Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - HGR Liquidating Trust | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - HGR Liquidating Trust | h83486exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - HGR Liquidating Trust | h83486exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - HGR Liquidating Trust | h83486exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-53964
Hines Global REIT, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Maryland (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
26-3999995 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
2800 Post Oak Boulevard Suite 5000 Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
77056-6118 (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(888) 220-6121
(888) 220-6121
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 8, 2011, approximately 73.7 million shares of the registrants common stock were
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
Certification |
||||||||
Certification |
||||||||
Certification of CEO & CFO pursuant to Section 906 |
||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
HINES GLOBAL REIT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investment property, net |
$ | 597,475 | $ | 449,029 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
250,226 | 146,953 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
3,719 | 348 | ||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
1,335 | 2,765 | ||||||
Tenant and other receivables |
9,550 | 7,876 | ||||||
Intangible lease assets, net |
215,538 | 161,036 | ||||||
Deferred leasing costs, net |
1,678 | 622 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
7,694 | 6,502 | ||||||
Other assets |
7,601 | 553 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 1,094,816 | $ | 775,684 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 18,962 | $ | 13,622 | ||||
Due to affiliates |
3,480 | 2,167 | ||||||
Intangible lease liabilities, net |
7,464 | 5,926 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
11,813 | 8,020 | ||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
4,879 | 38 | ||||||
Distributions payable |
5,237 | 3,231 | ||||||
Notes payable |
475,434 | 378,295 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
527,269 | 411,299 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
| | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred shares, $.001 par value;
500,000 preferred shares authorized,
none issued or outstanding as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value;
1,500,000 shares authorized, 68,868
and 41,287 issued and outstanding as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively |
69 | 41 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
578,052 | 350,561 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(49,933 | ) | (25,873 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
2,242 | 1,347 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
530,430 | 326,076 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
37,117 | 38,309 | ||||||
Total equity |
567,547 | 364,385 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 1,094,816 | $ | 775,684 | ||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
HINES GLOBAL REIT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue |
$ | 20,135 | $ | 133 | $ | 37,438 | $ | 133 | ||||||||
Other revenue |
1,727 | | 3,264 | | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
21,862 | 133 | 40,702 | 133 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
4,180 | 9 | 8,505 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Real property taxes |
1,696 | 16 | 3,290 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Property management fees |
501 | 2 | 1,014 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
12,859 | 57 | 23,422 | 57 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses |
2,132 | 2,494 | 3,185 | 2,583 | ||||||||||||
Asset management and acquisition fees |
2,797 | 425 | 6,663 | 425 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
856 | 465 | 1,609 | 775 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
25,021 | 3,468 | 47,688 | 3,867 | ||||||||||||
Loss before other income (expenses) and
provision for income taxes |
(3,159 | ) | (3,335 | ) | (6,986 | ) | (3,734 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||
Loss on interest rate swap contracts, net |
(8,313 | ) | | (6,380 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other gains (losses) |
(4 | ) | | 22 | | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,640 | ) | | (10,296 | ) | | ||||||||||
Interest income |
36 | 19 | 75 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(17,080 | ) | (3,316 | ) | (23,565 | ) | (3,709 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(767 | ) | | (1,124 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net loss |
(17,847 | ) | (3,316 | ) | (24,689 | ) | (3,709 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
1,263 | 827 | 629 | 829 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (16,584 | ) | $ | (2,489 | ) | $ | (24,060 | ) | $ | (2,880 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||||
Distributions declared per common share: |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding |
61,540 | 13,643 | 54,609 | 9,785 | ||||||||||||
Net comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (17,847 | ) | $ | (3,316 | ) | $ | (24,689 | ) | $ | (3,709 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(339 | ) | 28 | 2,248 | 28 | |||||||||||
Net comprehensive loss: |
(18,186 | ) | (3,288 | ) | (22,441 | ) | (3,681 | ) | ||||||||
Net comprehensive income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
(2,687 | ) | 816 | (724 | ) | 818 | ||||||||||
Net comprehensive loss attributable to common
stockholders |
$ | (20,873 | ) | $ | (2,472 | ) | $ | (23,165 | ) | $ | (2,863 | ) | ||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
HINES GLOBAL REIT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
Hines Global REIT, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Stockholders | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income | Equity | Interests | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
January 1, 2011 |
41,287 | $ | 41 | $ | 350,561 | $ | (25,873 | ) | $ | 1,347 | $ | 326,076 | $ | 38,309 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common
shares |
27,880 | 28 | 277,823 | | | 277,851 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions
declared |
| | (18,955 | ) | | | (18,955 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on
Convertible
Preferred Equity
Certificates
(CPEC) |
| | | | | | (1,912 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of
Common Shares |
(299 | ) | | (2,656 | ) | | | (2,656 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions
and dealer manager
fees |
| | (26,425 | ) | | | (26,425 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuer costs |
| | (2,296 | ) | | | (2,296 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (24,060 | ) | | (24,060 | ) | (629 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment |
| | | | 895 | 895 | 1,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
June 30, 2011 |
68,868 | $ | 69 | $ | 578,052 | $ | (49,933 | ) | $ | 2,242 | $ | 530,430 | $ | 37,117 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Stockholders | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income | Equity | Interests | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
January 1, 2010 |
3,276 | $ | 3 | $ | 26,012 | $ | (408 | ) | $ | | $ | 25,607 | $ | 33 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common
shares |
15,190 | 15 | 151,362 | | | 151,377 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions from
noncontrolling
interests |
| | | | | | 11,495 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions
declared |
| | (3,342 | ) | | | (3,342 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of
common shares |
(8 | ) | | (95 | ) | | | (95 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions
and dealer manager
fees |
| | (14,565 | ) | | | (14,565 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuer costs |
| | (1,607 | ) | | | (1,607 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (2,880 | ) | | (2,880 | ) | (829 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment |
| | | | 17 | 17 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
June 30, 2010 |
18,458 | $ | 18 | $ | 157,765 | $ | (3,288 | ) | $ | 17 | $ | 154,512 | $ | 10,703 | ||||||||||||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
HINES GLOBAL REIT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(UNAUDITED)
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (24,689 | ) | $ | (3,709 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25,705 | 119 | ||||||
Loss on interest rate swap contracts |
6,380 | | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Change in other assets |
(825 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Change in tenant and other receivables |
(764 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Change in deferred leasing costs |
(1,164 | ) | | |||||
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
4,239 | 2,389 | ||||||
Change in other liabilities |
3,360 | (170 | ) | |||||
Change in due to affiliates |
1,302 | 444 | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
13,544 | (963 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Investments in property and acquired lease intangibles, net |
(217,111 | ) | (20,172 | ) | ||||
Deposits on investment property |
(5,008 | ) | (34,635 | ) | ||||
Increase in restricted cash |
(3,384 | ) | | |||||
Net cash from investing activities |
(225,503 | ) | (54,807 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
267,672 | 148,261 | ||||||
Contribution from noncontrolling interests |
| 11,495 | ||||||
Redemption of common shares |
(2,832 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||
Payments of issuer costs |
(2,360 | ) | (2,974 | ) | ||||
Payment of selling commissions and dealer manager fees |
(26,649 | ) | (14,612 | ) | ||||
Distributions paid to stockholders and noncontrolling interests |
(9,450 | ) | (1,074 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes payable |
92,009 | | ||||||
Payments on notes payable |
(1,010 | ) | | |||||
Change in security deposit liability |
(4 | ) | | |||||
Deferred financing costs paid |
(1,960 | ) | | |||||
Net cash from financing activities |
315,416 | 141,021 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(184 | ) | 29 | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
103,273 | 85,280 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
146,953 | 28,168 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 250,226 | $ | 113,448 | ||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
HINES GLOBAL REIT, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
1. ORGANIZATION
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial information has been
prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)
have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations. For further information,
refer to the financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in
Hines Global REIT, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
and eliminations, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly and
in conformity with GAAP the financial position of Hines Global REIT, Inc. as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 have been included. The
results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for
the full year.
Hines Global REIT, Inc. (the Company), was formed as a Maryland corporation on December 10,
2008 under the General Corporation Law of the state of Maryland for the purpose of engaging in the
business of investing in and owning commercial real estate properties and other real estate
investments. Beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2009, the Company operated and
intends to continue to operate in a manner to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT)
for federal income tax purposes. The business of the Company is managed by Hines Global REIT
Advisors LP (the Advisor), an affiliate of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (Hines),
pursuant to the Advisory Agreement between the Company, the Advisor and the Operating Partnership
(defined below).
On August 5, 2009, the Company commenced its initial public offering of up to $3.5 billion in
shares of common stock for sale to the public (the Offering) through which it has received gross
offering proceeds of $690.5 million from the sale of 69.3 million shares through June 30, 2011. The
Company engaged Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc., (the Dealer Manager), an affiliate of Hines,
to serve as the dealer manager for the Offering. The Dealer Manager is responsible for marketing
the Companys shares being offered pursuant to the Offering. The Company has and intends to
continue to invest the net proceeds from the Offering in a diversified portfolio of quality
commercial real estate properties and other real estate investments throughout the United States
and internationally. Properties purchased by the Company may have varying uses including office,
retail, industrial, multi-family residential and hospitality or leisure. The Company may invest in
operating properties, properties under development, and undeveloped properties such as land. In
addition, the Company may also make other real estate investments including investments in equity
or debt interests, which may include securities in other real estate entities and debt related to
real estate.
The Company made its initial real estate investment in June 2010 and owned interests in seven
properties as of June 30, 2011. These properties consisted of three U.S. office properties, one
mixed-use industrial/flex office park complex in Austin, Texas, one office property
in London, England, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Birmingham, England and one
industrial complex located in Moscow, Russia. These properties contain, in the aggregate, 3.0
million square feet of leasable space.
Noncontrolling Interests
On January 7, 2009, the Company and Hines Global REIT Associates Limited Partnership (HALP),
an affiliate of the Advisor, formed Hines Global REIT Properties, LP (the Operating Partnership).
The Company conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership. As of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, HALP owned a 0.03% and 0.1% interest in the Operating
Partnership, respectively.
In June 2010, the Operating Partnership and Moorfield Real Estate Fund II GP Ltd.
(Moorfield) formed Hines Moorfield UK Venture I S.A.R.L., (the Brindleyplace JV) and, on July
7, 2010, the Brindleyplace JV acquired several properties located in Birmingham, England (the
Brindleyplace Project). The Brindleyplace Project consists of five office buildings including
ground-floor retail, restaurant and theatre space, and a 903-space multi-story parking garage. The
Company owns a 60% interest in the Brindleyplace JV and Moorfield holds the remaining 40% interest.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Described below are certain of the Companys significant accounting policies. The disclosures
regarding several of the policies have been condensed or omitted in accordance with interim
reporting regulations specified by Form 10-Q. Please see the Companys
5
Table of Contents
Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete listing of all of its significant accounting policies.
Use of Estimates
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP. The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires the Company
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and
contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. The Company evaluates its assumptions and estimates on an
ongoing basis. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Additionally,
application of the Companys accounting policies involves exercising judgments regarding
assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Hines
Global REIT, Inc., the Operating Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and the
Brindleyplace JV as well as amounts related to noncontrolling interests. All intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
International Operations
The British pound (GBP) is the functional currency for Companys subsidiaries operating in
the United Kingdom and the Russian rouble (RUB) is the functional currency for the Companys
subsidiaries operating in Russia. These subsidiaries have translated their financial statements
into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the
Company recorded foreign currency translation adjustments of approximately $2.2 million and
$28,000, respectively due to the effect of changes in exchange rates between the British pound,
Russian rouble and the U.S. dollar.
Impairment of Investment Property
Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment each reporting period if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable.
In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of
each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If the carrying
amount exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, it would be written down to the estimated fair value to
reflect impairment in the value of the asset. The determination of whether investment property is
impaired requires a significant amount of judgment by management and is based on the best
information available to management at the time of the evaluation. No impairment charges were
recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible
to cash with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had restricted cash of approximately
$3.7 million and $348,000, respectively, related to certain escrows required by several of the
Companys mortgage agreements.
Tenant and Other Receivables
Tenant and other receivables are recorded at cost, net of any applicable allowance for
doubtful accounts. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no such allowances have been
recorded.
In addition, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, tenant and other
receivables included $1.9 million and $1.2 million of receivables from the Companys transfer agent
related to shares of its stock that were issued, but the related proceeds had not yet been released
to the Company.
Deferred Leasing Costs
Tenant inducement amortization was approximately $33,000 and $97,000 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively and was recorded as a reduction to rental revenue. The
Company recorded approximately $16,000 and $31,000 as
6
Table of Contents
amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, respectively.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining debt financing,
including the financing fees paid to the Advisor (see Note 7 Related Party Transactions). These
costs are amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the
effective interest method, over the terms of the obligations. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, approximately $447,000 and $813,000, was amortized into interest expense,
respectively.
Other Assets
Other assets was primarily made up of prepaid expenses and a $5.0 million deposit on a pending
real estate acquisition as of June 30, 2011.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease
including rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable was $2.9 million and $1.6 million as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Issuer Costs
The Company reimburses the Advisor for any issuer costs related to the Offering that it pays
on the Companys behalf. From inception to June 30, 2011, issuer costs incurred by the Advisor on
the Companys behalf totaled $9.4 million, of which approximately $337,000 related to
organizational issuer costs.
Income Taxes
In connection with the operation of its international properties, the Company has recorded a
provision for foreign income taxes of approximately $767,000 and $1.1 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, in accordance with tax laws and regulations.
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. As
of June 30, 2011, the Company had recorded a deferred tax asset of $1.0 million
related to net operating loss carry-forwards, which was included in other assets in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Redemption of Common Stock
The Company has recorded liabilities of approximately $417,000 and $593,000 in accounts
payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, related to shares tendered for redemption and
approved by the board of directors, but which were not redeemed until the subsequent month. Such
amounts have been included in redemption of common shares in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of equity.
Per Share Data
Net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common
stockholders for each period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
such period. Net loss per common share on a basic and diluted basis is the same because the Company
has no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.
Reclassifications
The Company made a reclassification in its condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 to be consistent with the presentation for the six months ended
June 30, 2011. Specifically, the Company reclassified $10.3 million of payments from increase in
acquired intangible lease assets, net to investments in property and acquired lease intangibles,
net. Management believes this change in presentation simplifies the cash flow statement by
combining related line items, although it does not believe this change is necessary for the fair
presentation of the Companys financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, FASB issued guidance on fair value measurements. This guidance results in a
consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about
fair value between GAAP and IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards). The adoption of
this guidance is effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December
15, 2011. Management is currently evaluating this guidance and its potential impact on the Company.
In June 2011, FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance
eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the
statement of changes in equity. The adoption of this guidance is effective for interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is not expected to have a material effect on the
Companys financial statements.
3. INVESTMENT PROPERTY
The Company makes real estate investments directly through entities wholly-owned by the
Operating Partnership, or indirectly through other entities. The table below provides information
regarding the properties in which the Company owned interests as of June 30, 2011:
Direct Investments | Effective | |||||||||||||||
Property | Location | Date Acquired | Leasable Square Feet | Percent Leased | Ownership (1) | |||||||||||
17600 Gillette
|
Irvine, California | 6/2010 | 98,925 | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||
Hock Plaza
|
Durham, North Carolina | 9/2010 | 327,160 | 99 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||
Southpark
|
Austin, Texas | 10/2010 | 372,125 | 94 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||
Fifty South Sixth
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota | 11/2010 | 698,783 | 96 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||
Stonecutter Court
|
London, England | 3/2011 | 152,808 | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||
FM Logistic
|
Moscow, Russia | 4/2011 | 748,578 | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||
Total for Directly-Owned Properties
|
2,398,379 | 98 | % | |||||||||||||
Indirect Investments |
||||||||||||||||
Brindleyplace Project
|
Birmingham, England | 7/2010 | 560,207 | 96 | % | 60 | % | |||||||||
Total for Indirectly-Owned Properties
|
560,207 | 96 | % | |||||||||||||
Total for All Properties
|
2,958,586 | 98 | %(2) | |||||||||||||
(1) | This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On June 30, 2011, the Company owned a 99.97% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 0.03% interest in the Operating Partnership. | |
(2) | This amount represents the percentage leased assuming we own a 100% interest in each of these properties. The percentage leased based on our effective ownership interest in each property is also 98%. |
Investment property consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Buildings and improvements |
$ | 593,472 | $ | 443,592 | ||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(10,617 | ) | (3,893 | ) | ||||
Buildings and improvements, net |
582,855 | 439,699 | ||||||
Land |
14,620 | 9,330 | ||||||
Investment property, net |
$ | 597,475 | $ | 449,029 | ||||
8
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2011, the cost basis and accumulated amortization related to lease intangibles was
as follows (in thousands):
Lease Intangibles | ||||||||||||
Out-of-Market | Out-of-Market | |||||||||||
In-Place Leases | Lease Assets | Lease Liabilities | ||||||||||
Cost |
$ | 208,509 | $ | 36,319 | $ | (9,224 | ) | |||||
Less: accumulated amortization |
(25,979 | ) | (3,311 | ) | 1,760 | |||||||
Net |
$ | 182,530 | $ | 33,008 | $ | (7,464 | ) | |||||
As of December 31, 2010, the cost basis and accumulated amortization related to lease intangibles was as follows (in thousands):
Lease Intangibles | ||||||||||||
Out-of-Market | Out-of-Market | |||||||||||
In-Place Leases | Lease Assets | Lease Liabilities | ||||||||||
Cost |
$ | 139,561 | $ | 34,000 | $ | (6,674 | ) | |||||
Less: accumulated amortization |
(11,241 | ) | (1,284 | ) | 748 | |||||||
Net |
$ | 128,320 | $ | 32,716 | $ | (5,926 | ) | |||||
Amortization expense of in-place leases was $9.2 million and $16.7 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Amortization expense of in-place leases was
approximately $46,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and amortization of
above-market leases was a decrease to rental revenue of approximately $62,000 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of out-of-market leases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was a
decrease to rental revenue of approximately $547,000 and $1.1 million, respectively.
Expected future amortization of in-place leases and out-of-market leases, net, for the
following periods are as follows (in thousands):
In-Place | Out-of-Market | |||||||
Leases | Leases, Net | |||||||
July 1 through December 31, 2011 |
$ | 18,205 | $ | 990 | ||||
2012 |
27,941 | 2,659 | ||||||
2013 |
25,658 | 2,630 | ||||||
2014 |
23,797 | 2,609 | ||||||
2015 |
21,858 | 2,735 |
Leases
The company has entered into non-cancelable lease agreements with tenants for space. As of
June 30, 2011, the approximate fixed future minimum rentals for the following periods are as
follows (in thousands):
Fixed Future Minimum Rentals | ||||
July 1 through December 31, 2011 |
$ | 33,337 | ||
2012 |
62,850 | |||
2013 |
61,147 | |||
2014 |
59,047 | |||
2015 |
57,323 | |||
Thereafter |
208,509 | |||
Total |
$ | 482,213 | ||
9
Table of Contents
Of the Companys total rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately
18% was earned from a tenant in the accounting industry who has leases that expire in 2016, 2019
and 2024, approximately 13% was earned from a tenant in the legal services industry whose lease
expires in 2016, and approximately 12% was earned from a tenant in the education services industry
whose lease expires in 2019.
Recent Acquisitions
The
amounts of real estate assets and lease intangibles recognized for Stonecutter Court and FM Logistic Industrial Park
(FM Logistic) as of their respective acquisition dates were determined by allocating the purchase
price as follows (in thousands):
Stonecutter Court (1) | FM Logistic | |||||||
Buildings and improvements |
$ | 90,677 | $ | 51,588 | ||||
Land |
| 5,320 | ||||||
In-place lease intangibles |
53,317 | 15,780 | ||||||
Out-of-market lease intangibles, net |
1,598 | (1,840 | ) | |||||
Total |
$ | 145,592 | $ | 70,848 | ||||
(1) | These amounts were translated from GBP to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.61 per GBP, based on the exchange rate in effect on the date of acquisition. |
The tables below include the amounts of revenue and net loss of Stonecutter Court and FM
Logistic included in the Companys condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 as well as pro forma information that is presented assuming the
Company completed both acquisitions on January 1, 2010. This pro forma information is not
necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations would have been had the Company
completed these transactions on January 1, 2010, nor does it purport to represent its future
operations (in thousands):
Results of | Pro forma results | Results of | Pro forma results | |||||||||||||||||||||
operations for the | of operations for | operations for the | of operations for | |||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Pro forma | the Three Months | Three Months Ended | Pro forma | the Three Months | |||||||||||||||||||
Stonecutter Court | June 30, 2011 | Adjustments | Ended June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | Adjustments | Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 2,576 | $ | | $ | 2,576 | $ | | $ | 2,576 | $ | 2,576 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (4,579 | ) | $ | | $ | (4,579 | ) | $ | | $ | (2,089 | ) | $ | (2,089 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted
loss per common
share |
$ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) |
Results of | Pro forma results | Results of | Pro forma results | |||||||||||||||||||||
operations for the | of operations for | operations for the | of operations for | |||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended | Pro forma | the Six Months | Six Months Ended | Pro forma | the Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||
Stonecutter Court | June 30, 2011 | Adjustments | Ended June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | Adjustments | Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,174 | $ | 1,955 | $ | 5,129 | $ | | $ | 5,129 | $ | 5,129 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,830 | ) | $ | (3,592 | ) | $ | (9,422 | ) | $ | | $ | (6,828 | ) | $ | (6,828 | ) | |||||||
Basic and diluted
loss per common
share |
$ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.70 | ) |
10
Table of Contents
Pro forma | Pro forma | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of | results of | Results of | results of | |||||||||||||||||||||
operations for | operations for | operations for | operations for | |||||||||||||||||||||
the Three | the Three | the Three | the Three | |||||||||||||||||||||
Months Ended | Pro forma | Months Ended | Months Ended | Pro forma | Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
FM Logistic | June 30, 2011 | Adjustments | June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | Adjustments | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 1,518 | $ | 607 | $ | 2,125 | $ | | $ | 2,125 | $ | 2,125 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (203 | ) | $ | (81 | ) | $ | (284 | ) | $ | | $ | (284 | ) | $ | (284 | ) | |||||||
Basic and diluted
loss per common
share |
$ | | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Pro forma | Pro forma | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of | results of | Results of | results of | |||||||||||||||||||||
operations for | operations for | operations for | operations for | |||||||||||||||||||||
the Six Months | the Six Months | the Six Months | the Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Pro forma | Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | Pro forma | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
FM Logistic | 2011 | Adjustments | 2011 | 2010 | Adjustments | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 1,518 | $ | 2,709 | $ | 4,227 | $ | | $ | 4,227 | $ | 4,227 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (203 | ) | $ | (362 | ) | $ | (565 | ) | $ | | $ | (565 | ) | $ | (565 | ) | |||||||
Basic and diluted
loss per common
share |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) |
Probable Acquisitions
Marlborough
On June 1, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a
contract with Bel Marlborough I LLC and Bel Marlborough II LLC to acquire the Marlborough Campus, a
complex of four interconnected office buildings located in Marlborough, Massachusetts. The sellers
are not affiliated with the Company or its affiliates. Marlborough consists of 532,246 square feet
of rentable area that is 100% leased to six tenants. The contract purchase price for Marlborough is
expected to be approximately $103.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and
working capital reserves. The Company expects to fund the acquisition using proceeds from the
Offering along with the assumption of an existing $57.9 million mortgage loan with Bear Stearns
Commercial Mortgage, Inc. The mortgage loan has an interest rate of 5.21% and matures in December
2014. The Company funded a nonrefundable $5.0 million earnest money
deposit upon the signing of the agreement. The Company expects the closing of this acquisition to occur in the third quarter of 2011,
subject to completing the assumption of the existing mortgage as well as a number of other closing conditions.
Gogolevsky 11
On July 18, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a
contract with Delamore Limited to acquire Gogolevsky 11, a nine-story office building located in
Moscow, Russia. The sellers are not affiliated with the Company or its affiliates. Gogolevsky 11
consists of 85,740 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to six tenants. The contract
purchase price for Gogolevsky 11 is expected to be approximately $96.1 million, exclusive of
transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The Company expects to fund the
acquisition using proceeds from its current public offering along with the assumption of an
existing $40.0 million mortgage loan with Fibersoft Limited. The mortgage loan has an interest rate
of LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum and matures in April 2021. The Company expects the closing of this
acquisition to occur in the third quarter of 2011, subject to completing the assumption of a
mortgage as well as a number of other closing conditions.
250 Royall Street
On August 1, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a
contract with Inland American Canton Royall, LLC to acquire 250 Royall Street, an office building
located in Canton, Massachusetts. The seller is not affiliated with the Company or its affiliates.
250 Royall Street consists of 185,171 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to
Computershare Limited. The contract purchase price for 250 Royall Street is expected to be
approximately $57.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital
reserves. The Company funded a nonrefundable $2.0 million earnest money
deposit upon the signing of the agreement. The Company expects to fund the acquisition using proceeds from the Offering. The
Company expects the closing of this acquisition to occur in the third quarter of 2011, subject to
completing a number of closing conditions.
11
Table of Contents
There can be no assurance that any of the acquisitions described above will be completed.
4. DEBT FINANCING
The following table includes the Companys outstanding notes payable as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (in thousands, except interest rates):
Origination | ||||||||||||||||||||
or | Principal | Principal | ||||||||||||||||||
Assumption | Maturity | Outstanding at | Outstanding at | |||||||||||||||||
Description | Date | Date | Interest Rate | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
SECURED MORTGAGE DEBT |
||||||||||||||||||||
Brindleyplace Project |
07/01/10 | 07/07/15 | Variable(1) | $ | 193,919 | $ | 187,296 | |||||||||||||
Hock Plaza |
09/08/10 | 12/06/15 | 5.58 | % | 79,501 | 80,000 | ||||||||||||||
Southpark |
10/19/10 | 12/06/16 | 5.67 | % | 18,000 | 18,000 | ||||||||||||||
Fifty South Sixth |
11/04/10 | 11/04/15 | Variable(2) | 95,000 | 95,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stonecutter Court |
03/11/11 | 03/11/16 | Variable(3) | 90,800 | | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL
PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING |
477,220 | 380,296 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized Discount (4) |
(1,786 | ) | (2,001 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
NOTES
PAYABLE |
$ | 475,434 | $ | 378,295 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | On July 1, 2010, subsidiaries of the Brindleyplace JV entered into a secured mortgage facility agreement in the aggregate amount of £121.1 million ($183.7 million assuming a rate of $1.52 per GBP based on the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date) with Eurohypo AG (Eurohypo). The amounts outstanding were translated from GBP to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.60 and $1.55 per GBP as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The loan has a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.60%. Interest on approximately £90.8 million ($137.7 million assuming a rate of $1.52 per GBP based on the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date) of the loan balance was fixed at closing at 2.29% (3.89% including the 1.60% margin) through multiple 5-year interest rate swaps with Eurohypo. At June 30, 2011, the variable rate for the loan was 2.42%. See Note 5 Derivative Instruments for additional information regarding the Companys interest rate swaps. | |
(2) | This loan has a floating interest rate based on the higher of: (i) LIBOR, (ii) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or (iii) the Prime Rate. The Company entered into a five-year interest rate swap in order to fix the interest rate at 1.37% (3.62% including the 2.25% margin). At June 30, 2011, the variable rate for the loan was 2.44%. See Note 5 Derivative Instruments for additional information regarding the Companys interest rate swaps. | |
(3) | In connection with the acquisition of Stonecutter Court, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, entered into a secured facility agreement in the amount of £57.0 million ($92.0 million assuming a rate of $1.61 per GBP based on the closing date). The loan provides for quarterly installments for the repayment of principal of £313,500 ($506,100 assuming a rate of $1.61 per GBP based on the closing date). This loan has a variable interest rate based on LIBOR plus a margin of 2.08%. Principal and interest payments are due quarterly beginning on April 15, 2011 through maturity. The loan may be repaid in full prior to maturity, subject to a prepayment premium if it is repaid in the first four years, and is prepayable at par thereafter. This amount was translated from GBP to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.60 per GBP as of June 30, 2011. The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at 2.71% (4.79% including the 2.08% margin). See Note 5- Derivative Instruments for additional information regarding the Companys interest rate swaps. | |
(4) | The Company assumed notes payable in connection with various acquisitions, which were recorded at their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The difference between the fair value at acquisition and the principal outstanding is amortized over the term of the related note. |
12
Table of Contents
The Company is not aware of any instances of noncompliance with financial covenants on any of
its loans as of June 30, 2011.
Principal Payments on Notes Payable
The Company is required to make the following principal payments on its outstanding notes
payable for the period of July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, for each of the years ending
December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2015 and for the period thereafter (in thousands):
July 1 December 31, | Payments due by Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments |
$ | 1,505 | $ | 3,053 | $ | 3,126 | $ | 3,191 | $ | 366,584 | $ | 99,761 |
5. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company has entered into several interest rate swap contracts as economic hedges against
the variability of future interest rates on its variable interest rate borrowings. These swaps
effectively fixed the interest rates on each of the loans to which they relate. The Company has not
designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
The valuation of these instruments is determined based on assumptions that management believes
market participants would use in pricing, using widely accepted valuation techniques including
discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis
reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair
values of interest rate contracts have been determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected
variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate
curves.
The tables below provide additional information regarding each of the Companys interest rate
swap contracts (in thousands):
Interest Rate | ||||||||||||||||
Effective Date | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Received | Interest Rate Paid | ||||||||||||
July 7, 2010 |
July 7, 2015 | $ | 23,322 | (1) | LIBOR | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
July 7, 2010 |
July 7, 2015 | $ | 44,770 | (1) | LIBOR | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
July 7, 2010 |
July 7, 2015 | $ | 20,823 | (1) | LIBOR | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
July 7, 2010 |
July 7, 2015 | $ | 35,920 | (1) | LIBOR | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
July 7, 2010 |
July 7, 2015 | $ | 20,602 | (1) | LIBOR | 2.29 | % | |||||||||
November 4, 2010 |
November 4, 2015 | $ | 95,000 | LIBOR | 1.37 | % | ||||||||||
March 11, 2011 |
March 11, 2016 | $ | 91,303 | (1) | LIBOR | 2.71 | % |
(1) | The notional amounts reported are in USD and have been converted from GBP, at a rate of $1.60 per GBP as of June 30, 2011. |
Derivatives Fair Value | ||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for | ||||||||
accounting purposes: | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Interest rate swap contracts- Asset |
$ | 1,335 | $ | 2,765 | ||||
Interest rate swap contracts- Liability |
(4,879 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
Total derivatives, net |
$ | (3,544 | ) | $ | 2,727 | |||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Loss on interest
rate swap
contracts, net |
$ | (8,313 | ) | $ | | $ | (6,380 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Total |
$ | (8,313 | ) | $ | | $ | (6,380 | ) | $ | | ||||||
13
Table of Contents
6. DISTRIBUTIONS
With the authorization of its board of directors, the Company declared distributions to its
stockholders and HALP for the period from October 20, 2009 through September 30, 2011. These
distributions were or will be calculated based on stockholders of record for each day in an amount
equal to $0.00191781 per share, per day, which based on a purchase price of $10 per share, would
equate to a 7% annualized distribution rate if it were maintained every day for a twelve-month
period.
Distributions for the period from October 20, 2009 through February 28, 2010 were paid on
March 1, 2010. Distributions for subsequent months have been or will be paid monthly on the first
business day following the completion of each month to which they relate. All distributions were
or will be paid in cash or reinvested in shares of the Companys common stock for those
participating in its distribution reinvestment plan.
In addition, the Brindleyplace JV declared distributions in the amount of $1.9 million to
Moorfield for the six months ended June 30, 2011, related to the operations of the Brindleyplace
Project. The table below outlines the Companys total distributions declared to stockholders and
noncontrolling interests (HALP and Moorfield) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and for each
of the quarters ended during 2010, including the breakout between the distributions paid in cash
and those reinvested pursuant to the Companys distribution reinvestment plan (in thousands):
Stockholders | Noncontrolling Interests | |||||||||||||||
Distributions for the | Cash | Distributions | ||||||||||||||
quarter ended | Distributions | Reinvested | Total Declared | Total Declared | ||||||||||||
2011 |
||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 4,969 | $ | 5,770 | $ | 10,739 | $ | 932 | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 |
3,769 | 4,447 | 8,216 | 984 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,738 | $ | 10,217 | $ | 18,955 | $ | 1,916 | ||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
$ | 2,806 | $ | 3,386 | $ | 6,192 | $ | 794 | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 |
1,860 | 2,303 | 4,163 | 812 | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
977 | 1,368 | 2,345 | 4 | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 |
395 | 602 | 997 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,038 | $ | 7,659 | $ | 13,697 | $ | 1,614 | ||||||||
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The table below outlines fees and expense reimbursements incurred that are payable to Hines
and its affiliates for the periods below (in thousands):
Incurred | Incurred | Unpaid as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
Type and Recipient | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling Commissions- Dealer
Manager |
$ | 10,255 | $ | 6,654 | $ | 19,727 | $ | 10,825 | $ | 637 | $ | 663 | ||||||||||||
Dealer Manager Fee- Dealer Manager |
3,482 | 2,318 | 6,698 | 3,740 | (82 | ) | 116 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuer Costs- the Advisor |
1,433 | 485 | 2,296 | 1,607 | 762 | 826 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition Fee- the Advisor |
1,417 | 407 | 4,353 | 407 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset Management Fee- the Advisor |
1,380 | 18 | 2,310 | 18 | 1,380 | 292 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt Financing Fee- the Advisor |
| | 920 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (1) the Advisor |
287 | 232 | 626 | 319 | 193 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property Management Fee- Hines |
262 | 2 | 504 | 2 | 28 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Leasing Fee- Hines |
53 | | 63 | | 53 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Expense Reimbursement- Hines
(with respect to management and
operations of the Companys
properties) |
523 | 8 | 1,040 | 8 | 509 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Due to Affiliates |
$ | 3,480 | $ | 2,167 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Includes amounts the Advisor paid on behalf of the Company such as general and administrative expenses and acquisition-related expenses. These amounts are generally reimbursed to the Advisor during the month following the period in which they are incurred. |
14
Table of Contents
Other Affiliate Transactions
The Company receives rent under a lease of parking space with an affiliate of Hines at the
Brindleyplace Project. Under this agreement, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
the Company recorded rental revenues of approximately $518,000
and $982,000, respectively. Further, the Company recorded receivables related to this
agreement of approximately $170,000 and $350,000 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, which is recorded in tenant and other receivables.
8. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
On July 7, 2010, the Brindleyplace JV issued capital shares and Series B Convertible Preferred
Equity Certificates (CPEC) to Moorfield as a result of its contributions. Distributions are
declared and paid quarterly to Moorfield based on the distributable income of the Brindleyplace
Project and payment of the distributions will be subject to the approval of the board of directors
of the Brindleyplace JV. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Brindleyplace JV declared
approximately $1.9 million of preferred dividends to Moorfield related to the CPECs. This amount
was recorded in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss and offsets approximately $2.5 million
of net loss that was attributable to Moorfield during the six months ended June 30, 2011, related
to the results of operations of the Brindleyplace JV.
9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Derivative Instruments
As described in Note 5 Derivative Instruments, the Company entered into several interest
rate swap contracts as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on its
variable interest rate borrowings. Although the Company has determined the majority of the inputs
used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation
adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current
credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties,
Eurohypo, PB Capital Corporation and Landesbank Baden-Württemberg. In adjusting the fair values of
its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the
impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds
and guarantees. However, as of June 30, 2011, the Company has assessed the significance of the
impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and
has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuations
of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined its derivative valuations are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table sets forth the Companys interest rate swap contracts which are measured
at fair value on a recurring basis, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 (all amounts are in thousands):
Basis of Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||
Quoted Prices In | Significant | |||||||
Fair Value | Active Markets for | Other | Significant | |||||
of Assets | Identical Items | Observable Inputs | Unobservable | |||||
Period | (Liabilities) | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | ||||
June 30, 2011 | $ (3,544) | $ | $ (3,544) | $ | ||||
December 31, 2010 | $ 2,727 | $ | $ 2,727 | $ |
15
Table of Contents
Other Items
Other Financial Instruments
As of June 30, 2011, the Company estimated that the book values of its notes payable
approximate their fair values, as the rates approximate those available to the Company on current
terms. Other financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash,
distributions receivable, tenant and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses,
other liabilities and distributions payable. The carrying value of these items reasonably
approximates their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and/or short-term maturities.
10. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
The Companys investments in real estate are geographically diversified and management
evaluates the operating performance of each at an individual property level. The Company has
determined it has five reportable segments: 1) domestic office properties (three properties), 2)
domestic industrial properties (one property), 3) international office properties (one property),
4) international mixed-use properties (Brindleyplace Project) and 5) international industrial
properties (one property). During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company added the international office properties segment and the international industrial properties segment due to the acquisitions of Stonecutter Court and FM Logistic, respectively.
The tables below provide additional information related to each of the Companys segments and
a reconciliation to the Companys net loss, as applicable. Corporate-Level Accounts includes
amounts incurred by the corporate-level entities which are not allocated to any of the reportable
segments (all amounts are in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic office properties |
$ | 9,071 | $ | 133 | $ | 18,229 | $ | 133 | ||||||||
Domestic industrial property |
781 | | 1,759 | | ||||||||||||
International office property |
2,576 | | 3,174 | | ||||||||||||
International mixed-use property |
7,916 | | 16,022 | | ||||||||||||
International industrial property |
1,518 | | 1,518 | | ||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
$ | 21,862 | $ | 133 | $ | 40,702 | $ | 133 | ||||||||
Net Operating Income (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic office properties |
$ | 5,589 | $ | 106 | $ | 11,227 | $ | 106 | ||||||||
Domestic industrial property |
473 | | 1,157 | | ||||||||||||
International office property |
2,261 | | 2,784 | | ||||||||||||
International mixed-use property |
5,153 | | 10,359 | | ||||||||||||
International industrial property |
1,242 | | 1,242 | | ||||||||||||
Total Segment Net Operating Income |
$ | 14,718 | $ | 106 | $ | 26,769 | $ | 106 | ||||||||
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Total Assets |
||||||||
Domestic office properties |
$ | 300,244 | $ | 308,354 | ||||
Domestic industrial property |
30,507 | 32,483 | ||||||
International office property |
149,157 | | ||||||
International mixed-use property |
301,412 | 296,805 | ||||||
International industrial property |
78,088 | | ||||||
Corporate-level accounts |
235,408 | 138,042 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 1,094,816 | $ | 775,684 | ||||
16
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Reconciliation to net loss |
||||||||||||||||
Total segment net operating income |
$ | 14,718 | $ | 106 | $ | 26,769 | $ | 106 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(12,859 | ) | (57 | ) | (23,422 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition related expenses |
(2,132 | ) | (2,494 | ) | (3,185 | ) | (2,583 | ) | ||||||||
Asset management and acquisition
fees |
(2,797 | ) | (425 | ) | (6,663 | ) | (425 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(856 | ) | (465 | ) | (1,609 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on interest rate swap contracts |
(8,313 | ) | | (6,380 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other gains |
(4 | ) | | 22 | | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,640 | ) | | (10,296 | ) | | ||||||||||
Interest income |
36 | 19 | 75 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (17,847 | ) | $ | (3,316 | ) | $ | (24,689 | ) | $ | (3,709 | ) | ||||
(1) | Revenues less property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees and income taxes. |
11. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Supplemental cash flow disclosures for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 8,383 | $ | | ||||
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Activities |
||||||||
Distributions declared and unpaid |
$ | 5,237 | $ | 966 | ||||
Other receivables |
$ | 1,923 | $ | 1,856 | ||||
Distributions reinvested |
$ | 9,450 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Shares tendered for redemption |
$ | 417 | $ | 20 |
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In accordance with the terms of the secured mortgage facility agreement with Eurohypo, the
Brindleyplace JV is required to escrow a reserve in the amount of £3.5 million ($5.6 million
assuming a rate of $1.60 per GBP as of June 30, 2011) for the refurbishment of one of the buildings
of the Brindleyplace Project. The refurbishment is expected to commence in early 2012 and the
reserve will be released in reimbursement of qualified costs related to the refurbishment. The
reserve is required to be fully funded by January 2012. As of June 30, 2011, the Brindleyplace JV
had funded £1.8 million ($2.8 million USD assuming a rate of $1.60 per GBP as of June 30, 2011)
of this reserve, which was included in restricted cash in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
The Company may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
17
Table of Contents
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Hines Corporate Properties II
On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into a Master Agreement (the HCP II JV Agreement) with
New York State Common Retirement Fund (NYSCRF) and Hines, setting forth the terms pursuant to
which the parties intend to jointly invest in high-quality, build-to-suit and buy-to-suit real
estate projects in the United States. The targeted projects may include Class A office projects
and, to a lesser extent, medical office projects, located in major cities and primarily occupied by
single-tenant users.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will have the right, but not the
obligation, to invest 30% of the required equity in all projects with a projected project cost in
excess of $100 million, subject to the exception that, if the Company elects not to invest in any
co-investment project, it will lose its co-investment rights for any and all future projects under
the HCP II JV Agreement. Unless terminated earlier by NYSCRF, the investment period for the HCP II
JV will terminate on the earlier of (i) July 20, 2014 or (ii) the date as of which substantially
all of NYSCRFs allocated capital ($450 million) has been committed. As stated earlier, the
Companys participation in projects under the HCP II JV Agreement is purely a right and not an
obligation. The Companys investment in any such project will be subject to the approval of its
board of directors. There can be no assurances that the Company will invest any amounts under the
HCP II JV Agreement.
Extension of the Offering
On July 18, 2011, the Companys board of directors authorized the Company to postpone the
termination of the Offering, which was originally due to expire on August 5, 2011, until August 5,
2012. In many states, the Company will need to renew the registration statement to continue the
offering for this period. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to extend the
Offering in such states. The Company may further extend or terminate this Offering at any time.
250 Royall Street
On August 1, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into an agreement to
acquire 250 Royall Street. See Note 3 Investment Property for additional information.
Gogolevsky 11
On July 18, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into an agreement to
acquire Gogolevsky 1. See Note 3 Investment Property for additional information.
18
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following
discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements
and the notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements include statements concerning future financial performance
and distributions, future debt and financing levels, acquisitions and investment objectives,
payments to Hines Global REIT Advisors Limited Partnership (the Advisor), and its affiliates and
other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or
assumptions or forecasts related thereto as well as all other statements that are not historical
statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are
not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially
from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
typically identified by the use of terms such as may, should, expect, could, intend,
plan, anticipate, estimate, believe, continue, predict, potential or the negative of
such terms and other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on our
current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs that involve numerous risks and
uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other
things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, the availability of future financing
and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and
many of which are beyond our control. Any of the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements
could be inaccurate. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to
meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from
operations, pay distributions to our shareholders and maintain the value of any real estate
investments and real estate-related investments in which we may hold an interest in the future, may
be significantly hindered.
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to
differ materially from those presented in certain forward-looking statements:
| We have a limited operating history or established financing sources, and the prior performance of other Hines affiliated entities may not be a good measure of our future results; therefore, there is no assurance we will be able to achieve our investment objectives; | |
| Our current offering is a best efforts offering and as such, the risk that we will not be able to accomplish our business objectives and that the poor performance of a single investment will materially adversely affect our overall investment performance, will increase if we do not sell a substantial number of additional shares in the offering; | |
| Whether we will have the opportunity to invest offering and distribution reinvestment plan proceeds to acquire properties or other investments or whether such proceeds will be needed to redeem shares; and if proceeds are available for investment, our ability to make such investments in a timely manner and at appropriate amounts that provide acceptable returns; | |
| Competition for tenants and real estate investment opportunities, including competition with affiliates of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (Hines); | |
| Our reliance on our Advisor, Hines and affiliates of Hines for our day-to-day operations and the selection of real estate investments, and our Advisors ability to attract and retain high-quality personnel who can provide service at a level acceptable to us; | |
| Risks associated with conflicts of interests that result from our relationship with our Advisor and Hines, as well as conflicts of interests certain of our officers and directors face relating to the positions they hold with other entities; | |
| The potential need to fund tenant improvements, lease-up costs or other capital expenditures, as well as increases in property operating expenses and costs of compliance with environmental matters or discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous or other undetected adverse conditions at our properties; |
19
Table of Contents
| The availability and timing of distributions we may pay is uncertain and cannot be assured; | |
| In our initial quarters of operations, our distributions were paid using cash flows from financing activities, including proceeds from our initial public offering and proceeds from debt financings and some or all of the distributions we pay in the future may be paid from similar sources or sources such as cash advances by our Advisor or cash resulting from a waiver or deferral of fees. When we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, we will have less funds available for the acquisition of properties, and your overall return may be reduced; | |
| Risks associated with debt and our ability to secure financing; | |
| Risks associated with adverse changes in general economic or local market conditions, including terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, which may affect the markets in which we and our tenants operate; | |
| Catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, earthquakes and terrorist attacks; and our ability to secure adequate insurance at reasonable and appropriate rates; | |
| The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and make additional investments; | |
| Changes in governmental, tax, real estate and zoning laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance and increases in our administrative operating expenses, including expenses associated with operating as a public company; | |
| International investment risks, including the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and the uncertainty of such laws, the tax treatment of transaction structures, political and economic instability, foreign currency fluctuations, and inflation and governmental measures to curb inflation may adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions; | |
| The lack of liquidity associated with our assets; and | |
| Our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes. |
These risks are more fully discussed in, and all forward-looking statements should be read in
light of, all of the factors discussed Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the
expectations expressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may increase with the passage of time.
In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will be achieved. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. Each forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we do not undertake to update
any forward-looking statement.
Executive Summary
Hines Global REIT, Inc. (Hines Global and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries,
we, us or the Company) and its subsidiary, Hines Global REIT Properties, LP (the Operating
Partnership) were formed in December 2008 and January 2009, respectively, to invest in a
diversified portfolio of quality commercial real estate properties and related investments in the
United States and internationally. In August 2009, we commenced a $3.5 billion initial public
offering of our common shares (the Offering) and have raised $690.5 million in gross proceeds
from the Offering through June 30, 2011.
We intend to meet our primary investment objectives by investing in a portfolio of real estate
properties and other real estate investments that relate to properties that are generally
diversified by geographic area, lease expirations and tenant industries. These investments could
include a variety of asset types in the US and internationally such as office, retail, industrial,
etc. In addition, we may invest in operating properties, properties under development and
undeveloped properties or real estate-related investments such as real estate securities or debt.
We expect to fund these acquisitions primarily with proceeds from the Offering and debt financing.
As of June 30, 2011, we owned interests in seven properties. These properties consisted of
three U.S. office properties, one
20
Table of Contents
mixed-use industrial/flex office park complex in Austin, Texas, one office property in London,
England, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Birmingham, England and one industrial property
in Moscow, Russia. These properties contain, in the aggregate, 3.0 million square feet of leasable
space, and we believe each property is suitable for its intended purpose.
Critical Accounting Policies
Each of our critical accounting policies involves the use of estimates that require management
to make assumptions that are subjective in nature. Management relies on its experience, collects
historical and current market data, and analyzes these assumptions in order to arrive at what it
believes to be reasonable estimates. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves
the exercise of judgments regarding assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results could
materially differ from these estimates. A disclosure of our critical accounting policies is
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition. There have been no significant changes to our
policies during 2011.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal demands for funds are to purchase real estate properties and make other real
estate investments, for the payment of operating expenses and distributions, and for the payment of
principal and interest on indebtedness. Generally, we expect to meet operating cash needs from our
cash flow from operations, and we expect to meet cash needs for acquisitions and investments from
the net proceeds of the Offering and from debt proceeds.
As of June 30, 2011, we had consolidated cash and cash equivalents of $250.2 million, which
were primarily generated by proceeds from the Offering. While we have experienced delays in
investing the proceeds from the Offering, we intend to invest these and future proceeds raised as
quickly and prudently as possible. Real estate investment transaction volume increased during 2010
and the first half of 2011, and estimated going-in capitalization rates or cap rates (ratio of the
net projected operating income of a property in its initial fiscal year divided by the net purchase
price) have fallen relative to their peaks in late 2009. In the current market there continues to
be a significant amount of investment capital pursuing high-quality, well-located assets that
generate stable cash flows causing aggressive competition and pricing for assets which match our
investment strategy. This may continue to drive prices higher, resulting in lower cap rates and
returns. One of our priorities is to monitor the returns being achieved from our real estate
investments in relation to our distribution rate. If we continue to experience delays in investing
the proceeds from the Offering, or if pricing for real estate investments continues to increase and
returns continue to decrease, we may not be able to maintain our current rate of distributions.
We expect that once we have fully invested the proceeds of the Offering and other potential
subsequent offerings, our debt financing, including our pro rata share of the debt financing of
entities in which we invest, will be in the range of approximately 50% 70% of the aggregate value
of our real estate investments and other assets. Financing for acquisitions and investments may be
obtained at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as we
determine to be appropriate. In addition, debt financing may be used from time to time for property
improvements, lease inducements, tenant improvements and other working capital needs, including the
payment of distributions. Additionally, the amount of debt placed on an individual property or
related to a particular investment, including our pro rata share of the amount of debt incurred by
an individual entity in which we invest, may be less than 50% or more than 70% of the value of such
property/investment or the value of the assets owned by such entity, depending on market conditions
and other factors. Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, must be reasonable in relation
to our net assets and must be reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. Our charter
limits our borrowing to 300% of our net assets (which approximates 75% of the cost of our assets)
unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and is disclosed
to our stockholders in our next quarterly report along with justification for the excess. Our
portfolio was 42% leveraged as of June 30, 2011, based on the aggregate net purchase price of our
real estate investments and cash and cash equivalents on hand as of that date.
Notwithstanding the above, depending on market conditions and other factors, we may choose not
to place additional debt on our portfolio or our assets and may choose not to borrow to finance our
operations or to acquire properties. Any additional indebtedness we do incur will likely be subject
to continuing covenants, and we will likely be required to make continuing representations and
warranties about our company in connection with such debt. Moreover, some or all of our debt may be
secured by some or all of our assets. If we default on the payment of interest or principal on any
such debt, breach any representation or warranty in connection with any borrowing or violate any
covenant in any loan document, our lender may accelerate the maturity of such debt, requiring us to
immediately repay all outstanding principal.
The discussions below provide additional details regarding our cash flows.
21
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our real estate properties generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are
reduced by interest payments, direct leasing costs and property-level operating expenses.
Property-level operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages of property management
personnel, utilities, cleaning, insurance, security and building maintenance costs, property
management and leasing fees, and property taxes. Additionally, we incur general and administrative
expenses, asset management and acquisition fees and expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $13.5
million and primarily related to rental receipts offset by the payment of acquisition-related
expenses, asset management fees, general and administrative expenses and property operating
expenses. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and acquisition-related expenses are expensed and therefore
reduce cash flows from operating activities. However, we fund these expenses with proceeds from the
Offering or other equity capital. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid acquisition
fees and acquisition-related expenses of $6.6 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due
to the payment of $146.3 million related to the acquisition of Stonecutter Court and its related
lease intangibles and $70.2 million related to the acquisition of FM Logistic and its related lease
intangibles.
In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had an increase in restricted cash
of $3.4 million. The increase was primarily related to escrows required by our outstanding mortgage
loans.
Net cash used in investing activities was $54.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010
as a result of the following:
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we paid deposits of $28.6 million related to our
acquisition of the Brindleyplace Project in July and $6.0 million related to our potential
acquisitions of Hock Plaza and Southpark.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we made payments of $20.2 million related to our
acquisition of 17600 Gillette and its related lease intangibles.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Initial Public Offering
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, we raised proceeds of $267.7
million and $148.3 million from the Offering, excluding proceeds from the distribution reinvestment
plan. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we redeemed approximately $2.8
million in shares of our common stock through our redemption plan.
We use our proceeds from the Offering to make certain payments to Hines Global REIT Advisors
LP (the Advisor), the Dealer Manager and Hines and their affiliates during the various phases of
our organization and operation. During the organization and offering stage, these include payments
to our Dealer Manager for selling commissions and the dealer manager fee and payments to our
Advisor for reimbursement of issuer costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, we made payments of $29.0 million and $17.6 million, for selling commissions, dealer
manager fees and issuer costs related to the Offering.
Distributions
In our initial quarters of operations, and from time to time thereafter, we may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions paid. Therefore, particularly in
the earlier part of the Offering, some or all of our distributions may continue to be paid from
other sources, such as cash advances by the Advisor, cash resulting from a waiver or deferral of
fees, borrowings and/or proceeds from the Offering. We have not placed a cap on the amount of our
distributions that may be paid from any of these sources.
With the authorization of our board of directors, we declared distributions to our
stockholders and HALP for the period from October 20, 2009 through September 30, 2011. These
distributions were or will be calculated based on stockholders of record for each day in an amount
equal to $0.00191781 per share, per day, which based on a purchase price of $10 per share, would
equate to a 7% annualized distribution rate if it were maintained every day for a twelve-month
period. As discussed above, due to market conditions and delays in investing our offering proceeds,
we may re-evaluate our level of distributions for the future and may not be able to maintain our
current level of distributions.
Distributions for the period from October 20, 2009 through February 28, 2010 were paid on
March 1, 2010. Distributions for subsequent months have been or will be paid monthly on the first
business day following the completion of each month to which they relate. All distributions were or
will be paid in cash or reinvested in shares of our common stock for those participating in our
22
Table of Contents
distribution reinvestment plan. See Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources for
additional information regarding our distributions.
In addition, the Brindleyplace JV declared distributions in the amount of $1.9 million to
Moorfield for the six months ended June 30, 2011, related to the operations the Brindleyplace
Project. The table below contains additional information regarding distributions to our
stockholders and noncontrolling interest holders (HALP and Moorfield) as well as the sources of
payments (all amounts are in thousands):
Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders | Interests | Sources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions for the | Cash | Distributions | Total | Cash Flows From | Financing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Distributions | Reinvested | Declared | Total Declared | Operating Activities | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 4,969 | $ | 5,770 | $ | 10,739 | $ | 932 | $ | 5,901 | 100 | % | $ | | 0 | % | ||||||||||
March 31, 2011 |
3,769 | 4,447 | 8,216 | 984 | 4,753 | 100 | % | | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,738 | $ | 10,217 | $ | 18,955 | $ | 1,916 | $ | 10,654 | 100 | % | $ | | 0 | % | ||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
$ | 2,806 | $ | 3,386 | $ | 6,192 | $ | 794 | $ | | 0 | % | $ | 3,600 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
September 30, 2010 |
1,860 | 2,303 | 4,163 | 812 | | 0 | % | 2,672 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
977 | 1,368 | 2,345 | 4 | | 0 | % | 981 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 |
395 | 602 | 997 | 4 | | 0 | % | 399 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,038 | $ | 7,659 | $ | 13,697 | $ | 1,614 | $ | | 0 | % | $ | 7,652 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
(1) | Cash flows from financing activities includes proceeds from the Offering, equity capital contributions from Moorfield and proceeds from debt financings. |
Under GAAP, acquisition fees and acquisition-related expenses are expensed and therefore
reduce cash flows from operating activities. However, we have funded these fees and expenses with
proceeds from the Offering or equity capital contributions from Moorfield. During the six months
ended June 30, 2011, we paid approximately $4.4 million of acquisition fees and $2.2 million of
acquisition-related expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we paid $10.0 million of
acquisition fees and $15.5 million of acquisition-related expenses.
Debt Financings
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we entered into a £57.0 million mortgage loan
($92.0 million at a rate of $1.61 per GBP based on the transaction date) related to our acquisition
of Stonecutter Court. This loan requires quarterly interest payments and quarterly installments for
the repayment of principal of £313,500 ($506,055 assuming a rate of $1.61 per GBP based on the
transaction date). In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we made payments of
$2.0 million for financing costs related to this mortgage loan.
Contributions From Noncontrolling Interests
We formed a joint venture with Moorfield (the Brindleyplace JV) in June 2010 to acquire
certain properties that are a part of a mixed-use development in Birmingham, England. As of June
30, 2010, Moorfield had invested $11.5 million into the Brindleyplace JV to fund its share of the
earnest money deposit for the acquisition, which was recorded in contributions from noncontrolling
interests in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. We own a 60% interest in the
Brindleyplace JV and Moorfield holds the remaining 40% interest. In July 2010, the Brindleyplace JV
acquired the properties in Birmingham, England.
23
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not
comparable as we did not make our first real estate investment until June 2010. Further, our
results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not indicative of those
expected in future periods as we are currently in the acquisition stage of our life cycle. Amounts
recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 are due to the following:
| Total revenues, property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees, depreciation and amortization, interest expense and income taxes relate to the operation of our acquired properties. | ||
| Acquisition-related expenses represent costs incurred on properties we have acquired and those which we may acquire in future periods. | ||
| We pay monthly asset management fees to the Advisor based on the amount of net equity capital invested in real estate investments, and pay acquisition fees to the Advisor based on the purchase prices of our real estate investments. Acquisition fees incurred for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were $1.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, related to the acquisitions of Stonecutter Court and FM Logistic. Asset management fees incurred for three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $1.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Acquisition fees and asset management fees incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $425,000. | ||
| General and administrative expenses include legal and accounting fees, printing and mailing costs, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses. Certain of these costs are variable and may increase in the future as we continue to raise capital and make additional real estate investments. | ||
| We have entered into several interest rate swap contracts, as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on our variable interest rate borrowings. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair values in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011. The loss on interest rate swap contracts recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is the result of changes in the fair values of interest rate swaps. See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information regarding certain risks related to our derivatives, such as the risk of counterparty non-performance. | ||
| During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we allocated $2.5 million of the net loss of the Brindleyplace JV to Moorfield, based on its ownership in the Brindleyplace JV. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Brindleyplace JV declared $1.9 million of preferred dividends to Moorfield related to the Convertible Preferred Equity Certificates (CPEC). This amount was recorded in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss and offsets the net loss that was attributable to Moorfield during the quarter related to the results of operations of the Brindleyplace JV. The remaining amount of loss attributable to noncontrolling interests relates to our allocation of the net loss of the Operating Partnership to HALP, based on its 0.03% ownership in the Operating Partnership. |
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations (FFO) is a non-GAAP financial performance measure defined by the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) widely recognized by investors and
analysts as one measure of operating performance of a real estate company. FFO excludes items such
as real estate depreciation and amortization and gains and losses on the sale of real estate
assets. Depreciation and amortization, as applied in accordance with GAAP, implicitly assumes that
the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market conditions, it is managements view, and we believe the
view of many industry investors and analysts, that the presentation of operating results for real
estate companies by using the historical cost accounting alone is insufficient. In addition, FFO
excludes gains and losses from the sale of real estate, which we believe provides management and
investors with a helpful additional measure of the historical performance of our real estate
portfolio, as it allows for comparisons, year to year, that reflect the impact on operations from
trends in items such as occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative
expenses and interest costs.
In addition to FFO, management uses modified funds from operations (MFFO) as defined by the
Investment Program Association (IPA) as a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure to
evaluate our operating performance. MFFO includes funds generated by the operations of our real
estate investments and funds used in our corporate-level operations. MFFO is based on FFO, but
includes certain additional adjustments which we believe are appropriate. Some of these adjustments
relate to
24
Table of Contents
changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that have been put into effect
since the establishment of NAREITs
definition of FFO. These changes have prompted a significant increase in the magnitude of
non-cash and non-operating items included in FFO, as defined. Such items include amortization of
out-of-market lease intangible assets and liabilities and certain tenant incentives, the effects of
straight-line rent revenue recognition, fair value adjustments to derivative instruments that do
not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, non-cash impairment charges and certain other items as
described in the footnotes below. Management uses MFFO to evaluate the financial performance of
our investment portfolio, including the impact of potential future investments. In addition,
management uses MFFO to evaluate and establish our distribution policy and the sustainability
thereof. Further, we believe MFFO is one of several measures that may be useful to investors in
evaluating the potential performance of our portfolio following the conclusion of the acquisition
phase, as it excludes acquisition fees and expenses, as described below.
FFO and MFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) or to cash flows
from operating activities, but rather should be reviewed in conjunction with these and other GAAP
measurements. In addition, FFO and MFFO are not intended to be used as liquidity measures
indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs. Please see the limitations listed below
associated with the use of MFFO:
| As we are currently in the acquisition phase of our life cycle, acquisition costs and other adjustments that are increases to MFFO are, and may continue to be, a significant use of cash and dilutive to the value of an investment in our shares. | ||
| MFFO excludes acquisition expenses and acquisition fees payable to our Advisor. Although these amounts reduce net income, we fund such costs with proceeds from our offering and acquisition-related indebtedness and do not consider these fees in the evaluation of our operating performance and determining MFFO. | ||
| MFFO excludes gains (losses) related to changes in estimated values of derivative instruments related to our interest rate swaps. Although we expect to hold these instruments to maturity, if we were to settle these instruments currently, it would have an impact on our operating performance. | ||
| Our FFO and MFFO as presented may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs. | ||
| Our business is subject to volatility in the real estate markets and general economic conditions, and adverse changes in those conditions could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and MFFO. Accordingly, the predictive nature of MFFO is uncertain and past performance may not be indicative of future results. |
The following section presents our calculation of FFO and MFFO and provides additional
information related to our operations (in thousands, except per share amounts) for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. As we are in the capital raising and acquisition phase of
our operations, FFO and MFFO are not useful in comparing operations for the two periods presented
below. We expect revenues and expenses to increase in future periods as we raise additional
offering proceeds and use them to acquire additional investments.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (17,847 | ) | $ | (3,316 | ) | $ | (24,689 | ) | $ | (3,709 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization (1) |
12,859 | 57 | 23,422 | 57 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for noncontrolling
interests (2) |
94 | 838 | (1,795 | ) | 842 | |||||||||||
Funds from operations |
(4,894 | ) | (2,421 | ) | (3,062 | ) | (2,810 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on derivative instruments (3) |
8,313 | | 6,380 | | ||||||||||||
Other components of revenues and
expenses (4) |
626 | 62 | 230 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition fees and expenses (5) |
3,479 | 2,901 | 7,448 | 2,990 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for noncontrolling
interests (2) |
(1,490 | ) | (826 | ) | (652 | ) | (826 | ) | ||||||||
Modified Funds From Operations |
$ | 6,034 | $ | (284 | ) | $ | 10,344 | $ | (584 | ) | ||||||
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share |
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||||
Funds From Operations Per Common Share |
$ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||||
Modified Funds From Operations Per Common Share |
$ | 0.10 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.19 | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
61,540 | 13,643 | 54,609 | 9,785 |
25
Table of Contents
Notes to the table:
(1) | Represents the depreciation and amortization of various real estate assets. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such depreciation and amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of FFO. | |
(2) | Includes income attributable to noncontrolling interests and all adjustments to eliminate the noncontrolling interests share of the adjustments to convert our net loss to FFO and MFFO. | |
(3) | Represents components of net loss related to the estimated changes in the values of our interest rate swap derivatives. We have excluded these changes in value from our evaluation of our operating performance and MFFO because we expect to hold the underlying instruments to their maturity and accordingly the interim gains or losses will remain unrealized. | |
(4) | Includes the following components of revenues and expenses that we do not consider in evaluating our operating performance and determining MFFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands) : |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Straight-line rent adjustment (a) |
$ | (81 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,217 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Amortization of lease incentives (b) |
33 | | 97 | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of out-of-market
leases (b) |
546 | 62 | 1,126 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Other |
128 | | 224 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 626 | $ | 62 | $ | 230 | $ | 62 | |||||||||
(a) | Represents the adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms. We have excluded these adjustments from our evaluation of our operating performance and in determining MFFO because we believe that the rent that is billable during the current period is a more relevant measure of our operating performance for such period. | |
(b) | Represents the amortization of lease incentives and out-of-market leases. |
(5) Represents acquisition expenses and acquisition fees paid to our Advisor that are
expensed in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We fund such costs with
proceeds from our offering and acquisition-related indebtedness, and therefore do not
consider these expenses in evaluating our operating performance and determining MFFO.
Set forth below is additional information relating to certain items excluded from the analysis
above which may be helpful in assessing our operating results.
| Amortization of deferred financing costs was approximately $447,000 and $813,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. |
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with the Advisor, Dealer Manager and Hines or its affiliates,
whereby we pay certain fees and reimbursements to these entities during the various phases of our
organization and operation. During the organization and offering stage, these include payments to
our Dealer Manager for selling commissions and the dealer manager fee and payments to our Advisor
for reimbursement of issuer costs. During the acquisition and operational stages, these include
payments for certain services related to acquisitions, financing and management of our investments
and operations provided to us by our Advisor and Hines and its affiliates pursuant to various
agreements we have entered into or anticipate entering into with these entities. See Note 7 to the
condensed
26
Table of Contents
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form
10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional
information concerning our related-party transactions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have
or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources.
Recent Developments and Subsequent Events
Extension of the Offering
On July 18, 2011, our board of directors authorized us to postpone the termination of the
Offering, which was originally due to expire on August 5, 2011, until August 5, 2012. In many
states, we will need to renew the registration statement to continue the offering for this period.
There is no guarantee that we will be able to extend the offering in such states. We may further
extend or terminate this offering at any time.
Hines Corporate Properties II
On July 20, 2011, we entered into a Master Agreement (the HCP II JV Agreement) with New York
State Common Retirement Fund (NYSCRF) and Hines, setting forth the terms pursuant to which the
parties intend to jointly invest in high-quality, build-to-suit and buy-to-suit real estate
projects in the United States. The targeted projects may include Class A office projects and, to a
lesser extent, medical office projects, located in major cities and primarily occupied by
single-tenant users.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we will have the right, but not the obligation, to
invest 30% of the required equity in all projects with a projected project cost in excess of $100
million, subject to the exception that, if we elect not to invest in any co-investment project, we
will lose our co-investment rights for any and all future projects under the HCP II JV Agreement.
Unless terminated earlier by NYSCRF, the investment period for the HCP II JV will terminate on the
earlier of (i) July 20, 2014 or (ii) the date as of which substantially all of NYSCRFs allocated
capital ($450 million) has been committed. As stated earlier, our participation in projects under
the HCP II JV Agreement is purely a right and not an obligation. Our investment in any such project
will be subject to the approval of its board of directors. There can be no assurances that we will
invest any amounts under the HCP II JV Agreement.
Gogolevsky 11
On July 18, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a
contract with Delamore Limited to acquire Gogolevsky 11, a nine-story office building located in
Moscow, Russia. The sellers are not affiliated with us or our affiliates. Gogolevsky 11 consists of
85,740 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to six tenants. The contract purchase price
for Gogolevsky 11 is expected to be approximately $96.1 million, exclusive of transaction costs,
financing fees and working capital reserves. We expect to fund the acquisition using proceeds from
our current public offering along with the assumption of an existing $40.0 million mortgage loan
with Fibersoft Limited. The mortgage loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum and
matures in April 2021. We expect the closing of this acquisition to occur in the third quarter of
2011, subject to completing the assumption of a mortgage as well as a number of other closing
conditions.
250 Royall Street
On August 1, 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a
contract with Inland American Canton Royall, LLC to acquire 250 Royall Street, an office building
located in Canton, Massachusetts. The seller is not affiliated with us or our affiliates. 250
Royall Street consists of 185,171 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to Computershare
Limited. The contract purchase price for 250 Royall Street is expected to be approximately $57.0
million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. We expect to
fund the acquisition using proceeds from the Offering. We expect the closing of this acquisition
to occur in the third quarter of 2011, subject to completing a number of closing conditions.
There can be no assurances that any of the acquisitions described above will be completed.
27
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect
market-sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we believe that interest rate risk,
currency risk and real estate valuation risk are the primary market risks to which we are exposed.
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of debt used to
maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our
interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on cash
flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at fixed rates
or variable rates and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates via
interest rate swaps. We have and may continue to enter into derivative financial instruments such
as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial
instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative
purposes. We are exposed to credit risk of the counterparty to these interest rate swap agreements
in the event of non-performance under the terms of the derivative contracts. In the event of
non-performance by the counterparty, if we were not able to replace these swaps, we would be
subject to the variability of interest rates on the total amount of debt outstanding under the
mortgage.
On July 1, 2010, the Brindleyplace JV entered into a secured mortgage facility agreement in
the aggregate amount of £121.1 million ($183.7 million assuming a rate of $1.52 per GBP as of the
date of acquisition) with Eurohypo AG. The mortgage matures on July 7, 2015 and has a floating
interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.60%. Interest on approximately £90.8 million ($137.7 million assuming
a rate of $1.52 per GBP as of the date of acquisition) of the loan balance was fixed at closing at
3.89% through multiple 5-year swaps with Eurohypo. If interest rates increased by 1%, we would
incur approximately $485,000 in additional annual interest expense related to the unhedged portion
of the mortgage.
We currently have two investments in England, and as a result are subject to risk from the
effects of exchange rate movements of the British pound and U.S. dollar, which may affect future
costs and cash flows. However, as described above, we entered into a British pound denominated
mortgage loan on these investments, which provides a natural hedge with regard to changes in
exchange rates between the British pound and U.S. dollar. We are currently a net receiver of
British pounds (we receive more cash than we pay out), and therefore our foreign operations benefit
from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to British
pounds. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had no currency transactions which resulted
in significant gains or losses being recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of
operations. Based upon our equity ownership in the Brindleyplace JV and our ownership of
Stonecutter Court as of June 30, 2011, holding everything else constant, a 10% immediate,
unfavorable change in the exchange rate between the British pound and U.S. dollar would have
decreased the net book value of our investments in England by an aggregate of $13.2 million and
would have increased the aggregate net loss of the England properties for the six months ended June
30, 2011, by approximately $1.2 million.
We currently have one investment in Russia, and as a result are subject to risk from the
effects of exchange rate movements of the Russian rouble and U.S. dollar. During the six months
ended June 30, 2011, we had no currency transactions which resulted in significant gains or losses
being recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Based upon our ownership of
FM Logistic as of June 30, 2011, holding everything else constant, a 10% immediate, unfavorable
change in the exchange rate between the Russian rouble and U.S. dollar would have decreased the net
book value of our investments in Russia by an aggregate of $7.2 million.
As of June 30, 2011, we had consolidated cash and cash equivalents of $250.2 million, which
were primarily generated by proceeds from the Offering. While we have experienced delays in
investing the proceeds from the Offering, we intend to invest these and future proceeds raised as
quickly and prudently as possible. Real estate investment transaction volume increased during 2010
and the first half of 2011, and estimated going-in capitalization rates or cap rates (ratio of the
net projected operating income of a property in its initial fiscal year divided by the net purchase
price) have fallen relative to their peaks in late 2009. In the current market there continues to
be a significant amount of investment capital pursuing high-quality, well-located assets that
generate stable cash flows causing aggressive competition and pricing for assets which match our
investment strategy. This may continue to drive prices higher, resulting in lower cap rates and
returns. One of our priorities is to monitor the returns being achieved from our real estate
investments in relation to our distribution rate. If we continue to experience delays in investing
the proceeds from the Offering, or if pricing for real estate investments continues to increase and
returns continue to decrease, we may not be able to maintain our current rate of distributions.
We invest proceeds we receive from the Offering in short-term, highly-liquid investments until
we use such funds to make real estate investments. Although we do not expect that income we earn on
these temporary investments will be substantial, our earnings will be subject to the fluctuations
of interest rates and their effect on these investments.
28
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2011, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Change in Internal Controls
No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
29
Table of Contents
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company or its subsidiaries may
become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes. As of August 15, 2011, neither the Company
nor any of its subsidiaries was a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in Part I, Item 1A
of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we did not sell or issue any equity securities
that were not registered under the Securities Act.
All eligible requests for redemption for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were redeemed
using proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan. The following table lists shares we
redeemed under our share redemption program during the period covered by this report.
Maximum Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Shares | |||||||||||||||
Shares | that May Yet be | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as Part of | Purchased | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Publicly Announced | Under the Plans or | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Average Price Paid | Plans | Programs | |||||||||||||
Period | Reedemed | per Share | or Programs | (1) | ||||||||||||
April 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011 |
113,837 | 9.27 | 113,837 | 62,776 | ||||||||||||
May 1, 2011 to May 31, 2011 |
59,517 | 9.61 | 59,517 | 126,531 | ||||||||||||
June 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011 |
28,872 | 9.25 | 28,872 | 178,323 | ||||||||||||
Total |
202,226 | 202,226 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Our share redemption program was first announced at the commencement of our initial public offering in August 2009. Our share redemption program does not have a fixed expiration date, but it is subject to significant restrictions and limitations and our board of directors may terminate, suspend or amend the program without stockholder approval. We may redeem shares on a monthly basis if the shares were held for at least one year and meet certain other conditions. Any such redemptions will be limited to the lesser of the amount required to redeem 5% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year or the amount of proceeds received from our distribution reinvestment plan in the month prior to the month in which the redemption request was received. This amount represents the number of shares available for redemption on June 30, 2011, other than with respect to requests made in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder. Per the terms of our share redemption program, we may waive the one-year holding requirement and limitations described above for share redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder, as was the case with all of the shares listed in the table. |
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
On August 5, 2009, the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-156742) for the
Offering, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. The Offering commenced on August
5, 2009 and is currently expected to terminate on or before August 5, 2012, unless extended by our
board of directors.
From August 5, 2009 through the six months ended June 30, 2011, we raised gross proceeds of
$672.6 million through the sale of 67.6 million shares to the public in connection with the
Offering, excluding $16.0 million through the issuance of 1.7 million shares sold through our
distribution reinvestment plan. During that time, we paid $65.7 million of selling commissions and
dealer manager fees and $8.6 million of issuer costs related to the Offering. The selling
commissions and dealer manager fees were not paid with respect to the shares sold through our
distribution reinvestment plan. The selling commissions and dealer manager fees were paid to our
dealer manager, which is an affiliate of Hines and is wholly-owned, indirectly, by our Chairman,
Jeffrey C. Hines and his father,
30
Table of Contents
Gerald D. Hines. Net proceeds, from August 5, 2009 through June 30, 2011, available for
investment after the payment of the costs described above were $598.3 million. We used $351.8
million to make investments in real estate, including acquisition fees and expenses and financing
fees and expenses. The remaining portion of our proceeds was used for general and administrative
expenses and to provide working capital for our real estate investments. Additionally, in our
initial quarters of operations, and from time to time thereafter, we did not generate sufficient
cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions paid. From inception through December 31,
2010, as discussed in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition,
Liquidity and Results of Operations- Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources-
Distributions a portion of our distributions were funded with proceeds from the Offering.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, Liquidity and Results of
Operations Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for additional information regarding our cash flows.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits required by this item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
31
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HINES GLOBAL REIT, INC. |
||||
August 15, 2011 | /s/ CHARLES N. HAZEN | |||
Charles N. Hazen | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
August 15, 2011 | /s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGART | |||
Sherri W. Schugart | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
32
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
3 .1
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Hines Global REIT, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on August 3, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein) | |
3 .2
|
Bylaws of Hines Global REIT, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on March 18, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein) | |
4 .1
|
Hines Global REIT, Inc. Distribution Reinvestment Plan (included in the Prospectus as Appendix C) | |
31 .1*
|
Certification | |
31 .2*
|
Certification | |
32 .1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551 this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. | |
101 **
|
The following materials from Hines Global REIT, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed on August [ ], 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. | |
*
|
Filed herewith | |
**
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
33