Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - PLEXUS CORPc65694exv32w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - PLEXUS CORPc65694exv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - PLEXUS CORPc65694exv31w2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - PLEXUS CORPc65694exv32w1.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - PLEXUS CORPFinancial_Report.xls
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
(X)   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2011
or
     
(  )   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number 001-14423
PLEXUS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
         
 
  Wisconsin   39-1344447 
 
  (State of Incorporation)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
One Plexus Way
Neenah, Wisconsin 54956
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Telephone Number (920) 722-3451
(Registrant’s telephone number, including Area Code)
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
     
Yes  ü     No       
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
     
Yes  ü     No       
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
     
Large accelerated filer  ü  
  Accelerated filer       
 
Non-accelerated filer        
  Smaller reporting company        
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
   
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
     
Yes          No  ü  
          As of July 29, 2011, there were 35,432,308 shares of Common Stock of the Company outstanding.

1


 

PLEXUS CORP.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
July 2, 2011
                 
PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION     3  
 
               
 
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS     3  
 
               
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income     3  
 
               
 
      Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets     4  
 
               
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     5  
 
               
 
      Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements     6  
 
               
 
ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS     18  
 
               
 
      “Safe Harbor” Cautionary Statement     18  
 
               
 
      Overview     19  
 
               
 
      Executive Summary     20  
 
               
 
      Results of Operations     21  
 
               
 
      Reportable Segments     24  
 
               
 
      Liquidity and Capital Resources     25  
 
               
 
      Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Obligations     28  
 
               
 
      Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies     28  
 
               
 
      New Accounting Pronouncements     28  
 
               
 
ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK     29  
 
               
 
ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES     30  
 
               
PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION     31  
 
               
 
ITEM 1.   Legal Proceedings     31  
 
               
 
ITEM 1A.   Risk Factors     31  
 
               
 
ITEM 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds     32  
 
               
 
ITEM 6.   Exhibits     32  
 
               
SIGNATURES     34  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PLEXUS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
Unaudited
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
 
                               
Net sales
  $ 559,183     $ 536,384     $ 1,693,102     $ 1,457,761  
Cost of sales
    505,109       480,836       1,528,648       1,307,201  
 
                               
 
                               
Gross profit
    54,074       55,548       164,454       150,560  
 
                               
Selling and administrative expenses
    29,189       28,516       85,310       79,918  
 
                               
 
                               
Operating income
    24,885       27,032       79,144       70,642  
 
                               
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest expense
    (3,301 )     (2,359 )     (7,564 )     (7,336 )
Interest income
    388       320       954       1,143  
Miscellaneous
    750       (128 )     593       (239 )
 
                               
 
                               
Income before income taxes
    22,722       24,865       73,127       64,210  
 
                               
Income tax expense
    682       497       2,194       1,284  
 
                               
 
                               
Net income
  $ 22,040     $ 24,368     $ 70,933     $ 62,926  
 
                               
 
                               
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.60     $ 0.60     $ 1.81     $ 1.58  
 
                               
Diluted
  $ 0.58     $ 0.59     $ 1.78     $ 1.54  
 
                               
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    37,021       40,337       39,135       39,935  
 
                               
Diluted
    37,860       41,208       39,923       40,753  
 
                               
 
                               
Comprehensive income:
                               
Net income
  $ 22,040     $ 24,368     $ 70,933     $ 62,926  
Derivative instrument fair market value adjustment – net of income tax
    818       (573 )     3,265       1,353  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    281       30       2,651       (1,136 )
 
                               
Comprehensive income
  $ 23,139     $ 23,825     $ 76,849     $ 63,143  
 
                               
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

PLEXUS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Unaudited
                 
    July 2,   October 2,
    2011   2010
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 208,729     $ 188,244  
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,353 and $1,400, respectively
    301,213       311,205  
Inventories
    484,041       492,430  
Deferred income taxes
    22,054       18,959  
Prepaid expenses and other
    19,965       15,153  
 
               
 
               
Total current assets
    1,036,002       1,025,991  
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
    247,785       235,714  
Deferred income taxes
    10,158       11,787  
Other
    18,587       16,887  
 
               
 
               
Total assets
  $ 1,312,532     $ 1,290,379  
 
               
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
  $ 17,191     $ 17,409  
Accounts payable
    307,864       360,686  
Customer deposits
    32,542       27,301  
Accrued liabilities:
               
Salaries and wages
    37,290       46,639  
Other
    48,602       50,484  
 
               
 
               
Total current liabilities
    443,489       502,519  
 
               
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion
    274,677       112,466  
Other liabilities
    21,709       23,539  
 
               
 
               
Total non-current liabilities
    296,386       136,005  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
    -       -  
 
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding
    -       -  
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 48,278 and 47,849 shares issued, respectively, and 35,549 and 40,403 shares outstanding, respectively
    483       478  
Additional paid-in capital
    413,405       399,054  
Common stock held in treasury, at cost, 12,729 and 7,446 shares, respectively
    (370,513 )     (200,110 )
Retained earnings
    516,501       445,568  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    12,781       6,865  
 
               
 
               
Total shareholders’ equity
    572,657       651,855  
 
               
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,312,532     $ 1,290,379  
 
               
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

PLEXUS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Unaudited
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010
Cash flows from operating activities
               
Net income
  $ 70,933     $ 62,926  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    34,420       29,206  
Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment
    40       (215 )
Deferred income taxes
    1,646       (7,275 )
Stock based compensation expense
    8,218       7,104  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    11,472       (81,713 )
Inventories
    10,182       (146,869 )
Prepaid expenses and other
    (6,467 )     (4,784 )
Accounts payable
    (55,471 )     80,203  
Customer deposits
    5,117       1,561  
Accrued liabilities and other
    (12,889 )     33,095  
 
               
 
               
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
    67,201       (26,761 )
 
               
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Payments for property, plant and equipment
    (47,391 )     (47,332 )
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
    2,080       231  
 
               
 
               
Cash flows used in investing activities
    (45,311 )     (47,101 )
 
               
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Proceeds from debt issuance
    175,000       -  
Payments on debt and capital lease obligations
    (13,142 )     (16,704 )
Purchases of common stock
    (170,403 )     -  
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    4,899       20,815  
Income tax benefit of stock option exercises
    1,239       2,111  
 
               
 
               
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
    (2,407 )     6,222  
 
               
 
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    1,002       (539 )
 
               
 
               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    20,485       (68,179 )
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents:
               
Beginning of period
    188,244       258,382  
 
               
End of period
  $ 208,729     $ 190,203  
 
               
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

PLEXUS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 2011 AND JULY 3, 2010
Unaudited
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
               The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Plexus Corp. and its subsidiaries (“Plexus” or the “Company”) without audit and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of the consolidated financial position of the Company as of July 2, 2011, and the results of operations for the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, and the cash flows for the same nine month periods.
               Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the SEC’s rules and regulations dealing with interim financial statements. However, the Company believes that the disclosures made in the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
               The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. The Company also uses a “4-4-5” weekly accounting system for the interim periods in each quarter. Each quarter therefore ends on a Saturday at the end of the 4-4-5 period. Periodically, an additional week must be added to the fiscal year to re-align with the Saturday closest to September 30. The accounting periods for the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 each included 91 days and 273 days, respectively.
               In the fiscal first quarter of 2011, as previously announced, we completed our migration to a regional reporting structure. This change included establishing regional targets for various financial metrics, delegating additional authority to the regions to manage their business, and changing our related internal reporting. Given this change to regional reporting and management, as well as in the information used by management for assessing performance and allocating Company resources, we modified our reporting segments. Prior to fiscal 2011, the Company’s reportable segments consisted of the United States, Asia, Europe and Mexico. During the fiscal first quarter of 2011, we combined our United States and Mexico segments into the “Americas” (AMER) segment and renamed our Asia segment “Asia Pacific” (APAC) and our Europe segment “Europe, Middle East and Africa” (EMEA) to better represent our long-range regional focus. As a result, we have conformed all prior period segment presentations to be consistent with our current reportable segments. See Note 10 - Business Segment, Geographic and Major Customer Information for further information.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
               Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
               The Company holds financial instruments consisting of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, debt, and capital lease obligations. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and capital lease obligations as reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements approximate fair value. Accounts receivable were reflected at net realizable value based on anticipated losses due to potentially uncollectible balances. Anticipated losses were based on management’s analysis of historical losses and changes in customers’ credit status. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was $302.4 million and $105.2 million as of July 2, 2011 and October 2, 2010, respectively. The carrying value of the

6


Table of Contents

Company’s long-term debt was $276.3 million and $112.5 million as of July 2, 2011 and October 2, 2010, respectively. The Company uses quoted market prices when available or discounted cash flows to calculate the fair value of its term loan debt.
               Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (or exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. The input levels are:
               Level 1: Quoted (observable) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
               Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
               Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the asset or liability.
NOTE 2 - INVENTORIES
               Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. The stated cost is comprised of direct materials, labor, and overhead. The major classes of inventories, net of applicable lower of cost or market write-downs, were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    July 2,   October 2,
    2011   2010
Raw materials
  $ 356,122     $ 365,883  
Work-in-process
    42,578       56,036  
Finished goods
    85,341       70,511  
 
               
 
  $ 484,041     $ 492,430  
 
               
               Per contractual terms, customer deposits are received by the Company to offset obsolete and excess inventory risks. The total amount of customer deposits related to inventory and included within current liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 2, 2011 and October 2, 2010 was $31.2 million and $25.8 million, respectively.
NOTE 3 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
               Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following categories (in thousands):
                 
    July 2,   October 2,
    2011   2010
Land, buildings and improvements
  156,276     138,230  
Machinery and equipment
    271,569       255,138  
Computer hardware and software
    82,902       79,108  
Construction in progress
    24,281       22,145  
 
               
 
    535,028       494,621  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (287,243 )     (258,907 )
 
               
 
  247,785     235,714  
 
               
NOTE 4 - LONG-TERM DEBT
               On April 4, 2008, the Company entered into its credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of banks which allows the Company to borrow $150 million in term loans and $100 million in revolving loans. The $150 million in term loans was immediately funded and the $100 million revolving credit facility is currently available. The Credit Facility is unsecured and the revolving credit facility may be increased by an additional $100

7


Table of Contents

million (the “accordion feature”) if the Company has not previously terminated all or any portion of the Credit Facility, there is no event of default existing under the Credit Facility and both the Company and the administrative agent consent to the increase. The Credit Facility expires on April 4, 2013. Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be either through term loans or revolving or swing loans or letter of credit obligations. As of July 2, 2011, the Company has term loan borrowings of $101.3 million outstanding and no revolving borrowings under the Credit Facility.
               The Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants, which include a maximum total leverage ratio, maximum value of fixed rentals and operating lease obligations, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a minimum net worth test, all as defined in the agreement. As of July 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. If the Company incurs an event of default, as defined in the Credit Facility (including any failure to comply with a financial covenant), the group of banks has the right to terminate the remaining Credit Facility and all other obligations, and demand immediate repayment of all outstanding sums (principal and accrued interest). The interest rate on the borrowing varies depending upon the Company’s then-current total leverage ratio; as of July 2, 2011, the Company could elect to pay interest at a defined base rate or the LIBOR rate plus 1.50%. Rates would increase upon negative changes in specified Company financial metrics and would decrease upon reduction in the current total leverage ratio to no less than LIBOR plus 1.00%. The Company is also required to pay an annual commitment fee on the unused credit commitment based on its leverage ratio; the current fee is 0.375%. Unless the accordion feature is exercised, this fee applies only to the initial $100 million of availability (excluding the $150 million of term borrowings). Origination fees and expenses associated with the Credit Facility totaled approximately $1.3 million and have been deferred. These origination fees and expenses are being amortized over the five-year term of the Credit Facility. Equal quarterly principal repayments of the term loan of $3.75 million per quarter began on June 30, 2008 and end on April 4, 2013, with a balloon repayment of $75.0 million.
               The Credit Facility allows for the future payment of cash dividends or the future repurchases of shares provided that no event of default (including any failure to comply with a financial covenant) is existing at the time of, or would be caused by, a dividend payment or a share repurchase.
               On April 21, 2011, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain institutional investors related to $175 million in principal amount of 5.20% Senior Notes, due on June 15, 2018 (the “Notes”). The Company issued $100 million in principal amount of the Notes on April 21, 2011, and the remaining $75 million on June 15, 2011. The Agreement includes operational and financial covenants which include a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens and dispositions, all as defined in the Agreement. As of July 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. The Notes are unsecured and rank at least equally and ratably in point and security with the other unsecured and unsubordinated financing facilities of the Company. Our effective interest rate on the Notes after the treasury rate lock agreement discussed in Note 5 – Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements is 4.97%. Origination fees and expenses associated with the Agreement totaled approximately $0.9 million and have been deferred. These origination fees and expenses are being amortized over the seven-year term of the Notes. Semi-annual interest payments began on June 15, 2011 and end on June 15, 2018 with full repayment of the total principal of the Notes.
               Interest expense related to the commitment fee and amortization of deferred origination fees and expenses for the Credit Facility and Agreement totaled approximately $0.2 million for both the three months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, and $0.5 million for both the nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010.
NOTE 5 - DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
               All derivatives are recognized in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at their estimated fair values. On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as a hedge of a recognized asset or liability (a “fair value” hedge), a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a “cash flow” hedge), or a hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation. The Company currently has cash flow hedges related to variable rate debt and forecasted foreign currency payments. The Company does not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until earnings are affected by the variability of the cash flows.

8


Table of Contents

               During the fiscal second quarter of 2011, the Company entered into forward exchange contracts to fix the exchange rates on foreign currency cash used to pay for capital expenditures related to the construction of our fourth facility in Malaysia. Changes in the fair value of the forward contracts are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. As of July 2, 2011, the total notional value of the forward contracts was $8.4 million and the total fair value of these forward contracts was $0.2 million.
               During the fiscal second quarter of 2011, the Company entered into two separate treasury rate lock contracts to hedge the variability of the fixed interest rate on the then forecasted issuance of $175 million of fixed rate debt using a treasury lock transaction. The fixed interest rates for each of these contracts were 2.77% and 2.72%, respectively, with a notional value of $150 million. On April 4, 2011, the Company entered into a final treasury rate lock transaction for the remaining $25 million of exposure at a rate of 2.88%. On April 8, 2011, when the fixed interest rate for the debt issuance was determined, all three treasury rate lock contracts were settled and the Company received proceeds of $2.3 million, which will be amortized over the seven year term of the related debt.
               In June 2008, the Company entered into three interest rate swap contracts related to the $150 million in term loans under the Credit Facility that had an initial total notional value of $150 million and mature on April 4, 2013. These interest rate swap contracts will pay the Company variable interest at the three month LIBOR rate, and the Company will pay the counterparties a fixed interest rate. The fixed interest rates for each of these contracts are 4.415%, 4.490% and 4.435%, respectively. These interest rate swap contracts were entered into to convert $150 million of the variable rate term loan under the Credit Facility into fixed rate debt. Based on the terms of the interest rate swap contracts and the underlying debt, these interest rate contracts were determined to be effective, and thus qualify as a cash flow hedge. As such, any changes in the fair value of these interest rate swaps are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. The total fair value of these interest rate swap contracts was $6.2 million as of July 2, 2011. As of July 2, 2011, the total remaining combined notional amount of the Company’s three interest rate swaps was $101.3 million.
               The Company’s Malaysian operations have entered into forward exchange contracts on a rolling basis with a total notional value of $50.0 million as of July 2, 2011. These forward contracts will fix the exchange rates on foreign currency cash used to pay a portion of local currency expenses. Changes in the fair value of the forward contracts are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. The total fair value of these forward contracts was $1.6 million as of July 2, 2011.
               The tables below present information regarding the fair values of derivative instruments (as defined in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies) and the effects of derivative instruments on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
                                                                           
 
  Fair Values of Derivative Instruments  
  In thousands of dollars  
        Asset Derivatives               Liability Derivatives  
                  July 2,     October 2,                         July 2,     October 2,  
                  2011     2010                         2011     2010  
 
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments
    Balance Sheet Location     Fair Value     Fair Value               Balance
Sheet
Location
    Fair Value     Fair Value  
 
Interest rate swaps
                -         -                 Current liabilities
– Other
    $ 3,516       $ 3,616    
 
Interest rate swaps
                -         -                 Other liabilities     $ 2,637       $ 5,423    
 
Forward contracts
    Prepaid expenses
and other
    $ 1,550       $ 2,612                             -         -    
 
Forward contracts
    Prepaid expenses
and other
    $ 196         -                             -         -    
 

9


Table of Contents

     
                                                                                                                   
 
     
  The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations  
  for the Three Months Ended  
 
In thousands of dollars
 
                                                                                                 
                  Amount of Gain or                                                       Location of Gain or (Loss)     Amount of Gain or (Loss)  
                  (Loss) Recognized in                                                       Recognized in Income on     Recognized in Income on  
                  Other Comprehensive               Location of Gain or (Loss)     Amount of Gain or (Loss)               Derivative (Ineffective     Derivative (Ineffective  
  Derivatives in Cash               Income (“OCI”) on               Reclassified from     Reclassified from               Portion and Amount     Portion and Amount  
  Flow Hedging               Derivative (Effective               Accumulated OCI into     Accumulated OCI into               Excluded from     Excluded from  
  Relationships               Portion)               Income (Effective Portion)     Income (Effective Portion)               Effectiveness Testing)     Effectiveness Testing)  
                  July 2,     July 3,                         July 2,     July 3,                         July 2,     July 3,  
                  2011     2010                         2011     2010                         2011     2010  
 
 
                                                                                                       
 
Interest rate swaps
              $ (676 )     (1,817 )               Interest income (expense)     $ (1,085 )     (1,160 )               Other income (expense)     $ -       $ -    
 
Forward contracts
              $ 695       $ 579                 Selling and administrative expenses     $ 953       749                 Other income (expense)     $ -       $ -    
 
Treasury rate locks
              $ 869       $ -                 Interest income (expense)     $ 43       -                 Other income (expense)     $ -       $ -    
 
 
                               
 
   
 
   
 
                               
 
     
  The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations  
  for the Nine Months Ended  
 
In thousands of dollars
 
                                                                                                 
                  Amount of Gain or                                                       Location of Gain or (Loss)     Amount of Gain or (Loss)  
                  (Loss) Recognized in                                                       Recognized in Income on     Recognized in Income on  
                  Other Comprehensive               Location of Gain or (Loss)     Amount of Gain or (Loss)               Derivative (Ineffective     Derivative (Ineffective  
  Derivatives in Cash               Income (“OCI”) on               Reclassified from     Reclassified from               Portion and Amount     Portion and Amount  
  Flow Hedging               Derivative (Effective               Accumulated OCI into     Accumulated OCI into               Excluded from     Excluded from  
  Relationships               Portion)               Income (Effective Portion)     Income (Effective Portion)               Effectiveness Testing)     Effectiveness Testing)  
                  July 2,     July 3,                         July 2,     July 3,                         July 2,     July 3,  
                  2011     2010                         2011     2010                         2011     2010  
 
 
                                                                                                       
 
Interest rate swaps
              $ (420 )     (3,160 )               Interest income (expense)     $ (3,306 )     (3,715 )               Other income (expense)     $ -       $ -    
 
Forward contracts
              $ 2,108       $ 2,447                 Selling and administrative expenses     $ 2,848       1,150                 Other income (expense)     $ -       $ -    
 
Treasury rate locks
              $ 2,281       $ -                 Interest income (expense)     $ 43       -                 Other income (expense)     $ -       $ -    
 

10


Table of Contents

               The following table lists the fair values of the Company’s derivatives as of July 2, 2011, by input level as defined in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies:
                                             
 
       
Fair Value Measurements Using Input Levels:
 
        (in thousands)

 
        Level 1

    Level 2

    Level 3

    Total

 
 
Derivatives
                                         
 
 
                                         
 
 
                                         
 
Interest rate swaps
  $   -     $   6,153     $   -       $ 6,153    
 
 
                                         
 
 
                                         
 
Foreign currency forward contracts
  $   -     $   1,746     $   -       $ 1,746    
 
 
                                         
 
               The fair value of interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts is determined using a market approach which includes obtaining directly or indirectly observable values from third parties active in the relevant markets. The primary input in the fair value of the interest rate swaps is the relevant LIBOR forward curve. Inputs in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts include prevailing forward and spot prices for currency and interest rate forward curves.
NOTE 6 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
               The following is a reconciliation of the amounts utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
 
                               
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:
                               
Net income
  22,040     24,368     70,933     62,926  
 
                               
 
                               
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
    37,021       40,337       39,135       39,935  
Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding
    839       871       788       818  
 
                               
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    37,860       41,208       39,923       40,753  
 
                               
 
                               
Earnings per share:
                               
Basic
  0.60     0.60     1.81     1.58  
 
                               
Diluted
  0.58     0.59     1.78     1.54  
 
                               
               For the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011, stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) related to approximately 1.1 million and 1.2 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ and stock-settled SARs’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common shares and, therefore, their effect would be antidilutive.
               For the three and nine months ended July 3, 2010, stock options and stock-settled SARs related to approximately 0.8 million and 1.1 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the

11


Table of Contents

computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ and stock-settled SARs’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common shares and, therefore, their effect would be antidilutive.
NOTE 7 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
               The Company recognized $2.7 million and $8.2 million of compensation expense associated with stock-based awards for the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011, respectively, and $2.4 million and $7.1 million for the three and nine months ended July 3, 2010, respectively.
               The Company continues to use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of stock options and stock-settled SARs. The Company uses the fair value at the date of grant to value restricted stock units and unrestricted stock awards. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the stock-based awards’ vesting period.
NOTE 8 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               On February 16, 2011, as previously announced, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $200 million of common stock. As of July 2, 2011, the Company repurchased 5.3 million shares for approximately $170.4 million, at a weighted average price of $32.24 per share. These shares were recorded as treasury stock. As of July 2, 2011, the Company had a commitment of approximately $4.6 million related to the purchase of 0.1 million shares, which were purchased before July 2, 2011, but settled after the end of the fiscal third quarter.
NOTE 9 - INCOME TAXES
               Income tax expense for the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 was $0.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The effective tax rates for both the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 were 3 percent. As demonstrated in recent quarters, the Company’s tax rate can vary during the year based on the mix of forecasted earnings by tax jurisdiction. The Company currently benefits from reduced taxes in the Asia Pacific segment due to tax holidays.
               Income tax expense for the three and nine months ended July 3, 2010 was $0.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The effective tax rates for both the three and nine months ended July 3, 2010 were 2 percent.
               As of July 2, 2011, there was no material change in the amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The amount of interest and penalties recorded for both the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 was not material.
               It is reasonably possible that a number of uncertain tax positions related to federal and state tax positions may be settled within the next 12 months. Settlement of these matters is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
               The Company maintains valuation allowances when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Despite recent losses in the United States tax jurisdiction, the Company has concluded that it continues to be more likely than not that the net U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized, and no valuation allowance is currently warranted. Our net deferred tax assets as of July 2, 2011, reflect a $1.6 million valuation allowance against certain state deferred income taxes and a remaining valuation allowance of $1.0 million related to state tax deductions associated with stock-based compensation. If the United States operations continue to generate taxable losses, there may be a need to provide an additional valuation allowance on our net United States deferred tax assets.

12


Table of Contents

NOTE 10 - BUSINESS SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND MAJOR CUSTOMER INFORMATION
               Reportable segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in assessing performance and allocating resources.
               In the fiscal first quarter of 2011, we completed our migration to a regional reporting structure, and as a result, modified our reportable segments. See Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies for further information.
               The Company uses an internal management reporting system, which provides important financial data to evaluate performance and allocate the Company’s resources on a regional basis. Net sales for segments are attributed to the region in which the product is manufactured or service is performed. The services provided, manufacturing processes used, class of customers serviced and order fulfillment processes used are similar and generally interchangeable across the segments. A segment’s performance is evaluated based upon its operating income (loss). A segment’s operating income (loss) includes its net sales less cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses, but excludes corporate and other costs, interest expense, other income (loss), and income taxes. Corporate and other costs primarily represent corporate selling and administrative expenses, and restructuring and impairment costs, if any. These costs are not allocated to the segments, as management excludes such costs when assessing the performance of the segments. Inter-segment transactions are generally recorded at amounts that approximate arm’s length transactions. The accounting policies for the regions are the same as for the Company taken as a whole.
               Information about the Company’s three reportable segments for the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
Net sales:
                               
AMER
  305,448     321,932     981,895     907,619  
APAC
    280,126       251,497       818,509       673,368  
EMEA
    24,423       18,503       68,818       51,070  
Elimination of inter-segment sales
    (50,814 )     (55,548 )     (176,120 )     (174,296 )
 
                               
 
  559,183     536,384     1,693,102     1,457,761  
 
                               
 
                               
Depreciation:
                               
AMER
  3,781     3,508     11,283     10,046  
APAC
    5,304       4,823       15,736       13,489  
EMEA
    836       468       2,068       1,443  
Corporate
    1,773       1,596       5,333       4,228  
 
                               
 
  11,694     10,395     34,420     29,206  
 
                               
 
                               
Operating income (loss):
                               
AMER
  15,278     18,699     52,777     55,235  
APAC
    30,593       31,509       92,855       83,897  
EMEA
    (1,031 )     41       (1,237 )     (829 )
Corporate and other costs
    (19,955 )     (23,217 )     (65,251 )     (67,661 )
 
                               
 
  24,885     27,032     79,144     70,642  
 
                               

13


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
Capital expenditures:
                               
AMER
  2,452     6,898     10,712     13,510  
APAC
    12,620       2,732       27,661       19,380  
EMEA
    3,734       560       6,719       906  
Corporate
    399       5,707       2,299       13,536  
 
                               
 
  19,205     15,897     47,391     47,332  
 
                               
 
   
    July 2,   October 2,
    2011   2010
Total assets:
               
AMER
  452,984     $   495,639  
APAC
    620,660       539,543  
EMEA
    86,028       84,786  
Corporate
    152,860       170,411  
 
               
 
  1,312,532     $   1,290,379  
 
               
               The following enterprise-wide information is provided in accordance with the required segment disclosures. Net sales to unaffiliated customers were based on the Company’s location providing product or services (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
Net sales:
                               
United States
  279,468     296,796     898,688     837,257  
Malaysia
    220,687       212,777       649,288       584,136  
China
    59,439       38,720       169,221       89,232  
United Kingdom
    19,825       18,225       59,307       50,368  
Mexico
    25,980       25,136       83,207       70,362  
Romania
    4,598       278       9,511       702  
Elimination of inter-segment sales
    (50,814 )     (55,548 )     (176,120 )     (174,296 )
 
                               
 
  559,183     536,384     1,693,102     1,457,761  
 
                               
 
    July 2,   October 2,
    2011   2010
Long-lived assets:
               
United States
  56,402     59,233  
Malaysia
    93,011       86,387  
China
    28,214       21,920  
United Kingdom
    10,333       7,248  
Mexico
    9,876       8,655  
Romania
    6,702       4,484  
Corporate
    43,247       47,787  
 
               
 
  247,785     235,714  
 
               
               Long-lived assets as of both July 2, 2011 and October 2, 2010, exclude other long-term assets totaling $28.7 million.

14


Table of Contents

               The percentages of net sales to customers representing 10 percent or more of total net sales for the indicated periods were as follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”)
  17%   16%   17%   16%
               No other customers accounted for 10 percent or more of net sales in any of the indicated periods.
NOTE 11 - GUARANTEES
               The Company offers certain indemnifications under its customer manufacturing agreements. In the normal course of business, the Company may from time to time be obligated to indemnify its customers or its customers’ customers against damages or liabilities arising out of the Company’s negligence, misconduct, breach of contract, or infringement of third party intellectual property rights. Certain agreements have extended broader indemnification, and while most agreements have contractual limits, some do not. However, the Company generally does not provide for such indemnities and seeks indemnification from its customers for damages or liabilities arising out of the Company’s adherence to customers’ specifications or designs or use of materials furnished, or directed to be used, by its customers. The Company does not believe its obligations under such indemnities are material.
               In the normal course of business, the Company also provides its customers a limited warranty covering workmanship, and in some cases materials, on products manufactured by the Company. Such warranty generally provides that products will be free from defects in the Company’s workmanship and meet mutually agreed-upon specifications for periods generally ranging from 12 months to 24 months. If a product fails to comply with the Company’s limited warranty, the Company’s obligation is generally limited to correcting, at its expense, any defect by repairing or replacing such defective product. The Company’s warranty generally excludes defects resulting from faulty customer-supplied components, design defects or damage caused by any party or cause other than the Company.
               The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its limited warranty at the time product revenue is recognized and establishes additional reserves for specifically identified product issues. These costs primarily include labor and materials, as necessary, associated with repair or replacement and are included in the Company’s accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in other current accrued liabilities. The primary factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the value and the number of shipped units and historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.
               Below is a table summarizing the activity related to the Company’s limited warranty liability for fiscal 2010 and for the nine months ended July 2, 2011 (in thousands):
         
Limited warranty liability, as of October 3, 2009
  $ 4,470  
Accruals for warranties issued during the period
    557  
Settlements (in cash or in kind) during the period
    (972 )
 
     
Limited warranty liability, as of October 2, 2010
    4,055  
Accruals for warranties issued during the period
    864  
Settlements (in cash or in kind) during the period
    (316 )
 
     
Limited warranty liability, as of July 2, 2011
  $ 4,603  
 
     
NOTE 12 - LITIGATION
               In the fiscal fourth quarter of 2010, the Company determined it would incur up to approximately $1.1 million relating to non-conforming inventory received from a supplier. The Company reached a settlement with the supplier during the fiscal first quarter of 2011 for $0.9 million, which has been received and recorded in selling and administrative expenses in the nine months ended July 2, 2011.

15


Table of Contents

               In the fiscal first quarter of 2010, the Company received settlement funds of approximately $3.2 million related to a court case in which the Company was a plaintiff. The settlement related to prior purchases of inventory and therefore was recorded in cost of sales.
               The Company is party to certain other lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 13 - CONTINGENCIES
               We were notified in April 2009 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) of its intention to conduct a customary Focused Assessment of our import activities during fiscal 2008 and of our processes and procedures to comply with U.S. Customs laws and regulations. We recorded an accrual in Other Accrued current liabilities at the time the amount became estimable and probable, which was not material to the financial statements. During September 2010, the Company reported errors relating to import trade activity from July 2004 to the date of Plexus’ report. The Company is currently awaiting final determination of CBP duties and fees. Plexus has agreed that it will implement improved processes and procedures and review these corrective measures with CBP. At this time, we do not believe that any deficiencies in processes or controls or unanticipated costs, unpaid duties or penalties associated with this matter will have a material adverse effect on Plexus or the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 14 - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
               In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to comprehensive income guidance, which eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and its components in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The Company can elect to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. Under the two-statement approach, the first statement would include components of net income, and the second statement would include components of OCI. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not anticipated to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
               In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”). The amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. To improve consistency in application across jurisdictions some changes in wording are necessary to ensure that U.S. GAAP and IFRS fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are described in the same way. The amendment also provides for additional accounting guidance and disclosures related to fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not anticipated to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
               In October 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, replaces the term “fair value” in the revenue allocation guidance with “selling price,” eliminates the residual method of allocation by requiring that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method and requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a stand-alone basis. The Company adopted this guidance beginning October 3, 2010, and the adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
               In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) removes the exception from applying the consolidation guidance within this amendment. This amendment requires an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate a VIE. The amendment also requires an enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a

16


Table of Contents

VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement with VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that involvement, as well as how its involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprise’s financial statements. Finally, an enterprise will be required to disclose significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to consolidate a VIE. The Company adopted this amendment beginning October 3, 2010, and the adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

17


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.          MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
“SAFE HARBOR” CAUTIONARY STATEMENT:
               The statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts (such as statements in the future tense and statements including “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “target” and similar terms and concepts), including all discussions of periods which are not yet completed, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to:
    the risk of customer delays, changes, cancellations or forecast inaccuracies in both ongoing and new programs
 
    the poor visibility of future orders, particularly in view of current economic conditions
 
    the economic performance of the industries, sectors and customers we serve
 
    the effects of the volume of revenue from certain sectors or programs on our margins in particular periods
 
    our ability to secure new customers, maintain our current customer base and deliver product on a timely basis
 
    the risk that our revenue and/or profits associated with customers who are acquired by third parties will be negatively affected
 
    the particular risks relative to new customers, including our arrangements with The Coca-Cola Company, which risks include customer and other delays, start-up costs, potential inability to execute, the establishment of appropriate terms of agreements and the lack of a track record of order volume and timing
 
    the risks of concentration of work for certain customers
 
    our ability to successfully manage a complex business model characterized by high customer and product mix, low volumes and demanding quality, regulatory and other requirements
 
    the risk that new program wins and/or customer demand may not result in the expected revenue or profitability
 
    the fact that customer orders may not lead to long-term relationships
 
    the effects of the current constrained supply environment, which has led and may continue to lead to periods of shortages and delays in obtaining components based on the lack of capacity at some of our suppliers to meet increased demand, or which may cause customers to increase forecasts and orders to secure raw material supply or result in our inability to secure raw materials required to complete product assemblies
 
    raw materials and component cost fluctuations particularly due to sudden increases in customer demand
 
    the risks associated with excess and obsolete inventory, including the risk that inventory purchased on behalf of our customers may not be consumed or otherwise paid for by customers, resulting in an inventory write-off
 
    the weakness of the global economy and the continuing instability of the global financial markets and banking system, including the potential inability of our customers or suppliers to access credit facilities
 
    the effect of changes in the pricing and margins of products
 
    the effect of start-up costs of new programs and facilities, including our recent and planned expansions, such as our potential new replacement facility in Oradea, Romania, and our plans to further expand in Penang, Malaysia, Darmstadt, Germany and Xiamen, China
 
    the risk of unanticipated costs, unpaid duties and penalties related to an ongoing audit of our import compliance by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 
    possible unexpected costs and operating disruption in transitioning programs
 
    the potential effect of fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we transact business
 
    the potential effect of world or local events or other events outside our control (such as drug cartel-related violence in Mexico, changes in oil prices, terrorism, war in the Middle East, and the earthquake and tsunami in Japan)
 
    the impact of increased competition, and
 
    other risks detailed herein, as well as in our SEC filings (particularly in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010).

18


Table of Contents

OVERVIEW
               The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements included herein and the “Risk Factors” section in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010.
               Plexus Corp. and its subsidiaries (together “Plexus,” the “Company,” or “we”) participate in the Electronic Manufacturing Services (“EMS”) industry. We deliver optimized Product Realization solutions through a unique Product Realization Value Stream service model. This customer focused service model seamlessly integrates innovative product design, customized supply chain solutions, uniquely configured “focused factory” manufacturing, global end-market fulfillment and after-market services to deliver comprehensive end-to-end solutions for customers. We provide these services to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other technology companies in the wireline/networking, wireless infrastructure, medical, industrial/commercial and defense/security/aerospace market sectors. We provide advanced product development, manufacturing and testing services to our customers with a focus on the mid-to-lower-volume, higher complexity segment of the EMS market. Our customers’ products typically require exceptional production and supply-chain flexibility, necessitating an optimized demand-pull-based manufacturing and supply chain solution across an integrated global platform. Many of our customers’ products require complex configuration management and direct order fulfillment to their customers across the globe. In such cases we provide global logistics management and after-market service and repair. Our customers’ products may have stringent requirements for quality, reliability and regulatory compliance. We offer our customers the ability to outsource all phases of product realization, including product specifications; development, design and design verification; regulatory compliance support; prototyping and new product introduction; manufacturing test equipment development; materials sourcing, procurement and supply-chain management; product assembly/manufacturing, configuration and test; order fulfillment, logistics and service/repair.
               Plexus is passionate about its goal to be the best EMS company in the world at providing services for customers that have mid-to-lower-volume requirements and a higher complexity of products. We have tailored our engineering services, manufacturing operations, supply-chain management, workforce, business intelligence systems, financial goals and metrics specifically to support these types of programs. Our flexible manufacturing facilities and processes are designed to accommodate customers with multiple product-lines and configurations as well as unique quality and regulatory requirements. Each of these customers is supported by a multi-disciplinary customer team and one or more uniquely configured “focus factories” supported by a supply-chain and logistics solution specifically designed to meet the flexibility and responsiveness required to support that customer’s fulfillment requirements.
               Our go-to-market strategy is also tailored to our target market sectors and business strategy. We have business development and customer management teams that are dedicated to each of the five sectors we serve. These teams are accountable for understanding the sector participants, technology, unique quality and regulatory requirements and longer-term trends in these sectors. Further, these teams help set our strategy for growth in these sectors with a particular focus on expanding the services and value-add that we provide to our current customers while strategically targeting select new customers to add to our portfolio.
               Our financial model is aligned with our business strategy, with our primary focus to earn a return on invested capital (“ROIC”) 500 basis points in excess of our weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”). We review our internal calculation of WACC annually, and at the end of fiscal 2010 reduced our estimated WACC to 13.5%. The smaller volumes, flexibility requirements and fulfillment needs of our customers typically result in greater investments in inventory than many of our competitors, particularly those that provide EMS services for high-volume, less complex products with less stringent requirements (such as consumer electronics). In addition, our cost structure relative to these peers includes higher investments in selling and administrative costs as a percentage of sales to support our sector-based go-to-market strategy, smaller program sizes, flexibility, and complex quality and regulatory compliance requirements. By exercising discipline to generate a ROIC in excess of our WACC, our goal is to ensure that Plexus creates a value proposition for our shareholders as well as our customers.
               Our customers include both industry-leading OEMs and other technology companies that have never manufactured products internally. As a result of our focus on serving market sectors that rely on advanced electronics technology, our business is influenced by technological trends such as the level and rate of development of telecommunications infrastructure, the expansion of networks and use of the Internet. In addition, the federal

19


Table of Contents

Food and Drug Administration’s approval of new medical devices, defense procurement practices and other governmental approval and regulatory processes can affect our business. Our business has also benefited from the trend to increased outsourcing by OEMs.
               We provide most of our contract manufacturing services on a turnkey basis, which means that we procure some or all of the materials required for product assembly. We provide some services on a consignment basis, which means that the customer supplies the necessary materials, and we provide the labor and other services required for product assembly. Turnkey services require material procurement and warehousing, in addition to manufacturing, and involve greater resource investments than consignment services. Other than certain test equipment and software used for internal operations, we do not design or manufacture our own proprietary products.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
               As a consequence of the Company’s use of a “4-4-5” weekly accounting system, periodically an additional week must be added to the fiscal year to re-align with a fiscal year end at the Saturday closest to September 30. The accounting periods for the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 each included 91 days and 273 days, respectively.
               In the fiscal first quarter of 2011, as previously announced, we completed our migration to a regional reporting structure. This change included establishing regional targets for various financial metrics, delegating additional authority to the regions to manage their business, and changing our related internal reporting. Given this change to regional reporting and management, as well as in the information used by management for assessing performance and allocating Company resources, we modified our reporting segments. Prior to fiscal 2011, the Company’s reportable segments consisted of the United States, Asia, Europe and Mexico. During the fiscal first quarter of 2011, we combined our United States and Mexico segments into the “Americas” (AMER) segment and renamed our Asia segment “Asia Pacific” (APAC) and our Europe segment “Europe, Middle East and Africa” (EMEA) to better represent our long-range regional focus. As a result, we have conformed all prior period segment presentations to be consistent with our current reportable segments.
               Three months ended July 2, 2011. Net sales for the three months ended July 2, 2011, of $559.2 million increased by $22.8 million, or 4.3 percent, as compared to the three months ended July 3, 2010. The net sales increase in the current year period was driven primarily by new program wins and higher end-market demand from numerous existing customers in each of our market sectors except wireless infrastructure, as well as the addition of a new customer in the industrial/commercial sector, partially offset by the previously announced disengagement of a significant wireless infrastructure customer. Net sales to Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”), our largest customer, increased slightly as a result of improved end-market demand for the mix of Juniper products we produce.
               Gross margins were 9.7 percent for the three months ended July 2, 2011, which compared unfavorably to 10.4 percent for the three months ended July 3, 2010. The current year period included higher fixed expenses related to higher headcount to support the revenue growth as well as increased depreciation expense. Changes in customer mix also contributed to the decrease in gross margins.
               Selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended July 2, 2011 were $29.2 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 2.5 percent, over the three months ended July 3, 2010. The current year period increase was primarily related to higher personnel costs, including those related to headcount to support the higher revenue levels achieved, partially offset by lower variable incentive compensation expense.
               Net income for the three months ended July 2, 2011 decreased by $2.3 million, or 9.6 percent, to $22.0 million from the three months ended July 3, 2010, and diluted earnings per share decreased to $0.58 in the current year period from $0.59 in the prior year period. Net income decreased due to higher fixed, as well as selling and administrative expenses, primarily as a result of increased headcount to support the revenue growth. Increased interest expense related to the private placement debt issued in the fiscal third quarter, which supported the share repurchase program, also reduced net income. The effective tax rate in the current year period was 3 percent as compared to 2 percent in the prior year period due to the mix of forecasted earnings by tax jurisdiction. We currently benefit from reduced taxes in the Asia Pacific segment due to tax holidays.

20


Table of Contents

               Nine months ended July 2, 2011. Net sales for the nine months ended July 2, 2011, of $1,693.1 million increased by $235.3 million, or 16.1 percent, as compared to the nine months ended July 3, 2010 as a result of the same factors noted above for the three-month period.
               Gross margins were 9.7 percent for the nine months ended July 2, 2011, which compared unfavorably to 10.3 percent for the nine months ended July 3, 2010. The prior year period benefited from approximately $3.2 million of proceeds from a litigation settlement. Excluding the prior year settlement, the gross margin percentage in the current year period would have decreased 0.4 percent as compared to the prior year as a result of the mix of customer revenue as well as increased fixed expenses across the company related to higher headcount to support revenue growth and annual merit increases.
               Selling and administrative expenses for the nine months ended July 2, 2011 were $85.3 million, an increase of $5.4 million, or 6.8 percent, over the nine months ended July 3, 2010. The current year period increase was primarily related to higher personnel costs, including those related to increased headcount to support the higher revenue levels achieved and increased stock based compensation expense, partially offset by funds from a dispute recovery and lower variable incentive compensation expense.
               Net income for the nine months ended July 2, 2011 increased by $8.0 million, or 12.7 percent, to $70.9 million from the nine months ended July 3, 2010, and diluted earnings per share increased to $1.78 in the current year period from $1.54 in the prior year period. Net income increased due to higher sales, partially offset by increased fixed, as well as selling and administrative expenses, primarily as a result of increased headcount to support the revenue growth. The effective tax rate in the current year period was 3 percent as compared to 2 percent in the prior year period. The increase in the effective tax rate for the current year period as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to a change in mix of forecasted earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate. As demonstrated in recent quarters, the tax rate can vary during the year based on the mix of forecasted earnings by tax jurisdiction. We currently benefit from reduced taxes in the Asia Pacific segment due to tax holidays.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
               Net sales. Net sales for the indicated periods were as follows (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended   Variance   Nine Months Ended   Variance
    July 2,   July 3,   Increase/   July 2,   July 3,   Increase/
    2011   2010   (Decrease)   2011   2010   (Decrease)
 
                                                               
Net Sales
  $ 559.2     $ 536.4     $ 22.8       4.3 %   $ 1,693.1     $ 1,457.8     $ 235.3       16.1 %
               For the three months ended July 2, 2011, our net sales increase of 4.3 percent was the result of higher net sales in all market sectors except wireless infrastructure. The overall sales increase was driven by new program wins and improved end-market demand from numerous existing customers, as well as the addition of a new customer in the industrial commercial sector. Net sales to Juniper increased as a result of improved end-market demand for the mix of Juniper products we produce. The wireless infrastructure sector decreased due to the previously announced disengagement of a significant customer in that sector.
               For the nine months ended July 2, 2011, our net sales increase of 16.1 percent as compared to the prior year was the result of the same factors described above.
               Our percentages of net sales by market sector for the indicated periods were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
Industry   2011   2010   2011   2010
Wireline/Networking
    40 %     42 %     40 %     44 %
Wireless Infrastructure
    6 %     11 %     8 %     12 %
Medical
    21 %     21 %     21 %     19 %
Industrial/Commercial
    23 %     18 %     22 %     17 %
Defense/Security/Aerospace
    10 %     8 %     9 %     8 %

21


Table of Contents

               The percentages of net sales to customers representing 10 percent or more of net sales and net sales to our ten largest customers for the indicated periods were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
Juniper
    17 %     16 %     17 %     16 %
Top 10 customers
    53 %     54 %     53 %     57 %
               Net sales to our largest customers may vary from time to time depending on the size and timing of customer program commencements, terminations, delays, modifications and transitions. We remain dependent on continued sales to our significant customers, and we generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers. Customers’ forecasts can and do change as a result of changes in their end-market demand and other factors, including global economic conditions. Any material change in forecasts or orders from these major accounts, or other customers, could materially affect our results of operations. In addition, as our percentage of net sales to customers in a specific sector becomes larger relative to other sectors, we will become increasingly dependent upon the economic and business conditions affecting that sector.
               We have seen increased merger and acquisition activity that has already impacted, and may continue to impact, our customers. Specifically, two of our customers were acquired in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our production for these two customers ramped down during the first three quarters of fiscal 2011 and full disengagement of both customers is expected by the end of the fiscal year.
               Gross profit. Gross profit and gross margins for the indicated periods were as follows (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
 
   
    Three Months Ended   Variance   Nine Months Ended   Variance
    July 2,   July 3,   Increase/   July 2,   July 3,   Increase/
    2011   2010   (Decrease)   2011   2010   (Decrease)
 
                                                               
Gross Profit
  $ 54.1     $ 55.5       ($1.4 )     (2.5 %)   $ 164.5     $ 150.6     $ 13.9       9.2 %
Gross Margin
    9.7 %     10.4 %                     9.7 %     10.3 %                
               For the three months ended July 2, 2011, gross profit was impacted by the following factors:
    increased fixed expenses in the current year period due to higher headcount expenses of approximately $3.3 million to support the revenue growth as well as increased depreciation expense of approximately $1.2 million, and
 
    a change in customer mix as one significant wireless infrastructure customer disengaged during the quarter while a new program in the industrial commercial sector, which is inherently less profitable in its early stages, started to ramp up.
               For the nine months ended July 2, 2011, gross profit was impacted by the following factors:
    increased capacity utilization from higher revenue levels in the current year period, which resulted in higher gross margin
 
    partially offset by increased fixed expenses in the current year period due to higher headcount expenses of approximately $12.9 million to support the revenue growth and annual merit increases as well as increased depreciation expense of $4.2 million
 
    a $3.2 million benefit in the fiscal first quarter of 2010 from a litigation settlement, and
 
    a change in customer mix as we disengaged one significant customer, continue to ramp down another significant customer and ramp up other new programs, which are inherently less profitable in their early stages.
               Gross margins reflect a number of factors that can vary from period to period, including product and service mix, the level of new facility start-up costs, inefficiencies resulting from the transition of new programs, product life cycles, sales volumes, price reductions, overall capacity utilization, labor costs and efficiencies, the management of

22


Table of Contents

inventories, component pricing and shortages, fluctuations and timing of customer orders, changing demand for our customers’ products and competition within the electronics industry. During fiscal 2010 we experienced, and may again in the future experience, a constrained supply environment, which caused periods of parts shortages and delays for some components based on lack of capacity at some of our suppliers to meet increased demand from the gradually improving economic outlook. The March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan disrupted the global supply chain for certain components manufactured in Japan that are incorporated in the products we manufacture. While we have yet to experience a material adverse effect resulting from this event, the magnitude and duration of the impact on us relating to this event is not yet known. We continue to monitor the effect of the events in Japan on our supply chain. Shortages and delays could negatively impact net sales, inventory levels, component costs and margin. Additionally, turnkey manufacturing involves the risk of inventory management, and a change in component costs can directly impact average selling prices, gross margins and net sales. Although we focus on maintaining gross margins, there can be no assurance that gross margins will not decrease in future periods.
               Design work performed by the Company is not the proprietary property of Plexus and substantially all costs incurred with this work are considered reimbursable by our customers. We do not track research and development costs that are not reimbursed by our customers as we consider these amounts immaterial.
               Selling and administrative expenses. Selling and administrative expenses (“S&A”) for the indicated periods were as follows (dollars in millions):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended   Variance   Nine Months Ended   Variance
    July 2,   July 3,   Increase/   July 2,   July 3,   Increase/
    2011   2010   (Decrease)   2011   2010   (Decrease)
 
                                                               
S&A
  $ 29.2     $ 28.5     $ 0.7       2.5 %   $ 85.3     $ 79.9     $ 5.4       6.8 %
Percent of net sales
    5.2 %     5.3 %                     5.0 %     5.5 %                
               For the three months ended July 2, 2011, the dollar increase in S&A was due primarily to an increase in headcount and personnel related expenses of approximately $2.0 million to support the higher revenue levels achieved, partially offset by lower variable incentive compensation expense of $1.5 million. S&A as a percentage of net sales decreased during the fiscal third quarter of 2011 as a result of net revenue expanding more quickly than these costs increased.
               For the nine months ended July 2, 2011, the dollar increase in S&A was due primarily to higher headcount and personnel related expense of approximately $6.0 million to support the higher revenue levels achieved and higher stock based compensation expense of approximately $0.9 million, partially offset by lower variable incentive compensation expense of approximately $2.2 million and a dispute recovery of approximately $0.9 million. S&A as a percentage of net sales decreased during the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as a result of net revenue expanding more quickly than these costs increased.
               Income taxes. Income taxes for the indicated periods were as follows (dollars in millions):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
 
                               
Income tax expense
  $ 0.7     $ 0.5     $ 2.2     $ 1.3  
Effective annual tax rate
    3 %     2 %     3 %     2 %
               The effective tax rate for both the three months and nine months ended July 2, 2011 was 3 percent. The effective tax rates for both the three and nine months ended July 3, 2010 was 2 percent. The slight increase in the effective tax rate for the three and nine month period ended July 2, 2011 from the prior year period’s tax rate was primarily due to a change in mix of forecasted earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate. As demonstrated in past quarters, the tax rate can vary during the year based on the mix of forecasted earnings by tax jurisdiction. We

23


Table of Contents

currently benefit from reduced taxes in the Asia Pacific segment due to tax holidays; there are various terms and requirements related to these tax holidays, with which we must comply in order for them to continue.
               Our net deferred income tax assets as of July 2, 2011, reflect a $1.6 million valuation allowance against certain state deferred income taxes and a remaining valuation allowance of $1.0 million related to state tax deductions associated with stock-based compensation. If the United States operations continue to generate taxable losses, there may be a need to provide a valuation allowance on our net United States deferred tax assets.
               We currently expect the annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 to be 3 percent.
REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
               In the fiscal first quarter of 2011, we completed our migration to a regional reporting structure and as a result, made a minor change to our reportable segments. See “Executive Summary” above for further information.
               A further discussion of financial performance by reportable segment is presented below (dollars in millions):
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
 
                               
Net sales:
                               
AMER
  $ 305.5     $ 321.9     $ 981.9     $ 907.7  
APAC
    280.1       251.5       818.5       673.4  
EMEA
    24.4       18.5       68.8       51.0  
Elimination of inter-segment sales
    (50.8 )     (55.5 )     (176.1 )     (174.3 )
 
                               
 
  $ 559.2     $ 536.4     $ 1,693.1     $ 1,457.8  
 
                               
 
                               
Operating income (loss):
                               
AMER
  $ 15.3     $ 18.7     $ 52.7     $ 55.2  
APAC
    30.6       31.5       92.9       83.9  
EMEA
    (1.0 )     -       (1.2 )     (0.8 )
Corporate and other costs
    (20.0 )     (23.2 )     (65.3 )     (67.7 )
 
                               
 
  $ 24.9     $ 27.0     $ 79.1     $ 70.6  
 
                               
Americas (AMER): Net sales for the three months ended July 2, 2011 decreased $16.4 million, or 5.1 percent, due to the previously announced disengagement of a wireless infrastructure customer as well as volatile end-market demand from numerous existing customers in each of our market sectors. Net sales to our largest customer, Juniper, increased compared to the prior year period due to higher end-market demand for the mix of Juniper products we produce. Operating income for the current year period decreased as a result of the decreased sales.
Net sales for the nine months ended July 2, 2011 increased $74.2 million, or 8.2 percent, due to higher end-market demand from numerous existing customers in each of our market sectors, partially offset by soft demand from a wireless infrastructure customer as well as the disengagement of a significant wireless infrastructure customer. Net sales to our largest customer, Juniper, increased compared to the prior year period due to higher end-market demand for the mix of Juniper products we produce. Operating income for the current year period decreased slightly due to the prior year period benefitting from a $3.2 million litigation settlement.
Asia Pacific (APAC): Net sales for the three months ended July 2, 2011 increased $28.6 million, or 11.4 percent, due to a new industrial commercial customer as well as higher end-market demand from numerous existing customers across all sectors. This increase was partially offset by soft demand from a customer in

24


Table of Contents

the wireless infrastructure sector. Operating income in the current year period decreased slightly due to changes in customer mix and higher fixed expenses.
Net sales for the nine months ended July 2, 2011 increased $145.1 million, or 21.5 percent, due to higher end-market demand from numerous existing customers, primarily in our wireline/networking sector, as well as increased demand from a new customer in the industrial/commercial sector. Net sales to Juniper increased as a result of improved end-market demand for the mix of Juniper products we produce. Operating income in the current year period improved as a result of the net sales growth, offset by changes in customer mix.
Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA): Net sales for the three months ended July 2, 2011 increased $5.9 million, or 31.9 percent, due primarily to increased demand from two existing customer programs, one in the industrial/commercial sector and one in the defense/security/aerospace sector and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation. The net operating loss in the current year period was a result of increased operating costs from our Romania facility and our new engineering facility in Darmstadt, Germany.
Net sales for the nine months ended July 2, 2011 increased $17.8 million, or 34.9 percent, due primarily to increased demand from two existing customer programs in the industrial/commercial sector. Operating loss in the current year period increased $0.4 million as compared to the prior year period as a result of increased operating costs from our Romania facility and our new engineering facility in Darmstadt, Germany.
               For our significant customers, we generally manufacture product in more than one location. For example, net sales to Juniper, our largest customer, occur in the Americas and Asia Pacific segments. See Note 10 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for certain financial information regarding our reportable segments, including detail of net sales by reportable segment.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
               Operating Activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities were $67.2 million for the nine months ended July 2, 2011, as compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $26.8 million for the nine months ended July 3, 2010. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities was the result of increased earnings and improvements in working capital.
               Inventory levels increased slightly to support customer demand variability with our existing customers as compared to the prior year. Inventory turns as of July 2, 2011 were slightly higher at 4.2 as compared to turns of 4.1 as of July 3, 2010. Days in inventory changed favorably as of July 2, 2011 to 88 days as compared to 89 days in the prior year. We continue to take steps to actively manage our inventory levels down with the assistance of our customers, while continuing to meet our customers’ needs for flexibility and agility.
               The overall increase in accounts receivable was mainly due to increased revenue during the nine months ended July 2, 2011, as compared to the prior year, as well as the timing of collections. As of July 2, 2011, quarterly days sales outstanding in accounts receivable were 49 days as compared to 47 days for the prior year period, and were unfavorably impacted by fewer negotiated accelerated payments from customers.
               The decrease in accounts payable was largely the result of the timing of inventory receipts for the nine months ended July 2, 2011, as compared to the prior year.
               Investing Activities. Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $45.3 million for the nine months ended July 2, 2011, and were primarily for additions to property, plant and equipment in the Asia Pacific segment. These investments were for new equipment to support customer demand as well as investments in new facilities in Penang, Malaysia and Xiamen, China to increase capacity. See Note 10 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our capital expenditures by reportable segment.
               We utilized available cash and operating cash flows as the sources for funding our operating requirements. We currently estimate capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 to be approximately $80 million. A significant portion of

25


Table of Contents

the fiscal 2011 capital expenditures is being used for the construction of new manufacturing facilities in Penang, Malaysia and Xiamen, China, as mentioned above.
               Financing Activities. Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $2.4 million for the nine months ended July 2, 2011, as compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of $6.2 million for the nine months ended July 3, 2010. Cash flows used in the current year period represented payments for common stock related to our new share repurchase program as well as payments on our outstanding term loan, partially offset by cash proceeds from our private placement debt, described below.
               On February 16, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program that authorized us to repurchase up to $200 million of common stock. As of July 2, 2011, we have repurchased 5.3 million shares for approximately $170.4 million, at a weighted average price of $32.24 per share. These shares were recorded as treasury stock. As of July 2, 2011, we had a commitment of approximately $4.6 million related to the purchase of 0.1 million shares, which were purchased before July 2, 2011, but settled after the end of the fiscal third quarter. The remaining $25.0 million share repurchase authorization will be retained for future use based on market conditions.
               To support our new share repurchase program, we entered into a private placement of $175 million in principal amount of 5.20% Senior Notes, due June 15, 2018 (the “Notes”) during the fiscal third quarter of 2011. We issued $100 million in principal amount of the Notes on April 21, 2011, and the remaining $75 million on June 15, 2011. Origination fees and expenses associated with the private placement totaled approximately $0.9 million and have been deferred. These origination fees and expenses are being amortized over the seven-year term of the Notes. Semi-annual interest payments began on June 15, 2011 and end on June 15, 2018 with full repayment of the total principal of the Notes.
               During the fiscal second quarter of 2011, we entered into two separate treasury rate lock hedge contracts to hedge the variability of the fixed interest rate on the then forecasted issuance of $175 million of fixed rate debt using a treasury lock transaction. The fixed interest rates for each of these contracts are 2.77% and 2.72%, respectively, with a notional value of $150 million. On April 4, 2011, we entered into a final treasury rate lock hedge transaction for the remaining $25 million of exposure at a rate of 2.88%. On April 8, 2011, when the fixed interest rate for the debt issuance was determined, all three treasury rate lock contracts were settled and we received proceeds of $2.3 million, which will be amortized over the seven year term of the related debt.
               During the fiscal second quarter of 2011, we entered into forward exchange contracts to fix the exchange rates on foreign currency cash used to pay for capital expenditures related to the construction of our fourth facility in Malaysia. As of July 2, 2011, the total notional value of the forward contracts was $8.4 million and the total fair value of these forward contracts was $0.2 million.
               On April 4, 2008, we entered into our Credit Facility with a group of banks which allows us to borrow $150 million in term loans and $100 million in revolving loans. The $150 million in term loans was immediately funded and the $100 million revolving credit facility is currently available. The Credit Facility is unsecured and may be increased by an additional $100 million (the “accordion feature”) if we have not previously terminated all or any portion of the Credit Facility, there is no event of default existing under the credit agreement and both we and the administrative agent consent to the increase. The Credit Facility expires on April 4, 2013. Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be either through term loans, revolving or swing loans or letter of credit obligations. As of July 2, 2011, we had term loan borrowings of $101.3 million outstanding and no revolving borrowings under the Credit Facility.
               The Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants, which include a maximum total leverage ratio, maximum value of fixed rentals and operating lease obligations, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a minimum net worth test, all as defined in the agreement. As of July 2, 2011, we were in compliance with all debt covenants. If we incur an event of default, as defined in the Credit Facility (including any failure to comply with a financial covenant), the group of banks has the right to terminate the Credit Facility and all other obligations, and demand immediate repayment of all outstanding sums (principal and accrued interest). The interest rate on the borrowing varies depending upon our then-current total leverage ratio; as of July 2, 2011, the Company could elect to pay interest at a defined base rate or the LIBOR rate plus 1.50%. Rates would increase upon negative changes in specified Company financial metrics and would decrease upon reduction in the current total leverage ratio to no less

26


Table of Contents

than LIBOR plus 1.00%. We are also required to pay an annual commitment fee on the unused credit commitment based on our leverage ratio; the current fee is 0.375%. Unless the accordion feature is exercised, this fee applies only to the initial $100 million of availability (excluding the $150 million of term borrowings). Origination fees and expenses associated with the Credit Facility totaled approximately $1.3 million and have been deferred. These origination fees and expenses will be amortized over the five year term of the Credit Facility. Quarterly principal repayments on the term loan of $3.75 million per quarter began on June 30, 2008 and end on April 4, 2013, with a final balloon repayment of $75.0 million.
               The Credit Facility allows for the future payment of cash dividends or the future repurchases of shares provided that no event of default (including any failure to comply with a financial covenant) is existing at the time of, or would be caused by, the dividend payment or the share repurchases.
               We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not currently anticipate paying them in the future. However, we evaluate from time to time potential uses of excess cash, which in the future may include share repurchases, a special dividend or recurring dividends.
               In June 2008, the Company entered into three interest rate swap contracts related to the $150 million in term loans under the Credit Facility that had an initial notional value of $150 million and mature on April 4, 2013. The total fair value of these interest rate swap contracts was $6.2 million as of July 2, 2011. As of July 2, 2011, the total remaining combined notional amount of the Company’s three interest rate swaps was $101.3 million.
               Our Malaysian operations have entered into forward exchange contracts on a rolling basis with a total notional value of $50.0 million as of July 2, 2011. These forward contracts will fix the exchange rates on foreign currency cash used to pay a portion of our local currency expenses. The changes in the fair value of forward contracts are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. The total fair value of these forward contracts was $1.6 million at July 2, 2011.
               Based on current expectations, we believe that our projected cash flows from operations, available cash and short-term investments, the Credit Facility, our private placement debt, and our leasing capabilities should be sufficient to meet our working capital and fixed capital requirements for the next twelve months. $100 million of committed credit is currently available under the Credit Facility, with another $100 million available in an “accordion” facility, which is contingent upon compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement and lender approval. If our future financing needs increase, we may need to arrange additional debt or equity financing. Accordingly, we evaluate and consider from time to time various financing alternatives to supplement our financial resources.

27


Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET OBLIGATIONS
               Our disclosures regarding contractual obligations and commercial commitments are located in various parts of our regulatory filings. Information in the following table provides a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of July 2, 2011 (dollars in millions):
                                         
    Payments Due by Fiscal Period
            Remaining in                   2016 and
Contractual Obligations   Total   2011   2012-2013   2014-2015   thereafter
 
                               
Long-Term Debt Obligations (1,2)
  $ 346.3     $ 7.7     $ 122.3     $ 17.6     $ 198.7  
Capital Lease Obligations
    20.3       0.9       7.7       8.0       3.7  
Operating Lease Obligations
    36.6       2.4       16.8       11.2       6.2  
Purchase Obligations (3)
    354.9       232.5       121.6       0.3       0.5  
Other Long-Term Liabilities on the Balance Sheet (4)
    9.0       0.4       1.5       1.5       5.6  
Other Long-Term Liabilities not on the Balance Sheet (5)
    2.9       0.9       2.0       -       -  
 
                                       
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
  $ 770.0     $ 244.8     $ 271.9     $ 38.6     $ 214.7  
 
                                       
(1) - As of April 4, 2008, we entered into the Credit Facility and immediately funded a term loan for $150 million. The amounts listed above include interest, as we intend to hold the loan to maturity. See Note 4 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(2) As of April 21, 2011, we entered into the Note Purchase Agreement and immediately issued $100 million in principal amount and another $75 million in principal amount on June 15, 2011. The amounts listed above include interest, as we intend to hold the loan to maturity. See Note 4 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
(3) - As of July 2, 2011, purchase obligations consist of purchases of inventory and equipment in the ordinary course of business.
(4) - As of July 2, 2011, other long-term obligations on the balance sheet included deferred compensation obligations to certain of our former and current executive officers, as well as other key employees, and an asset retirement obligation. We have excluded from the table the impact, as of July 2, 2011, of approximately $6.0 million related to uncertain tax positions. The Company cannot make reliable estimates of the future cash flows by period related to this obligation.
(5) - As of July 2, 2011, other long-term obligations not on the balance sheet consisted of a commitment for salary continuation in the event employment of one executive officer of the Company is terminated without cause as well as a subsequent commitment for approximately $0.6 million related to an acquisition of land. We did not have, and were not subject to, any lines of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees, standby repurchase obligations, other off-balance sheet arrangements or other commercial commitments that are material.
DISCLOSURE ABOUT CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
               Our accounting policies are disclosed in our 2010 annual report on Form 10-K. During the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2011, there were no material changes to these policies.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
               See Note 14 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding new accounting pronouncements.

28


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.           QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
               We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign exchange and interest rates. We selectively use financial instruments to reduce such risks.
Foreign Currency Risk
               We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Our policy is to selectively hedge our foreign currency denominated transactions in a manner that partially offsets the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We typically use foreign currency contracts to hedge only those currency exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. Corresponding gains and losses on the underlying transaction generally offset the gains and losses on these foreign currency hedges. Beginning in July 2009 and continuing in the fiscal second quarter of 2011, we entered into forward contracts to hedge a portion of our foreign currency denominated transactions in our Asia Pacific reportable segment, as described in Note 5 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Our international operations create potential foreign exchange risk. Our percentages of transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar for the indicated periods were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    July 2,   July 3,   July 2,   July 3,
    2011   2010   2011   2010
Net sales
    6 %     5 %     6 %     4 %
Total costs
    15 %     13 %     14 %     13 %
               The Company has evaluated the potential foreign currency exchange rate risk on transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar for the periods presented above. Based on the Company’s overall currency exposure, as of July 2, 2011, a 10 percent change in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to our other transactional currencies would not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Interest Rate Risk
               We have financial instruments, including cash equivalents and short-term investments as well as debt, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. We consider the use of interest-rate swaps and treasury rate locks based on existing market conditions; we have entered into interest rate swaps for $101.3 million in term loans, as described in Note 5 in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. As is common with these types of agreements, our interest rate swap and treasury rate lock agreements are subject to the further risk that the counterparties to these agreements may fail to comply with their obligations thereunder.
               The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal, while maximizing yields without significantly increasing market risk. To achieve this, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of highly rated securities, money market funds and certificates of deposit and limit the amount of principal exposure to any one issuer.
               Our only material interest rate risk as of July 2, 2011, is associated with our Credit Facility under which we borrowed $150 million. Through the use of interest rate swaps, as described above, we have fixed the basis on which we pay interest, thus eliminating much of our interest rate risk. A 10 percent change in the weighted average interest rate on our average long-term borrowings would have had only a nominal impact on net interest expense for both the three and nine months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010.

29


Table of Contents

ITEM 4.       CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
               Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information the Company must disclose in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have reviewed and evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s management, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective (a) in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, and (b) in assuring that information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
               Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, there have been no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
               Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls: Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
               Notwithstanding the foregoing limitations on the effectiveness of controls, we have nonetheless reached the conclusion that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

30


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.       Legal Proceedings
               We were notified in April 2009 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) of its intention to conduct a customary Focused Assessment of our import activities during fiscal 2008 and of our processes and procedures to comply with U.S. Customs laws and regulations. We recorded an accrual in Other Accrued current liabilities at the time the amount became estimable and probable, which was not material to the financial statements. During September 2010 the Company reported errors relating to import trade activity from July 2004 to the date of Plexus’ report. The Company is currently awaiting final determination of CBP duties and fees. Plexus has agreed that it will implement improved processes and procedures and review these corrective measures with CBP. At this time, we do not believe that any deficiencies in processes or controls or unanticipated costs, unpaid duties or penalties associated with this matter will have a material adverse effect on Plexus or the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
               The Company is party to certain other lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
               In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed herein, particularly those discussed in the “Safe Harbor” Cautionary Statement, and the other sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I, Item 2, see the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010.

31


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds
     The following table provides the specified information about the repurchases of shares by the Company during the three months ended July 2, 2011.
                                 
                            Maximum
                    Total number   approximate dollar
                    of shares purchased   value of shares that
    Total number   Average   as part of publicly   may yet be purchased
    of shares   price paid   announced plans or   under the plans or
Period   purchased   per share   programs   programs*
 
                               
 
 
                               
April 3 to
April 30, 2011
    392,184     $ 34.81       392,184     $102,918,000  
 
                               
May 1 to
May 28, 2011
    540,130       36.00       540,130     $83,460,000  
 
                               
May 29 to
July 2, 2011
    1,623,070       33.17       1,623,070     $29,597,000  
                 
 
                               
Total
    2,555,384     $ 34.02       2,555,384          
                 
* On February 16, 2011, as previously announced, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $200 million of common stock. As of July 2, 2011, the Company has repurchased 5.3 million shares for approximately $170.4 million, at an average price of $32.24 per share. These shares were recorded as treasury stock. As of July 2, 2011, the Company had a commitment of approximately $4.6 million related to the purchase of 0.1 million shares, which were purchased before July 2, 2011, but settled after the end of the fiscal quarter. The remaining $25.0 million share repurchase authorization will be retained for future use based on market conditions.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
  31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  31.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.1   Certification of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.2   Certification of the CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32


Table of Contents

  101   The following materials from Plexus Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
     
101.INS
  XBRL Instance Document
 
   
101.SCH
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
   
101.CAL
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
   
101.LAB
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
   
101.PRE
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
   
101.DEF
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

33


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 
   
 
  Plexus Corp.     
 
  Registrant
 
   
 
   
 
   
8/5/11
  /s/ Dean A. Foate
 Date
  Dean A. Foate
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer
 
   
 
   
 
   
8/5/11
  /s/ Ginger M. Jones
 Date
  Ginger M. Jones
 
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

34