CSB BANCORP INC /OH - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-11 - EX-11 - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	l42454exv11.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	l42454exv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	l42454exv31w2.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	l42454exv10w1.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	l42454exv32w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	l42454exv32w2.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - CSB BANCORP INC /OH	Financial_Report.xls

CSB BANCORP, INC.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 0-21714

CSB Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio		34-1687530

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

91 North Clay, P.O. Box 232, Millersburg, Ohio 44654
(Address of principal executive offices)

(330) 674-9015

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Common stock, $6.25 par value		Outstanding at August 12, 2011:
		2,734,799 common shares

CSB BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2011
Table of Contents


	Page
Part I — Financial Information
ITEM 1 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
Consolidated Statements of Income		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		7
ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		23
ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		29
ITEM 4T — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		30

Part II — Other Information

ITEM 1 — Legal Proceedings		31
1A — Risk Factors		31
2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		31
3 — Defaults upon Senior Securities		31
4 — Removed and Reserved		31
5 — Other Information		31
6 — Exhibits		32
Signatures		33
EX-10.1
EX-11
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

CSB BANCORP, INC.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and due from banks	$	10,004		$	9,798
Interest-earning deposits in other banks		23,234			38,497
Federal funds sold		—			65

Total cash and cash equivalents		33,238			48,360


Securities
Available-for-sale, at fair value		82,003			75,204
Restricted stock, at cost		5,463			5,463

Total securities		87,466			80,667


Loans		316,581			315,647
Less allowance for loan losses		4,054			4,031

Net loans		312,527			311,616


Premises and equipment, net		7,727			7,878
Core deposit intangible		376			406
Goodwill		1,725			1,725
Bank-owned life insurance		3,014			2,961
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		3,479			3,443

TOTAL ASSETS	$	449,552		$	457,056


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	64,670		$	69,151
Interest-bearing		282,588			284,340

Total deposits		347,258			353,491


Short-term borrowings		32,387			32,018
Other borrowings		19,527			22,909
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,842			1,484

Total liabilities		401,014			409,902


SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $6.25 par value. Authorized 9,000,000 shares; issued 2,980,602 shares; outstanding 2,734,799 shares in 2011 and 2010		18,629			18,629
Additional paid-in capital		9,994			9,994
Retained earnings		23,557			22,673
Treasury stock at cost - 245,803 shares in 2011 and 2010		(5,015	)		(5,015	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,373			873

Total shareholders’ equity		48,538			47,154

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	449,552		$	457,056

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011		2010		2011		2010
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	4,276	$	4,286	$	8,512	$	8,588
Taxable securities		613		647		1,208		1,398
Nontaxable securities		102		82		200		166
Other		11		14		28		33

Total interest and dividend income		5,002		5,029		9,948		10,185

INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		705		876		1,491		1,752
Other borrowings		201		320		427		719

Total interest expense		906		1,196		1,918		2,471

NET INTEREST INCOME		4,096		3,833		8,030		7,714

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		190		239		470		758

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,906		3,594		7,560		6,956


NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts		279		286		524		555
Trust services		190		124		350		266
Debit card interchange fees		152		126		290		234
Gain on sale of loans, net		29		45		99		91
Securities gains, net		—		148		—		148
Other income		134		160		282		326

Total noninterest income		784		889		1,545		1,620

NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		1,793		1,744		3,556		3,349
Occupancy expense		204		192		423		412
Equipment expense		123		124		243		251
Professional fees		177		170		336		324
Franchise tax expense		135		135		270		270
Software expense		35		61		126		126
Marketing and public relations		73		85		132		156
FDIC deposit insurance		108		163		218		308
Debit card expense		63		58		126		110
Amortization of intangible assets		16		16		31		32
Other expenses		556		402		942		853

Total noninterest expenses		3,283		3,150		6,403		6,191

Income before income taxes		1,407		1,333		2,702		2,385
FEDERAL INCOME TAX PROVISION		435		412		834		727

NET INCOME	$	972	$	921	$	1,868	$	1,658


Basic and diluted net income per share	$	0.35	$	0.34	$	0.68	$	0.59

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	47,457		$	46,171		$	47,154		$	45,822
Comprehensive income:
Net income		972			921			1,868			1,658
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) , net of reclassification adjustments and related income taxes of $310, $91, $258, and $145, respectively		601			176			500			281

Total comprehensive income		1,573			1,097			2,368			1,939

Cash dividends declared $0.18 and $0.36 per share in 2011 and 2010		(492	)		(492	)		(984	)		(985	)

Balance at end of period	$	48,538		$	46,776		$	48,538		$	46,776

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011			2010
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	2,684		$	2,104

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments		13,264			28,004
Purchases		(19,416	)		(26,800	)
Proceeds from sale of securities		—			3,359
Loan originations, net of repayments		(1,817	)		1,085
Proceeds from sale of other real estate		38			228
Property, equipment, and software acquisitions		(158	)		(44	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(8,089	)		5,832


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in deposits		(6,212	)		378
Net change in short-term borrowings		369			2,325
Repayments of other borrowings		(3,382	)		(12,933	)
Cash dividends paid		(492	)		(492	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(9,717	)		(10,722	)


NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(15,122	)		(2,786	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		48,360			42,661


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	33,238		$	39,875


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	1,983		$	2,709
Income taxes		650			850
Noncash investing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned		415			301

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CSB Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Commercial and Savings Bank and CSB Investment Services, LLC (together referred to as the “Company” or “CSB”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position at June 30, 2011, and the results of operations and changes in cash flows for the periods presented have been made.

Certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted. The Annual Report for CSB for the year ended December 31, 2010, contains consolidated financial statements and related footnote disclosures, which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year or any future interim period.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20 is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity’s credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in ASU 2010-20 encourage, but do not require, comparative disclosures for earlier reporting periods that ended before initial adoption. However, an entity should provide comparative disclosures for those reporting periods ending after initial adoption. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

In December, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal year, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities may early adopt the amendments using the effective date for public entities. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The amendments in this Update provide additional guidance or clarification to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. The main objective in developing this Update is to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements (repos) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments in this Update remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic. The amendments affect all entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The guidance in this Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this Update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this Update improve the comparability, clarity, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and IFRS, the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. All entities that report items of comprehensive income, in any period presented, will be affected by the changes in this Update. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. The amendments in this update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES

Securities consist of the following at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	cost		gains		losses		Fair value
June 30, 2011
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies		22,988		35		52		22,971
Mortgage-backed securites in government sponsored entities		42,996		1,632		7		44,621
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		12,770		505		9		13,266
Corporate bonds		1,000		—		14		986

Total debt securities		79,854		2,172		82		81,944
Equity securities in financial institutions		69		4		14		59

Total available-for-sale		79,923		2,176		96		82,003
Restricted stock		5,463		—		—		5,463

Total securities	$	85,386	$	2,176	$	96	$	87,466


December 31, 2010
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies		20,009		8		306		19,711
Mortgage-backed securites in government sponsored entities		41,005		1,374		28		42,351
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		11,699		341		46		11,994
Corporate bonds		1,000		—		8		992

Total debt securities		73,813		1,723		388		75,148
Equity securities in financial institutions		69		3		16		56

Total available-for-sale		73,882		1,726		404		75,204
Restricted stock		5,463		—		—		5,463

Total securities	$	79,345	$	1,726	$	404	$	80,667

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


	Amortized
(Dollars in thousands)	cost		Fair value
Available-for-sale:
Due in one year or less	$	1,976	$	1,983
Due after one through five years		6,362		6,549
Due after five through ten years		16,637		17,131
Due after ten years		54,879		56,281

Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	79,854	$	81,944

Realized Gains and Losses

The following table shows the proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities and the gross realized gains and losses on the sales of those securities that have been included in earnings as a result of the sales. Gains or losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities are recognized upon sale and are determined by the specific identification method.


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Proceeds	$	—	$	3,359	$	—	$	3,359

Realized gains	$	—	$	148	$	—	$	148
Realized losses		—		—		—		—
Impairment losses		—		—		—		—

Net securities (losses) gains	$	—	$	148	$	—	$	148

At least quarterly, the Company conducts a comprehensive security-level impairment assessment. The assessments are based on the nature of the securities, the extent and duration of the securities, the extent and duration of the loss and management’s intent to sell or if it is more likely than not that management will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. Management believes the Company will fully recover the cost of these securities and it does not intend to sell these securities and likely will not be required to sell them before the anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. As a result, management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011 and has recognized the total amount of the impairment in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


	Securities in a continuous unrealized loss position
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
	Gross				Gross				Gross
	unrealized		Fair		unrealized		Fair		unrealized		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	losses		value		losses		value		losses		value
June 30, 2011
Obligations of U.S. Corporations and agencies	$	52	$	6,941	$	—	$	—	$	52	$	6,941
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		—		—		7		322		7		322
Obligations of state & political subdivisions		9		910		—		—		9		910
Corporate bonds		14		986		—		—		14		986

Total debt securities		75		8,837		7		322		82		9,159
Equity securities in financial institutions		—		—		14		40		14		40

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	75	$	8,837	$	21	$	362	$	96	$	9,199


December 31, 2010
Obligations of U.S. Corporations and agencies	$	306	$	12,686	$	—	$	—	$	306	$	12,686
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		14		4,032		14		493		28		4,525
Obligations of state & political subdivisions		46		2,561		—		—		46		2,561
Corporate bonds		8		492		—		—		8		492

Total debt securities		374		19,771		14		493		388		20,264
Equity securities in financial institutions		—		—		16		38		16		38

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	374	$	19,771	$	30	$	531	$	404	$	20,302

There were twelve (12) securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011, three (3) of which were in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more. There were twenty-two (22) securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010, three (3) of which were in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS

The Company grants commercial, commercial real estate, residential and consumer loans primarily to customers in Holmes, Tuscarawas, Wayne, Stark and contiguous counties in north central Ohio.

Loans consist of the following:


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	85,627	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		103,861		104,829
Residential real estate		104,299		108,832
Consumer		6,430		6,715
Construction & Land Development		16,148		16,515

Total loans before deferred costs		316,365		315,431
Deferred loan costs		216		216

Total Loans	$	316,581	$	315,647

Loan Origination/Risk Management

The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. The Company’s management examines current and occasionally projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and usually incorporate the personal guarantees of business owners; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type.

This diversity helps reduce the Company’s exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At June 30, 2011 approximately 87% of the outstanding principal balances of the Company’s commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS (CONTINUED)

With respect to loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties, the Company generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Company and have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources or repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from the Company or other approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

The Company originates consumer loans utilizing a judgmental underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by lenders and loan support personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk.

The Company utilizes an independent loan review vendor that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Company’s policies and procedures.

Concentrations of Credit

Nearly all of the Company’s lending activity occurs within the State of Ohio, including the four counties of Holmes, Stark, Tuscarawas and Wayne, as well as other markets. The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of owner occupied commercial real estate and commercial loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no concentrations of loans related to any single industry in excess of 6.6% and 6.2% respectively, of total loans.

The following table represents a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010

Beginning balance	$	4,031		$	4,060
Provision for loan losses		470			758
Loans charged-off		(494	)		(309	)
Recoveries		47			99

Ending balance	$	4,054		$	4,608

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS (CONTINUED)

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.


													Construction
				Commercial			Residential						& Land
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial			Real Estate			Real Estate			Consumer			Development		Unallocated		Total

June 30, 2011
Beginning balance, January 01, 2011	$	1,179		$	1,183		$	1,057		$	80		$	213	$	319	$	4,031
Provision for possible loan losses		129			418			(206	)		34			59		36		470
Charge-offs		(307	)		(43	)		(84	)		(60	)		—		—		(494	)
Recoveries		11			—			9			27			—		—		47

Net charge-offs		(296	)		(43	)		(75	)		(33	)		—		—		(447	)

Ending balance	$	1,012		$	1,558		$	776		$	81		$	272	$	355	$	4,054

The bank recognized a credit for provision for possible loan losses in the residential real estate loan category as a result of a $4.5 million reduction in outstanding volume and a $700 thousand reduction in loan delinquencies for the category for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the ending loan balances by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


									Construction
			Commercial		Residential				& Land
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Real Estate		Real Estate		Consumer		Development		Unallocated		Total

June 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balances attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	216	$	409	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	625
Collectively evaluated for impairment		796		1,149		776		81		122		355		3,279
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		150		—		150

Total ending allowance balance	$	1,012	$	1,558	$	776	$	81	$	272	$	355	$	4,054


Loans:
Loans indvidually evaluated for impairment	$	4,640	$	2,992	$	—	$	—	$	—			$	7,632
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		80,987		100,869		104,299		6,430		15,758				308,343
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		390				390

Total ending loans balance	$	85,627	$	103,861	$	104,299	$	6,430	$	16,148			$	316,365


December 31, 2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balances attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	106	$	132	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	238
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,073		1,051		1,057		80		121		319		3,701
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		92		—		92

Total ending allowance balance	$	1,179	$	1,183	$	1,057	$	80	$	213	$	319	$	4,031


Loans:
Loans indvidually evaluated for impairment	$	621	$	886	$	299	$	—	$	—			$	1,806
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		77,919		103,943		108,533		6,715		16,075				313,185
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		440				440

Total ending loans balance	$	78,540	$	104,829	$	108,832	$	6,715	$	16,515			$	315,431

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS (CONTINUED)

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


			Recorded		Recorded
	Unpaid		Investment		Investment		Total				Average
	Principal		with no		with		Recorded		Related		Recorded
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Allowance		Allowance		Investment		Allowance		Investment

June 30, 2011
Commercial	$	4,676	$	—	$	4,640	$	4,640	$	216	$	1,917
Commercial real estate		3,584		422		2,570		2,992		409		2,835
Residential real estate		—		—		—		—		—		24
Construction & land development		638		—		390		390		150		407

Total impaired loans	$	8,898	$	422	$	7,600	$	8,022	$	775	$	5,183


December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	644	$	51	$	571	$	622	$	106	$	571
Commercial real estate		1,047		109		777		886		132		1,631
Residential real estate		590		298		—		298		—		97
Construction & land development		683		—		440		440		92		483

Total impaired loans	$	2,964	$	458	$	1,788	$	2,246	$	330	$	2,782

The following table presents the aging of past due and nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by class of loans:


									Total
			30 - 59		60 - 89				Past Due
			Days		Days		90 Days +		and		Non-		Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Current		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Accrual		Loans

June 30, 2011
Commercial	$	85,295	$	186	$	57	$	—	$	243	$	89	$	85,627
Commercial real estate		101,972		221		129		27		377		1,512		103,861
Residential real estate		101,722		810		226		—		1,036		1,541		104,299
Consumer		6,237		122		71		—		193		—		6,430
Construction & land development		15,758		—		—		—		—		390		16,148

Total Loans	$	310,984	$	1,339	$	483	$	27	$	1,849	$	3,532	$	316,365


December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	78,235	$	63	$	160	$	58	$	281	$	24	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		100,914		2,156		114		26		2,296		1,619		104,829
Residential real estate		105,593		574		253		601		1,428		1,811		108,832
Consumer		6,580		69		66		—		135		—		6,715
Construction & land development		16,061		3		—		—		3		451		16,515

Total Loans	$	307,383	$	2,865	$	593	$	685	$	4,143	$	3,905	$	315,431

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS (CONTINUED)

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company has troubled debt restructurings of $8.7 million as of June 30, 2011, and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2010, with $515 thousand and $22 thousand of specific reserves allocated as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. At June 30, 2011 $7.9 million of the loans classified as troubled debt restructurings were performing to modified terms. The remaining $800 thousand were on nonaccrual.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes commercial loans with an outstanding balance greater than $275 thousand and is performed on an annual basis.

The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass. Loans classified as pass (Acceptable, Low Acceptable or Pass Watch) may exhibit a wide array of characteristics but at minimum represent an acceptable risk to the bank. Borrowers in this rating may have leveraged but acceptable balance sheet positions, satisfactory asset quality, and stable to favorable sales and earnings trends, acceptable liquidity and adequate cash flow. Loans are considered fully collectible and require an average amount of administration. While generally adhering to credit policy, these loans may exhibit occasional exceptions that do not result in undue risk to the Bank. Borrowers are generally capable of absorbing setbacks, financial and otherwise, without the threat of failure.

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have material weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan at some future date.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans that do not meet the criteria for special mention, substandard or doubtful classification, when analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 — LOANS (CONTINUED)


			Special
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Not Rated		Total

June 30, 2011
Commercial	$	73,892	$	2,223	$	7,910	$	—	$	1,602	$	85,627
Commercial real estate		86,599		8,374		7,518		—		1,370		103,861
Residential real estate		1,365		—		64		—		102,870		104,299
Consumer		—		—		—		—		6,430		6,430
Construction & land development		11,085		2,841		390		—		1,832		16,148

Total	$	172,941	$	13,438	$	15,882	$	—	$	114,104	$	316,365


December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	65,371	$	3,843	$	9,252	$	—	$	74	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		78,191		9,982		8,188		—		8,468		104,829
Residential real estate		1,153		—		365		—		107,314		108,832
Consumer		—		—		2		—		6,713		6,715
Construction & land development		11,626		2,905		591		—		1,393		16,515

Total	$	156,341	$	16,730	$	18,398	$	—	$	123,962	$	315,431

Loans listed as not rated are either less than $275 thousand or are included in groups of homogeneous loans. The following table presents loans that are not rated by class of loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Non-performing loans include loans past due 90 days and greater and loans on nonaccrual of interest.


(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Non-Performing		Total

June 30, 2011
Commercial	$	1,602	$	—	$	1,602
Commercial real estate		1,370		—		1,370
Residential real estate		101,402		1,468		102,870
Consumer		6,430		—		6,430
Construction & land development		1,822		10		1,832

Total	$	112,626	$	1,478	$	114,104


December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	74	$	—	$	74
Commercial real estate		8,468		—		8,468
Residential real estate		105,201		2,113		107,314
Consumer		6,713		—		6,713
Construction & land development		1,383		10		1,393

Total	$	121,839	$	2,123	$	123,962

Loans serviced for others approximated $50.1 million and $45.1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 4- FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company provides disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three broad levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 4- FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

Level I:		Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.

Level II:		Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by corroborated or other means. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level II input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level III:		Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. No liabilities are carried at fair value. As required by the accounting standards, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Equity securities and U.S. Treasury Notes are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, mortgage-backed securities and obligations of states and political subdivisions are valued at observable market data for similar assets.


(Dollars in thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets:	June 30, 2011
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Teasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		—		22,971		—		22,971
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		—		44,621		—		44,621
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		13,266		—		13,266
Corporate bonds		—		986		—		986

Total debt securities		100		81,844		—		81,944
Equity securities in financial institutions		59		—		—		59

Total available-for-sale securities	$	159	$	81,844	$	—	$	82,003


Assets:	December 31, 2010
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Teasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		—		19,711		—		19,711
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		—		42,351		—		42,351
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		11,994		—		11,994
Corporate bonds		—		992		—		992

Total debt securities		100		75,048		—		75,148
Equity securities in financial institutions		56		—		—		56

Total available-for-sale securities	$	156	$	75,048	$	—	$	75,204

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 4- FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans and other real estate that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Premises include a building currently used for storage that has been written down to appraised value. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions based on management’s best judgment that are significant inputs to the discounting calculations. As a result, these rights are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are classified within level III of the fair value hierarchy. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loans include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level I inputs; observable inputs employed by certified appraisers for similar assets classified as Level II inputs. In cases where valuation techniques included inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs.


(Dollars in thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis:	June 30, 2011
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	7,247	$	7,247
Other real estate owned		—		—		415		415
Premises		—		—		185		185
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		161		161


	December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	1,916	$	1,916
Other real estate owned		—		—		36		36
Premises		—		—		200		200
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		155		155

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of recognized financial instruments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:


	2011				2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	value		value		value		value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	33,238	$	33,238	$	48,360	$	48,360
Securities		87,466		87,466		80,667		80,667
Loans, net		312,527		316,452		311,616		316,474
Accrued interest receivable		1,228		1,228		1,215		1,215
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	347,258	$	349,063	$	353,491	$	355,589
Short-term borrowings		32,387		32,387		32,018		32,018
Other borrowings		19,527		19,641		22,909		23,042
Accrued interest payable		171		171		213		213

CSB BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)

For purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following assumptions are used:

Cash and cash equivalents; Accrued interest receivable; Short term borrowings, Accrued interest payable

The fair value of the above instruments is considered to be carrying value.

Securities

The fair value of securities available-for-sale which are measured on a recurring basis are determined primarily by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on securities’ relationship to other similar securities.

Loans, net

The fair value for loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current market inputs at which loans with similar terms and qualities would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Where quoted market prices were available, primarily for certain residential mortgage loans, such market rates were utilized as estimates for fair value. Fair value of non-accrual loans is based on carrying value.

Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds

The fair values of certificates of deposit and other borrowed funds are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using market rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities. Demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts are valued at the amount payable on demand as of quarter end.

The Company also has unrecognized financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These financial instruments relate to commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. The aggregated contract amount of such financial instruments was approximately $86,041,200 at June 30, 2011 and $76,017,000 at December 31, 2010. Such amounts are also considered to be the estimated fair values.

The fair value estimates of financial instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument over the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Since no ready market exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are largely based on judgments after considering such factors as future expected credit losses, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion focuses on the consolidated financial condition of CSB Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at June 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010. The purpose of this discussion is to provide the reader with a more thorough understanding of the consolidated financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the interim consolidated financial statements and related footnotes.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this report are not historical facts but rather are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the terms “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “believes”, and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. The Company’s actual results, performance or achievements may materially differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause or contribute to such material differences include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, interest rate environment, competitive conditions in the financial services industry, changes in law, governmental policies and regulations, and rapidly changing technology affecting financial services.

The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets were $450.0 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $457.1 million at December 31, 2010, representing a decrease of $7.5 million, or 1.6%. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $15.1 million, or 31.3%, during the six-month period ending June 30, 2011, primarily as a result of increases in securities and loans. Securities increased $6.8 million, or 7.8%, during the first six months of 2011 as purchases were made within the US Government Agency portfolio, mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored agencies and tax free political subdivisions. Net loans increased $911 thousand, or 0.3%, while deposits decreased $6.2 million, or 1.8%, during the six-month period. Short-term borrowings of securities sold under repurchase agreement increased $368 thousand and Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $3.4 million, during the period as advances matured and required amortized payments were made on outstanding advances at the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Net loans increased $911 thousand, or 0.3%, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. Commercial loans increased $7.1 million, or 9.0%, commercial real estate loans decreased $968 thousand, or 1.0%, and home equity lines increased $1.5 million, or 4.4%, over December 31, 2010. Decreases were recognized in real estate mortgage loans of $6.0 million, or 8.0% and consumer installment loans of $285 thousand, or 4.2%. Consumers continued to refinance their mortgage loans for lower long-term rates offered in the secondary market.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.28% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Outstanding loan balances increased 0.3% to $317 million at June 30, 2011 while net charge-offs of $447 thousand were offset by a provision of $470 thousand to the allowance for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Non-performing loans decreased $1 million or 22% from December 31, 2010, with improvement in both the past-due 90 days and still accruing and the non accrual loan categories.


	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2010
Non-performing loans	$	3,559		$	4,589		$	6,088
Other real estate		415			36			247
Allowance for loan losses		4,054			4,031			4,608
Total loans		316,581			315,647			311,857
Allowance: loans		1.28	%		1.28	%		1.48	%
Allowance: non-performing loans		1.1	x		0.9	x		0.8	x

The ratio of gross loans to deposits was 91.2% at June 30, 2011, compared to 89.3% at December 31, 2010. The increase in this ratio is the result of increases in loan volume and decreases in deposits during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

The Company had net unrealized gains of $2.1 million within its securities portfolio at June 30, 2011, compared to net unrealized gains of $1.3 million at December 31, 2010. The Company has no exposure to government-sponsored enterprise preferred stocks, collateralized debt obligations or trust preferred securities. The Company holds 2 issues of nonagency collateralized mortgage obligations that have paid down to $872 thousand outstanding from an original face of $5.5 million. The Company has the ability and intent to hold the bonds until the recovery of their cost and there is no significant evidence to support an adverse change in the expected cash flows. Management has considered industry analyst reports, sector credit reports and the volatility within the bond market in concluding that the gross unrealized losses of $96 thousand within the total portfolio as of June 30, 2011, were primarily the result of customary and expected fluctuations in the bond market and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. As a result, all security impairments detailed above on June 30, 2011, are considered temporary and no impairment loss relating to these securities has been recognized.

Short-term borrowings increased $369 thousand from December 31, 2010 and other borrowings decreased $3.4 million as the Company used cash from interest-earning deposits in other banks to repay required maturities and monthly payments on advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”).

Deposits decreased $6.2 million or 1.8% from December 31, 2010 with non-interest bearing deposits decreasing $4.5 million and interest-bearing deposit accounts decreasing $1.7 million. By deposit type, increases were recognized in statement savings and passbooks and money market savings accounts for the period ended June 30, 2011.

Total shareholders’ equity amounted to $48.5 million, or 10.8%, of total assets, at June 30, 2011, compared to $47.2 million, or 10.3% of total assets, at December 31, 2010. The increase in shareholders’ equity during the six-months ended June 30, 2011 was due to net income of $1.9 million and an increase in other comprehensive income of $501 thousand. Dividends declared of $985 thousand partially offset the above increases. The Company and its subsidiary bank met all regulatory capital requirements at June 30, 2011.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded net income of $972 thousand or $0.35 per share, as compared to net income of $921 thousand, or $0.34 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The $51 thousand increase in net income for the quarter was a result of a decrease in the provision for loan losses of $49 thousand and net interest income increasing $263 thousand. These gains were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense of $133 thousand, a decrease in noninterest income of $105 thousand and an increase in the federal income tax provision of $23 thousand. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.87% and 8.06%, respectively, for the three-month period of 2011, compared to 0.85% and 7.90%, respectively for 2010.

Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Margin Analysis


			For the three months ended June 30,
	2011					2010
	Average		Average			Average		Average
(Dollars in thousands)	balance		rate			balance		rate
ASSETS
Due from banks-interest bearing	$	19,025		0.23	%	$	25,451		0.23	%
Federal funds sold		89		0.11			282		0.14
Taxable securities		73,771		3.33			67,336		3.86
Tax-exempt securities		12,134		5.07			9,421		5.28
Loans		319,906		5.37			311,647		5.53

Total earning assets		424,925		4.78	%		414,137		4.92	%
Other assets		23,280					22,645

TOTAL ASSETS	$	448,205				$	436,782


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	52,617		0.08	%	$	51,300		0.08	%
Savings deposits		84,867		0.25			72,785		0.38
Time deposits		145,874		1.76			148,621		2.15
Other borrowed funds		49,880		1.62			61,545		2.09

Total interest bearing liabilities		333,238		1.09	%		334,251		1.44	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		65,243					54,509
Other liabilities		1,335					1,298
Shareholders’ Equity		48,389					46,724

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	448,205				$	436,782


Taxable equivalent net interest spread				3.69	%				3.48	%
Taxable equivalent net interest margin				3.93	%				3.76	%

Interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, was $5.0 million representing a $27 thousand decrease, or 0.5% decline, compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in the average taxable investment yield of 0.53% to 3.33% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to a taxable investment yield of 3.86% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2010. Additionally, average loan yields declined by 0.16% to 5.37% from 5.53% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared the second quarter 2010. Interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $906 thousand, a decrease of $290 thousand or 24%, from the same period in 2010. The decrease in interest expense occurred primarily due to decrease of 0.47% in interest rates paid on other borrowed funds representing FHLB advances combined with the maturity and payback of $12.5 million of average FHLB advances from the previous year.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, was $190 thousand, compared to a $239 thousand provision for the same quarter in 2010. The provision for loan losses is determined based on management’s calculation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, which includes provisions for classified loans as well as for the remainder of the portfolio based on historical data including past charge-offs and current economic trends.

Non-interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, was $784 thousand, a decrease of $105 thousand, or 11.8%, compared to the same quarter in 2010. Fees from Trust and Brokerage services increased $66 thousand to $190 thousand for second quarter 2011 as compared to the same quarter in 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $7 thousand or 2.4%, as consumers decreased their usage of overdraft products and maintained higher average deposit balances. Debit card interchange income rose $26 thousand or 20.6% as consumers increased their usage of the product. The gain on the sale of mortgage loans to the secondary market decreased to $29 thousand for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, from $45 thousand in the three-month period ended June 30, 2010. Refinancing activity has declined from the first quarter of 2011 and may continue to decline for the rest of 2011.

The Company sold no securities during the second quarter of 2011. A gain of $148 thousand was recognized during the second quarter of 2010.

Non-interest expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 increased $133 thousand, or 4.2%, compared to the second quarter of 2010. Salaries and employee benefits increased $49 thousand, or 2.8%. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $7 thousand in 2011 over the second quarter of 2010. Other expenses rose $154 thousand or 38% compared to the second quarter 2010. Included in other expense are loan and tax settlement expenses as a loan secured by real estate completes foreclosure and either becomes other real estate owned or is sold. These costs increased by $89 thousand for second quarter 2011 as compared to second quarter 2010.

Federal income tax expense increased $23 thousand, or 5.6% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010. The provision for income taxes was $435 thousand (effective rate of 30.9%) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $412 thousand (effective rate of 30.9%) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The increase in the expense resulted from improved income.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Net income for the six months ending June 30, 2011, was $1.9 million or $0.68 per share, as compared to $1.7 million or $0.61 per share during the same period in 2010. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.84% and 7.86%, respectively, for the six-month period of 2011, compared to 0.76% and 7.18%, respectively for 2010.

Comparative net income increased as net interest income improved to $8.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $316 thousand or 4.1% from the same period last year. The provision for loan losses decreased $288 thousand or 38% during the same comparative period. These improvements were partially offset by lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expenses for the six month period ending in 2011 as compared to 2010.

Interest income on loans decreased $76 thousand, or 0.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to an interest rate decrease of 19 basis points for the comparable six-month periods. Interest income on securities decreased $156 thousand, or 10%, as the yield on taxable securities decreased 82 basis points due to the sale of mortgage- backed securities at a gain in 2010, accelerated payments within the mortgage-backed securities portfolio and calls within the Agency portfolio. The average investment balances increased by $7.7 million with new purchases being added in a low interest rate market. Interest income on fed funds sold and interest bearing deposits decreased $5 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as the average fed funds sold volume decreased $7.3 million, compared to the same period in 2010.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Margin Analysis


			For the six months ended June 30,
	2011					2010
	Average		Average			Average		Average
(Dollars in thousands)	balance		rate			balance		rate
ASSETS
Due from banks-interest bearing	$	21,161		0.27	%	$	28,302		0.24	%
Federal funds sold		89		0.08			234		0.13
Taxable securities		73,855		3.30			68,488		4.12
Tax-exempt securities		11,913		5.13			9,549		5.30
Loans		319,777		5.38			311,717		5.57

Total earning assets		426,795		4.76	%		418,290		4.96	%
Other assets		23,206					22,548

TOTAL ASSETS	$	450,001				$	440,838


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	52,480		0.08	%	$	52,615		0.08	%
Savings deposits		83,562		0.26			72,392		0.39
Time deposits		147,848		1.86			148,643		2.16
Other borrowed funds		51,477		1.68			65,700		2.21

Total interest bearing liabilities		335,367		1.15	%		339,350		1.47	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		65,199					53,442
Other liabilities		1,506					1,455
Shareholders’ Equity		47,929					46,591

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	450,001				$	440,838


Taxable equivalent net interest spread				3.61	%				3.49	%
Taxable equivalent net interest margin				3.85	%				3.77	%

Interest expense decreased $553 thousand to $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Interest expense on deposits decreased $261 thousand, or 14.9%, from the same period as last year, while interest expense on other borrowings decreased $292 thousand or 40.6%. The decrease in interest expense has been caused by lower interest rates being paid across the board on interest-bearing deposit accounts and borrowings. Additionally, during the comparable six month periods, the Company grew non-interest bearing deposits in 2011. Time deposits continue to renew at lower interest rates, and some depositors have moved monies to savings instruments anticipating higher rate time deposits. Competition for deposits appears to be decreasing from a year ago with larger money center banks reducing the premium paid for term deposits. The net interest margin increased by 8 basis points for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, to 3.85%, from 3.77% for the same period in 2010.

The provision for loan losses was $470 thousand during the first six months of 2011, compared to $758 thousand in the same six-month period of 2010. The provision or credit for loan losses is determined based on management’s calculation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, which includes provisions for classified loans as well as for the remainder of the portfolio based on historical data including past charge-offs and current economic trends.

Non-interest income decreased $75 thousand, or 4.6%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease in non-interest income was primarily due a $148 thousand gain on securities sold in 2010 that did not reoccur in 2011. Increases in Trust fees were due to

CSB BANCORP, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

increases in market values of the custodial assets as well as increases in brokerage fee commissions in 2011. Debit card interchange income increased $56 thousand or 23.9% a result of increased card usage in 2011. Service charges on deposits decreased $31 thousand from the same period in 2010 as deposit customers curtailed their use of overdraft privilege products in 2011 and have maintained higher average deposit balances offsetting monthly service fees.

Decreases were recognized in gains on mortgage loans sold in the secondary market for the first half of 2011 as refinancing activity stalled and new housing sales remained extremely slow in 2011.

Non-interest expenses increased $212 thousand, or 3.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. The bank’s FDIC deposit premium decreased $90 thousand from $308 thousand for the six months ended 2010 reflecting a decrease in rate and accrual for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 2010. Salaries and employee benefits increased $207 thousand, or 6.2%, primarily the result of a full six month accrual of profit sharing and bonus accruals for 2011 as compared to a second quarter recognition of the same benefit accruals in 2010. Professional fees increased of $12 thousand or 3.7%. Occupancy and equipment expense remained stable during the first six-months of 2011 as compared with 2010 increasing $3 thousand or 0.5%. Increases were recognized in other expenses, primarily the result of increased operating costs of a larger company.

The provision for income taxes was $834 thousand (effective rate of 30.9%) for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $727 thousand (effective rate of 30.5%) for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in the effective tax rate resulted from an decrease in tax-exempt interest income as a portion of total income before income taxes.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) has established risk-based capital guidelines that must be observed by financial holding companies and banks. Failure to meet specified minimum capital requirements could result in regulatory actions by the Federal Reserve or Ohio Division of Financial Institutions that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Management believes there were no material changes to Capital Resources as presented in CSB Bancorp’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and as of June 30, 2011 the holding company and its bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity refers to the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash to fund current loan demand, meet deposit withdrawals, pay operating expenses and meet other obligations. The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, which totaled $33.2 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $15.1 million from $42.7 million at December 31, 2010. Net income, securities available-for-sale, and loan repayments also serve as sources of liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents and estimated principal cash flow and maturities on investments maturing within one year represent 13.1% of total assets as of June 30, 2011 compared to 15.0% of total assets at year-end 2010. Other sources of liquidity include, but are not limited to, purchase of federal funds, advances from the FHLB, adjustments of interest rates to attract deposits, and borrowing at the Federal Reserve discount window. Management believes that its sources of liquidity are adequate to meet cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as such term is defined in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules) that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

CSB BANCORP, INC.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 3 —QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks as of June 30, 2011, from that presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Management performs a quarterly analysis of the Company’s interest rate risk. All positions are currently within the Company’s board-approved policy.

The following table presents an analysis of the estimated sensitivity of the Company’s annual net interest income to sudden and sustained 100 through 400 basis point changes, in 100 basis point changes, in market interest rates at June 30, 2011 and 100 and 200 basis point changes in market interest rates at December 31, 2010. Due to the current low interest rate environment, particularly for short-term rates, the decreasing change is not calculated.


	(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2011
		Change in	Net
		interest rates	interest		Dollar		Percentage
		(basis points)	income		change		change
+		400		19,061	$	2,788		17.1
+		300		18,278		2,005		12.3
+		200		17,450		1,177		7.2
+		100		16,621		348		2.1
		0		16,273		—		—
-		100		N/A		N/A		N/A
-		200		N/A		N/A		N/A


December 31, 2010
	Change in	Net
	interest rates	interest		Dollar		Percentage
	(basis points)	income		change		change
+	200		16,073		241		1.5
+	100		15,906		74		0.5
	0		15,832		—		—
-	100		N/A		N/A		N/A

CSB BANCORP, INC.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 4T — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

With the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that:

	(a)		information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q would be accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;

	(b)		information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and

	(c)		the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiary is made known to them, particularly during the period for which our periodic reports, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are being prepared.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2011

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1-		LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
		There are no matters required to be reported under this item.


ITEM 1A-		RISK FACTORS
		There are no matters required to be reported under this item.


ITEM 2-		On July 7, 2005 CSB Bancorp, Inc. filed Form 8-k with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing that its Board of Directors approved a Stock Repurchase Program authorizing the repurchase of up to 10% of the Company’s common shares then outstanding. Repurchases will be made from time to time as market and business conditions warrant, in the open market, through block purchases and in negotiated private transactions.


ITEM 3-		DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES:
		There are no matters required to be reported under this item.


ITEM 4-		REMOVED AND RESERVED:


ITEM 5-		OTHER INFORMATION:
		There are no matters required to be reported under this item.

CSB BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2011
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6 -Exhibits:


Exhibit
Number		Description of Document
3.1		Amended Articles of Incorporation of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1994).

3.1.1		Amended form of Article Fourth of Amended Articles of Incorporation, as effective April 9, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1998).

3.2		Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-SB).

3.2.1		Amended Article VIII Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form DEF 14a for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2008).

4.0		Specimen stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-SB).

10.1		Office Purchase and Assumption Agreement by and between Premier Bank & Trust, National Association and The Commercial and Savings Bank of Millersburg, Ohio, dated June 23, 2011.

11		Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (reference is hereby made to Consolidated Statements of Income on page 4 hereof).

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CEO’s Certification

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CFO’s Certification

32.1		Section 1350 CEO’s Certification

32.2		Section 1350 CFO’s Certification

101		Interactive financial data

CSB BANCORP, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	CSB BANCORP, INC. (Registrant)
Date: August 12, 2011	/s/ Eddie L. Steiner
	Eddie L. Steiner
	President Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 12, 2011	/s/ Paula J. Meiler
	Paula J. Meiler
	Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer

CSB BANCORP, INC.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number		Description of Document
3.1		Amended Articles of Incorporation of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1994).

3.1.1		Amended form of Article Fourth of Amended Articles of Incorporation, as effective April 9, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1998).

3.2		Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-SB).

3.2.1		Amended Article VIII Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form DEF 14a for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2008).

4.0		Specimen stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-SB).

10.1		Office Purchase and Assumption Agreement by and between Premier Bank & Trust, National Association and The Commercial and Savings Bank of Millersburg, Ohio dated June 23, 2011.

11		Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (reference is hereby made to Consolidated Statements of Income on page 4 hereof).

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CEO’s Certification

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CFO’s Certification

32.1		Section 1350 CEO’s Certification

32.2		Section 1350 CFO’s Certification

101		Interactive financial data

Attached files

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

CSB BANCORP INC /OH Reports

Also read