BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.	exhibit311.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.	exhibit321.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.	exhibit312.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.	exhibit322.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED: JUNE 30, 2011

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___ to ____

Commission File Number: 000-53708

BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	20-4630076
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Beck Science Center, 8 Hartom St, Har Hotzvim, Jerusalem, Israel	97775
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
972-2- 548-6555
(Registrant’s telephone number)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” (Check one):

Large accelerated Filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

The number of the registrant’s shares of common stock outstanding was 26,685,022 as of August 7, 2011.

BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and from inception through June 30, 2011	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and from inception through June 30, 2011	4

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	30

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	31

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	31

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	31

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31

Item 4.	Reserved.

Item 5.	Other Information	31

Item 6.	Exhibits	31

Signatures		32

INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. (“BioCancell” or the “Company”) may contain forward-looking statements. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue” or similar words. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future business success or financial results. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss future expectations and plans, which contain estimations of future results of operations or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. We believe that it is important to communicate future expectations to investors. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and in other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements that we make.

Although there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or control, we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future. Accordingly, to the extent that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements regarding the financial condition, operating results, business prospects or any other aspect of the Company, please be advised that BioCancell's actual financial condition, operating results and business performance may differ materially from that projected or estimated by the Company in forward-looking statements.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BioCancell Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Financial Statements As of June 30, 2011

(Unaudited)

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Table of contents

Page

Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
Consolidated Statements of Operations	3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	7-18

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

		June 30,		December 31,
		2011		2010
	Note	U.S. dollars in thousands
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	3,864	$	3,487
Short - term deposits			-		1,993
Receivable from Chief Scientist and BIRD Foundation			50		96
Prepaid expenses			111		88
Other current assets			57		39

Total current assets			4,082		5,703

Long-term assets
Deposits in respect of employee severance benefits			293		288
Other assets			35		33

Total long-term assets			328		321

Property and equipment, net of $197 thousand
and $172 thousand accumulated depreciation as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			85		88

Total assets		$	4,495	$	6,112

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.

-1-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

			June 30,			December 31,
			2011			2010
	Note		U.S. dollars in thousands
Current liabilities
Accounts payable			$	101		$	99
Accrued expenses 1				757			319
Accrued vacation pay				76			67
Employees and related liabilities				226			141
Liability to BIRD Foundation				419			327
Liability for commission to underwriters				38			173

Total current liabilities				1,617			1,126

Long-term liabilities
Liability for employee severance benefits				275			243
Convertible notes payable		2,3		1,519			1,187
Warrants to noteholders		2		1,607			1,453

Total long-term liabilities				3,401			2,883



Stockholders' equity (deficit)
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share (65,000,000 shares authorized, and
26,495,090 and 26,361,083 shares issued and outstanding as of
June 30, 2011, and December 2010, respectively)				265			264
Additional paid-in capital				24,529			24,243
Accumulated other comprehensive income				309			329
Accumulated deficit				(25,626	)		(22,733	)

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)				(523	)		2,103

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity			$	4,495		$	6,112

1 The amounts recorded as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 include $113 and $23 thousand, respectively, to a related party.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.

-2-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three month period ended						Six month period ended						Cumulative from inception through
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011
	U.S. dollars in thousands
	(except share and per share data)
Research and development costs	$	963		$	477		$	1,653		$	1,011		$	15,129
Less: Chief Scientist and BIRD Foundation grants		(175	)		(198	)		(236	)		(227	)		(2,643	)

Research and development costs, net		788			279			1,417			784			12,486
General and administrative costs 1		590			472			1,102			900			9,350

Operating loss		1,378			751			2,519			1,684			21,836

Interest income, net		(5	)		(4	)		(26	)		(6	)		(60	)
Gain from marketable securities, net		-			-			-			-			(6	)
Interest on convertible notes and discount amortization 2		287			150			514			243			1,547
Revaluation of warrants		(363	)		(2,826	)		81			(1,640	)		(589	)
Gain on revaluation of liability for commission to underwriters		(158	)		-			(143	)		-			(247	)
Other financing income, net		(24	)		(12	)		(52	)		(6	)		(282	)


Net loss (profit)		1,115			(1,941	)		2,893			275			22,199

Basic net loss (profit) per share		0.04			(0.09	)		0.11			0.01			1.72

Diluted net loss (profit) per share		0.04			0.04			0.11			0.09			1.72

Weighted-average common shares used in computing
basic net loss (profit) per share		26,486,083			20,611,735			26,436,480			18,912,728			12,871,778

Weighted-average common shares used in computing
diluted net profit (loss) per share		26,486,083			20,669,946			26,436,480			19,676,882			12,871,778

1 The amounts for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, and for the cumulative period include $50 thousand, $65 thousand, $21 thousand, $42 thousand, and $220 thousand to a related party, respectively.

2 The amounts for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, and for the cumulative period include $91 thousand, $182 thousand, $0 thousand, $0 thousand, and $241 thousand to a related party, respectively.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.

-3-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

							Cumulative
							from October 1,
							2004 (inception)
	Six month period ended						through
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2011
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(2,893	)	$	(275	)	$	(22,199	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from
operating activities:
Income and expenses not involving cash flows:
Increase (decrease) in liability for employee severance benefits, net		22			(15	)		241
Fair value adjustment of marketable securities		-			-			133
Depreciation		16			18			174
Stock-based payment compensation		262			215			2,298
Loss (gain) on revaluation of warrants		81			(1,640	)		(589	)
Accrued interest and amortization of discount to notes
payable, and exchange difference thereon		281			243			1,240
Gain on revaluation of liability for commission to underwriters		(143	)		-			(247	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in other current assets		(17	)		13			(55	)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses		(18	)		54			(78	)
Decrease (increase) in Chief Scientist and BIRD foundation receivable		48			(224	)		24
Investment in marketable securities (trading)		-			-			(7,883	)
Proceeds from marketable securities (trading)		-			-			5,970
Decrease (increase) in severance pay deposits		6			17			(247	)
Increase in other assets		-			-			(25	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(3	)		(101	)		76
Increase in employees and related liabilities		77			22			234
Increase (decrease) in accrued vacation pay		6			(7	)		36
Increase in liability to BIRD Foundation		77			-			388
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		412			(90	)		663

Net cash used in operating activities		(1,786	)		(1,770	)		(19,846	)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Investment in marketable securities (trading)		-			-			(921	)
Proceeds from marketable securities (trading)		-			-			3,173
Decrease in deposits		2,058			-			163
Sale of property and equipment		-			1			1
Acquisition of property and equipment		(9	)		(7	)		(232	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	2,049		$	(6	)	$	2,184

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.

-4-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (cont’d)

						Cumulative
						from October 1,
						2004 (inception)
	Six month period ended					through
	June 30,		June 30,			June 30,
	2011		2010			2011
	U.S. dollars in thousands

Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock	$	-	$	3,042		$	18,019
Exercise of stock options and warrants		25		-			109
Deferred stock issuance costs		-		34			(178	)
Issuance of Series A convertible preferred stock		-		-			2,118
Payments of debtors for shares		-		-			473
Issuance of Series 1 option warrants		-		-			772
Issuance of Series 2 option warrants		-		-			1,028
Receipt of grant from Chief Scientist		-		-			2
Repayment of stockholder loans		-		-			360
Purchase of treasury stock		-		-			(4,951	)
Sale of treasury stock		-		-			1,568
Convertible notes payable		-		-			176
Warrants to noteholders		-		-			1,829

Net cash provided by financing activities		25		3,076			21,325

Effect of currency exchange rate on cash		89		(82	)		201

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		377		1,218			3,864
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,487		624			-

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,864	$	1,842		$	3,864

-5-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (cont’d)

					Cumulative
					from October 1,
					2004 (inception)
	Six month period ended				through
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2011		2010		2011
	U.S. dollars in thousands
Conversion of stockholder loans	$	-	$	-	$	360

Issuance of common stock to founders		-		-		43

Issuance of option warrants to underwriters		-		-		358

Exercise of stock options by Company consultants		-		-		1

Conversion of series A convertible preferred stock to common stock		-		-		33

Liability for commission to underwriters	$	-	$	-	$	277

The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements.

-6-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BioCancell Therapeutics, Inc. (hereafter "the Parent") was incorporated in the United States as a private company under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 26, 2004 and commenced operations on October 1, 2004.

The principal activities of the Parent and its subsidiary in Israel, BioCancell Therapeutics Israel Ltd. (the "Subsidiary"), (hereafter collectively referred to as “the Company”) are research and development of drug-candidates for the treatment of various cancer types. The leading drug-candidate developed by the Company BC-819 has been successfully tested for a number of cancer types in pre-clinical animal studies, compassionate use human trials and clinical trials. The Company is now performing Phase IIb clinical trial on bladder cancer patients, a Phase I/IIa clinical trial on ovarian cancer patients and has just successfully completed a Phase I/IIa clinical trial on pancreatic cancer patients with BC-819. The Company is in deployment process towards initiation of an advanced Phase IIb clinical trial on pancreatic cancer patients. The Company is evaluating indications for the possible use of this drug, and others under development, to treat other types of cancer.

The Company is in the development stage. Therefore, there is no certainty regarding the Company’s ability to complete the product’s development, receipt of regulatory permits, alternative treatments or procedures that may be developed, and success of its marketing. The continuation of the stages of development and the realization of assets related to the planned activities depend on future events, including the receipt of interim financing and achieving operational profitability in the future. The Company has not generated any revenues since its inception and has incurred substantial losses and expects that it will operate at a loss over the coming years, as it does not expect to generate any revenue from operations in the near term. The Company is initiating activities to raise capital for ensuring future operations although there are still significant doubts as to the ability of the Company to continue operating as a “going concern”. The Company believes that it has sufficient cash to meet its planned operating needs until November 2011, based on its current cash level. It is not possible to estimate the final outcome of these activities. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the value of assets and liabilities and their classification, which may be required if the Company cannot continue operating as a “going concern”.

The biotechnology industry is characterized by strong competition, resulting from the risk of frequent technological changes. Entry into this market requires the investment of considerable resources and continuous development. The Company's future success is dependent on several factors, including the quality of the Company's technology, the product's price, and the creation of an advantage over the competition.

The Company's research and development activities are carried out by its Subsidiary primarily through a laboratory research team at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. The Hebrew University laboratory is managed by the Chief Scientist of the Company, who is a related party. All of the Company’s net assets are located in Israel.

-7-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

The Company filed a prospectus for an initial public offering on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”) and beginning August 17, 2006 has been publicly traded on the TASE. On June 23, 2009 the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 was deemed effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and as of that date it is a reporting company to the SEC.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BioCancell Therapeutics, Inc. and its subsidiary and are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company also files Hebrew language, New Israel Shekel-based financial statements, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), with the TASE.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC for interim financial information and, therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. All adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature and are necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. Nevertheless, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other interim period.

Development Stage Enterprise

The Company’s principal activities to date have been the research and development of its products and the Company has not generated revenues from its planned, principal operations. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements are presented as those of a development stage enterprise.

-8-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported results of operations during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from such estimates.

Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the valuation of derivative instruments, deferred tax assets, convertible notes payable, liability for commission to underwriters and stock options. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in those estimates and assumptions.

H. Derivative Instruments

The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at their respective fair values. The Company carries its derivatives at fair value on the balance sheet and recognizes any subsequent changes to fair value in earnings.

The Company issued derivative instruments in the form of warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 6,280,783 shares of common stock (at a price of 71.6 cents per share) as part of the financing described in Note 3 below. The warrants have been recorded as a liability, at fair value, and changes in the fair value of the instruments are included in the Statement of Operations under the caption “Revaluation of warrants”.

I. Net Loss (Profit) Per Share

Basic net loss (profit) per share (EPS) is computed by dividing the net loss (profit) for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss (profit) per share is computed by dividing the net loss (profit) for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares plus dilutive potential common stock considered outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 , included the warrants to investors, as they have a dilutive effect.

-9-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

I. Net Loss Per Share (cont’d)

The following table summarizes the securities (including those issuable pursuant to contingent stock agreements) that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future and

were not included in the computation of basic and diluted EPS.

					Cumulative
					from October 1,
					2004 (inception)
	For the six month period ended June 30,				to June 30,
	2011		2010		2011
Series 2 Warrants		-		2,500,000		-
Series 3 Warrants		2,817,485		-		2,817,485
Series 4 Warrants		2,817,485		-		2,817,485
Warrants to underwriter		612,974		300,000		612,974
Convertible notes payable		4,078,212		4,078,212		4,078,212
Warrants for interest on convertible
notes payable		979,790		819,553		979,790
Warrants to private investors		10,438,283		10,278,046		10,438,283
Stock options to employees,
Directors and consultants under
Stock Option Plans		2,846,996		2,526,176		2,846,996

		24,591,225		20,501,987		24,591,225

-10-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures fair value representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the Company utilizes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:

Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The fair value hierarchy also requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

In accordance with ASC 820-10, the Company’s cash equivalents and short-term deposits are classified within Level 1. This is because the cash equivalents and the short-term deposits are valued using quoted active market prices.

The Company’s warrants to noteholders are valued using the Binomial model. This model uses the variables of the price of the underlying stock, the strike price, the continuously compounded risk-free interest rate, the continuously compounded annual dividend yield, the time in years until the expiration of the option and the implied volatility of the Series 3 and Series 4 Warrants. Some of the inputs to this valuation are unobservable in the market and are significant, requiring significant judgment using the best information available.

The Company recorded a financing profit (loss) of approximately $363 thousand and $(81) thousand and financing profits of $2,826 thousand, $1,640 thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively, and financing profits of $589 thousand for the development stage period, resulting from revaluation of warrants to shareholders, which has been recorded in the statement of operations.

-11-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (cont’d)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair value measurement at reporting date using
			Quoted
			Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for Identical		Other Observable		Significant Unobservable
	June 30, 2011		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Description	U.S. dollars in thousands
Cash equivalents	$	3,864	$	3,864	$	-	$	-
								-
Total Assets	$	3,864	$	3,864	$	-	$	-

Warrants to noteholders	$	1,519	$	-	$	-	$	1,519
Liability for commission to underwriters	$	38	$	-	$	-	$	38

Total Liabilities	$	1,557	$	-	$	-	$	1,557

			Fair value measurement at reporting date using
			Quoted
			Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for Identical		Other Observable		Significant Unobservable
	June 30, 2010		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Description	U.S. dollars in thousands
Cash equivalents	$	1,842	$	1,842	$	-	$	-
								-
Total Assets	$	1,842	$	1,842	$	-	$	-

Warrants to noteholders	$	1,693	$	-	$	-	$	1,693

Total Liabilities	$	1,693	$	-	$	-	$	1,693

-12-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (cont’d)

The assumptions used in the fair value calculation for the Warrants and Convertible

Notes Payable were as follows:

	As of			As of			As of
	June 30,			June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010			2010
Market price of underlying stock	1.853 NIS			2.22 NIS			2.441 NIS
Exercise price	$	0.716		$	0.716		$	0.716
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate for
the debt feature of the Convertible Notes Payable		0.21	%		1.53	%		0.48	%
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate for
Warrants		0.48	%		2.14	%		0.84	%
Continuously compounded annual dividend rate		0	%		0	%		0	%
Time in years until the expiration of the Convertible
Notes Payable	1.08 years			2.08 years			1.58 years
Time in years until the expiration of the Warrants	2.08 years			3.08 years			2.58 years

Implied volatility for the underlying stock	86.53-94.24		%	87.11-79.54		%		55.79	%

The assumptions used in the fair value calculation for Liability for commission to underwriters were as follows:

	As of
	June 30,
	2011
Market price of underlying stock	1.853 NIS
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate		3.53-4.41	%
Implied volatility for the underlying stock	78.82-94.24		%

-13-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (cont'd)

3.	The following table presents the Company’s activity for liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), as of June 30, 2011:

A. Warrants to noteholders:

	Level 3
	U.S. dollars
	in thousands
Balance at December 31, 2010		1,453
Loss from revaluation of warrants to shareholders,
included in the statement of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2011		81
Adjustment for foreign currency translation
differences		73

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	1,607

Balance at December 31, 2009		3,400
Gain from revaluation of warrants to shareholders,
included in the statement of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2010		(1,640	)
Adjustment for foreign currency translation
differences		(67	)

Balance at June 30, 2010	$	1,693

B. Liability for commission to underwriters:

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	173
Gain from revaluation of liability for commission to underwriters		(143	)
Adjustment for foreign currency translation differences		8

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	38

-14-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (cont'd)

C. Convertible notes payable:

The Company has outstanding convertible notes payable, of which the fair values have been determined using the Binomial model. Carrying amounts and the related estimated fair value of the convertible notes payable are as follows:

June 30, 2011

June 30, 2010

U.S. dollars in thousands

Carrying

Amount

Fair Value

Amount

Fair Value

Convertible notes payable

1,519

3,451

866

3,390

The difference between the carrying amounts as compared to the fair value of the convertible notes payable represents the unamortized portion of the beneficial conversion feature of the convertible notes payable.

Note 3 – Convertible Notes Payable

In July 2008, the Company carried out private placements with institutional investors (the “Investors”), whereby 3 investors received an aggregate amount of 1) 1,222,780 shares of common stock (at a price of 59.7 cents per share) (the “Common Shares”), 2) non-registered convertible notes payable (the “Convertible Notes Payable”) convertible into an aggregate of up to 5,058,002 common shares (at a conversion price of 71.6 cents per share) and 3) non-registered warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of up to 6,280,783 shares of common stock (at a price of 71.6 cents per share) exercisable for 5 years. The Company's gross proceeds from the private placements were approximately $3.650 million (NIS 12.662 million). As long as they are not converted, the Convertible Notes Payable bear dollar - linked interest of 10% per annum, to be added to the principal (and considered as part of the principal for the purposes of conversion) for the first nine quarters and paid quarterly thereafter, for the remaining seven quarters.

The Convertible Notes Payable were classified as long-term liabilities and were recorded at their initial relative fair value. The Convertible Notes Payable are presented net of unamortized discounts for the portions allocated to the Warrants, Common Shares and the beneficial conversion feature inherent in the instrument. The interest due on the Convertible Notes Payable is accrued to the value of the instrument, as the period for cash payment of interest. In October 2010, the Company commenced paying the interest, as described above.

-15-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 3 – Convertible Notes Payable (cont’d)

	U.S. dollars in thousands
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	1,187

Movement during the six month period:

Accrued interest		-
Amortization of discount for the six month period ended June 30, 2011		332


Balance of Convertible Notes Payable for the six month period ended June 30, 2011	$	1,519


	U.S. dollars in thousands
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	644

Movement during the six month period:

Accrued interest		140
Amortization of discount for the six month period ended June 30, 2010		82


Balance of Convertible Notes Payable for the six month period ended June 30, 2010	$	866

Note 4 - Financial Instruments and Risk Management

A. Concentration of credit risk

Financial instruments that may subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents and deposits in respect of employee severance benefits.

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term deposits are maintained with major financial institutions in Israel. Deposits in respect of employee severance benefits are maintained with major insurance companies and financial institutions in Israel.

Concentration of business risk

The Company uses materials required for our research and development activities that are currently available from a limited number of sources. The Company believes that it will not experience delays in the supply of critical components in the future. If the Company experiences such delays and there is an insufficient inventory of critical components at that time, the Company's operations and financial results would be adversely affected.

-16-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 5– Significant Events During the Period

On March 6, 2011, the Company allocated options to twelve employees and consultants to purchase 350,888 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, at an exercise price of NIS 2.85 (the 22-day average closing price of the Company's shares on the TASE at the time of the Board of Directors allocation decision) (approximately $0.82) of which 167 thousand options vested immediately and the remainder will vest over an additional 12 calendar quarters. The fair value of the options is NIS 738 thousand and the Company recorded an expense of NIS 480 thousand during the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton calculation of the value of the warrants were as follows:

Share price	2.61 NIS
Exercise price	2.85 NIS
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate		4.69%
Implied volatility for the underlying stock	75%
Estimated life of the warrants	10

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, 2011, the Company recorded an expense of NIS 163 thousand on account of a pending allocation of options to employees to purchase 430,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, at an exercise price of NIS 1.86 -2.9 (the 22-day average closing price of the Company's shares on the TASE at the time of the Board of Directors allocation decision) of which 34 thousand options vested immediately and the remainder will vest over an additional 16 calendar quarters. The fair value of the options is NIS 601 thousand.

The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton calculation of the value of the warrants were as follows:

Share price	1.72 NIS
Exercise price	1.86-2.9 NIS
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate		4.46%
Implied volatility for the underlying stock	81.8%
Estimated Life of the warrants	10

-17-

BioCancell Therapeutics Inc. and Subsidiary

(Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Note 6– Subsequent Events

Following disagreements between the Company and Tikcro Technologies Ltd. regarding the scope of consulting services provided to the Company between July 2008 and July 2009, and following the request of the parties to attempt arbitration (which had not yet commenced), the Company and Tikcro agreed that the Company would pay Tikcro half of the agreed consulting fee for the aforementioned period, in return for mutual waivers of claims regarding this matter, subject to the approval of a general meeting to be called of the stockholders of the Company. To this end, the Company accrued $30 thousand for such payment.

-18-

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements. Forward looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. These statements are only estimations. We have based these forward looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The outcome of the events described in these forward looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, you should not rely upon forward looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward looking statements. The forward looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

We were incorporated in the United States under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 26, 2004 and commenced operations on October 1, 2004. We filed a prospectus for an initial public offering on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, and, since August 17, 2006, our securities have been publicly traded in Israel on the TASE. For TASE purposes, we file Hebrew-language financial statements in New Israeli Shekels in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. On June 22, 2009, our registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was deemed effective and we began reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. For our filings in the United States, we prepare English-language financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

We and our wholly owned subsidiary in Israel, BioCancell Therapeutics Israel Ltd., focus our activities on the research and development of drugs for the treatment of various cancer types. The leading drug-candidate developed by us, BC-819, has been tested for a number of cancer types in pre-clinical animal studies, compassionate use human trials and a Phase I/IIa clinical trial. We are now performing a Phase IIb clinical trial on bladder cancer patients, a Phase I/IIa clinical trial on ovarian cancer patients, and we recently completed a Phase I/IIa clinical trial in pancreatic cancer and are deploying towards an advanced Phase IIb clinical trial on pancreatic cancer patients.

We are a development stage company. Therefore, there is no certainty regarding our ability to complete the development of any of our product-candidates, receive regulatory permits and succeed in our marketing efforts. Our operations since inception have been directed primarily toward developing research and development activities, conducting pre-clinical and clinical testing of our product candidates, business strategies, raising capital, exploring marketing channels and recruiting personnel.

-19-

From our inception, we have raised a cumulative amount of $21,325,000, including amounts received as a result of the exercise of options by our employees, directors and consultants. During 2005 and the first half of 2006, we raised $2,951,000 from private investors and from Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd., a founder of our company. We raised an additional $4,976,000 in connection with our initial public offering in August 2006 on the TASE. On May 15, 2008, we executed a private placement to Clal Biotechnology Industries Ltd., or CBI, from which we received aggregate gross proceeds of $669,000 (net proceeds of $653,000). On July 30, 2008, we carried out private placements with Tikcro Technologies Ltd. ("Tikcro"), CBI and the Provident Fund of the Employees of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd. (together, the "Three Institutional Investors"), whereby the Three Institutional Investors received an aggregate amount of 1,222,780 shares of our common stock at a price of about $0.60 per share, non-registered convertible notes payable, convertible into an aggregate of 5,058,002 shares of our common stock at a conversion price of about $0.72 per share and three non-registered warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 6,280,783 shares of our common stock at a price of about $0.72 per share exercisable for five years. The aggregate gross proceeds from the private placements to the Three Institutional Investors were approximately $3,650,000 (net proceeds of $3,609,000). During May and June 2009, we sold 1,099,756 shares of treasury stock, at an average price of $0.92 per share, for total proceeds of $1,017,000. In August 2009, we sold 713,000 shares of treasury stock, at an average price of $0.79 per share, for total proceeds of $552,000. Following the sale, we no longer hold any shares of treasury stock. In March 2010, we executed private placements to institutional and individual investors of 4,157,500 shares of common stock at a price of approximately $0.78 per share, and warrants to purchase an additional 4,157,500 shares of our common stock, exercisable immediately upon their issuance with a life of four years and an exercise price of approximately $1.12. The aggregate gross proceeds from the March 2010 private placements were $3,285,000 at an approximate price of $0.78 per share (net proceeds of $2,694,000). On November 18, 2010, we consummated a public offering, whereby investors received an aggregate amount of 5,634,970 shares of common stock at a price of NIS 3.30 per share (approximately $0.90 per share), 2,817,485 non-registered warrants to purchase 2,817,485 shares of common stock at a price of NIS 10,397,000 (approximately $1.01 per share) exercisable immediately upon their issuance with a life of two years and 2,817,485 non-registered warrants to purchase 2,817,485 shares of common stock at a price of NIS 12,481,000 (approximately $1.21 per share) exercisable immediately upon their issuance with a life of four years. The aggregate gross proceeds from the November 2010 offering were $5,104,000 (NIS 18,595,000) and the net proceeds were $4,196,000 (NIS 15,277,000).

We have incurred operating losses since inception, have not generated any product sales revenues and have not achieved profitable operations. Our deficit, accumulated during the development stage through June 30, 2011, aggregated $22,199,000 and we expect to continue to incur substantial losses in future periods while we continue to test and prepare our product candidates for the market. We believe that we have sufficient cash to meet our planned operating needs until December 2011, based on our current cash levels.

We are highly dependent on the success of our research, development and licensing efforts and, ultimately, upon regulatory approval and market acceptance of our products under development. Our short- and long-term capital requirements depend upon a variety of factors, including market acceptance for our technologies and product-candidates and various other factors. The continuation of our stages of development and the realization of assets related to our planned activities depend on future events, including the receipt of interim financing and achieving operational profitability in the future. It is not possible to forecast accurately the results of these activities.

The biotechnology industry is characterized by strong competition, resulting in part from frequent technological changes. Entry into this market requires the investment of significant capital resources and continuous development. Our future success is dependent on several factors, including the quality of our product's technology, the product's price, and the creation of an advantage over the competition.

Our research and development activities are carried out by our Israeli subsidiary primarily through a laboratory research team in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The laboratory is managed by our Chief Scientist, Prof. Abraham Hochberg. All of our assets are presently situated in Israel.

-20-

Costs and Expenses

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs comprise costs incurred in performing research and development activities, including salaries and related costs, consultants and sub-contractors costs, clinical trials costs, patent fees, materials and depreciation costs. We are currently conducting or preparing to conduct three main research and development projects: clinical trials for each of bladder, ovarian and pancreatic cancer. Completion of the projects is subject to a number of factors unknown and/or not under our control, including, but not limited to, clinical trial expectations of the FDA, the participation of sufficient volunteers that meet inclusion criteria in clinical trials and the granting of final market approval by the FDA. Therefore, the nature and scope of costs needed to bring each of these projects to conclusion is not estimable. If the bladder cancer trials conclude successfully, we expect to receive final FDA approval and commence sales in 2017. On account of anticipated FDA fast-track development for life-saving drugs, we expect the ovarian and pancreatic cancer trial projects to conclude by 2018, and if successful, for sales to commence shortly thereafter. Delays in completing a project on schedule would entail additional operating costs for the period of delay, and could adversely affect our liquidity in the pre-sales period.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation, travel and overhead costs for financial, legal and administrative personnel, insurance fees, fees for professional services, including investor relations, public relations, legal, accounting and other consulting fees and other general corporate expenses. Overhead costs consist primarily of rent, telecommunications, utilities and depreciation expenses.

Stock-Based Compensation

New employees typically receive stock option awards. We also grant additional stock option awards to existing employees and directors. The Company records stock-based compensation as an expense in the statement of operations.

The cost of stock-based compensation awards is measured at their fair value at the date of the award. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. We have accounted for stock-based compensation in this way from our inception.

Non-operating expenses (income), net

Non-operating expenses (income), net consists primarily of interest income, net which primarily consists of interest income earned on cash, cash equivalent and investment securities balances, gain from marketable securities, net, interest on convertible notes and discount amortization, fair value adjustments of our warrants and foreign currency exchange gains and losses.

Income Tax Expense

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not more likely than not to be realized. ASC subtopic 740-10 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as a component of income tax expense.

-21-

Results of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the Development Stage Period (cumulative from inception to June 30, 2011)

Research and Development Expenses

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011		Three Months Ended June 30, 2010		Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		Six Months Ended June 30, 2010		Cumulative From Inception to June 30, 2011
	U.S. Dollars in Thousands
Research and Development Expenses, Gross	$	963	$	477	$	1,653	$	1,011	$	15,129
Research and Development Expenses, Net		788		279		1417		784		12,486

Research and development expenses, gross increased by approximately $486,000, or 102%, to $963,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $477,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expenses, gross increased due to preparations for a Phase IIb pancreatic cancer clinical trial (as compared to the smaller Phase I/IIa pancreatic cancer clinical trial carried out in 2010), increased bladder cancer clinical trial expenses (mainly due to increased hospital expenses), and increased patent expenses and pre-clinical compensation. Salary expenses for clinical trial and pre-clinical personnel, increased by $37,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $312,000 (inclusive of $47,000 stock-based compensation to employees and directors) from $275,000 (inclusive of $22,000 stock-based compensation to employees and directors).

It is anticipated that our level of research and development expenses will increase as our clinical trials move forward, depending upon the enrollment of patients and the availability of funding.

Research and development expenses, net increased by $509,000, or 182%, to $788,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $279,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expenses, net, increased for the reasons described above, as well as decreased funding of $23,000 from OCS and other grants.

Research and development expenses, gross increased by approximately $642,000, or 63%, to $1,653,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $1,011,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expenses, gross increased due to preparations for a Phase IIb pancreatic cancer clinical trial (as compared to the smaller Phase I/IIa pancreatic cancer clinical trial carried out in 2010), increased bladder cancer clinical trial expenses (mainly due to increased hospital expenses), recording of a liability to repay a grant received from the BIRD Foundation following the successful completion of the Phase I/IIa pancreatic cancer clinical trial, and increased patent expenses and pre-clinical compensation. Salary expenses for clinical trial and pre-clinical personnel increased by $70,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $609,000 (inclusive of $115,000 stock-based compensation to employees and directors) from $539,000 (inclusive of $52,000 stock-based compensation to employees and directors) for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Research and development expenses, net increased by $633,000, or 81%, to $1,417,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $784,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expenses, net, increased for the reasons described above, as well as increased funding of $9,000 from OCS and other grants.

The following table summarizes information about our research and development expenses for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the cumulative period from inception to June 30, 2011:

-22-

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011			Three Months Ended June 30, 2010			Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			Six Months Ended June 30, 2010			Cumulative From Inception to June 30, 2011
	U.S. Dollars in Thousands
Clinical Trials:
Bladder cancer Phase I/IIa	$	-		$			$	-		$	-		$	897
Bladder cancer Phase IIb		92			22			129			42			2,689
Pancreatic cancer Phase I/IIa		133			45			265			78			1,248
Pancreatic cancer Phase IIb		181						235						255
Ovarian cancer Phase I/IIa		76			61			138			131			2,104
Liver cancer		-						-						20
Clinical trial compensation		162			172			304			327			2,003
General expenses		9			3			16			7			90
		653			303			1,087			585			9,306
Pre-clinical expenses:
Compensation		150			103			305			212			4,266
Material		45			29			82			62			449
Patents		105			22			145			107			685
Depreciation		7			8			14			16			162
General expenses		3			12			20			29			261
		310			174			566			426			5,823
		963			477			1,653			1,011			15,129
Less: Chief Scientist and BIRD Foundation grants		(175	)		(198	)		(236	)		(227	)		(2,643	)
Total Research and Development Expenses, Net	$	788		$	279		$	1,417		$	784		$	12,486

General and Administrative Expenses

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011		Three Months Ended June 30, 2010		Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		Six Months Ended June 30, 2010		Cumulative From Inception to June 30, 2011
	U.S. Dollars in Thousands
General and Administrative Expenses	$	590	$	472	$	1,102	$	900	$	9,350

General and administrative expenses increased by $118,000, or 25%, to $590,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $472,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses increased due primarily to higher professional service fees and consulting fees. The main components of general and administrative expenses were compensation costs of $272,000 (inclusive of $40,000 stock-based compensation to employees and directors) as compared to $268,000 (inclusive of $68,000 stock-based compensation provided to employees and directors), and professional service and consulting fees of $256,000 as compared to $151,000, for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

-23-

General and administrative expenses increased by $202,000, or 22%, to $1,102,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $900,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses increased due primarily to higher professional service fees and consulting fees. The main components of general and administrative expenses were compensation costs of $574,000 (inclusive of $121,000 stock-based compensation to employees and directors) as compared to $570,000 (inclusive of $162,000 stock-based compensation provided to employees and directors), and professional service and consulting fees of $413,000 as compared to $225,000, for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The following table summarizes information about our general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the cumulative period from inception to June 30, 2011:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011		Three Months Ended June 30, 2010		Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		Six Months Ended June 30, 2010		Cumulative From Inception to June 30, 2011
	U.S. Dollars in Thousands
Compensation	$	272	$	268	$	574	$	570	$	4,937
Professional services and consulting fees		256		151		413		225		3,065
Rent & office related expenses		31		28		59		57		667
Travel		4		-		4		-		143
Insurance		10		8		20		16		113
Corporate fees		7		5		13		11		122
Other general expenses		10		12		19		21		303
Total General and Administrative Expenses	$	590	$	472	$	1,102	$	900	$	9,350

Non-operating expenses (income), net

Non-operating income, net, decreased by $2,429,000 to $263,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $2,692,000 for the period ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in non-operating income, net, resulted primarily from the fair value adjustment of our warrants which are being accounted for as derivative financial instruments, as described in “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” below. The primary driver of the adjustment of our warrants was the decrease in our stock price as compared to the comparable quarter. An increase in the price of our common stock, among other factors, increases the value of the warrants and thus results in a loss in our income statement. Conversely, a decline in the price of our common stock, among other factors, decreases the value of the warrants and thus results in a gain in our income statement. We recorded income of approximately $521,000 as compared to $2,826,000 for the three months ended June 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, resulting from revaluation of warrants to shareholders and liability for commissions to underwriters. Both the revaluation of warrants and revaluation of commissions to underwriters are non-cash items.

Non-operating expenses (income), net, increased by $1,783,000 to $374,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from income of $(1,409,000) for the period ended June 30, 2010. The increase in non-operating expenses (income), net, resulted primarily from the fair value adjustment of our warrants which are being accounted for as derivative financial instruments, as described in “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” below. The primary driver of the adjustment of our warrants was the decrease in our stock price as compared to the comparable quarter. An increase in the price of our common stock, among other factors, increases the value of the warrants and thus results in a loss in our income statement. Conversely, a decline in the price of our common stock, among other factors, decreases the value of the warrants and thus results in a gain in our income statement. We recorded a charge of approximately $(62,000) as compared to $(1,640,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, resulting from revaluation of warrants to shareholders and liability for commissions to underwriters. Both the revaluation of warrants and revaluation of commissions to underwriters are non-cash items.

The following table summarizes information about our non-operating expenses (income), net, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the cumulative period from inception to June 30, 2011:

-24-

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011			Three Months Ended June 30, 2010			Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			Six Months Ended June 30, 2010			Cumulative From Inception to June 30, 2011
	U.S. Dollars in Thousands
Interest expense (income), net	$	(5	)	$	(4	)	$	(26	)	$	(6	)	$	(60	)
Gain from marketable securities, net		-			-			-			-			(6	)
Interest on convertible notes and discount amortization		287			150			514			243			1,547
Revaluation of warrants		(363	)		(2,826	)		81			(1,640	)		(589	)
Loss (gain) on revaluation of liability for commission to underwriters		(158	)		-			(143	)		-			(247	)
Other financing expense (income), net		(24	)		(12	)		(52	)		(6	)		(282	)
	$	(263	)	$	(2,692	)	$	374		$	(1,409	)	$	363

Our warrants to noteholders are valued using the Binomial model. This model uses the variables of the price of the underlying stock, the strike price, the continuously compounded risk free interest rate, the continuously compounded annual dividend yield, the time in years until the expiration of the option, and the implied volatility of the Series 3 Warrants and 4 Warrants.

-25-

The following table shows the changes in the underlying parameters used in the valuation of the Warrants:

	As of			As of			As of
	June 30,			June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010			2010
Market price of underlying stock	1.853 NIS			2.22 NIS			2.441 NIS
Exercise price	$	0.716		$	0.716		$	0.716
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate for the debt feature of the Convertible Notes Payable		0.21	%		1.53	%		0.48	%
Continuously compounded risk-free interest rate for Warrants		0.48	%		2.14	%		0.84	%
Continuously compounded annual dividend rate		0	%		0	%		0	%
Time in years until the expiration of the Convertible
Notes Payable	1.08 years			2.08 years				1.58 years
Time in years until the expiration of the Warrant	2.08 years			3.08 years				2.58 years

Implied volatility for the underlying stock	86.53		%	79.54-87.11		%		55.79	%

Prior to the adoption of the Binomial model in the second quarter of 2009, the Company’s warrants to noteholders were valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. Given the effect of recent foreign currency fluctuations on the exercise price of the Warrants throughout the life of the Warrant, the Company’s assumptions have changed regarding the possible exercise patterns, and these possibilities can be addressed through the Binomial model in contrast to the Black–Scholes-Merton model (which only allows for one exercise date). The change in the model did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of our operations or cash flows. These models use the variables of the price of the underlying stock, the strike price, the continuously compounded risk-free interest rate, the continuously compounded annual dividend yield, the time in years until the expiration of the option and the implied volatility of the Series 3 and Series 4 Warrants. Some of the inputs to this valuation are unobservable in the market and are significant, requiring significant judgment using the best information available.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company’s assumptions changed regarding the implied volatility of the Company’s warrants and are calculated as the latent volatility of the Series 3 Warrants. The change in the model did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of our operations or cash flows.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit

The federal tax rates applicable to us, as an entity incorporated in Delaware in the United States, are progressive corporate tax rates of up to 34%.

At December 31, 2010, we had net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards in the United States amounting to $2,549,000, which will expire beginning in 2024 through 2030. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 imposed substantial restrictions on the utilization of NOL and tax credits in the event of an ownership change of a corporation. Thus, in accordance with Internal Revenue Code, Section 382, our initial public offering, or IPO, and other ownership changes that have transpired, may limit our ability to utilize the NOL and credit carryforwards although we have not yet determined to what extent.

Pursuant to the tax laws applicable to Israeli residents, dividends received from a company that is not an Israeli resident are subject to tax in Israel, at a rate of 20% or 25%, depending on the identity of the stockholder (individual or company) and the ownership percentage. According to the tax laws in the United States, such a dividend is subject to withholding tax at the rate of 30%, which could be reduced to the rate of 25% or 12.5% (depending on the identity of the stockholder and the ownership percentage), in accordance with the Treaty to Prevent Double Taxation between Israel and the United States. In order to enjoy this tax treaty's benefits, several procedural requirements must be met. As of December 31, 2010, we believe that we are currently a dual tax resident in both Delaware and Israel.

The tax rates applicable to our Israeli subsidiary are as follows: 2010 – 25%, 2011 – 24%, 2012 – 23%, 2013 – 22%, 2014 – 21%, 2015 – 20% and 2016 thereafter – 18%. At December 31, 2010, our wholly owned Israeli subsidiary had NOL carryforwards in Israel amounting to NIS 51,411,000 (approximately $14 million) and capital loss carryforwards of NIS 12 million (approximately $3 million), which under current tax law can be carried forward indefinitely.

-26-

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are a development stage company and have not experienced significant revenue generating activities since our formation. We have incurred operating losses for each year since our inception in 2004. To achieve operating profits, we, alone or together with others, must successfully identify, develop and market product candidates. Our principal activities, from the beginning of our development stage, have been organizational matters, issuance of stock, product research and development, fund raising and market research. We have financed our operations from inception primarily through various private placement transactions, public offerings of our common stock, and option exercises.

We are currently operating under a material liquidity deficiency. We believe that we have sufficient cash to meet our planned operating needs until November 2011, based on our current cash levels. We therefore will need to raise substantial additional capital through future equity or debt financing to finance our initiatives and are currently evaluating potential alternatives.

In the near-term, we expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses as a result of the research and development expenses we expect to incur in developing our product candidates and the general and administrative expenses we expect to incur as a reporting company under the Exchange Act. Our research and development activity is subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to development, clinical trials, manufacturing and commercialization, and we may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for any of our prospective therapeutic products.

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			Six Months Ended June 30, 2010			Cumulative From Inception to June 30, 2011
	U.S. Dollars in Thousands
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(1,786	)	$	(1,770	)	$	(19,846	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	2,049		$	(6	)	$	2,184
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	25		$	3,076		$	21,325

As of June 30, 2011, we had $3,864,000 in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term deposits, a decrease of $1,616,000 from December 31, 2010.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operations was $1,786,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $1,770,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The net cash used in operations was mainly used for operating expenses. The difference between our net loss of $2,893,000 and our net cash used in operations was attributable mostly to accrued interest and amortization of discounts to notes payable, stock-based payment compensation, and accrued expenses.

Currently all of our funds are held as cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2011, we have no material commitments for capital expenditures. Net cash used by operations from our inception is attributable mostly to our net loss offset by non-cash items, primarily change in fair value of our warrants and stock-based compensation, as delineated in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. It is anticipated that our level of net cash used in operations will increase as our clinical trials move forward. Our cash reserves are currently the main source of funding for our current operations, in addition to grants from the OCS and other sources. We will require substantial additional funds to complete our research and development activities and, if additional funds are not available, we may need to significantly scale back or cease our operations, and our level of activity may change based on our ability to secure future funding.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2011 is mainly attributable to decrease in deposits, and June 30, 2010 is mainly attributable to the acquisition of equipment, as delineated in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Net cash provided by investing activities from our inception is attributable mostly to our investment in short-term deposits and to the proceeds from marketable securities less the investments in marketable securities and acquisition of equipment, as delineated in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. We redeemed our marketable securities for our ongoing activities and we do not expect this to continue because currently all of our funds are held as cash and cash equivalents.

-27-

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities was $25,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $3,076,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. In March 2010, we executed private placements to institutional and individual investors of 4,157,500 shares of our common stock of our stock at a price of approximately $0.78, and warrants to purchase an additional 4,157,500 shares of our common stock, exercisable immediately upon their issuance with a life of four years and an exercise price of about $1.12. The aggregate gross proceeds of these private placements were $3,285,000 at an approximate price of $0.78 per share (with net proceeds of $2,694,000), as summarized together with other financing activity since inception under "Overview" above.

Cash flow provided by financing activities for the development stage period (cumulative from inception to June 30, 2011) stems from the net proceeds from private placements to institutional and individual investors and from a public offering in 2010, the net proceeds from a private placement of common shares and warrants to the Three Institutional Investors in 2008, the net proceeds from our initial public offering in Israel and the conversion of our series A convertible preferred stock in 2006, and the exercise of stock options less the purchase of treasury stock.

Commencing January 30, 2011, we have been paying interest on a quarterly basis to the Three Institutional Investors on the convertible notes payable in an amount of approximately $90,000 per quarter, provided that the notes have not been converted.

Our financing needs may change substantially because of the results of our research and development, competition, advancing of our clinical trials and costs arising from additional regulatory approvals. We may not succeed in raising additional required funds. The timing of our need for additional funds will depend on a number of factors, which factors are difficult to predict or may be outside of our control, including:

	••	progress in our research and development programs;
	••	the resources, time and costs required to initiate and complete our research and development, to initiate and complete pre-clinical and clinical studies and to obtain regulatory approvals for our prospective therapeutic products;
	••	the timing, receipt and amount of milestone, royalty and other payments from present and future collaborators, if any; and
	••	costs necessary to protect our intellectual property.

As discussed above, in March 2010 we received net proceeds of $2,694,000 from a private placement, and on November 18, 2010 we consummated a public offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC and an Israeli shelf prospectus for which we received aggregate gross proceeds of $5,104,000 and net proceeds of $4,196,000. On June 20, 2011, a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on Form S-1 was declared effective by the SEC.

Future Operations

As discussed above, we believe we have sufficient cash to meet our planned operating needs until November 2011, based on our current cash levels. Furthermore, our business strategy includes growth through additional business combinations and licensing which could require use of a significant amount of our available cash and raising additional capital. We therefore will be required to raise additional capital through future debt or equity financing to finance such initiatives. However, we cannot be certain that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience significant dilution. The audit report covering our December 31, 2010 consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph that states that our recurring losses from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments to the value of our assets or the classification of our liabilities that might result if we would be unable to continue as a going concern. We have incurred operating losses since inception, have not generated any product sales revenues and have not achieved profitable operations. Our deficit accumulated during the development stage through June 30, 2011 aggregated $22,199,000, and we expect to continue to incur substantial losses in future periods while we continue to test and prepare our products for the market.

-28-

Our short and long-term capital requirements depend upon a variety of factors, including market acceptance for our technologies and product candidates and various other factors, many of which we cannot control, including:

	••	continued progress of and increased spending related to our research and development activities;
	••	progress with clinical trials and pre-clinical experiments;
	••	increased general and administrative expenses related to our being a reporting company both to TASE and SEC;
	••	prosecuting and enforcing patent claims;
	••	technological and market developments;
	••	the ability to establish product development arrangements;
	••	the cost of manufacturing development;
	••	effective marketing activities and arrangements; and
	••	licensing activity.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities in which we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities or any other obligations under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides us with financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we believe the following accounting policies to be the most critical in understanding the judgments and estimates we use in preparing our consolidated financial statements.

-29-

Accounting for Stock-based Compensation

We record stock-based compensation as an expense in the statement of operations and this requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. Compensation cost of all stock-based compensation awards are recorded at their fair value at the date of the award over the service period for awards expected to vest. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, which considers the exercise price relative to the market value of the underlying stock, the expected stock price volatility, the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield, and the estimated period of time option grants will be outstanding before they are ultimately exercised. We also determine the fair value of stock options and warrants granted to non-employees, for accounting purposes, using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results differ from our estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. We consider various factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including historical experience. Actual results may differ substantially from these estimates.

Prior to our IPO, the market value of the underlying stock was based on estimates, including volatility estimates that are inherently highly uncertain and subjective, since prior to our IPO there had been no public market for our stock. Subsequent to our IPO, we did not have sufficient history to actually predict our volatility, therefore, our assumptions about stock price volatility were based on the volatility rates of comparable publicly held companies. These rates may or may not reflect our actual stock price volatility. Our assumptions about our stock price volatility are based on a rate that we derived by taking into consideration the volatility rates of comparable publicly held companies as well as our own historical volatility rates. In future periods and as we accumulate our own volatility history over longer periods of time, we will increase the weighting of our own volatility history in calculating expected volatility. Had we made different assumptions about the market value of our stock, stock price volatility or the estimated time option and warrant grants will be outstanding before they are ultimately exercised, the related stock based compensation expense and our net loss and net loss per share amounts could have been significantly different.

The pre-IPO options were granted with a par value exercise price. Due to the par value amount of $0.01, the fair value of these options was estimated to be equal to our share price at the grant date, based on stock issuances that took place surrounding the grant date. The expenses recorded in the statement of operations on account of stock-based transactions were $88,000 and $91,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively, $236,000 and $215,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively, and $2,272,000 for the development stage period (cumulative from inception to June 30, 2011).

The parameter used from 2004 – 2005 to value options for employees was the price of the share on grant date, a method described above. The parameters used to value grants from 2006 – 2011 were based on the Black-Scholes-Merton model for valuing options for employees, as follows:

Year	Volatility		Expected Average Term of the Option	Risk-free Rate			Estimate Value of the Share on the Grant Date
2006		0.6	3 years		4.07% – 5.00	%	$	0.83 – $1.45
2008		0.6	10 years		6.37	%	$	0.10
2009		0.8	10 years		4.96	%	$	0.63
2010		0.9	7-10 years		4.97	%	$	0.88
2011		0.75-0.818	10 years		4.46-4.69	%	$	0.54-0.84

The fair value of options granted to non-employees has been computed and accounted for in accordance with ASC subtopic 505-50 and 718-10. The fair value of options granted to non-employees has been measured according to the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. To the extent that there are non-employee options for which a measurement date was not yet reached, the stock option compensation is revalued at the end of each reporting period.

Share-based payment expense has not been recorded in the statement of operations with respect to the award of an additional 150,000 contingent options that are milestone based, and at this point are not expected to vest.

-30-

Valuation of Financial Instruments Issued in Private Placement Financing

On July 30, 2008 we completed private placements with the Three Institutional Investors, for the purchase of: (i) shares of our common stock, (ii) debentures convertible into shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

To account for these private placements, we estimated the fair value of the three components embodied in the agreements. We used various valuation models and techniques to determine the individual values of the three components. These models use the variables of the price of the underlying stock, the strike price, the continuously compounded risk free interest rate, the continuously compounded annual dividend yield, the time in years until the expiration of the option, the implied volatility for the underlying stock and the standard normal cumulative distribution function. The $3.650 million of proceeds from the private placements were first allocated to the warrants, which were classified as derivative instruments. The warrants are considered derivatives since they are not indexed solely to our own stock as they must be settled in a currency other than our functional currency, and the warrants meet all of the characteristics of a derivative instrument. The convertible notes payable are classified as long-term liabilities and have been recorded at their relative fair value adjusted for the amortized discount and interest accrual. The warrants have been recorded as a liability, with a corresponding discount to the Convertible Notes Payable, based on their fair values, and are revalued at each reporting date. This model uses the variables of the price of the underlying stock, the strike price, the continuously compounded risk free interest rate, the continuously compounded annual dividend yield, the time in years until the expiration of the option, the implied volatility of the underlying stock and the standard deviation. While we believe we have applied appropriate judgment in the assumptions and estimates, variations in judgment in applying assumptions and estimates used in the valuations could have a material effect upon the valuation results, and thus, on our financial statements. For further details regarding these estimates, see the discussion on non-operating expenses (income), net above.

-31-

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

N/A

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2011. Based on such review, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that we have in place effective controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

During the three months ended June 30, 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-32-

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

N/A

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

-33-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BioCancell Therapeutics Inc.



Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ URI DANON

		Uri Danon
		Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ JONATHAN BURGIN

		Jonathan Burgin
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

-34-

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of BioCancell Therapeutics Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-162088, as filed on November 5, 2010), which information is incorporated herein by this reference.

3.2		Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of BioCancell Therapeutics Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-156252, effective June 22, 2009), which information is incorporated herein by this reference.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer required under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer required under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

-33-

BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC. - FORM 10-Q - August 11, 2011

Attached files

BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC. Reports