Exhibit 99.2

SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011 Partnering with Healthcare Systems and Physicians

Contact Us Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. 16435 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 320 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Telephone: (480) 998-3478 Fax: (480) 991-0755 Email: info@htareit.com Website: www.htareit.com SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Table of Contents CORPORATE   3 | Senior Management, Board of Directors and Other Information 4 | HTA Corporate Profile 6 | Healthcare Sector Strengths & Fundamentals 7 | Featured Key Market — Arizona 8 | Featured Key Market — South Carolina 9 | Featured Key Market — Texas 10 | Achievements as a Self-Managed REIT 11 | HTA Overview as of March 31, 2011   INVESTMENT   12 | HTA Acquisition Timeline 13 | Gross Investment Activity   FINANCIAL   14 | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations 15 | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets 16 | Consolidated Funds from Operations, Modified Funds from Operations, Normalized Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations 17 | Reconciliation of Net Income to Net Operating Income, EBITDA and Debt Ratios 18 | Covenant Requirements 19 | Schedule of Consolidated Debt   PORTFOLIO   20 | Portfolio Summary 23 | Medical Office Building Summary 24 | Healthcare System Relationships and Quality Tenants 25 | Glossary / Definitions SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

HTA Corporate Profile Data as of: March 31, 2011 Investment Concentration: Distribution Rate: 7.25%        Top 5 Tenants (based on gross GLA) 18% Gross Real Estate Assets:   $2.30 billion        Top 5 States (based on gross GLA) 52% Gross Leasable Area:   11,107,000 square feet     Weighted Average Shares             Outstanding (basic and diluted):   215 million     Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., or HTA, was incorporated on April 20, 2006. HTA is a fully integrated, self-administered, and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. HTA’s internal management team employs a hands-on approach to its operations. HTA has over 50 employees focused on acquiring, owning and operating high-quality medical office buildings that are predominantly located on the campuses of nationally recognized healthcare systems in U.S. major metropolitan areas. HTA is a full-service real estate company with acquisitions and asset management services performed in-house, with certain monitored services provided by third parties at market rates. Since its formation in 2006, HTA has made 78 portfolio acquisitions valued at $2.3 billion based on purchase price, which includes 242 buildings and two other real estate-related assets. HTA’s portfolio totals 11.1 million square feet and includes 218 medical office buildings, ten hospitals, nine skilled nursing and assisted living facilities and five healthcare-related office buildings located in 25 states. Partnering with Healthcare Systems & Physicians. Through management’s experience and our portfolio acquisitions, we have developed extensive long-term relationships with healthcare systems, physician groups, developers, lenders, brokers and other real estate professionals. In 2010, over 50% of our acquisitions were identified and made available to us through off-market sources where there was no formal sales process. We believe these strong relationships with our hospital systems and physician tenants drive incremental demand for our medical office building (“MOB”) space, increased tenant retention rates and provide us with further investment opportunities. Portfolio Fundamentals. Our portfolio of 11.1 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA) is focused on strategically located on-campus medical office buildings in locations with high barriers to entry. Our existing lease fundamentals provide for stable in-place revenue and rent growth. With approximately 91% occupancy and minimal near-term rollover, our portfolio allows for a good balance of growth through increased occupancy and stability with existing tenant base. Ninety-four percent of our portfolio is strategically located on-campus, aligned with or adjacent to recognized healthcare systems, situated in locations with high barriers to entry. By acquiring high quality buildings with stabilized occupancy in key strategically located on-campus locations associated with dominant healthcare systems, we are able to enter into stable leases that generate attractive annual rental revenue. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

HTA Corporate Profile, continued Diversification and Concentration. Our portfolio is geographically diverse, with properties in 25 states. We have strategically purchased properties in Texas, Arizona, South Carolina, Indiana, Georgia, New York and Florida. We believe that demographic trends, including an aging population, an increase in echo boomers moving to these regions for jobs, the decentralization and specialization of healthcare services, and high state healthcare spending forecasts will continue to fuel sustainable growth in these markets. No one state accounts for more than 12% of total portfolio GLA and no one state accounts for more than 16% of trailing twelve month revenues (TTM). Balance Sheet Flexibility. Our conservative and low-leveraged balance sheet with modest intermediate debt maturities provides a strong degree of financial flexibility to grow the company with new acquisitions. We have a strong cash position and as of May 2011, an unused $575 million unsecured credit facility. We recently received an investment grade rating from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s which we believe will enhance our ability to access the public debt markets and achieve favorable pricing. Based on the current covenant requirements of our unsecured credit facility, and assuming that we utilize all of our cash, fully access our unsecured credit facility, and enter into new debt facilities on additional asset purchases, we have the borrowing capacity with increased leverage (see chart below) to acquire over $1 billion of medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities. 1 Consistent with leverage ratios defined pursuant to our unsecured line of credit agreement. Enterprise Strength and Execution. Growth opportunities are generated by our prudent and disciplined acquisition capability, focused asset management, high-quality and stable existing tenant base, and our experienced executive officers and senior management team. We have a proven track record of acquiring properties off-market at accretive cap rates. Our hands-on asset management, leasing and property management philosophy focuses on defined internal growth through increased rental rates and maximizing the occupancy of our properties. For more information about HTA please visit our website at www.htareit.com SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Healthcare Sector Strengths & Fundamentals Healthcare is one of the fastest growing segments of the US economy, driven by a continually expanding population and growth in the utilization of medical care as the baby boomer generation approaches retirement age. Advancements in medical technology and specialization have allowed physicians to perform lower cost procedures that have traditionally been performed in hospitals with limited space. As demand for medical services increases, physicians are moving into medical office facilities that are better suited to the needs of the profession and a shifting consumer preference for outpatient services. Medical office buildings provide stable, long-term growth within this market, and do not experience as much volatility as other healthcare asset classes during turbulent times. Impact of Healthcare Bill. While the full impact of the healthcare bill will not be realized in the near term, RCG’s research suggests the increased demand for healthcare facilities will grow profitability for healthcare REITs over time. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that an additional 32 million Americans will have insurance coverage in 2016 as a result of the reform. Proponents of healthcare reform emphasize the importance of preventative care, which should increase the number of medical office visits. Favorable MOB Fundamentals. •  Demand for healthcare in the United States has been steadily increasing, driven by a growing population with longer life expectancies, increased healthcare costs, and a rising number of annual physician office visits per person. Hospital systems have been facing limitations on expansions and, as a result, more procedures are being performed in outpatient facilities. An increased use of preventative care and specialized medicine also contributes to this trend. Construction of MOBs has been relatively constrained with little developable land and high cost barriers to development. This limited amount of new construction will limit tenants’ relocation options, focusing occupancy demand on existing properties and driving accelerated rent growth. Strong rent growth is forecasted as market conditions tighten due to limited development, a decline in vacancy rates, growth in healthcare employment, a larger number of baby boomers entering retirement, and echo boomers beginning to start new families. Beginning in 2013, rent growth for medical office buildings is expected to outpace rent growth for traditional office properties as healthcare employment increases at a faster pace than traditional office-using industries. Note: Unless otherwise specified, the information included above was derived from a report prepared exclusively for HTA by Rosen Consulting Group (RCG) and may not be duplicated, disseminated, or used for any other purposes. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Featured Key Market — South Carolina South Carolina at a glance South Carolina was ranked #14 in the country for its low cost of doing business, according to CNBC.com in its 2011 America’s Top States for Business report. Baby boomers made up the largest share of the total population of South Carolina at 25.1% in 2010, driving an increase in the demand for medical services (RCG). According to Forbes, South Carolina was 8th in the country for its favorable regulatory climate and government integrity. Greenville Hospital Medical Office Portfolio: Patewood Campus, Greenville, SC Acquired September 2009 South Carolina Portfolio Our South Carolina portfolio currently includes 22 buildings comprised of approximately 1.1 million square feet of GLA with a total investment of $210,151,000 based on purchase price. With locations in Greenville, Charleston, Hilton Head, Mt. Pleasant, and Spartanburg, HTA entered the South Carolina market in September 2009. At the end of the first quarter 2011, our South Carolina portfolio had an overall occupancy of approximately 97%. Approximately 78% of our South Carolina assets (based on GLA) are located in Greenville, the second largest city by urban population in state. These assets are leased to Greenville Hospital System (Fitch AA- and Moody’s A1), one of the largest employers in the region and the dominant provider of healthcare services in South Carolina with approximately 70% of the market share in Greenville. South Carolina Market South Carolina’s total population grew at a relatively strong pace over the last decade. From 2000 to 2010, 613,000 additional residents were added to the population, representing a 15.3% growth. The Census forecasts that the total population of South Carolina will exceed 5 million residents by 2020. The 65 and older demographic will see the largest increase of any age group, increasing by 43.0%, or 261,000 people, over the next decade. As the elderly utilize medical services more than any other demographic, their growth will fuel the need for more physicians and medical office space. Rosen Consulting Group believes that the projected demographic growth in South Carolina, which is estimated to be strongest among the elderly, will cause demand for medical services to accelerate. From 2000 to 2010, South Carolina healthcare employment has increased by a cumulative 38.8% while total employment decreased 2.6%. With utilization habits increasing across all demographic groups, this will further drive demand for medical services and the increased number of physicians and medical office facilities needed to provide the necessary care. Note: Unless otherwise specified, the information included above was derived from a report prepared exclusively for HTA by
Rosen Consulting Group (RCG) and may not be duplicated, disseminated, or used for any other purposes. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Featured Key Market — Texas Texas at a glance The Texas economy is the 15th largest in the world, according to government figures. With a current estimated population of 22.8 million, Texas is the second most populous state in the US. The Lone Star State is home to 64 Fortune 500 companies, and in 2011, CNBC.com ranked Texas #2 in America’s Top States for Business. For the seventh year in a row, CEOs ranked Texas as the No. 1 state in which to do business in May 2011, according to Chief Executive magazine and ChiefExecutive.net. 7900 Fannin, Houston, TX Acquired June 2010 Texas Portfolio We began investing in the Texas market in 2007 and today we own 26 buildings in 7 different cities. Texas was recently ranked #2 in CNBC’s 2011 Top States for Business because of its infrastructure, access to capital, low cost of living, technology and innovation. The majority of our Texas portfolio (80% based on GLA) is located in and around the cities of Houston and Dallas/ Ft. Worth. With total gross leasable area of approximately 1.2 million, our Texas portfolio makes up 11.7% of our total portfolio and has an overall occupancy of approximately 97%. Our largest tenant in Texas, Kindred Healthcare (Moody’s B1), is one of the nation’s premier providers of rehabilitation and post-acute healthcare services and occupies approximately 21% of our Texas portfolio, based on GLA. Approximately 97% of our Texas portfolio is strategically located on-campus or aligned with recognized healthcare systems, situated in locations with high barriers to entry. Texas Market The Texas population has been growing at a rapid pace for decades, a trend that is expected to continue in the future. As the state’s large number of baby boomers reaches retirement age and echo boomers migrate to the region for jobs, RCG believes that the combination should drive a sharp increase in the need for healthcare services, employment and medical office space in Texas. Driven by the combination of a fast growing population, increased utilization and rising healthcare costs, both healthcare spending and healthcare employment have grown rapidly in recent years. The total amount of healthcare spending in Texas increased by 104% from 1994 to 2004 to more than $105 billion, according to the latest data available. Growth in the healthcare sector outpaced total employment growth in the past decade, expanding by a cumulative 40.4% from 2000 to 2010 as compared with a 9.3% increase in Texas total employment. With demographic growth and higher healthcare utilization projected to drive demand for medical services going forward, Rosen Consulting Group expects this trend to accelerate going forward, resulting in an increased need for Texas medical office space. Note: Unless otherwise specified, the information included above was derived from a report prepared exclusively for HTA by Rosen Consulting Group (RCG) and may not be duplicated, disseminated, or used for any other purposes. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

12 HTA Acquisition Timeline            April & October 2010 — Completed acquisition of two medical office buildings located in Pittsburgh, PA, for December 2009 — Entered the $79.5mm. Both buildings are located Phoenix market with a within one mile of the flagship $107.0mm acquisition of a 17 hospital in the West Penn Allegheny building medical office portfolio. Health System (“WPAHS”). WPAHS These properties were accounts for more than 25% of the developed in connection with patient market share in Pittsburgh. 2011 the Banner Boswell and Banner (Off-market transaction). Del E. Webb hospitals. Banner Health is the largest hospital March 2011 — HTA system in metro Phoenix, with reached $2.3bn in a 55% market share. (Off- gross real estate market transaction). assets 12/31/2010 YTD Acquisitions (based 2010 on purchase price) = $806,048,000 December 2010 & February February & May 2009 — Acquired two 2011 — Acquired 9 medical medical office buildings from Aurora 12/31/2009 YTD Acquisitions (based office buildings in Florida, Health Care for $74.4mm, adding on purchase price) = $493,895,000 New York and Massachusetts 315,000 square feet to our Wisconsin for $196.6mm. Comprised of portfolio. Aurora Health Care’s 961,000 square feet of GLA, current market share is above 50% in the portfolio is 98% leased Wisconsin and continues to grow. and includes strategically June 2010 — Acquired a located properties based Class A medical office upon hospital and cross-2009 referral tenant relationships. building in Houston, December 2008 — Texas, comprised of (Off-market transaction). HTA reached 176,000 square feet for $966mm in gross real $38.1mm. The building estate assets. is adjacent to The December 2010 — Completed a 12/31/2008 YTD Acquisitions (based Woman’s Hospital of $102.0mm acquisition from Select on purchase price) = $557,976,000 Texas, an HCA-affiliated Medical Corporation, one of the hospital within the Texas largest public operators of specialty 2008 Medical Center, the hospitals and rehabilitation clinics in largest medical center in the US. The portfolio includes 4 the world. long-term acute care hospitals, comprised of 218,000 square feet and located in Georgia, Texas, and March 2010 — Acquired Florida. a 5-building medical September 2009 — Completed the office portfolio in acquisition of a 16-building portfolio September & November 2010 —Southern Indiana in Greenville, South Carolina with Completed an $83.4mm acquisition of comprised of 260,500 865,000 square feet of GLA for 5 Class A on-campus MOBs. Located square feet from $162.8mm. Greenville Hospital in Arizona, Florida, New York, Deaconess Health System has approximately 70% of Missouri and Nevada, the portfolio is System, Inc., the market share in Greenville. comprised of 307,000 square feet of $45.3mm. Deaconess Approximately 92% of the portfolio GLA. (Off-market transaction). Health System, Inc. is is located on or adjacent to one of the largest health four hospital campuses. system in Southern Indiana. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

13 Gross Investment Activity Acquisition Volume by Year in Millions $900 $806 $800 $700 Q4 $558 Q3 $600 $494 $500 $408 Q2 $400 Q1 $300 $200 $36 $100 $-2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 YTD Portfolio Assets based on Purchase Growth in Annualized Base Rent Price in Millions in Millions $250.0 $2,303 $204 $2,500 $200.0 $2,000 $1,606 $140 $150.0 $1,500 $1,003 $90 $100.0 $1,000 $524 $46 $500 $50.0 $49 $2.0 $- $-1Q07 1Q08 1Q09 1Q10 1Q11 1Q07 1Q08 1Q09 1Q10 1Q11 Investment Activity — Last Twelve Months (through March 31, 2011) $ Investment based on Gross Leasable Area Purchase Price Q2 2010 490,000 $106,219,000 Q3 2010 376,000 89,806,000 Q4 2010 1,976,000 464,133,000 Q1 2011 188,000 36,314,000 Total last twelve months* 3,030,000 $696,472,000 *On June 10, 2011, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire two Class A, three-story, multi-tenant medical office buildings and a two-level parking structure located in Phoenix, Arizona for approximately $32.75 million. The closing of the acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited) Three months ended March 31, 2011 2010 Revenues: Rental income $68,413,000 $42,309,000 Interest income from mortgage notes receivable and other income  1,649,000   2,639,000 Total revenues  70,062,000   44,948,000 Expenses:       Rental expenses  23,772,000   14,585,000 General and administrative expenses  7,308,000   3,605,000 Acquisition expenses  1,062,000   3,224,000 Depreciation and amortization  26,750,000   17,006,000 Total expenses  58,892,000   38,420,000 Income (loss) before other income (expense)  11,170,000   6,528,000 Other income (expense):       Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount):       Interest expense related to mortgage loans payable, credit facility, and derivative financial instruments  (10,346,000 )  (8,876,000 ) Net gain on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments  504,000   1,561,000 Interest and dividend income  118,000   16,000 Income (loss) from continuing operations  1,446,000  (771,000 )       Discontinued operations:       Income (loss) from discontinued operations  744,000   289,000 Net income (loss)  2,190,000  (482,000 ) Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited partners  (40,000 )  (64,000 ) Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest  2,150,000  (546,000 ) Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest on distributed and undistributed earnings — basic and diluted:       Continuing operations $0.01 $(0.00 ) Discontinued operations $0.00 $(0.00 ) Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest $0.01 $(0.00 )         Weighted average number of shares outstanding       — basic  214,797,450   145,335,661 — diluted  214,996,502   145,335,661         Additional financial information       Normalized capital expenditures, tenant improvements, lease commissions  7,014,000   14,579,000 Straight-line rent revenues  3,804,000   2,256,000 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) March 31, 2011December 31, 2010 ASSETS Real estate investments, net: Operating properties, net $ 1,786,767,000 $ 1,772,923,000 Properties classified as held for sale, net 24,540,000 24,540,000 Total real estate investments, net 1,811,307,000 1,797,463,000 Real estate notes receivable, net 57,677,000 57,091,000 Cash and cash equivalents 207,405,000 29,270,000 Accounts and other receivables, net 15,221,000 16,385,000 Restricted cash and escrow deposits 25,370,000 26,679,000 Identified intangible assets, net 298,330,000 300,587,000 Non-real estate assets of properties held for sale 3,768,000 3,768,000 Other assets, net 44,992,000 40,552,000   Total assets $ 2,464,070,000 $ 2,271,795,000 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Liabilities: Mortgage and secured term loans payable, net $ 728,101,000 $ 699,526,000 Outstanding balance on unsecured revolving credit facility — 7,000,000 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 44,555,000 43,033,000 Derivative financial instruments — interest rate swaps 1,211,000 1,527,000 Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities 16,498,000 16,168,000 Identified intangible liabilities, net 12,742,000 13,059,000 Liabilities of properties held for sale 369,000 369,000 Total liabilities 803,476,000 780,682,000 Commitments and contingencies Redeemable noncontrolling interest of limited partners 3,889,000 3,867,000 Equity: Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding — — Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 225,679,179 and 202,643,705 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively 2,251,000 2,026,000 Additional paid-in capital 2,001,028,000 1,795,413,000 Accumulated deficit   (346,574,000 )   (310,193,000 ) Total stockholders’ equity 1,656,705,000 1,487,246,000 Total liabilities and equity $ 2,464,070,000 $ 2,271,795,000 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Consolidated Funds from Operations, Modified Funds from Operations, Normalized Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations Three months ended March 31, 2011 2010 Net income (loss) $ 2,190,000 $ (482,000 ) Add: Depreciation and amortization — consolidated properties 26,750,000 17,311,000 Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited partners   (40,000 )   (64,000 ) Depreciation and amortization related to noncontrolling interests   (64,000 )   (51,000 ) FFO attributable to controlling interest 28,836,000 16,714,000 FFO per share — basic and diluted 0.13 0.12 Add: Acquisition-related expenses 1,062,000 3,224,000 Transition-related charges — 195,000 MFFO attributable to controlling interest 29,898,000 20,133,000 MFFO per share — basic and diluted 0.14 0.14 Less: Termination fee revenue   (1,307,000 ) — Net gain on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments   (504,000 )   (1,561,000 ) Normalized FFO attributable to controlling interest 28,087,000 18,572,000 Normalized FFO per share — basic and diluted 0.13 0.13 MFFO attributable to controlling interest 29,898,000 20,133,000 Add: Above/Below market lease revenue (FAS 141) 501,000 158,000 Stock compensation 897,000 156,000 Less: Amortization of above/below market ground rent   (27,000 ) 0 Net gain on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments   (504,000 )   (1,561,000 ) Effect of straight-line rents   (2,090,000 )   (2,256,000 ) Normalized capital expenditures, tenant improvements, lease commissions   (7,014,000 )   (14,579,000 ) AFFO attributable to controlling interest 21,661,000 2,051,000 AFFO per share — basic and diluted 0.10 0.01 Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic 214,797,450 145,335,661 Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted 214,996,502 145,335,661 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Reconciliation of Net Income to Net Operating Income, EBITDA and Debt Ratios The following is the reconciliation of NOI (Cash) to net income (loss), EBITDA to net income (loss) and net debt to EBITDA ratio generated from our total portfolio of properties (including both our operating properties and those classified as held for sale) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010: NOI (Cash) Three months ended March 31, 2011 2010 Net income (loss) $ 2,190,000 $ (482,000 ) Add: General and administrative expense 7,308,000 3,605,000 Acquisition-related expenses 1,062,000 3,224,000 Depreciation and amortization — consolidated properties 26,750,000 17,311,000 Interest expense and net gain on derivative financial instruments 9,842,000 7,440,000 Less: Interest and dividend income   (118,000 )   (16,000 )       Net operating income 47,034,000 31,082,000   Add: Above/Below market lease revenue (FAS 141) 501,000 158,000 Less: Amortization of above/below market ground rent   (27,000 ) — Effect of straight-line rents   (2,090,000 )   (2,256,000 )       Net operating income (Cash) $ 45,418,000 $ 28,983,000   Net Income to EBITDA Reconciliation Three months ended March 31, 2011 2010 Net income (loss) $ 2,190,000 $ (482,000 ) Add: Depreciation and amortization — consolidated properties 26,750,000 17,311,000 Interest expense and net gain on derivative financial instruments 9,842,000 7,440,000 Less: Interest and dividend income   (118,000 )   (16,000 )       EBITDA $ 38,664,000 $ 24,253,000   Net Debt to EBITDA Total debt $ 728,101,000 $ 533,339,000 Less: cash and cash equivalents   (207,405,000 )   (128,404,000 )       Net debt 520,696,000 404,935,000       EBITDA (annualized) $ 154,656,000 $ 97,012,000 Net debt to EBITDA ratio 3.37 x 4.17 x SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Covenant Requirements The following ratios are generated from our total portfolio of properties (including both our operating properties and those classified as held for sale) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010: Three months ended March 31, 2011 2010 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (1)   EBITDA $ 38,664,000 $ 24,253,000 Fixed charges Interest expense and net gain on derivative financial instruments 9,842,000 7,440,000 Scheduled principal payments 2,584,000 1,405,000 Amortization — financing fees 1,013,000 482,000       Total fixed charges 13,439,000 9,327,000       Fixed charge coverage ratio 2.88 x 2.60 x   Total Leverage Ratio (2)   Total assets $ 2,464,070,000 $ 1,728,997,000 Debt Secured indebtedness 728,101,000 533,339,000 Outstanding balance on unsecured revolving credit facility 0 0       Total indebtedness 728,101,000 533,339,000 Total debt ratio   29.5 %   30.8 %   Distribution Coverage (3)   MFFO 29,898,000 20,133,000 Add: Stock compensation 897,000 156,000       Normalized FFO (as defined by credit agreement) 30,795,000 20,289,000       Distributions paid in cash 19,320,000 12,838,000 Total Coverage   160 %   158 %       (1) A comparable covenant in our unsecured line of credit arrangement is a minimum of 1.75x times.   (2) A comparable covenant in our unsecured line of credit arrangement is a maximum of 55%.   (3) A comparable covenant in our unsecured line of credit arrangement is 100% coverage of cash distributions by normalized FFO, defined as MFFO plus stock compensation. For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we paid total distributions of $36,971,000, including $19,320,000 in cash and $17,651,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

19 Schedule of Consolidated Debt            March 31, 2011 December 31, 2010 Debt: Total fixed rate debt $475,399,000 $470,815,000 Total variable rate debt 249,744,000 225,743,000 Total fixed and variable debt 725,143,000 696,558,000 Add: Net premium 2,958,000 2,968,000 Mortgage loans payable, net $728,101,000 $699,526,000 Interest: Weighted average interest rate of fixed rate debt 6.02% 6.02% Weighted average interest rate of variable rate debt 2.42% 2.72% Debt Maturity Summary ($mm) $180.0% in white font reflects debt maturing each year as a 6.2% percentage of total debt as of 3/31/2011 8.7% * $160.0 $153.4% in red font reflects debt maturing each year as a percentage of total assets as of 3/31/2011 $140.0 4.8% $119.2* 21.2% 4.3% $120.0 4.1% $105.5 3.3% $100.1 $100.0 $80.6 2.7% $80.0 14.6% 13.8% $67.5 2.0% 2.0% $60.0 11.1% $48.7 $50.1 9.3% $40.0 16.4% 6.9% $20.0 6.7% $- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018+ * Of this total amount outstanding at 3/31/2011, a loan balance of $58 million, or 8.0% of the total maturing debt balance, was paid off on May 3, 2011. Note that debt maturity summary does not reflect available renewal options. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Portfolio Summary Portfolio by Building Type Building  Investment based on Total Revenue Properties Count Purchase Price (TTM) GLA Occupancy Medical Office Building $218 1,807,516,000 $182,960,000 9,346,000 90% Hospital 10 238,675,000 19,006,000 641,000 100% Senior Care 9 91,600,000 10,341,000 580,000 100% Office 5 109,900,000 9,453,000 540,000 100% Mortgage Notes Receivable & Other N/A 55,180,000 6,461,000 N/A N/A Grand Total 242 2,302,871,000 228,221,000 11,107,000 91% Portfolio by Lease Type Investment Total Building based on Revenue Portfolio by Type Count Purchase Price (TTM) GLA Occupancy Single-Tenant Buildings Triple Net (MOB) 54 $453,732,000 $46,301,000 2,136,000 100% Gross Lease (MOB) 5 25,304,000 3,651,000 160,000 99% Triple Net (Hospital) 10 238,675,000 19,006,000 641,000 100% Triple Net (Sen Care) 9 91,600,000 10,341,000 580,000 100% Triple Net /Gross Lease (Office) 4 70,900,000 7,112,000 312,000 100% Single-Tenant subtotals 82 880,211,000 86,411,000 3,829,000 100% Multi-Tenant Buildings Triple Net (MOB) 70 630,560,000 64,274,000 3,139,000 88% Gross Lease (MOB) 89 697,920,000 68,734,000 3,911,000 85% Gross Lease (Office) 1 39,000,000 2,341,000 228,000 100% Multi-Tenant subtotals 160 1,367,480,000 135,349,000 7,278,000 87 % Other real estate-related assets Mortgage Notes Receivable & Other N/A 55,180,000 6,461,000 N/A N/A TOTALS 242 2,302,871,000 228,221,000 11,107,000 91%

Portfolio Summary, continued Lease Maturity Summary — All Properties Expiring GLA (amounts in thousands) Total GLA Leased GLA 2011* 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019+ 11,107 10,153 529 812 959 863 836 909 710 586 3,949 % of total 91% 5% 7% 9% 8% 8% 8% 6% 5% 35% * GLA expiring for the remainder of the year as of 3/31/2011 Year to Date Leasing Activity — All Properties GLA Leased GLA December 31, 2010 9,950,000 Move outs, lease terminations, and expirations (166,000) Acquisitions 187,000 New leases and expansions 68,000 Lease renewals 114,000 Leased GLA March 31, 2011 10,153,000 Total Portfolio: Lease Structure (based on GLA) The majority of our leases have a triple-net structure and are leased to tenants with high credit ratings. Under this lease type, the tenant typically pays a monthly base rent to the landlord, and any operating expenses are either paid directly to the service provider or fully reimbursed to the landlord. Triple-net leases usually are a more conservative lease structure, resulting in stable cash flows with less exposure to short-term fluctuations in the operating costs of the property. Under a gross lease, the tenant pays a pre-determined base rent. Included in that rent is either a portion of or all of the tenant’s share of operating expenses, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Portfolio Summary, continued Geographic Diversification Investment based on GLA by Region Acquisition Price Building Count Sum of GLA GLA % Leased % MidWest $352,544,000 65 2,218,000 20.0% 82% NorthEast 367,993,000 19 1,782,000 16.0% 98% South 461,277,000 34 1,847,000 16.6% 96% SouthEast 675,306,000 75 3,340,000 30.1% 94% SouthWest 390,373,000 49 1,920,000 17.3% 87% NorthWest — — — 0.0% 0.0% Grand Total $2,247,493,000 242 11,107,000   100% 91% Leasing Activity: Our Third Party Providers Property Management Managed GLA as % of Total Portfolio CB Richard Ellis 20.2% Plaza Companies 11.2% Hokanson 8.9% BBL Management 6.8% Transwestern 4.6% PM Realty Group 4.4% VERSA Property Management 2.2% Madison Property Management 1.7% Nath Companies 1.4% Prime Property Management 1.4% Health Connect Properties 1.3% The Galesi Group 1.1% CBRE The Furman Co. 1.0% RJ King & Associates 0.9% Craig Davis Properties 0.8% Cassidy Turley 0.6% Columbus Capital Management 0.5% Crossgate 0.5% Rossetti Management & Realty 0.4% Grand Total* 69.9% * The remaining 31.1% of our portfolio is managed in-house by HTA. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Medical Office Building Portfolio Summary MOB Portfolio by Location Total Building Investment based Revenue MOB Properties Count on Purchase Price (TTM) GLA Occupancy On-campus / Health System Aligned 199 $1,681,730,000 $168,035,000 8,815,000 90% Off-campus 19 125,786,000 14,925,000 531,000 84% Grand Total 218 $1,807,516,000 $182,960,000 9,346,000 90% MOB Portfolio by Lease Type Investment Total MOB Properties by Lease Building based on Revenue     Structure Count Purchase Price (TTM) GLA Occupancy Single-Tenant Buildings Gross Lease 5 $25,304,000 $3,651,000 160,000 99% Triple Net 54 453,732,000 46,301,000 2,136,000 100% Single-Tenant subtotals 59 479,036,000 49,952,000 2,296,000 100% Multi-Tenant Buildings Gross Lease 89 697,920,000 68,734,000 3,911,000 85% Triple Net 70 630,560,000 64,274,000 3,139,000   88% Multi-Tenant subtotals 159 1,328,480,000 133,008,000 7,050,000 87% TOTALS 218 $1,807,516,000 $182,960,000 9,346,000 90% Lease Maturity Summary — Medical Office Properties Expiring GLA (amounts in thousands) Total Leased GLA GLA 2011* 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019+ 9,346 8,393 579 721 719 492 738 757 639 586 3,162 % of total 90% 6% 8% 8% 5% 8% 8% 7% 6% 34% * GLA expiring for the remainder of the year as of 3/31/2011 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Healthcare System Relationships and Quality Tenants Partnering with dominant healthcare providers. Our strong relationships with our hospital systems drive incremental demand for our MOB space, increased tenant retention rates and provide us with further investment opportunities. The national network of medical advisor relationships that we have established and maintained provides us with early market intelligence and the opportunity to acquire prior to full market awareness. Our hospital system relationships include: Greenville Hospital System, Ascension Health, UNC Health Care, Mary Black Health System, Holston Medical Group, REX Health (UNC Health Care), Piedmont HealthCare, St. Vincent Health System, WakeMed Health & Hospitals, Henry Medical Center, Wellmont Health System, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, The Woman’s Hospital of Texas, Deaconess Health System, Catholic Healthcare West, Texas Children’s Hospital, St. John’s Mercy Health Care, St. Rose Dominican Hospitals, Texas Health Resources, Banner Health, Christus St. Vincent, Baylor Health Care System, Northwest Medical Center, Carondelet Health Network, Vanguard Health Systems, Community Health Systems, St. Joseph Medical Center, Indiana University Health, Allina Hospitals & Clinics, MountainStar Healthcare, Aurora Health Care, HealthEast Care System, Swedish Medical Center, St. Rita’s Medical Center, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Community Health Network, Kettering Health Network, MedStar Health, Franciscan Alliance, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, National Institutes of Health, West Penn Allegheny Health System, St. Francis Hospital and Health Centers, Adventist Health System, St. Peter’s Health Care Services, CDPHP, Gwinnett Medical Center, Catholic Health East, East Cooper Medical Center, Putnam Hospital Center, Hilton Head Regional Healthcare, Medical University of South Carolina Health and WellStar Health System. % of % of Top Twenty Credit Rated Annualized Annualized Leased Leased Tenants Location Rating Base Rent Base Rent GLA GLA Greenville Hospital System Greenville, SC A1 (Moody’s) $13,036,000 6.4% 762,000 7.5% Select Med Corp 28 States B (S&P) 9,789,000 4.8% 261,000 2.6% Kindred Healthcare (KND) 46 States B1 (Moody’s) 7,419,000 3.6% 268,000 2.6% Community Health Systems (CHS) 29 States B1 (Moody’s) 6,329,000 3.1% 304,000 3.0% Aurora Health Care Eastern Wisconsin A (Fitch) 6,306,000 3.1% 315,000 3.1% West Penn Allegheny Health System (WPAHS) Western Pennsylvania B2 (Moody’s) 5,904,000 2.9% 266,000 2.6% Indiana University Health Indiana A1 (Moody’s) 5,421,000 2.7% 307,000 3.0% Banner Health (AZ) 7 States AA- (Fitch) 4,280,000 2.1% 213,000 2.1% Hospital Corp of America (TN) 20 states and Great Britain B1 (Moody’s) 4,880,000 2.4% 228,000 2.2% Deaconess Health 6 States A+ (Fitch) 3,772,000 1.9% 261,000 2.6% Sisters of Mercy Healthcare (MO) AR, KS, LA, MO, OK, TX Aa3 (Moody’s) 3,512,000 1.7% 134,000 1.3% Quest Diagnostics (NJ) National Baa2 (Moody’s) 3,076,000 1.5% 118,000 1.2% US Government National AAA (Moody’s) 2,758,000 1.4% 113,000 1.1% Wellmont Health System (TN) TN, VA BBB+ (Fitch) 2,581,000 1.3% 166,000 1.6% Pfizer National AA- (Fitch) 2,261,000 1.1% 98,000 1.0% United Health Group National A2 (Moody’s) 2,154,000 1.1% 104,000 1.0% Catholic Health Partners (OH) KY, TN A1 (Moody’s) 2,006,000 1.0% 140,000 1.4% UNC Health Care NC Aa3 (Moody’s) 1,625,000 0.8% 68,000 0.7% Texas Children’s Hospital TX Aa2 (Moody’s) 1,618,000 0.8% 58,000 0.6% Health Quest Systems NY AA- (Fitch) 1,413,000 0.7% 52,000 0.5% Top Twenty Credit Rated Tenants Totals $90,140,000 44.2% 4,236,000 41.7% Other Credit Rated Tenants Totals $22,390,000 11.0% 1,091,000 10.7% Credit Rated Tenants Totals $112,530,000 55.2% 5,327,000 52.5% Total as of 3/31/11 $203,867,000 10,153,000 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Glossary/Definitions Acquisition-related expenses: Prior to 2009, acquisition-related expenses were capitalized and have historically been added back to FFO over time through depreciation; however, beginning in 2009, acquisition-related expenses related to business combinations are expensed. These acquisition-related expenses have been and will continue to be funded from the proceeds of our offerings and our debt and not from operations. We believe by excluding expensed acquisition-related expenses, MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for our real estate investments. Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO): AFFO is calculated by deducting from MFFO non-incremental capital expenditures, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, amortization of below market ground rent and adding back non-cash items including stock compensation expense and adjusting for gains/losses on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, the effect of straight-line rents and above/below market lease revenues. AFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. AFFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. Annualized Base Rent: Based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of the end of each year and does not reflect tenant concessions. Excludes notes receivable. Assets Held For Sale: Assets and liabilities of properties sold or to be sold are classified as held for sale, to the extent not sold, on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the results of operations of such properties are included in discontinued operations on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. Properties classified as held for sale at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 include four buildings within our Senior Care 1 portfolio, which is a portfolio consisting of six total buildings located in various cities throughout Texas and California. Pursuant to a master lease agreement in effect at the time of our purchase of this portfolio, the lessee of the four buildings within the portfolio that are located in Texas was afforded the option to purchase these buildings at the June 30, 2011 anniversary of the first five years of the ten year lease term. On December 31, 2010, the lessee opened escrow with a deposit of 5% of the minimum repurchase price and provided us with timely notice, as required by the agreement, of its intent to exercise this option. As a result of these actions, in accordance with ASC 360-10-45-9, Property, Plant, and Equipment — Overall — Other Presentation Matters — Long Lived Assets Classified as Held for Sale, we determined that these four buildings met the criteria for held for sale designation as of December 31, 2010 and continue to meet such criteria as of March 31, 2011. We have therefore separately presented the assets and liabilities of these buildings on our interim condensed consolidated balance sheet. Capital Expenditures, Tenant Improvements, Leasing Commissions: Represents amounts paid in cash for 1) recurring and non-recurring capital expenditures required to maintain and re-tenant our properties, 2) second generation tenant improvements, and 3) leasing commissions paid to third party leasing agents to secure new tenants. Distribution Rate: Based on original share price of $10 per share. Distributions are aggregated and paid monthly. It is our intent to continue to pay distributions. However, the amount of distributions we pay to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors, at its discretion, SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for the payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, as well as any liquidity alternative we may pursue in the future. Our board of directors may reduce its distribution rate and we cannot guarantee the amount of distributions paid in the future, if any. EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The real estate industry uses EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as a measure of both operating performance and liquidity. Financial Leverage: Total debt divided by gross real estate assets (based on acquisition price and includes two real estate notes receivable). Fixed Charges: Interest expense and net gain on derivative financial instruments, scheduled principal payments, and amortization — financing fees. We use fixed charges to measure our interest payments on outstanding debt for purposes of presenting fixed charge coverage. Funds from Operations: We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property but including asset impairment write downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. FFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. For more information on FFO, please see our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Gross Leasable Area (GLA): Gross leasable area (in square feet). Gross Lease: Full Service Gross (FSG): Under this type of lease, the tenant pays a pre-determined base rent and operating expenses are typically paid by the Landlord in year 1. In subsequent years, the tenant is responsible for their proportionate share of operating expense increases over the base year. Modified Gross (MG): Similar to a FSG lease, however the tenant pays a pre-determined base rent and some of the operating expenses are typically paid by the tenant instead of the Landlord (i.e. electrical or janitorial). Gross real estate assets: Based on acquisition price and includes two real estate notes receivable. Modified Funds from Operations: We use modified funds from operations, or MFFO, which excludes from FFO transition charges and acquisition-related expenses, to further evaluate how our portfolio might perform after our acquisition stage is complete and the sustainability of our dividend in the future. MFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. MFFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Our calculation of MFFO may have limitations as an analytical tool because it reflects the costs unique to our transition to a self-management model, which may be different from that of other healthcare REITs. Additionally, MFFO reflects features of our ownership interests in our medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities that are unique to us. Companies that are considered to be in our industry may not have similar ownership structures; and therefore those companies may not calculate MFFO in the same manner that we do, or at all, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP and FFO results and using our MFFO as a supplemental measure. MFFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. For more information on MFFO, please see our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mortgage Notes Receivable and Other: We have acquired two other real estate assets including five notes receivable for an aggregate purchase price of $52,135,000. These assets also include ground leases. Please refer to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for more information. Net Operating Income (NOI): NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, generated from our total portfolio of properties (including both our operating properties and those classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2011) before interest expense, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, amortization, acquisition-related expenses, and interest and dividend income. We believe that NOI provides an accurate measure of the operating performance of our operating assets because NOI excludes certain items that are not associated with management of the properties. Additionally, we believe that NOI is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate community. However, our use of the term NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they may have different methodologies for computing this amount. Net Operating Income (NOI) (Cash): NOI (Cash) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as NOI excluding GAAP revenue items including straight line rent and adjustments recorded to reflect above and below market leases in accordance with FAS 141. We believe that NOI (Cash) provides an accurate measure of the operating performance of our operating assets because NOI (Cash) excludes certain items that are not associated with management of the properties. Additionally, we believe that NOI (Cash) is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate community. However, our use of the term NOI (Cash) may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they may have different methodologies for computing this amount. Normalized Funds from Operations: Normalized FFO is calculated by deducting from MFFO termination fee revenue and adjusting for gains/losses on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments. Our internal definition of Normalized FFO differs from the definition per our unsecured line of credit agreement, defined as MFFO plus stock compensation. Normalized FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. Normalized FFO should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011

Occupancy: Occupancy represents the percentage of total gross leasable area that is leased and occupied, including month-to-month leases, as of the date reported. Occupancy is based on leases in place and in effect. Off-Campus: A building or portfolio that is not located on or in close proximity to key hospital based-campuses and is not aligned with recognized healthcare systems. On-Campus / Health System Aligned: A building or portfolio that is either (1) located on or in close proximity to key hospital-based campuses or (2) aligned with recognized healthcare systems. Approximately 94% of our medical office portfolio includes buildings are considered to be on-campus or health system aligned. Total equity raised since inception: Excludes share issuance from Distribution Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) Total Revenue (TTM): Total revenue for the trailing twelve months Transition-related charges: FFO includes certain charges related to the cost of our transition to self-management. These items include, but are not limited to, additional legal expenses, system conversion costs (including updates to certain estimate development procedures) and non-recurring employment costs. Because MFFO excludes such costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information by focusing on the changes in our fundamental operations that will be comparable rather than on such transition charges. We do not believe such costs will recur now that our transition to a self-management infrastructure is complete. Triple Net (NNN): Under this lease, the tenant pays a monthly lump sum base rent as well as the property taxes, the property insurance, and the maintenance. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION: FIRST QUARTER 2011