Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Crestwood Midstream Partners LPFinancial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Crestwood Midstream Partners LPh85699exv31w1.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Crestwood Midstream Partners LPh85699exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Crestwood Midstream Partners LPh85699exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 001-33631
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   56-2639586
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
     
717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3150, Houston, Texas   77002
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(832) 519-2200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common units and Class C units, as of the latest practicable date:
       
Title of Class   Outstanding as of July 29, 2011
Common Units   32,987,696  
Class C Units   6,337,093  
 
 

 


Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS
As used in this report, unless the context otherwise requires:
“Bbl(s)” means barrel or barrels
“EBITDA” means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and accretion
“hp” means horsepower
“LIBOR” means London Interbank Offered Rate
“Management” means management of Crestwood Midstream Partners LP’s General Partner
“Mcf” means thousand cubic feet
“MMcf” means million cubic feet
“MMcfd” means million cubic feet per day
“MMcfe” means MMcf of natural gas equivalents, calculated as one Bbl of oil or NGLs equaling six Mcf of gas
“MMcfed” means MMcfe per day
“NGL(s)” means natural gas liquids
“Oil” includes crude oil and condensate
COMMONLY USED TERMS
Other commonly used terms and their definitions follow:
“Alliance Midstream Assets” means gathering and treating assets purchased from Quicksilver in January 2010 in the Alliance Airport area of Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas
“Alliance System” means the Alliance Midstream Assets and subsequent additions
“Barnett Shale” means our Cowtown System, Lake Arlington System and Alliance System
“CMLP” means Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and our wholly owned subsidiaries, formerly known as Quicksilver Gas Services LP, which trades under the ticker symbol “CMLP”
“Credit Facility” means our senior secured credit facility, as amended, dated effective October 1, 2010
“Crestwood” means Crestwood Holdings Partners, LLC and its affiliates
“Crestwood Holdings” means Crestwood Holdings LLC and its affiliates
“Crestwood Transaction” means the sale to Crestwood by Quicksilver of all its interests in CMLP that was completed on October 1, 2010
“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
“Fayetteville Shale Systemmeans the pipeline, compression and treating assets located in Northwest Arkansas that were purchased in the Frontier Gas Acquisition on April 1, 2011
“Frontier” means Frontier Gas Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
“Frontier Gas Acquisition” means the purchase of midstream assets in the Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash from Frontier that was completed on April 1, 2011
“GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
“General Partner” means Crestwood Gas Services GP LLC, formerly known as Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC
“Granite Wash System” means the pipeline, compression and processing assets and subsequent additions located in Roberts County, Texas, that were purchased in the Frontier Gas Acquisition on April 1, 2011
“Joinder Agreement” means the additional commitments received from certain lenders under our Credit Facility, dated April 1, 2011, which expanded the total borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility to $500 million
“Lake Arlington System” means gathering and compression assets purchased from Quicksilver in 2008 located in eastern Tarrant County, Texas
“Las Animas System” means the gathering assets acquired in February 2011, located in Eddy County, New Mexico
“Omnibus Agreement” means the Omnibus Agreement, dated October 8, 2010, among our General Partner and Crestwood
“Partnership Agreement” means the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, dated February 19, 2008, as amended
“Senior Notes” means the $200 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019 issued by CMLP on April 1, 2011
“Quicksilver” means Quicksilver Resources Inc. and its affiliates
“SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

2


Table of Contents

Explanatory Note
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (this “Amendment”) to amend its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2011 (the “Original 10-Q”) to correct an error in the pro forma presentation of income table within footnote 3 “Acquisitions.” This Amendment has no impact on our previously reported statements of income, balance sheets, statements of cash flows, statements of changes in partners' capital, results of operations or liquidity and does not affect our Credit Facility.
In addition, this Amendment amends and restates Part I “Item 4. Controls and Procedures” and Part II “Item IA Risk Factors” to account for the error noted in this Amendment. This Amendment also amends and restates the exhibit list in Part II, Item 6 of the Original 10-Q and re-files certain exhibits specified herein, including currently dated certifications of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer as set forth as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 32.1 hereto, and corrects information presented within footnote 2.
Except as described above, we have not modified or updated other disclosures contained in the Original 10-Q. Accordingly, this Amendment, with the exception of the foregoing, does not reflect events occurring after the date of filing of the Original 10-Q, or modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. Consequently, all other information not affected by the corrections described above is unchanged and reflects the disclosures and other information made at the date of the filing of the Original 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with our filings with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original 10-Q, including amendments to those filings, if any.
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

3


 

CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q/A
For the Period Ended June 30, 2011
         
       
 
       
    6  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    8  
 
       
    9  
 
       
    10  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    34  
 
       
    34  
 
       
       
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    36  
 
       
    37  
Certification(s) Pursuant to Section 302
       
Certification Pursuant to Section 906
       
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

4


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
     Certain statements contained in this report and other materials we file with the SEC, or in other written or oral statements made or to be made by us, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Words such as “may,” “assume,” “forecast,” “predict,” “strategy,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “aim,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” “budget,” “potential,” or “continue,” and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be affected by assumptions used or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. Actual results may vary materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and should not consider the following list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by such forward-looking statements include:
    changes in general economic conditions;
 
    fluctuations in natural gas prices;
 
    failure or delays by our customers in achieving expected production from natural gas projects;
 
    competitive conditions in our industry;
 
    actions or inactions taken or non-performance by third parties, including suppliers, contractors, operators, processors, transporters and customers;
 
    ability to consummate acquisitions and successfully integrate the acquired business and our ability to realize any cost savings and other synergies from such acquisitions;
 
    any disruption from the Frontier Gas Acquisition making it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers;
 
    fluctuations in the value of certain of our assets and liabilities;
 
    changes in the availability and cost of capital;
 
    operating hazards, natural disasters, weather-related delays, casualty losses and other matters beyond our control;
 
    construction costs or capital expenditures exceeding estimated or budgeted amounts;
 
    the effects of existing and future laws and governmental regulations, including environmental and climate change requirements;
 
    the effects of existing or future litigation;
 
    risks related to the substantial indebtedness incurred as a result of the Frontier Gas Acquisition; and
 
    certain factors discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
     The list of factors is not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to these factors may occur that would impact our business. Additional information regarding these and other factors may be contained in our filings with the SEC, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. All such risk factors are difficult to predict and are subject to material uncertainties that may affect actual results and may be beyond our control. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances except to the extent required by applicable law.
All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.

5


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
In thousands, except for per unit data — Unaudited
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Revenue
                               
Gathering revenue — related party
  $ 24,515     $ 18,405     $ 47,866     $ 34,794  
Gathering revenue
    8,425       1,340       9,901       2,455  
Processing revenue — related party
    7,903       6,774       14,540       13,253  
Processing revenue
    659       675       1,175       1,431  
Product sales
    14,033             14,433        
 
                       
Total revenue
    55,535       27,194       87,915       51,933  
 
                       
 
                               
Expenses
                               
Operations and maintenance
    8,634       6,022       15,592       13,415  
Product purchases
    12,105             12,528        
General and administrative
    6,060       2,399       12,430       5,460  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
    8,361       5,642       14,386       11,007  
 
                       
Total expenses
    35,160       14,063       54,936       29,882  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    20,375       13,131       32,979       22,051  
 
                               
Interest expense
    9,819       2,945       12,825       5,623  
 
                       
 
                               
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    10,556       10,186       20,154       16,428  
 
                               
Income tax provision
    329       73       551       126  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income
  $ 10,227     $ 10,113     $ 19,603     $ 16,302  
 
                       
 
                               
General partner interest in net income
  $ 1,628     $ 677     $ 2,516     $ 778  
Limited partners’ interest in net income
  $ 8,599     $ 9,436     $ 17,087     $ 15,524  
 
                               
Basic income per unit:
                               
Net income per limited partner unit — basic
  $ 0.22     $ 0.33     $ 0.49     $ 0.54  
 
                               
Diluted income per unit:
                               
Net income per limited partner unit — diluted
  $ 0.22     $ 0.31     $ 0.49     $ 0.52  
 
                               
Weighted average number of common units outstanding:
                               
Basic
    38,558       28,502       34,893       28,502  
Diluted
    38,694       31,958       35,029       31,952  
Distributions declared per unit (attributable to the period ended)
  $ 0.46     $ 0.42     $ 0.90     $ 0.81  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands, except for unit data — Unaudited
                 
         June 30,          December 31,  
    2011     2010  
ASSETS
               
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 551     $ 2  
Accounts receivable
    8,582       1,679  
Accounts receivable — related party
    26,002       23,003  
Prepaid expenses and other
    2,578       1,052  
 
           
Total current assets
    37,713       25,736  
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
    688,398       531,371  
Intangible assets, net
    115,471        
Goodwill
    91,168        
Other assets
    19,905       13,520  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 952,655     $ 570,627  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
               
Current liabilities
               
Capital leases
  $ 2,652     $  
Accounts payable — related party
    4,048       4,267  
Accrued additions to property, plant and equipment
    10,331       11,309  
Accounts payable and other
    17,421       2,917  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    34,452       18,493  
 
               
Long-term debt
    437,500       283,504  
Long-term capital leases
    5,286        
Asset retirement obligations
    10,664       9,877  
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 13)
               
 
               
Partners’ capital
               
Common unitholders (32,987,696 and 31,187,696 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010)
    300,752       258,069  
Class C unit holders (6,337,093 and 0 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
    154,056        
General partner
    9,945       684  
 
           
Total partners’ capital
    464,753       258,753  
 
           
 
  $ 952,655     $ 570,627  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In thousands — Unaudited
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 19,603     $ 16,302  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    14,110       10,765  
Accretion of asset retirement obligations
    276       242  
Deferred income taxes
          126  
Equity-based compensation
    565       1,334  
Non-cash interest expense
    1,610       2,709  
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (6,568 )     141  
Prepaid expenses and other
    (1,612 )     (1,011 )
Accounts receivable — related party
    (2,999 )     (6,323 )
Accounts payable — related party
    (219 )      
Accounts payable and other
    13,791       2,464  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    38,557       26,749  
 
           
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (16,888 )     (34,845 )
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    (353,966 )      
Distribution to Quicksilver for Alliance Midstream Assets
          (80,276 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (370,854 )     (115,121 )
 
           
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Proceeds from senior notes
    200,000        
Proceeds from credit facility
    64,200       124,500  
Repayments of credit facility
    (110,204 )     (23,100 )
Debt issuance costs paid
    (6,982 )      
Proceeds from issuance of Class C units, net
    152,671        
Proceeds from issuance of Common units, net
    53,550       11,054  
Contributions by partners
    8,741        
Distributions paid
    (29,130 )     (23,128 )
Taxes paid for equity-based compensation vesting
          (1,144 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    332,846       88,182  
 
           
 
               
Net cash increase (decrease)
    549       (190 )
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    2       746  
 
           
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 551     $ 556  
 
           
 
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 7,357     $ 2,914  
Non-cash transactions:
               
Working capital related to capital expenditures
    10,331       12,112  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
In thousands — Unaudited
                                 
    Limited Partners’              
    Common     Subordinated     General Partner     Total  
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 281,239     $ 3,040     $ 558     $ 284,837  
Equity-based compensation
    1,334                   1,334  
Distributions paid
    (13,251 )     (8,980 )     (897 )     (23,128 )
Distributions to Quicksilver
    (80,276 )                 (80,276 )
Net income
    9,253       6,271       778       16,302  
Issuance of units, net of offering costs
    11,054                   11,054  
Taxes paid for equity-based compensation vesting
    (1,144 )                 (1,144 )
 
                       
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $ 208,209     $ 331     $ 439     $ 208,979  
 
                       
                                 
    Limited Partners’              
    Common     Class C     General Partner     Total  
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 258,069     $     $ 684     $ 258,753  
Equity-based compensation
    565                   565  
Distributions paid
    (27,134 )           (1,996 )     (29,130 )
Net income
    15,702       1,385       2,516       19,603  
Issuance of units, net of offering costs
    53,550       152,671             206,221  
Contributions by partners
                8,741       8,741  
 
                       
Balance at June 30, 2011
  $ 300,752     $ 154,056     $ 9,945     $ 464,753  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

9


Table of Contents

CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNAUDITED
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
     Organization — Crestwood Midstream Partners LP is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership formed for the purpose of acquiring and operating midstream assets. Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CMLP.” In this report, unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Partnership” are intended to mean the business and operations of Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and its subsidiaries.
     As of June 30, 2011 our ownership is as follows:
                         
    Ownership Percentage  
    Crestwood     Public     Total  
General partner interest
    1.9 %           1.9 %
Limited partner interest:
                       
Common unitholders
    48.8 %     33.5 %     82.3 %
Class C unitholders
    0.2 %     15.6 %     15.8 %
 
                 
Total
    50.9 %     49.1 %     100.0 %
 
                 
     Description of Business — We are primarily engaged in the gathering, compression, processing and treating of natural gas and the delivery of NGLs produced in the Barnett Shale, Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash. We provide these midstream services under long-term contracts, whereby we receive fees for performing gathering, compression, processing and treating services.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
     Basis of Presentation — The accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related notes present the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in partners’ capital of our natural gas gathering and processing assets. In management’s opinion, all necessary adjustments to fairly present our results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented have been made and all such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.
     Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     Changes in Presentation — Certain changes have been made to the 2010 financial statements for presentations adopted in 2011. The amount of the change is approximately $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from operations and maintenance expense to general and administrative expense.
     Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that exist at the date of the financial statements. Estimates and judgments are based on information available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Although management believes the estimates are appropriate, actual results can differ from those estimates.
     Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and long-term debt approximate their carrying amounts as of June 30, 2011.
     Revenue Recognition — Our primary service offerings are the gathering and processing of natural gas. We have fixed-fee contracts under which we receive revenue based on the volume of natural gas gathered and processed. We also have percent-of-proceeds contracts where we receive revenue based on the value of products sold to third parties which we classify as Product Sales. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met:
    persuasive evidence of an exchange arrangement exists;
 
    services have been rendered;
 
    the price for its services is fixed or determinable; and
 
    collectability is reasonably assured.

10


Table of Contents

     Segment Information — Our operations include three reportable operating segments. These operating segments reflect the way we manage our operations and make decisions. Our business segments reflect the areas in which we operate and consist of the Barnett Shale, the Fayetteville Shale and the Granite Wash. These business segments are engaged in the gathering, compression, processing and treating of natural gas and delivery of NGLs.
     Net Income per Limited Partner Unit — The following is a reconciliation of the components of the basic and diluted net income per limited partner per unit calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. There have not been any units excluded due to being anti-dilutive.
          The weighted-average common units — basic and the net income per limited partner unit — basic amounts have been corrected to include the Class C units in the basic earnings per unit calculation. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 the net income per limited partner unit — basic previously presented was $0.27 and has been corrected to $0.22. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 the net income per limited partner unit — basic previously presented was $0.54 and has been corrected to $0.49.
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (In thousands, except per unit data)          
Limited partners’ interest in net income
  $ 8,599     $ 9,436     $ 17,087     $ 15,524  
Impact of interest on subordinated note to Quicksilver (1)
          627             1,213  
 
                       
Income available assuming conversion of convertible debt
  $ 8,599     $ 10,063     $ 17,087     $ 16,737  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-average common units — basic
    38,558       28,502       34,893       28,502  
Effect of unvested phantom units
    136       517       136       517  
Effect of subordinated note to Quicksilver (1)
          2,939             2,933  
 
                       
Weighted-average common units — diluted
    38,694       31,958       35,029       31,952  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic earnings per unit:
                               
Net income per limited partner unit — basic
  $ 0.22     $ 0.33     $ 0.49     $ 0.54  
 
                               
Diluted earnings per unit:
                               
Net income per limited partner unit — diluted
  $ 0.22     $ 0.31     $ 0.49     $ 0.52  
Conversion price (1)
    N/A     $ 19.38       N/A     $ 19.42  
 
(1)   Assumes that convertible debt is converted using the lesser of average closing price per unit or final closing price on June 30, 2010. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of our subordinated note that terminated during the fourth quarter of 2010.
     Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income is equal to net income for the periods presented due to the absence of any other comprehensive income.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
     Accounting standard-setting organizations frequently issue new or revised accounting rules. We regularly review all new pronouncements to determine their impact, if any, on our financial statements. No pronouncements materially affecting our financial statements have been issued since the filing of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3. ACQUISITIONS
     Effective February 1, 2011, we acquired natural gas gathering pipelines located in the Morrow/Atoka area and near the emerging Avalon Shale and Bone Spring trends in Southeastern New Mexico for $5.1 million from a group of independent producers. The pipelines, which we refer to as the Las Animas System, are supported by long-term, primarily fixed-fee contracts which include existing Morrow/Atoka production. The Avalon Shale is a liquids-rich oil and gas producing formation that is part of the Permian Basin located in West Texas.
     Las Animas System
The Las Animas System, located in Eddy County, New Mexico, in the Morrow/Atoka area and near the emerging Avalon Shale and Bone Spring trends in Southeastern New Mexico, consists of natural gas gathering pipelines that deliver gas to El Paso Natural Gas and Southern Union Gas Services. The Las Animas System is reflected in the Barnett Shale for segment reporting.
     On April 1, 2011, we completed the Frontier Gas Acquisition including assets in the Fayetteville Shale and the Granite Wash for a purchase price of $338 million, subject to adjustments, with an additional $15 million to be paid to Frontier if certain operational objectives are met within six months of the closing date. The Fayetteville Shale is a dry gas formation in the Arkoma basin located in Northwest Arkansas. The Granite Wash is a liquids-rich oil and gas producing formation in the Anadarko basin located in the Texas Panhandle.

11


Table of Contents

     Fayetteville Shale System
The Fayetteville Shale System, located in Northwest Arkansas, consists of high pressure and low pressure gathering pipelines with a capacity of approximately 510 MMcfd, treating capacity of approximately 165 MMcfd and approximately 35,000 hp of compression. This system interconnects with multiple interstate pipelines and are supported by long-term, primarily fixed-fee contracts with producers in the core of the Fayetteville Shale, with initial terms through 2020 with five year extensions.
    Twin Groves / Prairie Creek / Woolly Hollow System. Located in Conway and Faulkner Counties, Arkansas and consists of a gathering system and a related gas compression facility with a capacity of 350 MMcfd and a dehydration and treating facility with capacity of 165 MMcfd. This system gathers natural gas produced by BHP Billiton Petroleum, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHP Billiton Limited (“BHP”) / BP p.l.c. (“BP”) and XTO Energy, Inc., a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”), and interconnects with interstate pipelines of Boardwalk Gas Transmission, Ozark Gas Transmission and Fayetteville Express Pipeline.
 
    Rose Bud System. Located in White County, Arkansas and consists of a gathering system and a related gas compression facility with a capacity of 60 MMcfd. This system gathers natural gas produced by BHP / BP and ExxonMobil, and interconnects with Ozark Gas Transmission.
 
    Wilson Creek System. Located in Van Buren County, Arkansas and consists of a gathering system and a related compression facility with a capacity of 100 MMcfd. This system gathers natural gas produced by BHP and SH Exploration and interconnects with Ozark Gas Transmission.
     Granite Wash System
The Granite Wash System located in Roberts County, Texas, consists of a gathering system and NGL pipeline system, approximately 9,000 hp of compression, and the Indian Creek Plant consisting of a 36 MMcfd natural gas processing unit that extracts NGLs from the natural gas stream. This system gathers natural gas produced by Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others and delivers NGLs to the Mid-America Pipeline for ultimate delivery to the Mt. Belvieu or Conway NGL market centers. Residue gas is delivered into ANR Pipeline Company.
     The final purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of appraisal valuations of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired, which may result in an adjustment to the preliminary purchase price allocation. The preliminary purchase price allocation is as follows ($ in thousands):
         
Purchase Price:
       
Total purchase price
  $ 348,867  
 
     
 
       
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation:
       
Accounts receivable
    335  
Prepaid expenses and other
    750  
Capital lease asset
    8,587  
Property, plant and equipment
    140,683  
Intangible assets
    116,200  
Other assets
    178  
 
     
Total assets
  $ 266,733  
 
     
 
       
Current portion of capital leases
    2,576  
Other payables
    64  
Capital leases
    6,011  
Asset Retirement Obligations
    383  
 
     
Total liabilities
  $ 9,034  
 
     
 
       
 
     
Goodwill
  $ 91,168  
 
     
 
       
     The $338 million purchase price, subject to adjustment, paid at closing was financed through a combination of equity and debt as described in Notes 4 and 7 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements in this Quarterly Report. The total purchase price paid of $349 million also includes $8 million in capital spend and $3 million of inventory purchased. Transaction costs for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $3.6 million of which $1.1 was recorded in general and administrative expense and $2.5 million was recorded in interest expense.
     The following table is the presentation of income as if we had owned the Fayetteville and Granite Wash Systems for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and for six months ended June 30, 2011. Subsequent to the issuance of the financial statements, we determined the amounts previously presented contained errors. The information reflects corrections to expenses, which as previously presented did not include depreciation and general and administration expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

12


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30, 2010     Three Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    As Previously Presented     As Restated  
    Crestwood                     Crestwood              
    Midstream     Fayetteville and             Midstream     Fayetteville and        
    Partners LP     Granite Wash     Combined     Partners LP     Granite Wash     Combined  
    (In thousands)     (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 27,194     $ 16,430     $ 43,624     $ 27,194     $ 16,430     $ 43,624  
Expenses
    (14,063 )     (10,762 )     (24,825 )     (14,063 )     (14,489 )     (28,552 )
 
                                   
Operating income
  $ 13,131     $ 5,668     $ 18,799     $ 13,131     $ 1,941     $ 15,072  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Basic earnings per limited partner unit:
  $ 0.33             $ 0.53     $ 0.33             $ 0.21  
Diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
  $ 0.31             $ 0.48     $ 0.31             $ 0.20  
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30, 2010     Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    As Previously Presented     As Restated  
    Crestwood                     Crestwood              
    Midstream     Fayetteville and             Midstream     Fayetteville and        
    Partners LP     Granite Wash     Combined     Partners LP     Granite Wash     Combined  
    (In thousands)     (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 51,933     $ 31,730     $ 83,663     $ 51,933     $ 31,730     $ 83,663  
Expenses
    (29,882 )     (21,170 )     (51,052 )     (29,882 )     (28,344 )     (58,226 )
 
                                   
Operating income
  $ 22,051     $ 10,560     $ 32,611     $ 22,051     $ 3,386     $ 25,437  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Basic earnings per limited partner unit:
  $ 0.54             $ 0.90     $ 0.54             $ 0.62  
Diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
  $ 0.52             $ 0.85     $ 0.52             $ 0.60  
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30, 2011     Six Months Ended June 30, 2011  
    As Previously Presented     As Restated  
    Crestwood                     Crestwood              
    Midstream     Fayetteville and             Midstream     Fayetteville and        
    Partners LP (1)     Granite Wash (2)     Combined     Partners LP (1)     Granite Wash (2)     Combined  
    (In thousands)     (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 87,915     $ 17,002     $ 104,917     $ 87,915     $ 17,002     $ 104,917  
Expenses
    (54,936 )     (12,420 )     (67,356 )     (54,936 )     (16,014 )     (70,950 )
 
                                   
Operating income
  $ 32,979     $ 4,582     $ 37,561     $ 32,979     $ 988     $ 33,967  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Basic earnings per limited partner unit:
  $ 0.49             $ 0.63     $ 0.49             $ 0.37  
Diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
  $ 0.49             $ 0.62     $ 0.49             $ 0.37  
 
(1)   Includes three months of operating income for Fayetteville and Granite Wash, from April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011, subsequent to acquisition.
 
(2)   Represents the first quarter of 2011, prior to the acquisition of Fayetteville and Granite Wash.
4. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND DISTRIBUTIONS
     On April 1, 2011, we issued 6,243,000 Class C units, representing limited partner interests in us, in a private placement. The negotiated purchase price for the Class C Units was $24.50 per unit, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $153 million used to finance a portion of our Frontier Gas Acquisition. The Class C units are substantially similar in all respects to our existing common units, representing limited partner interests, except that we can elect to pay distributions for our Class C units through the issuance of additional Class C units or cash. The Class C units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis on the second anniversary of the date of issuance.
     In connection with the issuance of the Class C units, our General Partner made an additional capital contribution of $8.7 million to us in exchange for us issuing an additional 293,948 general partner units, increasing the General Partner interest in us to 2%.
     On May 4, 2011, we completed a public offering of 1,800,000 common units, representing limited partner interests, in us under an existing shelf registration statement at a price of $30.65 per common unit ($29.75 per common unit, net of underwriting discounts and commissions), providing net proceeds of approximately $53 million. The net proceeds from the offering were used to reduce our indebtedness under our Credit Facility and for general partnership purposes. In connection with the issuance of the common units, our General Partner did not make an additional capital contribution resulting in a reduction of the General Partner’s interest in us to approximately 1.9%.
     Our Partnership Agreement requires that we make distributions within 45 days after the end of each quarter to unitholders of record on the applicable record date selected by the General Partner.
     The following table presents distributions attributable to quarters ended in 2011 and 2010:

13


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Attributable to the     Per Unit     Total Cash     PIK Units to Class             Total IDR  
Payment Date   Quarter Ended     Distribution     Distribution     C unitholders     Total     Distribution  
                    (In millions)                          
Pending Distributions
                                               
August 12, 2011
  June 30, 2011   $ 0.46     $ 16.8     $ 3.1     $ 19.9     $ 1.5  
Completed Distributions
                                               
2011
                                               
May 13, 2011
  March 31, 2011   $ 0.44     $ 14.8     $ 2.9     $ 17.7     $ 0.8  
February 11, 2011
  December 31, 2010   $ 0.43     $ 14.3     $     $ 14.3     $ 0.7  
2010
                                               
November 12, 2010
  September 30, 2010   $ 0.42     $ 13.9     $     $ 13.9     $ 0.6  
August 13, 2010
  June 30, 2010   $ 0.42     $ 12.7     $     $ 12.7     $ 0.5  
May 14, 2010
  March 31, 2010   $ 0.39     $ 11.6     $     $ 11.6     $ 0.3  
     Cash distribution included amounts paid to common and subordinated unitholders. Beginning with the distributions starting with the quarter ended December 31, 2010, we no longer have any subordinated units due to the conversion of all subordinated units into common units. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of our conversion of the subordinated units. We have the option to pay distributions to our Class C unitholders with cash or by issuing additional Class C units based upon the volume weighted average price of our limited partner units for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the distribution is declared. For the distribution that was paid May 13, 2011, attributable to the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued 94,093 additional Class C units. For the distribution that will be paid August 12, 2011, attributable to the quarter ended June 30, 2011, approximately 115,141 additional Class C units will be issued.
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
     Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Gathering systems
  $ 269,887     $ 158,975  
Processing plants and compression facilities
    410,589       365,208  
Construction in progress — gathering
    23,140       26,385  
Rights-of-way and easements
    47,565       32,054  
Land
    4,511       4,251  
Buildings and other
    5,083       3,494  
 
           
 
    760,775       590,367  
Accumulated depreciation
    (72,377 )     (58,996 )
 
           
Net property, plant and equipment
  $ 688,398     $ 531,371  
 
           
     With the Frontier Gas Acquisition we have leased compressors which are accounted for as capital leases for a total of $8.6 million less accumulated amortization of $0.7 million as of June 30, 2011.
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
     Intangible assets consist of gas contracts. The following table summarizes the intangibles and goodwill associated with the purchase of the Frontier Gas Acquisition.

14


Table of Contents

                         
            Accumulated     Net Book  
    Cost     Amortization     Value  
            (In thousands)          
Intangibles — subject to amortization:
                       
Gas contracts
  $ 116,200     $ 729     $ 115,471  
 
                       
Intangibles — not subject to amortization:
                       
Goodwill
    91,168             91,168  
 
                 
 
  $ 207,368     $ 729     $ 206,639  
 
                 
The intangible assets have useful lives of 6 to 17 years. Amortization expense recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $0.7 million. The expected amortization of the intangible assets is as follows:
Years Ending (in thousands)
         
2011 (remaining)
  $ 1,458  
2012
    4,370  
2013
    5,870  
2014
    7,151  
2015
    8,016  
Thereafter
    88,606  
 
     
 
       
Total
  $ 115,471  
 
     
7. DEBT
     Debt consisted of the following:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Credit Facility
  $ 237,500     $ 283,504  
Senior Notes
    200,000        
 
           
 
    437,500       283,504  
Current maturities of debt
           
 
           
Total
  $ 437,500     $ 283,504  
 
           
     Credit Facility — At June 30, 2011, we had $237.5 million outstanding under our $500 million Credit Facility at the weighted-average interest rate of 3.1%. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or a base rate as defined in the credit agreement. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the applicable margin under LIBOR borrowings is 2.75%. On April 1, 2011, we entered into a Joinder Agreement with certain lenders of our Credit Facility, which expanded our borrowing capacity from $400 million to $500 million. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of our indebtedness.
     The Credit Facility contains provisions that trigger an acceleration of indebtedness based solely on the occurrence of a material adverse change in our financial condition or results of operations. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our financial covenants.
     Bridge Loans — In February 2011, in connection with the Frontier Gas Acquisition, we obtained commitments from multiple lenders for senior unsecured bridge loans in an aggregate amount up to $200 million. The commitment was not drawn and was terminated on April 1, 2011 in connection with the closing of the Senior Notes described below. We recognized $2.5 million of commitment fees in the second quarter of 2011, which is included in interest expense, related to the bridge loans.
     Senior Notes — On April 1, 2011, we issued the Senior Notes. Our obligations under the Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by our current and future domestic subsidiaries. The proceeds were used to partially finance the Frontier Gas Acquisition. Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 7.75% per annum, and is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2011, and mature April 2019.

15


Table of Contents

     Our Senior Notes requires us to maintain a ratio of our consolidated trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined in the senior notes indenture) to fixed charges of at least 1.75 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with this covenant.
8. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER
     Accounts payable and other consist of the following:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Accrued operating expenses
  $ 3,099     $ 758  
Accrued property taxes
    2,728        
Product purchases payable
    4,330        
Compensation and benefits payable
    1,485        
Tax payable
    650       280  
Legal services
          176  
Consulting services
          802  
Interest payable
    4,653       726  
Other
    476       175  
 
           
 
  $ 17,421     $ 2,917  
 
           
9. CAPITAL LEASES
     With the Frontier Gas Acquisition we have leased compressors which are accounted for as capital leases. The total liability outstanding at June 30, 2011 related to these leases is $7.9 million. Future minimum lease payments of capital leases (in thousands):
     Years Ending
         
2011 (remaining)
  $ 1,431  
2012
    2,860  
2013
    2,860  
2014
    1,161  
 
     
Total payments
    8,312  
Imputed Interest
    (374 )
 
     
Present value of future payments
  $ 7,938  
 
     
10. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
     Activity for asset retirement obligations is as follows (in thousands):
         
Asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2010
  $ 9,877  
Incremental liability
    511  
Accretion expense
    276  
 
     
Asset retirement obligations as of June 30, 2011
  $ 10,664  
 
     
As of June 30, 2011, no assets are legally restricted for use in settling asset retirement obligations.
11. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
     Awards of phantom units have been granted under our Third Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Plan (the “2007 Equity Plan”). The following table summarizes information regarding 2011 phantom unit activity:

16


Table of Contents

                                 
    Payable in cash     Payable in units  
            Weighted             Weighted  
            Average Grant             Average Grant  
    Units     Date Fair Value     Units     Date Fair Value  
Unvested phantom units — January 1, 2011
        $       121,526     $ 27.11  
Vested
                       
Issued
    3,012       28.85       18,391       27.73  
Cancelled
                (14,820 )     27.11  
 
                       
Unvested phantom units — June 30, 2011
    3,012     $ 28.85       125,097     $ 27.20  
 
                       
     At January 1, 2011, we had total unvested compensation cost of $2.6 million related to phantom units. We recognized compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Grants of phantom units during the six months ended June 30, 2011 had an estimated grant date fair value of $0.6 million. We had unearned compensation expense of $2.6 million at June 30, 2011, which is generally expected to be recognized over the vesting period of three years except for grants to non-employee directors of our General Partner in lieu of cash compensation, which vest after one year. No phantom units vested during the six months ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, 636,909 units were available for issuance under the 2007 Equity Plan.
     See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a more complete description of our 2007 Equity Plan.
12. INCOME TAXES
     No provision for federal income taxes is included in our results of operations as such income is taxable directly to the partners holding interests in us.
     We are subject to Texas Margin tax, our current tax liability will be assessed based on 0.7% of the gross revenue apportioned to Texas.
     See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about our income taxes.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
     Litigation — At June 30, 2011, we are not currently subject to any material lawsuits or other legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition or for which disclosure is required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K.
     Casualties or Other Risks — We maintain coverage in various insurance programs, which provide us with property damage and other coverages which are customary for the nature and scope of our operations.
     Management of our General Partner believes that we have adequate insurance coverage, although insurance will not cover every type of loss that might occur. As a result of insurance market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies have increased substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable, or available for only reduced amounts of coverage. As a result, we may not be able to renew existing insurance policies or procure other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
     If we were to incur a significant loss for which we were not adequately insured, the loss could have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the proceeds of any available insurance may not be paid in a timely manner and may be insufficient if such an event were to occur. Any event that interrupts our revenues, or which causes us to make significant expenditures not covered by insurance, could reduce our ability to meet our financial obligations.
     Regulatory Compliance — In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to various laws and regulations. In the opinion of management of our General Partner, compliance with current laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.
     Environmental Compliance — Our operations are subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations pertaining to health, safety, and the environment. As an owner or operator of these facilities, we are subject to laws and regulations at the federal, state and local levels that relate to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste management and disposal and other environmental matters. The cost of planning, designing, constructing and operating our facilities must incorporate compliance with environmental laws and

17


Table of Contents

regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and potentially criminal enforcement measures. At June 30, 2010, we had recorded no liabilities for environmental matters.
     With the Frontier Gas Acquisition, we agreed to pay to Frontier up to an additional $15 million if certain commercial objectives are met within six months of the closing date.
14. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
     We routinely conduct business with Quicksilver and its affiliates. For a more complete description of our agreements with Quicksilver, see Notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, Quicksilver accounted for 58% and 71%, respectively of our total revenue. Approximately 10% of our gathered volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are comprised of natural gas purchased by Quicksilver from Eni SpA and gathered under Quicksilver’s Alliance System gathering agreement.
     With the purchase of the Alliance Midstream Assets, we also entered into an agreement with Quicksilver to lease pipeline assets attached to the Alliance System that we did not purchase. We have recognized $0.3 million of expense related to this agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
15. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     On April 1, 2011, we issued the Senior Notes. Our obligations under the Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by our current and future domestic subsidiaries. Condensed consolidated financial information for CMLP is presented below:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (in thousands)  
Revenue
  $     $ 55,535     $     $ 55,535  
Operating expenses
    6,070       29,090             35,160  
     
Operating income
    (6,070 )     26,445             20,375  
 
                               
Interest expense
    9,754       65             9,819  
     
Income before income tax
    (15,824 )     26,380             10,556  
Income tax provision
          329             329  
     
Net income before equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    (15,824 )     26,051             10,227  
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    26,051             (26,051 )      
     
Net Income
  $ 10,227     $ 26,051     $ (26,051 )   $ 10,227  
     

18


Table of Contents

                                 
    For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (in thousands)  
Revenue
  $     $ 27,194     $     $ 27,194  
Operating expenses
    2,399       11,664             14,063  
     
Operating income
    (2,399 )     15,530             13,131  
 
                               
Interest expense
    2,945                   2,945  
     
Income before income tax
    (5,344 )     15,530             10,186  
Income tax provision
          73             73  
     
Net income before equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    (5,344 )     15,457             10,113  
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    15,457             (15,457 )      
     
Net Income
  $ 10,113     $ 15,457     $ (15,457 )   $ 10,113  
     
                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (in thousands)  
Revenue
  $     $ 87,915     $     $ 87,915  
Operating expenses
    12,442       42,494             54,936  
     
Operating income
    (12,442 )     45,421             32,979  
 
Interest expense
    12,760       65             12,825  
     
Income before income tax
    (25,202 )     45,356             20,154  
Income tax provision
          551             551  
     
Net income before equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    (25,202 )     44,805             19,603  
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    44,805             (44,805 )      
     
Net Income
  $ 19,603     $ 44,805     $ (44,805 )   $ 19,603  
     

19


Table of Contents

                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (in thousands)  
Revenue
  $     $ 51,933     $     $ 51,933  
Operating expenses
    5,460       24,422             29,882  
     
Operating income
    (5,460 )     27,511             22,051  
 
                               
Interest expense
    5,623                   5,623  
     
Income before income tax
    (11,083 )     27,511             16,428  
Income tax provision
          126             126  
     
Net income before equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    (11,083 )     27,385             16,302  
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
    27,385             (27,385 )      
     
Net Income
  $ 16,302     $ 27,385     $ (27,385 )   $ 16,302  
     
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
                                 
    June 30, 2011  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (in thousands)  
ASSETS
                               
Current assets
  $ 344,367     $ 43,980     $ (350,634 )   $ 37,713  
Properties, plant and equipment — net
    10,893       677,505             688,398  
Intangible assets, net
          115,471             115,471  
Goodwill
          91,168             91,168  
Investment in subsidiaries
    560,054             (560,054 )      
Other assets
    19,097       808             19,905  
 
                       
Total assets
  $ 934,411     $ 928,932     $ (910,688 )   $ 952,655  
 
                       
 
                               
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
                               
Current liabilities
  $ 32,158     $ 352,928     $ (350,634 )   $ 34,452  
Long-term liabilities
    437,500       15,950             453,450  
Partners’ capital
    464,753       560,054       (560,054 )     464,753  
 
                       
Total liabilities and partners’ capital
  $ 934,411     $ 928,932     $ (910,688 )   $ 952,655  
 
                       

20


Table of Contents

                                 
    December 31, 2010  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
    (in thousands)  
ASSETS
                               
Current assets
  $ 291,637     $ 23,843     $ (289,744 )   $ 25,736  
Properties, plant and equipment — net
    11,142       520,229             531,371  
Investment in subsidiaries
    228,587             (228,587 )      
Other assets
    12,890       630             13,520  
 
                       
Total assets
  $ 544,256     $ 544,702     $ (518,331 )   $ 570,627  
 
                       
 
                               
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
                               
Current liabilities
  $ 1,999     $ 306,238     $ (289,744 )   $ 18,493  
Long-term liabilities
    283,504       9,877             293,381  
Partners’ capital
    258,753       228,587       (228,587 )     258,753  
 
                       
Total liabilities and partners’ capital
  $ 544,256     $ 544,702     $ (518,331 )   $ 570,627  
 
                       
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
     
    (in thousands)  
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ (33,278 )   $ 71,835     $     $ 38,557  
 
                       
Capital expenditures
          (16,888 )           (16,888 )
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
            (353,966 )             (353,966 )
 
                       
Net cash provided by investing activities
          (370,854 )           (370,854 )
 
                       
Proceeds from Senior Notes
    200,000                   200,000  
Proceeds from Credit Facility
    64,200                   64,200  
Repayments of Credit Facility
    (110,204 )                 (110,204 )
Debt issuance costs paid
    (6,982 )                 (6,982 )
Proceeds from issuance of equity
    206,221                   206,221  
Contributions by other partners
    8,741                   8,741  
Distributions to unitholders
    (29,130 )                 (29,130 )
Advances to Affiliates
    38,770       (38,770 )            
 
                       
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    371,616       (38,770 )           332,846  
 
                       
Net cash increase (decrease)
    338,338       (337,789 )           549  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    2                   2  
 
                       
Cash or cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 338,340     $ (337,789 )   $     $ 551  
 
                       

21


Table of Contents

                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
                            Crestwood  
    Crestwood     Restricted             Midstream  
    Midstream     Guarantor             Partners LP  
    Partners LP     Subsidiaries     Eliminations     Consolidated  
     
    (in thousands)  
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
  $ (6,272 )   $ 33,021     $     $ 26,749  
 
                       
Capital expenditures
          (34,845 )           (34,845 )
Distributions to Quicksilver for Alliance Midstream Assets
          (80,276 )           (80,276 )
 
                       
Net cash used in investing activities
          (115,121 )           (115,121 )
 
                       
Proceeds from Credit Facility
    124,500                   124,500  
Repayments of Credit Facility
    (23,100 )                 (23,100 )
Proceeds from issuance of equity
    11,088                   11,088  
Equity issuance cost paid
    (34 )                 (34 )
Distributions to unitholders
    (23,128 )                 (23,128 )
Taxes paid for equity-based compensation vesting
    (1,144 )                 (1,144 )
Advances to Affiliates
    135,885       (135,885 )              
 
                       
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    224,067       (135,885 )           88,182  
 
                       
Net cash increase (decrease)
    217,795       (217,985 )           (190 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    746                     746  
 
                       
Cash or cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 218,541     $ (217,985 )   $     $ 556  
 
                       
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
     Our operations include three reportable operating segments. These operating segment’s reflect the way we manage our operations and make decisions. We evaluate the performance of our operating segments based on EBITDA. Our business segments reflect the areas in which we operate and consist of the Barnett Shale, the Fayetteville Shale and the Granite Wash. These business segments are engaged in the gathering, compression, processing and treating of natural gas and delivery of NGLs.
     The following tables summarize the reportable segment data for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010:
                                         
    Three Months Ended June 30, 2011  
    Barnett     Fayetteville     Granite              
    Shale     Shale     Wash     Corporate     Total  
    (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 3,498     $ 7,083     $ 12,536     $     $ 23,117  
Revenue — related party
    32,418                         32,418  
 
                             
Total revenues
  $ 35,916     $ 7,083     $ 12,536     $     $ 55,535  
 
                                       
Operations and maintenance expense
    5,744       2,391       499             8,634  
Product purchases
    1,072       559       10,474             12,105  
General and administrative expense
                      6,060       6,060  
 
                             
EBITDA
    29,100       4,133       1,563       (6,060 )     28,736  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
    6,250       1,710       391       10       8,361  
 
                             
Operating income
  $ 22,850     $ 2,423     $ 1,172     $ (6,070 )   $ 20,375  
 
                             
 
                                       
Goodwill
  $     $ 73,845     $ 17,323     $     $ 91,168  
Total assets
  $ 561,789     $ 291,306     $ 79,099     $ 20,461     $ 952,655  
Capital Expenditures
  $ 3,843     $ 2,328     $ 2,741     $     $ 8,912  

22


Table of Contents

                                         
    Three Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    Barnett     Fayetteville     Granite              
    Shale     Shale     Wash     Corporate     Total  
    (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 2,015     $     $     $     $ 2,015  
Revenue — related party
    25,179                         25,179  
 
                             
Total revenues
  $ 27,194     $     $     $     $ 27,194  
 
                                       
Operations and maintenance expense
    6,022                         6,022  
Product purchases
                             
General and administrative expense
                      2,399       2,399  
 
                             
EBITDA
    21,172                   (2,399 )     18,773  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
    5,642                         5,642  
 
                             
Operating income
  $ 15,530     $     $     $ (2,399 )   $ 13,131  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total assets
  $ 513,690     $     $     $ 2,512     $ 516,202  
Capital Expenditures
  $ 17,682     $     $     $     $ 17,682  
                                         
    Six Months Ended June 30, 2011  
    Barnett     Fayetteville     Granite              
    Shale     Shale     Wash     Corporate     Total  
    (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 5,890     $ 7,083     $ 12,536     $     $ 25,509  
Revenue — related party
    62,406                         62,406  
 
                             
Total revenues
  $ 68,296     $ 7,083     $ 12,536     $     $ 87,915  
 
                                       
Operations and maintenance expense
    12,702       2,391       499             15,592  
Product purchases
    1,495       559       10,474             12,528  
General and administrative expense
                      12,430       12,430  
 
                             
EBITDA
    54,099       4,133       1,563       (12,430 )     47,365  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
    12,273       1,710       391       12       14,386  
 
                             
Operating income
  $ 41,826     $ 2,423     $ 1,172     $ (12,442 )   $ 32,979  
 
                             
 
                                       
Goodwill
  $     $ 73,845     $ 17,323     $     $ 91,168  
Total assets
  $ 561,789     $ 291,306     $ 79,099     $ 20,461     $ 952,655  
Capital Expenditures
  $ 11,819     $ 2,328     $ 2,741     $     $ 16,888  

23


Table of Contents

                                         
    Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    Barnett     Fayetteville     Granite              
    Shale     Shale     Wash     Corporate     Total  
    (In thousands)  
Revenue
  $ 3,886     $     $     $     $ 3,886  
Revenue — related party
    48,047                         48,047  
 
                             
Total revenues
  $ 51,933     $     $     $     $ 51,933  
 
                                       
Operations and maintenance expense
    13,415                         13,415  
Product purchases
                             
General and administrative expense
                      5,460       5,460  
 
                             
EBITDA
    38,518                   (5,460 )     33,058  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
    11,007                         11,007  
 
                             
Operating income
  $ 27,511     $     $     $ (5,460 )   $ 22,051  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total assets
  $ 513,690     $     $     $ 2,512     $ 516,202  
Capital Expenditures
  $ 34,845     $     $     $     $ 34,845  

24


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and notes thereto, and the other financial data included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
     We are a growth-oriented publicly traded Delaware master limited partnership engaged in gathering, compression, processing and treating of natural gas and delivery of NGLs produced in the Barnett Shale, Fayetteville Shale and in Granite Wash. We began operations in 2004 to provide midstream services primarily to Quicksilver as well as to other natural gas producers in the Barnett Shale. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 74% and 82%, respectively, of our total gathering volumes were comprised of natural gas owned or controlled by Quicksilver. Approximately 10% of our gathered volumes are comprised of natural gas purchased by Quicksilver from Eni SpA and gathered under Quicksilver’s Alliance System gathering agreement.
Our Operations
     Our results of operations are significantly influenced by the volumes of natural gas gathered and processed through our systems. We gather, process, compress and treat natural gas pursuant primarily to long term, fixed fee-based contracts. However, a prolonged low commodity price environment could result in our customers reducing their production volumes which would cause a decrease in our revenue. All of our natural gas volumes gathered and processed in the Barnett Shale, Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011 were subject to a mixture of percent-of-proceeds and fee-based contracts.
Operational Measurement
     Our Management uses a variety of financial and operational measures to analyze our performance. We view these measures as important factors affecting our profitability and unitholder value and therefore we review them monthly for consistency and to identify trends in our operations. These performance measures are outlined below:
     Volume — We must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our gathering and processing systems. We routinely monitor producer activity in the areas we serve to identify new supply opportunities. Our ability to achieve these objectives is impacted by:
    the level of successful drilling and production activity in areas where our systems are located;
 
    our ability to compete with other midstream companies for production volumes; and
 
    our pursuit of new opportunities.
     Operating Expenses — We consider operating expenses in evaluating the performance of our operations. These expenses are comprised primarily of direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance expense, utilities and contract services, and are largely independent of the volumes through our systems, but may fluctuate depending on the scale of our operations during a specific period. Our ability to manage operating expenses has a significant impact on our profitability and ability to pay distributions.
     EBITDA — We believe that EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s operational performance and its ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions. EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, as it does not include deductions for items such as depreciation, interest and income taxes, which are necessary to maintain our business. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating cash flow or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA calculations may vary among entities, so our computation may not be comparable to EBITDA measures of other entities. In evaluating EBITDA, we believe that investors should also consider, among other things, the amount by which EBITDA exceeds interest costs, how EBITDA compares to principal payments on debt and how EBITDA compares to capital expenditures for each period. A reconciliation of EBITDA to amounts reported under GAAP is presented in “Results of Operations.”
     EBITDA is also used as a supplemental performance measure by our Management and by external users of our financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
    financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
 
    our operating performance as compared to those of other companies in the midstream industry without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; and
 
    the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the rates of return on investment opportunities.

25


Table of Contents

2011 Recent Developments
Las Animas Acquisition — Effective February 1, 2011, we acquired approximately 46 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines located in the Morrow/Atoka area and near the emerging Avalon Shale and Bone Spring trends in Southeastern New Mexico for $5.1 million from a group of independent producers. The pipelines are supported by long-term, fixed-fee contracts which include existing Morrow/Atoka production and dedications of approximately 57,000 acres.
Bridge Loans In February 2011, in connection with the Frontier Gas Acquisition, we obtained commitments from multiple lenders for senior unsecured bridge loans in an aggregate amount up to $200 million. On April 1, 2011, the commitment was not drawn and was terminated in connection with the closing of the Senior Notes described below. We recognized $2.5 million of commitment fees in the second quarter of 2011, which is included in interest expense, related to the bridge loans.
Frontier Gas Acquisition — On April 1, 2011, the Partnership completed the previously announced Frontier Gas Acquisition for a purchase price of approximately $338 million, with an additional $15 million to be paid to Frontier if certain operational objectives are met within six months of the closing date. The $338 million purchase price paid at closing was financed through a combination of equity and debt as described in Notes 4 and 7 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements in this Quarterly Report.
The Fayetteville Shale System, located in Northwest Arkansas, consists of approximately 127 miles of high pressure and low pressure gathering pipelines with capacity of approximately 510 MMcfd, treating capacity of approximately 165 MMcfd and approximately 35,000 hp of compression. The Fayetteville Shale System which interconnects with multiple interstate pipelines are supported by long-term, fixed-fee contracts with producers who have dedicated approximately 100,000 acres in the core of the Fayetteville Shale System to Frontier. These contracts have initial terms that extend through 2020 with a five year extension.
The Granite Wash System, located in the Texas Panhandle, consist of a 28 mile pipeline system and a 36 MMcfd natural gas processing unit. This area has emerged as a highly economic liquids-rich natural gas play with active drilling programs and the Granite Wash System is supported by long-term contracts. We have made progress payments for a delivery of a second processing plant with 60 MMcfd of capacity to support growth in volumes from this region.
With the completion of the Frontier Gas Acquisition, we own and/or operate over 700 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines, and NGL, gas lift, residue and production lines.
Class C Units — On April 1, 2011, we issued 6,243,000 Class C units, representing limited partner interests in us, in a private placement. The negotiated purchase price for the Class C units was $24.50 per unit, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $153 million used to finance a portion of our Frontier Gas Acquisition. The Class C units are substantially similar in all respects to our existing common units, representing limited partner interests, except that we can elect to pay distributions for our Class C units through the issuance of additional Class C units or cash. The Class C units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis on April 1, 2013.
In connection with the issuance of the Class C units, our General Partner made an additional capital contribution of $8.7 million to us in exchange for an additional 293,948 general partner units, increasing the General Partner interest in us to 2%.
Senior Notes — On April 1, 2011, we issued the Senior Notes. Our obligations under the Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by our current and future domestic subsidiaries. The proceeds were used to partially finance the Frontier Gas Acquisition. Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 7.75% per annum, and is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2011, and mature April 2019.
Joinder Agreement to Credit Facility — On April 1, 2011, we entered into a Joinder Agreement with certain lenders under our Credit Facility, which expanded our borrowing capacity from $400 million to $500 million.
Offering of Common Units — On May 4, 2011, we completed a public offering of 1,800,000 common units, representing limited partner interests in us, under an existing shelf registration statement at a price of $30.65 per common unit ($29.75 per common unit, net of underwriting discounts and commissions), providing net proceeds of approximately $53 million. The net proceeds from the offering were used to reduce our indebtedness under our Credit Facility and for general partnership purposes. In connection with the issuance of the common units, our General Partner did not make an additional capital contribution resulting in a reduction of our General Partner’s interest in us to approximately 1.9%.

26


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
     The following discussion compares the results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to the three months ended June 30, 2010, which we refer to as the 2011 quarter and the 2010 quarter, respectively.
                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Total revenues
  $ 55,535     $ 27,194  
Operations and maintenance expense
    8,634       6,022  
Product purchases
    12,105        
General and administrative expense
    6,060       2,399  
 
           
EBITDA
    28,736       18,773  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
    8,361       5,642  
Interest expense
    9,819       2,945  
Income tax provision
    329       73  
 
           
Net income
  $ 10,227     $ 10,113  
 
           
The following table summarizes our volumes:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (MMcf)          
Barnett Shale
    42,046       29,609       13,093       11,494  
Fayetteville Shale System
    7,334                    
Granite Wash System
    1,538             1,466        
 
                       
 
                               
Total
    50,918       29,609       14,559       11,494  
 
                       
The following table summarizes the changes in our revenue:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing     Product Sales     Total  
            (In thousands)          
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010
  $ 19,745     $ 7,449     $     $ 27,194  
Volume changes
    14,210       1,987             16,197  
Price changes
    (1,015 )     (874 )     14,033       12,144  
 
                       
 
                               
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011
  $ 32,940     $ 8,562     $ 14,033     $ 55,535  
 
                       
     Total Revenue and Volumes — Operations related to the Fayetteville Shale System contributed $7.1 million to gathering revenue. Operations related to Granite Wash System contributed $12.5 million to revenue primarily related to product sales, which is products sold to third parties. The increase in revenue related to the Barnett Shale was $8.7 million due to increased volumes on all the systems.
     Operations and Maintenance Expense — The increase in operations and maintenance expense of $2.6 million was from the Frontier Gas Acquisition offset by lower costs in the Barnett Shale due to lower head count and lower operation costs at the facilities.
     Product purchases — The increase in product purchases of $12.1 million is due to the Frontier Gas Acquisition for gas purchased from local producers, related to percent-of-proceeds contracts, primarily related to the Granite Wash System.
     General and Administrative Expense — The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to transaction costs associated with the Frontier Gas Acquisition, an increase in compensation and benefits costs, costs of a new corporate location and costs related to professional services. Transaction costs related to the Crestwood Transaction and Frontier Gas Acquisition amounted to approximately $1.1 million for the 2011 quarter. General and administrative expense includes $0.2 million and $0.6 million of equity-based compensation expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
     EBITDA — EBITDA increased primarily as a result of the increase in revenues described above. As a percentage of revenue, EBITDA has decreased from 69% of revenues in the 2010 quarter to 52% in the 2011 quarter. Increases in revenues and expenses include product sales and product purchases primarily related to the Granite Wash System, which decreases EBITDA as a percent of revenue. Barnett Shale’s increased EBITDA from 78% to 81% of revenues is primary due to higher revenues offset by product purchases. Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash’s EBITDA is 58% and 12%, respectively, of revenue for the 2011 quarter.

27


Table of Contents

     Depreciation, Amortization and Accretion Expense — Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense increased primarily as a result of the Frontier Gas Acquisition and the continuing expansion of our Barnett Shale asset base. The Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash contributed $1.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, to depreciation, amortization and accretion expense.
     Interest Expense — Interest expense increased primarily due to the increases in the borrowings under our Credit Facility, which were principally used to fund capital projects, the addition of the Senior Notes and the expenses related to the commitments of the Bridge Loans. These increases were partially offset by the termination of the subordinated note in October 2010.
The following table summarizes the details of interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Interest:
               
Revolving Credit Facility
  $ 3,195     $ 2,308  
Senior Notes
    4,091        
Bridge Loan
    2,500        
Capital lease interest
    65        
Subordinated note to Quicksilver
          637  
 
           
Total
    9,851       2,945  
Less interest capitalized
    (32 )      
 
           
Interest expense
  $ 9,819     $ 2,945  
 
           
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
     The following discussion compares the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2010, which we refer to as the 2011 period and the 2010 period, respectively.
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Total revenues
  $ 87,915     $ 51,933  
Operations and maintenance expense
    15,592       13,415  
Product purchases
    12,528        
General and administrative expense
    12,430       5,460  
 
           
EBITDA
    47,365       33,058  
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
    14,386       11,007  
Interest expense
    12,825       5,623  
Income tax provision
    551       126  
 
           
Net income
  $ 19,603     $ 16,302  
 
           
 
               
The following table summarizes our volumes:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (MMcf)          
Barnett Shale
    81,447       55,406       24,053       22,738  
Fayetteville Shale System
    7,334                    
Granite Wash System
    1,538             1,466        
 
                       
 
                               
Total
    90,319       55,406       25,519       22,738  
 
                       

28


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the changes in our revenue:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing     Product Sales     Total  
            (In thousands)          
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010
  $ 37,249     $ 14,684     $     $ 51,933  
Volume changes
    23,472       1,796             25,268  
Price changes
    (2,954 )     (765 )     14,433       10,714  
 
                       
 
                               
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011
  $ 57,767     $ 15,715     $ 14,433     $ 87,915  
 
                       
     Total Revenue and Volumes — Operations related to the Fayetteville Shale System contributed $7.1 million to gathering revenue. Operations related to Granite Wash System contributed $12.5 million to revenue primarily related to product sales, which is products sold to third parties. The increase in revenue related to the Barnett Shale was $16.4 million due to increased volumes on all the systems.
     Operations and Maintenance Expense — The increase in operations and maintenance expense of $2.2 million was from the Frontier Gas Acquisition offset by lower costs in the Barnett Shale due to lower head count and lower operation costs at the facilities.
     Product purchases — The increase in product purchases of $12.5 million is due to the Frontier Gas Acquisition for gas purchased from local producers, related to percent-of-proceeds contracts, primarily related to the Granite Wash System.
     General and Administrative Expense — The increase in general and administrative expense was primarily due to transaction costs associated with the Frontier Gas Acquisition, an increase in compensation and benefits costs, costs of a new corporate location, costs related to professional services and transition costs related to the transition services agreement with Quicksilver, which expired March 31, 2011. Transaction costs related to the Crestwood Transaction and Frontier Gas Acquisition amounted to approximately $3.0 million for the 2011 period. General and administrative expense includes $0.4 million and $1.3 million of equity-based compensation expense for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
     EBITDA — EBITDA increased primarily as a result of the increase in revenues described above. As a percentage of revenue, EBITDA has decreased from 64% of revenues in the 2010 period to 54% in the 2011 period. Increases in revenues and expenses include product sales and product purchases primarily related to the Granite Wash System, which decreases EBITDA as a percent of revenue. Barnett Shale’s increased EBITDA from 74% to 79% of revenues is primary due to higher revenues offset by product purchases. Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash’s EBITDA is 58% and 12%, respectively, of revenue for the 2011 period.
     Depreciation, Amortization and Accretion Expense — Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense increased primarily as a result of the Frontier Gas Acquisition and the continuing expansion of our Barnett Shale asset base. The Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash contributed $1.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, to depreciation, amortization and accretion expense.
     Interest Expense — Interest expense increased primarily due to the increases in the borrowings under our Credit Facility, which were principally used to fund capital projects, the addition of the Senior Notes and the expenses related to the commitments of the Bridge Loans. These increases were partially offset by the termination of the subordinated note in October 2010.
The following table summarizes the details of interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Interest cost:
               
Revolving Credit Facility
  $ 6,237     $ 4,390  
Senior Notes
    4,091        
Bridge Loan
    2,500        
Capital lease interest
    65        
Subordinated note to Quicksilver
          1,233  
 
           
Total cost
    12,893       5,623  
Less interest capitalized
    (68 )      
 
           
Interest expense
  $ 12,825     $ 5,623  
 
           

29


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
     Our sources of liquidity include:
    cash generated from operations;
 
    borrowings under our Credit Facility; and
 
    future capital market transactions.
     We believe that the cash generated from these sources will be sufficient to meet our expected $0.46 per unit quarterly cash distributions during 2011 and satisfy our short-term working capital and maintenance capital expenditure requirements.
     Since the inception of operations in 2004, our cash flows have been significantly influenced by Quicksilver’s production in the Barnett Shale. As Quicksilver and others have developed the Barnett Shale, we have expanded our gathering and processing facilities to serve the additional volumes produced by such development. We expect to benefit from the Frontier Gas Acquisitions which will result in lower dependency on Quicksilver and our Barnett Shale operations. During the second quarter of 2011, approximately 74% of our total gathering volumes were comprised of natural gas owned or controlled by Quicksilver, which has decreased almost 20% from 92% in the first quarter of 2011.
Known Trends and Uncertainties
     Our financial condition and results of operations, including our liquidity and profitability, can be significantly affected by the following:
    natural gas prices;
 
    dependency on Quicksilver and the Barnett Shale; and
 
    regulatory requirements.
     The volumes of natural gas that we gather and process are dependent upon the natural gas volumes produced by our customers, which may be affected by prevailing natural gas prices, their derivative programs, and the availability and cost of their capital. We cannot predict future changes to natural gas prices or how any such pricing changes will influence producers’ behaviors. If reduced drilling and development programs were to be sustained over a prolonged period of time, we could experience a reduction in volumes through our systems and therefore reductions of revenue and cash flows.
     At this time, a portion of our revenue is derived from our operations in the Barnett Shale. In addition, more than 70% of our year to date gathering revenues are associated with natural gas volumes owned or controlled by Quicksilver. The risk of revenue fluctuations in the near-term is somewhat mitigated by the use of predominantly fixed-fee contracts for providing gathering and processing and treating services to our customers, but we are still susceptible to volume fluctuations. While the Frontier Gas Acquisition reduces the concentration risk associated with our dependency on one producer and one geographic area, we continue to regularly review opportunities for both organic growth projects and acquisitions in other producing basins and with other producers.
     We are subject to environmental laws, regulations and permits, including greenhouse gas requirements that may expose us to significant costs or obligations. In general, these laws, regulations, and permits have become more stringent over time and are subject to further changes and could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations in the future.
Significant Economic Factors That Impact our Business
     Changes in natural gas supply such as new discoveries of natural gas reserves, declining production in older fields and the introduction of new sources of natural gas supply, such as non-conventional and emerging natural gas shale plays, affect the demand from producers for our services. As these supply dynamics change, we anticipate that we will actively pursue projects that will allow us to provide midstream services to producers associated with the growth of new sources of supply. Changes in demographics, the amount of natural gas fired power generation, liquefied natural gas imports and exports and shifts in industrial and residential usage affect the overall demand for natural gas.
     We believe that the key factors that impact our business are natural gas prices, our customers’ drilling and completion activities, and government regulation on natural gas pipelines. These key factors play an important role in how we evaluate our operations and implement our long-term strategies.

30


Table of Contents

Cash Flows
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 38,557     $ 26,749  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (370,854 )     (115,121 )
Net cash provided by financing activities
    332,846       88,182  
     Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities — The increase in cash flows from operating activities resulted from an increase in accrued expenses related to operations, ad valorem tax, interest expense and incentive compensation, offset by higher receivables from Quicksilver and the Fayetteville Shale and Granite Wash operations.
     Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities — The increase in cash flows used in investing activities resulting from the Frontier and Las Animas System Acquisitions were approximately $354 million, offset by the distribution to Quicksilver of $80.3 million related to the purchase of the Alliance Midstream Assets in the prior year. For the 2011 period, we spent $16.9 million for gathering assets and processing facilities.
     Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities — Changes in cash flows used in financing activities during the 2011 period resulted primarily from the net borrowings under our Senior Notes and Credit Facility of $154 million compared with the 2010 period net borrowings of $101.4 million. This change is largely reflective of our Frontier Gas Acquisition in the 2011 period compared to the purchase of the Alliance Midstream Assets for $84.4 million in the 2010 period. We also had $206.2 million in proceeds from issuance of common and Class C units. In addition, we distributed $6 million more to our unitholders during the 2011 period. We have increased our distributions by 9.5% from the 2010 period to the 2011 period. In January 2010, the underwriters of our equity offering exercised their option to purchase an additional 549,200 common units, which generated proceeds of $11.1 million for which there was no comparable 2011 event.
     Information regarding historical and pending cash distributions is included in Note 4 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report.
Capital Expenditures
     The midstream energy business is capital intensive, requiring significant investment for the acquisition or development of new facilities. We categorize our capital expenditures as either:
    expansion capital expenditures, which are made to construct additional assets, expand and upgrade existing systems, or acquire additional assets; or
 
    maintenance capital expenditures, which are made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and extend their useful lives.
     We anticipate that we will continue to make capital expenditures to develop our gathering and processing network as Quicksilver and other producers continue to expand their development efforts in the Barnett Shale, Fayetteville Shale and the Granite Wash areas. Consequently, our ability to develop and maintain sources of funds to meet our capital requirements is critical to our ability to meet our growth objectives and to maintain our distribution levels.
     For the full year of 2011, we plan to spend $55 to $65 million for capital expenditures. This estimate includes a reduction of approximately $25 million primarily due to the timing of capital projects in the Granite Wash and Fayetteville Shale. These expenditures were originally expected to occur in the later part of 2011, are currently estimated to be spent in first half of 2012. In addition, maintenance capital spending is expected to be approximately $4 million in 2011. This is a change from our original estimate of $8 million for 2011 and is based on actual costs being lower than originally expected in 2011.
     During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we increased gross property, plant and equipment by $170.4 million, including $149.3 million for the Frontier Gas Acquisition assets, $5.1 million for the Las Animas Acquisition, expansion capital expenditures of approximately $15.2 million, $0.7 million in maintenance capital expenditures and $0.1 million in asset retirement cost.
Other Matters
     We regularly review opportunities for both organic growth projects and acquisitions that will enhance our financial performance. Since we distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders, we will depend on a combination of borrowings under our Credit Facility, operating cash flows and debt or equity offerings to finance any future growth capital expenditures or acquisitions.

31


Table of Contents

Debt
     Credit Facility — At June 30, 2011, we had $237.5 million outstanding under our $500 million Credit Facility at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.1%. Our average outstanding debt was $263 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K contains a more complete description of our indebtedness. On April 1, 2011, we entered into a Joinder Agreement with certain lenders under our Credit Facility, which expanded our borrowing capacity from $400 million to $500 million.
     Our Credit Facility requires us to maintain:
    a ratio of our consolidated trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) to our net interest expense of not less than 2.5 to 1.0; and
 
    a ratio of total indebtedness to consolidated trailing 12-month EBITDA of not more than 5.0 to 1.0 or not more than 5.5 to 1.0 for up to nine months following certain acquisitions.
     The Credit Facility contains provisions that trigger an acceleration of indebtedness based solely on the occurrence of a material adverse change in our financial condition or results of operations. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.
     Bridge Loans — In February 2011, in connection with the Frontier Gas Acquisition, we obtained commitments from multiple lenders for senior unsecured bridge loans in an aggregate amount up to $200 million. On April 1, 2011, the commitment was not drawn and was terminated in connection with the closing of the Senior Notes described below. We recognized $2.5 million of commitment fees in the second quarter of 2011, which is included in interest expense, related to the bridge loans.
     Senior Notes — On April 1, 2011, we issued the Senior Notes. Our obligations under the Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by our current and future domestic subsidiaries. The proceeds were used to partially finance the Frontier Gas Acquisition. Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 7.75% per annum, and is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2011, and mature April 2019.
     Our Senior Notes requires us to maintain a ratio of our consolidated trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined in the senior notes indenture) to fixed charges of at least 1.75 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with this covenant.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
     The following table summarizes our total contractual cash obligations as of June 30, 2011.
                                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations   Total     2011 (remaining)     2012     2013     2014     2015     Thereafter  
                    (In millions)                          
Long-term debt (1)
  $ 437.5     $     $     $     $     $ 237.5     $ 200.0  
Scheduled interest obligations (2)
    152.6       11.4       22.8       22.8       22.8       21.0       51.8  
Contractual obligations (3)
    8.7       2.7       2.8       2.0       0.8       0.4        
Capital lease obligations (4)
    7.9       1.3       2.7       2.8       1.1              
Asset retirement obligations (5)
    10.7                                     10.7  
Total contractual obligations
  $ 617.4     $ 15.4     $ 28.3     $ 27.6     $ 24.7     $ 258.9     $ 262.5  
 
                                         
 
(1)   As of June 30, 2011, we had $237.5 million outstanding under our Credit Facility and $200 million outstanding on our Senior Notes.
 
(2)   Based on our debt outstanding and interest rates in effect at June 30, 2011, we would anticipate interest payments to be approximately $7.4 million annually on our Credit Facility and $15.5 million annually on our Senior Notes. For each additional $10.0 million in borrowings on our Credit Facility, annual interest payments will increase by approximately $0.3 million. If the committed amount under our Credit Facility were to be fully utilized by year-end 2011 at interest rates in effect at June 30, 2011, we estimate that annual interest expenses would increase by approximately $8.1 million. If interest rates on our June 30, 2011 variable debt balance of $237.5 million increase or decrease by one percentage point, our annual income will decrease or increase by $2.4 million.
 
(3)   We lease office buildings and other property under operating leases.

32


Table of Contents

(4)   We lease compressors which are accounted for as capital leases, see Note 9 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report.
 
(5)     For more information regarding our asset retirement obligations, see Note 10 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We have no off-balance sheet arrangements within the definition of Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
     The information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report.
Critical Accounting Estimates
     Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related footnotes contained within Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report. The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Our critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were discussed in Item 7 in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These critical estimates, for which no significant changes have occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2011, include estimates and assumptions pertaining to:
    depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment;
 
    asset retirement obligations; and
 
    equity-based compensation.
     These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

33


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     We have established policies and procedures for managing risk within our organization, including internal controls. The level of risk assumed by us is based on our objectives and capacity to manage risk.
   Credit Risk
     Our primary credit risk relates to our dependency on Quicksilver for the majority of our natural gas volumes, which causes us to be subject to the risk of nonpayment or late payment by Quicksilver for gathering and processing fees. Quicksilver’s credit ratings are below investment grade, where they may remain for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, this risk could be higher than it might be with a more creditworthy customer or with a more diversified group of customers. Unless and until we significantly diversify our customer base, we expect to continue to be subject to non-diversified risk of nonpayment or late payment of our fees. Additionally, we perform credit analysis of our customers on a regular basis pursuant to our corporate credit policy. We have not had any significant losses due to counter-party failures to perform.
   Interest Rate Risk
     Although our base interest rates remain low, our leverage ratios directly influence the spreads charged by lenders. The credit markets could also drive the spreads charged by lenders upward. As base rates or spreads increase, our financing costs will increase accordingly. Although this could limit our ability to raise funds in the capital markets, we expect that our competitors would face similar challenges with respect to funding acquisitions and capital projects. We are exposed to variable interest rate risk as a result of borrowings under our Credit Facility.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
   Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the “Certifying Officers”) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management designs controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011, the Certifying Officers concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
     Subsequently, in the fourth quarter of 2011, management became aware of a deficiency in controls relating to the preparation of pro forma financial information that is required to be disclosed in Note 3 — Acquisitions — to our condensed consolidated financial statements. We have concluded that such a deficiency represented a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness resulted in the amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, in order to restate the pro forma financial information. As a result of this material weakness, the Certifying Officers have revised their earlier conclusion and have now concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2011.
   Remediation of Material Weakness
     The Partnership is implementing additional controls related to financial reporting disclosures for acquisitions and additional review procedures by individuals with expertise in U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting standards.
   Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we have continued to migrate our financial systems to a hosted environment. In connection with this implementation and resulting business process changes, we continue to enhance the design and documentation of our internal control processes to ensure suitable controls over our financial reporting.
     There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     Our operations are subject to a variety of risks and disputes normally incident to our business. As a result, we may, at any given time, be a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently subject to any material lawsuits or other legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition or for which disclosure is required by Item 103 of Regulation S-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factor discussed below and the risk factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, results of operations and cash flows, except that the following risk factors are no longer applicable:
    “Our pending acquisition of Frontier may not be consummated”;
 
    “The closing of the Frontier Acquisition is not subject to a financing condition and the Bridge Loans do not backstop the equity portion of the purchase price or our equity commitments”; and
 
    “Financing the Frontier Acquisition will substantially increase our leverage. We may not be able to obtain debt financing for the acquisition on expected or acceptable terms.”
Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on our operations, financial results or unit price.
     Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires companies to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of their internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting; our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting; and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to and report on management’s assessment and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
     As described in “Part I — Item 4. Controls and Procedures” of this report, our Certifying Officers concluded that as of June 30, 2011, there was a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and, as a result, as of that date, the Certifying Officers determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. As a result of this material weakness, errors occurred in the Partnership’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements related to presentation of pro forma financial information disclosed in the footnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. These errors ultimately resulted in the restatement of the Partnership’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Although the Partnership is implementing additional controls related to financial reporting disclosures for acquisitions and additional review procedures by individuals with expertise in U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting standards, the Partnership may fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future. Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in investigations or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could have a material adverse effect on investor confidence in our reported financial information, the market price of our common units could decline, we may be unable to obtain additional financing to operate and expand our business, and our business and financial condition could be harmed.
      The risk factors should be carefully considered when evaluating our business and the forward-looking statements in this report. See “Forward-Looking Information” on page five of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
     None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
     Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
     None.

35


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits:
The exhibit index is incorporated herein by reference into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A.

36


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: December 1, 2011
         
  CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
 
 
  By:   CRESTWOOD GAS SERVICES GP LLC, its
General Partner  
 
     
  By:   /s/ William G. Manias    
    William G. Manias   
    Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer   

37


Table of Contents

         
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits designated by an asterisk (*) are filed herewith and those with (**) are furnished and not filed herewith, all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing as indicated.
     
Exhibit No.   Description
3.1
  Certificate of Limited Partnership of Quicksilver Gas Services LP (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form S-1, File No. 33-140599, filed February 12, 2007 and included herein by reference).
 
   
3.2
  Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership of Quicksilver Gas Services LP (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed October 7, 2010 and included herein by reference)
 
   
3.3
  Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crestwood Midstream Partners LP dated as of April 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2011)
 
   
3.4
  First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Quicksilver Gas Services LP (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on November 8, 2010 and included herein by reference)
 
   
3.5
  Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Quicksilver Gas Services LP, dated February 19, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 22, 2008 and included herein by reference).
 
   
3.6
  Certificate of Formation of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form S-1, File No. 333-140599, filed February 12, 2007 and included herein by reference).
 
   
3.7
  Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Formation of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on November 8, 2010 and included herein by reference).
 
   
3.8
  First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC, dated July 24, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Form S-1/A, File No. 333-140599, filed July 25, 2007 and included herein by reference).
 
   
3.9
  First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC, dated July 24, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on November 8, 2010 and included herein by reference)
 
   
4.1
  Form of Common Unit Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form S-3/A, File No. 333-171735, filed April 8, 2011 and included herein by reference).
 
   
4.2
  Indenture, dated April 1, 2011, among Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and Crestwood Midstream Finance Corporation, the Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2011).
 
   
4.3
  Form of Note representing all 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2011).
 
   
4.4
  Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 1, 2011, among Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and Crestwood Midstream Finance Corporation, the Guarantors named therein and UBS Securities LLC, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., RBC Capital Markets, LLC and RBS Securities Inc., as the initial purchasers. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2011).
 
   
4.5
  Class C Unit Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 1, 2011, by and between Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2011).
 
   
10.1
  Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2011, by and among RBC Capital Markets Corporation, UBS Securities LLC and Bank of America, N.A., and Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 5, 2011).
 
   
*31.1
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
*31.2
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
*32.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
**101.INS
  XBRL Instance Document
 
   
**101.SCH
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Linkbase Document
 
   
**101.CAL
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
   
**101.DEF
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
   
**101.LAB
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
 
   
**101.PRE
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document