Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-K

---

---

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes o    No ý

          Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o    No ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    o

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

          Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o    No ý

          As of June 30, 2011 the aggregate market value of the Registrant's voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $123,975,813, based upon the $1.45 per share closing sale price of the Registrant's common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. For purposes of this calculation, the Registrant's directors and executive officers and holders of 10% or more of the Registrant's outstanding shares of voting common stock have been assumed to be affiliates, with such affiliates holding an aggregate of 21,804,883 shares of the Registrant's voting common stock on June 30, 2011, and shares held by such affiliates are not included in this calculation.

          Number of shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding as of February 29, 2012, was 139,782,742.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

          Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Registrant's 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

   

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

---

Table of Contents

PART I

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements"—that is, statements related to future, not past, events—as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), that reflect our current expectations regarding our future growth, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects, and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. Forward-looking statements include any statement that does not directly relate to a current or historical fact. We have tried to identify forward-looking statements by using words such as "anticipate," "believe," "expect," "intend," "will," "should," "may," "plan" and similar expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. These statements are based on information currently available to us and are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in Item 1A "Risk Factors" in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that could cause our actual growth, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects, and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Our forward-looking statements may include or relate to the following: (i) our plans to continue to grow our business through organic growth and integration of previous and future acquisitions; (ii) our beliefs with respect to the sufficiency of our liquidity and our plans to evaluate alternate sources of funding if necessary; (iii) our plans and assumptions, including estimated costs and saving opportunities, regarding our ongoing restructuring efforts designed to improve our financial performance; (iv) our expectations relating to state, local and federal regulatory frameworks affecting the wind energy industry, including the extension, continuation or renewal of federal tax incentives and grants and state renewable portfolio standards; (v) our expectations relating to construction of new facilities, expansion and/or restructuring of existing facilities and sufficiency of our existing capacity to meet the demands of our customers and support expectations regarding our growth; (vi) our expectations with respect to our efforts to diversify our customer base and sector focus; (vii) our plans with respect to the use of proceeds from financing activities and our ability to operate our business efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs effectively, and generate cash flow; (viii) our beliefs and expectations relating to the economy and the potential impact it may have on our business, including our customers; (ix) our beliefs regarding the state of the wind energy market and other energy and industrial markets generally; and (x) our expectations relating to the impact of pending securities litigation, the inquiry by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and environmental compliance matters. You should not consider any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all of the risks, uncertainties, or potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause our current expectations or beliefs to change. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances or for any other reason.

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

        As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms "we," "us," "our," "Broadwind," "Broadwind Energy," and the "Company" refer to Broadwind Energy, Inc., a Delaware incorporated company headquartered in Naperville, Illinois, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Dollars are presented in thousands unless otherwise stated.

Business Overview

        Broadwind provides technologically advanced high-value products and services to energy, mining and infrastructure sector customers, primarily in the U.S. Our most significant presence is within the U.S. wind industry, although we have increasingly diversified into other industrial markets in order to improve our capacity utilization and reduce our exposure to uncertainty related to the extension or renewal of tax incentives and other favorable governmental policies currently supporting the U.S. wind industry. Our product and service portfolio provides our wind energy customers, including wind turbine

1

---

Table of Contents

manufacturers, wind farm developers and wind farm operators, with access to a broad array of component and service offerings. Outside of the wind market, we provide precision gearing and specialty weldments to a broad range of industrial customers for oil and gas, mining and other industrial applications.

        The market for new U.S. wind energy installations is affected by the following factors: (i) economic growth and the associated demand for new electricity generation, (ii) the cost of competing energy sources, primarily natural gas, (iii) federal and state-level wind development incentives, (iv) upgrades to existing transmission infrastructure and the proliferation of smart grid technology, and (v) improvements in wind energy cost competitiveness resulting from the maturation of technologies and services within the wind industry, including increased turbine efficiencies and improved focus on equipment maintenance and reliability.

        In 2011, approximately 73% of our sales were associated with new wind turbine manufacturing and installations and 7% were related to servicing the installed fleet of wind turbines. The remaining 20% of our sales primarily consisted of gearing and specialty weldments for industrial customers. During this time we continued to execute our diversification strategy for our operations, focusing on increasing sales to industrial customers within our Gearing segment. Of our total company backlog at the end of 2011, 16% represents industrial customer demand, which is up from 8% in 2010.

Segments

        In December 2009, we revised our reporting segment presentation into four reportable operating segments: Towers, Gearing, Technical and Engineering Services, and Logistics. Within our Logistics segment, we offered specialized transportation, permitting and logistics management to the wind industry for oversize and overweight machinery and equipment. In December 2010, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest our Logistics business segment, and on March 4, 2011, we completed the disposition of our Logistics business to a third party purchaser. Consequently, this business unit is now reported as discontinued operations and we revised our segment presentation to include three reportable operating segments: Towers, Gearing and Services (previously Technical and Engineering Services). In conjunction with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have changed the name of our Towers segment to "Towers and Weldments" to better describe our offerings within this segment. All current and prior period financial results have been revised to reflect these changes. For additional financial information related to our segments, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 17 "Segment Reporting" in Item 15 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of summary financial information by segment.

        The following is a description of products and services offered in each segment:

Towers and Weldments

        The Towers and Weldments segment specializes in the production of wind turbine towers, and continues to diversify its customer base by expanding the portion of the business which fabricates specialty weldments for oil and gas, mining and other industrial applications. Our production facilities, located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Abilene, Texas, are situated in close proximity to the primary U.S. domestic energy and equipment manufacturing locations. We specialize in heavier "next generation" wind towers that are larger, more technically advanced towers, designed for two megawatt ("MW") and larger wind turbines. Since starting commercial production in 2005, we have produced approximately 1,100 towers for a wide variety of wind turbine manufacturers. The two facilities have a combined annual tower production capacity of approximately 500 towers, sufficient to support turbines generating more than 1,200 MW of power. However, pursuant to our diversification strategy, we are shifting a portion of this capacity to support an expansion of our specialty weldments business.

2

---

Table of Contents

        Our towers are predominantly sold to wind turbine manufacturers who utilize our products in the assembly of wind turbines. Due to the customized nature of our products, they are generally sold through our direct sales force following an evaluation, qualification and testing period, which may occur over a number of months. We compete based on product performance, quality, price, location and available capacity.

        We are also applying our core competency in welding large structures to other industries, including the mining, heavy equipment and medical fields. We have production facilities to fabricate specialty weldments in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Abilene, Texas, which provide large-scale sites, capacity and support equipment. Our capabilities include integrated blasting, cutting, beveling, rolling and welding capabilities. In addition, the Abilene facility offers the industry a large, modern blast booth and a large, modern paint booth.

Gearing

        We engineer, build and remanufacture precision gears and gearing systems for wind, oil and gas, and mining applications. We use an integrated manufacturing process, which includes machining processes in Cicero, Illinois, heat treatment in Neville Island, Pennsylvania, and a finishing process in a second Cicero factory. We have announced our intention to consolidate the operations of the two Cicero facilities into one of the existing facilities in 2012.

        In 2011, as demand for wind gearing decreased, we increased our sales force and shifted our focus to the manufacture of custom-engineered gearing systems and gearboxes for oil and gas, mining and other industrial customers. Although our wind gearing business serving gearbox manufacturers has declined, we anticipate growth in demand for replacement gearing on the existing installed wind turbine fleet. Due to the highly specialized nature of our gearing, it is generally sold through our direct sales force following an evaluation, qualifying, prototyping and testing period, which may occur over a number of months. We compete based on product performance, quality, price and available capacity. We have periodically entered into framework agreements under which we provide products to certain key customers over multi-year periods.

Services

        We offer a comprehensive range of services primarily to wind farm developers and operators. We specialize in non-routine blade and gearbox maintenance services for both kilowatt and megawatt turbines. We also offer comprehensive field services to the wind industry. We are increasingly focusing our efforts on the identification and/or development of product and service offerings which will improve the reliability and efficiency of wind turbines, and therefore enhance the economic benefits to our customers. We provide wind services across the U.S., with primary service locations in South Dakota and Texas. In February 2011, we put into operation our dedicated drivetrain service center in Abilene, Texas, which is focused on servicing the growing installed base of MW wind turbines as they come off warranty and to a limited extent, industrial gearboxes requiring precision repair and testing.

        Our Services business competes with a number of wind turbine manufacturers and independent service providers in a highly-fragmented but growing industry. Sales contacts are typically initiated through a small direct sales force, and through operating unit managers located in our service locations. Sales are generally made under individual purchase orders, although we may enter into blanket purchase orders with key customers.

Business and Operating Strategy

        We intend to capitalize on the wind energy market and growing oil and gas and mining market in North America by providing our products and components and customized services across the wind energy, other energy infrastructure and industrial markets.

3

---

Table of Contents

        Our strategic objectives include the following:

•

Diversify our customer base.  In 2011, 76% of our sales were derived from five customers, driven by concentration of sales in a few large wind tower customers. We have expanded our sales force and centralized our commercial organization in support of expanding our customer base. We have targeted expansion of U.S. wind customers, as well as expansion into other energy and infrastructure sectors, including oil and gas, mining and construction. In 2011, we announced orders with three new tower customers, and a new customer relationship to manufacture specialty weldments in our Abilene, Texas facility.



•

Improve capacity utilization and profitability.  Tower and gear manufacturing and drivetrain remanufacturing all require significant capital investments. As a result of significant capital expenditures made in 2008 and 2009, we have manufacturing capacity available that will potentially allow us to significantly increase our annual revenues. We intend to improve our capacity utilization and financial results by using our existing platform of manufacturing capacity to continue to penetrate the North American wind market and further expand into other energy and infrastructure sectors. We have also undertaken certain restructuring efforts to reduce overhead and operating costs and increase the overall efficiency of our operations; although we do not believe these efforts will significantly affect our manufacturing capacity.



•

Improve production technology and operational efficiency.  We believe that the proper coordination and integration of the supply chain are key factors that enable high operating efficiencies, increased reliability and lower costs. Our manufacturing facilities include state-of-the-art equipment and lean processes to help enhance our operational efficiency and flexibility. The planned restructuring of our gearing facilities should further enhance operating efficiency in this segment. We plan to continue to pursue strategies to further optimize our production processes to generate increased output, leverage our scale and lower our costs while maintaining product quality.



•

Develop and grow our service businesses.  We believe that there is a significant opportunity to provide more comprehensive support to customers in the wind industry. Wind turbine components are initially serviced by wind turbine manufacturers under applicable warranties. We believe that, as the size of the installed base grows and ages, manufacturer warranties expire and the complexity and size of wind turbines increase, wind farm operators will increasingly seek independent service providers to maintain their assets. We intend to support our customers' service strategies, identify or develop new products and services which improve the efficiency of our customers' wind turbines, further develop our own service channels, and capture a share of the expanding service and aftermarket support business through relationships with wind turbine manufacturers, wind farm operators and independent service providers.

Restructuring Activities

        During the third quarter of 2011, we conducted a review of our business strategies and product plans given the outlook for the economy at large, the forecast for the industries we serve and our own business environment. As a result, we have begun to execute a restructuring plan to rationalize our facility capacity and our management structure, and to consolidate and increase the efficiencies of our operations.

        We have concluded that our manufacturing footprint and fixed cost base are too large and expensive for our medium-term needs. We are planning to reduce our facility footprint by approximately 30% through the sale and/or closure during the next fifteen months of facilities comprising a total of approximately 440,000 square feet. The most significant planned reductions relate to of one of our Cicero, Illinois gearing facilities and our non-operational Brandon, South Dakota tower manufacturing facility. We believe the remaining locations will be sufficient to support our Towers and Weldments, Gearing, Services and general corporate and administrative activities while

4

---

Table of Contents

allowing for growth for the next several years. These factors have required management to reassess its estimates of the fair value of some of our assets.

        We expect to incur restructuring costs associated with the restructuring plan totaling an estimated $13,600, of which $874 has been incurred through the end of 2011. Costs are expected to include approximately $5,200 in capital expenditures and $8,400 in expenses, of which approximately $4,000 is anticipated to be non-cash expenses and $4,400 is anticipated to be cash expenses. Net proceeds from associated asset sales, projected to be approximately $7,600, will be used to fund cash costs. We anticipate annual cost savings going forward of approximately $5,500 related to the restructuring.

COMPANY HISTORY

        We were incorporated in Nevada in 1996 as Blackfoot Enterprises Inc. ("Blackfoot"). In February 2006, Blackfoot completed a reverse shell transaction with Tower Tech Systems Inc. ("Tower Tech"), whereupon Blackfoot became a holding company for Tower Tech and subsequently changed its name to Tower Tech Holdings Inc. In 2008, Tower Tech Holdings Inc. reincorporated in Delaware and changed its name to Broadwind Energy, Inc. Through our October 2007 acquisitions of R.B.A. Inc. ("RBA") and Brad Foote Gear Works, Inc. ("Brad Foote"), and acquisitions of Energy Maintenance Services, LLC ("EMS") and Badger Transport Inc. ("Badger") in January and June of 2008, respectively, we expanded upon our core platform as a wind tower component manufacturer and established our gearing systems, industrial products, technical services, precision repair and engineering and logistics businesses. In December 2010, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest our logistics business, Badger, which was sold to a third party purchaser on March 4, 2011, and is now treated as a discontinued operation. Effective February 1, 2011, EMS changed its name to Broadwind Services, LLC ("Broadwind Services"), and effective March 1, 2011, Tower Tech changed its name to Broadwind Towers, Inc. ("Broadwind Towers").

SALES AND MARKETING

        We market our towers, gearing and welding products and our maintenance services through our direct sales force. Our sales and marketing strategy is to develop and maintain long-term relationships with our energy and infrastructure sector customers and to offer an integrated suite of products and services to them. We believe this strategy best leverages our gearbox and blade knowledge and our core competency in specialty welding with customers. We believe this strategy also offers opportunities to cross-sell products and services across our platform of products. We also intend for our offerings to fulfill needs that our customers may consider non-core and do not desire to provide for within their organizations. Within the wind industry, our customer base consists of wind turbine manufacturers who supply end-users and wind farm developers with completed wind turbines, as well as wind farm developers and wind farm operators themselves. Within the oil and gas and mining industries, our customer base consists of manufacturers of hydraulic fracturing and mud pumps, mining equipment and off-highway vehicles. To support the efforts of our sales force, we utilize a number of marketing tactics to build our brand and position and promote our products and services. Our efforts include participation in industry conferences, media relations, use of social media channels, use of our website and other channels to connect with customers.

COMPETITION

        We do not believe that any competitors exist that have developed a suite of products and services for the North American wind industry similar to those offered by our businesses. However, each of our businesses faces competition from both domestic and international companies, and some of our customers maintain internal capabilities that compete with our offerings. Many of these competitors are larger and better capitalized than we are.

        For our Towers and Weldments segment, the largest North American based competitors are Trinity Industries and DMI Industries. Additionally, we face competition from a number of smaller tower

5

---

Table of Contents

producers, including Katana Summit and SIAG, as well as imports from a number of Asian tower manufacturers. On December 29, 2011, along with other U.S. based producers of wind towers, we asked the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission to conduct anti-dumping investigations of Chinese and Vietnamese imports of wind towers and a countervailing duty investigation into Chinese imports of wind towers.

        In our Gearing segment, which is focused on the oil and gas and mining markets, our key competitors include Overton Chicago Gear, Oerlikon Fairfield Drive Systems, Horsburgh & Scott, Milwaukee Gear and Philadelphia Gear (affiliated with Timken). In addition, we also compete with the internal gear manufacturing capacity of relevant equipment manufacturers. With the increased demand for oil and gas gearing capacity and increased mining demand, we are experiencing a significant resurgence of third party gearing demand. We also manufacture wind energy gear sets, but do not manufacture complete gearboxes for this segment. Wind gearbox manufacturers include Winergy (affiliated with Siemens), Bosch-Rexroth, Moventas and Hansen Transmissions (affiliated with ZF Friedrichshafen AG).

        The market for blade, drivetrain and field services in which our Services segment competes is highly fragmented, and includes original equipment manufacturers such as GE Services and Siemens, large-scale service providers such as enXco, and a number of independent service providers, including Outland Energy Services and UpWind Solutions.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND COMPLIANCE

        Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. While it is our objective to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, it may not be possible to quantify with certainty the potential impact of actions regarding environmental matters, particularly remediation and other compliance efforts that we may undertake in the future. Many of our facilities have a history of industrial operations and contaminants have been detected at some of our facilities. Refer to Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" for further discussion of environmental regulation and compliance.

BACKLOG

        We sell our towers and gearing under either long-term supply agreements or individual purchase orders, depending on the size and the duration of the purchase commitment. Some of these supply agreements are structured as framework agreements, pursuant to which customers commit to purchase a certain fixed quantity or share of their annual requirements from us, and we reserve a portion of our manufacturing capacity to meet these requirements. Under these framework agreements, we typically receive purchase orders on a monthly or other periodic basis based upon our customer's forecast of production volume levels. These long-term agreements have various terms, but generally range from several months to three years with some contracts carrying automatic renewal provisions. In recent years, the markets for wind towers and gearing capacity have generally shifted from multi-year framework agreements to individual purchase orders relating to specific projects scheduled for production within the following six to twelve months. In the future, we expect that our remaining multi-year agreements will expire, and that the mix of our business will continue to shift to shorter term project orders. As this trend continues, we anticipate our backlog will decrease, and we will likely experience greater month-to-month variations in backlog levels. For our Services segment, purchases are based either on individual purchase orders or longer-term operation and maintenance contracts. As of December 31, 2011, the dollar amount of our backlog believed to be firm under our supply agreements, purchase orders awarded and service contracts was approximately $200 million, of which $161 million is expected to be delivered during 2012. Beyond 2012, due to the structural change in order patterns, backlog is only expected to be reflective of six to twelve months of future sales.

6

---

Table of Contents

SEASONALITY

        The majority of our business is not affected by seasonality. Within our Services segment, revenues can be negatively affected by weather related constraints, typically during portions of the first and fourth quarters of the year.

EMPLOYEES

        We had 833 employees at December 31, 2011, of which 683 were in manufacturing, service and field support related functions and 150 were in administrative functions. Approximately 23% of our employees are covered by two collective bargaining agreements with local unions in Cicero, Illinois and Neville Island, Pennsylvania. Collective bargaining agreements with our Neville Island and Cicero unions are scheduled to remain in effect through October 2012 and February 2014, respectively. We consider our union and employee relations to be satisfactory.

RAW MATERIALS

        The primary raw material used in the construction of wind towers and gearing products is steel in the form of steel plate, forgings and castings. Although we are generally responsible for procurement of the raw materials, in some cases our customers source and retain title to steel plate which we convert into finished wind towers.

        We operate a multiple supplier sourcing strategy and source our raw materials through various suppliers located throughout the U.S. and abroad. We do not generally have long-term supply agreements with our raw materials suppliers and closely match terms with those of our customers to limit our exposure to commodity price fluctuations. We believe that we will be able to obtain an adequate supply of steel and other raw materials to meet our manufacturing requirements, although from time to time we have faced shortages of specific grades of steel, which may limit our ability to meet customer demand and cause manufacturing inefficiencies.

QUALITY CONTROL

        We have a long-standing focus on processes for ensuring the manufacture of high-quality products. To achieve high standards of production and operational quality, we implement strict and extensive quality control and inspection throughout our production processes. We maintain internal quality controls over all core manufacturing processes and carry out quality assurance inspections at the completion of each major manufacturing step to ensure the quality of our products. The manufacturing process at our Gearing operation, for example, involves transforming forged steel into precision gears through gear cutting, heat treating, testing and finishing. We inspect and test raw materials before they enter the assembly process, re-test the raw materials after rough machining, test the functioning of gear teeth and cores after thermal treatment and accuracy test final outputs for product specifications. We believe our investment in industry-leading heat treatment, high precision machining, specialized grinding technologies and cutting-edge welding has contributed to our high product reliability and the consistent performance of our products under varying operating conditions. Our Gearing segment is ISO 9001:2008 certified. Our tower manufacturing plant in Manitowoc, Wisconsin has received ISO 9001:2010 certification, and our Abilene, Texas tower manufacturing plant is currently in the certification process.

7

---

Table of Contents

CUSTOMERS

        We manufacture products for and provide services to a variety of customers in the wind energy, oil and gas, mining and other infrastructure industries. The majority of our wind industry customer base consists of wind turbine manufacturers, who supply wind farm operators and wind farm developers with completed wind turbines. In the other industrial sectors, we sell our products through our trained sales force or through manufacturers' representatives to a wide variety of customers. The wind turbine market is very concentrated. According to the American Wind Energy Association ("AWEA") 2011 industry data, the top ten wind turbine manufacturers constituted over 99% of the North American market. As a result, our concentration with a limited number of customers accounted for the majority of our revenues. Sales to each of Gamesa and General Electric represented an amount greater than 10% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010; sales to each of Gamesa and Goldwind represented an amount greater than 10% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011. The loss of one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business. As discussed as a component of our business strategies, we are seeking to diversify our customer base.

WORKING CAPITAL

        Our primary customers are wind turbine manufacturers, wind farm developers and wind farm operators. The industry has historically entered into customized contracts with varying terms and conditions between suppliers and customers, depending on the specific objectives of each party. Our practices mirror this historical industry practice for negotiating agreements on a case-by-case basis. As a result, working capital needs, including levels of accounts receivable and inventory, can vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on the contractual terms associated with that quarter's sales, such as whether we are required to purchase and supply steel pursuant to such contractual terms.

        Our most relevant internal metric to analyze our liquidity is operating working capital, which is comprised of accounts receivable and inventories, net of accounts payable and customer deposits. Our operating working capital at December 31, 2011 was $13,980, or 6% of trailing three months of sales annualized. This is an increase of $6,037 from December 31, 2010, when operating working capital was $7,943, or 4% of trailing three months of sales annualized. We anticipate our working capital needs to continue to grow in the future based on the transactional structural changes of raw material (steel) purchasing pursuant to orders for our Towers and Weldments segment, which remains our largest potential use of working capital.

CORPORATE INFORMATION

        Our principal executive office is located at 47 East Chicago Avenue, Suite 332, Naperville, IL 60540. Our phone number is (630) 637-0315 and our website address is www.bwen.com.

OTHER INFORMATION

        On our website at www.bwen.com, we make available under the "Investors" menu selection, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports or amendments are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Materials that we file or furnish to the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that we file electronically with the SEC.

8

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Our businesses, and therefore our results of operations and financial condition, may continue to be adversely affected by negative economic conditions and uncertainty.

        The recent global recession has had negative effects on demand for alternative sources of energy and consequently for many of our product and service offerings. Although some parts of the economy have resumed growth, there remains risk that this limited recovery may not be sustained, that the recovery may not include the industries or markets in which we conduct our business, or that the economy may revert to further contraction and corresponding uncertainty and volatility. Any deterioration in economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business in a number of ways, including lower sales and extended renewal cycles if there is a reduction in demand for wind energy, and such deterioration could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

        In particular, risks we might face could include potential declines in revenues in our business segments due to reduced orders or other factors caused by economic challenges faced by our customers and prospective customers, and an inability to finance our operating needs on reasonable terms.

The U.S. wind industry is reliant on tax and other economic incentives and political and governmental policies. A significant change in these incentives and policies could negatively impact our results of operations and growth.

        We supply products and services to wind turbine manufacturers and owners and operators of wind energy generation facilities. The U.S. wind industry is dependent in part upon federal tax incentives and state renewable portfolio standards and may not be economically viable in its current form absent such incentives. The federal government provides economic incentives to the owners of wind energy facilities, including a federal production tax credit, an investment tax credit and cash grant equal in value to the investment tax credit. The production tax credit was extended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ("ARRA") in February 2009 and provides the owner of a qualifying wind energy facility placed in service before the end of 2012 with a ten-year tax credit against the owner's federal income tax obligations based on the amount of electricity generated by the qualifying wind energy facility and sold to unrelated third parties. Alternatively, wind project owners (i) may elect to receive an investment tax credit equal to 30% of the qualifying basis of facilities placed in service before the end of 2012 or (ii) for facilities placed in service in 2009 through 2011 (or, if construction began before the end of 2011, placed in service before the end of 2012), could have applied to receive a cash grant from the Department of Treasury, equal in value to the investment tax credit.

        These programs, many of which expire at the end of 2012, provide material incentives to develop wind energy generation facilities and thereby impact the demand for our manufactured products and services. The increased demand for our products and services that generally results from the credits and incentives has been impacted by the pending expiration of these programs at the end of 2012. Because of the long lead times necessary to develop wind energy projects, the failure of Congress to extend or renew these incentives beyond their current expiration dates in 2012 has already negatively impacted potential wind energy installations planned for 2013. The failure to immediately renew or extend these incentives will likely further delay the development of wind energy generation facilities and the demand for wind turbines, towers, gearing and related components. It is possible that these federal incentives will not be extended beyond their current expiration dates. Although we believe that the production tax credit may be renewed or extended in 2012 or 2013, the duration thereof and whether such extension or renewal will be retroactive is unclear. Moreover, we currently believe it is unlikely that the investment tax credit and cash grant program will be renewed or extended in 2012 or 2013. The continued delay or failure to extend or renew these or similar incentives in the future could have a

9

---

Table of Contents

material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial performance and future development efforts.

        State renewable energy portfolio standards generally require or encourage state-regulated electric utilities to supply a certain proportion of electricity from renewable energy sources or devote a certain portion of their plant capacity to renewable energy generation. Typically, utilities comply with such standards by qualifying for renewable energy credits evidencing the share of electricity that was produced from renewable sources. Under many state standards, these renewable energy credits can be unbundled from their associated energy and traded in a market system, allowing generators with insufficient credits to meet their applicable state mandate. These standards have spurred significant growth in the wind energy industry and a corresponding increase in the demand for our manufactured products. Currently, the majority of states and the District of Colombia have renewable energy portfolio standards in place and certain states have voluntary utility commitments to supply a specific percentage of their electricity from renewable sources. The enactment of renewable energy portfolio standards in additional states or any changes to existing renewable energy portfolio standards (including changes due to the failure to renew or extend the federal incentives described above), or the enactment of a federal renewable energy portfolio standard or imposition of other greenhouse gas regulations, may impact the demand for our products and services. We cannot assure that government support for renewable energy will continue. The elimination of, or reduction in, state or federal government policies that support renewable energy could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial performance and future development efforts.

Our diversification outside of the wind energy market exposes us to business risks associated with the oil and gas and mining industries, among others, which may slow our growth or penetration in these markets.

        While we have some experience in the oil and gas and mining markets through our gearing and specialty weldments businesses, these industries have not been our primary focus. In further diversifying our business to serve these markets we will face competitors who may have more resources, longer operating histories and more well-established relationships than we do, and we may not be able to successfully or profitably generate additional business opportunities in these industries. Moreover, if we are able to successfully diversify into these markets our business may be exposed to risks associated with these industries, which could adversely affect our future earnings and growth. These risks include, among other things:

•

the prices and relative demand for oil, gas, minerals and other commodities;



•

domestic and global political and economic conditions affecting the oil and gas and mining industries;



•

changes in oil and gas and mining technology;



•

the price and availability of alternative fuels and energy sources, as well as changes in energy consumption or supply; and



•

federal, state and local regulations, including, among others, regulations relating to hydraulic fracturing and greenhouse gas emissions.

We could incur substantial costs to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and to address violations of or liabilities under these requirements.

        Our operations are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate and sell products governing, among other things, health, safety, pollution and protection of the environment and natural resources, including the use, handling, transportation, and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous materials and wastes, as well as emissions and discharges into the environment, including discharges to air, surface water, groundwater and soil,

10

---

Table of Contents

product content, performance and packaging. We cannot guarantee that we have been or will at all times be in compliance with such laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, obtain the necessary permits to operate our business, or comply with the terms and conditions of such permits may subject us to a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the imposition of civil and criminal sanctions, monetary fines and penalties, remedial obligations, and the issuance of compliance requirements limiting or preventing some or all of our operations.

        We also are subject to laws and regulations that impose liability and cleanup responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Under certain of these laws and regulations, such liabilities can be imposed for cleanup of currently and formerly owned, leased or operated properties, or properties to which hazardous substances or wastes were sent by current or former operators at our current or former facilities, regardless of whether we directly caused the contamination or violated any law at the time of discharge or disposal. Many of our facilities have a history of industrial operations, and contaminants have been detected at some of our facilities. The presence of contamination from hazardous substances or wastes could interfere with ongoing operations or adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or use our properties as collateral for financing. We also could be held liable under third-party claims for property damage, natural resource damage, or personal injury and for penalties and other damages under such environmental laws and regulations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

        We are aware of an investigation commenced by the United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, for potential violation of federal environmental laws. On February 15, 2011, pursuant to a search warrant, officials from the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") entered and conducted a search of one of our facilities in Cicero, Illinois, in connection with the alleged improper disposal of industrial wastewater to the sewer. On or about February 11, 2011, in connection with the same matter, we received a grand jury subpoena requesting testimony and the production of certain documents relating to the facility's past compliance with certain environmental laws and regulations relating to the generation, discharge and disposal of wastewater from certain of our processes between 2004 and the present. On or about February 23, 2011, we received another grand jury subpoena relating to the same investigation, requesting testimony and the production of certain other documents relating to certain of the facility's employees, environmental and manufacturing processes, and disposal practices. We have produced e-mails, reports and correspondence as requested in response to these subpoenas. We have also voluntarily instituted corrective measures at the facility, including changes to our wastewater disposal practices. There can be no assurances that the conclusion of the investigation will not result in a determination that we have violated applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Any violations found, or any criminal or civil fines, penalties and/or other sanctions imposed could be substantial and materially and adversely affect us.

        The assertion of further claims relating to regulatory compliance, on or off-site contamination, natural resource damage, the discovery of previously unknown environmental liabilities, the imposition of criminal or civil fines or penalties, or the obligation to undertake investigation, remediation or monitoring activities could result in potentially significant costs and expenditures to address contamination or resolve claims or liabilities. Such costs and expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

        Changes in existing environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, or their application, could cause us to incur additional or unexpected costs to achieve or maintain compliance.

11

---

Table of Contents

Our financial and operating performance is subject to certain factors which are out of our control, including prevailing economic conditions and the state of the wind energy market in North America.

        As a supplier of products and services to wind turbine manufacturers and owners and operators of wind energy generation facilities, our results of operations (like those of our customers) are subject to general economic conditions, and specifically, to the state of the wind energy market. In addition to the state and federal government policies supporting renewable energy described above, the growth and development of the larger wind energy market in North America is subject to a number of factors, including, among other things:

•

the availability of financing for the estimated pipeline of wind development projects;



•

the cost of electricity, which may be affected by a number of factors, including government regulation, power transmission, seasonality, fluctuations in demand, and the cost and availability of fuel and particularly natural gas;



•

the development of new power generating technology or advances in existing technology or discovery of power generating natural resources;



•

the development of electrical transmission infrastructure;



•

state and federal laws and regulations, particularly those favoring low carbon energy generation alternatives;



•

administrative and legal challenges to proposed wind development projects; and



•

public perception and localized community responses to wind energy projects.

        In addition, while some of the factors listed above may only affect individual wind project developments or portions of the market, in the aggregate they may have a significant effect on the successful development of the wind energy market as a whole, and thus affect our operating and financial results.

We are substantially dependent on a few significant customers.

        The wind turbine market in the U.S. is very concentrated, with ten manufacturers controlling in excess of 99% of the market. Like us, these customers were adversely affected by the recent downturn in the economy and the wind energy market, and we have seen, and may continue to see, a decrease in order volume from such customers. Historically, the majority of our revenues are highly concentrated with a limited number of customers. In 2011, two customers—Gamesa and Goldwind—each accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues and our five largest customers accounted for 76% of our consolidated revenues. Our customers periodically have expressed their intent to scale back, delay or restructure existing customer agreements, which has led to reduced revenues from these customers and which may occur again in the future. As a result, our operating profits and gross margins have been negatively affected by a decline in production levels, which has created production volume inefficiencies in our operations and cost structures.

        Additionally, if our relationships with significant customers should change materially, it could be difficult for us to immediately and profitably replace lost sales in a market with such concentration, which would materially adversely affect our results. We could be adversely impacted by decreased customer demand for our products and services due to (1) the impact of current or future economic conditions on our customers, (2) our customers' loss of market share to competitors of theirs that do not use our products, and (3) our loss of market share with our customers. We could lose market share with our customers to competitors or to our customers themselves, should they decide to become more vertically integrated and produce our products or deliver the services we provide internally. Finally,

12

---

Table of Contents

most of our customers do not purchase all of our products and services, so if some of our customers gain market share, it could impact our mix of products and services among our segments.

        In addition, even if our customers continue to do business with us, we can be adversely affected by a number of other potential developments with our customers. For example:

•

our customers may not comply with their contractual payment or volume obligations. The inability or failure of our customers to meet their contractual obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations;



•

our customers have in the past sought, and in the future may seek, to renegotiate the terms of current agreements or renewals. For example, some customers have sought payments from us for claims despite contractual limits that preclude our obligation to make payments for such claims;



•

if we are unable to deliver products to our customers in accordance with an agreed upon schedule we may become subject to liquidated damages provisions in our supply agreements for the period of time we are unable to produce finished products. Although the liquidated damages provisions are generally capped at certain levels, they can become significant and may have a negative impact on our liquidity and financial results;



•

although our subsidiary companies operate independently, a dispute between a significant customer and us or one of our subsidiaries could have a negative effect on the business relationship we have with that customer across our entire organization. Among other things, such a dispute could lead to an overall decrease in such customer's demand for our products and services or difficulty in collecting amounts due to one or more of our subsidiaries that are otherwise not related to such dispute; and



•

a material change in payment terms for accounts receivable of a significant customer could have a material adverse effect on our short-term cash flows.

Our customers may be significantly affected by disruptions and volatility in the economy and in the wind energy market.

        Current market disruptions and regular market volatility may have adverse impacts on our customers' ability to pay when due the amounts payable to us and could cause related increases in our working capital or borrowing needs. In addition, our customers have in the past attempted and may attempt in the future to renegotiate the terms of contracts or reduce the size of orders with us as a result of disruptions and volatility in the markets. Our backlog is significant, but we cannot predict with any degree of certainty the amount of our backlog that we will ultimately ship to our customers.

        Market disruptions and regular market volatility may also result in an increased likelihood of our customers asserting warranty or remediation claims in connection with our products or services that they would not ordinarily assert in a more stable economic environment. In the event of such a claim, we may incur costs if we decide to compensate the affected customer or to engage in litigation against the affected customer regarding the claim. We maintain product liability insurance, but there can be no guarantee that such insurance will be available or adequate to protect against such claims. A successful claim against us could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

We may have difficulty obtaining additional financing when needed or on acceptable terms and there can be no assurances that our operations will generate cash flows in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness.

        We rely on banks and capital markets as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by cash flows from operations or asset sales. We have experienced operating losses for each of the years during which we have operated and we anticipate that we will incur additional expenses in the

13

---

Table of Contents

near term in connection with our contemplated restructuring efforts. We expect to fund our facility restructuring efforts in part by using proceeds from the sale of surplus assets. We may be unable to complete these sales on a timely basis, and our committed sources of liquidity may be inadequate to satisfy our operational and restructuring needs. There can be no assurances that our restructuring efforts will be successful in improving our profitability. If we are not able to access capital at competitive rates, the ability to implement our business plans may be adversely affected. Additionally, we have a limited number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under our certificate of incorporation after the consummation of our stock offering in the third quarter of 2011; accordingly, our ability to raise capital through future equity issuances may be restricted unless we are successful in increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock, which would require the approval of holders of a majority of our outstanding shares. In the absence of access to capital resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations at times when the prices for such assets are depressed. In such event, we may not be able to consummate those dispositions. Furthermore, the proceeds of any such dispositions may not be adequate to meet our debt service obligations when due.

        Additionally, our ability to make scheduled payments on our existing or future debt obligations and fund operations will depend on our future financial and operating performance. There can be no assurances that our operations will generate sufficient cash flows to enable us to pay our remaining indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and, as a result, among other things, our debt holders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable which could force us to liquidate certain assets or alter our business operations or debt obligations. Moreover, if we are unable to obtain additional capital or if our current sources of financing are reduced or unavailable, we will likely be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate our plans for restructuring and expansion and this could affect our overall operations.

Our plans for growth and diversification may not be successful, and could result in poor financial performance.

        In 2011, approximately 73% of our revenue was derived through the sale of our products and services tied to new wind energy installations in the U.S. While we anticipate that economic conditions within the wind industry may be strong in the second and third quarters of 2012, we can provide no assurances that long-term improved market conditions within the wind industry will occur or that we will be able to capitalize on these opportunities. Moreover, the failure to immediately extend or renew the federal production tax credit or other federal incentive programs will likely have a material adverse impact on our wind energy business, results of operations, financial performance and future development efforts. A continued or prolonged economic slowdown in the wind industry or other unfavorable market factors could result in further revisions to our expectations with respect to future financial results and cash flows. In response to these conditions, we have made a strategic decision to diversify our business further into oil, gas, mining, and other industries, particularly within our gearing and specialty weldments businesses. While we have historically participated in these lines of business, there is no assurance that we will be able to grow our presence in these businesses at a rate sufficient to compensate for a potentially weaker wind energy market. Moreover, our participation in these markets may require additional investments in personnel, equipment and operational infrastructure. If we are unable to further penetrate these markets, our plans to diversify our operations may not be successful and our anticipated future growth may be adversely affected.

        We may also grow our existing business through increased production levels at existing facilities and through expansion to new manufacturing facilities and locations, such as our recently completed drivetrain service center in Abilene, Texas. Such expansion and any future expansion will require coordinated efforts across the Company and continued enhancements to our current operating

14

---

Table of Contents

infrastructure, including management and operations personnel, systems and equipment, and property. Difficulties or delays in acquiring and effectively integrating any new facilities may adversely affect future performance. For example, we recorded higher costs in 2009 in connection with the startup of production at our Abilene, Texas tower manufacturing facility. Moreover, if our expansion efforts do not adequately predict the demand of our customers and our potential customers, our future earnings may be adversely affected.

We face competition from industry participants who may have greater resources than we do.

        Our businesses are subject to risks associated with competition from new or existing industry participants who may have more resources and better access to capital. Many of our competitors and potential competitors may have substantially greater financial, customer support, technical and marketing resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry than we do. Among other things, these industry participants compete with us based upon price, quality, location and available capacity. We cannot be sure that we will have the resources or expertise to compete successfully in the future. Some of our competitors may also be able to provide customers with additional benefits at lower overall costs to increase market share. We cannot be sure that we will be able to match cost reductions by our competitors or that we will be able to succeed in the face of current or future competition. In addition, we may face competition from our customers as they seek to be more vertically integrated and offer full service packages. Some of our customers are also performing more services themselves.

We have generated net losses and negative cash flows since our inception.

        We have experienced operating losses for each of the years during which we have operated. In addition, in light of current economic conditions and the state of the wind energy market in the U.S., we anticipate that losses and periods of negative cash flow may occur in the foreseeable future. We have incurred significant costs in connection with the development of our businesses, and there is no assurance that we will achieve sufficient revenues to offset anticipated operating costs. Although we anticipate deriving revenues from the sale of our products and services, no assurance can be given that these products and services can be sold on a profitable basis. If we achieve profitability, we cannot give any assurance that we would be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.

Limitations on our ability to utilize our net operating losses may negatively affect our financial results.

        We may not be able to utilize all of our net operating losses. To the extent available, we will use any net operating loss carryforwards to reduce the U.S. corporate income tax liability associated with our operations. However, if we do not achieve profitability prior to their expiration, we will not be able to fully utilize our net operating losses to offset income. For financial statement presentation, all benefits associated with the loss carryforwards have been reserved. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("the IRC"), generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone certain changes in stock ownership. Our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses may be limited, under this section or otherwise, by our issuance of common stock or by other changes in stock ownership. Upon completion of our analysis of IRC Section 382, we have determined that aggregate changes in our stock ownership have triggered an annual limitation of net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses available for utilization. Although this event limits the amount of pre-ownership change date net operating losses and built-in losses we can utilize annually, it would not preclude us from fully utilizing our current carryforwards prior to their expiration. To the extent our use of net operating loss carryforwards and associated built-in losses is significantly limited in the future due to additional changes in stock ownership, our income could be subject to U.S.

15

---

Table of Contents

corporate income tax earlier than it would if we were able to use net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses without annual limitation, which could result in lower profits and the loss of benefits from these attributes.

Our future operating results and the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected if we are required to take additional write-downs to the carrying value of long-lived assets associated with any of our operating segments in the future.

        We review our long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the assets' carrying amount to their expected future undiscounted net cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.

        In the future, if our projected undiscounted cash flows associated with our operating segments do not exceed the carrying value of their net assets, we may be required to record additional write-downs of the carrying value of intangible assets or other long-lived assets associated with such operating segments and our operating results and the market price of our common stock may be materially adversely affected.

Disruptions in the supply of parts and raw materials, or changes in supplier relations, may negatively impact our operating results.

        We are dependent upon the supply of certain raw materials used in our production process, and these raw materials are exposed to price fluctuations on the open market. Raw material costs for items such as steel, the primary raw material used by us, have fluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate. To reduce price risk caused by market fluctuations, we have generally incorporated price adjustment clauses in our sales contracts. However, limitations on availability of raw materials or increases in the cost of raw materials (including steel), energy, transportation and other necessary services may impact our operating results if our manufacturing businesses are not able to fully pass on the costs associated with such increases to their respective customers. Alternatively, we will not realize material improvements from declines in steel prices as the terms of many of our contracts require that we pass through these cost savings to our customers.

        In addition, we may encounter supplier constraints, be unable to maintain favorable supplier arrangements and relations or be affected by disruptions in the supply chain caused by such events as natural disasters, power outages and labor strikes. In the event of significant increases or decreases in the price of raw materials, particularly steel, our margins and profitability could be negatively impacted.

If our projections regarding the future market demand for our products and services are inaccurate, our operating results and our overall business may be adversely affected.

        We have previously made significant capital investments in anticipation of rapid growth in the U.S. wind energy market. However, the growth in the U.S. wind energy market has not kept pace with the expectations we had when some of these capital investments were made, and there can be no assurance that the U.S. wind energy market will grow and develop in a manner consistent with our past expectations, or that we will be able to fill our idle capacity through the further diversification of our operations. The expansion of our internal manufacturing and service capabilities has required significant up-front fixed costs. If market demand for our products and services does not increase at the pace we have anticipated and align with our expanded manufacturing capacity, we may be unable to offset these costs and to achieve economies of scale, and our operating results may continue to be adversely affected as a result of high fixed costs, reduced margins and underutilization of capacity. In light of these considerations, we may be forced to temporarily idle existing capacity or sell to third

16

---

Table of Contents

parties manufacturing capacity that we cannot utilize in the near term. Alternatively, if we experience rapid demand for our products and services in excess of our estimates, or we have reduced our manufacturing capacity, our installed capital equipment and existing workforce may be insufficient to support higher production volumes, which could harm our customer relationships and overall reputation. In addition, we may not be able to expand our workforce and operations in a timely manner, procure adequate resources, or locate suitable third-party suppliers, to respond effectively to changes in demand for our existing products and services or to the demand for new products and services requested by our customers, and our business could be adversely affected. Our ability to meet such excess customer demand could also depend on our ability to raise additional capital and effectively scale our manufacturing operations.

If our estimates for warranty expenses differ materially from actual claims made, or if we are unable to reasonably estimate future warranty expense for our products and services, our business and financial results could be negatively affected.

        We provide warranty terms generally ranging between one and seven years to our tower, gearing and services customers depending upon the specific product or service and terms of the customer agreement. We reserve for warranty claims based on industry experience and estimates made by management based upon a percentage of our sales revenues related to such products or services. From time to time, customers have submitted warranty claims to us. However, we have a limited history on which to base our warranty estimates for certain products that we manufacture and services that we provide. Our assumptions could be materially different from the actual performance of our products in the future and could exceed the levels against which we have reserved. In some instances our customers have interpreted the scope and coverage of certain of our warranty provisions differently from our interpretation of such provisions. The expenses associated with remediation activities in the wind energy industry can be substantial, and if we are required to pay such costs in connection with a customer's warranty claim we could be subject to additional unplanned cash expenditures. If our estimates prove materially incorrect, or if we are required to cover remediation expenses in addition to our regular warranty coverage, we could be required to incur additional expenses and could face a material unplanned cash expenditure, which could harm our financial and operating results.

Trade restrictions may present barriers to entry in certain international markets.

        Restrictions on trade with certain international markets could affect our ability to expand into those markets. In addition, the existence of government subsidies available to our competitors in certain countries may affect our ability to compete on a price basis.

We may be unable to keep pace with rapidly changing technology in wind turbine component and other industrial manufacturing.

        The global market for wind turbines, as well as for other industrial components we manufacture, is rapidly evolving technologically. Our component manufacturing equipment and technology may not be suited for future generations of products being developed by wind turbine companies. For example, some wind turbine manufacturers are using wind turbine towers made from concrete instead of steel. Other wind turbine designs have reduced the use of gearing or eliminated the gearbox entirely through the use of direct or compact drive technologies. To maintain a successful business in our field, we must keep pace with technological developments and changing standards of our customers and potential customers and meet their constantly evolving demands. If we fail to adequately respond to the technological changes in our industry, or are not suited to provide components for new types of wind turbines, our net worth, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

17

---

Table of Contents

We rely on unionized labor, the loss of which could adversely affect our future success.

        We are dependent on the services of unionized labor and have collective bargaining agreements with certain of our operations workforce at our Cicero, Illinois and Neville Island, Pennsylvania gearing facilities. The loss of the services of these and other personnel, whether through terminations, attrition, labor strike, or otherwise, or a material change in our collective bargaining agreements, could have a material adverse impact on us and our future profitability. Collective bargaining agreements have been ratified by collective bargaining units in place at our Cicero and Neville Island facilities and expire in February 2014 and October 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, our collective bargaining units represented approximately 23% of our workforce.

We need to hire additional qualified personnel, including management personnel, and the loss of our key personnel could harm our business.

        Our future success will depend largely on the skills, efforts and motivation of our executive officers and other key personnel. Our success also depends, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified management and key personnel throughout our organization. During the remainder of 2012, we will likely need to hire additional personnel, including management, engineering and sales personnel, to fill in our organization. We face competition in the attraction and retention of personnel who possess the skill sets that we seek. In addition, key personnel may leave our company and subsequently compete against us. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other qualified and experienced personnel on acceptable terms, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

Our ability to comply with regulatory requirements is critical to our future success and our current level of controls cannot guarantee that we are in compliance with all such requirements.

        As a manufacturer and distributor of wind and other energy industry products we may be or become subject to the requirements of federal, state and local or foreign regulatory authorities. In addition, we are subject to a number of industry standard-setting authorities, such as the American Gear Manufacturers Association and the American Welding Society. Changes in the standards and requirements imposed by such authorities could have a material adverse effect on us. In the event we are unable to meet any such standards when adopted, our business could be adversely affected. We may not be able to obtain all regulatory approvals, licenses and permits that may be required in the future, or any necessary modifications to existing regulatory approvals, licenses and permits, or maintain all required regulatory approvals, licenses and permits.

        There can be no guarantee that our businesses are in full compliance with such standards and requirements. We continue to develop our internal controls with a goal of providing a greater degree of certainty that our businesses are in compliance with applicable governmental and regulatory requirements, but our current level of internal control may fail to reveal to us material instances of non-compliance with such requirements, and such non-compliance could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Certain stockholders have the ability to influence our affairs significantly.

        Tontine Capital Management, L.L.C. ("TCM"), Tontine Capital Overseas GP, L.L.C. ("TCO"), Tontine Management, L.L.C. ("TM"), Tontine Overseas Associates, L.L.C. ("TOA"), Tontine Capital Overseas Master Fund II, L.P. ("TCP II"), Tontine Assets Associates, L.L.C. ("TAA"), Tontine Power Partners, L.P. ("TPP") and Tontine Associates, L.L.C. ("TA", and collectively with TCM, TCO, TM, TOA, TCP II, TAA and TPP and their affiliates, "Tontine") owns approximately 12.7% of our outstanding common stock. Although Tontine currently does not have any representatives on our Board of Directors, Tontine has, and for so long as they hold at least 10% of our then issued and outstanding

18

---

Table of Contents

common stock will continue to have, the right to designate two individuals on our Board of Directors pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into with Broadwind in August 2007. As a result, Tontine may have the ability to significantly influence our policies, business and affairs, and the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets. Tontine's significant ownership level may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control that otherwise could result in a premium in the price of our common stock. In addition, the actions of Tontine may have the effect of influencing changes in control or changes in management, or limiting the ability of our other stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interest.

        In addition, Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. ("SSFQP"), Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. ("SSF Cayman"), Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P. ("SSFTF"), and Special Situations Technology Fund II, L.P. ("SSFTF II," and collectively with SSFQP, SSF Cayman, and SSFTF and their affiliates, "SSF"), owns approximately 22% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of such ownership, SSF may be able to influence certain matters which are subject to stockholder action.

We may not have the technical expertise and we may be unable to secure the necessary patents or other intellectual property rights needed to successfully market new products that we may develop.

        A key element of our business and operating strategy is to exploit our technological ability to design new manufacturing and service processes and products to take advantage of the anticipated growth in the North American wind market. Historically, we have not developed patented technology or engaged in technical design work on a significant scale. If we are unable to develop new manufacturing and service processes and products that are attractive to our customers and potential customers, or if we are unable to secure the necessary patents or other intellectual property rights needed to prevent our competitors from developing and marketing substantially similar products, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Current or future litigation and regulatory actions could have a material adverse impact on us.

        From time to time, we are subject to litigation and other legal and regulatory proceedings relating to our business. We are currently defendants in a number of litigation matters and the subject of an investigation by the SEC as further described under the heading "Legal Proceedings" in this report. No assurances can be given that the results of these or new matters will be favorable to us. An adverse resolution of lawsuits, investigations or arbitrations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Defending ourselves in these matters may be time-consuming, expensive and disruptive to normal business operations and may result in significant expense and a diversion of management's time and attention from the operation of our business, which could impede our ability to achieve our business objectives. Additionally, any amount that we may be required to pay to satisfy a judgment or settlement may not be covered by insurance. Under our charter and the indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our officers, directors and certain third parties, we are required to indemnify and advance expenses to them in connection with their participation in certain proceedings. There can be no assurance that any of these payments will not be material.

We cannot insure against all potential risks and may have difficulty insuring our business activities or become subject to increased insurance premiums.

        Our business is subject to a number of risks, including inherent risks associated with manufacturing and service and construction support for wind turbines. To mitigate the risks associated with our business, we have obtained various insurance policies. However, our insurance policies have high deductibles in certain instances and do not cover losses as a result of certain events. In addition, our insurance policies are subject to annual review by our insurers and these policies may not be renewed

19

---

Table of Contents

at all or on similar or favorable terms. If we were to incur a significant uninsured loss or a loss in excess of the limits of our insurance policies, the results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may fail to meet continued listing requirements with NASDAQ.

        We must comply with numerous NASDAQ Marketplace rules in order to maintain the listing of our common stock, which includes maintaining a minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for our common stock. On September 19, 2011, we received a notification letter from NASDAQ advising us that for 30 consecutive trading days preceding the date of the notice, the bid price of our common stock had closed below the $1.00 per share minimum required for continued listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market pursuant to NASDAQ's minimum bid price rule. The notice has no effect on the listing of our common stock at this time and our common stock will continue to trade on the NASDAQ under the symbol "BWEN". The notice also stated that we will be provided 180 calendar days, or until March 19, 2012, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule. In December 2011, we changed the listing of our common stock from the NASDAQ Global Select Market to the NASDAQ Capital Market. In February 2012, we requested from the NASDAQ Capital Market an additional 180 day period to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule. Provided that we meet all applicable standards for initial listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market (with the exception of the minimum bid price rule), we believe we will be granted an additional 180 calendar days, or until September 15, 2012, to regain compliance. To regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule, the bid price of our common stock must close at or above $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive trading days. If compliance with the minimum bid price rule cannot be demonstrated by September 15, 2012, or, if we do not receive the 180 calendar day compliance period extension, NASDAQ will provide a written notification to us that our common stock is subject to delisting.

        We intend to continue to monitor the bid price for our common stock. If our common stock does not trade at a level that is likely to regain compliance with the NASDAQ requirements, our Board of Directors will consider other options that may be available to achieve compliance, including, but not limited to, seeking implementation of a reverse stock split, which would require approval of our stockholders. There can be no assurance that we would be successful in obtaining the approvals necessary to effect a reverse stock split or that, following any reverse stock split, the per share price of our common stock would remain above $1.00 per share. If we are unable to regain compliance, our common stock will be delisted by NASDAQ. If we were to be delisted from NASDAQ, our common stock could be subject to "penny stock" rules which could negatively impact our liquidity and our stockholders' ability to sell their shares.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

        None.

20

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

        Our corporate headquarters is located in Naperville, Illinois, which is a suburb located west of Chicago, Illinois. In addition, our subsidiaries own or lease operating facilities, which are presented by operating segment as follows:

        We consider that our facilities are in good condition and are adequate for our present and future needs.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Shareholder Lawsuits

        On February 11, 2011, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against the Company and certain of its current or former officers and directors. The lawsuit is purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock between March 17, 2009 and August 9, 2010. A lead plaintiff has been appointed and an amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2011. The amended complaint names as additional defendants certain of the Company's current and former directors, certain Tontine entities, and Jeffrey Gendell, a principal of Tontine. The complaint seeks to allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and/or Section 20(a) of

21

---

Table of Contents

the Exchange Act by issuing or causing to be issued a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements concerning the Company's financial results, operations, and prospects, including with respect to the January 2010 secondary public offering of the Company's common stock. The plaintiffs allege that the Company's statements were false and misleading because, among other things, the Company's reported financial results during the class period allegedly violated generally accepted accounting principles because they failed to reflect the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, and the Company allegedly failed to disclose known trends and other information regarding certain customer relationships at Brad Foote. In support of their claims, the plaintiffs rely in part upon six alleged confidential informants, all of whom are alleged to be former employees of the Company. The Company's motion to dismiss was filed on November 18, 2011, and is now fully briefed and awaiting a ruling. Between February 15, 2011 and March 30, 2011, three putative shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division against certain of the Company's current and former officers and directors, and certain Tontine entities, seeking to challenge alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment, including in connection with the January 2010 secondary public offering of the Company's common stock. One of the lawsuits also alleges that certain directors violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Two of the matters pending in the federal court have been consolidated and the Company filed a motion to dismiss these matters on September 19, 2011, and is now fully briefed and awaiting a ruling. The Company has received a request from the Tontine defendants for indemnification in the derivative suits and the class action lawsuit and may receive additional requests for indemnification from Tontine and/or Mr. Gendell pursuant to various agreements related to shares owned by Tontine. The Company maintains directors and officers liability insurance; however, the costs of indemnification for Mr. Gendell and/or Tontine would not be covered by any Company insurance policy. Because of the preliminary nature of these lawsuits, the Company is not able to estimate a loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter at this time.

SEC Inquiry

        In August 2011, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC seeking documents and other records related to certain accounting practices at Brad Foote. The subpoena was issued in connection with an informal inquiry that the Company received from the SEC in November 2010 arising out of a whistleblower complaint received by the SEC related to revenue recognition, cost accounting and intangible and fixed asset valuations at Brad Foote. The Company has been voluntarily providing information to the SEC as a part of that inquiry and is in the process of responding to the subpoena with respect to the outstanding requests. The Company cannot currently predict the outcome of this investigation. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. No estimate regarding the loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter is possible at this time.

Environmental

        The Company is aware of an investigation commenced by the United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, for potential violation of federal environmental laws. On February 15, 2011, pursuant to a search warrant, officials from the USEPA entered and conducted a search of one of Brad Foote's facilities in Cicero, Illinois, in connection with the alleged improper disposal of industrial wastewater to the sewer. Also on or about February 11, 2011, in connection with the same matter, the Company received a grand jury subpoena requesting testimony and the production of certain documents relating to the facility's past compliance with certain environmental laws and regulations relating to the generation, discharge and disposal of wastewater from certain of its processes between 2004 and the present. On or about February 23, 2011, the Company received another grand jury

22

---

Table of Contents

subpoena relating to the same investigation, requesting testimony and the production of certain other documents relating to certain of the facility's employees, environmental and manufacturing processes, and disposal practices. The Company has produced e-mails, reports and correspondence as requested in response to these subpoenas. The Company has also voluntarily instituted corrective measures at the facility, including changes to its wastewater disposal practices. There can be no assurances that the conclusion of the investigation will not result in a determination that the Company has violated applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Any violations found, or any criminal or civil fines, penalties and/or other sanctions imposed could be substantial and materially and adversely affect the Company. The Company had recorded a liability of $675 at December 31, 2010, which represented the low end of its estimate of remediation-related costs and expenses; as of December 31, 2011, those initial costs have been incurred, and additional costs have been expensed as incurred. No additional remediation related expenses are anticipated or have been accrued; however, the outcome of the investigation, the liability in connection therewith, and the impact on the Company's operations cannot be predicted at this time. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. No estimate regarding the loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter is possible at this time.

Other

        We are also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. It is possible that if one or more of the matters described above were decided against us, the effects could be material to our results of operations in the period in which we would be required to record or adjust the related liability and could also be material to our cash flows in the period in which we would be required to pay such liability.

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

        Not Applicable

23

---

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices of our common stock traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. In December 2011, we changed the listing of our common stock from the NASDAQ Global Select Market to the NASDAQ Capital Market.

        The closing price for our common stock as of February 29, 2012 was $0.63. As of February 29, 2012, there were 107 holders of record of our common stock.

        We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and have no current plan to do so in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends on our common stock are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and are further limited by our credit agreements and other contractual agreements we may have in place from time to time. The decision of our Board of Directors to pay future dividends will depend on general business conditions, the effect of a dividend payment on our financial condition, and other factors the Board of Directors may consider relevant. The current policy of our Board of Directors is to reinvest cash generated in our operations to promote future growth and to fund potential investments.

24

---

Table of Contents

Performance Graph

        The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or "filed" under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under such Acts, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

        The following graph compares cumulative shareholder returns for our common stock as compared with the S&P 500 and the Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index for the period from April 9, 2009 (the date our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ) to December 31, 2011. The graph assumes an investment of $100 as of April 9, 2009 and that dividends were reinvested.

Repurchases

        We did not engage in any repurchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2011.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

        There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the fourth quarter or for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

        See Part III, Item 12 "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information as of December 31, 2011 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing share-based compensation plans.

25

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following selected historical consolidated financial and other data are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein and Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Our selected statement of continuing operations data set forth below for each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, are derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected statement of continuing operations data excludes the results of our Badger subsidiary, which is now reported as a discontinued operation.

(In thousands, except per share data)

26

---

Table of Contents

27

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The discussion below contains "forward-looking statements," as defined in Section 21E of the Exchange Act, that reflect our current expectations regarding our future growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and business prospects and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. We have tried to identify forward-looking statements by using words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "expect," "intend," "will," and similar expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. These statements are based on information currently available to us and are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those matters discussed in Item 1A "Risk Factors" in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that could cause our actual growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances, or for any other reason.

        As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms "we," "us," "our," "Broadwind," "Broadwind Energy" and the "Company" refer to Broadwind Energy, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

(Dollars are presented in thousands unless otherwise stated)

Business Overview

        Broadwind provides technologically advanced high-value products and services to energy, mining and infrastructure sector customers, primarily in the U.S. Our most significant presence is within the U.S. wind industry, although we have increasingly diversified into other industrial markets in order to improve our capacity utilization and reduce our exposure to uncertainty related to the extension or renewal of tax incentives and other favorable policies currently supporting the U.S. wind industry. Our product and service portfolio provides our wind energy customers, including wind turbine manufacturers, wind farm developers and wind farm operators, with access to a broad array of component and service offerings. Outside of the wind market, we provide precision gearing and specialty weldments to a broad range of industrial customers for oil and gas, mining and other industrial applications.

        The market for new U.S. wind energy installations is affected by the following factors: (i) economic growth and the associated demand for new electricity generation, (ii) the cost of competing alternatives to conventional energy sources, primarily natural gas, (iii) federal and state-level wind development incentives, (iv) upgrades to existing transmission infrastructure and the proliferation of smart grid technology, and (v) improvements in wind energy cost competitiveness resulting from the maturation of technologies and services within the wind industry, including increased turbine efficiencies, and improved focus on equipment maintenance and reliability.

        In 2011, approximately 73% of our sales were associated with new wind turbine manufacturing and installations and 7% were related to servicing the installed fleet of wind turbines. The remaining 20% of our sales primarily consisted of gearing and specialty weldments for industrial customers. During this time we continued to execute our diversification strategy for our operations focusing on increasing sales to industrial customers within our Gearing segment. Of our total company backlog at the end of 2011, 16% represents industrial customer demand, which is up from 8% in 2010.

        While we believe that we will continue to have sufficient cash flows to operate our business and meet our financial debt covenants, there can be no assurances that our operations will generate sufficient cash or that credit facilities will be available in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our

28

---

Table of Contents

indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If assumptions regarding our restructuring efforts (which are described in greater detail below), sales and subsequent collections from several of our large customers, as well as revenues generated from new customer orders, are not materially consistent with management's expectations, we may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us, which could affect our overall operations. Any additional equity financing, if available, may be dilutive to stockholders, and additional debt financing, if available, will likely require financial covenants or other restrictions. Additionally, we have a limited number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under our certificate of incorporation following our recent common stock offering. As such, our ability to raise capital through future equity issuances may be restricted unless we increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, which would require the approval of a majority of the holders of our outstanding shares.

        During the third quarter of 2011, we conducted a review of our business strategies and product plans given the outlook for the economy at large, the forecast for the industries we serve, and our own business environment. As a result, we have begun to execute a restructuring plan to rationalize our facility capacity and our management structure, and to consolidate and increase the efficiencies of our operations.

        We have concluded that our manufacturing footprint and fixed cost base are too large and expensive for our medium-term needs. We are planning to reduce our facility footprint by approximately 30% through the sale and/or closure during the next fifteen months of facilities comprising a total of approximately 440,000 square feet. The most significant planned reductions consist of one of our Cicero, Illinois gearing facilities and our non-operational Brandon, South Dakota tower manufacturing facility. We believe the remaining locations will be sufficient to support our Towers and Weldments, Gearing, Services and general corporate and administrative activities while allowing for growth for the next several years. These factors have required management to reassess its estimates of the fair value of some of our reportable segments and could result in further review of our intangible assets and fixed assets.

        We expect to incur restructuring costs associated with the restructuring plan totaling an estimated $13,600, of which $874 has been incurred through the end of 2011. Costs are expected to include approximately $5,200 in capital expenditures and $8,400 in expenses, of which approximately $4,000 is anticipated to be non-cash expenses and $4,400 is anticipated to be cash expenses. Net proceeds from associated asset sales, projected to be approximately $7,600, will be used to fund cash costs. We anticipate annual savings going forward of approximately $5,500 related to the restructuring.

        In connection with our December 2010 decision to divest our Badger Transport, Inc. subsidiary ("Badger"), which formerly comprised our Logistics segment, we classified Badger as a discontinued operation. The assets and liabilities of Badger were classified as "Assets held for sale" and "Liabilities held for sale" in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010. In connection with the reclassification to assets held for sale, in 2010 we recorded an impairment charge of $10,020 to write down the assets to their net realizable value. The impairment charge was included in "Loss from Discontinued Operations" in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2010.

29

---

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010

        The summary of selected financial data table below should be referenced in connection with a review of the following discussion of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

Consolidated

        Total revenues increased $48,958 or 36%, from $136,896 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $185,854 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to a 54%, or $40,776, increase in our Towers and Weldments segment revenue due to increased customer demand and improved capacity utilization. Our Gearing segment total revenues increased by 11% as increases in industrial gearing revenue more than offset the declines in wind revenue, consistent with our focus on diversifying our business. Revenues in our Services segment increased by 35% due to increased blade services to our two largest customers, as well as the initial

30

---

Table of Contents

sales of gearboxes and loose gearing in connection with our Abilene, Texas drivetrain service center facility which opened in February 2011.

        Total gross profit increased $5,241 or 269%, from $1,946 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $7,187 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The gross margin percentage rose from 1.4% in 2010 to 3.8% in 2011. The improvement was primarily attributable to increased tower and gearing sales volumes and a higher margin mix of gearing sales. Partly offsetting the increase were the impact of more competitive pricing within Towers and Weldments, and higher facility costs within Services due to the start-up of our Abilene drivetrain service center facility which operated at a low utilization level during 2011.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from $27,404 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $26,316 during the year ended December 31, 2011, as a reduction in employee compensation costs was partially offset by $1,839 in increased legal costs.

        We review our goodwill balances for impairment on at least an annual basis and review our intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset's carrying value amount may not be recoverable. During the second quarter of 2010 we identified a triggering event associated with the continued deterioration in the financial performance within our Services segment. This triggering event required a revision of our projection of future operating results and cash flows for this segment in light of the continued economic weakness in the wind energy industry. We performed our review of goodwill based on the carrying value of these assets as of June 30, 2010, and the estimate of fair value for each of our operating segments was based primarily on projected future results, cash flows and other assumptions. As a result of this review, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $4,561 at June 30, 2010 in our Services segment. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we identified triggering events associated with our current period operating losses, our history of continued operating losses and our revised projections of operating results and cash flows developed as part of the strategic planning process. As a result, our review of other long-lived assets indicated that the carrying values of customer relationships, trade name and property and equipment within our Services segment were also impaired. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge during the fourth quarter of $22,890. In addition, following our strategic planning meetings that took place in the fourth quarter 2010, we determined that our Brandon, South Dakota tower manufacturing facility was impaired and recorded an impairment charge to fixed assets of $13,326. During 2011, we identified triggering events associated with our current period operating losses combined with our history of continued operating losses. As a result, we evaluated the recoverability of certain of our identifiable intangible assets and certain property and equipment assets. We did not record any corresponding impairment in 2011.

        Intangible amortization expense decreased from $2,992 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $859 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease was due to a lower asset base because of the impairment charges noted above.

        We recorded restructuring costs of $441 in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2011, primarily due to the closure of our European sales office and subsidiary. We also recorded $297 in other restructuring costs related primarily to losses on the sale of surplus equipment.

        Total other income, net, was an expense of $686 during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to other expense, net, of $245 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The net improvement was a result of increased grant income associated with local economic development initiatives partially offset by the restructuring costs mentioned above.

        During the year ended December 31, 2010, we reported a benefit for income taxes of $160, compared to a provision for income taxes of $68 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in income tax benefit and increase in income tax provision for 2011 compared to 2010 was

31

---

Table of Contents

primarily attributable to the accrual of state income taxes in 2011 and the one-time reduction of deferred income tax liabilities in connection with reversal of naked tax credits during 2010.

        Net loss from continuing operations decreased from $69,753 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $20,742 during the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily as a result of the factors as described above.

        Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax was $15,422 during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $1,206 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The 2010 loss included impairment charges of $10,020.

        Net loss decreased from $85,175 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $21,948 during the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily as a result of the factors as described above.

Towers and Weldments Segment

        The following table summarizes the Towers and Weldments segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

        Towers and Weldments segment revenues increased by $40,776, from $76,150 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $116,926 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in revenues is attributable to a 43% increase in tower sections produced during 2011 versus 2010. The increase in volume also increased the MW's sold, with 593 MW's sold during the year ended December 31, 2011, versus 518 MW's sold during the year ended December 31, 2010.

        Towers and Weldments segment operating income improved by $16,623 from a loss of $11,436 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to operating income of $5,187 during the year ended December 31, 2011. Excluding a one-time impairment charge in 2010 of $13,326, operating income for the year would have improved by $3,297 compared to the prior year. The increase in section volume positively impacted operating margin, however competitive pricing pressures and inefficiencies that resulted from the production of new tower designs eroded a portion of those gains. Our operating margin was 4.4% for year ended December 31, 2011, versus a negative operating margin of (15.0%) for year ended December 31, 2010.

Gearing Segment

        The following table summarizes the Gearing segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

32

---

Table of Contents

        Gearing segment revenues increased $5,300, from $48,966 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $54,296 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in industrial gearing revenue of 60% more than offset the decline in wind revenue of 26%, consistent with our strategic diversification focus. The challenges in the wind industry depressed the manufacture of wind turbine gearing, which had typically accounted for the majority of our gearing revenues in the recent past. In 2011, as demand for wind gearing decreased, we increased our sales force and shifted our focus to the manufacture of custom-engineered gearing systems and gearboxes for oil and gas, mining and other industrial customers. Gearing sales to oil and gas, mining and other industrial customers in 2011 represented 60% of our total revenues, and orders from these customers represented 80% of our backlog as of December 31, 2011.

        Gearing segment operating loss improved by $2,945, from $13,678 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $10,733 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The operating margin improvement is due to improved sales volume and mix, partially offset by higher legal expenses of $1,209 as well as additional selling costs. Gearing operating margin was (27.9%) during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to (19.8%) during the year ended December 31, 2011, due to these factors.

Services Segment

        The following table summarizes the Services segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

        Services segment revenues increased $4,201, from $12,090 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $16,291 during the year ended December 31, 2011. Revenues within our Services segment increased by 35% due to increased blade services to our two largest customers, as well as the initial sales of gearboxes and loose gearing in connection with our Abilene, Texas drivetrain service center facility which opened in February, 2011.

33

---

Table of Contents

        Services segment operating loss improved $29,500, from $34,747 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $5,247 during the year ended December 31, 2011. Excluding a one-time impairment charge in 2010 of $27,451, the operating loss for the year would have improved by $2,049 compared to the prior year. Services segment operating loss improvement was primarily due to the absence of the 2010 intangible amortization expense of $2,133, partially offset by higher facility costs related to the startup of the Abilene facility and labor cost inefficiencies as we ramped up new blade service projects. Services operating margin was (287.4%) during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to (32.2%) during the year ended December 31, 2011, due to these factors.

Corporate and Other

        Corporate and Other operating loss increased $270 from $9,366 during the year ended December 31, 2010, to $9,636 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The small increase was due to higher legal fees of $881 and European office related restructuring costs of $406, largely offset by lower employee compensation costs.

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009

        The summary of selected financial data table below should be referenced in connection with a review of the following discussion of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

34

---

Table of Contents

Consolidated

        Total revenues decreased $47,902 or 26%, from $184,798 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $136,896 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to an 18% decline in our Towers and Weldments segment revenue due mainly to a reduction in the price of the steel component included in the overall tower section price compared to the prior year. Our Gearing segment experienced decreases in wind and industrial gearing revenues of 21% and 29%, respectively, due primarily to reduced or delayed production orders in 2010 from key customers. Revenues in our Services segment decreased 56% due to the absence of a large blade program completed in 2009, and an overall reduction in technical services provided in 2010.

        Total cost of sales decreased $37,944 or 22%, from $172,894 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $134,950 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in cost of sales within our Towers and Weldments segment was primarily attributable to the 18% decline in revenues as compared to the prior year, as well as the absence of start-up and production costs for our new wind tower manufacturing facility in Abilene, Texas in 2009. The decrease in cost of sales within our Gearing segment was primarily due to the 24% decline in revenues compared to the prior year as well as enhanced production efficiencies during the second half of 2010. The decrease in cost of sales in our Services segment was due to lower direct labor costs for field technicians as a result of the 56% decline in revenues compared to the prior year.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from $32,422 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $27,404 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to cost reduction initiatives, namely the reduction of third party professional fees, implemented during 2010 to mitigate the effects of an overall decline in production volumes, the absence of charges incurred in 2009 associated with amendments to our credit agreement with Bank of America and reserves established in connection with a customer dispute in 2009.

        We review our goodwill balances for impairment on at least an annual basis and review our intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset's carrying value amount may not be recoverable. During the second quarter of 2010, we identified a triggering event associated with the continued deterioration in the financial performance within our Services segment. This triggering event required a revision of our projection of future operating results and cash flows for this segment in light of the continued economic weakness in the wind energy industry. We performed our review of goodwill based on the carrying value of these assets as of June 30, 2010, and the estimate of fair value for each of our operating segments was based primarily on projected future results, cash flows and other assumptions. As a result of this review, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $4,561 at June 30, 2010 in our Services segment. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we identified triggering events associated with our current period operating losses, our history of continued operating losses and our revised projections of operating results and cash flows developed as part of the strategic planning process. As a result, our review of other long-lived assets indicated that the carrying values of customer relationships, trade name and property and equipment within our Services segment were also impaired. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge during the fourth quarter of $22,890. In addition, following our strategic planning meetings that took place in the fourth quarter 2010, we determined that our Brandon, South Dakota tower manufacturing facility was impaired and recorded an impairment charge to fixed assets of $13,326.

        Our 2009 impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of our goodwill and intangible assets related to our Gearing segment was less than the carrying value of these assets. Our analysis also indicated impairment to our customer relationship and trade name intangible assets in our Towers and Weldments segment as a result of the merger of our industrial weldment business into our Towers and Weldments segment in December 2009, and due to a revision in projected revenues and cash flows

35

---

Table of Contents

associated with these customer relationships. Accordingly, we recorded goodwill and intangible impairment charges of $24,269 and $57,942, respectively, to properly reflect the carrying value of these assets.

        Intangible amortization expense decreased from $9,524 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $2,992 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a $6,015 reduction in amortization expense in our Gearing segment as a result of the impairment in 2009 to its customer relationship intangibles. In addition, amortization expense in our Services segment decreased $427 due to the impairment of its intangible assets as of October 31, 2010.

        Total other income, net, was $4,280 during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to other expense, net, of $686 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to the recognition of $5,082 in income related to an escrow agreement settlement with the former owners of Brad Foote during the second quarter of 2009.

        During the year ended December 31, 2009, we reported a benefit for income taxes of $947, compared to a benefit for income taxes of $160 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in income tax benefit for 2010 compared to 2009 was primarily attributable to a reduction in our deferred income tax liabilities in connection with the goodwill impairment charge recorded during 2009.

        Net loss from continuing operations decreased from $107,026 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $69,753 during the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of the factors as described above.

        Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax was $3,093 during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $15,422 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The 2010 loss included impairment charges of $10,020.

        Net loss decreased from $110,119 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $85,175 during the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of the factors as described above.

Towers and Weldments Segment

        The following table summarizes the Towers and Weldments segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

        Towers and Weldments segment revenues declined $17,166, from $93,316 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $76,150 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The reduction in sales is attributable to a 3% decline in tower section production and lower average tower prices reflecting, in part, 20% lower average steel costs.

        Towers and Weldments segment operating loss increased by $10,937, from a loss of $499 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to a loss of $11,436 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The increased loss from operations was primarily attributable to a fixed asset impairment charge of $13,326 related to our investment in the Brandon, South Dakota tower facility. Additionally, a less profitable sales mix resulted in margin degradation of $2,819 as well as $965 in higher labor costs mainly associated with premium costs and inefficiencies that were incurred to support the increased production

36

---

Table of Contents

volume during the fourth quarter. These items were partially offset by the absence of $3,350 of start-up costs incurred in 2009 associated with our wind tower manufacturing facility in Abilene, Texas and a non-recurring impairment charge with respect to a customer relationship and trade name intangible in the aggregate amount of $1,916 taken in 2009. Towers and Weldments operating margins deteriorated from (0.5%) during the year ended December 31, 2009 to (15%) during the year ended December 31, 2010, as a result of these factors.

Gearing Segment

        The following table summarizes the Gearing segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

        Gearing segment revenues decreased $15,522, from $64,518 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $48,996 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to 21% and 29% declines in wind gearing and industrial revenues, respectively, due mainly to reduced or delayed production orders from key customers. The manufacture of wind turbine gearing, which typically accounts for the majority of our gearing revenues, continued to be negatively affected by reduced or delayed production orders from our key gearing customers, predominantly in the first half of the year, as well as ongoing challenges in the wind industry.

        Gearing segment operating loss decreased by $83,380, from $97,058 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $13,678 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in operating loss was largely attributable to the absence of impairment charges of $80,295 recorded during 2009. As a result of the 2009 impairment recorded, the corresponding amortization expense decreased by approximately $6,000 in 2010 compared to 2009. These two factors were partially offset by the establishment of an environmental reserve of approximately $675 in 2010. Gearing operating margin was (150.4%) during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to (27.9%) during the year ended December 31, 2010, due to these factors.

Services Segment

        The following table summarizes the Services segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

        Services segment revenues decreased $15,485, from $27,575 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $12,090 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in revenues was primarily the result of the absence of a large blade program completed in 2009, a reduction in services provided in

37

---

Table of Contents

2010 to two large clients due in part to their divestiture of wind farm sites and lower outsourced project activity overall.

        Services segment operating loss increased $34,137, from $610 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $34,747 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The operating margin declined from (2.2%) in 2009 to (287.4%) in 2010. The deterioration in operating loss and operating margin were primarily attributable to the $5,100 adverse effect of reduced sales, a goodwill impairment charge of $4,561 recorded in the second quarter of 2010, an impairment charge of $22,890 related to customer relationships, trade name and property and equipment taken in fourth quarter of 2010, less favorable labor utilization during the first half of the year and start-up costs related to our drivetrain service center in Abilene, Texas.

Corporate and Other

        Corporate and Other operating loss decreased $4,720 from $14,086 during the year ended December 31, 2009, to $9,366 during the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in operating loss was primarily attributable to a $2,930 reduction in professional fees associated with tax, accounting and legal services, as well as the absence of costs associated with an acquisition we did not complete during 2009. In addition, the decrease in operating loss was attributable to the absence of a $1,200 expense related to a customer dispute incurred in 2009.

SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        The methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results that we report in our financial statements. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain.

        We have identified the accounting policies listed below to be critical to obtain an understanding of our consolidated financial statements. This section should also be read in conjunction with Note 1 "Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Part IV, Item 15 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of these and other significant accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue when the earnings process is complete and when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, transfer of title has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred per the terms of the contract. Customer deposits and other receipts are deferred and recognized when the revenue is realized and earned.

        In some instances, typically within our Towers and Weldments segment, products are sold under terms included in bill and hold sales arrangements that result in different timing for revenue recognition. We recognize revenue under these arrangements only when the buyer requests the bill and hold arrangement, a fixed schedule for delivery exists, the ordered goods are segregated from inventory and not available to fill other orders and the goods are complete and ready for shipment. Assuming these required revenue recognition criteria are met, revenue is recognized upon completion of product manufacture and customer acceptance.

Warranty Liability

        We provide warranty terms that generally range from one to seven years for various products and services relating to workmanship and materials supplied by us. In certain contracts, we have recourse

38

---

Table of Contents

provisions for items that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid to customers under warranty provisions.

Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We have recorded a reserve for excess of cost over market value in our inventory allowance. Market value of inventory, and management's judgment of the need for reserves, encompasses consideration of other business factors including physical condition, inventory holding period, contract terms, and usefulness. Inventories are valued based on an average cost method, which approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.

        Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods. Raw materials consist of components and parts for general production use. Work-in-process consists of labor and overhead, processing costs, purchased subcomponents, and materials purchased for specific customer orders. Finished goods consist of components purchased from third parties as well as components manufactured by us that will be used to produce final customer products.

Intangible Assets

        We test intangible assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our assets may not be recovered. In evaluating the recoverability of the carrying value of intangible assets, we must make assumptions regarding the fair value of our reporting units. Recoverability is measured by comparing the assets' carrying amounts to their expected future undiscounted net cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value. If our fair value estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges related to intangible assets.

Long-Lived Assets

        We review property and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If such events or changes in circumstances occur, we will recognize an impairment loss if the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than the carrying value of the related asset. The impairment loss would adjust the asset to its fair value.

        In evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of such assets. If our fair value estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges related to property and equipment and other long-lived assets.

Income Taxes

        We account for income taxes based upon an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities versus the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Under this method, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The impact of tax rate changes on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the year that the change is enacted.

39

---

Table of Contents

        In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income tax liability for each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current income tax expense and assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of certain income or expense items for income tax reporting and financial reporting purposes. We also recognize the expected future income tax benefits of net operating loss carryforwards as deferred income tax assets. In evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets associated with net operating loss carryforwards, we consider, among other things, expected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary reporting differences, and the expected impact of tax planning strategies that may be implemented to prevent the potential loss of future income tax benefits. Changes in, among other things, income tax legislation, statutory income tax rates, or future taxable income levels could materially impact our valuation of income tax assets and liabilities and could cause our income tax provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.

        We also account for the uncertainty in income taxes related to the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. We follow the applicable pronouncement guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition related to the uncertainty in these income tax positions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses ("ASU 2010-20"). ASU 2010-20 requires increased disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and allowances for credit losses, including disclosures about credit quality indicators, past due information and modifications of financing receivables. We have adopted this standard as of January 1, 2011 and it had no material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

LIQUIDITY, FINANCIAL POSITION AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

        At December 31, 2011, cash assets totaled $14,216, compared to our cash assets which totaled $15,501 at December 31, 2010. On September 21, 2011, we completed a public offering of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an offering price of $0.40 per share. In the offering, we sold 32,500,000 newly issued shares of our common stock for approximately $12,155 in proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts, but before deducting other offering related costs. The proceeds will be used for general operating purposes. We feel that we have adequate internal and external cash resources to meet current and future operating requirements.

        Our most relevant internal metric to analyze our liquidity is operating working capital, which is comprised of accounts receivable and inventories, net of accounts payable and customer deposits. Our operating working capital at December 31, 2011 was $13,980, or 6% of trailing three months of sales annualized. This is an increase of $6,037 from December 31, 2010, when operating working capital was $7,943, or 4% of trailing three months of sales annualized. We anticipate our working capital needs to continue to grow in the future based on the transactional structural changes of raw material (steel) purchasing pursuant to orders for our Towers and Weldments segment, which remains our largest potential use of working capital.

        In September 2010, Brad Foote, Broadwind Services and Broadwind Towers (collectively, the "Subsidiaries") and Badger entered into account purchase agreements (the "AP Agreements") with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"). The aggregate facility limit of the AP Agreements is $10,000. On October 19, 2011, the AP Agreements were amended to modify the month-end minimum total cash balance requirement from $5,000 to the greater of $2,000 or the outstanding purchased amount, not to exceed $5,000. At December, 2011, $523 of financed receivables remained outstanding, and the

40

---

Table of Contents

Subsidiaries had the ability to draw up to $9,477, subject to maintaining a month-end minimum total cash balance of $2,000.

        While we believe that we will continue to have sufficient cash flows to operate our business and meet our financial debt covenants, there can be no assurances that our operations will generate sufficient cash or that credit facilities will be available in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If assumptions regarding our restructuring efforts, sales and subsequent collections from several of our large customers, as well as revenues generated from new customer orders, are not materially consistent with management's expectations, we may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us, which could affect our overall operations. Any additional equity financing, if available, may be dilutive to stockholders, and additional debt financing, if available, will likely require financial covenants or other restrictions. Additionally, we have a limited number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under our certificate of incorporation following our recent common stock offering. As such, our ability to raise capital through future equity issuances may be restricted unless we increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, which would require the approval of a majority of the holders of our outstanding shares.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Operating Cash Flows

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash flows used in operating activities totaled $10,304, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $10,123 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase in net cash used in operating activities as compared to the prior year was primarily attributable to increases in our inventory and accounts receivable balances, along with a decrease in our accounts payable. Partially offsetting this increase was an increase in our customer deposits, and reduced loss from operations. The loss from operations was $8,234 lower than the prior year loss exclusive of prior year impairment charges.

41

---

Table of Contents

Investing Cash Flows

        During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, net cash used in investing activities totaled $2,588 and $5,015, respectively. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities as compared to the prior year was primarily attributable to a reduction in capital expenditures and the sale of excess equipment in 2011.

Financing Cash Flows

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities totaled $11,305, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $31,953 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities as compared to the prior year was attributable to larger proceeds from an equity offering of $53,347 completed in January 2010, compared to proceeds from an equity offering of $11,697 completed in September 2011. Partially offsetting the decrease associated with the reduced proceeds from the equity offerings, were lower payments on lines of credit and notes payable of $1,517 in 2011 versus $21,231 in 2010, due to the reduction of our outstanding debt balances during 2011 and 2010.

Credit Facilities

Investors Community Bank Loans

        On April 7, 2008, RBA executed four promissory notes in favor of Investors Community Bank ("ICB") in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $3,781. Three of these promissory notes were term notes, with initial principal balances totaling $2,049, bearing interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.65% to 6.85% per annum, with maturities ranging from October 2012 to April 2013 (collectively, the "ICB Notes"). The fourth promissory note was a line of credit note, which has been repaid in full.

        Pursuant to the merger of RBA into Broadwind Towers on December 31, 2009, the loans evidenced by the ICB Notes (collectively, the "ICB Loans") were modified pursuant to a Master Amendment among ICB, Broadwind Towers and the Company (as guarantor) (the "Master Amendment"). Under the terms of the Master Amendment, Broadwind Towers agreed to a number of security and financial covenants. As the outstanding balances under the ICB Loans have declined, certain of these requirements have been removed through subsequent amendments to the Master Amendment. The remaining security requirements are that Broadwind Towers maintain a depository relationship of not less than $700 with ICB and maintain a debt service ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 at all times. The ICB Loans are also secured by a mortgage on a facility owned by Broadwind Towers in Clintonville, Wisconsin, and a guaranty by the Company. As of December 31, 2011, (i) the total amount of outstanding indebtedness under the ICB Notes was $1,101, (ii) the effective per annum interest rate under the ICB Notes was 5.75%, and (iii) Broadwind Towers was in compliance with all covenants under the documents evidencing and securing the ICB Loans.

Great Western Bank Loan

        On April 28, 2009, Broadwind Towers entered into a Construction Loan Agreement with Great Western Bank ("GWB"), pursuant to which GWB agreed to provide up to $10,000 in financing (the "Construction Loan") to fund construction of Broadwind Towers' wind tower manufacturing facility in Brandon, South Dakota (the "Facility"). Pursuant to a Change in Terms Agreement dated April 5, 2010 between GWB and Broadwind Towers, the Construction Loan was converted to a term loan (the "GWB Term Loan") providing for monthly payments of principal plus interest, extending the maturity date to November 5, 2016, reducing the principal amount to $6,500, and changing the per annum interest rate to 8.5%. Broadwind Towers was required to pay a 1.0% origination fee upon the conversion.

42

---

Table of Contents

        The GWB Term Loan is secured by a first mortgage on the Facility and all fixtures and proceeds relating thereto, pursuant to a Mortgage and a Commercial Security Agreement, each between Broadwind Towers and GWB, and by a Commercial Guaranty from the Company. In addition, we have agreed to subordinate all intercompany debt with Broadwind Towers to the GWB Term Loan. The GWB Term Loan contains representations, warranties and covenants that are customary for a term financing arrangement and contains no financial covenants. As of December 31, 2011, the total outstanding indebtedness under the GWB Term Loan was $4,833, which is included in our financial statements as Liabilities Held for Sale.

Wells Fargo Account Purchase Agreements

        On September 29, 2010, the Subsidiaries entered into the AP Agreements with Wells Fargo. Under the AP Agreements, when requested by us, Wells Fargo will advance funds against certain receivables arising from sales of the Subsidiaries' products and services. In connection with the entry into the AP Agreements, the Company and each Subsidiary executed guaranties (including cross-guaranties) in favor of Wells Fargo. With respect to the Subsidiaries, the AP Agreements contain provisions providing for cross-defaults and cross-collateralization. In addition, each Subsidiary has granted to Wells Fargo a security interest against all financed receivables and related collateral. Prior to entering into the AP Agreements, there was no material relationship between the Company, the Subsidiaries and Wells Fargo.

        Under the terms of the AP Agreements, when requested by us, Wells Fargo will advance approximately 80% of the face value of eligible receivables to the Subsidiaries. Wells Fargo will have full recourse to the Subsidiaries for collection of the financed receivables. The aggregate facility limit of the AP Agreements is $10,000. For Wells Fargo's services under the AP Agreements, the Subsidiaries have agreed to pay Wells Fargo (i) a floating discount fee equal to the then-prevailing London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 3.75% per annum on the sum of the outstanding financed accounts, (ii) an annual facility fee of 1% of the aggregate facility limit, and (iii) an annual unused line fee of 0.042% on the portion of the credit facility which is unused. The initial term of the AP Agreements ends on September 29, 2013. If the AP Agreements are terminated prior to that date, an early termination fee of up to 2% of the aggregate facility limit may apply.

        In connection with the sale of Badger to a third party purchaser on March 4, 2011, the AP Agreement between Badger and Wells Fargo and the guaranty provided by Badger to Wells Fargo with respect to the other AP Agreements were each terminated, pursuant to an Omnibus Amendment to Account Purchase Agreements and Guaranties dated as of March 4, 2011, by and among the Company, the Subsidiaries and Wells Fargo. On October 19, 2011, the AP Agreements were further amended to modify the month-end minimum total cash balance requirement from $5,000 to the greater of $2,000 or the outstanding purchased amount, not to exceed $5,000.

        During 2011, we financed approximately $981 of accounts receivable with Wells Fargo. At December 31, 2011, $523 of financed receivables remained outstanding, and the Subsidiaries had the ability to draw up to $9,477, subject to maintaining a month-end minimum total cash balance of $2,000.

Selling Shareholder Notes

        On May 26, 2009, we entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") with the former owners of Brad Foote, including J. Cameron Drecoll, who served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors until December 1, 2010. The Settlement Agreement related to the post-closing escrow established in connection with our acquisition of Brad Foote. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, among other terms, we issued three promissory notes to the former owners in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000 (the "Selling Shareholder Notes"). The Selling Shareholder Notes issued to the former owners other than Mr. Drecoll mature on May 28, 2012

43

---

Table of Contents

and bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with interest payments due quarterly. The Selling Shareholder Note issued to Mr. Drecoll in the principal amount of $2,320 pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement (the "Drecoll Note") also was originally scheduled to mature on May 28, 2012 and bore interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with interest payments due quarterly; however, effective as of July 1, 2011, the Drecoll Note was amended and restated to effect the following modifications: (i) the maturity date was changed to January 10, 2014; (ii) the interest rate was changed to 9% per annum; and (iii) the payment schedule was changed to quarterly payments of principal and interest, such that the Drecoll Note is now self-amortizing with payments that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2011. We agreed to pay Mr. Drecoll a restructuring fee in the amount of $10 in connection with the restructuring of the Drecoll Note. As of December 31, 2011, principal of $2,791 and accrued interest of $59 were outstanding under the Selling Shareholder Notes.

Other

        Included in Long Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities is $2,280 associated with the New Markets Tax Credit Agreement described further in described in Note 19, "New Markets Tax Credit" in Part IV, Item 15 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations

        The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2011, minimum future cash payments due under contractual obligations, including, among others, our debt and credit agreements, non-cancelable operating and capital lease agreements and purchase commitments as follows:

---

(1)

Debt and credit agreements represent the minimum future principal payments due under our outstanding contractual obligations.

(2)

Interest payments represent an amount calculated for expected interest payments due under our outstanding debt and credit agreements. Assumptions used to derive these amounts were based upon current interest rates as of December 31, 2011, required minimum principal payments due, and maturity of our debt and credit agreements per our contractual agreements. Actual interest payments could vary materially from those set out in this table.

(3)

Capital lease obligations include both the future principal and interest payments related to these agreements.

        Debt and Credit Agreements.    Debt and credit agreements include outstanding borrowings under our lines of credit, term notes related to vehicle and equipment purchases, and notes payable related to an escrow agreement settlement and a purchase agreement for manufacturing equipment. See Note 10 "Debt and Credit Agreements" in Part IV, Item 15 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our outstanding indebtedness and credit agreements.

44

---

Table of Contents

        Operating Lease Obligations.    We lease a number of our facilities and certain equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through 2026. Lease terms generally range from 3 to 15 years with renewal options for extended terms. The amounts in the table above represent future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases. During 2011 we extended the lease for one of our Cicero, Illinois manufacturing facilities by an additional seven years, resulting in an increase in our operating lease obligations when compared to the prior year.

        Capital Lease Obligations.    We have capital lease obligations related to certain manufacturing equipment and vehicles expiring at various dates through 2015. As of December 31, 2011, the balance of our outstanding capital lease obligations was approximately $2,116, which includes accrued interest of approximately $176.

        Purchase Commitments.    Purchase commitments represent remaining payments due on equipment purchase contracts related to the construction of our Brandon, South Dakota wind tower manufacturing facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        During 2009, Broadwind Towers entered into a sale-leaseback agreement with Varilease, Finance, Inc. ("Varilease"), whereby it sold certain equipment to Varilease in exchange for $2,935 in cash and agreed to lease the equipment back from Varilease for a certain period of time. The primary purpose of this arrangement was to provide additional liquidity for meeting working capital requirements. The lease agreement is for a three-year period with rental payments of $85 due monthly. In addition, the sale of the assets resulted in a gain on disposition of $40, which is being amortized to other income in our statement of operations over the life of the operating lease.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        We are exposed to financial market risks, which include changes in interest rates on our variable rate obligations, credit risks on accounts receivable and raw material price fluctuations.

Interest Rate Exposure

        As of December 31, 2011, the majority of our third party borrowings under our debt and credit agreements bear annual interest at fixed interest rates; therefore, we have limited interest rate exposure. We are subject to interest rate fluctuation exposure only through amounts financed under the AP Agreements. As of December 31, 2011, we had $523 of financed receivables outstanding under the AP Agreements. Our potential interest rate exposure over a one-year period that would result from a hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the interest rate of our variable rate obligations would be approximately $5 on a pre-tax basis. As of December 31, 2010, all of our third party borrowings under our debt and credit agreements were at fixed interest rates

Credit Risk Exposure

        We are exposed to credit risk on our accounts receivable balances and cash balances. Historically, our accounts receivable are highly concentrated with a select number of financially stable customers. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, our five largest customers accounted for approximately 76% and 78%, respectively, of consolidated revenues. Additionally, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our five largest customers comprised approximately 62% and 79%, respectively, of our outstanding accounts receivable balances. We are also exposed to potentially significant credit risk as our cash deposits often exceed the federally insured amounts. To address this we adhere to a formal investment policy which requires us to invest excess cash in efforts to diversify our cash away from any single financial institution.

45

---

Table of Contents

Commodity Risk Exposure

        We are dependent upon the supply of certain raw materials used in our production processes, and these raw materials are exposed to price fluctuations on the open market. The primary raw material we use is steel. To reduce price risk caused by market fluctuations, we have incorporated price adjustment clauses in certain sales contracts. Management believes a hypothetical 10% change in the price of steel and other raw materials would not have a significant effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows because these costs are generally passed through to our customers.

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

        The financial information required by Item 8 is contained in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

        None.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. This information is also accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter reported on herein. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        Our management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act).

        Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. Management based this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in "Internal Control—Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

        Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

        Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as stated in its report.

46

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

        None.

PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

        With the exception of the description of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct below, the information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the discussion under the headings "Directors and Director Compensation," "Corporate Governance" and "Other Matters—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2012 Proxy Statement").

Code of Ethics

        We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all of our directors, executive officers and senior financial officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, and any person performing similar functions). The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at www.bwen.com under the caption "Investors" and is available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who sends a request for a paper copy to Broadwind Energy, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 47 East Chicago Avenue, Suite 332, Naperville, IL 60540. We intend to include on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        Information regarding director and executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the headings "Directors and Director Compensation" and "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" in the 2012 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

        Certain of the information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the discussion under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Holders and Management" in the 2012 Proxy Statement.

47

---

Table of Contents

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 2011, with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans:

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

---

(1)

Includes outstanding stock options to purchase shares of our common stock and outstanding restricted stock awards pursuant to the Amended and Restated Broadwind Energy, Inc. 2007 Employee Incentive Plan (the "EIP")

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

        The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the discussion under the headings "Certain Transactions and Business Relationships" and "Corporate Governance" in our 2012 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

        The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the discussion under the heading "Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in our 2012 Proxy Statement.

PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

1.    Financial Statements

        The financial statements listed on the Index to Financial Statements (page 49) are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.    Financial Statement Schedules

        These schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto or because they are not applicable or not required.

3.    Exhibits

        The exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits (pages 92 through 97) are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

48

---

Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

49

---

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Broadwind Energy, Inc.

        We have audited Broadwind Energy, Inc.'s (a Delaware Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Broadwind Energy, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Broadwind Energy, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion, Broadwind Energy, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Broadwind Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 and our report dated March 13, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 13, 2012

50

---

Table of Contents

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Broadwind Energy, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Broadwind Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        We also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Broadwind Energy, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 13, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 13, 2012

51

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

52

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

53

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

54

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

55

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

        Broadwind Energy Inc. (the "Company") provides technologically advanced high-value products and services to energy, mining and infrastructure sector customers, primarily in the U.S. The Company's most significant presence is within the U.S. wind industry, although the Company has increasingly diversified into other industrial markets in order to improve its capacity utilization and reduce its exposure to uncertainty related to the extension or renewal of federal tax incentives and other favorable policies currently supporting the U.S. wind industry. The Company's product and service portfolio provides its wind energy customers, including wind turbine manufacturers, wind farm developers and wind farm operators, with access to a broad array of component and service offerings. Outside of the wind market, the Company provides precision gearing and specialty weldments to a broad range of industrial customers.

        The Company has three reportable operating segments: Towers and Weldments, Gearing, and Services. In conjunction with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements on this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company has changed the name of its Towers segment to Towers and Weldments in order to better describe the offerings within this segment. See Note 17 "Segment Reporting" of these consolidated financial statements for further discussion of reportable segments.

Towers and Weldments

        The Company manufactures towers for wind turbines, specifically the large and heavier wind towers that are designed for 2 megawatt ("MW") and larger wind turbines. Production facilities, located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Abilene, Texas, are situated in close proximity to the primary U.S. domestic energy and equipment manufacturing locations. The two facilities have a combined annual tower production capacity of approximately 500 towers, sufficient to support turbines generating more than 1200 MW of power. This product segment also encompasses the manufacture of specialty fabrications and specialty weldments for mining and other industrial customers.

Gearing

        The Company engineers, builds and remanufactures precision gears and gearing systems for wind, oil and gas, mining and other industrial applications. The Company uses an integrated manufacturing process, which includes machining processes in Cicero, Illinois, heat treatment in Neville Island, Pennsylvania and a finishing process in a second Cicero facility.

Services

        The Company offers a comprehensive range of services, primarily to wind farm developers and operators. The Company specializes in non-routine blade and gearbox maintenance services for both kilowatt and megawatt turbines. The Company also offers comprehensive field services to the wind industry. The Company is increasingly focusing its efforts on the identification and/or development of product and service offerings which will improve the reliability and efficiency of wind turbines, and therefore enhance the economic benefits to its customers. The Company provides wind services across the U.S., with primary service locations in South Dakota and Texas. In February 2011, the Company

56

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

put into operation its dedicated drivetrain service center in Abilene, Texas, which is focused on servicing the growing installed base of MW wind turbines as they come off warranty and, to a limited extent, industrial gearboxes requiring precision repair and testing.

Liquidity

        The Company has a limited history of operations and has incurred operating losses since inception. The Company anticipates that current cash resources and cash to be generated from operations in 2012 will be adequate to meet the Company's liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. As discussed further in Note 10, "Debt and Credit Agreements" of these consolidated financial statements, the Company is obligated to make principal payments on outstanding debt totaling $2,202 during 2012, has $4,833 of indebtedness associated with its Liabilities Held for sale and is obligated to make purchases of $390 under purchase commitments described in Note 12, "Commitments and Contingencies" of these consolidated financial statements. Additionally, working capital requirements are expected to increase due to structural changes of tower contracts related to raw material purchases. If sales and subsequent collections from several of the Company's large customers, as well as revenues generated from new customer orders, are not materially consistent with management's plans, the Company may encounter cash flow and liquidity issues. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to the Company, which could affect its overall operations. Any additional equity financing, if available, may be dilutive to stockholders, and additional debt financing, if available, will likely require financial covenants or other restrictions on the Company. There can be no assurances the Company's efforts to obtain sufficient cash flow will be successful.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

        These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Broadwind and entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity.

        When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a variable interest entity ("VIE"), and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with the accounting standard for the consolidation of variable interest entities. The accounting standard for the consolidation of VIE's requires the Company to qualitatively assess if the Company was the primary beneficiary of the VIE's based on whether the Company had (i) the power to direct those matters that most significantly impacted the activities of the VIE and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE. Refer to Note 19, "New Markets Tax Credit Transaction" of these consolidated financial statements for a description of two variable interest entities included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.

57

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Reclassifications

        Where appropriate, certain reclassifications have been made to prior years' financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Management's Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP") requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Significant estimates, among others, include revenue recognition, future tax rates, inventory reserves, warranty reserves, stock option fair values and allowance for doubtful accounts. Although these estimates are based upon management's best knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash balances and money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents were $13,340 and $15,331 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company's policy is to invest excess cash in money market account funds, which are generally of a short-term duration based upon operating requirements. Income earned on these investments is recorded to interest income within Other Income in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, interest income was $28, $43 and $123, respectively.

Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash at December 31, 2011 relates primarily to proceeds from the New Markets Tax Credit Agreement discussed further in Note 19, "New Markets Tax Credit" of these consolidated financial statements. There are also restricted cash balances related to certain vendor agreements. The Company anticipates that all restricted cash balances will be used for current purposes. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had restricted cash in the amounts of $876 and $170, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete and when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, transfer of title has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred per the terms of the contract. Customer deposits, deferred revenue and other receipts are deferred and recognized when the revenue is realized and earned.

        In some instances, typically within the Company's Towers and Weldments segment, products are sold under terms included in bill and hold sales arrangements that result in different timing for revenue

58

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

recognition. The Company recognizes revenue under these arrangements only when the buyer requests the bill and hold arrangement, a fixed schedule for delivery exists, the ordered goods are segregated from inventory and not available to fill other orders and the goods are complete and ready for shipment. Assuming these required revenue recognition criteria are met, revenue is recognized upon completion of product manufacture and customer acceptance.

Cost of Sales

        Cost of sales represents all direct and indirect costs associated with the production of products for sale to customers. These costs include operation, repair and maintenance of equipment, direct and indirect labor and benefit costs, insurance, equipment rentals, freight in and depreciation. Freight out to customers is at times classified as a selling expense and is then excluded from cost of sales. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, freight out included in selling, general and administrative expenses was $303, $0 and $104, respectively.

Accounts Receivable

        The Company generally grants uncollateralized credit to customers on an individual basis based upon the customer's financial condition and credit history. Credit is typically on net 30-day terms and customer deposits are frequently required at various stages of the production process to minimize credit risk.

        Historically, the Company's accounts receivable are highly concentrated with a select number of customers. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company's five largest customers accounted for 76% of its consolidated revenues and 62% of outstanding account receivable balances, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 when the Company's five largest customers accounted for 78% of its consolidated revenues and 79% of its outstanding account receivable balances.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        Based upon past experience and judgment, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts with respect to accounts receivable. The Company's standard allowance estimation methodology considers a number of factors that, based on its collections experience, the Company believes will have an impact on its credit risk and the realizability of its accounts receivable. These factors include individual customer circumstances, history with the Company and other relevant criteria. Accounts receivable balances that remain outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to accounts receivable.

        The Company monitors its collections and write-off experience to assess whether or not adjustments to its allowance estimates are necessary. Changes in trends in any of the factors that the Company believes may impact the realizability of its accounts receivable, as noted above, or modifications to the Company's credit standards, collection practices and other related policies may impact its allowance for doubtful accounts and its financial results. Bad debt expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $1,036, $1,011 and $1,438, respectively.

59

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined either based on the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") basis, or on a standard cost basis that approximates the FIFO method. Market is determined based on net realizable value. Any excess of cost over market value is included in the Company's inventory allowance. Market value of inventory, and management's judgment of the need for reserves, encompasses consideration of other business factors including physical condition, inventory holding period, contract terms and usefulness.

        Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. Raw materials consist of components and parts for general production use. Work-in-process consists of labor and overhead, processing costs, purchased subcomponents and materials purchased for specific customer orders. Finished goods consist of components purchased from third parties as well as components manufactured by the Company that will be used to produce final customer products.

Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets for financial reporting purposes and an accelerated method for income tax reporting purposes. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $13,675, $13,470 and $13,172, respectively. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized, while replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred on indebtedness used to construct property and equipment. Capitalized interest is recorded as part of the asset to which it relates and is amortized over the asset's estimated useful life. Interest cost capitalized was $0, $74 and $465 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Property or equipment sold or disposed of is removed from the respective property accounts, with any corresponding gains and losses recorded to other income or expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations.

Intangible and Other Long-lived Intangible Assets

        The Company reviews intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparing the assets' carrying amounts to their expected future undiscounted net cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value.

Warranty Liability

        The Company provides warranty terms that generally range from one to seven years for various products and services relating to workmanship and materials supplied by the Company. In certain contracts, the Company has recourse provisions for items that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid to customers under warranty provisions. The changes in the carrying amount of the

60

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Company's total product warranty liability for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

Income Taxes

        The Company accounts for income taxes based upon an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities versus the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Under this method, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The impact of tax rate changes on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the year that the change is enacted.

        In connection with the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax liability for each of the tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates. This process involves estimating the Company's actual current income tax expense and assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of certain income or expense items for income tax reporting and financial reporting purposes. The Company also recognizes as deferred income tax assets the expected future income tax benefits of net operating loss carryforwards. In evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets associated with net operating loss carryforwards, the Company considers, among other things, expected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary reporting differences and the expected impact of tax planning strategies that may be implemented to prevent the potential loss of future income tax benefits. Changes in, among other things, income tax legislation, statutory income tax rates or future taxable income levels could materially impact the Company's valuation of income tax assets and liabilities and could cause its income tax provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.

        The Company also accounts for the uncertainty in income taxes related to the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. The Company follows the applicable pronouncement guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition related to the uncertainty in these income tax positions.

61

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Share-Based Compensation

        The Company grants incentive stock options and restricted stock units to certain officers, directors, employees and consultants. The Company accounts for share-based compensation related to these awards based on the estimated fair value of the equity award and recognizes expense ratably over the vesting term of the award. See Note 16 "Share-Based Compensation" of these consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Company's share-based compensation plans, the nature of share-based awards issued and the Company's accounting for share-based compensation.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

        The Company presents both basic and diluted net income (loss) per share. Basic net income (loss) per share is based solely upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted net income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares and common-share equivalents outstanding during the year excluding those common-share equivalents where the impact to basic net income (loss) per share would be anti-dilutive.

2. EARNINGS PER SHARE

        The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 as follows:

62

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        In December 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to divest the Company's wholly owned subsidiary Badger Transport, Inc. ("Badger"), which formerly comprised its Logistics segment. The adverse effects of rail providers entering the heavy haul market for wind energy components as well as the effects of the global economic downturn resulted in continued operating losses at Badger. Badger's intercompany revenues and expenses were not significant in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 or 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $10,020 (pre-tax) to reduce the carrying value of the net assets held for sale to estimated fair value, and there were no material adjustments to that charge in 2011. The impairment charge is included in "Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes" in the table below.

        In March 2011, the Company completed the sale of Badger to BTI Logistics, LLC ("BTI Logistics"). Proceeds from the sale included approximately $800 in cash, a $1,500 secured promissory note payable in quarterly installments of $125 beginning September 30, 2011, and 100,000 shares of Broadwind common stock held by the buyer. The purchase price is subject to final working capital adjustments and certain contingencies and indemnifications. In addition, BTI Logistics assumed approximately $2,600 of debt and capital leases, plus approximately $1,600 of operating lease obligations.

        As of December 31, 2010, the assets and liabilities of Badger were reflected as held for sale. At December 31, 2010 these balances consisted of $1,847 of current assets, $6,847 of total assets, $1,775 of current liabilities, and $4,221 of total liabilities. These balances were eliminated as of the end of the first quarter of 2011 in conjunction with the Badger sale. Results of operations for Badger, which are reflected as discontinued operations in the Company's consolidated statements of income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, were as follows:

4. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

        In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses ("ASU 2010-20"). ASU 2010-20 requires increased disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and allowances for credit losses, including disclosures about credit quality indicators, past due information and modifications of financing receivables. The Company has adopted this standard as of January 1, 2011 and it had no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

63

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

5. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

        The activity in the accounts receivable allowance from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 consists of the following:

6. INVENTORIES

        The components of inventories from continuing operations as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

64

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

        The cost basis and estimated lives of property and equipment from continuing operations as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

        In the first quarter of 2010, the Company completed construction of a third wind tower manufacturing facility in Brandon, South Dakota (the "Brandon Facility"), but the Company has never commenced production at this facility. Following the Company's strategic planning meetings that took place in fourth quarter of 2010, the Company concluded it would be difficult or impossible to operate this facility in a profitable or cost-effective manner at expected production levels. In connection with this determination, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $13,326 to reduce the carrying value of the assets to fair value. The impairment charge was included in impairment charges in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company estimated the fair value of these assets primarily based on independent appraisals.

        In conjunction with the Company's third quarter 2011 decision to sell the Brandon Facility referenced in Note 20, "Restructuring" of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has reclassified the land, building and fixtures valued at $8,000 from Property and Equipment to Assets Held for Sale. The Company reviewed the value of the Brandon Facility assets through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and determined that no further impairment charges were required. The Company expects to sell the Brandon Facility within the next twelve months.

65

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the cost basis, accumulated amortization and net book value of intangible assets were as follows:

        The Company reviews intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company identified triggering events associated with the Company's current period operating loss combined with its history of continued operating losses. As a result, the Company evaluated the recoverability of certain of its identifiable intangible assets. Based upon the Company's assessment, no impairment to these assets was identified as of December 31, 2011. In the future, asset recoverability will be measured by comparing the assets' carrying amounts to their expected future undiscounted net cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value.

        During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company identified triggering events associated with the Company's current period operating loss, its history of continued operating losses and its revised projections of operating results and cash flows developed as part of the strategic planning process. As a result, the Company tested its intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment. The decline in the Company's estimates of future operating results and corresponding cash flows indicated that the fair value of these assets was less than the carrying value. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $22,890 related to the Services segment. The impairment was allocated as follows: customer relationships $17,796: trade name $1,540; and property and equipment $3,554.

        Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from 10 to 20 years. Amortization expense was $859, $2,992 and $9,524 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, estimated future amortization expense is as follows:

66

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

9. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

        Accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:

10. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS

        The Company's outstanding debt balances as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:

67

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

10. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS (Continued)

        As of December 31, 2011, future annual principal payments on the Company's outstanding debt obligations were as follows:

Credit Facilities

Investors Community Bank Loans

        On April 7, 2008, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary R.B.A. Inc. ("RBA") executed four promissory notes with Investors Community Bank ("ICB") in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $3,781. Three of these notes were term notes, with initial principal balances totaling $2,049, bearing interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.65% to 6.85% per annum, with maturities ranging from October 2012 to April 2013 (collectively, the "ICB Notes"). The fourth note was a line of credit note, which has been repaid in full.

        Pursuant to the merger of RBA into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Broadwind Towers, Inc. (f/k/a Tower Tech Systems, Inc.) ("Broadwind Towers") on December 31, 2009, the loans evidenced by the ICB Notes (collectively, the "ICB Loans") were modified pursuant to a Master Amendment among ICB, Broadwind Towers and the Company (as guarantor) (the "Master Amendment"). Under the terms of the Master Amendment, Broadwind Towers agreed to a number of security and financial covenants. As the outstanding balances under the ICB Loans have declined, certain of these requirements have been removed through subsequent amendments of the Master Amendment. The remaining security requirements are that Broadwind Towers maintain a depository relationship of not less than $700 with ICB and maintain a debt service ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 at all times. The ICB Loans are also secured by a mortgage on a facility owned by Broadwind Towers in Clintonville, Wisconsin, and a guarantee by the Company. As of December 31, 2011, (i) the total amount of outstanding indebtedness under the ICB Notes was $1,101, (ii) the effective per annum interest rate under the ICB Notes was 5.75%, and (iii) Broadwind Towers was in compliance with all covenants under the documents evidencing and securing the ICB Loans.

Great Western Bank Loan

        On April 28, 2009, Broadwind Towers entered into a Construction Loan Agreement with Great Western Bank ("GWB"), pursuant to which GWB agreed to provide up to $10,000 in financing (the "Construction Loan") to fund construction of the Brandon Facility. Pursuant to a Change in Terms Agreement dated April 5, 2010 between GWB and Broadwind Towers, the Construction Loan was

68

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

10. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS (Continued)

converted to a term loan (the "GWB Term Loan") providing for monthly payments of principal plus interest, extending the maturity date to November 5, 2016, reducing the principal amount to $6,500, and changing the per annum interest rate to 8.5%.

        The GWB Term Loan is secured by a first mortgage on the Brandon Facility and all fixtures and proceeds relating thereto, pursuant to a Mortgage and a Commercial Security Agreement, each between Broadwind Towers and GWB, and by a Commercial Guaranty from the Company. In addition, the Company has agreed to subordinate all intercompany debt with Broadwind Towers to the GWB Term Loan. The GWB Term Loan contains representations, warranties and covenants that are customary for a term financing arrangement and contains no financial covenants. As of December 31, 2011, the total outstanding indebtedness under the GWB Term Loan was $4,833, which is recorded as Liabilities Held for Sale within the consolidated balance sheet.

Wells Fargo Account Purchase Agreements

        On September 29, 2010, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries Broadwind Towers, Brad Foote Gear Works, Inc. ("Brad Foote"), Broadwind Services, LLC f/k/a Energy Maintenance Service, LLC ("Broadwind Services), (collectively, the "Subsidiaries"), and Badger entered into account purchase agreements (the "AP Agreements") with Wells Fargo Business Credit, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"). Under the AP Agreements, when requested by the Company, Wells Fargo will advance funds against certain receivables arising from sales of the Subsidiaries' products and services. In connection with the entry into the AP Agreements, the Company and each Subsidiary executed guaranties (including cross-guaranties) in favor of Wells Fargo. With respect to the Subsidiaries, the AP Agreements contain provisions providing for cross-defaults and cross-collateralization. In addition, each Subsidiary has granted to Wells Fargo a security interest against all financed receivables and related collateral. Prior to entering into the AP Agreements, there was no material relationship between the Company, the Subsidiaries and Wells Fargo.

        Under the terms of the AP Agreements, when requested by the Company, Wells Fargo will advance approximately 80% of the face value of eligible receivables to the Subsidiaries. Wells Fargo will have full recourse to the Subsidiaries for collection of the financed receivables. The aggregate facility limit of the AP Agreements is $10,000. For Wells Fargo's services under the AP Agreements, the Subsidiaries have agreed to pay Wells Fargo (i) a floating discount fee of the then-prevailing LIBOR plus 3.75% per annum on the sum of the outstanding financed accounts, (ii) an annual facility fee of 1% of the aggregate facility limit, and (iii) an annual unused line fee of 0.042% on the portion of the credit facility which is unused. The initial term of the AP Agreements ends on September 29, 2013. If the AP Agreements are terminated prior to this date, an early termination fee of up to 2% of the aggregate facility limit may apply.

        In connection with the sale of Badger to a third party purchaser on March 4, 2011, the AP Agreement between Badger and Wells Fargo and the guaranty provided by Badger to Wells Fargo with respect to the other AP Agreements were each terminated, pursuant to an Omnibus Amendment to Account Purchase Agreements and Guaranties dated as of March 4, 2011, by and among the Company, the Subsidiaries and Wells Fargo.

69

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

10. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS (Continued)

        On October 19, 2011 the AP Agreements were amended to modify the month-end minimum total cash balance requirement from $5,000 to the greater of $2,000 or the outstanding purchased amount, not to exceed $5,000.

        During 2011, the Company financed approximately $981 of accounts receivable with Wells Fargo. At December 31, 2011, $523 of financed receivables remained outstanding, and the Subsidiaries had the ability to draw up to $9,477, subject to maintaining a month-end minimum total cash balance of $2,000.

Selling Shareholder Notes

        On May 26, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") with the former owners of Brad Foote, including J. Cameron Drecoll, who served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and a member of its Board of Directors until December 1, 2010. The Settlement Agreement related to the post-closing escrow established in connection with the Company's acquisition of Brad Foote. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, among other terms, the Company issued three promissory notes to the former owners in the aggregate principal amount of $3,000 (the "Selling Shareholder Notes"). The Selling Shareholder Notes issued to the former owners other than Mr. Drecoll mature on May 28, 2012 and bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with interest payments due quarterly. The Selling Shareholder Note issued to Mr. Drecoll in the principal amount of $2,320 pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement (the "Drecoll Note") also was originally scheduled to mature on May 28, 2012 and bore interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with interest payments due quarterly; however, effective as of July 1, 2011, the Drecoll Note was amended and restated to effect the following modifications: (i) the maturity date was changed to January 10, 2014; (ii) the interest rate was changed to 9% per annum; and (iii) the payment schedule was changed to quarterly payments of principal and interest, such that the Drecoll Note is now self-amortizing with payments that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company agreed to pay Mr. Drecoll a restructuring fee in the amount of $10 in connection with the restructuring of the Drecoll Note. As of December 31, 2011, principal of $2,791 and accrued interest of $59 were outstanding under the Selling Shareholder Notes.

Other

        Included in Long Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities is $2,280 associated with the New Markets Tax Credit Agreement described further in described in Note 19, "New Markets Tax Credit" of these consolidated financial statements.

11. LEASES

        The Company leases various property and equipment under operating lease arrangements. Lease terms generally range from 3 to 15 years with renewal options for extended terms. The Company is required to make additional payments under certain property leases for taxes, insurance and other operating expenses incurred during the operating lease period. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $4,779, $4,289 and $4,510, respectively.

70

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

11. LEASES (Continued)

        In addition, the Company has entered into capital lease arrangements to finance property and equipment and assumed capital lease obligations in connection with certain acquisitions. The cost basis and accumulated depreciation of assets recorded under capital leases, which are included in property and equipment, are as follows as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

        Depreciation expense recorded in connection with assets recorded under capital leases was $620, $624 and $626 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        As of December 31, 2011, future minimum lease payments under capital leases and operating leases are as follows:

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Purchase Commitments

        The Company issued purchase commitments in connection with equipment purchases for its wind tower manufacturing facility located in Brandon, South Dakota. As of December 31, 2011, outstanding purchase commitments totaled approximately $390. The Company expects that these commitments will be fully satisfied in 2012.

71

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Legal Proceedings

        From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings or claims arising from its normal course of operations. The Company accrues for costs related to loss contingencies when such costs are probable and reasonably estimable. As of December 31, 2011, the Company is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings or threatened litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of pending actions. Refer to Note 22 "Legal Proceedings" of these consolidated financial statements for further discussion of legal proceedings.

Environmental Compliance and Remediation Liabilities

        The Company's operations and products are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates and sells products governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the use, handling and disposal of hazardous materials, soil and groundwater contamination, employee health and safety, and product content, performance and packaging. Also, certain environmental laws can impose the entire cost or a portion of the cost of investigating and cleaning up a contaminated site, regardless of fault, upon any one or more of a number of parties, including the current or previous owners or operators of the site. These environmental laws also impose liability on any person who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at a contaminated site. Third parties may also make claims against owners or operators of sites and users of disposal sites for personal injuries and property damage associated with releases of hazardous substances from those sites. Refer to Note 22 "Legal Proceedings" of these consolidated financial statements for further discussion of environmental compliance and remediation liabilities.

Collateral

        In select instances, the Company has pledged specific inventory and machinery and equipment assets to serve as collateral on related payable or financing obligations.

Warranty Liability

        The Company provides warranty terms that generally range from one to seven years for various products and services relating to workmanship and materials supplied by the Company. In certain contracts, the Company has recourse provisions for items that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid to customers under warranty provisions.

Liquidated Damages

        In certain customer contracts, the Company has agreed to pay liquidated damages in the event of qualifying delivery or production delays. These damages are typically limited to a specific percentage of the value of the product in question.

72

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Sale-Leaseback Transactions

        During 2009, the Company entered into sale-leaseback agreements whereby certain owned equipment was sold to a third party financing company in exchange for cash and the Company subsequently entered into an equipment lease agreement with the purchaser. The primary purpose of these arrangements was to provide additional liquidity to meet working capital requirements. Based on the terms of the lease agreements, the leases were classified as operating leases. In addition, the sale of the assets resulted in a gain which is being amortized to other income in the Company's statement of operations over the life of the operating leases. As of December 31, 2011, the minimum monthly payments due under these lease agreements totaled $85.

Other

        Collective bargaining agreements have been ratified by collective bargaining units in place at the Company's Cicero and Neville Island facilities and expire in February 2014 and October 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's collective bargaining units represented approximately 23% of its workforce.

        On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into a strategic financing agreement including the following third parties: AMCREF, a registered community development entity and Capital One, National Association ("Capital One"). This agreement allows the Company to receive below market interest rate funds through the New Markets Tax Credit program, see Note 19, "New Markets Tax Credit Transaction" of these consolidated financial statements. Under the New Markets Tax Credit program, the gross loan and investment in the Company's Abilene, Texas gearbox facility of $10,000 generates $3,900 in tax credits over a period of seven years, which the financing agreement makes available to Capital One. The gearbox facility must operate and be in compliance with the terms and conditions of the agreement during the seven year compliance period, or the Company may be liable for the recapture of $3,900 in tax credits to which Capital One is otherwise entitled. The Company does not anticipate any credit recaptures will be required in connection with this arrangement.

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the Company is required to provide disclosure and categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined as follows:

        Level 1—Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

73

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        Level 2—Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

        Level 3—Valuations are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Inputs reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

Fair value of financial instruments

        The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and customer deposits approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. Based upon interest rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms, the carrying value of the Company's long-term debt is approximately equal to its fair value.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

        The fair value measurement approach for long-lived assets utilizes a number of significant unobservable inputs or Level 3 assumptions. These assumptions include, among others, projections of the Company's future operating results, the implied fair value of these assets using an income approach by preparing a discounted cash flow analysis and a market-based approach based on the Company's market capitalization, and other subjective assumptions. During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company identified triggering events associated with the Company's current period operating loss combined with its history of continued operating losses. As a result, the Company evaluated the recoverability of certain of its identifiable intangible assets and certain property and equipment assets. Based upon the Company's assessment, no impairment to these assets was identified as of December 31, 2011.

        Upon completion of its 2009 impairment analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of its goodwill and intangible assets exceeded their fair value. Accordingly, the Company recorded goodwill and intangible impairment charges of $24,269 and $57,942, respectively, to properly reflect the carrying value of these assets.

        Upon completion of its 2010 impairment analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of its goodwill and intangible assets exceeded their fair value. Accordingly, the Company recorded goodwill and intangible impairment charges of $4,561 and $19,336, respectively, to properly reflect the carrying value of these assets. In addition, the Company recorded an impairment charge to fixed assets of $13,326 related to its Brandon, South Dakota tower manufacturing facility, and $3,554 related to property and equipment at its Services segment. The following table presents the fair value

74

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

measurements of the Company's nonrecurring assets for continuing operations as of December 31, 2010:

75

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

14. INCOME TAXES

        The Company accounts for income taxes based upon an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities versus the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Under this method, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The impact of tax rate changes on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the year that the change is enacted.

        The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 consists of the following:

        The increase in the deferred tax valuation allowance was $10,371, $29,721 and $42,845 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The change in the deferred tax valuation allowance in 2011 was the result of an increase to the deferred tax assets pertaining to additional federal and state net operating losses. The change in the deferred tax valuation allowance in 2010 was the result of a significant increase to deferred tax assets in connection with the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, and additional federal and state net operating losses.

76

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

14. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The tax effects of the temporary differences and net operating losses that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

        Valuation allowances of $91,691 and $83,217 have been provided for deferred income tax assets for which realization is uncertain as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of the valuation was as follows:

        As of December 31, 2011, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $136,189 expiring in various years through 2031. The majority of the net operating loss carry forwards will expire in 2028, 2029, 2030 and 2031.

        As of December 31, 2011, the Company had unapportioned state net operating losses in the aggregate of approximately $136,189 expiring in various years from 2021 through 2031 based upon various net operating loss periods as designated by the different taxing jurisdictions.

77

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

14. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The reconciliation of the tax (benefit) provision computed at the statutory rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:

        The Company accounts for the uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold for a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return that is required to be met before being recognized in the financial statements. The changes in the Company's uncertain income tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:

        The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011 that would affect the effective tax rate if the tax benefits were recognized was $417.

78

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

14. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        It is the Company's policy to include interest and penalties in tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized and accrued approximately $35 and $32, respectively, of interest and penalties.

        The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2011, open tax years in the federal and some state jurisdictions date back to 1996 due to the taxing authorities' ability to adjust operating loss carryforwards. During 2011, the Company closed an audit initiated by the Internal Revenue Service of its federal tax returns for the tax years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. Although these periods have been audited, they continue to remain open until all net operating losses generated in those tax years have been utilized or expire.

        The Company does not anticipate there will be a material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. However, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "IRC"), generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards and associated built-in losses that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone certain changes in stock ownership. The Company's ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses may be limited, under this section or otherwise, by the Company's issuance of common stock or by other changes in stock ownership. Upon completion of the Company's analysis of IRC Section 382, the Company has determined that aggregate changes in stock ownership have triggered an annual limitation of net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses available for utilization. Although this event limits the amount of pre-ownership change date net operating loss and built-in losses the Company can utilize annually, it would not preclude the Company from fully utilizing its current carryforwards prior to their expiration. To the extent the Company's use of net operating loss carryforwards and associated built-in losses is significantly limited in the future due to additional changes in stock ownership, the Company's income could be subject to U.S. corporate income tax earlier than it would if the Company were able to use net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses without such annual limitation, which could result in lower profits and the loss of benefits from these attributes.

15. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

        On September 21, 2011, the Company completed a public offering of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an offering price of $0.40 per share. In the offering, the Company sold 32,500,000 newly issued shares of its common stock for approximately $12,155 in proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts, but before deducting other offering related costs. In connection with the offering, the Company incurred $458 in costs associated with professional and other offering related expenses, which have been netted against the proceeds received in additional paid-in capital in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.

16. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Overview of Share-Based Compensation Plan

        The Company grants incentive stock options and other equity awards pursuant to the Amended and Restated Broadwind Energy, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the "EIP"), which was approved by

79

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

16. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

the Company's Board of Directors in October 2007 and by the Company's stockholders in June 2008. The EIP has been amended periodically since its original approval. Specifically, the EIP was amended by the Company's stockholders in June 2009 to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the EIP, and the EIP was further amended and restated in March 2011 by the Company's Board of Directors to limit share recycling under the EIP, to include a minimum vesting period for time-vesting restricted stock awards and restricted stock units and to add a clawback provision. As amended, the EIP reserves 5,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock for grants to officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors upon whose efforts the success of the Company and its affiliates will depend to a large degree. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had reserved 1,275,115 shares for the exercise of stock options outstanding, 3,646,299 shares for restricted stock unit awards outstanding and 62,119 additional shares for future stock awards under the EIP. As of December 31, 2011, 516,467 shares of common stock reserved for stock options and restricted stock unit awards under the EIP have been issued in the form of common stock.

        Stock Options.    The exercise price of stock options granted under the EIP is equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Stock options generally become exercisable on the anniversary of the grant date, with vesting terms that may range from one to five years from the date of grant. Additionally, stock options expire ten years after the date of grant. If a plan participant's employment is terminated during the vesting period, he or she forfeits the right to unvested stock option awards. The fair value of stock options granted is expensed ratably over their vesting term.

        Restricted Stock.    The granting of restricted stock units is provided for under the EIP. Restricted stock units generally vest on the anniversary of the grant date, with vesting terms that range from immediate vesting to five years from the date of grant. The fair value of each unit granted is equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant and is expensed ratably over the vesting term of the restricted stock award. If a plan participant's employment is terminated during the vesting period, he or she forfeits the right to any unvested portion of the restricted stock units.

80

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

16. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        Stock option activity during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 under the EIP was as follows:

        The following table summarizes information with respect to all outstanding and exercisable stock options under the EIP as of December 31, 2011:

81

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

16. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        The following table summarizes information with respect to outstanding restricted stock units as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:

        The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company's determination of the fair value of each stock option is affected by its stock price on the date of grant, as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Company's expected stock price volatility over the expected life of the awards and actual and projected stock option exercise behavior. The weighted average fair value per share of stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, and assumptions used to value stock options, are as follows:

        Dividend yield is zero as the Company currently does not pay a dividend.

        Risk-free rate is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the award.

82

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

16. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company utilized a standard volatility assumption of 96.1% and 91.5%, respectively, for estimating the fair value of stock options awarded based on comparable volatility averages for the energy related sector.

        The expected life of each stock option award granted is derived using the "simplified method" for estimating the expected term of a "vanilla-option" in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107, "Share-Based Payment," as amended by SAB No. 110, "Share-Based Payment." The fair value of each unit of restricted stock is equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the date of grant.

        During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company utilized a forfeiture rate of 25% for estimating the forfeitures of stock options granted.

        The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 as follows:

        As of December 31, 2011, the Company estimates that pre-tax compensation expense for all unvested share-based awards, including both stock options and restricted stock units, in the amount of approximately $3,539 will be recognized through the year 2015. The Company expects to satisfy the exercise of stock options and future distribution of shares of restricted stock by issuing new shares of common stock.

83

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

17. SEGMENT REPORTING

        The Company is organized into reporting segments based on the nature of the products and services offered and business activities from which it earns revenues and incurs expenses for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker. The Company's segments and their product and service offerings are summarized below:

Towers and Weldments

        The Company manufactures towers for wind turbines, specifically the large and heavier wind towers that are designed for 2 MW and larger wind turbines. Production facilities, located in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Abilene, Texas, are situated in close proximity to the primary U.S. domestic energy and equipment manufacturing hubs. The two facilities have a combined annual tower production capacity of approximately 500 towers, sufficient to support turbines generating more than 1200 MW of power. This product segment also encompasses the manufacture of specialty fabrications and specialty weldments for mining and other industrial customers.

Gearing

        The Company engineers, builds and remanufactures precision gears and gearing systems for wind, oil and gas, mining and other industrial applications. The Company uses an integrated manufacturing process, which includes machining and finishing processes in Cicero, Illinois, and heat treatment in Neville Island, Pennsylvania.

Services

        The Company offers a comprehensive range of services, primarily to wind farm developers and operators. The Company specializes in non-routine maintenance services for both kilowatt and megawatt turbines. The Company also offers comprehensive field services to the wind industry. The Company is increasingly focusing its efforts on the identification and/or development of product and service offerings which will improve the reliability and efficiency of wind turbines, and therefore enhance the economic benefits to its customers. The Company provides wind services across the U.S., with primary service locations in South Dakota and Texas. In February 2011, the Company put into operation its dedicated drivetrain service center in Abilene, Texas, which is focused on servicing the growing installed base of MW wind turbines as they come off warranty and to a limited extent, industrial gearboxes requiring precision repair and testing.

Corporate and Other

        "Corporate and Other" is comprised of adjustments to reconcile segment results to consolidated results, which primarily includes corporate administrative expenses and intercompany eliminations.

84

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

17. SEGMENT REPORTING (Continued)

        The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those referenced in Note 1, "Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of these consolidated financial statements. Summary financial information by reportable segment is as follows:

 

 

85

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

17. SEGMENT REPORTING (Continued)

        The Company generates revenues entirely from transactions completed in the U.S. and its long-lived assets are all located in the U.S. All intercompany revenue is eliminated in consolidation. During 2011, two customers each accounted for more than 10% of total net revenues. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, five customers accounted for 76%, 78% and 73%, respectively, of total net revenues.

18. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plans

        Prior to January 1, 2009, the Company and each of its business units had defined contribution or profit sharing 401(k) retirement savings plans with varying levels of contributions. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company replaced all of its 401(k) retirement savings plans with one defined contribution 401(k) safe harbor plan covering substantially all of the Company's non-union employees. Under this plan, an eligible employee may elect to contribute a portion of salary on a pre-tax basis, subject to federal statutory limitations. The plan requires the Company to make basic matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 3% of the eligible participant's plan compensation contributed as elective deferral contributions and 50% of the next 2% of the eligible participant's plan compensation contributed as an elective deferral contribution. Under the plan, elective deferrals and basic company matching will be 100% vested at all times. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009 and through the first quarter of 2011, the Company funded these contributions in shares of the Company's common stock in lieu of a cash contribution. Starting in the second quarter of 2011 and through December 31, 2011, the Company resumed funding 401(k) matching contributions in cash.

        Consistent with the collective bargaining agreements in place at its two union locations, for the Company's union employees in Illinois, the Company continued its discretionary match in an amount up to 50% of each participant's first 4% of elective compensation contributed, and for the Company's union employees in Pennsylvania, the Company continued its discretionary match in an amount up to 100% of each participant's first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of elective compensation contributed.

        For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded expense under these plans of approximately $636, $636 and $721, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plan

        The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan for certain key employees and nonemployee directors, whereby certain wages earned, compensation for services rendered, and discretionary company-matching contributions may be deferred and deemed to be invested in the Company's common stock. Changes in the fair value of the plan liability are recorded as charges or credits to compensation expense. Compensation expense associated with the deferred compensation plan recorded during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, was ($45), ($154) and $64, respectively. The fair value of the plan liability to the Company is included in accrued liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of plan liability to the Company was $39 and $61, respectively.

86

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

18. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

        In addition to the employee benefit plans described above, the Company participates in certain customary employee benefits plans, including those which provide health and life insurance benefits to employees.

19. NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT TRANSACTION

        On July 20, 2011, the Company received $2,280 in proceeds via a transaction involving tax credits linked to the Company's capital investment in its Abilene, Texas gearbox refurbishment facility (the "Gearbox Facility"). The transaction qualifies under the federal New Markets Tax Credit ("NMTC") program and included a gross loan from AMCREF Fund VII, LLC to Broadwind Services in the principal amount of $10,000, with a term of fifteen years and interest payable at the rate of 1.4% per annum, largely offset by a gross loan in the principal amount of $7,720 from the Company to COCRF Investor VIII, LLC, with a term of fifteen years and interest payable at the rate of 2.5% per annum.

        The NMTC regulations permit taxpayers to claim credits against their federal income taxes for up to 39% of qualified investments in the equity of community development entities. The program could generate $3,900 in tax credits which the Company has made available under the structure by passing them through to Capital One, National Association ("Capital One"). Most of the proceeds have been applied to the Company's recent investment in the Gearbox Facility assets and operating costs, as permitted under this program; the December 31, 2011 consolidated balance sheet has $646 in cash classified as restricted cash related to this arrangement which has yet to be used under this program.

        The Gearbox Facility must operate and be in compliance with various regulations and restrictions for the next seven years to comply with terms of the agreement, or the Company may be liable under its indemnification agreement with Capital One for the recapture of tax credits. The NMTC is subject to 100% recapture for a period of seven years as provided in the IRC. The Company does not anticipate any tax credit recapture events or that it will be required to make a payment to Capital One under the indemnification agreement.

        The Capital One contribution has been included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011. This transaction includes a put/call provision whereby the Company may be obligated or entitled to repurchase Capital One's interest. Capital One may exercise an option to put its investment and receive $130 from the Company. If Capital One does not exercise its put option, the Company can exercise a call option at the then fair market value of the call. The Company believes that Capital One will exercise the put option in 2018 at the end of the recapture period. The Capital One contribution other than the amount allocated to the put obligation will be recognized as income only after the put/call is exercised and when Capital One has no ongoing interest. However, there is no legal obligation for Capital One to exercise the put, and the Company has attributed only an insignificant value to the put option included in this structure.

        The Company has determined that two pass-through financing entities created under this structure are VIE's. The ongoing activities of the VIE's—collecting and remitting interest and fees and complying with NMTC requirements—were considered in the initial design of the transaction and are not expected to significantly affect economic performance throughout the life of the VIE's. Management also considered the contractual arrangements that obligate the Company to deliver tax

87

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

19. NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT TRANSACTION (Continued)

benefits and provide various other guarantees under the transaction structure, Capital One's lack of a material interest in the underlying economics of the project, and the fact that the Company is obligated to absorb losses of the VIE's. The Company has concluded that it is required to consolidate the VIEs because the Company has both (i) the power to direct those matters that most significantly impacted the activities of the VIE and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE.

        The $262 of issue costs paid to third parties are recorded as an offset to the related loan, and are being amortized over the expected seven year term of the NMTC arrangement. Capital One's net contribution of $2,280 is included in Long Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities in the consolidated balance sheet. Incremental costs to maintain the structure during the compliance period will be recognized as they are incurred.

20. RESTRUCTURING

        During the third quarter of 2011, the Company conducted a review of its business strategies and product plans based on the outlook for the economy at large, the forecast for the industries it serves, and its business environment. The Company concluded that its manufacturing footprint and fixed cost base are too large and expensive for its medium-term needs and has begun restructuring its facility capacity and its management structure to consolidate and increase the efficiencies of its operations.

        The Company plans to reduce its facility footprint by approximately 30% through the sale and/or closure during the next fifteen months of facilities comprising a total of approximately 440,000 square feet. The Company believes the remaining locations will be sufficient to support its Towers and Weldments, Gearing, Services and general corporate and administrative activities, while allowing for growth for the next several years.

        As part of this plan, in the third quarter of 2011, the Company determined that its tower manufacturing facility in Brandon, South Dakota should be sold, and as a result the Company has reclassified the land, building and fixtures valued at $8,000 from Property and Equipment to Assets Held for Sale. In addition, the related indebtedness associated with this facility of $4,833 has been reclassified from Long-Term Debt Net of Current Maturities and Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt to Liabilities Held for Sale. The Company expects that this sale will be completed in the next twelve months. The Company had previously recorded an impairment charge of $13,326 in the fourth quarter of 2010 to bring these assets to fair value; no further impairment charges were recorded in 2011.

        Additional future restructuring plans were formally approved in the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company expects to incur a total of $13,600 of expenses to implement its restructuring plan. Of the total projected expenses, the Company anticipates $4,000 will consist of non-cash expenditures. The Company expects the remaining cash expenditures will be funded substantially by net proceeds from

88

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

20. RESTRUCTURING (Continued)

asset sales of $7,600. The table below details the Company's total expected restructuring charges as of December 31, 2011:

21. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY (UNAUDITED)

        The following table provides a summary of selected financial results of operations by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 as follows:

 

89

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

22. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Shareholder Lawsuits

        On February 11, 2011, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against the Company and certain of its current or former officers and directors. The lawsuit is purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock between March 17, 2009 and August 9, 2010. A lead plaintiff has been appointed and an amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2011. The amended complaint names as additional defendants certain of the Company's current and former directors, certain Tontine entities, and Jeffrey Gendell, a principal of Tontine. The complaint seeks to allege that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and/or Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by issuing or causing to be issued a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements concerning the Company's financial results, operations, and prospects, including with respect to the January 2010 secondary public offering of the Company's common stock. The plaintiffs allege that the Company's statements were false and misleading because, among other things, the Company's reported financial results during the class period allegedly violated generally accepted accounting principles because they failed to reflect the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, and the Company allegedly failed to disclose known trends and other information regarding certain customer relationships at Brad Foote. In support of their claims, the plaintiffs rely in part upon six alleged confidential informants, all of whom are alleged to be former employees of the Company. The Company's motion to dismiss was filed on November 18, 2011, and is now fully briefed and awaiting a ruling. Between February 15, 2011 and March 30, 2011, three putative shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division against certain of the Company's current and former officers and directors, and certain Tontine entities, seeking to challenge alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment, including in connection with the January 2010 secondary public offering of the Company's common stock. One of the lawsuits also alleges that certain directors violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Two of the matters pending in the federal court have been consolidated and the Company filed a motion to dismiss these matters on September 19, 2011, which is now fully briefed and awaiting a ruling. The Company has received a request from the Tontine defendants for indemnification in the derivative suits and the class action lawsuit and may receive additional requests for indemnification from Tontine and/or Mr. Gendell pursuant to various agreements related to shares owned by Tontine. The Company maintains directors and officers liability insurance, however, the costs of indemnification for Mr. Gendell and/or Tontine would not be covered by any Company insurance policy. Because of the preliminary nature of these lawsuits, the Company is not able to estimate a loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter at this time.

SEC Inquiry

        In August 2011, the Company received a subpoena from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") seeking documents and other records related to certain accounting practices at Brad Foote. The subpoena was issued in connection with an informal inquiry that the

90

---

Table of Contents

BROADWIND ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

22. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

Company received from the SEC in November 2010 arising out of a whistleblower complaint received by the SEC related to revenue recognition, cost accounting and intangible and fixed asset valuations at Brad Foote. The Company has been voluntarily providing information to the SEC as a part of that inquiry and is in the process of responding to the subpoena with respect to the outstanding requests. The Company cannot currently predict the outcome of this investigation. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. No estimate regarding the loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter is possible at this time.

Environmental

        The Company is aware of an investigation commenced by the United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Illinois, for potential violation of federal environmental laws. On February 15, 2011, pursuant to a search warrant, officials from the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") entered and conducted a search of one of Brad Foote's facilities in Cicero, Illinois, in connection with the alleged improper disposal of industrial wastewater to the sewer. Also on or about February 11, 2011, in connection with the same matter, the Company received a grand jury subpoena requesting testimony and the production of certain documents relating to the facility's past compliance with certain environmental laws and regulations relating to the generation, discharge and disposal of wastewater from certain of its processes between 2004 and the present. On or about February 23, 2011, the Company received another grand jury subpoena relating to the same investigation, requesting testimony and the production of certain other documents relating to certain of the facility's employees, environmental and manufacturing processes, and disposal practices. The Company has produced e-mails, reports and correspondence as requested in response to these subpoenas. The Company has also voluntarily instituted corrective measures at the facility, including changes to its wastewater disposal practices. There can be no assurances that the conclusion of the investigation will not result in a determination that the Company has violated applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Any violations found, or any criminal or civil fines, penalties and/or other sanctions imposed could be substantial and materially and adversely affect the Company. The Company had recorded a liability of $675 at December 31, 2010, which represented the low end of its estimate of remediation-related costs and expenses; as of December 31, 2011, those initial costs have been incurred, and additional costs have been expensed as incurred. No additional remediation related expenses are anticipated or have been accrued; however, the outcome of the investigation, the liability in connection therewith, and the impact to the Company's operations cannot be predicted at this time. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. No estimate regarding the loss or range of loss, if any, that may be incurred in connection with this matter is possible at this time.

91

---

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

92

---

Table of Contents

93

---

Table of Contents

94

---

Table of Contents

95

---

Table of Contents

96

---

Table of Contents

97

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 13^th day of March, 2012.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

98

---