Exhibit 99.1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Debtors : The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. et al. (1)

Case Number: Jointly Administered 10-24549 (RDD)

Monthly Operating Report for the Period:

June 19, 2011 to July 16, 2011

Debtors’ Address:

2 Paragon Drive

Montvale, NJ 07645

Net Loss: $0.7 million

Debtors’ Attorneys:

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

601 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Telephone: (212) 446-4800

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900

James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C.

Paul M. Basta

Ray C. Schrock

and

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

300 North LaSalle

Chicago, IL 60654

Telephone: (312) 862-2000

Facsimile: (312) 862-2200

James J. Mazza, Jr.

Report Preparer:

The undersigned, having reviewed the attached report and being familiar with the Debtors’ financial affairs, verifies under the penalty of perjury that the information contained therein is complete, accurate and truthful to the best of my knowledge. (2)

(1)          See Schedule 1 for a listing of Debtor by case number

(2)          All amounts herein are unaudited and subject to revision.  The Debtors reserve all rights to revise this report.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

1

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al. (1)

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1)          See Schedule 1 for a listing of Debtor by case number.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

2

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al. (1)

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited – in thousands)

(1) See Schedule 1 for a listing of Debtor by case number.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

3

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al. (1)

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited – in thousands)

(1) See Schedule 1 for a listing of Debtor by case number.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

4

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al. (1)

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited – in thousands)

(1) See Schedule 1 for a listing of Debtor by case number.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

5

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al. (1)

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED

(Unaudited – in thousands)

ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET LOSS TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

6

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

1.     Background

General

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (“we,” “our,” “us” or “our Company”) is engaged in the retail food business.  Our Company operates stores under the following trade names: A&P®, SuperFresh®, Waldbaum’s®, Super Foodmart®, Food Basics®, The Food Emporium®, Best Cellars®, Best Cellars at A&P®, Pathmark® and Pathmark Sav-A-Center®.

Chapter 11 Reorganization Cases

On December 12, 2010, our Company and all of our U.S. subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief (the “Bankruptcy Filing”) under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in White Plains (the “Bankruptcy Court”), which are being jointly administered under case number 10-24549.   Management’s decision to initiate the Bankruptcy Filing was in response to, among other things, our Company’s deteriorating liquidity and management’s conclusion that the challenges of successfully implementing additional financing initiatives and of obtaining necessary cost concessions from our Company’s business and labor partners, was negatively impacting our Company’s ability to implement our previously announced turnaround strategy.  Our Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries, which are immaterial on a consolidated basis and have no retail operations, were not part of the Bankruptcy Filing.

We are currently operating as debtors-in-possession pursuant to the Bankruptcy Filing and continuation of our Company as a going-concern is contingent upon, among other things, the Debtors’ ability (i) to comply with the terms and conditions of the DIP Credit Agreement described in Note 4 to this Monthly Operating Report; (ii) to develop a plan of reorganization and obtain confirmation of that plan under the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) to reduce debt and other liabilities through the bankruptcy process; (iv) to return to profitability, including by securing necessary near-term cost concessions from our business and labor partners; (v) to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; and (vi) to obtain financing sources to meet our future obligations.  The uncertainty regarding these matters raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

2.     Basis of Presentation

Debtors-in-Possession Financial Statements

The unaudited consolidated financial statements and supplemental information contained herein represent the consolidated financial information for the Debtors as of and for the four weeks ended July 16, 2011. Non-Debtor subsidiaries are deemed to be immaterial on a consolidated basis and related income statement and balance sheet activity has been reported separately on Schedule 3 and Schedule 4 under the column “Foreign Non-Debtor”.

Our Company was required to apply the FASB’s provisions of Reorganizations effective on December 12, 2010, which is applicable to companies in chapter 11, which generally does not change the manner in which financial statements are prepared.  However, it does require that the financial statements for periods subsequent to the Bankruptcy Filing distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been derived from the books and records of our Company. Certain financial information, however, has not been subject to procedures that would typically be applied to financial information presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), and upon the application of such procedures (such as tests for asset impairment), we believe that the financial information will be subject to changes, and these changes could be material. The financial information furnished in this report includes primarily normal recurring adjustments as well as all of the adjustments that would typically be made so that the quarterly financial statements are in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, this report should be read in conjunction with our Company’s audited consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K as of and for the period ended February 26, 2011 and for the interim period on Form 10-Q as of and for the period ended June 18, 2011.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

7

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

The results of operations contained herein are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for any other period or for the full year and may not necessarily reflect the combined results of operations, financial position and cash flows of our Company in the future.

Intercompany Transactions

Intercompany transactions between Debtor entities, as well as between Debtor and Non-Debtor subsidiaries, include, but are not limited to, intercompany cash sweep arrangements, intercompany financing arrangements, intercompany wages and intercompany inventory procurement.  The intercompany financing agreements include two loans from two of the Non-Debtor foreign subsidiaries to Shopwell, Inc., a Debtor of our Company; a 3.562% loan due on May 27, 2013 with an outstanding balance of principal and interest of approximately $94.0 million from A&P Bermuda Limited and a 2.85% loan due on January 15, 2014 with an outstanding balance of principal and interest of approximately $0.1 million from APTEA Hungry Liquidity Management Limited Liability Company. Both loans were transferred from Shopwell, Inc. to The Great A&P Tea Company during June 2010 prior to the Bankruptcy Filing.

All payments between the Debtor and Non-Debtor entities have been stayed at this time and we did not record contractual interest expense subsequent to the Bankruptcy filing. The intercompany balances due to / from entities, as shown on individual entities’ balance sheets included in the accompanying Consolidating Balance Sheet, represent the accumulation of activity over time.  These balances between Debtor entities have not been eliminated in the accompanying Consolidating Balance Sheets. Certain intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.  Intercompany balances between the Debtor and Non-Debtor entities have been shown net in the consolidated financial statements.

Assumed Leases

During the four weeks ended July 16, 2011, our Company assumed 233 real estate leases. All undisputed cure amounts related to these leases in the amount of $6.7 million have been paid to the landlords.

Interest Expense

We recorded all contractual interest on secured debt for the four weeks ended July 16, 2011. We recorded interest accretion expense for capital leases and real estate liabilities, self-insurance reserves, GHI and corporate owned life insurance (“COLI”) obligations. Although we have recorded interest accretion expense, we have not made a final determination as to the value of any underlying assets or the rejection/assumption of any of the obligations that we have not assumed.  Once a determination is made, the accretion of the interest expense may change. We did not record contractual interest expense of $2.9 million for unsecured debt which is subject to compromise for the four weeks ended July 16, 2011.  Debt discounts and deferred financing fees for all debt which is subject to compromise were reclassified into the carrying value of the respective indebtedness upon the Bankruptcy Filing and the balances were then adjusted to the face value of the debt.  As a result of this reclassification, we ceased amortization of deferred financing fees and discounts effective as of the Bankruptcy Filing date. Such amounts may need to be adjusted in future periods.

Taxes and Insurance

We received approval to pay pre-petition employee withholding obligations in addition to employment and wage related taxes, sales and use taxes, and certain other taxes due in the normal course of business through certain court orders. As such, we have paid the applicable taxes when due except for amounts that are in dispute.

All post-petition tax obligations to the proper taxing authorities are current.  Deferred tax liabilities of $27.1 million are included within “Other accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Pre-petition amounts for leases not yet assumed owed for our pro-rata portion of certain taxes for which we reimburse third parties have not been paid.

Additionally, all insurance premiums are current and all insurance policies are in force as of July 16, 2011.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

8

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

Other non-current liabilities

Other non-current liabilities are comprised of $61.9 million for Non-Debtor obligations for COLI, $24.0 million for deferred rent liability, $13.8 million for self-insurance reserves, $0.5 million for deferred income and $0.2 million for other items that were incurred subsequent to the Bankruptcy Filing.  These amounts are not subject to compromise under the Bankruptcy Filing.

3.     Proceeds from Sale of Assets Held for Sale

In April and May 2011, our Company obtained approval from the Bankruptcy Court to sell, or alternatively, to close an additional 25 stores located in Maryland, Delaware and the District of Columbia.  On July 9, 2011, our Company completed the sale of the 12 of the 25 stores for $37.0 million in cash which primarily related to fixed assets.  As a result of the sale of the 12 stores, a gain of $27.2 million was recorded within “Store operating, general and administrative expense” within our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

4.     DIP Credit Agreement

In connection with the Bankruptcy Filing, on December 13, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered its interim financing order, among other things, permitting us to enter into a Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement (as amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of December 21, 2010, further amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Second Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of January 10, 2011, further amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Third Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of January 13, 2011, further amended by that certain First Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of July 8, 2011, as may be further amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time (the “DIP Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent (in such capacity, the “Agent”), the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, the “DIP Lenders”) and our Company and certain subsidiaries as borrowers thereunder.  On December 14, 2010, we satisfied all of the conditions to the effectiveness of the DIP Credit Agreement and to the initial closing thereunder and consummated the transactions contemplated thereunder including the refinancing in full of our Company’s and its applicable subsidiaries’ obligations under the pre-existing first lien credit facility. The Bankruptcy Court entered a final order approving the DIP Credit Agreement on January 11, 2011.  Pursuant to the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement:

·                  the DIP Lenders agreed to lend up to $800.0 million in the form of a $350.0 million term loan and a $450.0 million revolving credit facility with a $250.0 million sublimit for letters of credit, in each case subject to the terms and conditions therein;

·                  our Company’s and the Subsidiary Borrower’s obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement and the other specified loan documents are guaranteed by our Company’s certain other subsidiaries that are Debtors (“Subsidiary Guarantors” and, together with our Company and the Subsidiary Borrowers, the “Loan Parties”); and

·                  the Loan Parties’ obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement and such other specified loan documents are secured by a security interest in, and lien upon, substantially all of the Loan Parties’ existing and after-acquired personal and real property, having the priority and subject to the terms therein and in the order(s) entered into by the Bankruptcy Court, as applicable.

Our Company will have the option to have interest on the revolving loans under the revolving credit facility provided under the DIP Credit Agreement accrue at an alternate base rate plus 200 basis points or at adjusted LIBOR plus 300 basis points. Our Company will have the option to have interest on the term loan provided under the DIP Credit Agreement accrue at an alternate base rate plus 600 basis points or at adjusted LIBOR (with a floor of 175 basis points) plus 700 basis points. The DIP Credit Agreement limits, among other things, our Company’s and the other Loan Parties’ ability to (i) incur indebtedness, (ii) incur or create liens, (iii) dispose of assets, (iv) prepay certain indebtedness and make other restricted payments, (v) enter into sale and leaseback transactions and (vi) modify the

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

9

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

terms of certain indebtedness and certain material contracts. Notably, however, the DIP Credit Agreement permits our Company to use the proceeds generated from the sale of the Southern Stores in the operation of our business rather than requiring us to use those proceeds to reduce the Loan Parties’ outstanding indebtedness under the DIP Credit Agreement.

The DIP Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum excess availability covenant of $100.0 million (or $75.0 million at any time after August 13, 2011 but on or before November 5, 2011, or $50.0 million at any time after November 5, 2011), minimum liquidity covenant of $100.0 million and minimum cumulative EBITDA covenant as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement.  Minimum cumulative EBITDA measured beginning on April 24, 2011 is as follows (in millions):

Meeting our EBITDA covenant requires increasing levels of performance throughout the year, including the successful implementation of our business improvement initiatives. We previously entered into a definitive agreement with C&S to provide services and as of the balance sheet date, we are in the process of negotiating with union locals to obtain consensual modifications to collective bargaining agreements necessary for our successful reorganization. We may not achieve our minimum cumulative EBITDA covenant. A financial covenant violation could result in termination of the DIP Credit Agreement and/or termination of our access to funding thereunder. If either (or both) of those were to occur, our Company could be without sufficient cash availability to meet our operating needs or satisfy our obligations as they fall due, in which instance we could be required to seek a sale of our Company or certain of its material assets pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, or to convert the Bankruptcy Filing into a liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The DIP Credit Agreement matures upon the earliest to occur of (a) June 14, 2012, (b) the acceleration of the loans and the termination of the commitment thereunder, and (c) the substantial consummation (as defined in Section 1101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, which for purposes hereof shall be no later than the effective date thereof) of a plan of reorganization that is confirmed pursuant to an order entered by the Bankruptcy Court.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

10

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

5.     Reorganization Items, net

Reorganization items represent amounts incurred as a direct result of the Bankruptcy Filing and was comprised of the following:

Professional fees of approximately $4.1 million were accrued and $11.2 million were paid for the four weeks ended July 16, 2011.  U.S. Trustee fees of approximately $0.1 million were accrued for the four weeks ended July 16, 2011.

During the four weeks ended July 16, 2011, we rejected 18 of our leases through the bankruptcy process and reduced the closed locations reserve balance associated with these leases by $13.3 million, of which $13.2 million was attributed to continuing operations and $0.1 million was attributed to discontinued operations, net to the allowable claim for damages of $17.3 million.  Our total closed locations reserve balance of $193.2 million is comprised of damage claims of $187.1 million and $6.1 million pertains to locations for which the leases have not been rejected as of July 16, 2011. In connection with the rejection of the 18 leases, we also wrote off the related real estate liabilities of $13.8 million, obligations under capital leases of $2.4 million, and other liabilities related to rejected closed locations of $0.6 million, totaling $16.8 million, net.  Of this amount, $16.8 million relates to continuing operations with an offset of less than $0.1 million relating to discontinued operations.

6.     Liabilities Subject to Compromise

As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, the payment of pre-petition indebtedness is subject to compromise or other treatment under a plan of reorganization. Generally, actions to enforce or otherwise effect payment of pre-Bankruptcy Filing liabilities are stayed. Although payment of pre-petition claims generally is not permitted, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Debtor authority to pay certain pre-petition claims in designated categories and subject to certain terms and conditions. This relief generally was designed to preserve the value of our Company’s businesses and assets. Among other things, the Bankruptcy Court authorized us to pay certain pre-petition claims relating to employee wages and benefits, customers, vendors, and suppliers.

We have been paying and intend to continue to pay undisputed post-petition claims in the ordinary course of business. In addition, we may reject pre-petition executory contracts and unexpired leases with respect to our operations, with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Any damages resulting from rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases are treated as general unsecured claims and will be classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We previously notified all known claimants subject to the bar date of their need to file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy Court. A bar date is the date by which claims against our Company must be filed if the claimants disagree with the amounts included in our schedule of assets and liabilities filed with the Bankruptcy Court and wish to receive any distribution in the Bankruptcy Filing. The bar date of June 17, 2011 set by the Bankruptcy Court has passed. Thus far, claimants filed over nine thousand claims against our Company, asserting approximately $27.9 billion worth of liabilities.  Our Company and our retained professionals are continuing to review and analyze the proofs of claim submitted by claimants and will investigate any material differences between these

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

11

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

claims and liability amounts estimated by our Company. If necessary, in the event of a claims dispute, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination whether such claims should be allowed and, if so, the appropriate amount of such allowed claims. The ultimate amount of such liabilities is not determinable at this time.

Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise are required to be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.  The amounts currently classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” may be subject to future adjustments depending on Bankruptcy Court actions, further developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, or other events.  We expect that certain amounts currently classified as “Liabilities subject to compromise” may in fact be paid in the ordinary course as they come due.  Any resulting changes in classification will be reflected in subsequent monthly operating reports.

Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following:

Liabilities subject to compromise include liabilities related to pre-petition purchases and interest payments, some of which were scheduled for payment in the July 2011 period.  As a result, the July 2011 cash flows from operations were favorably affected by the stay of payment related to the liabilities.

Rejected Leases

During the four weeks ended July 16, 2011, we rejected 18 of our leases through the bankruptcy process. We reduced the closed locations reserve balance associated with these leases by $13.3 million, net to the allowable claim for damages of $187.1 million. The remaining closed locations reserve balance of $6.1 million pertains to locations for which the leases have not been rejected.  In connection with the 18 rejected leases, the related real estate liabilities, obligations under capital leases and other liabilities related to rejected closed locations were written off, all which were

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

12

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

NOTES TO MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT (UNAUDITED)

recorded to “Reorganization items, net” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Refer to Note 5 — Reorganization Items, Net, for further discussion of our rejected leases.

Non-Debtor Financing Agreements

Intercompany financing agreements with foreign non-Debtor subsidiaries of $94.1 million are not reflected in the above liabilities subject to compromise table as these amounts were eliminated on a consolidated basis.

7.     Post-petition Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

To the best of our knowledge, all undisputed post-petition accounts payable and accrued expenses have been paid, or are being paid under agreed-upon payment terms.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

13

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

SCHEDULE 1: SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS

Certain Debtor entities make disbursements on behalf of the other Debtor entities.  Every effort has been made to accurately represent the disbursements made on behalf of each affiliated debtor.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

14

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al. (1)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

SCHEDULE 2: DEBTOR QUESTIONNAIRE

Explanations to “Yes” answers:

(a)          Refer to Note 3 - Proceeds from Sale of Assets Held for Sale.

(b)          Funds have been disbursed from Rule 501(c)3 non-profit organizations, affiliates of our Company, in the normal course of operations.

(c)          Payments made on certain pre-petition liabilities were made pursuant to various court orders.

(d)          Due to the assumption of real estate leases (refer to Note 2 — Basis of Presentation), landlords were reimbursed for pre-petition real estate taxes paid on our behalf as cure amounts.

(e)          Certain severance payments have not been made and have been classified as part of “liabilities subject to compromise”; however, wage payments for existing employees are current.

(1) See Schedule 1 for a listing of Debtor by case number.

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

15

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

SCHEDULE 3: CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE FOUR WEEKS ENDED JULY 16, 2011

(Unaudited - in thousands)

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

-16-

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011

SCHEDULE 3: CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE FOUR WEEKS ENDED JULY 16, 2011

(Unaudited - in thousands)

Case No. 10-24549 (RDD) Jointly Administered

-16-

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al.

(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION)

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT FOR JULY 2011