(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days  x Yes     o No

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an  accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and" smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

o   Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer

o   Non-accelerated filer

x   Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  o Yes    x No

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, was 22,309,000 common shares as of December 20, 2011.

1

2

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words "believes," "project," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates," "intends," "strategy," "plan," "may," "will," "would," "will be," "will continue," "will likely result, "and similar expressions.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor   provisions.  Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

3

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

4

5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

ONYX SERVICE AND SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER 31, 2011

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Onyx Service and Solutions, Inc. (the Company) is currently a provider of both privately owned and company owned automatic teller machines (ATM). The Company receives revenues from the collection of the surcharge revenues and inter-exchange revenues.

Organization and Basis of Presentation

The Company was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware.  On November 25, 2009, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Fresca Worldwide Trading., a Nevada company, for the purchase of its ATM assets. The Company paid Fresca World Wide Trading Corp. $10,400 for the purchase of its ATM assets.  

On August 22, 2011, the Company entered into and consummated a share exchange agreement with Blackstone Equity Partners PTE LTD (“Blackstone”), the sole shareholder of Southern Geo Power Corp., a Wyoming corporation (“SGPC”) and SGPC to acquire all the issued and outstanding shares of SGPC, in consideration for 11,000,000 newly issued restricted shares of the Company. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been reflected herein.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ACCOUNTING BASIS

These financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2010, consolidated statement of owner’s equity for the three months ended October 31, 2011, and consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2011, are unaudited.  These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  In the opinion of the company’s management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and included all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the company’s statement of financial position at October 31, 2011 and its results of operations and its cash flows for the three months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010.  The results for the three months ended October 31, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2012.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts Onyx Service and Solutions, Inc., Fresca World Wide Trading Corp. and Premier ATM Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Fresca World Wide Trading Corp.  The Company absorbed all assets and liabilities from their subsidiary Southern Geo Power Corp in the month of August. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

8

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company derives its revenue from surcharge revenue and inter-exchange revenue. Surcharge fees are added fees which the Company charges the ATM user for dispensing cash. Inter exchange fees are fees charged between banks for transferring money. The Company receives all of the Surcharge Fees and receives a net of $.20 per transaction of the Inter exchange fees. The Company recognizes the net fees received as revenues. The Company receives interchange fees for transactions on ATM’s that it owns. The Company also receives the interchange fee for transactions on ATM’s owned by third party vendors included within its network. The Company keeps and reports as revenues all interchange fees.

The Company has 3 different circumstances for recording the surcharge fee as revenue. In the first case, for ATM’s owned and serviced by the Company, the Company receives and reports surcharge fee as revenue. In the second case, where the Company owns but does not service the ATM’s, the Company records the surcharge fee as revenue and records the portion of the fee paid to the owner of the ATM location as commission expense. In the third case, of ATM’s owned and serviced by third party vendors, the Company rebates all of the surcharge fee to the third party and does not report any surcharge fee revenue.

INCOME TAXES

The Company provides for income taxes under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Codification Number (“ASC”) 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” ASC 740 requires the use of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes.

ASC 740 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.   

In accordance with ASC 740, the Company has evaluate its tax positions and determined there are no uncertain tax positions.

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing the Company’s net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing the Company’s net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted as of the first of the year for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no diluted shares outstanding. 

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Company considers accounts receivable to be fully collectible; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. If amounts become uncollectible, they will be charged to operations when that determination is made. No such charges were recorded for the period ended October 31, 2011.

COMMISSION EXPENSE

When the Company owns but does not service the ATM’s, the Company records the surcharge fee as revenue and records the portion of the fee paid to the owner of the ATM location as commission expense.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. ASC 820 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.

9

ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

·  Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets.

·  Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly:, and

·  Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. [The basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing the Company’s net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing the Company’s net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted as of the first of the year for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no diluted shares outstanding. 

The Company had no assets or liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of October 31, 2011 or 2010, and as such, had no assets or liabilities that fell into the tiers described above.

In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC 825, Financial Instruments.  ASC 825 permits entities an option to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of this Statement is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities using different measurement techniques. The fair value measurement provisions are elective and can be applied to individual financial instruments. A business entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value options have been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The Company does not expect that the adoption of ASC 825 will have a material impact, if any, on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3 - PREPAIDS

As of October 31, 2011 and July 31, 2011 the Company has the following prepays.

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT

10

NOTE 5 - GOODWILL

On August 22, 2011, the Company entered into and consummated a share exchange agreement with Blackstone Equity Partners PTE LTD (“Blackstone”), the sole shareholder of Southern Geo Power Corp., a Wyoming corporation (“SGPC”) and SGPC to acquire all the issued and outstanding shares of SGPC, in consideration for 11,000,000 newly issued restricted shares of the Company.

The Company recognized $2,200,000 of goodwill from the share exchange with SGPC. For the period ending October 31, 2011 the Company did not record any impairment loss on the goodwill.

NOTE 6 - COMMON STOCK

During November 2009 the company sold 4,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock.  

During April 2010, the company sold 309,000 shares at $.25 per share for proceeds of $77,250.  

The company is authorized to issue common stock of 250,000,000 shares at par value of $ .0001.

On August 22, 2011, the Company entered into and consummated a share exchange agreement with Blackstone Equity Partners PTE LTD (“Blackstone”), the sole shareholder of Southern Geo Power Corp., a Wyoming corporation (“SGPC”) and SGPC to acquire all the issued and outstanding shares of SGPC, in consideration for 11,000,000 newly issued restricted shares of the Company.

In the month of August, the Company issued 5,000,000 common shares for a reduction in debt of $125,000.

In the month of September, the Company issued 2,000,000 common shares for services related to consulting contracts.

The number of common shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2011 is 22,309,000

NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE

As a result of the stock exchange with Southern Geo Power Corp. the Company absorbed a $400,000 note payable to Infinite Funding Inc. The note bears simple interest of 15% from the date of issuance March 4, 2010. The principle and interest are due in full on March 2, 2012.

The Company has a note payable to Margaret Burton, a former officer of the company, bearing interest at 8%; payable on demand.   

Notes payable and accrued interest for October 31, 2011 and July 31, 2011 are as follows:

11

NOTE 8 - RENT PAYABLE

The rent liability is being amortized over the life of the lease. The rent liability is accrued from the first free month of rent on the operating lease. As of October 31, 2011 the rent payable balance is $523.

NOTE 9 – COMMITTMENTS

 In August the Company signed a one year office lease with Regus Corp with a $1,045 a month rent. The first and last month of rent are free. Under GAAP the company will accrue rent expense for the free rental months and post a deferred rent liability.

The minimum future rental payments under the operating lease at October 31, 2011 are as follows:

2011                          $1,741.66

2012                          $6,095.81

In August the Company signed consulting agreements with two non related individuals. The terms are for six months. For both agreements, the first installment was paid with the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares. The second installment will become due in the Company’s second quarter which can be paid in either $25,000 cash or 1,000,000 common shares.

NOTE 10 - THE EFFECT OF RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 regarding subsequent events and amendments to certain recognition and disclosure requirements. Under this ASU, a public company that is a SEC filer, as defined, is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU is effective upon the issuance of this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers.  Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. The ASC was effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company

should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. The ASC was effective for the

12

Company for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In November 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”). The ASC has become the single source of non-governmental accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial statements. The ASC does not supersede the rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), therefore, the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC continue to be additional sources of GAAP for the Company. The Company adopted the ASC upon inception at June 23, 2009. The ASC does not change GAAP and did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10 entitled “Subsequent Events”. Companies are now required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated by management. Public entities (as defined) must conduct the evaluation as of the date the financial statements are issued, and provide disclosure that such date was used for this evaluation. ASC 855-10 provides that financial statements are considered “issued” when they are widely distributed for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. ASC 855-10 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively. The adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements. In connection with preparing the accompanying audited financial statements, management evaluated subsequent events through the date that such financial statements were issued (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission).

NOTE 11 - GOING CONCERN

The Company's financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable.  If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources.  Management's plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses, and (2) seeking out and completing a merger with an existing operating company.  However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 12 – ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: TRANSITION PERIOD

The company changed its year-end from Nov 30 to July 31. In doing so the company filed a transition period financial statement. The transition period starts after the prior year-end date, Nov 30, and goes to the new year-end date July 31. Note that the comparable numbers for 2010 are unaudited.

13

17

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Forward Looking Statements

Some of the information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue," or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they:

·

discuss our future expectations;

·

contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial condition; and

·

state other "forward-looking" information.

We believe it is important to communicate our expectations. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or over which we have no control. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors," "Business" and elsewhere in this prospectus. See "Risk Factors."

Organization and Basis of Presentation

The Company was formed under the laws of the State of Deleware.  On November 25, 2009, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Fresca World Wide Trading Corp, a Nevada company, for the purchase of its ATM assets. The Company paid Fresca World Wide Trading, Corp. $10,400 and assumed 32,995 of Liabilities for the purchase of its ATM assets on November 25, 2009.  Fresca World Wide Trading, Corp is operated as a privately held company and has been in existence since 2006. The Company was active from February 10, 2006, (date of formation) until November 25, 2009

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. However, future events are subject to change, and the best estimates and judgments routinely require adjustment. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported in our consolidated balance sheet, and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each of the fiscal periods, are affected by estimates and assumptions which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill and intangible asset impairments, restructurings, inventory and income taxes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition Policies

The Company derives its revenue from surcharge revenue and inter-exchange revenue. Surcharge fees are added fees which the Company charges the ATM user for dispensing cash. Inter exchange fees are fees charged between banks for transferring money. The Company all of the Surcharge Fees and receives a portion of the Inter exchange fees as income. The Company recognizes the net fees received as revenues.

The Company receives interchange fees for transactions on ATM’s that it owns. The Company also receives the interchange fee for transactions on ATM’s owned by third party vendors included within its network. The Company keeps and reports as revenues all interchange fees.

The Company has 3 different circumstances for recording the surcharge fee as revenue. In the first case, for ATM’s owned and serviced by the Company, the Company receives and reports the entire surcharge fee as revenue. In the second case, where the Company owns but does not service the ATM’s, the Company records the surcharge fee as revenue and records the portion of the fee paid to the owner of the ATM location as commission expense. In the third case, of ATM’s owned and serviced by third party vendors, the Company rebates all of the surcharge fee to the third party and does not report any surcharge fee revenue.

18

THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2011

REVENUES

The Company had total Revenue for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011 of $2,142.  This reflects a decrease of $4,169 or 66% when compared to the total revenue of $6,311 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010.  This change is primarily attributed to a decrease in the number of transactions on the system.

The Company had Inter-exchange Revenue for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011 of $1,322.  This reflects a decrease of $1,153 or 47%, when compared to the Interexchange Revenue $2,475 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010.  This is primarily attributed to a decrease in the number of ATM’s which Interexchange Revenue is earned and the number of transactions occurring during the period.

The Company had Surcharge Revenue for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011 of $820.   This reflects a decrease of $3,016 or 79% when compared to $3,836 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010.   This decrease is primarily attributed to a decrease in the number of transactions.

COSTS OF SALES

Our commissions decreased $462 or 30% from $1,534 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010 to $1,072, for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011.  The decrease is due to a decrease in the number of transactions, which commissions are based on.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

Our cost for ATM phone lines and supplies decreased $19 from $237 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010 to $218 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011.  This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in ATM Phone supplies purchased.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011 are $43,339.   This is an increase of $41,732 when compared to $1,607 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010. This increase consists primarily of increases in filing fees and professional fees.

Net Loss from Operations

We had a net loss of $407,296 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011 as compared to a net loss of $17,830 for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in stock for services expense for the Three Months Ended October 31, 2011.

Liquidation & Capital Resources

Our primary liquidity and capital resource needs are to finance the costs of our operations.

As of October 31, 2011 we had $7,298 cash on hand, compared to $5,331 as of July 31, 2011.  We believe that we will continue to need investing and financing activities to fund operations.

Net cash used by operating activities was $1,631,117 during the three Months Ended October 31, 2011, mainly representative of an increase in stock for services expense. This compares to net cash provided by operating activities of $17,273 for the three Months Ended October 31, 2010.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $1,714,727 during the three Months Ended October 31, 2011.  This compares to net cash used by investing activities of $0 for the three Months Ended October 31, 2010.

Net cash provided by financial activities was $87,717 during the three Months Ended October 31, 2011, mainly representing the increase in notes payable.  This compares to net cash provided by financing activities of $0 for the three Months Ended October 31, 2010.

We believe that our results of operations will provide us with the necessary funds to satisfy our liquidity needs for the next 3 months. To the extent they are not, however, our principal stockholders have agreed to fund our operations for the next Three-month period and beyond.  

19

Working Capital

As of October 31, 2011, we had total current assets of $70,258 and total current liabilities of $481,923 which results in working capital deficit of $411,665 as compared to total current assets of $33,410 and total current liabilities of $11,390 resulting in working capital of $22,020 as of November 30, 2010.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 The Registrant is a smaller reporting company as defined by Item 10(f)(1) and is not required to provide the information required by this Item.  

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective as of October 31, 2011 to cause the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal controls

Our management, with the participation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation to determine whether any change in our internal controls over financial reporting occurred during the three month period ended October 31, 2011.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that no change occurred in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the months ended October 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.

 The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceeding and we are not aware of any pending legal proceeding in which any of our officers or directors or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to or have a material interest adverse to the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable.

20

 There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the reported interim period.  

 The Company has no outstanding Senior Securities.

 None.

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ONYX SERVICE & SOLUTIONS, INC.

Dated: December 20, 2011

By: /s/ Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr.

Malcolm G. Burleson, Sr.        

Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director

By: /s/ Mary Passalaqua

Mary Passalaqua

Director

22