Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Company Overview

The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on August 2, 2007 under the name Mojo Shopping, Inc. for the purpose of developing, promoting, and expanding an online retail business. The Company was in the development stage and was focused on online retailing of products such as furniture, design accessories, art, clothing, music and a variety of environmentally friendly products which are designed to appeal to the tastes of young, socially conscious professionals. The Company generated only nominal revenues in the pursuit of its business plan and lacked the financial resources to maintain operations. The Company searched for investment capital to no avail and decided to seek and investigate alternate business opportunities for its shareholders.

On April 28, 2011, the Company filed an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation in Delaware to (i) change its name from Mojo Shopping, Inc. to Mojo Ventures, Inc. and (ii) to increase the number of its authorized shares from 100,000,000 shares to 200,000,000, consisting of 190,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

The Company also effectuated a forward stock split in which each shareholder was issued 25 shares of common stock in exchange for each one share of common stock held by them. The forward split was declared effective by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) on May 9, 2011. Immediately prior to the stock split 4,520,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was issued and outstanding and upon the effectiveness of the stock split there was 113,000,000 shares issued and outstanding.

On May 13, 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Specialty Beverage and Supplement, Inc., a privately held Nevada corporation (“SBSI”) and SBSI Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Acquisition Sub”), pursuant to which SBSI merged with and into Acquisition Sub (the “Merger”) with the filing of the Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 13, 2011 and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the closing of the Merger an aggregate of 19,552,128 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to the holders of SBSI’s common stock in exchange for their shares of SBSI.

On May 13, 2011, simultaneously with the consummation of the Merger, the Company issued 7,462,857 shares of common stock to retire certain debt in SBSI held by the holders of 9% subordinated convertible debentures. These noteholders contributed financing to SBSI and agreed to convert their debt in SBSI into the Company’s common stock.

Upon the closing of the Merger, Ms. Janieszewski resigned as President, Secretary, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the sole director of the Company. Peter Scalise III was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Scott Ferrari was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer and Neil Rosenberg was appointed Secretary and Treasurer. Simultaneous with the closing, Peter Scalise, Scott Ferrari, Neil Rosenberg, Duncan Weir and Rich Hall were appointed as directors.

On May 13, 2011, simultaneously with the consummation of the Merger, in a separate transaction, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with its former Chief Executive Officer and sole director, Ms. Janieszewski. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company transferred all of its membership interests in Mojo Shopping, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary (the “LLC”), to Ms. Janieszewski in exchange for the assumption of account payables that the Company owed to third party creditors in the amount of approximately $200,000, the cancellation of 80,000,000 of her shares of the Company’s common stock, and the cancellation of indebtedness owed by the Company to Ms. Janieszewski in the amount of $2,759. Also, simultaneously with the consummation of the Merger, two minority shareholders cancelled an aggregate of 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company intends to carry on SBSI’s business as its sole line of business. The Company has relocated its executive offices to 836 Grundy Avenue, Holbrook, New York 11741 and its telephone number is (631)-750-3195

SBSI was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 3, 2008. SBSI is currently engaged in the development of beverage products and vitamin supplements, such as energy drinks, sports drinks, wellness beverages, ready to drink (“RTD”) iced teas and vitamin enhanced kids drinks. SBSI is also developing vitamin and supplement lines for the sports, fitness and health industries.

Form 10 information concerning SBSI, the Merger and related transactions will be contained in a Current Report on Form 8-K that will be filed within 4 business days of the closing of the Merger.

Results of Operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the Period from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011

We generated no revenues for the three or six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and only $2,447 for the period from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011.

We incurred $20,847 in operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compare with $20,151 in operating expenses for the same period ended March 31, 2010. We incurred $58,167 in operating expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2011, as compare with $22,832 in operating expenses for the same period ended March 31, 2010. For all periods mentioned our operating expenses consisted of general and administrative expenses. Our operating expenses from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011 were $238,646.

We expect that our operating expenses will increase as we are able to locate funds and pursue business operations. Until then, our operating expenses will include general and administrative expenses for accounting fees, legal costs and other miscellaneous items.

We had a net loss of $20,847 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared with a net loss of $20,151 for the same period ended March 31, 2010. We had a net loss of $58,167 for the six months ended March 31, 2011, as compared with a net loss of $22,832 for the same period ended March 31, 2010. We have an accumulated net loss of $240,688 from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2011, we had total current assets of $327, consisting entirely of cash. Our total current liabilities as of March 31, 2011 were $209,460. Thus, we have a working capital deficit of $209,133, as of March 31, 2011.

Operating Activities used $33,784 in net cash for the period from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011. Investing Activities used $248 in cash for the purchase of software during the period from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011. Financing Activities generated $34,359 in cash during the period from August 2, 2007 (Date of Inception) until March 31, 2011, as a result of a private offering of equity securities raising $31,600 and loans from the Company’s sole officer, Ivona Janieszewski, of $2,759.

As of March 31, 2011, we had $327 in cash. At present, we lack the financial resources to operate and have therefore suspended operations indefinitely. We will need to raise additional funds during the next twelve months in order to resume operations or otherwise execute on our business plan. In addition, our management will consider other business opportunities should they arise.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2011, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

Our financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover our operating costs and allow us to continue as a going concern. Our auditors have indicated that our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until we become profitable. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, we will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet our minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that will be successful in accomplishing any of our plans.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We do not believe that any accounting policies currently fit this definition.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

We do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), as of December 31, 2010, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), who concluded, that because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2010.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This rule defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Ms. Ivona Janieszewski, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.   Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of March 31, 2011 as the result of a material weakness.   The material weakness results from significant deficiencies in internal control that collectively constitute a material weakness.

A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the registrant’s financial reporting.   The Company had the following significant deficiencies at March 31, 2011:

Remediation of Material Weakness

We are unable to remedy our internal controls until we are able to locate another business opportunity, or receive financing to hire additional employees.  At this time, we are effectively not a going concern.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 1A:Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Removed and Reserved

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.