DORAL FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q

DORAL FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q - August 16, 2011

Attached files

Attached files

DORAL FINANCIAL CORP Reports

Also read

file	filename
EX-12.2 - EX-12.2 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv12w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv31w1.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv32w1.htm
EX-12.1 - EX-12.1 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv12w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv32w2.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv31w2.htm
EX-10.22 - EX-10.22 - DORAL FINANCIAL CORP	g27895exv10w22.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-31579

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)


Puerto Rico		66-0312162
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization)		identification number)

1451 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue,
San Juan, Puerto Rico		00920-2717
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(787) 474-6700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer þ	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock: 127,293,756 outstanding as of August 12, 2011.

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
INDEX PAGE


	PAGE
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 — Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited) as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		1
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) — Quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010		2
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) — For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010		4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) — Quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) — For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010		5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6
Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		68
Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		120
Item 4 — Controls and Procedures		120
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings		121
Item 1A — Risk Factors		122
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		122
Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities		122
Item 4 — Removed and Reserved		123
Item 5 — Other Information		123
Item 6 — Exhibits		123
SIGNATURES
EX-10.22
EX-12.1
EX-12.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AS OF JUNE 30, 2011 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2010


	June 30,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except for share data)	2011			2010
Assets
Cash and due from banks ($890 and $2,642 were restricted at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)	$	562,397		$	355,819

Other interest-earning assets ($18,967 and $126,573 were restricted at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)		43,967			156,607

Securities held for trading, at fair value		44,589			45,029
Securities available for sale, at fair value (includes $631,257 and $743,843 pledged as collateral at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, that may be repledged)		671,451			1,505,065
Federal Home Loan Bank of NY (“FHLB”) stock, at cost		74,565			78,087

Total investment securities		790,605			1,628,181
Loans:
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market (includes $119,729 and $121,988 pledged as collateral at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, that may be repledged)		301,934			319,269
Loans receivable (includes $174,333 and $180,447 pledged as collateral at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, that may be repledged)		5,688,598			5,588,571
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses		(93,472	)		(123,652	)

Total net loans receivable		5,595,126			5,464,919

Total loans, net		5,897,060			5,784,188

Accounts receivable		41,592			28,704
Mortgage-servicing advances		54,011			51,462
Accrued interest receivable		37,244			38,774
Servicing assets, net		115,785			114,342
Premises and equipment, net		103,386			104,053
Real estate held for sale, net		101,499			100,273
Deferred tax asset (“DTA”)		103,958			105,712
Other assets		164,192			178,239

Total assets	$	8,015,696		$	8,646,354


Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	285,582		$	258,230
Other interest-bearing deposits		1,986,102			2,000,991
Brokered certificate of deposits		2,031,108			2,359,254

Total deposits		4,302,792			4,618,475
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		442,300			1,176,800
Advances from FHLB		1,342,849			901,420
Loans payable		294,623			304,035
Notes payable		510,430			513,958
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		258,442			269,471

Total liabilities		7,151,436			7,784,159
Commitments and contingencies (Please refer to Notes 24 and 25)

Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 5,811,391 shares issued and outstanding, at aggregate liquidation preference value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Perpetual noncumulative nonconvertible preferred stock (Series A, B and C)		148,700			148,700
Perpetual cumulative convertible preferred stock		203,382			203,382
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 127,293,756 shares issued and outstanding at both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		1,273			1,273
Additional paid-in capital		1,220,983			1,219,280
Legal surplus		23,596			23,596
Accumulated deficit		(735,229	)		(738,199	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax expense of $621 and expense of $1,332 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		1,555			4,163

Total stockholders’ equity		864,260			862,195


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	8,015,696		$	8,646,354

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands, except for share data)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest income:
Loans	$	79,238		$	78,916		$	159,303		$	160,349
Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”)		9,221			18,542			20,277			41,789
Interest-only strips (“IOs”)		1,508			1,491			2,979			3,034
Investment securities		130			583			229			1,448
Other interest-earning assets		1,020			1,545			2,320			3,685

Total interest income		91,117			101,077			185,108			210,305

Interest expense:
Deposits		22,543			27,587			49,442			54,287
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		6,238			13,738			15,357			31,762
Advances from FHLB		8,822			12,921			15,430			26,894
Notes payable		6,561			5,086			13,214			10,196
Loans payable		1,498			1,680			3,040			3,340

Total interest expense		45,662			61,012			96,483			126,479

Net interest income		45,455			40,065			88,625			83,826

Provision for loan and lease losses		13,323			44,617			15,914			58,538

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses		32,132			(4,552	)		72,711			25,288

Non-interest income (loss):
Total other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses		(411	)		—			(411	)		(40,195	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)		325			—			325			26,936

Net credit related OTTI losses		(86	)		—			(86	)		(13,259	)
Net gain (loss) on sale of investment securities available for sale		14,808			(137,204	)		17,662			(110,790	)
Net loss on early repayment of debt		(3,068	)		(2,545	)		(3,068	)		(3,021	)
Net gain on loans securitized and sold and capitalization of mortgage servicing		9,026			3,605			14,568			6,956
Retail banking fees		7,067			7,199			14,073			14,342
Mortgage loan servicing income (net of mark-to-market adjustments)		4,543			(1,354	)		13,442			5,390
Net gain on trading assets and derivatives		3,373			7,102			2,286			8,091
Insurance agency commissions		2,439			2,436			4,661			4,778
Other income		695			571			3,884			3,907

Total non-interest income (loss)		38,797			(120,190	)		67,422			(83,606	)

Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits		21,081			20,315			39,375			36,750
Professional services		9,339			15,420			17,976			29,212
Occupancy expenses		4,786			4,322			9,126			8,303
FDIC insurance expense		3,797			5,574			8,153			10,765
Communication expenses		3,636			4,056			7,639			8,000
Depreciation and amortization		3,463			3,110			6,666			6,257
EDP expenses		3,024			2,878			6,299			6,657
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes		2,923			2,591			5,799			5,155
Corporate Insurance		1,490			1,264			3,060			2,526
Other		5,785			9,737			11,688			16,302

		59,324			69,267			115,781			129,927

Other provisions and other real estate owned expenses:
Foreclosure expenses and other credit related expenses		2,196			582			4,561			2,723
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) expenses		2,061			23,414			4,023			28,011
Provision for Lehman Brothers, Inc. claim receivable		—			10,819			—			10,819

		4,257			34,815			8,584			41,553

Total non-interest expenses		63,581			104,082			124,365			171,480


Income (loss) before income taxes		7,348			(228,824	)		15,768			(229,798	)
Income tax expense		2,871			4,487			7,968			7,016


Net income (loss)	$	4,477		$	(233,311	)	$	7,800		$	(236,814	)


Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders⁽¹⁾	$	2,062		$	(235,726	)	$	2,970		$	(214,508	)


Net income (loss) per common share⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	0.02		$	(3.50	)	$	0.02		$	(3.30	)


⁽¹⁾		For the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, net income (loss) per common share represents the basic and diluted loss per common share. Refer to Note 28 for additional information regarding net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders.

⁽²⁾		For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, net loss per common share included $26.6 million related to the effect of the preferred stock exchange. Refer to Note 28 for additional information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)


	Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010
Preferred Stock:
Balance at beginning of period	$	352,082		$	415,428
Preferred stock issued (mandatorily convertible)		—			171,000
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock at par value:
Noncumulative nonconvertible		—			(48,687	)
Cumulative convertible		—			(14,659	)

Balance at end of period		352,082			523,082

Common Stock:
Balance at beginning of period		1,273			621
Common stock issued/converted:
Noncumulative nonconvertible		—			40
Cumulative convertible		—			12

Balance at end of period		1,273			673

Additional Paid-In Capital:
Balance at beginning of period		1,219,280			1,010,661
Stock-based compensation recognized		1,703			73
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock at par value:
Noncumulative nonconvertible		—			17,010
Cumulative convertible		—			19,699

Balance at end of period		1,220,983			1,047,443

Legal Surplus		23,596			23,596

Accumulated Deficit:
Balance at beginning of period		(738,199	)		(463,781	)
Net income (loss)		7,800			(236,814	)
Dividend accrued on preferred stock		(4,830	)		(4,279	)
Effect of conversion of preferred stock:
Noncumulative nonconvertible		—			31,637
Cumulative convertible		—			(5,052	)

Balance at end of period		(735,229	)		(678,289	)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:
Balance at beginning of period		4,163			(111,481	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of deferred tax		(2,608	)		139,948

Balance at end of period		1,555			28,467


Total stockholders’ equity	$	864,260		$	944,972

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPRENHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(UNAUDITED)


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30, 2011
(In thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income (loss)	$	4,477		$	(233,311	)	$	7,800		$	(236,814	)


Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax:

Unrealized gains on securities arising during the period		7,656			41,660			6,964			65,701
Non-credit portion of OTTI losses		(325	)		—			(325	)		(26,936	)
Reclassification of net realized (gains) losses included in net income (loss)		(7,462	)		129,749			(11,245	)		122,172

Other comprehensive (loss) income on investment securities, before tax		(131	)		171,409			(4,606	)		160,937

Income tax benefit (expense) related to investment securities		28			(25,712	)		711			(24,141	)

Other comprehensive (loss) income on investment securities, net of tax		(103	)		145,697			(3,895	)		136,796

Other comprehensive income on cash flow hedges⁽¹⁾		554			1,594			1,287			3,152

Other comprehensive income (loss)		451			147,291			(2,608	)		139,948

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	4,928		$	(86,020	)	$	5,192		$	(96,866	)


Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

Other comprehensive income on investment securities	$	3,794		$	36,502		$	3,794		$	36,502
Other comprehensive losses on investment securities on which OTTI has been recognized		(276	)		(3,563	)		(276	)		(3,563	)

Total other comprehensive income on investment securities		3,518			32,939			3,518			32,939
Other comprehensive loss on cash flow hedge⁽¹⁾		(1,963	)		(4,472	)		(1,963	)		(4,472	)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income net of tax	$	1,555		$	28,467		$	1,555		$	28,467


⁽¹⁾		For the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, other comprehensive loss on cash flow hedges includes $0.8 million and $1.7 million related to a deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)


	Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	7,800		$	(236,814	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		1,703			73
Depreciation and amortization		6,666			6,257
Mark-to-market adjustment of servicing assets		3,199			8,480
Deferred tax expense		2,493			3,126
Provision for loan and lease losses		15,914			58,538
Provision for claim receivable		—			10,819
Provision for OREO losses		1,375			26,391
Loss (gain) on sale of OREO		475			(58	)
Net premium amortization on loans, investment securities and debt		9,167			8,417
Origination and purchases of loans held for sale		(177,825	)		(160,982	)
Principal repayments and sales of loans held for sale		64,849			95,065
(Gain) loss on sale of securities		(27,636	)		108,150
Net OTTI losses		86			13,259
Net loss on early repayment of debt		3,068			3,021
Unrealized (gain) loss on trading securities		(64	)		61
Principal repayment and sales of securities held for trading		253,692			151,492
Amortization and net gain in the fair value of IOs		500			1,011
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments		(1,021	)		1,594
Decrease (increase) in derivative instruments		337			(5,224	)
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		(12,888	)		6,033
Increase in mortgage servicing advances		(2,549	)		(22,017	)
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		1,530			882
Decrease in other assets		137,550			66,033
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(3,879	)		65,365


Total adjustments		276,742			445,786


Net cash provided by operating activities		284,542			208,972

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of securities available for sale		(234,764	)		(1,430,635	)
Principal repayment and sales of securities available for sale		1,075,068			1,852,364
Proceeds from sale of FHLB stock		3,522			26,756
Originations, purchases and repurchases of loans receivable		(672,013	)		(592,890	)
Principal repayment of loans receivable		351,265			262,558
Proceeds from sales of servicing assets		—			192
Purchases of premises and equipment		(7,068	)		(4,455	)
Proceeds from sales of real estate held for sale		31,430			10,492


Net cash provided by investing activities		547,440			124,382


Cash flows from financing activities:
(Decrease) increase in deposits		(315,683	)		297,548
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(219,500	)		(687,483	)
Proceeds from advances from FHLB		145,000			575,000
Repayment of advances from FHLB		(160,001	)		(964,000	)
Fees paid on debt exchange and early repayment of debt		(65,367	)		—
Proceeds from other short-term borrowings		—			345,000
Repayment of other short-term borrowings		—			(455,000	)
Repayment of secured borrowings		(9,412	)		(18,384	)
Repayment of notes payable		(3,724	)		(3,363	)
Issuance of preferred stock		—			171,000

Net cash used in financing activities		(628,687	)		(739,682	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	203,295		$	(406,328	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		383,211			725,277


Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period ⁽¹⁾	$	586,506		$	318,949


Cash and cash equivalents includes:
Cash and due from banks	$	561,506		$	318,949
Other interest-earning assets		25,000			—

	$	586,506		$	318,949


Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:
Loan securitizations	$	243,719		$	148,851

Loans foreclosed	$	47,474		$	51,965

Capitalization of servicing assets	$	4,642		$	3,184

Reclassification of loans held for investment portfolio to the held for sale portfolio	$	59,917		$	95,648

Reclassification of loans held for sale portfolio to the held for investment portfolio	$	—		$	210

Substitution of securities sold under agreement to repurchase with advances from FHLB	$	515,000		$	—

Supplemental information for cash flows:
Cash used to pay interest	$	104,119		$	131,546

Cash used to pay income taxes	$	3,824		$	2,267


⁽¹⁾		Does not include $19.9 million and $0.3 million in restricted cash and equivalents as of June 30, 2011 and 2010.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Note 1 — Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation			7
Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements			7
Note 3 — Cash and Due from Banks			9
Note 4 — Other Interest-Earning Assets			9
Note 5 — Securities Held for Trading			10
Note 6 — Securities Available for Sale			11
Note 7 — Investments in an Unrealized Loss Position			13
Note 8 — Pledged Assets			16
Note 9 — Loans Held for Sale and Loans Receivable			16
Note 10 — Allowance for loan and lease losses and Impaired Loans			24
Note 11 — Related Party Transactions			30
Note 12 — Accounts Receivable and Other Assets			30
Note 13 — Servicing Activities			30
Note 14 — Sale and Securitization of Mortgage Loans			33
Note 15 — Servicing Related Matters			34
Note 16 — Other Real Estate Owned			34
Note 17 — Deposits			34
Note 18 — Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase			35
Note 19 — Advances from FHLB			36
Note 20 — Loans Payable			37
Note 21 — Notes Payable			38
Note 22 — Income Taxes			38
Note 23 — Guarantees			43
Note 24 — Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk			44
Note 25 — Commitments and Contingencies			45
Note 26 — Stock Options and Other Incentive Plans			45
Note 27 — Earnings (Losses) per Share			47
Note 28 — Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities			48
Note 29 — Derivatives			56
Note 30 — Variable Interest Entities			59
Note 31 — Segment Information			61
Note 32 — Subsequent Events			65

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Doral Financial Corporation (“Doral,” “Doral Financial” or the “Company”) is a bank holding company engaged in banking (including thrift operations), mortgage banking and insurance agency activities through its wholly-owned subsidiaries Doral Bank (“Doral Bank PR”), Doral Bank, FSB (“Doral Bank US”), a federal savings bank in New York and since 2010 in the northwest region of Florida, Doral Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Doral Insurance Agency”), and Doral Properties, Inc. (“Doral Properties”). Doral Bank PR operates three wholly-owned subsidiaries, Doral Mortgage, LLC (“Doral Mortgage”), Doral Money, Inc. (“Doral Money”), engaged in commercial lending in the New York metropolitan area, and CB, LLC, an entity formed to dispose of a real estate project of which Doral Bank PR took possession during 2005. Doral Money consolidates two variable interest entities created for the purpose of entering into a collateralized loan arrangement with a third party.

Doral Investment International, LLC (“Doral Investment”) was organized during 2008 to become a subsidiary of Doral Bank PR, but is not operational.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in the Company’s Annual Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Certain information and note disclosure normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain amounts reflected in the 2010 Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform with the presentation for 2011.

The results of operations for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-5 Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU No. 2011-5”). In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-5 to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, this amendment requires all changes in items not related to owners in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two statement approach, the first statement shall present total net income and its components followed by a second statement presenting total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. The purpose of this update is to increase prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-5 should be applied retrospectively and are effective for the Company during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU will not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU No. 2011-4”). In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-4 to amend fair value disclosure requirements in order to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Some of the amendments clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements while other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments clarify the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio and application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement. The amendments additionally prescribe enhanced financial statement disclosures for Level 3 fair value measurements. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-4 are effective for the Company during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of this ASU will have on its financial position and results of operations.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-03 — Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860). In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity.

The amendments in this Update remove from the assessment of effective control (i) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (ii) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. Other criteria applicable to the assessment of effective control are not changed by the amendments in this Update. Those criteria indicate that the transferor is considered to have maintained effective control over the financial assets transferred (and thus must account for the transaction as a secured borrowing) for agreements that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity if all of the following conditions are met:

	1.		The financial assets to be repurchased or redeemed are the same or substantially the same as those transferred.

	2.		The agreement is to repurchase or redeem them before maturity, at a fixed or determinable price.

	3.		The agreement is entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the transfer.

The guidance in this Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. Management does not expect the implementation of this standard to have a material effect on the financial statements.

Changes in Accounting Standards Adopted in the Financial Statements

Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02—Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. On April 4, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, which amends guidance for evaluating whether the restructuring of a receivable by a creditor is a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). In addition, disclosures required by paragraphs 310-10-50-33 through 50-34, which were deferred by ASU No. 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011.

The amendments in this update are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and require applying retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. An entity should disclose the total amount of receivables and the allowance for credit losses as of the end of the period of adoption related to those receivables that are newly considered impaired under Section 310-10-35 for which impairment was previously measured under Subtopic 450-20, Contingencies-Loss Contingencies. This ASU was adopted by the Company in its financial statement disclosures with no impact on the financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-29 Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosures of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). In December 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29 to address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. The amendments in this update clarify the acquisition date that should be used for reporting the pro forma financial information disclosures in Topic 805 when comparative financial statements are presented. The amendments also improve the usefulness of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosures by requiring a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments that are directly attributable to the business combination(s).

The amendments in this update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This ASU was adopted by the Company with no impact on the financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). In December 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28 to address questions about entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts because some entities concluded that Step 1 of the test is passed in those circumstances because the fair value of their reporting unit will generally be greater than zero. As a result of that conclusion, some constituents raised concerns that Step 2 of the test is not performed despite factors indicating that goodwill may be impaired. The amendments in this Update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples in paragraph 350-20-35-30, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. Upon adoption of the amendments, an entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative is required to assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units’ goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the entity should perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for those reporting unit(s). Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings as required by Section 350-20-35. This ASU was adopted by the Company with no significant impact on the financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ASU No. 2010-20”). This ASU requires new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and credit quality of its financing receivables. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting, as well as clarify the requirements of existing disclosures. ASU 2010-20 is effective the first fiscal quarter ending after December 15, 2010, except for certain disclosure requirements about activity that occurs during a reporting period which are effective the first fiscal quarter beginning after December 15, 2010. This ASU was adopted by the Company and is reflected in the enhanced disclosures in the financial statements.

3. Cash and due from banks

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s cash amounted to $562.4 million and $355.8 million, respectively, which includes non-interest bearing deposits with other banks amounting to $1.6 million and $10.4 million, respectively. The Company’s cash balances included interest bearing balances with the Federal Reserve of $522.1 million and $218.9 million, respectively, and with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $4.3 million and $92.0 million, respectively.

The Company’s bank subsidiaries are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank or other banks. Those required average reserve balances were $146.2 million and $115.9 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, cash and due from banks included $0.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, that is considered restricted cash.

4. Other Interest-Earning Assets

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s other interest-earning assets totaled $44.0 million and $156.6 million, respectively. Other interest-earning assets includes money market investments, securities purchased under agreements to resell, cash pledged with counterparties to back the Company’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase and/or derivatives positions, among others.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other interest-earning assets included $19.0 million and $126.6 million, respectively, that was considered restricted other interest-earning assets.

5. Securities Held for Trading

The following table summarizes the fair value of Doral Financial’s securities held for trading as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Mortgage-Backed Securities	$	830	$	766
Variable Rate IOs		43,552		44,018
Fixed Rate IOs		198		232
Derivatives⁽¹⁾		9		13

Total	$	44,589	$	45,029


⁽¹⁾		Doral Financial uses derivatives to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates. Derivatives include interest rate caps and forward contracts. Doral Financial’s general policy is to account for derivatives on a mark-to-market basis with gains or losses charged to operations as they occur. Derivatives not accounted for as hedges in a net asset position are recorded as securities held for trading, and derivatives in a net liability position are reported as liabilities. The gross notional amount of derivatives recorded as held for trading totaled $265.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and $310.0 million as of December 31, 2010. Notional amounts indicate the volume of derivatives activity, but do not represent Doral Financial’s exposure to market or credit risk.

The weighted-average yield is computed based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 weighted-average yield, including IOs, was 13.48% and 13.38%, respectively.

6. Securities Available for Sale

The following tables summarize the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of securities available for sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

The weighted-average yield is computed based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. Expected maturities of mortgage-backed securities and certain debt securities might differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

As of June 30, 2011


									Weighted-
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Average
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Yield
Agency MBS
Due within one year	$	7	$	—	$	—	$	7		6.60	%
Due from one to five years		195		9		—		204		4.84	%
Due from five to ten years		68,166		1,501		—		69,667		2.74	%
Due over ten years		372,161		5,114		197		377,078		3.18	%

CMO Government Sponsored Agencies
Due from five to ten years		7,116		46		140		7,022		4.85	%
Due over ten years		100,723		2,115		230		102,608		3.62	%

Non-Agency CMOs
Due over ten years		11,153		—		3,193		7,960		17.35	%

Obligations U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies
Due within one year		94,947		35		—		94,982		0.18	%

Other
Due from one to five years		5,002		—		1		5,001		3.45	%
Due over ten years		7,843		10		931		6,922		4.19	%

	$	667,313	$	8,830	$	4,692	$	671,451		3.05	%

As of December 31, 2010


									Weighted-
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Average
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Yield
Agency MBS
Due within one year	$	36	$	1	$	—	$	37		6.67	%
Due from one to five years		220		11		—		231		4.87	%
Due from five to ten years		416,709		3,447		130		420,026		2.47	%
Due over ten years		718,690		4,949		960		722,679		2.57	%

CMO Government Sponsored Agencies
Due from five to ten years		17,953		122		178		17,897		4.10	%
Due over ten years		288,414		6,750		230		294,934		3.57	%

Non-Agency CMOs
Due over ten years		11,108		—		3,916		7,192		19.74	%

Obligations U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies
Due within one year		34,987		5		—		34,992		0.16	%

Other
Due over ten years		8,203		—		1,126		7,077		4.25	%

	$	1,496,320	$	15,285	$	6,540	$	1,505,065		2.83	%

7. Investments in an Unrealized Loss Position

The following tables show Doral Financial’s gross unrealized losses and fair value for available for sale investments, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Securities Available for Sale


	As of June 30, 2011
	Less than 12 months						12 months or more						Total
	Number						Number						Number
	of				Unrealized		of				Unrealized		of				Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Positions		Fair Value		Losses		Positions		Fair Value		Losses		Positions		Fair Value		Losses
Agency MBS		1	$	16,244	$	197		—	$	—	$	—		1	$	16,244	$	197
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		1		3,538		230		1		1,554		140		2		5,092		370
Non-Agency CMOs		—		—		—		3		7,960		3,193		3		7,960		3,193
Other		1		5,001		1		1		2,069		931		2		7,070		932

		3	$	24,783	$	428		5	$	11,583	$	4,264		8	$	36,366	$	4,692

Securities Available for Sale


	As of December 31, 2010
	Less than 12 months						12 months or more						Total
	Number						Number						Number
	of				Unrealized		of				Unrealized		of				Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Positions		Fair Value		Losses		Positions		Fair Value		Losses		Positions		Fair Value		Losses
Agency MBS		13	$	241,675	$	1,090		—	$	—	$	—		13	$	241,675	$	1,090
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		2		11,564		255		1		1,704		153		3		13,268		408
Non-Agency CMOs		—		—		—		3		7,192		3,916		3		7,192		3,916
Other		1		5,162		41		1		1,915		1,085		2		7,077		1,126

		16	$	258,401	$	1,386		5	$	10,811	$	5,154		21	$	269,212	$	6,540

The securities held by the Company are principally MBS or securities backed by a U.S. government sponsored entity and therefore, principal and interest on the securities are considered recoverable. Doral Financial’s investment portfolio consists primarily of AAA rated debt securities, except for the Non-Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (“CMO”), which are non-investment grade.

The Company assesses whether a security is other than temporarily impaired (“OTTI”) whenever the fair value of an investment security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Amortized cost basis includes adjustments made to the cost of a security for accretion, amortization, collection of cash, previous OTTI recognized into earnings (less any cumulative effect adjustments) and fair value hedge accounting adjustments. OTTI is considered to have occurred under the following circumstances:

•

If the Company intends to sell the investment security and its fair value is less than its amortized cost.

•

If, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that the Company will decide or be required to sell the investment security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis.

•

If the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the investment security. This occurs when the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis of the security. In determining whether a credit loss exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the investment security. Cash flows expected to be collected are estimated based on a careful assessment of all available information. The amount of estimated credit loss is determined as the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of expected cash flows.

The Company evaluates its individual available for sale investment securities for OTTI on at least a quarterly basis. As part of this process, the Company considers its intent to sell each investment security and whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, the Company recognizes an OTTI charge to earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that meet neither of these conditions, an analysis is performed to determine if any of these securities are at risk for OTTI. To determine which securities are at risk for OTTI and should be quantitatively evaluated utilizing a detailed cash flow analysis, the Company evaluates certain indicators which consider various characteristics of each security including, but not limited to, the following: the credit rating and related outlook or status of the securities; the creditworthiness of the issuers of the securities; the value and type of underlying collateral; the duration and level of the unrealized loss; any credit enhancements; and other collateral-related characteristics such as the ratio of credit enhancements to expected credit losses. The relative importance of this information varies based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each security, as well as the economic environment at the time of assessment. The amount of estimated credit loss, which is charged to earnings, is determined as the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of expected cash flows.

As a result of its review of the portfolio as of June 30, 2011, the Company performed a detailed cash flow analysis of certain securities in unrealized loss to assess whether they were OTTI. The Company uses a third party provider to generate cash flow forecasts of each security reviewed based on a combination of management and market driven assumptions and securitization terms, including remaining payment terms of the security, prepayment speeds, the estimated amount of loans to become seriously delinquent over the life of the security, the estimated life-time severity rate, estimated losses over the life of the security, loan characteristics, the level of subordination within the security structure, expected housing price changes and interest rate assumptions. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011 an OTTI adjustment of $0.1 million was recognized on securities from the P.R. Non-Agency CMO portfolio with an amortized cost of $2.8 million. It is possible that future loss assumptions could change and cause future OTTI charges in these securities.

Higher default and loss assumptions driven by higher delinquencies in Puerto Rico, primarily due to the impact of inflationary pressures on the consumer, the high rate of unemployment and general recessionary condition on the Island, has resulted in higher default and loss estimates on the P.R. Non-Agency CMOs bonds. The higher default and loss estimates have resulted in lower bond prices and higher levels of unrealized losses on the bonds.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, it was determined that six securities reflected OTTI. Five of these securities are subordinated interests in a securitization structure collateralized by option adjustable rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans. The characteristics of these six securities that led to the OTTI conclusion included: i) the cumulative level and estimated future delinquency levels, ii) the effect of severely delinquent loans on forecasted defaults, iii) the cumulative severity and expected severity in resolving the defaulted loans, and iv) the current subordination of the securities that resulted in the present value of the forecast cash flows being less than the cost basis of the security. Management estimated that credit losses of $13.3 million had been incurred on these securities with an amortized cost of $313.9 million as of March 31, 2010.

In April 2010, the Company was approved by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) to bid for the assets and liabilities of certain Puerto Rico domiciled banks. As a condition to bid, the Company was required by the federal bank regulatory agencies to comply with certain financial ratios. To comply with the prescribed ratios, the Company could take a number of alternative actions including raising additional capital, disposing of non-performing loans, disposing of certain non-agency securities, shrinking the Company, or a combination of the preceding. On April 23, 2010, the Company sold the five securities mentioned above and recognized a loss of $136.7 million, of which $129.7 million had previously been reflected in other comprehensive income (loss). If the Company were not bidding for the assets and liabilities of certain failed banks, the Company would not have elected to sell the non-agency securities as it had the positive intent and the ability to hold the securities to maturity or until principal recovered.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not intend to sell the securities which were evaluated for OTTI and concluded it was not more likely than not that it would be required to sell these securities before the anticipated recovery of each security’s remaining amortized cost basis. Therefore, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the market value of the securities is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.

For the remainder of the Company’s securities portfolio that have experienced decreases in the fair value, the decline is considered to be temporary as the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis on the securities and neither intends to sell these securities nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities.

In subsequent periods the Company will account for the securities judged to be OTTI as if the securities had been purchased at the previous amortized cost less the credit related OTTI. Once a credit loss is recognized, the investment will be adjusted to a new amortized cost basis equal to the previous amortized cost basis less the amount recognized in earnings. For the investment securities for which OTTI was recognized in earnings, the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows

expected to be collected will be accreted as interest income.

The following table presents the securities for which an OTTI was recognized based on the Company’s impairment analysis of its investment portfolio at June 30, 2011 and 2010:


	As of						Quarter Ended						Six Month Period Ended
	June 30, 2011						June 30, 2011						June 30, 2011
	Amortized
	Cost (after		Gross						OTTI Related		Total				OTTI Related		Total
	credit related		Unrealized				OTTI Related		to Non-Credit		Impairment		OTTI Related		to Non-Credit		Impairment
(In thousands)	OTTI)		Losses		Fair Value		to Credit Loss		Loss		Losses		to Credit Loss		Loss		Losses
OTTI Investments
U.S. Non-Agency CMOs	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
P.R. Non-Agency CMOs		11,153		3,193		7,960		86		325		411		86		325		411


	$	11,153	$	3,193	$	7,960	$	86	$	325	$	411	$	86	$	325	$	411


	As of						Quarter Ended						Six Month Period Ended
	June 30, 2010						June 30, 2010						June 30, 2010
	Amortized
	Cost (after		Gross						OTTI Related		Total				OTTI Related		Total
	credit related		Unrealized				OTTI Related		to Non-Credit		Impairment		OTTI Related		to Non-Credit		Impairment
(In thousands)	OTTI)		Losses		Fair Value		to Credit Loss		Loss		Losses		to Credit Loss		Loss		Losses
OTTI Investments
U.S. Non-Agency CMOs	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13,257	$	26,840	$	40,097
P.R. Non-Agency CMOs		8,156		3,629		4,527		—		—		—		2		96		98


	$	8,156	$	3,629	$	4,527	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13,259	$	26,936	$	40,195

The following table presents activity related to the credit losses recognized in earnings on debt securities held by the Company for which a portion of OTTI remains in accumulated other comprehensive income:


	Quarters Ended				Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(In thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,816	$	1,193	$	2,816	$	1,191
Additions:
Credit losses for which OTTI was not previously recognized		—		—		—		—
Additional OTTI credit losses for which an other-than-temporary charge was previously recognized		86		—		86		2

Balance at end of period	$	2,902	$	1,193	$	2,902	$	1,193

The Company will continue to monitor and analyze the performance of its securities to assess the collectability of principal and interest as of each balance sheet date. As conditions in the housing and mortgage markets continue to change over time, the amount of projected credit losses could also change. Valuation and OTTI determinations will continue to be affected by external market factors including default rates, severity rates, and macro-economic factors in the United States and Puerto Rico. Doral Financial’s future results may be materially affected by worsening defaults and severity rates related to the underlying collateral.

8. Pledged Assets

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, certain securities and loans, as well as cash and other interest-earning assets, were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Cash	$	890	$	2,642
Other interest-earning assets		18,967		126,573
Securities available for sale		631,257		1,458,992
Loans held for sale		119,729		121,988
Loans receivable		2,344,012		2,388,428

Total pledged assets	$	3,114,855	$	4,098,623

9. Loans Held for Sale and Loans Receivable

Loans held for sale consist of the following:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Conventional single family residential⁽¹⁾	$	110,524	$	119,290
FHA/VA		165,176		172,216
Commercial loans to financial institutions		13,598		14,608
Commercial real estate		12,636		13,155

Total loans held for sale ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾	$	301,934	$	319,269


⁽¹⁾		At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, includes $0.1 million related to U.S. subsidiaries’ loans.

⁽²⁾		At both, June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the loans held for sale portfolio include $1.1 million of interest-only loans.

⁽³⁾		Includes $19.6 million and $21.4 million of balloon loans, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the loans held for sale portfolio included $148.1 million and $153.4 million, respectively, of defaulted loans collateralizing Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) securities for which the Company has an unconditional option (but not an obligation) to repurchase the defaulted loans. Payment of principal and a portion of the interest on these loans is guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”).

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a net deferred origination fee on loans held for sale amounting to approximately $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Non-performing loans held for sale totaled $2.5 million and $2.7 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Doral’s exposure to credit risk associated with its lending activities is measured on a customer basis as well as by groups of customers that share similar attributes. In the normal course of business, the Company has a concentration of loan credit risk in Puerto Rico and the mainland U.S., with the preponderance of its loans held for investment credit exposure in Puerto Rico.

The table below presents the Company’s loans receivable by product and geographic location:


	June 30, 2011									December 31, 2010
	PR			US			Total			PR			US			Total
Residential mortgage⁽¹⁾	$	3,406,704		$	131,200		$	3,537,904		$	3,451,895		$	108,641		$	3,560,536
FHA/VA guaranteed residential mortgage		132,657			—			132,657			187,473			—			187,473
Consumer Loans		46,324			31			46,355			54,354			26			54,380
Lease financing receivables		2,762			—			2,762			4,807			—			4,807

Total consumer		3,588,447			131,231			3,719,678			3,698,529			108,667			3,807,196

Commercial real estate		597,954			68,626			666,580			629,043			59,903			688,946
Commercial and industrial		38,384			874,036			912,420			36,639			597,056			633,695
Construction and land		309,590			80,330			389,920			349,899			108,835			458,734

Total commercial		945,928			1,022,992			1,968,920			1,015,581			765,794			1,781,375

Loans receivable, gross⁽²⁾		4,534,375			1,154,223			5,688,598			4,714,110			874,461			5,588,571


Allowance for loan and lease losses		(87,592	)		(5,880	)		(93,472	)		(117,821	)		(5,831	)		(123,652	)

	$	4,446,783		$	1,148,343		$	5,595,126		$	4,596,289		$	868,630		$	5,464,919


⁽¹⁾		Includes $576.5 million and $565.9 million of balloon loans, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Includes $405.8 million and $442.6 million of interest-only loans, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a net deferred origination fee on loans held for investment amounting to approximately $23.8 million and $24.0 million, respectively.

The Company has not traditionally made variable interest rate residential mortgage loans, option adjustable rate mortgages, or many of the higher risk mortgage loans made by a number of U.S. mainland banks. However, as part of its loss mitigation programs, the Company has granted certain concessions to borrowers in financial difficulties that have proven payment capacity which may include interest only periods or temporary interest rate reductions. Loans with temporarily reduced principal and interest payments may be subject to significant increases in loan payments as the temporary payment periods end which may lead to higher level of re-defaults. Doral works with the borrowers to establish terms and conditions (prior to the payment date) in order to optimize the Company’s interests.

Non-accrual and Past Due Loans and Leases

Doral recognizes interest income on loans receivable on an accrual basis unless it is determined that collection of all contractual principal or interest is unlikely. Doral discontinues recognition of interest income, when a loan receivable is delinquent on principal or interest for more than 90 days, except for revolving lines of credit and credit cards (non-accrual at 180 days), mortgage loans insured by FHA/VA (non-accrual at 270 days), and certain loans determined to be well collateralized so that ultimate collection of principal and interest is not in question (for example, when the outstanding loan and interest balance as a percentage of current collateral value is less than 60%). When a loan is placed on non-accrual, all accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against interest income in that period. Loans return to accrual status when principal and interest are current under the terms of the loan agreement, or when the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection and collectability is no longer doubtful. In the case of loans under troubled debt restructuring agreements, the Company continues to place the loans in non-accrual status and reports the loans as non-performing loans unless the Company expects to collect all contractual principal and interest and the loans have proven repayment capacity for a sufficient amount of time. Previously reversed or not accrued interest will be credited to income in the period of recovery. Interest income is recognized when a payment is received on a non-accrual loan if ultimate collection of principal is not in doubt.

Accrued interest receivable on impaired loans is reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest collections on non-accruing loans, for which the ultimate collectability of principal is uncertain, are applied as principal reductions; otherwise, such collections are credited to interest income when received. These loans may be restored to accrual status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection. Loans whose contractual terms have been modified in a TDR and are

current at the time of restructuring remain on accrual status if there is demonstrated performance prior to the restructuring and payment in full under the restructured terms is expected. Otherwise, the loans are placed on non-accrual status and reported as non-performing until there is sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period.

For consumer loans (primarily residential real estate), all of Doral’s loss mitigation tools require that the borrower demonstrate the intent and ability to pay all principal and interest on the loan. Doral must receive at least three consecutive monthly payments prior to qualifying the borrower for a loss mitigation product. Doral’s loss mitigation specialists must be reasonably assured of the borrower’s future repayment and performance from their review of the borrower’s circumstances, and when all the conditions are met, the customer is approved for a loss mitigation product, placed on a probation period and the loan is returned to accrual status. On a monthly basis Doral reviews the loan to ensure that payments are made during the probationary period. If a payment is not made during this probationary period the loan is immediately returned to non-accrual status. Also, if a payment is missed during the probationary period, the loan reverts to its original terms, and collections/foreclosure procedures begin from the point at which they stood prior to the restructure. Consumer loans not delinquent 90 days or more that are eligible for loss mitigation products are subject to the same requirements as the delinquent consumer loans, except that the requirement of making three consecutive payments prior to the restructure is waived.

For commercial loan loss mitigation (which includes commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and construction and land loans), the loans are underwritten by the Collections function, the intent and ability of the borrower to service the debt under the revised terms is studied, and if approved for the troubled debt restructuring, the customer is placed on a six month probationary period during which the customer is required to make six consecutive payments (or the equivalent in a lump sum) before the loan is returned to accrual status.

Loans receivable on which accrual of interest income had been discontinued as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(In thousands)	PR		US		Total		PR		US		Total
Consumer
Residential mortgage	$	277,501	$	685	$	278,186	$	276,328	$	2,030	$	278,358
Lease financing receivables		199		—		199		415		—		415
Other consumer ⁽¹⁾		500		—		500		404		—		404

Total consumer		278,200		685		278,885		277,147		2,030		279,177

Commercial
Commercial real estate		167,138		—		167,138		193,348		—		193,348
Construction and land		107,516		1,610		109,126		147,127		1,610		148,737
Commercial and industrial		2,731		—		2,731		2,522		—		2,522

Total commercial		277,385		1,610		278,995		342,997		1,610		344,607


Total loans receivable on which accrual of interest had been discontinued⁽²⁾⁽³⁾	$	555,585	$	2,295	$	557,880	$	620,144	$	3,640	$	623,784


⁽¹⁾		Includes personal, revolving lines of credit and other consumer loans.

⁽²⁾		Excludes $2.5 million and $2.7 million in loans held for sale on which accrual of interest had been discontinued as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

⁽³⁾		Excludes $79.1 million and $121.3 million of non-performing FHA/VA guaranteed loans that, due to the nature of their guarantees, present minimal credit risk to the Company as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Doral’s aging of past due loan receivables as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

As of June 30, 2011


																							Recorded
																							Investment
	30 to 89 Days				90 to 179 Days				180 to 240 Days				Over 240 Days										> 90 Days
	Past Due⁽¹⁾				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Total Past Due				Total Past		and Still
(In thousands)	PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		Due		Accruing
Consumer
Residential mortgage⁽²⁾	$	84,433	$	—	$	86,342	$	—	$	25,432	$	—	$	165,727	$	98	$	361,934	$	98	$	362,032	$	—
Lease financing receivables		219		—		199		—		—		—		—		—		418		—		418		—
Other consumer		804		—		2,452		—		91		—		71		—		3,418		—		3,418		1,961

Total consumer		85,456		—		88,993		—		25,523		—		165,798		98		365,770		98		365,868		1,961

Commercial
Commercial real estate		35,057		—		63,690		—		5,789		—		97,659		—		202,195		—		202,195		—
Construction and land		3,235		—		4,121		—		634		—		102,761		1,610		110,751		1,610		112,361		—
Commercial and industrial		366		—		618		—		807		—		1,960		—		3,751		—		3,751		560

Total commercial		38,658		—		68,429		—		7,230		—		202,380		1,610		316,697		1,610		318,307		560


Total past due loans	$	124,114	$	—	$	157,422	$	—	$	32,753	$	—	$	368,178	$	1,708	$	682,467	$	1,708	$	684,175	$	2,521


⁽¹⁾		In accordance with regulatory guidance, Doral defines 30 days past due as when the borrower is delinquent two payments. Doral defines 90 days past due based upon the actual number of days past due.

⁽²⁾		As of June 30, 2011 excludes $96.0 million of non-performing FHA/VA guaranteed loans that due to the nature of their guarantees present minimal credit risk to the Company.

As of December 31, 2010


																							Recorded
																							Investment
	30 to 89 Days				90 to 179 Days				180 to 240 Days				Over 240 Days										> 90 Days
	Past Due⁽¹⁾				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Total Past Due				Total Past		and Still
(In thousands)	PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		Due		Accruing
Consumer
Residential mortgage⁽²⁾	$	68,361	$	—	$	55,947	$	1,624	$	19,379	$	—	$	196,181	$	409	$	339,868	$	2,033	$	341,901	$	—
Lease financing receivables		234		—		386		—		—		—		—		—		620		—		620		—
Other consumer		1,341		—		400		—		—		—		4		—		1,745		—		1,745		1,993

Total consumer		69,936		—		56,733		1,624		19,379		—		196,185		409		342,233		2,033		344,266		1,993

Commercial
Commercial real estate		35,202		—		65,484		—		6,962		—		120,231		—		227,879		—		227,879		—
Construction and land		3,901		—		284		—		325		—		1,916		1,610		6,426		1,610		8,036		560
Commercial and industrial		2,281		—		8,135		—		395		—		138,144		—		148,955		—		148,955		—

Total commercial		41,384		—		73,903		—		7,682		—		260,291		1,610		383,260		1,610		384,870		560

Total past due loans	$	111,320	$	—	$	130,636	$	1,624	$	27,061	$	—	$	456,476	$	2,019	$	725,493	$	3,643	$	729,136	$	2,553


⁽¹⁾		In accordance with regulatory guidance, Doral defines 30 days past due as when the borrower is delinquent two payments. Doral defines 90 days past due based upon the actual number of days past due.

⁽²⁾		As of December 31, 2010 excludes $160.0 million of total past due FHA/VA guaranteed loans that due to the nature of their guarantees present minimal credit risk to the Company.

The Company would have recognized additional income had all delinquent loans been accounted for on an accrual basis as follows:


	Quarters Ended June 30,				Six Months Period Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Consumer
Residential mortgage ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	5,865	$	6,577	$	9,484	$	10,985
Other consumer		18		31		18		31

Total consumer		5,883		6,608		9,502		11,016

Commercial
Commercial real estate		3,477		3,292		6,108		5,774
Commercial and industrial		254		88		471		116
Construction and land		2,436		4,383		4,790		7,966

Total commercial		6,167		7,763		11,369		13,856

Total interest income	$	12,050	$	14,371	$	20,871	$	24,872


⁽¹⁾		Excludes $1.6 million and $3.7 million in additional interest income the Company would have recognized if FHA/VA non-accrual loans been accounted for on an accrual status for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Excludes $3.2 million and $5.8 million in additional interest income the Company would have recognized if FHA/VA non-accrual loans been accounted for on an accrual status for the six months period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Credit Quality

The Company’s lending activity is its core function and as such the quality and effectiveness of the loan origination and credit risk areas are imperative to its long term success. The Company manages credit risk by maintaining sound underwriting standards, monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality (including trends and collectability) and assessing reserves and loan concentrations. Critical risk management responsibilities include establishing sound lending standards, monitoring the quality of the loan portfolio performance, establishing loan rating systems, assessing reserves and loan concentrations, supervising document control and accounting, providing necessary training and resources to credit officers, implementing lending policies and loan documentation procedures, identifying problem loans as early as possible, and instituting procedures to ensure appropriate actions to comply with laws and regulations.

Credit risk management begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout the borrower’s credit cycle. Management’s judgment in conjunction with statistical analysis is used in underwriting, credit decisions, product pricing, risk appetite and setting credit limits, operating processes and metrics to limit the risks inherent in the loan portfolio and returns. Tolerance levels are set to decrease the percentage of approvals as the risk profile of the customer increases. Statistical models are based on detailed behavioral information from external sources such as credit bureaus, external credit scores and/or internal historical experience. These models are an integral part of our credit management process and are used in the assessment of both new and existing credit decisions, portfolio management strategies, collection practices and in the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The Company has also established an internal risk rating system and internal classifications which provide timely identification of potential deterioration in loan quality attributes in the loan portfolio. In addition, the Company has independent Loan Review and Internal Audit departments, each of which conduct monitoring and evaluation of loan portfolio quality, loan administration, and other related activities.

The risks involved in a loan decision are thoroughly analyzed prior to approval. Certain characteristics are indicators of risk, such as loan amount, purpose, product type, property type, loan amount in relation to the borrower’s previous credit experience and loan to value, cash out of the transaction, time of occupancy, and others. Many lending risks can be mitigated by requiring higher levels of borrower equity, risk pricing, additional documentation or collateral or other compensating factors.

The Company follows the established guidelines and requirements for government insured or guaranteed loans such as FHA, VA, Rural and Government subsidies, as well as conforming loans sold to FHLMC and FNMA. The Company also provides conventional loans for borrowers that do not qualify for a conforming loan. Doral’s underwriting policies focus primarily on the borrower’s ability to pay and secondarily on collateral value. The maximum loan to value ratio on conventional first mortgages generally does not exceed 80%. Loans with higher loan to value ratios may require private mortgage insurance.

Due to the current economic conditions, the Company has limited new lending activities in Puerto Rico in the construction, commercial and consumer (excluding mortgage) markets. The strategy adopted by the Company in relation to its loan exposures is to maintain a strong collection process that will ensure the orderly recovery of all loans by means of its collection efforts or restructuring of the loan. Lending activities in the United States increased in 2010 and continues to increase through the second quarter of June 30, 2011 as management determined that the U.S. market provides sound credit opportunities in select segments and markets. As of June 30, 2011 gross loans receivable in U.S totaled to $1.2 billion showing an increase of $279.8 million compared to December 31, 2010.

Delinquency is the primary indicator of credit quality the Company uses to monitor the credit quality of its portfolios, and is the basis for internal risk rating of loans. Refreshed LTVs and to a lesser extent, FICO scores are also considered in analyzing credit quality. On a daily basis, Doral monitors the delinquency of its loan portfolios and uses this information to calibrate its collection, restructuring and foreclosure targets. Portfolios are managed by different teams with expertise in their assigned tranches. For example, loans are segregated geographically, P.R. vs. U.S.; by product types (residential mortgage, small commercial, consumer, large commercial and construction and land loans); and by delinquency process stages, such as less than 90 days past due, over 90 days past due, loss mitigation, foreclosure and OREO.

For large commercial loans (including commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, construction and land loan portfolios), the Company uses workout agents, collection specialists, attorneys and third party service providers to supplement the management of the portfolio, including the credit quality and loss mitigation alternatives. In the case of residential construction projects, the workout function is primarily handled by a third party servicer that monitors the end-to-end process including, but not limited to, completion of construction, necessary restructuring, pricing, marketing and unit sales. For large commercial and construction loans the initial risk rating is driven by performance and delinquency. On an ongoing basis, the risk rating of large credits is managed by the portfolio management and collections function and reviewed and validated by the loan review function. Due to the current economic environment and management’s perceived increase in risk in the commercial loan portfolio, during the third quarter of 2010, management individually reviewed for impairment all commercial loans over $50,000 that were over 90 days past due to better estimate the amount the company expects to receive. Beginning the fourth quarter of 2010, management individually reviewed all commercial real estate loans over $500,000 that were over 90 days past due, as well as all new loans classified as substandard during the quarter. In future periods, and while management’s assessment of the inherent credit risk in the commercial portfolio continues to be high, the Company will continue to evaluate on a quarterly basis 25% of all commercial loans over 90 days past due and between $50,000 and $500,000 so that in any one year period it would have individually evaluated for impairment 100% of all substandard commercial loans between $50,000 and $500,000, as well as all substandard commercial real estate loans over $500,000 and all substandard commercial and construction loans over $1.0 million. There is a high level of surveillance and monitoring in place to manage these assets and mitigate any loss exposure.

As a result of the economic situation in P.R., Doral has created a number of loan modification programs to help borrowers stay in their homes and operate their businesses which also optimizes borrower performance and returns to Doral (refer to the discussion on loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings below for further information on the programs). Residential, other consumer or commercial loan modifications can result in returning a loan to accrual status when the criteria for doing so are met, resulting in increasing interest income and cash flows as previously non-performing loans begin to perform, and decreases in foreclosure and OREO costs by decreasing the number of foreclosed properties.

Detailed below is a table of the recorded investment in loans (including FHA/VA loans and loans held for sale) by the delinquency buckets the Company uses to monitor the credit quality of its loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The aging of the delinquent residential mortgage portfolio in the table below is a result of the prolonged foreclosure process characteristics in Puerto Rico and the Company’s efforts to help customers stay in their homes through various loss mitigation programs.

As of June 30, 2011


					30 to 89 Days				90 to 179 Days				180 to 240 Days				Over 240 Days
	Current				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Total
(In thousands)	PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		Total
Consumer
Residential mortgage	$	3,213,187	$	264,959	$	92,355	$	—	$	98,751	$	—	$	32,678	$	—	$	243,646	$	685	$	3,680,617	$	265,644	$	3,946,261
Lease financing receivables		2,342		—		219		—		201		—		—		—		—		—		2,762		—		2,762
Other consumer		43,069		31		793		—		2,316		—		86		—		60		—		46,324		31		46,355

Total consumer		3,258,598		264,990		93,367		—		101,268		—		32,764		—		243,706		685		3,729,703		265,675		3,995,378

Commercial
Commercial real estate		406,122		68,626		35,177		—		66,460		—		5,821		—		97,010		—		610,590		68,626		679,216
Commercial and industrial		48,318		874,036		371		—		613		—		803		—		1,877		—		51,982		874,036		926,018
Construction and land		199,100		78,720		3,237		—		4,121		—		632		—		102,500		1,610		309,590		80,330		389,920

Total commercial		653,540		1,021,382		38,785		—		71,194		—		7,256		—		201,387		1,610		972,162		1,022,992		1,995,154


Total	$	3,912,138	$	1,286,372	$	132,152	$	—	$	172,462	$	—	$	40,020	$	—	$	445,093	$	2,295	$	4,701,865	$	1,288,667	$	5,990,532


December 31, 2010

					30 to 89 Days				90 to 179 Days				180 to 240 Days				Over 240 Days
	Current				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Total
(In thousands)	PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		PR		US		Total
Consumer
Residential mortgage	$	3,425,774	$	106,608	$	78,545	$	—	$	72,097	$	1,624	$	27,651	$	38	$	326,671	$	507	$	3,930,738	$	108,777	$	4,039,515
Lease financing receivables		4,187		—		234		—		386		—		—		—		—		—		4,807		—		4,807
Other consumer		50,616		26		1,341		—		2,225		—		111		—		61		—		54,354		26		54,380

Total consumer		3,480,577		106,634		80,120		—		74,708		1,624		27,762		38		326,732		507		3,989,899		108,803		4,098,702

Commercial
Commercial real estate		,428,616		59,903		35,307		—		65,690		—		6,962		—		120,231		—		656,806		59,903		716,709
Commercial and industrial		29,653		597,056		3,901		—		607		—		360		—		2,118		—		36,639		597,056		633,695
Construction and land		200,943		107,225		2,281		—		8,136		—		395		—		138,144		1,610		349,899		108,835		458,734

Total commercial		659,212		764,184		41,489		—		74,433		—		7,717		—		260,493		1,610		1,043,344		765,794		1,809,138

Total	$	4,139,789	$	870,818	$	121,609	$	—	$	149,141	$	1,624	$	35,479	$	38	$	587,225	$	2,117	$	5,033,243	$	874,597	$	5,907,840

Loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings

Doral has created a number of loan modification programs to help borrowers stay in their homes which also optimizes borrower performance and returns to Doral. In these cases, the restructure or loan modification fits the definition of TDR. The programs are designed to provide temporary relief and, if necessary, longer term financial relief to the consumer loan customer. Doral’s consumer loan loss mitigation program (including consumer loan products and residential mortgage loans), grants a concession for economic or legal reasons related to the borrowers’ financial difficulties that Doral would not otherwise consider. Doral’s loss mitigation programs can provide for one or a combination of the following: movement of unpaid principal and interest to the end of the loan, extension of the loan term for up to ten years, deferral of principal payments for a period of time, and reduction of interest rates either permanently (feature discontinued in 2010) or for a period of up to two years. No programs adopted by Doral provide for the forgiveness of contractually due principal or interest. Deferred principal and uncollected interest are added to the end of the loan term at the time of the restructuring and uncollected interest is not recognized as income until collected or when the loan is paid off. Doral wants to make these programs available only to those borrowers who have defaulted, or are likely to default, permanently on their loan and would lose their homes in foreclosure action absent some lender concession. However, Doral will move borrowers and properties to foreclosure if the Company is not reasonably assured that the borrower will be able to repay all contractual principal or interest (which is not forgiven in part or whole in any current program).

Regarding the commercial loan loss mitigation programs, the Company adapted the loss mitigation program for residential mortgages discussed above for the small commercial real estate portfolio and used similar regulatory and accounting treatment for those loans. For the large commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and construction and land portfolios, the determination is made on a loan by loan basis at the time of restructuring as to whether a concession was made for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulty that Doral would not otherwise consider. Concessions made for commercial loans could include reductions in interest rates below market rates, extensions of maturity beyond policy, waiving of borrower covenants, or other contract changes that would be considered a concession. Doral mitigates loan defaults for its commercial loan portfolios through its Collections function. The function’s objective is to minimize both early stage delinquencies and losses upon default of commercial assets. The group utilizes existing collections infrastructure of front-end dialers, doorknockers, work-out agents, and third-party consultants. In the case of residential construction projects and large commercial loans, the function utilizes third-party vendors to manage the residential construction projects in terms of construction, marketing and sales, and restructuring of large commercial loans.

Residential, other consumer or commercial loan modifications can result in returning a loan to accrual status when the criteria for returning a loan to performing status are met (please refer to Doral’s non-accrual policies previously described). Loan modifications also increase Doral’s interest income by returning a non-performing loan to performing status, and cash flows by providing for payments to be made by the borrower, and decreases foreclosure and real estate owned (“REO”) costs by decreasing the number of foreclosed properties. Doral continues to consider a modified loan as a non-performing asset for purposes of estimating its allowance for loan and lease losses until the borrower has made at least six consecutive contractual payments. At such time the loan will be treated as any other performing loan for purposes of estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses.

Loan modifications that are considered troubled debt restructurings completed during the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


	For the Quarters Ended June 30,
	2011						2010
			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification				Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
			Outstanding Recorded		Outstanding Recorded				Outstanding Recorded		Outstanding Recorded
(In thousands)	Number of Contracts		Investment		Investment		Number of Contracts		Investment		Investment
Consumer:
Non FHA/VA Residential		320	$	37,000	$	36,548		526	$	64,062	$	63,733
Other Consumer		8		46		46		23		143		130

Total Consumer		328		37,046		36,594		549		64,205		63,863

Commercial:
Commercial Real Estate		10	$	3,309	$	3,671		8	$	1,690	$	1,690
Commercial and Industrial		0		—		—		2		5,226		5,226
Construction and Land		0		—		—		4		14,018		14,010

Total Commercial		10		3,309		3,671		14		20,934		20,926

Total Loan Modifications		338	$	40,355	$	40,265		563	$	85,139	$	84,789


	Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
	2011						2010
			Pre-modification		Post-modification				Pre-modification		Post-modification
	Number of		recorded		recorded		Number of		recorded		recorded
(In thousands)	contracts		investment		investment		contracts		investment		investment
Consumer modifications
Residential non FHA/VA		1,130	$	129,277	$	127,318		712	$	85,881	$	85,643
Other consumer		18		109		109		36		297		269

Total consumer		1,148		129,386		127,427		748		86,178		85,912

Commercial
Commercial real estate		80	$	18,937	$	18,912		17	$	8,581	$	8,581
Commercial and industrial		0		—		—		4		9,489		9,489
Construction and land		2		61		60		5		17,185		17,177

Total commercial		82		18,998		18,972		26		35,255		35,247

Total loan modifications		1,230	$	148,384	$	146,399		774	$	121,433	$	121,159

Recidivism, or the borrower defaulting on its obligation pursuant to a modified loan, results in the loan once again becoming a non-accrual loan. Recidivism occurs at a notably higher rate than do defaults on new origination loans, so modified loans present a higher risk of loss than do new origination loans.

Loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings made during the twelve months previous to June 30, 2011, that defaulted during the six month period ending June 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Six month period ended June 30, 2011
(In thousands)	Number of contracts		Recorded investment
Consumer
Residential mortgage — non FHA/VA		681	$	83,689
Other consumer		8		74

Total consumer		689		83,763

Commercial
Commercial real estate		105		23,800
Construction and land		5		6,824

Total commercial		110		30,624


Total recidivism		799	$	114,387

For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company would have recognized $2.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, in additional interest income had all TDR loans been accounted for on an accrual basis.

As of June 30, 2011, construction TDRs include an outstanding principal balance of $77.5 million with commitments to disburse additional funds of $19.1 million.

10. Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Impaired Loans

Doral’s allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) is management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the reported loan receivable balance as of the financial statement date. Management estimates the ALLL separately for each product category (non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans, other consumer, commercial real estate, construction and land, and other commercial and industrial) and geography (Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland), and combines the amounts in reaching its estimate for the full portfolio.

Management’s product category loss reserve estimate for performing loans considers: (i) the reserve is estimated based upon the probability of the performing loan defaulting at some future period, and (ii) Doral’s historical experience of charge-offs related to the outstanding principal balance.

For non-performing loans, the reserve is estimated either by (i) considering the loans’ current level of delinquency and the probability that the loan will be foreclosed upon from that delinquency stage, and the loss that will be realized assuming foreclosure (mortgage loans), or (ii) measuring impairment for individual loans considering the specific facts and circumstances of the borrower, guarantors, collateral, legal matters, market matters, and other circumstances that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay their loan, Doral’s ability to repossess and liquidate the collateral, and Doral’s ability to pursue and enforce any deficiency in payment received. The probability of a loan migrating to foreclosure whether a current loan or a past due loan, and the amount of loss given default, is based upon the Company’s own experience, with more recent experience judgmentally weighted more heavily in the calculated factors. With this practice management believes the factors used better represent existing economic conditions. In estimating the loss given default factor, management uses rates that are unique to ranges of loan-to-value ratios (calculated as current loan balance divided by the most recent appraisal value).

Loans determined to be TDRs are impaired and for purpose of estimating the ALLL must be individually evaluated for impairment. For residential mortgage loans determined to be TDRs, on a monthly basis, the Company pools TDRs with similar characteristics and performs an impairment analysis of discounted cash flows. If a pool yields a present value below the recorded investment in the pool of loans, an impairment is recognized by a charge to the provision for loan and lease losses and a credit to the ALLL. For loss mitigated loans without a concession in the interest rate, the Company performs an impairment analysis of discounted cash flows giving consideration of probability of default and loss given foreclosure on those estimated cash flows, and records an impairment by charging the provision for loan and lease losses with a corresponding credit to the ALLL.

The activity in Doral’s allowance for loan and lease losses account for the quarters and six month periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
	Non-												Construction			Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			and			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			Land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	54,016			5,565		$	59,581		$	23,956		$	30,642		$	6,025		$	60,623		$	120,204
Provision for loan and lease losses		5,410			854			6,264			4,372			2,278			409			7,059			13,323
Losses charged to the allowance		(4,271	)		(1,239	)		(5,510	)		(12,755	)		(21,769	)		(407	)		(34,931	)		(40,441	)
Recoveries		—			367			367			—			—			19			19			386

Balance at end of period	$	55,155		$	5,547		$	60,702		$	15,573		$	11,151		$	6,046		$	32,770		$	93,472

Reported balance of loans⁽¹⁾	$	3,537,904		$	46,947		$	3,584,851		$	666,580		$	389,920		$	912,420		$	1,968,920		$	5,553,771

ALLL for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	26,963		$	—		$	26,963		$	9,071		$	3,275		$	342		$	12,688		$	39,651

Reported balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	792,005		$	—		$	792,005		$	252,166		$	154,505		$	11,708		$	418,379		$	1,210,384

ALLL of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	28,192		$	5,547		$	33,739		$	6,502		$	7,876		$	5,704		$	20,082		$	53,821

Reported balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,745,899		$	46,947		$	2,792,846		$	414,414		$	235,415		$	900,712		$	1,550,541		$	4,343,387


⁽¹⁾		Excludes reported balance of guaranteed loans and loans on savings deposits.


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
	Non-												Construction			Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			and			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			Land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	53,708		$	7,763		$	61,471		$	24,745		$	57,233		$	4,032		$	86,010		$	147,481
Provision for loan and lease losses		18,769			1,644			20,413			4,771			17,705			1,728			24,204			44,617
Losses charged to the allowance		(14,497	)		(2,106	)		(16,603	)		(430	)		(39,489	)		(978	)		(40,897	)		(57,500	)
Recoveries		—			272			272			—			—			43			43			315

Balance at end of period	$	57,980		$	7,573		$	65,553		$	29,086		$	35,449		$	4,825		$	69,360		$	134,913


Reported balance of loans⁽¹⁾	$	3,674,920		$	70,119		$	3,745,039		$	728,608		$	382,572		$	475,061		$	1,586,241		$	5,331,280


ALLL for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	9,074		$	—		$	9,074		$	14,303		$	29,256		$	243		$	43,802		$	52,876


Reported balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	250,028		$	—		$	250,028		$	146,469		$	211,972		$	244		$	358,685		$	608,713


ALLL of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	48,906		$	7,573		$	56,479		$	14,783		$	6,193		$	4,582		$	25,558		$	82,037


Reported balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,424,892		$	70,119		$	3,495,011		$	582,139		$	170,600		$	474,817		$	1,227,556		$	4,722,567


⁽¹⁾ Excludes reported balance of guaranteed loans and loans on savings deposits.

	Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2011
	Non-												Construction			Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			and			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			Land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	56,487		$	6,274		$	62,761		$	29,712		$	25,026		$	6,153		$	60,891		$	123,652
Provision for loan and lease losses		6,165			1,349			7,514			(1,384	)		9,484			300			8,400			15,914
Losses charged to the allowance		(7,497	)		(2,837	)		(10,334	)		(12,755	)		(23,359	)		(426	)		(36,540	)		(46,874	)
Recoveries		—			761			761			—			—			19			19			780

Balance at end of period	$	55,155		$	5,547		$	60,702		$	15,573		$	11,151		$	6,046		$	32,770		$	93,472


Reported balance of loans⁽¹⁾	$	3,537,904		$	46,947		$	3,584,851		$	666,580		$	389,920		$	912,420		$	1,968,920		$	5,553,771


ALLL for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	26,963		$	—		$	26,963		$	9,071		$	3,275		$	342		$	12,688		$	39,651


Reported balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	792,005		$	—		$	792,005		$	252,166		$	154,505		$	11,708		$	418,379		$	1,210,384


ALLL of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	28,192		$	5,547		$	33,739		$	6,502		$	7,876		$	5,704		$	20,082		$	53,821


Reported balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,745,899		$	46,947		$	2,792,846		$	414,414		$	235,415		$	900,712		$	1,550,541		$	4,343,387


⁽¹⁾		Excludes reported balance of guaranteed loans and loans on savings deposits.


	Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2010
	Non-FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			Construction			Commercial			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consume			Consumer			Real Estate			Land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	51,814		$	8,338		$	60,152		$	21,883		$	54,458		$	4,281		$	80,622		$	140,774
Provision for loan and lease losses		25,378			3,277			28,655			7,839			20,390			1,654			29,883			58,538
Losses charged to the allowance		(19,212	)		(4,555	)		(23,767	)		(686	)		(39,521	)		(1,176	)		(41,383	)		(65,150	)
Recoveries		—			513			513			50			122			66			238			751

Balance at end of period	$	57,980		$	7,573		$	65,553		$	29,086		$	35,449		$	4,825		$	69,360		$	134,913


Reported balance of loans ⁽¹⁾	$	3,674,920		$	70,119		$	3,745,039		$	728,608		$	382,572		$	475,061		$	1,586,241		$	5,331,280


ALLL for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	9,074		$	—		$	9,074		$	14,303		$	29,256		$	243		$	43,802		$	52,876


Reported balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	250,028		$	—		$	250,028		$	146,469		$	211,972		$	244		$	358,685		$	608,713


ALLL of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	48,906		$	7,573		$	56,479		$	14,783		$	6,193		$	4,582		$	25,558		$	82,037


Reported balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,424,892		$	70,119		$	3,495,011		$	582,139		$	170,600		$	474,817		$	1,227,556		$	4,722,567


⁽¹⁾		Excludes reported balance of guaranteed loans and loans on savings deposits.

The following table provides Doral’s recorded investment in impaired loans which reflects partial charge-offs and other amounts which reduce credit risk, the contractual unpaid principal balance (“UPB”), and the related allowance as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


	As of June 30, 2011									December 31, 2010
			Recorded		Related							Recorded		Related
(In thousands)	UPB		Investment		Allowance		Reserve %			UPB		Investment		Allowance		Reserve %⁽¹⁾
With no allowance recorded at the report date:
Residential⁽²⁾	$	299,817	$	277,954	$	—		—	%	$	267,767	$	264,785	$	—		—	%

Total consumer		299,817		277,954		—		—	%		267,767		264,785		—		—	%

Commercial real estate		165,751		148,754		—		—	%		145,099		131,078		—		—	%
Commercial and industrial		10,890		10,822		—		—	%		5,489		5,435		—		—	%
Construction and land		107,945		107,535		—		—	%		96,357		85,252		—		—	%

Total commercial		284,586		267,111		—		—	%		246,945		221,765		—		—	%


With allowance recorded at the report date:
Residential⁽²⁾		529,184		514,051		26,963		5.25	%		537,698		533,223		27,347		5.13	%

Total consumer		529,184		514,051		26,963		5.25	%		537,698		533,223		27,347		5.13	%

Commercial real estate		119,149		103,412		9,071		8.77	%		138,827		131,941		22,086		16.74	%
Commercial and industrial		1,031		887		342		6.97	%		2,069		2,070		1,060		51.21	%
Construction and land		47,085		46,970		3,275		38.56	%		118,966		105,872		18,200		17.19	%

Total commercial		167,265		151,269		12,688		8.39	%		259,862		239,883		41,346		17.24	%


Total
Residential⁽²⁾		829,001		792,005		26,963		3.40	%		805,465		798,008		27,347		3.43	%

Total consumer		829,001		792,005		26,963		3.40	%		805,465		798,008		27,347		3.43	%

Commercial real estate		284,900		252,166		9,071		3.60	%		283,926		263,019		22,086		8.40	%
Commercial and industrial		11,921		11,709		3,275		2.12	%		7,558		7,505		1,060		14.12	%
Construction and land		155,030		154,505		342		2.92	%		215,323		191,124		18,200		9.52	%

Total commercial		451,851		418,380		12,688		3.03	%		506,807		461,648		41,346		8.96	%

Total	$	1,280,852	$	1,210,385	$	39,651		3.28	%	$	1,312,272	$	1,259,656	$	68,693		5.45	%


⁽¹⁾		Gross reserve percent represents the amount of the allowance to the recorded investment.

⁽²⁾		As of December 31, 2010 includes UPB and recorded investment of $66.0 million and $65.7 million, respectively of TDRs not previously included as impaired loans.

The second quarter ended June 30, 2011 included approximately $30.1 million of charge-offs as a result of adopting the practice of charging-off the portion of the difference between the loan balance before charge-off and the estimated fair value of the property collateralizing the loan prior to receipt of a third party appraisal due to the long delays to receive such appraisals in Doral’s Puerto Rico market. This new practice accelerated charge-offs into the 2011 second quarter, reduced the allowance for loan losses balance, and reduced the loan receivable balance.

The following table provides Doral’s average recorded investment in impaired loans and the related interest income recognized during the time within that period that the loans were impaired for the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.


	Quarters Ended June 30,
	2011				2010
	Average				Average
	Recorded		Interest Income		Recorded		Interest Income
(In thousands)	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
Consumer
Non-FHA/VA residential	$	609,598	$	6,015	$	536,076	$	6,878

Total consumer		609,598		6,015		536,076		6,878

Commercial
Commercial real estate		241,285		1,241		156,604		647
Commercial and industrial		9,264		172		247		5
Construction and land		164,799		763		269,624		347

Total commercial		415,348		2,176		426,475		999


Total	$	1,024,946	$	8,191	$	962,551	$	7,877


	Six month period Ended June 30,
	2011				2010
	Average				Average
	Recorded		Interest Income		Recorded		Interest Income
(In thousands)	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
Consumer
Non-FHA/VA residential	$	626,380	$	12,029	$	485,222	$	13,756

Total consumer		626,380		12,029		485,222		13,756

Commercial
Commercial real estate		243,676		2,482		153,247		1,297
Commercial and industrial		9,606		344		250		10
Construction and land		172,351		1,526		270,389		693

Total commercial		425,633		4,352		423,886		2,000


Total	$	1,052,013	$	16,381	$	909,108	$	15,756

For TDRs where impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, the entire change in present value is recognized as a provision for loan and lease losses, therefore, interest income in the table above does not include any interest based on the change in present value attributable to the passage of time.

11. Related Party Transactions

The following table summarizes certain information regarding Doral Financial’s loans outstanding to officers, directors and common stockholders controlling 5% or more for the periods indicated.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,300		$	2,840
Repayments		(20	)		(96	)
Loans of former officers		(29	)		(1,444	)

Balance at end of period⁽¹⁾	$	1,251		$	1,300


⁽¹⁾		At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, none of the loans outstanding to officers, directors and 5% or more stockholders were delinquent.

At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the amount of loans outstanding to officers, directors and 5% or more stockholders secured by mortgages on real estate totalled to $1.2 million.

Since 2000, Doral Financial has conducted business with an entity that provides property inspection services and is co-owned by the spouse of a former Executive Vice President of the Company (employed through the third quarter of 2010). The amount paid by the Company to this entity for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2010 totalled to $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively. No amounts were paid to this entity during 2011.

For both the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company assumed approximately $0.5 million, of the professional services expense related to Doral Holdings. Doral Holdings was dissolved on December 15, 2010 and no fees have been paid during 2011.

12. Accounts Receivable and Other Assets

The Company reported accounts receivable of $41.6 million and $28.7 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Total accounts receivable included $15.2 million and $12.5 million related to claims of loans foreclosed to FHA and VA as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

13. Servicing Activities

The Company routinely originates, securitizes and sells mortgage loans into the secondary market. The Company generally retains the servicing rights and, in the past, also retained IOs. Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”) represent the estimated present value of the normal servicing fees (net of related servicing costs) expected to be received on a loan being serviced over the expected term of the loan. MSRs entitle Doral Financial to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balance of the loans serviced and the contractual servicing fee. The annual servicing fees generally range between 25 and 50 basis points, less, in certain cases, any corresponding guarantee fee. In addition, MSRs may entitle Doral Financial, depending on the contract language, to ancillary income including late charges, float income, and prepayment penalties net of the appropriate expenses incurred for performing the servicing functions. In certain instances, the Company also services loans with no contractual servicing fee. The servicing asset or liability associated with such loans is evaluated based on ancillary income, including float, late fees, prepayment penalties and costs.

The changes in servicing assets measured using the fair value method for the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are shown below:


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	116,299		$	118,236		$	114,342		$	118,493
Capitalization of servicing assets		2,546			1,407			4,642			3,184
Sales of servicing asset⁽¹⁾		—			(162	)		—			(192	)
Servicing release due to repurchase⁽²⁾		(417	)		(1,029	)		(505	)		(1,165	)
Change in fair value		(2,643	)		(5,447	)		(2,694	)		(7,315	)

Balance at end of period⁽³⁾	$	115,785		$	113,005		$	115,785		$	113,005


⁽¹⁾		Amount represents MSRs sales related to $22.5 million and $24.0 million in principal balance of mortgage loans for the quarter and six month period ended 2010.

⁽²⁾		Amount represents the adjustment of MSR fair value related to the repurchase of $28.8 million and $74.5 million in principal balance of mortgage loans serviced for others for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and $35.1 million and $84.6 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

⁽³⁾		Outstanding balance of loans serviced for third parties totalled to $8.0 billion and $8.3 billion as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which includes $2.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of loans being serviced under sub-servicing arrangements.

The Company recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others and records these assets at fair value. The fair value of the Company’s MSRs is determined based on a combination of market information on trading activity (servicing asset trades and broker valuations), benchmarking of servicing assets (valuation surveys) and cash flow modeling. The valuation of the Company’s servicing assets incorporates two sets of assumptions: (i) market derived assumptions for discount rates, servicing costs, escrow earnings rate, float earnings rate and cost of funds and (ii) market derived assumptions adjusted for the Company’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior for escrow balances, delinquencies and foreclosures, late fees, prepayments and prepayment penalties. The constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) assumptions employed for the valuation of the Company’s servicing assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was 7.3% compared to 9.3% for the corresponding 2010 period.

Discount rate assumptions for the Company’s servicing assets were stable for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, which was 11.3% for both periods.

Based on recent prepayment experience, the expected weighted-average remaining life of the Company’s servicing assets at June 30, 2011 and 2010 was 7.3 years and 6.5 years, respectively. Any projection of the expected weighted-average remaining life of servicing assets is limited by conditions that existed at the time the calculations were performed.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, fair values of the Company’s retained interest were based on internal models that incorporate market driven assumptions, such as discount rates, prepayment speeds and implied forward London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rates (in the case of variable IOs), adjusted by the particular characteristics of the Company’s servicing portfolio.

The weighted-averages of the key economic assumptions used by the Company in its internal models and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions for mortgage loans at June 30, 2011, were as follows:


				Interest-Only
(Dollars in thousands)	Servicing Assets			Strips
Carrying amount of retained interest	$	115,785		$	43,750
Weighted-average expected life (in years)		7.3			5.8
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate)		7.3	%		7.5	%
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change	$	(3,642	)	$	(1,013	)
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change	$	(7,115	)	$	(1,988	)
Residual cash flow discount rate (weighted-average annual rate)		11.3	%		13.0	%
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change	$	(4,833	)	$	(1,496	)
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change	$	(9,301	)	$	(2,890	)

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or offset the sensitivities.

To determine the value of its portfolio of variable IOs, Doral Financial uses an internal valuation model that forecasts expected cash flows using forward LIBOR rates derived from the LIBOR/Swap yield curve at the date of the valuation. The characteristics of the variable IOs result in an increase in cash flows when LIBOR rates fall and a reduction in cash flows when LIBOR rates rise. This provides a mitigating effect on the impact of prepayment speeds on the cash flows, with prepayment expected to rise when long-term interest rates fall reducing the amount of expected cash flows and the opposite when long-term interest rates rise. Prepayment assumptions incorporated into the valuation model for variable and fixed IOs are based on publicly available, independently verifiable, prepayment assumptions for FNMA mortgage pools and statistically derived prepayment adjusters based on observed relationships between the Company’s and the FNMA’s U.S. mainland mortgage pool prepayment experiences.

This methodology resulted in a CPR of 7.5% and 11.1% for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change in the CPR between 2011 and 2010 was due mostly to a generalized decrease in market interest rates.

The Company continued to benchmark its internal assumptions for setting its discount rate to a third party valuation provider. This methodology resulted in a discount rate of 13.0% for both quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

For IOs, Doral Financial recognizes as interest income (through the life of the IO) the excess of all estimated cash flows attributable to these interests over their recorded balance using the effective yield method. Doral Financial recognizes as interest income the excess of the cash collected from the borrowers over the yield payable to investors, less a servicing fee (“retained spread”), up to an amount equal to the yield on the IOs. Doral Financial accounts for any excess retained spread as amortization to the gross IO capitalized at inception. The Company updates its estimates of expected cash flows periodically and recognizes changes in calculated effective yield on a prospective basis.

The activity of interest-only strips is shown below:


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	41,618		$	43,584		$	44,250		$	45,723
Amortization		(1,947	)		(2,729	)		(4,128	)		(5,527	)
Gain on the IO value		4,079			3,857			3,628			4,516

Balance at end of period	$	43,750		$	44,712		$	43,750		$	44,712

The following table summarizes the estimated change in the fair value of the Company’s IOs, the constant prepayment rate and the weighted-average expected life under the Company’s valuation model, given several hypothetical (instantaneous and parallel) increases or decreases in interest rates. As of June 30, 2011, all of the mortgage loan sales contracts underlying the Company’s floating rate IOs were subject to interest rate caps.

(Dollars in thousands)


Change in Interest Rates		Constant			Weighted-Average		Change in Fair			Percentage
(Basis Points)		Prepayment Rate			Expected Life (Years)		Value of IOs			of Change
	200		5.3	%		6.8	$	(6,154	)		(14.1)	%
	100		6.3	%		6.3		(3,445	)		(7.9)	%
	50		6.8	%		6.1		(1,726	)		(3.9)	%
Base			7.5	%		5.8		—			—	%
	-50		8.2	%		5.6		1,695			3.9	%
	-100		8.9	%		5.4		2,676			6.1	%
	-200		10.2	%		5.0		4,177			9.5	%

14. Sale and Securitization of Mortgage Loans

For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the unpaid principal balance of loan sales and securitizations totaled $132.5 million and $253.3 million, respectively, and $79.3 million and $167.2 million for the comparable 2010 periods while the principal balance of loans for which servicing was released or derecognized due to repurchases totalled $35.1 million and $84.6 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Under most of the servicing agreements, the Company is required to advance funds to make scheduled payments to investors, if payments due have not been received from the mortgagors. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, mortgage servicing advances totalled $54.0 million and $51.5 million, respectively, net of a reserve of $8.8 million and $9.0 million, respectively.

In general, Doral Financial’s servicing agreements are terminable by the investors for cause. The Company’s servicing agreements with FNMA permit FNMA to terminate the Company’s servicing rights if FNMA determines that changes in the Company’s financial condition have materially adversely affected the Company’s ability to satisfactorily service the mortgage loans. Approximately 28% of Doral Financial’s mortgage loan servicing on behalf of third parties relates to mortgage servicing for FNMA. Termination of Doral Financial’s servicing rights with respect to FNMA or other parties for which it provides servicing could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of Doral Financial. As of June 30, 2011, no servicing agreements have been terminated.

15. Servicing Related Matters

At June 30, 2011, escrow funds and custodial accounts included approximately $79.4 million deposited with Doral Bank PR. These funds are included within the cash and due from banks caption in the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements. Escrow funds and custodial accounts also included approximately $42.7 million deposited with other banks, which were excluded from the Company’s assets and liabilities. The Company had fidelity bond and errors and omissions coverage of $30.0 million and $17.0 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2011.

16. Other Real Estate Owned

The Company acquires real estate through foreclosure proceedings. Legal fees and other direct costs incurred in a foreclosure are expensed as incurred. Real estate held for sale totalled $101.5 million and $100.3 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The following table provides the balances of other real estate held for sale for the periods indicated:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Residential	$	53,381	$	63,794
Commercial		20,163		17,599
Construction and land		27,955		18,880

Balance at end of period	$	101,499	$	100,273

The following table presents activity of OREO for the periods indicated:


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	103,767		$	100,345		$	100,273		$	94,219
Additions		22,331			37,368			51,703			56,090
Sales		(22,110	)		(10,324	)		(44,836	)		(16,617	)
Retirements		(1,882	)		(1,735	)		(4,266	)		(4,124	)
Provision for OREO losses		(607	)		(22,477	)		(1,375	)		(26,391	)

Balance at end of period	$	101,499		$	103,177		$	101,499		$	103,177

17. Deposits

The following table summarizes deposit balances:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Brokered certificates of deposit	$	2,031,108	$	2,359,254
Certificates of deposit		607,701		703,473
Money markets accounts		554,528		475,467
NOW accounts and other transactions accounts		414,061		411,633
Regular savings		409,812		410,418

Total interest-bearing		4,017,210		4,360,245
Non-interest-bearing deposits		285,582		258,230

Total deposits	$	4,302,792	$	4,618,475

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company reclassified from deposit accounts to loan balances $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of overdrafts.

18. Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

As part of its financing activities the Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase the same or substantially similar securities. The Company retains control over such securities. Accordingly, the amounts received under these agreements represent borrowings, and the securities underlying the agreements remain in the Company’s asset accounts. These transactions are carried at the amounts at which transactions will be settled. The counterparties to the contracts generally have the right to repledge the securities received as collateral. Those securities are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as part of pledged investment securities. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consisted of the following:


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Repurchase agreements with maturities ranging from November 2012 to June 2015 (2010- March 2012 to June 2015), at various fixed rates averaging 2.42% and 3.15%, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.		342,300		1,026,800

Callable repurchase agreements with maturity date from August 2014 to January 2015, at various fixed rates averaging 2.33% at December 31, 2010 with callable dates between July and August 2012.		—		50,000

Putable repurchase agreement with a maturity of February 17, 2014 at a rate of 2.98% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, with a callable date of August 2011 (2010 - February 2011).		100,000		100,000

	$	442,300	$	1,176,800

Maximum repurchase agreements outstanding at any month end during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 were $1.2 billion. The approximate average daily outstanding balance of securities sold under repurchase agreements for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 was $1.0 billion. The weighted-average interest of such agreements, computed on a daily basis was 3.01% for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

During the second quarter of 2011 the Company substituted $515.0 million of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with advances from FHLB and retired $219.5 million of securities sold under agreements to repurchase upon the sale of investment securities pledged as collateral incurring prepayment charges of $3.1 million.

19. Advances from FHLB

Advances from FHLB consisted of the following:


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Non-callable advances with maturities ranging from October 2011 to February 2016 (2010- January 2011 to May 2013) at various fixed rates averaging 3.09% and 3.64%, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.	$	1,188,849	$	747,420

Non-callable advances with maturities ranging from September 2011 to November 2012, tied to 1-month LIBOR adjustable monthly, at a variable rate of 0.21% and 0.28% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.		74,000		74,000

Putable structured advances due on March 2012 at a fixed rate of 5.04% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, putable at September 2011 (2010- March 2011).		80,000		80,000

	$	1,342,849	$	901,420

Maximum advances outstanding at any month end during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 were $1.3 billion. The approximate average daily outstanding balance of advances from FHLB for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 was $1.0 billion. The weighted-average interest of such advances, computed on a daily basis was 3.14% for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

At June 30, 2011, the Company had pledged qualified collateral in the form of residential mortgage loans with an estimated market value of $1.4 billion to secure the above advances from FHLB, which generally the counterparty is not permitted to sell or repledge.

In January 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with the FHLB to exchange $555.4 million of its non-callable term advances, reducing the average contractual interest rate on those advances to 1.7% from 4.1%, and the average effective interest rate from 4.1% to 2.7%, and extending the average maturities to 39 months from 14 months. This transaction resulted in a $22.0 million fee paid to FHLB, which is capitalized and amortized as yield adjustment over the term of the borrowing.

During the second quarter of 2011 the Company increased its FHLB advances, using the proceeds to repay securities sold under agreements to repurchase from the FHLB, reducing contractual interest rates from 4.2% to 1.9%, and the average effective interest rate from 4.1% to 3.7%, and extending average maturity from 2.3 years to 4.0 years. The transaction resulted in a $40.2 million fee which is capitalized and amortized as a yield adjustment. The proceeds from the increase in FHLB advances were used to repay other repurchase agreements, fund new loans, or were retained in cash.

The FHLB advances are subject to early termination fees.

20. Loans Payable

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, loans payable consisted of financing agreements with local financial institutions secured by mortgage loans.

Outstanding loans payable consisted of the following:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Secured borrowings with local financial institutions, at variable interest rates tied to 3-month LIBOR averaging 1.76% and 1.74% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, collateralized by residential mortgage loans.	$	279,724	$	287,511

Secured borrowings with local financial institutions, at fixed interest rates averaging 7.39% and 7.40% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, collateralized by residential mortgage loans.		14,899		16,524

	$	294,623	$	304,035

The expected maturity date of secured borrowings based on collateral is from present to December 2025. Maximum loans payable outstanding at any month end during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 were $301.6 million. The approximate average daily outstanding balance of loans payable for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 was $300.1 million. The weighted-average interest of such borrowings, computed on a daily basis was 2.04% for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $119.7 million and $122.0 million, respectively, of loans held for sale and $174.3 million and $180.4 million, respectively, of loans receivable that were pledged to secure financing agreements with local financial institutions. Such loans can be repledged by the counterparty.

21. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
$30.0 million notes, net of discount, bearing interest at 7.00%, due on April 26, 2012, paying interest monthly.	$	29,921	$	29,875

$100.0 million notes, net of discount, bearing interest at 7.65%, due on March 26, 2016, paying interest monthly.		98,896		98,801

$40.0 million notes, net of discount, bearing interest at 7.10%, due on April 26, 2017, paying interest monthly.		39,524		39,492

$30.0 million notes, net of discount, bearing interest at 7.15%, due on April 26, 2022, paying interest monthly.		29,513		29,499

Bonds payable secured by mortgage on building at fixed rates ranging from 6.75% to 6.90%, with maturities ranging from December 2011 to December 2029, paying interest monthly.		37,935		38,445

Bonds payable at a fixed rate of 6.25%, with maturities ranging from December 2011 to December 2029, paying interest monthly.		7,300		7,400

Note payable with a local financial institution, collateralized by IOs, at a fixed rate of 7.75%, paying principal and interest monthly, last payment due on December 2013.		17,510		20,624

$250.0 million notes, net of discount, bearing interest at a variable interest rate (3-month LIBOR plus 1.85%), due on July 21, 2020, paying interest quarterly comencing on January 2011.		249,831		249,822

	$	510,430	$	513,958

Doral Financial is the guarantor of various unregistered serial and term bonds issued by Doral Properties, a wholly-owned subsidiary, through the Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority (“AFICA”). The bonds were issued to finance the construction and development of the Doral Financial Plaza building, the headquarters facility of Doral Financial. As of June 30, 2011, the outstanding principal balance of the bonds was $45.2 million with fixed interest rates, ranging from 6.25% to 6.90%, and maturities ranging from December 2011 to December 2029. Certain series of the bonds are secured by a mortgage on the building and underlying real property.

On July 8, 2010, the Company, through its subsidiary, Doral Money, entered into a collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) arrangement with a third party in which up to $450.0 million of largely U.S. mainland based commercial loans are pledged to collateralize AAA rated debt of $250.0 million paying three month LIBOR plus 1.85 percent issued by Doral CLO I, Ltd. Doral CLO I, Ltd. is a variable interest entity created to hold commercial loans and issue the previously noted debt and $200.0 million of subordinated notes to the Company whereby the Company receives any excess proceeds after payment of the senior debt interest and other fees and charges specified in the indenture agreement. The Company also serves as collateral manager of the assets of Doral CLO I, Ltd. Doral CLO I, Ltd. is consolidated with the Company in these financial statements.

DLAM, LLC is a subsidiary of Doral Money and holds the $200.0 million of subordinated notes issued by Doral CLO I, Ltd. DLAM, LLC is consolidated with the Company in these financial statements.

22. Income Taxes

Background

Income taxes include Puerto Rico income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. As Puerto Rico corporations, Doral Financial and all of its Puerto Rico subsidiaries are generally required to pay U.S. income taxes only with respect to their income derived from the active conduct of a trade or business in the United States (excluding Puerto Rico) and certain investment income derived from U.S. assets. Any such tax is creditable, with certain limitations, against Puerto Rico income taxes. Except for the operations of Doral Bank US and Doral Money, substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted through subsidiaries in Puerto Rico. Doral Bank US and Doral Money are U.S. corporations and are subject to U.S. income-tax on their income derived from all sources.

Until December 31, 2010, the maximum statutory corporate income tax rate in Puerto Rico was 39.00%. Under the 1994 Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as amended (“1994 Code”), Corporations are not permitted to file consolidated returns with their subsidiaries and affiliates. Doral Financial is entitled to a 100% dividend received deduction on dividends received from Doral Bank PR or any other Puerto Rico subsidiary subject to tax under the Puerto Rico tax code.

On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law the Special Act Declaring a State of Fiscal Emergency and Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save Puerto Rico’s Credit, Act No. 7 (the “Act”). Pursuant to the Act, Section 1020A was introduced to the Code to impose a 5.00% surtax over the total tax determined for corporations, partnerships, trusts, estates, as well as individuals whose combined gross income exceeds $100,000 or married individuals filing jointly whose gross income exceeds $150,000. This surtax is effective for tax years commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. This increased the Company’s income tax rate from 39.00% to 40.95% for tax years from 2009 through 2011.

On November 15, 2010, Act 171 was enacted into law (“Act 171”) generally providing, among other things: (1) an income tax credit equal to 7.00% of the “tax liability due” to corporations that paid the Christmas bonus required by local labor laws, and (2) extending to 10 years the carry forward term of net operating losses incurred for years commenced after December 31, 2004 and before December 31, 2012.

On January 31, 2011, the Governor signed into law the Internal Revenue Code of 2011 (“2011 Code”) making the 1994 Code largely ineffective, for years commenced after December 31, 2010. Under the provisions of the 2011 Code, the maximum statutory corporate income tax rate in 30.00% for years starting after December 31, 2010 and ending before January 1, 2014; if the government meets its income generation and expense control goals, for years started after December 31, 2013, the maximum corporate tax rate will be 25.00%. The 2011 Code eliminated the special 5.00% surtax on corporations for tax year 2011. In general, the 2011 Code maintains the extension in the carry forward periods for net operating losses from 7 to 10 years as provided for in Act 171; maintains the concept of the alternative minimum tax although it changed the way it is computed; allows limited liability companies to have flow-through treatment under certain circumstances; imposes additional restriction on the use of net operating loss carry forwards after certain types of reorganizations and/or changes in control; and specifies what types of auditors’ report will be acceptable when audited financial statements are required to be filed with the income tax return. Additionally, the 2011 Code provides for changes in the implications of being in a controlled group of corporations and/or a group of related corporations. Notwithstanding the 2011 Code, a corporation may be subject to the provisions of the 1994 Code if it so elects by the time it files its income tax return for the first year commenced after December 31, 2010 and ending before January 1, 2012. If the election is made to remain subject to the provisions of the 1994 Code, such election will be effective that year and the next four succeeding years.

The Company is evaluating the impact of the tax reform on its results of operations including the election to be taxed under the 1994 Code. Nevertheless, the Company recorded its deferred tax assets estimated to reverse after 2015 at the 30.00% tax rate required for all taxable earnings beginning in 2016, which is the latest taxable year that it would be permitted to elect taxation under the 1994 Code. Puerto Rico deferred tax assets subject to the maximum statutory tax rate and estimated to reverse prior to 2016, together with any related valuation allowance, are recorded at the 39.00% tax rate pursuant to the 1994 Code. Upon determination of which alternative treatment will be followed, the Company will adjust its deferred tax assets for any required tax rate change, if applicable. Adoption of the 2011 Code as of June 30, 2011 would represent an additional deferred tax expense of $8.4 million.

Income Tax Expense

The components of income tax expense are summarized below.


	Quarters Ended						Six month periods ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Current income tax expense — United States	$	3,101		$	3,615		$	5,475		$	3,890
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Puerto Rico		450			1,008			3,120			2,795
United States		(680	)		(136	)		(627	)		331

Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(230	)		872			2,493			3,126

Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	2,871		$	4,487		$	7,968		$	7,016

million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was related to the net effect on the Company’s deferred tax assets of (i) Puerto Rico tax legislation approved in January 2011 lowering the effective tax rate, resulting in a deferred tax expense of $18.8 million, (ii) the increased earnings expectation for profitable Puerto Rico entities which resulted in a deferred tax benefit of $17.4 million, and (iii) net amortization of deferred taxes of $1.7 million.

Deferred Tax Components

The Company’s DTA consists primarily of the differential in the tax basis of IOs sold, net operating loss carry-forwards and other temporary differences arising from the daily operations of the Company.

The Company has entered into several agreements with the Puerto Rico Treasury Department related to the intercompany transfers of IOs (The “IO Tax Asset” or “IO”) and its tax treatment thereon. Under the agreements, the Company established the tax basis of all the IO transfers, clarified that for Puerto Rico income tax purpose, the IO Tax Asset is a stand-alone intangible asset subject to straight-line amortization based on a useful life of 15 years, and established that the IO Tax Asset could be transferred to any entity within the Doral Financial corporate group, including the Puerto Rico banking subsidiary. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Treasury Department that granted the Company a two year moratorium of the amortization of the IO Tax Asset. This agreement resulted in a benefit of $11.2 million for the third quarter of 2009 and was effective for the taxable year beginning January 1, 2009. The realization of the deferred tax asset related to the differential in the tax basis of IOs sold is dependent upon the existence of, or generation of, taxable income during the remaining 12 year period (15 year original amortization period, 17 year original amortization period including the two year moratorium) in which the amortization of the IO Tax Asset is available. The IOs expire in 2022. Any IO amortization in excess of all legal entities’ taxable income would become a NOL subject to the 7 or 10 year carry-over period. Upon a business combination, which is not structured as a purchase of assets, the IOs should survive and be available to be used by the group’s legal entities.

NOLs generated between 2005 and 2011 can be carried forward for a period of 10 years (there is no carry-back allowed in Puerto Rico). The NOLs creating deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2011, expire beginning in 2016 until 2021 for Puerto Rico entities and 2025 through 2029 for United States entities filing in New York. Since each legal entity files a separate income tax return, the NOLs can only be used to offset future taxable income of the entity that incurred it.

The Company evaluates its deferred tax asset for realizability, and the deferred tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, the Company considers the expected reversal of its deferred tax assets and liabilities, projected future taxable income, cumulative losses in recent years, and tax planning strategies. The determination of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets requires judgment based on the weight of all available evidence and considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had two Puerto Rico entities which had incurred several consecutive years of losses. For purposes of assessing the realization of the DTAs, the loss position for these two entities is considered significant negative evidence that has caused management to conclude that the Company will not be able to fully realize the deferred tax assets related to these two entities in the future. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that $441.2 million and $462.7 million, respectively, of its gross deferred tax asset would not be realized and maintained a valuation allowance for that amount.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s deferred tax assets were as follows:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Deferred income tax asset resulting from:
Differential in tax basis of IOs sold	$	207,797		$	237,912
Net operating loss carry-forwards		226,509			193,322
Allowance for loan and lease losses		36,868			48,635
Capital loss carry-forward		18,227			26,783
Reserve for losses on OREO		13,367			17,340
Other		42,378			44,445

Gross deferred tax asset		545,146			568,437
Valuation allowance		(441,188	)		(462,725	)

Net deferred tax asset	$	103,958		$	105,712

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance off-set the following deferred tax assets:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Differential in tax basis of IOs sold	$	115,494	$	143,550
Net operating loss carry-forwards		220,376		186,447
Allowance for loan and lease losses		34,161		45,950
Capital loss carry-forward		18,224		26,779
Reserve for losses on OREO		13,321		17,294
Other		39,612		42,705

Total valuation allowance	$	441,188	$	462,725

The valuation allowance also includes $0.8 million and $1.3 million related to deferred taxes on unrealized losses on cash flow hedges as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Management did not establish a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets generated on the unrealized gains and losses of its securities available for sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 because the Company had the positive intent and the ability to hold the securities until maturity or recovery of value.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the deferred tax asset by legal entity was as follows:


	As of June 30, 2011
	Doral						Doral			Doral
	Financial			Doral			Mortgage			Insurance		Doral			Doral
(In thousands)	Corporation			Bank PR			LLC			Agency		Money			Bank FSB		Total
Differential in tax basis of IOs sold	$	207,797		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	207,797
Net operating loss carry-forwards		48,544			171,832			5,030			—		—			1,103		226,509
Allowance for loan and lease losses		4,178			29,983			—			—		2,194			513		36,868
Capital loss carry-forward		849			17,375			—			—		—			3		18,227
Reserve for losses on OREO		3,278			10,043			—			—		—			46		13,367
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale		474			—			—			—		—			—		474
Other		15,109			25,352			172			2,905		221			278		44,037

Deferred tax assets		280,229			254,585			5,202			2,905		2,415			1,943		547,279
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale		—			(1,095	)		—			—		—			—		(1,095	)
Other		(549	)		(324	)		(120	)		—		(45	)		—		(1,038	)

Deferred tax liabilities		(549	)		(1,419	)		(120	)		—		(45	)		—		(2,133	)
Valuation allowance		(186,927	)		(254,261	)		—			—		—			—		(441,188	)

Net deferred tax asset (liability)	$	92,753		$	(1,095	)	$	5,082		$	2,905	$	2,370		$	1,943	$	103,958


	As of December 31, 2010
	Doral						Doral			Doral
	Financial			Doral			Mortgage			Insurance		Doral			Doral
(In thousands)	Corporation			Bank PR			LLC			Agency		Money			Bank FSB		Total
Differential in tax basis of IOs sold	$	237,912		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	237,912
Net operating loss carry-forwards		46,634			139,813			5,963			83		—			829		193,322
Allowance for loan and lease losses		3,554			42,396			—			—		2,098			587		48,635
Capital loss carry-forward		6,776			20,003			—			—		—			4		26,783
Reserve for losses on OREO		4,903			12,391			—			—		—			46		17,340
Other		14,887			29,403			178			2,935		14			100		47,517

Deferred tax assets		314,666			244,006			6,141			3,018		2,112			1,566		571,509
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale		—			(1,889	)		—			—		—			—		(1,889	)
Other		(700	)		(299	)		(135	)		—		(49	)		—		(1,183	)

Deferred tax liabilities		(700	)		(2,188	)		(135	)		—		(49	)		—		(3,072	)
Valuation allowance		(219,017	)		(243,708	)		—			—		—			—		(462,725	)

Net deferred tax asset (liability)	$	94,949		$	(1,890	)	$	6,006		$	3,018	$	2,063		$	1,566	$	105,712

Puerto Rico deferred tax assets subject to the maximum statutory tax rate and estimated to reverse prior to 2016, together with any related valuation allowance, are recorded at the tax rate in effect under the 1994 Code, 39.00% or 40.95% as applicable. As of June 30, 2011, DTAs totalling $457.7 million were at the higher rates with a valuation allowance of $422.3 million. DTAs of $62.4 million were at the 30.00% tax rate while DTAs of $25.1 million with a valuation allowance of $18.9 million, were at other tax rates (and would not be impacted by the change in the tax code). If the Company elects to adopt the 2011 Code, DTAs would be $439.4 million with a valuation allowance of $343.7 million for a net DTA of $95.7 million.

For Puerto Rico taxable entities with positive core earnings, a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets has not been recorded since they are expected to continue to be profitable. At June 30, 2011, the net deferred tax asset associated with these two companies was $8.0 million, compared to $9.0 million at December 31, 2010. In addition, approximately, $92.3 million of the IO tax asset maintained at the holding company would be realized through these entities. In management’s opinion, for these companies, the positive evidence of profitable core earnings outweighs any negative evidence.

Failure to achieve sufficient projected taxable income in the entities and deferred tax assets where a valuation allowance has not been established, might affect the ultimate realization of the net deferred tax assets.

Management assesses the realization of its deferred tax assets at each reporting period. To the extent that earnings improve and the deferred tax assets become realizable, the Company may be able to reduce the valuation allowance through earnings.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not have unrecognized tax benefits and had accrued interest of $0.8 million on previously unrecognized tax benefits. The Company classifies all interest related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense.

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity, and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company settled its uncertain tax positions. As of June 30, 2011, the following years remain subject to examination: U.S. Federal jurisdictions — 2004 through 2008 and Puerto Rico — 2005 through 2008.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not identify any additional uncertain tax position.

23. Guarantees

In the ordinary course of the business, Doral Financial makes certain representations and warranties to purchasers and insurers of mortgage loans at the time of the loan sales to third parties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold, and in certain circumstances, such as in the event of early or first payment default. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, if there is a breach of contract of a representation or warranty or if there is an early payment default, Doral Financial may be required to repurchase the mortgage loan and bear any subsequent loss related to the loan. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, repurchases totalled $4.2 million, compared to $50,000 for the corresponding 2010 period. These repurchases were at fair value and no significant losses were incurred.

In the past, in relation to its asset securitizations and loan sale activities, the Company sold pools of delinquent FHA, VA and conventional mortgage loans on a servicing retained basis. Following these transactions, the loans are not reflected on Doral Financial’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. Under these arrangements, as part of its servicing responsibilities, Doral Financial is required to advance the scheduled payments of principal, interest and taxes whether or not collected from the underlying borrower. While Doral Financial expects to recover a significant portion of the amounts advanced through foreclosure or, in the case of FHA and VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs, the amounts advanced tend to be greater than normal arrangements because of the delinquent status of the loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding principal balance of such delinquent loans was $125.1 million and $139.6 million, respectively.

30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s records reflected that the outstanding principal balance of loans sold subject to full or partial recourse was $0.7 billion and $0.8 billion, respectively. As of such dates, the Company’s records also reflected that the maximum contractual exposure to Doral Financial if it were required to repurchase all loans subject to recourse was $0.7 billion. Doral Financial’s contingent obligation with respect to its recourse provision is not reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, except for a liability of estimated losses from such recourse agreements, which is included as part of “Accrued expenses and other liabilities”. The Company discontinued the practice of selling loans with recourse obligations in 2005. Doral Financial’s current strategy is to sell loans on a non-recourse basis, except recourse for certain early payment defaults and industry standard representations and warranties. For the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company repurchased at fair value $1.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively, pursuant to recourse provisions, compared to $6.7 million and $14.0 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods of 2010.

Doral Financial’s reserve for its exposure to recourse amounted to $10.1 million and $10.3 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively and the reserve for other credit-enhanced transactions explained above amounted to $8.8 million and $9.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The following table shows the changes in the Company’s liability of estimated losses from recourse agreements, included in the Statement of Financial Condition, for each of the periods shown:


	Quarter Ended			Six Month Period Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	9,877		$	10,264
Net charge-offs / termination		(100	)		(728	)
Provision for recourse liability		352			593

Balance at end of period	$	10,129		$	10,129

24. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The following tables summarize Doral Financial’s commitments to extend credit, commercial and performance standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commitments to extend credit	$	146,982	$	139,791
Commitments to sell loans		98,123		64,751
Commercial and Performance standby letter of credit		2,664		25

Total	$	247,769	$	204,567

The Company enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include commitments to extend credit and sell loans. The contractual amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Generally, the Company does not enter into interest rate lock agreements with borrowers.

The Company purchases mortgage loans and simultaneously enters into a sale and securitization agreement with the same counterparty, essentially a forward contract that meets the definition of a derivative during the period between trade and settlement date.

A letter of credit is an arrangement that represents an obligation on the part of the Company to a designated third party, contingent upon the failure of the Company’s customer to perform under the terms of the underlying contract with a third party. The amount of the letter of credit represents the maximum amount of credit risk in the event of non-performance by these customers. Under the terms of a letter of credit, an obligation arises only when the underlying event fails to occur as intended, and the obligation is generally up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and typically expire without having been drawn upon.

The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.

25. Commitments and Contingencies

Total minimum rental and operating commitments for leases in effect at June 30, 2011, were as follow:


(In thousands)
2012	$	6,225
2013		6,191
2014		5,408
2015		5,183
2016		5,049
2017 and thereafter		22,860

	$	50,916

Rent expense for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011 totalled approximately $2.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, compared to $1.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively for the corresponding 2010 periods.

Doral Financial and its subsidiaries are defendants in various lawsuits or arbitration proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including employment related matters. Management believes, based on the opinion of legal counsel, that the aggregated liabilities, if any, arising from such actions will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Doral Financial.

Since 2005, Doral Financial became a party to various legal proceedings, including regulatory and judicial investigations and civil litigation, arising as a result of the Company’s restatement. For additional information on Legal Matters and Banking Regulatory Matters refer to Note 32 of the financial statements on the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

26. Stock Option and Other Incentive Plans

On April 8, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) subject to shareholder approval, which was obtained at the annual shareholders’ meeting held on May 7, 2008. The Plan replaced the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Stock options granted are expensed over the stock option vesting period based on fair value which is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method at the date the options are granted.

The aggregate number of shares of common stock which the Company may issue under the Plan is limited to 6,750,000. No options were granted by the Company for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

On July 22, 2008, four independent directors were each granted 2,000 shares of restricted stock and stock options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the stock on the grant date. The restricted stock became 100% vested during the first quarter of 2010. The stock options vest ratably over a five year period commencing with the grant date.

On June 25, 2010, the Board of Directors of Doral Financial Corporation approved and adopted a retention program for six of the Company’s officers (the “Retention Program”). Pursuant to the Retention Program, the Company granted 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as restricted stock to such officers. The restricted stock will vest in installments so long as at the time of vesting the employee has been continuously employed by the Company from the date of grant, as follows: 33% will vest 12 calendar months after the grant date, an additional 33% will vest 24 calendar months after the grant date, and the remaining 33% will vest 36 calendar months after the grant date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, 100% of the restricted stock will vest (i) upon the occurrence of a change of control of the Company; (ii) if the Company’s terminates the employee’s employment without cause or the employee terminates his or her employment for good reason (as defined in the agreement); or (iii) upon such employee’s death.

On March 22, 2011, five directors were each granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock. The restricted stock will vest in installments as follows: (i) 50% of the shares shall vest 12 calendar months after the grant date, and (ii) an additional 50% of the shares will vest 24 calendar months after the grant date. In April 2011, five officers were granted a total of 1,192,728 shares of restricted stock

with similar conditions as those granted in June 2010.

Stock-based compensation recognized was as follows:


	Quarters Ended				Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(In thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Stock-based compensation recognized, net	$	1,043	$	56	$	1,703	$	73


Unrecognized at end of period:
Stock options	$	95	$	214	$	95	$	214

Restricted stock	$	6,581	$	8,182	$	6,581	$	8,182

The fair value of the options granted in 2008 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following assumptions:


Weighted-average exercise price	$	13.70
Stock option estimated fair value	$	5.88
Expected stock option term (years)		6.50
Expected volatility		39.00	%
Expected dividend yield		—	%
Risk-free interest rate		3.49	%

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a ten-year period. The Company uses empirical research data to estimate options exercise and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is based on management’s expectation that the Company will not resume dividend payments on its Common Stock for the foreseeable future.

Doral Financial’s nonvested restricted stock activity for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:


				Weighted-Average
				Grant Date Fair
Nonvested Restricted Shares	Shares			Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2010		3,000,000		$	2.74
Granted		125,000			1.17

Nonvested at March 31, 2011		3,125,000			2.68
Granted		1,192,728			1.11
Vested		(1,000,000	)		(2.74	)

Nonvested at June 30, 2011		3,317,728		$	2.10

As of June 30, 2011, the total amount of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan was approximately $6.7 million related to stock options and restricted stock granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 4 years for the stock options and 3 years for the restricted stock. As of June 30, 2011, the total fair value of stock options and restricted stock was $10.3 million.

27. Earnings (Losses) Per Share Data

The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the earnings (losses) per share follows:


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net Income (Loss):
Net income (loss)	$	4,477		$	(233,311	)	$	7,800		$	(236,814	)
Non-convertible preferred stock dividend		—			—			—			—
Convertible preferred stock dividend		(2,415	)		(2,415	)		(4,830	)		(4,279	)
Effect of conversion of preferred stock⁽¹⁾		—			—			—			26,585

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	2,062		$	(235,726	)	$	2,970		$	(214,508	)


Weighted-Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding⁽²⁾		127,293,756			67,285,568			127,293,756			64,920,036


Net Income (loss) per Common Share⁽³⁾	$	0.02		$	(3.50	)	$	0.02		$	(3.30	)


⁽¹⁾		The carrying value of the noncumulative preferred stock exceeded the fair value of consideration transferred and, accordingly, the difference between the liquidation preference of the preferred stock retired and the market value of the common stock issued amounted to $31.6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, and was credited to retained earnings. In the case of the convertible preferred stock, the fair value of stock exchanged for the preferred stock converted exceeded the fair value of the stock issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms and, accordingly, this excess or inducement amounted to $5.1 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and was charged to retained earnings. As a result, both transactions impacted the net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders.

⁽²⁾		Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings (losses) per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per share. As of June 30, 2011, there were granted 60,000 stock options and 4,323,728 shares of restricted stock.

⁽³⁾		For the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, net income (loss) per common share represents both the basic and diluted earnings (losses) per common share, respectively, for each of the periods presented.

On March 20, 2009, the Board of Directors of Doral Financial announced that it had suspended the declaration and payment of all dividends on all of Doral Financial’s outstanding series of cumulative and non-cumulative preferred stock. The suspension of dividends was effective and commenced with the dividends for the month of April 2009 for Doral Financial’s three outstanding series of non-cumulative preferred stock, and the dividends for the second quarter of 2009 for Doral Financial’s one outstanding series of cumulative preferred stock.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were 813,526 shares of the Company’s 4.75% perpetual cumulative convertible preferred stock that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive. Each share of convertible preferred stock is currently convertible into 0.31428 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment under specific conditions. The option of the purchasers to convert the convertible preferred stock into shares of the Company’s common stock is exercisable only (a) if during any fiscal quarter after September 30, 2003, the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading date of the preceding fiscal quarter exceeds 120% of the conversion price of the convertible preferred stock (currently 120% of $795.47, or $954.56); (b) upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions; or (c) upon the delisting of the Company’s common stock. On or after September 30, 2008, the Company may, at its option, cause the convertible preferred stock to be converted into the number of shares of common stock that are issuable at the conversion price. The Company may only exercise its conversion right if the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price of the convertible preferred stock (currently 130% of $795.47, or $1,034.11) in effect for 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on a trading day not more than two trading days prior to the date the Company gives notice of conversion.

28. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

The Company uses fair value measurements to state certain assets and liabilities at fair value and to support fair value disclosures. Securities held for trading, securities available for sale, derivatives and servicing assets are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, Doral may be required to record other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans receivable and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The Company discloses for interim and annual reporting periods the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not in the statement of financial position.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The Company categorizes its financial instruments based on priority of inputs to the valuation technique into a three level hierarchy described below.

Determination of Fair Value

The Company bases fair values on the price that would be received upon sale of an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is Doral Financial’s intent to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.

Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there is limited or no observable market data are based primarily upon the Company’s estimates, and are generally calculated based on current pricing policy, the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other such factors. Therefore, the fair values represent management’s estimates and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.

The Company relies on appraisals for valuation of collateral dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned. An appraisal of value is obtained at the time the loan is originated. New estimates of collateral value are obtained when a loan that has been performing becomes delinquent and is determined to be collateral dependent, and at the time an asset is acquired through foreclosure. Updated reappraisals are requested at least every two years for collateral dependent loans and other real estate owned.

Residential mortgage loans are considered collateral dependent when they are 180 days past due (collateral dependent residential mortgage loans are those past due loans whose borrowers’ financial condition has deteriorated to the point that Doral considers only the collateral when determining its allowance for loan and lease loss estimate). An updated estimate of property’s value is obtained when the loan is 180 days past due, and a second assessment of value is obtained when the loan is 360 days past due. The Company generally uses broker price opinions (“BPOs”) as an assessment of value of collateral dependent residential mortgage loans.

As it takes a period of time for commercial loan appraisals to be completed once they are requested, Doral must at times estimate its allowance for loan and lease losses for an impaired loan using a dated, or stale, appraisal. As Puerto Rico has experienced some decrease in property values during its extended recession, the reported values of the stale appraisals must be adjusted to recognize the “fade” in market value. In estimating its allowance for loan and lease losses on collateral dependent loans using outdated appraisals, Doral uses the original appraisal as adjusted for the estimated fade in property value less selling costs to

estimate the current fair value of the collateral. That current adjusted estimated fair value is then compared to the reported investment, and if the adjusted fair value is less than reported investment, that amount is included in the allowance for loan and lease loss estimate.

Residential development construction loans that are collateral dependent present unique challenges to estimating the fair value of the underlying collateral. Residential development construction loans are partially completed with additional construction costs to be incurred, have units being sold and released from the construction loan, and may have additional land collateralizing the loan on which the developer hopes or expects to build additional units. Therefore, the value of the collateral is regularly changing and any appraisal has a limited useful life. Doral uses an internally developed estimate of value that considers Doral’s exit strategy of foreclosing and completing the construction started and selling the individual units constructed for residential buildings, and separately uses the most recent appraised value for any remnant land adjusted for the fade in value since the appraisal date as described above. This internally developed estimate is prepared in conjunction with a third party servicer of the portfolio who validates and determines the inputs used to arrive at the estimate of value (e.g. units sold, expected sales, cost to complete, etc.)

Once third party appraisals are obtained, the previously estimated property values are updated with the actual values reflected in the appraisals and any additional loss incurred is recognized in the period when the appraisal is received. The internally developed collateral price index is also updated and any changes resulting from the update in the index are also recognized in the period.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for financial instruments recorded at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Securities held for trading: Securities held for trading are reported at fair value and consist primarily of securities and derivatives held for trading purposes. The valuation method for trading securities is the same as the methodology used for securities classified as Available for Sale. The valuation methodology for IOs (Level 3) and derivatives (Level 2) are described in the Servicing assets and interest-only strips, and Derivatives sections, respectively.

For residual CMO certificates included in trading securities, the Company uses a cash flow model to value the securities. Doral utilizes the collateral’s statistics available on Bloomberg such as forecasted prepayment speed, weighted-average remaining maturity, weighted-average coupon and age. Based on Bloomberg information, the Company forecasts the cash flows and then discounts it at the discount rate used for the period. For purposes of discounting, the Company uses the same Z-spread methodology used for the valuations of Doral’s floating rate IOs.

Securities available for sale: Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions, expected defaults and loss severity. Level 1 securities (held for trading) include those securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 securities include agency CMOs, municipal bonds, and agency MBS. Level 3 securities include non-agency and agency CMOs for which quoted market prices are not available. For determining the fair value of Level 3 securities available for sale, the Company uses a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future cash flows. The model incorporates the Company’s own estimates of assumptions market participants use in determining the fair value, including prepayment speeds, loss assumptions and discount rates.

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of net cost or market value on an aggregate portfolio basis. The amount by which cost exceeds market value, if any, is accounted for as a loss through a valuation allowance. Loans held for sale consist primarily of mortgage loans. The market value of mortgage loans held for sale is generally based on quoted market prices for MBS adjusted to reflect particular characteristics of the asset such as guarantee fees, servicing fees, actual delinquency and credit risk. Loans held for sale are classified as Level 2, except for loans where management makes certain adjustments to the model based on unobservable inputs that are significant. These loans are classified as Level 3. Loans held for sale were carried at cost as of June 30, 2011.

Loans receivable: Loans receivable are those held principally for investment purposes. These consist of construction loans for new housing development, certain residential mortgage loans which the Company does not expect to sell in the near future, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, leases, land, and consumer loans. Loans receivable are carried at their unpaid principal balance, less unearned interest, net of deferred loan fees or costs (including premiums and discounts), undisbursed portion of construction loans and an allowance for loan and lease losses. Loans receivable include collateral dependent loans for which the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. The Company does not record loans receivable at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, the Company records nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent loans to reflect (i) partial write-downs that are based on the fair value of the collateral, or (ii) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value. The fair value of the collateral is mainly derived from appraisals that take into

consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations. The Company classifies loans receivable subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.

For the fair value of loans receivable, not reported at fair value loans are classified by type such as, residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, leases, land, and consumer loans. The fair value of residential mortgage loans is based on quoted market prices for MBS adjusted by particular characteristics like guarantee fees, servicing fees, actual delinquency and the credit risk associated to the individual loans. For the syndicated commercial loans, the Company engages a third party specialist to assist with its valuation. The fair value of syndicated commercial loans is determined based on market information on trading activity. For all other loans, the fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on LIBOR and with adjustments that the Company believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value for like assets.

Servicing assets and interest-only strips: The Company routinely originates, securitizes and sells mortgage loans into the secondary market. As a result of this process, the Company typically retains the servicing rights and, in the past, also retained IOs. Servicing assets retained in a sale or securitization arise from contractual agreements between the Company and investors in mortgage securities and mortgage loans. The Company records mortgage servicing assets at fair value on a recurring basis. Considerable judgment is required to determine the fair value of the Company’s servicing assets. Unlike highly liquid investments, the market value of servicing assets cannot be readily determined because these assets are not actively traded in securities markets. The fair value of the servicing assets is determined based on a combination of market information on trading activity (servicing asset trades and broker valuations), benchmarking of servicing assets (valuation surveys) and cash flow modeling. The valuation of the Company’s servicing assets incorporates two sets of assumptions: (i) market derived assumptions for discount rates, servicing costs, escrow earnings rate, float earnings rate and cost of funds and (ii) market derived assumptions adjusted for the Company’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior for escrow balances, delinquencies and foreclosures, late fees, prepayments and prepayment penalties. For IOs the Company uses a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future cash flows. The model incorporates the Company’s own estimates of assumptions market participants use in determining the fair value, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rates, defaults and contractual fee income. IOs are recorded as securities held for trading. Fair value measurements of servicing assets and IOs use significant unobservable inputs and, accordingly, are classified as Level 3.

Real estate held for sale: The Company acquires real estate through foreclosure proceedings. These properties are held for sale and are stated at the lower of cost or fair value (after deduction of estimated disposition costs). A loss is recognized for any initial write down to fair value less costs to sell. The fair value of the properties is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties, which are not market observable. The Company records nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect any losses in the carrying value arising from periodic appraisals of the properties charged to expense in the period incurred. The Company classifies real estate held for sale subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.

Other assets: The Company may be required to record certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets include premises and equipment, goodwill, and certain assets that are part of CB, LLC. CB, LLC is an entity formed to manage a residential real estate project that Doral Bank PR received in lieu of foreclosure. Fair value measurements of these assets use significant unobservable inputs and, accordingly, are classified as Level 3.

Premises and equipment: Premises and equipment are carried at cost. However, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the fair value of the property, which is generally obtained from appraisals. Property impairment losses are recorded as part of occupancy expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Goodwill: Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment. In determining the fair value of a reporting unit the Company uses discounted cash flow analysis. Goodwill impairment losses are recorded as part of other expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

CB, LLC: Events or changes in circumstances may indicate that the carrying amount of certain assets may not be recoverable, such as for land and the remaining housing units. Impairment losses are recorded as part of occupancy expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Derivatives: Substantially all of the Company’s derivatives are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. For those derivatives, Doral Financial measures fair value using internally developed models that use primarily market observable inputs, such as yield curves and volatility surfaces.

The non-performance risk is evaluated internally considering collateral held, remaining term and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk. These derivatives are classified as Level 2. Level 2 derivatives consist of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for instruments not recorded at fair value.

Cash and due from banks and other interest-earning assets: Valued at the carrying amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity.

Deposits: Fair value is calculated considering the discounted cash flows based on brokered certificates of deposits curve and internally generated decay assumptions.

Loans payable: These loans represent secured lending arrangements with local financial institutions that are generally floating rate instruments, and therefore their fair value has been determined to be par.

Notes payable, advances from FHLB, other short-term borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase: Valued utilizing discounted cash flow analysis over the remaining term of the obligation using market rates for similar instruments.

Financial Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The tables below present the balance of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.


	June 30, 2011								December 31, 2010
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Securities Held for Trading
MBS	$	830	$	—	$	—	$	830	$	766	$	—	$	—	$	766
IOs		43,750		—		—		43,750		44,250		—		—		44,250
Derivatives		9		—		9		—		13		—		13		—

Total Securities Held for Trading		44,589		—		9		44,580		45,029		—		13		45,016

Securities Available for Sale
Agency MBS		446,956		—		445,288		1,668		1,142,973		—		1,141,281		1,692
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		109,630		—		102,347		7,283		312,831		—		305,442		7,389
Non-Agency CMOs		7,960		—		—		7,960		7,192		—		—		7,192
Obligations U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies		94,982		—		94,982		—		34,992		—		34,992		—
Other		11,923		—		—		11,923		7,077		—		—		7,077

Total Securities Available for Sale		671,451		—		642,617		28,834		1,505,065		—		1,481,715		23,350
Servicing Assets		115,785		—		—		115,785		114,342		—		—		114,342

	$	831,825	$	—	$	642,626	$	189,199	$	1,664,436	$	—	$	1,481,728	$	182,708

Liabilities:
Derivatives⁽¹⁾	$	3,435	$	—	$	3,435	$	—	$	5,418	$	—	$	5,418	$	—


⁽¹⁾		Forward contracts and interest rate swaps included as part of accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The changes in Level 3 of assets and liabilities for the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:


	For the quarter ended June 30, 2011
						Capitalization				Principal
			Change in fair			of servicing		Net gains		repayments
			value			assets		included in		and
	Balance,		included in			included in		other		amortization
	beginning of		the Statement			the Statement		comprehensive		of premium					Balance, end
(In thousands)	quarter		of Operations			of Operations		income		and discount ⁽⁴⁾			Purchases		of quarter
Securities held for trading
MBS	$	805	$	25		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	830
IOs⁽¹⁾		41,618		2,132			—		—		—			—		43,750

Total securities held for trading		42,423		2,157			—		—		—			—		44,580

Securities available for sale⁽²⁾
Agency MBS		1,682		—			—		12		(26	)		—		1,668
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		7,336		—			—		10		(63	)		—		7,283
Non-Agency CMOs		7,753		(86	)		—		216		77			—		7,960
Other		11,876		—			—		187		(140	)		—		11,923

Total securities available for sale		28,647		(86	)		—		425		(152	)		—		28,834

Servicing Assets⁽³⁾		116,299		(3,059	)		2,545		—		—			—		115,785

Balance at end of period	$	187,369	$	(988	)	$	2,545	$	425	$	(152	)	$	—	$	189,199


	For the quarter ended June 30, 2010
						Capitalization					Principal
			Change in fair			of servicing		Net gains (losses)			repayments
			value			assets		included in			and
	Balance,		included in			included in		other			amortization
	beginning of		the Statement			the Statement		comprehensive			of premium						Balance, end
(In thousands)	quarter		of Operations			of Operations		income			and discount ⁽⁴⁾			Purchases			of quarter
Securities held for trading
MBS	$	796	$	36		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	832
IOs⁽¹⁾		43,584		1,128			—		—			—			—			44,712

Total securities held for trading		44,380		1,164			—		—			—			—			45,544

Securities available for sale⁽²⁾
Agency MBS		1,738		—			—		25			—			—			1,763
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		8,194		—			—		(349	)		(65	)		—			7,780
Non-Agency CMOs		261,129		—			—		129,634			(383,268	)		—			7,495
Other		1,860		—			—		(45	)		—			—			1,815

Total securities available for sale		272,921		—			—		129,265			(383,333	)		—			18,853

Servicing Assets⁽³⁾		118,236		(6,475	)		1,406		—			—			(162	)		113,005

Balance at end of period	$	435,537	$	(5,311	)	$	1,406	$	129,265		$	(383,333	)	$	(162	)	$	177,402


⁽¹⁾		Changes in fair value are recognized in net gain on trading activities in non-interest income and the amortization of the IOs is recognized in interest income on interest-only strips. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the IO had a gain of $4.1 million for change in fair value and an amortization of $2.0 million. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the IO had a gain of $3.8 million for change in fair value and an amortization of $2.7 million.

⁽²⁾		OTTI is recognized as part of non-interest income. Amortization of premium and discount is recognized as part of interest income as mortgage-backed securities.

⁽³⁾		Change in fair value of servicing assets is recognized in non-interest income as servicing income. Capitalization of servicing assets is recognized in non-interest income as net gain on mortgage loan sales and fees.

⁽⁴⁾		Amortization of premium and discount of $108,000 and $489,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively is recognized within interest income from MBS in the consolidated financial statements.


	For the six month period ended June 30, 2011
			Change in fair			Capitalization of		Net gains		Principal
			value included			servicing assets		included in		repayments and
	Balance,		in the			included in the		other		amortization of
	beginning of		Statement of			Statement of		comprehensive		premium and					Balance, end
	year		Operations			Operations		income		discount⁽⁴⁾			Purchases		of year
Securities available for trading MBS	$	766	$	64		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	830
IOs⁽¹⁾		44,250		(500	)		—		—		—			—		43,750

Total securities held for trading		45,016		(436	)		—		—		—			—		44,580

Securities available for sale ⁽²⁾ Agency MBS		1,692		—			—		26		(50	)		—		1,668
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		7,389		—			—		28		(134	)		—		7,283
Non-Agency CMOs		7,192		(86	)		—		724		130			—		7,960
Other		7,077		—			—		204		(360	)		5,002		11,923

Total securities available for sale		23,350		(86	)		—		982		(414	)		5,002		28,834

Servicing Assets ⁽³⁾		114,342		(3,199	)		4,642		—		—			—		115,785

Balance at end of period	$	182,708	$	(3,721	)	$	4,642	$	982	$	(414	)	$	5,002	$	189,199


	For the six month period ended June 30, 2010
			Change in fair			Capitalization of		Net gains		Principal
			value included			servicing assets		included in		repayments and
	Balance,		in the			included in the		other		amortization of
	beginning of		Statement of			Statement of		comprehensive		premium and						Balance, end
	year		Operations			Operations		income		discount ⁽⁴⁾			Purchases			of year
Securities available for trading MBS	$	893	$	(61	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	832
IOs ⁽¹⁾		45,723		(1,011	)		—		—		—			—			44,712

Total securities held for trading		46,616		(1,072	)		—		—		—			—			45,544

Securities available for sale ⁽²⁾ Agency MBS		1,830		—			—		32		(99	)		—			1,763
CMO Government Sponsored Agencies		7,701		—			—		230		(151	)		—			7,780
Non-Agency CMOs		270,600		(13,259	)		—		143,507		(393,353	)		—			7,495
Other		1,650		—			—		165		—			—			1,815

Total securities available for sale		281,781		(13,259	)		—		143,934		(393,603	)		—			18,853

Servicing Assets ⁽³⁾		118,493		(8,478	)		3,183		—		—			(193	)		113,005

Balance at end of period	$	446,890	$	(22,809	)	$	3,183	$	143,934	$	(393,603	)	$	(193	)	$	177,402


⁽¹⁾		Changes in fair value are recognized in net gain on trading activities in non-interest income and the amortization of the IOs is recognized in interest income on interest-only strips. For the period ended June 30, 2011, the IO had a gain of $3.6 million for change in fair value and an amortization of $4.1 million. For the period ended June 30, 2010, the IO had a gain of $4.5 million for change in fair value and an amortization of $5.5 million.

⁽²⁾		OTTI is recognized as part of non-interest income. Amortization of premium and discount is recognized as part of interest income as mortgage-backed securities.

⁽³⁾		Change in fair value of servicing assets is recognized in non-interest income as servicing income. Capitalization of servicing assets is recognized in non-interest income as net gain on mortgage loan sales and fees.

⁽⁴⁾		Amortization of premium and discount of $172,000 and $0.1 million for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively is recognized within interest income from MBS in the consolidated financial statements.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The valuation methodologies used to measure these fair value adjustments are described above. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the six month period ended June 30, 2011, that were still held on the balance sheet at June 30, 2011, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at period end.


(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Level 3
June 30, 2011
Loans receivable ⁽¹⁾	$	158,590	$	158,590
Real estate held for sale⁽²⁾	$	37,507	$	37,507

Total		196,097		196,097


December 31, 2010
Loans receivable⁽¹⁾	$	266,093	$	266,093
Real estate held for sale⁽²⁾		70,335		70,335
Other assets⁽³⁾		2,275		2,275

Total	$	338,703	$	338,703


⁽¹⁾		Represents the carrying value of collateral dependent loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral.

⁽²⁾		Represents the carrying value of real estate held for sale for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the properties.

⁽³⁾		Represents the carrying value of CB, LLC assets for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of land and the remaining housing units.

The following table summarizes total losses relating to assets (classified as level 3) held at the reporting periods.


		Loss for the quarters ended				Loss for the six month periods
	Location of Loss Recognized in the	June 30,				ended June 30,
(In thousands)	Statement of Operations	2011		2010		2011		2010
Loans receivable	Provision for loan and lease losses	$	8,411	$	4,284	$	5,789	$	20,335
Real estate held for sale	Other expenses	$	1,945	$	27,980	$	6,493	$	32,429

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table discloses the carrying amounts of financial instruments and their estimated fair values as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The amounts in the disclosure have not been updated since quarter end, therefore, the valuations may have changed significantly since that point in time. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methods may have a material effect in the estimated fair value amounts.


	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying				Carrying
(In thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	562,397	$	562,397	$	355,819	$	355,819
Other interest-earning assets		43,967		43,967		156,607		156,607
Securities held for trading⁽¹⁾		44,589		44,589		45,029		45,029
Securities available for sale		671,451		671,451		1,505,065		1,505,065
Loans held for sale⁽²⁾		301,934		308,715		319,269		325,655
Loans receivable		5,595,126		5,357,922		5,464,919		5,179,879
Servicing assets		115,785		115,785		114,342		114,342

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	4,302,792	$	4,361,116	$	4,618,475	$	4,685,730
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		442,300		458,706		1,176,800		1,218,280
Advances from FHLB		1,342,849		1,421,846		901,420		923,266
Loans payable		294,623		294,623		304,035		304,035
Notes payable		510,430		481,915		513,958		482,441
Derivatives⁽³⁾		3,435		3,435		5,418		5,418


⁽¹⁾		Includes derivatives of $9,000 and $13,000 for June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Includes $148.1 million and $153.4 million for June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, related to GNMA defaulted loans for which the Company has an unconditional buy-back option.

⁽³⁾		Includes $53,000 and $0.7 million of derivatives held for trading purposes and $3.4 million and $4.7 million of derivatives held for purposes other than trading, for June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, as part of accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.

29. Derivatives

Doral Financial uses derivatives to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. The Company maintains an overall interest rate risk-management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate changes. Derivatives include interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and forward contracts. The Company’s goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that net interest margin is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by movements in interest rates.

Doral Financial accounts for derivatives on a marked-to-market basis with gains or losses charged to operations as they occur. The fair value of derivatives is generally reported net by counterparty. The fair value of derivatives accounted as hedges is also reported net of accrued interest and included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. Derivatives not accounted as hedges in a net asset position are recorded as securities held for trading and derivatives in a net liability position as other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had the following derivative financial instruments outstanding:


	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
	Notional		Fair Value					Notional		Fair Value
(In thousands)	Amount		Asset		Liability			Amount		Asset		Liability
Cash Flow Hedges:
Interest rate swaps	$	74,000	$	—	$	(3,382	)	$	74,000	$	—	$	(4,677	)
Other Derivatives (non hedges):
Interest rate caps		210,000		1		—			210,000		13		—
Forward contracts		55,000		8		(53	)		100,000		—		(741	)

Total	$	339,000	$	9	$	(3,435	)	$	384,000	$	13	$	(5,418	)

Cash Flow Hedges

As of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $74.0 million outstanding pay fixed interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges with maturities between September 2011 and November 2012. The Company designated the pay fixed interest rate swaps to hedge the variability of future interest cash flows of adjustable rate advances from FHLB. For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not realized ineffectiveness for the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income included unrealized losses on cash flow hedges of $2.0 million and $4.5 million, respectively, of which the Company expects to reclassify approximately $2.5 million and $3.9 million, respectively, against earnings during the next twelve months.

Doral Financial’s interest rate swaps had weighted average receive rates of 0.21% and 0.29% and weighted average pay rates of 4.60% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The table below presents the location and effect of cash flow derivatives on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.


	Location of Loss								Loss Reclassified
	Reclassified from						Accumulated		from Accumulated
	Accumulated Other						Other		Other
	Comprehensive	Notional					Comprehensive		Comprehensive
(In thousands)	Income to Income	Amount		Fair Value			Income		Income to Income
Cash flow Hedges June 30, 2011
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense — Advances from FHLB	$	74,000	$	(3,382	)	$	554	$	(825	)


June 30, 2010
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense — Advances from FHLB	$	305,000	$	(7,511	)	$	1,594	$	(2,522	)

The table below presents the location and effect of cash flow derivatives on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.


	Location of Loss
	Reclassified from								Loss Reclassified
	Accumulated Other						Accumulated		from Accumulated
	Comprehensive						Other		Other
	Income to						Comprehensive		Comprehensive
(In thousands)	Income	Notional Amount		Fair Value			Income		Income to Income
Cash flow Hedges June 30, 2011
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense — Advances from FHLB	$	74,000	$	(3,382	)	$	1,287	$	(1,589	)


June 30, 2010
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense — Advances from FHLB	$	305,000	$	(7,511	)	$	3,152	$	(3,673	)

Trading and Non-Hedging Activities

The following table summarizes the total derivatives positions at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and their different designations. Also, includes net gains (losses) on derivative positions for the periods indicated.


		June 30, 2011
	Location of Gain (Loss)
	Recognized in the									Net Loss for the
	Consolidated Statement of	Notional					Net Loss for the			Six Month
(In thousands)	Operations	Amount		Fair Value			Quarter			Period
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges:
Interest rate caps	Net gain (loss) on trading activities	$	210,000	$	1		$	(2	)	$	(12	)

Forward contracts	Net gain (loss) on trading activities		55,000		(45	)		(704	)		(1,331	)

		$	265,000	$	(44	)	$	(706	)	$	(1,343	)


		June 30, 2010
	Location of Gain (Loss)								Net (Loss) Gain
	Recognized in the Consolidated	Notional				Net (Loss) Gain			for the Six
(In thousands)	Statement of Operations	Amount		Fair Value		for the Quarter			Month Period
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges:
Interest rate caps	Net gain (loss) on trading activities	$	270,000	$	53	$	(162	)	$	(723	)
Forward contracts	Net gain (loss) on trading activities		135,000		2,781		3,407			4,298

		$	405,000	$	2,834	$	3,245		$	3,575

Doral Financial held $265.0 million and $310.0 million in notional value of derivatives not designated as hedges at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The Company purchases interest rate caps to manage its interest rate exposure. Interest rate cap agreements generally involve purchases of out of the money caps to protect the Company from adverse effects from rising interest rates. These products are not linked to specific assets and liabilities that appear on the balance sheet or to a forecasted transaction and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding interest rate caps with a notional amount of $210.0 million, respectively.

The Company enters into forward contracts to create an economic hedge on its mortgage warehouse line and on its MSR. The notional amount of the forward contract used to create an economic hedge on its MSR as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $25.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had forwards hedging its warehousing line with a notional amount of $30.0 million and $35.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a notional amount of $50.0 million of forward contracts used to create an economic hedge on its MSR and a notional amount of $50.0 million of forwards hedging its warehousing line. For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded losses of $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively, on forward contracts which included gains of $0.6 million and $59,000, respectively, related to the economic hedge on the MSR. For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded gains of $3.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively, on forward contracts which included gains of $4.7 million and $6.5 million, respectively, related to the economic hedge on the MSR.

Credit risk related to derivatives arises when amounts receivable from counterparty exceed those payable. Because the notional amount of the instruments only serves as a basis for calculating amounts receivable or payable, the risk of loss with any counterparty is limited to a small fraction of the notional amount. Doral Financial’s maximum loss related to credit risk is equal to the gross fair value of its derivative instruments. Doral Financial deals only with derivative dealers that are national market makers with strong credit ratings in their derivatives activities. The Company further controls the risk of loss by subjecting counterparties to credit reviews and approvals similar to those used in making loans and other extensions of credit. In addition, counterparties are required to provide cash collateral to Doral Financial when their unsecured loss positions exceed certain negotiated limits.

All derivative contracts to which Doral Financial is a party settle monthly, quarterly or semiannually. Further, Doral Financial has netting agreements with the dealers and only does business with creditworthy dealers. Because of these factors, Doral Financial’s credit risk exposure related to derivatives contracts at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was not considered material.

30. Variable Interest Entities

In June 2009, the FASB revised authoritative guidance for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). A VIE is an entity that by design possesses the following characteristics:

	•		The equity investment at risk is not sufficient for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support.

	•		As a group, the holders of equity investment at risk do not possess: i) the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; or ii) the obligation to absorb expected losses or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or iii) symmetry between voting rights and economic interests and where substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with disproportionately fewer voting rights (e.g., structures with nonsubstantive voting rights).

These entities are subject to the accounting and disclosure requirements of ASC 810-10-05, Consolidation-Variable Interest Entities. The Company is required to consolidate any VIEs in which it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary through having (i) power over the significant activities of the entity and (ii) having an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which are potentially significant to the VIE.

The Company identified four potential sources of variable interests: (i) the servicing portfolio, (ii) the investment portfolio, (iii) the lending portfolio and (iv) special purpose entities with which the Company is involved, and performed and assessed each for the existence of VIEs and determination of possible consolidation requirements. In all instances where the Company identified a variable interest in a VIE, a primary beneficiary analysis was performed.

Servicing Assets: In the ordinary course of business, the Company transfers financial assets (whole loan sales/securitizations) in which it has retained the right to service the assets. The servicing portfolio was considered a potential source of variable interest and was analyzed to determine if any VIEs required consolidation. The servicing portfolio was grouped into three segments: government sponsored entities (“GSEs”), governmental agencies and private investors. Except for two private investors (further analyzed as investment securities below), the Company concluded that the servicing fee received from providing this service did not represent a variable interest as defined by this guidance. The Company determined that its involvement with these entities is in the ordinary course of business and the criteria established to consider the servicing activities as those of a service provider (fiduciary in nature) and not a decision maker, were met.

Investment Securities: The Company analyzed its investment portfolio and determined that it had several residual interests in non-agency CMOs that required full analysis to determine the primary beneficiary. For trading assets and insignificant residual interests as well as investments in non-profit vehicles, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary since it does not have power over the significant activities of the entity. For two residual interests in non-agency CMOs where the Company is also the servicer of the underlying assets it was determined that due to: (i) the unilateral ability of the issuers to remove the Company from its role as servicer, or role of servicer for loans more than 90 days past due; (ii) the issuer’s right to object to commencement of the foreclosure procedures; and (iii) the requirement for issuer authorization of the sales price of all foreclosed property; the Company did not have power over the significant activities of the entity and therefore consolidation was not appropriate.

Loans: Through its construction portfolio, the Company provides financing to legal entities created with the limited purpose of developing and selling residential or commercial properties. Often these entities do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to finance its activities, and the Company could potentially have a variable interest in the entities since it may absorb losses related to the loans granted. In situations where the loan defaults or is re-structured by the Company, the loan could result in the Company’s potential absorption of losses of the entity. However, the Company is not involved in the design or operations of these entities and it has therefore been concluded that the Company does not have the power over the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary in any of these entities. The Company will continue to assess this portfolio on an ongoing basis to determine if there are any changes in its involvement with these VIEs that could potentially lead to consolidation treatment.

Special Purpose Entities (SPE): The Company is involved with two special purpose entities. These special purpose entities are deemed to be VIEs.

•

The Company sold an asset portfolio to a third party on July 29, 2010, consisting of performing and non-performing late-stage residential construction and development loans and other real estate assets, with carrying amounts at the transfer date of $33.8 million, $63.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively. As consideration for the transferred assets, the Company received a $5.1 million cash payment and a $96.9 million note receivable which has a 10-year maturity and a fixed interest rate of 8% per annum and permits interest capitalization for the first 18 months. This financing provided by the Company is secured by a general pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. As of June 30, 2011, the carrying amount of the note receivable was $96.9 million and is classified in loans receivable in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.

Concurrent with this transaction, the Company provided the acquirer with a $28.0 million construction line of credit which has a 10- year maturity and a fixed interest rate of 8% per annum. The line of credit will be used by the acquirer of the assets to provide construction advances on the transferred loans or to fund construction on foreclosed properties. As of June 30, 2011, the carrying amount of the line of credit is $3.4 million and is classified as loan receivable in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.

The Company has determined that the acquirer is a VIE and that the Company is not its primary beneficiary. The assets of the acquirer are comprised of the transferred asset portfolio in addition to $10.2 million of in kind capital contribution provided by a single third party. The sole equity holder has unconditionally committed to contribute an additional $7.0 million of capital over the next six years.

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is an enterprise that has a controlling financial interest in the VIE which exists when an enterprise has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The rights provided to the Company as creditor are protective in nature. As the Company does not have the right to manage the loan portfolio, impact foreclosure proceedings, or manage the construction and sale of the property, the Company does not have power over the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the acquirer. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from the variable interest entity is limited to the interest and principal outstanding on the note receivable and the line of credit. Therefore, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

The transfer of the portfolio, consisting of contruction loans and other real estate assets, was accounted for as a sale. The note receivable was recognized at its initial fair value of $96.9 million. The initial fair value measurement of the note receivable was determined using discount rate adjustment techniques with significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. Management based its fair value estimate using cash flows forecasted considering the initial and future loan advances, when the various construction project units would be complete, current absorption rates of new housing in Puerto Rico, and a market interest rate that reflects the estimated credit risk of the acquirer and the nature of the loan collateral. Doral considered the loans to be construction loans for the purposed of determining a market rate.

•

During the third quarter of 2010, the Company, through one of its subsidiaries, Doral Money, entered into a Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO) arrangement with a third party in which up to $450.0 million of largely U.S. mainland based commercial loans are pledged to collateralize AAA rated debt of $250.0 million paying three month LIBOR plus 1.85 percent issued by Doral CLO I, Ltd. Doral CLO I, Ltd. is a variable interest entity created to hold the commercial loans and issue the previously noted debt and $200.0 million of subordinated notes to the Company whereby the Company receives any excess proceeds after payment of the senior debt interest and other fees and charges specified in the indenture agreement. The Company also serves as collateral manager of the assets of Doral CLO I, Ltd. Doral CLO I, Ltd. is consolidated with the Company in these financial statements.

A CLO is a securitization where a special purpose entity purchases a pool of assets consisting of loans and issues multiple tranches of equity or notes to investors. Typically, the asset manager has the power over the significant decisions of the VIE through its discretion to manage the assets of the CLO.

Doral CLO I, Ltd. is a VIE because it does not have sufficient equity investment at risk and the subordinated notes provide additional financial support to the structure. Management has determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary of Doral CLO I, Ltd. because it has a variable interest in Doral CLO I, Ltd. through both its collateral manager fee and its obligation to absorb potentially significant losses and the right to receive potentially significant benefits of the CLO through the subordinated securities held. The most significant activities of Doral CLO I, Ltd. are those associated with managing the collateral obligations on a day-to-day basis and, as collateral manager, the Company controls the significant activities of the VIE.

The classifications of assets and liabilities on the Company’s Statement of Financial Condition associated with our consolidated VIE follows:


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Carrying amount
Cash and other interest-earning assets	$	13,267		$	51,828
Loans receivable		438,898			401,723
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(1,669	)		(2,388	)
Other assets		9,156			9,795

Total assets		459,652			460,958

Notes payable (third party liability)		249,831			249,822
Other liabilities		1,721			2,934

Total liabilities		251,552			252,756

Net assets	$	208,100		$	208,202

The following table summarizes the Company’s unconsolidated VIEs and presents the maximum exposure to loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances, for which the possibility of occurrence is remote, for the periods indicated.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Carrying amount
Servicing assets	$	14,849	$	15,201
Available for sale securities:
Non-agency CMO		11,153		11,108
Loans receivable:
Construction and land ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		359,063		412,352
Maximum exposure to loss⁽¹⁾
Servicing assets	$	14,849	$	15,201
Available for sale securities:
Non-agency CMO⁽²⁾		11,153		11,108
Loans receivable:
Construction and land ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		359,063		412,352


⁽¹⁾		Maximum exposure to loss is a required disclosure under GAAP and represents estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances, for which the possibility of occurrence is remote, such as where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery or offset from any economic hedges. Accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss.

⁽²⁾		Refers to book value of residual interest from two private placements (Refer to Investment Securities disclosure above). These transactions are structured without recourse, so as servicers our exposure is limited to standard representations and warranties as seller of the loans and responsibilities as servicer of the SPE’s assets.

⁽³⁾		Does not include construction spot loans and construction development loans to non-developers.

⁽⁴⁾		Net of ALLL of $11.2 million and $25.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

31. Segment Information

The Company’s reportable business segments are strategic business units that offer distinctive products and services that are marketed through different channels. These are managed separately because of their unique technology, marketing and distribution requirements.

Management determined the reportable segments based upon the Company’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer, to the senior management team and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, management also considered the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Company’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.

During 2011, the Company reorganized its reportable segments consistent with its return to profitability plan. The strategic plan has the objectives of establishing a focused approach for a turnaround and returning to profitability, and of managing its liquidating portfolios. The Company now operates in the following four reportable segments:

•

Puerto Rico — This segment is the Company’s principal market and includes all mortgage and retail banking activities in Puerto Rico including loans, deposits and insurance activities. This segment operates a branch network in Puerto Rico of 34 branches offering a variety of consumer loan products as well as deposit products and other retail banking services. This segment’s primary lending activities have traditionally focused on the origination of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico.

•

United States — This segment is the Company’s principal source of growth in the current economic environment. It includes retail banking in the United States through its federal savings bank subsidiary with branches in New York and Florida. This segment also includes the Company’s middle market syndicated lending unit that is engaged in purchasing participations in senior credit facilities in the U.S. syndicated leverage loan market and is the primary source of growth in the Company’s loan portfolio.

•

Liquidating Operations — This segment manages the Company’s liquidating portfolios comprised primarily of construction and land portfolios (loans and repossessed assets) with the purpose of maximizing the Company’s returns on these assets. There is no expected growth in the portfolios within this segment except as part of a workout function.

•

Treasury — The Company’s Treasury function handles its investment portfolio, interest rate risk management and liquidity position. It also serves as a source of funding for the Company’s other lines of business.

The accounting policies followed by the segments are generally the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies described in the Company’s Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K except for intersegment allocations. Intersegment entries are made to account for intersegment loans in which segments with excess liquidity lend cash to segments with a shortage of liquidity. The extent of the intersegment loans is calculated based on the net assets less allocated equity of each segment. Intersegment interest income and expense is calculated based on portfolio specifics and market terms. The Company also allocates administrative expenses (included in the “Corporate” column in the table below) proportionally to the four reportable segments based on their individual total assets after intersegment loans. Income tax expense has not been deducted in the determination of segment profits.

The following table presents financial information of the four reportable segments as of June 30, 2011 and for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011 with the new reportable segment structure. Management determined that it was impracticable to change the composition of reportable segments for earlier periods. Therefore, we have presented below segment information as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 with the new reportable segment structure as well as comparative segment information as of and for the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 using the old reportable segment structure.

Prior to 2011, the Company operated in three reportable segments: mortgage banking activities, banking (including thrift operations) and insurance agency activities. The Company’s segment reporting was organized by legal entity and aggregated by line of business. Legal entities that did not meet the threshold for separate disclosure were aggregated with other legal entities with similar lines of business. Management made this determination based on operating decisions particular to each business line and because each one targeted different customers and required different strategies. The majority of the Company’s operations are conducted in Puerto Rico. The Company also operates in the mainland United States, principally in the New York City metropolitan area and since the third quarter of 2010 in Florida.


	Quarter ended June 30, 2011
										Liquidating
(In thousands)	Puerto Rico			United States			Treasury			Operations			Corporate			Intersegment ⁽¹⁾			Total
Net interest income (loss) from external customers	$	43,589		$	11,713		$	(14,186	)	$	4,339		$	—		$			$	45,455
Intersegment net interest (loss) income		(12,613	)		(1,346	)		18,398			(2,087	)		(2,352	)		—			—
Total net interest income (loss)		30,976			10,367			4,212			2,252			(2,352	)		—			45,455
Provision for loan and lease losses		6,502			358			—			6,463			—			—			13,323
Non-interest income (loss)		23,040			934			14,864			—			(41	)		—			38,797
Depreciation and amortization		1,522			261			—			1			1,679			—			3,463
Non-interest expense		30,288			5,123			4,515			5,490			14,702			—			60,118
Net income (loss) before income taxes and corporate allocations		15,704			5,559			14,561			(9,702	)		(18,774	)		—			7,348
Allocation of corporate		14,197			3,398			—			1,179			(18,774	)		—			—
Net income (loss) before income taxes		1,507			2,161			14,561			(10,881	)		—			—			7,348
Identifiable assets		6,253,327			1,295,428			3,262,710			611,010			224,326			(3,631,105	)		8,015,696


	Six Month Period ended June 30, 2011
										Liquidating
(In thousands)	Puerto Rico			United States			Treasury			Operations			Corporate			Intersegment ⁽¹⁾			Total
Net interest income (loss) from external customers	$	88,549		$	23,549		$	(30,980	)	$	7,507		$	—		$	—		$	88,625
Intersegment net interest (loss) income		(28,353	)		(2,294	)		39,216			(4,180	)		(4,389	)		—			—
Total net interest income (loss)		60,196		$	21,255		$	8,236		$	3,327		$	(4,389	)	$	—			88,625
Provision (recovery) for loan and lease losses		6,044			(38	)		—			9,908			—			—			15,914
Non-interest income (loss)		46,554			2,867			18,044			(2	)		(41	)		—			67,422
Depreciation and amortization		3,097			424			—			2			3,143			—			6,666
Non-interest expense		58,156			11,464			9,119			11,387			27,573			—			117,699
Net income (loss) before income taxes and corporate allocations		39,453			12,272			17,161			(17,972	)		(35,146	)		—			15,768
Allocation of corporate		26,895			6,002			35			2,214			(35,146	)		—			—
Net income (loss) before income taxes		12,558			6,270			17,126			(20,186	)		—			—			15,768
Identifiable assets		6,253,327			1,295,428			3,262,710			611,010			224,326			(3,631,105	)		8,015,696


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2011

	Mortgage					Insurance		Intersegment
(In thousands)	Banking			Banking		Agency		Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Totals
Net interest income	$	1,040		$	43,237	$	—	$	1,178		$	45,455
Provision for loan and lease losses		4,036			9,287		—		—			13,323
Non-interest income		9,677			30,038		2,438		(3,356	)		38,797
(Loss) Income before income taxes		(2,355	)		7,647		1,830		226			7,348
Net (loss) income		(2,034	)		5,176		1,059		275			4,476
Identifiable assets		1,723,272			7,344,397		12,175		(1,064,149	)		8,015,696


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2010

	Mortgage						Insurance		Intersegment
(In thousands)	Banking			Banking			Agency		Eliminations ⁽¹⁾			Totals
Net interest income	$	2,068		$	36,507		$	—	$	1,490		$	40,065
Provision for loan and lease losses		4,170			40,447			—		—			44,617
Non-interest income		9,402			(128,172	)		2,482		(3,902	)		(120,190	)
(Loss) Income before income taxes		(20,660	)		(209,488	)		1,723		(399	)		(228,824	)
Net (loss) income		(20,963	)		(212,966	)		1,017		(399	)		(233,311	)
Identifiable assets		1,753,139			8,679,522			19,837		(1,055,606	)		9,396,892


⁽¹⁾		The intersegment eliminations in the tables above include servicing fees paid by the banking subsidiaries to the mortgage banking subsidiary recognized as a reduction of the non interest income, direct intersegment loan origination costs amortized as yield adjustment or offset against net gains on mortgage loan sales and fees (mainly related with origination costs paid by the banking segment to the mortgage banking segment) and other income derived from intercompany transactions, related principally to rental income paid to Doral Properties, the Company’s subsidiary that owns the corporate headquarters facilities. Assets include internal funding and investments in subsidiaries accounted for at cost.


	Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2011
	Mortgage					Insurance		Intersegment
(In thousands)	Banking			Banking		Agency		Eliminations⁽¹⁾			Total
Net interest income	$	1,782		$	84,556	$	—	$	2,287		$	88,625
Provision for loan and lease losses		3,996			11,918		—		—			15,914
Non-interest income		16,294			54,439		4,661		(7,972	)		67,422
(Loss) income before income taxes		(2,025	)		15,902		3,169		(1,278	)		15,768
Net (loss) income		(3,829	)		11,003		1,853		(1,227	)		7,800
Identifiable assets		1,723,272			7,344,397		12,175		(1,064,148	)		8,015,696


	Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2010
	Mortgage						Insurance		Intersegment
(In thousands)	Banking			Banking			Agency		Eliminations⁽¹⁾			Total
Net interest income	$	5,454		$	75,110		$	—	$	3,262		$	83,826
Provision for loan and lease losses		6,287			52,251			—		—			58,538
Non-interest income (loss)		15,563			(96,548	)		4,862		(7,483	)		(83,606	)
(Loss) income before income taxes		(28,016	)		(205,142	)		3,610		(250	)		(229,798	)
Net (loss) income		(28,373	)		(210,323	)		2,132		(250	)		(236,814	)
Identifiable assets		1,753,139			8,679,522			19,837		(1,055,606	)		9,396,892


⁽¹⁾		The intersegment eliminations in the tables above include servicing fees paid by the banking subsidiaries to the mortgage banking subsidiary recognized as a reduction of the non interest income, direct intersegment loan origination costs amortized as yield adjustment or offset against net gains on mortgage loan sales and fees (mainly related with origination costs paid by the banking segment to the mortgage banking segment) and other income derived from intercompany transactions, related principally to rental income paid to Doral Properties, the Company’s subsidiary that owns the corporate headquarters facilities. Assets include internal funding and investments in subsidiaries accounted for at cost.

32. Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date that these consolidated financial statements were issued and determined that no events have occurred that require disclosure or adjustments.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, Doral Financial may make forward-looking statements in its press releases, other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or in other public or shareholder communications and its senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media and others.

These forward-looking statements may relate to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings, tax legislation and tax rules, regulatory matters and new accounting standards on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, but instead represent Doral Financial’s current expectations regarding future events. Such statements may be generally identified by the use of words or phrases such as “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “expect,” “predict,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “target,” “goal,” “may” or similar expressions.

Doral Financial cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements since they speak only as of the date made and represent Doral Financial’s expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligations to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of those statements.

Forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties and changes in circumstances, many of which are beyond Doral Financial’s control. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement:

	•		the continued recessionary conditions of the Puerto Rico economy and any deterioration in the performance of the United States economy and capital markets that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits leading to, among other things, (i) a deterioration in the credit quality of our loans and other assets, (ii) decreased demand for our products and services and lower revenue and earnings, (iii) reduction in our interest margins, and (iv) decreased availability and increased pricing of our funding sources, including brokered certificates of deposits;

	•		the weakness of the Puerto Rico and United States real estate markets and of the Puerto Rico and United States consumer and commercial credit sectors and its impact in the credit quality of our loans and other assets which have contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other things, an increase in our non-performing loans, charge-offs and loan loss provisions and may subject the Company to further risk from loan defaults and foreclosures;

	•		recent and/or future downgrades of the long-term debt ratings of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , which could adversely affect economic conditions in the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

	•		a decline in the market value and estimated cash flows of our mortgage-backed securities and other assets may result in the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment of such assets under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America;

	•		our ability to derive sufficient income to realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets;

	•		uncertainty about the legislative and other measures adopted by the Puerto Rico government in response to its fiscal situation and the impact of such measures on different sectors of the Puerto Rico economy;

	•		uncertainty about the adopted changes to the Puerto Rico internal revenue code and other related tax provisions and the impact of such measures on different sectors of the Puerto Rico economy;

	•		uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions undertaken to stimulate the United States economy and stabilize the United States financial markets, and the impact of such actions on our business, financial condition and results of operations;

	•		uncertainty about the outcome of regular annual safety and soundness and compliance examinations by our primary regulators which may contribute to, among other things, an increase in our charge-offs, loan loss provisions, and compliance costs;

	•		changes in interest rates, which may result from changes in the fiscal and monetary policy of the federal government, and

			the potential impact of such changes in interest rates on our net interest income and the value of our loans and investments;

	•		the commercial soundness of our various counterparties of financing and other securities transactions, which could lead to possible losses when the collateral held by us to secure the obligations of the counterparty is not sufficient or to possible delays or losses in recovering any excess collateral belonging to us held by the counterparty;

	•		higher credit losses because of federal or state legislation or regulatory action that either (i) reduces the amount that our borrowers are required to pay us, or (ii) limits our ability to foreclose on properties or collateral or makes foreclosures less economically feasible;

	•		developments in the regulatory and legal environment for public companies and financial services companies in the United States (including Puerto Rico) as a result of, among other things, the adoption in July 2010 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the regulations adopted and to be adopted thereunder by various federal and state securities and banking regulatory agencies, and the impact of such developments on our business, business practices, capital requirements and costs of operations;

	•		the exposure of Doral Financial, as originator of residential mortgage loans, sponsor of residential mortgage loan securitization transactions, or servicer of such loans or such transactions, or in other capacities, to government sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”), investors, mortgage insurers or other third parties as a result of representations and warranties made in connection with the transfer or securitization of such loans;

	•		the risk of possible failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures, and the risk that our risk management policies may be inadequate;

	•		the risk that the FDIC may further increase deposit insurance premiums and/or require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase in the Company’s non-interest expense;

	•		changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards, and changes in how accounting standards are interpreted or applied;

	•		general competitive factors and industry consolidation;

	•		the strategies adopted by the FDIC and the three acquiring banks in connection with the resolution of the residential, construction and commercial real estate loans acquired in connection with the three Puerto Rico banks that failed in April 2010, which may adversely affect real estate values in Puerto Rico;

	•		to the extent we make any acquisitions, including FDIC-assisted acquisitions of assets and liabilities of failed banks, the risks and difficulties relating to combining the acquired operations with our existing operations;

	•		potential adverse outcome in the legal or regulatory actions or proceedings described in Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated in Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings” in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and as updated from time to time in the Company’s future reports filed with the SEC; and

	•		the other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as updated in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and as updated from time to time in the Company’s future reports filed with the SEC.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This financial discussion contains an analysis of the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations of Doral Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, notes and tables included elsewhere in this report.

In addition to the information contained in this Form 10-Q, readers should consider the description of the Company’s business contained in Item 1 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. While not all inclusive, Items 1 and 1A of the Form 10-K disclose additional information about the business of the Company, risk factors, many beyond the Company’s control, and further provide discussion of the operating results, financial condition and credit, market and liquidity risks than that which is presented in the narrative and tables included herein.

OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 totalled $4.5 million, compared to a net loss of $233.3 million for the comparable 2010 period. Doral Financial’s performance for the second quarter of 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010 was primarily due to (i) an increase in net gain on investment securities of $152.0 million as approximately $378.0 million of low quality non-agency securities were sold in April 2010 at a loss of $136.7 million; (ii) a decrease of $30.6 million in other provisions and OREO expenses generally to recognize deterioration of credit quality in 2010 not experienced in 2011; (iii) a decrease of $31.3 million in the provision for loan and lease losses in part due to a write down of $13 million of certain loan assets to facilitate their sale in July 2010 and improvements in delinquency of the loan portfolio; (iv) and an increase of $5.4 million in net interest income resulting from structural changes in the balance sheet to generate higher sustainable net interest income.

The Company’s financial results and condition for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 included the following:

	•		Net income attributable to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2011 totalled $2.1 million, and resulted in a net income per share of $0.02, compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders for the corresponding 2010 period of $235.7 million, or a loss per share of $3.50.

	•		Net interest income for the second quarter of 2011 was $45.5 million, compared to $40.1 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The increase of $5.4 million in net interest income for 2011, compared to 2010, was due to a decrease in interest income of $10.0 million, or 9.9%, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense of $15.4 million, or 25.2%. The decrease in interest income was driven by a decrease in interest on mortgage backed securities of $9.3 million from the sale of securities to delever the bank and decrease the bank’s sensitivity to increasing interest rates. The decrease in interest expense was driven by decreases of $7.5 million in interest expense on securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $4.1 million in interest expense on advances from FHLB and $5.0 million on deposits, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.5 million in notes payable primarily related to a $250.0 million debt issued under the CLO at a rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 1.85% in July 2010. Lower interest expense charges resulted from changes to FHLB borrowings (advances and repos) that extended duration and lowered interest rates, and efforts to lower retail deposit rates in Puerto Rico and brokered CD’s.

	•		The provision for loan and lease losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 totalled $13.3 million, a decrease of $31.3 million over the $44.6 million provision for the corresponding 2010 period. The decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses for the second quarter of 2011 resulted primarily from the Puerto Rico loan portfolios, and reflects specific provisions made in the second quarter of 2010 to write down assets sold in July 2010 to their sales price and reflect the effect on the loan loss provision of writing down OREO to facilitate faster sales and the lower level of non-performing loans in the second quarter of 2011.

	•		Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2011 was $38.8 million, an increase of $159.0 million compared to non-interest loss of $120.2 million for the corresponding 2010 period. The increase in non-interest income for the second quarter of 2011, compared to the same period in 2010 resulting from the following (i) during the second quarter of 2010 the Company recognized a loss on sale of securities of $137.2 million driven by a loss of $136.7 million on the sale of $378.0 million of certain non-agency CMOs, (ii) during the second quarter of 2011 the Company had a gain on sale of investment securities of $14.8 million as a result of its deleveraging of the balance sheet and (iii) servicing income increased $5.9 million related to an improvement in the mark to market adjustment of the MSRs of $3.4 million. The improvement in the value of the MSRs was primarily due to a reduction in prepayment speeds. The improvement in servicing income was driven by lower interest losses of $3.5 million. During the second quarter of 2010 the Company recognized an interest loss on servicing advances of $4.2 million related to the

			repurchase of certain GNMA defaulted loans. This improvement was partially offset by lower servicing fees of $0.7 million as the serviced loan portfolio continues to run-off from prepayments.

	•		Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2011 was $63.6 million, compared to $104.1 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The $40.5 million decrease in non-interest expenses for the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, was due to (i) a decrease of $10.8 million in the reserve for the Company’s claim on Lehman Brothers Inc. that was established in the second quarter of 2010; this claim was subsequently sold to a third party; (ii) a decrease in OREO expenses of $21.4 million related to an additional provision for OREO losses of $17.0 million established during the second quarter of 2010 to recognize the effect of management’s decision to reduce pricing to stimulate property sales, adjustments driven by lower values of certain OREO properties, and higher maintenance costs to maintain the properties in saleable condition; (iii) a decrease of $6.1 million in professional services driven by lower defense litigation costs of $4.2 million, lower advisory services of $0.5 million related to the dissolution of Doral Holdings and Doral Holdings L.P., and lower advisory services of $1.3 million in 2011 compared to 2010 which were incurred in relation to the sale of certain construction loans; (iv) a decrease in advertising expense of $2.3 million related to campaigns conducted to gain market share in deposits and mortgage originations subsequent to the local market bank failures and asset acquisition in April 2010; (v) lower FDIC insurance expense of $1.8 million related to a lower deposit base and a change in the method of computing the assessment; and (vi) an increase of $1.6 million in other credit related expenses which was due to an increase of $0.9 million in foreclosure expenses and $0.9 million in the provision for negative escrow.

	•		An income tax expense of $2.9 million for the second quarter of 2011, compared to an income tax expense of $4.5 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease in tax expense was due to taxes recognized in 2010 related to U.S. source income partially offset by realization of operational deferred tax assets.

	•		Doral Financial’s loan production for the second quarter of 2011 was $464.7 million, compared to $380.2 million for the comparable 2010 period, an increase of approximately 22.2%. The production increase resulted mainly from the US loan production.

	•		Assets as of June 30, 2011 totalled $8.0 billion compared to $8.6 billion as of December 31, 2010, a decrease of $0.6 billion or 7.3%. The decrease in assets was due mainly to the sale of $870.0 million of mortgage backed securities during the first half of 2011. These sales were conducted pursuant to the Company’s deleveraging of the balance sheet.

	•		Total deposits of $4.3 billion decreased $315.7 million, or 6.8%, from deposits of $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2010. The year-to-date deposit decrease resulted from a decrease of $328.2 million, or 13.9%, in brokered deposits, partially offset by a $12.5 million, or 0.6%, increase in non-brokered deposits.

	•		Non-performing loans (“NPLs”), excluding FHA/VA loans guaranteed by the US government, as of June 30, 2011 were $560.5 million, a decrease of $11.0 million and $65.9 million from March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The reduction in NPLs was a result of continued emphasis on collections and restructures to optimize performance of the loan portfolio as well as the effect of net charge-offs of $40.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to net charge-offs of $6.0 million in the first quarter of 2011.

Table A
Selected Financial Data


	Quarters Ended						Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands, except for share data)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income	$	91,117		$	101,077		$	185,108		$	210,305
Interest expense		45,662			61,012			96,483			126,479

Net interest income		45,455			40,065			88,625			83,826
Provision for loan and lease losses		13,323			44,617			15,914			58,538

Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan and lease losses		32,132			(4,552	)		72,711			25,288
Non-interest income (loss)		38,797			(120,190	)		67,422			(83,606	)
Non-interest expenses		63,581			104,082			124,365			171,480

Income (loss) before income taxes		7,348			(228,824	)		15,768			(229,798	)
Income tax expense		2,871			4,487			7,968			7,016

Net income (loss)	$	4,477		$	(233,311	)	$	7,800		$	(236,814	)

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders⁽¹⁾	$	2,062		$	(235,726	)	$	2,970		$	(214,508	)

Net income (loss) per common share⁽²⁾	$	0.02		$	(3.50	)	$	0.02		$	(3.30	)


Accrued dividends, preferred stock	$	2,415		$	2,415		$	4,830		$	4,279
Preferred stock exchange premium, net	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(26,585	)
Book value per common share	$	4.02		$	6.27		$	4.02		$	6.27
Preferred shares outstanding at end of period		5,811,391			6,096,393			5,811,391			6,096,393
Weighted average common shares outstanding		127,293,756			67,285,568			127,293,756			64,920,036
Common shares outstanding at end of period		127,293,756			67,293,370			127,293,756			67,293,370

Selected Balance Sheet Data at Period End:
Total investment securities	$	790,605		$	2,527,802		$	790,605		$	2,527,802
Total loans, net⁽³⁾		5,897,060			5,768,728			5,897,060			5,768,728
Allowance for loan and lease losses		93,472			134,913			93,472			134,913
Servicing assets, net		115,785			113,005			115,785			113,005
Total assets		8,015,696			9,393,533			8,015,696			9,393,533
Deposits		4,302,792			4,940,569			4,302,792			4,940,569
Total borrowings		2,590,202			3,265,020			2,590,202			3,265,020
Total liabilities		7,151,436			8,448,561			7,151,436			8,448,561
Preferred equity		352,082			523,082			352,082			523,082
Common equity		512,178			421,890			512,178			421,890
Total stockholders’ equity		864,260			944,972			864,260			944,972

Selected Average Balance Sheet Data for Period End: ⁽⁴⁾
Total investment securities	$	1,258,527		$	2,284,672		$	1,422,522		$	2,603,284
Total loans⁽³⁾		5,890,682			5,876,723			5,878,311			5,858,009
Total interest-earning assets		7,729,926			8,747,284			7,790,441			9,123,226
Total assets		8,381,285			9,427,981			8,455,508			9,808,502
Deposits		4,449,327			4,644,841			4,496,081			4,648,579
Total borrowings		2,814,985			3,449,652			2,831,581			3,876,960
Total interest-bearing liabilities		6,997,000			7,863,038			7,055,458			8,287,745
Preferred equity		352,082			486,191			352,082			448,205
Common equity		518,602			468,198			513,195			468,161
Total stockholders’ equity		870,684			954,389			865,277			916,366

Operating Data:
Loan production	$	464,653		$	380,170		$	814,742		$	669,225
Loan servicing portfolio ⁽⁵⁾		8,045,830			8,335,364			8,045,830			8,335,364
Selected Financial Ratios:
Performance:
Net interest margin		2.36	%		1.84	%		2.29	%		1.85	%
Return on average assets ⁽⁴⁾		0.21	%		(9.93	)%		0.19	%		(4.87	)%
Return on average common equity⁽⁴⁾⁽⁶⁾		1.59	%		(201.94	)%		1.17	%		(103.85	)%
Capital:
Leverage ratio		9.07	%		8.52	%		9.07	%		8.52	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		13.41	%		13.99	%		13.41	%		13.99	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		14.67	%		15.26	%		14.67	%		15.26	%
Asset quality:
Total NPAs as percentage of the loan portfolio, net, and OREO (excluding GNMA defaulted loans)		12.73	%		18.26	%		12.73	%		18.26	%
Total NPAs as percentage of consolidated total assets		9.29	%		11.18	%		9.29	%		11.18	%
ALLL as a percentage of loans receivable outstanding, at end of period		1.64	%		2.44	%		1.64	%		2.44	%
ALLL plus partial charge-offs and discounts to loans receivable (excluding FHA/VA guaranteed loans and loans on savings)		3.70	%		2.47	%		3.70	%		2.47	%
ALLL to non-performing loans (excluding NPLs held for sale)		16.75	%		17.65	%		16.75	%		17.65	%
ALLL plus partial charge-offs and discounts to non-performing loans (excluding NPLs held for sale)		36.89	%		19.46	%		36.89	%		19.46	%
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs		33.26	%		78.02	%		34.53	%		90.90	%
Net charge-off’s to average loan receivable outstanding		0.71	%		1.03	%		0.83	%		1.16	%
ALLL to net charge-offs on an annualized basis		58.18	%		58.82	%		100.56	%		103.89	%
Other ratios:
Average common equity to average assets⁽⁴⁾		6.19	%		4.97	%		6.07	%		4.77	%
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets		7.11	%		4.79	%		7.11	%		4.79	%


⁽¹⁾		For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, includes $26.6 million related to the net effect of the conversion of preferred stock during the period indicated.

⁽²⁾		For the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, net income (loss) per common share represents the basic and diluted income (loss) per common share, respectively, for each of the periods presented.

⁽³⁾		Includes loans held for sale.

⁽⁴⁾		Average balances are computed on a daily basis.

⁽⁵⁾		Represents the total portfolio of loans serviced for third parties. Excludes $4.5 billion of mortgage loans owned by Doral Financial at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.

⁽⁶⁾		Excludes the effect of the preferred stock exchange inducement

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain of these estimates are critical to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations since they are particularly sensitive to the Company’s judgment and are highly complex in nature. Doral Financial believes that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the factual circumstances as of June 30, 2011. However, given the sensitivity of Doral Financial’s consolidated financial statements to these estimates, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. Critical Accounting Policies are detailed in Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, please refer to Note 2 of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTERS AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by Doral Financial on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. Doral Financial’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk resulting from the repricing and maturity mismatch in the Company’s assets and liabilities. Generally, Doral Financial’s assets have a longer maturity and a longer period to repricing date than its liabilities, which results in lower net interest income in periods of rising short-term interest rates and higher net interest income in periods of declining short-term interest rates. Please refer to “Risk Management” below for additional information on the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk.

Second Quarter 2011 vs. Second Quarter 2010 - Net interest margin increased 52 basis points to 2.36% for the second quarter of 2011 from 1.84% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. An increase of $5.4 million in net interest income was due to a decrease in interest expense of $15.4 million partially offset by a decrease in interest income of $10.0 million. The decrease in interest expense is attributed to decreases of $7.5 million in interest expense on securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $4.1 million in interest expense on advances from FHLB and $5.0 million on deposits, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.5 million in notes payable primarily related to a $250.0 million debt issued under the CLO at a rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 1.85% in July 2010. The decreased interest expense results from successful efforts to restructure Doral’s advances from FHLB and securities sold under agreements to repurchase to lower rates and extend duration, and lower rates paid on Puerto Rico sourced deposits and brokered deposits. The decrease in interest income was driven by a decrease in interest on mortgage backed securities of $9.3 million from the sale of securities to delever the bank and decrease the bank’s sensitivity to increasing interest rates. Average interest-earning assets decreased $1.0 billion, from $8.7 billion for the second quarter of 2010 to $7.7 billion for the corresponding 2011 period, while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $866.0 million, from $7.9 billion for the second quarter of 2010 to $7.0 billion, for the same 2011 period.

Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 — Net interest margin increased 44 basis points to 2.29% for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to 1.85% for the same period in 2010. An increase of $4.8 million in net interest income was driven by a decrease in interest expense of $30.0 million and partially offset by a decrease in interest income of $25.2 million. The decrease in interest expense was mainly due to (i) a decrease of $4.8 million on interest on deposits as the brokered deposits portfolio continued to decrease in size and interest rate as well as a reduction in interest rates of other interest bearing deposits, and (ii) a decrease in interest of securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $16.4 million

due to the strategic restructuring of Doral’s FHLB borrowings during the first half of 2011 to increase term to maturity and reduce rates. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in notes payable of $3.0 million related to the $250.0 million debt issued under the CLO in July 2010. The decrease in interest income was driven by an increase in interest income from growth of the US commercial loan portfolio more than offset by a decrease in interest on mortgage backed securities of $21.5 million related to the strategic delevering of the bank to reduce future interest income sensitivity. Average interest-earning assets decreased $1.3 billion, from $9.1 billion for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to $7.8 billion for the corresponding 2011 period, while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $1.2 billion, from $8.3 billion to $7.1 billion, for the same periods.

The following tables present, for the periods indicated, Doral Financial’s average balance sheet, the total dollar amount of interest income from its average interest-earning assets and the related yields, as well as the interest expense on its average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed in both dollars and rates, and the net interest margin and spread. These tables do not reflect any effect of income taxes. Average balances are based on average daily balances.

Table B
Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income


	Quarters Ended June 30,
	2011							2010
	Average				Average			Average				Average
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate			Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate
ASSETS:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans:
Consumer:
Residential ⁽¹⁾	$	3,936,498	$	53,671		5.47	%	$	4,117,768	$	57,956		5.65	%
Lease financing receivables		3,220		47		5.83	%		9,701		122		5.04	%
Consumer		48,399		1,719		14.25	%		66,889		2,805		16.82	%

		3,988,117		55,437		5.58	%		4,194,358		60,883		5.82	%

Commercial:
Commercial real estate		704,104		8,964		5.11	%		778,372		10,145		5.23	%
Commercial and industrial		768,847		10,275		5.36	%		370,747		5,015		5.43	%
Construction and land		429,614		4,562		4.26	%		533,246		2,873		2.16	%

		1,902,565		23,801		5.02	%		1,682,365		18,033		4.30	%

Total loans⁽²⁾		5,890,682		79,238		5.40	%		5,876,723		78,916		5.39	%
Mortgage-backed securities		1,111,699		9,221		3.33	%		2,197,216		18,542		3.38	%
Interest-only strips (“IOs”)		43,901		1,508		13.78	%		43,946		1,491		13.61	%
Investment securities		102,927		130		0.51	%		43,510		583		5.37	%
Other interest-earning assets		580,717		1,020		0.70	%		585,889		1,545		1.06	%

Total interest-earning assets/interest income		7,729,926	$	91,117		4.73	%		8,747,284	$	101,077		4.63	%

Total non-interest-earning assets		651,359							680,697

Total assets	$	8,381,285						$	9,427,981

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest bearing deposits	$	2,018,048	$	6,985		1.39	%	$	1,732,410	$	8,594		1.99	%
Brokered CDs		2,163,967		15,558		2.88	%		2,680,976		18,993		2.84	%

		4,182,015		22,543		2.16	%		4,413,386		27,587		2.51	%
Repurchase agreements		882,607		6,238		2.83	%		1,597,173		13,738		3.45	%
Advances from FHLB		1,122,093		8,822		3.15	%		1,254,513		12,921		4.13	%
Other short-term borrowings		—		—		—	%		3,791		4		0.49	%
Loans payable		298,555		1,498		2.01	%		325,378		1,676		2.07	%
Notes payable		511,730		6,560		5.13	%		268,797		5,086		7.57	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense		6,997,000	$	45,661		2.62	%		7,863,038	$	61,012		3.11	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		274,822							231,455
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		238,779							379,099

Total non-interest-bearing liabilities		513,601							610,554

Total liabilities		7,510,601							8,473,592
Stockholders’ equity		870,684							954,389

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	8,381,285						$	9,427,981


Net interest-earning assets	$	732,926						$	884,246

Net interest income on a non-taxable equivalent basis			$	45,456						$	40,065

Interest rate spread⁽³⁾						2.11	%						1.52	%
Interest rate margin⁽⁴⁾						2.36	%						1.84	%
Net interest-earning assets ratio⁽⁵⁾						110.47	%						111.25	%


⁽¹⁾		Average loan balances include the average balance of non-accruing loans, on which interest income is recognized when collected. Also, includes the average balance of GNMA defaulted loans for which the Company has an unconditional buy-back option.

⁽²⁾		Interest income on loans includes $76,000 and $0.2 million for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties related to the Company’s loan portfolio.

⁽³⁾		Interest rate spreads represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted-average yield on interest bearing liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾		Interest rate margin represents net interest income on an annualized basis as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

⁽⁵⁾		Net interest-earning assets ratio represents average interest-earning assets as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities.

Table C
Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income


	Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
	2011							2010
	Average				Average			Average				Average
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate			Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate
ASSETS:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans:
Consumer:
Residential ⁽¹⁾	$	3,971,743	$	107,903		5.48	%	$	4,113,655	$	118,822		5.82	%
Lease financing receivables		3,755		122		6.56	%		10,671		228		4.31	%
Consumer		50,347		3,560		14.26	%		69,207		4,705		13.71	%

		4,025,845		111,585		5.59	%		4,193,533		123,755		5.95	%

Commercial:
Commercial real estate		698,116		17,231		4.98	%		775,549		20,019		5.21	%
Commercial and industrial		709,979		20,975		5.96	%		353,686		9,869		5.63	%
Construction and land		444,371		9,512		4.32	%		535,241		6,706		2.53	%

		1,852,466		47,718		5.19	%		1,664,476		36,594		4.43	%

Total loans⁽²⁾		5,878,311		159,303		5.46	%		5,858,009		160,349		5.52	%
Mortgage-backed securities		1,286,794		20,277		3.18	%		2,495,194		41,789		3.38	%
Interest-only strips (“IOs”)		43,723		2,979		13.74	%		44,820		3,034		13.65	%
Investment securities		92,005		229		0.50	%		63,270		1,448		4.62	%
Other interest-earning assets		489,608		2,320		0.96	%		661,933		3,685		1.12	%

Total interest-earning assets/interest income		7,790,441	$	185,108		4.79	%		9,123,226	$	210,305		4.65	%

Total non-interest-earning assets		665,067							685,276

Total assets	$	8,455,508						$	9,808,502

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest bearing deposits	$	1,998,156	$	14,853		1.50	%	$	1,678,246	$	16,430		1.97	%
Brokered CD’s		2,225,721		34,589		3.13	%		2,732,539		37,857		2.79	%

		4,223,877		49,442		2.36	%		4,410,785		54,287		2.48	%
Repurchase agreements		1,028,891		15,357		3.01	%		1,898,535		31,762		3.37	%
Advances from FHLB		990,049		15,430		3.14	%		1,368,914		26,894		3.96	%
Other short-term borrowings		—		—		—	%		10,138		15		0.30	%
Loans payable		300,085		3,040		2.04	%		329,823		3,325		2.03	%
Notes payable		512,556		13,214		5.16	%		269,550		10,196		7.57	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense		7,055,458	$	96,483		2.76	%		8,287,745	$	126,479		3.08	%

Non-interest-bearing deposits		272,204							237,794
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities		262,569							366,597

Total non-interest-bearing liabilities		534,773							604,391

Total liabilities		7,590,231							8,892,136
Stockholders’ equity		865,277							916,366

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	8,455,508						$	9,808,502


Net interest-earning assets	$	734,983						$	835,481

Net interest income on a non-taxable equivalent basis			$	88,625						$	83,826

Interest rate spread⁽³⁾						2.03	%						1.57	%
Interest rate margin⁽⁴⁾						2.29	%						1.85	%
Net interest-earning assets ratio⁽⁵⁾						110.42	%						110.08	%


⁽¹⁾		Average loan balances include the average balance of non-accruing loans, on which interest income is recognized when collected. Also, includes the average balance of GNMA defaulted loans for which the Company has an unconditional buy-back option.

⁽²⁾		Interest income on loans includes $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties related to the Company’s loan portfolio.

⁽³⁾		Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted-average yield on interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾		Interest rate margin represents net interest income on an annualized basis as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

⁽⁵⁾		Net interest-earning assets ratio represents average interest-earning assets as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities.

The following table presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected Doral Financial’s interest income and interest expense during the period indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to: (i) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by prior year rate); (ii) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior year volume); and (iii) total change in rate and volume. The combined effect of changes in both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the changes due to rate and volume.

Table D
Net Interest Income Variance Analysis


	Quarter Ended June 30,
	2011 Compared to 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due To:
(In thousands)	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest Income Variance
Loans	$	114		$	208		$	322
Mortgage-backed securities		(12,416	)		3,095			(9,321	)
Interest-only strips		(2	)		19			17
Investment securities		228			(681	)		(453	)
Other interest-earning assets		(13	)		(512	)		(525	)

Total Interest Income Variance	$	(12,089	)	$	2,129		$	(9,960	)

Interest Expense Variance
Deposits	$	(1,579	)	$	(3,465	)	$	(5,044	)
Repurchase agreements		(6,113	)		(1,387	)		(7,500	)
Advances from FHLB		(1,442	)		(2,657	)		(4,099	)
Other short-term borrowings		(2	)		(2	)		(4	)
Loans payable		(151	)		(27	)		(178	)
Notes payable		3,005			(1,530	)		1,475

Total Interest Expense Variance	$	(6,282	)	$	(9,068	)	$	(15,350	)

Net Interest Income Variance	$	(5,807	)	$	11,197		$	5,390

Table E
Net Interest Income Variance Analysis


	Six Month Period Ended June 30,
	2011 Compared to 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due To:
(In thousands)	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest Income Variance
Loans	$	231		$	(1,277	)	$	(1,046	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(30,936	)		9,424			(21,512	)
Interest-only strips		(75	)		20			(55	)
Investment securities		181			(1,400	)		(1,219	)
Other interest-earning assets		(881	)		(484	)		(1,365	)

Total Interest Income Variance	$	(31,480	)	$	6,283		$	(25,197	)

Interest Expense Variance
Deposits	$	(2,434	)	$	(2,411	)	$	(4,845	)
Repurchase agreements		(14,320	)		(2,085	)		(16,405	)
Advances from FHLB		(7,059	)		(4,405	)		(11,464	)
Other short-term borrowings		(8	)		(7	)		(15	)
Loans payable		(325	)		40			(285	)
Notes payable		6,493			(3,475	)		3,018

Total Interest Expense Variance	$	(17,653	)	$	(12,343	)	$	(29,996	)

Net Interest Income Variance	$	(13,827	)	$	18,626		$	4,799

PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan and lease losses to a level considered appropriate by management considering all losses inherent in the portfolio and based on Doral Financial’s historical loss experience, current delinquency rates, known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio, individual assessment of significant impaired loans, the estimated value of the underlying collateral or discounted expected cash flows, and an assessment of current economic conditions and emerging risks. While management believes that the current allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, future additions to the allowance could be necessary if economic conditions change or if credit losses increase substantially from those forecast by Doral Financial in determining the allowance. Unanticipated increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses could materially affect Doral Financial’s net income in future periods.

The provision for loan and lease losses for the second quarter of 2011, reflected a decrease of $31.3 million compared to the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter 2011 provision for loan and lease losses was the result of (i) new market information received increasing estimated losses on loans evaluated individually for impairment in the second quarter, (ii) refinements made to the loss reserving methodologies, and (iii) increased aging of the past due residential mortgage loans. The June 2010 provision included a $12.6 million charge to reduce certain construction loans to lower of cost or market when transferred to loans held for sale and an $8.0 million charge due to increased severities on other real estate owned properties resulting from management’s strategic decision to accelerate OREO dispositions, in addition to higher provisions driven by higher delinquencies in 2010 compared to 2011.

The provision for loan and lease losses for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 totaled $15.9 million compared to $58.5 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease of $42.6 million in the provision was mainly related to the previously mentioned charges of $12.6 million for loans reclassified to held for sale and $8.0 million for increased severities on OREO as well as higher delinquencies which drove higher provisions in 2010 compared to 2011.

Please refer to the discussions under “Non-performing assets and allowance for loan and lease losses” and “Credit Risk” below for further analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and NPAs and related ratios.

NON-INTEREST INCOME (LOSS)

Table F


	Quarters ended									Six month periods ending
	June 30,									June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010			Variance			2011			2010			Variance
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses	$	(86	)	$	—		$	(86	)	$	(86	)	$	(13,259	)	$	13,173
Net gain on loans securitized and sold and capitalization of mortgage servicing		9,026			3,605			5,421			14,568			6,956			7,612
Servicing income:
Servicing fees		6,817			7,515			(698	)		13,835			14,625			(790	)
Late charges		1,753			2,287			(534	)		3,520			4,382			(862	)
Prepayment penalties		147			4			143			791			(5	)		796
Other servicing fees		298			238			60			456			472			(16	)
Interest loss on serial notes and others		(1,413	)		(4,924	)		3,511			(1,961	)		(5,606	)		3,645
Mark-to-market adjustment of servicing assets		(3,059	)		(6,474	)		3,415			(3,199	)		(8,478	)		5,279

Total servicing income (loss)		4,543			(1,354	)		5,897			13,442			5,390			8,052
Trading activities
Gain (loss) on IO valuation		4,079			3,857			222			3,628			4,516			(888	)
Gain (loss) on MSR economic hedge		582			4,656			(4,074	)		59			6,484			(6,425	)
Loss on hedging derivatives		(1,288	)		(1,411	)		123			(1,401	)		(2,909	)		1,508

Net gain (loss) on trading activities		3,373			7,102			(3,729	)		2,286			8,091			(5,805	)
Commissions, fees and other income:
Retail banking fees		7,067			7,199			(132	)		14,073			14,342			(269	)
Insurance agency commissions		2,439			2,436			3			4,661			4,778			(117	)
Other (loss) income		695			571			124			3,884			3,907			(23	)

Total commissions, fees and other income		10,201			10,206			(5	)		22,618			23,027			(409	)
Net loss on early repayment of debt		(3,068	)		(2,545	)		(523	)		(3,068	)		(3,021	)		(47	)
Net gain (loss) on investment securities		14,808			(137,204	)		152,012			17,662			(110,790	)		128,452

Total non-interest income (loss)	$	38,797		$	(120,190	)	$	158,987		$	67,422		$	(83,606	)	$	151,028

Second Quarter 2011 vs. Second Quarter 2010 — Non-interest income of $38.8 million for the second quarter of 2011 increased by $159.0 million over the second quarter of 2010, primarily due to the following:

•

An improvement in gain on sale of investment securities of $152.0 million. During the second quarter of 2010 the Company recognized a loss on sale of securities of $137.2 million driven by a loss of $136.7 million on the sale of $378.0 million of certain non-agency CMOs. During the second quarter of 2011 the Company had a gain on sale of investment securities of $14.8 million as a result of its deleveraging of the balance sheet.

•

Servicing income increased $5.9 million related to an improvement in the mark to market adjustment of the MSR of $3.4 million and higher servicing fees of $2.5 million. The improvement in the value of the MSR was primarily due to a reduction in prepayment speeds. The improvement in servicing fees was driven by lower interest losses of $3.5 million. During the second quarter of 2010 the Company recognized an interest loss of $4.2 million related to the repurchase of certain GNMA defaulted loans. This improvement was partially offset by lower servicing fees of $1.0 million.

Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 — The non-interest income of $67.4 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 reflects an increase in total non-interest income of $151.0 million compared to non-interest loss of $83.6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Significant variances in non-interest income for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 were as follows:

•

An improvement in gain on sale of investment securities of $128.5 million. During the second quarter of 2010 the Company recognized a loss on sale of securities of $137.2 million driven by a loss of $136.7 million on the sale of $378.0 million of certain non-agency CMOs. During the first semester of 2011 the Company had a gain on sale of investment securities of $17.7 million as a result of its deleveraging of the balance sheet.

•

An improvement in OTTI of $13.2 million. During 2010, there was a deterioration in estimated future cash flows of non-agency CMOs resulting in an OTTI of $13.3 million. These securities were sold during the second quarter of 2010 and the unrealized loss in OCI was realized. OTTI of approximately $0.8 million recognized in 2011 was related to PR non-agency CMOs.

•

Servicing income increased $8.1 million related to an improvement in the mark to market adjustment of the MSR of $5.3 million and higher servicing fees of $2.8 million. The improvement in the value of the MSR was primarily due to a reduction in prepayment speeds. The improvement in servicing fees was driven by lower interest losses of $3.6 million. During the second quarter of 2010 the Company recognized an interest loss of $4.2 million related to the repurchase of certain GNMA defaulted loans. This improvement was partially offset by lower servicing fees of $0.8 million.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

Table G


	Quarters Ended								Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,								June 30,
(In thousands)	2011		2010			Variance			2011		2010		Variance
Compensation and benefits	$	21,081	$	20,315		$	766		$	39,375	$	36,750	$	2,625
Professional services		9,339		15,420			(6,081	)		17,976		29,212		(11,236	)
FDIC insurance expense		3,797		5,574			(1,777	)		8,153		10,765		(2,612	)
Communication expenses		3,636		4,056			(420	)		7,639		8,000		(361	)
Occupancy expenses		4,786		4,322			464			9,126		8,303		823
EDP expenses		3,024		2,878			146			6,299		6,657		(358	)
Depreciation and amortization		3,463		3,110			353			6,666		6,257		409
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes		2,923		2,591			332			5,799		5,155		644
Advertising		1,748		4,073			(2,325	)		2,746		5,571		(2,825	)
Office expenses		1,042		1,112			(70	)		2,032		2,397		(365	)
Corporate insurance		1,490		1,264			226			3,060		2,526		534
Other		2,995		4,552			(1,557	)		6,910		8,334		(1,424	)

		59,324		69,267			(9,943	)		115,781		129,927		(14,146	)
OREO expenses and other reserves:
Other real estate owned expense		2,061		23,414			(21,353	)		4,023		28,011		(23,988	)
Foreclosure expenses		864		(74	)		938			2,507		622		1,885
Reserve on claim receivable from LBI		—		10,819			(10,819	)		—		10,819		(10,819	)
Provisions for other credit related expenses		1,332		656			676			2,054		2,101		(47	)

		4,257		34,815			(30,558	)		8,584		41,553		(32,969	)

Total non-interest expense	$	63,581	$	104,082		$	(40,501	)	$	124,365	$	171,480	$	(47,115	)

Second Quarter 2011 vs. Second Quarter 2010 — Non-interest expense of $63.6 million for the second quarter of 2011 decreased by $40.5 million, or 38.9% compared the second quarter of 2010. Significant variances in non-interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:

•

A decrease of $10.8 million in the reserve for the Company’s claim on Lehman Brothers Inc. that was established in the second quarter of 2010. The claim was subsequently sold to a third party.

•

OREO expenses were $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $23.4 million for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $21.4 million. Higher OREO expenses in 2010 were related to an additional provision for OREO losses of $17.0 million established during the second quarter of 2010 to recognize the effect of management’s strategic decision to reduce pricing

to stimulate property sales, adjustments driven by lower values of certain OREO properties, and higher maintenance costs to maintain the properties in saleable condition.

•

A decrease of $6.1 million in professional services was driven by lower defense litigation costs of $4.2 million, lower advisory services of $0.5 million related to the dissolution of Doral Holdings and Doral Holdings L.P., and lower advisory services of $1.3 million in 2011 compared to 2010 which were incurred in relation to the sale of certain construction loans.

•

There was a higher advertising expense in 2010 of $2.3 million compared to the second quarter of 2011, related to campaigns conducted to gain market share in deposits and mortgage originations subsequent to the local market bank failures and asset acquisition in April 2010.

•

Lower FDIC insurance expense of $1.8 million related to a lower deposit base and a change in the method of computing the assessment.

•

An increase of $1.6 million in credit related costs was due to an increase of $0.9 million in foreclosure expenses and $0.9 million in the provision for negative escrow.

Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 — Non-interest expense of $124.4 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 decreased by $47.1 million, or 27.5%, over the previous year. Significant variances in non-interest expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:

	•		A decrease of $10.8 million in the reserve for the Company’s claim on Lehman Brothers Inc. that was established in the second quarter of 2010. The claim was subsequently sold to a third party.

	•		OREO expenses were $4.0 million in 2011 compared to $28.0 million for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $24.0 million. Higher OREO expenses in 2010 were related to an additional provision for OREO losses of $17.0 million established during the second quarter of 2010 to recognize the effect of management’s strategic decision to reduce pricing to stimulate property sales, market value adjustments driven by lower values of certain OREO properties, and higher maintenance costs to maintain the properties in saleable condition.

	•		A decrease of $11.2 million in professional services was driven by lower defense litigation costs of $8.1 million, lower advisory services of $0.5 million related to the dissolution of Doral Holdings and Doral Holdings L.P., and lower advisory services of $2.7 million in 2011 compared to 2010 which were incurred in relation to the sale of certain construction loans as well as expenses incurred for the Company’s participation in bidding for FDIC assisted transactions in 2010.

	•		There was a higher advertising expense in 2010 of $2.8 million compared to 2011, related to campaigns conducted to gain market share in deposits and mortgage originations subsequent to the local market bank failures and asset acquisition in April 2010.

	•		Lower FDIC insurance expense of $2.6 million related to a lower deposit base and a change in the method of computing the assessment.

	•		An increase of $2.6 million in stock based compensation was related to certain stock incentive bonuses and tax benefits thereon.

INCOME TAXES

On January 31, 2011, the Governor signed into law the Internal Revenue Code of 2011 (“2011 Code”). Under the provisions of the 2011 Code, the maximum statutory corporate income tax rate is 30% for years commenced after December 31, 2010 and ending before January 1, 2014. Notwithstanding, a corporation may elect to remain subject to the 1994 Puerto Rico Tax Code, as amended (“1994 Code”) for 2011 and the next four succeeding years, if it so elects by the time it files its income tax return for 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the tax reform on its results of operations including the election to remain subject to the 1994 Code through 2015. Nevertheless, the Company recorded its deferred tax assets expected to reverse after 2015 at the 30.0% tax rate required for all taxable earnings beginning in 2016 which is the latest year that it would be required to convert to the 2011 Code. Puerto Rico deferred tax assets subject to the maximum statutory tax rate and expected to reverse prior to 2016, together with any related valuation allowance, are recorded at the 39.0% tax rate pursuant to the 1994 Code. Upon determination of which alternative treatment will be followed the Company will adjust its deferred tax assets for any required tax rate change, if applicable. Adoption of the 2011 Code as of June 30, 2011 would represent an additional deferred tax expense of $8.4 million.

For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, Doral Financial recognized income tax expense of $2.9 million and $8.0 million, respectively, compared to an income tax expense of $4.5 million and $7.0 million for the comparable periods in 2010. The components of income tax expense (benefit) are summarized below:


	Quarters Ended						Six month period ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Current income tax expense — United States	$	3,101		$	3,615		$	5,475		$	3,890
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:
Puerto Rico		450			1,008			3,120			2,795
United States		(680	)		(136	)		(627	)		331

Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(230	)		872			2,493			3,126

Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	2,871		$	4,487		$	7,968		$	7,016

The current income tax expense of $3.1 million and $5.5 million for the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, was related to taxes on U.S. source income. The deferred tax benefit of $0.2 million and deferred tax expense of $2.5 million for the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 reflected reductions over the comparable periods in 2010 due to higher taxes recognized in 2010 related to U.S. source income, as well as the impact of tax rate change on the current period valuation allowance, partially offset by realization of operational deferred tax assets. The deferred income tax expense of $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was related to the net effect on the Company’s deferred tax assets of (i) Puerto Rico tax legislation approved in January 2011 lowering the effective tax rate, resulting in a deferred tax expense of $18.8 million, (ii) the increased earnings expectation for profitable Puerto Rico entities which resulted in a deferred tax benefit of $17.4 million, and (iii) net amortization of deferred taxes of $1.7 million.

Refer to Note 23 of the accompanying financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s income taxes.

BALANCE SHEET AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS

LOAN PRODUCTION

Loan production includes loans internally originated by Doral Financial as well as residential mortgage loans purchased from third parties with the related servicing rights. Purchases of mortgage loans from third parties were $16.5 million and $30.0 million for the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $39.7 million and $58.8 million, for the corresponding 2010 periods, respectively.

The following table sets forth the number and dollar amount of Doral Financial’s loan production for the periods indicated:

Table H
Loan Production


	Quarters Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except for average	2011									2010
initial loan balance)	PR			US			Total			PR			US			Total
FHA/VA mortgage loans
Number of loans		378			—			378			422			—			422
Volume of loans	$	50,704		$	—		$	50,704		$	58,136		$	—		$	58,136
Percent of total volume		11	%		—	%		11	%		15	%		—	%		15	%
Average initial loan balance	$	134,138		$	—		$	134,138		$	137,763		$	—		$	137,763
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
Number of loans		333			—			333			217			—			217
Volume of loans	$	40,116		$	—		$	40,116		$	28,984		$	—		$	28,984
Percent of total volume		9	%		—	%		9	%		8	%		—	%		8	%
Average initial loan balance	$	120,469		$	—		$	120,469		$	133,567		$	—		$	133,567
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans⁽¹⁾

Number of loans		171			4			175			493			—			493
Volume of loans	$	28,811		$	2,323		$	31,134		$	72,269		$	—		$	72,269
Percent of total volume		6	%		1	%		7	%		19	%		—	%		19	%
Average initial loan balance	$	168,485		$	580,750		$	177,903		$	146,590		$	—		$	146,590
Construction development loans
Number of loans		—			—			—			—			6			6
Volume of loans	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2,861		$	2,861
Percent of total volume		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		1	%		1	%
Average initial loan balance	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	476,833		$	476,833
Disbursement under existing construction development loans
Volume of loans	$	3,021		$	418		$	3,439		$	2,300		$	1,498		$	3,798
Percent of total volume		1	%		—	%		1	%		1	%		—	%		1	%
Commercial loans⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Number of loans		10			133			143			12			82			94
Volume of loans	$	4,671		$	294,656		$	299,327		$	3,780		$	180,644		$	184,424
Percent of total volume		1	%		63	%		64	%		1	%		48	%		49	%
Average initial loan balance	$	467,100		$	2,215,459		$	2,093,201		$	315,000		$	2,202,976		$	1,961,957
Consumer loans⁽²⁾
Number of loans		98			2			100			338			—			338
Volume of loans	$	534		$	9		$	543		$	1,613		$	—		$	1,613
Percent of total volume		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%
Average initial loan balance	$	5,449		$	4,500		$	5,427		$	4,772		$	—		$	4,772
Other⁽⁴⁾
Number of loans		—			7			7			—			24			24
Volume of loans	$	—		$	39,390		$	39,390		$	—		$	28,085		$	28,085
Percent of total volume		—	%		8	%		8	%		—	%		7	%		7	%
Average initial loan balance	$	—		$	5,627,143		$	5,627,143		$	—		$	1,170,208		$	1,170,208

Total loans
Number of loans		990			146			1,136			1,482			112			1,594
Volume of loans	$	127,857		$	336,796		$	464,653		$	167,082		$	213,088		$	380,170


⁽¹⁾		Includes $70,000 and $87,000 in second mortgages for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Commercial and consumer lines of credit are included in the loan production according to the credit limit approved.

⁽³⁾		Includes commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans.

⁽⁴⁾		Consists of multifamily loans.

The following table sets forth the number and dollar amount of Doral Financial’s loan production for the periods indicated:

Table I

Loan Production


	Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except for average	2011									2010
initial loan balance)	PR			US			Total			PR			US			Total
FHA/VA mortgage loans
Number of loans		762			—			762			804			—			804
Volume of loans	$	100,125		$	—		$	100,125		$	109,623		$	—		$	109,623
Percent of total volume		12	%		—	%		12	%		16	%		—	%		16	%
Average initial loan balance	$	131,398		$	—		$	131,398		$	136,347		$	—		$	136,347
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
Number of loans		645			—			645			415			—			415
Volume of loans	$	77,699		$	—		$	77,699		$	51,359		$	—		$	51,359
Percent of total volume		10	%		—	%		10	%		8	%		—	%		8	%
Average initial loan balance	$	120,464		$	—		$	120,464		$	123,756		$	—		$	123,756
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans⁽¹⁾
Number of loans		398			4			402			1,044			—			1,044
Volume of loans	$	66,208		$	2,323		$	68,531		$	166,115		$	—		$	166,115
Percent of total volume		8	%		—	%		8	%		25	%		—	%		25	%
Average initial loan balance	$	166,352		$	580,750		$	170,475		$	159,114		$	—		$	159,114
Construction development loans
Number of loans		—			1			1			—			6			6
Volume of loans	$	—		$	3,600		$	3,600		$	—		$	2,861		$	2,861
Percent of total volume		—	%		1	%		1	%		—	%		1	%		1	%
Average initial loan balance	$	—		$	3,600,000		$	3,600,000		$	—		$	476,833		$	476,833
Disbursement under existing construction development loans
Volume of loans	$	3,528		$	1,956		$	5,484		$	4,918		$	1,771		$	6,689
Percent of total volume		1	%		—	%		1	%		1	%		—	%		1	%
Commercial loans⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Number of loans		18			185			203			21			153			174
Volume of loans	$	6,377		$	509,864		$	516,241		$	6,587		$	285,182		$	291,769
Percent of total volume		1	%		62	%		63	%		1	%		43	%		44	%
Average initial loan balance	$	354,278		$	2,756,022		$	2,543,059		$	313,667		$	1,863,935		$	1,676,833
Consumer loans⁽²⁾
Number of loans		238			2			240			435			—			435
Volume of loans	$	1,317		$	9		$	1,326		$	2,274		$	—		$	2,274
Percent of total volume		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%
Average initial loan balance	$	5,534		$	4,500		$	5,525		$	5,227		$	—		$	5,227
Other⁽⁴⁾
Number of loans		1			7			8			—			28			28
Volume of loans	$	2,348		$	39,390		$	41,738		$	—		$	38,535		$	38,535
Percent of total volume		—	%		5	%		5	%		—	%		6	%		6	%
Average initial loan balance	$	2,348,000		$	5,627,143		$	5,217,250		$	—		$	1,376,250		$	1,376,250

Total loans
Number of loans		2,062			199			2,261			2,719			187			2,906
Volume of loans	$	257,602		$	557,142		$	814,744		$	340,876		$	328,349		$	669,225


⁽¹⁾		Includes $70,000 and $0.4 million in second mortgages for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Commercial and consumer lines of credit are included in the loan production according to the credit limit approved.

⁽³⁾		Includes commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans.

⁽⁴⁾		Consists of multifamily loans.

Loan production increased $84.5 million, or 22.2%, in the second quarter of 2011, and $145.5 million, or 21.7%, for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, when compared to the corresponding 2010 periods. For the second quarter of 2011, the higher volume was mainly driven by an increase of approximately $114.9 million in commercial and industrial loans principally originated by the Company’s U.S. lending unit, an increase of $11.3 million in multifamily residential mortgages and an increase of $11.1 million in conventional conforming mortgage loans originated by the Puerto Rico mortgage lending unit in the 2011 second quarter. These increases were partially offset by a decline of $41.1 million and $7.4 million in the origination of conventional non-conforming loans and FHA/VA loans, respectively, by the Company’s Puerto Rico mortgage lending unit. For the period ended June 30, 2011, the higher volume was mainly attributable to an increase of approximately $224.5 million in commercial loans originated principally by the Company’s U.S. lending unit, an increase of $26.3 million in the origination of conventional conforming mortgage loans, which was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $97.6 million and $9.5 million in the origination of conventional non-conforming mortgage loans and FHA/VA loans, respectively, by the Puerto Rico mortgage lending unit.

The U.S. based middle market syndicated lending strategy is to acquire $5.0 million to $15.0 million participation interests in U.S. mainland companies that are first underwritten by money center or regional banks, and re-underwritten by the Company’s U.S. based syndicated lending unit.

The decrease in Doral Financial’s originated loans, exclusive of the U.S. based syndicated commercial lending and construction loans, is due to a number of factors including continuing challenging economic conditions in Puerto Rico, competition from other financial institutions, and changes in laws and regulations.

A substantial portion of Doral Financial’s total residential mortgage loan originations has consistently been composed of refinancing transactions. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 refinancing transactions represented approximately 65% and 87%, respectively, of the total dollar volume of internally originated mortgage loans. Doral Financial’s future results could be adversely affected by a significant increase in mortgage interest rates that may reduce refinancing activity. However, the Company believes that refinancing activity in Puerto Rico is less sensitive to interest rate changes than in the mainland United States because a significant number of refinance loans in the Puerto Rico mortgage market are made for debt consolidation purposes rather than interest savings due to lower rates.

The following table sets forth the sources of Doral Financial’s loan production as a percentage of total loan originations for the periods indicated:

Table J
Loan Origination Sources


	Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
	2011									2010
	PR			US			Total			PR			US			Total
Consumer		27	%		—	%		27	%		43	%		—	%		43	%
Wholesale⁽¹⁾		4	%		—	%		4	%		6	%		3	%		9	%
Housing Developments⁽²⁾		—	%		1	%		1	%		1	%		—	%		1	%
Commercial and Industrial		1	%		62	%		63	%		—	%		39	%		39	%
Other⁽³⁾		—	%		5	%		5	%		1	%		7	%		8	%

Total		32	%		68	%		100	%		51	%		49	%		100	%


⁽¹⁾		Refers to purchases of mortgage loans from other financial institutions and mortgage lenders.

⁽²⁾		Includes new construction development loans and the disbursement of existing construction development loans.

⁽³⁾		Refers to commercial real estate, consumer and multifamily loans originated through the banking subsidiaries.

MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING

Doral Financial’s principal source of servicing rights has traditionally been sales of loans from its internal loan production. However, Doral Financial has also purchased mortgage loans and mortgage loan servicing rights, though not in recent periods. Doral Financial intends to continue growing its mortgage-servicing portfolio primarily by internal loan originations, but may also continue to seek and consider attractive opportunities for wholesale purchases of loans with the related servicing rights and bulk purchases of servicing rights from third parties.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the total mortgage loan-servicing portfolio of Doral Financial for the periods indicated:

Table K Loans Serviced For Third Parties


	As of June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Average Size of Loans Serviced)	2011			2010
Composition of Portfolio Serviced for Third Parties at Period End:
GNMA	$	2,455,564		$	2,272,527
FHLMC/FNMA		2,748,411			2,943,897
Other conventional mortgage loans⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		2,841,855			3,118,940


Total portfolio serviced for third parties	$	8,045,830		$	8,335,364


Activity of Portfolio Serviced for Third Parties:
Beginning servicing portfolio	$	8,208,060		$	8,655,613
Additions to servicing portfolio		167,538			167,244
Servicing released due to repurchases		(35,094	)		(84,647	)
MSRs sales		—			(24,045	)
Run-off⁽³⁾		(294,674	)		(378,801	)


Ending servicing portfolio	$	8,045,830		$	8,335,364


Selected Data Regarding Mortgage Loans Serviced for Third Parties:
Number of loans		96,909			99,760
Weighted-average interest rate		6.13	%		6.26	%
Weighted-average remaining maturity (months)		237			239
Weighted-average gross servicing fee rate		0.41	%		0.41	%
Average servicing portfolio⁽⁴⁾	$	8,126,624		$	8,512,746
Principal prepayments	$	207,361		$	222,161
Constant prepayment rate		4.86	%		4.96	%
Average size of loans	$	83,018		$	83,554
Servicing assets, net	$	115,785		$	113,005
Mortgage-servicing advances⁽⁵⁾	$	54,011		$	41,609

Delinquent Mortgage Loans and Pending Foreclosures at Period End:
60-89 days past due		2.53	%		2.60	%
90 days or more past due		5.85	%		5.10	%

Total delinquencies excluding foreclosures		8.38	%		7.70	%

Foreclosures pending		3.54	%		2.99	%


⁽¹⁾		Excludes $4.6 billion and $4.5 billion of mortgage loans owned by Doral Financial at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Includes portfolios of $125.1 million and $0.1 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of delinquent FHA/VA and conventional mortgage loans sold to third parties.

⁽³⁾		Run-off refers to regular amortization of loans, prepayments and foreclosures.

⁽⁴⁾		Excludes the average balance of mortgage loans owned by Doral Financial of $4.5 billion and $4.5 billion at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Includes reserves for possible losses on P&I advances of $8.8 million and $5.5 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Substantially all of the mortgage loans in Doral Financial’s servicing portfolio are secured by single (one-to-four) family residences located in Puerto Rico. At June 30, 2011 and 2010, less than one percent of Doral Financial’s mortgage-servicing portfolio was related to mortgages secured by real property located on the U.S. mainland.

The main component of Doral Financial’s servicing income is loan servicing fees, which depend on the type of mortgage loan being serviced. The servicing fees on residential mortgage loans generally range from 0.25% to 0.50% of the outstanding principal balance of the serviced loan.

The amount of principal prepayments on mortgage loans serviced for third parties by Doral Financial was $0.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and $0.2 billion for the corresponding 2010 period. Total delinquencies excluding foreclosures increased from 7.70% to 8.38% from June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2011 as a result of the economic recession and general deterioration of the mortgage sector, while pending foreclosures increased from 2.99% to 3.54% from June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2011. The Company does not expect significant losses related to these delinquencies since it has a reserve for losses for loans under recourse agreements and for other non-recourse loans has not experienced significant losses in the past.

As part of its servicing responsibilities, in some servicing agreements, Doral Financial is required to advance the scheduled payments of principal or interest whether or not collected from the underlying borrower. While Doral Financial generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements within 30 days, it must absorb the cost of funding the advances during the time the advance is outstanding. In the past, Doral Financial sold pools of delinquent FHA and VA and conventional mortgage loans. Under these arrangements, Doral Financial is required to advance the scheduled payments whether or not collected from the underlying borrower. While Doral Financial expects to recover a significant portion of the amounts advanced through foreclosure or, in the case of FHA and VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs, the amounts advanced tend to be greater than normal arrangements because of the large number of delinquent loans.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Doral Financial has an ongoing need for capital to finance its lending, servicing and investing activities. Doral Financial’s cash requirements arise mainly from loan originations and purchases, purchases and holding of securities, repayment of debt upon maturity, payment of operating and interest expenses, servicing advances and loan repurchases pursuant to recourse or warranty obligations. Sources of funds include deposits, advances from FHLB and other borrowings, proceeds from the sale of loans, and of certain available for sale investment securities and other assets, payment from loans held on the balance sheet, and cash income from assets owned, including payments from owned mortgage servicing rights and interest only strips. The Company’s Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) establishes and monitors liquidity guidelines to ensure the Company’s ability to meet these needs. Doral Financial currently has and anticipates that it will continue to have adequate liquidity, financing arrangements and capital resources to finance its operations in the ordinary course of business.

Liquidity of the Holding Company

The holding company’s principal uses of funds are the payment of its obligations, primarily the payment of principal and interest on its debt obligations. The holding company no longer directly funds any mortgage banking activities. Beyond the amount of unencumbered liquid assets at the holding company, the principal sources of funds for the holding company are principal and interest payments on the portfolio of loans, securities retained on its balance sheet and dividends from its subsidiaries, including Doral Bank PR, Doral Bank NY and Doral Insurance Agency. The existing cease and desist order applicable to the holding company requires prior regulatory approval for the payment of any dividends from Doral Bank PR to the holding company. In addition, various federal and Puerto Rico statutes and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Company’s banking and other subsidiaries may pay without regulatory approval. No restrictions exist on the dividends available from Doral Insurance Agency, other than those generally applicable under the Puerto Rico corporation law.

Doral Financial has not paid dividends on the Company’s common stock since April 2006.

On March 20, 2009, the Company announced that in order to preserve capital the Board of Directors approved the suspension of the payment of dividends on all of its outstanding series of cumulative and non-cumulative preferred stock. The suspension of dividends is effective and commenced with the dividends for the month of April 2009 for Doral Financial’s noncumulative preferred stock and the dividends for the second quarter of 2009 for Doral Financial’s cumulative preferred stock.

Liquidity is managed at the holding company level that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. It is also managed at the level of the banking and non-banking subsidiaries.

The following items have impacted the Company’s liquidity, funding activities and strategies during 2011 and 2010:

	•		changes in short-term borrowings and deposits in the normal course of business;

	•		repayment of certain long-term callable certificate of deposits;

	•		sales of securities;

	•		early repayment of debt;

	•		adoption of an initiative to lengthen the brokered certificates term to structurally reduce interest rate sensitivity;

	•		capital contributions to Doral Bank;

	•		suspension of payment of dividends on outstanding preferred stock;

	•		prepayment of FDIC insurance assessments for the years 2010-2012;

	•		repurchase of GNMA defaulted loans in 2010;

	•		inducement on preferred stock conversions;

	•		capital raise of $171.0 million in the second quarter of 2010;

	•		efforts to increase retail deposits in the wake of failed Puerto Rico banks; and

	•		on July 8, 2010, the Company entered into a collateralized loan arrangement in which $450.0 million of U.S. based commercial loans are funded by $250.0 million from a third party paying 3-month LIBOR plus 1.85%, and $200.0 million by Doral. The entity holding the loans is consolidated by Doral and the third party financing is reported as a note payable. The third party funding provides an additional source of liquidity for the Company’s US operations.

The following sections provide further information on the Company’s major funding activities and needs. Also, refer to the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Liquidity of the Banking Subsidiaries

Doral Financial’s liquidity and capital position at the holding company differ from the liquidity and capital positions of the Company’s banking subsidiaries. Doral Financial’s banking subsidiaries rely primarily on deposits, including brokered deposits, borrowings under advances from FHLB and repurchase agreements secured by pledges of their mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities and other borrowings. In periods previous to June 30, 2011, the Company has used as their primary sources of liquidity term notes backed by FHLB letters of credit and auction term funds to depository institutions granted by the Federal Reserve under Term Auction Facility (“TAF”). The banking subsidiaries have significant investments in loans and investment securities which, together with the owned mortgage servicing rights, serve as a source of cash from interest and principal received from loan customers. To date, these sources of liquidity for Doral Financial’s banking subsidiaries have not been materially adversely impacted by the current challenging liquidity conditions in the U.S. mortgage and credit markets.

Cash Sources and Uses

Doral Financial’s sources of cash as of June 30, 2011 include retail and commercial deposits, borrowings under advances from FHLB, borrowings from the Federal Reserve, repurchase financing agreements, principal repayments and sales of loans and securities.

Management does not contemplate material uncertainties in the rolling over of deposits, both retail and wholesale, and is not engaged in capital expenditures that would materially affect the capital and liquidity positions. In addition, the Company’s banking subsidiaries maintain borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the discount window of the Federal Reserve, and have a considerable amount of collateral that can be used to raise funds under these facilities.

Doral Financial’s uses of cash as of June 30, 2011 include origination and purchase of loans, purchase of investment securities, repayment of obligations as they become due, dividend payments related to the preferred stock (which were suspended by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 2009 effective during the second quarter of 2009), and other operational needs. The Company also is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factors, the Company will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity.

Primary Sources of Cash

The following table shows Doral Financial’s sources of borrowings and the related average interest rates as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Table L
Sources Of Borrowings


	As of June 30, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
	Amount		Average			Amount		Average
(Dollars in thousands)	Outstanding		Rate			Outstanding		Rate
Deposits	$	4,302,792		1.85	%	$	4,618,475		2.18	%
Repurchase Agreements		442,300		2.55	%		1,176,800		3.10	%
Advances from FHLB		1,342,849		3.05	%		901,420		3.49	%
Loans Payable		294,623		2.00	%		304,035		1.95	%
Notes Payable		510,430		4.78	%		513,958		4.91	%

As of June 30, 2011, Doral Financial’s banking subsidiaries held approximately $4.0 billion in interest-bearing deposits at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.99%. For additional information on the Company’s sources of borrowings please refer to Notes 17 to 22 of the consolidated financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In January 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with the FHLB to exchange $555.4 million of its non-callable term advances, reducing the average contractual interest rate on those advances to 1.7% from 4.1%, and the effective yield to 2.9% from 4.1%, and extending the average maturities to 39 months from 14 months. This transaction resulted in a $22.0 million fee paid to the FHLB, which is deferred and amortized over the term of the borrowings.

The following table presents the average balance and the annualized average rate paid on each deposit type for the periods indicated:

Table M
Average Deposit Balance


	Six Month Period Ended					Year Ended
	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
	Average		Average			Average		Average
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Rate			Balance		Rate
Certificates of deposit	$	674,457		2.13	%	$	634,924		2.48	%
Brokered certificates of deposits		2,216,458		3.14	%		2,645,028		2.89	%
Regular passbook savings		408,426		1.04	%		380,534		1.46	%
NOW accounts and other transaction accounts		414,737		0.94	%		379,100		1.31	%
Money market accounts		509,799		1.48	%		416,269		1.94	%

Total interest-bearing		4,223,877		2.36	%		4,455,855		2.49	%
Non-interest bearing		272,204		—	%		249,991		—	%

Total deposits	$	4,496,081		2.22	%	$	4,705,846		2.36	%

The following table sets forth the maturities of certificates of deposit having principal amounts of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2011.

Table N
Certificates of Deposits Maturities


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011
Certificates of deposit maturing:
Three months or less	$	249,736
Over three through six months		300,211
Over six through twelve months		493,281
Over twelve months		1,341,188

Total	$	2,384,416

The amounts in Table N include $2.0 billion in brokered deposits issued in denominations greater than $250,000 to broker-dealers, but within the applicable FDIC insurance limit of $250,000.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Doral Financial’s banking subsidiaries had approximately $2.0 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, in brokered deposits. Brokered deposits are used by the Company’s banking subsidiaries as a source of long-term funds, and Doral Financial’s banking subsidiaries have traditionally been able to replace maturing brokered deposits. Brokered deposits, however, are generally considered by some a less stable source of funding than deposits obtained through retail bank branches. Brokered-deposit investors are generally more sensitive to interest rates and sometimes move funds from one depository institution to another based on minor differences in rates offered on deposits.

The Company’s banking subsidiaries, as members of the FHLB, have access to collateralized borrowings from the FHLB up to a maximum of 30% of total assets. In addition, the FHLB makes available additional borrowing capacity in the form of repurchase agreements on qualifying high grade securities. Advances and reimbursement obligations with respect to letters of credit must be secured by qualifying assets with a market value of 100% of the advances or reimbursement obligations. As of June 30, 2011, Doral Financial’s banking subsidiaries had $1.3 billion in outstanding advances from FHLB at a weighted-average interest rate cost of 3.05%. Please refer to Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information regarding such advances.

The Company also derives liquidity from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary mortgage markets. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is the most liquid in the world in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs maintained by FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. To the extent these programs are curtailed or the standard for insuring or selling loans under such programs is materially increased, or, for any reason, Doral Financial were to fail to qualify for such programs, Doral Financial’s ability to sell mortgage loans and consequently its liquidity would be materially adversely affected.

Other Uses of Cash

Servicing agreements relating to the MBS programs of FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold to certain other investors, require the Company to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. While the Company generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements within 30 days, it must absorb the cost of funding the advances during the time the advance is outstanding. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the monthly average amount of funds advanced by the Company under such servicing agreements was approximately $66.7 million, compared to $45.8 million for the corresponding 2010 period, and $62.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2010. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Company’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Company would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts. In the past, the Company sold pools of delinquent FHA and VA and conventional mortgage loans. Under these arrangements, the Company is required to advance the scheduled payments whether or not collected from the underlying borrower. While the Company expects to recover the amounts advanced through foreclosure or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs, the amounts advanced tend to be greater than normal arrangements because of the delinquent status of the loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding principal balance of such delinquent loans was $125.1 million and $139.6 million, respectively, and the aggregate monthly amount of funds advanced by the Company was $16.2 million and $15.4 million, respectively.

When the Company sells mortgage loans to third parties, which serve as a source of cash, it also generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics investors are generally entitled to cause the Company to repurchase such loans.

In addition to its servicing and warranty obligations, in the past the Company loan sale activities have included the sale of non-conforming mortgage loans subject to recourse arrangements that generally require the Company to repurchase or substitute the loans if the loans are 90 days or more past due or otherwise in default up to a specified amount or limited to a period of time after the sale. To the extent the delinquency ratios of the loans sold subject to recourse are greater than anticipated and the Company is required to repurchase more loans than anticipated, the Company’s liquidity requirements would increase. Please refer to “Off-Balance Sheet Activities” below for additional information on these arrangements.

In the past, the Company sold or securitized mortgage loans with FNMA on a partial or full recourse basis. The Company’s contractual agreements with FNMA authorize FNMA to require the Company to post collateral in the form of cash or marketable securities to secure such recourse obligation to the extent the Company does not maintain an investment grade rating. As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s maximum recourse exposure with FNMA totaled $545.4 million and required the posting of a minimum of $44.0 million in collateral to secure recourse obligations. While considered unlikely by the Company, FNMA has the contractual right to request collateral for the full amount of the Company’s recourse obligations. Any such request by FNMA would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and business. Please refer to Note 25 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and “Off-Balance Sheet Activities” below for additional information on these arrangements.

Under the Company’s repurchase lines of credit and derivative contracts, the Company is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of changes in interest rates or other market conditions, the Company will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity.

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Doral Financial’s total assets were $8.0 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $8.6 billion at December 31, 2010.

Total assets at June 30, 2011, when compared to December 31, 2010 were affected by a decrease of $833.6 million in available for sale securities as part of the Company’s deleverage and interest rate risk strategies, which was partially offset by an increase of $206.6 million in cash and due from banks and an increase of $130.2 million in net loan receivable.

Total liabilities were $7.2 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $7.8 billion at December 31, 2010. Total liabilities as of June 30, 2011 were principally affected by (i) a decrease in brokered deposits of $328.2 million, (ii) a decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $734.5 million, offset by (iii) an increase in advances from FHLB of $441.4 million and (iv) an increase of $12.5 million in non-brokered deposits.

CAPITAL

Doral Financial reported total equity of $864.3 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $862.2 million at December 31, 2010. The Company reported accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) (“OCI”) of $1.6 million as of June 30, 2011, compared to OCI of $4.2 million as of December 31, 2010.

Regulatory Capital Ratios

As of June 30, 2011, Doral Bank PR and Doral Bank US were in compliance with all the applicable regulatory capital requirements as a state non-member bank and federal savings bank, respectively (i.e., Total capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of at least 4%). However, as described below, Doral Financial is subject to a consent order pursuant to which it submitted a capital plan in which it has agreed to maintain capital ratios in excess of the prompt corrective action well capitalized floors at both the holding company and Doral Bank PR level.

Set forth below are Doral Financial’s, and its banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2011, based on existing Federal Reserve, FDIC and OTS guidelines.

Table N
Regulatory Capital Ratios


	As of June 30, 2011
	Doral			Doral			Doral
	Financial			Bank PR			Bank US
Total Capital Ratio (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)		14.7	%		15.4	%		12.4	%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)		13.4	%		14.2	%		12.1	%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio⁽¹⁾		9.1	%		8.6	%		6.9	%


⁽¹⁾		Tier 1 capital to average assets in the case of Doral Financial and Doral Bank PR and Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets in the case of Doral Bank US.


	As of December 31, 2010
	Doral			Doral			Doral
	Financial			Bank PR			Bank US
Total Capital Ratio (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)		14.5	%		15.6	%		11.0	%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)		13.3	%		14.4	%		10.7	%
Leverage Ratio⁽¹⁾		8.6	%		8.0	%		6.5	%


⁽¹⁾		Tier 1 capital to average assets in the case of Doral Financial and Doral Bank PR and Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets in the case of Doral Bank US.

As of June 30, 2011, Doral Financial capital levels exceeded the well capitalized thresholds under applicable federal bank regulatory definitions. The well capitalized thresholds as contained in the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the FDIC pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) require an institution to maintain a Leverage Ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6% and a Total Capital Ratio of at least 10% and not be subject to any written agreement or directive to meet a higher specific capital ratio.

Failure to meet minimum regulatory capital requirements could result in the initiation of certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by banking regulators against Doral Financial and its banking subsidiaries that, if undertaken, could have a material adverse effect on Doral Financial, such variety of enforcement remedies, including, with respect to an insured bank or savings bank, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and to certain restrictions on its business.

On March 17, 2006, Doral Financial entered into a consent order with the Federal Reserve, pursuant to which the Company submitted a capital plan in which it established a target minimum leverage ratio of 5.5% for Doral Financial and 6.0% for Doral Bank PR. For a detailed description of this order, please refer to Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings, in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

During the second and third quarters of 2010, the Board of Directors of Doral Financial approved capital contributions to Doral Bank PR totaling $194.0 million.

Housing and Urban Development Requirements

The Company’s mortgage operation is a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) approved non-supervised mortgagee and is required to maintain an excess of current assets over current liabilities and minimum net worth, as defined by the various regulatory agencies. Such equity requirement is tied to the size of the Company’s servicing portfolio and ranged up to $1.0 million. The Company is also required to maintain fidelity bonds and errors and omissions insurance coverage based on the balance of its servicing portfolio. Non-compliance with these requirements could derive in actions from the regulatory agencies such as monetary penalties, the suspension of the license to originate loans, among others.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Doral Mortgage maintained $27.7 million and $27.2 million, respectively, in excess of the required minimum level for adjusted net worth required by HUD.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company uses fair value measurements to state certain assets and liabilities at fair value and to support fair value disclosures. Securities held for trading, securities available for sale, derivatives and servicing assets are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans receivable and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The Company groups its assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

• Level 1 — Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

• Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, or are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or by other means.

• Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

Approximately 10.38% and 19.3% of the Company total assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets for which fair values were measured using significant Level 3 inputs represented approximately 22.7% and 11.0% of these financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair values of the remaining assets were measured using valuation methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information, collectively Level 1 and 2 measurements.

Refer to Note 29 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion about the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities, the valuation methodologies used and its impact on earnings.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES

In the ordinary course of the business, Doral Financial makes certain representations and warranties to purchasers and insurers of mortgage loans at the time of the loan sales to third parties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold, and in certain circumstances, such as in the event of early or first payment default. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, if there is a breach of contract of a representation or warranty or if there is an early payment default, Doral Financial may be required to repurchase the mortgage loan and bear any subsequent loss related to the loan. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, repurchases amounted to approximately $4.2 million and $50,000, respectively. These repurchases were recorded at fair value and no significant losses were incurred.

In the past, in relation to its asset securitization and loan sale activity, the Company sold pools of delinquent FHA, VA and conventional mortgage loans on a servicing retained basis. Following these transactions, the loans were not reflected on Doral Financial’s consolidated statements of financial condition. Under these arrangements, as part of its servicing responsibilities, Doral Financial is required to advance the scheduled payments of principal and interest regardless of whether they are collected from the underlying borrower. While Doral Financial expects to recover a significant portion of the amounts advanced through foreclosure or, in the case of FHA and VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs, the amounts advanced tend to be greater than normal arrangements because of delinquent status of the loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding principal balance of such delinquent loans amounted to $125.1 million and $139.6 million, respectively.

In addition, Doral Financial’s loan sale activities in the past included certain mortgage loan sale and securitization transactions subject to recourse arrangements that require Doral Financial to repurchase or substitute the loan if the loans are 90-120 days or more past due or otherwise in default. The Company is also required to pay interest on delinquent loans in the form of servicing advances. Under certain of these arrangements, the recourse obligation is terminated upon compliance with certain conditions, which generally involve: (i) the lapse of time (normally from four to seven years), (ii) the lapse of time combined with certain other conditions such as the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans falling below a specific percentage (normally less than 80%) of the appraised value of the underlying property or (iii) the amount of loans repurchased pursuant to recourse provisions reaching a specific percentage of the original principal amount of loans sold (generally from 10% to 15%). As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s records reflected that the outstanding principal balance of loans sold subject to full or partial recourse was $0.7 billion and $0.8 billion, respectively. As of such dates, the Company’s records also reflected that the maximum contractual exposure to Doral Financial if it were required to repurchase all loans subject to recourse was $0.7 billion. Doral Financial’s contingent obligation with respect to such recourse provision is not reflected on Doral Financial’s consolidated financial statements, except for a liability of estimated losses from such recourse agreements, which is included as part of “Accrued expenses and other liabilities.” The Company discontinued the practice of selling loans with recourse obligations in 2005. Doral Financial’s current strategy is to sell loans on a non-recourse basis, except recourse for certain early payment defaults. For the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company repurchased at fair value $1.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively, pursuant to recourse provisions, compared to $6.7 million and $14.0 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods of 2010.

Doral Financial reserves for its exposure to recourse amounted to $10.1 million and $10.3 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and the reserve for other credit-enhanced transactions explained above amounted $8.8 million and $9.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. For additional information regarding sales of delinquent loans please refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.

The following table shows the changes in the Company’s liability of estimated losses from recourse agreements, included in the Statement of Financial Condition, for each of the periods shown:


	Quarter Ended			Six Month Period Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	9,877		$	10,264
Net charge-offs / termination		(100	)		(728	)
Provision for recourse liability		352			593

Balance at end of period	$	10,129		$	10,129

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS

The tables below summarize Doral Financial’s contractual obligations, on the basis of contractual maturity or first call date, whichever is earlier, and other commercial commitments as of June 30, 2011.

Table Q
Contractual Obligations


	Payment Due By Period
			Less Than						After
(In thousands)	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years
Deposits	$	4,302,792	$	2,941,531	$	833,959	$	453,277	$	74,025
Repurchase agreements⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		442,300		100,000		307,300		35,000		—
Advances from FHLB⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		1,342,849		214,000		628,027		500,822		—
Loans payable⁽³⁾		294,623		28,517		55,870		48,170		162,066
Notes payable		510,430		37,797		13,789		102,110		356,734
Other liabilities		107,642		107,642		—		—		—
Non-cancelable operating leases		50,916		6,225		11,599		10,232		22,860

Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	7,051,552	$	3,435,712	$	1,850,544	$	1,149,611	$	615,685


⁽¹⁾		Amounts included in the table above do not include interest.

⁽²⁾		Includes $100.0 million of a repurchase agreement with a fixed rate of 2.98% and which the lender has the right to call before its contractual maturity. The repurchase agreement is included in the less-than-one year category in the above table but has an actual contractual maturity of February 2014. It was included on the first call date basis because increases in interest rates over the average rate of the Company’s borrowings may induce the lender to exercise its right.

⁽³⁾		Consist of secured borrowings with local financial institutions, collateralized by residential mortgage loans at variable interest rates tied to 3-month LIBOR. These loans are not subject to scheduled payments, but are required to be repaid according to the regular amortization and prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans. For purposes of the table above, the Company used a CPR of 7.5% to estimate the repayments.

The Company enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include commitments to extend credit and sell loans. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position.

The contractual amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. The Company’s exposure to credit losses in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit or for forward sales is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. Doral Financial uses the same credit policies in making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral, if considered necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.

Table P
Other Commercial Commitments⁽¹⁾


	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
	Total
	Amount		Less Than						After
(In thousands)	Committed		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years
Commitments to extend credit	$	146,982	$	86,140	$	25,065	$	—	$	35,777
Commitments to sell loans		98,123		98,123		—		—		—
Commercial and financial standby letters of credit		2,664		2,664		—		—		—
Maximum contractual recourse exposure		653,955		—		—		—		653,955

Total	$	901,724	$	186,927	$	25,065	$	—	$	689,732


⁽¹⁾		Refer to “Off-Balance Sheet Activities” above for additional information regarding other commercial commitments of the Company.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Doral Financial’s business is subject to four broad categories of risks: interest rate risk, credit risk, operational risk and liquidity risk. Doral Financial has specific policies and procedures which have been designed to identify, measure and manage risks to which the Company is exposed.

Interest Rate and Market Risk Management

Interest rate risk refers to the risk that changes in interest rates may adversely affect the value of Doral Financial’s assets and liabilities and its net interest income.

Doral Financial’s risk management policies are designed with the goal of maximizing shareholder value with emphasis on stability of net interest income and market value of equity. These policies are also targeted to remain well capitalized, preserve adequate liquidity, and meet various regulatory requirements. The objectives of Doral Financial’s risk management policies are pursued within the limits established by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Board of Directors has delegated the oversight of interest rate and liquidity risks to its Risk Policy Committee.

Doral Financial’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) has been created under the authority of the Board of Directors to manage the Company’s interest rate, market value of equity and liquidity risk. The ALCO is primarily responsible for ensuring that Doral Financial operates within the Company’s established asset/liability management policy guidelines and procedures. The ALCO reports directly to the Risk Policy Committee of the Board of Directors.

The ALCO is responsible for:

	•		developing the Company’s asset/liability management and liquidity strategy;

	•		establishing and monitoring of interest rate, pricing and liquidity risk limits to ensure compliance with the Company’s policies;

	•		overseeing product pricing and volume objectives for banking and treasury activities; and

	•		overseeing the maintenance of management information systems that supply relevant information for the ALCO to fulfill its responsibilities as it relates to asset/liability management.

Risk Identification Measurement and Control

Doral Financial manages interest rate exposure related to its assets and liabilities on a consolidated basis. Changes in interest rates can affect the volume of Doral Financial’s mortgage loan originations, the net interest income earned on Doral Financial’s portfolio of loans and securities, the amount of gain on the sale of loans and the value of Doral Financial’s servicing assets, loans, investment securities and other retained interests.

As part of its interest rate risk management practices, Doral Financial has implemented measures to identify the interest rate risk associated with the Company’s assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet activities. The Company has also developed policies and procedures to control and manage these risks and continues to improve its interest rate risk management practices. The Company currently manages its interest rate risk by principally focusing on the following metrics: (i) net interest income sensitivity; (ii) market value of equity sensitivity; (iii) effective duration of equity; and (iv) maturity/repricing gaps. Doral Financial’s Asset/Liability Management Policies provide a limit structure based on these four metrics. A single limit is defined for effective duration of equity. Net interest income sensitivity limits are set for instantaneous parallel rate shifts. Specific parallel rate shifts defined for net interest income and market value equity limits are -300 bps, -200 bps, -100 bps, +100 bps, +200 bps, and +300 bps. Net interest income sensitivity limits are established for different time horizons. Additional limits are defined for maturity/repricing mismatches, however management continues to emphasize risk management and controls based on net interest income and market value of equity sensitivity as these measures incorporate the effect of existing asset/liability mismatches. The explanations below provide a brief description of the metrics used by the Company and the methodologies/assumptions employed in the estimation of these metrics:

	•		Net Interest Income Sensitivity. Refers to the relationship between market interest rates and net interest income due to the maturity mismatches and repricing characteristics of Doral Financial’s interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and off-balance sheet positions. To measure net interest income exposure to changes in market interest rates, the Company uses earnings simulation techniques. These simulation techniques allow for the forecasting of net interest income and expense under various rate scenarios for the measurement of interest rate risk exposures of Doral Financial. Primary scenarios include instantaneous parallel and non-parallel rate shocks. Net interest income sensitivity is measured for time horizons ranging from twelve to sixty months and as such, serves as a measure of short to medium term earnings risk. The basic underlying assumptions used in net interest income simulations are: (i) the Company maintains a static balance sheet; (ii) full reinvestment of funds in similar product/instruments with similar maturity and repricing characteristics; (iii) spread assumed constant; (iv) prepayment rates on mortgages and mortgage related securities are modeled using multi-factor prepayment model; (v) non-maturity deposit decay and price elasticity assumptions are incorporated, and (vi) evaluation of embedded options is also taken into consideration. To complement and broaden the analysis of earnings at risk the Company also performs earning simulations for longer time horizons.

	•		Market Value of Equity Sensitivity. Used to capture and measure the risks associated with longer-term maturity and re-pricing mismatches. Doral Financial uses value simulation techniques for all financial components of the consolidated statement of financial condition. Valuation techniques include static cash flows analyses, stochastic models to qualify value of embedded options and prepayment modeling. To complement and broaden the risk analysis, the Company uses duration and convexity analysis to measure the sensitivity of the market value of equity to changes in interest rates. Duration measures the linear change in market value of equity caused by changes in interest rates, while, convexity measures the asymmetric changes in market value of equity caused by changes in interest rates due to the presence of options. The analysis of duration and convexity combined provide a better understanding of the sensitivity of the market value of equity to changes in interest rates.

	•		Effective Duration of Equity. The effective duration of equity is a broad measure of the impact of interest rate changes on Doral Financial’s economic capital. The measure summarizes the net sensitivity of assets and liabilities, adjusted for off-balance sheet positions.

Interest Rate Risk Management Strategy

Doral Financial’s current interest rate management strategy is implemented by the ALCO and is focused on reducing the volatility of the Company’s earnings and to protect the market value of equity. While the current strategy will also use a combination of derivatives and balance sheet management, more emphasis is placed on balance sheet management.

Net Interest Income Risk. In order to protect net interest income against interest rate risk, the ALCO employs a number of tactics which are evaluated and adjusted in relation to prevailing market conditions. Internal balance sheet management practices are designed to reduce the re-pricing gaps of the Company’s assets and liabilities. However, the Company will use derivatives, mainly interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, as part of its interest rate risk management activities. Interest rate swaps represent a mutual agreement to exchange interest rate payments; one party pays fixed rate and the other pays a floating rate. For net interest income protection, Doral Financial typically enters into a fixed rate payer-float receiver swaps to eliminate the variability of cash flows associated with the floating rate debt obligations.

Market Value of Equity Hedging Strategies. Due to the composition of Doral Financial’s assets and liabilities, the Company has earnings exposure to rising interest rates. The Company measures the market value of all rate sensitive assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet positions; and the difference between assets and liabilities, adjusted by off-balance sheet positions, is termed market value of equity. The Company measures how the market value of equity fluctuates with different rate scenarios to measure risk exposure of economic capital or market value equity. Management uses duration matching strategies to manage the fluctuations of market value of equity within the long-term targets established by the Board of Directors of the Company.

Duration Risk. Duration is a measure of the impact (in magnitude and direction) of changes on interest rates in the economic value of financial instruments. In order to bring duration measures within the policy thresholds established by the Company, management may use a combination of internal liability management techniques and derivative instruments. Derivatives such as interest rate swaps, treasury futures, Eurodollar futures and forward contracts may be entered into as part of the Company’s risk management.

Convexity Risk. Convexity is a measure of how much duration changes as interest rates change. For Doral Financial, convexity risk primarily results from mortgage prepayment risk. As part of managing convexity risk management may use a combination of internal balance sheet management instruments or derivatives, such as swaptions, caps, floors, put or call options on interest rate indexes or related fixed income underlying securities (i.e. Eurodollar, treasury notes).

Hedging related to Mortgage Banking Activities. As part of Doral Financial’s risk management of mortgage banking activities, such as secondary market and servicing assets, the Company enters into forward agreements to buy or sell MBS to protect the Company against changes in interest rates that may impact the economic value of servicing assets or the pricing of marketable loan production.

Hedging the various sources of interest rate risks related to mortgage banking activities is a complex process that requires sophisticated modeling, continuous monitoring and active management. While Doral Financial balances and manages the various aspects relating to mortgage activities, there are potential risks to earnings associated to them. Some of these potential risks are:

	•		The valuation of MSRs are recorded in earnings immediately within the accounting period in which the changes in value occur, whereas the impact of changes in interest rates are reflected in originations with a time lag and effects on servicing fee income occurs over time. Thus, even when mortgage activities could be protected from adverse changes in interest rates over a period of time (on a cumulative basis) they may display large variations in income from period to period.

	•		The degree to which the “natural hedge” associated to mortgage banking (i.e. originating and servicing) offsets changes in servicing asset valuations may be imperfect, as it may vary over time.

	•		Origination volumes, the valuation of servicing assets, economic hedging activities and other related costs are impacted by multiple factors, which include, changes in the mix of new business, changes in the term structure of interest rates, changes in mortgage spreads (mortgage basis) to other rate benchmarks, and rate volatility, among others. Interrelation of all these factors is hard to predict and, as such, the ability to perfectly hedge their effects is limited.

Doral Financial’s Risk Profile

Doral Financial’s goal is to manage market and interest rate risk within targeted levels established and periodically reviewed by the Board of Directors of the Company. Interest rate sensitivity represents the relationship between market interet rates and the

net interest income due to existing maturity and repricing imbalances between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate sensitivity is also defined as the relationship between market interest rates and the economic value of equity (referred to market value of equity or “MVE”). The interest risk profile of the Company is measured in the context of net interest income, market value of equity, maturity/repricing gaps and effective duration of equity.

The risk profile of the Company is managed by use of natural offsets generated by the different components of the balance sheet as a result of the normal course of business operations and through active hedging activities by means of both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions (i.e. derivative instruments) to achieve targeted risk levels.

The Company’s interest rate risk exposure may be asymmetric due to the presence of embedded options in products and transactions which allow clients and counterparties to modify the maturity of loans, securities, deposits and/or borrowings. Examples of embedded options include the ability of a mortgagee to prepay his/her mortgage or a counterparty exercising its puttable option on a structured funding transaction. Assets and liabilities with embedded options are evaluated taking into consideration the presence of options to estimate their economic price elasticity and also the effect of options in assessing maturity/repricing characteristics of the Company’s balance sheet. The embedded optionality is primarily managed by purchasing or selling options or by other active risk management strategies involving the use of derivatives, including the forward sale of MBS.

The Company measures interest rate risk and has specific targets for various market rate scenarios. General assumptions for the measurement of interest income sensitivity are: (i) rate shifts are parallel and instantaneous throughout all benchmark yield curves and rate indexes; (ii) behavioral assumptions are driven by simulated market rates under each scenario (i.e. prepayments, repricing of certain liabilities); (iii) static balance sheet assumed with cash flows reinvested at forecasted market rates (i.e. forward curve, static spreads) in similar instruments. For net interest income the Company monitors exposures and has established limits for time horizons ranging from one up to three years, although for risk management purposes earning exposures are forecasted for longer time horizons.

The tables below present the risk profile of Doral Financial (taking into account the derivatives set forth below) under 100-basis point parallel and instantaneous increases or decreases of interest rates, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


As of June 30, 2011	Market Value of Equity Risk			Net Interest Income Risk⁽¹⁾
+ 100 BPS		(6.3	)%		1.0	%
- 100 BPS		3.6	%		0.3	%


As of December 31, 2010	Market Value of Equity Risk			Net Interest Income Risk⁽¹⁾
+ 100 BPS		(8.5	)%		(0.9)	%
- 100 BPS		4.7	%		(0.1)	%


⁽¹⁾		Based on 12-month forward change in net interest income.

The net interest income (“NII”) sensitivity measure to a one hundred (100) basis point parallel and instantaneous rate increase, based on a 12-month horizon, changed from (0.9)% to 1.0% when comparing December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011. The effect is driven by the continued efforts to reduce maturity/repricing mismatches by extending the maturity in certain wholesale liabilities, sale of investments and the growth of variable rate syndicated loans.

As of June 30, 2011 the market value of equity (“MVE”) showed lower sensitivity to rising interest rates when compared to December 31, 2010. MVE sensitivity to an increase of one hundred (100) basis points in market rates changed from (8.5)% to (6.3)%. The Company has been actively managing the balance sheet to maintain the interest rate risk measures in line with targets mainly by the use of on-balance sheet strategies. The sale of certain investment securities, the continued focus on extending maturity of wholesale funding, issuance of callable funding and growth in variable rate assets, have all contributed to reducing MVE exposure.

The following table shows the Company’s investment portfolio sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The table below assumes parallel and instantaneous increases and decreases of interest rates as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	Change in Fair			Change in Fair
Change in Interest	Value of Available			Value of Available
Rates (Basis Points)	For Sale Securities			For Sale Securities
+200	$	(45,387	)	$	(180,474	)
+100		(19,571	)		(47,474	)
Base		—			—
-100		6,997			21,917
-200		11,370			34,416

Derivatives. As described above, Doral Financial uses derivatives to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates. Derivatives are generally either privately negotiated over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts or standard contracts transacted through regulated exchanges. OTC contracts generally consist of swaps, caps and collars, forwards and options. Exchange-traded derivatives include futures and options.

The Company is subject to various interest rate cap agreements to manage its interest rate exposure. Interest rate cap agreements generally involve purchase of out of the money caps to protect the Company from larger rate moves and to provide the Company with positive convexity. Non-performance by the counterparty exposes Doral Financial to interest rate risk. The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate caps outstanding at June 30, 2011.

Table R
Interest Rate Caps


(Dollars in thousands)
Notional		Maturity				Fair
Amount		Date	Entitled Payment Conditions	Premium Paid		Value
$	15,000	September, 2011	1-month LIBOR over 5.50%	$	134	$	—
	15,000	September, 2012	1-month LIBOR over 6.00%		143		—
	15,000	October, 2011	1-month LIBOR over 5.00%		172		—
	15,000	October, 2012	1-month LIBOR over 5.50%		182		—
	50,000	November, 2012	1-month LIBOR over 6.50%		228		—
	50,000	November, 2012	1-month LIBOR over 5.50%		545		1
	50,000	November, 2012	1-month LIBOR over 6.00%		350		—

$	210,000			$	1,754	$	1

The Company is subject to various interest rate swap agreements to manage its interest rate exposure. Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal. The Company principally uses interest rate swaps to convert floating rate liabilities to fixed rate by entering into pay fixed receive floating interest rate swaps. Non-performance by the counterparty exposes Doral Financial to interest rate risk. The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate swaps outstanding at June 30, 2011.

Table S
Interest Rate Swaps


(Dollars in thousands)
Notional		Maturity					Fair
Amount		Date	Pay Fixed Rate			Receive Floating Rate	Value
Cash Flow Hedge
$	3,000	September, 2011		4.69	%	1-month LIBOR plus 0.02%	$	(34	)
	6,000	October, 2011		4.51	%	1-month LIBOR plus 0.05%		(86	)
	5,000	October, 2012		4.62	%	1-month LIBOR plus 0.05%		(282	)
	15,000	November, 2011		4.55	%	1-month LIBOR plus 0.02%		(275	)
	45,000	November, 2012		4.62	%	1-month LIBOR plus 0.02%		(2,705	)

$	74,000						$	(3,382	)

Freestanding Derivatives. Doral Financial uses derivatives to manage its market risk and generally accounts for such instruments on a mark-to-market basis with gains or losses charged to current operations as part of net gain (loss) on trading activities as they occur. Contracts with positive fair values are recorded as assets and contracts with negative fair values as liabilities, after the application of netting arrangements. Fair values of derivatives such as interest rate futures contracts or options are determined by reference to market prices. Fair values for derivatives purchased in the over-the-counter market are determined by valuation models and validated with prices provided by external sources. The notional amounts of freestanding derivatives totaled $265.0 million and $310.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Notional amounts indicate the volume of derivative activity, but do not represent Doral Financial’s exposure to market or credit risk.

Derivatives — Hedge Accounting. Doral Financial seeks to designate derivatives under hedge accounting guidelines when it can clearly identify an asset or liability that can be hedged pursuant to the strict hedge accounting guidelines. The notional amount of swaps treated under hedge accounting totaled $74.0 million at both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company typically uses interest rate swaps to convert floating rate advances from FHLB to fixed rate by entering into pay fixed receive floating swaps. In these cases, the Company matches all of the terms in the advance from FHLB to the floating leg of the interest rate swap. Since both transactions are symmetrically opposite the effectiveness of the hedging relationship is high.

The following table summarizes the total derivatives positions at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and their different designations.

Table T
Derivatives Positions


	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
	Notional		Fair			Notional		Fair
(In thousands)	Amount		Value			Amount		Value
Cash Flow Hedges
Interest rate swaps	$	74,000	$	(3,382	)	$	74,000	$	(4,677	)
Other Derivatives
Interest rate caps		210,000		1			210,000		13
Forward contracts		55,000		(45	)		100,000		(741	)

		265,000		(44	)		310,000		(728	)

	$	339,000	$	(3,426	)	$	384,000	$	(5,405	)

100

The following tables summarize the fair values of Doral Financial’s freestanding derivatives as well as the source of the fair values.

Table U
Fair Value Reconciliation


	Six Month Period Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2011
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period	$	(728	)
Changes in fair values during the period		684

Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period	$	(44	)

Table V
Sources of Fair Value


(In thousands)	Payment Due by Period
	Maturity							Maturity
	less than			Maturity		Maturity		in excess		Total Fair
As of June 30, 2011	1 Year			1-3 Years		3-5 Years		of 5 Years		Value
Prices actively quoted	$	(45	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(45	)
Prices provided by internal sources		—			1		—		—		1

	$	(45	)	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	(44	)

The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives arises principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on changes in interest rates.

The credit risk of OTC derivatives arises from the potential of counterparties to default on their contractual obligations. To manage this credit risk, Doral Financial deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and monitors the markets on pledged collateral to minimize credit exposure. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default. As a result of the ratings downgrades affecting Doral Financial, counterparties to derivative contracts used for interest rate risk management purposes could increase the applicable margin requirements under such contracts, or could require the Company to terminate such agreements.

101

Table W
Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011
													Weighted Average
	Number of				Total Exposure at		Negative Fair						Contractual Maturity
Rating⁽¹⁾	Counterparties⁽²⁾		Notional		Fair Value⁽³⁾		Values			Total Fair Value			(in years)
AA-		1	$	180,000	$	1	$	—		$	1			1.27
A+		1		104,000		—		(3,382	)		(3,382	)		0.98
A		2		55,000		168		(213	)		(45	)		0.06

Total Derivatives		4	$	339,000	$	169	$	(3,595	)	$	(3,426	)		0.98


⁽¹⁾		Based on the S&P Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings.

⁽²⁾		Based on legal entities. Affiliated legal entities are reported separately.

⁽³⁾		For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with a positive fair value including the related accrued interest receivable/payable (net.)


(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2010
													Weighted Average
	Number of				Total Exposure at		Negative Fair						Contractual Maturity
Rating⁽¹⁾	Counterparties⁽²⁾		Notional		Fair Value⁽³⁾		Values			Total Fair Value			(in years)
AA-		1	$	180,000	$	12	$	—		$	12			1.76
A+		1		104,000		1		(4,677	)		(4,676	)		1.47
A		2		100,000		95		(836	)		(741	)		0.06

Total Derivatives		4	$	384,000	$	108	$	(5,513	)	$	(5,405	)		1.24


⁽¹⁾		Based on the S&P Long-Term Issuer Credit Ratings.

⁽²⁾		Based on legal entities. Affiliated legal entities are reported separately.

⁽³⁾		For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with a positive fair value including the related accrued interest receivable/payable (net.)

Credit Risk

Doral Financial is subject to credit risk, particularly with respect to its investment securities and loans receivable. For a discussion of credit risk on investment securities refer to Note 7 of the accompanying financial statements.

Loans receivable are loans that Doral Financial holds for investment and, therefore, the Company is at risk for credit loss over the term of the loans. Because many of the Company’s loans are made to borrowers located in Puerto Rico and secured by properties located in Puerto Rico, the Company is subject to credit risk tied to adverse economic, political or business developments and natural hazards, such as hurricanes, that may affect Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico economy has been in a recession since 2006. This has affected borrowers’ disposable incomes and their ability to make payments when due, causing an increase in delinquency and foreclosure rates. The Company believes that these conditions will continue to affect its credit quality. In addition, there is evidence that property values have declined from their peak. This has reduced borrowers’ capacity to refinance and increased the exposure to loss upon default. This decline in prices and increases in expected defaults are incorporated into the loss rates used for calculating the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses. The Company also has a growing portfolio of commercial and construction and land loans, geographically dominated by loans in the New York Metropolitan area, and performance of such loans is subject to the strength of the New York City and US economy.

With respect to mortgage loans originated for sale as part of its mortgage banking business, Doral Financial is generally at risk for any mortgage loan default from the time it originates the mortgage loan until the time it sells the loan or packages it into a MBS. For residential mortgage loans that are retained as a loan investment, Doral retains the credit risk from the time the loan is originated until the loan is paid. With respect to FHA loans, Doral Financial is fully insured as to principal by the FHA against foreclosure loss. VA loans are guaranteed within a range of 25% to 50% of the principal amount of the loan subject to a maximum, ranging from $22,500 to $50,750, in addition to the mortgage collateral. Prior to 2006, the Company sold loans on a recourse basis as part of the ordinary course of business. As part of such transactions, the Company committed to make payments to remedy loan defaults or to repurchase defaulted loans. Refer to “Off-Balance Sheet Activities” above for additional information regarding recourse obligations. In mid 2005, the Company discontinued the practice of selling mortgage loans with recourse, except for recourse related to early payment defaults.

102

The residential mortgage portfolio includes loans that, at some point were repurchased pursuant to recourse obligations and, as a result, have a higher credit risk. Repurchases of delinquent loans from recourse obligations for the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 totaled $1.4 million and $5.8 million, respectively, and resulted in a loss of $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the corresponding periods. When repurchased from recourse obligations, loans are recorded at their market value, which includes a discount for poor credit performance.

Historically, Doral Financial provided land acquisition, development, and construction financing to developers of residential housing projects and, as consequence, has credit risk exposure to this sector. Construction loans extended to developers are typically adjustable rate loans, indexed to the prime interest rate with terms ranging generally from 12 to 36 months. Doral Financial principally targeted developers of residential construction for single-family primary-home occupancy. As a result of the negative outlook for the Puerto Rico economy and its adverse effect on the construction industry, in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company ceased financing new housing projects in Puerto Rico. The recorded balance for the residential housing construction sector has decreased from $181.5 million as of December 31, 2010, to $158.0 million as of June 30, 2011. Management expects that the amount of construction loans will continue to decrease in future years.

Puerto Rico and the Company have experienced low levels of new home absorption in recent periods due to the recession in Puerto Rico. As a result, in September 2010, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law Act No. 132 of 2010 which established various housing tax and other incentives to stimulate the sale of new and existing housing units. Act No. 115 of July 5, 2011 amended Act No. 132 to extend the expiration of the housing tax and other incentives from June 30, 2011 to October 31, 2011. The tax and other incentives, which include incentives or reductions relating to capital gains taxes, property taxes and property recording fees and stamps, will be in effect through October 31, 2011 and have had a favorable impact in the current economic environment in Puerto Rico. The six month period ended June 30, 2011 reflected lower UPB in land acquisition, development, and construction financing performing and non-performing loans compared to December 31, 2010.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the commercial real estate portfolio experienced an increase in late stage delinquency mainly attributed to adverse performance of the small commercial portfolio related to the continued recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico. Management has taken certain actions to mitigate the risk in the portfolio, including leveraging the collections and loss-mitigation resources from the residential mortgage area to the small commercial area as well as expanding advisory services of third party providers for the large commercial area in order to work-out delinquent loans and prevent performing loans from becoming delinquent.

Loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings

With Puerto Rico unemployment of 15.1%, many borrowers have temporarily lost the means to pay their loan contractual principal and interest obligations. As a result of the economic hardships, a number of borrowers have defaulted on their debt obligations, including residential mortgage and consumer loans. The lower level of income and economic activity has also led to fewer new construction residential home sales, increased commercial real estate vacancy, and lower business revenues, which has led to increased defaults on commercial real estate, construction and land loans. Doral’s management has concluded that it is in the Company’s best interest, and in the best interest of the Puerto Rican economy and citizenry, if certain defaulted loans are restructured in a manner that keeps borrowers in their homes, or businesses operating, rather than foreclosing on the loan collateral if it is concluded that the borrower’s payment difficulties are temporary and Doral will in time collect the loan principal and agreed upon interest.

Doral has created a number of loan modification programs to help borrowers stay in their homes and operate their businesses which also optimizes borrower performance and returns to Doral. In these cases, the restructure or loan modification fits the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”) as defined by ASC 310-40, Receivables — Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors. TDRs are accounted for based on the provisions of ASC 310-10-35, Receivables-Measurement of Loan Impairment. The programs are designed to provide temporary relief and, if necessary, longer term financial relief to the consumer loan customer. Doral’s consumer loan loss mitigation program (including consumer loan products and residential mortgage loans), grants a concession for economic or legal reasons related to the borrowers’ financial difficulties Doral would not otherwise consider. Doral’s loss mitigation programs can provide for one or a combination of the following: movement of unpaid principal and interest to the end of the loan, extension of the loan term for up to ten years, deferral of principal payments for a period of time, and reduction of interest rates either permanently (feature discontinued in 2010) or for a period of up to two years. No programs adopted by Doral provide for the forgiveness of contractually due principal or interest. Deferred principal and uncollected interest are added to the end of the loan term at the time of the restructuring and uncollected interest is not recognized as income until collected when the loan is paid off. Doral wants to make these programs available only to those borrowers who have defaulted, or are likely to default, permanently on their loan and would lose their homes in foreclosure action absent some lender concession. However, Doral will move borrowers and properties to foreclosure if the Company is not reasonably assured

103

that the borrower will be able to repay all contractual principal or interest (which is not forgiven in part or whole in any current program).

Regarding the commercial loan loss mitigation programs (including commercial real estate, commercial, land and construction loan portfolios), the determination is made on a loan by loan basis at the time of restructuring as to whether a concession was made for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulty that Doral would not otherwise consider. Concessions made for commercial loans could include reductions in interest rates, extensions of maturity, waiving of borrower covenants, or other contract changes that would be considered a concession. Doral mitigates loan defaults for its commercial loan portfolios loans through its Loan Workout function. The function’s objective is to minimize losses upon default of larger credit relationships. The group uses relationship officers, collection specialists, attorneys and third party service providers to supplement its internal resources. In the case of residential construction projects, the workout function monitors project specifics, such as project management and marketing. Residential, other consumer or commercial loan modifications can result in returning a loan to accrual status when the criteria for returning a loan to performing status are met. Loan modifications also increase Doral’s interest income by returning a non-performing loan to performing status and cash flows by providing for payments to be made by the borrower, and decreases foreclosure and OREO costs by decreasing the number of foreclosed properties. Doral continues to consider a modified loan as a non-performing asset for purposes of estimating its allowance for loan and lease losses until the borrower has made at least six consecutive contractual payments. At such time the loan will be treated as any other performing loan for purposes of estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses.

Loan modifications that are considered troubled debt restructurings completed as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (all loan modifications are related to loans to Puerto Rico residents):

Table X — Loan modifications considered TDRs


	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
			90 days and over				90 days and over
(In thousands)	TDRs		delinquency		TDRs		delinquency
Consumer modifications
Residential mortgage(1)	$	713,093	$	77,388	$	740,889	$	142,213
Other consumer		1,098		432		1,257		75

Total consumer		714,191		77,820		742,146		142,288

Commercial
Commercial real estate	$	84,326	$	16,841	$	71,501	$	31,314
Commercial and industrial		9,663		—		5,568		71
Construction and land		82,766		24,957		78,847		36,438

Total commercial		176,755		41,798		155,916		67,823

Total TDRs	$	890,946	$	119,618	$	898,062	$	210,111

(1) As of December 31, 2010 includes $55.5 million of loan modifications not previously reported as TDRs.

The decrease in residential mortgage TDRs in June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 is due to the removal from TDR classification of restructured loans that are in compliance with their modified terms and yield a market rate in calendar years after the year in which the restructuring took place.

A significant portion of Doral’s restructured residential mortgage loans were current, paid-off or re-modified as of June 30, 2011, as illustrated by the table of restructured loans that are non-performing at June 30, 2011.


					90 days and over		Percentage of
	Original UPB of		Remaining UPB of		delinquent at		restructured UPB
Year restructured	restructured loans(1)		restructured loans		June 30, 2011 (2)		90 days and over
2007	$	5,941	$	5,922	$	623		10.5	%
2008		47,605		44,494		10,379		23.5	%
2009		121,523		117,230		26,491		22.6	%
2010		420,915		411,648		37,029		9.0	%
2011		137,007		133,799		2,866		2.1	%

	$	732,991	$	713,093	$	77,388		10.9	%


⁽¹⁾		Excluding loans subject to a second restructure.

⁽²⁾		Using bank regulatory definition of four or more payments past due.

104

Non-performing Loans

Non-performing assets consist of loans on non-accrual basis, other real estate owned and other non-performing assets. Doral discontinues interest income recognition and considers financial assets non-performing when they are 90 days or more past due, except for revolving lines of credit and credit cards which are considered non-performing when they are 180 days or more past due, FHA and VA loans which are considered non-performing when they are 270 days past due, and certain loans determined to be well collateralized so that ultimate collection of principal and interest is not in question (current loan and interest balance as a percentage of collateral value is less than 60%). In addition, any financial asset for which management estimates it will not collect contractual principal or interest is considered non-performing when such judgment is made. When income recognition is discontinued for a loan, all accrued but unpaid interest to date is reversed against current period income. Such interest, if collected in the future, is credited to income in the period of the recovery, and the loan returns to accrual status when it becomes current and/or collectability is reasonably assured. The Company also places in non-accrual status all residential construction loans classified as substandard whose sole source of payment is interest reserves funded by Doral Financial. For the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company would have recognized $20.9 million and $12.1 million, respectively, compared to $14.4 million and $24.9 million for the corresponding 2010 periods, in additional interest income had all delinquent loans been accounted for on an accrual basis. This amount includes interest reversal on loans placed on non-accrual status during the period.

For consumer loans (primarily residential real estate), all of Doral’s loss mitigation tools require that the borrower demonstrate the intent and ability to pay principal and interest on the loan. Doral must receive at least three consecutive monthly payments prior to qualifying the borrower for a loss mitigation product. Doral’s loan underwriters must be reasonably assured of the borrower’s future repayment and performance from their review of the borrower’s circumstances, and when all the conditions are met, the customer is approved for a loss mitigation product and placed on a probation period. When the loan is returned to accrual status, Doral reviews the loan on a monthly basis to ensure that payments are made during the probationary period. If a payment is not made during this probationary period the loan is immediately returned to non-accrual status. Also, if a payment is missed during the probationary period, the loan reverts to its original terms, and collections/foreclosure procedures begin from the point at which they stood prior to the restructure. Consumer loans not delinquent 90 days or more that are eligible for loss mitigation products are subject to the same requirements as the delinquent consumer loans except the receipt of the three months of payment in advance of the restructures is waived.

For commercial loan loss mitigation (which includes commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, construction and land loans), the loans are underwritten by the Collections or Commercial function, depending on the loss-mitigation alternative, the intent and ability of the borrower to service the debt under the revised terms scrutinized, and if approved for the TDR, the borrower is placed on a six month probationary period during which the customer is required to make six consecutive payments (or equivalent in a lump sum) before the loan is returned to accrual status. Upon receiving six consecutive months of payments, the commercial loan is returned to accrual status. If the loan was in accrual status at the time of the TDR, the loan is kept in accrual status if the ultimate collection of principal and interest is not in question, and placed in a probationary period. If a payment is missed during the probationary period, the loan reverts to its original terms and collections/foreclosure procedures begin from the point at which they stood prior to the restructure.

105

The following table sets forth information with respect to Doral Financial’s non-performing loans, OREO and other NPAs as of the dates indicated:

Table Y — Non-Performing Assets


	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
(In thousands)	PR		US		Total			PR		US		Total
Non-performing consumer, excluding FHA/VA⁽¹⁾
Residential mortgage	$	279,529	$	820	$	280,349		$	278,675	$	2,166	$	280,841
Lease financing receivables		199				199			415		—		415
Other consumer⁽²⁾		500				500			404		—		404


Total non-performing consumer, excluding FHA/VA		280,228		820		281,048			279,494		2,166		281,660

Non-performing commercial
Commercial real estate		167,643		—		167,643			193,556		—		193,556
Commercial and industrial		2,731		—		2,731			2,522		—		2,522
Construction and land		107,516		1,610		109,126			147,127		1,610		148,737

Total non-performing commercial		277,890		1,610		279,500			343,205		1,610		344,815

Total non-performing loans, excluding FHA/VA	$	558,118	$	2,430	$	560,548		$	622,699	$	3,776	$	626,475


OREO and repossessed units
Residential mortgage	$	53,381	$	—	$	53,381		$	63,794	$	—	$	63,794
Commercial		20,163		—		20,163			17,599		—		17,599
Construction and land		27,305		650		27,955			18,230		650		18,880
Other		111		—		111			75		—		75

Total OREO and repossessed units	$	100,960	$	650	$	101,610		$	99,698	$	650	$	100,348


Non-performing FHA/VA guaranteed residential^(1)(3)(4)	$	79,179	$	—	$	79,179		$	121,305	$	—	$	121,305
Other non-performing assets		3,204		—		3,204			3,692		—		3,692

Total non-performing assets⁽⁵⁾	$	741,461	$	3,080	$	744,541		$	847,394	$	4,426	$	851,820


Total NPAs as a percentage of the loan portfolio, net, and OREO (excluding GNMA defaulted loans)						12.73	%						14.85	%

Total NPAs as a percentage of consolidated total assets						9.29	%						9.85	%
Total non-performing loans to total loans (excluding GNMA defaulted loans and FHA/VA guaranteed loans)						9.85	%						11.29	%
Ratio of allowance for loan and lease losses to total non-performing loans (excluding loans held for sale) at end of period⁽⁵⁾						16.75	%						19.82	%


⁽¹⁾		FHA/VA delinquent loans are separated from the non-performing loans that present substantial credit risk to the Company in order to recognize the different risk of loss presented by these assets.

⁽²⁾		Includes delinquency related personal, revolving lines of credit and other consumer loans.

⁽³⁾		Does not include approximately $115.3 million and $112.8 million of GNMA defaulted loans over 90 days delinquent (for which the Company has the option, but not an obligation, to buy back from the pools serviced), included as part of the loans held for sale portfolio as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

⁽⁴⁾		FHA loans are placed in accrual status until 270 days delinquent because the principal balance of these loans is insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA program and interest is, in most cases, fully recovered in foreclosures proceedings. Accordingly, total non-performing FHA guaranteed residential mortgage loans exclude $16.8 million and $31.5 million of FHA loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, that were 90 days or more past due.

⁽⁵⁾		Excludes FHA and VA claims amounting to $15.2 million and $12.5 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

106

The following tables provide the non-performing loans activity by portfolio for the periods indicated.

Table Z — Non-Performing Loans Activity


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
	Non-															Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			Construction			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			and Land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	254,942		$	551		$	255,493		$	187,076		$	126,190		$	2,789		$	316,055		$	571,548
Additions		74,441			780			75,221			9,884			1,883			859			12,626			87,847
Repurchases		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Remediated/Cure		(46,395	)		(450	)		(46,845	)		(17,271	)		(214	)		(457	)		(17,942	)		(64,787	)
Foreclosed		—			—			—			(3,628	)		—			—			(3,628	)		(3,628	)
Write-downs		(2,639	)		(182	)		(2,821	)		(8,418	)		(18,733	)		(460	)		(27,611	)		(30,432	)

	$	280,349		$	699		$	281,048		$	167,643		$	109,126		$	2,731		$	279,500		$	560,548


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
	Non-															Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			Construction			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			and land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	407,256		$	1,148		$	408,404		$	157,443		$	304,413		$	1,908		$	463,764		$	872,168
Additions		84,768			1,373			86,141			24,011			60,058			2,312			86,381			172,522
Repurchases		6,672			—			6,672			—			—			—			—			6,672
Remediated/Cure		(65,211	)		(737	)		(65,948	)		(9,402	)		(69,780	)		(877	)		(80,059	)		(146,007	)
Foreclosed		(19,833	)		—			(19,833	)		(1,386	)		(104	)		—			(1,490	)		(21,323	)
Write-downs		(10,676	)		(722	)		(11,398	)		(1,423	)		(39,488	)		—			(40,911	)		(52,309	)

Balance at end of period	$	402,976		$	1,062		$	404,038		$	169,243		$	255,099		$	3,343		$	427,685		$	831,723


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Non-															Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			Construction			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			and Land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	280,841		$	819		$	281,660		$	193,556		$	148,737		$	2,522		$	344,815		$	626,475
Additions		121,702			1,662			123,364			24,647			4,625			1,873			31,145			154,509
Repurchases		2,628			—			2,628			—			—			—			—			2,628
Remediated/Cure		(107,317	)		(1,101	)		(108,418	)		(36,592	)		(10,006	)		(1,185	)		(47,783	)		(156,201	)
Foreclosed		(11,640	)		—			(11,640	)		(5,550	)		(13,907	)		—			(19,457	)		(31,097	)
Write-downs		(5,865	)		(681	)		(6,546	)		(8,418	)		(20,323	)		(479	)		(29,220	)		(35,766	)

Balance at end of period	$	280,349		$	699		$	281,048		$	167,643		$	109,126		$	2,731		$	279,500		$	560,548


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Non-															Commercial
	FHA/VA			Other			Total			Commercial			Construction			and			Total
(In thousands)	Residential			Consumer			Consumer			Real Estate			and land			Industrial			Commercial			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	397,698		$	1,610		$	399,308		$	130,811		$	306,954		$	933		$	438,698		$	838,006
Additions		162,930			2,020			164,950			62,638			103,861			3,708			170,207			335,157
Repurchases		11,864			—			11,864			—			—			—			—			11,864
Remediated/Cure		(123,632	)		(1,846	)		(125,478	)		(18,256	)		(115,081	)		(1,075	)		(134,412	)		(259,890	)
Foreclosed		(32,138	)		—			(32,138	)		(4,271	)		(1,116	)		(25	)		(5,412	)		(37,550	)
Write-downs		(13,746	)		(722	)		(14,468	)		(1,679	)		(39,520	)		(198	)		(41,397	)		(55,865	)

Balance at end of period	$	402,976		$	1,062		$	404,038		$	169,243		$	255,098		$	3,343		$	427,684		$	831,722

107

Non-performing loans (excluding FHA/VA loans guaranteed by the US government) as of June 30, 2011 were $560.5 million, a decrease of $65.9 million and $271.2 million from December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively. Major fluctuations during the period ended June 30, 2011 are reflected in the commercial and industrial and the construction and land portfolios, with decreases of $25.9 million and $39.6 million, respectively. The six month period ended June 30, 2011 reflected decreases of $122.6 million and $146.0 million in the residential mortgage and construction and land portfolios, respectively. Non-performing loans have decreased during 2011 due to collection efforts and loan restructuring resulting returning loans to current status. Additionally, second quarter 2011 charge-offs totaled $40.4 million compared to the second quarter 2010 charge-offs of $57.5 million. Historically, Doral’s charge-off policy has been to reduce the reported balance of a collateral dependent loan (a loan is collateral dependent when the liquidation of collateral is considered the likely source of repayment of a delinquent loan) by a charge to the allowance for loan and lease losses upon receipt of a current market appraised value. However, due to long delays in receiving new market value appraisals of properties in Puerto Rico, Doral implemented a methodology to estimate market values for all properties based upon the changes in market values in new appraisals it has received. During the second quarter of 2011, Doral adopted the practice of charging off the excess of the loan balance before charge-off over the estimated fair value of the property collateralizing the loan considered uncollectible. This new practice also reduces the reported allowance for loan and lease losses and the coverage ratios that exclude the amount previously charged-off.

Non-performing assets, including non-performing loans (discussed above), decreased by $107.2 million, or 12.5%, as of June 30, 2011, compared to December 31, 2010. The decrease in non-performing loans compared to December 31, 2010 was complemented by a decrease in non-performing FHA/VA guaranteed loans of $42.1 million. As of June 30, 2011, Doral reported a total of $280.4 million of non-performing residential loans excluding FHA/VA guaranteed loans, which represents 7.7% of total residential loans (excluding FHA/VA guaranteed loans) and 50.0% of total non-performing loans.

Doral Financial does not hold a significant amount of adjustable interest rate, negative amortization, or other exotic credit features that are common in other parts of the United States. However, as part of its loss mitigation programs, the Company has granted certain concessions to borrowers in financial difficulties that have proven payment capacity which may include interest only periods or temporary interest rate reductions. The payments for these loans will reset at the former payment amount unless the loan is restructured again or the restructured terms are extended. Substantially all residential mortgage loans are conventional 30 and 15 year amortizing fixed rate loans at origination. There has been significantly less fade in residential real estate values in homes under $250,000 in Puerto Rico, the price point for the preponderance of Doral’s residential mortgage loan portfolio. The following table shows the composition of the mortgage non-performing loans according to their actual loan-to-value (“LTV”) and whether they are covered by mortgage insurance. LTV ratios are calculated based on current unpaid balances and original property values.

Table AA
Composition of Mortgage Non-Performing Loans
June 30, 2011


Collateral Type	Loan To Value			Distribution
FHA/VA loans		n/a			23.9	%
Loans with private mortgage insurance		n/a			5.6	%
Loans with no mortgage insurance		< 60	%		8.1	%
		61-80	%		21.2	%
		81-90	%		13.9	%
	Over 91%				27.3	%

Total loans					100.0	%

Actual LTV ratios, calculated based on current unpaid balances and original property values, are considered when establishing the levels of general reserves for the residential mortgage portfolio. Assumed loss severity fluctuates depending on the different LTV levels of individual loans.

Doral’s construction and land loan portfolio reflected a decrease in non-performing loans due primarily to charge-offs of $21.8 million and $23.4 million during the quarter and six month periods ended on June 30, 2011. Construction and land had non-performing loans of $109.1 million as of June 30, 2011, or 19.5% (98.5% of which are in Puerto Rico), of total non-performing loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 27.9% and 32.4%, respectively, of the loans within the construction and land portfolio were considered non-performing loans. The sale of a portion of the construction loan portfolio during 2010 reduced the Company’s risk to this sector, however, the remaining construction portfolio is directly affected by the continuing Puerto Rico recession as the underlying loans’ repayment capacity is dependent on the ability to attract buyers.

108

During the past two years, the Company’s construction and land loan portfolio has experienced a significant increase in default rates resulting from borrowers not being able to sell finished units within the loan term. Although the Company has taken (and continues to take) steps to mitigate the credit risk underlying these loans, their ultimate performance will be affected by each borrower’s ability to complete the project, maintain the pricing level of the housing units within the project, and sell the inventory of units within a reasonable timeframe.

During 2010 and the six month period ended June 30, 2011, Doral Financial did not enter into commitments to fund new construction loans for residential housing projects in Puerto Rico, other than a new commitment amounted to $124.9 million entered during the third quarter of 2010, related to the sale of an asset portfolio to a third party on July 2010, consisting of performing and non-performing late-stage residential construction and development loans and real estate. Commitments to fund new construction loans in the US totaled $2.4 million and $39.4 million for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to $23.3 million and $41.1 million for the corresponding 2010 period.

The following table presents further information on the Company’s construction portfolio.

Table BB — Construction and land loan portfolio analysis


	June 30, 2011									December 31, 2010
(In thousands)	PR			US			Total			PR			US			Total
Residential construction loans	$	157,915		$	300		$	158,215		$	181,240		$	300		$	181,540
Multi-family, condominium, commercial and land construction loans		151,675			80,030			231,705			168,659			108,535			277,194
Undisbursed funds under existing commitments⁽¹⁾		47,114			15,495			62,609			44,336			9,539			53,875
Total non-performing		107,516			1,610			109,126			147,127			1,610			148,737
Net charge offs		23,359			—			23,359			54,944			991			55,935
Allowance for loan losses		9,634			1,516			11,151			22,761			2,265			25,026
Non-performing construction to total construction loans		34.73	%		2.00	%		27.99	%		42.05	%		1.48	%		32.42	%
Net charge-offs on an annualized basis to total construction loans		15.22	%		—	%		12.08	%		15.70	%		0.91	%		12.19	%


⁽¹⁾		Includes undisbursed funds to matured loans and loans in non-accrual status that are still active.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s loans past due 90 days and still accruing as of the dates indicated. Loans included in this table are 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal and still accruing, because they are either well-secured and in the process of collection or charged-off prior to being placed in non-accrual status.

Table CC — Loans past due 90 days and still accruing


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(In thousands)	PR		US		Total		PR		US		Total
Consumer loans past due 90 days and still accruing
Residential mortgage ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Credit cards⁽²⁾		960		—		960		973		—		973
Other consumer⁽³⁾		1,059		—		1,059		1,022		—		1,022

Total consumer loans past due 90 days and still accruing		2,019		—		2,019		1,995		—		1,995

Commercial loans past due 90 days and still accruing
Commercial and industrial		655		—		655		560		—		560


Total loans past due 90 days and still accruing	$	2,674	$	—	$	2,674	$	2,555	$	—	$	2,555


⁽¹⁾		Excludes $16.8 million and $31.5 million, FHA/VA guaranteed residential mortgages past due 90 days and still accruing, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾		Credit cards until 180 days delinquent.

⁽³⁾		Revolving lines of credit until 180 days delinquent.

109

Detailed below is information on loans 30 to 89 days past due as of the periods indicated. This table excludes GNMA defaulted loans 30 to 89 days past due (for which the Company has the option, but not an obligation, to buy back from the pools serviced) and FHA/VA guaranteed loans.

Table DD — Loans past due 30-89 days


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(In thousands)	PR		US		Total		PR		US		Total
Past-due 30-89 days consumer
Residential mortgage⁽¹⁾	$	87,545	$	—	$	87,545	$	71,750	$	—	$	71,750
Lease financing receivables		219		—		219		245		—		245
Other consumer		804		—		804		1,343		—		1,343

Total past-due consumer		88,568		—		88,568		73,338		—		73,338


Past-due 30-89 days commercial
Commercial real estate		35,057		—		35,057		35,353		—		35,353
Construction and land		3,235		—		3,235		2,286		—		2,286
Commercial and industrial		366		—		366		3,900		—		3,900

Total past-due commercial		38,658		—		38,658		41,539		—		41,539

Total past-due loans⁽²⁾	$	127,226	$	—	$	127,226	$	114,877	$	—	$	114,877


⁽¹⁾		Excludes $3.6 million and $7.4 million of FHA/VA guaranteed loans.

⁽²⁾		Regulatory guidance regarding days past due followed by many banks provides that the number of days past due may be based upon the number of payments missed. According to this regulatory guidance, monthly pay loans are reported as 30 days past due when the borrower has missed two payments. Doral follows this guidance in its reporting except that it more conservatively reports loans 90 days past due based upon the contractual number of days past due.

Other Real Estate Owned

Doral Financial believes that the value of the OREO reflected in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition represents a reasonable estimate of the properties’ sales price, net of disposition costs. The fair value of the OREO is normally determined on the basis of internal and external appraisals and physical inspections. A loss is recognized for any initial write down to fair value less cost to sell. Any losses in the carrying value of the properties arising from periodic appraisals are charged to expense in the period incurred. Holding costs, property taxes, maintenance and other similar expenses are charged to expense in the period incurred.

OREO foreclosures have increased in recent periods as the volume of the NPLs has increased and as Doral has shortened the period from the initiation of foreclosure to possession of property by approximately 10 months. OREO sales improved in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 2010 due to the Company’s strategic decision to reduce pricing on the OREO portfolio in order to accelerate sales. The accelerated disposition of OREO is expected to reduce the carrying costs of OREO.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold 294 OREO properties, representing $49.3 million in unpaid balance. Total proceeds amounted to $31.4 million, representing the recovery of 62.1% and 62.6% of unpaid principal balance and appraised value, respectively. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the Company sold 135 OREO properties, representing $14.3 million in unpaid principal balance. Total proceeds amounted to $12.2 million, representing the recovery of 85.4% and 100.1% of unpaid principal balance and appraised value, respectively. Gains and losses on sales of OREO are recognized in other expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

110

The following presents the activity of OREO for the periods indicated:

Table EE — Other real estate owned activity


	Quarters Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	103,767		$	100,345
Additions		22,368			37,368
Sales		(22,147	)		(6,161	)
Retirements		(1,882	)		(1,735	)
Lower of cost or market adjustments		(607	)		(26,640	)

Balance at end of period	$	101,499		$	103,177


	For the six month period ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	100,273		$	94,219
Additions		51,740			56,090
Sales		(44,873	)		(13,139	)
Retirements		(4,266	)		(4,124	)
Lower of cost or market adjustments		(1,375	)		(29,869	)

Balance at end of period	$	101,499		$	103,177

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”)

The Company estimates and records its ALLL on a monthly basis. For all performing loans and non-performing small balance homogeneous loans (including residential mortgages, consumer, construction, commercial real estate and commercial under $1.0 million; and performing construction, commercial real estate and commercial greater than $1.0 million) the ALLL is estimated based upon estimated probability of default and loss given default by shared product characteristics using the Company’s historical experience. For larger construction, commercial real estate and commercial loans (loan balance greater than $1.0 million) that are 90 or more days past due or are, otherwise considered to be impaired, management estimates the related ALLL based upon an analysis of each individual loans’ characteristics. The ALLL estimate methodologies are described more fully in the following paragraphs.

Residential mortgage. The general allowance for residential mortgage loans is calculated based on the probability that loans within different delinquency buckets will default and, in the case of default, the extent of losses that the Company expects to realize. In determining the probabilities of default, the Company considers recent experience of rolls of loans from one delinquency bucket into the next. In determining the allowance for loan and lease losses for residential mortgage loans, for purposes of forecasting the future behavior of the portfolio, the Company determined that it should only use the roll-rates of relatively recent months, which reflect both, the deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico, and the effect of the Company’s increased collections efforts. Using the older historical performance would yield lower probabilities of default that may not reflect recent macroeconomic trends and management changes. Severity of loss is calculated based on historical results from foreclosure and ultimate disposition of collateral. Historical results are adjusted for the Company’s expectation of housing prices. Severity assumptions for the residential portfolio range between 6% and 33% depending on the different loan types and loan-to-value ratios, and up to 100% for second mortgages.

Construction, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and land. The ALLL for performing construction, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and land is estimated considering either the probability of the loan defaulting in the next twelve months and the estimated loss incurred in the event of default or the loan quality assigned to each loan and the estimated expected loss associated with that loan grade. The probability of a loan defaulting is based upon the Company’s experience in its current portfolio. The loss incurred upon default is based upon the Company’s actual experience in resolving defaulted loans.

Construction, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and land loans with principal balances greater than $1.0 million that are not performing, or when management estimates it may not collect all contractual principal and interest, are considered impaired and are measured for impairment individually.

The Company evaluates impaired loans and estimates the valuation allowance based on ASC 310-10-35 (formerly SAS 114). Commercial and construction loans over $1.0 million that are classified more than 90 days past due, or when management is concerned about the collection of all contractual amounts due, are evaluated individually for impairment. Loans are considered

111

impaired when, based on current information and events it is probable that the borrower will not be able to fulfill its obligation according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. During the third quarter of 2010, given certain risk indicators, management individually reviewed for impairment all commercial loans over $50,000 that were over 90 days past due and recorded an incremental provision of $3.0 million.

The impairment loss, if any, on each individual loan identified as impaired is generally measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, impairment may be measured based on the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. If foreclosure is probable, accounting guidance requires the measurement of impairment to be based on the fair value of the collateral. Since current appraisals were not available on all properties at quarter end, management determined its loss reserve estimates for these loans by estimating the fair value of the collateral. In doing so, management considered a number of factors including the price at which individual units could be sold in the current market, the period of time over which the units would be sold, the estimated cost to complete the units, the risks associated with completing and selling the units, the required rate of return on investment a potential acquirer may have and current market interest rates in the Puerto Rico market.

Consumer. The ALLL for consumer loans is estimated based upon the historical charge-off rate using the Company’s historical experience. The ALLL is supplemented by the Company’s policy to charge-off all amounts in excess of the collateral value when the loan principal or interest is 120 days or more days past due.

Generally, the percentage of the allowance for loan and lease losses to non-performing loans will not remain constant due to the nature of the Company’s loan portfolios, which are primarily collateralized by real estate. The collateral for each non-performing mortgage loan is analyzed to determine potential loss exposure, and, in conjunction with other factors, this loss exposure contributes to the overall assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. On an ongoing basis, management monitors the loan portfolio and evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. In determining the adequacy of the allowance, management considers such factors as default probabilities, internal risk ratings (based on borrowers’ financial stability, external credit ratings, management strength, earnings and operating environment), probable loss and recovery rates, and the degree of risk inherent in the loan portfolios. Allocated general reserves are supplemented by a macroeconomic or emerging risk reserve. This portion of the total allowance for loan and lease losses reflects management’s evaluation of conditions that are not directly reflected in the loss factors used in the determination of the allowance. The conditions evaluated in connection with the macroeconomic and emerging risk allowance include national and local economic trends, industry conditions within the portfolios, recent loan portfolio performance, loan growth, changes in underwriting criteria and the regulatory and public policy environment.

Loans, or portions of loans, estimated by management to be uncollectible are charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Recoveries on loans previously charged-off are credited to the allowance. Provisions for loan and lease losses are charged to expenses and credited to the allowance in amounts estimated by management based upon its evaluation of the known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While management believes that the current allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, future additions to the allowance may be necessary. If economic conditions change substantially from the assumptions used by the Company in determining the allowance for loan and lease losses further increases in the allowance may be required.

112

The following table summarizes the Company’s provisions, charge-offs and recoveries for the ALLL for the indicated periods and provides allocation of the ALLL to the various loan products.

Table FF — Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses


	Quarters Ended June 30,
	2011									2010
(Dollars in thousands)	PR			US			Total			PR			US			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	114,768		$	5,436		$	120,204		$	143,603		$	3,878		$	147,481
Provision for loans and lease losses:
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage		5,405			5			5,410			18,719			50			18,769
Lease financing receivables		(148	)		—			(148	)		64						64
Other consumer		1,002			—			1,002			1,580						1,580

Total consumer		6,259			5			6,264			20,363			50			20,413
Commercial real estate		4,336			36			4,372			4,754			17			4,771
Commercial and industrial		(647	)		1,056			409			1,669			59			1,728
Construction and land		2,931			(653	)		2,278			17,301			404			17,705

Total commercial		6,620			439			7,059			23,724			480			24,204

Total provision for loan and lease losses		12,879			444			13,323			44,087			530			44,617
Charge-offs:
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage		(4,271	)		—			(4,271	)		(14,497	)		—			(14,497	)
Lease financing receivables		(121	)		—			(121	)		(202	)		—			(202	)
Other Consumer		(1,118	)		—			(1,118	)		(1,903	)		—			(1,903	)

Total consumer		(5,510	)		—			(5,510	)		(16,602	)		—			(16,602	)
Commercial real estate		(12,755	)		—			(12,755	)		(430	)		—			(430	)
Commercial and industrial		(407	)		—			(407	)		(978	)		—			(978	)
Construction and land		(21,769	)		—			(21,769	)		(38,498	)		(991	)		(39,489	)

Total commercial		(34,931	)		—			(34,931	)		(39,906	)		(991	)		(40,897	)

Total charge-offs		(40,441	)		—			(40,441	)		(56,508	)		(991	)		(57,499	)

Recoveries:
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage		—			—			—			—			—			—
Lease financing receivables		176			—			176			83			—			83
Other consumer		191			—			191			189			—			189

Total consumer		367			—			367			272			—			272
Commercial real estate		—			—			—			—			—			—
Commercial and industrial		19			—			19			43			—			43
Construction and land		—			—			—			—			—			—

Total commercial		19			—			19			43			—			43

Total recoveries		386			—			386			315			—			315


Net charge-offs		(40,055	)		—			(40,055	)		(56,193	)		(991	)		(57,184	)


Balance at end of period	$	87,592		$	5,880		$	93,472		$	131,497		$	3,417		$	134,914


ALLL plus partial charge-offs and discounts to loans receivable (excluding FHA/VA guaranteed loans and loans on savings deposits)								3.70	%								2.47	%
ALLL as a percentage of loans receivable outstanding, at the end of period								1.64	%								2.44	%
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs								33.26	%								78.02	%

113


	Quarters Ended June 30,
	2011					2010
(Dollars in thousands)	PR	US	Total			PR	US	2010
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable outstanding				0.71	%				1.03	%
ALLL to net charge-offs on an annualized basis				58.18	%				58.82	%

114

The following table summarizes Doral Financial’s provisions, charge-offs and recoveries for the ALLL for the periods indicated and provides allocation by loan categories.

Table GG — Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses


	Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
	2011									2010
(Dollars in thousands)	PR			US			Total			PR			US			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	117,821		$	5,831		$	123,652		$	136,878		$	3,896		$	140,774
Provision (recovery) for loans and lease losses:
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage		6,150			15			6,165			25,312			66			25,378
Lease financing receivables		(430	)		—			(430	)		(190	)		—			(190	)
Other consumer		1,779			—			1,779			3,467			—			3,467

Total consumer		7,499			15			7,514			28,589			66			28,655
Commercial real estate		(1,419	)		35			(1,384	)		7,822			17			7,839
Commercial and industrial		(448	)		748			300			1,618			36			1,654
Construction and land		10,233			(749	)		9,484			19,997			393			20,390

Total commercial		8,366			34			8,400			29,437			446			29,883

Total provision (recovery) for loan and lease losses		15,865			49			15,914			58,026			512			58,538

Charge-offs:
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage		(7,497	)		—			(7,497	)		(19,212	)		—			(19,212	)
Lease financing receivables		(231	)		—			(231	)		(512	)		—			(512	)
Other Consumer		(2,606	)		—			(2,606	)		(4,042	)		—			(4,042	)

Total consumer		(10,334	)		—			(10,334	)		(23,766	)		—			(23,766	)
Commercial real estate		(12,755	)		—			(12,755	)		(686	)		—			(686	)
Commercial and industrial		(426	)		—			(426	)		(1,176	)		—			(1,176	)
Construction and land		(23,359	)		—			(23,359	)		(38,530	)		(991	)		(39,521	)

Total commercial		(36,540	)		—			(36,540	)		(40,392	)		(991	)		(41,383	)

Total charge-offs		(46,874	)		—			(46,874	)		(64,158	)		(991	)		(65,149	)

Recoveries:
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage		—			—			—			—			—			—
Lease financing receivables		478			—			478			109			—			109
Other consumer		283			—			283			404			—			404

Total consumer		761			—			761			513			—			513
Commercial real estate		—			—			—			50			—			50
Commercial and industrial		19			—			19			66			—			66
Construction and land		—			—			—			122			—			122

Total commercial		19			—			19			238			—			238

Total recoveries		780			—			780			751			—			751


Net charge-offs		(46,094	)		—			(46,094	)		(63,407	)		(991	)		(64,398	)


Balance at end of period	$	87,592		$	5,880		$	93,472		$	131,497		$	3,417		$	134,914


ALLL plus partial charge-offs and discounts to loans receivable (excluding FHA/VA guaranteed loans and loans on savings deposits)								3.70	%								2.74	%
ALLL as a percentage of loans receivable outstanding, at the end of period								1.64	%								2.44	%
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs								34.53	%								90.90	%
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable outstanding								0.83	%								1.16	%
ALLL to net charge-offs on an annualized basis								100.56	%								103.89	%

115

While the ALLL is a general reserve established to reflect losses estimated to have been incurred across the entire held for investment loan portfolio, the following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of Doral Financial’s allowance for loans and lease losses by category and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans as of the dates indicated:

Table HH — Allocation of Allowance for Loans and Lease Losses


	June 30, 2011									December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	PR		US		Total		Percentage			PR		US		Total		Percentage
Consumer:
Residential mortgage	$	54,903	$	252	$	55,155		59	%	$	56,250	$	237	$	56,487		46	%
Lease financing receivable		335		—		335		—	%		518		—		518		—	%
Other consumer		5,212		—		5,212		6	%		5,756		—		5,756		5	%

Total consumer		60,450		252		60,702		65	%		62,524		237		62,761		51	%

Commercial:
Commercial real estate		15,388		185		15,573		17	%		29,562		150		29,712		24	%
Commercial and industrial		2,119		3,927		6,046		6	%		2,974		3,179		6,153		5	%
Construction and land		9,635		1,516		11,151		12	%		22,761		2,265		25,026		20	%

Total commercial		27,142		5,628		32,770		35	%		55,297		5,594		60,891		49	%

Total	$	87,592	$	5,880	$	93,472		100	%	$	117,821	$	5,831	$	123,652		100	%

As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses was $93.5 million, a decrease of $30.2 million from $123.7 million as of December 31, 2010. This reduction was driven by a decrease of $14.1 million and $13.9 million in the ALLL related to commercial real estate loans and the construction and land portfolio, respectively, primarily as a result of charge-offs. The second quarter provision for loan losses of $13.3 million declined $31.3 million compared to the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter 2011 provision resulted from (i) new market information received increasing estimated losses on loans evaluated individually for impairment in the second quarter, and (ii) an increase in past due residential mortgage loans. The June 2010 provision included a $12.6 million charge to reduce certain construction loans to lower of cost or market when transferred to loans held for sale and an $8.0 million charge due to increased severities on other real estate owned properties resulting from management’s strategic decision to accelerate OREO dispositions, in addition to higher provisions driven by higher delinquencies in 2010 compared to 2011. The provision for loan and lease losses for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 totaled $15.9 million compared to $58.5 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease of $42.6 million in the provision was mainly related to the previously mentioned charges of $12.6 million for loans reclassified to held for sale and $8.0 million for increased severities on OREO as well as higher delinquencies which drove higher provisions in 2010 compared to 2011.

Net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2011 decreased by $17.1 million when compared to June 30, 2011. Construction and land loans and residential mortgage loans reflected a decrease in charge-offs during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 2010 of approximately $17.2 million and $10.2 million, respectively. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of $12.3 million in charge-offs related to the commercial real estate portfolio. The increase in charge-off is the result of the Company’s adoption of a new practice of assessing the collectability of long term delinquent collateral dependent loans described earlier in the document.

Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $18.3 million when compared to the same period during 2010. The construction and land portfolios reflect a decrease of $16.2 million, while the residential mortgage and consumer portfolios reflect a decrease of $11.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The commercial real estate portfolio reflects an increase of approximately $12.0 million during the period ended June 30, 2011. As mentioned previously, this increase is mostly related to the adoption of a new practice of access the collectability of long term delinquent collateral dependent loans. The allowance for loan and lease losses coverage ratios as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (including and excluding the effect of partial charge-offs and credit related discounts) was as follows:

116

Table II — Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Coverage Ratios


	June 30, 2011												December 31, 2010
	ALLL plus partial charge-												ALLL plus partial charge-
	offs and discount as a % of:⁽¹⁾						ALLL as a % of:⁽²⁾						offs and discount as a % of:⁽¹⁾						ALLL as a % of:⁽²⁾
	Loans⁽³⁾			NPLs			Loans⁽³⁾			NPLs			Loans⁽³⁾			NPLs			Loans⁽³⁾			NPLs
Consumer
Residential mortgage		2.43	%		29.70	%		1.56	%		19.82	%		2.46	%		31.77	%		1.59	%		20.29	%
Lease financing receivable		12.09			167.84			12.09			167.84			10.78			124.82			10.78			124.82
Consumer		11.91	%		1,053.51	%		11.80	%		1,042.60	%		11.22	%		1,431.68	%		11.17	%		1,424.75	%

Total consumer		2.55	%		31.64	%		1.70	%		21.76	%		2.60	%		33.94	%		1.74	%		22.48	%

Commercial
Commercial real estate		5.91	%		24.45	%		2.34	%		9.32	%		7.17	%		26.33	%		4.31	%		15.37	%
Commercial and industrial		0.70	%		230.54	%		0.66	%		218.86	%		0.97	%		243.97	%		0.97	%		243.97	%
Construction and land		15.66	%		64.46	%		2.86	%		10.22	%		12.79	%		42.00	%		5.46	%		16.83	%

Total commercial		5.73	%		42.14	%		1.66	%		11.75	%		6.55	%		34.68	%		3.42	%		17.67	%

Total		3.70	%		36.89	%		1.64	%		16.75	%		3.92	%		33.83	%		2.29	%		19.82	%


⁽¹⁾		Loans and NPL amounts are increased by the amount of partial charge-offs and discounts.

⁽²⁾		Loans and NPL amounts are not increased by the amount of partial charge-offs and discounts.

⁽³⁾		Excludes FHA/VA guaranteed loans and loans on saving deposits.

Doral discontinued new construction lending in Puerto Rico in 2007, new commercial real estate and commercial and industrial lending in Puerto Rico in 2008, and significantly tightened its residential underwriting standards in 2009. Doral’s seasoned vintages, where problems have been identified and addressed in previous periods, currently require smaller additional provisions. Considering the effect of the partial charge-offs, the Company’s coverage ratio was 3.70% as of June 30, 2011 and 3.92% as of December 31, 2010. The 22 basis point decline in the allowance to loans coverage ratio, considering partial charge-offs, was largely due to the increase in the loan portfolio and the charge-offs. The allowance to non-performing loan coverage ratio increased 306 basis points due to lower non-performing loans and the second quarter provision.

The allowance for loan and lease losses represented 1.64% of period-end loans receivable at June 30, 2011, a decrease of 80 basis points compared with 2.44% at December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan and lease losses to non-performing loans (excluding non-performing loans held for sale) was 16.75%, a decrease of 307 basis points compared to 19.82% for December 31, 2010. These ratios do not consider partial charge-offs, and their decrease results from the high level of partial charge-offs recorded in the second quarter.

The following table summarizes the Company’s recorded investment in impaired loans and its related allowance:

Table JJ — Impaired loans and related allowance


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010 ⁽¹⁾
Impaired loans with allowance	$	665,319	$	773,106
Impaired loans without allowance		545,065		486,550

Total impaired loans	$	1,210,384	$	1,259,656

Related allowance	$	39,651	$	68,693

(1) Includes $65.7 million of impaired loans not previously reported as TDRs.

Historically, Doral reduced the reported balance of collateral dependent commercial, construction and land loans (a loan is collateral dependent when the loan collateral is considered the likely source of repayment of a delinquent loan) by a charge to the allowance for loan and lease losses upon receipt of a current market appraised value. As a result of significant delays in receiving new market value appraisals on Puerto Rico property, Doral has developed a methodology to estimate market values for all commercial real estate, construction and land properties, based upon the changes in market values in new appraisals received. Based on this new practice, during the second quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a charge-off on the difference between the loan balance before the charge-off and the estimated fair value of the property collateralizing the loan. Pursuant to this provision, total charge-offs for the second quarter of 2011 totaled $30.1 million.

117

Counterparty Risk

The Company has exposure to many different counterparties, and it routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, and other institutional clients. Loans, derivatives investments, repurchase agreements, other borrowings, and receivables, among others, expose the Company to counterparty risk. Many of these transactions expose the Company to credit risk in the event of default of its counterparty or client. In addition, the Company’s credit risk may be impacted when the collateral held by it cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to the Company. There can be no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

The Company has procedures in place to mitigate the impact of default among its counterparties. The Company requests collateral for most credit exposures with other financial institutions and monitors these on a regular basis. Nevertheless, market volatility could impact the valuation of collateral held by the Company and result in losses.

Operational Risk

Operational risk includes the potential for financial losses resulting from failed or inadequate controls. Operational risk is inherent in every aspect of business operations, and can result from a range of factors including human judgment, process or system failures, or business interruptions. Operational risk is present in all of Doral Financial’s business processes, including financial reporting. The Company has adopted a policy governing the requirements for operational risk management activities. This policy defines the roles and responsibilities for identifying key risks, key risks indicators, estimation of probabilities and magnitudes of potential losses and monitoring trends.

Overview of Operational Risk Management

Doral Financial has a corporate-wide Chief Risk Officer, who is responsible for implementing the process of managing the risks faced by the Company. The Chief Risk Officer is responsible for coordinating risk identification and monitoring throughout Doral Financial with the Company’s Internal Audit group. In addition, the Internal Audit function provides support to facilitate compliance with Doral Financial’s system of policies and controls and to ensure that adequate attention is given to correct issues identified.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

For a detailed discussion of the Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2010, please refer to Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures, of the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Liquidity Risk

For a discussion of the risks associated with Doral Financial’s ongoing need for capital to finance its lending, servicing and investing activities, please refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.

General Business, Economic and Political Conditions; Puerto Rico Economy and Fiscal Condition

The Company’s business and earnings are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States. Significant business and economic conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation and the strength of the Puerto Rico and U.S. economies and housing markets. If any of these conditions deteriorate, the Company’s business and earnings could be adversely affected. For example, business and economic conditions that negatively impact household income could decrease the demand for residential mortgage loans and increase the number of customers who become delinquent or default on their loans; or, a dramatically rising interest rate environment could decrease the demand for loans and negatively affect the value of the Company’s investments and loans.

118

Inflation also generally results in increases in general and administrative expenses. Interest rates normally increase during periods of high inflation and decrease during periods of low inflation. Please refer to “Risk Management” above for a discussion of the effects of changes of interest rates on Doral Financial’s operations.

Given that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the United States and given the degree of interrelation between Puerto Rico’s economy and that of the United States, we are particularly exposed to downturns in the United States economy. Dramatic declines in the United States housing market over the past few years, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions.

Doral Financial’s business activities and credit exposure are concentrated in Puerto Rico. Consequently, its financial condition and results of operations are highly dependent on economic conditions in Puerto Rico.

The economy of Puerto Rico is closely linked to the United States economy, as most of the external factors that affect the Puerto Rico economy (other than the price of oil) are determined by the policies of, and economic conditions prevailing in, the United States. These external factors include exports, direct investment, the amount of federal transfer payments, the level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, and tourist expenditures. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, approximately 68.1% of Puerto Rico’s exports went to the U.S. mainland, which was also the source of approximately 53.3% of Puerto Rico’s imports. In the past, the economy of Puerto Rico has generally followed economic trends in the overall United States economy. However, in recent years, economic growth in Puerto Rico has lagged behind growth in the United States.

The dominant sectors of the Puerto Rico economy in terms of production and income are manufacturing and services. The manufacturing sector has undergone fundamental changes over the years as a result of an increased emphasis on higher-wage, high-technology industries, such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, computers, microprocessors, professional and scientific instruments, and certain high-technology machinery and equipment. The services sector, including finance, insurance, real estate, wholesale and retail trade, and tourism, also plays a major role in the economy. It ranks second to manufacturing in contribution to Puerto Rico’s gross domestic product and leads all sectors in providing employment.

Puerto Rico’s economy is currently in a recession that began in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2006, a fiscal year in which Puerto Rico gross national grew by only 0.5%. Puerto Rico’s real gross national product decreased by 1.2%, 2.9% and 4.0%, respectively, for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009. According to the Puerto Rico Planning Board’s latest projections, Puerto Rico real gross national product was projected to have contracted 3.8% and 1.0% during fiscal years 2010 and 2011, respectively. Puerto Rico’s real gross national product for fiscal year 2012, however, is projected to grow by 0.7%.

The number of persons employed in Puerto Rico during fiscal year 2010 averaged 1,102,700, a decrease of 5.6% compared to the previous fiscal year. During the first nine months of fiscal year 2011, total employment averaged 1,079,700, a decline of 2.6% with the same period of the previous fiscal year, and the unemployment rate averaged 16.0%.

Future growth of the Puerto Rico economy will depend on several factors including the condition of the United States economy, the relative stability of the price of oil imports, the exchange value of the United States dollar, the level of interest rates, the effectiveness of the recently approved changes to local tax incentive legislation, and the continuing economic uncertainty generated by the Puerto Rico government’s fiscal condition described below.

Since 2000, the Government of Puerto Rico has experienced a structural imbalance between recurring government revenues and total expenditures. The structural imbalance was exacerbated during fiscal years 2008 and 2009, with recurring government expenditures significantly exceeding recurring government revenues. Prior to fiscal year 2009, the Puerto Rico government bridged the deficit resulting from the structural imbalance through the use of non-recurring measures, such as borrowing from the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico or in the bond market, postponing the payment of various government expenses, such as payments to suppliers and utilities providers, and other one time measures such as the use of derivatives and borrowings collateralized with government assets such as real estate. Since March 2009, the government has taken multiple steps to address and resolve the structural imbalance.

On August 8, 2011 Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the long-term debt rating of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico from A3 to Baal. The action by Moody’s was primarily due to the financial situation of the three Puerto Rico government’s pension systems. As of June 30, 2010, the date of the latest actuarial valuations of the retirement systems, the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (including basic and system administered benefits) for the Employees Retirement System, the Teachers Retirement System and the Judiciary Retirement System was $17.8 billion, $7.1 billion and $283 million, respectively, and the funded ratios were 8.5%, 23.9% and 16.4%, respectively.

For additional information relating to the fiscal situation and challenges of the Government of Puerto Rico and various initiatives it has undertaken during the last two fiscal years, refer to the sections titled “Fiscal Condition,” “Fiscal Stabilization Plan,” “Government Reorganization Plan,” “Unfunded Pension Benefit Obligations and Funding Shortfalls of the Retirement System,” “Economic Reconstruction Plan,” and “Economic Development Plan” under “Business-The Commonwealth” in item 1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

119

The Company cannot predict at this time the impact that the current fiscal situation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the various legislative and other measures adopted by the Puerto Rico government in response to such fiscal situation will have on the Puerto Rico economy and on Doral Financial’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company operates in a highly competitive industry that could become even more competitive as a result of economic, legislative, regulatory and technological changes. The Company faces competition in such areas as mortgage and banking product offerings, rates and fees, and customer service. In addition, technological advances and increased e-commerce activities have, generally, increased accessibility to products and services for customers which has intensified competition among banking and non-banking companies in the offering of financial products and services, with or without the need for a physical presence.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For information regarding market risk to which the Company is exposed, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Management.”

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Control and Procedures

Doral Financial’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”) as of June 30, 2011. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined under SEC rules as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on this evaluation, Doral Financial’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

120

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For information on these proceedings, refer to Note 26 to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in Item 1. Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Legal Matters

On August 24, 2005, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York served Doral Financial with a grand jury subpoena seeking the production of certain documents relating to issues arising from the restatement, including financial statements and corporate, auditing and accounting records prepared during the period from January 1, 2000 to the date of the subpoena. Doral Financial is cooperating with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in this matter. Doral Financial cannot predict the outcome of this matter and is unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact to Doral Financial of this matter.

On August 13, 2009, Mario S. Levis, former Treasurer of Doral, filed a complaint against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The complaint alleges that the Company breached a contract with the plaintiff and the Company’s by-laws by failing to advance payment of certain legal fees and expenses that Mr. Levis has incurred in connection with a criminal indictment filed against him in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Further, the complaint claims that Doral fraudulently induced the plaintiff to enter into agreements concerning the settlement of a civil litigation arising from the restatement of the Company’s financial statements for fiscal years 2000 through 2004. The complaint seeks declaratory relief, damages, costs and expenses. On December 16, 2009, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. On December 17, 2009, Mr. Levis’ motion for a preliminary injunction was denied as moot, and all further proceedings were stayed.

Banking Regulatory Matters

On March 16, 2006, Doral Financial entered into a consent cease and desist order with the Federal Reserve. The mutually agreed upon order required Doral Financial to conduct reviews of its mortgage portfolio, and to submit plans regarding the maintenance of capital adequacy and liquidity. The consent order contains restrictions on Doral Financial from obtaining extensions of credit from, or entering into certain asset purchase and sale transactions with its banking subsidiaries, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve. The consent order restricts Doral Financial from receiving dividends from the banking subsidiaries without the approval of the respective primary banking regulatory agency. Doral Financial is also required to request permission from the Federal Reserve for the payment of dividends on its common stock and preferred stock not less than 30 days prior to a proposed dividend declaration date and requires Doral Financial and Doral Bank PR to submit plans regarding the maintenance of minimum levels of capital and liquidity. Doral Financial has complied with these requirements and no fines or civil money penalties were assessed against the Company under the order.

As a result of an examination conducted during the third quarter of 2008, on July 8, 2009, Doral Bank PR consented with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and paid civil monetary penalties of $38,030 related to deficiencies in compliance with the National Flood Insurance Act as a result of flood insurance coverage, failure to maintain continuous flood insurance protection and failure to ensure that borrowers obtain flood insurance in a timely manner.

On February 19, 2008, Doral Bank PR entered into a consent order with the FDIC relating to failure to comply with certain requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). The regulatory findings that resulted in the order were based on an examination conducted for the period ended December 31, 2006, and were related to findings that had initially occurred in 2005 prior to the Company’s change in management and the Recapitalization. The order replaced the Memorandum of Understanding with the FDIC and the Office of the Commissioner dated August 23, 2006. Doral Bank PR was not required to pay any civil monetary penalties in connection with this order. The order required Doral Bank PR to correct certain violations of law, within the timeframes set forth in the order (generally 120 days) including certain violations regarding the BSA, failure to maintain an adequate BSA/Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program (“BSA/AML Compliance Program”) and failure to operate with an effective compliance program to ensure compliance with the regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”). The order further required Doral Bank PR to, among other things, amend its policies, procedures and processes and training programs to ensure full compliance with the BSA and OFAC; conduct an expanded BSA/AML risk assessment of its operations, enhance its due diligence and account monitoring procedures, review its BSA/AML staffing and resource needs, amend its policies and procedures for internal and external audits to include periodic reviews for BSA/AML compliance, OFAC compliance and perform annual independent testing programs for BSA/AML and OFAC requirements. The order also required Doral Bank PR to engage an independent consultant to review account and transaction activity from April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007 to determine compliance with suspicious activity reporting requirements (the “Look Back Review”). On September 15, 2008, the FDIC terminated this consent order. As the Look Back

121

Review was in process, Doral Bank PR and the FDIC agreed to a Memorandum of Understanding that covered the remaining portion of the Look Back Review. On June 30, 2009, the FDIC terminated this Memorandum of Understanding because the Look Back Review had been completed.

Doral Financial and Doral Bank PR have undertaken specific corrective actions to comply with the requirements of the terminated enforcement actions and the single remaining enforcement action, but cannot give assurances that such actions are sufficient to prevent further enforcement actions by the banking regulatory agencies.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Readers should carefully consider, in connection with other information disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the risk factors set forth in Item 1A-Risk Factors of the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K as updated by the information set forth below and other filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These risk factors and other presently unforeseen risk factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those stated in any forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or included in our previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, these risk factors and other presently unforeseen risk factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Please also refer to the section titled “Forward Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Recent and/or future U.S. credit downgrades or changes in outlook by major credit rating agencies may have an adverse effect on financial markets, including financial institutions and the financial industry.

On August 5, 2011, Standard and Poor’s downgraded the United States long-term debt rating from its AAA rating to AA+. On August 8, 2011, Standard and Poor’s downgraded from AAA to AA+ the credit ratings of certain long-term debt instruments issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and other U.S. government agencies linked to long-term United States debt. It is difficult to predict the effect of these actions, or any future downgrades or changes in outlook by Standard & Poor’s or either of the other two major credit rating agencies. However, these events could impact the trading market for U.S. government securities, including agency securities, and the securities markets more broadly, and consequently could impact the value and liquidity of financial assets, including assets in our investment portfolio. These actions could also create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may negatively affect the global banking system and limit the availability of funding, including borrowing under repurchase agreements, at reasonable terms. In turn, this could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company has been and could continue to be negatively affected by adverse economic conditions.

The United States and other countries recently faced a severe economic crisis, including a major recession. These adverse economic conditions have negatively affected, and are likely to continue to negatively affect for some time, the Company’s assets, including its loans and securities portfolios, capital levels, results of operations and financial condition. In response to the economic crisis, the United States and other governments established a variety of programs and policies designed to mitigate the effects of the crisis. These programs and policies appear to have stabilized the severe financial crisis that occurred in the second half of 2008, but the extent to which these programs and policies will assist in an economic recovery or may lead to adverse consequences, whether anticipated or unanticipated, is still unclear. If these programs and policies are ineffective in bringing about an economic recovery or result in substantial adverse developments, the economic conditions may again become more severe, or adverse economic conditions may continue for a substantial period of time. In addition, economic uncertainty that may result from the recent downgrading of United States long-term debt, and fiscal imbalances in federal, state and local municipal finances combined with the political difficulties in resolving these imbalances, may directly or indirectly adversely impact economic conditions faced by the Company and its customers. Any increase in the severity or duration of adverse economic conditions, including a double-dip recession in the United States or a delay in recovery in Puerto Rico, would adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

As previously disclosed, our board of directors announced on March 20, 2009 that it had suspended the declaration and payment of all dividends on our 7% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, 8.35% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B and 7.25% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C (collectively, the “Noncumulative

122

Preferred Stock”) and 4.75% Perpetual Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Convertible Preferred Stock”). The suspension of dividends for our Noncumulative Preferred Stock was effective and commenced with the dividends for the month of April 2009. The suspension of dividends for our Convertible Preferred Stock was effective and commenced with the dividends for the quarter commencing in April 2009. Accrued dividends in arrearage with respect to our Convertible Preferred Stock, through June 30, 2011, were approximately $22.1 million.

Because we have failed to pay dividends in full on all outstanding series of our Noncumulative Preferred Stock for eighteen consecutive monthly dividend periods and on our Convertible Preferred Stock for consecutive dividend periods containing in the aggregate a number of days equivalent to six fiscal quarters, the holders of our Noncumulative Preferred Stock and the holders of our Convertible Preferred Stock, all acting together as a single class, have the right to appoint or elect two additional members of our board of directors in accordance with the terms of the respective certificates of designation with respect to such preferred stock. A special meeting of holders of shares of Noncumulative Preferred Stock and Cumulative Preferred Stock of Doral Financial was scheduled to be held on August 3, 2011 for the purpose of electing two directors of the Company’s Board of Directors by such holders of shares of preferred stock of Doral Financial. Due to the lack of a quorum, the special meeting was not able to be held.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On August 10, 2011, Mr. Robert E. Wahlman (the “Executive”) and the Company amended certain terms of the Employment Agreement executed by and between the Company and the Executive on March 16, 2009, which included the Executive’s principal work location and cost of housing. See Exhibit 10.22 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

The exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the exhibit index below.

Doral Financial has not filed as exhibits certain instruments defining the rights of holders of debt of the Company not exceeding 10% of the total assets of Doral Financial and its consolidated subsidiaries. Doral Financial will furnish copies of any such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

123


Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Doral Financial, as currently in effect. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 3.1(j) to Doral Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on March 19, 2008).

3.2		Bylaws of Doral Financial, as amended on August 2, 2007. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 3.1 of Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 6, 2007).

3.3		Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of Doral Financial dated March 12, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 3.1 of Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 16, 2010).

3.4		Certificate of Designations of Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock dated April 20, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 3.1 of Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 26, 2010).

4.1		Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.1 to Doral Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on March 19, 2008).

4.2		Loan and Guaranty Agreement among Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority (“AFICA”), Doral Properties, Inc. and Doral Financial. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.1 of Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on November 15, 1999).

4.3		Trust Agreement between AFICA and Citibank, N.A. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.2 of Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on November 15, 1999).

4.4		Form of Serial and Term Bond (included in Exhibit 4.3 hereof).

4.5		Deed of Constitution of First Mortgage over Doral Financial Plaza. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.4 of Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on November 15, 1999).

4.6		Mortgage Note secured by First Mortgage referred to in Exhibit 4.5 hereto (included in Exhibit 4.5 hereof).

4.7		Pledge and Security Agreement. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.6 of Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on November 15, 1999).

4.8		Indenture, dated May 14, 1999, between Doral Financial and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, pertaining to senior debt securities. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.1 of Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 21, 1999).

4.9		Indenture, dated May 14, 1999, between Doral Financial and Bankers Trust Company, as trustee, pertaining to subordinated debt securities. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.3 of Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 21, 1999).

4.10		Form of Stock Certificate for 7% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4(A) of Doral Financial’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Commission on October 30, 1998).

124


Exhibit
Number		Description
4.11		Form of Stock Certificate for 8.35% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.1 of Doral Financial’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on August 30, 2000).

4.12		First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 30, 2001, between Doral Financial and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company), as trustee. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.9 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 2, 2001).

4.13		Form of Stock Certificate for 7.25% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.1 of Doral Financial’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on May 30, 2002).

4.14		Form of Stock Certificate for 4.75% Perpetual Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).

4.15		Form of Stock Certificate for Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 4.1 of Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 26, 2010)(included in Exhibit 3.4 hereto).

10.1		Order to Cease and Desist issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on March 16, 2006. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 99.2 of Doral Financial’s Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2006).

10.2		Stipulation and Agreement of Partial Settlement, dated as of April 27, 2007. (Incorporated herein by reference to same exhibit number of Doral Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Commission on April 30, 2007).

10.3		Order to Cease and Desist issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, dated February 19, 2008. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 99-2 of Doral Financial’s Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 21, 2008).

10.4		Purchase Agreement, dated September 23, 2003, between Doral Financial Corporation and Wachovia Securities LLC, as Representative of the Initial Purchasers of Doral Financial’s 4.75% Perpetual Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock named therein. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 1 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).

10.5		Employment Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2006, between Doral Financial Corporation and Glen Wakeman. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 30, 2006).

10.6		Employment Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2006, between Doral Financial Corporation and Lesbia Blanco. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Commission on December 29, 2006).

10.7		Employment Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2006, between Doral Financial Corporation and Enrique R. Ubarri, Esq. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.7 to Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Commission on December 29, 2006).

10.8		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2007, between Doral Financial Corporation and Paul Makowski (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.11 to Doral Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on March 19, 2008).

125


Exhibit
Number		Description
10.9		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2007, between Doral Financial Corporation and Christopher Poulton (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.10 to Doral Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on March 19, 2008).

10.10		Securityholders Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 19, 2007, between Doral Financial Corporation and Doral Holding Delaware, LLC (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 20, 2007).

10.11		Advisory Services Agreements, dated as of July 19, 2007, between Doral Financial Corporation and Bear Stearns Merchant Manager III, L.P. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 20, 2007).

10.12		Doral Financial 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to the Definitive Proxy Statement for the Doral Financial 2008 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting filed with the Commission on April 11, 2008).

10.13		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2009, between Doral Financial and Robert E. Wahlman. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 99.2 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 26, 2009).

10.14		Summary of Doral Financial’s 2007 Key Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 1 to Doral Financial’s Registration Statement of Form S-4 filed with the Commission on September 29, 2009).

10.15		Cooperation Agreement dated as of April 19, 2010 between Doral Financial Corporation, Doral Holdings Delaware, LLC, Doral Holdings, L.P. and Doral GP, Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.15 to Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the Commission on May 10, 2010).

10.16		Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 19, 2010 between Doral Financial Corporation with the purchasers named therein. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.16 to Doral Financial’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the Commission on May 10, 2010).

10.17		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert Wahlman dated June 25, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.3 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 25, 2010).

10.18		Form of Restricted Stock Award Granted to Certain Named Executive Officers of the Company on June 25, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 25, 2010).

10.19		Form of Retention Bonus Letter Regarding Retention Bonuses Granted to Certain Named Executive Officers of the Company on June 25, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.2 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 25, 2010).

10.20		Amendment No. 1 to Securityholders and Registration Rights Agreement between Doral Financial Corporation and Doral Holdings Delaware, LLC dated as of August 5, 2010. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 10, 2010).

10.21		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors of Doral Financial Corporation under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to Doral Financial’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 24, 2011).

10.22		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert E. Wahlman dated August 10, 2011.

12.1		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

126


Exhibit
Number		Description
12.2		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.

31.1		CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

127

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


		DORAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: August 16, 2011		/s/ Glen R. Wakeman Glen R. Wakeman
		Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: August 16, 2011		/s/ Robert E. Wahlman Robert E. Wahlman
		Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

128

Level 1

Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2

Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, or are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or by other means.

Level 3

Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.