Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2011
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 001-33601
GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 74-2785449 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
4500 Lockhill-Selma, Suite 150 San Antonio, Texas |
78249 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Office) | (Zip Code) |
(210) 308-8267
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes x No
As of August 11, 2011, there were 18,098,541 shares of common stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2011
Index
Page | ||||||
Part I. |
Financial Information | 2 | ||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements | 2 | ||||
Condensed Balance Sheets | 2 | |||||
Condensed Statements of Operations | 3 | |||||
Condensed Statement of Stockholders Equity | 4 | |||||
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows | 5 | |||||
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements | 6 | |||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 12 | ||||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 25 | ||||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures | 25 | ||||
Part II. |
Other Information | 25 | ||||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings | 25 | ||||
Item 1A |
Risk Factors. | 25 | ||||
Item 6. |
Exhibits | 26 | ||||
Signatures | 26 |
GlobalSCAPE®, CuteFTP®, CuteFTP Pro® Enhanced File Transfer Server® and CuteSendIt® are registered trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. Secure FTP ServerTM, WAFSTM, CDPTM, DMZ GatewayTM, Advanced Workflow EngineTM, AS2TM, AWETM, CuteFTP LiteTM, Mail ExpressTM, Total Path SecurityTM, appShieldTM and CuteBackup are trademarks of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. Other trademarks and trade names in this Quarterly Report are the property of their respective owners.
1
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
Condensed Balance Sheets
(in thousands except share amounts)
June 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 12,615 | $ | 11,087 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $66 and $237 on June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) |
3,288 | 3,124 | ||||||
CoreTrace receivable |
597 | 298 | ||||||
Federal income tax receivable |
| 94 | ||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
878 | 881 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
217 | 319 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
17,595 | 15,803 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net |
1,110 | 1,286 | ||||||
Investment - CoreTrace |
2,278 | 2,278 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
380 | 531 | ||||||
Goodwill |
619 | 619 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
92 | | ||||||
Other assets |
30 | 30 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 22,104 | $ | 20,547 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 488 | $ | 250 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
1,106 | 1,392 | ||||||
Income tax payable |
160 | | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
5,708 | 5,554 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
7,462 | 7,196 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
| 7 | ||||||
Other long term liabilities |
1,339 | 1,185 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000 authorized, no shares issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 40,000,000 authorized, 18,502,122 and 18,346,982 shares issued June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
19 | 18 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
12,751 | 12,137 | ||||||
Treasury stock, 403,581 shares, at cost, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
(1,452 | ) | (1,452 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
1,985 | 1,456 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
13,303 | 12,159 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 22,104 | $ | 20,547 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Condensed Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Operating Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Licenses |
$ | 2,839 | $ | 2,518 | $ | 4,819 | $ | 4,979 | ||||||||
Maintenance and support |
2,279 | 1,865 | 4,499 | 3,640 | ||||||||||||
All others |
592 | 83 | 1,036 | 259 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Revenues |
5,710 | 4,466 | 10,354 | 8,878 | ||||||||||||
Operating Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
529 | 144 | 898 | 246 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
3,511 | 3,213 | 6,706 | 6,122 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
762 | 725 | 1,547 | 1,371 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
193 | 199 | 397 | 399 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
4,995 | 4,281 | 9,548 | 8,138 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
715 | 185 | 806 | 740 | ||||||||||||
Other income, net |
13 | 4 | 13 | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
728 | 189 | 819 | 745 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
257 | 55 | 290 | 248 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 471 | $ | 134 | $ | 529 | $ | 497 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income per common share - basic |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||
Net income per common share - diluted |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
17,997 | 17,354 | 17,969 | 17,318 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
18,761 | 18,021 | 18,727 | 17,934 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
3
Table of Contents
Condensed Statement of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional paid-in Capital |
Treasury Stock |
Retained Earnings |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
18,346,982 | $ | 18 | $ | 12,137 | $ | (1,452 | ) | $ | 1,456 | $ | 12,159 | ||||||||||||
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options |
101,720 | 1 | 122 | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax deficiency from stock-based compensation |
| | (25 | ) | | | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| | 517 | | | 517 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
53,420 | | | | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 529 | 529 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
18,502,122 | $ | 19 | $ | 12,751 | $ | (1,452 | ) | $ | 1,985 | $ | 13,303 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 529 | $ | 497 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Bad debt recoveries |
(170 | ) | (81 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
397 | 399 | ||||||
Loss on disposition of assets |
| 52 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
517 | 481 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
(96 | ) | (538 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit from vested restricted stock |
| 15 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
6 | (636 | ) | |||||
CoreTrace receivable |
(299 | ) | | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
102 | (61 | ) | |||||
Federal income tax |
254 | 392 | ||||||
Other assets |
| 11 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
238 | (9 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(286 | ) | 205 | |||||
Deferred revenues |
154 | 518 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
154 | 5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,500 | 1,250 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(70 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||
Purchase of short-term investments |
| (350 | ) | |||||
Redemption of short-term investments |
| 1,205 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(70 | ) | 770 | |||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
123 | 37 | ||||||
Tax (deficiency) benefit from stock-based compensation |
(25 | ) | 49 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
98 | 86 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash |
1,528 | 2,106 | ||||||
Cash at beginning of period |
11,087 | 7,026 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 12,615 | $ | 9,132 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 157 | $ | 374 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
1. | Nature of Business |
GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (GlobalSCAPE or the Company) provides secure information exchange capabilities for consumers and enterprises through the development and sale of software, delivery of managed and hosted solutions, provision of maintenance and support, and professional services. Since our organization in 1996, we have evolved from a company focused primarily on personal file transfer products, sold over the Internet, to a solution provider deriving over 90 percent of revenue from sales to small and medium business and enterprise customers worldwide.
We operate primarily in the Managed File Transfer, or MFT, industry. Our MFT products ensure the privacy of critical information such as financial data, medical records, customer files and other similar sensitive documents. In addition, these products ensure compliance with many government and commercial regulations relating to the protection of information while allowing users to reduce IT costs, increase efficiency, track and audit transactions and automate processes. Since 2008, we have added managed e-mail attachment, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and cloud-based subscription offerings to our solution portfolio. Our managed e-mail attachment solution addresses the needs of customers who are constrained by the typical limits on e-mail attachment size or who require additional security, auditing, and reporting for file attachments shared through e-mail. Our SaaS and cloud-based subscription solutions allow customers to reduce their upfront and total cost of ownership and achieve other recognized benefits of cloud-based solutions, including service elasticity and strong service level agreements for IT infrastructure reliability and performance.
We are continuing our evolution from an MFT company into adjacent solution spaces applicable to Total Path Security. The Total Path Security framework addresses data and information security in motion (for example, with traditional MFT solutions delivered as on-premises software or as a cloud service) and at rest (for example, with endpoint security and data recovery solutions like appShield and CuteBackup, respectively). During the first quarter of 2011, we announced development of appShield, a consumer whitelisting solution designed to defeat malicious software applications by allowing only designated applications and executables (i.e., those on the whitelist), to run on protected systems. This approach changes the paradigm of traditional blacklisting solutions, such as antivirus software, which typically use signature-based approaches to identify, quarantine, or block execution of an exponentially growing number of malware threats.
In the second quarter of 2011, we announced development of CuteBackup, a data backup and recovery software solution aimed at helping consumers and small business owners avoid a data loss catastrophe. CuteBackup became available for download and purchase in July 2011.
2. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, Interim Financial Statements. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required under generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normally recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been made. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as well as Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations also included in our 2010 Form 10-K and in this Report.
6
Table of Contents
The Company follows accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, commonly referred to as the FASB. The FASB sets generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that the Company follows to ensure we consistently report our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Companys financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Companys financial position and results of operations.
Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no changes in our significant accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from those described in our 2010 Form 10-K. Listed below is a condensed version of the Companys critical accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition The Company markets and distributes software products; revenue is recognized when the following conditions have been met:
| Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; |
| Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; |
| Fixed or determinable amount |
| Collection is reasonably assured |
If the Company determines that any one of the four criteria is not met, we will defer recognition of revenue until all the criteria are met.
License revenue is derived primarily from the licensing of various products and technology. Generally, license revenue is recognized upon delivery of the product, assuming all other conditions for revenue recognition noted above have been met.
The Company also enters into perpetual software license agreements through direct sales to customers and indirect sales with distributors and resellers. The license agreements generally include product maintenance and support agreements, for which the related revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the agreements. In any given period if the amount of revenue that is deferred, which is equal to the total of that periods maintenance and support sales, is greater than the amount recognized, then revenue will decrease and vice versa.
In arrangements that include multiple elements, including perpetual software licenses and maintenance and/or services, revenue is allocated and deferred for the undelivered items based on vendor specific-objective evidence (VSOE). When VSOE of fair value exists for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, revenue is allocated to each element based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. VSOE of fair value is established by the price charged when the same element is sold separately. In a multiple element arrangement whereby VSOE of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but VSOE of fair value does not exist for one or more delivered elements, revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue, assuming collection is probable. Deferred revenue consists primarily of the unamortized balance of product maintenance.
We recognize hosting revenue over the contractual term of the customer contract. We believe our customers generally will continue to utilize our services beyond the initial contract term which typically ranges from one to three years. As a result, initial setup fees are recognized ratably over the estimated average life of a customer relationship. Amounts that have been invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and either deferred revenue or revenue, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met.
7
Table of Contents
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We regularly assess the collectability of outstanding customer invoices and, in so doing, we maintain an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the non-collection of customer receivables. In estimating this allowance, we consider factors such as: historical collection experience; a customers current creditworthiness; customer concentration; age of the receivable balance; and general economic conditions that may affect a customers ability to pay. Actual customer collections could differ from our estimates.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill and certain indefinite-lived assets are not amortized, but are evaluated at least annually for impairment. The determination of whether the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets has been impaired requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions about future business trends and growth. If an event occurs that would cause the Company to revise its estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the value of goodwill or other intangibles, such revision could result in an impairment charge that could have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Income Taxes The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entitys financial statements or tax returns. Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with FASB guidance.
3. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
As of June 30, 2011, GlobalSCAPE had goodwill of approximately $619,000 associated with the acquisition of Availl, Inc. in 2006. No events occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011 that would have been considered a triggering event under current accounting guidance and require an impairment test as of that date.
Intangible assets represent amounts acquired in the acquisition of Availl, and consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Life (Years) |
||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||||
Software |
$ | 1,775 | $ | (1,444 | ) | 5 | ||||||
Customer list |
180 | (135 | ) | 5 | ||||||||
Patent |
7 | (3 | ) | 18 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,962 | $ | (1,582 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Estimated Amortization Expense |
||||||||||||
For remainder of 2011 |
$ | 150 | ||||||||||
For the Year-ended 12/31/2012 |
226 | |||||||||||
For the Year-ended 12/31/2013 |
1 | |||||||||||
For the Year-ended 12/31/2014 |
1 | |||||||||||
For the Year-ended 12/31/2015 |
1 | |||||||||||
Thereafter |
1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 380 | ||||||||||
|
|
Acquired intangibles are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over their weighted average lives. Intangible assets amortization expense was approximately $151,000 for each of the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. No events occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011 that would have caused the Company to evaluate the need to record an impairment.
4. | Financial Instruments and Investments |
Accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the
8
Table of Contents
principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not an assumption specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including our own credit risk.
The Companys investments currently consist of an investment in a software company, which is accounted for under the cost method. The current carrying amount of this cost method investment is approximately $2.3 million. The Company believes that the carrying amount approximates fair value and has not evaluated it for impairment as there have been no indicators that would suggest the value of the investment has declined below cost.
Accounts receivable and accounts payable are reflected in the accompanying financial statements, at cost, which approximate fair value because of their short term maturity.
5. | Stock-Based Compensation |
GlobalSCAPE has stock-based compensation plans available to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock to employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors.
Approximately $517,000 and $481,000 of compensation cost related to stock options and restricted stock awards were recognized in operating results in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2010 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (2010 EIP) authorizes the issuance of up to three million shares of common stock for stock-based incentives including stock options and restricted stock awards. The exercise price, term and other conditions applicable to each stock option or stock award granted under the 2010 EIP are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of stock options is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share of our stock on that date (at market close). The stock options will expire after ten years.
Stock Options
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of GlobalSCAPE stock. We used the simplified method to derive an expected term. The expected term represents an estimate of the time options are expected to remain outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The following table sets forth the assumptions used to determine compensation cost for our stock options consistent with the requirements established by FASB:
Three-months ended June 30, 2011 |
Six-months ended June 30, 2011 | |||
Expected volatility |
73% | 77% | ||
Expected annual dividend yield |
0 | 0 | ||
Risk free rate of return |
2.1% | 2.5% | ||
Expected option term (years) |
6 | 6 |
9
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
Number of Options |
Weighted Average Share Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) |
Average Intrinsic Value ($M) |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
3,260,327 | $ | 1.83 | 7.63 | $ | 1.48 | ||||||||||
Granted |
335,500 | 2.28 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
101,720 | 1.20 | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
93,927 | 2.21 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
3,400,180 | $ | 1.88 | 7.06 | $ | 1.75 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
1,995,006 | $ | 1.95 | 6.13 | $ | 1.10 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.35. The total intrinsic value of options (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price of the options on the date of exercise) exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $92,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $123,000.
At June 30, 2011, there was approximately $1.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.91 years.
Stock Awards
The GlobalSCAPE, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Long Term Incentive Plan allows for the issuance of either stock options or restricted stock awards. Restricted stock awards for 80,000 and 53,420 were granted in accordance with the terms of the plan in June 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The fair value of stock awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of grant. Stock awards are amortized over their applicable vesting period, one year, using the straight-line method.
The following table summarizes information about stock awards activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2010 |
53,420 | $ | 2.01 | |||||
Granted |
80,000 | 2.16 | ||||||
Vested |
53,420 | 2.01 | ||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nonvested balance at June 30, 2011 |
80,000 | $ | 2.16 | |||||
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, there was approximately $159,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 11 months.
6. | Warrants |
On November 16, 2006, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with accredited investors and granted warrants to purchase 1,352,000 shares of our common stock to the investors with an exercise price of $3.15 per share. The warrants have a 5-year term beginning May 15, 2007 and ending May 15, 2012. There have been exercises of 80,000, and as of June 30, 2011, there were 1,272,000 warrants outstanding.
10
Table of Contents
7. | Earnings per Common Share |
The components of earnings per share are as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerators |
||||||||||||||||
Numerators for basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 471 | $ | 134 | $ | 529 | $ | 497 | ||||||||
Denominators |
||||||||||||||||
Denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
17,997 | 17,354 | 17,969 | 17,318 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options and awards (1) |
765 | 667 | 758 | 616 | ||||||||||||
Common stock warrants (2) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Denominator for dilutive earnings per share |
18,761 | 18,021 | 18,727 | 17,934 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share basic |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||
Net income per common share diluted |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.03 |
(1) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 132,100 and 175,425 options were not included in dilutive shares, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months and six months June 30, 2010, 426,196 and 588,216 options were not included in dilutive shares, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
(2) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, no warrants were included in dilutive shares, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
8. | Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company from time to time may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its ordinary course of business.
GlobalSCAPE has been named as one of a number of defendants in two different patent infringement suits. The first was filed by Content Delivery Solutions LLC in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Austin Division. The complaint alleges that GlobalSCAPE infringed on a patent that addresses products or services for resuming interrupted transmission of a file over a network. The second was filed by Achates Reference Publishing, Inc in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division. The complaint alleges that GlobalSCAPE infringed on a patent that addresses product activation functionality. Both of these matters have just been brought forth and, while GlobalSCAPE believes that it has meritorious defenses to both plaintiffs claims and intends to defend the lawsuits vigorously, it is early in its process and it is not possible to reasonably determine the outcome of these suits. Accordingly, it is not possible at this time to assess whether or not we need to reserve for potential settlements.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that it plans to audit our 2009 Federal income tax return.
11
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward looking statements are those statements that describe managements beliefs and expectations about the future. We have identified forward-looking statements by using words such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, may, expect, and intend. Although we believe these expectations are reasonable, our operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the Risk Factors section of our 2010 Form 10-K and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. GlobalSCAPEs actual results could differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
Our solutions provide secure information exchange capabilities for consumers and enterprises through the sale of software licenses, delivery of managed and hosted solutions, provision of maintenance and support, and professional services. Since our organization in 1996, we have evolved from a company focused primarily on personal file transfer products, sold over the Internet, to a solution provider deriving over 90 percent of revenue from sales to small and medium business, or SMB, and enterprise customers worldwide.
We operate primarily in the Managed File Transfer, or MFT, industry. Our MFT products ensure the privacy of critical information such as financial data, medical records, customer files and other similar sensitive documents. In addition, these products ensure compliance with many government and commercial regulations relating to the protection of information while allowing users to reduce IT costs, increase efficiency, track and audit transactions and automate processes. Since 2008, we have added managed e-mail attachment, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and cloud-based subscription offerings to our solution portfolio. Our managed e-mail attachment solution addresses the needs of customers who are constrained by the typical limits on e-mail attachment size or who require additional security, auditing, and reporting for file attachments shared through e-mail. Our SaaS and cloud-based subscription solutions allow customers to reduce their upfront and total cost of ownership and achieve other recognized benefits of cloud-based solutions, including service elasticity and strong service level agreements for IT infrastructure reliability and performance.
We are continuing our evolution from an MFT company into adjacent solution spaces applicable to Total Path Security. The Total Path Security framework addresses data and information security in motion (for example, with traditional MFT solutions delivered as on-premises software or as a cloud service) and at rest (for example, with endpoint security and data recovery solutions like appShield and CuteBackup, respectively).
During the first quarter of 2011, we announced development of appShield, a consumer whitelisting solution designed to defeat malicious software applications by allowing only designated applications and executables (i.e., those on the whitelist), to run on protected systems. This approach changes the paradigm of traditional blacklisting solutions, such as antivirus software, which typically use signature-based approaches to identify, quarantine, or block execution of an exponentially growing number of malware threats. In the second quarter of 2011, we announced development of CuteBackup, a data backup and recovery software solution aimed at helping consumers and small business owners avoid a data loss catastrophe. CuteBackup became available for download and purchase in July 2011.
Key Business Metrics
As described in our 2010 Form 10-K, we review a number of key business metrics on an ongoing basis to help us monitor our performance and to identify material trends which may affect our business. The measures that we believe are the primary indicators of our performance are:
| Revenue Growth; |
| Sales and Sales Pipeline Growth; |
| Recurring Revenue Growth; and |
| EBITDA. |
12
Table of Contents
Our 2010 Form 10-K provides our perspective on these key business metrics. The Outlook section and Comparison of the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, below, provide updates on revenue and recurring revenue growth, as well as related sales developments.
Revenue Growth. As detailed below in the discussion of our results of operations, revenue grew by approximately 28% during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 versus the same period in 2010. This revenue growth was the result of increased product license sales, particularly for the Enhanced File Transfer Server solution suite, continued increases in maintenance and support revenue, and substantial growth in professional services revenue, largely associated with our delivery of engineering support as a subcontractor on the McLane Advanced Technologies (MAT) industry team that won the $52.3 million re-compete contract for the US Army Standard Army Maintenance System Enhanced (SAMS-E) in September 2010. We also recognized increasing revenue from our subscription-based hosted and managed services. Note, however, that the revenue growth in the second quarter of 2011 may not be representative of future revenue growth as we recognized some revenue in the quarter from opportunities that slipped from the first quarter.
Sales and Sales Pipeline Growth. We continued to experience sales and sales pipeline growth during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 versus the same period in 2010. As we increase sales of our subscription services, and pursue opportunities with larger deal sizes, we believe our sales and sales pipeline growth remains a key indicator of our potential to deliver increased revenue in future periods.
Recurring Revenue Growth. Recurring revenue continued to grow during the quarter as compared to the same period in 2010. As stated in our 2010 Form 10-K, we believe that an increase in deferred revenues indicates both growth in our installed base and satisfaction with our products and our maintenance and support services. At June 30, 2011, deferred revenue was $5.7 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or approximately 24%, over the balance at June 30, 2010. This growth represents a combination of increased maintenance and support sales, plus growing sales of our hosted and managed solutions.
EBITDA. EBITDA or Earnings Before Interest, Depreciation, and Amortization, is not a measure of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and should not be considered a substitute for net income. We define EBITDA as Net Income, plus Income Taxes, Total Other Income (Expense), Depreciation and Amortization, and non-cash charges for asset impairments. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and when assessing our operating performance, EBITDA should not considered in isolation, or as a substitute for net income or other income statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP. See our EBITDA to net income reconciliations in the table below. As shown in the table, EBITDA increased to $908,000 in the second quarter, compared to $384,000 during the same period in 2010, an increase of 136 percent. The increase in EBITDA was the result of substantially increased revenue in the second quarter and continued close management of fixed operating expenses.
13
Table of Contents
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net Revenue |
$ | 5,710 | $ | 4,466 | $ | 10,354 | $ | 8,878 | ||||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 715 | $ | 185 | $ | 806 | $ | 740 | ||||||||
Net income: |
$ | 471 | $ | 134 | $ | 529 | $ | 497 | ||||||||
Plus: Income taxes |
257 | 55 | 290 | 248 | ||||||||||||
Plus: Total other (income) |
(13 | ) | (4 | ) | (13 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Plus: Depreciation and Amortization |
193 | 199 | 397 | 399 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 908 | $ | 384 | $ | 1,203 | $ | 1,139 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and Solutions
The following is a brief description of our products and solutions:
Managed File Transfer Solutions Our MFT solutions are best known for the CuteFTP product line. They primarily consist of products that help users securely move and copy files on the Internet. FTP, along with more secure protocols such as SFTP, FTP/S, and HTTP/S, requires two software programs: a client program to start a transfer and a server program to accept the connection. Our MFT product line includes CuteFTP Pro, CuteFTP Home, CuteFTP Lite, CuteFTP Mac, and Enhanced File Transfer Server. A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from licensing our file management products, especially Enhanced File Transfer Server. We have continued to develop new versions of Enhanced File Transfer Server that, for example, delivers additional security and visibility features, along with improved workflow tools. Other recent enhancements in Enhanced File Transfer Server include industry-leading two-factor authentication, real-time visibility into all ongoing file transfers passing through the server, integration with Microsoft® SharePoint® Server, improved worldwide scalability with UTF-8 encoding, an enhanced user experience for browser-based access, and simplified corporate branding and customization.
Wide-Area File Services and Continuous Data Protection Solutions Our Wide Area File Services, or WAFS, software is a true wide area file solution that enables accelerated collaboration across multiple sites, while reducing network bandwidth requirements. With WAFS software, customers can implement instant file-sharing and server-to-server mirroring across multiple sites, with full coherency at near-LAN access speeds. Continuous, real-time multi-directional acceleration and mirroring technology ensures that data exists in multiple places simultaneously and in complete synchronization, no matter where a change in any file is made. The data is mirrored between servers on the LAN, virtual private network, or across firewalls in real time, with full support for file locking ensuring coherency. Our WAFS product ensures bandwidth-efficient WAN utilization, and that users have access to the most recent data. WAFS technology can have our Continuous Data Protection, or CDP, product added to it to provide enterprises with a file access and data protection combination that centralizes data storage and IT administration facilities without compromising data sharing and protection. As files change, file servers backup in real time to the customers backup site which can be at the same or a remote location. The backup server can keep any number of past versions of each file (and deleted files) which gives the customer immediate restore, as well as the ability to perform point-in-time snapshots.
Managed E-mail Attachment Solution Our managed e-mail attachment solution, Mail Express, addresses the needs of businesses that prefer to use their legacy e-mail infrastructure to deliver and manage e-mail attachments. E-mail traditionally has been ill-suited for delivery of certain attachments due to typical infrastructure and administrator-defined limitations on e-mail attachment size. In many cases, these limitations preclude sending or receiving e-mail attachments larger than even 10 or 20 MB. The Mail Express solution is a software add-in (also
14
Table of Contents
sometimes referred to as a plug-in) compatible with Microsoft Outlook. The add-in transparently redirects e-mail attachments, up to 25 GB in size, for delivery in accordance with administrator-defined policies. Mail Express also supports communication through the GlobalSCAPE DMZ Gateway. The DMZ Gateway support allows customers to implement Mail Express behind a DMZ firewall which provides an added layer of protection for data storage and retrieval, user authentication, and firewall traversal. The latest version of Mail Express also includes an internal web portal. The portal provides full Mail Express functionality via a standard web browser to customer employees who may not use Microsoft Outlook as their primary mail client. The portal also allows approved partners to send large files back to Mail Express users, ensuring the files and data remain secure at all times. Other key features of the newest version of Mail Express include support for Microsoft Outlook and Exchange 2010, improved performance and optimization when interacting with anti-virus software, and increased capacity and number of users per Mail Express server, supporting the growing demands of larger enterprises.
Endpoint Security Solution During the first quarter of 2011, we announced ongoing development of appShield, a consumer endpoint security solution to protect computers against the rapid growth of viruses and other malicious software. The appShield solution is based on proven enterprise-level application whitelisting technology from CoreTrace Corporation, the recognized leader in dynamic and client-based application whitelisting. Previously, in 2010, we entered into a reseller agreement with CoreTrace, under which we resell CoreTraces BOUNCER enterprise whitelisting solution. Unlike traditional blacklisting solutions, such as antivirus software, that attempt to detect and remove infected files and applications running on a computer, whitelisting allows users to lock servers, personal computers, and other devices into a known, trusted state and allows only approved applications to run. By ensuring that only approved applications can run, appShield automatically blocks unauthorized applicationsincluding viruses and rogue applications that may have been inadvertently downloaded from email, websites, or social media, for example.
Data Backup and Recovery Solution In the second quarter of 2011, we announced development of CuteBackup, a data backup and recovery software solution for the consumer and SMB markets. CuteBackup is powered by Paragon Software Groups Backup and Recovery 10 Suite. The CuteBackup product became available for download and purchase in July 2011, as part of our roadmap for developing and integrating solutions consistent with our previously communicated Total Path Security framework.
Maintenance and Support We offer maintenance and support, or M&S, contracts for all of our software products. These M&S contracts entitle the licensee to software upgrades and technical support services in accordance with the terms of our M&S contract. Standard technical support services are provided via e-mail and telephone during our regular business hours. Optionally, for Enhanced File Transfer Server Enterprise and WAFS software, we also offer a Platinum M&S contract which provides access to emergency technical assistance 24 hours 7 days a week.
GlobalSCAPE Managed Solutions Through a partner agreement with Rackspace Hosting, Inc., we deliver cloud-based managed file transfer solutions for the secure exchange of business-to-business data, including large files and sensitive data. These subscription-based solutions include hosted and fully-managed offerings tailored for the SMB market and large enterprises. Our Managed Information Xchange, or MIX, service is a GlobalSCAPE-managed solution for companies seeking complete support for the contracted services. The tiered service, delivered through Rackspaces infrastructure, allows customers to outsource all or part of their complex and demanding information exchange needs to reduce costs, improve operational efficiencies, track and audit transactions, and provide a greater level of security. Available solution tiers range from trial and proof-of-concept implementations to enterprise-scale managed services. Info Security Products Guide has recognized MIX as the winner of the 2011 Global Excellence Award in the Cloud category. The 2011 Global Excellence Awards attracted entries from all over the world, and more than 50 judges from a broad spectrum of industries determined the winners. Also during the first quarter, we announced availability of our Hosted Enhanced File Transfer Service. This service expands our cloud-based solution portfolio by integrating a hosted version of our market-leading Enhanced File Transfer Server solution with infrastructure from Rackspace Hosting. This scalable and tiered service is structured for the SMB market, and allows customers of all sizes to outsource all or part of their secure information exchange needs at affordable price points. The Hosted EFT Server Service offering delivers these capabilities and benefits while allowing direct customer management of the Enhanced File Transfer Server solution (as contrasted with the fully managed MIX service).
15
Table of Contents
Software as a Service Solution Our SaaS solution, CuteSendIt, is a file transfer service for individuals, professionals, and businesses. CuteSendIt uses cloud computing approaches to deliver files through a hosted web portal. This solution approach meets the needs of users who do not have, or wish to invest in, file transfer infrastructure such as FTP servers or even client application software. Users access the CuteSendIt application over the Internet using a standard web browser, securely upload files (up to multi-GB) through the portal, and compose a brief message to accompany the file delivery. CuteSendIt then sends the message to the recipients as the body of an e-mail message. This e-mail message also includes links to the files uploaded through the CuteSendIt web portal. Anyone with an Internet connection can access this service at www.cutesendit.com. There is no software to install with CuteSendIt and no specific knowledge of file transfer is needed to use it. CuteSendIt currently is free to use for a limited number of transfers, and offers various monthly and yearly fee-based plans that meet specific file transfer requirements.
Professional Services We offer a range of professional services to complement our software and cloud-based solutions. These professional services include product customization and system integration, solution quickstart implementations, business process and workflow, policy development, and education and training. In addition, we may provide longer-term engineering services, including supporting multi-year contracts, if necessary, to support certain solution implementations and integrations. For example, earlier in 2011, we announced an increase in our engineering support as a subcontractor on the MAT industry team supporting SAMS-E, a major army logistics program. This SAMS-E support represents the largest professional services engagement in GlobalSCAPEs 15-year history. Under the contract terms, we are providing professional services to sustain integration of our Secure FTP Server and CuteFTP solutions within the SAMS-E environment. In addition to the contracted services, GlobalSCAPE may deliver enhanced software solutions for SAMS-E under the subcontractor agreement.
Outlook
We believe that the future success of our business will be dependent upon our ability to:
| Leverage our MFT solutions and expertise to enter, and establish leadership in, broader information exchange markets while maintaining leadership in the MFT industry, |
| Grow recurring revenue, |
| Continue developing and enhancing our software solutions, |
| Enter and extend our presence in the endpoint security market, |
| Increase our market coverage through international and channel sales, |
| Grow our enterprise and government sales, and |
| Develop our corporate brand and market recognition. |
Enter and Establish Leadership in Broader Markets. We have been in the leaders quadrant of the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Managed File Transfer for the past two years. Gartner has stated that the MFT market is approximately $500 million to $550 million. With MFT capabilities increasingly being integrated into business-to-business (B2B) gateway, data integration, service oriented architecture, and other technical solutions, the need to keep evolving our solutions and entering adjacent markets is clear. We believe the market will continue shifting toward consideration of MFT as more of a feature than a solution. This shift may take many years, but we believe early recognition of the trend and appropriate strategic planning increase our potential for evolving our solutions in front of the ongoing market changes. Our entry into the multi-billion dollar cloud services and endpoint security markets reflects strategic broadening of our solution applicability. We also have considerably enhanced our professional services capabilities in recent years. More customers are contracting for our professional services and seeking repeat consulting engagements to support their business operations. The persistent business presence allowed by our cloud-based subscription services is a strategic development that we believe will reinforce this trend.
16
Table of Contents
Grow Recurring Revenue. Recurring revenue includes M&S contracts and subscriptions for our cloud-based managed and hosted solutions. In the broadest sense, delivery of labor hours on long-duration contracts also fits within this growth strategy because such contracted sales provide a book of sold business that will be recognized into revenue in future periods, with some revenue from these labor contracts potentially visible even two or three years in the future. We believe increasing recurring revenue provides greater predictability of revenue in future periods and a stronger hedge against future business (or broader economic) downturns. Our recurring revenue, primarily in the form of M&S contracts, grew to $2.3 million in the second quarter of 2011, up from $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2010. During the second quarter of 2011, we also continued to increase our pipeline of managed solution opportunities.
Continue to enhance and develop our solutions. We have allocated significant resources to enhancing and developing our solutions in recent years. This strategic focus has delivered substantially more capable releases of our WAFS, Mail Express, and Enhanced File Transfer solutions, plus our cloud-based offerings and professional services. We intend to maintain our focus on developing our solution portfolio and, as appropriate, enhancing our existing solutions. Our solution portfolio may evolve over time, for example, through development of new offerings in adjacent markets or through acquisition. For example, since 2010, we have announced development of several new solutions, including MIX, Hosted Enhanced File Transfer Server, appShield and CuteBackup.
Enter and Extend our Presence in the Endpoint Security Market. We are entering the antivirus segment of the endpoint security market with appShield. The appShield solution provides an opportunity for us to increase sales of our consumer products, which have declined in recent years. The endpoint security market also is attractive because consumer sales typically are relatively low-touch and accomplished largely through our online cart, over the Internet. From this initial market entry with appShield we intend to explore, and potentially develop or acquire, other endpoint security solutions. These additional solutions may be complementary to appShield or to our other solutions. Like appShield, the other solutions also may appeal to SMB or even enterprise customers.
Increase Coverage through International and Channel Sales. We have added several channel partners in recent years and also organized our sales force and associated sales processes, to more effectively support our partner network worldwide. Channel partners resell, distribute, or integrate our solutions. Channel partners announced since the beginning of 2009 include Carahsoft Corporation, Lifeboat Distribution, MAT, and multiple system integration companies with whom we have registered as a small business. We also have added other channel partners worldwide in recent months. These channel partners provide us with additional opportunities to penetrate deeper into existing markets and enter new sales territories. Channel sales also can help us establish a lower-touch delivery model through which we train and provision the partners to sell and distribute our solutions. Achieving additional traction in new sales territories potentially can increase our sales in future years, considering we derived 89 percent of our sales from just the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia in the second quarter of 2011. As part of our strategy, we continually identify and certify strategic partners to cover growing markets.
Grow Enterprise and Government Sales. GlobalSCAPE does business with thousands of businesses around the world. We provide solutions to some of the worlds largest banks, insurance companies, healthcare providers, automakers and film companies. Our intentions are to continue to penetrate large enterprise firms with our expanding solutions and services. Government sales, particularly large contracts from the U.S. Army, have had a significant positive impact on our growth and market image since 2007; however, these large contracts also cause significant swings in our financial results. We are focused on more deliberate growth in government sales, including software and associated services, potentially augmented by occasional large product orders. Our current engineering services activities in support of the SAMS-E contract are part of this long-term focus. We may obtain, sustain, or update government certifications as necessary to compete in this sector. For example, we have received Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 validation of the GlobalSCAPE Cryptographic Module embedded in Enhanced File Transfer Server. In addition, Enhanced File Transfer Server Version 6 and the latest version of CuteFTP Pro received the Certificate of Networthiness from the U.S. Army Network Technology Command during 2009. Our receipt of this certificate enables Army installations worldwide to install and operate these server and client-based secure information exchange solutions.
Develop our Corporate Brand. We traditionally have been better known for CuteFTP than as a corporate brand. Since the late-2008 timeframe, we have made a concerted effort to elevate our corporate profile. We retained marketing communications and investor relations firms in 2009; we also established a strong, but informal,
17
Table of Contents
relationship with Americas Growth Capital, an investment bank focused on emerging growth markets. Through our efforts in this area, we have participated in numerous analyst briefings and non-deal investor conferences that have increased our recognition within the investor and analyst communities. We also have obtained increasing national media coverage. In addition, we have revised our website, logos, and other areas reflecting our corporate brand. Through these activities, we have established a much more consistent, recognizable brand that may better support future growth and market visibility. We also believe we have enhanced our brand through additional national and regional attention resulting from corporate awards received. For example, during the second quarter of 2011, we were named one of Computerworld Magazines 100 Best Places to Work in IT for the second straight year. In its 18th year, Computerworlds annual ranking recognizes 100 companies that provide information technology professionals the best in work environment experience and job satisfaction. Using data collected from a combination of nominations and survey data, each company was selected based on their benefits, workplace diversity, career development, training opportunities, and employee retention.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company continues to enjoy a strong working capital position resulting from net profits from operations over 27 of the last 29 quarters. At June 30, 2011, the Company had net working capital of $10.1 million. The primary component of current liabilities at June 30, 2011 was $5.7 million of deferred revenues which will be recognized over the remaining term (generally one to twelve months) of the maintenance and support contracts. At June 30, 2011, our principal commitments consisted of obligations outstanding under operating leases as well as royalty agreements with third parties and trade accounts payable. The commitments related to royalty agreements are contingent on sales volumes. We plan to continue to expend significant resources on product development in future periods and may also use our cash to license or acquire technology, products, or businesses. At June 30, 2011, we had $12.6 million of cash available in a depository account and we continue to generate cash in excess of our operational needs.
Our cash on hand currently allows us to operate from a position of financial strength. However, because our principal sources of capital are cash on hand and cash flow from operations, if our sales were to decline, our available capital would also decline. If sales decline significantly or if our liquidity is otherwise under duress, management may substantially reduce personnel and personnel-related costs, reduce or substantially eliminate capital expenditures and/or reduce or substantially eliminate research and development expenditures. We may also sell equity securities or enter into credit arrangements in order to finance future acquisitions or licensing activities, to the extent available.
As in 2010, the Board of Directors has determined that the Company should continue to concentrate on increasing revenues in 2011 and subsequent years. This has entailed and will continue to entail, increased spending on research and development, personnel, partner relationships and public relations. It is expected that these investments would decrease net income and earnings per share in the short term, but would help provide for future revenue growth in 2012 and beyond.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The increase in 2011 was due to an increase in net income as well as significant changes in all operating assets and liabilities.
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately ($70,000) and $770,000, respectively. Cash used in investing activities in 2011 was only for equipment purchases where as cash provided by investing activities for 2010 was from the redemption of short-term investments.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $98,000 and $86,000 respectively. The increase was due to proceeds received from the exercise of stock options.
18
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the contractual obligations disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7, of our 2010 Form 10-K. Our obligations mainly consist of the lease on our office space and leases on equipment.
Comparison of the Three Months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 ($ in thousands)
Three Months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 5,710 | $ | 4,466 | 1,244 | 27.9 | % | |||||||||
Cost of revenues |
529 | 144 | 385 | 267.4 | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
3,511 | 3,213 | 298 | 9.3 | % | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
762 | 725 | 37 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
193 | 199 | (6 | ) | -3.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expense |
4,995 | 4,281 | 714 | 16.7 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
715 | 185 | 530 | 286.5 | % | |||||||||||
Other income |
13 | 4 | 9 | 225.0 | % | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
257 | 55 | 202 | 367.3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 471 | $ | 134 | 337 | 251.5 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. We derive our revenue primarily from sales of our software licenses and from maintenance and support and professional services. We also recognize revenue from subscription-based offerings. Software license revenue primarily consists of revenue from sales of our enterprise solutions, such as Enhanced File Transfer Server and WAFS, and is typically recognized upon shipment. Maintenance and support revenue includes unspecified software license updates and product support. Maintenance and support revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual period, which is typically one year, but can be up to three years. Professional services revenue includes a variety of customization, implementation, and integration services, as well as delivery of education and training associated with our solutions, all of which are recognized as the services are performed. In addition, we have added subscription revenues related to the sales of our Managed Solutions. Subscription revenue is recognized on a monthly basis as the services are billed over the contract period, which ranges from one to three years.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, total revenues increased by approximately $1.2 million or 27.9% from the same quarter in 2010. Revenues increased due to increased product sales, particularly for the Enhanced File Transfer Server solution suite, maintenance and support renewals, and substantial growth in professional services revenue.
19
Table of Contents
The following table reflects revenue by product including the related maintenance and support for each product ($ in thousands):
Revenue for the Three Months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||
EFT Server Enterprise |
$ | 3,358 | 58.8 | % | $ | 2,604 | 58.3 | % | ||||||||
EFT Server |
933 | 16.3 | % | 951 | 21.3 | % | ||||||||||
CuteFTP Professional |
265 | 4.6 | % | 324 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||
CuteFTP Home |
61 | 1.1 | % | 68 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||
Wide Area File Services/CDP |
408 | 7.1 | % | 418 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||
Professional Services |
523 | 9.2 | % | 65 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
162 | 2.8 | % | 36 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Operating Revenues |
$ | 5,710 | 100.0 | $ | 4,466 | 100.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of our EFT Server Enterprise and EFT Server products increased by approximately $736,000 or 20.7% for the quarter. These products represented 75.1% of our total revenues in the three months ending June 30, 2011 as compared to 79.6%, in the same period in 2010. EFT Server Enterprise revenues increased by 29.0% from $2.6 million to $3.4 million, mainly due to an increase in maintenance and support sales from $1.9 million to $2.3 million, especially renewal sales and an increase in the average sale price of units sold. This increase in EFT Server Enterprise revenue was offset, to some extent, by a decline of $18,000 (or almost two percent) in EFT Server revenue. The decrease in EFT Server revenue was due to a decrease in both product license sales and maintenance and support contracts when compared to the same period in 2010. We believe this decrease was a result of potential customers considering transitioning to our Managed Solution offerings, such as MIX, instead of procuring software for on-premise implementation. The sales cycle for closing sales on our Managed Solution offerings has been considerably longer than we originally anticipated. As we continue building the sales pipeline for subscription-based managed solutions, sales for on-premise implementations may decline, although this has not occurred through the second quarter of 2011. Delays or reductions in on-premise software sales, especially for enterprise solutions such as EFT Server, would yield a corresponding decrease in new maintenance and support contract sales which we began to experience in the second quarter of 2011. However, increasing managed solution sales will yield growing subscription revenue, which we believe, over time, will offset the associated declines in Enhanced File Transfer Server software sales while also building a growing book of recurring business.
Revenues from the CuteFTP Home and CuteFTP Professional products decreased by $66,000 or 16.8% in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, and accounted for approximately 5.7% and 8.8% of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This decline continued the general reduction in CuteFTP product revenues, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of revenue, experienced since 2006. The consumer FTP product market has substantial low-cost, and even free, solutions that have put increasing pressure on CuteFTP product revenues. Additional pressure on this product line comes from social media companies and services that allow consumers to share images and video. Our reliance on the current CuteFTP products will continue to decline as we emphasize sales of our more complex enterprise products and potentially enter adjacent markets.
Sales of our WAFS and CDP software decreased by $10,000 or 2.4% for the quarter. The WAFS and CDP products are largely used by architectural, engineering, and construction firms to transfer large files between offices. The decrease was largely due to a decrease in maintenance and support renewals sold, and we believe this decrease reflects the time that has passed since the last major release of WAFS in 2009. We believe WAFS software sales will increase with the next major release, anticipated in the second half of 2011. WAFS and CDP software accounted for approximately 7.1% of total revenue for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 9.4% for the same period in 2010.
Professional services increased by $458,000 or 705% for the quarter. The growth in professional services revenue was driven largely by $392,000 in revenue earned on the MAT contract during the quarter. We have more than a dozen engineers and other personnel assigned to this contract and will be working with the MAT industry team to finalize the scope of our participation on this program in Government fiscal year 2012 (FY2012). The revenue we derive from the MAT contract may increase, stay approximately the same, or decline in FY2012, depending on the available contract funding, our negotiated workshare, and possible product purchases or upgrades under the contract.
20
Table of Contents
Products and services included in Other revenue, increased by $126,000, or 350%, for the quarter. This category primarily consists of Mail Express, Managed Information Exchange (MIX) and Hosted Enhanced File Transfer Server (Hosted EFT Server) sales. The increase in Other revenue was largely due to an increase of Mail Express revenue of $74,000.
Because of the more complex and business-critical nature of the EFT Server, EFT Server Enterprise, Wide Area File Services, Continuous Data Protection, and Mail Express solutions, purchasers of those enterprise products require increased maintenance and support. Our maintenance and support revenues for the quarter increased by 22.2% from $1.9 million in 2010 to $2.3 million in 2011, accounting for more than 40% of revenue in the quarter. Deferred revenue increased from $4.6 million at June 30, 2010 to $5.7 million at June 30, 2011 as a result of this higher maintenance and support sales over a 12 month period. As our enterprise products become a larger portion of our total revenues, we believe maintenance and support revenues will continue to increase. However, if sales of our on-premise enterprise products decrease, then new sales of maintenance and support contracts will decrease as well given the typical bundling of M&S contracts with enterprise software solution sales. Maintenance and support pricing is reflective of the license cost of the products and the additional support it takes to maintain and support the products and customers. With higher maintenance and support revenues, we will recognize additional deferred revenue as we earn the revenue over the life of the maintenance and support agreement.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of royalties, a portion of our bandwidth costs, hosted service expenses for our Managed Solutions, travel associated with professional services delivery and other cost of goods sold. Cost of revenues increased by approximately 267% from $144,000 in the second quarter of 2010 to $529,000 in 2011. This increase was largely caused by an increase in royalties of $42,000, the addition of hosted server expenses of approximately $48,000, and other cost of goods sold of $296,000. The increase in royalties was due to increased sales of a licensed technology. The hosted server expenses are associated with the new MIX and Hosted EFT Server solutions which launched in July, 2010 and February 2011, respectively. The other cost of goods sold was due to labor associated with the professional services being performed for the MAT contract, with the substantial increase reflecting the much greater cost of sales for labor-based professional services contracts, as compared to the cost of goods sold for product or subscription services sales.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 61% in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to 71% in the same period last year, though these expenses increased in absolute terms mostly due to increased sales. The net increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses of approximately $298,000 or 9.3% was primarily caused by increases in commission expense, salaries and wages and related payroll taxes, compensation expense, recruiting expense, other professional fees, marketing expense, trade show expense and travel expense. These increases were offset by decreases in a handful of other accounts, including legal fees, consulting fees, and bad debt.
Commission expense increased by approximately $169,000 due to the increase in sales during the second quarter. The approximate $148,000 increase in salaries and wages and related payroll taxes was due to an overall increase in staffing of eight additional people since the second quarter of 2010. The increase in staffing also led to compensation expense increasing by approximately $24,000. Recruiting expense increased by approximately $15,000 due to the hiring of a Chief Financial Officer. Other professional fees increased by approximately $23,000 due to the addition of an investor relations firm. Marketing expense increased by approximately $22,000 due to an increase in the use of social media and the addition of a marketing automation platform. The increase in trade show expense of approximately $33,000 was due to the increased attendance at trade shows. Travel expense increased by approximately $33,000 due to travel related to the attendance at trade shows and international travel related to the strengthening of our channel relationships.
Legal fees were $35,000 higher in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2011 due to the now-resolved Uniloc litigation. Consulting fees were approximately $34,000 higher in the second quarter of 2010 due to a consultant which was hired to develop the MIX product line and was later hired as an employee. Bad debt expense decreased by $147,000 due to a decline in the accounts receivable balances which were over 90 days old.
Research and Development. The increase in research and development expenses of approximately $37,000 was mainly due to an increase in salaries and wages and related payroll taxes of approximately $39,000 and an increase in the stock compensation expense of $15,000. The increase in salaries and wages, and related payroll
21
Table of Contents
taxes was mainly due to the hiring of new engineers in 2011. The hiring of new engineers also led to an increase in compensation expense. These increases were offset by a decrease of $24,000 in external research and development expense due to customary ongoing charges in the utility of software development contractors.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation expense related to our fixed assets and amortization of capitalized development costs and intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization combined has remained relatively stable between the years with a decrease of only $6,000.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rates were 35.3% and 29.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate increased slightly in the six months ended 2011 as compared to 2010 due to a higher domestic production activities deduction (DPAD) in 2010. In 2011 and 2010, the most significant items that affected our effective income tax rate were the non-deductible incentive stock option expenses and the deduction for domestic production activities.
Comparison of the Six Months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 ($ in thousands)
Six Months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 10,354 | $ | 8,878 | 1,476 | 16.6 | % | |||||||||
Cost of revenues |
898 | 246 | 652 | 265.0 | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
6,706 | 6,122 | 584 | 9.5 | % | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
1,547 | 1,371 | 176 | 12.8 | % | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
397 | 399 | (2 | ) | -0.5 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expense |
9,548 | 8,138 | 1,410 | 17.3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
806 | 740 | 66 | 8.9 | % | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
13 | 5 | 8 | 160.0 | % | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
290 | 248 | 42 | 16.9 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 529 | $ | 497 | 32 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. We derive our revenue primarily from sales of our software licenses and from maintenance and support and professional services. We also recognize revenue from subscription-based offerings. Software license revenue primarily consists of revenue from sales of our enterprise solutions, such as Enhanced File Transfer Server and WAFS, and is typically recognized upon shipment. Maintenance and support revenue includes unspecified software license updates and product support. Maintenance and support revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual period, which is typically one year, but can be up to three years. Professional services revenue includes a variety of customization, implementation, and integration services, as well as delivery of education and training associated with our solutions, all of which are recognized as the services are performed. In addition, we have added subscription revenues related to the sales of our Managed Solutions. Subscription revenue is recognized on a monthly basis as the services are billed over the contract period, which ranges from one to three years.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, total revenues increased by approximately $1.5 million or 16.6% as compared to the same period in 2010. Revenues increased due to an increase in the average sales price, an increase in maintenance and support contract renewals, and strong growth in professional services revenue.
22
Table of Contents
The following table reflects revenue by product including the related maintenance and support for each product ($ in thousands):
Revenue for the Six Months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Enhanced File Transfer Server Enterprise |
$ | 5,956 | 57.5 | % | $ | 5,058 | 57.0 | % | ||||||||
Enhanced File Transfer Server |
1,822 | 17.6 | % | 1,815 | 20.4 | % | ||||||||||
CuteFTP Pro |
546 | 5.3 | % | 608 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||
CuteFTP Home |
121 | 1.2 | % | 152 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
Wide Area File Services/CDP |
756 | 7.3 | % | 964 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||
Professional Services |
927 | 9.0 | % | 224 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||
All Others |
226 | 2.2 | % | 57 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Operating Revenues |
$ | 10,354 | 100.0 | $ | 8,878 | 100.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of our EFT Server Enterprise and EFT Server products increased by approximately $905,000 or 13.2% for the six months. These products represented approximately 75.1% of our total revenues in the six months ending June 30, 2011 as compared to 77.4%, in the same period in 2010. The increase in sales was largely due to an increase in average sales price and an increase in maintenance and support contract renewals. The six-month increase also reflects increased product license sales of EFT Server Enterprise in the second quarter of 2011.
Revenues from the CuteFTP Home and CuteFTP Professional products decreased by $93,000 or 12.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, and accounted for approximately 6.5% and 8.5% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This decline continued the general reduction in CuteFTP product revenues, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of revenue, experienced since 2006. The consumer FTP product market has substantial low-cost, and even free, solutions that have put increasing pressure on CuteFTP product revenues. Additional pressure on this product line comes from social media companies and services that allow consumers to share images and video. Our reliance on the current CuteFTP products will continue to decline as we emphasize sales of our more complex enterprise products and potentially enter adjacent markets.
Sales of our WAFS and CDP software decreased by $208,000 or 21.6% during the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The WAFS and CDP products are largely used by architecture, engineering, and construction firms to transfer large files between offices. The decrease was due principally to a decrease in the number of licenses sold. These products accounted for approximately 7.3% of total revenue for the first six months ending June 30, 2011 compared to 10.9% for the same period in 2010.
Professional services increased by $703,000 or 314% for the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The growth in professional services revenue is driven largely by $621,000 in revenue earned on the MAT contract during the quarter. As noted above in the three-month revenue comparisons, our level of participation on the MAT contract may change during Government FY2012, depending on a variety of factors, including availability of Government budget authorization for the SAMS-E program.
Products and services included in Other revenue, increased by $169,000, or 296%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This category primarily consists of Mail Express, Managed Information Exchange (MIX) and Hosted Enhanced File Transfer (Hosted EFT Server) sales. Other revenue accounted for 2.2% of total revenue for the six month period in 2011 as compared to .6% for the same period in 2010. The increase in Other revenue was largely due to an increase of Mail Express revenue of $91,000.
Because of the more complex and business-critical nature of the EFT Server, EFT Server Enterprise, WAFS, and CDP products, purchasers require maintenance and support. Maintenance and support pricing is
23
Table of Contents
reflective of the license cost of the products and the additional support needed to maintain and support the products and customers. Our maintenance and support revenues for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 increased by 23.6% compared to the same period in 2010 due to an increase in the amount earned as compared to the amount deferred in the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of royalties, a portion of our bandwidth costs, hosted service expenses for our Managed Solutions, travel associated with professional services delivery and other cost of goods sold. Cost of revenues increased by approximately 265% from $246,000 in 2010 to $898,000 in 2011. This increase was largely caused by an increase in royalties of $79,000, the addition of hosted server expenses of approximately $94,000, and other cost of goods sold of $454,000. The increase in royalties was due to increased sales of a licensed technology. The hosted server expenses are associated with the new MIX and Hosted EFT Server solutions which launched in July, 2010 and February 2011, respectively, and the other cost of goods sold was due to labor associated with the professional services being performed for the MAT contract.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 64% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 68% in the same period last year. The net increase in these expenses of approximately $584,000 or 9.5% was caused by several items: salaries and wages and related payroll taxes, commission expense, compensation expense, other professional fees, marketing expense, trade shows, and travel expense. These increases were offset by decreases in legal fees, consulting fees, advertising fees, and bad debt.
The approximate $329,000 increase in salaries and wages and related payroll taxes was due to an overall increase in staffing of eight additional people as compared to the same period in 2010. Commission expense increased by approximately $188,000 due to increased sales when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Compensation expense increased by approximately $26,000 due the addition of new people in the compensation pool. Other professional fees increased by approximately $51,000 due to the addition of an investor relations firm. Marketing expense increased by approximately $40,000 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to the addition of social media, and a marketing automation platform. Trade show expense increased by approximately $46,000 due to increased attendance at trade shows. Travel expense increased by approximately $68,000 due to travel related to the attendance at trade shows and international travel related to the strengthening of our channel relationships.
Legal fees were higher by approximately $62,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2011 due to the now-resolved Uniloc litigation. Consulting fees were approximately $46,000 higher in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2011 due to a consultant which was hired to develop the MIX product line and was later hired as an employee. Advertising fees decreased by approximately $45,000 due to the continued optimization of Google search ads. We have reduced the amount that we spend on search terms without affecting the amount of sales leads that are generated by the search results. The reduction in bad debt expense of approximately $89,000 as compared to the same period in 2010 was due to a decrease in accounts receivable balances which were over 90 days old.
Research and Development. The net increase in research and development expenses of approximately $176,000 primarily consists of a $141,000 increase in salaries and wages and related payroll taxes due to the addition of new engineers.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation expense related to our fixed assets and amortization of capitalized development costs and intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization combined has remained relatively stable between the years with a decrease of only $2,000.
Other Income (Expense), net. Other income/expense consists of interest income. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was from interest earned on the CoreTrace promissory note.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rates were 35.4 % and 33.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For 2011, the most significant item that affected our effective income tax rate relates to the deduction for domestic production activities (DPAD) and was offset by non-deductible incentive stock option expense and state income taxes.
24
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
To date, we have not utilized derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. We do not expect to employ these or other strategies to hedge market risk in the foreseeable future. We may invest our cash in money market funds, which are subject to minimal credit and market risk. We believe that the interest rate risk and other relevant market risks associated with these financial instruments are immaterial.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 32% of our sales came from customers outside the United States. All revenues are received in U.S. dollars so we have no material exchange rate risk with regard to the sales. However, in July 2003, the European Union (EU) enacted Value Added Taxes (VAT) on electronic purchases. These taxes are charged to our non-business customers in the EU and, in our case, are remitted quarterly in pound sterling. The impact of this currency translation has not been material to our business.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of GlobalSCAPEs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
GlobalSCAPE has been named as one of a number of defendants in two different patent infringement suits. The first was filed by Content Delivery Solutions LLC in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Austin Division. The complaint alleges that GlobalSCAPE infringed on a patent that addresses products or services for resuming interrupted transmission of a file over a network. The second was filed by Achates Reference Publishing, Inc in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division. The complaint alleges that GlobalSCAPE infringed on a patent that addresses product activation functionality. Both of these matters have just been brought forth and, while GlobalSCAPE believes that it has meritorious defenses to both plaintiffs claims and intends to defend the lawsuits vigorously, it is early in its process and it is not possible to reasonably determine the outcome of these suits. Accordingly, it is not possible at this time to assess whether or not we need to reserve for potential settlements.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that it plans to audit our 2009 Federal income tax return.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2010 Form 10-K which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our 2010 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing GlobalSCAPE. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.
25
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) | Exhibits |
31.1 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 |
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 |
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 |
Interactive Data File |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
GLOBALSCAPE, INC. | ||||||
August 11, 2011 | By: | /s/ T. Randall Hawkins | ||||
Date | T. Randall Hawkins | |||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
26