Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - TRX INC/GAFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex321.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex311.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex312.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex231.htm
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex211.htm
EX-10.38 - EX-10.38 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex1038.htm
EX-10.75 - EX-10.75 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex1075.htm
EX-10.46 - EX-10.46 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex1046.htm
EX-10.42 - EX-10.42 - TRX INC/GAd284372dex1042.htm
Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                .

Commission File No. 000-51478

 

 

TRX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

 

 

Georgia   58-2502748
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
2970 Clairmont Road, Suite 300, Atlanta, Georgia   30329
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Issuer’s telephone number, including area code: (404) 929-6100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $.01 par value per share   Pink OTC Markets Inc.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filer pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of June 30, 2011, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates based on the closing price of $0.65 per share was approximately $3.4 million.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 27, 2012 was 18,515,581 shares.

 

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Specifically identified portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC.

2011 FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

Number

        Page
Number
 
   PART I   

ITEM 1.

   BUSINESS      1   

ITEM 1A.

   RISK FACTORS      9   

ITEM 1B.

   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS      18   

ITEM 2.

   PROPERTIES      18   

ITEM 3.

   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS      18   

ITEM 4.

   MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES      18   
   PART II   

ITEM 5.

  

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

     19   

ITEM 6.

   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA      19   

ITEM 7.

  

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     20   

ITEM 8.

   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA      28   

ITEM 9.

  

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     49   

ITEM 9A.

   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES      49   

ITEM 9B.

   OTHER INFORMATION      50   
   PART III   

ITEM 10.

   DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE      51   

ITEM 11.

   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION      51   

ITEM 12.

  

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

     51   

ITEM 13.

  

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

     51   

ITEM 14.

   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES      51   
   PART IV   

ITEM 15.

   EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES      52   

SIGNATURES

     53   


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute “forward-looking” statements as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”), or in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), all as may be amended from time to time. Statements contained in this annual report that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the PSLRA. You can identify forward-looking statements as those that are not historical in nature, particularly those that use terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “contemplate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of these, or similar terms.

Any such forward-looking statements reflect our beliefs and assumptions and are based on information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of such laws. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements we make are not guarantees or indicative of future performance.

In evaluating these forward-looking statements, you should consider the following factors, as well as others set forth in Item 1A under the caption “Risk Factors” and as are detailed from time to time in other reports we file with the SEC, any or all of which may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement:

 

   

the loss of current key clients or the inability to obtain new clients;

 

   

volatility in the number of transactions we service;

 

   

failure or interruptions of our software, hardware or other systems;

 

   

industry declines and other competitive pressures; and

 

   

our ability to control costs and implement measures designed to enhance operating efficiencies.

Any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth or referred to above, as well as the risk factors contained in Item 1A of this report. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to update such statements or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.

Company Overview

TRX is a travel technology and data services provider, offering more than 20 software-as-a-service utilities for reservation processing, data intelligence, expense reporting, and process automation. We provide patented savings maximization solutions, extending spend management services to travel buyers all over the world. We complement our offerings with a global workforce focused on travel process automation and reengineering expertise. For the foreseeable future, we intend to focus our efforts primarily on the large opportunities within the travel industry. We deliver our technology applications as a service over the Internet to travel agencies, corporations, travel suppliers, government agencies, credit card associations, credit card issuing banks, and third-party administrators. TRX is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with operations and associates in North America, Europe, and Asia.

 

1


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Our data services technologies allow our clients to use information from multiple and disparate sources to gain new visibility, and to make better decisions, faster. We collect data for our clients in any format from anywhere in the world, and then normalize, validate, and translate this data into both our industry-leading as well as client-requested formats. The ability to view data from disparate sources in a consistent, useable format on a timely basis is increasingly important to our target market. We believe that the importance of our data intelligence services to our target market has increased due to increasingly fractured data sources and will continue to do so.

We generate economies of scale in our reservation processing applications by combining transactions from numerous clients. Our clients leverage our aggregated transaction volume to shift a portion of their fixed costs to a more flexible, variable structure. Our scale, combined with our focus on process reengineering and automation, helps our clients reduce travel-related costs on an ongoing basis. We believe our scale cannot be achieved internally by our clients and is not currently available from a single travel supplier, agency, or electronic travel distribution system.

We target clients in four areas: travel agencies, travel suppliers, corporations and governments, and credit card issuers. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we served more than 270 clients. Our client base includes global leaders in the markets we serve, such as American Airlines, Inc., American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“American Express”), Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), and Expedia, Inc. (“Expedia”). Growing our client roster continues to be a key objective for us, as we work to reduce dependency on a handful of clients.

We provide expertise in redesigning business processes and their associated systems and resources. We offer our processing capabilities and process reengineering expertise through a comprehensive service offering of hosted technology applications, as well as through consulting engagements. We provide each of our technology applications individually or as a comprehensive, integrated end-to-end processing solution. As a result, we can add value and earn compensation at multiple points during the lifecycle of a single data record. Our clients typically pay us on a per-transaction basis. We typically have multi-year contracts with minimum volume commitments based on each client’s scale and expected growth rate.

As disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, during the process of preparing our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, we determined that our calculation of stock compensation expense in previously issued financial statements was incorrect. Our calculation applied forfeiture adjustments to both vested and unvested options, including those for which the employee had provided the requisite service, which results in an understatement of stock compensation in 2010 and prior periods. As a result, our previously issued financial statements have been restated.

Corporate Background and History

Prior to January 1997, we conducted our business as a division and subsidiary of BCD Travel, formerly WorldTravel BTI, one of the largest corporate travel agencies in the U.S. In January 1997, our business was transferred into a separate business organization. In 1999, TRX was incorporated as a Georgia corporation, and we acquired a data integration provider. In 1999 and 2000, we established European joint ventures to support travel distribution throughout Europe. In 2004, we purchased the remaining interests in our European joint ventures. We established operations in Bangalore, India in 2004 to support multiple processing activities and technology development functions. Also in 2004, we made a strategic decision to gradually transition away from providing call center services, and in the subsequent years closed or sold our call centers in France, Switzerland, England and the United States. On a selective basis, we may continue to provide these services to clients as part of our offerings. We continue to provide call center services from our operation in Berlin. In 2005, we had our initial public offering and were listed for trading on NASDAQ Stock Market. We made one acquisition in 2006 and a second acquisition in 2007 to augment our data intelligence offerings in the corporate market. As reported on November 7, 2011, we sold our corporate online booking technology (“RESX”) and related customer contracts to nuTravel Technology Solutions, LLC (“nuTravel”).

 

2


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

As announced on March 12, 2010, and in light of receiving a notice of noncompliance of the continued listing requirements from NASDAQ Stock Market, we voluntarily removed our securities from listing and registration on the NASDAQ Capital Market. On March 22, 2010, we filed a Form 25 delisting our shares from the NASDAQ Capital Market, and trading of our shares was suspended effective at the open of business on March 30, 2010. Our common stock (OTCQB:TRXI) has been quoted on the Pink OTC Markets, Inc. (“OTC Marketplace”) electronic quotation service under the OTCQB market tier since April 1, 2010.

Industry Background

Overview

We are a leading technology provider to the travel industry, which is among the largest industries globally and is undergoing dramatic and rapid change. The processes in these industries are complex and data-intensive. For example, the transaction record associated with a single traveler may include 500 or more distinct data fields for each trip.

The industry is focused on achieving a lower per transaction cost, which is difficult due to the complexities and inefficiencies that exist throughout the travel transaction process (from booking through settlement). We believe that automating the travel transaction process is difficult without substantial scale, access to all processes and technology throughout the travel transaction lifecycle, travel industry knowledge and relationships, and travel process reengineering expertise. In addition, we believe industry participants are challenged to reengineer their own cost structure while remaining focused on their core competencies and daily business objectives.

Current Trends

Financial pressure on travel suppliers, particularly airlines, has driven investment in automation to decrease the distribution and fulfillment costs associated with travel transactions, which in the past few years has resulted in market share gains by supplier websites at the expense of other online distribution channels. In addition, suppliers have been utilizing add-on fees as a means of generating incremental revenues after the primary sale for items such as upgrades, meals, and internet access. Other current industry trends include the following:

 

   

Emphasis on policy compliance and rules management. In an effort to lower travel costs, companies often enter into preferred provider contracts with travel suppliers and also establish corporate travel policies that require interpretation and enforcement on a real-time basis. The splintering of distribution, due in large part to the shift to supplier direct bookings, increases the demand for comprehensive data intelligence about corporations’ travel expenditures.

 

   

Need to improve access to and usefulness of corporate data. Companies are generating data at a more rapid pace from a growing number of internal and external sources, and managers need access to a consolidated view of this information in order to make timely, informed decisions. Large sellers of travel, such as travel agencies, represent a significant segment of the travel industry and are a key client segment for us. We believe that industries with travel-related components, such as credit card issuers, are a natural extension for our product and service offerings. We expect the need for products and services that address automation and data intelligence for the travel industry to increase over time due to the trends outlined above, and for similar trends to be evident in other industries as well.

Our Products and Services

We believe that our utilities facilitate the distribution of travel in a cost-efficient manner and assist our clients in better managing the vast amounts of data generated by travel and travel-related processes. Our clients are able to use our products and services individually or as a comprehensive, integrated end-to-end bundled solution. We develop our products and services as hosted technologies. We believe that by hosting solutions for our clients we can provide lower costs per transaction, scalability of solutions, continuity of business, rapid product development, compliance with and adaptability to business rules, and speed to market.

 

3


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Our hosted technology suite includes the following primary solutions:

 

   

Data intelligence enables the aggregation, enhancement, extraction, and reporting of transaction data. Our data intelligence suite consolidates data records from a variety of sources, including credit card issuers, credit card networks, back office travel systems, hotel suppliers, airlines, and GDSs (global distribution systems), and normalizes those records into a common structure in a single data repository.

It also enables enhancement of data records with more detailed transaction data from other sources, increasing the value and utility of the data to our clients. We host the application, warehouse multi-terabytes of client data, deliver information electronically back to clients in any format, and provide Web-based access to our hosted reporting and analysis tool. Clients include American Express, Citibank, HealthPlan Services, UAL Corporation, MasterCard Inc., Sabre Holdings Corporation and the United States General Services Administration.

 

   

Reservation Processing offers a suite of utilities that processes our clients’ travel data records in a cost efficient manner. Our products enable automated quality control, file finishing, and electronic ticketing, including low fare searches, seat assignments, upgrades, and alternate route and carrier searches. We also handle multiple activities for our clients including exchanges, refunds, waivers and split payments, commission management, fare loading, document distribution, debit memo processing, and back office hosting and settlement. We offer our agency clients software functionality for exception processing and agent workflow management and tracking. We host our Reservation Processing applications for our clients and provide access to them via the Internet. Our Reservation Processing services are used by large travel agencies, corporations and suppliers, including American Airlines, Inc., American Express, The Boeing Company, Expedia, Hogg Robinson Group, Omega Travel, and Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe our competitive strengths have enabled us to become a leading independent provider of data intelligence and reservation processing technologies for the global travel industry and will continue to enhance our leadership position and contribute to our growth in the future, both in travel and other industry channels. Those strengths include:

 

   

Independent, objective, and unbiased technology provider. We provide an objective and unbiased means to access travel inventory and integrate global data. Our products and services provide quality control, ticketing, exception management and reporting, whether a booking is generated from a GDS, a supplier, or an alternative travel source. We believe that shifting travel industry dynamics, in particular GDS ownership or affiliation with online travel agencies and booking engines, have made our clients reluctant to adopt non-independent third-party processing solutions. Additionally, our independence has allowed us to develop a service offering combining the data associated with corporate credit card transactions from multiple processors, with travel data, such as hotel folio data and travel agency back office data, in order to deliver a comprehensive report to the issuer. We believe our independence provides clients with confidential and unbiased processing capabilities.

 

   

Expertise in automation and process reengineering. One of our core competencies is our ability to automate and reengineer complicated travel and travel-related processes. We have multiple, dedicated teams developing products and services that meet the evolving needs of our clients. We continually reengineer our processes and related automation to provide technologically advanced solutions to meet the complex needs of our clients.

 

   

Established long-term partnerships. We have long-standing collaborative relationships with many travel industry leaders. Areas of collaboration include technology, operations, and other areas that are integral to our clients’ use of our products and services. By partnering with our clients, we are better able to understand their existing needs and can tailor our product development to better anticipate future demands. We believe this approach improves the value proposition of our products and services

 

4


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
 

to these clients. Many of our largest clients have a history of contract renewals and business expansion with us. Many of our clients also commit to long-term contracts with us. We believe this is a testimony to our ability to forge strong, lasting relationships with clients to create joint long-term value.

 

   

Core travel processing infrastructure. We offer multiple products and services that allow us to address specific client needs across the complete travel transaction lifecycle. We believe that automating the travel transaction process is difficult without substantial scale, access to the processes and technology throughout the travel transaction lifecycle, relationships with industry participants, and the travel reengineering expertise that we possess. Furthermore, we update and refine our products and services on a regular basis, using client and market feedback to develop new improvements. Our ability to offer a flexible end-to-end solution allows us to provide additional products and services to our existing clients on an individual basis or as part of an integrated solution.

Our Growth Strategy

During the past five years, our revenues have declined primarily due to our exit from call center operations in the United States and United Kingdom, pricing pressure in our reservation processing products, a loss of and reduced volume from certain reservation processing and online booking clients, as well as the sale of our online booking technology and related client contracts in late 2011. We expect these trends to continue.

In order to counteract these continuing trends, we plan to focus on the following:

 

   

Expand the use of our data intelligence utilities. We believe both purchasers and sellers of travel and travel-related products and services have an increasing desire to consolidate and enhance disparate data in order to make better business decisions. We intend to broadly offer our existing and new technologies to those companies globally that would benefit from our independence and our expertise in travel combined with our data intelligence capabilities. We expect this expansion to eventually include growth in industries beyond travel, such as financial services and health care. For the foreseeable future, we intend to focus our efforts on the large opportunities within the travel industry.

 

   

Increase our client base. We believe that our existing and new data intelligence technologies enable us to provide valuable services to a very large number of corporations. We began focusing on this large corporate market primarily in the U.S. beginning in 2007, and are continuing to expand both within the U.S. and globally. We believe that increasing the number of users who interact with our technologies will lead to increased adoption of our other utilities.

 

   

Grow revenues from traditional travel agencies. A number of large agencies operate on a decentralized basis, using legacy systems that require substantial manual labor. We believe that these companies will increasingly recognize that their decentralized legacy structures put them at a cost disadvantage, and that greater process efficiencies and technology will improve both service levels and margins.

 

   

Continue to enhance our technology offerings. We are focused on the early recognition of marketplace changes as well as the process reengineering and automation of travel distribution to design products and services that meet the discrete needs of our client base. We offer these products and services as extensions to our existing product suite and cross-sell them to our clients. We intend to continue to enhance and extend our offerings to allow our clients access to evolving travel technologies.

 

   

Pursue strategic relationships. We intend to pursue strategic relationships with leaders in travel and travel-related industries both in the U.S. and abroad. We believe these relationships will increase the number of users who interact with our technologies and will lead to increased adoption rates of our products and services.

 

5


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Clients and Partners

During 2011, more than 270 corporations, financial institutions, travel agencies, and travel suppliers used our products and services. Our primary clients and prospects are large corporations and governments, travel suppliers, credit card issuing banks, and medium and large travel agency distributors. Our top five client contracts accounted for approximately 61% of our total revenues in 2011.

The following alphabetical client list represents our largest clients, each of which generated at least $500,000 of our revenue during 2011.

 

American Airlines, Inc.   Hogg Robinson plc
American Express   MasterCard Incorporated
BCD Travel and affiliates   Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.
Citibank   UAL Corporation
Expedia, Inc. and its affiliates (1)  

Unister Holding GmbH

U.S. General Services Administration

 

(1) Includes expedia.com, expedia.co.uk, expedia.de, expedia.ca, Egencia Corporate Travel, hotels.com and Hotwire, Inc.

Our clients include the global market leaders in each segment that we serve. We consider our client relationships to be a key strength. We have a history of client renewals and signing long-term contracts with our clients. We believe this is a testimony to our ability to forge strong, lasting relationships with clients to create joint long-term value.

Expedia and its affiliates accounted for 38% of our revenues in 2011 compared to 44% of our revenues in 2010. Expedia has been a client since its launch in 1996. Our agreement with Expedia is amended from time to time and now continues through December, 31 2012. We expect that 2012 revenues from Expedia will be approximately $4 million less than their 2011 level. We can give no assurance that we will retain any business from Expedia during the current contract term or beyond.

In addition, during the protracted global recession which began in 2008, a number of global airlines enacted capacity reductions, some permanent and others seasonal, due to continuing weak air travel demand. In general, reduced airline capacity results in lower transaction volumes for us. In the future, based on our expectation of reduced revenues from Expedia and from lower transaction volumes generally, it is likely that our revenues, operating results and cash flows will be adversely impacted and the impact will be material, unless sufficiently offset by new revenue growth, further cost reductions, or a combination of the two.

Competition

We have different competitors in each category of services that we offer. The data intelligence technologies we offer are substantially tied to travel and travel-related processes. We compete against many of the traditional providers in this category. Companies offering such services include IBM, Informatica, SAS, and large travel agencies. As the market for data intelligence grows, we believe a number of companies will increase their efforts to develop products and services that will compete with ours. It is also possible that new competitors or alliances among our competitors and potential clients may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share.

The market for reservation processing for the travel industry continues to evolve as agencies and suppliers make strategic decisions about whether to outsource or insource these data-intensive and costly processes. Currently, the marketplace for reservation processing services for the travel industry is comprised primarily of in-house solutions and operations residing mostly on legacy systems at travel agencies. All of the GDSs provide their own booking solution.

 

6


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Our competition comes from, or is anticipated to come from, the following sources:

 

   

in-house operations of prospective or existing clients;

 

   

traditional travel service providers including travel agencies;

 

   

operators of reservation systems;

 

   

information technology service firms building customized solutions;

 

   

teleservice companies introducing online customer support capabilities;

 

   

enterprise software companies adding travel management functionality to their products; and

 

   

other outsourced providers, including providers of customer care products and services.

Intellectual Property

We are constantly developing new technology and enhancing existing proprietary technology. We hold a U.S. patent entitled “Tool for Analyzing Corporate Airline Bids” (Patent #7,401,029 B2), which was issued on July 15, 2008. Our patent has a remaining life of approximately 12 years. We also have a small portfolio of pending patent applications which relate to our proprietary technology. Currently, we primarily rely on a combination of patent, copyrights, trade secrets, confidential procedures and contractual provisions to protect our technology. Despite these protections, it may be possible for unauthorized parties to copy, obtain or use certain portions of our proprietary technology. Any misappropriation of our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position.

Government Regulation

The laws and regulations applicable to the travel industry affect us and our clients. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the sale and fulfillment of travel services. In addition, many of our clients and reservation systems providers are heavily regulated by the U.S. and other governments. Our services are indirectly affected by regulatory and legal uncertainties affecting the businesses of our clients and reservation systems providers.

We are subject to federal regulations prohibiting unfair and deceptive practices. In addition, federal regulations concerning the display and presentation of information currently applicable to airline booking services, as well as other laws and regulations aimed at protecting customers accessing online or other travel services, could be extended to us in the future. In certain states, we are required to register as a seller of travel, comply with certain disclosure requirements and participate in the state’s restitution fund.

We must also comply with laws and regulations applicable to online commerce and businesses in general. There continues to be uncertainty about whether or how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to commercial online services. As laws and regulations are adopted to address these and other issues, it is likely that such new laws or different applications of existing laws will impose additional burdens on companies conducting business online. In turn, such trends could decrease the demand for our products and services or increase our cost of operations.

In addition, government agencies have been contemplating or developing initiatives to enhance national and aviation security. These initiatives may result in conflicting legal requirements with respect to data handling. We may incur legal defense costs and become exposed to potential liabilities as a result of differing views on the privacy of travel data. Travel businesses have also been subjected to investigations, lawsuits and adverse publicity due to allegedly improper disclosure of passenger information. It is expected that our business will continue to be affected by privacy and data protection legislation.

Numerous jurisdictions globally have privacy and data protection legislation, including the European Union (“EU”) through its Data Protection Directive (and implementing statutes of this Directive in the EU Member

 

7


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

States). This legislation is intended to protect the privacy of personal data that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. Enforcement takes place under the force of national legislation of the EU Member States.

We may be affected by regulations concerning issues such as exports of technology, telecommunications and electronic commerce. Our business may be affected if regulations are adopted or changed in these areas. Any such regulations may vary among jurisdictions. We believe that we are capable of addressing these regulatory issues as they arise.

In addition, we are subject to a broad range of federal, foreign, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the pollution and protection of the environment, health and safety, and labor. Based on continuing internal review and advice from independent consultants, we believe that we are currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental requirements and health and safety and labor laws. We do not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, or competitive position as a result of our efforts to comply with environmental requirements.

Congress, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other governmental agencies have under consideration and may consider and adopt new laws, regulations, and policies regarding a variety of matters that could affect our business or operations. We cannot predict what other matters might be considered in the future by Congress, the U.S. Department of Transportation or such other agencies, nor what the impact of this regulation might be on our business.

Employees

As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 794 employees, of which approximately 210 were located in North America, 185 in Europe and 399 in India. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, although our German operations are subject to German laws requiring, among other requirements, a Works Counsel. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe our relationship with our employees is good.

Website Access to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Reports

Our Internet address is http://www.trx.com. Through our website, we make available, free of charge, access to all reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports, as filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Copies of any materials we file with, or furnish to, the SEC can also be obtained free of charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov or at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

 

8


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Item  1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as other information contained in or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the possible adverse events described below actually occur, our business, results of operations, or financial condition would likely suffer and the market price of our common stock could decline.

Risks Related to Our Business

A substantial portion of our revenue is generated by our key clients; a significant loss of business with any of these clients would reduce our revenues and our results of operations and financial condition could deteriorate due to lower revenue.

Our top five client contracts accounted for approximately 61% of our total revenues in 2011. Entities affiliated with Expedia, our largest client, accounted for approximately 38% of our revenue in 2011. Our clients can generally terminate their agreements with us if we do not meet specified performance or other criteria. Some clients, including Expedia, can terminate these agreements without cause upon notice and/or payment of specified fees. If agreements with these or other key clients are terminated, or if we are unable to negotiate favorable renewal terms, our revenues and operating results would be significantly diminished.

Expedia has been a client since its launch in 1996, and is currently under contract through December 31, 2012. We expect that 2012 revenues from Expedia will be approximately $4 million less than their 2011 level. We can give no assurance that we will retain any business from Expedia during the current contract term or beyond.

In general, reduced airline capacity results in lower transaction volumes for us. Based on our expectation of reduced revenues from Expedia and from lower transaction volumes generally, it is likely that our revenues, operating results and cash flows will be adversely impacted and the impact will be material, unless sufficiently offset by new revenue growth, further cost reductions, or a combination of the two.

Additionally, many of our large clients prepay us for our services. Consequently, if we were to lose one or more of such prepayment arrangements, our liquidity and working capital would be affected, which could harm our operating results and cash flows.

We experience volatility in the volume of transactions we service; such volatility may negatively impact our ability to provide consistent services and strain our operational capabilities.

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience significant levels of volatility in the volume of travel transactions we service. This volatility is attributable to a number of factors, including travel industry conditions and promotional programs by our clients. Significant or unanticipated increases in transaction volume have strained and may continue to strain our operational capabilities, leading to higher costs and lower quality of service. In addition, we may experience significantly lower transaction volume than expected, which would lead to decreased revenues and underutilization of our resources. Our failure to address unanticipated transaction volume may decrease our profitability and harm our relationships with our clients.

We also experience volatility in the number and scope of project requests for the customization of our products and services. There can be no assurance that we will be able to accurately forecast volatility related to project requests and that we will be able to meet all client project delivery mandates in a manner satisfactory to our clients.

We also have experienced and expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our business. Business and consumer travel bookings typically decline during the fourth quarter of each calendar year. This seasonality has caused, and will likely continue to cause, quarterly fluctuations in our operating results.

 

9


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Failures of our software, hardware, and other systems could increase our operating costs, subject us to monetary damages, undermine our clients’ confidence in our reliability, and cause us to lose clients or prevent us from gaining new clients.

Delivering our services requires the successful integration and operation of a network of software, computer hardware, and telecommunications equipment. A failure of any element in this network could partially or completely disrupt our activities, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations by causing us to lose clients, prevent us from gaining new clients, or result in our owing monetary damages. Third parties provide some of these elements and, accordingly, they are not within our control. In addition, this network is vulnerable to interruption from power failures, telecommunications outages, natural disasters, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and other network service outages and disruptions. The loss of one or more of our facilities or failures of our software, hardware, and other systems could result in delays, service interruptions, service errors or loss of critical data and, therefore, significantly undermine our clients’ confidence in our reliability and diminish the TRX brand name. We cannot guarantee that our back-up systems or disaster recovery plans will adequately protect against such failures. These failures or other interruptions may be costly to remedy as our business interruption or other insurance may not protect us fully against any losses that may result.

Interruptions in our ability to access third-party computer systems could impair the quality of our service.

We and our clients rely on third-party computer systems, including the computerized reservation systems serving the airline industry, to make and complete travel reservations. We also rely on the compatibility of our proprietary software with these computer systems. Interruptions in our ability to access these systems or the failure of our software to interact with these systems would significantly harm our business and operating results by causing us to lose clients, preventing us from gaining new clients, or resulting in our owing monetary damages.

Failure to meet our clients’ performance expectations and to provide their customers with high quality customer service could cause us to lose clients or prevent us from gaining new clients.

Our clients expect us to maintain high levels of service quality for their businesses. In many cases, specific performance criteria such as service levels, average response time, and timely processing are included in our contracts with clients. Any failure by us to meet specified or otherwise expected performance criteria or to provide the level of service required by our clients could lead to financial penalties, the deterioration of our relationships with our clients, and a loss of credibility in the marketplace. Dissatisfied clients may choose to terminate or not renew their contracts with us or seek services from other sources. This could reduce our revenues and harm our operating results, as well as make it more difficult to attract new clients.

Our strategy of sales through distributors may not be successful.

We currently sell our products and services directly, as well as through a network of distributors, such as American Express, Expedia and its affiliates, and BCD Travel. In many cases we must rely on the efforts of our partners to sell and implement our products and services. Expected growth may not materialize as quickly as we are anticipating or at all, or distributors may decide to discontinue this relationship with us. Additionally, poor performance by our partners could cause harm to our reputation with the end user corporations and travelers.

Our sales and implementation cycle is lengthy and variable, depends upon factors outside our control, and could cause us to expend significant time and resources prior to earning associated revenues.

The typical sales cycle, whether direct sales or through our distributor network, for our services is lengthy and unpredictable, requires pre-purchase evaluation by a significant number of employees in our clients’ organizations, and often involves a significant operational decision by our clients. Moreover, a purchase decision

 

10


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

by a potential large client typically requires the approval of several senior decision makers. Our sales cycle for our larger clients is generally between six and eighteen months. Additionally, the implementation and testing of our services can take up to one year, and unexpected implementation delays and difficulties can occur. This lengthy and variable sales and implementation cycle may have a negative impact on the timing of our revenues, causing our revenues and operating results to vary significantly from period to period.

We have a history of net losses, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to sustain profitability.

We incurred net losses in every year of our operations prior to 2008. We had an accumulated deficit of $93.8 million and $95.2 million at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Although we experienced net income in both 2011 and 2010, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sustain levels of profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our results of operations will be harmed if our revenues do not increase or are insufficient for us to achieve or sustain profitability.

Failure to manage our growth, or to recruit or retain qualified employees, could reduce our revenues or net income.

Rapid expansion strains our infrastructure, management, internal controls and financial systems. We may not be able to effectively manage our future expansion. New clients and the expansion of services from existing clients may cause rapid increases to our transaction volumes. Rapid increases in transaction volumes can inhibit our ability to train and integrate our new employees. Inadequate training and integration of our employees may result in inefficiencies in our workforce and may reduce our revenues or net income.

We are also heavily dependent on our employees to provide the high level of service our clients expect. If we cannot recruit and retain enough qualified and skilled employees, the growth of our business may be limited. Our ability to provide services to clients and grow our business depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees. If our employee turnover rate increases significantly, our recruiting and training costs could rise, and our operating efficiency and productivity could decline. We may not be able to recruit or retain the caliber of employees required to carry out essential functions at the pace necessary to sustain or grow our business.

If we are not successful in adapting to changes in technology made by the major GDSs or integrating our systems with those of alternatives to the major GDSs, we may lose clients and market share.

Most of our transaction processing originates from traditional GDSs and, in general, our current solutions are tightly integrated with the four major GDS providers. Unforeseen changes in technologies, standards or procedures at any of the GDS providers could make it difficult for us to integrate our systems. Also, travel industry deregulation has resulted in the emergence of alternatives to the traditional GDS providers. Moreover, significant volumes of travel transactions from our clients may migrate to these alternatives. If we are not successful in integrating our systems with GDS alternatives as they evolve, we may lose clients and market share.

Our ability to increase our revenues will depend upon introducing new products and services, and if the marketplace does not accept these new products and services, our revenues may not increase or may decline.

To increase our revenues, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and new versions of existing products that satisfy increasingly sophisticated client requirements and achieve market acceptance. Products and services that we plan to market in the future are in various stages of development or are a result of recent acquisitions, and we are in the process of integrating them into TRX. Significant human and capital investment is often made to develop and launch new products and services and to discontinue old products and services. We cannot assure you that the marketplace will accept our new products and services. If our current or potential clients are not willing to switch to or adopt our new products and services, our ability to increase revenues will be significantly impaired.

 

11


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

We may seek to diversify our revenue streams by serving many different industry segments. If we are not successful in serving industry segments other than the travel and travel-related industries we currently serve, we may not be successful in capturing these potential revenue streams or recapturing expenditures pursuing these diversified revenue streams.

We may seek to adapt our products and services to industries other than the travel and travel-related industries upon which we currently depend. Our ability to increase our revenues will depend on how effectively we are able to modify and enhance our software, technology and networks in the future to address the various needs of different industry segments. If we are unable to accurately anticipate the needs of industry segments other than the travel and travel-related industries we currently serve, if costs associated with serving additional industries are higher than expected, or if we are not successful in marketing our solutions to new industries, we may be unable to profitably grow our revenues.

If we fail to keep up with rapidly changing technologies, our products and services could become less competitive or obsolete.

In our business, technology changes rapidly, and there are continuous improvements and changes in computer hardware, software applications, network operating systems, programming tools, programming languages, operating systems, database technology, and communication protocols. Advances in technology may result in changing client preferences for products and services and delivery formats. If we fail to enhance our current products and develop new products in response to changes in technology, industry standards, or client preferences, our products and services could rapidly become less competitive or obsolete.

We face significant competition in the markets we serve, which could result in decreased market share, revenues, or margins.

We have different competitors in each category of services that we offer. The market for transaction processing for the travel industry is new and continues to evolve as more agencies and suppliers look to outsource these processes. Currently, the marketplace for transaction processing services for the travel industry is comprised primarily of in-house solutions and operations residing mostly on legacy systems at travel agencies. All of the GDSs provide their own booking solutions. Our competition comes from, or is anticipated to come from, the following sources:

 

   

in-house operations of prospective or existing clients;

 

   

traditional travel service providers including travel agencies;

 

   

operators of reservation systems;

 

   

information technology service firms building customized solutions;

 

   

teleservice companies introducing online customer support capabilities;

 

   

enterprise software companies adding travel management functionality to their products; and

 

   

other outsourced providers, including providers of customer care products and services.

Innovations in technology have increased the ability of travel suppliers to distribute their travel products and services directly to businesses and consumers. As travel suppliers focus increasingly on direct distribution, new travel processing services competitors may emerge that offer greater flexibility, accuracy, reliability, speed of service, or price. In addition, as travel agencies, travel specific websites and corporate travel management companies expand their size and financial resources through consolidation, they may combine existing businesses or create new businesses that compete directly with us. Additionally, increased consolidation means that we have fewer new client prospects or could cause us to lose clients.

 

12


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

The data intelligence software and consulting services we offer are substantially tied to travel and travel-related processes. We compete against many of the traditional providers in this category. Companies offering such services include Ascential Software Corporation, which is owned by International Business Machines Corporation, Informatica Corporation, and SAS Institute Inc.

As the market for both data processing and data intelligence grows, we believe a number of companies will increase their efforts to develop products and services that will compete with ours. It is also possible that new competitors or alliances among our competitors and potential clients may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. Moreover, our current and future competitors may have significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. If we are unable to effectively respond to market and competitive pressures, we may lose clients and market share, which could decrease our revenues or margins.

We could be required to pay damages due to errors, such as errors made in ticketing or fare loading processes.

We depend in part on manual programming, input of travel policies and restrictions, loading of fares, and other data used in connection with the delivery of our products and services to our clients. Human errors, miscommunication and other factors could lead to errors made in ticketing, fare loading or other processes that result in tickets being issued at incorrect prices or agency commissions being miscalculated. Such errors on our part have led to, and could lead to, claims against us and payments by us for damages.

Our international operations subject us to additional business risks that may reduce our profitability or revenues.

A significant part of our business is conducted outside of the U.S. During 2011, we received approximately 33% of our revenue from Europe-based clients. We incur material costs in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and India. We plan to continue to pursue opportunities abroad, and approximately half of our workforce is located in Bangalore, India. As a result, our future operating results could be negatively affected by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. The risks and potential costs of our international operations include:

 

   

political and economic instability;

 

   

changes in regulatory requirements and policy and the adoption of laws detrimental to our operations, such as legislation relating to trade protection, and restrictions on pricing and privacy;

 

   

negative impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations;

 

   

potentially adverse tax consequences;

 

   

increased restrictions on the repatriation of funds;

 

   

general economic conditions in international markets;

 

   

labor laws and restrictions;

 

   

staffing key management positions;

 

   

cultural differences;

 

   

negative impact of wage rate increases and other costs subject to inflation;

 

   

competition;

 

   

nationalization; and

 

   

foreign tax and other laws.

These risks may adversely affect our ability to conduct and grow business internationally, which could cause us to increase expenditures and costs, decrease our revenue growth, or both.

 

13


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could increase our operating expenses and decrease our operating margins.

A portion of our costs and revenues are denominated in non-U.S. currencies, such as the euro, British pound sterling and Indian rupee. As a result, changes in the exchange rates of these currencies or any other applicable currencies to the U.S. dollar will affect our operating expenses and operating margins and could result in exchange losses. As it is not cost effective, we currently do not hedge our exposure to currency fluctuation risks. The impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our results of operations cannot be accurately predicted.

If we are not able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our competitors may be able to duplicate our services.

We rely in part upon our proprietary technology to conduct our business. Our failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could harm our business by making it easier for our competitors to duplicate our services. We hold a U.S. patent entitled “Tool for Analyzing Corporate Airline Bids” (Patent #7,401,029 B2), which was issued on July 15, 2008. We also have a small portfolio of pending patent applications which relate to our proprietary technology. Currently, we primarily rely on a combination of copyrights, trade secrets, confidential procedures and contractual provisions to protect our technology. Despite these protections, it may be possible for unauthorized parties to copy, obtain or use certain portions of our proprietary technology. Any misappropriation of our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position.

We cannot be certain that third parties will not infringe or misappropriate our proprietary rights or that third parties will not independently develop similar proprietary information. Any infringement, misappropriation or independent development could harm our future financial results. In addition, effective protection of intellectual property rights may not be available in every country where we provide services. We may, at times, have to incur significant legal costs and spend time defending our intellectual property rights. Any defensive efforts, whether successful or not, would divert both time and resources from the operation and growth of our business.

There is also significant uncertainty regarding the applicability to the Internet of existing laws regarding matters such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property rights. Legislatures adopted the vast majority of these laws prior to the advent of the Internet, and as a result, these laws do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. We cannot be sure what laws and regulations may ultimately affect our business or intellectual property rights.

Others may assert that our technology infringes their intellectual property rights.

We may be subject to infringement claims in the future. The defense of any claims of infringement made against us by third parties could involve significant legal costs and require our management to divert time from our business operations. If we are unsuccessful in defending any claims of infringement, we may be forced to obtain licenses or to pay royalties to continue to use our technology. We may not be able to obtain any necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we fail to obtain necessary licenses or other rights, or if these licenses are too costly, our operating results may suffer either from reductions in revenues through our inability to serve clients or from increases in costs to license third-party technology.

If any breaches or compromises to the security systems of our databases occur, including theft of our customers’ personal information, our reputation could suffer, our customers may not be willing to use our products and services, and we may have difficulty attracting new customers.

If the security systems of our databases are breached or compromised in any way, our business and operations could be harmed. Our collection and processing of travel transactions and enhancement of data requires us to receive and store personally identifiable data, such as names and addresses, credit card information and transaction history records. Any breaches of the security systems of our databases could result in the theft of personal confidential information of our customers or other modification of our records. We have had incidents

 

14


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

of security breaches which led to the theft of confidential information. If any breaches or compromises to the security systems of our databases were to occur, customers may be deterred from using our products and services, our reputation may be harmed, we may be exposed to liability, and we may incur increased costs relating to any liability.

Our business could be adversely affected by reduced levels of cash, whether from operations or pursuant to the terms of our debt, as well as our ability to refinance our existing debt.

Reduced levels of cash generated from operations as well as our ability to refinance our existing debt could adversely impact our current business and our ability to grow.

Historically, our principal sources of cash have been cash flows from operations and borrowings from banks and other sources. Operations may continue to generate less cash than in the past. Our current bank credit facility expires in June 2012. We believe that we will be able to secure future renewals with adequate capacity, or to generate additional capital to meet our liquidity needs. However, we can provide no assurances that future renewals of our bank credit facility will be executed at favorable or desirable terms. If we are not successful in achieving the anticipated refinancing the lender is entitled to enforce the guarantee under our credit facility. Management believes its additional sources of liquidity include but are not limited to, generating positive operating cash flows through revenue growth, further reducing our expenses and/or capital expenditures, generating working capital through our clients and/or vendors, refinancing our debt, issuing equity, convertible debt or other securities, or selling assets.

The terms of our senior secured revolving credit facility may limit our ability to operate.

Our senior secured revolving credit facility may restrict our ability to take specific actions, even if such actions may be in our best interest. These restrictions limit our ability to, among other things, make advances to our European operations, make acquisitions, make capital expenditures, incur additional debt and pay dividends. Under the facility, we are subject to maintenance of a maximum consolidated senior leverage ratio (as defined in the facility) of 1.75 to 1 at December 31, 2011. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could result in our being required to repay any borrowings, which totaled $0.8 million as of December 31, 2011, before their due date. In addition, these covenants and restrictions may limit our future growth or operational opportunities. As of December 31 2011, we were in compliance with all financial covenants in the credit agreement.

Our common stock has been delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market and is now quoted on the Pink OTC Markets electronic quotation service, which may, among other things, reduce the price of our common stock and the levels of liquidity available to our shareholders.

As announced on March 12, 2010, and in light of receiving a notice of noncompliance of the continued listing requirements from The NASDAQ Stock Market, we voluntarily removed our securities from listing and registration on the NASDAQ Capital Market. On March 22, 2010, we filed a Form 25 delisting our shares from the NASDAQ Capital Market, and trading of our shares was suspended effective at the open of business on March 30, 2010. Our common stock (OTCQB:TRXI) has been quoted on the Pink OTC Markets Inc. (“OTC Marketplace”) electronic quotation service under the OTCQB market tier beginning on April 1, 2010.

The trading of our common stock on the OTC Marketplace may reduce the price of our common stock and the levels of liquidity available to our shareholders. In addition, the trading of our common stock in the OTC Marketplace may materially adversely affect our access to the capital markets, and the limited liquidity and potentially reduced price of our common stock could materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital through alternative financing sources on terms acceptable to us. There may also be other negative implications, including the potential loss of confidence by suppliers, customers and employees, the loss of institutional investor interest in our company. There is no assurance that our common stock will continue to be quoted on the OTC Marketplace, and failure to be quoted will have a material adverse effect on the price and liquidity of our stock.

 

15


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

We may be unsuccessful in pursuing and integrating business combinations and strategic alliances, which could result in increased expenditures or cause us to fail to achieve anticipated cost savings or revenue growth.

We regularly evaluate potential business combinations, strategic alliances and growth opportunities and may pursue acquisitions of other companies or technologies in the future in order to maintain and grow revenues and increase our market position. We may not be successful in identifying suitable strategic partners, acquisition candidates or may not be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms for such business combinations or strategic alliances.

Even if we are able to complete these types of business transactions, we may face additional risks, including:

 

   

difficulties in integrating or assimilating acquired operations, technology and personnel;

 

   

diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns and market developments;

 

   

loss of key management and technical personnel from acquired businesses;

 

   

impairment of relationships with existing clients, employees and business partners; and

 

   

expenses associated with amortization of acquired intangible assets and other expenses associated with a change in control.

If we are unable to successfully pursue and integrate business combinations and strategic alliances, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected due to the increased expenditures or our failure to achieve anticipated cost savings or revenue growth.

Disposition of our corporate travel self-booking tool, RESX, could result in reduction to our transaction processing revenue.

The disposition of software, websites, certain customer agreements and intellectual property related to TRX’s corporate travel self-booking tool, RESX, to nuTravel, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, effective October 31, 2011 could result in a reduction to our corporate online booking technology revenue. In 2011 and 2010, we derived approximately 8% and 9% of our total revenue from RESX.

Risks Related to Our Industry

We are currently dependent on the travel industry, and declines or disruptions in the travel industry could reduce our revenues.

We rely in large part on the health and growth of the travel industry. Travel is highly sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels and tends to decline during general economic downturns. In addition, other adverse trends or events that tend to reduce travel are likely to reduce our revenues. These may include:

 

   

price escalation in the airline industry or other travel-related industries due to increased fuel costs or other factors;

 

   

financial instability of clients;

 

   

occurrence of travel-related accidents and concerns about passenger convenience and safety;

 

   

airline or other travel-related strikes;

 

   

advances in business technology and communication, such as videoconferencing and online teleconferencing;

 

   

a slowdown in the growth of the adoption of online travel;

 

16


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
   

political instability, regional hostilities, terrorism, natural disasters and governmental terror warnings;

 

   

consolidations in the airline industry;

 

   

health-related fears; and

 

   

bad weather.

In addition, our clients may seek reduced prices for our services in response to changing fare and commission structures and other travel industry conditions.

Acts of terrorism, war and/or pandemic or fear of pandemic could have an adverse effect on the travel industry, which in turn could adversely affect our business due to the possible decrease in new travel bookings.

Travel is sensitive to safety, security, and health concerns, and thus declines after occurrences of and fears of future incidents that affect the safety, security and confidence of travelers. For example, the H1N1 flu pandemic during 2009, the start of the war in Iraq in 2003 and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 resulted in the cancellation of a significant number of flights and travel bookings and a decrease in new travel bookings. Future revenues may be reduced by similar and/or other acts of terrorism, war, or pandemic. The effects of these events could include, among other things, a protracted decrease in demand for air travel due to fear, military and governmental responses and a perceived inconvenience in traveling by air and increased costs and reduced operations by airlines due, in part, to new safety and security directives adopted by the Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation Security Administration, Homeland Security or other governmental agencies.

Travel industry and travel-related industry participants may choose not to adopt outsourcing or may otherwise be precluded from adopting outsourcing.

Our business depends in significant part on the continued adoption by travel industry participants of the outsourcing of transaction processing and data intelligence services and by travel-related industry participants of the outsourcing of data intelligence services as a means to achieve cost savings and enhanced customer service. There is no guarantee that our services will lower the costs of our clients’ businesses or improve customer service. If these cost savings or customer service improvements do not occur, we may not be able to retain clients or attract new clients.

Our processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation, conflicting legal requirements or differing views of personal privacy rights.

Our collection and processing of travel transactions and our consolidation, extraction, and enhancement of data requires us to receive and store a large volume of personally identifiable data. This type of data is subject to legislation and regulation in various jurisdictions, including the European Union through the Data Protection Directive, and variations of this directive in legislation enacted by member states of the European Union. Such laws typically protect the privacy of personal data that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from these jurisdictions. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if the laws and regulations are expanded, implemented or interpreted to require changes to our business practices and methods of data collection.

In the U.S., government agencies continue to discuss and develop initiatives to increase airline security, including the Transportation Security Administration’s Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System and its successors. These government initiatives could change the way we handle data and may result in conflicting legal requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we operate.

 

17


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

As personal and legal issues relating to privacy and data protection become more sensitive, we may become exposed to potential liabilities with respect to the data we collect, manage and process, and may incur legal costs if our or our vendors’ established information security policies and procedures are not effective or if we are required to defend our methods of collection, processing and storage of personal data. Future investigations, lawsuits or adverse publicity relating to our methods of handling personal data could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations due to the costs and negative market reaction to such developments.

Regulatory requirements and regulatory changes may impose burdens on our business.

The laws and regulations applicable to the travel and financial services industries affect us and our clients. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the sale and fulfillment of travel services and the financial services industry. Our services are indirectly affected by regulatory and legal uncertainties affecting the businesses of our clients and reservation systems providers.

We must also comply with laws and regulations applicable to online commerce and businesses in general. Currently, few laws and regulations directly apply to the Internet and commercial online services. Moreover, there is currently great uncertainty about whether or how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the Internet and commercial online services. As laws and regulations are adopted or interpreted to address these and other issues, it is likely that such new laws or different applications of existing laws will impose additional burdens on companies conducting business online and may decrease the growth of commercial online services. In turn, this could decrease the demand for our products and services or increase our cost of operations.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

Item 2. Properties

Our headquarters are located in Atlanta, Georgia and consist of approximately 44,000 square feet of office space held under a lease that expires in October 2019. We lease a total of approximately 125,000 square feet globally. As of December 31, 2011, the locations of our other principal leased facilities include Dallas, Texas, Milton, Florida, Bangalore, India, Berlin, Germany, Leicester, United Kingdom and Crawley, United Kingdom. These leases expire at various times between 2012 and 2019.

We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current and near-term needs, and that we will be able to locate additional facilities as needed.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We expect to be a party from time to time to certain routine legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although we are not currently involved in any litigation that we expect will have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations, we cannot accurately predict the outcome of any such proceedings in the future.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 

18


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As announced on March 12, 2010, and in light of receiving a notice of noncompliance of the continued listing requirements from The NASDAQ Stock Market, we voluntarily removed our securities from listing and registration on the NASDAQ Capital Market. On March 22, 2010, we filed a Form 25 delisting our shares from the NASDAQ Capital Market, and trading of our shares was suspended effective at the open of business on March 30, 2010. Our common stock has been quoted on the Pink OTC Markets Inc. (“OTC Marketplace”) electronic quotation service under the OTCQB market tier since April 1, 2010 under the symbol “TRXI.” Such over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. See “Our common stock has been delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market and is now quoted on the Pink OTC Markets electronic quotation service, which may, among other things, reduce the price of our common stock and the levels of liquidity available to our shareholders” in Item 1A “Risk Factors”, included herein. The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the range of high and low sales prices for our common stock.

 

     High      Low  

Year Ended December 31, 2011:

     

First Quarter

   $ 1.02       $ 0.50   

Second Quarter

   $ 0.75       $ 0.50   

Third Quarter

   $ 0.98       $ 0.63   

Fourth Quarter

   $ 1.42       $ 0.75   

Year Ended December 31, 2010:

     

First Quarter

   $ 0.93       $ 0.45   

Second Quarter

   $ 1.01       $ 0.40   

Third Quarter

   $ 0.90       $ 0.51   

Fourth Quarter

   $ 0.70       $ 0.21   

As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately 42 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners of our common stock whose shares are held in the names of various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers and other fiduciaries.

We have not paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently expect to retain all of our earnings for use in developing our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Future cash dividends, if any, will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend, among other things, upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. We have certain restrictions on the declaration and payment of dividends as defined under the “Restricted Payments” section of our credit agreement with Atlantic Capital Bank that prohibit, among other things, cash dividend payments to non-equity holders. Dividend payments in the form of common stock or other equity interests are not prohibited.

Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 below.

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

 

19


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis presents the factors that had a material effect on our results of operations during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Also discussed is our financial position as of December 31, 2011. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. Our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been restated. All information and disclosures contained in this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations have been updated to reflect the effects of such restatement. For a more detailed description of the restatements, see Note 2 of the Notes to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

TRX is a travel technology and data services provider, offering more than 20 software-as-a-service utilities for online booking, reservation processing, data intelligence, and process automation. We provide patented savings maximization solutions, extending spend management services to travel buyers all over the world. We complement all of this with a global workforce focused on travel process automation and reengineering. For the foreseeable future, we intend primarily to focus our efforts on the large opportunities within the travel industry. We deliver our technology applications as a service over the Internet to travel agencies, corporations, travel suppliers, government agencies, credit card associations, credit card issuing banks, and third-party administrators. TRX is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia with operations and associates in North America, Europe, and Asia.

We are focused on transaction-based revenue from data intelligence, reservation processing and online booking technologies that provide economies of scale to our clients and to us. These transactions are an integral part of our clients’ daily operations. Transaction levels, and thus revenues, fluctuate with our clients’ business levels, which are impacted by market changes and seasonality. We supplement our transaction-based revenue with short-term projects to implement, customize or enhance our service delivery.

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from long-term contracts with several large clients. Our largest client, Expedia and its affiliates, accounted for 38% and 44% of our total revenues in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Expedia has been a client since its launch in 1996. The Expedia Agreement is amended from time to time and now continues through December 31, 2012. We expect that 2012 revenues from Expedia will be approximately $4 million less than their 2011 level. We can give no assurance that we will retain any business from Expedia during the current contract term or beyond.

Our scale and process-reengineering expertise has allowed us to reduce our costs in several areas when measured on a per transaction basis, and we continue to take steps to reduce our cost structure in the normal course of business. We have established pricing models that provide volume-based discounts to share scale efficiencies with our clients to ensure long-term, mutually-beneficial relationships. As a result, our average revenue per transaction has generally declined over the last few years. We expect it to continue to decline in the future because of scale efficiencies, as well as trends in the travel processing supply chain that are putting negative pressure on our revenue per transaction.

On November 3, 2011, TRX, its subsidiary TRX Technology Services, L.P., and nuTravel executed and closed an Asset Purchase Agreement effective October 31, 2011 (the “Agreement”) in which nuTravel acquired software, websites, certain customer agreements and intellectual property related to TRX’s corporate online booking technology, RESX. TRX received cash consideration during 2011 of $2.8 million, of which $0.2 million

 

20


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

was placed with a third party escrow agent to be held for up to two years and distributed in accordance with the Indemnity Escrow Agreement. Additionally, TRX has the ability to earn up to an additional $0.5 million on or before December 31, 2012, subject to the conversion of certain nonassignable contracts to nuTravel as provided for in the Agreement. TRX recorded a gain of $1.5 million related to the sale of RESX assets.

In conjunction with the execution of the Agreement, TRX and nuTravel also entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”). Under the terms of the Services Agreement, for a period not to exceed December 31, 2012, TRX will provide certain transition and technical services at an annualized rate of $1.8 million to support the continued operation of the RESX services and to facilitate the orderly and effective transition of the RESX services from TRX to nuTravel.

Industry factors impacting our operating results include the channel shifts toward online bookings and direct distribution, cost compression in the travel processing supply chain, use of corporate credit cards, reduction in airline seat capacity, changing and increasing access methods to reach supplier inventory, reduction in supplier commission rates, global distribution system (“GDS”) incentive levels, and overall economic conditions. Our estimates of future results are primarily affected by assumptions of transaction volumes, pricing levels, our ability to efficiently scale with our clients, and client retention and acquisition. These anticipated results may be impacted by seasonality of the travel industry and credit card volumes related to travel.

As announced in March 2010, and in light of receiving a notice of noncompliance of the continued listing requirements from The NASDAQ Stock Market, we voluntarily removed our securities from listing and registration on the NASDAQ Capital Market. On March 22, 2010, we filed a Form 25 delisting our shares from the NASDAQ Capital Market, and trading of our shares was suspended effective at the open of business on March 30, 2010. Our common stock (OTCQB:TRXI) has been quoted on the Pink OTC Markets Inc. (“OTC Marketplace”) electronic quotation service under the OTCQB market tier beginning on April 1, 2010.

Sources of Revenue

We principally operate a transaction-based business model under long-term contracts using hosted technology applications. Transaction and other revenues are derived from two principal service offerings:

 

   

Transaction Processing: We generate transaction processing revenue from service and processing fees based primarily on the number of data records we process. Also included in transaction revenue is customer care revenue, which consists of generated service fees based primarily on the number or length of telephone calls answered or the number of email responses delivered.

 

   

Data Intelligence: We generate data intelligence revenue from service and processing fees based primarily on the number of data records we consolidate, the number of users accessing the data, the number of sources from which we receive data, and the frequency of data submissions.

Transaction-based revenues are recognized when we perform the services. In connection with providing transaction processing and data intelligence services, we generate revenues from short-term projects to customize or enhance service delivery. Revenue generated from short-term project work is recognized as the services are performed, which is generally when billed. Revenue from implementation or set-up fees is recognized over the life of the client contract.

Client reimbursements reflect pass-through items, primarily voice and data costs and items such as ticket envelopes that we bill to our clients at cost. In the future, if our clients decide to pay these items directly, our client reimbursement revenue and client reimbursement expense will decrease accordingly.

Historically, we have experienced sales cycles of six to eighteen months with respect to several of our larger clients. Additionally, the implementation of our services can take up to one year depending on the size and complexity of the service offering and the speed at which our clients implement the service offering to their

 

21


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

customer base. In 2006, we began offering components of our technology solutions to clients and potential clients. This change has reduced the length of our sales cycle and has also reduced the average amount of revenue initially earned from each of our clients.

Costs

Our expenses include operating, selling, general and administrative, technology development, restructuring and depreciation and amortization.

Operating expenses include salaries, benefits, and related overhead of personnel directly and indirectly supporting service delivery. Personnel indirectly supporting service delivery include information technology, client services, training, and business integration personnel. Operating expenses also include communication costs, technology hosting, and processing errors. Operating expenses are impacted by our revenue mix, with customer care services generally having higher operating expenses as a percentage of revenue due to the labor-intensive nature of providing customer care services. Our ability to efficiently manage and utilize our employees along with our ability to provide services from low-cost labor markets also impacts operating expenses.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, benefits and related overhead associated with the selling and marketing of our products and services, as well as other support functions, including executive, accounting, legal, centralized human resources and administration. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include professional services and insurance.

Technology development expenses primarily include salaries, benefits and related overhead of personnel focusing on developing and maintaining our technologies.

Depreciation and amortization expenses relate to fixed assets, software development costs and other intangible assets. We currently purchase substantially all of our equipment.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Our actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe that, of our significant accounting policies described in Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we believe are the most critical to assist investors in fully understanding and evaluating our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue recognition. A significant portion of our revenue is recognized based on objective criteria that do not require significant estimates or uncertainties. Accordingly, revenues recognized under these methods do not require the use of significant estimates that are susceptible to change.

We recognize revenue when certain other consulting or other services are combined with our transaction processing revenues and when all of the following have occurred: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) services have been performed, (3) the fee for services is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, these criteria are considered to have been met as follows:

 

   

for transaction revenue, in which we perform ticketing, file-finishing, data consolidation and reporting, and customer care services, when the services are provided;

 

22


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
   

for short-term client-specific customizations, which do not generate direct on-going incremental transaction revenue, when the customization has been delivered to our client; and

 

   

for implementation and set-up fees, which generate direct on-going incremental transaction revenue, over the life of the underlying transaction service agreement. Related costs are deferred and recognized as expenses over the life of the underlying transaction service agreement.

Internal-Use Software Development Costs. We account for internal-use software development costs in accordance with the applicable guidance which specifies that software costs, including internal payroll costs, incurred in connection with the development or acquisition of software for internal use is charged to technology development expense as incurred until the project enters the application development phase. Costs incurred in the application development phase are capitalized and depreciated over an estimated useful life of three years, beginning when the software is ready for use. Each of our software products enters the application development phase upon completion of a detailed program in which (1) we have established that the necessary skills, hardware and software technology are available to us to produce the product, (2) the completeness of the detailed program design has been confirmed by documentation and tracing the design to product specifications, and (3) the detailed program design has been reviewed for high-risk development issues (for example, novel, unique, unproven function and features or technological innovations), and any uncertainties related to identified high-risk development issues have been resolved through coding and testing. Significant judgment is required in determining when the application development phase has begun.

Goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. We test goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30 or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduces the value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. We recorded an impairment charge to all previously recorded goodwill in 2009. We recorded additional goodwill through December 31, 2011 related to earnout payments on a previous business acquisition transaction. The earnout obligation related to this business acquisition ended on December 31, 2011. Since there was no significant improvement in our financial outlook, we determined that such goodwill was also impaired in that same period.

Impairment of long-lived assets. We regularly evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate whether the carrying amount of property and equipment and other intangible assets may warrant revision or may not be recoverable. When factors indicate that these long-lived assets should be evaluated for recoverability, we assess the recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such long-lived assets will be recovered through the future undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. We assessed indicators to determine whether the carrying values of long-lived assets, including property and equipment and other intangible assets should be impaired and determined no impairment was required at December 31, 2011.

Transaction processing provisions. We have recorded estimates to account for processing errors made in the ticketing or fareloading process that result in tickets being issued at incorrect prices or from agency commissions being miscalculated. Our reserve for processing errors is based on several factors including historical trends, average debit memo lag time and timely identification of errors. Transaction processing provisions were $0.3 million and $0.1 million during 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included as operating expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. We completed a review of our transaction processing provisions and determined that no adjustments were required as of December 31, 2011. The accrual related to processing errors was $2.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

 

23


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Results of Operations

As disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, during the process of preparing our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, we determined that our calculation of stock compensation expense in previously issued financial statements was incorrect. Our calculation applied forfeiture adjustments to both vested and unvested options, including those for which the employee had provided the requisite service, which results in an understatement of stock compensation in 2010 and prior periods. As a result, our previously issued financial statements have been restated.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

The following table sets forth selected statement of operations data.

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
   2011     2010
(As Restated)
    Change  
   (dollars in thousands)  

Revenue:

            

Transaction processing

   $ 37,115        76   $ 44,764        80   $ (7,649     (17 )% 

Data intelligence

     11,888        24        11,470        20        418        4   
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Transaction and other revenues

     49,003        100     56,234        100     (7,231     (13

Client reimbursements

     365          497         
  

 

 

     

 

 

       

Total revenues

     49,368          56,731         

Expenses:

            

Operating

     31,902          33,645          (1,743     (5

Selling, general, and administrative

     9,377          12,131          (2,754     (23

Technology development

     3,162          3,657          (495     (14

Client reimbursements

     365          497          (132     (27

Impairment of goodwill

     316          323          (7     (2

Gain on sale of assets

     (1,468       —            1,468        —     

Depreciation and amortization

     3,437          4,094          (657     (16

Interest (expense) income:

            

Interest income

     32          13          19        146   

Interest expense

     (476       (685       (209     (31

Income tax (provision) benefit

     (508       399          907        227   
  

 

 

     

 

 

       

Net income

   $ 1,325        $ 2,111         
  

 

 

     

 

 

       

Transaction processing revenues. The decrease for 2011 was primarily due to the decreased scope of services and/or pricing provided to Expedia and American Express. Overall we expect the rate of decline in our transaction processing revenues to slow when compared to the past few years, and we expect our revenues per transaction to continue to decline because of trends in the travel processing supply chain that are putting negative pressure on our revenue per transaction.

Data intelligence revenues. The increase in data intelligence revenues for 2011 compared to the prior year was primarily due to higher annual contractual transaction revenues and non-recurring project-based revenues as well as underlying core business growth. We expect growth in data intelligence revenues based on recent sales activity and market interest in these products and services.

Operating expenses. The decrease in operating expenses for 2011 compared to the prior year was primarily due to reduced personnel-related costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses for 2011 compared to the prior year was primarily due to reduced personnel-related costs and a reduction to the bad debt provision in 2011 as a result of improved collections.

 

24


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Technology development expenses. The decrease in technology development expense for 2011 compared to the prior year was primarily due to reduced personnel-related costs.

Gain on sale of assets. In late 2011, we sold our RESX corporate online booking technology and related customer contracts which resulted in a gain of $1.5 million.

Depreciation and amortization. The decrease for 2011 compared to the prior year was primarily due to a decrease in our capital spending and the sale of our RESX corporate online booking technology.

Interest expense. The decrease for 2011 compared to the prior year was primarily due to lower outstanding principal balance related to our revolving credit facility. In addition, our note payable to Hi-Mark matured and was paid in April 2011.

Income tax provision. Income tax provision of $0.5 million was recorded in 2011. This provision was composed of $0.1 million of current tax benefit from the settlement of uncertain tax positions in the U.S. and Germany, $0.2 million of net deferred tax expense, and $0.4 million of current tax expense. Income tax benefit of $0.4 million was recorded in 2010. This benefit was composed of $0.5 million of current tax benefit from the settlement of uncertain tax positions in Germany, $0.2 million of net deferred tax benefit, and $0.3 million of current tax expense. The $0.2 million net deferred tax benefit included $1.5 million of deferred tax benefit from the release of valuation allowance. This release was prompted by usage of deferred tax inventory during 2010 and by the completion of international contract negotiations during fourth quarter of 2010 that allowed us to reassess the amount of our deferred tax inventory that we were more likely than not to realize.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We fund our ongoing operations primarily with cash from operating activities. The underlying drivers of cash from operating activities include cash receipts from the sale of our services and cash payments to our employees and service providers. Most of our larger clients remit payment for our services 30 to 90 days in advance of our service delivery. Advance payments from clients are recorded as customer deposits and deferred revenue until the service is performed.

At December 31, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million and $7.7 million of availability under our revolving credit facility with Atlantic Capital Bank (“ACB”). Our available cash includes $1.6 million of cash held by foreign subsidiaries whose earnings are considered permanently reinvested for income tax purposes. We believe that we are able to maintain a sufficient level of liquidity for our domestic operations and commitments without repatriation of the cash held by these foreign subsidiaries. We had $0.8 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility at December 31, 2011. Although we have been prudent in our strategy for our anticipated near-term liquidity needs, it is not possible to accurately predict how macroeconomic conditions may affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Additional failures of financial and other institutions could impact our customers’ ability to pay us, reduce amounts available under our credit facility, cause losses to the extent cash amounts or the value of securities exceed government deposit insurance limits, and restrict our access to the equity and debt markets. A continuation of the turmoil in the capital and credit markets and the general economic downturn could adversely impact the availability, terms and/or pricing of financing if we need additional liquidity. We will experience liquidity problems if we are unable to obtain sufficient additional financing as our debt becomes due. Adverse economic conditions, increased competition, or other unfavorable events also could affect our liquidity.

Our credit agreement with ACB matures June 30, 2012. Based on our favorable history of renewals and expected capital needs, we expect to renew the facility prior to its maturity and plan to elect to reduce the size of the facility from $10 million to approximately $5 million, given our reduced need for access to working capital borrowings.

 

25


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Net cash provided by operating activities was $3.8 million during 2011, compared to $1.7 million during 2010. Cash provided during 2010 was lower primarily due to the reduction in prepayments from a major customer, which adversely impacted operating cash flow. Customer prepayments have remained relatively flat during 2011. In addition, during 2011 our operating cash flow benefited from improved collections and the return of a deposit related to the relocation of our Bangalore, India operations center.

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.2 million during 2011, compared to $3.2 million during 2010. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the sale of our software, websites, certain customer agreements and intellectual property related to our corporate online booking technology, RESX. Additionally, another driver of our investing activities is our capital expenditures, which include costs associated with internally developed software, as well as infrastructure required to support and maintain our existing systems and opportunities to reduce costs. As of December 31, 2011, we had no material commitments related to capital expenditures. We expect our 2012 capital expenditures will be consistent with recent years.

Net cash used in financing activities was $4.0 million during 2011, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $1.4 million during 2010. The primary driver for 2011 was the repayment of our credit facility, which exceeded borrowings from the credit facility.

We believe that we will be able to meet our current and long-term liquidity and capital requirements, including fixed charges, through our cash flow from operations and other available sources of liquidity, including borrowings under the credit agreement and through our ability to obtain future external financing. We expect to continue to use a portion of our cash flows to fund our strategic capital expenditures, to invest in business opportunities and to meet our debt repayment obligations. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on having sufficient liquidity for our operations. We believe that we are able to maintain a sufficient level of liquidity for our domestic operations and commitments without repatriation of the cash held by our foreign subsidiaries. We are currently in compliance with all financial covenants in the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2011, we have borrowed $0.8 million against the facility and there was a $1.5 million letter of credit against this facility relating to the lease of our Atlanta office, leaving $7.7 million that is currently available for borrowing. As of December 31, 2011, the interest rate on our outstanding borrowings was 4.25%. We expect to remain in compliance with all financial covenants over the remaining term of our revolving credit facility with ACB, however, we acknowledge that market conditions remain uncertain, and, as such, can provide no assurances that we will remain in compliance. We monitor our expected debt compliance and believe we would have time to further reduce our expenses and/or capital expenditures if needed to remain in compliance. If we are not successful in maintaining our debt compliance, ACB as lender is entitled to enforce the guarantee under our credit facility. Management believes that the existing cash on hand, availability under the credit agreement and cash flow from operations will provide the needed liquidity to fund operations sufficient to continue as a going concern. The credit agreement requires us to maintain (1) a ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement, which may not be comparable to consolidated total debt or measures of GAAP profitability presented elsewhere in this document) of not more than 1.75 to 1.00 and (2) a ratio of the remainder of consolidated EBITDA minus capital expenditures to the sum of interest expense for the period and debt principal payments required to be made in the next twelve months of not more than 1.40 to 1.00. The credit agreement also contains additional covenants which, among other things, require us to deliver to ACB specified financial information, including annual and quarterly financial information, and limit our ability to (or to permit any subsidiaries to), subject to various exceptions and limitations, (1) merge with other companies, (2) create liens on our property, (3) incur debt obligations, (4) enter into transactions with affiliates, except on an arms-length basis, (5) dispose of property, or (6) pay dividends.

Seasonality

Our business experiences seasonal fluctuations, reflecting seasonal trends for the purchase of air travel by both leisure and corporate travelers as well as credit card volume related to corporate travel. For example,

 

26


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

traditional leisure air travel bookings are higher in the first two calendar quarters of the year in anticipation of spring and summer vacations and holiday periods. Corporate travel air bookings and credit card spending levels are generally higher in the first and third calendar quarters of the year. Business and consumer travel bookings typically decline during the fourth quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our fourth calendar quarter generally reflects lower revenues as compared to the first three calendar quarters.

Inflation and Changing Prices

We do not believe that inflation and changing prices have materially impacted our results of operations during the past two years.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Comprehensive Income—In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The new guidance revised the presentation options in ASC Topic 220 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. In either option, entities are required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We have not determined the presentation format that will be used in future periods. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the provisions only relate to presentation and disclosure.

On December 23, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, which indefinitely defers the provision of ASU No. 2011-5 related to the requirement that entities present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented.

 

27


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

 

     Page  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     29   

Consolidated Balance Sheets

     30   

Consolidated Statements of Operations

     31   

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)

     32   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

     33   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     34   

 

28


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

TRX, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TRX, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TRX, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been restated.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 6, 2012

 

29


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2011 and 2010

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     2011     2010  

ASSETS

      
 
(As
Restated)
  
  

CURRENT ASSETS:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 2,153      $ 2,565   

Trade accounts receivable, net

     4,876        6,127   

Prepaids and other

     1,763        3,318   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     8,792        12,010   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NONCURRENT ASSETS:

    

Property and equipment, net

     4,003        5,743   

Restricted cash

     200        —     

Deferred income tax

     70        264   

Other assets, net

     582        795   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noncurrent assets

     4,855        6,802   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 13,647      $ 18,812   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

    

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

    

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   $ 6,649      $ 8,275   

Customer deposits and deferred revenue

     3,857        4,624   

Current portion of long-term debt

     800        583   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     11,306        13,482   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:

    

Long-term debt—less current portion

     —          4,200   

Other long-term liabilities

     1,912        1,759   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noncurrent liabilities

     1,912        5,959   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     13,218        19,441   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 3)

    

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT):

    

Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 18,693,897 and 18,656,302 shares issued; 18,506,366 and 18,468,771 shares outstanding

     186        186   

Additional paid-in capital

     96,372        96,232   

Treasury stock, at cost; 187,531 shares

     (2,294     (2,294

Cumulative translation adjustment

     6        413   

Accumulated deficit

     (93,841     (95,166
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)

     429        (629
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit)

   $ 13,647      $ 18,812   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

30


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

     2011     2010  

REVENUES:

      
 
(As
Restated)
  
  

Transaction and other revenues

   $ 49,003      $ 56,234   

Client reimbursements

     365        497   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

     49,368        56,731   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

EXPENSES:

    

Operating, excluding depreciation and amortization

     31,902        33,645   

Selling, general, and administrative, excluding depreciation and amortization

     9,377        12,131   

Technology development

     3,162        3,657   

Client reimbursements

     365        497   

Impairment of goodwill

     316        323   

Gain on sale of assets

     (1,468     —     

Depreciation and amortization

     3,437        4,094   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total expenses

     47,091        54,347   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

     2,277        2,384   

INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE):

    

Interest income

     32        13   

Interest expense

     (476     (685
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense, net

     (444     (672
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

     1,833        1,712   

(PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES

     (508     399   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET INCOME

   $ 1,325      $ 2,111   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES:

    

Basic

     18,479        18,466   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

     18,696        18,533   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE

   $ 0.07      $ 0.11   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

31


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     Common Stock      Additional
Paid-In
Capital
     Treasury
Stock
    Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Total  
   Shares      Amount                                  

BALANCE—December 31, 2009, as restated

     18,456,524       $ 186       $ 96,101       $ (2,294   $ 276      $ (97,277   $ (3,008

Comprehensive income:

                 

Net income, as restated

     —           —           —           —          —          2,111        2,111   

Translation adjustment

     —           —           —           —          137        —          137   
                 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

                    2,248   

Employee stock purchase plan

     9,747         —           6         —          —          —          6   

Exercise of employee stock options

     2,500         —           —           —          —          —          —     

Stock compensation expense, as restated

     —           —           125         —          —          —          125   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2010, as restated

     18,468,771         186         96,232         (2,294     413        (95,166     (629

Comprehensive income:

                 

Net income

     —           —           —           —          —          1,325        1,325   

Translation adjustment

     —           —           —           —          (407     —          (407
                 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

                    918   

Employee stock purchase plan

     20,095         —           13         —          —          —          13   

Exercise of employee stock options

     17,500            6         —          —          —          6   

Stock compensation expense

     —           —           121         —          —          —          121   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2011

     18,506,366       $ 186       $ 96,372       $ (2,294   $ 6      $ (93,841   $ 429   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

32


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands)

 

     2011     2010  
           (As
Restated)
 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net income

   $ 1,325      $ 2,111   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     3,437        4,094   

Gain on sale of assets

     (1,468     —     

Impairment of goodwill

     316        323   

Lease impairment

     283        —     

Provision for bad debts

     8        357   

Stock compensation expense

     121        125   

Deferred taxes

     182        (253

Debt issuance cost amortization

     38        73   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

Trade accounts receivable

     1,222        (138

Prepaids and other assets

     1,441        (882

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     (2,335     (2,260

Customer deposits and deferred revenue

     (771     (1,802
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     3,799        1,748   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Capital expenditures

     (2,338     (2,855

Sale of assets, net of costs to sell

     2,702        —     

Change in restricted cash

     (200     —     

Payment of contingent consideration

     (324     (325
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (160     (3,180
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Repayments of long-term debt

     (583     (1,167

Borrowings from credit facility

     12,000        16,500   

Payments on credit facility

     (15,400     (13,900

Debt issue costs

     —          (15

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

     6        —     

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plans

     13        6   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (3,964     1,424   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     (87     (324
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     (412     (332
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year

     2,565        2,897   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of year

   $ 2,153      $ 2,565   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

33


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands, except share data)

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

TRX is a travel technology and data services provider, offering more than 20 software-as-a-service utilities for reservation processing, data intelligence, expense reporting, and process automation. We provide patented savings maximization solutions, extending spend management services to travel buyers all over the world. We complement all of this with a global workforce focused on travel process automation and reengineering expertise. For the foreseeable future, we intend to focus our efforts primarily on the opportunities within the travel industry. We deliver our technology applications as a service over the Internet to travel agencies, corporations, travel suppliers, government agencies, credit card associations, credit card issuing banks, and third-party administrators. TRX is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia with operations and associates in North America, Europe, and Asia. We are majority-owned by BCD Technology, S.A. (“BCD”).

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TRX, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods presented. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consisted solely of investment grade commercial paper at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Interest income during 2011 and 2010 was $32 and $13, respectively.

Restricted Cash—Restricted cash represents the balance held in trust related to the sale of our corporate online booking technology, RESX and related customer contracts. There was no restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2010. See Note 8 for additional disclosures about the restricted cash balance.

Correction of an Error—During the process of preparing our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, we determined that our calculation of stock compensation expense related to stock options in previously issued financial statements was incorrect for the year ended December 31, 2010, and for prior periods. Our calculation applied forfeiture adjustments to both vested and unvested outstanding options, including those for which the employee had provided the requisite service, which results in an understatement of stock compensation expense in 2010 and prior periods. As a result of this error, our previously reported balances of accumulated deficit and additional paid in capital as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were materially misstated and certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statement of operations, consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity (deficit) and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 were materially misstated; accordingly we have restated the prior period financial statements.

The restated opening balances within the accompanying consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity (deficit) for the year ended December 31, 2010 which present the cumulative effect of the error in our calculation of stock compensation expense as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 

     As
Previously
Presented
    Stock Option
Correction
    As Restated  

Additional paid-in capital

   $ 95,653      $ 448      $ 96,101   

Accumulated deficit

   $ (96,829   $ (448   $ (97,277

Total shareholders’ deficit

   $ (3,008   $ —        $ (3,008

 

34


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

The restated consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 and the restated consolidated statement of operations, statement of stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flow from operating activities section of the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 are as follows:

 

     As
Previously
Presented
    Stock Option
Correction
    As Restated  

Additional paid-in capital

   $ 95,416      $ 816      $ 96,232   

Accumulated deficit

   $ (94,350   $ (816   $ (95,166

Total shareholders’ deficit

   $ (629   $ —        $ (629

The additional paid-in capital balance within the restated consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as shown above includes an adjustment to increase stock compensation (credit) expense from $(243) to $125.

 

     As
Previously
Presented
     Stock Option
Correction
    As Restated  

Operating, excluding depreciation and amortization

   $ 33,637       $ 8      $ 33,645   

Selling, general, and administrative, excluding depreciation and amortization

   $ 11,778       $ 353      $ 12,131   

Technology development

   $ 3,650       $ 7      $ 3,657   

Total expenses

   $ 53,979       $ 368      $ 54,347   

OPERATING INCOME

   $ 2,752       $ (368   $ 2,384   

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   $ 2,080       $ (368   $ 1,712   

NET INCOME

   $ 2,479       $ (368   $ 2,111   

BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE

   $ 0.13       $ (0.02   $ 0.11   

 

     As
Previously
Presented
    Stock Option
Correction
    As Restated  

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

      

Net income

   $ 2,479      $ (368 )   $ 2,111   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stock compensation (credit) expense

   $ (243   $ 368      $ 125   

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 1,748      $ —        $ 1,748   

Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and are non-interest bearing. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for receivables that are not probable of collection. Management reviews the accounts receivable by aging category to identify specific customers with known disputes or collectability issues. In determining the amount of the reserve, management makes judgments about the creditworthiness of significant customers based on ongoing credit evaluations. The following table shows our allowance for doubtful accounts and the associated activity for each of the two years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

     2011     2010  

Balance, January 1

   $ (426   $ (422

Provision for bad debts

     (8     (357

Writeoffs, net of recoveries

     144        353   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31

   $ (290   $ (426
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property and Equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The useful lives of computers, software, office equipment, and furniture range from three to seven years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is recorded over the shorter of the terms of the leases or estimated useful lives of five to seven years using the straight-line method.

 

35


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

We have incurred expenditures for software used to facilitate internal data consolidation processes and to enable transaction processing services for our clients. Software costs, including internal payroll costs, incurred in connection with the development or acquisition of software for internal use are charged to technology development expense as incurred until the project enters the application development phase. Costs incurred in the application development phase are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of three years, beginning when the software is ready for use.

The following details the components of property and equipment (and estimated useful lives) at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011     2010  

Computers, purchased software, and equipment (3-5 years)

   $ 19,280      $ 22,142   

Internally-developed software costs (3 years)

     7,244        12,723   

Leasehold improvements (up to 10 years)

     1,646        2,009   

Furniture and fixtures (7 years)

     820        1,117   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     28,990        37,991   

Accumulated depreciation

     (24,987     (32,248
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 4,003      $ 5,743   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation expense was $3,264 and $3,921 during 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Goodwill—Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. We test goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30 or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduces the value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. We recorded an impairment charge to all previously recorded goodwill in 2009. We recorded additional goodwill through December 31, 2011 related to earnout payments on a previous business acquisition transaction. The earnout obligation related to this business acquisition ended on December 31, 2011. Since there was no improvement in our financial outlook, we determined that such goodwill recorded in connection with the earnout payments were also impaired in that same period.

The following table discloses the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011     2010  

Balance, January 1

   $ 37,975      $ 37,652   

Accumulated impairment losses

     (37,975     (37,652
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnout on Travel Analytics

     316        323   

Impairment charge

     (316     (323
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31

     38,291        37,975   

Accumulated impairment losses

     (38,291     (37,975
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Intangible Assets—We have recorded amounts related to the value of identifiable intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations and purchases of certain assets in prior years. These amounts are included in other assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

We expect to record approximately $173 of amortization expense related to these intangible assets in each of the next two years and $44 in the year thereafter. We recorded related amortization expense of $173 for both 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

36


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Changes in other intangible assets during 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

 

     2011     2010  

Balance, January 1

   $ 563      $ 736   

Amortization of intangible assets

     (173     (173
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31

   $ 390      $ 563   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

A summary of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

 

     Useful
Lives
     December 31, 2011     December 31, 2010  
      Gross
Carrying
Value
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Gross
Carrying
Value
     Accumulated
Amortization
 

Trademarks and patents

     10 years       $ 866       $ (476   $ 866       $ (303

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—We regularly evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate whether the carrying amount of property and equipment and other intangible assets may warrant revision or may not be recoverable. When factors indicate that these long-lived assets should be evaluated for recoverability, we assess the recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such long-lived assets will be recovered through the future undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. We assessed indicators to determine whether the carrying values of long-lived assets, including property and equipment and other intangible assets should be impaired and determined no impairment was required at December 31, 2011.

Fair Value Measurements—We adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)’s guidance on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic for our financial assets and financial liabilities on January 1, 2008 and for our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1, 2009. Under this guidance, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The guidance outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures.

We currently do not have financial or non-financial assets and financial or non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Other Assets—At December 31, 2011 and 2010, other assets include $192 and $ 232, respectively, of deposits related to our India operations.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities—This balance consists of the following components at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011      2010  

Accounts payable and other

   $ 2,101       $ 2,601   

Personnel-related accruals

     1,380         2,630   

Client-related accruals

     2,263         2,252   

Lease termination accrual

     505         249   

Accrued interest

     83         118   

Income tax payable

     41         251   

Facility-related accruals

     276         174   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 6,649       $ 8,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Customer Deposits and Deferred Revenue—Several customer agreements require prepayments to us for transaction revenue. These deposits are recognized as revenue as the service is provided. In addition, deferred revenue primarily represents services and implementation fees that are prepaid, and recognized as revenue when earned.

 

37


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Revenue Recognition and Cost Deferral—We recognize revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) services have been performed; (3) the fee for services is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, these criteria are considered to have been met as follows:

 

   

For transaction revenue, in which we perform ticketing, file-finishing, data consolidation and reporting, and customer care services, when the services are provided;

 

   

For short-term client-specific customizations, which do not generate direct on-going incremental transaction revenue, when the customization has been delivered to our customer; and

 

   

For implementation and set-up fees, which generate direct on-going incremental transaction revenue, over the life of the underlying transaction service agreement. Related costs are deferred and recognized as expenses over the life of the underlying transaction service agreement.

Client reimbursements received for direct costs paid to third parties and related expenses are characterized as revenue. Client reimbursements represent direct costs paid to third parties primarily for voice and data and items such as paper tickets.

Concentration of Credit Risk—A significant portion of our revenues is derived from a limited number of clients. Our top five clients accounted for approximately 61% and 69% of our total revenues in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Contracts with the major clients may be terminated by the client if we fail to meet certain performance criteria. Expedia, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for 38% and 44% of revenues in 2011 and 2010, respectively. The agreement with Expedia is amended from time to time and now continues through December 31, 2012. We can give no assurance that we will retain any business from Expedia during the current contract period or beyond. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“American Express”) accounted for 14% and 16% of revenues during both 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, 6% and 5%, respectively, of our accounts receivable related to American Express.

Earnings per Share—Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing reported income or loss available to common shareholders by weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Income or loss available to common shareholders is the same as reported net income or loss for all periods presented.

Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing reported earnings available to common shareholders, adjusted for the earnings effect of potentially dilutive securities, by weighted average shares outstanding during the period and the impact of securities that, if exercised, would have a dilutive effect on earnings per share.

All common stock equivalents with an exercise price less than the average market share price for the period are assumed to have a dilutive effect on earnings per share. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:

 

     2011      2010  
   Net
Income
     Weighted
Average
Shares
     Per
Share
     Net
Income
     Weighted
Average
Shares
     Per
Share
 

Basic net income per share

   $ 1,325         18,479       $ 0.07       $ 2,111         18,466       $ 0.11   

Effect of dilutive securities:

                 

Options to acquire common stock

     —           217         —           —           67         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted net income per share

   $ 1,325         18,696       $ 0.07       $ 2,111         18,533       $ 0.11   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Because of their anti-dilutive effect on the income per share recorded in each of the periods presented, the diluted share base excludes shares related to employee stock options of 1,607 and 1,694 for 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Stock-Based Employee Compensation—We account for stock-based employee compensation under the Compensation—Stock Compensation Topic of the FASB Standards Codification. The grant-date fair value of the

 

38


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

options granted during 2011, calculated using the Black-Scholes model, ranged from $0.47 to $1.02. The grant-date fair value of the options granted during 2010, calculated using the Black-Scholes model, ranged from $0.41 to $0.70.

The following assumptions were used for grants in 2011: dividend yield of zero, volatility of 132.9% to 192.6%, risk-free interest rate of 0.21% to 1.99%, and an expected life of 2.00 to 4.25 years. The following assumptions were used for grants in 2010: dividend yield of zero, volatility of 133.5% to 189.1%, risk-free interest rate of 0.35% to 1.96%, and an expected life of 2.00 to 4.25 years. Volatility is based on the volatility of our stock. We use an estimate for the expected life and historical data to estimate the employee termination and volatility assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant over the expected life of the grant.

At December 31, 2011, options to purchase 85,690 shares of common stock were available for future grant under our stock plan. The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011:

 

Range of Exercise Prices

   Options Outstanding      Options Exercisable  
   Number of
Shares
     Weighted
Average
Remaining Life
     Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
     Number of
Shares
     Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

$0.29 – $2.99

     2,083,500         7.0       $ 1.51         1,407,750       $ 1.90   

$3.00 – $12.24

     351,000         3.7       $ 9.05         351,000       $ 9.05   
  

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     2,434,500         6.6       $ 2.60         1,758,750       $ 3.30   
  

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Information regarding activity under our stock plan is summarized as follows:

 

     2011      2010  
   Options     Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
     Options     Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at January 1

     2,339,000      $ 3.04         2,458,000      $ 3.63   

Granted

     357,000        0.83         140,000        0.60   

Cancelled

     (244,000     4.40         (256,500     7.42   

Exercised

     (17,500     0.35         (2,500     0.35   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31

     2,434,500      $ 2.60         2,339,000      $ 3.04   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. At December 31, 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $731 with a weighted average exercise price of $2.60 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.6 years; the aggregate intrinsic value of the 1,758,750 options exercisable was $399 with a weighted average exercise price of $3.30 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.8 years; and the aggregate intrinsic value of the 2,176,443 options vested or expected to vest was $653 with a weighted average exercise price of $2.60 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.6 years.

 

39


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

The following table summarizes unvested stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2011 as well as activity during the year then ended:

 

     Unvested Options  
   Options     Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value
 

Outstanding at January 1

     835,251      $ 0.84   

Granted

     357,000        0.83   

Cancelled

     (68,000     0.77   

Vested

     (448,500     0.85   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31

     675,751      $ 0.83   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Compensation cost from nonvested stock granted to employees is recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2011, total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options was approximately $185. Approximately half of this cost is expected to be recognized over the next year, with the remainder primarily over the subsequent two years. For 2011 and 2010, our total stock-based compensation expense was approximately $121 and $125, respectively.

Income Taxes—We account for income taxes under the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. A valuation allowance is recorded when appropriate to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and several foreign jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Our judgments, assumptions, and estimates relative to the provision for income taxes take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities. In spite of our belief that we have appropriate support for all the positions taken on our tax returns, we acknowledge that certain positions may be successfully challenged by the taxing authorities.

Under the provisions of ASC 740-10, we record a liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions in various jurisdictions, which would affect earnings and the effective tax rate if the tax benefits were recognized. We recognize interest expense and penalty expense related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of our income tax expense. In addition, the tax effect of discrete items is booked entirely in the quarter in which the discrete event occurs.

Although we believe our recorded tax assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax laws and regulations are subject to interpretation and inherent uncertainty. Upon examination, the final determination could be materially different than that which is reflected in our provision for income taxes and recorded tax assets and liabilities.

Statement of Cash Flows—Cash paid for interest was $472 and $625 for 2011 and 2010. Cash paid for income taxes net of amounts refunded was $318 in 2011 and $143 in 2010. We had accrued capital expenditures of $0 and $23 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation—We have subsidiaries operating in the United Kingdom, Germany and India at December 31, 2011. The functional currency of these operations is the local currency. Gains and losses on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are included in determining net income (loss) for the period in which the exchange rates change. Foreign exchange transaction gains or losses were not material for any period presented. Balance sheet accounts of international subsidiaries are translated at the year-end exchange rate, and income statement accounts are translated at the average rates prevailing during the year. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity (deficit).

 

40


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk—Approximately 33% and 28% of our consolidated revenues during 2011 and 2010 were associated with operations outside of the United States. At December 31, 2011, 30% of our consolidated assets were associated with operations outside of the United States compared to 36% at December 31, 2010. The U.S. dollar balance sheets and statements of operations for these businesses are subject to currency fluctuations. We are most vulnerable to fluctuations in the British pound, Euro and Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar. Historically, we have not entered into derivative financial instruments to mitigate this risk, as it has not been cost-effective to do so. Through 2011, the impact of currency fluctuations on our results of operations has not been significant since both revenues and operating costs of these businesses are denominated in local currency.

Segment Reporting—Operating segments are defined by the Segments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Chief Executive Officer is our chief operating decision maker. The expense structure of the business is managed functionally, and resource allocation decisions are made as one operating segment. Our measure of segment profit is consolidated operating income.

Our revenue, aggregated by service offering, is as follows for each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011      2010  

Transaction processing

   $ 37,115       $ 44,764   

Data intelligence

     11,888         11,470   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Transaction and other revenues

     49,003         56,234   

Client reimbursements

     365         497   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 49,368       $ 56,731   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following is a geographic breakdown of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and a geographic breakdown of long-lived assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011      2010  

Revenues:

     

United States

   $ 33,164       $ 40,850   

Germany

     12,396         10,960   

Other International

     3,808         4,921   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 49,368       $ 56,731   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Property and Equipment, net:

     

United States

   $ 3,420       $ 5,266   

Germany

     384         277   

Other International

     199         200   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 4,003       $ 5,743   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements—

Comprehensive Income— In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial

 

41


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

statements. The new guidance revised the presentation options in ASC Topic 220 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. In either option, entities are required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We have not determined the presentation format that will be used in future periods. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the provisions only relate to presentation and disclosure.

On December 23, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, which indefinitely defers the provision of ASU No. 2011-5 related to the requirement that entities present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented.

3. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Obligations—We lease certain facilities and equipment under noncancelable operating lease agreements which expire at various times through 2019. Some of these leases contain renewal options under various terms. Future minimum annual lease payments under the related noncancelable operating leases and future sublease income at December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

     Gross      Sub-lease
income
     Net  

2012

   $ 1,944       $ 110       $ 1,834   

2013

     1,358         135         1,223   

2014

     1,212         138         1,074   

2015

     962         128         834   

2016

     984         —           984   

Thereafter

     2,904         —           2,904   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 9,364       $ 511       $ 8,853   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Rental expense for 2011 and 2010 was $1,934 and $1,884, respectively. Rental expense for 2011 and 2010 includes lease impairments of $283 and $0, respectively, which relates to the sublease of a portion of our office facilities in Atlanta, Georgia

Employment Agreements—We have entered into employment agreements with certain key executives. The agreements provide for compensation and benefits through the expiration of the individual agreement upon termination of employment, other than by the employee voluntarily or by us for cause. Minimum commitments under these agreements are $1,470 for 2012.

Litigation —We are involved in a few claims incidental to our business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of such claims will not have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

Savings Plan—In the U.S., we sponsor a 401(k) profit-sharing plan (the “Plan”) under which substantially all full-time employees are eligible to participate. Participants are also eligible to receive a discretionary match. Total expense recognized under the Plan was $249 and $297 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. In the United Kingdom, Germany and India, we participate in defined-contribution plans. Total expense recognized under these plans was $96 and $124 in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

42


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

4. DEBT

Debt consists of the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     Maturity
Date
     2011      2010  

Note payable

     April 2011       $ —         $ 583   

Revolver

     June 2012         800         4,200   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

        800         4,783   

Less current maturities

        800         583   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term debt

      $ —         $ 4,200   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Our note payable related to partial consideration for the acquisition of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Hi-Mark, LLC in 2007. Hi-Mark was principally owned by Kevin Austin, our Executive Vice President of TRAVELTRAX. Our quarterly principal payments were approximately $300 plus interest at a fixed annual rate of 8.0%. This note matured and was paid in April 2011.

Our credit agreement with Atlantic Capital Bank (“ACB”) provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility with aggregate principal commitments not to exceed $10,000, which includes a $2,000 letter of credit subfacility limit. Any outstanding letters of credit on this subfacility reduce the borrowing capacity of the credit agreement. A loan under the credit agreement may be a Base Rate loan or a LIBOR loan, at the option of TRX. Interest under the credit agreement accrues at an interest rate indexed to the prime rate as announced publicly by ACB from time to time (the “Base Rate”) or LIBOR (plus 1.75% for Base Rate loans and 3.00% for LIBOR loans) for the revolving credit facility, with a minimum borrowing rate of 4.25%. In addition, the credit agreement contains an unused commitment fee of 0.5%. For letters of credit, the letter of credit fee is equal to the Applicable Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) times the daily amount available to be drawn under the letter of credit. Overdue amounts bear a fee of 2% per annum above the rate applicable to these amounts. We capitalized $215 of issuance cost related to this facility and our letter of credit, which is amortized as interest expense over the specific terms of the facility and letter of credit.

The credit agreement requires us to maintain (i) a ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement, which may not be comparable to consolidated total debt or measures of GAAP profitability presented elsewhere in this document) of not more than 1.75 to 1.00 and (ii) a ratio of the remainder of consolidated EBITDA minus capital expenditures to the sum of interest expense for the period and debt principal payments required to be made in the next twelve months of not more than 1.40 to 1.00. The credit agreement also contains additional covenants which, among other things, require us to deliver to ACB specified financial information, including annual and quarterly financial information, and limit our ability to (or to permit any subsidiaries to), subject to various exceptions and limitations, (i) merge with other companies, (ii) create liens on our property, (iii) incur debt obligations, (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates, except on an arms-length basis, (v) dispose of property, or (vi) pay dividends. As of December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all financial covenants in the credit agreement.

BCD Holdings N.V. (“BCD Holdings”), the parent of our majority shareholder, BCD, is the guarantor to our credit agreement. We pay BCD Holdings an annual guarantee fee of 250-350 basis points, depending on borrowing levels under the credit agreement.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on having sufficient liquidity for our operations. We are currently in compliance with all financial covenants in the credit agreement. As of December, 2011, we have borrowed $800 against the facility and there was a $1,500 letter of credit against this facility relating to the lease of our Atlanta office, leaving $7,700 that is currently available for borrowing. As of

 

43


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the interest rate on our outstanding borrowings was 4.25%. We expect to remain in compliance with all financial covenants over the remaining term of our revolving credit facility with ACB, however, we acknowledge that market conditions remain uncertain, and, as such, can provide no assurances that we will remain in compliance. We monitor our expected debt compliance and believe we would have time to further reduce our expenses and/or capital expenditures if needed to remain in compliance. If we are not successful in maintaining our debt compliance, ACB as lender is entitled to enforce the guarantee under our credit facility. Our credit agreement with ACB matures June 30, 2012. Based on our favorable history of renewals and expected capital needs, we expect to renew the facility prior to its maturity. If we were unable to renew the facility prior to maturity or secure additional financing, management believes that the existing cash on hand, excluding cash held by foreign subsidiaries, cash flow from operations, as well as our ability to implement cost containment strategies would provide the needed liquidity to fund operations sufficient to continue as a going concern.

5. INCOME TAXES

Our domestic and foreign (loss) income before income taxes for 2011 was $(168) and $2,001, respectively. Our domestic and foreign (loss) income before income taxes for 2010 was $(104) and $1,816, respectively. The following presents the components of income tax (provision) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Certain corrections have been made to prior year amounts in order to present the components of income tax (provision) benefit according to domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Such corrections were not considered material.

 

     2011     2010  

Current tax (provision) benefit:

    

Federal

     42        (42

State

     (18     (35

Foreign

     (350     293   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     (326     216   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax (provision) benefit:

    

Federal

     —          —     

State

     —          —     

Foreign

     (182     183   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     (182     183   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total tax (provision) benefit

   $ (508   $ 399   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

44


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Deferred taxes are as follows at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

     2011     2010  

Current deferred tax assets:

    

Accruals

   $ (171   $ 643   

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     103        150   

Deferred revenue

     345        232   

Effect of uncertain tax positions on deferred items

     —          37   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current deferred tax assets

     277        1,062   

Noncurrent deferred tax assets:

    

Net operating loss carryforwards—U.S.

     16,293        15,886   

Net operating loss carryforwards—foreign

     1,984        1,996   

Intangible assets

     4,496        4,782   

Property and equipment

     646        483   

Accrued bonuses

     415        —     

Stock compensation

     374        402   

Charitable contribution carryforward

     4        5   

Indian adjustment

     9        7   

Indian MAT credit carryforward

     220        300   

Alternative minimum tax credit (“AMT”) carryforward

     168        168   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noncurrent deferred tax assets

     24,609        24,029   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Outside basis difference —Germany

     (842     (618

Foreign withholding tax

     (51     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

     (893     (618
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

     23,993        24,473   

Valuation allowance

     (23,910     (24,201
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   $ 83      $ 272   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The stock compensation deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2010 in the above table was corrected as a result of the error described in Note 2. This correction resulted in a corresponding increase to the valuation allowance.

 

45


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, U.S. federal net operating losses of $45,036 and $44,562, respectively, are available to offset future taxable income, and expire beginning in 2021 and continuing through 2031. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, U.S. state net operating losses of $25,303 and $25,910 are available to offset future state taxable income, and expire beginning in 2020 and continuing through 2031. We have not performed a study to determine if these net operating losses could be partially limited by Internal Revenue Code Section 382, but we are not aware of any events that would trigger the imposition of Section 382 limitations. Additionally, there is a full valuation allowance applied to these amounts due to uncertainty of usage. Foreign net operating losses of $9,921 and $9,979 are available to offset future taxable income, and these losses are in jurisdictions with no expiration date on usage. At both December 31, 2011 and 2010, AMT credit carryforwards of $168 are available and can be carried forward indefinitely. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, Indian Minimum Alternative Tax (“MAT”) credit carryforwards of $220 and $300, respectively, are available and can be carried forward for either 7 years (credits generated prior to April 1, 2010) or 10 years (credits generated after March 31, 2010). We do not provide for deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over the tax basis in our investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. This amount becomes taxable upon a repatriation of assets from the subsidiary or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiary. With the exception of our German subsidiary, it is our intent to reinvest the earnings of our non-US subsidiaries in those operations, and we are not required to provide deferred taxes on any excess. Determination of the amount of the unrecognized income tax liability that would be recorded were these earnings to be repatriated is not determinable due to complexities associated with the hypothetical calculation. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we determined that it is no longer our intent to permanently reinvest the German earnings in our German subsidiary. We have established a deferred tax liability for the estimated outside basis difference in the German subsidiary as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. A reconciliation of income taxes at the federal statutory rate to the tax provision recorded by us for 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

 

     2011     2010  

Federal income tax benefit at statutory rate

     34.0     34.0

State income taxes—net of federal benefit

     1.4        0.1   

Domestic permanent differences

     1.1        2.5   

International permanent differences

     (1.3     (15.0

Indian MAT tax

     5.8        6.8   

Indian MAT credit

     2.6        (5.6

Deferred rate true-up

     (0.1     52.8   

Outside basis difference—German Subsidiary

     15.0        36.1   

ASC 740-10 liability

     (2.8     (28.4

Difference in foreign rates from federal statutory

     (14.1     (4.5

Other

     (2.2     (14.8

Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance

     (11.7     (87.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     27.7     (23.3 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The valuation allowance was recorded because management is unable to conclude that it is more likely than not that our U.S. net deferred tax assets will be realized and that our U.K. and Indian net deferred tax assets will be realized in their entirety.

The evaluation of an uncertain tax position is a two-step process of recognition and measurement. We recognize the benefit of an uncertain tax position if we determine that the position will be more likely than not to be sustained, based on the technical merits of the position. We measure the amount of the benefit at the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being recognized upon settlement.

 

46


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits for 2011 and 2010 is presented in the table below.

 

     2011     2010  

Unrecognized tax benefits, January 1

   $ 605      $ 1,107   

Increase related to prior year’s unrecognized income tax benefits

     (332     332   

Cumulative translation adjustment

     (6     (83

Decreases for tax positions related to settlements

     (267     (751
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits, December 31

   $ —        $ 605   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Of this amount, $0 would impact the effective income tax rate if we were to recognize the benefit of such positions.

We do not expect any material changes in the unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months.

We recognize potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had accrued interest of $0 and $8, respectively. We had no accrued penalties recorded at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

The following summarizes the open tax years by jurisdiction as of December 31, 2011:

 

Jurisdiction

   Open Tax Years

Federal

   2008-2011

Georgia

   2008-2011

Florida

   2008-2011

Texas

   2006-2011

Virginia

   2008-2011

West Virginia

   2008-2011

United Kingdom

   2010-2011

Germany

   2007-2011

India

   2009-2011

Our last federal audit was for the 2004 tax year and it was concluded in 2007. We are not currently under audit domestically as of December 31, 2011. We concluded our German audit for the 2004-2006 tax years during 2011. We are not under audit for any other international jurisdictions as of December 31, 2010. The state of Texas is reviewing our Texas Margin Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 as part of a previously-scheduled sales and use tax audit with the state. We believe that we have appropriately accrued for any material uncertain tax positions inherent in these examinations.

6. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Stock Options—We have two stock-based employee compensation plans. The TRX, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”) was amended upon our initial public offering in September 2005 to, among other things, increase the number of shares available for issuance to employees from 1,300,000 to 3,300,000 and to expand the types of awards permitted to be made. The Stock Plan allows the issuance of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, and stock purchase rights. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our stock at the date of grant; those option awards generally vest ratably over four years and have 10-year contractual terms. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change of control (as defined in the Stock Plan). In addition our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) has 500,000 shares reserved for issuance. As of December 31, 2011, 246,914 shares have been issued under our ESPP. See Note 2 for further information about our stock options.

 

47


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Preferred Stock—We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, no preferred stock was outstanding.

7. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

BCD Travel USA, LLC (“BCD Travel”) is majority-owned by the parent of our majority shareholder, BCD Holdings. Effective January 1, 2011, the existing online booking services agreement between TRX Technology Services, L.P. (“TRX Technology”) and BCD Travel was extended to January 1, 2015 and updated certain pricing and other terms under agreement. Effective November 1, 2011, the online booking services agreement was assigned by us to nuTravel Technology Solutions, LLC (“nuTravel”) as part of the sale transaction further described below. During 2011 and 2010, we recognized transaction and other revenues from BCD Travel, totaling $1,168 and $1,424, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 we continue to provide Data intelligence services to BCD Travel. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, $188 and $107 was receivable from BCD Travel.

Airtrade International, Inc. (“Vayama”) is majority-owned by the parent of our majority shareholder, BCD Holdings. The agreement between TRX Technologies India PVT Ltd. and Vayama, dated February 15, 2009 and amended on February 17, 2010, was entered into between the parties for travel management services and was effective January 28, 2010 through November 19, 2010. Effective June 1, 2011 the existing reservation processing services agreement between TRX Technology and Vayama automatically renewed for one year to May 31, 2012. During 2011 and 2010, we recognized transaction and other revenues from Vayama totaling $60 and $1,154, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, $0 and $278 was receivable from Vayama.

Park ‘N Fly, Inc. (“Park ‘N Fly”) is owned by the parent of our majority shareholder, BCD Holdings. TRX and Park ‘N Fly entered into an agreement, dated September 1, 2011, for referral services through TRX’s corporate travel self-booking tool. This referral services agreement has been assigned by us to nuTravel as part of the sale transaction further described below. During 2011, we recognized revenues from Park ‘N Fly totaling $3. At December 31, 2011 no amounts were receivable from Park ‘N Fly.

8. SALE OF ASSETS

On November 3, 2011, TRX, its subsidiary TRX Technology and nuTravel executed and closed an Asset Purchase Agreement effective October 31, 2011 (the “Agreement”) in which nuTravel acquired software, websites, certain customer agreements and intellectual property related to TRX’s corporate online booking technology, RESX.

TRX received cash consideration during 2011 of $2,804, of which $200 was placed with a third party escrow agent to be held for up to two years and distributed in accordance with the Indemnity Escrow Agreement. We paid $102 in costs to sell in 2011. Additionally, TRX has the ability to earn up to an additional $516 on or before December 31, 2012, subject to the conversion of certain nonassignable contracts to nuTravel as provided for in the Agreement. The revenue related to these contracts will be recognized by TRX upon conversion to NuTravel. TRX recorded a gain of $1,468 related to the sale of RESX assets, which is included in “Gain on sale of assets” in our consolidated statements of operations.

In conjunction with the execution of the Agreement, TRX and nuTravel also entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”). Under the terms of the Services Agreement, for a period not to exceed December 31, 2012, TRX will provide certain transition and technical services at an annualized rate of $1,800 to support the continued operation of the RESX services and to facilitate the orderly and effective transition of the RESX services from TRX to nuTravel.

 

48


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

9. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)

All four quarters of 2010 and the first three quarters of 2011 have been restated to reflect the correction of stock compensation expense referred to in Note 2. Quarterly financial data for 2011 and 2010 as previously reported and as restated is as follows (tables in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

As previously reported                           

2011

   Q1 2011      Q2 2011     Q3 2011      Q4 2011  

Revenues

   $ 12,598       $ 12,409      $ 12,874       $ 11,487   

Operating income (loss)

     697         (291     890         1,186   

Net income (loss)

     403         (478     743         862   

Net income (loss) per weighted average share, diluted: common shareholders

   $ 0.02       $ (0.03   $ 0.04       $ 0.05   

 

2010

   Q1 2010      Q2 2010      Q3 2010      Q4 2010  

Revenues

   $ 14,678       $ 14,152       $ 13,729       $ 14,172   

Operating income

     926         837         793         196   

Net income

     483         403         797         796   

Net income per weighted average share, diluted: common shareholders

   $ 0.03       $ 0.02       $ 0.04       $ 0.04   

 

As restated                           

2011

   Q1 2011      Q2 2011     Q3 2011      Q4 2011  

Revenues

   $ 12,598       $ 12,409      $ 12,874       $ 11,487   

Operating income (loss) as restated

     664         (316     743         1,186   

Net income (loss) as restated

     370         (503     596         862   

Net income (loss) per weighted average share, diluted: as restated

   $ 0.02       $ (0.03   $ 0.03       $ 0.05   

 

2010

   Q1 2010      Q2 2010      Q3 2010      Q4 2010  

Revenues

   $ 14,678       $ 14,152       $ 13,729       $ 14,172   

Operating income as restated

     834         793         561         196   

Net income as restated

     391         359         565         796   

Net income per weighted average share, diluted: as restated

   $ 0.02       $ 0.02       $ 0.03       $ 0.04   

The 2011 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements will be prospectively restated in the quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q for the first three quarters in 2012.

 

Item  9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

 

Item  9A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as of December 31, 2011. Our evaluation tested controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding

 

49


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

required disclosure. Based on our evaluation, as of December 31, 2011, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below in the area of accounting for stock compensation.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as described below, there were no changes to internal controls in the fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company has completed the following steps to begin to remediate the stock compensation deficiency:

 

   

developed and implemented additional procedures to increase the level of review, evaluation and validation of the Company’s stock compensation expense;

 

   

increased the level of knowledge among Company employees in the area of stock compensation; and

 

   

corrected and tested the template used to calculate stock compensation expense.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO Framework”). A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a Company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls. Due to the error related to stock compensation accounting, management has determined that there is a material weakness in the design of the company’s internal control over financial reporting in the area of accounting for stock compensation, and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2011.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

TRX’s performance under the Executive Incentive Plan with respect to fiscal year 2011 was satisfied above the minimum level of performance measures and therefore resulted in a performance award for the Executive Incentive Plan participants. The Compensation, Corporate Governance, and Nominating Committee certified results of the 2011 performance measures, reviewed the payout calculation of the awards earned, and recommended to the Board the cash payout of the awards earned. Additionally, the Committee recommended to the Board the cash payout of a discretionary bonus to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer related to the sale of the RESX corporate online booking technology in the amount of $78,000 and $66,000, respectively. Such recommendations were subsequently approved by the Board on February 29, 2012.

 

50


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this section will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the sections entitled “Proposal 1—Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers and Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Corporate Governance. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted the TRX, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics meets the requirements of a “code of ethics” as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K, and applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (who is both our principal financial and principal accounting officer), as well as all other employees, as indicated above. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also meets the requirements of a code of conduct under the NASDAQ listing standards. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.trx.com under the links “Investor Center—Corporate Governance—Conduct.” We intend to disclose any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers for executive officers or directors, on our website at www.trx.com.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by this Item 11 relating to executive compensation and other matters is set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Non-Employee Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information relating to ownership of our common stock is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above. Such information is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information relating to existing or proposed relationships or transactions between us and any of our affiliates is set forth under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information relating to our principal accountant’s fees and services is set forth under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

51


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Documents filed as part of this report.

1. Consolidated Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements are set forth in “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules to our consolidated financial statements have been omitted because they are not required under the related instruction or are inapplicable, or because we have included the required information in our consolidated financial statements or related notes.

3. Exhibits

The exhibits filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K and listed on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits, which Exhibit Index is incorporated in this Item 15 by reference.

(b) Exhibits

See Item 15(a) (3) above.

(c) Financial Statement Schedules

See Item 15(a) (2) above.

 

52


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

TRX, Inc.
By:   /s/    H. SHANE HAMMOND
    H. Shane Hammond
    President, Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 6, 2012

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints H. Shane Hammond and David D. Cathcart, and each of them his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2011, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/    H. SHANE HAMMOND

H. Shane Hammond

  

President, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

  March 6, 2012

/s/    DAVID D. CATHCART

David D. Cathcart

  

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)

  March 6, 2012

/s/    NORWOOD H. (“TRIP”)  DAVIS, III

Norwood H. (“Trip”) Davis, III

   Chairman of the Board and Director   March 6, 2012

/s/    JOHAN G. (“JOOP”) DRECHSEL

Johan G. Drechsel

   Director   March 6, 2012

/s/    MARK R. BELL

Mark R. Bell

   Director   March 6, 2012

/s/    JOHN F. DAVIS, III

John F. Davis, III

   Director   March 6, 2012

/s/    JOHN A. FENTENER  VAN VLISSINGEN

John A. Fentener van Vlissingen

   Director   March 6, 2012

/s/    WILLIAM A. CLEMENT, JR.

William A. Clement, Jr.

   Director   March 6, 2012

 

53


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

TRX, INC.

FORM 10-K

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description

  3.1    Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of TRX, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on July 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
  3.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of TRX, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on July 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
  4.1    Specimen Common Stock certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 4 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on July 27, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1    Letter Agreement, dated December 31, 2004, by and among BCD Technology, S.A. and Norwood H. Davis, III, Davis Family Holdings, LLC and Davis Family Holdings II, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on May 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2    Credit Agreement, dated May 30, 2008, by and between TRX, Inc. and Atlantic Capital Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3    First Amendment to Credit Agreement by and between TRX, Inc. and Atlantic Capital Bank, effective December 3, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4    Second Amendment to Credit Agreement by and between TRX, Inc. and Atlantic Capital Bank, effective October 19, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 9, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5    Third Amendment to Credit Agreement by and between TRX, Inc. and Atlantic Capital Bank, effective November 5, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6    Agreement to Modify Credit Agreement, Security Agreement and Application and Reimbursement Agreement for Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit by and between TRX, Inc. and Atlantic Capital Bank effective June 9, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7    Promissory Note made by TRX, Inc. in favor of Hi-Mark, LLC, dated January 11, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8    First Amendment to the Promissory Note made by TRX, Inc. in favor of Hi-Mark, LLC, dated as of November 7, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9    Services Agreement, dated December 23, 2002, by and between American Airlines, Inc. and TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on June 17, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.10    Amendment #1 to Services Agreement between TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC and American Airlines, Inc., dated February 1, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).*

 

54


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit No.

  

Description

10.11    Amendment II to Services Agreement between TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC and American Airlines, Inc., effective July 1, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.12    Amendment #3 to Services Agreement between TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC and American Airlines, Inc., effective June 29, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13    Amendment #4 to Services Agreement between TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC and American Airlines, Inc., effective September 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.14    Amendment #5 to Services Agreement between TRX Fulfillment Services, LLC and American Airlines, Inc., effective September 28, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.15    Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider including Statements of Work #1-#3 and #6 between TRX, Inc and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., entered into as of December 3, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 13, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.16    Amendment to Statement of Work #3 to Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., dated November 29, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17    Statement of Work #4 to Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective December 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.18    Statement of Work #5 to Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective August 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.19    Statement of Work #7 to the Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective February 18, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.20    Amended and Restated Statement of Work #7 to the Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., dated August 17, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.21    Statement of Work #8 to the Amended and Restated Master Service Agreement for Application Service Provider between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective January 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.22    Amended and Restated Agreement for the Provision of Services, dated December 1, 2005, by and between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).*

 

55


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit No.

  

Description

10.23    Amendment #1 to Amended and Restated Agreement for the Provision of Services between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Service Company, Inc., dated October 23, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.24    Amendment #2 to Amended and Restated Agreement for the Provision of Services between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective January 1, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.25    Amendment #3 to Amended and Restated Agreement for the Provision of Services between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective October 1, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.26    Amendment #4 to Amended and Restated Agreement for Provision of Services between TRX, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., effective September 1, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.27    Master Services Agreement between Expedia, Inc. and TRX, Inc., dated January 1, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.28    Amendment # 1 to Master Services Agreement between Expedia, Inc. and TRX, Inc., dated March 30, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.46 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.29    Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective March 3, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.30    Second Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective January 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 9, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.31    Amendment to Second Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective June 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 13, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.32    Amendment 2 to Second Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective July 30, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.33    Amendment 3 to Second Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective August 30, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.34    Amendment 4 to Second Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective September 30, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.35    Amendment 5 to Second Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective October 20, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

56


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit No.

  

Description

10.36    Third Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective October 15, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.37    Fourth Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective January 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.38    Fifth Letter of Amendment to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., executed on December 29, 2011. †*
10.39    Amended and Restated Statement of Work for Contact Center Services pursuant to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective January 1, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.40    Amendment #1 to the Amended and Restated Statement of Work for Contact Center Services pursuant to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective January 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.41    Amendment #2 to the Amendment and Restated Statement of Work for Contact Center Services pursuant to the Master Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Expedia, Inc., effective March 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.42    Data Services Contract between TRX, Inc. and the General Services Administration, executed on December 23, 2011. †*
10.43    CORREX Services Agreement between Hogg Robinson Plc and TRX Europe Ltd., dated April 1, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.44    Amendment to CORREX Services Agreement between Hogg Robinson Plc and TRX Europe Ltd., effective January 1, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.45    Second Amendment to CORREX Services Agreement between Hogg Robinson Plc and TRX Europe, Ltd., effective May 19, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.46    Third Amendment to CORREX Services Agreement between Hogg Robinson Plc and TRX Europe, Ltd., effective November 28, 2011. †*
10.47    Amended and Restated Master Agreement dated January 1, 2006 by and between TRX Technology Services, L.P. and World Travel Partners I, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 4, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.48    Amendment 3 to the Amended and Restated Master Agreement between TRX Technology Services, L.P. and BCD Travel USA LLC (formerly known as WorldTravel Partners I, LLC), effective as of January 1, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment #1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, filed on April 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.49    Software and Services Agreement between TRX, Inc. and BCD Travel USA LLC, effective as of January 1, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*

 

57


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit No.

  

Description

10.50    RESX Distributor Agreement between TRX Technology Services, L.P. and BCD Travel USA LLC, effective as of January 1, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.51    Amendment #1 to the RESX Distributor Agreement between TRX Technology Services, L.P. and BCD Travel USA LLC, effective as of January 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.52    Amendment #2 to the RESX Distributor Agreement between TRX Technology Services, L.P. and BCD Travel USA LLC, effective as of July 1, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.53    Referral Source Agreement between TRX, Inc. and Park N Fly, Inc., dated September 6, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.54    Employment Contract between Norwood H. Davis, III and TRX, Inc., dated December 31, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on May 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.55    First Amendment to Employment Contract between Norwood H. Davis, III and TRX, Inc., dated August 26, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.65 to Amendment No. 8 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on September 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.56    Second Amendment to Employment Contract between Norwood H. Davis, III and TRX, Inc., dated June 30, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.57    Third Amendment to Employment Contract between Norwood H. Davis, III and TRX, Inc., dated April 5, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.58    Fourth Amendment to Employment Contract between Norwood H. Davis, III and TRX, Inc., dated January 10, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.59    Fifth Amendment to Employment Contract between Norwood H. Davis, III and TRX, Inc., dated December 10, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.60    Employment Contract between H. Shane Hammond and TRX, Inc., dated December 10, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.61    First Amendment to Employment Contract between H. Shane Hammond and TRX, Inc., effective as of December 6, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.43 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.62    Employment Contract between David Cathcart and TRX, Inc., dated July 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.63    First Amendment to Employment Contract between David Cathcart and TRX, Inc., dated November 15, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.64    Employment Contract between Kevin Austin and TRX, Inc, dated December 7, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

58


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit No.

  

Description

10.65    First Amendment to Employment Contract between Kevin Austin and TRX, Inc., dated December 31, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.66    Second Amendment to Employment Contract between Kevin Austin and TRX, Inc., dated January 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 13, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.67    Office Lease, dated June 25, 2008, by and between TRX, Inc. and NNN Park Central, LLC et. al. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.68    Lease Deed, dated September 29, 2010, by and between TRX Technologies India Private Limited and Mr. Azeez Mohammed, M/s Kay Arr & Company, et. al. (filed as Exhibit 10.50 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 1, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.69    TRX, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.70    TRX, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on July 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.71    TRX, Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.72    Asset Purchase Agreement by and among TRX, Inc., Hi-Mark, LLC, Hi-Mark Travel Systems, Inc., Integrated Profitmark Corporation, LLC and the Owner Entity Shareholders, dated December 7, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.73    First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, by and among TRX, Inc., Hi-Mark, LLC, Hi-Mark Travel Systems, Inc., Integrated Profitmark Corporation, LLC and the Owner Entity Shareholders, dated January 11, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, filed August 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.74    Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Travel Analytics, Inc., Scott Gillespie, Kristina O. Gillespie and TRX, Inc., dated August 2, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.75    Asset Purchase Agreement by and among TRX, Inc., TRX Technology Services, L.P., and nuTravel Technology Solutions, LLC, effective October 31, 2011. †*
21.1    Subsidiaries of the Registrant.†
23.1    Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.†
24.1    Power of Attorney (included with signature page hereto).
31.1    Certification of H. Shane Hammond, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
31.2    Certification of David Cathcart, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
32.1    Section 906 Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Certification.‡

 

59


Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit No.

  

Description

101    The following financial information from TRX, Inc’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. †

 

Filed herewith.
Furnished herewith.
* Confidential treatment requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

60