Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - POWERDYNE INTERNATIONAL, INC. | v235497_ex31-1.htm |
| EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - POWERDYNE INTERNATIONAL, INC. | v235497_ex31-2.htm |
| EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - POWERDYNE INTERNATIONAL, INC. | v235497_ex32-1.htm |
| EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - POWERDYNE INTERNATIONAL, INC. | v235497_ex32-2.htm |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
(Mark One)
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 :
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-53259
POWERDYNE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
20-5572576
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
incorporation or organization)
|
300 Centerville Road
Suite 100E
Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 401/739-3300
Securities registered pursuatn to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
¨ Yes x No
Inidcate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
¨ Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", "non-accelerated filer", and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large Accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer
|
¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company
|
x
|
(do not check if smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨ Yes x No
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
$ 0
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
|
Class
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001
|
189,000,000 shares
|
Documents incorporated by reference: None
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
On December 11, 2010, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to each of Tiber Creek Corporation and IRAA Fin Serv. As part of a change in control effected on December 13, 2010, Greenmark Acquisition Corporation issued 200,000,000 shares of common stock to the following shareholders in the following amounts:
|
Dale P. Euga
|
188,000,000 | |||
|
Arthur M. Read, II, Esq.
|
12,000,000 |
On February 7, 2011, 84,526,666 shares of common stock were contributed by Dale P. Euga to the Company. Mr. Euga received no remuneration or consideration therefor. From February 8, 2011 to March 31, 2011, 68,526,666 shares of common stock were sold by the Company to various shareholders pursuant to previous subscription agreements to purchase or acquire shares or in connection with shares issued to officers and/or consultants in connection with their services for the Company.
On February 7, 2011, Greenmark Acquisition Corporation merged with Powerdyne, Inc. (Nevada). Powerdyne, Inc. ( Nevada) was formed in February 2010 in the State of Nevada and had limited operations. Greenmark Acquisition Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware in September 2006 and was a development stage company. As part of that merger, Greenmark Acquisition Corporation, the surviving corporation, changed its name to Powerdyne International, Inc. (the "Company"). The merger was effectuated as a statutory merger, and a certificate of merger was filed in the State of Delaware effecting the transaction.
Products
The Company is a development stage company and has no operating history and has experienced losses since its inception. The Company’s independent auditors have issued a report questioning the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company plans to manufacture, install, maintain and lease its own portable electrical power equipment (for which the Company has applied for a patent). The Company plans to manufacture portable electrical power equipment intended to be installed at client locations. The Company will own, maintain and lease the equipment to the customer who will use it to produce its own supplemental electrical power. The Company’s products are intended to be portable, easy-to-use units that can be conveniently redeployed in various locations around the world. The Company’s units can also be assembled and combined to produce power centers providing up to 50 megawatts of power.
The Company’s product ‘genset’ unit (PDIGenset) is a self contained generator that is powered by a modified radial air cooled engine to drive a minimum of a 1-megawatt generator. The entire unit, which runs on natural gas or propane, is compact, lightweight and clean burning. As a result, the unit produces extremely low emissions and is extremely energy-efficient.
To meet the demand for a reliable and powerful prime mover, the concept of using a radial air cooled direct drive motor was the obvious starting point for the Company’s research and development efforts. From there, new internal mechanical components, fuel delivery systems, and a highly advanced electrical component package have been designed, fabricated and tested to create an extremely efficient and powerful engine that has a 16,000 hour (minimum) performance capacity on gaseous fuels. The engine casing has been redesigned to operate in a multi-fuel capacity with natural gas being the most common application. The radial design allows for efficient operations with a very compact unit. As a result of the specialized fuel delivery system and special lubricants, the engine has full power capabilities up to 20,000 feet above sea-level without de-rating. The radial concept also provides immediate access to any section of the motor should an isolated adjustment or repair be needed. Other efficiencies of this type of motor include condensed configuration, weight benefits, rebuild/refit characteristics, physical small size, the availability of core parts, minimal manpower needs for handling and component interchange characteristics.
The basic product unit, the PDIGenset, produces 1-megawatt of power 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, all year round, and has an expected operational life of 20,000 hours before rebuild or replacement of the prime mover. Units can be leveraged to produce up to 10-megawatts (recommended for small power plants) for each power source block.
All electrical generation equipment consists of three basic components: a generator, electrical control switchgear, and a prime mover. Generators are a shelf item and ordered from multiple manufacturers based on the specifications of the end user.
All switchgear is custom made for each of the Company’s “gensets” to make the power dovetail with the existing power grid or user requirements.
The prime mover in all power generator systems is the power source that turns the generator. It can be water-driven (as in a hydroelectric dam), steam-driven (as in a turbine), jet turbine-driven, diesel motor-driven, wind-driven turbine or driven by any other form of internal combustion engine. The efficiency of the prime mover is the critical element of all electrical power generation equipment.
The idea for using an air cooled radial engine to drive a generator posed operating difficulties due to the fact that the engine was not designed to run on gaseous fuels. Therefore, a completely new system for delivering a gaseous fuel to the engine had to be invented and developed. The Company's president and promoter, Dale P. Euga, pioneered a new system capable of delivering the gaseous fuel to the engine. Further testing and modifications have produced a solid state unit that efficiently delivers the fuel to the engine, resulting in a strong and reliable engine that can operate on any gaseous fuel with a sustained engine life and maximum horsepower.
The basis of the Company’s overall business is founded on the ability to produce electrical power using proprietary technology to power electrical generation equipment which generates electricity at a much lower cost than the existing means of producing or providing primary electric power. The Company expects that the difference between its cost to produce electrical power and the current billing rate of existing local utility providers presents a sizable cost savings for customers and revenue opportunity for the Company.
The Company has recently completed the building of a prototype of the PDIGenset. Previously, prior to the formation of the Company, the Company’s founder and CEO independently produced and tested an earlier version of the current prototype.
Prototypes
The current prototype (designated as a Series 2 prototype) has completed the final phases of testing. The earlier version of the prototype (Series 1 prototype) was tested and results obtained from the bench testing of this earlier Series 1 prototype version.
The testing of the Series 1 prototype occurred in 2006 and consisted of tests related to fuel consumption, oil consumption, cylinder head temperature, oil temperature, and torque. The tests were recorded in an engine log book in 2006. Such tests were performed by Anderson Aeromotive (a Federal Aviation Administration certified engine repair and overhaul facility) in Grangeville, Idaho. The findings from these tests are used herein by the Company as a basis to its financial assumptions, business model, product estimates and overall business plan. Subsequent to these tests, the Series 1 version of the prototype was disassembled; however, the Company has retained all of the relevant test results from the Series 1 prototype. The Series 1 prototype was disassembled by the Company as a precautionary measure to ensure that a third party could not discover or misappropriate the prototype system. The disassembled Series 1 prototype remains stored in Idaho for the Company.
The Series 1 prototype used an earlier version of an air cooled radial aircraft engine; however, the Company believes that the test results did confirm the business model that the Company currently intends to pursue. At present, the Company has completed the major construction of its Series 2 prototype. The Series 2 prototype uses a later model of the aircraft engine used in the Series 1 prototype. The Series 2 prototype (as tested) operates with greater efficiency, and has produced better bench test results, than the Series 1 prototype, due to the improvements in the design of the aircraft engine being used as well as improvements made by the Company to the design of the prototype itself.
During 2011, the Company developed and tested a variety of components (transmission elements) to have the engine effectively and efficiently drive the generator of the Series 2 prototype. The Company recently completed a fully operational factory Series 2 prototype, which is test certified and ready as a demonstration unit. This unit is available for any prospective customer to view in full operational capacity. In addition, the Series 2 prototype is ready to be manufactured for customer upon placement of customer orders.
Markets
The initial deployment concept of the business is focused on large niche markets where the existing production of electricity comes at a very high cost. The Company’s ability to generate this electricity so efficiently with its product unit, at a reasonable cost, is as a result of the efficiencies of the Company’s prime mover (engine) and the other components of the system.
The Company intends to market and distribute its products worldwide. However, initially the Company has directed its plan of initial operations and market entry to the State of Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the nation of the Dominican Republic.
As it intends to provide remote, independent and cost efficient primary electrical power generating systems, the Company’s potential customers include a variety of small independent utility companies, mining operations, manufacturing centers, and commercial enterprises worldwide. The Company plans to build portable generator equipment specific to its clients’ specifications which thereafter generates electrical power for the customer to run its facility, operation or other power needs. The Company expects that in many markets any excess electricity generated can be sold by the customer to its primary electrical utility, thereby reducing the customer’s operating costs.
The applications for all PDIGenset units is primary or supplemental electrical power generation on site using the Company’s specially modified and remanufactured engine (green technology). In addition, based on interchangeable component design, the Company’s products can operate in extreme operating conditions, such as frigid cold and at high altitudes. The PDIGenset conveniently fits inside a standard shipping container.
The Company will provide a viable alternative for local utilities to reduce the demand on the primary grid by using the Company’s equipment and power, therefore increasing the limits and capabilities of the primary grid. By opting to use the Company’s equipment, the customer solves several problems at once. First, the expensive and polluting diesel units are replaced with cost efficient, small, green gensets. Second, the customer’s cost to produce the electrical power is substantially reduced. Third, cost savings produce excess cash for the customer. Fourth, maintenance is provided exclusively by the Company, thereby allowing the customer to reduce its workforce. Fifth, the tank farms and all other diesel support equipment can be dismantled and removed from the sites. This concept is designed to dovetail with the power company’s plans of action currently envisioned and being implemented by the local utilities. Sixth, excess generation capacity can be used to sell electricity to most regulated electrical utilities for positive cash flow.
The Market
The Company initially plans to enter selected target markets, namely Alaska, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, the Caribbean Basin and South America.
The Company’s market is global and the primary use of the PDIGenset is focused toward commercial, manufacturing and mining operations, and any other existing independent power generation application that employs a diesel engine to drive a generator. Most mine operations, especially in South America, are over 5,000 feet above sea level and in remote locations. At these high altitudes several diesel engines are required to run a single generator whereas only one of the Company’s genset units would be needed to drive the same generator. The Company intends to lease power stations that allow customers to generate electricity on a 24/7 basis and deliver that power, in concert with existing utility companies, into their existing grids.
Electronic controls and monitoring sensors provide another level of technological sophistication for the user wherein the unit can be operated worldwide from any remote headquarters location. The PDIGenset is also equipped with internal “black box technology” that continuously reports streaming data to a central control 24/7 providing security and performance threshold monitoring when the unit is in operation or idle.
In smaller electrical generation locations throughout the world, the units currently in place are driven by a conventional diesel motor. In the past, the diesels were chosen for two reasons: (1) they were widely available; and (2) diesel fuel was available and cheap. These operational cost elements, in addition to the cost of the hardware, were simply passed on to the consumer. The inherent nature of diesel engines coupled with the high cost of diesel fuel made this type of pollution prone power generation system to be outmoded, expensive and a source of environmental pollution as well as noise. Hence, the Company’s flagship product, the PDIGenset, is well-positioned to provide an effective replacement solution for the needs of the marketplace.
In addition, extreme weather conditions, such as is found in the Alaskan environment with its harsh and extreme cold weather conditions, plague diesel operations and other liquid fuel equipment with many logistical and operational problems. Large tank farms with exposed piping and valves are needed to constantly feed the powerhouse generators. It is common to have the fuel thicken or to have the valves freeze, to a point where the diesel fuel will not flow. Compounding these issues, there are other problems associated with the quality of the fuel and any additives that may have been added. It is common in the winter to see teams with blowtorches thawing the valves and heating the pipes to get the fuel to start flowing. These dangerous practices are nonexistent with the PDIGenset. Tank farms age and leak therein polluting the ground and causing other long term environmental problems. Diesel exhaust is also a major atmospheric pollutant. For all of these reasons cited above, various jurisdictions (such as Alaska) mandate that diesel equipment be replaced and the tank farms dismantled.
Pollution, global warming, energy efficiencies, green technology and other industry parameters have begun to severely impact the nation and the planet. The ever increasing demand for electrical power worldwide necessitates an effective system that can meet these demands. The concept and demand for local independent electrical power generation is dramatically increasing and it is in this domain and market demand where the PDIGenset excels. In essence, the PDIGenset, with its ease-of-use, efficiency and performance characteristics, is an extremely viable option for almost any power market around the globe.
Competition
The Company believes that because of the operational characteristics of its engine and systems the PDIGenset is positioned to compete effectively against other genset manufacturers, all of whom produce standard diesel driven gensets. Other power production systems involving wind turbines, jet (gas) turbines, steam, coal-fired, and hydroelectric are not a competitive factor because of the size of the systems and the high capital cost of constructing these systems.
Cummings, Morse Diesel, Kohler, Volvo and Detroit Diesel also make engines that produce enough horsepower to drive respective competing 1- megawatt generators, however, all of these products are diesel equipment or diesel with natural gas augmentation or conversion. Diesel engines have been abundantly available since the 1910s and diesel fuel was cheap until the late 1990s. The basic radial engine is mature technology but was unable to operate efficiently on natural gas or propane. Aviation fuel cost three to ten times more than diesel fuel, and, hence, radial engines were not used as prime movers.
The Company has developed a solid state, self contained unit (GFD System, patent pending) which first made radial engines a viable alternative to diesels because they could now run efficiently on natural gas, propane, methane, ethane, hydrogen, and bio-fuels. The Company’s product unit inherently provides maximum flexibility and performance, which the Company believes differentiates the product units from competing products and solutions. Accordingly, the Company believes that its product unit is unique and offers a compelling value proposition not currently available in the marketplace.
Intellectual Property
The Company’s intends to protect its intellectual property, trade secrets and proprietary methods and processes.
The Company has applied for a use patent for its product system. This application (#12/662,233), which is currently still pending, was submitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
The Company also plans to apply for an additional U.S. patent for a fuel delivery system. The Company plans to file this patent application in the near future.
Research and Development
The executive officers, advisors and consultant of the Company have a long history of experience and practical application in aircraft technology and have brought their respective and collective knowledge to address the needs for primary electrical power generation in remote locations or extreme conditions. To meet this demand, the concept of using a radial air cooled direct drive motor was the obvious starting point. From there, new internal mechanical components, fuel delivery systems, and a highly advanced electrical component package has been designed, fabricated and tested to create an extremely efficient and powerful engine. The radial design allows for efficient operations with a very compact unit. The radial concept also provides immediate access to any section of the motor should an isolated adjustment or repair be needed.
Other efficiencies of this type of motor include condensed configuration, weight benefits, rebuild/refit characteristics, physical small size, availability of core parts, minimal manpower needs for handling and component interchange characteristics. Internal components and critical technological elements for the engine have been invented or reengineered, developed and installed in the Company’s products. The component concept, operating fuel burn, and overall size of the entire unit, specifically as it relates to the size, weight and noise, are the major advantages of the unit as designed by the Company. The intention with the PDIGenset is that the motor (the prime mover) can be easily interchangeable at no cost to the user when scheduled as part of a maintenance plan. Unlike a diesel system that will require at least one to three weeks downtime for an engine overhaul in place, the PDIGenset unit requires only four to six hours to remove and replace the spent unit with a fresh motor.
Based on 60 years of validated historical data, and the Company’s own recent engine testing in January 2010, this Company’s engine consumes approximately 85 gallons of aviation fuel per hour at 1800 rpm. The consumption of propane per gallon is almost identical to aviation gas consumption, and therefore, the quantity assumed in the calculations will be the same.
Employees
The Company presently has three (3) employees and a total of five (5) executive officers. Mr. Euga, Mr. Caromile and Ms. Madison receive a salary; the remaining officers receive no salaries or other compensation. The remaining officers will not receive any compensation until, and if, the Company raises or procures adequate capital (through operations, financings or otherwise) to pay such compensation. Of the Company’s officers, only Mr. Euga, Mr. Barton and Mr. Caromile are employed by the Company in a full-time capacity. The Company has no other employees but expects that it will hire additional personnel upon raising additional capital and as the Company expands.
Subsidiaries
The Company has no subsidiaries.
Distribution
The PDIGenset unit can be fitted comfortably inside an 8’x8’x 30’ (40’ with a survival chamber) box; about the size of a shipping container or medium size box truck. This compact size allows for easy handling, transport and delivery, and thereby also making the unit ideal for a portable power station, even on the back of a truck, if necessary, anywhere in the world.
The Company intends to ship product units around the world, FOB Massachusetts. Delivery time for most product units to any location can be as quick as 90 days from initial order to full operation on site based on the availability of generators. Upon arrival at the user’s site, the package can be easily off-loaded, maneuvered, and interfaced with the existing power configuration.
Reports to Security Holders
In 2008, the Company (as Greenmark Acquisition Corporation) filed a Form 10-SB registration statement pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a reporting company pursuant such Act and files with the Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports and management shareholding information. The Company intends to deliver a copy of its annual report to its security holders, and will voluntarily send a copy of the annual report, including audited financial statements, to any registered shareholder who requests the same.
The Company's documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be inspected at the Commission's principal office in Washington, D.C. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. All of the Company’s filings may be located under the CIK number 0001435617.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The corporate headquarters of the Company are located in Warwick, Rhode Island. In the near future, the Company plans to open an additional regional office in San Juan, Puerto Rico. These locations will initially be administrative in nature and eventually expand as the market demands to become fabrication sites.
All engines will be built in an engine shop in Massachusetts for the purpose of quality control. Originally, the Company had planned to conduct manufacturing out of the premises owned by Bigelow Electric Co. in Worcester, Massachusetts. Recently, the Company instead decided to use the manufacturing factory of Imperia Corporation located in West Bridgewater, Massachusetts. The Company currently occupies a portion of these premises, and will be entering, but has not yet entered, into a short-term lease for the premises. The expected term of the lease will be for three months at a rate of approximately $300.00 per month. The lease is expected to be renewable in three-month terms for up to five years, at the Company’s discretion. The Company will also have the ability to choose as part of its anticipated lease for rent to accrue in arrears until such time as the Company has sufficient cash or chooses to pay rent balances. Imperia Corporation is owned by Mr. Barton, an officer of the Company.
As the orders for products increase, it would become logistically prudent to have an assembly site in Puerto Rico and Alaska to serve the needs in those regions. Engines will continue to be manufactured in Massachusetts. The Company believes that the importance of quality control for the production of the engines cannot be understated. The Company believes that its manufacturing facilities and arrangements thereof are sufficiently adequate to allow the Company to undertake its operations and business in the near term.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are currently no pending, threatened or actual legal proceedings in which the Company or any subsidiary is a party, except as set forth directly below.
The Company has asserted a claim against a former employee for $5,000.00 for funds advanced to the former employee. The former employee has asserted a claim against the Company in response. It is the opinion of the Company’s legal counsel that the former employee’s claim is meritless and is only an attempt to avoid paying the Company’s demand for $5,000.00.
ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)
PART II
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
There is no public market for the Company’s common stock. The Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-1 pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 for the offer and sale by selling shareholders of up to 69,818,500 shares of its common stock. The registration statement is not yet effective and the Company cannot predict when, if at all, such registration statement will become effective. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the offering.
On December 11, 2010, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of its common stock in addition to the then outstanding 1,000,000 shares of common stock. As part of the change in control effected on December 13, 2010, the Company issued 200,000,000 shares of common stock to the following shareholders in the following amounts:
|
Dale P. Euga
|
188,000,000 | |||
|
Arthur M. Read, II
|
12,000,000 |
On February 7, 2011, Greenmark Acquisition Corporation merged with Powerdyne, Inc. (Nevada). Powerdyne, Inc. ( Nevada) was formed in February 2010 in the State of Nevada and had limited operations. Greenmark Acquisition Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware in September 2006 and was a development stage company. As part of that merger, Greenmark Acquisition Corporation, the surviving corporation, changed its name to Powerdyne International, Inc. (the "Company").
On February 7, 2011, Mr. Euga contributed back to the Company 84,526,666 shares of common stock without remuneration.. The Company subsequently issued 68,526,666 shares to officers, directors, and private investors.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
There is no selected financial data required to be filed for a smaller reporting company.
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
The Company is a development stage company and was incorporated in the State of Delaware in September 2006 and merged with Powerdyne, Inc., a Nevada corporation in February 2011. As Greenmark Acquisition, the Company had no operations or specific business plan until the merger which is subsequent to the date of this report, the information discussed below speaks to the Company subsequent to the date of the merger and references to the financial condition are to Powerdyne Nevada, which merged into the Company as a result of the merger.
From Powerdyne Nevada's inception (February 2, 2010) through December 31, 2010, it had no revenues and incurred operating losses of $146,270. Powerdyne Nevada focused its efforts on conducting product research and development.
Revenues
Currently, the Company has no revenues and has not realized any profits. In order to succeed, the Company needs to develop a viable strategy to market and distribute its products to end customers. The Company has developed a marketing strategy that it believes will lead to near-term revenues in the Caribbean Basin, and thereafter, in Alaska and South America.
The Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-1 for the sale by selling shareholders of 69,818,500 shares of the common stock of the Company at an offering price of $0.15 per share. The offering has not yet been declared effective and no sales have been made pursuant to such offering. The Company will not realize any proceeds from the offering.
In order to succeed, the Company needs to develop a viable strategy to market and distribute its products to end customers. The Company has developed a marketing strategy that it believes will lead to near-term revenues in the Caribbean Basin, and thereafter, in Alaska and South America.
Equipment Financing
The Company has a written engagement letter with MBA, by which MBA will act as the Company’s financial advisor to assist the Company in establishing a $5.0 million equipment financing program. If such an equipment financing facility is ultimately established, the program would allow the Company to potentially obtain its needed equipment financing.
The Company is also in the process of attempting to secure a commitment to provide financing for the construction of equipment subject to contract orders should the Company need any additional financing. This arrangement (if consummated) will position the Company on sound financial footing by bolstering the financial capability of the Company to meet its manufacturing commitments and schedules. The funds would be provided on a contract by contract basis wherein 65% of the total unit cost would be made available as a credit line with a UCC commercial lien on the unit. The terms of each order would provide that the buyer pay 55% of the unit cost at contract signing, 35% upon completion of construction and bench test certification, and the 10% balance upon installation and start-up.
Pricing
PDIGenset is priced to meet the customer’s needs. A 1-megawatt PDIGenset will be leased for a five year term, pursuant to a Master Equipment Lease that will provide for an initial deposit of $750,000, a monthly maintenance fee calculated at the rate of $0.015/kilowatt-hour and a monthly lease calculated at a rate per kilowatt-hour which will be dependent upon local fuel cost. In any event, the Company anticipates that the cost to the customer will be substantially lower than that which the customer is then paying to any local utility provider.
Potential Revenue
The Company’s primary source of revenues in the near term will be from leases or payment streams based on the Company’s product units. The Company’s business model proposes that each product unit be leased to a third party that will be responsible for the payment to the Company on a leasehold basis for each location.
Revenues for the Company will be generally based on lease payments which are based upon the maximum power which the particular genset is capable of generating. Units are constructed under terms and conditions of a contract and installed specifically to meet the customer’s needs. The customer pays the Company each month on a flat rate basis. In addition, the customer pays a maintenance fee as well as an initial deposit which allows the construction of the genset unit.
Each product unit is custom-made for the specific application and therefore the client power company pays for the construction and installation of the unit in advance. This cost is credited against power that is produced by the Company’s units until that credit is exhausted. Thereafter, the power is paid for on a monthly basis in accordance with the rate per kilowatt-hour that is agreed upon by the parties. The Company and/or the client may receive tax credits from the use of the Company’s products, and the parties will agree to share such tax benefits with each other.
Further, maintenance is performed exclusively by the Company and constitutes a part of the expected recurring revenue stream to the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires making estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying financial statements. The Company is classified as a development stage enterprise under GAAP and has not generated significant revenues from its principal operations.
Share-based Payments
The Company intends to periodically issue shares of common stock to employees and non-employees for services. Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period.
Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 350-30 (formerly SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), the Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their then carrying values may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company’s management currently believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.
Development Stage and Capital Resources
Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its efforts to business planning, research and development, recruiting management and technical staff and raising capital. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage. The Company has not generated revenues from its operations, and there is no assurance of future revenues. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit from inception of approximately $146,270.
The Company’s activities will necessitate significant uses of working capital beyond 2011. Near term capital requirements will include employee costs, prototype refinement and testing costs and sales and marketing costs, and such expenses are expected to total approximately $7,000 per month in the near-term. Additionally, the Company’s capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the success of the Company’s continued research and development efforts and the status of competitive products. The Company plans to continue financing its operations with cash received from financing activities. The Company currently incurs, and expects to continue to incur, a monthly cash expense of approximately $3,000 to $5,000 (which consists of minimal employee costs and a minimal level of prototype testing and refinement activity).
There is no assurance that the Company’s activities will generate sufficient revenues to sustain its operations without additional capital, or if additional capital is needed, that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company.
Discussion of Period Ended December 31, 2010
The Company incurred a net loss of $146,270 for the period ended December 31, 2010, with general and administrative expenses of $146,270. The Company received no revenue in such period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the period ended December 31, 2010 were $146,270, with total selling, general and administrative expenses from inception to December 31, 2010 totaling $146,270. These amounts consisted of: $75,000 for professional services (primarily related to the Company’s plans to become a public company and seek public registration of its securities); $26,280 for legal and accounting services; $14,000 for consulting services; and the remainder for a variety of items (including automobiles, employee salaries and expenses, materials, travel and supplies).
Liquidity. The Company received $130,985 from the private sale of its stock in the period from February 2, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. The Company has no continuous methods of generating cash.
Capital Resources. The Company did not incur any capital expenditures other than the purchase of machinery and equipment in 2010 in the aggregate amount of $21,793.
Results of Operations. The Company completed no sales and received no revenues in the period from inception through December 31, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that it will generate revenue sufficient to cover its operating expenses until the close of this offering and the development of its business plan.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 for Greenmark Acquisition Corporation and Powerdyne, Inc. (Nevada) are attached to this report.
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
On November 14, 2010, the Company changed its accounting firm. The Company had no disagreements on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure or audit scope or procedure with the former accountant. The company filed a Form 8-K reporting the change in accountants.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Pursuant to Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules. This evaluation was done as of the end of the fiscal year under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, they believe that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in gathering, analyzing and disclosing information needed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports is recorded, summarized and processed timely. Both officers are directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company.
Management's Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's president and principal financial and accounting officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria establish in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treaedway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010, based on those criteria. A control system can provide only reasonably, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues have
been detected.
Anton & Chia the independent registered public accounting firm, has not issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company effected a change in control on December 13, 2010 resulting in the resignation of the then sole officer and director. New officers and directors are now in charge of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting but have not made any changes during its fourth fiscal quarter that materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following table sets forth information regarding the members of the Company’s board of directors and its executive officers:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Year Commenced
|
|
Dale P. Euga
|
64
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director; Promoter
|
2010
|
|
Arthur M. Read, II, Esq.
|
65
|
Vice President, Assistant Secretary, General Counsel and Director
|
2010
|
|
Edwin S. Barton, II
|
65
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
2010
|
|
Stephen L. Caromile
|
30
|
Vice President, Lead Engineer
|
2010
|
|
Linda H. Madison
|
64
|
Secretary
|
2011
|
Dale P. Euga
Dale P. Euga serves as the chief executive officer, president and a director of the Company, and is a promoter of the Company. From 1967 to 1971, Mr. Euga served in the United States Army completing his service as commander of a Special Forces A-Team and retiring with a distinguished and honorable record. Mr. Euga graduated in 1976 from The Boston Architectural College with a degree in Architecture. From 1976 through 1988, Mr. Euga taught a design studio at the Boston Architectural College. He became a Registered Architect in 1980 and was further NCARB Certified in 1985 while owning and managing a very successful architectural firm in Boston. In 1988 Mr. Euga formed ComVest International Inc., which was responsible for the Organization and Financial Management for International Projects such as the overview of the construction of Mersa-Matruh Power and Desalination plant for the Government of Egypt. Mr. Euga also directly arranged acquisition and construction financing and oversaw the construction of industrial, manufacturing and resort facilities in Panama, Netherlands, Belize, Bermuda and Spain, in addition to Mr. Euga worked as the coordinator and overseer for the lenders. In 1996 in concert with ComVest International Inc. Mr. Euga founded and managed Suburban Mortgage Company and built the company into 60 brokers, 12 processors, and 18 insurance agents plus a quality control team, and administrative staff. This complete full spectrum financial service company with 92 employees was acquired by Directors Mortgage Company (CA) in 2002. From 2002 until the formation of Powerdyne, Inc., a Nevada company, Mr. Euga was focused on independently developing the underlying product concepts related to the PDIGenset. Since the inception of Powerdyne, Inc., a Nevada company, Mr. Euga has focused on specializing on the company's primary design and technological development of the engine and support systems and development and testing of fuel systems in support of the application to power generation. He has also been involved with the company organization and facilities procurement including client development, development of key staff, and continuing research and development of engine and electrical components. Mr. Euga remains very active with the Special Forces Association in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.
Arthur M. Read, II, Esq.
Arthur M. Read, II, Esq., serves as vice president, general counsel and as a director of the Company. Mr. Read received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Bethany College in 1968, and his Masters of Arts from University of Rhode Island in 1971 and his Juris Doctor from Boston University in 1972. From1972-2001, Mr. Read started as an Associate, then stockholder and Vice-President of Gorham & Gorham, an established Rhode Island law firm, at which he was engaged in the general practice of law with an emphasis on litigation, family law and divorce litigation, extensive appellate practice, commercial and business matters, municipal law (including representation of municipalities and school committees, municipal boards and agencies), negligence, estate planning and administration. From 1974-75, Mr. Read was appointed by the Hon. Richard J. Israel (Ret.) (then Attorney General and, later, Associate Justice of the Superior Court) as a Special Assistant Attorney General. In 2001, Mr. Read formed his own law practice. Mr. Read is admitted to Rhode Island Supreme Court; United States District Court, District of Rhode Island; United States Supreme Court; United States Tax Court; and United States Court of Appeals. Mr. Read is a member of the Rhode Island Bar Association, Rhode Island Trial Lawyers’ Association, and American Trial Lawyers’ Association.
Edwin S. Barton, II
Edwin S. Barton II serves as chief operating officer of the Company. Mr. Barton is a seasoned corporate executive with 35 years of professional experience. Previously, he served as Vice President and Director of Rico, Inc., a Rhode Island manufacturing company, and President of Imperia, Inc., a Massachusetts millwork and high-end manufacturer and distributor.
Stephen L. Caromile
Stephen L. Caromile serves as vice president and lead engineer of the Company. Mr. Caromile received a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Wentworth Institute of Technology in 1997. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Caromile was a process engineer and cell manager for the repair of jet turbine components at Chromalloy in California. In 2001and 2002, Mr. Caromile was associated with Hamor & Associates in Maine. From 2002 to 2010, Mr. Caromile was a design engineer for land use planning with CES, Inc. in Maine. In this capacity, Mr. Caromile completed land development plans for sub-division and also participated in safety management, information technology and field surveillance. Since 2010, Mr. Caromile has worked with the Company and has designed and engineered components of the Company’s products and systems, including supervising fabrication and production of the prototype unit.
Linda H. Madison
Linda H. Madison serves as secretary of the Company. Mrs. Madison is a graduate of Mineola High School, Mineola, New York, and has served as the Administrative Assistant to the Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of Masons for the State of Rhode Island where she was responsible for human resources, information technology, office coordination, publishing its various publications, maintaining and designing complex data bases. She previously worked as the Executive Secretary and bookkeeper for a large investment advisory firm in Rhode Island.
Director Independence
Pursuant to Rule 4200 of The NASDAQ Stock Market one of the definitions of an independent director is a person other than an executive officer or employee of a company. The Company's board of directors has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of the directors has with the Company, either directly or indirectly. Based on this review, the board has determined that there are no independent directors.
Committees and Terms
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) has not established any committees.
The Company will notify its stockholders for an annual shareholder meeting and that they may present proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement to be mailed in connection with any such annual meeting; such proposals must be received by the Company at least 90 days prior to the meeting. No other specific policy has been adopted in regard to the inclusion of shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no binding guidelines or procedures for resolving potential conflicts of interest. Failure by management to resolve conflicts of interest in favor of the Company could result in liability of management to the Company. However, any attempt by shareholders to enforce a liability of management to the Company would most likely be prohibitively expensive and time consuming.
Code of Ethics
The Company has not at this time adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to rules described in Regulation S-K. The Company has no operations or business and does not have any revenues. The Company intends to adopt a Code of Ethics to provide a manner of conduct. Because the Company does not have any activities, there are no activities or transactions which would be subject to this code. Finally the vice president of the Company is an attorney at law and subject to the ethical code established by the bars in which he is also a member. At the time the Company completes its initial public offering of securities, management anticipates that it will adopt such a code.
Corporate Governance
For reasons similar to those described above, the Company does not have a nominating nor audit committee of the board of directors. The board of Directors consists of two directors. The Company has no activities, and receives no revenues. At such time that the Company has a larger , board of directors and commences activities, the Company will propose creating committees of its board of directors, including both a nominating and an audit committee.
Legal Proceedings
There are currently no pending, threatened or actual legal proceedings in which the Company or any subsidiary is a party, except as set forth directly below.
The Company has asserted a claim against a former employee for $5,000.00 for funds advanced to the former employee. The former employee has asserted a claim against the Company in response. It is the opinion of the Company’s legal counsel that the former employee’s claim is meritless and is only an attempt to avoid paying the Company’s demand for $5,000.00.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Description of Compensation Table
|
Name/Position
|
Year
|
Annual
Payments
Salary
|
Annual
Payments
Made
|
Aggregate
Accrued
Salary Since Inception
|
Bonus
|
Stock & Options
|
Compensation Plans
|
All
Other Compensation
|
Annual
Compensation
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dale P. Euga
|
2011
|
$ | 0 | 0 | 62,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
President
|
2010
|
$ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
During 2011, accrued compensation is due to the Company’s management in the total amount of $146,814.77, representing the total from accruals of compensation made for each of the five executive officers during the first quarter of 2011. As of April 1, 2011, no further accruals of compensation have been made or are planned to be made. With respect to executive officers other than the principal executive officer, no such executive officer has received cash compensation in excess of $100,000 in the Company's fiscal year which ended as of December 31, 2010. Upon successful completion by the Company of a public offering in the future, however, certain management personnel will receive such compensation as is discussed below in “Anticipated Officer and Director Remuneration”.
Other than as discussed herein with respect to Mr. Euga, Mr. Caromile and Ms. Madison, there are no current plans to pay or distribute cash or non-cash bonus compensation for fiscal year 2011 to officers of the Company. However, the Board of Directors may allocate salaries and benefits to the officers for fiscal year 2011 and thereafter in its sole discretion. No such person is subject to a compensation plan or arrangement that results from his or her resignation, retirement, or any other termination of employment with the company or from a change in control of the company or a change in his or her responsibilities following a change in control. The members of the board of directors may receive, if the board of directors so decides, a fixed fee and reimbursement of expenses, for attendance at each regular or special meeting of the board of directors, although no such program has been adopted to date. The Company currently has no retirement, pension, or profit-sharing plan covering its officers and directors; however, the Company plans to implement certain such benefits after sufficient funds are realized or raised by the Company (see “Anticipated Officer and Director Remuneration” below.)
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of its officers. In addition, each of Mr. Euga, Mr. Caromile and Mrs. Madison are currently being paid a salary in order to ensure their respective availability to the Company.
Anticipated Officer and Director Remuneration
Other than as set forth above, the Company has not paid any compensation to any officer or director. The Company intends to pay annual salaries to all its officers and will pay an annual stipend to its directors when, and if, it completes a primary offering for the sale of securities. At such time, the Company anticipates offering cash and non-cash compensation to officers and directors.
Although not presently offered, the Company anticipates that its officers and directors will be provided with a group health, vision and dental insurance program at subsidizes rates, or at the sole expense of the Company, as may be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Company in its sole discretion. In addition, the Company plans to offer 401(k) matching funds as a retirement benefit, paid vacation days and paid holidays.
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by each of its executive officers and directors, individually and as a group and by each person who beneficially owns in excess of five percent of the common stock after giving effect to any exercise of warrants or options held by that person.
|
Number of Shares of
|
Percent of
|
||||||||
|
Name
|
Position
|
Common Stock
|
Class
|
||||||
|
Dale P. Euga
|
President and Director
|
103,473,334 | 55 | % | |||||
|
Arthur M. Read, II, Esq.
|
Vice President and Director
|
12,000,000 | 6.3 | % | |||||
|
Edwin S. Barton, II
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
6,833,333 | 3.6 | % | |||||
|
Stephen L. Caromile
|
Vice President
|
6,000,000 | 3.2 | % | |||||
|
Linda H. Madison
|
Secretary
|
1,000,000 | * | ||||||
|
Eric Foster
|
18,000,000 | 9.5 | % | ||||||
|
Total owned by officers, directors and 5% shareholders
|
148,890,000 | 79 | % | ||||||
* Less than 1%
(1) Based upon 189,000,000 shares outstanding
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
A partner in the law firm which acts as counsel to the Company is the sole owner and director of Tiber Creek Corporation which owns 2,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock.
From time to time, the Company makes payments for the benefit of its sole stockholder, which are personal in nature, as well as receives payments from the sole stockholder in the form of cash and/or out-of-pocket expenditures for the benefit of the Company, which are business in nature. The balance of advances from stockholder was $2,975 and the balance of advances to stockholder was $4,369 as of December 31, 2010.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees incurred for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the audits of the Company's annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-K and Form 10-Q reports and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were as follows:
|
December 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||
|
$
|
13,850
|
$
|
3,000
|
|||
Tax Fees
The Company incurred $0 for tax related services.
All Other Fees
The Company incurred $0 for other fees by the principal accountant for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Company does not currently have an audit committee serving and as a result its board of directors performs the duties of an audit committee. The board of directors will evaluate and approve in advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. The Company does not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
There are no financial statement schedules nor exhibits filed herewith. The exhibits filed in earlier reports and the Company's Form 10-SB are incorporated herein by reference.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Rep Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-1
|
|
|
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
F-2
|
|
|
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the Period from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
F-3
|
|
|
Stat Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Period from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
F-4
|
|
|
Stat Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for the Period from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
F-5
|
|
|
Not Notes to Financial Statements
|
F6-F9
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Greenmark Acquisition Corporation
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Greenmark Acquisition Corporation (a development stage company) (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from September 13, 2006 (Inception) through December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of Greenmark Acquisition Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has a loss from operations and an accumulated deficit of $5,317 from September 13, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2010. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, a significant amount of additional capital will be necessary to advance operations to the point at which the Company is profitable. These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 1 and the subsequent events. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Anton & Chia, LLP
Newport Beach, CA
March 16, 2011
F-1
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||||||
|
Current Assets
|
||||||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 500 | $ | 500 | ||||
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | 500 | $ | 500 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT
|
||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
||||||||
|
Accrued liabilities
|
$ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | ||||
|
Total liabilities
|
3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||
|
Stockholders' deficit
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock; $.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
100 | 100 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
2,717 | 2,717 | ||||||
|
Deficit accumulated during development stage
|
(5,317 | ) | (5,317 | ) | ||||
|
Total stockholders' deficit
|
(2,500 | ) | (2,500 | ) | ||||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | 500 | $ | 500 | ||||
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-2
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the Period
from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
For the period from
|
||||||||||||
|
For the Year Ended
|
For the Year Ended
|
September 13, 2006
|
||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
(Inception) to
|
||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||
|
Income
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
|
Expenses
|
||||||||||||
|
Organization expense
|
- | - | 650 | |||||||||
|
Professional Fees
|
- | 2,667 | 4,667 | |||||||||
|
Total expenses
|
- | 2,667 | 5,317 | |||||||||
|
Other Income (Expense)
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | - | $ | (2,667 | ) | $ | (5,317 | ) | ||||
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-3
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
For the Period from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
|
during
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Development
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Stage
|
Equity (Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, September 13, 2006
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
(Date of Inception)
|
- | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Common stock issuance
|
1,000,000 | 100 | 400 | - | 500 | |||||||||||||||
|
Fair value of expenses contributed
|
535 | 535 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(535 | ) | (535 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
1,000,000 | $ | 100 | $ | 935 | $ | (535 | ) | $ | 500 | ||||||||||
|
Fair value of expenses contributed
|
115 | 115 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(115 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
1,000,000 | $ | 100 | $ | 1,050 | $ | (650 | ) | $ | 500 | ||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(2,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
1,000,000 | $ | 100 | $ | 1,050 | $ | (2,650 | ) | $ | (1,500 | ) | |||||||||
|
Fair value of expenses contributed
|
1,667 | 1,667 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
(2,667 | ) | (2,667 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
1,000,000 | $ | 100 | $ | 2,717 | $ | (5,317 | ) | $ | (2,500 | ) | |||||||||
|
Net loss
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
1,000,000 | $ | 100 | $ | 2,717 | $ | (5,317 | ) | $ | (2,500 | ) | |||||||||
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-4
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the Period
from September 13, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
For the Year
|
For the Year
|
For the Period from
|
||||||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
September 13, 2006
|
||||||||||
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
(Inception) to
|
||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | - | $ | (2,667 | ) | $ | (5,317 | ) | ||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities
|
||||||||||||
|
Contributed organizationl expenses
|
- | - | 650 | |||||||||
|
Contriubed professional fees
|
- | 1,667 | 1,667 | |||||||||
|
Increase in liabilities
|
- | 1,000 | 3,000 | |||||||||
|
Net cash used In operating activities
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | - | - | - | |||||||||
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
- | - | 500 | |||||||||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
- | - | 500 | |||||||||
|
Net Increase in Cash
|
- | - | 500 | |||||||||
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
500 | 500 | - | |||||||||
|
Cash at end of period
|
$ | 500 | $ | 500 | $ | 500 | ||||||
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-5
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2010 and 2009
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
(A) Organization and Business Operations
Greenmark Acquisition Corporation (a development stage company) ("the Company") was incorporated in Delaware on September 13, 2006, to serve as a vehicle to effect a merger, exchange of capital stock, asset acquisition or other business combination with a domestic or foreign private business. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had not yet commenced any formal business operations, and all activity to date relates to the Company's formation.
On February 7, 2011, the Company changed its name to Powerdyne International, Inc.
The Company's ability to commence operations is contingent upon its ability to identify a prospective target business.
(B) Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
(C) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
(D) Taxes
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codifcation ("ASC") 740-10-50-2 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized for future tax consequence attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statement of income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefits, or that future deductibility is uncertain. Losses incurred by Company in prior years provide for a net operating loss carry-forward. However, due to the unpredictability of the Company's future net income, the asset's balance has been fully reserved for.
(E) Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the Untied States of America. The Company has no operations and continues to incur on-going professional fees to maintain its current filings with the SEC. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $5,317 and a working capital deficit of $2,500 as of December 31, 2010. The Company also has a net loss from operations of $0 for the year then ended.
The future success of the Company is dependent on its ability to find and successfully merge with a target business and on the President and/or Tiber Creek Corporation to financially support the Company until that time. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in completing a merger. The President, who is a 50% shareholder in the Company (by virtue of his 100% ownership of Tiber Creek Corporation, a 50% shareholder, see Note 4) has agreed to financially support the on-going expenses of the Company.
F-6
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(F) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. There were no potentially dilutive securities for 2010 and 2009.
(G) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB ASC 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs in measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.
These tiers include:
|
|
·
|
Level 1 - defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2 - defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3 - defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
(H) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on an amendment of accounting for transfers of financial assets, and seeks to improve the relevance and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about transfers of financial assets; the effects of the transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor's continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The authoritative guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies other sale-accounting criteria, and changes the initial measurement of a transferor's interest in transferred financial assets. The authoritative guidance is currently effective. The Company believes adopting the new guidance will not significantly impact its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on consolidation of variable interest entities, which requires an enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The authoritative guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and is currently effective. The Company believes adopting the new guidance will not significantly impact its financial statements.
F-7
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2010 and 2009
In October 2009, the FASB, issued updates to revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables and accounting for revenue arrangements that include software elements. Under the new guidance on arrangements that include software elements, tangible products that have software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software- effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company enabled products will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. The authoritative guidance is believes adopting the new guidance will not significantly impact its financial statements. FASB has codified a single source of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the Accounting Standards Codification. Unless needed to clarify a point to readers, the Company will refrain from citing specific section references when discussing application of accounting principles or addressing new or pending accounting rule changes. There are no recently issued accounting standards that are expected to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.
NOTE 2 INCOME TAXES
There is no provision for income taxes because the Company has incurred net operating losses. There are no deferred tax assets from temporary differences, other than net operating losses, because the Company is still in development stage and only has incurred professional fees in connection with its filings with the SEC. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, of which the timing and amount are uncertain. Therefore, the deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. For 2010, the valuation allowance was same as year 2009. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
$ | 1,808 | $ | 1,808 | ||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
$ | 1,808 | $ | 1,808 | ||||
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
At December 31, 2010 the Company's federal net operating loss carry-forward was $5,317 which will begin to expire in 2026. The availability of the federal net operating loss carry-forward may be subject to limitations based on ownership changes as defined in the United States Internal Revenue Code, which could prevent the Company from realizing some or all of its net operating loss carry-forward.
NOTE 3 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(A) Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock at $.0001 par value, with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.
(B) Common Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock at $.0001 par value. The Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock to Tiber Creek Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and 500,000 shares of its common stock to IRAA Fin Serv, an unincorporated California business entity, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for an aggregate consideration of $500.
F-8
GREENMARK ACQUISITION CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2010 and 2009
NOTE 4 RELATED PARTIES
Legal counsel to the Company is a firm owned by the President of the Company who also owns 100% of the outstanding stock of Tiber Creek Corporation, a 50% shareholder. Tiber Creek Corporation is expected to perform consulting services for the Company in the future. Additional paid-in capital as of December 31, 2010 includes $2,317 the fair value of organization and professional costs incurred by related parties on behalf of the Company.
NOTE 5 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated the subsequent events through March 16, 2011, the date upon which the financial statements were issued.
The Company has entered into an agreement to complete a reverse merger with a private company during the first quarter of 2011.
F-9
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
1
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
2
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
3
|
|
|
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
|
4
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows
|
5
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
6
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Powerdyne, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Powerdyne, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations, stockholder deficit, and cash flows for the period from February 2, 2010 (Inception) through December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Powerdyne, Inc. as of December 31, 2010, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period from February 2, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Anton & Chia, LLP
Newport Beach, California
February 18, 2011
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||
|
ASSETS
|
||||
|
Current Assets:
|
||||
|
Cash
|
$ | 2,059 | ||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
1,817 | |||
|
Advances to Stockholder
|
4,369 | |||
|
Total current assets
|
8,245 | |||
|
Equipment
|
||||
|
Equipment
|
21,793 | |||
|
Total Assets
|
$ | 30,038 | ||
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
||||
|
Current Liabilities:
|
||||
|
Accrued expenses
|
$ | 42,348 | ||
|
Advances from Stockholder
|
2,975 | |||
|
Total current liabilities
|
45,323 | |||
|
Total Liabilities
|
45,323 | |||
|
Stockholder's Equity:
|
||||
|
Common stock; No Par Value; 75,000 shares authorized, 25,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
1,000 | |||
|
Common stock subscribed
|
129,985 | |||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(146,270 | ) | ||
|
Total stockholder's deficit
|
(15,285 | ) | ||
|
Total liabilities and stockholder's deficit
|
$ | 30,038 | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 2
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the period from February 2, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
From Inception to
|
||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||
|
Revenues
|
$ | - | ||
|
Cost of revenues
|
- | |||
|
Gross profit
|
- | |||
|
Operating expenses
|
||||
|
Selling, general and admin.
|
146,270 | |||
|
Total operating expenses
|
146,270 | |||
|
Loss from operations
|
(146,270 | ) | ||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (146,270 | ) | |
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
$ | (5.85 | ) | |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
25,000 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 3
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
For the period from February 2, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Stock
|
Common Stock
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Subscribed
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, February 2, 2010 (Inception)
|
25,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,000 | |||||||||||
|
Common stock subscribed
|
- | - | 129,985 | - | 129,985 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net loss from Inception through to December 31, 2010
|
- | - | - | (146,270 | ) | (146,270 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
25,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 129,985 | $ | (146,270 | ) | $ | (15,285 | ) | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 4
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the period from February 2, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
|
From February 2, 2010
|
||||
|
(Inception) to
|
||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (146,270 | ) | |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||
|
Change in due to/from related parties
|
(1,394 | ) | ||
|
Prepaid expenses
|
(1,817 | ) | ||
|
Accrued expenses
|
42,348 | |||
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
(107,133 | ) | ||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||
|
Used for:
|
||||
|
Equipment
|
(21,793 | ) | ||
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
(21,793 | ) | ||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||
|
Proceeds from common stock
|
1,000 | |||
|
Proceeds from common stock subscribed
|
129,985 | |||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
130,985 | |||
|
Net change in cash
|
2,059 | |||
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
- | |||
|
Cash, end of period
|
$ | 2,059 | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 5
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
1. ORGANIZATION
Powerdyne, Inc., incorporated February 2, 2010 in Nevada, is a closely-held C Corporation registered to do business in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. The Company is a start-up organization which intends to produce and distribute completely packaged independent electrical generator units that run on environmentally-friendly fuel sources, such as natural gas and propane. At this time, the sole stockholder has patents pending with the United States Patent Office regarding the unique design of these units.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and include all the notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation of the financial statements have been included.
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying financial statements. The Company is classified as a development stage enterprise under GAAP and has not generated significant revenues from its principal operations.
Development Stage and Capital Resources
Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its efforts to business planning, research and development, recruiting management and technical staff, acquiring operating assets and raising capital. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage as defined in GAAP. The Company has not generated significant revenues from its principal operations, and there is no assurance of future revenues. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit from inception of approximately $146,270.
The Company’s activities will necessitate significant uses of working capital beyond 2010. Additionally, the Company’s capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the success of the Company’s continued research and development efforts and the status of competitive products. The Company plans to continue financing its operations with cash received from financing activities, more specifically from one of its major shareholders.
Page 6
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Development Stage and Capital Resources (continued)
While the Company strongly believes that its capital resources will be sufficient in the near term, there is no assurance that the Company’s activities will generate sufficient revenues to sustain its operations without additional capital, or if additional capital is needed, that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments include cash and accrued expenses. The estimated fair value of these instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Management believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of advances to stockholder because the transactions cannot be assumed to have been consummated at arm’s length, the terms are not deemed to be market terms, there are no quoted values available for these instruments, and an independent valuation would not be practical due to the lack of data regarding similar instruments, if any, and the associated potential costs.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2010.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with high quality banking institutions. From time to time, the Company maintains cash balances at certain institutions in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit.
Page 7
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Concentration of Credit Risk (continued)
Revenue Recognition
The Company is in the development stage and has yet to realize revenues from planned operations. The Company will recognize revenue on arrangements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 605, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company has not recorded any sales transactions since inceptions.
Equipment, net
Equipment is stated at cost. Capital expenditures for improvements and upgrades to existing equipment are also capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The machinery and equipment is currently classified as ‘construction in process’ and it is the Company’s policy to begin depreciation once the assets are placed into service. Equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful life of ten years on straight-line basis when the assets are put into use. Depreciation expense for the period from inception, February 2, 2010, to December 31, 2010 was zero.
Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 350-30 (formerly SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), the Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their then carrying values may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company’s management currently believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.
Page 8
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Income Taxes
As a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, (formerly FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109) , (“ASC 740”), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined. ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes.
In 2010, the Company adopted Accounting for Uncertain Income Taxes under the provisions of ASC 740. ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company did not recognize any additional liability for unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the adoption of ASC 740.
We believe that our income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change to our financial position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to ASC 740. In addition, we did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of ASC 740. Our policy for recording interest and penalties associated with income-based tax audits is to record such items as a component of income taxes.
Our tax provision determined using an estimate of our annual effective tax rate using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which they are earned, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the relevant period. Each quarter we update our estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if our estimated tax rate changes, we make a cumulative adjustment. Taxes payable as of December 31, 2010 was zero.
Loss per Common Share
Basic loss per common share excludes dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Since the Company has only incurred losses, basic and diluted loss per share is the same. As of December 31, 2010, there are no outstanding dilutive securities.
Page 9
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Loss per Common Share (continued)
The following table represents the computation of basic and diluted losses per share:
|
From Inception to
|
||||
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||
|
Loss available for common shareholder
|
$ | (146,270 | ) | |
|
Basic and fully diluted loss per share
|
(5.85 | ) | ||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
25,000 | |||
Net loss per share is based upon the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued amended standards that require additional fair value disclosures. These disclosure requirements are effective in two phases. In the first quarter of 2010, we adopted the requirements for disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value as well as disclosures about significant transfers. Beginning in the first quarter of 2011, these amended standards will require presentation of disaggregated activity within the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). These amended standards did not have any impact on our financial statements or disclosures.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.
Page 10
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
4. EQUIPMENT - NET
Equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31, 2010:
|
2010
|
||||
|
Machinery and equipment
|
$ | 21,793 | ||
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
- | |||
|
Total equipment - net
|
$ | 21,793 | ||
Machinery and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 10 years. The machinery and equipment is currently classified as ‘construction in process’ and it is the Company’s policy to begin depreciation once the asset is placed into service. Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to zero.
5. COMMON STOCK
Upon incorporation (inception February 2, 2010), the Company authorized 75,000 no par value shares and issued 25,000 of these shares to its sole shareholder. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had one class of capital stock, common stock. No preferred stock was authorized and/or issued.
In June 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with private investors to provide working capital for the Company. Initially, the private investors have provided the Company with $50,000 in working capital with the total amount of capital provided to be determined in exchange for a percentage of common stock available at the time of Initial Public Offering. As of December, 2010, the private investors have provided approximately $130,000 total in additional working capital.
6. RELATED PARTY
From time to time, the Company makes payments for the benefit of its sole stockholder, which are personal in nature, as well as receives payments from the sole stockholder in the form of cash and/or out-of-pocket expenditures for the benefit of the Company, which are business in nature. The balance of advances from stockholder was $2,975 and the balance of advances to stockholder was $4,369 as of December 31, 2010.
Page 11
POWERDYNE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
During the ordinary course of the Company’s business, it is subject to various claims and litigation. Management believes that the outcome of such claims or litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated subsequent events through February 18, 2011, the date upon which the financial statements were issued.
The Company received common stock subscriptions for approximately 7,680,000 shares in return for approximately $212,500 to individual investors during the months of January, 2011 and February, 2011.
Page 12
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
POWERDYNE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Dale P. Euga
|
|
|
President and Principal executive officer
|
||
|
Dated: September 20, 2011
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/ Linda H. Madison
|
|
|
Principal financial officer
|
||
Dated: September 20, 2011
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
NAME
|
OFFICE
|
DATE
|
||
|
Dale P. Euga
|
Director
|
9/20/2011
|
||
|
Arthur M. Read, II, Esq.
|
|
Director
|
|
9/20/2011
|