Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd - FORM 10-K/A

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd	v243754_ex31-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd	v243754_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd	v243754_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd	v243754_ex32-2.htm

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

(MARK ONE)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from _______________ to _________________

Commission file number: 000-53934

TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

NEVADA		26-3552213
(State or Other Jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of Incorporation or Organization)

Unit 1217-1218, 12F of Tower B, Gemdale Plaza, No. 91 Jianguo Road Chaoyang District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China		100022
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(86) 10-8571-2518

Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12 (B) Of The Act:

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share

Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12 (G) Of The Act:

Name of each exchange on which registered: The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated

filer ¨

Accelerated

filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting

company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

The aggregate market value of the shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the registrant held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2010 was zero.

There were 36,807,075 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of December 28, 2011.

Explanatory Note

This Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Trunkbow International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company”), on March 29, 2011 is being filed to (i) amend Item 1A - Risk Factors (ii) amend Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation (iii) amend Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and (iv) include updated Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for our principal executive and financial officers.

Except as specifically referenced herein, this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A does not reflect any event occurring subsequent to March 29, 2011, the filing date of the original report, and no other changes have been made to the report.

PART I

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information in this Form 10-K, readers should carefully consider the following important factors. These factors, among others, in some cases have affected, and in the future could affect, our financial condition and results of operations and could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements that appear in this on Form 10-K or that we have made or will make elsewhere.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a limited operating history as a separate wholly owned foreign company which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.

Our limited operating history following our separation from Trunkbow Shenzhen Technologies Limited in December 2007 and the early stage of development of the mobile payment industry in which we operate makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. Although our revenues have grown rapidly, we cannot assure you that we will maintain profitability or that we will not incur net losses in the future. Our business model includes recurring revenues from revenue sharing agreements with resellers and the Big Three. To date, less than five percent of our revenues have been derived from these revenue sharing agreements. There is no assurance that we will generate significant revenue from such agreements. We expect that our operating expenses will increase as we expand. Any significant failure to realize anticipated revenue growth could result in significant operating losses. We will continue to encounter risks and difficulties in implementing our business model, including potential failure to:

•

increase awareness of its products, protect its reputation and develop customer loyalty;

•

manage its expanding operations and service offerings, including the integration of any future acquisitions;

•

maintain adequate control of its expenses; and

•

anticipate and adapt to changing conditions in the markets in which it operates as well as the impact of any changes in government regulation, mergers and acquisitions involving its competitors, technological developments and other significant competitive and market dynamics.

If we are not successful in addressing any or all of these risks, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business depends to a large extent on mobile telecommunications service providers in the PRC and any deterioration of such relationships may have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

We have derived, and believe we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our revenues from a limited number of large customers, such as China Mobile, China Telecom, and China Unicom which are our only major customers and who have been customers for over five years. We have passed a rigorous supplier approval process carried out by each of the three major carriers to become an “approved vendor” to each of them. Our approved vendor status allows us to be eligible to enter into individual customer contracts with the relevant provincial branch of each respective carrier in each province in which we operate. Such individual contracts are similar to purchase orders for our technology platforms, in the form of proprietary software licensing and revenue sharing arrangements with the relevant branch of China Mobile, China Telecom or China Unicom, as the case may be. Currently, China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom are the only mobile telecommunications service providers in China that operate mobile payment platforms. Our agreements are generally for a period of less than five years and generally do not have automatic renewal provisions. If any of the carriers is unwilling to continue to cooperate and negotiate with us upon expiration of such agreements, we will not be able to conduct our existing mobile payment business at the levels we anticipate.

Revenues from sales to the Big Three, including revenues generated through the resale of our products to mobile carriers through intermediaries (i.e., direct and indirect sales to these carriers), accounted for approximately 16%, 47% and 20%, and 42%, 15% and 42% of our total revenues for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Further, four resellers accounted for approximately 81% and two provincial branches of China Unicom accounted for approximately 81% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The loss of our status as a approved vendor to any of China Mobile, China Telecom or China Unicom, or our inability to renegotiate our revenue sharing agreements with resellers on terms as favorable as those under which we presently operate, would have a significant negative impact on our business and on our financial results.

In addition, if either China Mobile, China Telecom or China Unicom decides to change its content or transaction fees or its share of revenues, our revenues and profitability could also be materially adversely affected.

Our financial condition and results of operations may be materially affected by the changes in policies or guidelines of the mobile telecommunications service providers.

The mobile telecommunications service providers in the PRC may, from time to time, issue certain operating policies or guidelines, requesting or stating their preference for certain actions to be taken in choosing their partners in certain application service platforms. Due to our reliance on the mobile telecommunications service providers, a significant change in their policies or guidelines may have a material adverse effect on our business. Such change in policies or guidelines may result in lower revenue or additional operating costs for us, and as such, we cannot assure you that our financial condition and results of operations will not be materially adversely affected by any such policy or guideline change.

Our customers are concentrated in a limited number of industries and an economic downturn in any of these industries could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our customers are concentrated primarily in the telecommunications, media and technology industries, and to a lesser extent, the transportation, financial services, and retail industries, where we provide applications for their industries. Our ability to generate revenue depends on the demand for our services in these industries. An economic downturn, or a slowdown or reversal of the tendency in any of these industries to rely on our services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and we may not be able to maintain market share.

We offer only one Mobile Payment model. Competing technologies from larger, better financed international companies are increasing their effort to gain a foothold in the PRC market. This may result in erosion of our market share in mobile payment services.

Increasing competition among telecommunication companies in greater China has led to a reduction in telecommunication services fees that can be charged by such companies. Within the MVAS Application Platform segment, our principal competitors are Huawei and ZTE. Within the Mobile Payment System segment, our primary competitors are UMPay, HiSun Technology, Shanghai Huateng, Huawei, ZTE, Fujian Fujisu and Digital China Si Tech. If a reduction in telecommunication services fees negatively impacts revenue generated by our customers, they may require us to reduce the price of our services, or seek competitors that charge less, which could reduce our market share. If we must significantly reduce the price of our services, the decrease in revenue could materially and adversely affect our profitability.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, which could lead to volatility in our stock price.

Our quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past and are likely to continue to vary significantly in the future. Historically, we have generally experienced a slowdown or decrease in generating revenues in the first and fourth quarter of the year due to the Chinese Lunar New Year. In addition, our quarterly revenues are subject to fluctuation because they substantially depend upon the timing of orders. As a result, you may not be able to rely on period-to-period comparisons of our operating results as an indication of our future performance. Our actual quarterly results may differ from market expectations, which could adversely affect our stock price.

The loss of certain employees that are essential to our business could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Li Qiang, Chief Executive Officer, Hou Wanchun, Chairman, and Ye Yuanjun, Chief Financial Officer are essential to our ability to continue to grow our business. Messrs. Li, Hou and Ms. Ye have established relationships within the industries in which we operate. If either of them were to leave us, our growth strategy might be hindered, which could limit our ability to increase revenue. We do not maintain key-person insurance coverage. In addition, we face competition for attracting skilled personnel. If we fail to attract and retain qualified personnel to meet current and future needs, this could slow our ability to grow our business, which could result in a decrease in market share.

International operations require significant management attention, which could detract from the time and attention management spends on our domestic operations and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our operations in countries outside of the PRC are subject to various unique risks, including the following, which, if not planned and managed properly, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results:

•

legal uncertainties or unanticipated changes regarding regulatory requirements, political instability, liability, export and import restrictions, tariffs and other trade barriers;

•

longer customer payment cycles and greater difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;

•

uncertainties of laws and enforcement relating to the protection of intellectual property; and

•

potentially uncertain or adverse tax consequences.

Additionally, international operations require significant management attention, which could detract from the time and attention management spends on our domestic operations and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We expect to need additional financing, which may not be available on satisfactory terms or at all.

We believe that our existing cash, including the net proceeds from the private placement in February 2010 and our IPO in February 2011, will be sufficient to support our current operating plan through 2012. Our capital requirements may be accelerated as a result of many factors, including timing of development activities, underestimates of budget items, unanticipated expenses or capital expenditures, limitation of development of new potential products, future product opportunities with collaborators, future licensing opportunities and future business combinations. Consequently, we may need to seek additional debt or equity financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, and which may be dilutive to you.

We may seek to raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or additional corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution. To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing debt securities, we would likely incur substantial interest obligations, may be required to pledge assets as security for the debt and may be constrained by restrictive financial and/or operational covenants. Debt financing would also be superior to your interest in bankruptcy or liquidation. To the extent we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or product candidates, or grant licenses on unfavorable terms.

We are exposed to credit risk on our accounts receivable which is heightened during periods when economic conditions worsen.

We operate our business in the PRC, where credit periods vary substantially across industries, segments, types and size of companies. We operate in a niche of the PRC telecommunication industry, specifically in the provision of Mobile Value Added services and Mobile Payment systems. Our customers include the Big Three and resellers that further provide services to the Big Three. We may not collect our accounts receivable in accordance with the terms of our contracts with our customers.

Our management determines the collectability of outstanding accounts based on the following considerations:

1.	Reputable customers: our customers or ultimate customers through the resellers are the three mobile operators, which are listed companies and have good reputations and stable cash flows.

Evaluation of resellers: in the arrangements that are through resellers to reach the mobile operators, management investigates all aspects of the resellers, including the arrangement between the mobile operators and the resellers, the particular reseller’s credit reputation and payment history, the financial status and customer lists of our resellers. Only reputable resellers with good quality of assets and cash flows can sign up with us.

3.	Continuous collection of accounts receivable: we have been able to collect our accounts receivable on a continual basis.

In the event accounts receivable are due and the balance remains outstanding, we negotiate repayment plans with our customers. Credit periods will be extended when our customers have a continuous payment history. Constant review of the recoverability of the accounts receivable is performed by management and if there is any indication that a customer may default, allowance for doubtful debts are provided to the accounts receivable.

5.	No defaults on historical collection of accounts receivable: we started in 2001 and during the past 10 years, we never had a bad debt on accounts receivable.

However, if our actual collection experience with our customers or other conditions change, or the other factors that we consider indicate that it is appropriate, provision for doubtful accounts may be required, which could adversely affect our financial results.

We must respond quickly and effectively to new technological developments, and the failure to do so could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our business is highly dependent on its computer and telecommunications equipment, including mobile handsets, and software systems. Our failure to maintain our technological capabilities or to respond effectively to technological changes could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Our future success also depends on our ability to enhance existing software and systems and to respond to changing technological developments. If we are unable to successfully develop and bring to market new software and systems in a timely manner, our competitors’ technologies or services may render our products or services noncompetitive or obsolete.

If we fail to protect adequately or enforce our intellectual property rights, or to secure rights to patents of others, the value of our intellectual property rights could diminish.

Our success, competitive position and future revenues will depend in part on our ability, and the ability of our licensors, to obtain and maintain patent protection for our products, methods, processes and other technologies, to preserve our trade secrets, to prevent third parties from infringing on our proprietary rights and to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of third parties.

To date, our technology is the subject of 164 filed patent applications with 50 patents issued by the National Intellectual Property Administration of the PRC. We anticipate filing additional patent applications both in the PRC and in other countries, as appropriate. However, we cannot predict the degree and range of protection patents will afford us against competitors, including whether third parties will find ways to invalidate or otherwise circumvent our patents, if and when patents will be issued, whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to our patent applications, or if we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings, which may be costly whether we win or lose.

Our success also depends on the skills, knowledge and experience of our scientific and technical personnel, consultants, advisors, licensors and contractors. To help protect its proprietary know-how and inventions for which patents may be unobtainable or difficult to obtain, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements. To this end, we require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and contractors to enter into confidentiality and, where applicable, grant-back agreements. These agreements may not provide adequate protection in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or the lawful development by others of such information. If any of our intellectual property is disclosed, its value would be significantly impaired, and our business and competitive position would suffer.

If we infringe on the rights of third parties, we could be prevented from selling products, forced to pay damages and compelled to defend against litigation.

If our products, methods, processes and other technologies infringe proprietary rights of other parties, we could incur substantial costs, and may have to obtain licenses (which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all), redesign our products or processes, stop using the subject matter claimed in the asserted patents, pay damages, or defend litigation or administrative proceedings, which may be costly whether we win or lose. All these efforts could result in a substantial diversion of valuable management resources.

We believe we have taken reasonable steps, including comprehensive internal and external prior patent searches, to ensure we have freedom to operate and that our development and commercialization efforts can be carried out as planned without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. However, we cannot guarantee that no third party patent has been filed or will be filed that may contain subject matter of relevance to its development, causing a third party patent holder to claim infringement. Resolving such issues has traditionally resulted, and could in our case result, in lengthy and costly legal proceedings, the outcome of which cannot be predicted accurately.

We have never paid cash dividends and are not likely to do so in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. We do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future but will review this policy as circumstances dictate.

Failure to manage our growth or develop appropriate internal organizational structures, internal control environment and risk monitoring and management systems in line with our rapid growth could negatively affect our business and prospects.

Our business and operations have expanded rapidly since our formation. Significant management resources must be expended to develop and implement appropriate structures for internal organization and information flow, an effective internal control environment and risk monitoring and management systems in line with our rapid growth, as well as to hire and integrate qualified employees into our organization. In addition, the disclosure and other ongoing obligations associated with becoming a public company increase the challenges to our finance and accounting team. Our general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 were $3,075,833, as compared to $1,877,732 for the 2009 fiscal year. It is possible that our existing internal control and risk monitoring and management systems could prove to be inadequate. If we fail to appropriately develop and implement structures for internal organization and information flow, an effective internal control environment and a risk monitoring and management system, we may not be able to identify unfavorable business trends, administrative oversights or other risks that could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Risks Associated with Doing Business in Greater China

There are substantial risks associated with doing business in greater China, as set forth in the following risk factors.

Adverse changes in the political and economic policies of the PRC government could materially and adversely affect the overall economic growth of China, which could adversely affect our business.

Substantially all of our assets are located in the PRC and all of our revenues are derived from our operations there. Accordingly, economic, political and legal developments in the PRC significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the PRC economy has grown significantly in the past 30 years, the growth has been uneven across different periods, regions and economic sectors of the PRC. We cannot assure you that the PRC economy will continue to grow, or that any such growth will be steady and uniform, or that if there is a slowdown, such a slowdown will not have a negative effect on our business.

The PRC government also exercises significant control over the PRC’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. From late 2003 to mid-2008, the PRC government implemented a number of measures, such as increasing the People’s Bank of China’s statutory deposit reserve ratio and imposing commercial bank lending guidelines that had the effect of slowing the growth of credit, which in turn may have slowed the growth of the PRC economy. In response to the recent global and Chinese economic downturn, the PRC government has promulgated several measures aimed at expanding credit and stimulating economic growth. Since August 2008, the People’s Bank of China has decreased the statutory deposit reserve ratio and lowered benchmark interest rates several times. It is unclear whether the PRC government will continue such policies, or whether PRC economic policies will be effective in creating stable economic growth. Any further slowdown in the economic growth of the PRC could reduce demand for our solutions and services, which could materially and adversely affect our business, our financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us.

We conduct our business primarily through our PRC subsidiaries. Our operations in the PRC are governed by PRC laws and regulations. Our PRC subsidiaries are foreign-invested enterprises and are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in the PRC and, in particular, laws applicable to foreign-invested enterprises. The PRC legal system is largely a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value.

In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing general economic matters. The overall effect of legislation over the past two decades has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various foreign investments in the PRC. However, the PRC has not developed a fully integrated legal system, and recently enacted laws and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in the PRC. Because these laws and regulations are relatively new, and published court decisions are limited and nonbinding in nature, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. In addition, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all, which may have a retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of these policies and rules until after the violation occurs. Any administrative and court proceedings in the PRC may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. However, since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may also impede our ability to enforce the contracts entered into by our PRC subsidiaries. As a result, these uncertainties could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The contractual arrangement with Trunkbow Technologies and its shareholders entered into in 2007 may require further approval.

On December 20, 2007, Trunkbow Shandong entered into a series of contracts with Trunkbow Technologies and its shareholders. Through these contractual arrangements, Trunkbow Technologies became a contractually controlled entity of Trunkbow Shandong.

The Regulation on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors jointly issued by six PRC regulatory agencies, including MOFCOM, the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the State Administration for Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) on August 8, 2006, or the New M&A Rule, has a particular provision which requires that MOFCOM’s approval is required if a PRC resident acquires its/his affiliated Chinese company in the name of an offshore enterprise established or controlled by it or him. The New M&A Rule further provides that the aforesaid requirement cannot be circumvented by a foreign invested enterprise’s domestic investment or “by other means” in China. At the time of entering into the contractual arrangements between Trunkbow Shandong and Trunkbow Technologies in December 2007, Trunkbow Hong Kong was an offshore enterprise indirectly controlled by Hou Wanchun and Li Qiang who are PRC residents. Trunkbow Shandong is a foreign invested enterprise 100% owned by Trunkbow Hong Kong. Hou Wanchun and Li Qiang are two shareholders of Trunkbow Technologies. According to the New M&A Rule, the approval of MOFCOM would be required if we acquired the beneficiary ownership of Trunkbow Technologies by our Company or its Trunkbow Hong Kong directly, and the adoption of the contractual arrangements might be deemed to be circumvent of such approval requirements “by other means”. As the interpretation and implementation of the New M&A Rule are unclear, if the approval of MOFCOM is required, Trunkbow Hong Kong may need to obtain further approval from MOFCOM.

Our contractual arrangements with our VIEs and their shareholders may not be as effective in providing control over our VIEs as direct ownership.

Our contractual arrangements with our VIEs and their respective shareholders provide us with effective control over our VIEs. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we are considered to be the primary beneficiary of our VIEs; we consolidate the results of operations, assets and liabilities of our VIEs in our financial statements. Although we have been advised by Han Kun, our PRC legal counsel, that each contract under these contractual arrangements is valid and binding under current PRC laws and regulations, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective in providing us with control over our VIEs as direct ownership of these companies. If our VIEs or their shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under these contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and resources to enforce such arrangements, and rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot assure you will be effective.

Trunkbow Technologies no longer accounts for any of our new business and is being operationally wound down. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Trunkbow Technologies represented 11.7% and 9% , respectively, of our consolidated revenue. As at December 31, 2010 and 2009, Trunkbow Technologies represented 7.6% and 9% respectively, of our total consolidated assets.

The shareholders of our VIEs may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Trunkbow Technologies and Delixunda are jointly owned by nominee shareholders, including Mr. Hou Wanchun, our chairman, Mr. Li Qiang, our CEO, and Mr. Xie Liangyao. Conflict of interests between these nominee shareholders of our contractually controlled entity and their duties to our company may arise. PRC law provides that a director or member of management owes a fiduciary duty to the company he directs or manages. Mr. Hou and Mr. Li must therefore act in good faith and in the best interests of our VIEs and must not use their respective positions for personal gain. These laws do not require them to consider our best interests when making decisions as a director or member of management of the contractually controlled entity. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise, these individuals will act in the best interests of our company or that conflicts of interest will be resolved in our favor. In addition, these individuals may breach or cause our contractually controlled entity to breach or refuse to renew the existing contractual arrangements that allow us to effectively control it and receive economic benefits from it. Currently, we do not have arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these individuals and our company and a conflict could result in these individuals as officers of our company violating fiduciary duties to us. If we cannot resolve any conflicts of interest or disputes between us and the shareholders of our VIEs, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business, and there would be substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

Contractual arrangements we have entered into may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities, and a finding that we or our affiliated entities owe additional taxes could reduce our net income and the value of your investment.

As required by applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. We could face adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements between Trunkbow Shandong and our VIEs do not represent an arm’s-length price and adjust our VIEs’ income in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of expense deductions recorded by our VIEs, which could in turn increase its respective tax liabilities. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on our affiliated entities for underpaid taxes.

Our net income may be adversely affected if our VIEs’ tax liabilities increase or if it is found to be subject to late payment fees or other penalties.

We have not yet registered the equity pledges made by our VIE shareholders of their equity in Trunkbow Technologies or Delixunda, which means that these pledges have not been officially validated. Accordingly, the contractual arrangements among the nominee shareholders, Trunkbow Shandong and our VIEs, designed to control our VIEs’ operations and extract their profits, may be undermined.

PRC Property Law provides that all equity pledges under equity pledge agreements must be registered to be validated. Our subsidiary, Trunkbow Shandong, has entered into equity pledge agreements with the nominee shareholders of Trunkbow Technologies and Delixunda, whereby such nominee shareholders are obligated to promptly take necessary steps to register and perfect the equity pledges to secure the service fees under the relevant service agreements and the loans under the loan agreements between Trunkbow Shandong and them. Trunkbow Shandong is now coordinating with the nominee shareholders to prepare various equity pledge registration application documents (including the Chinese versions of the equity pledge agreements and other application forms) in accordance with the requirements of the local competent branch of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce. However, until the equity pledges are registered and perfected, we may not enforce these pledges in PRC courts, and accordingly the contractual arrangements among the nominee shareholders, Trunkbow Shandong and our VIEs, designed to control the VIEs’ operations and extract their profits, will be undermined. Moreover, it is possible that, in the absence of a validated pledge, the nominee shareholders may pledge or otherwise dispose of their equity interests in the relevant VIE to third parties.

We may rely on dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries in the PRC to fund our cash and financing requirements, and any limitation on the ability of our subsidiaries to make payments to us could materially adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

As an offshore holding company, we may rely principally on dividends from our subsidiaries in the PRC for our cash requirements, including to pay dividends or make other distributions to our shareholders or to service our debt we may incur and to pay our operating expenses. The payment of dividends by entities organized in the PRC is subject to limitations. In particular, the PRC regulations permit our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, as determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of our subsidiaries in the PRC is required to set aside a certain amount of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserves. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

If our subsidiaries in the PRC incur debt on their own behalf, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. Any limitation on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute dividends or other payments to us could materially adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions, pay dividends and otherwise fund and conduct our business.

We may be subject to penalties, including restriction on our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries and our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute profits to us, if our PRC resident shareholders or beneficial owners fail to comply with relevant PRC foreign exchange rules.

SAFE issued a public notice in October 2005 requiring PRC residents to register with the local SAFE branch before establishing or controlling any company outside of the PRC for the purpose of capital financing with assets or equities of PRC companies, referred to in the notice as an “offshore special purpose vehicle”. PRC residents that are shareholders and/or beneficial owners of offshore special purpose companies established before November 1, 2005 were required to register with the local SAFE branch before March 31, 2006. In addition, any PRC resident that is a shareholder of an offshore special purpose vehicle is required to amend its SAFE registration with respect to that offshore special purpose company in connection with any increase or decrease of capital, transfer of shares, merger, division, equity investment or creation of any security interest over any assets located in China or other material changes in share capital.

We have requested our current shareholders and/or beneficial owners to disclose whether they or their shareholders or beneficial owners fall within the ambit of the SAFE notice and urge those who are PRC residents to register with the local SAFE branch as required under the SAFE notice. However, we cannot provide any assurance that all of our shareholders and beneficial owners who are PRC residents will comply with our request to make, obtain or update any applicable registrations or comply with other requirements required by the SAFE notice or other related rules. In case of any non-compliance on any of our PRC resident shareholders or beneficial owners, our PRC subsidiaries and such shareholders and beneficial owners may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions.

Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of the PRC. We receive substantially all of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our Nevada holding company primarily relies on dividend payments from our wholly-owned PRC subsidiaries in the PRC to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have.

Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior SAFE approval by complying with certain procedural requirements. Therefore, our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries may pay dividends in foreign currency to us without pre-approval from SAFE. However, approval from or registration with competent government authorities is required where the Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. With the prior approval from SAFE, cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiary may be used to pay off debt they owe to entities outside the PRC in a currency other than the Renminbi. The PRC government may at its discretion restrict access to foreign currencies for current account transactions in the future. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders.

Currency fluctuations and restrictions on currency exchange may adversely affect our business, including limiting our ability to convert Chinese Renminbi into foreign currencies and, if Chinese Renminbi were to decline in value, reducing our revenue in U.S dollar terms.

Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar and our operations in the PRC use their local currency as their functional currencies. Substantially all of our revenue and expenses are in Chinese renminbi. We are subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations with respect to any of these currencies. For example, the value of the renminbi depends to a large extent on PRC government policies and the PRC’s domestic and international economic and political developments, as well as supply and demand in the local market. Since 1994, the official exchange rate for the conversion of renminbi to the U.S. dollar had generally been stable and the renminbi had appreciated slightly against the U.S. dollar. However, on July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its policy of pegging the value of Chinese renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, Chinese renminbi may fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. Following the removal of the U.S. dollar peg, the Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. From mid-2008 to mid-2010 the Renminbi traded within a narrow range against the U.S. dollar at approximately RMB6.83 per U.S. dollar. In June 2010, the People’s Bank of China announced the removal of the de facto peg. Following this announcement, the Renminbi has appreciated modestly. It is difficult to predict when and how Renminbi exchange rates may change going forward.

The income statements of our operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions results in reduced revenue, operating expenses and net income for our operations. Similarly, to the extent the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions results in increased revenue, operating expenses and net income for our operations. We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as we convert the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars in consolidation. If there is a change in foreign currency exchange rates, the conversion of the foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars will lead to a translation gain or loss which is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. In addition, we have certain assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the relevant entity’s functional currency. Changes in the functional currency value of these assets and liabilities create fluctuations that will lead to a transaction gain or loss. We have not entered into agreements or purchased instruments to hedge its exchange rate risks, although it may do so in the future. The availability and effectiveness of any hedging transaction may be limited and we may not be able to successfully hedge its exchange rate risks.

Although PRC governmental policies were introduced in 1996 to allow the convertibility of Chinese renminbi into foreign currency for current account items, conversion of Chinese renminbi into foreign exchange for capital items, such as foreign direct investment, loans or securities, requires the approval of SAFE, which is under the authority of the People’s Bank of China. These approvals, however, do not guarantee the availability of foreign currency conversion. We cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain all required conversion approvals for our operations or that PRC regulatory authorities will not impose greater restrictions on the convertibility of Chinese renminbi in the future. Because a significant amount of our future revenue may be in the form of Chinese renminbi, our inability to obtain the requisite approvals or any future restrictions on currency exchanges could limit our ability to utilize revenue generated in Chinese renminbi to fund our business activities outside of the PRC, or to repay foreign currency obligations, including our debt obligations, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may have limited legal recourse under PRC law if disputes arise under our contracts with third parties.

The PRC government has enacted some laws and regulations dealing with matters such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. However, their experience in implementing, interpreting and enforcing these laws and regulations is limited, and our ability to enforce commercial claims or to resolve commercial disputes is unpredictable. If business ventures are unsuccessful, we face the risk that the parties to these ventures may seek ways to terminate the transactions, or, may hinder or prevent us from accessing important information regarding the financial and business operations of these acquired companies. The resolution of these matters may be subject to the exercise of considerable discretion by agencies of the PRC government, and forces unrelated to the legal merits of a particular matter or dispute may influence their determination. Any rights we may have to specific performance, or to seek an injunction under PRC law, in either of these cases, are severely limited, and without a means of recourse by virtue of the Chinese legal system, we may be unable to prevent these situations from occurring. The occurrence of any such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

You may have difficulty enforcing judgments against us.

We are a Nevada holding company and most of our assets are located outside of the United States. Most of our current operations are conducted in the PRC. In addition, most of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons is located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors, most of whom are not residents in the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts (imposing monetary fines, penalties, damages or otherwise) or entertain original actions brought in the courts of the PRC against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. Courts in China may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other arrangements that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments with the United States. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, courts in the PRC will not recognize or enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers (imposing monetary fines, penalties, damages or otherwise) or entertain original actions brought in the courts of the PRC against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States if they decide that the judgment violates basic principles of PRC law or national sovereignty, security or the public interest. So it is uncertain whether a PRC court would recognize or enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States.

We must comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and PRC anti-bribery law, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage.

Following the registration of our common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we, a former shell company, will be required to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits U.S. companies from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Foreign companies, including some of our competitors, are not subject to these prohibitions. We are also subject to PRC anti-bribery law, which strictly prohibits bribery of government officials. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices occur from time-to-time in mainland China. If our competitors engage in these practices, they may receive preferential treatment from personnel of some companies, giving our competitors an advantage in securing business or from government officials who might give them priority in obtaining new licenses, which would put us at a disadvantage. Although we inform our personnel that such practices are illegal, we can not assure you that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties.

Under the PRC EIT Law, we, Trunkbow BVI and/or Trunkbow Hong Kong may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of the PRC. Such classification could result in PRC tax consequences to us, our non-PRC resident investors, Trunkbow BVI and/or Trunkbow Hong Kong.

On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress approved and promulgated a new tax law (the “EIT Law”), which took effect on January 1, 2008. Under the EIT Law, enterprises are classified as “resident enterprises” and “non-resident enterprises.” An enterprise established outside of the PRC with a “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to an enterprise organized under the laws of the PRC for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the EIT Law define “de facto management body” as a managing body that in practice exercises “substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties” of the enterprise; however, it remains unclear whether the PRC tax authorities would deem our managing body or the managing body of Trunkbow BVI or Trunkbow Hong Kong as being located within the PRC. Due to the short history of the EIT Law and the lack of applicable legal precedents, the PRC tax authorities determine the PRC tax resident treatment of a foreign (non-PRC) company on a case-by-case basis.

If the PRC tax authorities determine that we, Trunkbow BVI and/or Trunkbow Hong Kong is a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we, Trunkbow BVI and/or Trunkbow Hong Kong could be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on our, Trunkbow BVI’s and /or Trunkbow Hong Kong’s worldwide taxable income, as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. Second, under the EIT Law and its implementing rules dividends paid between “qualified resident enterprises” are exempt from enterprise income tax. As a result, if we, Trunkbow BVI and Trunkbow Hong Kong are treated as “qualified resident enterprises,” all dividends from Trunkbow Shenzen and Trunkbow Shandong to us (through Trunkbow Hong Kong and Trunkbow BVI) should be exempt from the PRC enterprise income tax.

If Trunkbow Hong Kong were treated as a PRC “non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, then dividends that Trunkbow Hong Kong receives from Trunkbow Shenzhen and Trunkbow Shandong (assuming such dividends were considered sourced within the PRC) (i) may be subject to a 5% PRC withholding tax, provided that Trunkbow Hong Kong owns more than 25% of the registered capital of Trunkbow Shenzhen or Trunkbow Shandong, as applicable, continuously within 12 months immediately prior to obtaining such dividends, and the Arrangement between the Mainland of China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income (the “PRC-Hong Kong Tax Treaty”) were otherwise applicable, or (ii) if such treaty does not apply (i.e., because the PRC tax authorities may deem Trunkbow Hong Kong to be a conduit not entitled to treaty benefits), may be subject to a 10% PRC withholding tax. Similarly, if Trunkbow BVI were treated as a “non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law and Trunkbow Hong Kong were treated as a “resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, then the dividends that Trunkbow BVI receives from Trunkbow Hong Kong (assuming such dividends were considered sourced within the PRC) may be subject to a 10% PRC withholding tax. A similar situation may arise if we were treated as a “non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law and Trunkbow BVI were treated as a “resident enterprise” under the EIT Law. Any such taxes on dividends could materially reduce the amount of dividends, if any, we could pay to our shareholders.

Finally, if we are determined to be a “resident enterprise” under the EIT Law, or dividends payable to (or gains realized by) our investors that are not tax residents of the PRC (“non-resident investors”) are otherwise treated as income derived from sources within the PRC, this could result in (i) a 10% PRC tax being imposed on dividends we pay to our non-resident investors and that are enterprises (but not individuals) and gains derived by them from transferring our common stock and (ii) a potential 20% PRC tax being imposed on dividends we pay to our non-resident investors who are individuals and gains derived by them from transferring our common stock. In such event, we may be required to withhold the applicable PRC tax on any dividends paid to our non-resident investors. Our non-resident investors also may be responsible for paying the applicable PRC tax on any gain realized from the sale or transfer of our common stock in these circumstances. We would not, however, have an obligation to withhold PRC tax with respect to such gain under the PRC tax laws.

On December 10, 2009, the State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) released Circular Guoshuihan No. 698 (“Circular 698”), which reinforces the taxation of certain equity transfers by non-resident investors through overseas holding vehicles. Circular 698 is retroactively effective from January 1, 2008. Circular 698 addresses indirect equity transfers as well as other issues. According to Circular 698, where a non-resident investor that indirectly holds an equity interest in a PRC resident enterprise through a non-PRC offshore holding company indirectly transfers an equity interest in the PRC resident enterprise by selling an equity interest in the offshore holding company, and the latter is located in a country or jurisdiction where the actual tax burden is less than 12.5% or where the offshore income of its residents is not taxable, the non-resident investor is required to provide the PRC tax authorities in charge of that PRC resident enterprise with certain relevant information within 30 days of the execution of the equity transfer agreement. The tax authorities in charge will evaluate the offshore transaction for tax purposes. In the event that the PRC tax authorities determine that such transfer is abusing forms of business organization and a reasonable commercial purpose for the offshore holding company other than the avoidance of PRC income tax liability is lacking, the tax authorities will have the power to re-assess the nature of the equity transfer under the doctrine of substance over form. If the SAT’s challenge of a transfer is successful, it may deny the existence of the offshore holding company that is used for tax planning purposes and subject the non-resident investor to PRC tax on the capital gain from such transfer. Because Circular 698 has a short history, there is uncertainty as to its application. We (or a non-resident investor) may become at risk of being taxed under Circular 698 and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with Circular 698 or to establish that we (or such non-resident investor) should not be taxed under Circular 698, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations (or such non-resident investor’s investment in us).

If any PRC tax applies to a non-resident investor, the non-resident investor may be entitled to a reduced rate of PRC tax under an applicable income tax treaty and/or a deduction for such PRC tax against such investor’s domestic taxable income or a foreign tax credit in respect of such PRC tax against such investor’s domestic income tax liability (subject to applicable conditions and limitations). Investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the applicability of any such taxes, the effects of any applicable income tax treaties, and any available deductions or foreign tax credits.

Restrictions under PRC law on our PRC subsidiaries' ability to make dividends and other distributions could materially and adversely affect our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could benefit our business, pay dividends to you, and otherwise fund and conduct our businesses.

Substantially all of our revenues are earned by our PRC subsidiaries, Trunkbow Shenzhen and Trunkbow Shangdong. However, PRC regulations restrict the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make dividends and other payments to their offshore parent company. PRC legal restrictions permit payments of dividend by our PRC subsidiaries only out of their accumulated after-tax profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Our PRC subsidiaries are also required under PRC laws and regulations to allocate at least 10% of our annual after-tax profits determined in accordance with PRC GAAP to a statutory general reserve fund until the amounts in said fund reaches 50% of our registered capital. Allocations to these statutory reserve funds can only be used for specific purposes and are not transferable to us in the form of loans, advances or cash dividends. Any limitations on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to transfer funds to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends and otherwise fund and conduct our business.

SAFE regulations may limit our ability to finance our PRC subsidiaries effectively and affect the value of your investment and may make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisition.

If we finance our PRC subsidiaries through additional capital contributions, MOCFOM in China or its local counterpart must approve the amount of these capital contributions. On August 29, 2008, SAFE promulgated Circular 142, a notice regulating the conversion by a foreign-invested company of foreign currency into Renminbi by restricting how the converted Renminbi may be used. The notice requires that Renminbi converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital of a foreign-invested company may only be used for purposes within the business scope approved by the applicable governmental authority and may not be used for equity investments in the PRC unless otherwise provided by laws and regulations. In addition, SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of Renminbi funds converted from the foreign currency denominated capital of a foreign-invested company. The use of such Renminbi may not be changed without approval from SAFE, and may not be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not yet been used for purposes within the company’s approved business scope. Violations of Circular 142 may result in severe penalties, including substantial fines as set forth in the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to the use and conversion of the foreign currencies provided by us to our PRC subsidiaries by mean of loans or capital contributions in the future. If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals, our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to use and convert such foreign currencies into Renminbi may be negatively affected, in particular in our future equity investments in the PRC, which could adversely and materially affect our ability to fund and expand our business.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

In the future, we may choose to adopt an employee incentive option plan. Under applicable PRC regulations, all foreign exchange matters relating to employee stock ownership plans, share option plans or similar plans in which PRC citizens participate require approval from SAFE or its authorized local branch. In addition, PRC citizens who are granted share options, shares or other equity interests by an offshore listed company are required, through a PRC agent or PRC subsidiary of the offshore listed company, to register with SAFE and complete certain other procedures. Since we are an offshore listed company and may in the future adopt an employee incentive option plan, we and our PRC employees who are granted share options or shares will be subject to, and intend to comply with, these regulations. If we or our PRC employees fail to comply with these regulations, we or our Chinese employees may face sanctions imposed by SAFE or other PRC government authorities, including restrictions on foreign currency conversions and additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries.

We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

Pursuant to the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Circular 698, issued by the State Administration of Taxation on December 10, 2009 with retroactive effect from January 1, 2008, where a non-resident enterprise transfers the equity interests of a PRC resident enterprise indirectly via disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, or an Indirect Transfer, and such overseas holding company is located in a tax jurisdiction that: (i) has an effective tax rate less than 12.5% or (ii) does not tax foreign income of its residents, the foreign investor shall report to the competent tax authority of the PRC resident enterprise this Indirect Transfer. Using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of avoiding PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. SAT Circular 698 also provides that, where a non-PRC resident enterprise transfers its equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise to its related parties at a price lower than the fair market value, the relevant tax authority has the power to make a reasonable adjustment to the taxable income of the transaction.

There is uncertainty as to the application of SAT Circular 698. For example, while the term “Indirect Transfer” is not clearly defined, it is understood that the relevant PRC tax authorities have jurisdiction regarding requests for information over a wide range of foreign entities having no direct contact with China. Moreover, the relevant authority has not yet promulgated any formal provisions or formally declared or stated how to calculate the effective tax rates in foreign tax jurisdictions, and the process and format of the reporting of an Indirect Transfer to the competent tax authority of the relevant PRC resident enterprise. In addition, there are not any formal declarations with regard to how to determine whether a foreign investor has adopted an abusive arrangement in order to avoid PRC tax. As a result, we may become at risk of being taxed under SAT Circular 698 and we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with SAT Circular 698 or to establish that we should not be taxed under SAT Circular 698, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission may be required in connection with the recent listing of our common stock on NASDAQ under a regulation adopted in August 2006, and, if required, we cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain such approval.

In 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies jointly adopted the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the New M&A Rule. This rule requires that, if an overseas company established or controlled by PRC domestic companies or citizens intends to acquire equity interests or assets of any other PRC domestic company affiliated with the PRC domestic companies or citizens, such acquisition must be submitted to MOFCOM for approval. In addition, this regulation requires that an overseas company controlled directly or indirectly by PRC companies or citizens and holding equity interests of PRC domestic companies needs to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to listing its securities on an overseas stock exchange. On September 21, 2006, the CSRC, published a notice on its official website specifying the documents and materials required to be submitted by overseas special purpose companies seeking CSRC’s approval of their overseas listings.

While the application of the New M&A Rule remains unclear, based on their understanding of current PRC laws, regulations, and the notice published on September 21, 2006, our PRC counsel, Han Kun Law Offices, has advised us that, since our subsidiaries were established by means of direct investment rather than by merger or acquisition of the equity interest or assets of any “domestic company” as defined under the New M&A Rules, and no provision in the New M&A Rules classifies our contractual arrangements with Trunkbow Technologies as a type of acquisition transaction falling under the New M&A Rules, we are not required to submit an application to MOFCOM or the CSRC for its approval for our contractual control on Trunkbow Technologies and the listing and trading of our common stock on a US national securities exchange. However, MOFCOM and the CSRC may hold a different view from our PRC counsel.

If the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency subsequently determines that the approvals from the MOFCOM and/or CSRC were required our contractual control over Trunkbow Technologies and for the listing and trading of our shares on NASDAQ, we may need to apply for a remedial approval from the CSRC and may be subject to certain administrative punishments or other sanctions from PRC regulatory agencies. The regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in the PRC, limit our operating privileges in the PRC, delay or restrict the repatriation of our foreign currency in our offshore bank accounts into the PRC, or take other actions that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of our common stock.

Also, if MOFCOM or CSRC later requires that we obtain its approval, we may be unable to obtain a waiver of such approval requirements, if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. Any uncertainties or negative publicity regarding these approval requirements could materially and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

The New M&A Rule sets forth complex procedures for acquisitions conducted by foreign investors that could make it more difficult to pursue acquisitions.

The New M&A Rule sets forth complex procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that MOFCOM be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Complying with the requirements of the New M&A Rule to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from MOFCOM, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

Until February 2010 we were a “shell” company and as such, we may have material liabilities of which we are not aware.

We were incorporated as a “shell” company with nominal assets under the name Bay Peak 5 Acquisition Corp. (“BP5”). Immediately prior to the closing of the Share Exchange in February 2010, we conducted a due diligence review of BP5’s financial condition and legal status. Notwithstanding such review, BP5 may have material liabilities that we have not yet discovered. Further, although the Share Exchange Agreement contains customary representations and warranties from BP5 concerning its assets, liabilities, financial condition and affairs, we may have limited or no recourse against former owners or principals of BP5 in the event these prove to be untrue. We cannot insure against any loss we might incur as a result of undisclosed liabilities. See “Item 1 – Business” of this Report captioned “Company Background – Our History and Corporate Structure” for more information about the Share Exchange and our former status as a “shell” company.

Because we became public by means of a reverse takeover transaction, we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

Additional risks may exist since we became public through a “reverse takeover” with a shell company. Security analysts of major brokerage firms and securities institutions may not cover us since there are no broker-dealers who sold our stock in a public offering who would have an incentive to follow or recommend the purchase of our common stock. No assurance can be given that established brokerage firms will want to conduct any financings for us in the future.

If we are unable to establish appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in the restatement of our financial statements, harm our operating results, subject us to regulatory scrutiny and sanction, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the market price for shares of our common stock.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, which is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

As a newly public company, we have significant additional requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls. We will be required to document and test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company.

We cannot assure you that we will not, in the future, identify areas requiring improvement in our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take to remediate any areas in need of improvement will be successful or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future as we continue our growth. If we are unable to establish appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in the restatement of our financial statements, harm our operating results, subject us to regulatory scrutiny and sanction, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the market price for shares of our common stock.

Lack of experience as officers of publicly-traded companies of our management team may hinder our ability to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the internal controls and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance staff or consultants in order to develop and implement appropriate internal controls and reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s internal controls requirements, we may not be able to obtain the independent auditor certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires publicly-traded companies to obtain.

We will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, has required changes in the corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect these new rules and regulations to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and to make certain corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these new rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of our operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those statements. This discussion contains forward-looking statements reflecting our management’s current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed on page 18 entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

We provide technology platform solutions for mobile telecom operators in the People’s Republic of China. Our patented platforms provide a comprehensive solution for Chinese telecom operators to deliver and manage the distribution of various mobile value added service (“MVAS”) applications to their subscribers. We believe that the Trunkbow brand is regarded by the telecom operators as a well managed, trusted provider of technology solutions. Our research and development focused business model provides us with a defensible market position as a technology provider to the telecom operators.

As of December 31, 2010, our technology is the subject of 164 filed patent applications, of which 50 have been granted by the National Intellectual Property Administration of the People’s Republic of China. We have recently begun the process of filing for international and U.S. patents in order to protect our intellectual properties globally.

The primary geographic focus of our operations is in the PRC, where we derive substantially all of our revenues. We conduct our business operations primarily through our wholly-owned subsidiaries Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shenzhen) Limited and Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Limited. Both companies are registered in PRC as Wholly-Owned Foreign Enterprises.

Overview

Our History and Corporate Structure

We were incorporated as a “shell” company with nominal assets under the name Bay Peak 5 Acquisition Corp. We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 3, 2004 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Visitalk Capital Corporation (“VCC”). We were formed as part of the implementation of the Chapter 11 reorganization plan (the “Visitalk Plan”) of visitalk.com, Inc. (“Visitalk.com”), a former provider of VOIP services. The Visitalk Plan was deemed effective by the Bankruptcy Court on September 17, 2004 (the “Effective Date”). On September 22, 2004, Visitalk.com was merged into VCC, which was authorized as the reorganized debtor under the Visitalk Plan.

On July 28, 2008, pursuant to Stock Purchase Agreements (“SPAs”), we sold 5,971,898 shares of common stock to two parties unaffiliated with us (the “Purchasing Shareholders”) for a total payment of $51,000, or approximately $.008 per share (the “Change of Control Transactions”). On August 29, 2008, the SPAs were approved by our shareholders at a special shareholders’ meeting and all the closing conditions of the SPAs were met. After the Change of Control Transactions, including the impact of a related master settlement agreement, these newly issued shares represented 85.5% ownership of us. One of the parties, Bay Peak, LLC (“Bay Peak”), had contacts with various companies and individuals in Asia, in particular the PRC. Cory Roberts, the managing member of Bay Peak, was appointed to our Board of Directors and elected President in conjunction with the Change of Control Transactions. Mr. Roberts resigned as a member of our Board of Directors on March 30, 2011. On August 28, 2008, shareholders authorized adopting the name of Bay Peak 5 Acquisition Corp. Also on August 28, 2008, shareholders ratified a one-for-seven reverse stock split (the “First Reverse Split”), which was implemented on January 6, 2010 and in January 2010, authorized a further reverse split of 4.14 for 1, which was implemented on January 27, 2010 (the “Second Reverse Split”).

Effective as of September 24, 2008, we entered into a Plan and Agreement of Merger (the “Plan and Agreement of Merger”) with VT Dutch Services, also a subsidiary of VCC, pursuant to which VT Dutch Services merged with and into us. Pursuant to the merger, holders of shares of common stock of VT Dutch Services received the identical number and class of our stock as they held in VT Dutch Services, and holders of warrants of VT Dutch Services received the identical number and class of our warrants as they held in VT Dutch Services. In connection with the Plan and Agreement of Merger, VT Dutch Services also changed its name to “Bay Peak 5 Acquisition Corp.” All shares of common stock of BP5 held prior to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Plan and Agreement of Merger were cancelled. The sole purpose of the merger was to change the corporate domicile of VT Dutch Services from Arizona to Nevada and to effect a name change of VT Dutch Services.

In February 2010 we entered into the Share Exchange Agreement with Trunkbow BVI and the shareholders of Trunkbow BVI (the “Shareholders”), who together owned shares constituting 100% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares of Trunkbow BVI (the “Trunkbow BVI Shares”), and Bay Peak, our former principal shareholder. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Shareholders transferred to us all of the Trunkbow BVI Shares in exchange for the issuance of 19,562,888 (the “Shares”) shares of our common stock (the “Share Exchange”). As a result of the Share Exchange, Trunkbow BVI became our wholly owned subsidiary. After giving effect to the Share Exchange, the sale of common stock in the February 2010 Offering and the BP5 Warrant Financing (as defined below) (i) existing shareholders of Trunkbow BVI owned approximately 60.25% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) purchasers of common stock in the February 2010 Offering owned approximately 26.01% of our outstanding common stock (including 7.7% owned by VeriFone, Inc.), (iii) the holders of BP5 warrants owned approximately 8.54% of our outstanding common stock and (iv) the pre-existing shareholders of BP5 owned approximately 5.2% of our outstanding common stock.

We were founded in 2001 by former Silicon Valley engineers with extensive experience in the telecom industry. We have been able to develop first to market application platforms that enable telecom operators to generate significant new revenue streams by leveraging our extensive knowledge of the mobile network technology. Since our inception, we have invested significant time and resources to develop cutting edge technology solutions for our customers. We were the first to create and develop a Color Ring Back Tone (“CRBT”) application platform for Shandong Unicom in 2003. Since then, this innovative service solution has become the third largest revenue contributor for China Mobile after voice and Short Message Service (“SMS”).

Concurrent with the Share Exchange, (i) we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain investors (the “Investors”) for the sale of an aggregate of 8,447,575 shares (the “Investor Shares”) and 1,689,515 warrants (the “Investor Warrants”), for aggregate gross proceeds equal to $16,895,150 (the “February 2010 Offering”) and (ii) certain holders of our outstanding warrants issued to creditors and claimants of Visitalk.com, in accordance with the Visitalk Plan, referred to herein as the “BP5 Warrant Investors” exercised the 2,774,500 warrants owned by them for an aggregate exercise price of $5.5 million and received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 554,900 shares of common stock (“BP5 Warrant Financing”).

We believe that we have a competitive advantage over our primary competitors by our proven track record of innovation. We believe Chinese telecom operators continue to utilize our technology platforms because of our superior technological solutions and unique product offerings.

Our organizational structure is as follows:

(1)

Trunkbow International Holdings Limited (“Trunkbow BVI”) was established in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) on July 17, 2009. Trunkbow BVI itself has no significant business operations and assets other than holding of equity interests in its subsidiaries through a series of reorganization activities described below (the “Reorganization”).

(2)

Trunkbow (Asia Pacific) Investment Holdings Limited (“Trunkbow Hong Kong”) was established as an Investment Holding Company in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) on July 9, 2004. As part of the reorganization, on September 16, 2009, the entire issued share capital Trunkbow Hong Kong was transferred to Trunkbow BVI.

(3)

Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Company, Limited (“Trunkbow Shandong”) was established as a wholly foreign owned enterprise on December 10, 2007 in Jinan, Shandong Province, the PRC by Trunkbow Hong Kong. It is principally engaged in research and development of application platforms for mobile operators in the PRC.

(4)

Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shenzhen) Company, Limited (“Trunkbow Shenzhen”) was established as a wholly foreign owned enterprise on June 7, 2007 in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, the PRC by Trunkbow Hong Kong. It is principally engaged in research and development of application platforms for mobile operators in the PRC.

(5)

(6)

We entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Beijing Delixunda Technology Co., Ltd. (“Delixunda”) and its shareholders on March 10, 2011. Delixunda is a telecom value-added service licensed company and was established as a limited liability company on December 1, 2009 in Beijing, the PRC. Delixunda has no operations prior to February 10th, 2011. As a result of the contractual arrangements with Delixunda, we indirectly own the telecom value-added service license, which would enble us to offer telecom wireless value-added conten service to individual clients.

How We Generate Revenue

We develop wireless enablement platforms targeted at cellular carriers and provide them with constantly improving interactive delivery vehicles to improve cellular performance and end-user functionality. We leverage our patented technology platforms to help telecom operators in China to increase their per subscriber revenue and reduce subscriber churn. We generate revenues through direct and indirect revenue sharing agreements with the relevant provincial branch of the telecom operators, one-time service and product sales, and maintenance fees. We charge a one time licensing fee and an annual maintenance fee of approximately 5 – 10% of the initial system purchasing amount. We also have monthly revenue sharing contracts in place with resellers and directly with the relevant provincial branch of the telecom providers for up to a 50% share in the revenue generated through our proprietary applications platforms. In addition to one-time sales and revenue sharing, we also generate revenue through transaction fees for our Mobile Payment System solution.

Our current MVAS Application Platform solutions generate revenue through one time sales and recurring revenues. For our Caller Color Ring Back Tone (“Caller CRBT”) and Color Numbering solution, we have revenue sharing agreements with resellers and directly with telecom providers to receive up to 50% of the subscription revenues generated for up to 5 years and then renewable upon expiration. For our Number Change Notification (“NCN”) solution, we receive revenues from one-time system sales and maintenance fees.

For our Mobile Payment System solution, we generate both one-time and recurring revenues.

We generate non-recurring revenues in the following ways:

•

System sales to telecom providers which enables the mobile payment function on their network;

•

System sales to telecom providers that enables various MPS compatible SIM and mobile payment functions for their corporate clients; and

•

Revenue share on the MPS compatible SIM cards that are sold to the telecom providers.

We generate recurring revenues in the following ways:

•

Up to a 50% share of the monthly function fee charged by the telecom providers;

•

0.1 – 0.5% of total transaction cost on purchases made through the mobile payment application; and

•

Monthly rental revenues on POS (Point of Sales) machines deployed by Trunkbow.

We operate under exclusive patent licensing and revenue sharing agreements for Caller CRBT in three provinces with local branches of China Telecom, two provinces with local branches of China Mobile and two provinces with local branches of China Unicom, Number Change Notification in two provinces with local branches of China Unicom and two provinces with local branches of China Telecom, and Mobile Payment System in four provinces with local branches of China Telecom. These agreements typically have a one to five year term. In addition, we have sold over 10 different other platform services to the mobile operators over the past years.

In determining development priorities, we conduct research efforts which include client input, market analysis, economic considerations, revenue potential and technical feasibility. Only when these factors each rise above a predefined threshold will a true development undertaking ensue. As an ISO 9000 certified business entity, which is a family of standards for quality management systems that is maintained by the International Organization for Standardization, and in keeping with this practice, all projects must adhere to a pre-defined regimen of development and only ends when acceptance by the client is gained.

Our business has grown rapidly since inception and we anticipate that our business will continue to grow at a rapid pace in the next three to five years. We expect that our growth will be driven by the broad adoption of our Caller CRBT and Mobile Payment services, geographic expansion and the introduction of new products and services.

Our customers are primarily telecom service providers in the PRC, including local branches of China’s three major cellular carriers, China Telecom, China Unicom and China Mobile. Collectively, these carriers provide services to greater than 700 million cellular subscribers. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, revenues generated directly by sales to China Telecom, China Unicom and China Mobile accounted for approximately 3%, 6% and nil, and 4%, 95% and nil, respectively, of our total revenues, and 7%, 5% and nil, and 3%, 6% and nil, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. When we include resales of our products to these carriers through intermediaries (i.e., direct and indirect sales to these carriers), then revenues generated from sales to these three carriers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 accounted for approximately 42%, 15% and 42%, and 4%, 95% and nil, respectively, of our total revenues, and 16%, 47% and 28%, and 42%, 15% and 42%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The significant increase in revenues generated from sales to China Mobile for 2009 as compared to 2008 is attributable to the sale in 2009 of two platforms to two resellers that provided an air-charge system to China Mobile in two provinces. The large variations in revenues attributable to China Unicom and China Mobile during 2008 and 2009 are mainly attributable to a reorganization of China Unicom which resulted in that company’s CDMA segment being spun-off into China Telecom and the remaining company being merged with China Netcom. Even though our relationship with these three continues to expand, it is important to understand the complexity of these relationships. The significant increase in revenues generated from sales to China Unicom for 2010 as compared to 2009 is contributed from the sale in 2010 of the deployment of our systems including Caller CRBT, Color Numbering, Mobile Business Card and Mobile Payment.

To be accepted as an approved vendor of services to any of these carriers, a company must first gain approval at a corporate level by successfully completing a series of tests of its technology. Once completed, the next step is to gain contracted business from each operating unit. Each of the 30 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions contains its own self sufficient cellular operating unit with separate P&L responsibility. In other words, with 30 regions, there are 30 separate operating companies per cellular carrier. This model is replicated in each of the three major carriers, resulting in a total of ninety potential clients within China.

The PRC government has mandated that these mobile payment services and MVAS functions must be available to all provinces over the next five years. With such services currently available in 13 provinces, the 17 remaining provinces will be seeking them from the market with Trunkbow being a major incumbent; fully vetted at a corporate level and with patented technology.

While we were initially focused exclusively on the PRC market, we have built a product set for the global sector. To this end, we are now actively positioning our product sets with carriers in the US and Europe, and we are entering the global market with a well accepted product set and excellent credentials.

Seasonality

Our quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past and are likely to continue to vary significantly in the future. Historically, we have generally experienced a slowdown or decrease in generating revenues in the first and fourth quarter of the year due to the Chinese Lunar New Year as a majority of the businesses in the PRC shut down for a month long holiday and slow down for a month prior to the New Year celebration. We believe that this fluctuation will gradually subside as we increase our recurring revenue streams.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2010 versus 2009

Net Revenues: Net revenues increased $10.96 million, or 81.6%, from $13.43 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $24.39 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Software sales increased $10.69 million, or 252.6%, from $4.23 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $14.92 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, mainly due to increased sales in Mobile Payment by $8.85 million and MVAS software of Caller CRBT, NCN and Color Numbering by $2.52 million in additional provinces. Our net revenues shifted to more software sales and less system integration sales during 2010. System integration revenues increased $0.87 million, from $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $9.37 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, due to the change in demand of our customers for the various components of our services. And our company’s competitive edge is in R&D. So the increase in Software sales is more than System integration revenues.

We started to deploy MPS platforms with our customers from the third quarter of 2009. We generated revenues of $12.66 million and $12.18 million, $10.14 million and $3.33 million, from MVAS and MPS solutions for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. MPS solutions have become a significant revenue segment, representing 49% and 25% for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Gross Margin: Gross margin increased $8.25 million, or 73.6%, from $11.21 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $19.46 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase in gross margin was due to revenue growth associated with the software sales. Gross margin rate decreased by 3.7% from 83.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 79.8% for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in gross margin rate was due to the sale of point of sale system, of which gross margin rate was 23.6%. The increase in business tax and surcharges in line with the increase of revenues also cut down the gross margin.

The gross margin or the gross margin rate for the MVAS and MPS was $11.2 million or 90.9% and $8.27 million or 68.5%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010, and $8.64 million or 85.5% and $2.57 million or 77.2%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses, including selling, general and administrative expenses and R&D increased $2.84 million, or 99.9%, from $2.85 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $5.69 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase in operating expenses was related to the expansion of administrative and R&D departments with recruitment of more employees, related office expenses, as well as the addition of public company related expenses.

Interest expenses: Interest expenses increased $0.15 million, or 234.26%, from $0.07 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $0.22 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 due to an increase in interest expenses from the contingently convertible notes with an annual interest rate of 12% and short-term loans with an annual interest rate of 6.6375%.

Research and Development: For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we spent $1.2 million and $0.44 million on research and development expenses, of which $0.61 million and $0.34 million was attributable to MVAS and $0.59 million and $0.1 million was attributable to MPS.

Income from Operations: Income from operations increased $5.4 million, or 64.6%, from $8.36 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $13.76 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, principally due to revenue growth associated with our geographic expansion into additional provinces. Income from operations margin rate decreased 5.8% from 62.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 56.4% for the year ended December 31, 2010, mainly caused by the excessive increase of cost and expenses over the growth of revenue.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. We prepare our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reporting of, among other things, assets and liabilities, contingent assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses. We continually evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on the most recently available information, our own historical experiences and other factors that we believe to be relevant under the circumstances. Since our financial reporting process inherently relies on the use of estimates and assumptions, our actual results could differ from what we expect. This is especially true with some accounting policies that require higher degrees of judgment than others in their application. We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our audited consolidated financial statements because they involve the greatest reliance on our management’s judgment.

Revenue Recognition. We derive revenues from our MVAS Technology Platforms and Mobile Payment Solutions in the form of providing system integration, sales of software, patent licensing and maintenance services. With respect to the system integration, we sign contracts with telecommunication and mobile operators and system integrators to install and integrate the Group’s software with the hardware and software purchased from third-party suppliers. Deliverables of system integration include: software, hardware, integration, installation and training. No Post-Contract Customer Support (PCS) arrangement is included in system integration. Revenue is recognized when the last deliverable in the arrangement is delivered and when all of the following criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is probable.

With respect to the sales of software, revenue is recognized when the last deliverable in the arrangement is delivered and when all of the following criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is probable.

With respect to patent licensing, we enter into contracts with local system integrators who further contract with telecommunication and mobile operators, and provide these system integrators with our patents which permit the system integrators to use our patents. The system integrators pay the Group a one-time license fee for obtaining the programs and technologies. Patent licensing revenues are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria according to ASC 985-605 have been met.

Revenue derived from technical support contracts primarily includes telephone consulting, on-site support, product updates, and releases of new versions of products previously purchased by the customers, as well as error reporting and correction services. Maintenance contracts are typically sold for a separate fee with initial contractual period of one year with renewal for additional periods thereafter. Technical support service revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the service agreement.

Accounts Receivable. We sell our products and services to telecommunication and mobile operators directly or through resellers. We do not require collateral from our customers.

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and review the composition of accounts receivable, analyze historical bad debts, customer concentration, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate if allowance for doubtful accounts is needed.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

The FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation — Stock Compensation (ACS Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. The ASU codifies the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-J. The amendments to the Codification clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity.

The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Earlier adoption is permitted. The amendments are to be applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this update on our consolidated financial statements.

Foreign Currency Translation

Our functional currency is the renminbi (“RMB”) which is not freely convertible into foreign currencies. We maintain our financial statements in the functional currency. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Exchange gains or losses arising from foreign currency transactions are included in the determination of net income for the respective periods.

For financial reporting purposes, our financial statements, which are prepared using the functional currency, have been translated into U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates and stockholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Any translation adjustments resulting are not included in determining net income but are included in foreign currency translation adjustment of other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

The exchange rates applied are as follows:

	December 31,
	2010	2009
Year end RMB exchange rate	6.6118	6.8372
Average RMB exchange rate	6.7788	6.8409

There is no significant fluctuation in exchange rate for the conversion of RMB to U.S. dollars after the balance sheet date.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Dividends

We are a holding company and conduct our operations primarily through our subsidiaries and VIEs in the PRC. As a result, our ability to pay dividends depends upon dividends paid by our subsidiaries and VIEs. The VIEs’ earnings are transferred to our subsidiaries in the form of payments under the technology support and related consulting agreements. If our subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf, the instruments governing their debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends to us. In addition, our subsidiaries are permitted to pay dividends to us only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with accounting standards and regulations applicable to such subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2010, our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs had aggregate unappropriated earnings of approximately $21.1 million that were available for distribution. These unappropriated earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, and will be subject to PRC dividend withholding taxes upon distribution.

Under PRC law, each of our PRC subsidiaries must set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of its registered capital. Each of our PRC subsidiaries with foreign investments must also set aside a portion of its after-tax profits to fund an employee welfare fund at the discretion of the board. Although the statutory reserves can be used, among other ways, to increase the registered capital and eliminate future losses in excess of retained earnings of the respective companies, companies may not distribute the reserve funds as cash dividends except upon a liquidation of these subsidiaries. In addition, dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries could be delayed as we may only distribute such dividends upon completion of annual audits of the subsidiaries.

Government Control of Currency Conversion

Cash Flows

In summary, our cash flows were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

Net cash flows used in operating activities	$	(8,637,933	)	$	(1,305,453	)
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(999,465	)		(825,535	)
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		16,333,451			5,046,382
Effect of foreign currency fluctuation on cash and cash equivalents		258,224			(100,880	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	6,954,277		$	2,814,514
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year	$	3,305,473		$	490,959
Cash and cash equivalents – end of year	$	10,259,750		$	3,305,473

Operating Activities

Net cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $8.64 million as compared with $1.35 million used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, for a net increase of $7.28 million. This increase was mainly due to the significant increase in the change of accounts receivable, loans receivable and other current assets and inventory, offset by the effect of an increase in changes of tax payable and net income during the year ended December 31, 2010.

The increase in the change of accounts receivable caused the operating cash flows to be out about $14.48 million. It’s mainly because of the increasing revenue, which increased by $11.38 million, from $13.47 million to $24.84 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, while our revenue only increased by $0.55 million, when compared the data from year ended December 31, 2009 to year ended December 31, 2008.

The decrease in operating cash flows was also attributable to a substantial increase in cash out flows from advances to suppliers of $6.88 million as of December 31, 2010 when compared to December 31, 2009, due to large demand of third party software and hardware to be used in our MVAS and MPS platform deployment in 2011, and also due to the fact that we obtained lower price through large purchase. While there was no material change in advance to suppliers as of December 31, 2009 when compared to December 31, 2008, there was no material effect on the cash flow by advance to suppliers for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The inventory balance increased significantly by $3.37 million from $0.31 million as of December 31, 2009 to $3.68 million as of December 31, 2010, due to the purchase of point of sale systems from Verifone, related to the deployment of our mobile payment platforms.

The increase in operating cash flows was attributable to a substantial increase in tax payable of $2.05 million as of December 31, 2010 when compared to December 31, 2009, due to our large gross margin which caused significant portion of value added tax output not offset by value added tax input.

Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2010, our main use of investing activities was for loans to third parties. The cash payments used in investing activities was netted against the collections from amounts due from directors.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $16.33 million as compared with $4.95 million provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Of the $5 million contingently convertible notes as of December 31, 2009, $2 million was repaid in cash to the convertible note holders in February and March 2010, and $3 million was converted to 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share as a result of the share exchange and the February 2010 Offering.

The cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 included the net proceeds from the February 2010 Offering of $17.07 million and the short-term loan of $1.77 million, offset by the repayment of $2 million contingently convertible notes.

Restricted Net Assets

As a result of these PRC laws and regulations that require annual appropriations of 10% of after-tax income to be set aside prior to payment of dividends as general reserve fund, our PRC operating entities are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to us. Amounts restricted include paid-in capital and statutory reserve funds of our PRC operating subsidiaries as determined pursuant to PRC generally accepted accounting principles, totaling approximately US$24.4 million as of December 31, 2010.

Operating lease commitment

We lease office space under a lease agreement with a term expiring in April 2014. The lease may be cancelled by either party with 30-days prior written notice.

Future minimum rental payments under this operating lease are as follows:

	Office Rental
Year ending December 31, 2011		227,946
Year ending December 31, 2012		155,897
Year ending December 31, 2013		28,025
Year ending December 31, 2014		6,171
Total	$	418,039

We do not have other commitments besides the commitment in office rental.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Inflation

Inflation has not historically been a significant factor impacting our financial results.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial Data

Consolidated Financial Statements

The financial statements required by this item begin on page F-1 hereof.

PART IV

Item 1.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010(1)

3.1		Amended Articles of Incorporation(1)

3.2		Bylaws(1)

4.1		Form of Investor Warrant(1)

4.2		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2010(1)

4.3		Specimen Common Stock Certificate(5)

4.4		Form of Underwriter Warrant(5)

10.1		Subscription Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2010(1)

10.2		Make Good Escrow Agreement(1)

10.3		Form of Director Repayment Agreement(1)

10.4		Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.5		Exclusive Option Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Wanchun Hou and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.6		Exclusive Option Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Qiang Li and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.7		Exclusive Option Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Liangyao Xie and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.8		Loan Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Wanchun Hou(2)

10.9		Loan Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Qiang Li(2)

10.10		Loan Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Liangyao Xie(2)

10.11		Power of Attorney of Wanchun Hou in favor of Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.12		Power of Attorney of Qiang Li in favor of Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.13		Power of Attorney of Liangyao Xie in favor of Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.14		Share Pledge Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Wanchun Hou and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.15		Share Pledge Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Qiang Li and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.16		Share Pledge Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Liangyao Xie and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.17		Nominee Letter to Wanchun Hou(2)

10.18		Nominee Letter to Qiang Li(2)

10.19		Nominee Letter to Liangyao Xie(2)

14.1		Code of Ethics(3)

21.1		Subsidiaries of Trunkbow Holdings International Limited(1)

31.1*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed herewith.

(1)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by Trunkbow on June 4, 2010.

(2)	Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed by Trunkbow on December 15, 2010.

(3)	Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed by Trunkbow on January 18, 2011.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

December 30, 2011	By:	/s/ Li Qiang
(Date Signed)		Li Qiang, Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature	Capacity	Date

/s/ Dr. Hou WanChun	Chairman of the Board of Directors	December 30, 2011
Dr. Hou WanChun

/s/ Li Qiang	Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	December 30, 2011
Li Qiang

/s/ Ye Yuan Jun	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)	December 30, 2011
Ye Yuan Jun

/s/ Bao Jihong	Director	December 30, 2011
Bao Jihong

/s/ Wang Xin	Director	December 30, 2011
Wang Xin

/s/ Albert Liu	Director	December 30, 2011
Albert Liu

/s/ Regis Kwong	Director	December 30, 2011
Regis Kwong

/s/ Dr. Tan Kok Hui	Director	December 30, 2011
Dr. Tan Kok Hui

/s/ Iris Geng	Director	December 30, 2011
Iris Geng

/s/ Dr. Lv Ting Jie	Director	December 30, 2011
Dr. Lv Ting Jie

/s/ Huang Zhaoxing	Director	December 30, 2011
Huang Zhaoxing

/s/ Li Dong	Director	December 30, 2011
Li Dong

Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2010(1)

3.1		Amended Articles of Incorporation(1)

3.2		Bylaws(1)

4.1		Form of Investor Warrant(1)

4.2		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2010(1)

4.3		Specimen Common Stock Certificate(5)

4.4		Form of Underwriter Warrant(5)

10.1		Subscription Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2010(1)

10.2		Make Good Escrow Agreement(1)

10.3		Form of Director Repayment Agreement(1)

10.4		Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.5		Exclusive Option Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Wanchun Hou and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.6		Exclusive Option Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Qiang Li and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.7		Exclusive Option Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Liangyao Xie and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.8		Loan Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Wanchun Hou(2)

10.9		Loan Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Qiang Li(2)

10.10		Loan Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd. and Liangyao Xie(2)

10.11		Power of Attorney of Wanchun Hou in favor of Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.12		Power of Attorney of Qiang Li in favor of Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.13		Power of Attorney of Liangyao Xie in favor of Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.14		Share Pledge Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Wanchun Hou and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.15		Share Pledge Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Qiang Li and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.16		Share Pledge Agreement among Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Co., Ltd., Liangyao Xie and Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.(2)

10.17		Nominee Letter to Wanchun Hou(2)

10.18		Nominee Letter to Qiang Li(2)

10.19		Nominee Letter to Liangyao Xie(2)

14.1		Code of Ethics(3)

21.1		Subsidiaries of Trunkbow Holdings International Limited(1)

31.1*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed herewith.

(1)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed by Trunkbow on June 4, 2010.

(2)	Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed by Trunkbow on December 15, 2010.

(3)	Incorporated herein by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed by Trunkbow on January 18, 2011.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Trunkbow International Holdings Limited.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trunkbow International Holdings Limited (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP

March 31, 2011 except for Note 24, as to which the date is December 30, 2011

New York, New York

F-1

TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,
	2010		2009
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,259,750	$	3,305,473
Restricted deposit		362,987		—
Accounts receivable		25,658,184		10,455,284
Advances to suppliers		6,881,368		7,580
Loans receivable and other current assets, net		3,900,168		1,078,075
Due from directors		79,256		2,088,168
Inventories		3,681,450		307,182
Total current assets		50,823,163		17,241,762
Property and equipment, net		484,761		39,817
Long-term prepayment		358,397		—
TOTAL ASSETS	$	51,666,321	$	17,281,579
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	853,762	$	331,654
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		593,846		603,266
Short-term loan		1,814,937		—
Due to directors		—		24,430
Contingently convertible notes		—		5,000,000
Taxes payable		3,718,963		1,561,599
Total current liabilities		6,981,508		7,520,949
Other non-current liabilities		138,767		—
Total liabilities		7,120,275		7,520,949
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock: par value USD0.001, authorized 10,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009		—		—
Common Stock: par value USD0.001, authorized 190,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 32,472,075 shares at December 31, 2010 and 19,562,888 at December 31, 2009		32,472		19,563
Additional paid-in capital		21,384,050		1,323,239
Appropriated retained earnings		2,428,847		1,010,486
Unappropriated retained earnings		20,125,001		8,002,477
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		575,676		(595,135	)
Total stockholders’ equity		44,546,046		9,760,630
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	51,666,321	$	17,281,579

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-2

TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

Revenues	$	24,843,836		$	13,468,581
Less: Business tax and surcharges		455,919			38,624
Net revenues		24,387,917			13,429,957
Cost of revenues		4,929,974			2,220,577
Gross margin		19,457,943			11,209,380
Operating expenses
Selling and distribution expenses		1,412,499			533,633
General and administrative expenses		3,075,833			1,877,732
Research and development expenses		1,203,264			435,712
		5,691,596			2,847,077
Income from operations		13,766,347			8,362,303

Interest income		(37,204	)		(350	)
Interest expense		220,668			66,016
Other expenses		41,998			3,655
		225,462			69,321
Income before income tax expense		13,540,885			8,292,982
Income tax expense		—			—
Net income		13,540,885			8,292,982
Foreign currency translation fluctuation		1,170,811			(92,830	)
Comprehensive income	$	14,711,696		$	8,200,152
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic and diluted		31,022,002			19,562,888
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted	$	0.44		$	0.42

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-3

TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	13,540,885		$	8,292,982
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		93,135			20,362
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		—			1,281
Provision for doubtful debts					366,912
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(14,480,828	)		(9,791,845	)
Advance to suppliers and other assets		(6,369,759	)		95,224
Inventories		(3,280,951	)		(307,017	)
Long-term prepayment		(784,576	)		(241,583	)
Accounts payable		498,222			(85,218	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		118,273			383,859
Amount due to directors		(24,641	)		24,417
Taxes payable		2,052,307			(64,827	)
Net cash flows used in operating activities		(8,637,933	)		(1,305,453	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of property and equipment		(449,169	)		(4,729	)
Loans to third parties		(2,579,165	)		57,070
Collection in (increase in) amount due from directors		2,028,869			(877,876	)
Collection in long-term receivables		—			—
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(999,465	)		(825,535	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Increase in restricted deposit		(362,987	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock (net of finance costs)		17,073,720			100,000
Repayment of loans from third parties		(147,520	)		(53,618	)
Repayment of contingently convertible notes		(2,000,000	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of contingently convertible notes		—			5,000,000
Proceeds from short-term loan		1,770,238			—
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		16,333,451			5,046,382
Effect of exchange rate fluctuation on cash and cash equivalents		258,224			(100,880	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		6,954,277			2,814,514
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of the year		3,305,473			490,959
Cash and cash equivalents – end of the year	$	10,259,750		$	3,305,473
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	220,668		$	—
Cash paid for income taxes	$	—		$	—
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activities
Conversion of contingently convertible notes to common stock	$	3,000,000		$	—

See notes to the consolidated financial statements

F-4

TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

	Common stock				Additional paid-in			Appropriated retained		Unappropriated retained			Accumulated other comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		Capital			earnings		earnings			income/(loss)			Total

Balance at January 1, 2009	$	19,562,888	$	19,563	$	1,323,239		$	27,518	$	692,463		$	(502,305	)	$	1,560,478
Net income		-		-		-			-		8,292,982			-			8,292,982
Appropriation of statutory surplus reserve		-		-		-			982,968		(982,968	)		-			-
Foreign currency Translation adjustment		-		-		-			-		-			(92,830	)		(92,830	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		19,562,888		19,563		1,323,239			1,010,486		8,002,477			(595,135	)		9,760,630

Net income		-		-		-			-		13,540,885			-			13,540,885
Stock issued in recapitalization		1,687,112		1,687		(1,687	)		-		-			-			-
Issue of shares		11,222,075		11,222		20,062,498			-		-			-			20,073,720
Appropriation of statutory surplus reserve		-		-		-			1,418,361		(1,418,361	)		-			-
Foreign currency Translation adjustment		-		-		-			-		-			1,170,811			1,170,811
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	32,472,075	$	32,472	$	21,384,050		$	2,428,847	$	20,125,001		$	575,676		$	44,546,046

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

TRUNKBOW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1 — ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

Trunkbow International Holdings Limited (formerly named as Bay Peak 5 Acquisition Corp. (“BP5”)) (the “Company”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 3, 2004. The Company was formed as part of the implementation of the Chapter 11 reorganization plan (the “Visitalk Plan”) of visitalk.com, Inc. (“Visitalk.com”), a former provider of VOIP services. The Visitalk Plan was deemed effective by the Bankruptcy Court on September 17, 2004 (the “Effective Date”). On September 22, 2004, Visitalk.com was merged into VCC, which was authorized as the reorganized debtor under the Visitalk Plan.

In February 2010, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Trunkbow International Holdings Limited, a company organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (“Trunkbow”), the shareholders of Trunkbow (the “Shareholders”), who together own shares constituting 100% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares of Trunkbow (the “Trunkbow Shares”), and the principal shareholder of the Company (“Principal Shareholder”). Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Shareholders transferred to the Company all of the Trunkbow Shares in exchange for the issuance of 19,562,888 (the “Shares”) shares of our common stock (the “Share Exchange”). As a result of the Share Exchange, Trunkbow became our wholly owned subsidiary. After giving effect to the Share Exchange, the sale of common stock in the February 2010 Offering (defined below) and the BP5 Warrant Financing referred to below (i) existing shareholders of Trunkbow owned approximately 60.25% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, (ii) purchasers of Common Stock in the Offering owned approximately 26.01% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock (including 7.7% owned by VeriFone, Inc.), (iii) the holders of BP5 Warrants owned approximately 8.54% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock and (iv) the pre-existing shareholders of BP5 owned approximately 5.2% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock.

Concurrent with the Share Exchange, (i) we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain investors (the “Investors”) for the sale of an aggregate of 8,447,575 shares (the “Investor Shares”) and 1,689,515 warrants (the “Investor Warrants”), for aggregate gross proceeds equal to $16,895,150 (the “February 2010 Offering”) and (ii) certain holders of outstanding warrants of the Company issued to creditors and claimants of visitalk.com., in accordance with the Visitalk Plan, referred to herein as the “BP5 Warrant Investors” exercised the 2,774,500 warrants owned by them for an aggregate exercise price of $5.5 million and received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 554,900 shares of Common Stock (“BP5 Warrant Financing”).

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Trunkbow, was established in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) on July 17, 2009, with no significant business operations and assets other than holding of equity interests in its subsidiaries and variable interest entity (“VIE”). Trunkbow’s wholly owned subsidiary, Trunkbow (Asia Pacific) Investment Holdings Limited (“Trunkbow Hong Kong”) was established as an Investment Holding Company in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) on July 9, 2004.

Trunkbow Hong Kong established two wholly foreign owned subsidiaries in the PRC, Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shandong) Company, Limited (“Trunkbow Shandong”) which was established on December 10, 2007 in Jinan, Shandong Province and Trunkbow Asia Pacific (Shenzhen) Company, Limited (“Trunkbow Shenzhen”) which was established on June 7, 2007 in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province. Both subsidiaries are principally engaged in research and development of application platforms for mobile operators in China.

Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Company, Limited (“Trunkbow Technologies”) was established as a limited liability company on December 4, 2001 in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, the PRC. Trunkbow Technologies was formerly engaged in research and development of application platforms for mobile operators in China as well as wireless application systems for the international market. In December 2007, a series of agreements were entered into amongst Trunkbow Shandong, Trunkbow Technologies and its controlling shareholders, providing Trunkbow Shandong the ability to control Trunkbow Technologies, including its financial interest. As a result of these contractual arrangements, which assigned all of Trunkbow Technologies’ equity owners’ rights and obligations to Trunkbow Shandong resulting in the equity owners lacking the ability to make decisions that have a significant effect on Trunkbow Technologies’ operations and Trunkbow Shandong’s ability to extract the profits from the operation of Trunkbow Technologies, and assume the Trunkbow Technologies’ residual benefits. Because Trunkbow Shandong and its indirect parent are the sole interest holders of Trunkbow Technologies, the Company consolidates Trunkbow Technologies from its inception consistent with the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810-10.

The Company, its subsidiaries and VIE are collectively referred to as the “Group”.

F-6

2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a)	Change of reporting entity and basis of presentation

As a result of the Share Exchange on February 10, 2010, the former Trunkbow shareholders owned a majority of the common stock of the Company. The transaction was regarded as a reverse merger whereby Trunkbow was considered to be the accounting acquirer as its shareholders retained control of the Company after the Share Exchange, although the Company is the legal parent company. The share exchange was treated as a recapitalization of the Company. As such, Trunkbow (and its historical financial statements) is the continuing entity for financial reporting purposes. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange, BP5 was delivered with no assets and no liabilities at time of closing. Following the Share Exchange, the company changed its name from Bay Peak 5 Acquisition Corp. to Trunkbow International Holdings Limited. The financial statements have been prepared as if Trunkbow had always been the reporting company and then on the share exchange date, had changed its name and reorganized its capital stock.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company, and its subsidiaries and VIE, Trunkbow, Trunkbow Hong Kong, Trunkbow Shandong, Trunkbow Shenzhen and Trunkbow Technologies.

b)	Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, the Company’s subsidiaries and the Company’s VIE. All transactions and balances between the Company and its subsidiaries and VIE have been eliminated upon consolidation.

c)	Reclassification

The comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

d)	Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management makes these estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made; however actual results could differ from those estimates.

e)	Foreign currency translation

The functional currency of the Company is United States dollars (“US$”), and the functional currency of Trunkbow Hong Kong is Hong Kong dollars (“HK$”). The functional currency of the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIE is the Renminbi (“RMB”), and the PRC is the primary economic environment in which the Company operates.

For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIE, which are prepared using the RMB, are translated into the Company’s reporting currency, the United States Dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated using average rates prevailing during each reporting period, and shareholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from the translation are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

F-7

The exchange rates applied are as follows:

	December 31,
	2010	2009
Year end RMB exchange rate	6.6118	6.8372
Average RMB exchange rate	6.7788	6.8409

Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. The resulting exchange differences are included in the determination of net income of the consolidated financial statements for the respective periods.

f)	Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents represent cash on hand and deposits held at call with banks. The Group considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

g)	Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable value consisting of the carrying amount less an allowance for uncollectible accounts as needed. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Group’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Group’s existing accounts receivable. The Group determines the allowance based on aging data, historical collection experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Group did not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure relating to its customers, suppliers or others. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, management has determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts is required.

Inventory

Inventories represent hardware and equipment and are stated at the lower of cost or market value, determined using the specific identification method.

i)	Property and equipment, net

Furniture and office equipment, electronic equipment and motor vehicles are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method after taking into account their respective estimated residual values over the following estimated useful lives:

		Years
Motor vehicles		5
Furniture and office equipment		5
Electronic equipment		3 – 5
Telecommunication equipment		3 – 5
Leasehold improvements		3

Depreciation expense is included in cost of revenues, selling and distribution expenses, and general and administrative expenses.

When furniture and office equipment, electronic equipment and motor vehicles are retired or otherwise disposed of, resulting gain or loss is included in net income or loss in the year of disposition for the difference between the net book value and proceeds received thereon. Maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the expected useful lives of the assets are charged to expenses as incurred.

F-8

Impairment of long-lived assets

In accordance with Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets Subsections of FASB ASC Subtopic 360-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment — Overall, long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, and purchased intangible asset subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, the Group first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. No impairment of long-lived assets was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

j)	Fair value measurement

The Group applies the provisions of ASC Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements, for fair value measurements of financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements. ASC Subtopic 820-10 also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

ASC Subtopic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Group considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.

ASC Subtopic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC Subtopic 820-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Group has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

A discussion of the valuation technique used to measure the fair value of the warrant is provided in Note 15.

The Group did not have any nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

k)	Revenue recognition

The Group derives revenues from the MVAS Technology Platform and Mobile Payment Solutions in the form of providing system integration, sales of software, patent licensing, maintenance services and revenue sharing for the two services.

F-9

System integration

For the system integration, the Group signs contracts with telecommunication and mobile operators and system integrators to install and integrate the Group’s software with the hardware and software purchased from third-party suppliers.

Deliverables of system integration include: software, hardware, integration, installation, and training. No Post-Contract Customer Support (PCS) arrangement is included in system integration. The provision of services is substantially completed, i.e., when the Group purchases the hardware and software from third-party suppliers, integrates them together with the Group’s programs and software, and provides installation and training to customers, customers sign the final acceptance confirmation.

System integration includes a significant software portion. The software is not regarded as incidental to the provision of services as a whole because the marketing of such services focuses on the internally developed technologies included in the software. Therefore, ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition”, is applicable for these services. The Group cannot establish vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair values of the deliverables; therefore, according to ASC 985-605, revenue is recognized when the last deliverable in the arrangement is delivered and when all of the following criteria have been met:

(1)	Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

(2)	Delivery has occurred;

(3)	The vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable; and

(4)	Collectability is probable.

Sales of software

The Group enters into contracts with the mobile operators or the resellers to provide software that enables the mobile operators to provide mobile payment and value-added service to the end-users.

The Group recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 985-605, (formerly Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2 Software Revenue Recognition, as amended and interpreted by Statement of Position 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with respect to certain transactions), as well as Technical Practice Aids issued from time to time by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, that provides further interpretive guidance for public companies on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. No PCS arrangement is included in software sales.

The Group generally recognizes revenue from software and system services when all of the following criteria have been met, which is symbolized by the issuance of the final acceptance:

(1)	Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

(2)	Delivery has occurred;

(3)	The vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable; and

(4)	Collectability is probable.

Patent licensing

The Group enters into contracts with local system integrators who further contract with telecommunication and mobile operators, and provides these system integrators with our patents which permit the system integrators to use the Group’s patents. The system integrators pay the Group a one-time license fee for obtaining the programs and technologies. According to the contracts, these integrators are responsible for the construction and maintenance of the system platform while the Group assists these integrators during construction in form of providing technologies and programs. No PCS is offered in the patent licensing arrangement. When the construction of system platform is completed, these integrators perform examination and sign the final acceptance.

Patent licensing revenues are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria according to ASC 985-605-25 have been met, which is symbolized by the issuance of the final acceptance. Such criteria include: (i) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery having occurred; (iii) whether the vender’s fee is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility being probable. We recognize revenue under ASC 985-605-25 because:

F-10

(i) It is our customary practice to have a signed written agreement between us and our customers.

(ii) According to these contracts, the integrators are responsible for the construction and maintenance of the system platform while we assist the integrators during construction in form of providing technologies and programs. Codes and programs were delivered to the integrators during the construction of the system platform. At the same time, we are obligated to provide training and support until the whole platform, including hardware incorporated with our codes and programs, is confirmed and accepted by the integrators. Revenue is recognized upon the final acceptance being signed by the integrators.

(iii) It is our policy to not provide customers the right to any adjustments or refund of any portion of their license fees paid, acceptance provisions, cancellation privileges, or rights of return.

(iv) Collectability is assessed on a customer-by-customer basis. The Company typically sells to customers for whom there is a history of successful collection, and new customers are subject to a credit review process that evaluates the customer’s ability to pay.

Maintenance services

Revenue sharing

We have three to five year contractual agreements with mobile carriers on deploying or managing the mobile value added service platforms or mobile payment platforms. We are obligated to provide maintenance services on the platforms and consulting services to the end-users, and also provide training to the mobile carriers’ employees.

We share revenues with the mobile carriers based upon 10% to 60% of the fees billed to the end-users. The fees billed to the end-users and subject to revenue sharing include monthly functional fees and telephone bills. Revenue is recognized monthly upon the receipt of the sales and usage reports provided by the mobile carriers. Revenue is reported on a net basis since the mobile carriers act as principal when providing services to the end-users.

Royalty income

Other than the one-time license fee, the Group also receives royalties for each end-user subscribed to the services. Royalty revenue is recognized when earned and collectability is reasonably assured, based upon the receipt of reports from mobile carriers.

l)	Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues primarily includes cost of equipment and software purchased from third parties and labor costs.

m)	Concentration risk

Credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Group to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Group places their cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high-credit ratings and quality.

F-11

The Group conducts credit evaluations of customers and generally does not require collateral or other security from customers. The Group establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based upon the age of the receivables and factors relevant to determining the credit risk of specific customers. The amount of receivables ultimately not collected by the Group has generally been consistent with management’s expectations and the allowance established for doubtful accounts.

Major Customers

The Group had sales to three and four customers that accounted for approximately 50.3% and 80.9% of revenues during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These customers accounted for approximately 55.7% and 85.2% of accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Major Suppliers

The Group had purchases from two vendors that accounted for approximately 57.2% and 75.1 % of purchases during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These vendors accounted for approximately nil and 29.8% of accounts payable balance as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

F-12

n)	Research and development expenses

Research and development costs are incurred in the development of technologies in mobile value added service platform and mobile payment system, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products and services. The Group applies ASC985-20, “Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed”. In particular, nearly all of the research and development expenditure incurred since the Group’s formation has been to establish the technological feasibility of the Group’s software and techniques. As a result, all research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

o)	Operating leases

Leases where substantially all the rewards and risks of ownership of assets remain with the lesser are accounted for as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease periods.

Taxation

Income taxes

The Group follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between of the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the period in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Group records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in the income statement in the period that includes the enactment date. The Group had no deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized for any of the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Value added taxes

The Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIE are subject to value-added tax (“VAT”) on sales. For Trunkbow Technologies and Trunkbow Shandong, the VAT is calculated at a rate of 17% on revenues from sales of hardware and software as well as the installation and system integration services which are deemed as mixed-sale of goods and thus subject to VAT. Trunkbow Shenzhen is a small scale tax payer and the VAT is calculated at a rate of 3% on revenues.

Pursuant to the policies issued by Ministry of Finance, State Taxation Administration and General Administration of Customs for Encouraging Software Industry and Integrated Circuits Industry issued in 2000, an enterprise classified as a “software enterprise” will be entitled to a rebate of its net VAT liability to the extent that it exceeds 3% of the actual VAT burden relating to self-developed software product sales.

Business tax and surcharges

The Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIE are also subject to business tax at a rate of 5% on technical services revenues.

q)	Uncertain tax positions

ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a more likely than not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on recognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim periods, and income tax disclosures. For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Group did not have any interest and penalties associated with tax positions and the Group did not have any significant unrecognized uncertain tax positions.

F-13

The Company’s subsidiaries and VIE are subject to taxation in PRC and other tax jurisdictions. There is no ongoing examination by taxing authorities at this time. Various tax years during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 of the Company’s subsidiaries and VIE remain open in the relevant taxing jurisdictions.

r)	Earnings per share

Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income attributable to holders of common stock by the weighted average number of common shares considered to be outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding common stock warrants is reflected in the diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method when the impact is dilutive.

s)	Appropriated Retained Earnings

The income from the Company’s subsidiaries and VIE is distributable to its owners after transfer to statutory reserves as required by relevant PRC laws and regulations and the Company’s Articles of Association. As stipulated by the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC, the Company’s subsidiaries and VIE are required to maintain a statutory surplus reserve fund which is non-distributable to shareholders. Appropriations to such reserve are 10% of net profit after taxation determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the PRC.

Statutory surplus reserve fund is established for the purpose of offsetting accumulated losses, enlarging productions or increasing share capital. The appropriation may cease to apply if the balance of the fund is equal to 50% of the entity’s registered capital.

t)	Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances excluding transactions resulting from investments from owners and distributions to owners. Accumulated other comprehensive income, as presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments.

u)	Commitments and contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Group is subject to loss contingencies, such as legal proceedings and claims arising out of its business, that cover a wide range of matters, including, among others, government investigations, product and environmental liability, and tax matters. In accordance with ASC 450-20, “Accounting for Contingencies”, the Group records accruals for such loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Group has not experienced any material service liability claims.

v)	Recently enacted accounting standards

The FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation—Stock Compensation (ACS Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. The ASU codifies the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-J. The amendments to the Codification clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity.

F-14

3 — RESTRICTED DEPOSIT

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Restricted deposit	$	362,987	$	—

The restricted deposit as of December 31, 2010 was security deposit for the short-term loan with balance of $ 1,814,937.

4 — ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, accounts receivable consisted of:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Accounts receivable	$	25,658,184	$	10,455,284

The Group has not recognized an allowance for doubtful receivables because there has not been a significant change in credit quality and the amounts are still considered recoverable. The Group does not hold any collateral or other credit enhancements over these balances. The Group has not had any write-off of trade receivables during the period presented. $3,863,588 was subsequently collected by March 31, 2011.

5 — ADVANCE TO SUPPLIERS

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, advance to suppliers consisted of:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Advances to suppliers	$	6,881,368	$	7,580

Advances to suppliers represents prepayment to the Group's distributors for the purchase of third party software and hardware to be used in our MVAS/MPS platforms.

F-15

6 — LOANS RECEIVABLE AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS, NET

Loans receivable and other current assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009
Prepaid advertisement	$	483,983	$	—
Deposits		49,199		18,320
Loans to third parties		3,187,190		1,163,600
Staff advances		257,974		10,243
Prepaid expenses		210,791		241,713
Others		77,943		11,111
	$	4,267,080	$	1,444,987
Less: Allowance for doubtful debt		366,912		366,912
	$	3,900,168	$	1,078,075

Prepaid advertisement is amortized as the expense incurred. Advertising expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $118,016 and nil, respectively.

Loans to third party represent loans to the Company’s distributors. As part of the support for our MVAS/MPS deployment, the Company advanced funds in the form of loan to the distributors for the purchase of third party software and hardware. Once the hardware and software is delivered to the carriers, the distributors will get paid and repay the loan to us. As of March 31, 2011, $1,527,572 of loans to third parties were subsequently collected.

7 — AMOUNT DUE FROM (TO) DIRECTORS

a) As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, amount due from directors consisted of:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Amount due from Directors	$	79,256	$	2,088,168

Amount due from directors represented advance to the directors for expenses to be paid on behalf of the company.

b) At December 31, 2010 and 2009, amount due to directors consisted of:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Amount due to Directors	$	—	$	24,430

8 — INVENTORIES

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, inventories consisted of:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

System integration hardware	$	825,818	$	307,182
Point of sale systems		2,855,632		-
	$	3,681,450	$	307,182

F-16

The point of sale systems were purchased from Verifone, a related party of the Company.

9 — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment of the Group mainly consists of furniture and office equipment and electronic equipment located in the PRC.

Property and equipment as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Motor vehicles	$	51,386	$	—
Furniture and office equipment		103,242		47,637
Electronic equipment		287,231		63,868
Telecommunication equipment		115,165		—
Leasehold improvement		58,250		—
		615,274		111,505
Less: Accumulated depreciation		130,513		71,688
	$	484,761	$	39,817

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $93,135 and $20,362, respectively.

10 — LONG-TERM PREPAYMENT

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Office rental	$	45,689	$	—
Prepaid membership fee		268,711		—
Others		43,997		—
	$	358,397	$	—

11 — ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The breakdowns of accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Accrued payroll	$	177,290	$	56,719
Advance from customers		75,622		48,265
Loans from third parties		37,811		146,259
Advances to staff		143,341		93,772
Accrued expenses		94,060		166,016
Others		65,722		92,235
	$	593,846	$	603,266

F-17

Loans from third parties are short-term and non-interest bearing.

12 — SHORT-TERM LOAN

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Short-term loan	$	1,814,937	$	—

The short-term loan as of December 31, 2010 was borrowed from China Bohai Bank, guaranteed by Trunkbow Shandong, Mr. Wanchun Hou and Mr. Qiang Li, and secured by a restricted deposit of $362,987. The loan is due on May 5, 2011 with floating lending rate, 25% up PBOC benchmark rate. The interest expense related to the short term loan was $93,118 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

13 — CONTINGENTLY CONVERTIBLE NOTES

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Bridgeway Asset Management Limited	$	—	$	1,000,000
Bay Peak LLC		—		2,000,000
Mengyuan Song		—		2,000,000
	$	—	$	5,000,000

Among the $5,000,000 contingently convertible notes, $1,000,000 was repaid in cash to Bridgeway in March 2010, $1,000,000 was repaid in cash to Bay Peak LLC in February 2010, and another $1,000,000 was converted to 500,000 shares at $2.00 per share as a result of the share exchange. The convertible notes of $2,000,000 issued to Mengyuan Song were converted to 1,000,000 shares at $2.00 per share in the February 2010 Offering.

The interest expenses related to contingently convertible notes were $126,782 and $66,016 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

14 — TAXES PAYABLE

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Value Added Tax Payable	$	2,152,999	$	314,326
Income Tax Payable		1,290,066		1,247,273
Others		275,898		—
	$	3,718,963	$	1,561,599

15 — OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

	December 31,
	2010		2009

Other non-current liabilities	$	138,767	$	—

F-18

Other non-current liabilities represented government subsidy. Such subsidy is not treated as taxable income and must be used for funding its software research and development.

16 — INCOME TAXES

Corporation Income Tax (“CIT”)

(i) The Company is incorporated in the state of Nevada. Under the current law of Nevada, the Company is not subject to state corporation income tax. The Company became a holding company and does not conduct any substantial operations of its own after the Share Exchange. No provision for federal corporate income tax has been made in the financial statements as the Company has no taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2010. And earnings in the PRC are intended to be permanently reinvested in the PRC operation.

Trunkbow was established in the British Virgin Islands on July 17, 2009. Under the current laws of the British Virgin Islands, Trunkbow is not subject to tax on income or capital gains. In addition, upon payments of dividends by Trunkbow, no British Virgin Islands withholding tax is imposed.

Trunkbow Hong Kong was incorporated in Hong Kong on July 9, 2004. Trunkbow Hong Kong did not earn any income that was derived in Hong Kong for the year ended December 31, 2010 and therefore was not subject to Hong Kong Profits Tax. The payments of dividends by Hong Kong companies are not subject to any Hong Kong withholding tax.

(ii) PRC subsidiaries and VIE

The subsidiaries and VIE incorporated in the PRC are generally subject to a corporate income tax rate of 25% commencing January 1, 2008 except for those subsidiaries and VIE that enjoy tax holidays or preferential tax treatment, as discussed below.

Trunkbow Shandong

Trunkbow Shandong, a PRC company, is a wholly foreign-owned entity under PRC law and is governed by the income tax law of the PRC and is subject to PRC enterprise income tax. The statutory income tax rate commencing January 1, 2008 was 25%.

On October 16, 2009, Trunkbow Shandong was certified as a software enterprise by Shandong Economic and Information Technology Committee. Pursuant to the PRC tax laws, newly established and certified software enterprises are entitled to tax preferential policies of full exemption from income tax for the first two years and a 50% reduction for the next three years, commencing from the first profit-making year after offsetting all tax losses carried forward from the previous five years. The first profit making year for Trunkbow Shandong was 2009. On January 7, 2010, Trunkbow Shandong obtained the official approval from the tax bureau of Shandong Province Jinan City High-tech Industry Development Zone on the preferential tax exemption.

Pursuant to the aforementioned taxation laws, Trunkbow Shandong was exempt from income tax for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, and thereafter, a half tax rate of 12.5% will be enacted for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Trunkbow Shenzhen

Trunkbow Shenzhen, a PRC company, is a wholly foreign-owned entity under PRC law. Because it was incorporated in Shenzhen, a special economic zone in the PRC, is entitled to preferential income tax rate of 15% in 2007. According to the pronouncement of tax bureau, for companies established after March 16, 2007, the income tax rate will be immediately raised to the unified tax rate of 25% started from January 1, 2008. As Trunkbow Shenzhen was established on September 7, 2007, the income tax rate from year 2008 on was 25%. Trunkbow Shenzhen was in net operation loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 and no income tax provision was recorded.

F-19

Trunkbow Technologies

Trunkbow Technologies was registered in Shenzhen, a special economic zone in the PRC, which is entitled to preferential income tax rates of 18% and 15% in 2008 and 2007 respectively. According to the pronouncement of tax bureau, for companies established before March 16, 2007, the income rate will gradually increase to 25% within 4 years, 20% in 2009, 22% in 2010, 24% in 2011 and 25% from 2012. Trunkbow Technologies was not recording a current year tax provision because it was utilizing prior year net operation carryforward.

The following is a reconciliation of tax computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to PRC operations to income tax expenses for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009

PRC statutory tax rate		25	%		25	%
Accounting income before tax	$	14,256,065		$	8,553,059
Computed expected income tax expenses		3,564,016			2,138,265
Loss from subsidiaries and contractually controlled entity		18,452			349,627
Less: tax exemption		3,458,473			2,487,892
Less: net operation loss carryforward		123,895			—
Income tax expenses	$	—		$	—

17 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In a reverse acquisition the historical stockholders’ equity of the accounting acquirer prior to the merger is retroactively reclassified (a recapitalization) for the equivalent number of shares received in the merger after giving effect to any difference in par value of the registrant’s and the accounting acquirer’s stock by an offset in paid in capital.

Common stock

Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, Trunkbow shareholders transferred to the Company all of the Trunkbow shares in exchange for the issuance of 19,562,888 shares of the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the Company reclassified its common stock and additional paid-in-capital accounts for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The Company authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $.001 per share, but no preferred shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement entered into concurrently with the Share Exchange Agreement, an aggregate of 8,447,575 shares and 1,689,515 warrants were sold for aggregate gross proceeds equal to $16,895,150. Certain holders of outstanding warrants of the Company issued to creditors and claimants of visitalk.com, Inc. in accordance with such company’s Chapter 11 reorganization plan exercised the 2,774,500 warrants owned by them for an aggregate exercise price of $5.5 million and received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 554,900 shares of Common Stock.

Net proceeds were approximately $20,100,000 (including the conversion of $3,000,000 from contingently convertible notes to common stock), net of issuance costs of $2,370,431, including (1) placement agent fees of $1,568,091 to Merriman Curhan Ford & Co.; (2) legal and professional fees of $555,510 and (3) other fees directly related to the financing of $246,830.

Warrants

In connection with the February 2010 offering, we issued warrants to purchase 2,805,519 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.00. The warrants have a five year term and are excisable immediately. The exercise price and number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances, including in the event of a stock dividend, or our recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation.

F-20

No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the warrants. If, upon exercise of a warrant, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will pay to the holder cash equal to such fraction multiplied by the then fair market value of one full share.

The estimated fair values of the warrants issued to investors were determined at February 10, 2010 using Binominal Option Pricing Model. The fair values of the warrants are summarized as follows:

Fair value of warrant per share (US$) at date of issuance: $1.18

Key assumptions adopted in Binomial Option Pricing Model for the estimation of the fair value of the warrants outstanding were summarized as follows:

Expected volatility		73	%
Expected dividends yield		0	%
Time to maturity	5 years
Risk-free interest rate per annum		2.218	%
Fair value of underlying common shares (per share)	$	1.95

As of December 31, 2010, no outstanding warrants had been exercised.

In connection with our IPO in February 2011, Roth Capital Partners, LLC received warrants to purchase a number of shares of our common stock equal to 5% of the shares of common stock issued in the offering. The warrants have a term of three years, have an exercise price equal to 120% of the public offering price of the common stock, provide for cashless exercise at all times and, in accordance with FINRA Rule 5110(g)(1), may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated, or be the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of such warrant by any person for a period of 180 days immediately following the effective date of the registration statement, except as provided in FINRA Rule 5110(g)(2).

Escrow shares

In connection with the Share Exchange Agreement, Chief Honor Investments Limited and Capital Melody Limited (collectively referred to as “Controlling Stockholders”) entered into an Investor Side Letter Agreement with certain investors (“Investors”). Pursuant to the side letter, a) the Controlling Stockholders agree to deliver to the Investors, as a group, an aggregate of 337,500 shares of Common Stock of the Company, if the Company fails to achieve at least $8,000,000 in consolidated net income in accordance with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as set forth in the final audit for Trunkbow’s consolidated group for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009; b) If the Company’s consolidated net income per share for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Actual 2010 EPS”) is not at least $0.37 on a fully diluted basis then the Controlling Stockholders shall deliver additional shares, on a pro rata basis to each Investor, with the maximum aggregate number of 8,437,500 shares; c) if the Company fails to cause its Common Stock to be listed on the NASDAQ Stock market, the NYSE Amex or the New York Stock Exchange within twelve months of the effective date of the Form 10 registration statement, each of the Controlling Shareholders agrees that they shall immediately issue and deliver to the Investors, as a group, an aggregate of 675,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, to be divided among each Investor on a pro rata basis as partial liquidated damages and not as a penalty.

The purpose of the Investor Side Letter Agreement was an inducement made to facilitate the respective offerings, and not part of a compensatory arrangement to management. The escrow shares will not be released or cancelled due to the discontinued employment of any management of the Company.

18 — REVENUES AND COST OF REVENUES

The following consolidated result of operations includes the results of operations of the Company, all the subsidiaries and our contractually controlled entity, Trunkbow Technologies (Shenzhen) Company, Limited.

F-21

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, revenues and cost of revenues consisted of:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009

Gross Revenues
System integration	$	9,368,839	$	8,496,191
Software sales		14,916,350		4,230,450
Maintenance service		404,513		672,564
Shared revenue		154,134		69,376
		24,843,836		13,468,581
Less:
Business tax and surcharges		455,919		38,624
Cost of Revenues
Equipment costs		4,182,148		2,040,591
Labor Costs		747,826		179,986
		4,929,974		2,220,577
Gross margin	$	19,457,943	$	11,209,380

19 — SEGMENT INFORMATION

ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Group’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews consolidated results of operations prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Group; hence, the Group has only one operating segment.

The Group operates in the PRC and all of the Group’s long-lived assets are located in the PRC. As of December 31, 2010, the Company provides two products and services: MVAS Technology Platforms and Mobile Payment Solutions. MVAS Technology Platforms enable the operators to offer mobile value added services to end-users through our major products including Caller Color Ring Back Tone, Number Change Notification and Color Numbering. Mobile Payment Solutions allows RF-SIM (radio frequency SIM) enabled mobile phones worldwide to be utilized as payment tools and authentication devices, and also enables the end-user to consolidate a variety of functions and services into one phone.

We do not track our assets by operating segments. Consequently, it is not practical to show assets by operating segments results.

The gross revenues and cost of revenues consist of the following products and services:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009

MVAS Technology Platforms
Gross Revenues	$	12,660,109	$	10,135,865
Business tax and surcharges		345,628		38,624
Cost of Revenues		1,124,594		1,459,980
	$	11,189,887	$	8,637,261
Mobile Payment Solutions
Gross Revenues	$	12,183,727	$	3,332,716
Business tax and surcharges		110,291		—
Cost of Revenues		3,805,380		760,597
	$	8,268,056	$	2,572,119

F-22

20 — EMPLOYEE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN

Full time employees of the Group in the PRC participate in a government mandated defined contribution plan, pursuant to which certain pension benefits, medical care, employee housing fund and other welfare benefits are provided to employees. Chinese labor regulations require that the PRC subsidiaries of the Group make contributions to the government for these benefits based on certain percentages of the employees’ salaries. The Group has no legal obligation for the benefits beyond the contributions made. The total amounts for such employee benefits, which were expensed as incurred, were $255,909 and $212,182 for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

21 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

Leasing Arrangements

The Group has entered into commercial leases for offices with a term expiring in April 2014. The lease may be cancelled by either party with 30-days prior written notice. Future minimum rental payments under this operating lease are as follows:

	Office Rental
Year ending December 31, 2011	$	227,946
Year ending December 31, 2012		155,897
Year ending December 31, 2013		28,025
Year ending December 31, 2014		6,171
Total	$	418,039

Contingencies

Contingencies through March 31, 2011 have been considered by the Company and none were noted which were required to be disclosed.

22 — EARNINGS PER SHARE

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009

Numerator:
Net income	$	13,540,885	$	8,292,982
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
-Basic and diluted		31,022,002		19,562,888
Earnings per share
-Basic and diluted	$	0.44	$	0.42

F-23

All share and per share data have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the recapitalization of the Company after the share exchange agreement. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has not traded in the public market, the Company considered the fair value of the warrants per share at date of issuance by using Binominal Option Pricing Model as the market price per share of the common stock which was $1.18, and because this market price is lower than the exercise price per share of the warrants which is $2, there is no dilutive effective on the earnings per share.

23 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

1) Purchase from related parties

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009

VeriFone Electronic (Beijing) Co., Ltd.	$	5,035,589	$	—

VeriFone invested $5 million in the February 2010 Offering and owns 7.7% of our common stock as of December 31, 2010. We have granted VeriFone the ability to name one of the directors on our Board of Directors so long as it beneficially owns at least 4.99% of our outstanding Common Stock.

Verifone Electronic (Beijing) Co., Ltd is the subsidiary of Verifone in China.

24 — VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

To satisfy PRC laws and regulations, the Company conducts certain business in the PRC through its variable interest entity.

In December 2007, a series of agreements were entered into amongst Trunkbow Shandong, Trunkbow Technologies and its controlling shareholders, providing Trunkbow Shandong the ability to control Trunkbow Technologies, including its financial interest.

Resulting from the contractual arrangements between Trunkbow Shandong, Trunkbow Technologies and its controlling shareholders, the Company includes the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Trunkbow Technologies in its consolidated financial statements. The contractual arrangements with Trunkbow Technologies are summarized below:

Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreements. Pursuant to Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreements entered into amongst Trunkbow Shandong, Trunkbow Technologies and its controlling shareholders in December 2007, Trunkbow Shandong has the exclusive right to provide to our PRC operating subsidiaries complete technical support, business support and related consulting services, which include, among other things, technical services, business consultations, equipment or property leasing, marketing consultancy and product research. Each of our PRC operating subsidiaries has agreed to pay an annual service fee to Trunkbow Shandong equal to 100% of its audited total amount of operational income each year. Each of our PRC operating subsidiary has also agreed to pay a monthly service fee to Trunkbow Shandong equal to 100% of the net income generated on a monthly basis. The payment and terms of payment are fixed to ensure that Trunkbow Shandong obtains 100% of the net income for that month, although adjustments may be made upon approval by Trunkbow Shandong to provide for operational needs. If at year end, after an audit of the financial statements of any of our PRC operating subsidiaries, there is determined to be any shortfall in the payment of 100% of the annual net income, such PRC operating subsidiary must pay such shortfall to Trunkbow Shandong. Each agreement has a ten-year term, subject to renewal and early termination in accordance with the terms therein.

Exclusive Option Agreements. Under Exclusive Option Agreements entered into amongst Trunkbow Shandong, Trunkbow Technologies and its controlling shareholders in December 2007, each of the PRC Shareholders irrevocably granted to Trunkbow Shandong or its designated person an exclusive option to purchase, to the extent permitted by PRC law, a portion or all of their respective equity interest in any PRC Operating Subsidiary for a purchase price of RMB10 or a purchase price to be adjusted to be in compliance with applicable PRC laws and regulations. Trunkbow Shandong or its designated person has the sole discretion to decide when to exercise the option, whether in part or in full. Each of these agreements has a ten-year term, subject to renewal at the election of Trunkbow Shandong.

Share Pledge Agreements. Under the Share Pledge Agreements entered into by and among Trunkbow Shandong, our PRC operating subsidiaries and each of Mr. Wanchun Hou, Mr. Qiang Li and Mr. Liangyao Xie, (the “PRC Shareholders”) in December 2007, the PRC Shareholders pledged, all of their equity interests in PRC Operating Subsidiaries to guarantee our PRC operating subsidiaries’ performance of its obligations under the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement. If the PRC operating subsidiaries or any of the PRC Shareholders breaches its/his/her respective contractual obligations under this agreement, or upon the occurrence of one of the events regarded as an event of default under each such agreement, Trunkbow Shandong, as pledgee, will be entitled to certain rights, including the right to dispose of the pledged equity interests. The PRC Shareholders agreed not to dispose of the pledged equity interests or take any actions that would prejudice Trunkbow Shandong's interest, and to notify Trunkbow Shandong of any events or upon receipt of any notices which may affect Trunkbow Shandong's interest in the pledge. Each of the equity pledge agreements will be valid until all the payments due under the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement have been fulfilled.

F-24

Powers of Attorney. The PRC Shareholders each executed a power of attorney in December 2007, to appoint Trunkbow Shandong as their exclusive attorneys-in-fact to vote on their behalf on all matters with respect to our PRC operating subsidiaries that require shareholder approval. The term of each power of attorney is valid so long as such shareholder is a shareholder of the respective PRC operating subsidiary.

As a result of these contractual arrangements, we are considered to be the primary beneficiary of Trunkbow Technologies; we consolidate the results of operations, assets and liabilities of Trunkbow Technologies in our financial statements. Although we have been advised by our PRC legal counsel that each contract under these contractual arrangements is valid and binding under current PRC laws and regulations, our contractual arrangements with Trunkbow Technologies may not be as effective in providing us with control over the Trunkbow Technologies as direct ownership. We rely on these contractual rights to effect control and management of the VIE, which exposes us to the risk of potential breach of contract by the shareholders of Trunkbow Technologies for a number of reasons. For example, their interests as shareholders of Trunkbow Technologies and our interests may conflict and we may fail to resolve such conflicts; the shareholders may believe that breaching the contracts will lead to greater economic benefit for them; or the shareholders may otherwise act in bad faith. If any of the foregoing were to happen, we may have to rely on legal or arbitral proceedings to enforce our contractual rights, including specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages. Such arbitral and legal proceedings may cost substantial financial and other resources, and result in disruption of our business, and we cannot assure that the outcome will be in our favor. Apart from the above risks, there are no significant judgments or assumptions regarding enforceability of the contractual agreements with Trunkbow Technologies.

In addition, as all of these contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through either arbitration or litigation in the PRC, they would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures. The legal environment in the PRC is not as developed as in other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could further limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Furthermore, these contracts may not be enforceable in the PRC if PRC government authorities or courts take a view that such contracts contravene PRC laws and regulations or are otherwise not enforceable for public policy reasons. At present, the equity interest pledge agreement has not been registered with the relevant PRC authorities, which will affect our ability to enforce its provisions prior to such registration. In the event we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert effective control over our VIE, and our ability to conduct our business may be materially and adversely affected. If the applicable PRC authorities invalidate our contractual arrangements for violation of PRC laws, rules and regulations, in such an event, we would lose control of the VIE resulting in its deconsolidation in financial reporting and loss in our market valuation.

In addition, if our VIE or all or part of its assets become subject to court injunctions or asset freezes or liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some of our businesses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If our VIE undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, its shareholders or unrelated third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of its assets. The occurrence of any of these events may hinder our ability to operate business, which could in turn materially harm our business and ability to generate revenues and cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly.

Most of our operations are conducted through our affiliated companies, including our VIE which we control through contractual agreements in the form of a variable interest entity. Current regulations in the PRC permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us only out of its accumulated distributable profits, if any, determined in accordance with their articles of association and PRC accounting standards and regulations. The ability of these PRC affiliates to make dividends and other payments to us may be restricted by factors that include changes in applicable foreign exchange and other laws and regulations.

Under PRC law, our subsidiary may only pay dividends after 10% of its after-tax profits have been set aside as reserve funds, unless such reserves have reached at least 50% of its registered capital. Such cash reserve may not be distributed as cash dividends.

The PRC Income Tax Law also imposes a 10% withholding income tax on dividends generated on or after January 1, 2008 and distributed by a resident enterprise to its foreign investors, if such foreign investors are considered as non-resident enterprise without any establishment or place within China or if the received dividends have no connection with such foreign investors’ establishment or place within China, unless such foreign investors’ jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement.

F-25

Summary information regarding consolidated VIE is as follows:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009

Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	904,614		$	392,954
Accounts receivable			2,740,005			317,894
Loans receivable and other current assets, net			243,449			829,703
Inventories			67,202			179,444
Due from directors			4,611			-
Property and equipment, net			24,980			31,783
Total Assets		$	3,984,861		$	1,751,778

Liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	5,276		$	15,188
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			215,064			434,309
Due to directors			15,970			62,527
Short-term loan			1,814,937			-
Taxes payable			1,758,905			1,604,563
Total Liabilities		$	3,810,152		$	2,116,587

The assets of the VIE can be used only to settle the obligations of the VIE. Conversely, liabilities recognized as of consolidating VIE do not represent additional claims on the Company’s assets.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the financial performance of VIE reported in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income includes revenues of $2,879,686, cost of revenues of $1,781,515, operating expenses of $480,184 and net income of $495,580.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, the financial performance of VIE reported in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income includes revenues of $1,216,120, cost of revenues of $470,844, operating expenses of $2,082,623 and net loss of $1,371,227.

25 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued and material subsequent event is as follows:

On February 3, 2011, the Company announced its initial public offering of 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock priced at $5.00 per share. The shares began trading on February 3, 2011, on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol "TBOW". The net proceeds are $18,109,988 after deduction of $1,400,000 of underwriter’s commission, and $490,012 of legal and professional fees.

We entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Beijing Delixunda Technology Co., Ltd. (“Delixunda”)and its shareholders on March 10, 2011. Delixunda is a telecom value-added service licensed company and was established as a limited liability company on December 1, 2009 in Beijing, the PRC. Delixunda has no operations prior to February 10th, 2011. As a result of the contractual arrangements with Delixunda, we indirectly own the telecom value-added service license, which would enable us to offer telecom wireless value-added content service to individual clients.

F-26

Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd - FORM 10-K/A - December 30, 2011

Attached files

Trunkbow International Holdings Ltd Reports