PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.2 - PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.	q1100106_ex32-2.htm
EX-31.1 - PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.	q1100106_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.	q1100106_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.	q1100106_ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2011

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 333-155375

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		27-1347616
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

One Parker Plaza

400 Kelby Street, 9th Floor

Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(212) 867-0700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at August 15, 2011
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		5,907,255

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	1
Consolidated Statements of Earnings - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	3
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income - Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and the Year Ended December 31, 2010	4

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2. Management‘s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors	21
Item 6. Exhibits	33

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS	(unaudited)
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,097		$	516
Accounts receivable		5,604			5,358
Inventories		9,150			7,814
Income taxes receivable		1,130			1,191
Deferred income taxes		245			245
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,029			575
Total current assets		31,255			15,699
Property, plant and equipment		5,281			5,123
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		1,525			1,311
Intangible assets		4,328			4,436
Goodwill		5,534			5,534
Total assets	$	47,923		$	32,103

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Bank overdrafts	$	1,459		$	-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		8,344			7,442
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		8,150			6,063
Income taxes payable		166			161
Total current liabilities		18,119			13,666
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current maturities		9,912			17
Pension deficit		308			308
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		2,252			2,320
Deferred credit		700			700
Total liabilities		31,291			17,011

Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		-			-
Common stock, par value $0.001; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 5,907,255 shares issued and outstanding		6			6
Additional paid-in capital		7,666			7,541
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(78	)		(305	)
Retained earnings		9,038			7,850
Total shareholders' equity		16,632			15,092
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	47,923		$	32,103

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

- 1 -

Table of Contents

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Earnings (unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2011			2010

Revenues	$	16,412	$	12,350		$	32,138		$	20,601
Cost of goods sold		12,860		9,367			24,265			15,811
Gross profit		3,552		2,983			7,873			4,790
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative		2,711		1,987			5,501			3,137
Foreign exchange (gain) loss		5		(150	)		(12	)		(57	)
Total operating expenses		2,716		1,837			5,489			3,080
Operating income		837		1,146			2,384			1,710
Interest and bank charges		105		81			227			94
Other expense (income)		441		350			441			350
Gain on bargain purchase		-		(1,052	)		-			(1,052	)
Earnings before income taxes		291		1,767			1,716			2,318
Provision for income taxes		65		394			528			555
Net earnings	$	226	$	1,373		$	1,188		$	1,763

Earnings per common share
Basic	$	0.04	$	0.23		$	0.20		$	0.30
Diluted	$	0.04	$	0.23		$	0.20		$	0.30

Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		5,907		5,874			5,907			5,837
Diluted		5,983		5,947			5,968			5,883

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

- 2 -

Table of Contents

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
Operating activities
Net earnings	$	1,188		$	1,763
Depreciation		338			232
Amortization of intangibles		108			34
Deferred tax expense		(281	)		(124	)
Accrued pension		(36	)		(68	)
Stock-based compensation		126			47
Warrant issuance expense		-			92
Common stock issuance expense		-			140
Gain on bargain purchase		-			(1,052	)
Changes in current operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable, net		(152	)		461
Inventories		(1,179	)		494
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(452	)		(207	)
Income taxes		97			(1,475	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		801			1,282
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		558			1,619

Investing activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(422	)		(673	)
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired		-			(399	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(422	)		(1,072	)

Financing activities
Increase (decrease) in bank overdrafts		1,441			673
Increase (decrease) in long-term debt		10,269			-
Increase (decrease) in revolving credit facilities		2,009			(2,090	)
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(340	)		(304	)
Repayment of advances from limited partners of a shareholder		-			(150	)
Issuance of warrants		-			12
Transaction costs		-			(108	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		13,379			(1,967	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		13,515			(1,420	)
Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents		66			(6	)

Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of year		516			1,560
End of period	$	14,097		$	134

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

- 3 -

Table of Contents

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Other							Additional				Accumulated			Total
	Comprehensive			Common Stock				paid-in		Retained		other compre-			shareholders'
	Income			Shares		Amount		capital		earnings		hensive (loss)			equity
Balance - December 31, 2010					5,907,255	$	6	$	7,540	$	7,850	$	(305	)	$	15,091
Net earnings		1,188			-		-		-		1,188		-			1,188
Stock-based compensation		-			-		-		126		-		-			126
Foreign currency translation adjustment		253			-		-		-		-		253			253
Pension adjustment, net of taxes		(26	)		-		-		-		-		(26	)		(26	)
Total comprehensive income	$	1,415			-		-		-		1,188		227			1,415
Balance - June 30, 2011					5,907,255	$	6	$	7,666	$	9,038	$	(78	)	$	16,632

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

- 4 -

Table of Contents

1.	Basis of Presentation

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Form 10-Q to the “Company,” “Pioneer,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Pioneer Electrogroup Canada Inc., Pioneer Transformers Ltd., Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc., 7834080 Canada Inc., and Jefferson Electric, Inc.

These unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. We believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the financial position, results of operations and cash flows with respect to the interim consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the Company and its subsidiaries included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which was filed with the SEC on March 31, 2011.

Reverse Stock Split

The Company’s board of directors authorized a one-for-five reverse stock split on June 1, 2011, which took effect on June 20, 2011. All share and related stock option and warrant information presented in these financial statements and accompanying footnotes has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reduced number of shares resulting from this action.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

2.	Adoption of New Accounting Standards and recently issued accounting pronouncements

New accounting standards

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘FASB’) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)” (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 requires reporting entities to make more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, including information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. ASU 2010-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure regarding Level 3 activity, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 for Levels 1, 2 and 3 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -

Table of Contents

Intangibles – Goodwill & Other

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”). ASU 2010-28 affects all entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 so that for those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (“ASU 2010-29”). The objective of ASU 2010-29 is to address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. ASU 2010-29 specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, it should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the required supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 affects any public entity as defined by Topic 805 that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-29 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 creates fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend to change the application of the requirements in Topic 820. Some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent regarding the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For public entities, ASU 2011-04 is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-04 on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”). Under the amendments, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. ASU 2011-05 should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-05 on its consolidated financial statements.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

3.	Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure” applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. ASC 820 requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1:	Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:	Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3:	Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to ASC 820. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3.

The fair value represents management’s best estimates based on a range of methodologies and assumptions. The carrying value of receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business approximate fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected realization. These items have been classified as Level 1.

4.	Inventories

The components of inventories are summarized below (in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Raw materials	$	3,631	$	3,693
Work in process		2,136		2,029
Finished goods		3,383		2,092
Total inventories	$	9,150	$	7,814

Included in raw materials at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are goods in transit of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

The preceding amounts are net of inventory reserves of approximately $0.4 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

5.	Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Changes in goodwill and intangible asset balances for the six months ended June 30, 2011, consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Goodwill		Intangible Assets
Balance December 31, 2010	$	5,534	$	4,436
Additions due to acquisitions		-		-
Amortization		-		(108	)
Balance June 30, 2011	$	5,534	$	4,328

- 7 -

Table of Contents

	Intangible		Accumulated			Intangible Assets,
	Assets		Amortization			Net
Customer relationships	$	2,050	$	(225	)	$	1,825
Non-compete agreement		80		(27	)		53
Trademarks		1,790		-			1,790
Technology-related industry accreditations		660		-			660
Total intangible assets	$	4,580	$	(252	)	$	4,328

6.	Credit Facilities

Canadian Credit Facilities

In June 2011, Pioneer Electrogroup Canada Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. and the parent company of Pioneer Transformers Ltd., Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc., 7834080 Canada Inc. and Bemag Transformer Inc. (the “Borrowers”), entered into a letter loan agreement with the Company’s Canadian bank (the “Canadian Facilities”) that replaced and superseded all the Company’s prior financing arrangements with the bank. Bemag Transformer Inc. became a party to the Canadian Facilities on July 1, 2011, upon the acquisition of all of its capital shares by 7834080 Canada Inc. (see Note 14 “Subsequent Event”).

The Canadian Facilities provide for up to $23.0 million CAD (approximately $23.9 million expressed in U.S. dollars) consisting of a $10.0 million CAD demand revolving credit facility (“Facility A”) to finance ongoing operations, a $2.0 million CAD term credit facility (“Facility B”) with principal repayments becoming due on a five year amortization schedule to refinance the existing term loan granted to Pioneer Transformers Ltd. for its plant expansion, a $10.0 million CAD term credit facility (“Facility C”) with principal repayments becoming due on a five year amortization schedule to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures or to provide funding to Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc., a $50,000 CAD Corporate MasterCard credit facility (“Facility D”) and a $1.0 million CAD foreign exchange settlement risk facility (“Facility E”).

The Canadian Facilities are secured by a first-ranking lien in the amount of approximately $25 million CAD on all of the present and future movable and immovable property of the borrowers and their subsidiaries.

The Canadian Facilities require the Borrowers to comply on a consolidated basis with various financial covenants, including maintaining a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25, a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75 and a limitation on funded debt to less than 60% of capitalization. The Canadian Facilities also restrict the ability of the Borrowers to, among other things, (i) provide any funding to any person, including affiliates, in an aggregate amount exceeding $5.0 million CAD or (ii) to make distributions in an aggregate amount exceeding 50% of Pioneer Electrogroup Canada Inc.’s previous year’s net income.

Facility A is subject to margin criteria and borrowings bear interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 0.50% per annum on amounts borrowed in Canadian dollars, or the U.S. base rate plus 0.50% per annum or LIBOR plus 2.00% per annum on amounts borrowed in U.S. dollars. Borrowings under Facility B bear interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.00% per annum. Borrowings under Facility C bear interest at the following rates: if the funded debt to EBITDA ratio is equal to or greater than 2.00, the bank’s prime rate plus 1.25% per annum on amounts borrowed in Canadian dollars, or the U.S. base rate plus 1.25% per annum or LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum on amounts borrowed in U.S. dollars; or, if the funded debt to EBITDA ratio is less than 2.00, the bank’s prime rate plus 1.00% per annum on amounts borrowed in Canadian dollars, or the U.S. base rate plus 1.00% per annum or LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum on amounts borrowed in U.S. dollars. In addition, Facility C is subject to a standby fee which is calculated monthly using the unused portion of the facility at either 0.625% per annum if the funded debt to EBITDA ratio is equal to or greater than 2.00, or 0.5625% per annum if the funded debt to EBITDA ratio is less than 2.00.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $11.8 million CAD outstanding under the Canadian Facilities and the Borrowers were in compliance with their financial covenant requirements.

United States Credit Facilities

Jefferson Electric, Inc. has a bank loan agreement with a U.S. bank that includes a revolving credit facility with a borrowing base limit of $5.0 million and a term credit facility (“the U.S. Facilities”). Monthly payments of accrued interest must be made under the revolving credit facility and monthly payments of principal and accrued interest must be made under the term credit facility, with a final payment of all outstanding amounts due on October 31, 2011. Borrowings under the bank loan agreement are collateralized by substantially all the assets of Jefferson Electric, Inc. which had a net carrying value of approximately $8.8 million as of June 30, 2011 and are guaranteed by its Mexican subsidiary. In addition, an officer of Jefferson Electric, Inc. is a guarantor under the bank loan agreement and has provided additional collateral to the bank in the form of common stock and a warrant to purchase shares of common stock of the Company held by him.

The bank loan agreement requires Jefferson Electric, Inc. to comply with certain financial covenants, including a requirement to exceed minimum quarterly targets for tangible net worth and maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio. The bank loan agreement also restricts Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s ability to pay dividends or make distributions, advances or other transfers of assets. The interest rate under the revolving credit facility is equal to the greater of the bank’s reference rate (currently 3.25% per annum) or 6.5% per annum. The interest rate under the term credit facility is 7.27% annually.

As of June 30, 2011, Jefferson Electric, Inc. had approximately $3.8 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility, approximately $2.5 million outstanding under the term credit facility and was in compliance with its financial covenant requirements.

7.	Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Revolving credit facilities	$	5,245		$	3,217
Term credit facilities		12,793			2,832
Capital lease obligations		24			31
Total debt and capital lease obligations		18,062			6,080
Less current portion		(8,150	)		(6,063	)
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	9,912		$	17

8.	Common Stock

On April 30, 2010, the Company issued 97,255 common shares in conjunction with the acquisition of Jefferson Electric, Inc.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company also issued 10,000 common shares as payment for investor relations services. The issuance of the shares and related expense was accounted for at the fair value of the shares on the issue date which amounted to $140,000.

The board of directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, without further vote or action by the shareholders, to issue from time to time shares of preferred stock in one or more series. Each such series of preferred stock shall have such number of shares, designations, preferences, voting powers, qualifications, and special or relative rights or privileges as shall be determined by the board of directors, which may include, among others, dividend rights, voting rights, liquidation preferences, conversion rights and preemptive rights.

- 9 -

Table of Contents

9.	Additional Paid-in Capital

Stock Options

On December 2, 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan") for the purpose of issuing incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance unit awards and stock bonus awards to employees, directors, consultants and other service providers. A total of 320,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the 2009 Plan. Options may be granted under the 2009 Plan on terms and at prices as determined by the board of directors or by the plan administrators appointed by the board of directors. As of June 30, 2011, 118,400 stock options had been granted, consisting of 65,200 incentive stock options and 53,200 non-qualified stock options.

On March 24, 2011, the Company granted an aggregate of 5,200 incentive stock options to four employees to purchase common shares. Options to purchase 3,200 common shares are exercisable for common shares at an exercise price of $12.00 per share, expire on March 24, 2021 and vest over three years with one-third vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and one-third vesting on each of the second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Options to purchase 2,000 common shares are exercisable for common shares at an exercise price of $13.20 per share, expire on March 24, 2016 and vest over three years with one third vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and one third vesting on each of the second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

On March 24, 2011, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,200 non-qualified stock options to eight directors to purchase common shares. The stock options are exercisable for common shares at an exercise price of $12.00 per share, expire on March 24, 2021 and vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

On May 11, 2011, the board of directors of the Company adopted the Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) which was subsequently approved by stockholders of the Company on May 31, 2011.

The 2011 Plan replaces and supersedes the 2009 Plan. The Company’s outside directors and employees, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officers, and certain contractors are all eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan allows for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other awards, which may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem, and upon such terms as are determined by the Board or a committee of the Board that is designated to administer the Plan. Subject to certain adjustments, the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards under the 2011 Plan is 700,000 shares.

Expense for stock-based compensation recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $126,000 and $47,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had total stock-based compensation expense remaining to be recognized of approximately $0.5 million.

- 10 -

Table of Contents

A summary of stock option activity under all plans as of June 30, 2011, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2011, are presented below:

			Weighted-		Weighted-
	Stock		Average Exercise		Average Remaining		Aggregate
	Options		Price ( Per Share)		Contractual Term		Intrinsic Value
Balance December 31, 2010		110,000	$	15.28
Granted		8,400		12.29
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited		-		-
Outstanding on June 30, 2011		118,400	$	15.07		7.55	$	45
Exercisable on June 30, 2011		28,000		-		6.95	$	7

Warrants

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had warrants outstanding to purchase 640,000 shares of common stock with an average exercise price of approximately $14.00 per share. The warrants expire on dates beginning on December 2, 2014 and ending on April 30, 2015. No warrants were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company's warrants:

	Number of		Weighted average
	Shares		exercise price
Balance December 31, 2010		640,000	$	14.00
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-
Balance June 30, 2011		640,000	$	14.00

9.	Comprehensive Income

The components of the Company’s comprehensive income was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net Earnings	$	226		$	1,373		$	1,188		$	1,763
Foreign currency translation adjustments		43			(391	)		253			(59	)
Pension adjustment net of taxes		(44	)		(64	)		(26	)		(61	)
Total	$	225		$	918		$	1,415		$	1,643

10.	Pension Plan

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan in which a majority of its Canadian employees are members. The employer contributes 100% to the plan. The benefits, or the rate per year of credit service, are established by the Company and updated at its discretion.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

Cost of Benefits

The components of the expense the Company incurred under the pension plan are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Current service cost, net of employee contributions	$	9		$	10		$	17		$	20
Interest cost on accrued benefit obligation		37			36			73			71
Expected return on plan assets		(39	)		(35	)		(78	)		(69	)
Amortization of transitional obligation		3			3			7			6
Amortization of past service costs		2			1			4			2
Amortization of net actuarial gain		8			8			16			14
Total cost of benefit	$	20		$	23		$	39		$	44

The Company’s policy is to fund the pension plan at or above the minimum level required by law. The Company made $96,000 and $115,000 of contributions to its defined benefit pension plan during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Changes in the discount rate and actual investment returns that are lower than the long-term expected return on plan assets could result in the Company making additional contributions.

11.	Related Party Transactions

The following table summarizes the Company's related party transactions for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 measured at the exchange amount which is the amount of the consideration established and agreed to by the related parties (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Companies under common significant influence
Consulting and administration fee expenses	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	66

During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company paid $0 and $66,000, respectively, to a company controlled by a limited partner of a shareholder of the Company, as reimbursement for rent, office services, and travel and entertainment expenses.

12.	Geographical Information

The Company has one material operating segment, the sale of electrical equipment. Revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of the Company's customers (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Canada	$	10,499	$	7,927	$	20,381	$	15,719
United States		5,829		4,237		11,059		4,474
Others		84		186		698		408
Total	$	16,412	$	12,350	$	32,138	$	20,601

13.	Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental shares issuable upon exercise of certain stock options or warrants as applicable. Certain of the Company’s employee and director stock options and warrants have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share since they are anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):

- 12 -

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010

Numerator:
Net earnings for basic and diluted earnings per common share	$	226	$	1,373	$	1,188	$	1,763

Denominator:
Weighted average basic shares outstanding		5,907		5,874		5,907		5,837

Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director stock option awards		-		-		-		-
Warrants outstanding		76		73		61		46
		76		73		61		46
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share		5,983		5,947		5,968		5,883

Earnings per common share basic and diluted:
Basic	$	0.04	$	0.23	$	0.20	$	0.30
Diluted	$	0.04	$	0.23	$	0.20	$	0.30

14.	Subsequent Event

Acquisitions

On July 1, 2011, 7834080 Canada Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, completed the acquisition of all of the capital shares of Bemag Transformer Inc. Pursuant to the share purchase agreement, as amended, 7834080 Canada Inc. purchased all the capital shares of Bemag Transformer Inc. in a transaction valued at approximately $9.3 million CAD, this amount includes approximately $2.9 million CAD of Bemag Transformer Inc.’s revolving and long-term debt which was repaid at closing.

On July 1, 2011, 7834080 Canada Inc. also entered into an equipment purchase agreement with the former shareholders of Vermont Transformers, Inc., pursuant to which 7834080 Canada Inc. acquired, on such date, all of the equipment used by Vermont Transformers, Inc. in the operation of its business in exchange for $1.6 million US.

- 13 -

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2011 and is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements,” which include information relating to future events, future financial performance, financial projections, strategies, expectations, competitive environment and regulation. Words such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and may not be accurate indications of when such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information we have when those statements are made or management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

·	Our ability to expand our business through strategic acquisitions.

·	Our ability to integrate acquisitions and related businesses.

·	Many of our competitors are better established and have significantly greater resources, and may subsidize their competitive offerings with other products and services, which may make it difficult for us to attract and retain customers.

·	We depend on Hydro-Quebec Utility Company and Siemens Industry, Inc. for a large portion of our business, and any change in the level of orders from Hydro-Quebec Utility Company or Siemens Industry, Inc. could have a significant impact on our results of operations.

·	The potential loss or departure of key personnel, including Nathan J. Mazurek, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.

·	Our ability to generate internal growth.

·	Market acceptance of existing and new products.

·	Operating margin risk due to competitive pricing and operating efficiencies, supply chain risk, material, labor or overhead cost increases, interest rate risk and commodity risk.

·	Restrictive loan covenants or our ability to repay or refinance debt under our credit facilities could limit our future financing options and liquidity position and may limit our ability to grow our business.

·	Our ability to develop and grow our wind energy business.

·	General economic and market conditions in the electrical equipment, power generation, commercial construction, industrial production, oil and gas, marine and infrastructure industries.

·	The impact of geopolitical activity on the economy, changes in government regulations such as income taxes, climate control initiatives, the timing or strength of an economic recovery in our markets and our ability to access capital markets.

·	Unanticipated increases in raw material prices or disruptions in supply could increase production costs and adversely affect our profitability.

·	Our chairman controls a majority of our combined voting power, and may have, or may develop in the future, interests that may diverge from yours.

·	Future sales of large blocks of our common stock may adversely impact our stock price.

- 14 -

Table of Contents

The foregoing does not represent an exhaustive list of matters that may be covered by the forward-looking statements contained herein or risk factors that we are faced with that may cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements. Moreover, new risks regularly emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict or articulate all risks we face, nor can we assess the impact of all risks on our business or the extent to which any risk, or combination of risks, may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. When considering our forward-looking statements, keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Form 10-Q.

One-for-Five Reverse Stock Split

Our board of directors authorized a one-for-five reverse stock split on June 1, 2011 which took effect on June 20, 2011. All share and related option and warrant information presented in the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reduced number of shares outstanding which resulted from this action.

Overview and Recent Events

We are a manufacturer of specialty electrical equipment headquartered in Fort Lee, New Jersey. Our subsidiaries provide a range of products and services to the electrical transmission and distribution industry. Our focus is on the electric utility, industrial, commercial and wind energy market segments and our customers are primarily located in North America.

On July 1, 2011 we acquired the capital shares of Bemag Transformer Inc., a Quebec-based manufacturer and supplier of dry-type transformers, and in a separate transaction purchased all the manufacturing equipment of its U.S. affiliate, Vermont Transformers, Inc. As these transactions occurred following the completion of our fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011, the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements do not reflect the impact of the acquisitions on our results of operations or financial condition for any periods presented.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, all comparative financial information contained in this discussion has been recast from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars. We also elected to report our financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. to improve the comparability of our financial information with our peer companies.

Although we have elected to report our results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. and in U.S. dollars, our largest operating subsidiary, Pioneer Transformers Ltd., is a Canadian entity and its functional currency is the Canadian dollar. As such, its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and equity are initially consolidated in Canadian dollars. The subsidiary's assets and liabilities are then translated from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars by applying the foreign currency exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date, while the results of our operations and cash flows are translated to U.S. dollars by applying the average foreign currency exchange rate in effect during the reporting period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in other comprehensive income or loss.

- 15 -

Table of Contents

The financial position and operating results of Pioneer Transformers Ltd. have been translated to U.S. dollars by applying the following exchange rates, expressed as the number of Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar for each period reported:

	2011						2010
	Consolidated Balance Sheet		Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income				Consolidated Balance Sheet		Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income
Quarter Ended	End of Period		Period Average		Cumulative Average		End of Period		Period Average		Cumulative Average
March 31	$	0.9696	$	0.9860	$	0.9860	$	1.0158	$	1.0409	$	1.0409
June 30	$	0.9645	$	0.9676	$	0.9768	$	1.0646	$	1.0276	$	1.0343

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The financial statements include estimates based on currently available information and our judgment as to the outcome of future conditions and circumstances. Significant estimates in these financial statements include pension expense, inventory provisions, useful lives and impairment of long-lived assets, determination of fair values of stock options and warrants and allowance for doubtful accounts. Changes in the status of certain facts or circumstances could result in material changes to the estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements and actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Changes in Accounting Principles

No significant changes in accounting principles were adopted during 2010 and 2011, except for the following:

Fair Value Measurements. In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)” (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 requires reporting entities to make more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, including information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, and (4) transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. ASU 2010-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure regarding Level 3 activity, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 for Levels 1 and 2 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, and we do not expect the adoption of the standard for Level 3 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Intangibles – Goodwill & Other

- 16 -

Table of Contents

Business Combinations

Results of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, consolidated revenues increased 32.9% to $16.4 million, up from $12.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Revenue from Pioneer Transformers Ltd. increased on higher unit volume by approximately $1.9 million, or 21.8%, during the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Revenue from Jefferson Electric, Inc. increased 56.7%, to approximately $6.0 million, during the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $3.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010 which period includes only two months of results following the acquisition on April 30, 2010. Had Jefferson Electric, Inc. been acquired at the beginning of the second quarter of 2010, its revenue growth rate would have been 23.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our wind energy business, which was established in June 2010, made no contribution to our total revenue during either reporting period.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, consolidated revenues increased $11.5 million, or 56.0%, to $32.1 million as compared to $20.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Revenue from Pioneer Transformers Ltd. increased by approximately $4.1 million, or 24.4%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period during 2010. Jefferson Electric, Inc. contributed approximately $11.3 million to our revenue during the first six months of 2011, versus $3.8 million during the comparable period of 2010. Had Jefferson Electric, Inc. been acquired at the beginning of 2010, its revenue growth rate would have been 20.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our wind energy business made no contribution to our total revenue during either six month period.

Gross Margin. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our gross margin percentage decreased to 21.6% of revenues, compared to 24.2% during the three months ended June 30, 2010. This 2.6% gross margin decrease was due to a less favorable product mix consisting of higher volume but lower average price units sold, by our Pioneer Transformers Ltd. business during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiary also experienced a small gross margin decline during the three months ended June 30, 2011 due primarily to a sales mix that was more heavily weighted towards its distribution channel.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our gross margin percentage increased to 24.5% of revenues, compared to 23.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2010. This 1.2% gross margin increase was due primarily to a highly favorable product mix experienced by our Pioneer Transformers Ltd. during the first quarter of 2011. Our Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiary experienced a slight gross margin decline during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, despite achieving an improved gross margin on a sequential quarter basis during 2011.

- 17 -

Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, selling, general and administrative expense increased by approximately $0.7 million, or 36.4%, to $2.7 million, as compared to $2.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Approximately $0.6 million of the increase was due to the inclusion of Jefferson Electric, Inc. and Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. in our consolidated results during the full three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to only partial inclusion in the prior year period when each subsidiary was acquired. In addition, operating expenses attributable to Pioneer Transformers Ltd. increased by approximately $0.2 million due to higher revenues and variable selling expense in the three months ended June 30, 2011. Offsetting these increases, corporate expenses decreased by approximately $0.1 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, selling, general and administrative expense increased by approximately $2.4 million, or 75.4%, to approximately $5.5 million, as compared to $3.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Approximately $1.8 million of the increase was due to the inclusion of Jefferson Electric, Inc. and Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. in our consolidated results during the full six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to two months and one month, respectively, during the prior year period. Approximately $0.6 million of the increase was due to increased corporate expenses and higher selling expenses at Pioneer Transformers Ltd. due to its revenue increase.

Foreign Exchange (Gain) Loss. Most of our consolidated operating revenues are denominated in Canadian dollars, principally via our Pioneer Transformers Ltd. operating subsidiary, and a material percentage of our expenses are denominated and disbursed in U.S. dollars. We have not historically engaged in currency hedging activities. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the time we initiate and then settle transactions with our customers and suppliers can have an impact on our operating results. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a loss of approximately $5,000 due to currency fluctuations, compared to a gain of approximately $150,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a gain of approximately $12,000 due to currency fluctuations, compared to a gain of approximately $57,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Interest and Bank Charges. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, interest and bank charges were approximately $105,000, as compared to $81,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to higher average borrowings as a result of the assumption of our Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiary’s debt during the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, interest and bank charges were approximately $227,000 as compared to $94,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to higher average borrowings as a result of the assumption of our Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiary’s debt during the second quarter of 2010.

Other Expense (Income). For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, other expense was approximately $0.4 million. The 2011 other expense consists of costs incurred in connection with our proposed public offering of common stock, which was postponed due to market conditions. The 2010 other expense relates primarily to professional fees and costs associated with the closing of two acquisitions during the second quarter of 2010. In addition, in 2010 we incurred certain non-recurring reorganization expenses upon taking control of the wind energy assets we acquired.

Provision for Income Taxes. Our provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate on earnings before income taxes of 22.3% during both the three months ended June 30, 2011 and three months ended June 30, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate on earnings before income taxes of 30.8%, as compared to 23.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our effective tax rate increased for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily as a result of operating losses from our Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. business for which we have not recognized a future tax benefit beyond what has already been recorded.

Net Earnings. We generated net earnings of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, down from approximately $1.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our net earnings decreased primarily due to a $1.1million non-cash gain recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2010, which resulted from the acquisition of our wind energy business. Earnings per basic and diluted share was $0.04 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $0.23 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

- 18 -

Table of Contents

For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, net earnings were approximately $1.2 million, down from approximately $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. As discussed above, the decrease was primarily due to $1.1 million non-cash gain we recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010. In addition, our net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2011 benefitted from significantly higher net earnings from our Pioneer Transformers Ltd. subsidiary, offset by increased losses by our wind energy business and higher corporate expenses. Earnings per basic and diluted share was $0.20 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $0.30 per share for six months ended June 30, 2010.

Backlog. Our order backlog at June 30, 2011 was $16.5 million, as compared to $18.7 million at December 31, 2010 and $14.7 million at June 30, 2010. Our backlog is based on orders expected to be delivered in the future, most of which is expected to occur during 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General. At June 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $14.1 million and total debt, including capital lease obligations, of $18.1 million. The large increase in our cash and debt positions during the quarter was due to the bank financing we received in conjunction with completing two acquisitions on the day following our balance sheet measurement date (see "Subsequent Events" below). Without the effect of the financing for these acquisitions, as of June 30, 2011, we would have had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4.3 million and total debt, including capital lease obligations, of $8.3 million.

We have historically met our cash needs through a combination of cash flows from operating activities and bank borrowings. Our cash requirements are generally for operating activities, debt repayment and capital improvements. We believe that working capital, borrowing capacity available under our credit facilities and funds generated from operations should be sufficient to finance our cash requirements for anticipated operating activities, capital improvements and principal repayments of debt through at least the next twelve months.

Cash provided by our operating activities was approximately $0.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to cash flow generated from operating activities of $1.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The principal elements of cash flow from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were net earnings of $1.2 million and $0.3 million of non-cash expenses included in our net earnings, offset by approximately $0.9 million of cash used due to higher working capital requirements.

Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $0.4 million, as compared to $1.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 our cash used in investing activities consisted entirely of additions to property, plant and equipment. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 our cash used in investing activities consisted of additions to property, plant and equipment for the facility expansion, as well as for acquisitions.

Cash provided by our financing activities was approximately $13.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to cash used of $2.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. During the 2011 period, the significant increase in cash from financing activities resulted from approximately $9.8 million of new borrowings provided by our Canadian credit facilities for the purpose of acquiring Bemag Transformer Inc., in addition to the purchase of certain assets from Vermont Transformers, Inc. and to fund anticipated transaction expenses. These acquisitions closed on July 1, 2011. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2011, our short term bank borrowings and overdrafts increased by $1.9 million, we increased our long-term borrowings by approximately $2.0 million (see "Capital Expenditures" below). We repaid approximately $0.3 million of long-term debt and capital lease obligations. Our primary use of cash for financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was for debt repayment, including $3.0 million of debt we repaid under Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s bank loan agreement, as well as an additional $0.3 million in other long-term debt that was repaid, and $0.1 million for transaction costs.

Canadian Credit Facilities. In June 2011, Pioneer Electrogroup Canada Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary and the parent company of Pioneer Transformers Ltd., Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc., 7834080 Canada Inc. and Bemag Transformer Inc., entered into a letter loan agreement with our Canadian bank (the “Canadian Facilities”) that replaced and superseded all our prior financing arrangements with the bank.

The Canadian Facilities provide for up to $23.0 million CAD (approximately $23.9 million expressed in U.S. dollars) consisting of a $10.0 million CAD demand revolving credit facility (“Facility A”) to finance ongoing operations, a $2.0 million CAD term credit facility (“Facility B”) to refinance the existing term loan granted to Pioneer Transformers Ltd. for its plant expansion, a $10.0 million CAD term credit facility (“Facility C”) to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures or to provide funding to our U.S. corporations, a $50,000 CAD Corporate MasterCard credit facility (“Facility D”) and a $1.0 million CAD foreign exchange settlement risk facility (“Facility E”).

- 19 -

Table of Contents

On June 30, 2011, we received funding of approximately $1.5 million under Facility A and $8.3 million under Facility C in preparation for closing the Bemag Transformer Inc. stock acquisition and the Vermont Transformers Inc. equipment acquisition. Both acquisition transactions were completed on July 1, 2011, as described further below under “Subsequent Events.”

United States Credit Facilities. Our Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiary has a bank loan agreement with a U.S. bank that includes a revolving credit facility with a borrowing base limit of $5.0 million and a term credit facility (the “U.S. Facilities”). As of June 30, 2011, our Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiary had approximately $3.8 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility and approximately $2.5 million outstanding under the term credit facility. Monthly payments of accrued interest must be made under the revolving credit facility and monthly payments of principal and accrued interest must be made under the term credit facility, with a final payment of all outstanding amounts due on October 31, 2011. We have requested an extension of this maturity date from our U.S. bank. We believe that our relationships with banks are good and that we will be able to extend, repay or refinance our U.S. Facilities at or before maturity through a combination of cash on hand, cash flow from operations, availability under our Canadian Facilities or through a replacement credit facility.

Capital Expenditures. In September 2009, we commenced an expansion of our Pioneer Transformers Ltd. plant that increased our manufacturing facilities and office space by approximately 6,000 square feet. The capital budget for the project was approximately $2.0 million, including machinery and equipment, the last of which is expected to be fully commissioned during the third quarter of 2011. The cost of the project was initially funded through cash flow from operations and was subsequently financed with a bank term loan under our Canadian Facilities in May 2011. We have no major future capital projects planned, or significant replacement spending anticipated, during 2011.

Subsequent Events. On July 1, 2011, 7834080 Canada Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, completed the acquisition of all of the capital shares of Bemag Transformer Inc. Pursuant to the share purchase agreement, as amended, we purchased all the capital shares of Bemag Transformer Inc. in a transaction valued at approximately $9.3 million CAD, which amount includes approximately $2.9 million CAD of Bemag Transformer Inc.’s revolving and long-term debt which we repaid at closing.

The acquisition is subject to a post-closing purchase price adjustment (upwards or downwards), determined by calculating the difference between the adjusted net equity of Bemag Transformer Inc. on the closing date against a benchmark value of $3.3 million CAD, with any excess above the benchmark value being paid to the former shareholders of Bemag Transformer Inc. and any shortfall below the benchmark value being returned to us. As a result of the acquisition, Bemag Transformer Inc. is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours.

As conditions to the closing of the acquisition, Bemag Transformer Inc. entered into a license agreement with its former controlling shareholder for certain automated production technology and a lease agreement for certain office and other space for use by Bemag Transformer Inc.

On July 1, 2011, we also entered into an equipment purchase agreement with the former shareholders of Vermont Transformers, Inc., pursuant to which we acquired, on such date, all of the equipment used by Vermont Transformers, Inc. in the operation of its business in exchange for $1.6 million US.

- 20 -

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Conclusions Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2011, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and participation of management including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of June 30, 2011.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before investing in our common stock you should carefully consider the following risks, together with the financial and other information contained in this Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of may become important factors that affect us. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial conditions and operating results may be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our common stock may decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We may not be able to expand our business through strategic acquisitions, which could decrease our profitability.

A key element of our strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions that either expand or complement our business in order to increase revenue and earnings. We may not be able to identify additional attractive acquisition candidates on terms favorable to us or in a timely manner. We may require additional debt or equity financing for future acquisitions, which may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all. Moreover, we may not be able to integrate any acquired businesses into our business or to operate any acquired businesses profitably. Acquired businesses (such as Jefferson Electric, Inc.) may operate at lower profit margins, which could negatively impact our results of operations. Each of these factors may contribute to our inability to grow our business through strategic acquisitions, which could ultimately result in increased costs without a corresponding increase in revenues, which would result in decreased profitability.

Any acquisitions that we complete could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and operations.

In an effort to effectively compete in the specialty electrical equipment manufacturing and service businesses, where increasing competition and industry consolidation prevail, we will seek to acquire complementary businesses in the future. In the event of any future acquisitions, we could:

·	issue additional securities that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage ownership or provide the purchasers of the additional securities with certain preferences over those of common stockholders, such as dividend or liquidation preferences;

- 21 -

Table of Contents

·	incur debt and assume liabilities; and

·	incur large and immediate write-offs of intangible assets, accounts receivable or other assets.

These events could result in significant expenses and decreased revenue, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In addition, integrating product acquisitions and completing any future acquisitions could also cause significant diversions of management’s time and resources. Managing acquired businesses entails numerous operational and financial risks. These risks include difficulty in assimilating acquired operations, diversion of management’s attention, and the potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired operations.

Our industry is highly competitive.

The electrical transformer industry is highly competitive. Principal competitors in our markets include ABB Ltd., Carte International, Inc., Cooper Industries plc, General Electric Company, Hammond Power Solutions Inc., Howard Industries, Inc., Partner Technologies, Inc. and Schneider Electric. Many of these competitors, as well as other companies in the broader electrical equipment manufacturing and service industry where we expect to compete, are significantly larger and have substantially greater resources than we do and are able to achieve greater economies of scale and lower cost structures than us and may, therefore, be able to provide their products and services to customers at lower prices than we are able to. Moreover, we cannot be certain that our competitors will not develop the expertise, experience and resources to offer products that are superior in both price and quality to our products. Similarly, we cannot be certain that we will be able to market our business effectively in the face of competition or to maintain or enhance our competitive position within our industry, maintain our customer base at current levels or increase our customer base. Our inability to manage our business in light of the competitive forces we face could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Because we currently derive a significant portion of our revenues from two customers, any decrease in orders from these customers could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We depend on Hydro-Quebec Utility Company for a large portion of our business, and any change in the level of orders from Hydro-Quebec Utility Company, has, in the past, had a significant impact on our results of operations. In particular, Hydro-Quebec Utility Company represented a substantial portion of our entire company’s sales, approximately 36% and 40% of net sales in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, Siemens Industry, Inc. accounted for 9% of our entire company’s sales in the year ended December 31, 2010. Aside from being a customer of ours, Siemens Industry, Inc. is also a manufacturer of transformers. If either of these customers was to significantly cancel, delay or reduce the amount of business it does with us, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Our long term supply agreements for the sale of our products to Hydro-Quebec Utility Company expire in 2012 and we therefore cannot assure you that Hydro-Quebec Utility Company will continue to purchase transformers from us in quantities consistent with the past or at all. Moreover, although Jefferson Electric, Inc. has a pricing agreement for the sale of its products to Siemens Industry, Inc., the agreement does not obligate Siemens Industry, Inc. to purchase transformers from Jefferson Electric, Inc. in quantities consistent with the past or at all. If either of these customers were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay or were to delay payment for services, our business, financial condition and operating results could also be materially adversely affected.

We are vulnerable to economic downturns in the commercial construction market, which may reduce the demand for some of our products and adversely affect our sales, earnings, cash flow or financial condition.

Portions of our business, in particular those of Jefferson Electric, Inc., involve sales of our products in connection with commercial real estate construction. Our sales to this sector are affected by the levels of discretionary business spending. During economic downturns in this sector, the levels of business discretionary spending may decrease. This decrease in spending will likely reduce the demand for some of our products and may adversely affect our sales, earnings, cash flow or financial condition.

- 22 -

Table of Contents

The commercial and industrial building and maintenance sectors began to experience a significant decline in 2008. The downturn in these segments contributed to a decline in the demand for some of Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s products and adversely affected Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s sales and earnings in 2008 through 2010. We cannot predict the duration or severity of the downturn in these segments. Continued downturn in these segments could continue to reduce the demand for some of our products and may adversely impact sales, earnings and cash flow.

The departure or loss of key personnel could disrupt our business.

We depend heavily on the continued efforts of Nathan J. Mazurek, our principal executive officer, and on other senior officers who are responsible for the day-to-day management of our three operating subsidiaries. In addition, we rely on our current electrical and mechanical design engineers, along with trained coil winders, many of whom are important to our operations and would be difficult to replace. We cannot be certain that any of these individuals will continue in their respective capacities for any particular period of time. The departure or loss of key personnel, or the inability to hire and retain qualified employees, could negatively impact our ability to manage our business.

Our revenue may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

A majority of our revenue and a significant portion of our expenditures are derived or spent in Canadian dollars. However, we report our financial condition and results of operations in U.S. dollars. As a result, fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar will impact the amount of our revenues. For example, if the Canadian dollar appreciates relative to the U.S. dollar, the fluctuation will result in a positive impact on the revenues that we report. However, if the Canadian dollar depreciates relative to the U.S. dollar, there will be a negative impact on the revenues we report due to such fluctuation. It is possible that the impact of currency fluctuations will result in a decrease in reported sales even though we have experienced an increase in sales when reported in the Canadian dollar. Conversely, the impact of currency fluctuations may result in an increase in reported sales despite declining sales when reported in the Canadian dollar. The exchange rate from the U.S. dollar to the Canadian dollar has fluctuated substantially and may continue to do so in the future. Though we may choose to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate changes in the future, there is no guarantee such hedging, if undertaken, will be successful.

We may be unable to generate internal growth.

Our ability to generate internal growth will be affected by, among other factors, our ability to attract new customers, increase or decrease in the number or size of orders received from existing customers, hire and retain skilled employees and increase volume utilizing our existing facilities. Many of the factors affecting our ability to generate internal growth may be beyond our control, and we cannot be certain that our strategies will be implemented with positive results or that we will be able to generate cash flow sufficient to fund our operations and to support internal growth. If we do not achieve internal growth, our results of operations will suffer and we will likely not be able to expand our operations or grow our business.

Fluctuations in the price and supply of raw materials used to manufacture our products may reduce our profits.

Our raw material costs represented approximately 63% and 64% of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Although we anticipate that this percentage will be lower in the future due to our acquisition of Jefferson Electric, Inc., there is no guarantee that such result will be achieved. The principal raw materials purchased by us are core steel, copper wire, aluminum strip and insulating materials including transformer oil. We also purchase certain electrical components from a variety of suppliers including bushings, switches, fuses and protectors. These raw materials and components are available from, and supplied by, numerous sources at competitive prices, although there are more limited sources of supply for electrical core steel and transformer oil. Unanticipated increases in raw material prices or disruptions in supply could increase production costs and adversely affect our profitability. We cannot provide any assurances that we will not experience difficulties sourcing our raw materials in the future.

- 23 -

Table of Contents

Jefferson Electric, Inc. may be unable to service, repay or refinance its debt and remain in compliance with its debt covenants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Jefferson Electric, Inc. is highly leveraged, and its ability to repay its debt, substantially all of which is due to be repaid in October 2011, will depend on its financial and operating performance and on our ability to execute on our business strategy with respect to Jefferson Electric, Inc. The financial and operational performance of Jefferson Electric, Inc. will depend on numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as economic conditions and governmental regulation. We cannot be certain that Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s cash flow will be sufficient to allow it to pay the principal and interest on its debt and meet other obligations. If Jefferson Electric, Inc. does not generate enough cash flow to fully amortize its debt, it may be unable to refinance all or part of the existing debt or sell assets on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Further, failing to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants in its loan agreement could result in an event of default, which could result in acceleration of the payments due. Because Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s debt is secured by substantially all of Jefferson Electric, Inc.’s assets, if Jefferson Electric, Inc. is unable to service, repay or refinance its debt and remain in compliance with its debt covenants, we could lose all of our investment in Jefferson Electric, Inc.

Our operating subsidiaries have, and are expected to continue to have, credit facilities with restrictive loan covenants that may impact our ability to operate our business and to pursue our business strategies, and our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an acceleration of our indebtedness.

We rely on our Pioneer Transformers Ltd. and Jefferson Electric, Inc. subsidiaries for a significant portion of the cash flow to operate our business and execute our strategy. Our credit facilities with our lenders contain certain covenants that restrict each of these subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:

·	effect an amalgamation, merger or consolidation with any legal entity;

·	cause its subsidiaries to wind up, liquidate or dissolve their affairs, in the case of Pioneer Transformers Ltd, and permit any subsidiaries to exist, in the case of Jefferson Electric, Inc.;

·	change the nature of its core business;

in the case of Pioneer Transformers, Ltd., alter its capital structure in a manner that would be materially adverse to our Canadian lender and undergo a change of control and limits our ability to make investments or advancements to affiliated or related companies without our Canadian lender’s prior written consent; or

·	in the case of Jefferson Electric, Inc., recapitalize its corporate structure, acquire any business, acquire stock of any corporation, or enter into any partnership or joint venture.

The majority of the liquidity derived from our credit facilities is based on availability determined by a borrowing base. Specifically, the availability of credit is dependent upon eligible receivables, inventory and certain liens. We may not be able to maintain adequate levels of eligible assets to support our required liquidity.

In addition, our credit facilities require us to meet certain financial ratios, including maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio and a maximum total debt to capitalization ratio in the case of Pioneer Transformers, Ltd. and a requirement to exceed minimum quarterly targets for tangible net worth, as defined, and maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio in the case of Jefferson Electric, Inc. Our ability to meet these financial provisions may be affected by events beyond our control. If, as or when required, we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our indebtedness under, or amend the covenants contained in, our credit facilities, our lenders could institute foreclosure proceedings against the assets securing borrowings under those facilities, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog.

We routinely have a backlog of work to be completed on contracts representing a significant portion of our annual sales. As of December 31, 2010, our order backlog was $18.7 million. Orders included in our backlog are represented by customer purchase orders and contracts that we believe to be firm. Backlog develops as a result of new business taken, which represents the revenue value of new customer orders received by us during a given period. Backlog consists of customer orders that either (1) have not yet been started or (2) are in progress and are not yet completed. In the latter case, the revenue value reported in backlog is the remaining value associated with work that has not yet been completed. From time to time, customer orders are canceled that appeared to have a high certainty of going forward at the time they were recorded as new business taken. In the event of a customer order cancellation, we may be reimbursed for certain costs but typically have no contractual right to the total revenue reflected in our backlog. In addition to our being unable to recover certain direct costs, canceled customer orders may also result in additional unrecoverable costs due to the resulting underutilization of our assets.

- 24 -

Table of Contents

We are subject to pricing pressure from our larger customers.

We face significant pricing pressures in all of our business segments from our larger customers, including Hydro-Quebec Utility Company. Because of their purchasing size, our larger customers can influence market participants to compete on price terms. Such customers also use their buying power to negotiate lower prices. If we are not able to offset pricing reductions resulting from these pressures by improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, those price reductions may have an adverse impact on our financial results.

Deterioration in the credit quality of several major customers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

A significant asset included in our working capital is accounts receivable from customers. If customers responsible for a significant amount of accounts receivable become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for products and services, or become unwilling or unable to make payments in a timely manner, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. A significant deterioration in the economy could have an adverse effect on the servicing of these accounts receivable, which could result in longer payment cycles, increased collection costs and defaults in excess of management’s expectations. Deterioration in the credit quality of Hydro-Quebec Utility Company, Siemens Industry, Inc. or of any other major customers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Our operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

Our quarterly results may be materially and adversely affected by:

·	the timing and volume of work under new agreements;

·	the spending patterns of customers;

·	customer orders received;

·	a change in the mix of our customers, contracts and business;

·	increases in design and manufacturing costs;

·	the length of our sales cycles;

·	the rates at which customers renew their contracts with us;

·	changes in pricing by us or our competitors, or the need to provide discounts to win business;

·	a change in the demand or production of our products caused by severe weather conditions;

·	our ability to control costs, including operating expenses;

·	losses experienced in our operations not otherwise covered by insurance;

·	the ability and willingness of customers to pay amounts owed to us;

·	the timing of significant investments in the growth of our business, as the revenue and profit we hope to generate from those expenses may lag behind the timing of expenditures;

·	costs related to the acquisition and integration of companies or assets;

·	general economic trends, including changes in equipment spending or national or geopolitical events such as economic crises, wars or incidents of terrorism; and

·	future accounting pronouncements and changes in accounting policies.

Accordingly, our operating results in any particular quarter may not be indicative of the results that you can expect for any other quarter or for an entire year.

We rely on third parties for key elements of our business whose operations are outside our control.

We rely on arrangements with third-party shippers and carriers such as independent shipping companies for timely delivery of our products to our customers. As a result, we may be subject to carrier disruptions and increased costs due to factors that are beyond our control, including labor strikes, inclement weather, natural disasters and rapidly increasing fuel costs. If the services of any of these third parties become unsatisfactory, we may experience delays in meeting our customers’ product demands and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement on a timely basis or on commercially reasonable terms. Any failure to deliver products to our customers in a timely and accurate manner may damage our reputation and could cause us to lose customers.

- 25 -

Table of Contents

We also utilize third party distributors and manufacturer’s representatives to sell, install and service certain of our products. While we are selective in whom we choose to represent us, it is difficult for us to ensure that our distributors and manufacturer’s representatives consistently act in accordance with the standards we set for them. To the extent any of our end-customers have negative experiences with any of our distributors or manufacturer’s representatives; it could reflect poorly on us and damage our reputation, thereby negatively impacting our financial results.

We may face impairment charges if economic environments in which our business operates and key economic and business assumptions substantially change.

Assessment of the potential impairment of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets is an integral part of our normal ongoing review of operations. Testing for potential impairment of long-lived assets is dependent on numerous assumptions and reflects our best estimates at a particular point in time, which may vary from testing date to testing date. The economic environments in which our businesses operate and key economic and business assumptions with respect to projected product selling prices and materials costs, market growth and inflation rates, can significantly affect the outcome of impairment tests. Estimates based on these assumptions may differ significantly from actual results. Changes in factors and assumptions used in assessing potential impairments can have a significant impact on both the existence and magnitude of impairments, as well as the time at which such impairments are recognized. Future changes in the economic environment and the economic outlook for the assets being evaluated could also result in additional impairment charges. Any significant asset impairments would adversely impact our financial results.

International expansion is one of our growth strategies, and international operations beyond our current markets will expose us to additional risks that we do not face in our current markets, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue from operations in Canada and currently derive limited revenue from outside of North America. However, international expansion is one of our growth strategies, including into Western Europe and to Asia, and we expect our revenue and operations outside of North America will expand in the future. These operations will be subject to a variety of risks that we do not face in the U.S., and that we may face only to a limited degree in Canada, including:

·	building and managing highly experienced foreign workforces and overseeing and ensuring the performance of foreign subcontractors;

·	increased travel, infrastructure and legal and compliance costs associated with multiple international locations;

·	additional withholding taxes or other taxes on our foreign income, and tariffs or other restrictions on foreign trade or investment;

·	imposition of, or unexpected adverse changes in, foreign laws or regulatory requirements, many of which differ from those in the U.S.;

·	increased exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk;

·	longer payment cycles for sales in some foreign countries and potential difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable;

·	difficulties in repatriating overseas earnings;

·	general economic conditions in the countries in which we operate; and

·	political unrest, war, incidents of terrorism, or responses to such events.

Our ability to expand into international markets will depend, in part, on our ability to navigate differing legal, regulatory, economic, social and political conditions. We may be unable to develop and implement policies and strategies that will be effective in managing these risks in each country where we do business. Our failure to manage these risks could cause us to fail to reap our investments in developing these markets and could harm our international operations, reduce our international sales and increase our costs, thus adversely affecting our international and overall business, financial condition and operating results.

- 26 -

Table of Contents

Our business requires skilled labor, and we may be unable to attract and retain qualified employees.

Our ability to maintain our productivity and profitability will be limited by our ability to employ, train and retain skilled personnel necessary to meet our requirements. We may experience shortages of qualified personnel. We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain an adequate skilled labor force necessary to operate efficiently and to support our growth strategy or that our labor expenses will not increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of skilled personnel. Labor shortages, increased labor costs or loss of our most skilled workers could impair our ability to maintain our business or grow our revenues, and may adversely impact our profitability.

Our business operations are dependent upon our ability to engage in successful collective bargaining with our unionized workforce.

Approximately 75% of our workforce is unionized. Our current collective bargaining agreements with our unionized workforces in Canada expire in May 2015, in the case of Pioneer Transformers Ltd., and in March 2013 in the case of Bemag Transformer Inc. We have a similar agreement with our unionized workforce in Reynosa, Mexico that has an indefinite term, subject to annual review and negotiation of key provisions. If we are unable to renew our agreements regarding the terms of these collective bargaining agreements, or if additional segments of our workforce become unionized, we may be subject to work interruptions or stoppages. Strikes or labor disputes with our employees may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

Our risk management activities may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks.

Although we maintain insurance policies with respect to our related exposures, these policies contain deductibles and limits of coverage. We estimate our liabilities for known claims and unpaid claims and expenses based on information available as well as projections for claims incurred but not reported. However, insurance liabilities are difficult to estimate due to various factors and we may be unable to effectively anticipate or measure potential risks to our company. If we suffer unexpected or uncovered losses, any of our insurance policies or programs are terminated for any reason or are not effective in mitigating our risks, we may incur losses that are not covered by our insurance policies or that exceed our accruals or that exceed our coverage limits and could adversely impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Regulatory, environmental, monetary and other governmental policies could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

We are subject to international, federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental matters, including emissions to air, discharge to waters and the generation and handling of waste. We are also subject to laws relating to occupational health and safety. The operation of manufacturing plants involves a high level of susceptibility in these areas, and there is no assurance that we will not incur material environmental or occupational health and safety liabilities in the future. Moreover, expectations of remediation expenses could be affected by, and potentially significant expenditures could be required to comply with, environmental regulations and health and safety laws that may be adopted or imposed in the future. Future remediation technology advances could adversely impact expectations of remediation expenses.

Future litigation could impact our financial results and condition.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be affected by significant future litigation or claims adverse to us. Types of potential litigation cases include product liability, contract, employment-related, labor relations, personal injury or property damage, intellectual property, stockholder claims and claims arising from any injury or damage to persons, property or the environment from hazardous substances used, generated or disposed of in the conduct of our business.

- 27 -

Table of Contents

Market disruptions caused by domestic or international financial crises could affect our ability to meet our liquidity needs at reasonable cost and our ability to meet long-term commitments, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on credit facilities with our lenders, amongst other avenues, to satisfy our liquidity needs. Disruptions in the domestic or international credit markets or deterioration of the banking industry’s financial condition (such as occurred beginning in 2008), may discourage or prevent our lenders and other lenders from meeting their existing lending commitments, extending the terms of such commitments or agreeing to new commitments, such as for acquisitions or to refinance existing credit facilities. Market disruptions may also limit our ability to issue debt securities in the capital markets. We can provide no assurances that our lenders or any other lenders we may have will meet their existing commitments or that we will be able to access the credit markets in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Longer term disruptions in the domestic or international capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, reduced financing alternatives or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to the liquidity needed for our business. Any disruption could require us to take measures to conserve cash until the market stabilizes or until alternative financing can be arranged. Such measures could include deferring capital expenditures and reducing other discretionary expenditures.

Market disruptions could cause a broad economic downturn that may lead to increased incidence of customers’ failure to pay for services delivered, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Capital market disruptions could result in increased costs related to variable rate debt. As a result, continuation of market disruptions could increase our interest expense and adversely impact our results of operations. Disruption in the capital markets and its actual or perceived effects on particular businesses and the greater economy also adversely affects the value of the investments held within our pension plans. Significant declines in the value of the investments held within our pension plans may require us to increase contributions to those plans in order to meet future funding requirements if the actual asset returns do not recover these declines in value in the foreseeable future. These trends may also adversely impact our results of operations, net cash flows and financial positions, including our stockholders’ equity.

Risks Relating to Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc.

The wind turbine-related assets that we acquired from AAER Inc. were acquired pursuant to Canadian court proceedings in which AAER Inc. sought protection from its creditors after it failed to raise additional capital to fund losses from its wind turbine manufacturing and marketing business. As such, no assurance can be given that we will be able to operate AAER Inc.’s former business at a profit, or that we will continue to provide for the funding needs of Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. if it does not perform to our expectations.

All of our wind turbine assets were acquired from AAER Inc. in connection with the failure of AAER Inc. to raise sufficient capital to continue funding its wind turbine manufacturing and marketing business. We are seeking a qualified third party to assemble our wind turbine model for us, but have so far been unable to establish such an arrangement. While we believe this operating model for our Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. business would entail less inventory risk and require less working capital than AAER Inc.’s operations, no assurance can be given that we will be able to monetize the wind turbine assets we purchased, and related products sold in the future, at a profit and succeed where AAER Inc. was unable to. In particular, we have limited experience in working with wind turbines. Moreover, the wind turbine business is highly competitive and dominated by a few much larger corporations with greater resources such as GE Energy, Siemens Wind Power A/S, Vestas Wind Systems A/S and Gamesa Corporation Tecnologica S.A.

We have significantly restructured the operations of the wind energy business we acquired and, as such, we consider Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. to be a development stage business that is highly dependent on its senior management personnel.

The business of Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. is highly dependent on the experience, reputation and knowledge of its senior managers in order to secure attractive wind energy project customers, including its president and manager of strategic procurement. The loss of either of these individuals could significantly impair Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc.’s ability to identify and attract customers and adequately source and supply products and services that meet customers’ needs.

- 28 -

Table of Contents

Our business strategy includes providing equipment financing assistance to our customers, a practice with which we have no experience to date.

Inherent in our strategy to provide financing in conjunction with sales of our wind turbine equipment is credit risk associated with our customers. We intend to provide customers extended payment terms from the time of wind turbine delivery and installation. If we are able to sell wind turbine equipment on this basis, we anticipate that each sale will create over $1.0 million of accounts receivable plus interest per customer per project and will provide for a payment schedule of up to, or exceeding, one year. If customers responsible for a significant amount of accounts receivable become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for our equipment and services, or become unwilling or unable to make payments in a timely manner, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. The creditworthiness of each customer and the rate of delinquencies, repossessions and net losses on customer obligations will be directly impacted by several factors, including relevant industry and economic conditions, the availability of capital, the experience and expertise of the customer’s management team, the sustained value of the underlying collateral and the overall performance of the customer’s power project. In the event of delinquencies that might cause us to seek to take possession of our collateral, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell such collateral at a price sufficient to recover our investment.

Our wind energy equipment and services business is highly dependent on our customers receiving regulatory incentives, subsidies and third party financing.

The wind energy industry is supported in many territories through a variety of financial incentives offered by government and regulatory bodies. If the availability of such incentives was reduced or removed it would likely have an adverse effect on our business. Such an incentive in the U.S. is the Production Tax Credit (PTC), a federal level income tax credit which is due to expire on December 31, 2012. Without the PTC, the projected return on investment in an individual wind power facility may not be sufficient to attract investment capital in the amount necessary to fund the acquisition, development and construction of wind power projects in the U.S.

While the PTC has been in effect continuously since 1992 and most recently renewed in February 2009, there can be no assurance that the PTC will be renewed beyond its current expiration date of December 31, 2012. The absence of the PTC could have a significant adverse effect on our growth potential.

The PTC will only be available for qualifying facilities that are placed in service while the PTC is in effect or through a retrospective application of the PTC. The time required to identify potential wind power projects, and to then pursue them to completion and implementation, typically ranges from 18 to 36 months, although lesser periods are possible for smaller projects. If the PTC is not extended beyond 2012, U.S. projects under development by us at that time and not completed by December 31, 2012 would not be eligible for the PTC. Accordingly, our customers might have to reduce their project spending to offset the corresponding reduction in revenues from the sale of U.S. projects.

The wind energy industry in other jurisdictions in which we expect to have a market presence may also rely to some extent on financial incentives and/or penalties designed to support the wind energy industry in that jurisdiction.

Changes to, or the removal of such measures may have a significant adverse affect on our ability to compete in such jurisdictions.

Finally, in addition to regulatory incentives, some of our customers will rely on us or on third parties in connection with the financing of purchases of wind turbines from us. Starting during the economic downturn of 2008, third party financing became very difficult to obtain for wind power projects and remains challenging to secure. The absence of easily obtainable third party financing for wind power projects could materially reduce demand for our wind turbines.

- 29 -

Table of Contents

Our customers may have difficulty in locating suitable project development sites, resulting in less demand for our wind turbines.

The development of new wind power generating projects requires the identification, acquisition and permit for viable wind resource land assets. We believe that adequate wind resource land exists and can be acquired by our current and prospective customers on a reasonable cost basis. However, management believes competition for wind resource sites is increasing and we believe developers in some areas have bid up site costs to levels that result in marginal project economics. This trend may increase and spread to many wind regions, limiting demand for our wind turbines. In some locations, residents and others have objected to wind projects based on noise, visual aesthetics or wildlife protection concerns.

Changes in tax laws may adversely affect our wind turbine business.

When the U.S. Congress renewed the PTC in 2004, it amended certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code in a manner that resulted in wind energy property no longer qualifying as five-year depreciation property. Congress restored the availability of accelerated 5-year depreciation as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which also extended the PTC. There can be no assurance, however, that future changes in U.S. tax laws will not require wind energy property to be depreciated over a longer period of time. Such changes could force us to modify our pricing and could lead to a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Relating to Bemag Transformer Inc.

Our Bemag Transformer Inc. subsidiary currently derives a significant portion of its revenues through three electrical distributor groups; any decrease in orders through these distributors could have an adverse effect on Bemag Transformer Inc.’s financial condition and operating results.

Bemag Transformer Inc. depends on three electrical distributor groups for a large portion of its business, and any change in the level of orders obtained through these distributors, has, in the past, had a significant impact on Bemag Transformer Inc.’s results of operations. Collectively, customer purchases through these distributor groups represent approximately 70% of Bemag Transformer Inc.’s annual sales, and we expect sales through these distributor groups to represent approximately less than 10% of our entire company’s sales in the year ending December 31, 2011. Our Bemag Transformer Inc. subsidiary has pricing and rebate agreements with these distributor groups that are negotiated annually and, if the pricing and rebate agreements are modified or not renewed in future periods, we cannot assure you that our customers will continue to purchase transformers from us through these distributor groups in quantities consistent with the past or at all. If any of these distributor groups was to influence our customers to cancel, significantly delay or reduce the amount of business they do with Bemag Transformer Inc., there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Moreover, although Bemag Transformer Inc. has agreements for the sale of its products through these three distributor groups, these agreements doe not obligate the groups to distribute transformers from Bemag Transformer Inc. in quantities consistent with the past or at all. If any of these distributor groups were to become insolvent, our business, financial condition and operating results could also be materially adversely affected.

Risks Relating to Our Organization

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board to create new series of preferred stock without further approval by our stockholders, which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.

Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock. In addition, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that has greater voting power than our common stock or that is convertible into our common stock, which could decrease the relative voting power of our common stock or result in dilution to our existing stockholders.

- 30 -

Table of Contents

Your ability to influence corporate decisions may be limited because Provident Pioneer Partners, L.P. owns a controlling percentage of our common stock.

Provident Pioneer Partners, L.P., which is controlled by Nathan J. Mazurek, chief executive officer, president and chairman of the board of directors, beneficially owns approximately 78% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of this stock ownership, Provident Pioneer Partners, L.P. and Mr. Mazurek can control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of voting power could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire. In addition, as the interests of Provident Pioneer Partners, L.P. and our minority stockholders may not always be the same, this large concentration of voting power may lead to stockholder votes that are inconsistent with the best interests of our minority stockholders or the best interest of us as a whole.

We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements for which our accounting, internal audit and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared.

On December 2, 2009, we became subject to reporting and other obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404 requires us to conduct an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources. We anticipate that we may need to upgrade our systems, implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures, implement an internal audit function, and hire additional accounting, internal audit and finance staff. If we are unable to accomplish these objectives in a timely and effective fashion, our ability to comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to reporting companies could be impaired. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.

Because we became public by means of a reverse merger, we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

There may be risks associated with the fact that we became a public company through a “reverse merger.” Securities analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is no incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. No assurance can be given that brokerage firms will, in the future, want to conduct any secondary offerings on our behalf. Moreover, regulatory authorities such as the SEC and securities exchanges may subject us to heightened scrutiny because of the manner in which we became a public company, which could lead to increased compliance costs or delays in implementing transactions such as financings and acquisitions.

Risks Relating to our Common Stock

There is, at present, only a limited market for our common stock and we cannot ensure investors that an active market for our common stock will ever develop or be sustained.

There is, at present, only a limited trading market for our common stock. The price at which our common stock may be sold is very unpredictable because there are very few trades in our common stock. Because our common stock is so thinly traded, a large block of shares traded can lead to a dramatic fluctuation in the share price. In addition, our common stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board, which generally lacks the liquidity, research coverage and institutional investor following of a national stock exchange like the NYSE Amex Equities, the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market. While we intend to list our common stock on a national stock exchange once we satisfy the initial listing standards for such an exchange, we currently do not, and may not ever, satisfy such initial listing standards. Furthermore, in order for us to satisfy these initial listing standards, we may be required to effectuate a reverse stock split or potentially dilutive offering. Should we nonetheless fail to satisfy the initial listing standards for a national stock exchange or should our common stock be otherwise rejected for listing and remain on the OTC Bulletin Board or be suspended from the OTC Bulletin Board, the trading price of our common stock could suffer, the trading market for our common stock may be less liquid and our common stock price may be subject to increased volatility.

- 31 -

Table of Contents

Substantial sales of our common stock, or the perception that such sales are likely to occur, could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public market could harm the market price of our common stock and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of common stock. In addition to the possibility that actual sales of significant amounts of our common stock in the public market could harm our common stock price, the fact that our stockholders have the ability to make such sales could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang,” in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

Our common stock may be affected by limited trading volume and price fluctuations, each of which could adversely impact the value of our common stock.

There has been very limited trading in our common stock and there can be no assurance that an active trading market in our common stock will either develop or be maintained. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. These fluctuations may also cause short sellers to enter the market from time to time in the belief that we will have poor results in the future. We cannot predict the actions of market participants and, therefore, can offer no assurances that the market for our stock will be stable or appreciate over time.

Our stock price may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The market price of our common stock is highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

·	technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;

·	additions or departures of key personnel, including Nathan J. Mazurek, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;

·	sales of our common stock, including management shares;

·	limited availability of freely-tradable “unrestricted” shares of our common stock to satisfy purchase orders and demand;

·	our ability to execute our business plan;

·	operating results that fall below expectations;

·	loss of any strategic relationship;

·	industry developments;

·	economic and other external factors;

·	our ability to manage the costs of maintaining adequate internal financial controls and procedures in connection with the acquisition of additional businesses; and

·	period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also significantly affect the market price of our common stock.

We do not expect to pay dividends in the future. As a result, any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates.

- 32 -

Table of Contents

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not currently have research coverage by securities and industry analysts and you should not invest in our common stock in anticipation that we will obtain such coverage. If we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage and if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Item 6. Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.


Date: August 15, 2011	/s/ Nathan J. Mazurek
	Nathan J. Mazurek
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer duly authorized to sign on behalf of Registrant)

Date: August 15, 2011	/s/ Andrew Minkow
	Andrew Minkow Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer duly authorized to sign on behalf of Registrant)

- 33 -

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 2009).
3.2		Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 2009).
4.1		Form of Securities Purchase Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2009).
4.2		Form of $10.00 Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2009).
4.3		Form of $16.25 Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2009).
4.4		Form of Lock-up Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2009).
4.5		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated April 30, 2010, issued to Thomas Klink (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2010).
4.6		Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated April 26, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2010).
4.7		Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated May 11, 2010, issued to investor relations firm and its designees (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 20, 2011).
10.1		Letter Loan Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2011 among Pioneer Electrogroup Canada Inc., Pioneer Transformers Ltd., Pioneer Wind Energy Systems Inc. and Bemag Transformer Inc., as Borrowers, and Bank of Montreal, as lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2011).
10.2		Amendment Agreement, dated June 30, 2011, between Fiducie Familiale Mazoyer, Bon-Ange Inc., Gilles Mazoyer and 7834080 Canada Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2011).
10.4		Equipment Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2011, between Vermont Transformers Inc., GCEFF Inc., Gilles Mazoyer and 7834080 Canada Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2011).

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

_______________

* Filed herewith.

- 34 -

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. - FORM 10-Q - August 15, 2011

Attached files

PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. Reports