Module One RD, INC - FORM 10-K - September 28, 2011

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - Module One RD, INC	modone_ex311.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - Module One RD, INC	modone_ex321.htm

UNITES STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: June 30, 2011

o	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission File No.: 000-52953

MODULE ONE RD, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		26-0830388
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

228 Clearwater Drive, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082

(Address of principal executive offices)

(904) 273-8420

Issuer’s telephone number

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. oYes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). x Yes o No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $0

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. At September 27, 2011 there were 1,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference into the Annual Report on Form 10-K include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the words “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “potential,” “continue,” or “should,” or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology. Such statements include, but are not limited to, any statements relating to our ability to consummate any acquisition or other business combination and any other statements that are not statements of current or historical facts. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, but actual results may differ materially due to various factors, including, but not limited to, our being a development stage company with no operating history; our lack of funding; the inexperience of our management with respect to our business plan; our potential inability to consummate a business combination with an operating company that is generating revenues; the possibility that our company may never generate revenues; unknown risks that may attend to a business with which we consummate a business combination; our personnel allocating his time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with our business; the ownership of our securities being concentrated, and those other risks and uncertainties detailed herein and in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and developments in the industry in which we operate may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and developments in the industry in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us described in “Risk Factors.” The forward-looking events we discuss in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speak only as of the date of such statement and might not occur in light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation and disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business.

General

Module One RD, Inc. (“we”, “us” or the “Company”) was organized in the State of Nevada on October 12, 2007. We were organized to serve as a vehicle for a business combination through a capital stock exchange, merger, asset acquisition or other similar business combination (a “Business Combination”) with an operating or development stage business (the “Target Business”) which desires to utilize our status as a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Since inception, our business operations have comprised attending to organizational matters, registering our class of common stock under the Exchange Act, satisfying our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and identifying and evaluating potential Target Businesses. We have not generated any revenue, have no full-time employees and do not own or lease any property. Our sole officer and director has never served as an officer or director of a development stage public company with the purpose of acquiring a Target Business.

The Company, based on its proposed business activities, is a “shell company” which is defined, as a company which has (i) no or nominal operations; and (ii) either (x) no or nominal assets; (y) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or (z) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets. In addition, the Company is a “blank check company,” which is defined as a development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, as defined in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies. Many states have enacted laws limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions.

Given that we are a “shell company” and the Target Business with which we consummate a Business Combination likely will be involved in business operations at the time of the transaction, the transaction we enter into with such company would be referred to as a “reverse acquisition” or “reverse merger” for accounting purposes.

As more fully described under Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities,” because we are a shell company, our stockholders are not entitled to rely on the provisions of Rule 144 as an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in connection with the resale of their securities prior to any Business Combination and are subject to additional limitations as to the use of Rule 144 to resell their securities after a Business Combination.

Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a Business Combination, and then only in the discretion of management of our Business Combination partner. The Company intends to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements

We are not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial business or revenue generating operations unless and until we consummate a Business Combination, if ever. We are currently in the process of identifying and evaluating Target Businesses but we do not have any specific Business Combination under consideration. Our efforts to identify a prospective Target Business will not be limited to a particular industry or geographic location. We will seek to consummate the transaction which is most attractive and provides the greatest opportunity for creating securityholder value. The determination of which opportunity is the most attractive will be based on our analysis of a variety of factors, including whether such acquisition would be in the best interests of our securityholders, the terms of the transaction and the perceived quality of the business of the Target Business, among other factors, some of which are described below. We believe that the owners of potential Target Businesses may find an acquisition by us to be an easier and less dilutive means to achieve liquidity than an initial public offering or other forms of financing transactions.

We anticipate that the selection of a Target Business will be complex and extremely risky and we may never consummate a Business Combination. Our current financial condition may negatively impact our ability to consummate a Business Combination or cause us to discontinue operations before we enter such a transaction. As of the date of this report, we are not generating any revenue and at June 30, 2011, we had $30 of cash, total liabilities of $39,299 and losses of $39,369 since inception. Over the next twelve months, we will incur costs and expenses in connection with the preparation and filing of reports under the Exchange Act, identifying and evaluating Targets Businesses and costs we may incur in connection with entering into a Business Combination. These costs are hard to quantify given the multitude of variables associated with such activities. Our ongoing expenses will result in continued net operating losses that will increase until we can consummate a Business Combination with a profitable Target Business, if ever. Our cash on hand will not be sufficient to cover our operating costs over the next twelve months. Though our stockholder has advised us of their present intention to fund our costs and expenses going forward through loans or further investments in the Company, there is no written agreement binding them to do so.

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in concluding a Business Combination. We will not realize any revenues or generate any income unless and until we successfully merge with or acquire an operating business that is generating revenues and otherwise is operating profitably. Moreover, we can offer no guarantee that the Company will achieve long-term or immediate short-term earnings from any Business Combination.

Affecting a Business Combination

General.

A Business Combination may involve the acquisition of or merger with a company that desires to have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act, while avoiding what its management may deem to be the adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself. These include time delays, significant expense, possible loss of voting control by the target's existing management through dilution of their ownership position and compliance with various federal and state securities laws. As more fully described below under the heading “Form of acquisition; Opportunity for stockholder approval,” the proposed structure of a Business Combination may not require that we seek stockholder approval for the transaction and holders of our common stock may not have the opportunity to vote upon a proposed Business Combination.

Search for a target.

We are currently in the process of identifying and evaluating potential Target Businesses. As described below in more detail, our management has broad discretion with respect to identifying and selecting prospective acquisition candidates. At such time as we affect a Business Combination, if ever, we will be impacted by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of the Target Business. The risks attendant to the Target Business may include risks typical of a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stage of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.

Sources of Target Businesses.

We intend to source our target opportunities from various internal and external sources. Target candidates have been, and we anticipate will continue to be, brought to our attention from affiliated and unaffiliated sources. We believe that we will be able to identify target opportunities from internal sources primarily resulting from personal contacts and relationships that our officer and director and his affiliates have developed and maintain with various professionals, including accountants, consultants, bankers, attorneys and other advisors, as a result of formal or informal inquiries or discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. In no event will any of our affiliates be paid any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in connection with the consummation of a Business Combination.

Target Business candidates may be brought to our attention by unaffiliated sources as a result of being solicited by us through calls or mailings. These sources may also introduce us to Target Business candidates in which they believe we may have an interest. In addition, we may retain the services of agents or other representatives to identify or locate suitable targets on our behalf, though we have not engaged any such persons, to date. We have not adopted any policies with respect to utilizing the services of consultants or advisors to assist in the identification of a Target Business, the criteria to be used in selecting such consultants or advisors, the services to be provided, the term of service, or regarding the total amount of fees that may be paid. In the event that we retain the services of professional firms or other individuals that specialize in business acquisitions, we may pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation.

Selection criteria for a Target Business.

We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective Target Businesses. In evaluating a prospective Target Business, our management will consider, among other factors, the following:

·	financial condition and results of operation;
·	growth potential;
·	experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel;
·	capital requirements;
·	competitive position;
·	barriers to entry in the industry;
·	stage of development of the products, processes or services;
·	degree of current or potential market acceptance of the products, processes or services;
·	proprietary features and degree of intellectual property or other protection of the products, processes or services;
·	regulatory environment of the industry; and
·	costs associated with affecting the Business Combination.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive or to in any way limit the board of director’s unrestricted discretion to enter into a Business Combination with any Target Business. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular Business Combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant by our management.

Due Diligence Investigation.

In evaluating a prospective Target Business, we will conduct as extensive a due diligence review of potential targets as possible in view of our lack of financial resources and the inexperience of our management in such endeavors. Moreover, management’s decisions will be made without detailed feasibility studies, independent analyses or market surveys, which, if we had more cash, would be desirable. Given our current resources, we will likely enter into a Business Combination with a privately-held company in its early stages of development or that has only a limited operating history on which to base our decision. Generally, very little public information exists about these companies and we will be required to rely on the ability of our management to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from entering into a Business Combination with such a company. We will be particularly dependent in making decisions upon information provided by the promoters, owners, sponsors or others associated with the business opportunity seeking our participation. We expect that our due diligence may include, among other things, meetings with the Target Business’s management, inspection of its facilities and a review of financial and other information that is made available to us. This due diligence review will be conducted by our management, possibly with the assistance of the Company's counsel and accountants, as necessary.

It is unlikely that our management at the time of a Business Combination will continue in any material capacity with the Company after the consummation of a Business Combination, other than as a stockholder.

Our assessment of a Target Business and its management may not be accurate. If we do not uncover all material information about a Target Business prior to a Business Combination, we may not make a fully informed investment decision and we may lose money on our investment.

The time and costs required to select and evaluate a Target Business and to structure and complete the Business Combination, if we are able to consummate such a transaction at all, cannot presently be ascertained with any degree of certainty. Any costs we incur with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective Target Business with which a Business Combination is not ultimately completed may result in a loss to us.

Lack of diversification.

We expect that we will be able to consummate a Business Combination with only one candidate given that, among other considerations, we will not have the resources to diversify our operations. Moreover, given that we likely will offer a controlling interest in our Company to a Target Business in order to achieve a tax-free reorganization, as described below, the dilution of interest to present and prospective stockholders will render more than one Business Combination unlikely. Therefore, at least initially, the prospects for our success may be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business and we will not benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses that Business Combinations with multiple operating entities would offer. By consummating a Business Combination with a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

·	result in our dependency upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services; and

·	subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to a Business Combination.

Form of acquisition; Opportunity for stockholder approval.

Although we cannot predict the terms of any Business Combination, we will seek to structure a Business Combination to qualify as a tax-free transaction under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Tax-free treatment of such a transaction can be accomplished, if structured correctly, through the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of a Target Business or by way of a merger (either directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company) with a Target Business. Depending on the circumstances of any acquisition, however, we may not be able to structure a transaction in the most tax advantageous manner. Further, we cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authorities will agree with our tax treatment of any transaction.

If the transaction is structured as an acquisition, we will acquire our participation in a Target Business through the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of its capital stock in exchange for the issuance of our common stock or other securities to the security holders of the Target Business and the Target Business would become our wholly owned subsidiary. If the transaction is structured as a statutory merger or consolidation, we would merge a Target Business with and into our Company or a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company.

Acquisition: Under Section 368(a)(1) of the Code, in order for a stock exchange transaction to qualify as a “tax free” reorganization, the holders of the stock of the target must receive a number of shares of our capital stock equal to 80% or more of the voting stock of our Company. If a transaction were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than other “tax free” provisions provided under the Code, our existing stockholders would, in such circumstances, retain 20% or less of the total issued and outstanding shares after the transaction. Depending upon the relative negotiating strength of the parties, our stockholders at the time of the Business Combination may retain substantially less than 20% of the total issued and outstanding shares of our Company, which is likely in our case. This would result in substantial additional dilution to the equity of those persons who were stockholders of our Company prior to such Business Combination. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of our Company's then management at the time may resign and new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders. If the Business Combination is structured as an acquisition of a Target Business's stock, our Company will not require the vote or approval of stockholders and the transaction may be accomplished in the sole determination of management.

Merger: In a merger transaction, we would merge a Target Business with and into our Company or a wholly-owned subsidiary. Simultaneous with the merger, we may affect a recapitalization in order to achieve a manageable float of our outstanding capital stock. However, a proposed merger transaction would require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and may necessitate calling a stockholders' meeting to obtain such approval and filings with the SEC and state agencies. The necessity to obtain stockholder approval may result in delay and additional expense in the consummation of any proposed transaction and will also give rise to certain rights to dissenting stockholders who could require that the Company purchase their shares at a price equal to the fair market value in cash.

In light of the above, management likely will seek to structure a Business Combination so as not to require stockholder approval.

In view of our status as a “shell” company, any acquisition of the stock of or the merger with an operating company would be deemed to be a “reverse acquisition” or “reverse merger,” respectively, for accounting purposes.

We anticipate that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require significant management time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for a Business Combination, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in the loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.

In the case of either an acquisition or merger, our stockholders prior to the consummation of a Business Combination likely will not have control of a majority of the voting shares of the Company following a Business Combination. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of the Company's then directors may resign and new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.

Competition

We expect that in the course of identifying, evaluating and selecting a Target Business, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. These include blank check companies that have raised significant capital through sales of securities registered under federal securities laws that have a business plan similar to ours and, consequently, possess a significant competitive advantage over our Company both from a financial and personnel perspective. Additionally, we may be subject to competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including venture capital firms, leveraged buyout firms and operating businesses looking to expand their operations through acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established, possess significant capital, may be able to offer securities for which a trading market exists and have extensive experience identifying and affecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, nearly all of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than us. In addition, we will experience competition from other modestly capitalized shell companies that are seeking to enter into business combinations with targets similar to those we expect to pursue.

While we believe there may be numerous potential target candidates with which we could affect a Business Combination, our ability to compete in affecting a Business Combination with prime candidates will be limited by our lack of financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of the most attractive Target Businesses.

If we succeed in affecting a Business Combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of the Target Business. We cannot apprise you of any of these risks nor can we assure you that, subsequent to a Business Combination, we will have the resources or ability to compete effectively.

Employees

We have one executive officer who has other business interests and is not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters. He intends to devote only as much time as he deems necessary to our affairs. The amount of time management will devote to our affairs in any time period will vary based on whether a Target Business has been selected for the Business Combination and the stage of the Business Combination process the Company is in. Accordingly, as management identifies suitable Target Businesses, we expect that our management will spend more time investigating such Target Business and will devote additional time and effort negotiating and processing the Business Combination as developments warrant. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of a Business Combination.

Our management may engage in other business activities similar and dissimilar to those we are engaged in without any limitations or restrictions applicable to such activities. To the extent that our management engages in such other activities, there will be possible conflicts of interest in diverting opportunities which would be appropriate for our Company to another company, or to entities or persons with which our management is or may be associated or have an interest, rather than diverting such opportunities to us. Since we have not established any policy for the resolution of such a conflict, we could be adversely affected should our officer and director choose to place his other business interests before ours. We cannot assure you that such potential conflicts of interest will not result in the loss of potential opportunities or that any conflict will be resolved in our favor.

Our sole officer and director may actively negotiate for or otherwise consent to the disposition of all or any portion of the shares of common stock he owns, as a condition to, or in connection, with a Business Combination. Therefore, it is possible that the terms of any Business Combination will provide for the sale of all or a portion of his shares of common stock which would raise issues relating to a possible conflict of interest with our other security holders.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements, before making a decision to invest in our securities. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

The absence of operations and revenues raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The report of our independent auditor and Note 7 to the financial statements included in this Form 10-K indicate that the Company is in the development stage, has suffered losses from operations, has a net capital deficiency and has yet to generate cash flow, and that these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, we have no significant assets or financial resources. We will continue to sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a Business Combination. This will result in continued net operating losses that will increase until we can consummate a Business Combination with a profitable Target Business. Our operating and financial condition renders it unlikely that we would be able to obtain third-party financing to sustain operations, if necessary. In light of our limited resources, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue operations, that we will be able to identify a suitable Target Business or that we will consummate a Business Combination.

We are not generating any revenue, have limited capital resources and will incur significant costs over the next twelve months. We are dependent entirely upon our management to fund our operations.

We are not generating any revenues and possess limited capital to fund our operations, including for such purposes as preparing and filing periodic reports under the Exchange Act, identifying a Target Business and negotiating a Business Combination. In addition, we have substantial liabilities comprising promissory notes in favor of our current officer and director in the principal amount of $36,510 that bear interest at 8% per year and accrued expenses of $2,789. We are dependent entirely on our management to provide funds for the foregoing requirements and for any other corporate purposes that may arise in the future. Though our sole stockholder has advised us of his intention to fund our operations, there is no written agreement binding him to do so. Our operating and financial condition renders it unlikely that we would be able to obtain third-party financing to sustain operations, if necessary. In the even that our principal does not fund our capital requirements, we may not be able to continue operations and stockholders could lose the entire amount of their investment in our Company. Without further capital infusion from our stockholder, we will not have the ability to continue operations beyond the filing of this report.

We may have insufficient resources to cover our operating expenses and the costs and expenses of consummating a Business Combination.

At June 30, 2011, we had $30 of cash in our treasury and no other assets of any kind. We do not expect that the funds currently in our treasury will be sufficient to cover our operating costs and expenses, including those we will incur in connection with satisfying our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and consummating a Business Combination. If our financial resources are inadequate to cover our costs and expenses, we will require additional financing and we cannot be certain that such financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Our failure to secure funds necessary to cover our costs and expenses would have an adverse affect on our operations and ability to achieve our objective and may require us to discontinue operations.

We are a development stage company with no operating history and, accordingly, there is no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective. We can offer no assurance that we ever will consummate a Business Combination.

We are a development stage company and have not engaged in any revenue generating activities to date. Since we do not have any operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective. We are currently in the process of evaluating and identifying targets for a Business Combination. We are not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial business or generate any revenue until we consummate such a transaction, if ever. We cannot assure you as to when or if a Business Combination will occur. Moreover, we can offer no guarantee that the Company will achieve long-term or immediate short-term earnings from any Business Combination.

Our sole officer and director has never been a principal of, nor has he ever been affiliated with, a company formed with a business purpose similar to ours.

Our sole officer and director has never served as an officer or director of a development stage public company with the business purpose of acquiring a Target Business. Furthermore, our officer and director has never been involved with a public shell company of any sort. Accordingly, you may not be able to adequately evaluate his ability to consummate successfully a Business Combination. Moreover, our officer and director does not have experience evaluating or conducting due diligence with respect to companies in connection with a Business Combination and he may not uncover all material information about a Target Business prior to a Business Combination nor may he accurately assess a Target Company's business or management. Management's failure to conduct complete and accurate due diligence or accurately assess the future strength of a Target Business could have a significant negative impact on our operations and could cause our stockholders to lose entire investment.

We do not have a specific plan for identifying Target Businesses and we cannot estimate or predict when or if we ever will affect a Business Combination.

Our management does not have any specific plan or process for identifying a Target Business or effectuating a Business Combination. The business of the Company is predicated upon relationships built by management and the ongoing effort to develop new contacts through which management is introduced to potential Target Businesses. Moreover, given the wide ranging variables inherent in its business, management cannot predict the amount of time required to effectuate a Business Combination nor the amount of funds required therefor. In light of these factors, we cannot assure investors that we ever will consummate a Business Combination.

Our sole officer and director will apportion his time to other businesses which may cause conflicts of interest in his determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to consummate a Business Combination.

Our officer/ director engages in other businesses and is not required to devote his full time or any specific number of hours to our affairs, which could create a conflict of interest when allocating his time between our operations and his other commitments. We do not have and do not expect to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of a Business Combination. If our officer /director’s other business affairs require him to devote more substantial amounts of time to such affairs, it could limit his ability to devote time to our affairs and could have a negative impact on our ability to consummate a Business Combination. We cannot assure you that these conflicts will be resolved in our favor.

Our future success is dependent on the ability of management to complete a Business Combination with a Target Business that operates profitably.

The nature of our operations is highly speculative. We may not be able to enter into a Business Combination. If we do, the future success of our plan of operation will depend on the operations, financial condition and management of the Target Business we may acquire. While management is seeking to enter into a Business Combination with an entity having an established, profitable operating history and effective management, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in consummating a Business Combination with a candidate that meets that those criteria. We can not assure you that, even if we consummate a Business Combination, the Company will realize any short-term or long-term earnings.

We have no existing agreement for a Business Combination or other transaction.

We presently have no written arrangement or agreement to engage in a Business Combination. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify and evaluate suitable business opportunities or that we will enter into a Business Combination. Management has not identified any particular industry or specific business within an industry for evaluation. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to negotiate a Business Combination on favorable terms, if at all.

The time and cost of preparing a private company to become a public reporting company may preclude us from entering into a Business Combination with the most attractive private companies.

Target companies that we may investigate that fail to comply with SEC reporting requirements, financial and otherwise, may delay or preclude a Business Combination. Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act require reporting companies to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including audited financial statements for the company acquired. The time and additional costs that target entities will incur to prepare these statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude the consummation of a Business Combination. Otherwise suitable acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may be inappropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable.

If we affect a Business Combination with a financially unstable company or an entity in the early stage of development or growth, we will be subject to greater risks than if we were to affect a Business Combination with a more established company with a proven record of earnings and growth.

Given our financial and personnel resources compared to those of our competitors, we may be limited to consummating a Business Combination with a company that is financially unstable or is in the early stage of development or growth, including an entity without established records of sales or earnings. To the extent we affect a Business Combination with a financially unstable or early stage or emerging growth company, we may be impacted by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of such company that we would not be subject to if we were to affect a Business Combination with a more seasoned company with a proven record of earnings and growth.

We likely will complete only one Business Combination, which will cause us to be dependent solely on a single business and a limited number of products, services or assets.

Given our limited financial resources and other considerations, it is likely we will complete a Business Combination with only one Target Business. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be solely dependent upon the performance of a single business and dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services. In this case, we will not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several Business Combinations or asset acquisitions in different industries or different areas of a single industry so as to diversify risks and offset losses.

Given our limited resources and the significant competition for Target Businesses, we may not be able to consummate an attractive Business Combination.

We will encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including blank check companies, finance companies, banks, venture capital funds, leveraged buyout funds, operating businesses and other financial buyers competing for acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience in identifying and affecting Business Combinations directly or through affiliates. Nearly all of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do and our financial resources will be negligible when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. In addition, we will experience direct competition from other modestly capitalized shell companies that are seeking to enter into business combinations with targets similar to those we expect to pursue.

It is likely that we will consummate a Business Combination with a private company for which limited information will be available to conduct due diligence.

We likely will enter into a Business Combination with a privately-held company. Generally, very little public information exists about these companies or their management and we will be required to rely on the ability of our management to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential success of entering into a transaction with such a company. In addition, our management will only devote limited time to the business of the Company and will have available to it extremely limited financial resources with which to conduct due diligence. If our assessment of the Target Business’s operations and management is inaccurate or we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, then we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments.

If we consummate a Business Combination by way of an acquisition, stockholders may not have an opportunity to vote on the transaction.

If we consummate a Business Combination by way of an acquisition of the capital stock or assets of the Target Business, the transaction may be accomplished in the sole determination of management without any vote or approval by our securityholders. Accordingly, holders of our securities at the time of any Business Combination may not have an opportunity to evaluate the Target Business or its management and will have to rely on the judgment of management in assessing the future profitability and viability of the Target Business.

Since we have not yet selected a particular industry or Target Business with which to complete a Business Combination, we are unable to ascertain the merits or risks of the industry or business in which we may ultimately operate at this time.

We are currently in the process of evaluating and identifying targets for a Business Combination. However, our plan of operation permits our board of directors to consummate a Business Combination with a company in any industry it chooses and is not limited to any particular industry or type of business. Accordingly, there is no current basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the particular industry in which we may ultimately operate or the Target Business that we may ultimately acquire. To the extent we complete a Business Combination with a company that does not have a stable history of earnings and growth or an entity in a relatively early stage of its development, we will be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations of those entities. If we complete a Business Combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we will be affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. Such risks, among other things, could preclude the Company's ability to secure financing for operations after a Business Combination, should it be required. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or Target Business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. Even if we properly assess those risks, some of them may be outside of our control.

A Business Combination with a foreign company may subject us to additional risks.

If we enter into a Business Combination with a foreign entity, we will be subject to all of the risks inherent in business operations outside of the United States. These risks include:

·	unexpected changes in, or impositions of, legislative or regulatory requirements;
·	foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
·	potential hostilities and changes in diplomatic and trade relationships;
·	changes in duties and tariffs, taxes, trade restrictions, license obligations and other non-tariff barriers to trade;
·	burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations;
·	longer payment cycles and difficulties collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;
·	difficulties in enforcing or defending agreements and intellectual property rights;
·	reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
·	potentially adverse tax consequences; and
·	political and economic instability

If the Target Business with which we enter a Business Combination does not successfully manage these risks among others that we may not identify at the time of a Business Combination, our business may be negatively impacted.

Our long-term success will be dependent in large part upon the management team of the Target Business, which may be difficult to fully evaluate.

After a Business Combination, our long-term success we will be dependent upon the management team of the Target Business. Although we intend to scrutinize the management team of a prospective Target Business as closely as possible in connection with evaluating the desirability of affecting a Business Combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of the management team will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the complex disclosure and financial reporting requirements imposed on U.S. public companies and other requirements of operating a public company, which could divert their attention from their core business to the determent of the operating results of the Target Business.

If we are unable to structure the Business Combination as a “tax free” transaction, potential Target Businesses could be deterred from entering into such a transaction with our Company.

We may not be able to structure our acquisition to result in tax-free treatment for the companies or their stockholders, which could deter third parties from entering into certain Business Combinations with us. Currently, a transaction may be structured so as to result in tax-free treatment to both companies, as prescribed by various federal and state tax provisions. We intend to structure any Business Combination so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to both us and the target entity and the respective stockholders of each company; however, we cannot guarantee that the Business Combination will meet the statutory requirements of a tax-free reorganization or that the parties will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets. A non-qualifying reorganization could result in the imposition of both federal and state taxes that may have an adverse affect on all parties to the transaction.

We have not conducted any market research concerning prospective business opportunities, which may affect our ability to identify a Target Business.

We have neither conducted nor have others made available to us results of market research concerning prospective business opportunities. Therefore, we have no assurances that market demand exists for a Business Combination as contemplated by us. There is no assurance that we will be able to enter into a Business Combination on terms favorable to us. Decisions as to which business opportunity to participate in will be unilaterally made by our management, which, in many cases, may act without the consent, vote or approval of our stockholders.

Numerous external forces, including the recent financial crisis, could negatively affect our businesses, results of operations and financial condition.

Numerous external forces, including the state of global financial markets and general economic conditions, lack of consumer confidence, lack of availability of credit, interest rate and currency rate fluctuations and national and international political circumstances (including wars and terrorist acts) could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The ongoing global financial crisis affecting the banking system, financial markets and financial institutions has resulted in a tightening in the credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial markets and extreme volatility in credit and equity markets. The length of time or severity with which these conditions may persist is unknown. As a consequence, companies that otherwise may have considered becoming public as a result of a reverse acquisition may elect to delay or forego entirely such plans because of the impact of the global financial crisis on their operations, their inability to obtain financing to grow their operations and the costs they will required to incur associated with being a public company, among other reasons. Accordingly, it may be more difficult and take more time to identify a suitable and willing Target Business and consummate a Business Combination.

We have no independent audit committee. Our full board of directors functions as our audit committee and is comprised of one director who is not considered independent. This may hinder our board of directors’ effectiveness in fulfilling the functions of the audit committee.

Currently, we have no independent audit committee, though we are not required to have one. Our full board of directors functions as our audit committee and is comprised of a single director who is not considered to be “independent” in accordance with the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. An independent audit committee plays a crucial role in the corporate governance process, assessing a company’s processes relating to its risks and control environment, overseeing financial reporting, and evaluating internal and independent audit processes. The lack of an independent audit committee may prevent the board of directors from being independent from management in its judgments and decisions and its ability to pursue the committee’s responsibilities without undue influence. We do not expect to create an independent audit committee, which could compromise the management of our business.

The Company may be subject to further government regulations which would adversely affect our operations.

Although we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, management believes we will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ( the “Investment Company Act”), since we will not be engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. If we engage in business combinations which will result in our holding passive investment interests in a number of entities, we could be subject to regulations under the Investment Company Act. If so, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs. We have received no formal determination from the SEC as to our status under the Investment Company Act and, consequently, violation of the Investment Company Act could subject us to material adverse consequences.

Limitations on liability and indemnification matters.

As permitted by the corporate laws of the State of Nevada, we have included in our articles of incorporation a provision to eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach or alleged breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, subject to certain exceptions, including, for example, if the directors did not act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. In addition, our bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our officers and directors under certain circumstances, including those circumstances in which indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and we will be required to advance expenses to our officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified.

Our compliance with changing laws and rules regarding corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses to us which, in turn, may adversely affect our ability to continue our operations.

Keeping abreast of, and in compliance with, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and, in the event we are ever approved for listing on either an automated quotation system or a registered exchange, and system or stock exchange rules, will require an increased amount of management attention and external resources. We intend to continue to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, which may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. This could have an adverse impact on our operations.

We expect to issue a significant number of new shares of capital stock in a Business Combination, which will result in substantial dilution and a change in control of ownership of the Company.

Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Any Business Combination affected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the common stock issued in any such transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm's-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Our board of directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued in connection with a Business Combination or otherwise, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holders of common stock might be materially adversely affected

We may issue preferred stock which may have greater rights than our common stock.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize our Company to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock. Currently, no preferred shares have been issued; however, we can issue shares of our preferred stock in one or more series and can set the terms of the preferred stock without seeking any further approval from our common stockholders. Any preferred stock that we issue may rank ahead of our common stock in terms of dividend priority or liquidation premiums and may have greater voting rights than our common stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of common stock, which could dilute the value of common stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price, if any, of our common stock.

There are significant restrictions on the transferability of outstanding shares of our common stock.

None of the outstanding shares of our common stock have been registered under the Securities Act or the securities laws of any state and, consequently, they may not be resold, transferred or otherwise disposed of under federal securities laws unless such transaction is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. In connection with any transfer of shares of our common stock other than pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, the Company may require the holder to provide to the Company an opinion of counsel to the effect that such transfer does not require registration under the Securities Act. Persons who acquired our common stock prior to a Business Combination will not be entitled to rely on Rule 144 under the Exchange Act for the resale of our securities unless and until (i) we cease to be a shell company, (ii) at the time of the sale we are reporting under the Exchange Act, (iii) we have filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed during the preceding 12 months, and (iv) at least one year has elapsed from the time that we file the disclosure required by the SEC reflecting the fact that we are no longer a shell company. These restrictions will limit the ability of our stockholders to liquidate their investment.

We have not registered or qualified any shares of our class of our common stock for resale under the Blue Sky laws of any state, which will limit the liquidity of the common stock.

The Company has not registered or qualified its class of common stock for resale or trading under the Blue Sky laws of any state and current management does not anticipate doing so. Current stockholders and persons who desire to purchase our common stock should be aware that significant state Blue Sky law restrictions may limit our stockholders from selling their shares and potential purchasers from acquiring our common stock.

Because we may seek to complete a business combination through a “reverse merger”, following such a transaction we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

Additional risks may exist since we will assist a privately held business to become public through a “reverse merger.” Securities analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of our Company since there is no incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. No assurance can be given that brokerage firms will want to conduct any secondary offerings on behalf of our post-merger company in the future.

The absence of an established trading market will limit the ability of stockholders to dispose of their common stock.

There is currently no public trading market for any of our securities. The Company will not seek to list any of our securities on any exchange or have them quoted on an automated quotation system or over-the-counter market. Any decision to initiate public trading of our common stock will be in the discretion of management of a Target Company with which we consummate a Business Combination. Since stockholders will not be able to sell their shares, stockholders should consider their liquidity needs with respect to the securities and should be prepared to hold their shares for an indefinite period.

We cannot assure you that following a Business Combination with an operating business, our common stock will be listed or admitted to quotation on any securities exchange or other trading medium, which will limit the liquidity of the shares.

Following a Business Combination, new management may seek to initiate a public market for our common stock. However, we cannot assure you that following such a transaction, our Company as then constituted will meet the initial listing standards of any stock exchange or that our common stock will be admitted for quotation on the over the counter bulletin board or commence trading on any other medium. If our common stock does not trade publicly, holders may not be able to sell common stock.

The designation of our common stock as a "penny stock" would limit the liquidity of the shares.

Our common stock after a Business Combination may be deemed a “penny stock” as that term is defined under Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. Generally, a "penny stock" is a common stock that is not listed on a securities exchange and trades for less than $5.00 a share. Prices often are not available to buyers and sellers and the market may be very limited. Penny stocks in start-up companies are among the riskiest equity investments. Broker-dealers who sell penny stocks must provide purchasers of these stocks with a standardized risk-disclosure document prepared by the SEC. The document provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks involved in investing in the penny stock market. A broker must also provide purchasers with bid and offer quotations and information regarding broker and salesperson compensation, make a written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and obtain the purchaser's written agreement to the purchase. Many brokers choose not to participate in penny stock transactions. Because of the penny stock rules, there may be less trading activity in penny stocks in any market that develops for our common stock in the future and stockholders are likely to have difficulty selling their shares.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock stocks in any market that develops for our common stock in the future, which may limit the ability to buy and sell our stock and which will have an adverse effect on any market that develops for our shares.

We have never paid dividends on our common stock.

We have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not presently intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. In the unlikely event we generated profits prior to a Business Combination, we expect to retain such earnings and re-invest them into the Company to further its business strategy.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not Applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

We maintain our principal executive offices at 228 Clearwater Drive, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, where our President maintains a business office. We use this office space free of charge. We believe that this space is sufficient for our current requirements. The Company does not own or lease any properties at this time and does not anticipate owning or leasing any properties prior to the consummation of a Business Combination, if ever.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The Company presently is not a party to, nor is management aware of, any pending, legal proceedings.

Item 4. Reserved

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

As of September 27, 2011, there was one holder of record of 1,000,000 outstanding shares of our common stock.

Our common stock does not trade, nor is it admitted to quotation, on any stock exchange or other trading facility. Management has no present plan, proposal, arrangement or understanding with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of our securities. Any decision to initiate public trading of our common stock will be in the discretion of management of a Target Company with which we consummate a Business Combination. We cannot assure you that a trading market for our common stock will ever develop. We have not registered our class of common stock for resale under the blue sky laws of any state and current management does not anticipate doing so. The holders of shares of common stock, and persons who may desire to purchase shares of our common stock in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that, in addition to transfer restrictions imposed by federal securities laws, significant state blue sky law restrictions may exist which could limit the ability of stockholders to sell their shares and limit potential purchasers from acquiring our common stock.

We are not obligated by contract or otherwise to issue any securities and there are not outstanding any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock.

Shares Available for Future Sale

All outstanding shares of our common stock are “restricted securities,” as that term is defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, because they were issued in a private transaction not involving a public offering. Accordingly, none of the outstanding shares of our common stock may be resold, transferred, pledged as collateral or otherwise disposed of unless such transaction is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is available. In connection with any transfer of shares of our common stock other than pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, the Company may require the holder to provide to the Company an opinion of counsel to the effect that such transfer does not require registration of such transferred shares under the Securities Act.

Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by companies that are, or previously were, shell companies, as we are, unless the following conditions are met:

·	the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;
·	the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
·	the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and
·	at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current comprehensive disclosure with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

Neither the Company nor its officer and director has any present plan, proposal, arrangement, understanding or intention of selling any unissued or outstanding shares of common stock in the public market subsequent to a Business Combination. Nevertheless, in the event that a substantial number of shares of our common stock were to be sold in any public market that may develop for our securities subsequent to a Business Combination, such sales may adversely affect the price for the sale of the Company's common stock securities in any such trading market. We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of currently restricted shares of common stock or the availability of such shares for sale will have on the market prices prevailing from time to time, if any.

Dividends.

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date and do not presently intend to pay cash dividends prior to the consummation of a Business Combination.

The payment of any dividends subsequent to a Business Combination will be within the discretion of our then seated board of directors. Current management cannot predict the factors which any future board of directors would consider when determining whether or when to pay dividends.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

None.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

The Company did not issue or sell any securities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The information to be furnished under this Item 6 is not required of smaller reporting companies, as such term is defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following plan of operation provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results, expectations and plans discussed in these forward looking statements.

General.

We were formed to serve as a vehicle to acquire, through a capital stock exchange, reverse acquisition, reverse merger, asset acquisition or other similar business combination, an operating or development stage business which desires to utilize our status as a reporting corporation under the Exchange Act. We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues during the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2011, our fiscal year end.

We are currently in the process of evaluating and identifying targets for a Business Combination. We are not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial business until we consummate a Business Combination.

Our management has broad discretion with respect to identifying and selecting a prospective Target Business. We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective Target Businesses. There are numerous risks in connection with our current and proposed operations and plans, including those enumerated under "Item 1A Risk Factors." By way of example, we will be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of the Target Business and, if such business is a foreign entity, we will be subject to all of the risks attendant to foreign operations. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular Target Business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.

We expect that in connection with any Business Combination, we will issue a significant number of shares of our common stock (equal to at least 80% of the total number of shares outstanding after giving effect to the transaction and likely, a significantly higher percentage), in order to ensure that Business Combination qualifies as a “tax free” transaction under federal tax laws). The issuance of additional shares of our capital stock will significantly reduce the equity interest of our stockholders as of the date of the transaction and will likely result in the resignation or removal of our management as of the date of the transaction.

Our management anticipates that the Company will affect only one Business Combination, due primarily to our financial resources and the dilution of interest for present and prospective stockholders, which is likely to occur as a result of our management's plan to offer a controlling interest to a Target Business in order to achieve a tax-free reorganization. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in us, because it will concentrate the chance for our success into a single business and not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against potential gains from another.

Management anticipates that the selection of a Target Business and the consummation of a Business Combination will be complex and extremely risky and cannot assure investors that the Company ever will enter into such a transaction or that if we do consummate of a Business Combination that the Company will achieve long-term or immediate short-term earnings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had total assets of $30, comprised exclusively of cash. This compares with assets of $10, comprised exclusively of cash, as of June 30, 2010. The Company’s current liabilities as of June 30, 2011 totaled $39,299, comprised principally of amounts due to its stockholders and evidenced by promissory notes that bear interest at the rate of 8% per year and accrued expenses. This compares with liabilities of $27,791 comprised exclusively of monies due to stockholders and accrued expenses, as of June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2011, we had negative working capital of $39,269. The Company can provide no assurance that it can continue to satisfy its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The following is a summary of the Company's cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities for the years ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.

	Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011			Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(10,306	)	$	(4,825	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		10,326			4,800
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		20			(25	)

The Company has nominal assets and has generated no revenues since inception. Our current assets will not be sufficient to cover our operating costs and expenses over the next twelve months during which time we will incur costs and expenses in connection with the preparation and filing of reports under the Exchange Act, identifying and evaluating Targets Businesses and costs we may incur in connection with entering into a Business Combination. These costs are hard to quantify given the multitude of variables associated with such activities. Our ongoing expenses will result in continued net operating losses that will increase until we can consummate a Business Combination with a profitable Target Business, if ever.

To date, we have funded our operations through loans from our stockholder. Our current stockholder has advised us that it expects to fund additional costs and expenses that we will incur in connection with our operations, including as may be required to file reports under the Exchange Act, for due diligence activities and to consummate a Business Combination, through loans or further investment in the Company, as and when necessary. However, it is not bound to do so. If continued funding and capital resources are unavailable at reasonable terms, the Company may not be able to implement its plan of operations.

We cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will have sufficient capital resources to identify a suitable Target Business, to conduct effective due diligence as to any Target Business or to consummate a Business Combination. As a result of our negative working capital, our losses since inception, and failure to generate revenues from operations, our financial statements include a note in which our auditor has expressed doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.”

Results of Operations.

Since our inception, we have not engaged in any revenue generating activities or realized any revenues. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition or merger with an operating company, of which there can be no assurance. It is management's assertion that these circumstances may hinder the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s plan of operation for the next twelve months shall be to continue its efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates.

We reported a net loss for the year ended June 30, 2011 of $11,488, compared to a net loss for the year ended June 30, 2010 of $10,066. Our expenses consist principally of professional fees and filing costs in connection with satisfying our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act.

We do not expect to engage in any substantive activities unless and until such time as we enter into a Business Combination with a Target Business, if ever. We cannot provide investors with any assessment as to the nature of a Target Business’s operations or speculate as to the status of its products or operations, whether at the time of the Business Combination it will be generating revenues or its future prospects.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, business combination purchase price allocations, our review for impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, income taxes and stock-based compensation expense. Actual results may differ from these judgments and estimates, and they may be adjusted as more information becomes available. Any adjustment may be significant.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably may have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur may materially impact the financial statements. We refer readers to Note 1 to our audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2011 filed with this Annual Report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 contained in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for a discussion of new and recently adopted accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The information to be furnished under this Item 7A is not required of smaller reporting companies, as such term is defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT INDEX

Independent Auditor’s Report			F-1
Balance Sheets for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010			F-2
Statement of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and cumulative since inception (October 12, 2007) to June 30, 2011			F-3
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit as of June 30, 2011			F-4
Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and cumulative since inception (October 12, 2007) to June 30, 2011			F-5
Notes to Financial Statements			F-6

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Boards of Directors

Module One RD, Inc.

Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Module One RD, Inc., as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholder’s deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended and the period from October 11, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Module One RD, Inc., as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the years then ended and the period from October 11, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Module One RD, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations, has negative working capital and is in need of additional capital to grow its operations so that it can become profitable. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are described in Note 7. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Bingham Farms, Michigan

September 26, 2011

F-1

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and equivalents	$	30		$	10

TOTAL ASSETS	$	30		$	10

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses	$	2,789		$	3,750
Accrued interest – related party		5,446			3,303
Loan payable - related party		31,064			20,738
Total liabilities		39,299			27,791

Stockholder’s Deficit
Common Stock, $.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding		100			100
Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- shares issued and outstanding		0			0
Additional paid-in capital		0			0
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(39,369	)		(27,881	)
Total stockholder’s deficit		(39,269	)		(27,781	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT	$	30		$	10

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-2

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 11, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2011

	Year ended June 30, 2011			Year ended June 30, 2010			Period from October 11, 2007 (Inception) to June 30, 2011

REVENUES	$	0		$	0		$	0

EXPENSES
Professional fees		7,725			8,400			31,645
General and administrative expenses		1,620			175			2,278
TOTAL EXPENSES		9,345			10,066			33,923

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(9,345	)		(8,575	)		(33,923	)

OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense		2,143			1,491			5,446

LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(11,488	)		(10,066	)		(39,369	)

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		0			0			0

NET LOSS	$	(11,488	)	$	(10,066	)	$	(39,369	)

NET LOSS PER SHARE: BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING: BASIC AND DILUTED		1,000,000			1,000,000

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-3

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT

PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 11, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2011

	Common Stock				Additional paid-in		Deficit accumulated during the development
	Shares		Amount		capital		stage			Total

Inception, October 11, 2007		0	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	0

Issuance of common stock for cash @$.0001		1,000,000		100		-		-			100

Net loss for the period ended June 30, 2008		-		-		-		(10,484	)		(10,484	)

Balance, June 30, 2008		1,000,000		100		0		(10,484	)		(10,384	)

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2009		-		-		-		(7,331	)		(7,331	)

Balance, June 30, 2009		1,000,000		100		0		(17,815	)		(17,715	)

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2010		-		-		-		(10,066	)		(10,066	)

Balance, June 30, 2010		1,000,000		100		0		(27,881	)		(27,781	)

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2011		-		-		-		(11,488	)		(11,488	)

Balance, June 30, 2011		1,000,000	$	100	$	0	$	(39,369	)	$	(39,269	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-4

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 11, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 2011

	Year ended June 30, 2011			Year ended June 30, 2010			Period from October 11, 2007 (Inception) to June 30, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period	$	(11,488	)	$	(10,066	)	$	(39,369	)
Change in non-cash working capital items:
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		(961	)		3,750			2,789
Increase in accrued interest – related party		2,143			1,491			5,446
CASH FLOWS USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(10,306	)		(4,825	)		(31,134	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Loans received from related party		10,326			4,800			31,064
Proceeds from sales of common stock		0			0			100
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		10,326			4,800			31,164

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		20			(25	)		30

Cash, beginning of period		10			35			0
Cash, end of period	$	30		$	10		$	30

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	0		$	0		$	0
Income taxes paid	$	0		$	0		$	0

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-5

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

Module One RD, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 11, 2007 as a corporation with a year end of June 30. The Company’s objective is to acquire or merge with a target business or company in a business combination.

Development Stage Company

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to development-stage companies. A development-stage company is one in which planned principal operations have not commenced or if its operations have commenced, there has been no significant revenues there from.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars.

Accounting Basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” accounting). The Company has adopted a June 30 fiscal year end.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Module One RD considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $30 and $10 of cash, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accrued expenses, accrued interest – related party and loans payable to a related party. The carrying amount of these financial instruments approximates fair value due either to length of maturity or interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates unless otherwise disclosed in these financial statements.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when products are fully delivered or services have been provided and collection is reasonably assured.

F-6

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Basic Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. There are no such common stock equivalents outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and 123 (R) (ASC 718). To date, the Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has not issued any stock-based payments to its employees.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Module One RD does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

NOTE 2 – ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses at June 30, 2011 consisted of amounts owed to the Company’s outside independent auditors and a registration fee.

NOTE 3 – LOAN PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

The Company has received loans from a related party to be used for working capital. The loans are due upon demand, bear 8% interest and are unsecured. The balance due on these loans was $31,064 and $20,738 as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Accrued interest on the above loans was $5,446 and $3,303 as of June 30, 2011 and 2010.

NOTE 4 – COMMON STOCK

The Company has 100,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock authorized.

On October 13, 2007, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for cash proceeds of $100.

As of June 30, 2011 and 2010 there were 1,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

The Company also has 10,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock authorized.

As of June 30, 2011 and 2010 there were 0 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer has provided office services without charge. There is no obligation for the officer to continue this arrangement. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and accordingly are not reflected herein. The officers and directors are involved in other business activities and most likely will become involved in other business activities in the future.

F-7

MODULE ONE RD, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2011

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $39,369 that may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income through 2030. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following:

	2011			2010
Federal income tax attributable to:
Current Operations	$	3,906		$	3,422
Less: valuation allowance		(3,906	)		(3,422	)
Net provision for Federal income taxes	$	0		$	0

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:

	2011			2010
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	13,385		$	9,479
Less: valuation allowance		(13,385	)		(9,479	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0		$	0

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards of $39,369 for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

NOTE 7 – LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN

Module One RD has negative working capital, has incurred losses since inception, and has not yet received revenues from sales of products or services. These factors create substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

The ability of Module One RD to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating cash from the sale of its common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations. Management’s plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and ongoing operations; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts.

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent events through September 26, 2011, the date on which the financial statements were issued, and has determined it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

F-8

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

On September 9, 2010, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission to disclose that it dismissed Traci J. Anderson, CPA’s (“TJA”) as its independent registered public accountants as of September 6, 2010, as required by Item 4.01. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant thereof (the “8-K”). TJA had audited our financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and 2009 and for the period from October 12, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2009. In the 8-K, the Company also disclosed that it had engaged Silberstein Ungar, PLLC (“SUP”) as its independent registered public accountants, effective September 6, 2010 (the “Engagement Date”), to (i) audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010 and for the period from October 12, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2010 and (ii) re-audit the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009. There were no disagreements with TJA.

During the period from October 12, 2007 (date of inception) and through the Engagement Date, the Company has not consulted with SUP regarding either:

(1)	the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that SUP concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or

(2)	any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures;

As of the end of the year covered by this Annual Report, management performed, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer, who is our Principal Financial Officer, and who we refer to in this annual report as our PEO, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our PEO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based upon that evaluation, our PEO concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC as a result of the weakness in our internal controls described below.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, (“ICFR”) as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. ICFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. A company’s ICFR includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, ICFR may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of ICFR will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our ICFR as of the end of the period covered by this report using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, the Company’s ICFR was not effective at the reasonable assurance level because we identified the following material weaknesses:

1.	We did not maintain effective controls over the control environment. Specifically, we have not developed and effectively communicated to our employees our accounting policies and procedures. This has resulted in inconsistent practices. Further, our directors are not independent nor do they qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. Since these entity level programs have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness.
2.	We did not maintain effective controls over financial statement disclosure. Specifically, controls were not designed and in place to ensure that all disclosures required were originally addressed in our financial statements.
3.	There existed a lack of segregation of duties in regard to the Company’s financial reporting, procedures for depositing of funds, procedures for cash disbursements, procedures for checkbook entries, period close procedures, and procedures for financial statement preparation.

A material weakness in ICFR is defined in Section 210.1-02(4) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in ICFR, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in ICFR that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the Company's financial reporting. As a result of the material weaknesses in the Company's ICFR, there are increased risks of errors in financial reporting under current operations.

We believe that the weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting are a direct consequence of our size, resource constraints and the nature of our business. We are a "shell company," as defined under the Securities Act, in that we have no operations and nominal assets. We were organized to serve as a vehicle for a business combination with an operating or development stage business and we have not engaged in any substantive business operations and do not expect to engage in any such activities, unless and until we consummate a business combination. We have no full-time employees.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, which internal controls will remain deficient until such time as the Company completes a merger transaction or acquisition of an operating business at which time management will be able to implement effective controls and procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The table sets forth information as of the date of this report with respect to our management:

Name	Age	Title
Thomas Hurley	51	President and Director

Mr. Hurley has been our President and a member of our board of directors since inception. Since 2000, Mr. Hurley served as sales representative at Hanley Wood, a leading-edge business-to-business media and information company reaching audiences in residential housing and commercial construction. From 1985 to 1999, he was an advertising sales representative for Chilton Company, a division of Capital Cities, Inc., where he rose to become the top billing salesman in division of several hundred sales people.

The term of office of our director expires at the Company's annual meeting of stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Our director is not compensated for serving as such. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Section 16 Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors and person who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports regarding ownership of and transactions in our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commissioner and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies received by or a written representation from certain reporting persons we believe that during fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, we believe that all eligible persons are in compliance with the requirements of Section 16(a).

Code of Ethics.

The Company has not adopted a code of ethics. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires a code of ethics at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will adopt a code of ethics that will be suitable for its operations after the Company consummates a Business Combination.

Audit Committee.

The board of directors has not established an audit committee nor adopted an audit committee charter, rather, the entire board of directors serves the functions of an audit committee. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires an audit committee at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will make a determination as to whether to establish an audit committee and to adopt an audit committee charter that will be suitable for its operations after the Company consummates a Business Combination.

Stockholder Communications.

The board of directors has not adopted a process for security holders to send communications to the board of directors. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires a process for security holders to send communications to the board of directors at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will establish such a process that will be appropriate for its operations after the Company consummates a Business Combination.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The Company has not paid any compensation to any person since inception and will not pay any compensation until it affects a Business Combination, at which time compensation shall be in the discretion of then current management. Current management expects to devote only such time to the affairs of the Company as required to affect the Company’s business plan.

The Company has not adopted any retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs for the benefit of its employees.

The Company does not have a compensation committee. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and the current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires a compensation committee at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will take such action to establish and seat a compensation committee that will be suitable for its operations at such time as the Company consummates a Business Combination, if ever.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth, as of September 27, 2011, certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock and by our sole officer and director.

The applicable percentage of ownership is based on 1,000,000 shares outstanding. There were no outstanding securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of common stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Amount of Beneficial Ownership		Percent of Outstanding Shares of Class Owned
Thomas Hurley		1,000,000		100	%

All officers and directors as a group (1 person)		1,000,000		100	%

___________________

(1) The address of Mr. Hurley is c/o the Company.

Compensation Plans.

We have not adopted any compensation plans for the benefit of our employees, representatives or consultants. The Company does not have outstanding any options, warrants or other rights outstanding that entitle anyone to acquire shares of capital stock.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Related Party Transactions

The Company utilizes office space provided free of charge by Mr. Hurley. The Company will continue to maintain its offices at this location until the consummation of a Business Combination, if ever.

During the twelve months ended June 30, 2011 the Company borrowed an aggregate of $10,326 from Thomas Hurley, our sole stockholder and officer and director. Since inception, the Company has borrowed an aggregate of $4,800 from Mr. Hurley. Each of the loans is evidenced by a promissory note which is payable on demand with interest calculated at the rate of 8% per annum. The proceeds from the loans have been utilized by the Company to cover the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of Exchange Act reports and the target entity selection and the due diligence process.

Director Independence.

The Company has not established its own definition for determining whether its directors and nominees for directors are “independent” nor has it adopted any other standard of independence employed by any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system.

Current management cannot predict whether incoming management of a Target Business upon the consummation of a Business Combination, if such transaction occurs, will adopt a definition of “independence” or establish any committees of the board, such as an audit committee, a compensation committee or nominating committee.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

AUDIT FEES. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Silberstein Ungar, PLLC for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for the fiscal years ending on June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 were $2,500 and $1,875, respectively. In addition, the Company paid Traci J. Anderson, CPA’s (“TJA”) the sum of $2,500 in connection with the audit of the 2009 financial statements; however, upon the revocation of that firm’s registration by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Company is not entitled to rely upon TJA’s audit report for 2009, necessitating the re-audit of the 2009 financial statements by Silberstein Ungar, PLLC. The aggregate fees billed for professional fees rendered in connection with the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 were $1,500 and $1,500, respectively.

AUDIT-RELATED FEES. We did not pay any audit related fees paid to our accountants for either of the past two fiscal years.

TAX FEES. We did not pay any tax fees to our accountant for either of the past two fiscal years.

ALL OTHER FEES. We did not pay any fees billed for services rendered for the past two fiscal years to our accountants, other than the fees for audit services referenced above.

PRE-APPROVAL POLICY. The Company has not established an audit committee nor adopted an audit committee charter. Rather, it is the responsibility of the entire board of directors to serve the functions of an audit committee and to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors, such approval to take place in advance of such services when required by law, regulation, or rule, subject to the de minimus exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act that are approved by the board prior to completion of the audit.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Financial Statements

The financial statements of Module One RD, Inc. and the report of independent registered public accounting firm thereon are set forth under Part II, Item 8 of this report.

(b) Exhibits.

The following are filed as exhibits to this report:

Exhibit No.	Description	Location Reference
3.1	Articles of Incorporation.		1
3.2	By-laws.		1
4.1	Form of demand promissory note executed by the registrant in favor of Thomas Hurley.		1
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d 14(a), promulgated under the Exchange Act as Amended.		2
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.		2

____________
1. Incorporated by reference to Form 10-SB as filed with the SEC on December 5, 2007.

2. Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on September 27, 2011.

	MODULE ONE RD, INC.

	By:	/s/ Thomas Hurley
		Thomas Hurley, President

	MODULE ONE RD, INC.

September 27, 2011	By:	/s/ Thomas Hurley
		Name: Thomas Hurley
		Title: President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and Sole Director

Module One RD, INC - FORM 10-K - September 28, 2011

Attached files

Module One RD, INC Reports