.

Capital Sources

Funding for our business activities has historically been provided by cash flow from operations, and short-term lender financing, including loans from SC Coke’s sole director Xinshun Wang, who is also our Chairman of the Board of Directors, and/or from short term and long term bank loans obtained from local financial institutions.

On May 23, 2010, SC Coke entered into a loan agreement with its sole director regarding outstanding loans to SC Coke of $35.6 million as of December 31, 2009. The principal terms of the loan are: (a) 12 year term, from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2021, (b) 3% fixed annual interest on a non-compounded basis over the term of the loan, (c) SC Coke has the option, but not the obligation, to pay interest for the first two years, (d) 10 year equal payments from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2021, and (e) the lender has no ability to call a default. Additionally, on May 31, 2010, SC Coke’s sole director agreed to indemnify SC Coke from any underpayment of its income tax in prior and future years, and all associated interest, penalties and costs as a result of such underpayment, up to a maximum of $35.6 million.

On March 31, 2010, the SC Coke Shareholders, and Anyang Xinlong Coal (Group)Hongling Coal Co., Ltd., Anyang Huichang Coal Washing Co., Ltd. and Anyang Jindu Coal Co., Ltd (collectively, the “third party lenders”) formalized the terms for approximately $35.5 million of loans previously extended to SC Coke by the three lenders. On June 21, 2010, the SC Coke Shareholders entered into an agreement with the third party lenders to assume the obligations of the third party lenders, and concurrently the third party lenders released SC Coke from any liability. Also, on June 21, 2010, SC Coke and the SC Coke Shareholders entered into a debt agreement for the original principal amount of the loans due to the third party lenders

Because of SC Coke’s rapid capacity expansion, its internally generated funds from operations have historically been insufficient to meet its liquidity requirements. The growth of SC Coke has been dependent on financings to meet its liquidity, working capital and expansion expenditures. As of December 31, 2011, total loans payable were $72.8 million (excluding $70.2 million related party loan from SC Coke’s sole director), among which $69.7 million was short term and payable in the next 12 months, and $3.1 million was long-term loan due on March 23, 2012. These loans have interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 8.85%, and certain of the loans are collateralized.

The loans are guaranteed by various parties in exchange for corresponding guarantees obtained from SC Coke. For a description of such guarantees, refer to “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” If such bank financings become unavailable to us and/or additional funding is not obtained, we may not be able to meet our financing obligations, which could have a material adverse impact on our business. If SC Coke is required to satisfy obligations of any of its guarantees, it could have a material adverse impact on its financial condition.

As part of our operations, SC Coke issues bank notes payable as payments to its suppliers. These bank notes payable are issued by financial institutions and require deposits from SC Coke, ranging from 50% to 100% of the bank notes issued. Bank notes payable outstanding at December 31, 2011 were $186.9 million.

SC Coke’s management intends to continue the growth in its business through (1) increased coking production volumes to seek to achieve greater economies of scale which it believes will increase productivity and energy efficiency; (2) better recycling and usage of coking byproducts which have higher profit margins and create less environmental impact; and (3) potential acquisitions or equity participation in third party coal mines to source raw materials. Growth through facility expansion and acquisition will require additional bank financing and/or equity capital, and therefore the sustainability of such growth will be dependent upon the availability of financing arrangements and capital, if any, on acceptable terms. SC Coke’s management believes that the costs associated with its expansion activities will be funded through cash flows from operations and additional short and long-term debt obligations and/or raising funds through equity offerings, if any such financing is available on terms acceptable to the Company. If additional funding is not obtained, SC Coke will need to reduce, defer or cancel development programs, planned initiatives or overhead expenditures, to the extent necessary. The failure to fund SC Coke’s capital requirements would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Capital Expenditures

During the year ended December 31, 2011, SC Coke made approximately additional capital expenditures of $40 million. Such additional capital expenditures were primarily used for the purchases of coking equipment, upgrades and improvements to its coke production facilities.

Foreign Currency Translation Gains and Losses

During the year ended December 31, 2011, SC Coke recognized a foreign currency translation gain of $1.22 million, as compared to a foreign currency translation gain of $0.77million for the year ended December 31, 2010 due to a increase in the value of the RMB to the U.S. Dollar and the increase in SC Coke’s overall debt to equity ratio.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

SC Coke has entered into financial guarantees and similar commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of third parties. Conversely, SC Coke’s debt with lenders is also guaranteed by other parties which may be related or unrelated to us. As an industry practice, Chinese financial institutions require third party guarantees in order to provide both short term and long term bank loans to any corporate borrower. Because of this requirement, it is common practice that Chinese private enterprises enter into arrangements with other private enterprises to provide mutual guarantees in order to obtain bank loans from local Chinese financial institutions.

Typically, SC Coke enters into such mutual guarantees for companies that have good longstanding relationships with SC Coke or its sole director and our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Xinshun Wang, and a mutual guarantee provided to SC Coke of approximately similar amounts. Such guarantees are typically for a period of 2 years from the date of issuance of the guarantees.

Changes in the economic environment could leave SC Coke exposed for obligations that it has guaranteed which could have a materially negative impact on our ongoing business, and cause SC Coke to potentially be unable to meet its obligations under other bank financings. Additionally, should any of the companies for which SC Coke provides guarantees defaults, and the banks enforce SC Coke’s guarantees, SC Coke’s recourse may only be limited to default on the mutual guarantee; SC Coke may not be able to meet the liquidity and working capital requirements for our ongoing business, resulting in a material adverse impact on our business.

As of December 31, 2011, SC Coke guaranteed the obligations of eleven companies of approximately $ 123 million in total principal outstanding. Of the aforementioned guarantees, six of the thirteen companies have, in turn, guaranteed debts of approximately $57,897,466 on behalf of SC Coke at December 31, 2011. SC Coke has not historically incurred any losses due to such debt guarantees. Although the Company has determined that the fair value of the guarantees is immaterial, SC Coke’s potential liability under guarantees could include interest, default interest and the obligation to pay costs of collection in addition to principal amounts to which the guarantees relate.

We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging, or research and development services with us.

Inflation

In recent years, the Chinese economy has experienced periods of rapid expansion and high rates of inflation. During the past fifteen years, the official consumer price index in China has been as high as 24.1% and as low as -1.4%; while these inflation rates are an average national basis, the regional inflation in the major cities has been higher. These factors have led to the adoption by the PRC government, from time to time, of various corrective measures designed to restrict the availability of credit or regulate growth and contain inflation including bank lending restrictions on property investment in China. While inflation has been more moderate since 1995, high inflation may in the future cause the PRC government to impose controls on credit and/or prices, or to take other action, which could inhibit economic activity in China, and thereby harm the market for SC Coke’s products. SC Coke’s operations have also experienced cost increases, including labor costs and raw material costs. SC Coke expects its operating costs to increase in tandem with the inflationary environment, particularly because of the economic growth in China, and we expect higher inflation rates to impact our operating costs in the near term.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Basis of Presentation

In preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect: (i) the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities; (ii) the disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities at the end of each reporting period; and (iii) the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during each reporting period. We continually evaluate these estimates based on our own historical experience, knowledge and assessment of current business and other conditions, our expectations regarding the future based on available information and reasonable assumptions, which together form our basis for making judgments about matters that are not readily apparent from other sources. Because the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, our actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that any reasonable deviation from those judgments and estimates would not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. To the extent that the estimates used differ from actual results, however, adjustments to the statement of operations and corresponding balance sheet accounts would be necessary. These adjustments would be made in future financial statements. When reading our financial statements, you should consider: (i) our critical accounting policies; (ii) the judgment and other uncertainties affecting the application of such policies; and (iii) the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions. We believe the following accounting policies involve the most significant judgment and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. SC Coke has not made any material changes in the methodology used in these accounting polices during the past two years.

We consolidated the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of SC Coke and Longdu based on accounting guidance found in FASB ASC 810 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities which calls for us to consider various factors indicative of the relationship between the WFOE and SC Coke and Longdu. We considered the risks (absorption of potential losses), benefits (residual returns), obligations (repayment of debt on behalf of subsidiaries or the operating entities), nature of the business, legal aspects, and the purpose of the entities in concluding that SC Coke and Longdu should be treated for accounting purposes as wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., management makes estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for trade receivables, economic lives of property, plant and equipment, asset impairments, and contingency reserves. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, any change in these estimates or their related assumptions could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.

Long lived assets make up a significant portion of our asset base. Accordingly, we make regular assessments of our estimates of the useful lives, potential residual values, and potential impairments of our long lived assets.

The carrying value of trade receivables is subject to our estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We perform a regular analysis of the aging of our receivables in order to determine that estimate.

Bank Notes Receivable/Payable

Banks in China commonly issue bank notes to companies for transactional purposes. The bank notes do not have a stated interest rate, but may be redeemed by the holder at a discount before the maturity date. The requirements by the banks vary, but the usual transaction will require the borrowing company to pay approximately 50% of the bank note upon issuance and deposit the remaining 80% to 100% with the bank as restricted funds. The amount of money required depends on bank policy and the credit rating of the requesting company. The notes are settled at maturity, which is usually between three to six months.

SC Coke accepts bank notes receivable from vendors in China as payment for products sold in the ordinary course of business. SC Coke also obtains bank notes from various banks to pay vendors for coal or for deposits on machinery or coal. Due to the short-term nature of the bank notes and the immaterial credit risk, as a function of the notes bearing the full creditworthiness of the issuing banks, SC Coke considers both bank notes receivable and bank notes payable at face value to be recorded at their fair market value. Despite the liquid nature of the bank notes, SC Coke does not include in current cash bank notes receivable with a maturity of less than three months.

Revenue Recognition and Trade Receivables

SC Coke is primarily in the business of processing coal to produce and sell coke. During the production process, several byproducts are produced, which SC Coke refines to produce and sell additional products. SC Coke’s primary customers are long-term customers with which SC Coke has developed long-term selling relationships. Most of these customers have long term contracts with SC Coke, but the terms of the contracts tend to change with the prevailing market price of coal and/or coke. Credit investigations are performed on new customers before a contract is approved. SC Coke reviews trade receivables and provides an allowance for receivables its suspects might not be collectable.

Revenue is recognized when products are fully delivered and accepted and collection is reasonably assured.

We believe that our revenue recognition policy meets the prescribed guidelines found in the FASB ASC 605-10 and is conservative in nature because our policy is reliant on customer acceptance documentation.

Plant and Equipment

Plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.

Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Gain or loss on disposals are immaterial and included in cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. SC Coke capitalizes interest attributable to capital construction projects in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 835-20, Capitalization of Interest, which requires interest to be capitalized for assets that are constructed or otherwise produced for an entity’s own use, including assets constructed or produced for the entity by others for which deposits or progress payments have been made.

Our existing plant and equipment make up a very material portion of our asset base. We are also actively adding to our facilities in order to both increase capacity and efficiency. The selection of a useful life for assets heavily impacts the amount of depreciation that we record, and in turn the results of our operations. In accordance with PRC tax law, the PRC national government provides guidelines for useful lives for plant and equipment. The PRC tax depreciation guidelines are very strong indicators of appropriate useful lives, accordingly the PRC useful lives are used for both PRC tax law and US GAAP reporting purposes.

Long-term Investments

Long-term investments represent investments SC Coke has in private companies within China. SC Coke did not hold a greater than 20% interest in, and it has determined that it did not have significant control or influence over, any of SC Coke’s investment holdings other than Longdu. SC Coke’s investments are in private companies where there is not a market to determine the value of the investments. Accordingly, SC Coke records these investments at cost. SC Coke will continually evaluate its investments.

We have made equity investments in four private companies. The investments are passive in nature. We do not participate in management of the companies in which we invest. In the event that the companies in which we have invested become insolvent, the maximum loss that we would experience is up to the amount that we have invested. We review the financial statements of such companies annually to determine if there has been any impairment of our investment. We have not yet received any cash dividends from our investments. We are not aware that the companies in which we have invested currently have any plans to become public listed companies. If any of our investments became publicly listed, we would mark their values to fair market value on a quarterly basis.

Guarantees

From time to time, SC Coke provides guarantees of loans and other obligations for other, unrelated local enterprises. SC Coke’s potential liability under such guarantees could include interest, default interest and the obligation to pay costs of collection in addition to principal amounts to which the guarantee relates. Because banks typically require security for loans, such as guarantees, mortgages or pledges, and these enterprises, including SC Coke, have mortgaged and pledged all of their available assets in order to obtain additional bank loans, the local enterprises often agree to provide guarantees for one another. All of the guarantees provided by SC Coke are joint liability guarantees, which provide that when the debtor defaults, the bank can request SC Coke to pay the total debt outstanding without first enforcing its rights against the debtor. SC Coke records a liability for guarantees of loans and other obligations for others when: (i) information available indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the financial statement date, and (ii) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

Forgivable Loans

When all of the criteria set forth in the grants have been fulfilled, the amounts will become part of SC Coke’s permanent capital, which is restricted for growth purposes and cannot be used to pay dividends.

Income Taxes

SC Coke accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740) (formerly SFAS 109 Accounting for Income Taxes). ASC 740 requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We adopted accounting policies in accordance with GAAP with regard to provisions, reserves, inventory valuation method, and depreciation that are consistent with requirements under Chinese income tax laws. Therefore, there were no significant deferred tax assets or liabilities recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2010. We adopted the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, on January 1, 2009. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in our financial statements. The interpretation also provides guidance for the measurement and classification of tax positions, interest and penalties, and requires additional disclosure on an annual basis. The cumulative effect of the change was not material. Following implementation, the ongoing recognition of changes in measurement of uncertain tax positions will be reflected as a component of income tax expense. Interest and penalties incurred associated with unresolved income tax positions will continue to be included in other income (expense).

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 in June 2009, which approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting standards for all non-governmental entities, except for guidance issued by the SEC. The Codification, which changes the referencing of financial standards, is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after September 15, 2009. Therefore, in our consolidated financial statements, all references made to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) use the new Codification numbering system prescribed by the FASB. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial statements.

Item 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Birch Branch, Inc.

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Stated in US Dollars)

Birch Branch, Inc.

Contents	Page

Report of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets	1-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations	3

Consolidated Statements of Equity	4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6-29

REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To:	The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
	Birch Branch, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Birch Branch, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Birch Branch, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

San Mateo, California	Samuel H. Wong & Co., LLP
March 16, 2012	Certified Public Accountants

Birch Branch, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Stated in US Dollars)

			12/31/2011		12/31/2010
	Note		(audited)		(audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	2D	$	2,704,987	$	9,213,760
Restricted cash	2E		142,168,060		91,017,450
Bank notes receivable	2F		145,162		4,335,785
Trade receivables	2G, 3		15,822,298		28,150,931
Other receivables	4		7,514,142		11,548,983
Related party receivables	16		1,148,900		4,752,208
Inventories	2H, 5		50,042,822		59,822,024
Advances to suppliers and prepayments	6		68,802,754		52,006,509
Security Deposits			3,301,491		4,764,209
Total current assets			291,650,616		265,611,859

Non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment, net	2I, 7		68,927,116		70,056,271
Construction in Progress	2J, 8		83,621,292		50,727,936
Intangible assets, net	2K, 9		870,903		935,661
Long-term investments	2L, 10		24,352,460		20,200,106
Total non-current assets			177,771,771		141,919,974

Total assets		$	469,422,387	$	407,531,833

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities

Current liabilities:
Bank notes payable	11		186,890,191		120,118,576
Short term bank loans	12		66,538,879		50,213,255
Accounts payable			68,841,304		51,021,652
Accrued liabilities			660,695		287,899
Taxes payable			12,199,742		11,560,614
Other payable	13		9,179,612		44,942,564
Long term bank loans, current portion	12		3,142,331		-
Capital lease obligation, current portion	18		4,087,562		1,455,414
Customer deposits			8,202,109		5,486,463
Total current liabilities			359,742,425		285,086,437

Non-current liabilities:
Notes payable to related party	14		70,190,769		64,141,201
Forgivable loans	15		6,235,959		5,192,184
Long term bank loans	12		3,142,332		-
Capital lease obligation, non-current portion	18		11,509,361		3,620,470
Total non-current liabilities			91,078,421		72,953,855
Total liabilities			450,820,846	$	358,040,292

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Birch Branch, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Stated in US Dollars)

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
	(audited)		(audited)
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized, $0 par value, 0 shares issued and outstanding	$	-	$	-

Common stock, 500,000,000 shares authorized, $0 par value, 32,047,222 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010		6,963,403		6,963,403

Statutory reserve		234,683		234,683
Retained earnings		6,369,358		38,499,365
Accumulated other comprehensive income		4,594,559		3,366,695
Non-controlling interest		439,538		427,395
Total stockholders’ equity		18,601,541		49,491,541

Total liabilities and equity	$	469,422,387	$	407,531,833

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Birch Branch, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Stated in US Dollars)

	Note	12/31/2011			12/31/2010
Revenues	2R	$	389,174,750		$	302,274,783
Cost of revenues			382,015,408			276,126,696
Gross profit			7,159,342			26,148,087

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	2T		8,399,888			4,914,208
General and administrative			16,337,060			6,297,569
Total operating expenses			24,736,948			11,211,777

Income (loss) from operations			(17,577,606	)		14,936,310

Other income (expense):
Interest income			2,794,896			1,130,207
Interest expense			(18,261,215	)		(8,542,722	)
Bad Debt Recovery/(Provision)			(2,618,147	)		2,110,931
Other income			3,552,743			498,206
Other expense			(203,229	)		(598,260	)
Gain on investment			194,694			110,552

Total other income (expense)			(14,540,258	)		(5,291,086	)

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes	2U, 17		(32,117,864	)		9,645,224

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes			-			2,618,202

Net income (loss)			(32,117,864	)		7,027,022

Net income attributable to:
- Common stockholders			(32,130,007	)		7,072,471
- Non-controlling interest			(12,143	)		45,449

Earnings per share	22
- Basic		$	(1.00	)	$	0.22
- Diluted		$	(1.00	)	$	0.22

Weighted average shares outstanding
- Basic			32,047,222			32,047,222
- Diluted			32,047,222			32,047,222

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Birch Branch, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

(Stated in US Dollars)

													Accumulated
										Non-			Other
	Shares		Registered		Statutory		Retained			controlling			Comprehensive		Total
	Outstanding		Capital		Reserve		Earnings			Interest			Income		Equity
Balance at January 1, 2010		31,506,750	$	6,395,907	$	234,683	$	31,426,894		$	472,844		$	2,595,677	$	41,126,005
Share compensation		540,472		567,496		-		-			-			-		567,496
Apportionment of loss to non-controlling interest		-		-		-		45,449			(45,449	)		-		0
Net income		-		-		-		7,027,022						-		7,027,022
Currency translation adjustment		-		-		-		-			-			771,018		771,018
Balance at December 31, 2010		32,047,222	$	6,963,403	$	234,683	$	38,499,365		$	427,395		$	3,366,695	$	49,491,541

Balance at January 1, 2011		32,047,222	$	6,963,403	$	234,683	$	38,499,365		$	427,395		$	3,366,695	$	49,491,541
Apportionment of loss to non-controlling interest								(12,143	)		12,143
Net income								(32,117,864	)							(32,117,864	)
Currency translation adjustment														1,227,864		1,227,864
Balance at December 31, 2011		32,047,222	$	6,963,403	$	234,683	$	6,369,358		$	439,538		$	4,594,559		18,601,541

	Twelve months			Twelve months		Accumulated
	12/31/2011			12/31/2010		Total
Comprehensive Income
Net income	$	(32,117,864	)	$	7,027,022	$	(25,090,842	)
Other Comprehensive Income		-			-		-
Foreign currency translation adjustment		1,227,864			771,018		1,998,882
Total Comprehensive Income	$	(30,890,000	)	$	7,798,040	$	(23,091,960	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Birch Branch, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Stated in US Dollars)

	12/31/2011			12/31/2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(32,117,864	)	$	7,027,022
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
Share based compensation		-			567,496
Depreciation and amortization		8,816,114			6,015,278
Bad debt expense		2,618,147			75,532

Change in assets and liabilities:
Decrease/(Increase) in Notes and trade receivables		13,901,108			(17,467,781	)
Decrease/(Increase) in Inventories		9,779,201			(27,395,704	)
Decrease/(Increase) in Prepayments and other current assets		(9,158,095	)		4,749,757
(Increase) in Security deposits		-			(4,764,209	)
Increase/(Decrease) in Notes and accounts payable		84,591,267			88,694,267
Increase/(Decrease) in Other payables and current liabilities		(25,985,813	)		99,505,806
Net cash provided by operating activities		52,444,065			157,007,464

Cash flows from investing activities:
(Increase) in Restricted cash		(51,150,610	)		(38,612,920	)
(purchase) of long-term investment in equities		(4,152,354	)		(4,779,457	)
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment		(7,584,424	)		(29,454,990	)
(Increase) in Construction in progress		(32,893,356	)		(26,696,177	)
Acquisitions of Intangible asset		-			(973,054	)
Withdrawal of LT deposit		1,462,718			-
Net cash used in investing activities		(94,318,026	)		(100,516,598	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net Proceeds of borrowings from bank and others		22,610,287			-
Net Repayment of bank borrowings and others		-			(52,720,849	)
Proceeds/(Repayment) of capital lease obligation		10,521,040			(1,077,220	)
Proceeds of Government forgivable loans		1,043,774			-
Net cash used in financing activities		34,175,101			(53,798,069	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash		(7,698,860	)		2,692,797

Effect of exchange rate changes		1,190,087			771,018

Cash at beginning of the period		9,213,760			5,749,945

Cash at end of the period	$	2,704,987		$	9,213,760

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest received	$	2,794,896		$	1,130,207
Interest paid	$	(18,179,571	)	$	(8,254,823	)
Income taxes paid	$	(10,281,295	)	$	(2,618,202	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

The Company and Principal Business Activities

Organizational History

Ultimate Holding Company

a.)

Birch Branch, Inc. (“BRBH”) was incorporated in the State of Colorado on September 29, 1989. BRBH was originally formed to pursue real estate development projects until December 16, 2006. Unless the context requires or is otherwise indicated, the term the “Company” includes BRBH and the following entities, after giving effect to the Share Exchange (as defined herein):

II.

Intermediary Holding Companies

a.)

Shun Cheng Holdings HongKong Limited (“Shun Cheng HK”) is an investment holding company that was incorporated in Hong Kong on December 18, 2009.

Shun Cheng HK does not have any operations. Its sole purpose is to act as an intermediary holding company.

b.)

On March 17, 2010, under the laws of the Henan Province, in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (“Anyang WFOE”) was incorporated as a wholly-foreign owned entity. Anyang WFOE is wholly-owned by Shun Cheng HK.

Anyang WFOE does not conduct operations. All operations are conducted through the operating entities via a variable interest entity agreement detailed below.

III.

Operating Entities

All of the Company’s operations are located in the PRC, and are conducted through its operating entities detailed below:

a.) Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (“SC Coke”) is a limited liability company organized in the PRC on August 27, 1997 as Anyang ShunCheng Washing Co., Ltd. In February 2005, the name was changed to Coal Coking Co., Ltd. In August 2007, the name was changed to the current name of Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. SC Coke has three shareholders: Wang Xinshun, Wang Xinming and Cheng Junsheng (collectively, the “SC Coke Shareholders”) owning 60%, 20% and 20% interests, respectively.

SC Coke is located in the Henan Province coal chemical industry cluster area in Anyang County, about 40 kilometers (approximately 25 miles) to the northwest of Anyang City. SC Coke is principally engaged in the processing of coal into coke, and related byproducts of cleaned coal, tar, crude benzene, and ammonium sulfate.

b.) Henan Shuncheng Group Longdu Trade Co., Ltd. (“Longdu”) is a limited liability company organized in the PRC on May 25, 2004. SC Coke holds an 86% interest in Longdu. The Company’s Chairman, Mr. Wang Xinshun, owns a 5% interest in Longdu.

Longdu is principally engaged in coal-washing and the production of refined coal, medium coal and coal slurry. The majority of Longdu’s coal is sent to the Company for further processing, while the remainder is sold to outside customers.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Variable Interest Entity Agreement

On March 19, 2010, Anyang WFOE entered into four contractual arrangements that for accounting purposes will be collectively known as the variable interest entity (“VIE”) agreement with the SC Coke Shareholders. The VIE agreement entitles Anyang WFOE to 100% of the future earnings and losses of both SC Coke, and its proportional 86% share of the earnings of Longdu. The Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a Current Report on Form 8-K on July 2, 2010 that included the documents comprising the VIE agreement as exhibits. The Company accounted for the VIE agreement, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) 810-10, by consolidating SC Coke and Longdu as operating entities (similar to a subsidiary) of both Anyang WFOE and the Company, because the Company: (1) has the authority to direct the operations of SC Coke and Longdu, (2) has the authority to provide financial support for SC Coke and Longdu, and (3) is primary beneficiary of the results of operations of SC Coke and Longdu. The significant terms of the VIE agreement are detailed for each of the contractual arrangements below:

Entrusted Management Agreement

Anyang WFOE has full and exclusive rights to manage SC Coke. These rights include, but are not limited to: appointment and dismissal of the members of the board of directors, hiring and termination of managerial and administrative personnel, and control over assets, which includes deployment and disposition thereof, and related cash flows generated by these assets.

Anyang WFOE is entitled to receive a quarterly management fee paid 45 days in arrears from the end of the quarter equivalent to SC Coke’s earnings before taxes for the quarter, subject to quarterly and annual adjustments.

Anyang WFOE is subject to operational risk and is obligated to settle debts on behalf of SC Coke, if SC Coke does not have sufficient funds to pay its debts itself.

II.

Exclusive Option Agreement

Anyang WFOE, or parties designated by Anyang WFOE, has been granted the irrevocable right to purchase all or part of the ownership interest of SC Coke from the SC Coke Shareholders for the minimum possible price permissible by PRC law. The option is exercisable only to the extent that such purchase does not violate any PRC law then in effect. The purchase right is exclusively granted to Anyang WFOE and is not transferable without the express written consent of the SC Coke Shareholders.

The SC Coke Shareholders cannot dispose, assign or mortgage SC Coke assets or operations without the express written consent of Anyang WFOE.

Unless unanimously terminated by all parties, the Exclusive Option Agreement remains in effect for SC Coke, the SC Coke Shareholders, and Anyang WFOE and their successors.

III.

Shareholders' Voting Proxy Agreement

The SC Coke Shareholders have irrevocably appointed the board of directors of Anyang WFOE as their proxy to vote on all matters that require the approval of the SC Coke Shareholders. These voting rights include, but are not limited to, the election of directors and the chairman of the board.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

In the event that PRC regulations change (which regulations presently prohibit the transfer of SC Coke to Anyang WFOE), the SC Coke Shareholders may be exclusively permitted to transfer their ownership in SC Coke to Anyang WFOE; however, they are strictly prohibited from transferring their ownership in SC Coke to any other individuals or entities.

The SC Coke Shareholders have agreed to irrevocably and unconditionally indemnify the board of directors of Anyang WFOE from claims arising from the exercise of any of the powers conferred upon Anyang WFOE under the agreement.

IV.

Shares Pledge Agreement

The SC Coke Shareholders have pledged all of their ownership interests in SC Coke, including rights to PRC registered capital and dividends related to ownership in SC Coke, to guarantee their obligations under the Entrusted Management Agreement, the Exclusive Option Agreement and the Shareholders’ Voting Proxy Agreement.

Share Exchange Agreements

On June 28, 2010, BRBH closed a share exchange transaction (the “Share Exchange”) in which BRBH issued 30,233,750 common shares to the former shareholders of Shun Cheng HK in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Shun Cheng HK. In connection with the Share Exchange, certain shareholders of BRBH agreed to cancel 435,123 common shares and BRBH issued 540,472 common shares to financial consultants. Immediately prior to the closing of the Share Exchange there were 1,708,123 common shares outstanding. Upon completion of the Share Exchange and transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange agreement, there were 32,047,222 common shares outstanding. Immediately following the closing of the Share Exchange, the former shareholders of Shun Cheng HK and the original shareholders of BRBH own approximately 95% and approximately 5% of BRBH’s issued and outstanding common shares, respectively.

The Share Exchange has been accounted for as a recapitalization of Shun Cheng HK in which BRBH (the legal acquirer) is considered the accounting acquiree and Shun Cheng HK (the legal acquiree) is considered the accounting acquirer. As a result of the Share Exchange, BRBH is deemed to be a continuation of the business of Shun Cheng HK. Accordingly, the financial data included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods prior to June 28, 2010 is that of the accounting acquirer Shun Cheng HK. The historical stockholders’ equity of the accounting acquirer prior to the Share Exchange has been retroactively restated as if the Share Exchange occurred as of the beginning of the first period presented.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Financial Statement Presentation

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BRBH, Shun Cheng HK, Anyang WFOE, SC Coke, and Longdu. All intercompany transactions, such as sales, cost of sales, and balances due to/due from, investment in subsidiaries, and subsidiaries’ capitalization have been eliminated.

The Company regrouped certain accounts in the December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet to improve comparability with December 31, 2011 balance sheet line items. There was no impact on earnings as a result of the regrouping.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Non-controlling Interest

14% of the registered capital of Longdu is owned by parties other than SC Coke. The Company’s Chairman, Mr. Wang Xinshun, owns a 5% interest in Longdu, while other investors own the remaining 9% interest. Mr. Wang’s and the other investors’ share of capital, retained earnings, and income are separately disclosed on the Company’s balance sheet and statement of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to: (1) allowance for trade receivables, (2) economic lives of property, plant and equipment, (3) asset impairments, and (4) contingency reserves. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, any change in these estimates or their related assumptions could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.

Cash

Cash consists primarily of cash on hand or cash deposits in banks that are available for withdrawal without restriction.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents cash that is held by banks as collateral for bank notes payable. The banks have collateral requirements ranging from 50% to 100% of the outstanding bank notes.

Bank Notes Receivable

Bank notes receivable are highly liquid negotiable instruments issued by banks in the PRC on behalf of SC Coke’s customers, which are collateralized by deposits made by such customers at the subject banks. These notes typically have maturities between one to six months. The Company can: (a) redeem the notes for face value at maturity, (b) endorse the notes to the Company’s vendors as a form of payment instrument, or (c) factor the notes to a bank. In the event that the Company factors these notes to a bank, it will record as interest expense the difference between cash received and the face value of the note.

Trade Receivables

Trade receivables are reported at net realizable value. The Company has established an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors pertaining to the credit risks of specific customers, historical trends, age of the receivable and other information. Delinquent accounts are written off when it is determined that the amounts are uncollectible.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a standard cost basis, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Lower of cost or market is evaluated by considering obsolescence, excessive levels of inventory, deterioration, and other factors. Adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value, if required, are made for estimated excess or obsolescence and are charged to cost of revenues. Currently, the Company does not allocate costs to the byproducts.

Plant and Equipment

Plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Machinery and equipment		10 years
Building and improvements		20 years
Company vehicles		5 years
Furniture and office equipment		5 years
Miscellaneous		5 years

Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Gaines or losses on disposals are included in cost of revenues.

The Company capitalizes interest attributable to capital construction projects in accordance with ASC subtopic 835-20, Capitalization of Interest, which requires interest to be capitalized for assets that are constructed or otherwise produced for an entity’s own use, including assets constructed or produced for the entity by others for which deposits or progress payments have been made.

Construction in Progress

Construction in progress represents direct costs of construction or acquisition and design fees incurred. Capitalization of these costs ceases and the construction in progress is transferred to plant and equipment when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use are completed. No depreciation is recorded on construction in progress until construction has been completed and the related asset is ready for intended use and has been transferred to plant and equipment.

Intangible Assets

Land Use Rights are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is provided over its useful life, using the straight-line method. The useful life of the land use right is 30 years.

Long-term Investments

Long-term investments represent investments that SC Coke has in private companies within China other than Longdu. SC Coke does not hold any interest greater than 20% and it has determined that it did not have significant control or influence over any of the private companies in which it has investment holdings. As a result of the investments being private companies, there is a lack of readily determinable market value for these investments; as such, SC Coke recorded these investments at cost or fair value whichever is lower.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, ASC 360-10-35. The Company evaluates its long lived assets for impairment when indicators of impairment are present or annually, whichever occurs sooner. In the event that there are indications of impairment, the Company will record a loss to the statement of operations equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the long lived asset. The Company typically, but not exclusively, employs the expected future discounted cash flows method to determine fair value of long lived assets subject to impairment. The fair value of long lived assets that are held for disposition will include the cost of disposal.

The Company’s long-lived assets are grouped by their presentation on the consolidated balance sheets, and further segregated by their operating and asset type. Long-lived assets subject to impairment include buildings, equipment, vehicles, software licenses, and land-use-rights. The Company makes its determinations based on various factors that impact those assets.

At December 31, 2011, the Company assessed its buildings, equipment, vehicles, software licenses, and land-use-rights for production and has concluded its long-lived assets have not experienced any impairment losses because the Company’s long lived assets have enabled the Company to experience significant profit growth during years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company has adopted ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies whenever other statements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.

ASC 820-10 includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase the consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing an asset or liability based upon their own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:

Level 1–inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2–observable inputs other than level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3–instrument valuations are obtained without observable market values and require a high-level of judgment to determine the fair value.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

The Company’s financial instruments consist mainly of cash, restricted cash, bank notes receivable, and debt obligations. Bank notes receivable are reflected in the accompanying financial statements at historical cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of debt obligations also approximates its carrying value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. While the Company believes its valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the hierarchy set forth in ASC 820-10:

	Quoted in		Significant
	Active Markets		Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets		Inputs		Inputs
At December 31, 2011	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
Financial assets:
Cash	$	2,704,987	$	-	$	-	$	2,704,987
Restricted cash		142,168,060		-		-		142,168,060
Notes receivables		-		145,162		-		145,162
Total financial assets		144,873,047		145,162		-		145,018,209

Financial liabilities:
Notes payable		-		186,890,191		-		186,890,191
Total financial liabilities	$	-	$	186,890,191	$	-	$	186,890,191

In January 2008, the Company adopted ASC 825-10, Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, and has elected not to measure any of SC Coke’s current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value. ASC 825-10 was issued to allow entities to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value (fair value option). The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, ASC 825-10 specifies that unrealized gains and losses for that instrument shall be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. ASC 825-10 became effective January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for its financial assets and liabilities existing on January 1, 2008, and did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities transacted during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Statutory Reserve

In accordance with PRC laws, statutory reserve refers to the appropriation from net income, to the account “statutory reserve,” to be used for future company development, recovery of losses, and increase of capital, as approved, to expand production or operations. PRC laws prescribe that an enterprise operating at a profit must appropriate, on an annual basis, an amount equal to 10% of its profit. Such an appropriation is necessary until the reserve reaches a maximum that is equal to 50% of the enterprise’s PRC registered capital. SC Coke cannot pay dividends out of statutory reserves or paid in capital registered in PRC.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Foreign Currency Translation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. The functional currency of the Company’s operating entities is the RMB, the official currency of the PRC. Capital accounts of the consolidated financial statements are translated into U.S. Dollars from RMB at their historical exchange rates when the capital transactions occurred. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Income and expenditures are translated at the average exchange rates for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Currency translation adjustment results from translation to U.S. Dollar for financial reporting purposes are recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of owners’ equity. A summary of the conversion rates for the periods presented is as follows:

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010		12/31/2009
Period/year end RMB: U.S. Dollar exchange rate		6.3647		6.6118		6.8372
Average RMB: U.S. Dollar exchange rate		6.4735		6.7788		6.8408

RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currency and all foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions. No representation is made that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. Dollars at the rates used in translation.

Comprehensive Income

The Company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with the provisions of ASC topic 220, Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income or loss and its components in the financial statements. The accumulated other comprehensive income represents foreign currency translation adjustments.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with ASC 605-10, the Company recognizes revenue upon receipt of an acceptance of goods document issued by its customers. Each customer enters into an annual master sales agreement with the Company which will indicate a total volume for the year, and an acceptable range of prices, given market fluctuations on a short term basis, for the Company’s coke and coal byproducts. Final determination of the price for coke is determined on individual purchase orders which lie in the aforementioned price range. The Company’s coke and coal byproducts are fully usable at the point of shipment. From a revenue recognition perspective, the Company believes that collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured at the time that customers acknowledge receipt and accept the Company’s product. The Company has not experienced any material return of products, and as such, it has not prepared allowances for returns.

Customer payments received prior to completion of the above criteria are recorded as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet as unearned revenue.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are recorded net of the amount collected. Shipping and handling expense are included in sales and marketing expenses.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

T. Advertising

Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as they are incurred; such costs were immaterial for 2011 and 2010 and are included in sales and marketing expenses.

U. Income Taxes

The Company has implemented ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Income tax liabilities computed according to the United States, Hong Kong and PRC tax laws are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related primarily to differences between the basis of fixed assets and intangible assets for financial and tax reporting. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will be either taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred taxes also are recognized for operating losses that are available to offset future income taxes. A valuation allowance is created to evaluate deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize the associated tax benefit, or that future realization is uncertain. The Company assesses its future tax assets and liabilities for any uncertainty on an annual basis. Upon completion of its annual audit of its tax position for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company concluded that there was no uncertainty regarding its tax position. Any changes in the Company’s position on a going forward basis will be charged to tax expense or deferred tax benefit in its statement of operations.

V. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, FASB issued ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, and ASC 810, Consolidation, a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FASB ASC 810 Consolidation). The Company has adopted the new accounting policies and has determined that there is no material impact to the financial statements presented herein.

On June 30, 2009, FASB issued ASC 105, Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC 105 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. On the effective date of this standard, ASC became the source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards for nongovernmental entities, in addition to guidance issued by the SEC. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. If an accounting change results from the application of this guidance, an entity should disclose the nature and reason for the change in accounting principle in their financial statements. This new standard categorizes the US GAAP hierarchy to two levels: one that is authoritative (in ASC) and one that is non-authoritative (not in ASC). Exceptions include all rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws, which are sources of authoritative US GAAP for SEC registrants, and certain grandfathered guidance having an effective date before March 15, 1992. Statement No. 168 is the final standard that will be issued by FASB in that form. There will no longer be, for example, accounting standards in the form of statements, staff positions, Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) abstracts, or AICPA Accounting Statements of Position. The Company has adopted and implemented the new accounting policy.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13 “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements - A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force”. This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. The Company will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011; however, earlier application is permitted. The management is in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB issued ASU-2010-09 (Topic 855) to amend guidance on subsequent events to remove the requirement for SEC filers (as defined in ASU 2010-09) to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events. This change alleviates potential conflicts with current SEC guidance. An SEC filer is still required to evaluate subsequent events through the date financial statements are issued, but disclosure of that date is no longer required. The amendments in ASU 2010-09 became effective upon issuance of the guidance. Management adopted this pronouncement as of July 1, 2010.

Trade Receivables

The Company’s trade receivables as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, as well as the activity in the Company’s allowance for bad debts for the years then ended are set forth below:-

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Trade Receivables		20,093,732	$	29,804,218
Less: Allowance for Bad Debt		4,271,434		1,653,287
Trade Receivables, net		15,822,298		28,150,931

Allowance for Bad Debts
Beginning Balance		1,653,287		3,618,626
Provision for bad debts		2,618,147		75,532
Less: Allowance write back because of bad debt recovery		-		(2,040,871	)
Ending Balance	$	4,271,434	$	1,653,287

Other Receivables

Other receivables at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are detailed in the table below.

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Project safety deposit	$	110	$	10,411
Non-collateralized, non-interest bearing loans to individuals receivable on demand		3,784,696		9,814,316
Others		3,729,336		1,724,256
	$	7,514,142	$	11,548,983

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Inventories

The components of the Company’s inventories as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:-

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Raw materials	$	1,588,832	$	10,767,108
Work in process and semi-finished goods		19,162,264		44,736,578
Finished goods		29,291,726		4,318,338
Total inventories	$	50,042,822	$	59,822,024

Advances to Suppliers and Prepayments

The components of the Company’s advances to suppliers and prepayments as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:-

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Construction projects prepayments	$	-	$	-
Prepayments for raw materials in operations		68,688,613		48,982,719
Prepaid taxes		114,141		3,023,790
	$	68,802,754	$	52,006,509

Property, Plant and Equipment, net

The components of the Company’s plant and equipment are as follows:-

			Accumulated
12/31/2011	At Cost		Depreciation		Net
Buildings and plant	$	35,576,186	$	4,820,117	$	30,756,069
Machinery and equipment		1,388,507		848,902		539,605
Electronic equipment		3,604,960		1,982,054		1,622,906
Vehicles		54,974,689		19,277,467		35,697,222
Wastewater treatment and environmental equipment		817,221		505,907		311,314
Total plant and equipment	$	96,361,563	$	27,434,447	$	68,927,116

			Accumulated
12/31/2010	At Cost		Depreciation		Net
Buildings and plant	$	31,214,528	$	2,724,146	$	28,490,382
Machinery and equipment		52,145,602		13,736,261		38,409,341
Electronic equipment		970,225		272,652		697,573
Vehicles		3,660,104		1,650,989		2,009,115
Wastewater treatment and environmental equipment		786,680		336,820		449,860
Total plant and equipment	$	88,777,139	$	18,720,868	$	70,056,271

Depreciation expenses related to plant and equipment were $8,713,579 and $5,977,886 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Construction in Progress

The components of the Company’s construction in progress are as follows:-

			Accumulated
12/31/2011	At Cost		Depreciation		Net
Construction in progress		72,661,191		-		72,661,191
Deposits for construction projects		10,960,101				10,960,101
Total Construction in progress	$	83,621,292		-	$	83,621,292

			Accumulated
12/31/2010	At Cost		Depreciation		Net
Construction in progress		37,363,374		-		37,363,374
Deposits for construction projects		13,364,562				13,364,562
Total Construction in progress	$	50,727,936		-	$	50,727,936

The construction in progress sub-account is detailed below:-

Description	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Coking furnace	$	40,380,647	$	12,548,316
Office buildings		5,662,946		4,176,514
Plant and facilities		26,582,072		20,006,351
Sewage system		35,526		632,193
Equipment peripherals		-		-
	$	72,661,191	$	37,363,374

Intangible Assets, net

The components of the Company’s intangible assets are as follows:-

			Accumulated
12/31/2011	At Cost		Amortization		Net
Land Use Rights	$	1,010,831	$	139,928	$	870,903
Total intangible assets	$	1,010,831	$	139,928	$	870,903

			Accumulated
12/31/2010	At Cost		Amortization		Net
Land Use Rights	$	973,053	$	37,392	$	935,661
Total intangible assets	$	973,053	$	37,392	$	935,661

Amortization expenses related to intangible assets were $102,536 and $37,392 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

10.

Investments

The following tabulation presents SC Coke’s investment in non-controlled entities, which are not included in the consolidation.

Investment		Ownership			Type	12/31/2011
Anyang Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch			11.26	%	Equity	$	4,524,958
Anyang Urban Credit Cooperative			11.26	%	Equity		9,392,273
Ansteel Group Metallurgy Stove Co., Ltd.			19.00	%	Equity		2,447,876
Anyang Xinlong Coal (Group) Hongling Coal Co., Ltd.			18.25	%	Equity		7,969,746
Anyang Rural Credit Cooperative - Dinglong Branch	*		Less than 1	%	Equity		17,607
						$	24,352,460

* Note: SC Coke invested Share Capital of Anyang Rural Credit Cooperative – Dinglong Branch. Since the investment in Rural Credit Cooperative – Dinglong Branch is immaterial; there is no significant and material influence on financial report.

Investment	Ownership			Type	12/31/2010
Anyang Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch		11.26	%	Equity	$	4,355,849
Anyang Urban Credit Cooperative		11.26	%	Equity		6,184,558
Ansteel Group Metallurgy Stove Co., Ltd.		19	%	Equity		2,356,393
Anyang Xinlong Coal (Group) Hongling Coal Co., Ltd.		16	%	Equity		7,303,306
					$	20,200,106

11.

Bank Notes Payable

The following table provides the name of the financial institution, due date, and amounts outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010 for the Company’s bank notes payable.

Financial Institution	Due Date	12/31/2011	12/31/2010
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	03/05/2012	3,142,331
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	03/20/2012	7,384,480
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	04/13/2012	471,350
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	01/20/2012	4,085,031
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	01/07/2012	6,284,663
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	07/08/2012	6,284,663
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	05/29/2012	2,356,749
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	05/25/2012	1,571,166
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	05/24/2012	1,571,166
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	05/16/2012	3,142,332

Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	03/15/2012	1,571,166
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	03/14/2012	2,356,749
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	03/16/2012	2,356,749
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	06/06/2012	3,142,332
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	06/22/2012	3,927,915
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	06/16/2012	4,713,498
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	02/04/2012	9,426,996

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Financial Institution	Due Date	12/31/2011	12/31/2010
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	05/29/2012	6,284,664
Bank of Luoyang - Zhengzhou Branch	04/17/2012	6,284,664
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - Shuiye Branch	03/01/2012	1,571,166
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - Shuiye Branch	02/29/2012	1,571,166
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	04/11/2012	3,142,332
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	02/19/2012	4,713,498
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	06/19/2012	7,855,830
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	04/21/2012	6,284,664
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/05/2012	3,927,915
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/02/2012	5,499,081
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/02/2012	4,713,498
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	04/19/2012	7,227,363
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	02/12/2012	4,713,498
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	02/09/2012	7,855,830
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/15/2012	4,320,706
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	05/29/2012	3,142,332
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	02/25/2012	785,583
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/20/2012	1,571,166
Agricultural Bank of China - Anyang Branch	06/27/2012	1,571,166
China Citic Bank - Anyang Branch	05/08/2012	4,713,498
China Citic Bank - Anyang Branch	06/23/2012	1,571,166
Bank of Pindingshan	02/26/2012	9,426,996
Zhengzhou Bank - Nongye Eastern Road Branch	06/05/2012	3,927,915
Zhengzhou Bank - Nongye Eastern Road Branch	06/06/2012	3,142,332
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	03/15/2012	7,855,830
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	05/03/2012	4,713,498

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Financial Institution	Due Date		12/31/2011	12/31/2010
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	05/10/2012		1,571,166
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	06/01/2012		1,571,166
Bank of China - Anyang Branch	06/26/2012		1,571,166
China Citic Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	01/28/2011				3,024,895
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	01/02/2011				10,587,132
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	04/14/2011				2,722,406
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	04/28/2011				5,293,566
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	06/10/2011				9,830,908
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	01/06/2011				5,293,566
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	01/26/2011				6,049,790
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	03/10/2011				2,268,671
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	06/14/2011				7,562,237
Henan Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch	03/11/2011				4,537,342
Henan Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch	03/26/2011				2,722,406
Henan Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch	03/29/2011				3,024,895
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	03/09/2011				4,537,342
Bank of Luoyang - Zhengzhou Branch	03/01/2011				4,537,342
Bank of Luoyang - Zhengzhou Branch	05/30/2011				1,512,448
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/08/2011				13,612,027
China Minsheng Banking Corp.- Zhengzhou Branch	06/09/2011				4,537,342
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	01/23/2011				4,537,342
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	01/28/2011				6,049,790
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	02/20/2011				3,055,144
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	04/13/2011				3,024,895
China Everbright Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	06/21/2011				7,562,237
China Construction Bank - Zhongzhou Branch	01/20/2011				4,234,853
		$	186,890,191	$	120,118,576

The bank notes payable do not carry a stated interest rate, but do carry a specific due date. These notes are negotiable documents issued by financial institutions on the Company’s behalf to vendors. These notes can either be endorsed by the vendor to other third parties as payment, or prior to coming due, they can factor these notes to other financial institutions. These notes are short term in nature and, as such, the Company does not calculate imputed interest with respect to them. These notes are collateralized by the Company’s deposits as described in Note 2E - Restricted Cash.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

12.

Loans

The components of the Company’s loans payable are as follows:-

		Due	Interest
Name of Creditors	Note	Date	Rate			12/31/2011
Anyang Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch	a.	03/22/2012		10.1000	%	$4,713,497
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	b.	12/26/2012		7.8200	%	3,142,332
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	c.	02/23/2012		7.3200	%	1,571,166
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	d.	03/14/2012		7.8200	%	3,142,332
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	e.	06/07/2012		6.9396	%	1,571,166
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	f.	07/18/2012		7.2160	%	4,713,498
Bank of China - Anyang Branch	g.	09/27/2012		7.2160	%	3,142,332
Anyang Urban Credit Cooperative	h.	05/09/2012		9.4650	%	3,142,332
Agricultural Bank of China - Anyang Branch	i.	10/11/2012		8.8560	%	1,099,816
Agricultural Bank of China - Anyang Branch	j.	10/28/2012		8.8560	%	1,571,166
Agricultural Bank of China - Anyang Branch	k.	10/10/2012		8.8560	%	1,571,166
Agricultural Bank of China - Anyang Branch	l.	10/10/2012		8.8560	%	3,613,682
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - Shuiye Branch	m.	01/04/2012		6.7100	%	3,927,915
Bank of Luoyang - Zhengzhou Branch	n.	07/14/2012		9.4464	%	3,142,332
Bank of Luoyang - Zhengzhou Branch	o.	04/10/2012		7.3200	%	3,142,332
Zhengzhou Bank - Nongye Eastern Road Branch	p.	12/14/2012		8.5280	%	4,713,498
Bank of China - Anyang Branch	q.	03/15/2012		6.6660	%	3,142,332
Bank of Pindingshan	r.	02/25/2012		6.7100	%	4,477,823
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	s.	11/09/2012		6.5600	%	1,571,166
Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	t.	11/30/2012		6.5600	%	1,571,166
Anyang Rural Credit Cooperatives - Tongye Branch	u.	12/21/2012		15.0866	%	4,713,498
China Citic Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	v.	07/26/2012		7.2160	%	3,142,332
						$66,538,879

		Due	Interest
Name of Creditors	Note	Date	Rate			12/31/2010
Henan Rural Credit Cooperatives - Anyang Branch	A	03/22/2011		10.6200	%	$4,537,342
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch	B	09/19/2011		6.1160	%	6,049,790
Bank of China - Anyang Branch	C	07/20/2011		5.8410	%	3,024,895
China Construction Bank - Anyang Branch	D	07/28/2011		6.3720	%	3,024,895
Agricultural Bank of China - Anyang Branch	E	09/18/2011		6.3720	%	4,537,342
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - Shuiye Branch	F	02/09/2011		5.3460	%	1,814,937

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China - Shuiye Branch	G	04/13/2011		5.6500	%	7,562,238
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	H	07/19/2011		5.3100	%	3,024,895
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	I	06/07/2011		5.3100	%	1,512,447
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	J	01/18/2011		5.3100	%	3,024,895
Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	K	07/14/2011		5.3100	%	1,512,447
Henan Urban Credit Cooperative - Anyang Branch	L	04/13/2011		7.9650	%	3,024,895
Bank of Luoyang - Zhengzhou Branch	M	01/27/2011		6.3720	%	3,024,895
Bank of Zhengzhou – Nongyedong Branch	N	11/29/2011		6.6720	%	1,512,447
Bank of Zhengzhou – Nongyedong Branch	O	11/29/2011		6.6720	%	3,024,895
						$50,213,255

SC Coke has collateralized its debt obligations in December 31, 2011. Refer to notes below for collateral corresponding to each obligation.

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd and Linzhou Hongqiqu Electrical Carbon Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Chengyu Coking Co., Ltd and Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Xinlei Coking Group Co., Ltd

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by the Company’s refined coke

Guaranteed by Anyang Xinpu Steel Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Xinlei Group Cheng Chen Coking

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd and Linzhou Hongqiqu electrical Carbon Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Chengyu Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd and Henan Chengyu Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang Nianxinpu Steel Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Shunche’eng Group Coking Co., Ltd and Henan Small Corporation Investment Co., Ltd

Long term bank loans

The components of the Company’s long term bank loans payable are as follows:

		Due	Interest
Name of Creditors	Note	Date		Rate		12/31/2011
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank - Zhengzhou Branch				7.8200	%	6,284,663
Among which: Current Portion		12/26/2012		7.8200	%	3,142,331
Long-term Portion		03/23/2013		7.8200	%	3,142,332

The long term loan was guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd, shareholders Wang Xinshun, Wang Xingming, and Cheng Junsheng.

SC Coke has collateralized its debt obligations in December 31, 2010. Refer to notes below for collateral corresponding to each obligation.

Guaranteed by Linzhou Hongqiqu Electrical Carbon Co., Ltd and Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang New Tianhe Cement Co., LLC

Guaranteed by Xinlei Group Cheng Chen Coking Co., Ltd.

Guaranteed by Linzhou Hexin Casting Co., Ltd.

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd.

Guaranteed by the Company’s inventory

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd and Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd and Xinlei Group Cheng Chen Coking

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd and Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd and Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Guaranteed by Anyang Bailianpo Coal Co., Ltd.

Guaranteed by Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

13.

Other Payable

Other payable at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is detailed in the table below.

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Project safety deposit	$	2,681,680	$	111,222
Unbilled purchase payable		-		133,446
Payable for raw materials in operation		20,542		29,194
Advances from individuals payable on demand		5,477,457		43,962,055
Others		999,933		706,647
	$	9,179,612	$	44,942,564

14.

Notes Payable to Related Party

Creditor	Note	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
Chairman, Wang Xinshun	A	$	25,785,216	$	36,955,017
SC Coke Shareholders	B		44,405,553		27,186,184
		$	70,190,769	$	64,141,201

A. Note Payable to Wang Xinshun

On May 23, 2010, SC Coke entered into a formal loan agreement with the Company’s Chairman, Mr. Wang Xinshun, for amounts owed to him in the amount of approximately $35.6 million at December 31, 2009. The significant terms of the loan are: (a) 12 year term, beginning as of December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2021, (b) 3% fixed simple annual interest, (c) SC Coke has the option, but not the obligation, to pay interest for the first two years, (d) after the first two years, the balance of the loan will be amortized over the remaining 10 years of the term and SC Coke is required to make monthly interest and principal payments, and (e) Mr. Wang Xinshun is prohibited from declaring default against SC Coke.

The Company has neither accrued nor paid any interest for the note payable to Mr. Wang Xinshun during the year ended December 31, 2011.

B. Note Payable to SC Coke Shareholders

On June 21, 2010, the SC Coke Shareholders entered into an agreement with the third party lenders to assume the obligations of the third party lenders, and concurrently the third party lenders released SC Coke from any liability.

Also, on June 21, 2010, SC Coke and the SC Coke Shareholders entered into a debt agreement for the original principal amount of the loans due to the third party lenders (approximately $35.5 million), the significant terms of which are: (a) 15 year term, commencing on June 21, 2010, (b) 2% fixed simple annual interest, (c) SC Coke has the option, but not the obligation, to pay interest when accrued, and (d) the SC Coke Shareholders do not have the ability to declare a default.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

15.

Forgivable Loans

SC Coke is currently the beneficiary of two government grants that are generally intended to be used towards capital technology improvement with the end goal of increased production and energy efficiency. The grants were awarded during 2008, 2009, and 2011 respectively. These grants have been recorded as forgivable loans in the liability section of the balance sheet. SC Coke has received payment of the grants, but has not yet met all the criteria set forth under the grant. Upon receiving government approval of fulfilling all of the criteria set forth under the grant, SC Coke will credit the balance to other income on the consolidated statement of operations. SC Coke will also appropriate that same amount from retained earnings to statutory reserves indicating that the assets associated with these grants are not available for dividend distribution.

16.

Related Party Transactions

SC Coke has specified the following transactions with related parties with ending balances as of December 31, 2011:-

Trade Receivables and Revenue

(a)

Angang Steel Group Metallurgy Furnace Co., Ltd (Angang), in which SC Coke owns a 19% stake, is one of the customers of SC Coke.

There was an ending balance in accounts receivable from Angang of approximately $273,202 as of December 31, 2011.

Revenue recorded in the consolidated financial statements from Angang amounts to approximately $861,259 for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Deposits and Cost of Revenues

(a)

The Chairman and majority owner, Mr. Wang Xinshun, owns a 43.86% interest in Anyang Bailianpo Coal Co., Ltd. (Bailianpo) which provides raw coal to SC Coke.

SC Coke had outstanding prepayment to Bailianpo of $614,849 as of December 31, 2011.

(b)

SC Coke holds a 16% interest in Anyang Xinlong Coal (Group) Hongling Coal Co., Ltd. (Anyang Xinlong), which is a coal mine located in Anyang County providing SC Coke with a substantial portion of its coking coal requirements.

SC Coke has an ending balance in accounts receivable from Anyang Xinlong of $260,850 as of December 31, 2011.

17.

Income Taxes

The Company and its operating entities are subject to income tax under the jurisdictions where they operate. The following table details the Company and its operating entities, and the statutory tax rates to which they are subject:

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Entity	Country of Domicile	Income Tax Rate
Birch Branch, Inc.	USA		15.00% - 35.00%
Shuncheng Holdings HongKong Ltd.	HK		16.50%
Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd.	PRC		25.00%

Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd.	PRC		25.00%
Henan Shuncheng Group Longdu Trade Co., Ltd.	PRC		25.00%

Although the Company is subject to United States income taxes, it is a holding company with no operations or profits within the U.S. borders. The Company currently only incurs expenses in the United States that are associated with being a public company.

Income (loss) before taxes and provision for taxes (tax benefit) consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively:

	12/31/2011			12/31/2010
Income (loss) before tax:
USA		-			(567,496	)
HK		(50	)		(14,487	)
PRC		(32,117,814	)		10,227,207
Total	$	(32,117,864	)	$	9,645,224

Provision for income taxes:
US Federal		-			-
State		-			-
PRC		-			2,618,202
Total provision for taxes (tax benefit)		-		$	2,618,202

Effective tax rate		-			27.15	%

The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rates and the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are shown in the following table:

	12/31/2011		12/31/2010
US statutory tax rate		-		34	%
Lower rates in the PRC		-		(9	)%
Accrual and reconciling items		-		2.15	%
Effective tax rate		-		27.15	%

18.

Commitments and Contingencies

Third Party Guarantees

SC Coke entered into agreements as a guarantor of debt for thirteen companies (the “guarantees”) in the amount of approximately $123,682,186 at December 31, 2011. Of the aforementioned guarantees, six of the thirteen companies have, in turn, guaranteed debts of approximately $57,897,466 on behalf of SC Coke at December 31, 2011. SC Coke has not historically incurred any losses due to such debt guarantees. Additionally, the Company has determined that the fair value of the guarantees is immaterial. For more details of the outstanding guarantees, see the table below:

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

		Guarantee
Guarantee Beneficiary	Creditor	End		12/31/2011
Anshan Minshan Metal Co., Ltd.	Agricultural Bank of China – Anyang Branch	02/23/2012	$	,613,682
Linzhou Hongqiqu Electrical Carbon Co., Ltd	Agricultural Bank of China – Linzhou Branch	05/15/2012		3,142,332
Linzhou Hongqiqu Electrical Carbon Co., Ltd	Agricultural Bank of China – Linzhou Branch	04/09/2012		3,142,332
Linzhou Hongqiqu Electrical Carbon Co., Ltd	Agricultural Bank of China – Linzhou Branch	07/03/2012		7,855,830
Linzhou Hongqiqu Electrical Carbon Co., Ltd	Agricultural Bank of China – Linzhou Branch	09/02/2012		7,855,830
Anyang Hengxiang Coal Co., Ltd.	Agricultural Bank of China – Anyang Branch	05/28/2012		659,890
Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd.	Bank of China – Anyang Branch	11/14/2012		4,713,498
Henan Hubo Cement Co., Ltd.	Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	06/16/2012		3,770,798
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	China Citic Bank	11/25/2012		6,284,664
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	Commercial Banks of China - Anyang Branch	01/05/2013		4,713,498
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	Shanghai Pudong Development Bank – Zhengzhou Branch	02/21/2012		32,994,485
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	China Citic Bank	09/15/2012		3,142,332
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	Bank of Luoyang	03/09/2012		4,085,032
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	Agricultural Bank of China	06/24/2012		3,142,332
Anyang Liyuan Coking Co., Ltd	Agricultural Bank of China	06/16/2012		3,142,332
Anyang Xintianhe Cement Co., Ltd	Guangdong Development Bank	06/13/2012		6,284,664
Henan Chengyu Coking Co., Ltd	Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	09/20/2012		9,426,996
Henan Chengyu Coking Co., Ltd	Anyang Rural Credit Cooperative - Tongye Branch	02/20/2012		3,142,332
Anyang Lichuang Co.	Guangdong Development Bank - Anyang Branch	03/08/2012		3,142,332
Henan Xinlei Group	Bank of Minsheng – Zhengzhou Branch	10/10/2012		1,571,166
Anyang Xinpu Steel Co., Ltd	City Cooperative	06/04/2012		7,070,247
Anyang Qili Cement Co., Ltd	Commercial Bank of Anyang	05/23/2012		628,466
Anyang Hongyuan Yinsheng Steel Co., Ltd	Commercial Bank of Anyang	05/05/2012		314,233
Taifeng Company	Bank of Mingsheng – Zhengzhou Branch	08/26/2012		1,571,166
Anyang Yuxin Activity of Limestone Co., Ltd.	China Construction Bank	01/04/2013		1,885,399
			$	123,682,186

Capital Lease Obligations

SC Coke has entered into a non-cancellable lease agreement for certain machinery and equipment. The following table details SC Coke’s commitments for minimum lease payments and the related principal outstanding at December 31, 2011:-

Year ending December 31:	Principal		Payments
2012	$	3,647,834	$	4,846,973
2013		4,602,042		4,846,973
2014		4,322,635		4,846,973
2015		2,624,029		2,845,512
Total future minimum lease payments	$	15,196,541	$	17,386,431

Accrued Payment of Enterprise Income Taxes

Effective January 1, 2008, PRC government implements a new 25% income tax rate for all enterprise regardless of whether domestic or foreign enterprise without any tax holiday. Certain local government has the authority to defer the enterprise’s tax payment in a way to support local business. SC Coke is subject to the 25% tax rule. However, Anyang City government defers SC Coke income tax payment by implementing fixed payment quota instead of determining based on taxable income assessment. As of December 31, 2009, SC Coke had accrued approximately $11 million liability for estimated taxes. In the event that, PRC tax authority starts to collect this deferral, SC Coke will be subject to an overdue fine at the rate of 0.05% per day of the amount of taxes in arrears. The tax authority may also impose an additional fine of 50% to five times the underpaid taxes. SC Coke has been unable to determine the potential penalties and interest related to the overdue tax balance at this time.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

SC Coke has available funds to cover the unpaid tax liability, but may not have sufficient funds available to pay the fine. The Chairman entered into a tax indemnity agreement on May 23, 2010, pursuant to which he agreed to indemnify SC Coke for any interest, penalties or other related extra costs resulting from the prior and any future tax underpayments in tax years in which he managed and operated SC Coke. The indemnification is capped at $35.6 million.

19. Risks

Concentration of Credit and Other Risks

Cash, bank notes receivable, and trade receivables subject SC Coke to concentrations of credit risk. SC Coke holds all its deposits and bank notes receivable with banks in China. In China, there is no insurance equivalent to the federal deposit insurance in the United States; as such these amounts held in banks in China are not insured. SC Coke has not experienced any losses in such bank accounts through December 31, 2011.

SC Coke offers unsecured credit to its customers in the normal course of business; therefore, SC Coke’s accounts receivable are subject to credit risks.

Economic and Political Risks

The operations of SC Coke are located in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic, and legal environment in the PRC.

The Chinese Government controls its foreign currency reserves through restrictions on imports and conversion of Renminbi into foreign currency. In July 2005, the Chinese Government adjusted its exchange rate policy from “Fixed Rate” to “Floating Rate”. From December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011, the exchange rate between RMB and US Dollars fluctuated between $1.00 to RMB 6.6118 and $1.00 to RMB 6.3647. There can be no assurance that the exchange rate will remain stable. The Renminbi could appreciate or depreciate against the US Dollar. The Company’s financial condition and results of operations may also be affected by changes in the value of certain currencies other than the Renminbi in which its earnings and obligations are denominated.

Concentration Risks

The Company deals with four suppliers and five customers to source its purchases and sells its products which can create certain concentration risks.

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

The following four suppliers accounted for 64.38% of total purchases:

Suppliers	12/31/2011		%
Yizhong Energy Group	$	74,669,479		26.03	%
ZaoZhuang Mining (Group) Co.,Ltd.		42,236,914		14.73	%
Xuzhou Yuantong Burning Co., Ltd.		39,185,045		13.66	%
Hebi Fuyuan Coke Co., Ltd		28,569,165		9.96	%
	$	184,660,603		64.38	%

Five customers accounted for 85.69% of its sales:

Customers	12/31/2011		%
Henan Fengbao Steel Co.,Ltd	$	84,783,617		22.58	%
Changzhou zhongfa Iron Co., Ltd		78,541,040		20.91	%
Zhejiang Huatuo Energy Co., Ltd		75,104,014		20.00	%
Shagang Group Anyang Yongxing Iron & Steel Co., Ltd		49,236,940		13.11	%
Anyang xinpu Iron & Steel Co., Ltd		34,126,126		9.09	%
	$	321,791,737.00		85.69	%

20.

Share Based Compensation

For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an expense of $567,496 under the general and administrative account for the issuance of 540,472 common shares at $1.05 per share. The shares were issued to financial consultants for services rendered in connection with the Share Exchange and expected future financing transactions. For the purposes of calculating earnings per share, the Company has assumed that these shares were issued on January 1, 2010.

21.

Warrants

On June 28, 2010, the Company issued to SCM Capital, LLC two warrants. The first warrant entitles the holder to purchase 1,922,833 common shares, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. The second warrant entitles the holder to purchase 6% of the number of common shares issued and outstanding immediately following the closing of a private financing resulting in gross proceeds of $25 million or more, less 1,922,833 common shares. Neither warrant is exercisable until the closing of such private financing, and each warrant is subject to forfeiture in the event such private financing is not closed on or prior to August 31, 2010. Accordingly, the Company believes that the contingently issuable shares are related to a capital transaction and are not compensatory in nature but are potentially dilutive for purposes of calculating earnings per share.

As of October 21, 2010, the Company has not closed the private financing. These warrants have been forfeited.

22.

Earnings Per Share

	12 months			12 months
	ended			ended
	12/31/2011			12/31/2010
Basic earnings per share numerator:
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	(32,130,007	)	$	7,072,471

Basic weighted average shares outstanding:		32,047,222			32,047,222
Additions from potentially dilutive events

Birch Branch, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

	12 months			12 months
	ended			ended
	12/31/2011			12/31/2010
Warrants issued to consultants		-			-
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding:		32,047,222			32,047,222

Earnings per share
- Basic	$	(1.00	)	$	0.22
- Diluted	$	(1.00	)	$	0.22

Weighted average shares outstanding:
- Basic		32,047,222			32,047,222
- Diluted		32,047,222			32,047,222

Item 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our internal control system was designed to, in general, provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our management has determined that as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective for the purposes for which it is intended.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this report, fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS: COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The following table sets forth the name, age, and position of our executive officers and directors. Executive officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors. Each executive officer holds his office until he resigns, is removed by the Board, or his successor is elected and qualified. Directors are elected annually by our shareholders at the annual meeting. Each director holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or his earlier resignation or removal.

Name	Position Held with our Company	Age
Xinshun Wang	Chairman of the Board of Directors	51
Feng Wang	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	47
Lei Wang	Chief Financial Officer	43
Dexin Li	Chief Operating Officer and Director	64
Qifa Huang	Director	48
Senshan Gong	Director	37

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officers and directors during the past five (5) years.

Xinshun Wang

Mr. Wang is a founder and the sole director of SC Coke (formerly known as Anyang Shuncheng Coal Washing Co., Ltd prior to February 2005), a position he has held since February 2005. Since May 2008 Mr. Wang has also served as the General Manager of Bailianpo, in which he owns a 43.86% interest. From August 1997 to January 2005 Mr. Wang serviced as general manager of Anyang Shuncheng Coal Washing Co., Ltd. Mr. Wang founded Anyang Tiexi Coal Washery in March 1991 where he worked as a factory director until July 1997. Mr. Wang serves on the board of directors of Angang Steel Group Metallurgy Furnace Co., Ltd., Anyang Commercial Bank Co. Ltd. and Bailianpo. Mr. Wang graduated from Henan Engineering School in June 2009. Mr. Wang’s experience in the coal and coke industry and the operation and management of large-scale coke and refined coal operations are valuable resources in formulating business strategy, addressing business opportunities and resolving operational issues that arise from time to time.

Feng Wang

Mr. Wang has served as Assistant General Manager of SC Coke since January 2000. Mr. Wang served as officer from August 1986 until July 1992, as the Head of Human Resources Department from August 1992 to June 1994 and as Chief of Office from July 1994 to December 1998, at Anyang Chemical Fiber Industry Co., Ltd. Mr. Wang graduated from Zhengzhou University in 1986. Mr. Wang has been the Assistant General Manager of SC Coke since 2000 and has been responsible for SC Coke’s operations related to supply, sales and financing. His business experience makes him qualified to serve on the Board.

Lei Wang

Mr. Wang has two decades of experience in accounting and financial management with companies in a diversity of industries. Before joining us, since January 21, 2010 Mr. Wang had served as the M&A manager at PANSOFT, a NASDAQ company, where he managed company’s portfolio and oversaw the company’s compliance with U.S. GAAP. Between January 9, 2006 and January 10, 2009, Mr. Wang held the finance manager position at Sun Moon Star, a Singapore publicly traded company, where he took charge in monitoring accounting procedures and preparing financial reports. Between January 5, 2005 and January 6, 2006, Mr. Wang was an accountant at Oriental

Health-Well Medicine, a UK company, where he was responsible for recording and verifying account journal entries and reviewing internal accounting procedures. Before that, Mr. Wang served as financial executives at a variety of companies in China for more than 10 years.

Mr. Wang received his MBA degree from the University of Northumbira in UK in 2005. Mr. Wang became a qualified E.C.D.L. (European Computer Driving License) at Gateshead College in 2009 and a qualified AAT (Association of Accounting Technicians) at Tyne Metropolitan College in 2008.

Dexin Li

Mr. Li has served as the General Manager of SC Coke since April, 2006. From July 1999 to March 2006, Mr. Li served as the Factory Director of Anyang Iron and Steel Group Coking Plant and as Deputy Factory Director from June 1989 to June 1999. Mr. Li is also an executive director of the China Coking Industry Association and a director of the Henan Coking Committee of Chinese Society of Metals. Mr. Li graduated from Wuhan Institute of Iron and Steel (now known as Wuhan University of Science and Technology) in 1985. Mr. Li has been the General Manager of SC Coke since 2006 and has been responsible for all of its operations. His expertise in coke, refined coal and other chemical products makes him qualified to serve on the Board.

Qifa Huang

Mr. Huang has served as the Chief Financial Officer at Shanghai Kuai Lu Investment Group since March 2010. From January 2005 to March 2009, Mr. Huang served as the Assistant General Manager of Beijing Yongtuo Certified Public Accountants Co., Ltd. Mr. Huang subsequently served as the deputy chief accountant at Hugang International Consulting Group from April 2009 to March 2010. Mr. Huang received his bachelor’s degree from Anhui Agricultural University in 1987. Mr. Huang is a Certified Public Accountant, a registered real estate appraiser, a registered consulting engineer and a registered land appraiser. Hehas more than twenty years of experience in audit, tax and management consultancy and knowledge of various financial matters. Such experience and knowledge makes him qualified to serve on the Board.

Senshan Gong

Mr. Gong is a director of the Company. He has many years of experience working at oversea listed Chinese operating companies. From September 2006 to May 2008, Mr. Gong served as the Manager of the Investment Analysis Department of Jinbao Intelligence United Venture Investment (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“Jinbao”) where he was in charge of site survey, material analysis and project selection during the early stage of Jinbao’s overseas listing process. Since June 2008, Mr. Gong has been serving as the Project Manager of USA Wall Street Capital United Investment Group Limited (“USA Wall Street”), the Company’s financing consultant. In that capacity, Mr. Gong has been coordinating the communication between the Company and its Chinese and U.S. legal counsels, auditors, and various other agencies to assist the Company in fulfilling its reporting obligations.

Mr. Gong graduated from Anhui Television and Radio Broadcasting University in 1998 with university qualifications.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between the directors and executive officers of the Company.

Auditors; Financial Expert

We do not have an audit committee financial expert. The reason is that we believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Furthermore, since we are only beginning our commercial operations, at the present time, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.

Compliance With Section 16(A) Of The Exchange Act.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are required to furnish copies to the Company. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, any reports required to be filed were timely filed in fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Code of Ethics

The Company has not adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions as of the date hereof.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table – Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

The following table sets forth information concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the named person for services rendered in all capacities during the noted periods.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)

Feng Wang	2011	$	5,263		53,216		0		0		0	$	58,479
President, CEO and Director	2010	$	5,263		53,216		0		0		0	$	58,479

Lei Wang	2011	$	52,381		4,762		0		0		0	$	57,143
Chief Financial Officer	2010	$	3,788		41,668		0		0		0	$	45,456

Dexin Li	2011	$	5,263		53,216		0		0		0	$	58,479
COO and Director	2010	$	5,263		53,216		0		0		0	$	58,479

Timothy Brasel (1)	2011	$	0		0		0		0		0	$	0
	2010	$	0		0		0		0		0	$	0

Earnest Mathis (2)	2011	$	0		0		0		0		0	$	0
	2010	$	0		0		0		0		0	$	0

Robert Lazzeri (3)	2011	$	0		0		0		0		0	$	0
	2010	$	0		0		0		0		0	$	0

	(1)	Mr. Timothy Brasel was appointed as the sole director and officer of the Company on June 30, 2009 and he resigned from the Board of Directors in connection with the Share Exchange, effective July 13, 2010, and from all positions he held in the Company effective June 28, 2010.
	(2)	Mr. Earnest Mathis was the former President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. On June 30, 2009, Mr. Mathis tendered a resignation from all positions held in the Company, effective immediately.
	(3)	Mr. Robert Lazzeri was the former Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and a director of the Company. On June 30, 2009, Mr. Lazzeri resigned from all positions held in the Company, effective immediately.

Director Compensation

The following table shows information regarding the compensation earned during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 by the member of our board of directors whose compensation is not included in the summary compensation table.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Xinshun Wang Chairman of the Board of Directors	87,179	(1)		-		-		-	87,179

Qifa Huang Director	-			-		-		-	0

Senshan Gong Director	-			-		-		-	0

(1)

Consists of an annual salary of $ 5,263 and a cash bonus of 82,475 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2011

There were no option or other equity grants in 2011.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year End

There were no options or other equity awards outstanding in 2011.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2011

There were no option exercises or stock vested in 2011.

Pension Benefits

There were no pension benefit plans in effect in 2011.

Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

There were no nonqualified defined contributions or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans in effect in 2011.

Employment Agreements

We have not entered into any other employment agreements with our directors or officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of the date hereof with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock, the sole outstanding class of our voting securities, by (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company, (ii) each executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Common stock subject to options, warrants or convertible securities exercisable or convertible within 60 days as of the date hereof are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person or entity holding such options, warrants or convertible securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person and is based on 32,047,222shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the date hereof.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title	Shares Beneficially Owned		Percentage of Class Beneficially Owned (1)

Executive Officers and Directors

Feng Wang c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Chun Road Intersection, Anyang County, Henan Province 455141, PRC	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director		-		-	%

Lei Wang c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Chun Road Intersection, Anyang County, Henan Province 455141, PRC	Chief Financial Officer		-		-	%

Dexin Li c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Chun Road Intersection, Anyang County, Henan Province 455141, PRC	Chief Operating Officer and Director		-		-	%

Xinshun Wang (2) c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Chun Road Intersection, Anyang County, Henan Province 455141, PRC	Chairman of the Board of Directors		23,869,547		74.5	%

Qifa Huang c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Chun Road Intersection, Anyang County, Henan Province 455141, PRC	Director	-	-	%

Senshan Gong c/o Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. (New Building), Cai Chun Road Intersection, Anyang County, Henan Province 455141, PRC	Director	-	-	%

All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (6 persons)	-	23,869,547	74.5	%

5% Shareholders

Shun Cheng Holdings Limited (2) P.O. Box 957 Offshore Corporations Centre Road Town, Tortola British Virgin Islands	-	14,799,421	46.2	%

Weitian Li (3) Suite 806 1220 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801	-	6,364,203	19.9	%

USA Wall Street Capital United Investment Group Limited Suite 806 1220 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801	-	1,829,142	5.7	%

(1)

Percentages are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one percent. The percentage of class beneficially owned is based on 32,047,222 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the Record Date.

(2)

Xinshun Wang and the sole shareholder of SC Holdings and various shareholders of other Shun Cheng HK Shareholders are parties to call option agreements, dated as of May 14, 2010 (collectively, the “Call Option Agreements”), pursuant to which Xinshun Wang is entitled to purchase up to 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of (i) SC Holdings and (ii) such other Shun Cheng HK Shareholders, at a price of $0.0001 per share for a period of five years upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Upon completion of the Share Exchange, SC Holdings and such shareholders of other Shun Cheng HK Shareholders owned in the aggregate approximately 74.5% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Under the Call Option Agreements, Xinshun Wang also acquired the exclusive right to exercise all of the voting rights in respect of the shares of SC Holdings and the other Shun Cheng HK Shareholders subject to the agreements.

(3)

Weitian Li has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares held by USA Wall Street Capital United Investment Group Limited (1,829,142 shares), Jinmao Investment Group Limited (1,511,687 shares), Global Chinese Alliance Development Ltd. (1,511,687 shares) and USA International Finance Consulting Group Ltd. (1,511,687 shares).

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

On May 14, 2010, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with the principal shareholders of the Company, Shun Cheng Holdings Hongkong Limited, a privately-held company organized under the laws of Hong Kong (“Shun Cheng HK”), and the shareholders of Shun Cheng HK (the “Share Exchange Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Shun Cheng HK from the Shun Cheng HK shareholders in exchange for the issuance by us to the Shun Cheng HK shareholders of an aggregate of 30,233,750 newly-issued shares of our common stock (the “Share Exchange”), which, upon completion of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement, will constitute approximately 95% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Upon consummation of the Share Exchange, Shun Cheng HK will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

On May 23, 2010, Xinshun Wang, our Chairman and sole director of SC Coke, entered into a tax indemnity agreement with SC Coke, pursuant to which Xinshun Wang agreed to indemnify SC Coke for any interest, penalties or other related extra costs resulting from the prior and any future tax underpayments in tax years in which he managed and operated SC Coke, and any such indemnity payment will be solely deducted from the principal amount of the loan Xinshun Wang provided to SC Coke.

On May 23, 2010, SC Coke entered into a loan agreement with Xinshun Wang, our Chairman and the sole director of SC Coke, regarding outstanding loans to SC Coke of $35.6 million as at December 31, 2009. The principal terms of the loan are: (a) 12 year term, beginning as of December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2021, (b) 3% fixed annual interest on a non-compounded basis over the term of the loan, (c) SC Coke has the option, but not the obligation, to pay interest for the first two years, (d) 10 year equal payments beginning December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2021, and (e) the lender has no ability to call a default. Additionally, on May 31, 2010 SC Coke’s sole director agreed to indemnify SC Coke from any underpayment of its income tax in prior and future years, and all associated interest, penalties and costs as a result of such underpayment, up to a maximum of $35.6 million.

On March 31, 2010, the SC Coke Shareholders, and Anyang Xinlong Coal (Group)Hongling Coal Co., Ltd., Anyang Huichang Coal Washing Co., Ltd. and Anyang Jindu Coal Co., Ltd (collectively, the “third party lenders”) formalized the terms for approximately $35.5 million of loans previously extended to SC Coke by the three lenders. On June 21, 2010, the SC Coke Shareholders entered into an agreement with the third party lenders to assume SC Coke’s obligations to the third party lenders, and concurrently the third party lenders released SC Coke from any payment obligations and liability. Also, on June 21, 2010, SC Coke and the SC Coke Shareholders entered into a debt agreement for the original principal amount of the loans due to the third party lenders.

On June 1, 2010, SC Coke entered into a Listing & Financing Consultancy Agreement (the “Financing Consultancy Agreement”) with USA Wall Street Capital United Investment Group Limited (“USA Wall Street”) where Senshan Gong, one of our directors, has been serving as the Project Manager since June 2008. Pursuant to the Financing Consultancy Agreement, USA Wall Street agreed to provide financial consultancy services. Pursuant to the terms of the Financing Consultancy Agreement, USA Wall Street provided financial consulting services to SC Coke prior to and in connection with the Share Exchange in exchange for which it was entitled to receive 20% of the equity of Shun Cheng HK. In connection with the closing of the Share Exchange, USA Wall Street, collectively with other entities under common control with it, received 6,364,203 shares of common stock of BRBH.

On July 20, 2010, SC Coke entered into a loan agreement with Bank of China, Anyang Branch. The principal amount of the secured loan is approximately $2,937,461. The secured loan carries an interest rate of 5.841% per annum, is due on July 20, 2011, and is personally guaranteed by the SC Coke shareholders, one of whom is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and a third party guarantor. The Company has repaid the full amount of the loan.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we were billed approximately $ 100,000 and $ 100,000 for professional services rendered for the audit and review of our financial statements.

Audit Related Fees

There were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Tax Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we were not billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All Other Fees

The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

-approved by our audit committee; or

-entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.

We do not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors.

The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentage of the above fees were pre-approved. However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NUMBER		DESCRIPTION
2.1		Share Exchange Agreement, dated May 14, 2010 *
2.2		Amendment No. 1 to the Share Exchange Agreement dated June 28, 2010 *
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of the Company *
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company *
3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company *
10.1		Cancellation Agreement, dated June 28, 2010 by and among Birch Branch, Inc., Shun Cheng Holdings HongKong Limited, Brasel Family Partners, LaMirage Trust, Lazzeri Family Trust, Mathis Family Partners LTD, Lazzeri Equity Partners 401(k) Plan. *
10.2		Entrusted Management Agreement dated March 19, 2010 between Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Wang Xinshun, Wang Xinming, Cheng Junsheng and Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. *
10.3		Shareholders’ Voting Proxy Agreement dated March 19, 2010 between Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Wang Xinshun, Wang Xinming and Cheng Junsheng. *
10.4		Exclusive Option Agreement dated March 19, 2010 between Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Wang Xinshun, Wang Xinming, Cheng Junsheng and Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. *
10.5		Shares Pledge Agreement dated March 19, 2010 between Anyang Shuncheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Wang Xinshun, Wang Xinming, Cheng Junsheng and Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. *
10.6		Loan Agreement dated May 23, 2010 by and between Xinshun Wang and Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke, Co., Ltd. *
10.7		Listing & Financing Consultancy Agreement dated as of June 1, 2010 between Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. and USA Wall Street Capital United Investment Group Limited. *
10.8		Tax Indemnity Agreement dated May 23, 2010 by and between Wang Xinshun and Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke, Co., Ltd. *
10.9		Loan Agreement dated May 23, 2010 by and between Wang Xinshun and Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke, Co., Ltd. *
10.10		Employment Agreement dated June 28, 2010 between Birch Branch, Inc. and Xinshun Wang. *
10.11		Employment Agreement dated June 28, 2010 between Henan Shuncheng Group Coal Coke Co., Ltd. and Xinshun Wang.*
10.12		Employment Agreement dated June 28, 2010 between Birch Branch, Inc. and Feng Wang. *
10.13		Employment Agreement dated June 28, 2010 between Birch Branch, Inc. and Dexin Li. *
10.14		Employment Agreement dated November 15, 2010 between Birch Branch, Inc. and Lei Wang. *
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. †

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. †
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. †
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 †

* Previously filed.

† Filed herein.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the March 30, 2012 .

	BIRCH BRANCH, INC.

	By:	/s/ Feng Wang
		Feng Wang
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Birch Branch, Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ Feng Wang
		Feng Wang
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ Xinshun Wang
		Xinshun Wang
		Chairman of the Board of Directors

March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ Lei Wang
		Lei Wang
		Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ Dexin Li
		Dexin Li
		Chief Operating Officer and Director

March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ Qifa Huang
		Qifa Huang
		Director

March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ Senshan Gong
		Senshan Gong
		Director

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

BIRCH BRANCH INC Reports

Also read