Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA INC | a59662exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA INC | a59662exv32w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: April 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 0-21296
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California | 95-3759463 | |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3450 East Miraloma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(714) 414-4000
(Registrants telephone number)
(Registrants telephone number)
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o |
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o |
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): |
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated Filer þ | Non-Accelerated Filer o | Smaller Reporting Company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ |
On June 3, 2011, the registrant had 66,294,379 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended April 30, 2011
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended April 30, 2011
Index
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited, all amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)
April 30, 2011 | January 29, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 24,705 | $ | 63,710 | ||||
Merchandise inventories |
115,837 | 95,701 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
13,393 | 11,669 | ||||||
Other current assets |
5,335 | 4,773 | ||||||
Total current assets |
159,270 | 175,853 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET: |
||||||||
Gross property and equipment |
612,427 | 619,478 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(430,310 | ) | (426,298 | ) | ||||
Total property and equipment, net |
182,117 | 193,180 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,243 | 6,243 | ||||||
Other assets |
25,759 | 26,000 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 373,389 | $ | 401,276 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 49,247 | $ | 41,028 | ||||
Other current liabilities |
39,337 | 42,186 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
88,584 | 83,214 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Deferred lease incentives |
26,538 | 28,553 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
19,382 | 19,786 | ||||||
Mortgage debt, long-term portion |
28,962 | 29,093 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
26,116 | 26,296 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
100,998 | 103,728 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 170,859,375 shares authorized; 66,257,144
and 66,173,397 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
663 | 662 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
12,535 | 11,593 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
170,609 | 202,079 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
183,807 | 214,334 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 373,389 | $ | 401,276 | ||||
See accompanying footnotes
3
Table of Contents
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(unaudited, all amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)
First Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 30, 2011 | May 1, 2010 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 185,754 | $ | 190,308 | ||||
Cost of goods sold, including buying, distribution and occupancy costs |
150,264 | 147,842 | ||||||
Gross margin |
35,490 | 42,466 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
66,142 | 73,154 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(30,652 | ) | (30,688 | ) | ||||
Other expense, net |
542 | 2 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(31,194 | ) | (30,690 | ) | ||||
Income tax provision |
276 | 338 | ||||||
Net loss |
$ | (31,470 | ) | $ | (31,028 | ) | ||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (31,470 | ) | $ | (31,028 | ) | ||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
$ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
66,202,568 | 65,837,928 |
See accompanying footnotes
4
Table of Contents
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, all amounts in thousands)
First Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 30, 2011 | May 1, 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (31,470 | ) | $ | (31,028 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11,985 | 14,029 | ||||||
Asset impairment and loss on asset disposals |
2,435 | 5,522 | ||||||
Non-cash stock based compensation |
977 | 1,171 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Merchandise inventories |
(20,136 | ) | (16,957 | ) | ||||
Other current assets |
(2,586 | ) | 536 | |||||
Other assets |
241 | 199 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
8,219 | 4,404 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
(2,392 | ) | (6,909 | ) | ||||
Deferred lease incentives |
(2,015 | ) | (2,821 | ) | ||||
Deferred rent |
(404 | ) | (422 | ) | ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
(96 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(35,242 | ) | (32,412 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(3,860 | ) | (3,960 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from insurance settlement |
300 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,560 | ) | (3,960 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Principal payments under mortgage borrowings |
(122 | ) | | |||||
Principal payments under capital lease and long-term debt obligations |
(84 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
3 | | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(203 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(39,005 | ) | (36,459 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
63,710 | 93,091 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ | 24,705 | $ | 56,632 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 525 | $ | 12 | ||||
Cash paid/(refunded) for income taxes |
$ | 384 | $ | (182 | ) | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: |
||||||||
Property and equipment purchases accrued at end of period |
$ | 795 | $ | 1,619 |
See accompanying footnotes
5
Table of Contents
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Company) is
a leading specialty retailer rooted in the action sports, fashion and music influences of the
California lifestyle. The Company sells a combination of branded and proprietary casual apparel,
accessories and footwear designed to appeal to teens and young adults. It operates a nationwide,
primarily mall-based chain of retail stores under the names Pacific Sunwear and PacSun. In
addition, the Company operates an e-commerce website at www.pacsun.com which sells PacSun
merchandise online, provides content and community for its target customers, and provides
information about the Company. The Company, a California corporation, was incorporated in August
1982. As of April 30, 2011, the Company leased and operated 827 stores in each of the 50 states and
Puerto Rico.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited and have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. These Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29,
2011 (the 2010 Annual Report) filed with the SEC. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
include the accounts of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Pacific Sunwear
Stores Corp. and Miraloma Borrower Corporation). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring entries necessary
for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as well as the reported
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these
estimates. The results of operations for the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 28,
2012 (fiscal 2011).
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Information regarding significant accounting policies is contained in Note 1, Nature of Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the
2010 Annual Report. Presented below in the following notes is supplemental information that should
be read in conjunction with Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in that Report.
Income Taxes
The Company calculates its interim income tax provision in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 270, Interim Reporting
and ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (ASC 740). At the end of each interim period,
the Company estimates the annual effective tax rate and applies that rate to its ordinary quarterly
earnings. The tax expense or benefit related to significant, unusual, or extraordinary items is
recognized in the interim period in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in
enacted tax laws, rates or tax status is recognized in the interim period in which the change
occurs. The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate at each interim period requires
certain estimates and significant judgment including the expected operating income for the year,
permanent and temporary differences as a result of differences between amounts measured and
recognized in accordance with tax laws and financial accounting standards, and the likelihood of
recovering deferred tax assets generated in the current fiscal
6
Table of Contents
year. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new
events occur, additional information is obtained or as the tax environment changes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This
ASU establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements including multiple
revenue-generating activities. This ASU provides amendments to the criteria for separating
deliverables and measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of
accounting. The amendments in this ASU also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the
selling price of a deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures are also required to provide
information about a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information about
the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The
amendments in this ASU also require providing information about the significant judgments made and
changes to those judgments and about how the application of the relative selling-price method
affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The amendments in this ASU are effective
prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Based on the Companys evaluation of this ASU, the adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include
Software Elements. This ASU changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include
both tangible products and software elements that are essential to the functionality, and scopes
these products out of current software revenue guidance. The new guidance will include factors to
help companies determine what software elements are considered essential to the functionality.
The amendments in this ASU will now subject software-enabled products to other revenue guidance and
disclosure requirements, such as guidance surrounding revenue arrangements with
multiple-deliverables. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010. Based on the Companys evaluation of this ASU, the adoption of this statement did not have a
material impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4. FAIR VALUE OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Based on reviews of
the operating performance and projections of underperforming stores, the Company determined that
certain underperforming stores would not be able to generate sufficient cash flows over the
remaining life of the related leases to recover the Companys investment in the stores. As a
result, during the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011, the Company recorded non-cash
impairment charges of approximately $2.4 million within selling, general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations to write-down the carrying value of
long-lived store assets to their estimated fair values. Fair value is determined using a discounted
cash flow model which requires Level 3 inputs (as defined in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures). The impairment charge reduced the carrying amount of the applicable
long-lived assets as follows for the first quarters ended (in millions):
April 30, | May 1, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Carrying value of assessed long-lived assets |
$ | 3 | $ | 7 | ||||
Less: Impairment charge |
(2 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Fair value of assessed long-lived assets |
$ | 1 | $ | 2 | ||||
5. CREDIT FACILITY
The Company has an asset-backed credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders (the Credit
Facility) which expires on April 29, 2013, and provides for a secured revolving line of credit of
up to $150 million that can be increased to up to $225 million subject to lender approval.
Extensions of credit under the Credit Facility are limited to a borrowing base consisting of
specified percentages of eligible categories of assets, primarily cash and inventory (generally,
75% of inventories). The Credit Facility is available for direct borrowing and, subject to
borrowing base
7
Table of Contents
availability ($72 million at April 30, 2011), up to $75 million is available for the issuance of
letters of credit and up to $15 million is available for swing-line loans. The Credit Facility is
secured by cash, cash equivalents, deposit accounts, securities accounts, credit card receivables
and inventory. Direct borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at the administrative
agents alternate base rate (as defined, 3.5% at April 30, 2011) or at optional interest rates that
are primarily dependent upon LIBOR or the federal funds effective rate for the time period chosen.
Based on current forecasts and plans for the year, the Company believes that cash flows from
operating activities, working capital, borrowing availability under the Credit Facility, and other
available sources of financing will be sufficient to meet its operating and capital expenditure
needs for the next twelve months. At April 30, 2011, the Company had no direct borrowings and $22
million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility resulting in remaining
availability of $50 million.
The Company is not subject to any financial covenant restrictions under the Credit Facility unless
total remaining borrowing availability under the Credit Facility falls below $15 million at any
point in time, or 10% of the aggregate lender commitments in the event the Credit Facility is
increased beyond $150 million. The Company is restricted from incurring additional indebtedness or
liens in excess of certain levels specified by the Credit Facility. In general, the Company is not
allowed to incur additional secured indebtedness, but can obtain unsecured indebtedness outside of
the Credit Facility up to $150 million. Additionally, the Credit Facility contains specific limits
on particular kinds of indebtedness, as defined in the Credit Facility agreement, and such
agreement contains other typical affirmative and negative covenants, such as obligations to deliver
financial statements, provide certain notices, comply with laws, and not enter into certain
transactions or make certain payments without the consent of the lenders.
6. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
As of the dates presented, other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
April 30, | January 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Accrued gift cards |
$ | 9,453 | $ | 12,046 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
7,221 | 10,036 | ||||||
Sales taxes payable |
4,011 | 4,120 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability |
2,147 | 2,147 | ||||||
Accrued capital expenditures |
795 | 1,298 | ||||||
Other |
15,710 | 12,539 | ||||||
Total other current liabilities |
$ | 39,337 | $ | 42,186 | ||||
7. MORTGAGE DEBT
On August 20, 2010, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Miraloma Borrower
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Miraloma), and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., a California
corporation (PacSun Stores), executed two promissory notes pursuant to which borrowings in an
aggregate amount of $29.8 million from American National Insurance Company (Anico) were incurred.
The note executed by Miraloma (the Miraloma Note) is in the amount of $16.8 million and bears
interest at the rate of 6.50% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments under the Miraloma
Note commenced on October 1, 2010, and are $113,435. The principal and interest payments are based
on a 25-year amortization schedule. The remaining principal balance of the Miraloma Note, and any
accrued but unpaid interest thereon (estimated to be $14.4 million), will be due in full on
September 1, 2017. The Miraloma Note is secured by a deed of trust on the building and land
comprising the Companys principal executive offices in Anaheim, California and is non-recourse to
the Company. The Miraloma Note does not contain any financial covenants. In connection with the
Miraloma Note, the Company transferred the building and related land securing the note to Miraloma
and entered into a lease for the building and land with Miraloma. Miraloma paid a prepayment fee to
Anico equal to 1% of the principal amount of the note on the closing date of the transaction. As a
result, Miraloma may prepay the note, in whole, but not in part, at any time without penalty upon
30 days prior written notice to Anico.
The note executed by PacSun Stores (the PacSun Stores Note) is in the amount of $13.0 million and
bears interest at the rate of 6.50% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments under the
PacSun Stores Note commenced
8
Table of Contents
on October 1, 2010, and are $87,777. The principal and interest payments are based on a 25-year
amortization schedule. The remaining principal balance of the PacSun Stores Note, and any accrued
but unpaid interest thereon (estimated to be $11.2 million), will be due in full on September 1,
2017. The PacSun Stores Note is secured by a mortgage on the Companys leasehold interest in the
building and land comprising the Companys distribution center in Olathe, Kansas, and is
unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. The PacSun Stores Note does not contain any financial
covenants. PacSun Stores paid a prepayment fee to Anico equal to 1% of the principal amount of the
note on the closing date of the transaction. As a result, PacSun Stores may prepay the note, in
whole, but not in part, at any time without penalty upon 30 days prior written notice to Anico.
These transactions generated net cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $28 million. As of
April 30, 2011, remaining aggregate principal payments required under these mortgage debt
borrowings are as follows (in thousands):
FISCAL YEAR ENDING: |
||||
January 28, 2012 |
$ | 339 | ||
February 2, 2013 |
583 | |||
February 1, 2014 |
548 | |||
January 31, 2015 |
589 | |||
January 30, 2016 |
651 | |||
Thereafter |
26,766 | |||
29,476 | ||||
Less current portion |
514 | |||
Mortgage debt, long-term |
$ | 28,962 | ||
Interest expense recorded on the mortgage debt was $0.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2011.
8. INCOME TAXES
The provisions codified within ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740), require companies to assess
whether valuation allowances should be established against their deferred tax assets based on
consideration of all available evidence using a more likely than not standard. In accordance with
ASC 740, a full valuation allowance was established during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009 and
continues to be maintained on all federal and the majority of state deferred tax assets. Remaining
net state deferred tax assets of $4 million were not reserved as the Company concluded it is more
likely than not that these net deferred tax assets would be utilized before expiration. The Company
has discontinued recognizing federal and certain state income tax benefits until it is determined
that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to realize
the deferred income tax assets.
The Company is also currently evaluating whether an ownership change has occurred under Internal
Revenue Code Section 382. If the Company determines that an ownership change has occurred, its
ability to utilize federal net operating loss carryforwards may be limited. As reported in the
2010 Annual Report, tax effected federal net operating losses of $40.5 million were carried forward
to fiscal 2011 and will begin to expire in fiscal tax year 2029.
9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense for each of the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was
included in the cost of goods sold for buying and distribution employees ($0.3 million in each
quarter) and in selling, general and administrative expenses for all other employees ($0.6 million
and $0.8 million, respectively).
Stock Options
The Company granted stock options for 13,750 and 341,500 shares under the 2005 Performance
Incentive Plan during the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, at a weighted
average grant-date fair value of $2.15 and $3.00 per share, respectively. The Company records
compensation expense for employee stock options based on
9
Table of Contents
the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The table below summarizes the assumptions used in the valuation of stock options:
First Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 30, 2011 | May 1, 2010 | |||||||
Expected life |
4 years | 4 years | ||||||
Expected volatility |
82.9 | % | 79.4 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.6 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
| |
Non-vested Stock Awards
The Company granted non-vested stock awards for 619,375 and 184,750 shares during the first
quarters of each of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, at a weighted average grant-date fair value
of $3.55 and $5.09, respectively.
As of April 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $5 million of compensation expense related to
non-vested stock options and non-vested stock awards, net of estimated forfeitures, not yet
recognized. This compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of approximately 2.8 years. The amount of unrecognized compensation expense noted above does not
necessarily represent the amount that will ultimately be recognized by the Company in its Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements due to actual forfeitures.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
Charles Pfeiffer, individually and on behalf of other aggrieved employees vs. Pacific Sunwear of
California, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., Superior Court of California, County of
Riverside, Case No. 1100527. On January 13, 2011, the plaintiff in this matter filed a lawsuit
against the Company alleging violations of Californias wage and hour, overtime, meal break and
rest break rules and regulations, among other things. The complaint seeks an unspecified amount of
damages and penalties. The Company filed an answer denying all allegations regarding the
plaintiffs claims and asserting various defenses. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is
uncertain no amounts have been accrued by the Company as of the date of this Report. Depending on
the actual outcome of this case, provisions could be recorded in the future which may have an
adverse effect on the Companys operating results and cash flows.
Phillip Gleason, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated vs. Pacific Sunwear of
California, Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 457654. On March
21, 2011, the plaintiff in this matter filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company
alleging violations of Californias wage and hour, overtime, meal break and rest break rules and
regulations, among other things. The complaint seeks class certification, the appointment of the
plaintiff as class representative, and an unspecified amount of damages and penalties. The Company
has filed an answer denying all allegations regarding the plaintiffs claims and asserting various
defenses. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, no amounts have been accrued by the
Company as of the date of this Report. Depending on the actual outcome of this case, provisions
could be recorded in the future which may have an adverse effect on the Companys operating results
and cash flows.
Tamara Beeney, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
vs. Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corporation, Superior Court of
California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2011-00459346-CU-OE-CXC. On March 18, 2011, the plaintiff
in this matter filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company alleging violations of
Californias wage and hour, overtime, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, among other
things. The complaint seeks class certification, the appointment of the plaintiff as class
representative, and an unspecified amount of damages and penalties. The Company filed an answer
denying all allegations regarding the plaintiffs claims and asserting various defenses. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, no amounts have been
accrued by the Company as of the
10
Table of Contents
date of this Report. Depending on the actual outcome of this case, provisions could be recorded in
the future which may have an adverse effect on the Companys operating results and cash flows.
Since the allegations in all three of the above cases are substantially similar, the Company filed
a motion to coordinate the cases in the Los Angeles Superior Court on April 20, 2011.
The Company is also involved from time to time in other litigation incidental to its business. The
Company believes that the outcome of such litigation will not likely have a material adverse effect
on its results of operations or financial condition and, from time to time, it may make provisions
for probable litigation losses. Depending on the actual outcome of pending litigation, charges in
excess of any provisions could be recorded in the future, which may have an adverse effect on the
Companys operating results and cash flows.
Letters of Credit
The Company has issued guarantees in the form of commercial letters of credit primarily as security
for merchandise shipments from overseas. The Company had approximately $22 million of such letters
of credit outstanding at April 30, 2011. All in-transit merchandise covered by letters of credit is
accrued for in accounts payable.
11. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates exclusively in the retail apparel industry. The Company distributes, designs
and produces clothing and related products catering to teens and young adults through its primarily
mall-based PacSun retail stores. The Company has identified three operating segments: PacSun
stores, PacSun Outlet stores and pacsun.com. The three operating segments have been aggregated into
one reportable segment based on the similar
nature of products sold, production, merchandising and distribution processes involved, target
customers, and economic characteristics among the three operating segments.
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted average number of
shares outstanding adjusted for the incremental shares attributed to outstanding options to
purchase common stock using the treasury stock method, if dilutive. In periods where a net loss is
reported, incremental shares are excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive. In such
circumstances, the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in the basic and diluted earnings
per common share calculations will be the same. Anti-dilutive options and non-vested shares are
excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because either the option exercise
price or the grant date fair value of the non-vested share is greater than the market price of the
Companys common stock. Options to purchase 2,762,839 and 3,154,687 shares of common stock in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
11
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
(MD&A) should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and we intend that such forward-looking statements be
subject to the safe harbors created thereby. In Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 29, 2011 (the 2010 Annual Report), we provide cautionary
statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those projected in the forward-looking statements contained herein. Any statements that
express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions,
future events or performance (often, but not always, identifiable by the use of words or phrases
such as will result, expects to, will continue, anticipates, plans, intends,
estimated, projects and outlook) are not historical facts and may be forward-looking and,
accordingly, such statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties which could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.
Examples of forward-looking statements in this Report include, but are not limited to, the
following categories of expectations about:
| the sufficiency of operating cash flows, working capital and available credit to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements, |
| our capital expenditure plans for fiscal 2011, |
| potential recording of non-cash impairment charges for underperforming stores in future quarters, |
| increases in product sourcing costs, |
| forecasts of future store closures, expansions, relocations and store refreshes during fiscal 2011, and |
| future increases in occupancy expenses. |
All forward-looking statements included in this Report are based on information available to us as
of the date hereof, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. See Item 1A, Risk
Factors, in the 2010 Annual Report, which are hereby incorporated by reference in this Report for a
discussion of these risks and uncertainties. We assume no obligation to update or revise any such
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after such statements are
made.
Executive Overview
We consider the following items to be key performance indicators in evaluating our performance:
Comparable (or same store) sales. Stores are deemed comparable stores on the first day of the
fiscal month following the one-year anniversary of their opening or expansion/relocation. We
consider same store sales to be an important indicator of current Company performance. Same store
sales results are important in achieving operating leverage of certain expenses such as store payroll, store occupancy, depreciation, general and
administrative expenses and other costs that are somewhat fixed. Positive same store sales results
usually generate greater operating
12
Table of Contents
leverage of expenses while negative same store sales results
generally have a negative impact on operating leverage. Same store sales results also have a direct
impact on our net sales, cash and working capital.
Net merchandise margins. We analyze the components of net merchandise margins, specifically initial
markups and markdowns as a percentage of net sales. Any inability to obtain acceptable levels of
initial markups or any significant increase in our use of markdowns could have an adverse impact on
our gross margin results and results of operations.
Operating margin. We view operating margin as a key indicator of our success. The key drivers of
operating margins are comparable store net sales, net merchandise margins, and our ability to
control operating expenses. For a discussion of the changes in the components comprising operating
margins, see Results of Operations in this section.
Store sales trends. We evaluate store sales trends in assessing the operational performance of our
stores. Important store sales trends include average net sales per store and average net sales per
square foot.
Cash flow and liquidity (working capital). We evaluate cash flow from operations, liquidity and
working capital to determine our short-term operational financing needs. Based on current forecasts
and plans for fiscal 2011, we believe that cash flows from operating activities, working capital,
borrowing availability under our Credit Facility, and other available sources of financing will be
sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months.
However, if we were to experience a same-store sales decline similar to what occurred in
fiscal 2010, combined with further gross margin erosion, we may have to access most, if not all, of
the Credit Facility and potentially require other sources of financing to fund our operations,
which might not be available. At April 30, 2011, we had no direct borrowings under the Credit
Facility. For a discussion of the changes in operating cash flows and working capital, see Liquidity and
Capital Resources in this section.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the
information provided in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included in the 2010 Annual Report.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected income statement data expressed as a percentage of net
sales for the fiscal quarters indicated. The discussion that follows should be read in conjunction
with the following table:
First Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 30, 2011 | May 1, 2010 | |||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of goods sold, including buying, distribution and occupancy costs |
80.9 | 77.7 | ||||||
Gross margin |
19.1 | 22.3 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
35.6 | 38.4 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(16.5 | ) | (16.1 | ) | ||||
Other expense, net |
0.3 | 0.0 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(16.8 | ) | (16.1 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
0.1 | 0.2 | ||||||
Net loss |
(16.9 | )% | (16.3 | )% | ||||
Numbers of stores open at end of period |
827 | 883 | ||||||
Total square footage (in 000s) |
3,222 | 3,421 |
13
Table of Contents
The first quarter ended April 30, 2011 as compared to the first quarter ended May 1, 2010
Net Sales
Net sales decreased to $186 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from $190 million for the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. The components of this $4 million decrease in net sales are as
follows:
$ millions | Attributable to | |||
$ | (7 | ) | 25 store closures. |
|
2 | Non-comparable sales from new, expanded or relocated stores not yet included in the comparable store base and e-commerce net sales. | |||
1 | 1% increase in comparable store net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, due to a mid-single digit percentage improvement in average sale transaction, partially offset by a low-single digit percentage decline in total transactions. The improvement in the average sale transaction was driven primarily by a low-single digit percentage increase in average unit retail prices. | |||
$ | (4 | ) | Total |
|
For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, comparable store net sales of Womens increased 4% and Mens
decreased 3%. Apparel represented 85% of total sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 versus
88% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Accessories and footwear represented a combined 15% of
total sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 versus 12% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Gross Margin
Gross margin, after buying, distribution and occupancy costs, was $35 million for the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 versus $42 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. As a percentage of net
sales, gross margin was 19.1% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to 22.3% for the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The components of this 3.2% decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net
sales were as follows:
% | Attributable to | ||||
(2.7 | ) | Decrease in merchandise margin rate primarily due to increased markdowns as a percentage of sales. |
|||
(0.3 | ) | Deleverage of occupancy costs. Occupancy costs were $47 million in each of the first quarters of
fiscal 2011 and 2010. |
|||
(0.2 | ) | Deleverage of buying and distribution costs. Buying and distribution costs were $9 million in each of the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010. | |||
(3.2 | ) | Total |
|||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased to $66 million for the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 from $73 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $7
million, or 9.6%. These expenses decreased to 35.6% as a percentage of net sales in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 from 38.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The components of this 2.8%
decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were as
follows:
14
Table of Contents
% | Attributable to | ||||
(1.6 | ) | Decrease in non-cash asset impairment charges of $3 million. |
|||
(1.1 | ) | Decrease in payroll and payroll-related expenses as a percentage of sales due to cost saving initiatives. In dollars, payroll and payroll-related expenses declined $3 million. | |||
(0.9 | ) | Decrease in depreciation expense. In dollars, depreciation expense declined $2 million. |
|||
0.8 | Increase in other SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales. In dollars, other SG&A
expenses increased $1 million. |
||||
(2.8 | ) | Total |
|||
We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets for all stores
(primarily property and equipment) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. For a discussion of impairment charges,
see Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report, which
information is incorporated herein by reference. Should comparable store net sales and gross margin
continue to decline, we may record additional non-cash impairment charges within selling, general
and administrative expenses for underperforming stores in future quarters.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense was $0.5 million for the first fiscal quarter of 2011 primarily due to recording
interest expense related to the promissory notes for the mortgage transactions described in Note 7
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Income Taxes
We recognized income tax expense of $0.3 million for each of the first quarters of fiscal 2011 and
2010. Our effective income tax rate was (0.9)% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 versus (1.1)% in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. For fiscal 2011, we expect to continue to maintain a valuation
allowance against deferred tax assets resulting in minimal income tax expense for the year. As a
result of recording income tax provisions for certain state and local tax jurisdictions against our
pre-tax operating losses, the effective income tax rate was negative in the first quarter of fiscal
2011 and 2010. For further information, see Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Net Loss and Net Loss per Share
Our net loss for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was $31 million, or $(0.48) per share, versus a
net loss of $31 million, or $(0.47) per share, for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Amounts for
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 include the continuing impact of a valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets. On a non-GAAP basis, excluding the impact of this valuation allowance and
using a normalized 36.5% income tax rate, our net loss for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was $20
million, or $(0.30) per share, versus a non-GAAP net loss of $20 million, or $(0.30) per share for
the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
About Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The preceding paragraph contains non-GAAP financial measures, including non-GAAP net loss and
non-GAAP net loss per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010. Non-GAAP financial
measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures do not reflect a
comprehensive system of accounting, differ from GAAP measures with the same names, and may differ
from non-GAAP financial measures with the same or similar names that are used by other companies.
We compute non-GAAP financial measures using a consistent methodology from quarter to
quarter and year to year. We may consider whether other significant items that arise in the future
should be excluded from the non-GAAP financial measures.
15
Table of Contents
We excluded a deferred tax asset valuation allowance charge in presenting a non-GAAP net loss
amount and per share amount above under the caption Net Loss and Net Loss per Share. We believe
that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our
operating results primarily because they exclude amounts that are not considered part of ongoing
operating results when planning and forecasting and when assessing the performance of the
organization, individual operating segments or its senior management. In addition, we believe that
non-GAAP financial information is used by analysts and others in the investment community to
analyze our historical results and to provide estimates of future performance versus the results
and estimates of others. We believe that failure to report these non-GAAP measures excluding the
impact of the valuation allowance could result in confusion among investors and analysts by
creating a misplaced perception that our results have underperformed or exceeded expectations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have typically financed our operations primarily from internally generated cash flow, with
occasional short-term and long-term borrowings. Our primary cash requirements have been for the
financing of inventories and construction of newly opened, remodeled, expanded or relocated stores.
Based on current forecasts and plans for the year, we believe that cash flows from operating
activities, working capital, borrowing availability under our Credit Facility, and other available
sources of financing will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure needs for the
next twelve months. If we were to experience a same-store sales decline similar to what occurred in
fiscal 2010, combined with further gross margin erosion, we may be required to access most, if not
all, of our Credit Facility and potentially require other sources of financing to fund our
operations, which might not be available. At April 30, 2011, we had no direct borrowings under the
Credit Facility.
(In thousands) | April 30, | May 1, | ||||||
FIRST QUARTER ENDED | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (35,242 | ) | $ | (32,412 | ) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,560 | ) | (3,960 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(203 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents. |
$ | (39,005 | ) | $ | (36,459 | ) | ||
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was $35 million. We used
$16 million of cash in operations (net of non-cash charges). In addition, cash decreased $17
million from changes in working capital items (primarily merchandise inventories) and $2 million
due to changes in other assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in operating activities for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was $32 million. We used
$10 million of cash in operations (net of non-cash charges). In addition, cash decreased $19
million from changes in working capital items (primarily merchandise inventories) and $3 million
due to changes in other assets and liabilities.
Working Capital
Working capital at April 30, 2011 was $71 million compared to $93 million at January 29, 2011, a
decrease of $22 million. The changes in working capital were as follows:
$ millions | Description | |||
$ | 93 | Working capital at January 29, 2011 |
||
(39 | ) | Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (see Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows). |
||
12 | Increase in inventories, net of accounts payable. |
|||
3 | Decrease in other current liabilities. |
|||
2 | Increase in other current assets. |
|||
$ | 71 | Working capital at April 30, 2011 |
||
16
Table of Contents
Investing Cash Flows
Net cash used in investing activities in the first quarter of each of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $4
million. Investing cash flows for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010 were comprised
primarily of capital expenditures. We expect total capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 to be
approximately $15 to $17 million.
Credit Facility
Information regarding our Credit Facility is contained in Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
Mortgage Transactions
Information regarding our mortgage debt transactions is contained in Note 7 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
Contractual Obligations
We have minimum annual rental commitments under existing store leases as well as a minor amount of
capital leases for computer equipment. We lease all of our retail store locations under operating
leases. We lease equipment, from time to time, under both capital and operating leases. In
addition, at any time, we are contingently liable for commercial letters of credit with foreign
suppliers of merchandise. At April 30, 2011, our future financial commitments under all existing
contractual obligations were as follows:
Payments Due by Period (in $ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less | More | |||||||||||||||||||
than 1 | 1-3 | 3-5 | than 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | year | years | years | years | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
$ | 489 | $ | 93 | $ | 157 | $ | 117 | $ | 122 | ||||||||||
Mortgage debt |
29 | <1 | 1 | 1 | 27 | |||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
22 | 22 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Guaranteed minimum royalties |
5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | | |||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
<1 | <1 | <1 | | | |||||||||||||||
ASC 740 (FIN 48) obligations
including interest and
penalties |
<1 | <1 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 546 | $ | 117 | $ | 161 | $ | 119 | $ | 149 | ||||||||||
We have an aggregate of nearly 400 lease expirations for reconsideration through 2013. These leases
will either be renewed or extended, potentially at different rates, or be allowed to expire. As a
result, depending on market conditions, actual future rental commitments and the time frame of such
commitments may differ significantly from those shown in the table above.
The contractual obligations table above does not include common area maintenance (CAM) charges,
which are also a required contractual obligation under our store operating leases. In many of our
leases, CAM charges are not fixed and can fluctuate significantly from year to year for any
particular store. Additionally, total CAM expenses may continue to fluctuate significantly from
year to year as long-term leases come up for renewal at current market rates in excess of original
lease terms and as we continue to close stores.
We lease our retail stores and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at
various dates through January 2023. Substantially all of our retail store leases require us to pay
minimum rent, CAM charges, insurance, property taxes and additional percentage rent based on sales
volumes exceeding certain minimum sales levels. The initial terms of such leases are typically 8 to
10 years, many of which contain renewal options exercisable at our
discretion. Most leases also contain rent escalation clauses that come into effect at various times
throughout the lease term. Rent expense is recorded under the straight-line method over the life of
the lease. Other rent escalation
17
Table of Contents
clauses can take effect based on changes in primary mall tenants
throughout the term of a given lease. Most leases also contain cancellation or kick-out clauses in
our favor that relieve us of any future obligation under a lease if specified sales levels are not
achieved by a specified date. None of our retail store leases contain purchase options.
We review the operating performance of our stores on an ongoing basis to determine which stores, if
any, to expand, relocate or close. We closed 25 stores in the first fiscal quarter of 2011. We
currently anticipate closing approximately 40 to 50 stores for all of fiscal 2011.
The ASC 740 (FIN 48) obligations shown in the table above represent uncertain tax positions related
to temporary differences. The years for which the temporary differences related to the uncertain
tax positions will reverse have been estimated in scheduling the obligations within the table.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to
customers, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters,
including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of such agreements, services to be
provided by us, or intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, we
have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers that will require us,
among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their
status or service as directors or officers. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may
cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers in
certain circumstances.
It is not possible to determine our maximum potential liability under these indemnification
agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and
circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements may not be
subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of
obligations under these agreements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial
guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments, or other contingent
arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other
obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk, or credit risk support to us.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is contained in Note 3 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations in the
recent past. However, we are currently anticipating that product sourcing costs will continue to
increase during fiscal 2011 due to a combination of increases in cotton, labor, fuel and currency
costs. We currently estimate that these cost increases will adversely affect our net merchandise
margins in fiscal 2011. We intend to partially mitigate these increases through a combination of
initiatives such as better product assortments, refined pricing strategies, localization
initiatives, shipment consolidation and detailed reviews of product specifications.
Seasonality and Quarterly Results
Our business is seasonal by nature. Our first quarter historically accounts for the smallest
percentage of annual net sales with each successive quarter contributing a greater percentage than
the last. In recent years, approximately 45% of our net sales have occurred in the first half of
the fiscal year and 55% have occurred in the second half. The
18
Table of Contents
six to seven week selling periods for
each of the back-to-school and holiday seasons together account for approximately 35% to 40% of our
annual net sales and a higher percentage of our operating results on a combined basis. Our
quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of
factors, including changes in consumer buying patterns; fashion trends; the timing and level of
markdowns; the timing of store closings, expansions and relocations; competitive factors; and
general economic conditions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are exposed to interest rate risk from the Credit Facility (see Note 5 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report). Direct borrowings under the Credit
Facility bear interest at the administrative agents alternate base rate (as defined, 3.5% at April
30, 2011) or at optional interest rates that are primarily dependent upon LIBOR or the federal
funds effective rate for the time period chosen. At April 30, 2011 we had no direct borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Facility.
A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the impact of unfavorable changes in interest
rates on our cash flows. The sensitivity analysis quantified that the estimated potential cash flow
impact would be less than $10,000 in additional interest expense (for each $1 million borrowed) if
interest rates were to increase by 10% over a three-month period. Actual interest charges incurred
may differ from those estimated because of changes or differences in market rates, differences in
amounts borrowed, timing and other factors. We are not a party to any derivative financial
instruments.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated
under the Exchange Act. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified by the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are also designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of April 30,
2011.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
19
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
For information on legal proceedings see Litigation within Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Report, which information is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We have included in Part I, Item 1A of the 2010 Annual Report a description of certain risks and
uncertainties that could affect our business, future performance or financial condition (the Risk
Factors). We believe there are no material changes from the disclosure provided in the 2010 Annual
Report with respect to the Risk Factors. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making
an investment decision with respect to the Companys stock.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Reserved.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Incorporated by | ||||||||
Reference | ||||||||
Exhibit # | Exhibit Description | Form | Filing Date | |||||
3.1 | Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company
|
10-Q | 8/31/04 | |||||
3.2 | Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock of the Company
|
8-K | 12/24/98 | |||||
3.3 | Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company
|
8-K | 4/3/09 | |||||
31.1+ | Written statements of Gary H. Schoenfeld and Michael W. Kaplan
pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||||||
32.1+ | Written statement of Gary H. Schoenfeld and Michael W. Kaplan
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
+ | Filed herewith |
20
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: June 6, 2011 | By: | /s/ GARY H. SCHOENFELD | ||
Gary H. Schoenfeld | ||||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
Date: June 6, 2011 | By: | /s/ MICHAEL W. KAPLAN | ||
Michael W. Kaplan | ||||
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
21