Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - SolarWinds, Inc.Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO AND THE CFO - SolarWinds, Inc.dex321.htm
EX-31.1 - 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO - SolarWinds, Inc.dex311.htm
EX-31.2 - 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO - SolarWinds, Inc.dex312.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 001-34358

 

 

SOLARWINDS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware   73-1559348

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

3711 S. MoPac Expressway

Building Two

Austin, Texas 78746

(512) 682.9300

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

On August 3, 2011, 72,858,567 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

SOLARWINDS, INC.

Table of Contents

 

         Page No.  

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  
Item 1.  

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

  
 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

     1   
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010

     2   
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010

     3   
 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     4   
Item 2.  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     10   
Item 3.  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     23   
Item 4.  

Controls and Procedures

     24   
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION   

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

     25   

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

     26   

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     26   

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

     26   
Signature      28   
Exhibit Index      29   
Certifications   

Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. The statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements may be signified by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “continues,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “hopes,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but

 


Table of Contents

are not limited to, those summarized under Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

 


Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

SolarWinds, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share information)

(Unaudited)

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 

Assets

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 169,513       $ 142,003   

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $263 and $201 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively

     22,664         20,255   

Income tax receivable

     5,815         10,350   

Deferred taxes

     240         261   

Other current assets

     3,509         3,210   
                 

Total current assets

     201,741         176,079   

Property and equipment, net

     6,701         6,702   

Deferred taxes

     7,160         4,099   

Goodwill

     55,523         40,424   

Intangible assets and other, net

     27,316         20,173   
                 

Total assets

   $ 298,441       $ 247,477   
                 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

     

Current liabilities:

     

Accounts payable

   $ 2,636       $ 2,150   

Accrued liabilities

     7,260         8,588   

Accrued earnout

     4,046         4,000   

Income taxes payable

     891         555   

Current portion of deferred revenue

     59,719         52,583   
                 

Total current liabilities

     74,552         67,876   

Long-term liabilities:

     

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

     3,163         3,175   

Other long-term liabilities

     1,377         817   
                 

Total liabilities

     79,092         71,868   

Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)

     

Stockholders’ equity:

     

Common stock, $0.001 par value: 123,000,000 shares authorized and 72,801,342 and 71,658,808 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively

     73         72   

Additional paid-in capital

     182,730         165,972   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     771         (1,256

Accumulated earnings

     35,775         10,821   
                 

Total stockholders’ equity

     219,349         175,609   
                 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 298,441       $ 247,477   
                 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

1


Table of Contents

SolarWinds, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except per share information)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Revenue:

        

License

   $ 21,069      $ 17,264      $ 41,449      $ 34,885   

Maintenance and other

     24,754        18,244        47,352        34,948   
                                

Total revenue

     45,823        35,508        88,801        69,833   

Cost of license revenue

     809        462        1,574        817   

Cost of maintenance and other revenue

     1,758        1,458        3,479        2,802   
                                

Gross profit

     43,256        33,588        83,748        66,214   

Operating expenses:

        

Sales and marketing

     12,778        10,688        24,505        20,937   

Research and development

     5,034        3,824        10,072        7,451   

General and administrative

     6,317        6,925        12,987        12,246   
                                

Total operating expenses

     24,129        21,437        47,564        40,634   
                                

Operating income

     19,127        12,151        36,184        25,580   

Other income (expense):

        

Interest income

     70        67        125        100   

Interest expense

     —          (363     —          (1,146

Other income (expense)

     (210     163        (516     211   
                                

Total other income (expense)

     (140     (133     (391     (835
                                

Income before income taxes

     18,987        12,018        35,793        24,745   

Income tax expense

     5,436        3,682        10,532        7,472   
                                

Net income

   $ 13,551      $ 8,336      $ 25,261      $ 17,273   
                                

Net income per share:

        

Basic earnings per share

   $ 0.19      $ 0.12      $ 0.35      $ 0.25   
                                

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.18      $ 0.11      $ 0.34      $ 0.24   
                                

Weighted shares used to compute net income per share:

        

Shares used in computation of basic earnings per share

     72,719        68,202        72,541        67,738   
                                

Shares used in computation of diluted earnings per share

     74,346        73,287        74,184        73,061   
                                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

SolarWinds, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010  

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Net income

   $ 25,261      $ 17,273   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     3,958        2,492   

Provision for doubtful accounts

     68        15   

Stock-based compensation expense

     5,450        6,609   

Deferred taxes

     293        (511

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

     (4,439     (7,193

Other non-cash expenses

     213        501   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:

    

Accounts receivable

     (2,154     (1,991

Income taxes receivable

     (109     (493

Prepaid income taxes

     —          4,675   

Prepaid and other current assets

     (252     (622

Accounts payable

     463        (1,141

Accrued liabilities

     (1,784     (308

Accrued interest payable

     —          (539

Income taxes payable

     9,800        7,460   

Deferred revenue and other liabilities

     5,735        6,594   
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     42,503        32,821   

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Purchases of property and equipment

     (1,063     (1,434

Purchases of intangible assets and other

     (292     (209

Acquisition of businesses

     (23,000     (28,039

Earnout payments for acquisitions

     (3,743     —     
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (28,098     (29,682

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Repurchase of common stock

     (307     —     

Exercise of stock options

     7,009        5,836   

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

     4,439        7,193   

Repayment of long-term debt

     —          (44,097

Repayments of capital lease obligations

     —          (9
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     11,141        (31,077

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     1,964        (2,083
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     27,510        (30,021

Cash and cash equivalents

    

Beginning of period

     142,003        129,788   
                

End of period

   $ 169,513      $ 99,767   
                

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

    

Cash paid for interest

   $ —        $ 1,280   
                

Cash paid (received) for income taxes

   $ 464      $ (3,658
                

Noncash investing and financing transactions

    

Accrued earnout (Note 5)

   $ 3,938      $ 3,743   
                

Stock issued for acquisition

   $ —        $ 9,221   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

SolarWinds, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Nature of Operations

SolarWinds, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (“we” or “us”) design, develop, market, sell and support enterprise information technology, or IT, infrastructure management software to IT professionals in organizations of all sizes. Our product offerings range from individual software tools to more comprehensive software products that solve problems encountered every day by IT professionals. Our products are designed to help enable efficient and effective management of networks and IT environments.

Basis of Presentation

We prepared our interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and the reporting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated all intercompany balances and transactions.

We have made estimates and judgments affecting the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. The actual results that we experience may differ materially from our estimates. The accounting estimates that require our most significant, difficult and subjective judgments include:

 

   

the valuation of goodwill, intangibles, long-lived assets and contingent consideration;

   

revenue recognition;

   

stock-based compensation;

   

income taxes; and

   

loss contingencies.

The interim financial information is unaudited, but reflects all normal adjustments that are, in our opinion, necessary to provide a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. This interim information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a standard to provide a consistent definition of fair value and change certain fair value measurement principles. In addition, the standard enhances the disclosure requirements concerning the measurement uncertainty of Level 3 fair value measurements. The updated accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 on a prospective basis. Early application is not permitted. We will adopt the updated guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. We do not believe this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued a standard to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The standard eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. The updated accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 on a retrospective basis. Early application is permitted. We will adopt the updated guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. Since the updated guidance only requires a change in the placement of information already disclosed in our condensed consolidated financial statements, we do not expect the adoption to have an impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their respective fair values, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

We apply the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The guidance defines fair value, thereby eliminating inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements, and increases disclosures surrounding fair value calculations.

 

4


Table of Contents

The guidance establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by us.

Level 2: Inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those inputs classified as Level 1.

Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation.

The following section describes the valuation methodologies we use to measure different financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value.

In order to determine the fair value of our money market funds, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Therefore, our money market funds are considered a Level 1 item. We currently have no financial instruments that qualify as Level 2 items.

The following tables summarize the basis used to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Basis of Fair Value Measurements as of
June 30, 2011
 
     Total     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  
Description    (in thousands)  

Cash equivalents – money market funds

   $ 92,000      $ 92,000       $ —         $ —     

Accrued earnout (Hyper9)

   $ (4,046   $ —         $ —         $ (4,046

The fair value of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Hyper9, Inc., or Hyper9, in January 2011, was recorded at $3.9 million in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in the first quarter of 2011 as an accrued earnout (see Note 5 for further details on the determination of fair value). The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.1 million due to the passage of time was recorded in other income (expense) in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

     Basis of Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2010
 
     Total     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  
Description    (in thousands)  

Cash equivalents – money market funds

   $ 106,200      $ 106,200       $ —         $ —     

Accrued earnout (Tek-Tools)

   $ (4,000   $ —         $ —         $ (4,000

In February 2011, we paid $4.0 million of cash upon the achievement of certain performance criteria related to the acquisition of assets from Tek-Tools, Inc. in January 2010. This contingent consideration was recorded at fair value in the first quarter of 2010 as an accrued acquisition earnout of $3.7 million. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.3 million due to the passage of time was recorded in other income (expense) in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2010. Therefore, in accordance with authoritative guidance, the $3.7 million earnout is reflected in cash flows from investing activities and the $0.3 million change in fair value is reflected in cash flows from operating activities in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of acquisition accrued earnouts using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 follows:

 

(in thousands)       

Balance at December 31, 2010

   $ 4,000   

Accrued earnout payment (Tek-Tools)

     (4,000

Accrued earnout accrual (Hyper9)

     3,938   

Accrued earnout accretion (Hyper9)

     108   
  

 

 

 

Balance at June 30, 2011

   $ 4,046   

 

5


Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net income. Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. The table below provides a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income.

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
(in thousands)    2011      2010  

Net income

   $ 25,261       $ 17,273   

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     2,027         (1,692
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   $ 27,288       $ 15,581   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Stock-Based Compensation

We have granted our employees and directors stock-based incentive awards. These awards are in the form of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. We measure stock-based compensation expense for all share-based awards granted based on the estimated fair value of those awards on the date of grant. The fair value of the stock option awards is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards is determined using the fair market value of our common stock based on the quoted market price on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense reduced income before income taxes by $2.8 million and $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and by $5.5 million and $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

An excess tax benefit arises when the tax deduction related to a stock option award is greater than the award’s original grant date fair value pursuant to the authoritative guidance. For financial reporting purposes, this excess tax benefit is not recorded as a tax benefit in our condensed consolidated statements of income and is, instead, treated as additional paid-in capital in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The excess tax benefit recognized from the exercise of stock option awards was $0.9 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4.4 million and $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These excess tax benefits are a reduction to our cash payments related to income taxes and must be reported as cash flows from financing activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Income Taxes

We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in the authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes. Under this method, we recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the respective carrying amounts and tax basis of our assets and liabilities.

We follow the authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in our financial statements which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. We accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

2. Business Combinations

On January 14, 2011, we acquired Hyper9 for approximately $23.0 million in cash and contingent consideration ranging from $0 to $7.0 million. The contingent consideration fair value was $3.9 million and was recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in the first quarter of 2011. See Note 5 for a further discussion of outstanding obligations related to the Hyper9 acquisition. In the first quarter of 2011, we also incurred $0.7 million in acquisition related costs and an additional $0.3 million of other acquisition costs primarily consisting of lease abandonment costs, net of estimated sublease income. In the second quarter of 2011, we recorded a $0.2 million reduction in lease abandonment costs due to an increase in our estimated sublease income. Acquisition related costs are included in general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of income. The acquisition was financed with cash flows from operations.

 

6


Table of Contents

Hyper9 increased our product offerings to include virtualization management software and eliminated the normal time to market required to develop a new software product. We accounted for the Hyper9 acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting. We allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired, including intangible assets, and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. We estimated the value of assets and liabilities based on purchase price and future intended use. We derived the value of intangible assets from the present value of estimated future benefits from the various intangible assets acquired. The weighted average amortization period for the intangible assets acquired was 6.8 years. We included the operating results of Hyper9 in our condensed consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition.

We allocated the purchase price for Hyper9 as follows:

 

     Fair Value
(in thousands)
    Useful Life
(in years)
 

Intangible assets

    

Developed product technologies

   $ 7,978        7   

Customer relationships

     560        6   

Non-competition covenant

     462        5   

Goodwill

     14,663        —     

Deferred revenue

     (258     —     

Net other assets

     3,533        —     
          

Total purchase price

   $ 26,938     
          

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired and is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill for Hyper9 resulted primarily from our expectations that we will now be able to offer our customers products that provide virtualization management. Additionally, the Hyper9 products will be used to attract new customers for our entire line of products. We have integrated the Hyper9 business into our broader IT infrastructure management business eliminating overlapping processes and expenses and integrating its products and sales efforts. Therefore, there are no separate revenue and earnings for Hyper9 since the integration. The pro forma effects of Hyper9 would not have been material to our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and therefore are not presented.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had goodwill in the amounts of $55.5 million and $40.4 million, respectively. The increase in goodwill in the first half of 2011 consisted of $14.7 million of goodwill associated with the Hyper9 acquisition along with a $0.4 million increase from exchange rate fluctuations upon consolidation of goodwill recorded in our foreign subsidiaries. We assess goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if other indicators of potential impairment arise. No impairment was noted for our reporting unit at June 30, 2011.

The following table reflects the changes in goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

 

(in thousands)       

Balance at December 31, 2010

   $ 40,424   

Hyper9 acquisition

     14,663   

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     436   
        

Balance at June 30, 2011

   $ 55,523   
        

3. Earnings Per Share

We computed basic earnings per share using the weighted-average number of our common shares outstanding during the reporting period. We adjusted diluted earnings per share for the after-tax impact of incremental shares that would be available for issuance upon the assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units.

 

7


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the number of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
(in thousands)                            

Basic earnings per share

           

Numerator:

           

Net income

   $ 13,551       $ 8,336       $ 25,261       $ 17,273   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

           

Weighted-average common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share

     72,719         68,202         72,541         67,738   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

           

Numerator:

           

Net income

   $ 13,551       $ 8,336       $ 25,261       $ 17,273   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

           

Weighted-average shares used in computing basic earnings per share

     72,719         68,202         72,541         67,738   

Add options and restricted stock units to purchase common stock

     1,627         5,085         1,643         5,323   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share

     74,346         73,287         74,184         73,061   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Dilution from assumed exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units is dependent upon several factors, including the market price of our common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, stock-based incentive awards of approximately 1,525,000 and 1,196,000, respectively, and 1,608,000 and 1,196,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The awards were not included because the average market price of the underlying stock did not exceed the sum of the exercise price, unrecognized compensation expense and the excess tax benefit and thus, the results would have been anti-dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share requires us to make certain assumptions related to the use of proceeds that would be received upon the assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units. These assumed proceeds include the excess tax benefit that we receive upon assumed exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units.

4. Income Taxes

For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded income tax expense of $5.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively, resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.6% and 30.6%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded income tax expense of $10.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively, resulting in an effective tax rate of 29.4% and 30.2%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2010 to 2011 was primarily attributable to the re-enacted U.S. research and development tax credit and an increase in international earnings, which are generally taxed at lower tax rates.

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, interest and penalties recorded were not significant. As of June 30, 2011, we have an insignificant amount accrued for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits.

We file U.S. federal, state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2007 through 2009 tax years remain open and subject to examination by federal and foreign tax authorities. The 2006 through 2009 tax years generally remain open and subject to examination by the state tax authorities. The audit by the Ireland Revenue Authority for the period beginning January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009 was closed in the first quarter 2011 with no adjustments. We are currently under audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for the tax year ended December 31, 2009 and do not anticipate any material adjustments. Besides the United States, we are not currently under audit in any major taxing jurisdiction.

5. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we have been and may be involved in various legal proceedings arising from our ordinary course of business, which are discussed in Part II, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q under the heading “Legal Proceedings.” In the opinion of management, there was not at least a reasonable possibility we may have incurred a material loss, or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual, with respect to loss contingencies. However, the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain. Therefore, although management considers

 

8


Table of Contents

the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote, if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against us in the same reporting period for amounts in excess of management’s expectations, our condensed consolidated financial statements could be materially adversely affected.

Pending Litigation

On September 13, 2010, Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited (“Uniloc”) brought a lawsuit against SolarWinds, Inc. and SolarWinds Worldwide, LLC (collectively, “SolarWinds”) and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint filed by Uniloc alleges that SolarWinds and each of the other

fifteen named defendants’ software infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,490,216 allegedly owned by Uniloc. Uniloc alleges that SolarWinds’ software, specifically its license key system, infringes upon this patent that utilizes a system for activating software products through a registration process. Uniloc has brought a series of lawsuits against numerous software companies around the world and the infringement and damages related to the patent at issue in the case are currently being challenged in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Because this lawsuit is in its initial stages, it is not possible to reliably predict the outcome of the litigation. Therefore, we cannot currently estimate the loss, if any, associated with the litigation. We intend to contest the claims associated with this lawsuit vigorously.

On June 22, 2011, Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. (“Achates”) brought a lawsuit against SolarWinds, Inc. and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint filed by Achates alleges that SolarWinds, Inc. and each of the other twelve named defendants’ software infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,982,889 (“889 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,173,403 (“403 Patent”) which are allegedly owned by Achates. Achates alleges that SolarWinds, Inc.’s Engineer Suite family of software infringes upon the 889 and 403 Patents “by employing activation technology.” Achates has brought a series of lawsuits against numerous software companies around the world. Currently, it is not possible to reliably predict the outcome of the litigation. Therefore, we cannot currently estimate the loss, if any, associated with the litigation. We intend to contest the claims associated with this lawsuit vigorously.

As each of these matters is in an early stage, we are currently unable to determine if the resolution of these matters will have an adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. We currently have no other material legal proceedings pending other than the matters described above.

Past Litigation

On October 15, 2010, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of Daniel Richardson and a purported class of all persons who purchased or acquired shares of common stock of SolarWinds, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) against SolarWinds, Inc. and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit filed by Plaintiffs alleged that SolarWinds, Inc. and certain of its officers and/or directors violated the securities laws by “issu[ing] materially false and misleading statements regarding [SolarWinds, Inc.’s] operations and its business and financial results and outlook” and therefore “misled investors by misrepresenting and failing to disclose material problems with … sales to the United States federal government . . .[and] problems with [its] sales management team.”

On May 12, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed this lawsuit without prejudice after the Plaintiffs made a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case. Therefore, this lawsuit is no longer pending.

Contingent Consideration

On January 14, 2011, we acquired Hyper9 for approximately $23.0 million in cash and contingent consideration ranging from $0 to $7.0 million based on sales milestones for fiscal year 2011 that will be paid, if at all, in the first quarter of 2012. This contingent consideration was recorded at fair value in the first quarter of 2011 as an accrued acquisition earnout of $3.9 million. In the second quarter of 2011, we recorded a change in the fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.1 million due to the passage of time in other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The accrued acquisition earnout was $4.0 million at June 30, 2011.

The fair value is determined using the income approach with significant inputs that are not observable in the market. Key assumptions include discount rates consistent with the level of risk of achievement and probability adjusted financial projections. The expected outcomes are recorded at net present value, which requires adjustment over the life of the accrued earnout for changes in risks and probabilities. We will record any fair value adjustments due to the passage of time or changes in outcomes in other income (expense) in our condensed consolidated statements of income throughout 2011.

6. Subsequent Events

        In July 2011, we acquired TriGeo Network Security, Inc., or TriGeo, for approximately $35.0 million in cash plus an amount equal to the excess of TriGeo’s cash and other current assets minus certain current liabilities, or working capital, as of the closing date. We paid an estimated amount of $3.5 million at closing for the working capital. This amount is subject to adjustment upon the closing balance sheet. By acquiring TriGeo, we increased our product offerings to include affordable log and event management software. The transaction will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the results of operations of TriGeo since the date of acquisition will be included in our condensed consolidated financial statements in the third quarter of 2011. We also incurred $0.1 million in acquisition related costs which are included in general and administrative expense in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. All of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction will be recognized at their acquisition date fair values which are not finalized at this time due to the recent completion of the acquisition.

 

9


Table of Contents

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This section should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see the “Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement” above for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.

Overview

We design, develop, market, sell and support powerful yet easy-to-use enterprise IT infrastructure management software to IT professionals in organizations of all sizes. Our offerings range from individual software tools to more comprehensive software products that solve problems faced every day by IT professionals and help to enable efficient and effective management of their infrastructure, including networks, applications, storage and physical and virtual servers.

As a core part of our strategy, we employ a highly efficient product development process, a scalable marketing model and a high-volume, transaction-oriented inside sales model that have allowed us to drive and support rapid growth in our business at high operating margins while offering our products at prices that are typically significantly lower than competing frameworks. We manage our business with a culture and systems that are focused on metrics, helping us to achieve consistency in our execution.

In January 2010, in response to changes in the technology environment and to meet the needs of our customers, we acquired certain assets of Tek-Tools, Inc., or Tek-Tools, expanding the range of elements of IT infrastructure that our products monitor and manage to include storage and virtualized servers. In January 2011, we entered into the application performance and virtualization management markets through the launch of SolarWinds Application Performance Monitor and the acquisition of Hyper9, Inc., or Hyper9, a privately-held virtualization management software provider based in Austin, Texas. In July 2011, we acquired TriGeo Network Security, Inc., an Idaho corporation, or TriGeo, expanding our broad portfolio of products to include a log and event management solution. We anticipate continuing to make selective acquisitions of companies with products that complement our business model.

Throughout 2011, we plan to continue to focus on growth opportunities in the IT infrastructure management market while expanding our customer base and brand awareness in the network, application, storage resource, virtualization and log and event management markets. We are in the initial phases of localizing certain of our products with country-specific product documentation, websites and marketing material. We believe our market penetration is low in all geographic and end user markets in which we sell products. We anticipate continuing our international expansion to further market, sell and develop our products. In the new markets we have entered, we will continue our strategy of delivering powerful, easy to use and affordable software along with leveraging the web as the primary method to reach potential customers.

Key Financial Highlights

Key financial highlights for the first half of 2011 include the following:

 

   

Total revenue was $88.8 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $69.8 million in the first half of 2010;

 

   

Operating income was $36.2 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $25.6 million in the first half of 2010;

 

   

Net income was $25.3 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $17.3 million in the first half of 2010; and

 

   

Net income was $0.34 per share on a fully diluted basis for the first half of 2011 compared to $0.24 per share on a fully diluted basis for the first half of 2010.

Key Business Metrics

We review a number of key business metrics to help us monitor the performance of our business model and to identify trends affecting our business. The measures that we believe are the primary indicators of our quarterly and annual performance are as follows:

Transactional Metrics

We focus our sales, marketing and research and development efforts on IT professionals in organizations of all sizes, with the goal of driving purchases of our software by these IT professionals in short sales cycles with minimal levels of approval. In addition, many of our customers make small initial purchases of our software to manage specific components of their infrastructures and, then, make additional purchases over time to expand the use of the product that they purchased or to buy additional software products from us. We review the average transaction size and the core product transaction growth for new license sales to ensure the effectiveness of our marketing and sales model. We define a transaction as each invoice issued for the sale of one or more of our products. Our core products are defined as transactions that include network management products and modules, our Orion family of products, application management, storage management or virtualization management products.

 

10


Table of Contents

Core Product Transaction Growth for New License Sales. We define our core product transactions as the number of new license sales transactions that include at least one of the following core products: Orion, Orion modules, Profiler, Storage Manager or Virtualization Manager. This core product list may change as we develop or acquire more products.

If our core products are not included in a particular transaction, that transaction is not a core transaction. Therefore, if we sell one of our other products, but no core product is included in that transaction, that transaction will not be a core product transaction. The following products are examples of products that are not core products: ipMonitor, Kiwi, Toolset, Switch Port Mapper and LANsurveyor. These products create broad awareness and usage of our tools which may influence the purchase of our core products. However, since the sales of core products represented more than 90% of our license revenue for the first half of 2011, we believe that management can better evaluate changes in our product portfolio, expansion into new markets and the addition of new customers by evaluating the performance of our core products.

Average Transaction Size for New License Sales. We calculate average transaction size for new license sales excluding our Kiwi Syslog Server, Kiwi CatTools and Kiwi Logviewer products, or Kiwi products, because these products sell at a higher transaction volume and lower price than our core products and other transactional products which include ipMonitor, Toolset, Switch Port Mapper and LANsurveyor. Including these Kiwi products would have a significant impact on the average transaction size for new license sales despite representing only a very small portion of our revenue. By excluding our Kiwi products, we believe that management can better evaluate our core business without the impact of the high-volume, low price Kiwi products that are not representative of our other products.

The average transaction size for new license sales for our business fluctuates on a quarterly basis. This fluctuation occurs as a result of the varying mix of product sales to businesses of varying sizes. This fluctuation is especially characteristic in our U.S. federal government business. As a result, we review the average transaction size for new license sales on a trailing 12-month basis to eliminate the quarterly variability in our transaction mix.

We review the core product transaction growth and the average transaction size concurrently. As we change our product mix and as our business grows, the average transaction size will continue to fluctuate with our business and the number of core product transactions. By reviewing both of these metrics, this allows us to measure the overall effectiveness of our marketing and sales model and our growth strategy.

Non-GAAP Operating Income

Our management uses non-GAAP operating income to measure our performance. Because non-GAAP operating income excludes certain non-cash expenses including amortization, stock-based compensation and certain expenses that may not be indicative of our core business, we believe that this measure provides us with additional useful information to measure and understand our performance, particularly with respect to changes in performance from period to period. We use non-GAAP operating income in the preparation of our budgets and to measure and monitor our performance. Non-GAAP operating income is not determined in accordance with GAAP and is not a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP. For further discussion regarding non-GAAP operating income and a reconciliation of non-GAAP operating income to operating income, see the discussion under the caption “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included later in this Item 2.

Revenue Growth

We have employed a differentiated business model for marketing and selling high volumes of enterprise-class software, which is focused on rapid revenue growth at high operating margins. We regularly review our total revenue growth to measure our success. We have built a pricing model for our products that aims to maximize our recurring revenue and the value of a customer over time and not upfront license revenue. This pricing model is an important component of our financial model. These models are based on the premise that we will be able to deliver ongoing value to our customers and maintain a long-term financial relationship with the users of our core enterprise-class network and IT management products.

Opportunities and Trends

Businesses, governments and other organizations are increasingly relying on data networks and IT infrastructures to execute their operations, facilitate their internal and external communications and transact business with their customers and partners. The size of these networks, the number of applications and servers, and the complexity of physical and virtual server environments are increasing as organizations place more reliance on them. We believe that the increasing challenges of IT infrastructure management and the limitations of existing offerings present a market opportunity for our products. In addition to the network management products that we have offered since 2001, we also offer products that we have developed or acquired that manage servers and applications and monitor and manage storage and virtualized servers. We

 

11


Table of Contents

believe that these products allow us to compete effectively in the adjacent markets of application management, storage resource management and virtual server management. In July 2011, we also expanded our portfolio of products to include a log and event management solution, which we believe complements our business model. We expect our revenue to continue to grow as we capitalize on these and other market opportunities.

Our trailing 12-month average transaction size for new license sales increased approximately 10% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. We expect to see continued fluctuations in our trailing 12-month average transaction size as our business continues to evolve through acquisitions. In the second quarter of 2011, our trailing 12-month average transaction size was impacted by an increase in the core product transaction growth due to the introduction of new products through acquisitions and internal development.

We believe there is significant uncertainty regarding the economic conditions in certain geographic regions, particularly in parts of Europe. We believe that any difficult economic conditions may adversely affect the sales of our products, but could offer us an opportunity to market and sell our products to mid-size businesses and enterprise customers at compelling prices compared to the prices of many competing products.

We expect the U.S. federal government to continue to be a significant market opportunity, as we believe the ease of deployment, power and scalability of our products gives us an enhanced opportunity to sell to various agencies and departments of the U.S. federal government. We have experienced and continue to expect inconsistency in the buying pattern of the U.S. federal government for larger transactions with our products. Our sales, both new licenses and maintenance renewals, to the U.S. federal government are largely dependent on systems integrators, distributors and resellers whose purchases from us have been difficult to predict. In addition, we believe that many of our larger transactions with the U.S. federal government are dependent on specific projects that may or may not be continued at the same scale in the future due to budgetary cuts or other reasons, and the reduction or cancellation of specific projects such as these may change the buying patterns of the U.S. federal government and could result in our sales to the U.S. government being less than expected.

Key Components of Our Results of Operations

Sources of Revenue

Our revenue is primarily comprised of license and maintenance revenue. We license our software under perpetual licenses, which ordinarily include one year of maintenance as part of the initial purchase price of the product. License revenue reflects the revenue recognized from sales of new licenses and upgrades to our software. We have experienced annual and quarterly year-over-year growth in license revenue. Customers can renew, and generally have renewed, their maintenance agreements for annual periods at our standard list maintenance renewal pricing for their software products. Current customers with maintenance agreements are entitled to receive unspecified upgrades or enhancements when and if they become available. Maintenance revenue is an important source of our future revenue. We have experienced strong and consistent annual and quarterly year-over-year growth in maintenance and other revenue. Because our maintenance base grew during 2010 and the first half of 2011 due to new license sales, high customer retention and acquisitions, we expect maintenance revenue to continue to increase in future periods.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue primarily consists of personnel costs related to providing technical support services and amortization of acquired developed product technologies. Personnel costs include salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation and related employer-paid payroll taxes for technical support personnel, as well as an allocation of our facilities, information technology and other overhead costs and our employee benefit costs. We allocate stock-based compensation expense and related employer-paid payroll taxes to personnel costs based on how we categorize the department in which the option or restricted stock unit holder works. We allocate overhead, such as rent, computer and other technology costs and employee benefit costs, to personnel costs in each expense category based on worldwide headcount in that category. We expect our cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars, but to remain relatively stable as a percentage of revenue in future periods.

Operating Expenses

        We classify our operating expenses into three categories: sales and marketing; research and development; and general and administrative.

Our operating expenses primarily consist of personnel costs, contract research and development costs, marketing program costs and legal, accounting, consulting and other professional service fees. Personnel costs for each category of operating expenses include salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation and related employer-paid payroll taxes for personnel in each expense category, as well as an allocation of our facilities, information technology and other overhead costs and our employee benefit costs.

 

12


Table of Contents

Our operating expenses increased in absolute dollars and decreased as a percentage of revenue in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010, as we have continued to build infrastructure and add employees through acquisitions and internal growth across all departments in order to accelerate and support our growth. The number of full-time employees as of June 30, 2011, was 497, as compared to 432, as of June 30, 2010. We will continue to make investments in our business by expanding our direct inside sales force domestically and internationally, increasing our marketing operations and programs and adding research and development personnel worldwide which will increase our operating expenses. We expect our operating expenses in future periods to continue to increase in absolute dollars and to fluctuate as a percentage of revenue as we acquire additional companies and integrate the businesses.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for our sales, marketing and business development employees and executives, commissions earned by our sales personnel, the cost of marketing programs such as paid search, search engine optimization and management, trade shows, webinars and the cost of business development programs. We expect to continue to hire sales personnel in the United States and in our international sales offices. We expect to continue to invest in our marketing programs to drive customer downloads and support our new product launches.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for our product development employees and executives. We have devoted our development efforts primarily to expanding our product line and increasing the functionality and enhancing the ease-of-use of our software products. In 2008, we opened a development center in the Czech Republic to take advantage of low labor rates and strong technical talent. We also acquired research and development personnel in New Zealand, India and the United States as part of our acquisitions. Since establishing our research and development center in the Czech Republic, and as a result of our acquisitions, we have significantly increased our research and development employee headcount. We expect to continue to invest in our research and development activities by hiring engineers in the United States and in our international locations. We expect to expand our development center in India in the second half of 2011, which will result in an increase in facilities and personnel costs.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for our executive, finance, legal, human resources and administrative personnel, as well as legal, accounting and other professional service fees and other corporate expenses. We expect to incur higher administrative costs in future periods as our business continues to grow both organically and through acquisitions. In addition, we intend to continue to grant equity awards to our current executives and employees and those who join us in the future through acquisitions or otherwise, which will result in additional stock-based compensation expense.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) primarily consists of interest income, interest expense, foreign exchange gains (losses) and acquisition related contingent consideration fair value adjustments. Interest income represents interest received on our cash and cash equivalents. Interest expense in the first half of 2010 was associated with our outstanding long-term debt which was paid in full in May 2010. Foreign exchange gains (losses) relate to expenses and billing transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the associated subsidiary. Acquisition related contingent consideration fair value adjustments are related to the change in fair value due to the passage of time.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense primarily consists of corporate income taxes related to profits resulting from the sale of our software offerings by our United States and Irish entities. The rate of taxation on income earned by our United States entity is higher than the rate of taxation on income earned by our Irish entity. If our international income, as a percentage of total income, increases as we expect, then our effective income tax rate should correspondingly decline. However, our effective tax rate may be affected by many factors, such as changes in tax laws, regulations or rates, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, the impact of accounting for stock-based compensation, the impact of accounting for business combinations, changes in our international structure, shifts in the amount of taxable income earned in the United States, as compared with other regions in the world, and changes in overall levels of income before tax.

We benefit from the tax credit incentives under the U.S. research and experimentation tax credit extended to taxpayers engaged in qualified research and experimental activities while carrying on a trade or business. The tax credit is currently set to expire on December 31, 2011, and if not renewed under similar terms as in prior years, the result could have a material impact on our financial results.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. In many instances, we could reasonably use different accounting estimates, and in some instances, changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to

 

13


Table of Contents

period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are differences between our estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected, perhaps materially.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application, while in other cases, management’s judgment is required in selecting among available alternative accounting standards that allow different accounting treatment for similar transactions. We believe that these accounting policies requiring significant management judgment and estimates are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas of our financial results. These critical accounting policies are:

 

   

Valuation of goodwill, intangibles, long-lived assets and contingent consideration;

 

   

Revenue recognition;

 

   

Stock-based compensation;

 

   

Income taxes; and

 

   

Loss contingencies.

Other than the additional policy set forth below, a full description of our critical accounting policies that involve significant management judgment appears in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011 under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates since that time other than the addition of the following:

Loss contingencies

We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In accordance with GAAP, we record a charge equal to the minimum estimated liability for litigation costs or a loss contingency only when both of the following conditions are met: (i) information available prior to issuance of our condensed consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements, and (ii) the range of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.

From time to time, we are involved in disputes, litigation, and other legal actions. We are aggressively defending our current litigation matters. However, there are many uncertainties associated with any litigation, and these actions or other third-party claims against us may cause us to incur costly litigation and/or substantial settlement charges. If any of those events were to occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected. The actual liability in any such matters may be materially different from our estimates, which could result in the need to adjust our liability and record additional expenses. For a discussion of current litigation, see Note 5, Commitments and Contingencies, under the heading “Legal Proceedings” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a standard to provide a consistent definition of fair value and change certain fair value measurement principles. In addition, the standard enhances the disclosure requirements concerning the measurement uncertainty of Level 3 fair value measurements. The updated accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 on a prospective basis. Early application is not permitted. We will adopt the updated guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. We do not believe this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued a standard to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The standard eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. The updated accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 on a retrospective basis. Early application is permitted. We will adopt the updated guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. Since the updated guidance only requires a change in the placement of information already disclosed in our condensed consolidated financial statements, we do not expect the adoption to have an impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

14


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statements of income data for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended  
     June 30, 2011     % of
Revenue
    June 30, 2010     % of
Revenue
    Change  
     (in thousands)           (in thousands)           (in thousands)  

Revenue:

          

License

   $ 21,069        46.0   $ 17,264        48.6   $ 3,805   

Maintenance and other

     24,754        54.0        18,244        51.4        6,510   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenue

     45,823        100.0        35,508        100.0        10,315   

Cost of revenue

     2,567        5.6        1,920        5.4        647   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     43,256        94.4        33,588        94.6        9,668   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

          

Sales and marketing

     12,778        27.9        10,688        30.1        2,090   

Research and development

     5,034        11.0        3,824        10.8        1,210   

General and administrative

     6,317        13.8        6,925        19.5        (608
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     24,129        52.7        21,437        60.4        2,692   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

     19,127        41.7        12,151        34.2        6,976   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

          

Interest income

     70        0.2        67        0.2        3   

Interest expense

     —          —          (363     (1.0     363   

Other income (expense)

     (210     (0.5     163        0.5        (373
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

     (140     (0.3     (133     (0.4     (7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     18,987        41.4        12,018        33.8        6,969   

Income tax expense

     5,436        11.9        3,682        10.4        1,754   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 13,551        29.6   $ 8,336        23.5   $ 5,215   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Revenue

Revenue was $45.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $35.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $10.3 million, or 29.0%. Maintenance and other revenue increased $6.5 million due to a growing maintenance renewal customer base and an increase in new license sales which drives new maintenance revenue. We have maintained high customer retention and our customer base has continued to grow with acquisitions. License revenue increased $3.8 million due to sales of our core products and new product sales in the network, storage and virtualization markets.

We have continued to expand our core products with the acquisitions of Tek-Tools in January 2010 and Hyper9 in January 2011, stand-alone products and other new SolarWinds’ product offerings. As a result of these new product offerings, our core product transaction growth increased 36.0% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010. As the number of core product transactions fluctuates with changes in the business or product mixes, this also affects our trailing 12-month average transaction size which increased approximately 10% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. As of June 30, 2011, the trailing 12-month average transaction size for new license sales was approximately $8,500 as compared to approximately $7,600 for the trailing 12-month period as of June 30, 2010.

For the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010, new license sales in our commercial business increased 25.2% globally and new license sales in our U.S. federal government business increased 25.0%. This growth in both businesses was driven mainly by strong year-over-year growth in transaction volume. Our revenue from our foreign subsidiaries was 25.6% and 21.5% of total revenue in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The primary foreign currencies that we invoice and on which we collect are the Euro, British Pound Sterling and Australian Dollar. We began invoicing and collecting in Australian Dollars in the second half of 2010.

 

15


Table of Contents

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue was $2.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $0.7 million, or 33.7%. This increase was due to a $0.3 million increase in cost of maintenance revenue related to increased headcount in our United States, EMEA and Asian-Pacific support organizations to support the new customers we added during 2010 and the first half of 2011 from new sales, additional product offerings from acquisitions and internal product development. Cost of license revenue also increased by $0.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, primarily due to the amortization of acquired product technologies associated with the Hyper9 acquisition.

Operating Expenses

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $12.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $10.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2.1 million, or 19.6%. Our sales and marketing personnel costs, which include stock-based compensation expense, increased by $2.2 million primarily due to the expansion of our direct inside sales force, including management, in the United States. Marketing program costs to drive higher levels of web traffic such as paid search, search engine optimization and management, web operating costs and trade shows decreased by $0.3 million due to planned eliminations of underperforming programs. Other costs such as professional fees and consulting service expenses increased by $0.2 million.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $5.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $3.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $1.2 million, or 31.6%. In order to support our product development strategy combined with an increase in the number of core products, we continued to increase the size of our Czech Republic research center throughout 2010 and the first half of 2011. We also added research and development personnel with the acquisition of the Austin-based Hyper9 in January 2011. Due to this growth, our personnel costs, which include stock-based compensation expense, increased by $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010. Other costs such as contract services, professional fees and travel expenses increased by $0.2 million.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $6.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $6.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 8.8%. The $0.6 million decrease was primarily due to a $1.0 million decrease in personnel costs, which include stock-based compensation expense, a $0.2 million reduction in lease abandonment costs due to an increase in our estimated sublease income and a $0.2 million reduction in severance costs related to the retirement of our former Executive Chairman in June 2010 offset by increases of $0.4 million in professional fees and $0.3 million of amortization related to certain acquired intangible assets. The decrease in personnel costs includes a one-time stock-based compensation expense of $1.4 million from the acceleration of the vesting of certain options related to the retirement of our former Executive Chairman on June 30, 2010.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense in the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $0, decreasing by $0.4 million from the three months ended June 30, 2010, because we paid all of the outstanding principal of our credit facilities in 2010. In March 2010, we prepaid $19.1 million of the outstanding principal balance on our credit facilities. In May 2010, we fully repaid the remaining $25.0 million of principal outstanding. Other expense increased primarily due to foreign exchange losses associated with the currency fluctuations of the British Pound Sterling, U.S. dollar and Australian Dollar against the Euro.

Income Tax Expense

Our income tax expense increased by $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period for 2010. This increase resulted from an increase in our income before income taxes of $7.0 million when comparing the same periods. Our expected effective tax rate decreased from 30.6% in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 28.6% in the three months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily attributable to the re-enacted U.S. research and development tax credit, and an increase in international earnings, which are generally taxed at lower tax rates.

 

16


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statements of income data for the periods indicated:

 

 

     Six Months Ended  
     June 30, 2011     % of
Revenue
    June 30, 2010     % of
Revenue
    Change  
     (in thousands)           (in thousands)           (in thousands)  

Revenue:

          

License

   $ 41,449        46.7   $ 34,885        50.0   $ 6,564   

Maintenance and other

     47,352        53.3        34,948        50.0        12,404   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenue

     88,801        100.0        69,833        100.0        18,968   

Cost of revenue

     5,053        5.7        3,619        5.2        1,434   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     83,748        94.3        66,214        94.8        17,534   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

          

Sales and marketing

     24,505        27.6        20,937        30.0        3,568   

Research and development

     10,072        11.3        7,451        10.7        2,621   

General and administrative

     12,987        14.6        12,246        17.5        741   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     47,564        53.6        40,634        58.2        6,930   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

     36,184        40.7        25,580        36.6        10,604   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

          

Interest income

     125        0.1        100        0.1        25   

Interest expense

     —          —          (1,146     (1.6     1,146   

Other income (expense)

     (516     (0.6     211        0.3        (727
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

     (391     (0.4     (835     (1.2     444   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     35,793        40.3        24,745        35.4        11,048   

Income tax expense

     10,532        11.9        7,472        10.7        3,060   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 25,261        28.4   $ 17,273        24.7   $ 7,988   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Revenue

Revenue was $88.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $69.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $19.0 million, or 27.2%. Maintenance and other revenue increased $12.4 million due to a growing maintenance renewal customer base and an increase in new license sales which drives new maintenance revenue. We have maintained high customer retention and our customer base has continued to grow with acquisitions. License revenue increased $6.6 million due to new product sales in the network, storage and virtualization markets along with continued growth of our core products.

We have continued to expand our core products with the acquisitions of Tek-Tools in January 2010 and Hyper9 in January 2011, stand-alone products and other new SolarWinds’ product offerings. As a result of these new product offerings, our core product transaction growth increased 26.1% in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010. As the number of core product transactions fluctuates with changes in the business or product mixes, this also affects our trailing 12-month average transaction size which increased approximately 10% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. As of June 30, 2011, the trailing 12-month average transaction size for new license sales was approximately $8,500 as compared to approximately $7,600 for the trailing 12-month period as of June 30, 2010.

For the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010, new license sales in our commercial business increased 19.4% globally and new license sales in our U.S. federal government business increased 23.3%. This growth in both businesses was driven by year-over-year growth in transaction volume. We had one transaction with the U.S. federal government that resulted in license revenue greater than $0.5 million in each of the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our revenue from our foreign subsidiaries was 24.8% and 21.7% of total revenue in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The primary foreign currencies that we invoice and on which we collect are the Euro, British Pound Sterling and Australian Dollar. We began invoicing and collecting in Australian Dollars in the second half of 2010.

 

17


Table of Contents

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue was $5.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $3.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $1.5 million, or 39.6%. This increase was due to a $0.7 million increase in cost of maintenance revenue related to increased headcount in our United States, EMEA and Asian-Pacific support organizations to support the new customers we added during 2010 and the first half of 2011 from new sales, additional product offerings from acquisitions and internal product development. Cost of license revenue also increased by $0.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the first half of 2010, primarily due to the amortization of acquired product technologies associated with the Hyper9 acquisition.

Operating Expenses

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $24.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $20.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $3.6 million, or 17.0%. Our sales and marketing personnel costs, which include stock-based compensation expense, increased by $4.0 million primarily due to the expansion of our direct inside sales force in the United States. Marketing program costs to drive higher levels of web traffic such as paid search, search engine optimization and management, web operating costs and trade shows decreased by $0.9 million due to planned eliminations of underperforming programs. Other costs such as professional fees, consulting services and travel expenses increased by $0.4 million.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $10.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2.6 million, or 35.2%. In order to support our product development strategy combined with an increase in the number of core products, we continued to increase the size of our Czech Republic research center throughout 2010 and the first half of 2011. We also added research and development personnel with the acquisition of the Austin-based Hyper9 in January 2011. Due to this growth, our personnel costs, which include stock-based compensation expense, increased by $2.3 million in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010. Other costs such as contract services, professional fees and travel expenses increased by $0.3 million.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $13.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $12.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $0.8 million, or 6.1%. This $0.8 million increase was primarily due to an increase of $0.5 million in acquisition costs, $0.5 million in amortization expense related to certain acquired intangible assets, $0.3 million in professional fees and a $0.2 million reduction in legal reimbursement fees associated with a claim by a former employee that was settled in December 2009, partially offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in personnel costs, which include stock-based compensation expense, and a $0.2 million reduction in severance costs related to the retirement of our former Executive Chairman in June 2010. The decrease in personnel costs include a one-time stock-based compensation expense of $1.4 million from the acceleration of the vesting of certain options related to the retirement of our former Executive Chairman on June 30, 2010.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $0, decreasing by $1.1 million from the six months ended June 30, 2010, because we paid all of the outstanding principal of our credit facilities in 2010. In March 2010, we prepaid $19.1 million of the outstanding principal balance on our credit facilities. In May 2010, we fully repaid the remaining $25.0 million of principal outstanding. Other expense increased primarily due to foreign exchange losses associated with the currency fluctuations of the British Pound Sterling, U.S. dollar and Australian Dollar against the Euro.

Income Tax Expense

Our income tax expense increased by $3.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period for 2010. This increase resulted from an increase in our income before income taxes of $11.0 million when comparing the same periods. Our expected effective tax rate decreased from 30.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 29.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily attributable to the re-enacted U.S. research and development tax credit, and an increase in international earnings, which are generally taxed at lower tax rates.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This Form 10-Q includes the following financial measures defined as non-GAAP financial measures by the Securities and Exchange Commission: non-GAAP operating income; non-GAAP net income; non-GAAP diluted earnings per share; and free cash flow. Explanations of our non-GAAP financials measures, our use of these measures and reconciliations of these financial measures to the GAAP financial measures we consider most comparable are below.

We believe non-GAAP financial measures are useful to our investors in evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:

 

   

non-GAAP financial measures are widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to certain items, such as interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation and related employer-paid payroll taxes, that can vary substantially from company to company depending upon their financing and accounting methods, the book value of their assets, their capital structures and the method by which their assets were acquired and certain expenses and expenditures, such as lawsuit settlement costs and related legal fees, that may not be indicative of a company’s core business operations;

 

18


Table of Contents
   

securities analysts use non-GAAP financial measures as a supplemental measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of companies; and

 

   

by comparing our non-GAAP financial measures in different historical periods, our investors can evaluate our operating results without the additional variations of certain items that may not be indicative of our core operations, including stock-based compensation expense, which is a non-cash expense that is not a key measure of our operations.

Our management uses non-GAAP financial measures:

 

   

as a measure of operating performance, because it does not include the impact of items not directly resulting from our core operations;

 

   

for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual operating budget;

 

   

to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business;

 

   

to determine employee incentive compensation;

 

   

to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies; and

 

   

in communications with our board of directors concerning our financial performance.

We understand that, although non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluation of companies, non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as an analytical tool. Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, do not reflect a comprehensive system of accounting and may not be completely comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies due to potential differences in the exact method of calculation between companies. Certain items that are excluded from non-GAAP financial measures, such as the amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense and related employer-paid payroll taxes and acquisition related costs, can have a material impact on net earnings. As a result, you should not consider non-GAAP financial measures in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP.

We have provided reconciliations of our non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures below.

Non-GAAP Operating Income

We define non-GAAP operating income as GAAP operating income plus stock-based compensation expense and related employer-paid payroll taxes, amortization of intangible assets, public offering costs, lawsuit settlement costs and related legal fees, severance costs related to the retirement of our former Executive Chairman and acquisition related costs, excluding the changes in fair value of contingent consideration. The table below provides a reconciliation of non-GAAP operating income to GAAP operating income.

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 30,     June 30,  

(in thousands)

   2011     2010     2011      2010  

GAAP operating income

   $ 19,127      $ 12,151      $ 36,184       $ 25,580   

Amortization of intangible assets

     1,435        845        2,607         1,476   

Stock-based compensation expense and related employer-paid payroll taxes

     2,807        4,438        5,667         6,960   

Public offering costs

     —          151        —           170   

Lawsuit settlement costs and related legal fees (reimbursements)

     —          (69     —           (217

Severance costs related to retirement of former Executive Chairman

     —          208        —           208   

Acquisition related costs

     (90     144        914         410   
                                 

Non-GAAP operating income

   $ 23,279      $ 17,868      $ 45,372       $ 34,587   
                                 

 

19


Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Net Income

We define non-GAAP net income as GAAP net income plus those same items as above in the calculation of non-GAAP operating income as well as the write-off of debt issuance costs, fair value adjustments related to contingent consideration included in acquisition related costs and the tax benefits associated with the excluded items.

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 30,     June 30,  
(in thousands)    2011     2010     2011     2010  

GAAP net income

   $ 13,551      $ 8,336      $ 25,261      $ 17,273   

Amortization of intangible assets

     1,435        845        2,607        1,476   

Stock-based compensation expense and related employer-paid payroll taxes

     2,807        4,438        5,667        6,960   

Debt issuance costs write-off

     —          131        —          334   

Public offering costs

     —          151        —          170   

Lawsuit settlement costs and related legal fees (reimbursements)

     —          (69     —          (217

Severance costs related to retirement of former Executive Chairman

     —          208        —          208   

Acquisition related costs

     18        144        1,022        410   

Tax benefits associated with above adjustments

     (1,123     (1,633     (2,170     (2,517
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP net income

   $ 16,688      $ 12,551      $ 32,387      $ 24,097   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share

Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share is equal to non-GAAP net income divided by weighted average shares outstanding.

 

     Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended  
     June 30,      June 30,  
(in thousands)    2011      2010      2011      2010  

Numerator:

           

Non-GAAP net income

   $ 16,688       $ 12,551       $ 32,387       $ 24,097   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

           

Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share

     74,346         73,287         74,184         73,061   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.22       $ 0.17       $ 0.44       $ 0.33   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Free Cash Flow

We define free cash flow as GAAP cash flows from operating activities plus excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation less purchases of property and equipment. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides important information to management, investors and security analysts regarding the cash generated by the business after the purchase of property and equipment that can then be used for, among other things, strategic acquisitions and investments, share repurchases and ongoing operations. Free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash balance for the period. The table below presents a reconciliation of free cash flow to GAAP cash flows from operating activities.

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 30,     June 30,  
(in thousands)    2011     2010     2011     2010  

GAAP cash flows from operating activities

   $ 23,637      $ 16,898      $ 42,503      $ 32,821   

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

     874        3,310        4,439        7,193   

Purchases of property and equipment

     (465     (852     (1,063     (1,434
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Free cash flow

   $ 24,046      $ 19,356      $ 45,879      $ 38,580   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

20


Table of Contents

The increase in free cash flow for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, is primarily due to the increase in cash flows from operating activities offset by a reduction in tax benefits associated with the unusually large number of option exercises by executives in 2010. For further discussion regarding cash flows from operating activities, see the discussion under the caption “Liquidity and Capital Resources” included later in this Item 2.

Acquisitions

In January 2011, we acquired Hyper9 for approximately $23.0 million in cash and contingent consideration ranging from $0 to $7.0 million based on sales milestones for fiscal year 2011 that will be paid, if at all, in the first quarter of 2012. In the first quarter of 2011, we recorded a liability for the fair value of the contingent consideration of $3.9 million which was based on the income approach with significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 instrument. We recorded a $0.1 million fair value adjustment due to the passage of time in the second quarter of 2011. We will continue to record fair value adjustments due to the passage of time or changes in outcomes in other income (expense) in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the remainder of 2011. The contingent consideration is recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011, as an accrued earnout of $4.0 million.

We accounted for the acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting. We allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. We derived the value of intangible assets of $9.0 million from the present value of estimated future benefits from the various intangible assets acquired. We recorded goodwill of $14.7 million for the Hyper9 acquisition, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values of the net identifiable assets acquired. For further information regarding this acquisition, see Note 2, Business Combinations, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In July 2011, we acquired TriGeo Network Security, Inc., or TriGeo, for approximately $35.0 million in cash plus an amount equal to the excess of TriGeo’s cash and other current assets minus certain current liabilities, or working capital, as of the closing date. We paid an estimated amount of $3.5 million at closing for the working capital. This amount is subject to adjustment upon the closing balance sheet. By acquiring TriGeo, we increased our product offerings to include affordable log and event management software. The transaction will be accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the results of operations of TriGeo since the date of acquisition will be included in our condensed consolidated financial statements in the third quarter of 2011. We also incurred $0.1 million in acquisition related costs which are included in general and administrative expense in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. All of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction will be recognized at their acquisition date fair values which are not finalized at this time due to the recent completion of the acquisition.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents our key measures of liquidity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

 

     Six Months Ended  
     June 30,  
(in thousands)    2011     2010  

Cash and cash equivalents (end of period)

   $ 169,513      $ 99,767   

Accounts receivable, net

     22,664        17,013   

Working capital

     127,189        66,760   

Net cash provided by operating activities

     42,503        32,821   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (28,098     (29,682

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     11,141        (31,077

Cash and cash equivalents

On June 30, 2011, we had $169.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and $127.2 million of working capital. Our subsidiaries outside the United States held $31.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, substantially all of which was generated from our international operations. We currently intend that the earnings generated by our international operations will be invested indefinitely in those operations and we do not expect to repatriate those earnings to our domestic operations. If we were to try and repatriate these earnings, we would incur a U.S. federal income tax liability that is not currently accrued in our financial statements.

 

21


Table of Contents

Our available cash and cash equivalents are held in bank deposits and money market funds at June 30, 2011, although we anticipate investing in higher-yielding securities in the future. Our money market mutual funds invest in high-quality, short-term securities, many of which are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or by U.S. government agencies. We actively monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal while secondarily maximizing yield on those funds. The balances held in the United States may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, insurance limits or may not be insured by the FDIC. While we monitor the balances in our accounts, and adjust the balances as appropriate, these balances could be impacted if the underlying depository institutions or the guarantors fail or could be subject to adverse conditions in the financial markets. We strive to maintain our cash deposits and invest our money market funds with multiple financial institutions of reputable credit and therefore, bear minimal credit risk. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our invested cash and cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to our funds will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets in the future.

Accounts receivable, net

Our accounts receivable balance fluctuates from period to period, which affects our cash flow from operating activities. The fluctuations vary depending on the timing of our sales, cash collections and changes to our allowance for doubtful accounts. Our accounts receivable balance represents trade receivables from customers when we have provided software licenses and/or annual software maintenance agreements and we have not yet received payment. We have historically had insignificant write-offs related to bad debts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.3 million at June 30, 2011, and $0.1 million at June 30, 2010. We use days sales outstanding, or DSO, calculated on a quarterly basis, as a measurement of the quality and status of our receivables. We define DSO as (a) accounts receivable divided by (b) total revenue for the most recent quarter, multiplied by (c) the number of days in the quarter. Our DSO was 45.0 days at June 30, 2011.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $42.5 million and $32.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net income was $25.3 million and $17.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We incurred net non-cash expenses of $5.5 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Non-cash expenses primarily consisted of stock-based compensation expense of $5.5 million and $6.6 million and depreciation and amortization expense of $4.0 million and $2.5 million offset by excess tax benefits related to employee stock option exercises of $4.4 million and $7.2 million, all for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The change in certain assets and liabilities resulted in a net source of cash of $11.7 million and $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities is driven by sales of our software offerings and maintenance renewals. Collection of accounts receivable from the sales of our software offerings and maintenance renewals is a significant component of our cash flows from operating activities, as is the change in deferred revenue related to these sales. Changes in our income tax receivable and payable balances are also significant components of our cash flows from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was increased by a U.S. federal income tax refund of $3.7 million and reduced by interest payments of $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $28.1 million and $29.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily related to the $23.0 million of cash used in our purchase of Hyper9. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid $4.0 million of cash upon the achievement of certain performance criteria related to the asset acquisition of Tek-Tools in January 2010. This contingent consideration was recorded at fair value in the first quarter of 2010 as an accrued acquisition earnout of $3.7 million. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.3 million due to the passage of time was recorded in other income (expense) in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2010. Therefore, in accordance with authoritative guidance, the $3.7 million earnout is reflected in cash flows from investing activities and the $0.3 million change in fair value is reflected in cash flows from operating activities in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily due to the $28.0 million of cash used in our purchase of certain assets of Tek-Tools.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $11.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and net cash used in financing activities was $31.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Net cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2011, was due to $7.0 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and the excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises of $4.4 million, which is a reduction in cash payments related to income taxes. Net cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2010, was due to a $44.1 million repayment of long-term debt partially offset by $5.8 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and the excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises of $7.2 million, which is a reduction in cash payments related to income taxes.

 

22


Table of Contents

Anticipated cash flows

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and our cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations and our capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts and expansion into new territories, the timing of any acquisitions to expand our business, the timing of introductions of new software products and enhancements to existing software products, and the continuing market acceptance of our software offerings. Although we are not currently a party to any definitive agreement regarding potential investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, applications or technologies, we may enter into these types of arrangements, which could require us to seek additional equity or debt financing or repatriate cash generated by our international operations that would cause us to incur a U.S. federal income tax liability. Additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all.

Capital expenditures

We estimate our capital expenditures for the second half of 2011 to be approximately $3.2 million, comprised primarily of additional leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures and computer equipment.

Acquisition-related costs

In July 2011, we acquired TriGeo Network Security, Inc., or TriGeo, for approximately $35.0 million in cash plus an amount equal to the excess of TriGeo’s cash and other current assets minus certain current liabilities, or working capital, as of the closing date. We paid an estimated amount of $3.5 million at closing for the working capital. This amount is subject to adjustment upon the closing balance sheet.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In January 2011, we acquired Hyper9 for approximately $23.0 million in cash and contingent consideration ranging from $0 to $7.0 million based on sales milestones for fiscal year 2011 that will be paid, if at all, in the first quarter of 2012. The payment is recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011, as an accrued acquisition earnout of $4.0 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the first half of 2011, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

 

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to certain financial market risks, including the following:

Interest Rate Risk

We had cash and cash equivalents of $169.5 million at June 30, 2011. We held these amounts primarily in cash or money market funds, although we anticipate investing in higher-yielding securities in the future. We hold cash and cash equivalents for working capital purposes. We do not have material exposure to market risk with respect to investments, as our investments consisted primarily of highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less at June 30, 2011, although we anticipate investing in securities with original maturity dates of greater than three months in the future. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes; however, we may adopt specific hedging strategies in the future. Any declines in interest rates, however, will reduce future interest income.

Foreign Currency Risk

As a global company, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Our revenue from our foreign subsidiaries was approximately 24.8% of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The primary foreign currencies that we invoice and on which we collect are the Euro, British Pound Sterling and Australian Dollar. Expenses incurred by our international subsidiaries are, generally, denominated in the local currency of the subsidiary. Our condensed consolidated statements of income are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions results in reduced revenues, operating expenses and net income for our international operations. Similarly, our revenues, operating

 

23


Table of Contents

expenses, and net income will increase for our international operations if the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies. Although we may do so in the future, we do not currently enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge exposure denominated in foreign currencies or any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Thus, fluctuations in currency exchange rates could harm our business in the future.

We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as we translate the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars in consolidation. If there is a change in foreign currency exchange rates, the conversion of the foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S dollars will lead to a translation gain or loss which is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.

 

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

24


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we have been and may be involved in various legal proceedings and claims, including the pending and post litigation discussed below, as well as other legal proceedings and claims that have not been fully resolved and that have arisen in our ordinary course of business.

Pending Litigation

On September 13, 2010, Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited (“Uniloc”) brought a lawsuit against SolarWinds, Inc. and SolarWinds Worldwide, LLC (collectively, “SolarWinds”) and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint filed by Uniloc alleges that SolarWinds and each of the other fifteen named defendants’ software infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,490,216 allegedly owned by Uniloc. Uniloc alleges that SolarWinds’ software, specifically its license key system, infringes upon this patent that utilizes a system for activating software products through a registration process. Uniloc has brought a series of lawsuits against numerous software companies around the world and the infringement and damages related to the patent at issue in the case are currently being challenged in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Because this lawsuit is in its initial stages, it is not possible to reliably predict the outcome of the litigation. Therefore, we cannot currently estimate the loss, if any, associated with the litigation. We intend to contest the claims associated with this lawsuit vigorously.

On June 22, 2011, Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. (“Achates”) brought a lawsuit against SolarWinds, Inc. and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint filed by Achates alleges that SolarWinds, Inc. and each of the other twelve named defendants’ software infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,982,889 (“889 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,173,403 (“403 Patent”) which are allegedly owned by Achates. Achates alleges that SolarWinds, Inc.’s Engineer Suite family of software infringes upon the 889 and 403 Patents “by employing activation technology.” Achates has brought a series of lawsuits against numerous software companies around the world. Currently, it is not possible to reliably predict the outcome of the litigation. Therefore, we cannot currently estimate the loss, if any, associated with the litigation. We intend to contest the claims associated with this lawsuit vigorously.

As each of these matters is in an early stage, we are currently unable to determine if the resolution of these matters will have an adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. We currently have no other material legal proceedings pending other than the matters described above.

Past Litigation

On October 15, 2010, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of Daniel Richardson and a purported class of all persons who purchased or acquired shares of common stock of SolarWinds, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) against SolarWinds, Inc. and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit filed by Plaintiffs alleged that SolarWinds, Inc. and certain of its officers and/or directors violated the securities laws by “issu[ing] materially false and misleading statements regarding [SolarWinds, Inc.’s] operations and its business and financial results and outlook” and therefore “misled investors by misrepresenting and failing to disclose material problems with … sales to the United States federal government . . .[and] problems with [its] sales management team.”

On May 12, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissed this lawsuit without prejudice after the Plaintiffs made a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case. Therefore, this lawsuit is no longer pending.

 

25


Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Period

   Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
(1)
     Average
Price
Paid
Per
Share
     Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
     Approximate
Dollar
Value of
Shares
That May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
 

April 1-30, 2011

     —         $ —           —         $ —     

May 1-31, 2011

     111         23.57         —           —     

June 1-30, 2011

     —           —           —           —     

 

(1) Represents shares of our common stock withheld by us to satisfy employee withholding obligations due from equity awards issued pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit

Number

   
    2.1(1)   Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among SolarWinds, Inc., Timber Acquisition Corp., TriGeo Network Security, Inc., the Shareholders and Michelle Dickman, individually and in her capacity as Representative, dated as of June 20, 2011
    3.1(2)   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as currently in effect
    3.2(3)   Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect
    4.1(3)   Specimen certificate for shares of common stock
  31.1*   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  31.2*   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32.1**   Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS**   XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

26


Table of Contents
101.CAL**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

(1) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2011.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-162661) filed on October 26, 2009.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-149851), originally filed on March 21, 2008 and subsequently amended.
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.

 

27


Table of Contents

SOLARWINDS, INC.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  SOLARWINDS, INC.
Dated: August 5, 2011   By:   /S/    MICHAEL J. BERRY          
     
    Michael J. Berry
   

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(on behalf of the Registrant and as principal financial officer)

 

28


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit

Number

   

    2.1(1)

  Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among SolarWinds, Inc., Timber Acquisition Corp., TriGeo Network Security, Inc., the Shareholders and Michelle Dickman, individually and in her capacity as Representative, dated as of June 20, 2011

    3.1(2)

  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as currently in effect

    3.2(3)

  Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect

    4.1(3)

  Specimen certificate for shares of common stock

  31.1*

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

  31.2*

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

  32.1**

  Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS**

  XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**

  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**

  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB**

  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**

  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

(1) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2011.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-162661) filed on October 26, 2009.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-149851), originally filed on March 21, 2008 and subsequently amended.
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.

 

29