Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - Williams Partners L.P. | c65674e8vk.htm |
Exhibit
99.1
News
Release
|
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ) One Williams Center Tulsa, OK 74172 800-600-3782 www.williamslp.com |
DATE: Aug. 3, 2011
MEDIA CONTACT:
|
INVESTOR CONTACTS: | |||||
Jeff Pounds
|
Travis Campbell | Sharna Reingold | David Sullivan | |||
(918) 573-3332
|
(918) 573-2944 | (918) 573-2078 | (918) 573-9360 |
Williams Partners Reports Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results
| Second-Quarter 2011 Net Income per L.P. Unit is $0.91, Up 38% Over 2Q 2010 | ||
| Distributable Cash Flow Attributable to Partnership Ops Up 26%, Coverage Ratio Remains Strong | ||
| Higher NGL Margins, Fee-based Revenues Drive Strong Performance | ||
| Partnership Increases Quarterly Distribution for Sixth Consecutive Quarter Up 9% Over 2Q 2010 |
Summary Financial Information | 2Q | YTD | ||||||||||||||
Amounts in millions, except per-unit amounts. | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 338 | $ | 240 | $ | 645 | $ | 562 | ||||||||
Net income per common L.P. unit |
$ | 0.91 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 1.24 | ||||||||
Distributable cash flow (DCF) (1) |
$ | 397 | $ | 337 | $ | 838 | $ | 768 | ||||||||
Less: Pre-partnership DCF (2) |
| (21 | ) | | (179 | ) | ||||||||||
DCF attributable to partnership operations |
$ | 397 | $ | 316 | $ | 838 | $ | 589 | ||||||||
Cash distribution coverage ratio (1) |
1.39 | x | 1.43 | x | 1.49 | x | 1.57 | x | ||||||||
(1) | Distributable Cash Flow and Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio are non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations to the most relevant measures included in GAAP are attached to this news release. | |
(2) | For 2010, this amount represents DCF for January 2010 from the assets acquired in February 2010 and DCF for January-June 2010 from the assets acquired in November 2010, since these periods were prior to the receipt of cash flows from the acquired assets. |
TULSA, Okla. Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ) today announced unaudited second-quarter
2011 net income of $338 million, or $0.91 per common limited-partner unit, compared with
second-quarter 2010 net income of $240 million, or $0.66 per common unit.
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 1 of 10 |
Year-to-date through June 30, Williams Partners reported net income of $645 million, or $1.72 per
common
unit, compared with net income of $562 million, or $1.24 per common unit for the same period in
2010.
The increases in net income for the second-quarter and year-to-date 2011 periods are primarily due
to higher natural gas liquid margins (NGL) and fee-based revenues in the midstream business. There
is a more detailed discussion of the midstream and gas pipeline results in the business segment
performance section below.
The results throughout this release have been recast to reflect the fourth-quarter 2010 asset
acquisition from Williams. In the recasting of the partnerships net income, all of the acquired
assets net income occurring prior to the closing date was allocated to Williams, which resulted in
a lower allocation of net income to limited partners for first-quarter 2010.
Strong Business Performance, 2010 Acquisitions Drive Higher Distributable Cash Flow in 2011
For second-quarter 2011, Williams Partners distributable cash flow attributable to partnership
operations was $397 million, compared with $316 million for second-quarter 2010. The 26-percent
increase in DCF attributable to partnership operations in the second quarter was due to the
previously noted improved results in the midstream business, as well as the growth of the
partnership via asset acquisitions in the second half of 2010.
Williams Partners DCF attributable to partnership operations in the first half of 2011 was $838
million, compared with $589 million for the first half of 2010.
The 42-percent increase in DCF attributable to partnership operations in the year-to-date period is
primarily due to the growth of the partnership via the first-quarter 2010 asset acquisitions.
CEO Perspective
Williams Partners performed exceptionally well in the second quarter, as we delivered strong
growth in both distributable cash flow and earnings, said Alan Armstrong, chief executive officer
of Williams Partners general partner.
Per-unit NGL margins remain strong, and as expected NGL volume growth recovered significantly from
the first quarter. We also saw higher fee-based revenue in the quarter that was the result of
recent growth projects, including expansions in the Marcellus Shale, Piceance Basin and Gulf of
Mexico, Armstrong said. And we continue to work on numerous expansion projects in both the gas
pipeline and midstream businesses.
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 2 of 10 |
Partnership Reaffirms Strong Guidance for Adjusted Segment Profit
Williams Partners is reaffirming its strong guidance for 2011-12 adjusted segment profit. The
partnership has narrowed the range for 2011 adjusted segment profit guidance, but the midpoint is
unchanged from guidance issued on May 5.
Capital expenditure guidance for 2011 has been reduced $150 million at the midpoint to reflect
somewhat slower spending.
Williams Partners updated assumptions for certain energy commodity prices for 2011-12 and the
corresponding guidance for the partnerships earnings and capital expenditures are displayed in the
following table.
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 3 of 10 |
Commodity Price Assumptions and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average NGL Margins | 2011 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
As of Aug. 3, 2011 | Low | Mid | High | Low | Mid | High | |||||||||||||||||||
Natural Gas ($/MMBtu): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NYMEX |
$ | 3.40 | $ | 4.25 | $ | 5.10 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 6.00 | |||||||||||||
Rockies |
$ | 3.10 | $ | 3.85 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 3.65 | $ | 4.55 | $ | 5.45 | |||||||||||||
San Juan |
$ | 3.20 | $ | 4.00 | $ | 4.80 | $ | 3.70 | $ | 4.65 | $ | 5.60 | |||||||||||||
Oil / NGL: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude Oil WTI ($ per barrel) |
$ | 80 | $ | 95 | $ | 110 | $ | 80 | $ | 95 | $ | 110 | |||||||||||||
Crude to Gas Ratio |
21.6 | x | 22.5 | x | 23.5 | x | 18.3 | x | 19.2 | x | 20.0 | x | |||||||||||||
NGL to Crude Oil Relationship (1) |
57 | % | 53 | % | 50 | % | 53 | % | 54 | % | 54 | % | |||||||||||||
Average NGL Margins ($ per gallon) |
$ | 0.72 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.90 | |||||||||||||
Williams Partners Guidance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts are in millions except coverage ratio. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | Mid | High | Low | Mid | High | ||||||||||||||||||||
DCF attributable to partnership ops. (2) |
$ | 1,350 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,650 | $ | 1,460 | $ | 1,710 | $ | 1,960 | |||||||||||||
Total Cash Distribution (3) |
$ | 1,143 | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,272 | $ | 1,337 | $ | 1,396 | |||||||||||||
Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio (2) |
1.2 | x | 1.3 | x | 1.4 | x | 1.1 | x | 1.3 | x | 1.4 | x | |||||||||||||
Adjusted Segment Profit (2): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 670 | $ | 690 | $ | 710 | $ | 680 | $ | 700 | $ | 720 | |||||||||||||
Midstream |
1,075 | 1,200 | 1,325 | 1,100 | 1,350 | 1,600 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted Segment Profit |
$ | 1,745 | $ | 1,890 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 1,780 | $ | 2,050 | $ | 2,320 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted Segment Profit + DD&A: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 1,020 | $ | 1,050 | $ | 1,080 | $ | 1,040 | $ | 1,070 | $ | 1,100 | |||||||||||||
Midstream |
1,335 | 1,470 | 1,605 | 1,375 | 1,635 | 1,895 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted Segment Profit + DD&A |
$ | 2,355 | $ | 2,520 | $ | 2,685 | $ | 2,415 | $ | 2,705 | $ | 2,995 | |||||||||||||
Capital Expenditures: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
$ | 470 | $ | 493 | $ | 515 | $ | 410 | $ | 445 | $ | 480 | |||||||||||||
Growth |
1,270 | 1,410 | 1,550 | 1,070 | 1,185 | 1,300 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital Expenditures |
$ | 1,740 | $ | 1,903 | $ | 2,065 | $ | 1,480 | $ | 1,630 | $ | 1,780 |
(1) | This is calculated as the price of natural gas liquids as a percentage of the price of crude oil on an equal volume basis. | |
(2) | Distributable Cash Flow, Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio and Adjusted Segment Profit are non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations to the most relevant measures included in GAAP are attached to this news release. | |
(3) | The cash distributions in guidance reflects an approximate 6% (low), 8% (midpoint), and 10% (high) increase in quarterly limited partner cash distributions annually through 2012. |
Business Segment Performance
Williams Partners operations are reported through two business segments, Gas Pipeline and
Midstream Gas & Liquids.
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 4 of 10 |
Consolidated Segment Profit | 2Q | YTD | ||||||||||||||
Amounts in millions | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 152 | $ | 148 | $ | 327 | $ | 317 | ||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
319 | 213 | 581 | 468 | ||||||||||||
Total Segment Profit |
$ | 471 | $ | 361 | $ | 908 | $ | 785 | ||||||||
Adjustments |
3 | (16 | ) | 3 | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Adjusted Segment Profit* |
$ | 474 | $ | 345 | $ | 911 | $ | 764 | ||||||||
* | A schedule reconciling segment profit to adjusted segment profit is attached to this press release. |
Gas Pipeline
Williams Partners owns interests in three major interstate natural gas pipeline systems Transco,
Northwest Pipeline and Gulfstream. Transco and Northwest Pipeline have a combined total annual
throughput of approximately 2,800 trillion British Thermal Units of natural gas, which is
approximately 14 percent of the natural gas consumed in the United States. Combined peak-day
delivery capacity is approximately 14 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d).
Gas Pipeline reported segment profit of $152 million for second-quarter 2011, compared with $148
million for second-quarter 2010. For the first six months of 2011, Gas Pipeline reported segment
profit of $327 million, compared with $317 million for the first half of 2010.
Higher transportation revenues associated with expansion projects placed into service in 2010 drove
the improved results in the second-quarter and year-to-date periods.
Two key expansions on the Transco system Mobile Bay South II and 85 North phase II were
placed into service in May 2011 adding a combined 599 thousand dekatherms per day (Mdt/d) of firm
transportation capacity to serve markets in the southeastern United States.
Gas Pipeline continues to work on several other expansion projects, including the Pascagoula
Expansion Project, which is expected to be placed into service in September 2011, and two expected
to be placed into service next year the Mid-Atlantic Connector and Mid-South Phase I projects.
The Pascagoula expansion involves the construction of a new pipeline to be jointly owned with
Florida Gas
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 5 of 10 |
Transmission connecting the existing Mobile Bay Lateral to the outlet pipeline of a proposed
LNG import terminal in Mississippi. The partnerships share of the expansions capacity will be 467
Mdt/d.
In July 2011, Williams Partners received FERC approval on the Mid-Atlantic Connector. The project
will expand the existing natural gas transmission system on Transco from North Carolina to markets
as far downstream as Maryland. The cost of the project is estimated to be $55 million and will
increase capacity by 142 Mdt/d. The partnership plans to place the project into service in
November 2012.
In October 2010, Williams Partners filed an application with the FERC for the Mid-South Expansion
project. This project will upgrade compressor facilities and expand our existing natural gas
transmission system from Alabama to markets as far north as North Carolina on Transco. The cost of
the Mid-South Expansion project is estimated to be $217 million. The project is expected to be
phased into service in September 2012 and June 2013, with an increase in capacity of 225 Mdt/d.
Midstream Gas & Liquids
Midstream provides natural gas gathering, treating, and processing; deepwater production handling
and oil transportation; and NGL fractionation, storage and transportation services.
The business reported segment profit of $319 million for second-quarter 2011, compared with segment
profit of $213 million for second-quarter 2010.
The second-quarter 2011 results improved primarily because NGL margins and fee-based revenues were
both improved over second-quarter 2010. Higher per-unit NGL prices drove the NGL margin increase
for the quarter.
The increase in equity volumes sold during second-quarter 2011 was due to new capacity at the Echo
Springs plant as well as absence of maintenance at the Opal plant that occurred in second-quarter
2010.
NGL Margin Trend | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | 1Q | 2Q | ||||||||||||||||||||
NGL margins (millions) |
$ | 193 | $ | 166 | $ | 136 | $ | 200 | $ | 207 | $ | 253 | |||||||||||||
NGL equity volumes (gallons in millions) |
332 | 302 | 271 | 317 | 289 | 308 | |||||||||||||||||||
Per-unit NGL margins ($/gallon) |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.83 |
The improvement in fee-based revenues in the second quarter was primarily due to new gathering business in
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 6 of 10 |
the Marcellus Shale, a gathering rate increase in the Piceance Basin associated with the
assets acquired from Williams in November 2010, and new business from the Perdido Norte gas and oil
pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico.
Year-to-date through June 30, Midstream reported segment profit of $581 million, compared with $468
million for the same period in 2010.
Higher per-unit NGL prices and higher fee-based revenues were the key factors in the year-to-date
improvement in Midstreams results. The same factors that resulted in higher fee-based revenues in
the second quarter also drove the year-to-date improvement in those revenues.
The midstream business will continue work on several ongoing expansion projects in 2011 and beyond
in all of its major locations.
Williams Partners plans to construct a 350 MMcf/d cryogenic gas processing plant at its Parachute
Plant Complex in the Piceance Basin. The new Parachute TXP I plant will support a new basin-wide
agreement for all gathering and processing services with Williams exploration and production
business. The partnership plans to place the expansion into service in 2014.
The partnership also plans to participate in the construction of a pipeline connection and capacity
expansions on the Overland Pass system. The expansions will increase the pipelines capacity to
the maximum of 255,000 bbls/d in order to accommodate new volumes coming from the Bakken Shale in
the Williston Basin.
In the Marcellus Shale, Williams Partners has assumed the operational activities for the gathering
business it acquired at the end of 2010 and completed various compression and dehydration projects
to increase the capacity of the gathering system to approximately 550 MMcf/d. However, volumes are
constrained by take-away capacity until phase one of the
partnerships Springville pipeline is placed into service later this year.
Once in service, the first phase of the Springville project will allow Williams Partners to deliver
approximately 250 MMcf/d of production to its Transco interstate gas pipeline system. Expansions
to the Springville compression facilities in 2012 will eventually increase the take-away capacity
to 650 MMcf/d.
With its gathering system in northeast Pennsylvania and its Laurel Mountain Midstream joint venture
in western Pennsylvania, Williams Partners expects to ultimately provide 2.75 Bcf/d of gathering
capacity in Pennsylvania by 2015.
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 7 of 10 |
In the Gulf region, construction is underway on the partnerships proprietary floating-production
system, Gulfstar FPS, which will serve the Tubular Bells field development located in the eastern
deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Gulfstar FPS will have a capacity of 60,000 barrels of oil per day, up
to 200 MMcf/d of natural gas and the capability to provide seawater injection services. It is
expected to be in service in 2014.
Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This press release includes certain financial measures Distributable Cash Flow, Cash
Distribution Coverage Ratio, and Adjusted Segment Profit that are non-GAAP financial measures as
defined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For Williams Partners L.P., Adjusted Segment Profit excludes items of income or loss that we
characterize as unrepresentative of our ongoing operations. Management believes Adjusted Segment
Profit provides investors meaningful insight into Williams Partners L.P.s results from ongoing
operations.
For Williams Partners L.P. we define Distributable Cash Flow as net income plus depreciation and
amortization and cash distributions from our equity investments less our earnings from our equity
investments, distributions to noncontrolling interests and maintenance capital expenditures. We
also adjust for payments and/or reimbursements under omnibus agreements with Williams and certain
other items. Total Distributable Cash Flow is reduced by any amounts associated with operations,
which occurred prior to our ownership of the underlying assets to arrive at Distributable Cash Flow
attributable to partnership operations.
For Williams Partners L.P. we also calculate the ratio of Distributable Cash Flow attributable to
partnership operations to the total cash distributed (Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio). This
measure reflects the amount of Distributable Cash Flow relative to our cash distribution. We have
also provided this ratio calculated using the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income.
This press release is accompanied by a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their
nearest GAAP financial measures. Management uses these financial measures because they are accepted
financial indicators used by investors to compare company performance. In addition, management
believes that these measures provide investors an enhanced perspective of the operating performance
of the Partnerships assets and the cash that the business is generating. Neither Adjusted Segment
Profit nor Distributable Cash Flow are intended to represent cash flows for the period, nor are
they presented as an alternative to net income or cash
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 8 of 10 |
flow from operations. They should not be
considered in isolation or as substitutes for a measure of performance prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles.
Quarterly Materials to be Posted Shortly, Q&A Webcast Scheduled for Next Week
Williams Partners second-quarter 2011 analyst package; investor presentation on the quarterly
results and outlook, including a recorded commentary from Alan Armstrong, chief executive officer
of Williams Partners general partner; and data book should be available shortly at
www.williamslp.com.
The partnership will host its second-quarter 2011 Q&A live webcast on Tuesday, Aug. 9 at 11 a.m.
EDT. Participants are encouraged to access the webcast at www.williamslp.com.
A limited number of phone lines also will be available at (888) 378-4361. International callers
should dial (719) 325-2249. Replays of the second-quarter webcast in both streaming and
downloadable podcast formats will be available for two weeks following the event on the
partnerships web site.
Management set the dates for release of Williams Partners second-quarter earnings package and
investor presentation in coordination with other scheduling commitments. The result is
slightly different from the partnerships traditional timeline.
Form 10-Q
The partnership plans to file its second-quarter 2011 Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) this week. The document will be available on both the SEC and Williams Partners
web sites.
About Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
Williams Partners L.P. is a leading diversified master limited partnership focused on natural gas
transportation; gathering, treating, and processing; storage; natural gas liquid (NGL)
fractionation; and oil transportation. The partnership owns interests in three major interstate
natural gas pipelines that, combined, deliver 14 percent of the natural gas consumed in the United
States. The partnerships gathering and processing assets include large-scale operations in the
U.S. Rocky Mountains and both onshore and offshore along the Gulf of Mexico. Williams (NYSE: WMB)
owns approximately 75 percent of Williams Partners, including the general-partner interest. More
information is available at www.williamslp.com. Go to
http://www.b2i.us/irpass.asp?BzID=1296&to=ea&s=0 or http://www.b2i.us/irpass.asp?BzID=630&to=ea&s=0
to join our email list.
# # #
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 9 of 10 |
Williams Partners L.P. is a limited partnership formed by The Williams Companies, Inc.
(Williams). Our reports, filings, and other public announcements may contain or incorporate by
reference statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such
statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You
typically can identify forward-looking statements by various forms of words such as anticipates,
believes, seeks, could, may, should, continues, estimates, expects, forecasts,
intends, might, goals, objectives, targets, planned, potential, projects,
scheduled, will, or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on
managements beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management and
include, among others, statements regarding:
| Amounts and nature of future capital expenditures; | ||
| Expansion and growth of our business and operations; | ||
| Financial condition and liquidity; | ||
| Business strategy; | ||
| Cash flow from operations or results of operations; | ||
| The levels of cash distributions to unitholders; | ||
| Seasonality of certain business segments; and | ||
| Natural gas and natural gas liquids prices and demand. |
Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, uncertainties and risks that could
cause future events or results to be materially different from those stated or implied in this
announcement. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our ability to
control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual results to differ from results
contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
| Whether we have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to maintain current levels of cash distributions or to pay cash distributions following establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner; | ||
| Availability of supplies (including the uncertainties inherent in assessing and estimating future natural gas reserves), market demand, volatility of prices, and the availability and cost of capital; | ||
| Inflation, interest rates and general economic conditions (including future disruptions and volatility in the global credit markets and the impact of these events on our customers and suppliers); | ||
| The strength and financial resources of our competitors; | ||
| Development of alternative energy sources; | ||
| The impact of operational and development hazards; | ||
| Costs of, changes in, or the results of laws, government regulations (including climate change regulation and/or potential additional regulation of drilling and completion of wells), environmental liabilities, litigation and rate proceedings; | ||
| Our allocated costs for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans sponsored by our affiliates; | ||
| Changes in maintenance and construction costs; | ||
| Changes in the current geopolitical situation; | ||
| Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers; | ||
| Risks related to strategy and financing, including restrictions stemming from our debt agreements, future changes in our credit ratings and the availability and cost of credit; | ||
| Risks associated with future weather conditions; | ||
| Acts of terrorism; and | ||
| Additional risks described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). |
Given the uncertainties and risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those contained in any forward-looking statement, we caution investors not to unduly rely on
our forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligations to and do not intend to update the
above list or to announce publicly the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking
statements to reflect future events or developments.
In addition to causing our actual results to differ, the factors listed above may cause our
intentions to change from those statements of intention set forth in this announcement. Such
changes in our intentions may also cause our results to differ. We may change our intentions, at
any time and without notice, based upon changes in such factors, our assumptions, or otherwise.
Limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation,
although many of the business risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be
faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business. Investors are urged to closely consider the
disclosures and risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 24,
2011, and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q available from our offices or from our website at
www.williamslp.com.
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
|
Second-Quarter 2011 Financial Results Aug. 3, 2011 | Page 10 of 10 |
Financial Highlights and Operating Statistics
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Final
June 30, 2011
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
This press release includes certain financial measures, Adjusted Segment Profit and Distributable
Cash Flow that are non-GAAP financial measures as defined under the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
For Williams Partners L.P., Adjusted Segment Profit excludes items of income or loss that we
characterize as unrepresentative of our ongoing operations. Management believes Adjusted Segment
Profit provides investors meaningful insight into Williams Partners L.P.s results from ongoing
operations.
For Williams Partners L.P. we define Distributable Cash Flow as net income plus depreciation
and amortization and cash distributions from our equity investments less our earnings from equity
investments, distributions to noncontrolling interests and maintenance capital expenditures. We
also adjust for payments and/or reimbursements under omnibus agreements with Williams and certain
non-cash adjustments. Total Distributable Cash Flow is reduced by any amounts associated with
operations, which occurred prior to our ownership of the underlying assets to arrive at
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partnership operations.
For Williams Partners L.P. we also calculate the ratio of Distributable Cash Flow attributable
to partnership operations to the total cash distributed (cash distribution coverage ratio). This
measure reflects the amount of Distributable Cash Flow relative to our cash distribution. We have
also provided this ratio calculated using the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income.
This press release is accompanied by a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to
their nearest GAAP financial measures. Management uses these financial measures because they are
accepted financial indicators used by investors to compare company performance. In addition,
management believes that these measures provide investors an enhanced perspective of the operating
performance of the Partnerships assets and the cash that the business is generating. Neither
Adjusted Segment Profit nor Distributable Cash Flow are intended to represent cash flows for the
period, nor are they presented as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations. They
should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for a measure of performance prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except coverage ratios) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Williams Partners L.P. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Distributable Cash Flow to GAAP Net income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 322 | $ | 240 | $ | 253 | $ | 286 | $ | 1,101 | $ | 307 | $ | 338 | $ | 645 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
140 | 140 | 140 | 148 | 568 | 150 | 154 | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash amortization of debt issuance costs included in interest expense |
4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 5 | 5 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings from investments |
(26 | ) | (27 | ) | (24 | ) | (32 | ) | (109 | ) | (25 | ) | (36 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(6 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | | (18 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary conversion gain resulting from Ignacio fire |
| (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary conversion gain resulting from Hurricane Ike |
| (7 | ) | (7 | ) | | (14 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of certain gathering assets |
| | | 9 | 9 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reimbursements (payments) from/(to) Williams under omnibus agreement |
| (1 | ) | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures |
(32 | ) | (46 | ) | (119 | ) | (104 | ) | (301 | ) | (34 | ) | (106 | ) | (140 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow excluding equity investments |
402 | 294 | 243 | 315 | 1,254 | 411 | 357 | 768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plus: Equity investments cash distributions to Williams Partners L.P. |
29 | 43 | 29 | 32 | 133 | 30 | 40 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow |
431 | 337 | 272 | 347 | 1,387 | 441 | 397 | 838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Pre-partnership Distributable Cash Flow |
158 | 21 | 32 | 12 | 223 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partnership operations |
$ | 273 | $ | 316 | $ | 240 | $ | 335 | $ | 1,164 | $ | 441 | $ | 397 | $ | 838 | ||||||||||||||||
Total cash distributed: |
$ | 155 | $ | 221 | $ | 250 | $ | 268 | $ | 894 | $ | 276 | $ | 286 | $ | 562 | ||||||||||||||||
Coverage ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partnership operations divided
by Total cash distributed |
1.76 | 1.43 | 0.96 | 1.25 | 1.30 | 1.60 | 1.39 | 1.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income divided by Total cash distributed |
2.08 | 1.09 | 1.01 | 1.07 | 1.23 | 1.11 | 1.18 | 1.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
Reconciliation of GAAP Segment Profit to Non-GAAP Adjusted Segment Profit
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 169 | $ | 148 | $ | 161 | $ | 159 | $ | 637 | $ | 175 | $ | 152 | $ | 327 | ||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
255 | 213 | 210 | 259 | 937 | 262 | 319 | 581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Profit |
$ | 424 | $ | 361 | $ | 371 | $ | 418 | $ | 1,574 | $ | 437 | $ | 471 | $ | 908 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unclaimed property assessment accrual adjustment TGPL |
| (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unclaimed property assessment accrual adjustment NWP |
| (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss related to Eminence storage facility leak |
| | | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of base gas from Hester storage field |
(5 | ) | (3 | ) | | | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Gas Pipeline adjustments |
(5 | ) | (5 | ) | | 5 | (5 | ) | | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary conversion gain related to Ignacio |
| (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary conversion gain related to Hurricane Ike |
| (7 | ) | (7 | ) | | (14 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of certain assets |
| | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of certain gathering assets |
| | | 9 | 9 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement gain related to Green Canyon development |
| | | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Midstream Gas & Liquids adjustments |
| (11 | ) | (19 | ) | 3 | (27 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments included in segment profit |
(5 | ) | (16 | ) | (19 | ) | 8 | (32 | ) | | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted segment profit |
$ | 419 | $ | 345 | $ | 352 | $ | 426 | $ | 1,542 | $ | 437 | $ | 474 | $ | 911 | ||||||||||||||||
2
Williams Partners L.P.
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Full Year Forecasted 2011 | Full Year Forecasted 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except coverage ratios) | Low | Midpoint | High | Low | Midpoint | High | ||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Distributable Cash Flow attributable to partnership operations
to GAAP Net income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,200 | $ | 1,350 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,225 | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,755 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
610 | 630 | 650 | 635 | 655 | 675 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
10 | 13 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures |
(470 | ) | (493 | ) | (515 | ) | (410 | ) | (445 | ) | (480 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow attributable to partnership operations |
$ | 1,350 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,650 | $ | 1,460 | $ | 1,710 | $ | 1,960 | ||||||||||||
Total cash to be distributed * |
$ | 1,143 | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,272 | $ | 1,337 | $ | 1,396 | ||||||||||||
Coverage ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributable cash flow attributable to partnership operations
divided by Total cash to be distributed * |
1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income divided by Total cash to be distributed * |
1.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
* | Distributions reflect growth rates of 6-10%. |
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted Segment Profit to GAAP Segment Profit
Segment Profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream |
$ | 1,075 | $ | 1,200 | $ | 1,325 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 1,350 | $ | 1,600 | ||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
667 | 687 | 707 | 680 | 700 | 720 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Segment Profit |
1,742 | 1,887 | 2,032 | 1,780 | 2,050 | 2,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline Gain on sale of base gas from Hester storage field |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline Loss related to Eminence storage facility leak |
7 | 7 | 7 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted segment profit |
$ | 1,745 | $ | 1,890 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 1,780 | $ | 2,050 | $ | 2,320 | ||||||||||||
3
Consolidated Statement of Income
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per-share amounts) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 407 | $ | 380 | $ | 409 | $ | 409 | $ | 1,605 | $ | 416 | $ | 407 | $ | 823 | ||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
1,083 | 1,020 | 919 | 1,087 | 4,109 | 1,163 | 1,264 | 2,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany eliminations |
| | (1 | ) | 2 | 1 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,490 | 1,400 | 1,327 | 1,498 | 5,715 | 1,579 | 1,671 | 3,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and operating expenses |
1,033 | 1,002 | 923 | 1,026 | 3,984 | 1,105 | 1,163 | 2,268 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
62 | 70 | 70 | 79 | 281 | 73 | 74 | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense net |
(3 | ) | (6 | ) | (13 | ) | 7 | (15 | ) | (11 | ) | (1 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Segment costs and expenses |
1,092 | 1,066 | 980 | 1,112 | 4,250 | 1,167 | 1,236 | 2,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General corporate expenses |
35 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 125 | 30 | 27 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
160 | 138 | 151 | 150 | 599 | 166 | 138 | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
238 | 196 | 196 | 236 | 866 | 246 | 297 | 543 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General corporate expenses |
(35 | ) | (28 | ) | (30 | ) | (32 | ) | (125 | ) | (30 | ) | (27 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating income |
363 | 306 | 317 | 354 | 1,340 | 382 | 408 | 790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings |
26 | 27 | 24 | 32 | 109 | 25 | 36 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest accrued |
(81 | ) | (102 | ) | (103 | ) | (107 | ) | (393 | ) | (108 | ) | (107 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest capitalized |
12 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
3 | | | 1 | 4 | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) net |
(1 | ) | 2 | 9 | 4 | 14 | 5 | (2 | ) | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
322 | 240 | 254 | 287 | 1,103 | 307 | 338 | 645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
322 | 240 | 253 | 286 | 1,101 | 307 | 338 | 645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
6 | 5 | 5 | | 16 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
$ | 316 | $ | 235 | $ | 248 | $ | 286 | $ | 1,085 | $ | 307 | $ | 338 | $ | 645 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocation of net income for calculation of earnings per common unit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
$ | 316 | $ | 235 | $ | 248 | $ | 286 | $ | 1,085 | $ | 307 | $ | 338 | $ | 645 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocation of net income to general partner and Class C units |
284 | 65 | 85 | 73 | 517 | 71 | 74 | 145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation of net income to common units |
$ | 32 | $ | 170 | $ | 163 | $ | 213 | $ | 568 | $ | 236 | $ | 264 | $ | 500 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income, per common unit |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 2.66 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 1.72 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common units outstanding (thousands) |
52,777 | 255,777 | 260,508 | 282,058 | 213,539 | 289,845 | 290,213 | 290,030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash distributions per common unit |
$ | 0.6575 | $ | 0.6725 | $ | 0.6875 | $ | 0.7025 | $ | 2.7200 | $ | 0.7175 | $ | 0.7325 | $ | 1.4500 |
4
Gas Pipeline
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
$ | 106 | $ | 103 | $ | 103 | $ | 110 | $ | 422 | $ | 110 | $ | 106 | $ | 216 | ||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
300 | 278 | 305 | 299 | 1,182 | 305 | 301 | 606 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | (1 | ) | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
407 | 380 | 409 | 409 | 1,605 | 416 | 407 | 823 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and operating expenses |
212 | 199 | 216 | 212 | 839 | 219 | 225 | 444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
33 | 39 | 37 | 42 | 151 | 41 | 40 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense net |
2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 16 | (10 | ) | 4 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total segment costs and expenses |
247 | 242 | 258 | 259 | 1,006 | 250 | 269 | 519 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings |
9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 38 | 9 | 14 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported segment profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
54 | 50 | 53 | 55 | 212 | 56 | 51 | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
108 | 91 | 100 | 95 | 394 | 111 | 89 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 31 | 8 | 12 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total reported segment profit |
169 | 148 | 161 | 159 | 637 | 175 | 152 | 327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
| (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
(5 | ) | (4 | ) | | 5 | (4 | ) | | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments |
(5 | ) | (5 | ) | | 5 | (5 | ) | | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted segment profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
54 | 49 | 53 | 55 | 211 | 56 | 51 | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
103 | 87 | 100 | 100 | 390 | 111 | 92 | 203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 31 | 8 | 12 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjusted segment profit |
$ | 164 | $ | 143 | $ | 161 | $ | 164 | $ | 632 | $ | 175 | $ | 155 | $ | 330 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating statistics (Tbtu) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Throughput |
179.4 | 156.5 | 152.7 | 183.8 | 672.4 | 176.8 | 142.3 | 319.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avg. daily transportation volumes |
2.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avg. daily firm reserved capacity |
2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Throughput |
586.1 | 459.6 | 517.1 | 593.5 | 2,156.3 | 652.2 | 535.2 | 1,187.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avg. daily transportation volumes |
6.5 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 6.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avg. daily firm reserved capacity |
7.0 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 7.7 |
5
Midstream Gas & Liquids
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering & processing |
$ | 149 | $ | 152 | $ | 155 | $ | 163 | $ | 619 | $ | 163 | $ | 172 | $ | 335 | ||||||||||||||||
NGL sales from gas processing |
338 | 272 | 229 | 298 | 1,137 | 306 | 360 | 666 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production handling and transportation |
29 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 107 | 25 | 26 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing sales |
999 | 897 | 796 | 1,025 | 3,717 | 1,122 | 1,233 | 2,355 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
43 | 42 | 38 | 40 | 163 | 42 | 47 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,558 | 1,389 | 1,244 | 1,552 | 5,743 | 1,658 | 1,838 | 3,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intrasegment eliminations |
(475 | ) | (369 | ) | (325 | ) | (465 | ) | (1,634 | ) | (495 | ) | (574 | ) | (1,069 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,083 | 1,020 | 919 | 1,087 | 4,109 | 1,163 | 1,264 | 2,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL cost of goods sold |
145 | 106 | 93 | 98 | 442 | 99 | 107 | 206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing cost of goods sold |
997 | 902 | 792 | 1,006 | 3,697 | 1,109 | 1,221 | 2,330 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other cost of goods sold |
10 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 30 | 7 | 9 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
144 | 157 | 141 | 166 | 608 | 166 | 176 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
29 | 31 | 32 | 38 | 130 | 32 | 34 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense net |
(5 | ) | (10 | ) | (17 | ) | 2 | (30 | ) | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Intrasegment eliminations |
(475 | ) | (369 | ) | (325 | ) | (465 | ) | (1,634 | ) | (495 | ) | (574 | ) | (1,069 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total segment costs and expenses |
845 | 824 | 723 | 851 | 3,243 | 917 | 967 | 1,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings |
17 | 17 | 14 | 23 | 71 | 16 | 22 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported segment profit |
255 | 213 | 210 | 259 | 937 | 262 | 319 | 581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments |
| (11 | ) | (19 | ) | 3 | (27 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted segment profit |
$ | 255 | $ | 202 | $ | 191 | $ | 262 | $ | 910 | $ | 262 | $ | 319 | $ | 581 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating statistics |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering and Processing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering volumes (TBtu) |
312 | 312 | 317 | 321 | 1,262 | 321 | 337 | 658 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant inlet natural gas volumes (Tbtu) |
360 | 352 | 343 | 369 | 1,424 | 349 | 390 | 739 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL equity sales (million gallons) * |
332 | 302 | 271 | 317 | 1,222 | 289 | 308 | 597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL margin ($/gallon) |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||||
NGL production (million gallons) * |
671 | 653 | 616 | 722 | 2,662 | 666 | 724 | 1,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discovery Producer Services LLC (equity investment) - 100% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL equity sales (million gallons) |
30 | 28 | 23 | 24 | 105 | 20 | 19 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL production (million gallons) |
89 | 84 | 81 | 91 | 345 | 83 | 80 | 163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laurel Mountain Midstream, LLC (equity investment) - 100% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gathering volumes (Tbtu) |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 42 | 12 | 13 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overland Pass Pipeline Company LLC (equity investment) - 100% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL Transportation volumes (Mbbls) |
10,456 | 11,643 | 9,856 | 11,362 | 43,317 | 10,483 | 11,836 | 22,319 |
* | Excludes volumes associated with partially owned assets that are not consolidated for financial reporting purposes. |
6
Capital Expenditures and Investments
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
$ | 10 | $ | 24 | $ | 51 | $ | 35 | $ | 120 | $ | 14 | $ | 22 | $ | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
56 | 83 | 98 | 145 | 382 | 84 | 77 | 161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
66 | 107 | 149 | 180 | 502 | 98 | 99 | 197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
54 | 114 | 97 | 70 | 335 | 58 | 54 | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total* |
$ | 120 | $ | 221 | $ | 246 | $ | 250 | $ | 837 | $ | 156 | $ | 153 | $ | 309 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of businesses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
| | | 608 | 608 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 608 | $ | 608 | $ | | $ | | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline** |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | $ | 179 | $ | 187 | ||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
8 | 6 | 434 | 23 | 471 | 28 | 60 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9 | $ | 6 | $ | 435 | $ | 26 | $ | 476 | $ | 36 | $ | 239 | $ | 275 | ||||||||||||||||
Summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 67 | $ | 107 | $ | 150 | $ | 183 | $ | 507 | $ | 106 | $ | 278 | $ | 384 | ||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
62 | 120 | 531 | 701 | 1,414 | 86 | 114 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 129 | $ | 227 | $ | 681 | $ | 884 | $ | 1,921 | $ | 192 | $ | 392 | $ | 584 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative summary: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline |
$ | 67 | $ | 174 | $ | 324 | $ | 507 | $ | 507 | $ | 106 | $ | 384 | $ | 384 | ||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
62 | 182 | 713 | 1,414 | 1,414 | 86 | 200 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 129 | $ | 356 | $ | 1,037 | $ | 1,921 | $ | 1,921 | $ | 192 | $ | 584 | $ | 584 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures incurred and purchase of investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increases to property, plant, and equipment |
$ | 103 | $ | 181 | $ | 235 | $ | 240 | $ | 759 | $ | 142 | $ | 160 | $ | 302 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of businesses |
| | | 608 | 608 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of investments |
9 | 6 | 435 | 26 | 476 | 36 | 239 | 275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 112 | $ | 187 | $ | 670 | $ | 874 | $ | 1,843 | $ | 178 | $ | 399 | $ | 577 | ||||||||||||||||
*Increases to property, plant, and equipment |
$ | 103 | $ | 181 | $ | 235 | $ | 240 | $ | 759 | $ | 142 | $ | 160 | $ | 302 | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in related accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
17 | 40 | 11 | 10 | 78 | 14 | (7 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 120 | $ | 221 | $ | 246 | $ | 250 | $ | 837 | $ | 156 | $ | 153 | $ | 309 | ||||||||||||||||
** | The second quarter of 2011 includes the acquisition of a 24.5 percent interest in Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C. from a subsidiary of Williams. |
7
Depreciation and Amortization
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas Pipeline: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest Pipeline |
$ | 22 | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | $ | 88 | $ | 23 | $ | 22 | $ | 45 | ||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line |
63 | 62 | 62 | 65 | 252 | 64 | 67 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
85 | 84 | 84 | 87 | 340 | 87 | 89 | 176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream Gas & Liquids |
55 | 56 | 56 | 61 | 228 | 63 | 65 | 128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 140 | $ | 140 | $ | 140 | $ | 148 | $ | 568 | $ | 150 | $ | 154 | $ | 304 | ||||||||||||||||
8