Attached files

file filename
EX-34.7 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-7.txt
EX-34.9 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-9.txt
EX-34.8 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-8.txt
10-K - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_10k-2011.txt
EX-31 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_31.txt
EX-33.4 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-4.txt
EX-33.6 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-6.txt
EX-33.9 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-9.txt
EX-33.3 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-3.txt
EX-33.2 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-2.txt
EX-34.3 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-3.txt
EX-34.6 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-6.txt
EX-33.1 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-1.txt
EX-33.7 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-7.txt
EX-34.2 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-2.txt
EX-33.8 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-8.txt
EX-34.5 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-5.txt
EX-34.1 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-1.txt
EX-33.10 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-10.txt
EX-33.11 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-11.txt
EX-33.5 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_33-5.txt
EX-35.3 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_35-3.txt
EX-35.1 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_35-1.txt
EX-35.2 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_35-2.txt
EX-35.4 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_35-4.txt
EX-35.5 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_35-5.txt
EX-34.10 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-10.txt
EX-34.11 - Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2011-2smt11002_34-11.txt

  EX-34.4
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5212


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Advisory Committee of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Subsidiaries, an
indirect subsidiary of Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.:

We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion of Compliance, that Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, an indirect subsidiary of Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the primary
servicing of residential mortgage-backed securities (the Platform), except for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii)
and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2011. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying Management's Assertion of Compliance, for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), the Company has engaged
various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria.
The Company has determined that none of these vendors is considered a
"servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has
elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the
SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone
Interpretations (Interpretation 17.06). As permitted by


KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership,
the. U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity.


(page)


(logo) KPMG


Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and
procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors'
activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria
applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining
that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the
vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no
procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation
17.06.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii) for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2011, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 2012


2