White River Capital Inc - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - JOINT CERTIFICATION - White River Capital Inc	wrc_10q0630ex32.htm
EX-31.1 - CEO CERTIFICATION - White River Capital Inc	wrc_10q0630ex311.htm
EX-31.2 - CFO CERTIFICATION - White River Capital Inc	wrc_10q0630ex312.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - White River Capital Inc	Financial_Report.xls

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number: 001-33257

White River Capital, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana	35-1908796
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6051 El Tordo, PO Box 9876

Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067

(Address of principal executive offices/zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 997-6740

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o

Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of August 5, 2011, there were 3,612,880 shares outstanding of the issuer’s Common Stock, without par value.

White River Capital, Inc.

Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2011

- INDEX -

		PAGE
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010	1

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	2

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	3

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	4

	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	26

Item 5.	Other Information	26

Item 6.	Exhibits	26

SIGNATURES		27

EXHIBIT INDEX		28

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

WHITE RIVER CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS	(Unaudited)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,951		$	3,287
Finance receivables—net		105,725			96,723
Deferred tax assets—net		38,955			40,914
Other assets		673			684

TOTAL	$	147,304		$	141,608


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Line of credit	$	61,000		$	56,000
Accrued interest		147			130
Other payables and accrued expenses		2,033			2,449

Total liabilities		63,180			58,579

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred Stock, without par value, authorized 3,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common Stock, without par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares; 3,612,880 and 3,706,759 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011and December 31, 2010, respectively		175,694			177,403
Accumulated deficit		(91,570	)		(94,374	)

Total shareholders’ equity		84,124			83,029

TOTAL	$	147,304		$	141,608

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

WHITE RIVER CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Quarters Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
INTEREST:
Interest on receivables	$	8,676		$	8,095		$	17,047		$	15,951
Accretion and other interest		-			5			-			14

Total interest income		8,676			8,100			17,047			15,965

Interest expense		(446	)		(368	)		(914	)		(717	)

Net interest margin		8,230			7,732			16,133			15,248

Provision for loan losses		(699	)		(1,649	)		(1,755	)		(3,501	)

Net interest margin after provision for loan losses		7,531			6,083			14,378			11,747

OTHER REVENUES (EXPENSES):
Salaries and benefits		(2,240	)		(2,057	)		(4,688	)		(4,313	)
Other operating expenses		(1,248	)		(1,079	)		(2,370	)		(2,446	)
Change in fair market valuation of creditor notes payable		-			43			43			89
Gain from deficiency account sale		-			35			-			37
Other expense		(141	)		(14	)		(225	)		(48	)

Total other expenses		(3,629	)		(3,072	)		(7,240	)		(6,681	)

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		3,902			3,011			7,138			5,066

INCOME TAX EXPENSE		(1,365	)		(1,034	)		(2,505	)		(1,742	)

NET INCOME	$	2,537		$	1,977		$	4,633		$	3,324

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (BASIC)	$	0.70		$	0.51		$	1.27		$	0.85

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (DILUTED)	$	0.70		$	0.51		$	1.27		$	0.85

BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING		3,612,880			3,884,603			3,650,953			3,929,500

DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING		3,614,984			3,886,515			3,655,063			3,931,093

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

WHITE RIVER CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Quarters Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010

NET INCOME	$	2,537	$	1,977		$	4,633	$	3,324

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Net unrealized change on recombined assets and Beneficial Interest in Master Trust, net of tax		-		(1	)		-		(3	)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	2,537	$	1,976		$	4,633	$	3,321

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

WHITE RIVER CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	4,633		$	3,324
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Accretion of other comprehensive income		-			(5	)
Accretion of securitization discount		-			(2	)
Provision for loan losses		1,755			3,501
Amortization and depreciation		168			200
Amortization of discount and interest accrued on creditor notes payable		43			84
Gain from disposition of equipment		-			4
Deferred income taxes		1,959			1,600
Change in fair value of creditor notes payable		(43	)		(89	)
Stock based compensation expense		150			306
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		(102	)		(87	)
Other payables and accrued expenses		(399	)		(150	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		8,164			8,686

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of finance receivables		(41,342	)		(33,480	)
Collections on finance receivables		30,591			25,791
Principal collections and recoveries on receivables held for investment		(6	)		134
Capital expenditures		(55	)		(13	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(10,812	)		(7,568	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock repurchased		(1,859	)		(3,437	)
Common stock cash dividend		(1,829	)		(1,977	)
Net borrowing on line of credit		5,000			2,000
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,312			(3,414	)

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(1,336	)		(2,296	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year		3,287			6,797
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	1,951		$	4,501

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax paid	$	376		$	-
Interest paid	$	854		$	627

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

WHITE RIVER CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED) QUARTERS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,

2011 AND 2010

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The foregoing condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented have been included, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments. Results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

The condensed consolidated unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Form 10-Q specifications and therefore do not include all information and footnotes normally shown in annual financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is derived from audited financial statements. These interim period financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements that are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of White River Capital, Inc., which is available online at www.WhiteRiverCap.com or www.sec.gov.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2011-05 will supersede some of the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220. The main provisions of this ASU provide that an entity that reports items of other comprehensive income has the option to present comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements: (i) a single statement must present the components of net income and total net income, the components of other comprehensive income and total other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income; or (ii) in a two-statement approach, an entity must present the components of net income and total net income in the first statement. That statement must be immediately followed by a financial statement that presents the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The option in current GAAP that permits the presentation of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity has been eliminated. This ASU is effective beginning with the first quarter of 2012 and will have no impact on the White River consolidated financial statements.

2. GENERAL DISCUSSION

White River Capital, Inc. (“White River” or the “Company”) is a holding company for specialized indirect auto finance businesses, with one principal operating subsidiary, Coastal Credit LLC (“Coastal Credit”). Coastal Credit based in Virginia Beach, Virginia, is a specialized subprime auto finance company engaged in acquiring subprime auto receivables from both franchised and independent automobile dealers which have entered into contracts with purchasers of typically used, but some new, cars and light trucks. Coastal Credit then services the receivables it acquires. Coastal Credit operates in 23 states through 16 offices.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Union Acceptance Company LLC (“UAC”), a now inactive subsidiary of White River, was a specialized auto finance company operating under a bankruptcy plan of reorganization. UAC’s bankruptcy case was closed in January 2007. As of September 1, 2010, UAC no longer materially contributes to the assets, liabilities, or results of operations of White River on a consolidated basis. As a result UAC is no longer a reportable business segment. All financial information for UAC is reported in the “Corporate and Other” business segment.

3. FINANCE RECEIVABLES – NET

Coastal Credit’s typical borrower has a credit history that may fail to meet the lending standards of most banks, credit unions and captive automobile finance companies. Substantially all of Coastal Credit’s automobile contracts involve loans made to individuals with limited or impaired credit histories. Coastal Credit believes that its borrower credit profile is similar to that of its direct competitors in the subprime automobile finance business. Coastal Credit also believes that its underwriting criteria and branch network management system coupled with close senior management supervision enhances its risk management and collection functions.

In deciding whether to acquire a particular contract, Coastal Credit considers various factors, including:

the applicant’s length of residence;

the applicant’s current and prior job status;

the applicant’s history in making other installment loan payments;

the applicant’s payment record on previous automobile loans;

the applicant’s current income and discretionary spending ability;

the applicant’s credit history;

the value of the automobile in relation to the purchase price;

the term of the contract;

the automobile make and mileage; and

Coastal Credit’s prior experience with contracts acquired from the dealer.

Borrowers under the contracts typically make down payments, in the form of cash or trade-in, ranging from 5% to 20% of the sale price of the vehicle financed. The balance of the purchase price of the vehicle plus taxes, title fees and, if applicable, premiums are generally financed over a period of 36 to 54 months.

Finance receivables are recorded at cost, net of unearned finance charges, discounts and an allowance for loan losses. Coastal Credit purchases finance contracts from auto dealers without recourse, and accordingly, the dealer usually has no liability to Coastal Credit if the consumer defaults on the contract. This is the sole class of finance receivables and there is no off-balance sheet credit exposure related to these receivables.

Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations in amounts sufficient to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to cover credit losses inherent in finance receivables.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The allowance for loan losses is established systematically by management based on the determination of the amount of credit losses inherent in the finance receivables as of the reporting date. All finance receivables of the Company are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Company reviews charge off experience factors, delinquency reports, historical collection rates and other information in order to make the necessary judgments as to credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of the reporting date. The Company measures its credit exposure by determining credit risk profiles based on payment activity and contractual delinquency. In addition to contractually delinquent accounts, the Company also evaluates historical loss performance of other accounts in their final stages of collection, in the aggregate, in determining the allowance for loan losses. These accounts amounted to $1.1 million and $0.9 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Assumptions regarding probable credit losses are reviewed quarterly and may be impacted by actual performance of finance receivables and changes in any of the factors discussed above. Should the credit loss assumptions increase, there could be an increase in the amount of allowance for loan losses required, which could decrease the net carrying value of finance receivables and increase the provision for loan losses recorded on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company believes that the existing allowance for loan losses is sufficient to absorb probable finance receivable losses.

Coastal Credit’s policy is to charge off finance receivables against the allowance for loan losses in the month in which the installment contract becomes 60 days delinquent under recency terms and 180 days delinquent under contractual terms, if the vehicle has not been repossessed. If the vehicle has been repossessed, the receivable is charged off in the month the repossessed automobile is disposed of at public auction unless cash collections on the receivable are foreseeable in the near future. Receivables that are deemed uncollectible prior to the maximum charge off period are charged off immediately.

Interest on receivables is recognized for financial reporting purposes using the interest method. Initial fees earned on add-on products such as collateral protection insurance, credit life insurance, road service plans and warranty products are recorded in income using the interest method. Late charges and deferment charges on contracts are recorded in income as collected. Cash received from loans that have previously been charged off is applied directly to the allowance for loan losses in the consolidated balance sheets. Discounts and fees, which consist primarily of non-refundable dealer acquisition discounts, are amortized over the term of the related finance receivables using the interest method and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets when the related finance receivables are charged off or paid in full. As a result of this charge-off policy, most accounts are charged off rather than being placed in nonaccrual status and thus any impact to the consolidated financial statements is immaterial.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Coastal Credit Finance receivables – net outstanding were as follows (in thousands):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Finance receivables, gross	$	128,819		$	119,788
Unearned finance charge income		(1,980	)		(1,951	)
Finance receivables, net of unearned finance charge income		126,839			117,837

Accretable unearned acquisition discounts and fees		(13,411	)		(12,961	)
Finance receivables, net of unearned finance charge income and discounts and fees		113,428			104,876

Allowance for loan losses		(7,703	)		(8,153	)

Finance receivables - net	$	105,725		$	96,723

Activity in the Coastal Credit allowance for loan losses on finance receivables is as follows (in thousands):

	Quarters Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,953		$	8,235		$	8,153		$	8,085
Charge-offs		(1,608	)		(2,119	)		(3,437	)		(4,391	)
Recoveries		659			543			1,238			1,074
Provision for loan losses		699			1,686			1,749			3,577

Balance at the end of the period	$	7,703		$	8,345		$	7,703		$	8,345

Finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges	$	126,839		$	113,833		$	126,839		$	113,833

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges		6.07	%		7.33	%		6.07	%		7.33	%

Annualized net charge-offs as a percent of finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges		2.99	%		5.54	%		3.47	%		5.83	%

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of annualized net charge-offs		202.92	%		132.38	%		175.15	%		125.79	%

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following is an assessment of the credit quality of the finance receivables as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Delinquency experience of finance receivables at Coastal Credit, including unearned interest under contractual terms ($ in thousands):

	June 30,					December 31,
	2011					2010
	$		%			$		%

Finance receivables - gross balance	$	128,819				$	119,789

Delinquencies:
30-59 days	$	999		0.8	%	$	1,209		1.0	%
60-89 days		292		0.2	%		538		0.4	%
90+ days		262		0.2	%		354		0.3	%
Total delinquencies	$	1,553		1.2	%	$	2,101		1.8	%

4. OTHER ASSETS

Other assets are as follows (in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Prepaid expenses	$	324	$	337
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net		324		335
Other		25		12
Total other assets	$	673	$	684

5. INCOME TAXES

White River had no liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

White River recognizes interest and penalties, if any, on tax assessments or tax refunds in the financial statements as a component of income tax expense.

White River and its subsidiary are subject to taxation by the United States and by various state jurisdictions. With some exceptions, White River’s consolidated tax returns for its 2006 tax year and forward remain open to examination by tax authorities. Also, net operating losses carried forward from prior years remain open to examination by tax authorities.

6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On October 26, 2005, the board of directors of White River adopted the White River Capital, Inc. Directors Stock Compensation Plan. The plan provides for the payment of a portion of regular fees to certain members of the board of directors in the form of shares of White River common stock. The terms of the plan include the reservation of 100,000 shares of White River common stock for issuance under the plan. As of June 30, 2011, 55,134 shares of White River common stock were issued under this plan.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

On May 18, 2009, White River entered into a new employment agreement with William McKnight, President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastal Credit. Mr. McKnight’s employment agreement was amended on May 10, 2011, as described in greater detail below. This employment agreement includes a long-term incentive award providing for the payment, in cash, of the value of 100,000 shares of White River stock, vesting in three annual increments of 33,333.33 shares on January 1, 2010, 2011 and 2012. This long-term incentive award was extended pursuant to the May 10, 2011 amendment, as described below. This award is accounted for as a liability award. The value of payment is determined based on the mean of the trading value of White River shares for 20 trading days prior to the vesting date. Compensation expense related to this award approximated $174,000 and $117,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $318,000 and $227,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The compensation expense related to this award is included in salaries and benefits expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for this share-based compensation arrangement was approximately $64,000 and $43,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $116,000 and $83,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

On May 10, 2011 White River and Coastal Credit entered into an amendment to the employment agreement of Mr. McKnight. The amendment extends the term of Mr. McKnight’s employment by two years from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2014. The amendment also provides that, effective as of January 2012, Mr. McKnight’s annual base salary shall be $450,000. The long-term cash incentive award also was extended in that an additional 33,333.33 shares will vest annually and payable only in cash on January 1, 2013 and 2014 (in addition to the 33,333.33 shares already scheduled to vest on January 1, 2012).

On May 5, 2006, White River shareholders approved the White River Capital, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The purpose of this plan is to offer certain employees, non-employee directors, and consultants the opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in White River. The plan provides for the grant of options, restricted stock awards and performance stock awards. The total number of options and stock awards that may be awarded under the plan may not exceed 250,000. As of June 30, 2011, White River awarded restricted stock awards totaling 127,100 shares and 93,700 of these shares have vested and have been issued and 23,400 shares have been forfeited. Forfeited shares are available for the purposes of the plan. White River has not issued stock options as of June 30, 2011. The following is a summary of the status of White River’s non-vested restricted stock awards and changes during the respective periods:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011				2010
Restricted Stock Awards	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Beginning nonvested awards		2,000	$	6.45		4,400	$	7.96
Granted		10,000		17.25		-		-
Vested		-		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-		-
Ending nonvested awards		12,000	$	15.45		4,400	$	7.96

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The value of restricted awards is determined based on the trading value of White River shares on the grant date. Compensation expense related to these awards approximated $20,000 and $9,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $29,000 and $18,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The compensation expense related to these awards is included in salaries and benefits expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for this share-based compensation arrangement was approximately $7,000 and $3,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $11,000 and $7,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There was $1.7 million and $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements and liability awards granted as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years and 1.5 years as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

Set forth in the table below is certain financial information with respect to White River’s reportable segments (in thousands):

For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2011	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	8,676		$	-		$	8,676

Interest expense		(446	)		-			(446	)

Net interest margin		8,230			-			8,230

Provision for loan losses		(699	)		-			(699	)

Net interest margin after provision for loan losses		7,531			-			7,531

Total other expenses		(3,179	)		(450	)		(3,629	)

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	4,352		$	(450	)	$	3,902

For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2010	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	8,094		$	6		$	8,100

Interest expense		(325	)		(43	)		(368	)

Net interest margin (deficit)		7,769			(37	)		7,732

Recovery (provision) for loan losses		(1,686	)		37			(1,649	)

Net interest margin after recovery (provision) for loan losses		6,083			-			6,083

Total other expenses		(2,738	)		(334	)		(3,072	)

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	3,345		$	(334	)	$	3,011

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2011	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	17,046		$	1		$	17,047

Interest expense		(871	)		(43	)		(914	)

Net interest margin (deficit)		16,175			(42	)		16,133

Provision for loan losses		(1,749	)		(6	)		(1,755	)

Net interest margin (deficit) after provision for loan losses		14,426			(48	)		14,378

Total other expenses		(6,279	)		(961	)		(7,240	)

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	8,147		$	(1,009	)	$	7,138

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2010	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	15,949		$	16		$	15,965

Interest expense		(630	)		(87	)		(717	)

Net interest margin (deficit)		15,319			(71	)		15,248

Recovery (provision) for loan losses		(3,577	)		76			(3,501	)

Net interest margin after recovery (provision) for loan losses		11,742			5			11,747

Total other expenses		(5,593	)		(1,088	)		(6,681	)

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	6,149		$	(1,083	)	$	5,066

The following table presents assets with respect to White River’s reportable segments (in thousands) at:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010

Corporate and other	$	39,325	$	41,599
Coastal Credit		107,979		100,009

	$	147,304	$	141,608

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the reported net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding during a period is weighted for the portion of the period that the shares were outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the dilutive effect of stock awards. Basic and diluted earnings per share have been computed as follows (dollars in thousands except per share data):

	Quarters Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010

Net income in thousands	$	2,537	$	1,977	$	4,633	$	3,324

Weighted average shares outstanding		3,612,880		3,884,603		3,650,953		3,929,500

Incremental shares from assumed conversions:
Stock award plans		2,104		1,912		4,110		1,593

Weighted average shares and assumed incremental shares		3,614,984		3,886,515		3,655,063		3,931,093

Earnings per share:

Basic	$	0.70	$	0.51	$	1.27	$	0.85

Diluted	$	0.70	$	0.51	$	1.27	$	0.85

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

White River and its subsidiary, as consumer finance companies, are subject to various consumer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties, based upon, among other things, usury, disclosure inaccuracies, wrongful repossession, violations of bankruptcy stay provisions, certificate of title disputes, fraud, breach of contract, and discriminatory treatment of credit applicants. Some litigation against White River and its subsidiary could take the form of class action complaints by consumers. As the assignee of finance contracts originated by dealers, White River and its subsidiary may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against dealers. The damages and penalties claimed by consumers in these types of matters can be substantial. The relief requested by the plaintiffs varies but can include requests for compensatory, statutory and punitive damages. White River and its subsidiary believe that it has taken prudent steps to address and mitigate the litigation risks associated with its business activities.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

10. DIVIDENDS AND SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On November 11, 2009, the Board of Directors reauthorized White River’s previously announced share repurchase program. White River is authorized to repurchase up to 500,000 shares of its outstanding common stock, from time to time and subject to market conditions, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of June 30, 2011, White River has repurchased 482,429 shares of its outstanding common stock under the program for $7.3 million. Information on the shares repurchased during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 under the program is as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program

April 1, 2011 - April 30, 2011		-	$	-		-		17,571
May 1, 2011 - May 31, 2011		-	$	-		-		17,571
June 1, 2011 - June 30, 2011		-	$	-		-		17,571
		-	$	-		-

On May 5, 2011, White River announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of 25 cents per share on its common stock to shareholders of record on May 16, 2011. This quarterly dividend was paid on May 31, 2011.

11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On August 1, 2011, White River’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of 25 cents per share on its common stock to be paid on August 25, 2011 to shareholders of record as of August 11, 2011.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

General

Founded in 2004, White River Capital, Inc. (“White River”) is a financial services holding company headquartered in Rancho Santa Fe, California with one principal operating subsidiary.

Coastal Credit LLC (“Coastal Credit”), based in Virginia Beach, Virginia, is a specialized subprime auto finance company engaged in acquiring subprime auto receivables from both franchised and independent automobile dealers which have entered into contracts with purchasers of typically used, but some new, cars and light trucks. Coastal Credit then services the receivables it acquires. Coastal Credit operates in 23 states through 16 offices.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. White River believes that the following represents the material critical accounting policies used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ significantly from estimates.

Allowance for Loan Losses – Finance Receivables

Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations in amounts sufficient to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in finance receivables.

The allowance for loan losses is established systematically by management based on the determination of the amount of probable credit losses inherent in the finance receivables as of the reporting date. Coastal Credit reviews charge off experience factors, delinquency reports, historical collection rates and other information in order to make the necessary judgments as to credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of the reporting date. Assumptions regarding probable credit losses are reviewed quarterly and may be impacted by actual performance of finance receivables and changes in any of the factors discussed above. Should the credit loss assumptions increase, there could be an increase in the amount of allowance for loan losses required, which could decrease the net carrying value of finance receivables and increase the provision for loan losses recorded on the consolidated statements of operations. Coastal Credit believes that the existing allowance for loan losses is sufficient to absorb probable finance receivable losses.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, their respective tax basis and net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset depends on White River’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the future and its ability to avoid an ownership change for tax purposes. The valuation allowance has been derived pursuant to the provisions of ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes, and reduces the total deferred tax asset to an amount that will “more likely than not” be realized. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there was no liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Results of Operations

The Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 – Overview

Net income was $2.5 million, or $0.70 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $2.0 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The increase in net income from the prior year is primarily due to an increase of $0.6 million in interest on receivables and a decrease of $1.0 million in provision for loan losses during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. This was partially offset by an increase in income tax expense of $0.3 million.

The Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 – Overview

Net income was $4.6 million, or $1.27 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $3.3 million, or $0.85 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in net income from the prior year is primarily due to an increase of $1.1 million in interest on receivables and a decrease of $1.7 million in provision for loan losses during the six months ended June 30, 2011. This was partially offset by an increase in income tax expense of $0.8 million.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Discussion of Results

The following table presents consolidating financial information for White River for the periods indicated (in thousands):

For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2011	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	8,676		$	-		$	8,676

Interest expense		(446	)		-			(446	)

Net interest margin		8,230			-			8,230

Provision for loan losses		(699	)		-			(699	)

Net interest margin after provision for loan losses		7,531			-			7,531

Total other expenses		(3,179	)		(450	)		(3,629	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		4,352			(450	)		3,902

Income tax expense		-			(1,365	)		(1,365	)

Net income (loss)	$	4,352		$	(1,815	)	$	2,537

For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2010	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	8,094		$	6		$	8,100

Interest expense		(325	)		(43	)		(368	)

Net interest margin (deficit)		7,769			(37	)		7,732

Recovery (provision) for loan losses		(1,686	)		37			(1,649	)

Net interest margin after recovery (provision) for loan losses		6,083			-			6,083

Total other expenses		(2,738	)		(334	)		(3,072	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		3,345			(334	)		3,011

Income tax expense		-			(1,034	)		(1,034	)

Net income (loss)	$	3,345		$	(1,368	)	$	1,977

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2011	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	17,046		$	1		$	17,047

Interest expense		(871	)		(43	)		(914	)

Net interest margin (deficit)		16,175			(42	)		16,133

Provision for loan losses		(1,749	)		(6	)		(1,755	)

Net interest margin (deficit) after provision for loan losses		14,426			(48	)		14,378

Total other expenses		(6,279	)		(961	)		(7,240	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		8,147			(1,009	)		7,138

Income tax expense		-			(2,505	)		(2,505	)

Net income (loss)	$	8,147		$	(3,514	)	$	4,633

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2010	Coastal Credit			Corporate and Other			Consolidated

Total interest income	$	15,949		$	16		$	15,965

Interest expense		(630	)		(87	)		(717	)

Net interest margin (deficit)		15,319			(71	)		15,248

Recovery (provision) for loan losses		(3,577	)		76			(3,501	)

Net interest margin after recovery (provision) for loan losses		11,742			5			11,747

Total other expenses		(5,593	)		(1,088	)		(6,681	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		6,149			(1,083	)		5,066

Income tax expense		-			(1,742	)		(1,742	)

Net income (loss)	$	6,149		$	(2,825	)	$	3,324

The Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 - Consolidated

Interest on receivables increased $0.6 million to $8.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $8.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. This increase is a result of an increase in the Coastal Credit average finance receivable balance to $110.4 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $99.9 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Interest expense was $0.4 million for each of the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Costal Credit’s average line of credit was $59.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $41.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Provision for loan losses was $0.7 million compared to $1.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring Coastal Credit’s allowance for loan losses to a level which management considers adequate to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio of finance receivables. This reduction in provision for loan losses was a result of the continued improved performance of the finance receivables and reduced levels of charge-offs.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Salaries and benefits were relatively stable at $2.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Other operating expenses were $1.2 million compared to $1.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This increase is due primarily to higher professional fees.

Income tax expense was $1.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The expense is based on the estimated effective tax rates for 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 - Consolidated

Interest on receivables increased $1.0 million to $17.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is a result of an increase in the Coastal Credit average finance receivable balance to $108.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $98.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Interest expense was $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This increase is a result of an increase in Costal Credit’s average line of credit to $58.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $40.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Provision for loan losses was $1.8 million compared to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring Coastal Credit’s allowance for loan losses to a level which management considers adequate to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio of finance receivables. This reduction in provision for loan losses was a result of the continued improved performance of the finance receivables and reduced levels of charge-offs.

Salaries and benefits were $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is related to the increase in performance based compensation.

Other operating expenses were $2.4 million compared to $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Income tax expense was $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The expense is based on the estimated effective tax rates for 2011 and 2010, respectively.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Financial Condition as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

Finance Receivables, Net

Finance receivables, net increased to $105.7 million at June 30, 2011 as compared to $96.7 million at December 31, 2010. A significant number of contracts acquired by Coastal Credit are contracts made with borrowers who are in the United States military. As of June 30, 2011, 50.8% of the Coastal Credit receivables were with borrowers who are in the United States military as compared to 47.7% as of December 31, 2010. Coastal Credit believes that having in the portfolio a significant percentage of contracts for which the borrowers are United States military personnel contributes to lower payment delinquency and greater collection personnel efficiencies. Coastal Credit requests that all borrowers who are in the military use the military allotment system to make payments on their contracts. Under this allotment system, the borrower authorizes the military to make a payroll deduction for the amount of the borrower’s monthly contract payment and to direct this deduction payment to Coastal Credit on behalf of the borrower. Delinquency of payments on contracts paid by allotment historically has been less than delinquency of payments on contracts not paid by allotment. As a result, the collection effort associated with the military contracts requires substantially less time, allowing Coastal Credit’s collection staff to focus on non-military contracts.

Accrued Interest Payable

Accrued interest payable was $0.1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is primarily a result of a reduction of $0.2 million in other payables and accrued expenses and $0.4 million of taxes paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Net cash used in investing activities was $10.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This change was primarily the result of the net increase in finance receivables acquired by Coastal Credit during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Net cash flows provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily resulted from the $5.0 million increase in the line of credit. This activity was partially offset by the $1.9 million repurchase of White River common stock and $1.8 million of cash dividends paid. Net cash flows used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily resulted from the $3.4 million repurchase of White River common stock and $2.0 million of cash dividends paid. This activity was partially offset by the $2.0 million increase in the line of credit.

At June 30, 2011, White River and its subsidiary had cash and cash equivalents of $2.0 million compared to $4.5 million at June 30, 2010.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Coastal Credit has a revolving credit facility from a lending institution with a maximum borrowing limit at June 30, 2011 of $100.0 million. The maturity date on the line of credit is December 31, 2011 and the interest rate is the 1 month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.60%. As of June 30, 2011, Coastal Credit had $61.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under this facility as compared to $56.0 million as of December 31, 2010. Total availability under the line of credit at June 30, 2011 was $94.8 million based upon the level of eligible collateral, with $33.8 million available in excess of the amount utilized at June 30, 2011. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of Coastal Credit. In addition, White River has provided an unconditional corporate guaranty. Coastal Credit must maintain specified financial ratios within guidelines established by the lender. Interest is paid monthly at a variable rate, based on meeting certain financial criteria. The average rate during each of the months of June, 2011 and December, 2010 was LIBOR plus 2.60% which equated to 2.8%. There is an annual commitment fee of 1/8 of 1% on the average daily unused commitment. In the event of a significant pay down or an earlier retirement of the revolver commitment, Coastal Credit would sustain certain prepayment penalties. This facility limits distributions Coastal Credit may make to White River to 50% of Coastal Credit’s net income. Coastal Credit is currently in discussions with its lender and anticipates renewing or replacing this credit facility.

White River’s sources of liquidity, as the parent company, are limited and consist of cash on hand and distributions by Coastal Credit (subject to restrictions under Coastal Credit’s credit facility).

Asset Quality

Set forth below is certain information concerning the credit loss experiences on the fixed rate retail automobile receivables of White River. There can be no assurance that future net loan loss experience on the receivables will be comparable to that set forth below. See “Discussion of Forward-Looking Statements.”

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Finance Receivables – Coastal Credit

Delinquency experience of finance receivables at Coastal Credit, including unearned interest ($ in thousands):

	June 30,					December 31,
	2011					2010
	$		%			$		%

Finance receivables - gross balance	$	128,819				$	119,789

Delinquencies:
30-59 days	$	999		0.8	%	$	1,209		1.0	%
60-89 days		292		0.2	%		538		0.4	%
90+ days		262		0.2	%		354		0.3	%
Total delinquencies	$	1,553		1.2	%	$	2,101		1.8	%

As a result of the nature of the customers in Coastal Credit’s portfolio, Coastal Credit considers the establishment of an adequate allowance for loan losses to be critical to its financial results. Coastal Credit has an allowance for loan losses that is calculated independent of the aggregate acquisition discounts and fees on finance receivables. Coastal Credit’s allowance for loan losses is based upon the historical rate at which (1) current loans, (2) contracts in a 30, 60 and 90+ day delinquency state and (3) loans ineligible for its borrowing line, have defaulted. These historical rates are evaluated and revised on a quarterly basis for current conditions. See “Discussion of Forward-Looking Statements.”

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Allowance for loan losses of finance receivables ($ in thousands):

	Quarters Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,953		$	8,235		$	8,153		$	8,085
Charge-offs		(1,608	)		(2,119	)		(3,437	)		(4,391	)
Recoveries		659			543			1,238			1,074
Provision for loan losses		699			1,686			1,749			3,577

Balance at the end of the period	$	7,703		$	8,345		$	7,703		$	8,345

Finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges	$	126,839		$	113,833		$	126,839		$	113,833

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges		6.07	%		7.33	%		6.07	%		7.33	%

Annualized net charge-offs as a percent of finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges		2.99	%		5.54	%		3.47	%		5.83	%

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of annualized net charge-offs		202.92	%		132.38	%		175.15	%		125.79	%

Recent Market Developments

As the financial and credit markets continue to recover from the 2007-2009 recession and attendant financial crisis, some auto finance companies have experienced improved funding opportunities and increased originations, while others continue to experience limited sources of liquidity. We believe White River is well positioned to continue operations and grow the company responsibly based on the following factors:

Coastal Credit is not dependent on the securitization market for financing.

At June 30, 2011, there was $33.8 million available, in excess of the amount utilized, from the line of credit, which expires December 2011.

White River is well capitalized with an equity to asset ratio of 57.1% as of June 30, 2011.

While there is never any guarantee White River will not be faced with the constrained financing scenarios seen by other auto finance companies during and since the recession, we believe White River is well positioned in this uncertain economic environment, and we expect to be able to fund normal business operations and meet our general liquidity needs for the next 12 months through access to the current or renewed line of credit, cash flows from operations, and our other funding sources.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

In addition, on July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which significantly changes the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. Many provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act went into effect on July 21, 2011. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions affecting large and small financial industry participants alike, including several provisions that will profoundly affect how certain companies providing consumer financial products and services, such as Coastal Credit, will be regulated in the future. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an independent entity within the Federal Reserve, which will be given the authority to promulgate consumer protection regulations applicable to all entities offering consumer financial services or products, including non-bank commercial companies in the business of extending credit and servicing consumer loans. The Dodd-Frank Act contains numerous other provisions affecting financial industry participants of all types, many of which may have an impact on the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Consequently, the Dodd-Frank Act is likely to affect our cost of doing business. It may limit or expand our permissible activities, and it may affect the competitive balance within our industry and market areas. The nature and extent of future legislative and regulatory changes affecting financial institutions and non-bank commercial companies, including as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, is very unpredictable at this time. The Company’s management continues to actively review the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and assess its probable impact on the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the Company. However, the ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial services industry in general, and the Company in particular, is uncertain at this time.

Discussion of Forward-Looking Statements

The preceding Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are also made elsewhere in this report. White River publishes other forward-looking statements from time to time. Statements that are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you to be aware of the speculative nature of “forward-looking statements.” Although these statements reflect White River’s good faith belief based on current expectations, estimates and projections about (among other things) the industry and the markets in which White River operates, they are not guarantees of future performance. Whether actual results will conform to management’s expectations and predictions is subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including:

the risks and uncertainties discussed in White River’s Annual Report on Form 10-K;

general economic, market, or business conditions;

changes in economic variables, such as the availability of business and consumer credit, conditions in the housing market, energy costs, the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment and the levels of consumer confidence and consumer debt;

changes in interest rates, the cost of funds, and demand for White River’s financial services;

the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices, currency values, investments, and other market fluctuations and other market indices;

changes in White River’s competitive position;

White River’s ability to manage growth;

the opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by White River;

competitive actions by other companies;

changes in laws or regulations, including the impact of current, pending and future legislation and regulations, including the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act and legislation regarding the U.S. debt ceiling and related fiscal policy;

changes in the policies of federal or state regulators and agencies; and

other circumstances, many of which are beyond White River’s control.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consequently, all of White River’s forward-looking statements are qualified by these cautionary statements. White River may not realize the results anticipated by management or, even if White River substantially realizes the results management anticipates, the results may not have the consequences to, or effects on, White River or its business or operations that management expects. Such differences may be material. Except as required by applicable laws, White River does not intend to publish updates or revisions of any forward-looking statements management makes to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

White River's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of White River's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Sections 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"), have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, White River's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by White River in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in those reports is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During White River’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011, there were no changes in White River’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect White River’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Information regarding White River’s purchases of share of its common stock for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 is set forth in Note 10, “Dividends and Share Repurchase Program,” to White River’s condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and is incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Declaration of Cash Dividend

New Stock Repurchase Program

On August 11, 2011, White River announced that its Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase, from time to time and subject to market conditions, up to 250,000 shares of White River's outstanding common stock, without par value, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The number of shares authorized to be repurchased under the new program represents approximately 6.9% of White River's common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

No.		Description
31.1		CEO Certification required by 17 C.F.R. Section 240.13a-14(a)
31.2		CFO Certification required by 17 C.F.R. Section 240.13a-14(a)
32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101		The following materials from White River's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, formatted in an XBRL Interactive Data File: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.*

*	Users of the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are advised, in accordance with Regulation S-T Rule 406T, that this Interactive Data File is deemed not filed or as a part of a registration statement for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL-related documents is unaudited and unreviewed.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	White River Capital, Inc.
	(Registrant)

August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ Martin J. Szumski
		Martin J. Szumski
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Signing on behalf of the registrant
		and as Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

No.		Description	Location
31.1		CEO Certification required by 17 C.F.R. Section 240.13a-14(a)	Attached
31.2		CFO Certification required by 17 C.F.R. Section 240.13a-14(a)	Attached
32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Attached
101		The following materials from White River's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, formatted in an XBRL Interactive Data File: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.*	Attached

*	Users of the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are advised, in accordance with Regulation S-T Rule 406T, that this Interactive Data File is deemed not filed or as a part of a registration statement for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL-related documents is unaudited and unreviewed.

Attached files

White River Capital Inc Reports

Also read